INCLUSIVE PEACEBUILDING:
How civil society can fill the gap in UN peacebuilding efforts
MAY 2015
In March 2014, Ambassador Antonio de Aguiar Patriota of Brazil, then Chair of the United Nations (UN) Peacebuilding Commission (PBC), told the Security Council that peacebuilding and post-conflict development must not be seen as a “technology of security,” but rather that it has to be “people-centred,” meaning that for efforts to be meaningful they must positively impact the lives of people. The 2015 review of the UN’s Peacebuilding Architecture (PBA), which includes the PBC, the Peacebuilding Fund (PBF) and the Peacebuilding Support Office (PBSO), is an opportunity to examine what a “people-centred” approach to UN peacebuilding looks like. For the PBA to effectively fulfil its mission to assist countries in their recovery from violent conflict and prevent a relapse into violence, it must gauge and measure its success through its impact on people. The 2015 PBA review is an important moment to examine how the UN engages with local people through both the Architecture and other peacebuilding efforts. A challenge for the UN’s approach to peacebuilding in general is that it is often disconnected from the realities on the ground: civil society can bridge this gap. Organised civil society provides the necessary link and local grounding for all its peacebuilding activities, and engaging with civil society offers a way to make these activities more relevant, strategic and catalytic. The founding resolutions of the PBA by the General Assembly and the Security Council recognize “the important contribution of civil society and non-governmental organisations, including women’s organisations, to peacebuilding efforts.”1 Each resolution also “Encourages the Commission to consult with civil society, nongovernmental organisations, including women’s organisations, and the private sector engaged in peacebuilding activities, as appropriate.”2 However, the findings from research conducted by GPPAC and QUNO suggest that these initial aspirations have not translated into meaningful and consistent engagement with civil society, including women’s organisations.3 After extensive consultations with UN experts, member state diplomats, academics and INGOs in New York as well as with a broad section of civil society in Burundi, Liberia and the Central African Republic, the research found that UN efforts to include civil society have been lacking, both in form and substance, and result in a onedimensional sense of national ownership – that of the state only. The mechanisms used for engagement have not successfully harnessed the breadth and depth of the perspectives that civil society has to offer. Participants in the research noted that consultations with civil society groups are currently less about local ownership and more about legitimising pre-planned interventions. As it is always the same actors who are consulted by the UN, the perception is that these actors are (even if unintentionally) pre-determined to prioritise certain issues and activities over others, and usually their priorities match that of the UN and donors. In this way they do not accurately reflect the diversity of viewpoints and peacebuilding work present in society. The result is a rubber-stamping exercise rather than an open process over which people can feel ownership. National ownership, they say, is the result of a process that has touched or involved the whole of society, especially when a country is in transition from a state of conflict or a government has won heavily contested elections. The legitimacy of such a government is by nature more de jure than de facto. 1 See General Assembly resolution 60/180, The Peacebuilding Commission, A/RES/60/180 (30 December 2005), available from undocs.org/ A/RES/60/180, and Security Council resolution 1645 (20 December 2005), available at www.un.org/en/sc/ documents/resolutions/2005.shtml 2 Ibid. 3 Between March 2014 and March 2015, GPPAC and QUNO undertook research on the PBA's current and potential capacity to engage with civil society in New York and in country. The research was supported by the Swedish Ministry for Foreign Affairs, and culminated in the report Filling the Gap: how civil society engagement can help the UN's Peacebuilding Architecture meet its purpose, by Camilla Campisi and Laura Ribeiro Rodrigues Pereira. The report was published in April 2014 and is available at www.gppac.net and www.quno.org