Pupil Premium 2020/2021

Pupil Premium Strategy / Self-Evaluation Summary information School

St Stephen’s (Kearsley Moor) CE Primary School

Academic Year

2020/21

Total PP budget

£60,835

Date of most recent PP review

Sept 2020

Total number of pupils

209

Number of pupils eligible for PP

47

Date for next internal review

Sept 2021

ATTAINMENT 1.

Attainment in End of KS2 Assessments – 2020 (7 PPG pupils) 2.

3. of children in receipt of Pupil Premium Grant - End of Key Stage 2 (2018) % achieving expected standard or above in reading, writing & maths

COVID-19 no validated data

Average scaled score in Reading

COVID-19 no validated data

Average scaled score in Mathematics

COVID-19 no validated data

PPG

Current Year 6 Attainment 20/21 ( PPG pupils) % achieving expected standard or above in reading, writing & maths % making expected progress in reading (as measured in the school) % making expected progress in writing (as measured in the school) % making expected progress in mathematics (as measured in the school) Barriers to future attainment (for pupils eligible for PP – including high ability) Academic Barriers A.

High percentage (72%) from households with no academic qualifications / further education

B.

Poor oral language skills

C.

Limited cultural / life experiences

D.

Lack of confidence / low self esteem

Additional Barriers E.

Lack of parental support / challenging home circumstances

Non PPG (national average)

Intended outcomes (specific outcomes and how they will be measured) A.

Success criteria

Narrow and eliminate gaps between PPG and non-PPG pupils - End of KS2 outcomes and internal school data

Gap between PP and peers not statistically

analysed regularly at Pupil Progress meetings.

significant when compared to national.

B.

Dedicated and targeted support from Learning Mentor builds resilience and self-esteem

Positive Pupil Feedback

C.

To ensure PPG pupils develop talents and have access to all learning experiences – incl. workshops and

Registers indicate 100% participation rate

residentials

for all activities.

3. Review of Expenditure and Impact 2019-2020 

End of Key Stage 2 data showed that Disadvantaged pupils were outperformed significantly by their non-PPG peers – reversing the very positive picture form the previous year when PPG pupils outperformed non-Disadvantaged.



Lower down the school, internal data analysis shows a narrowing of gaps in achievement.



All PPG children accessed the full range of trips, workshops and residential visits on offer.



No significant difference in attendance between PPG and their non-Disadvantaged peers.

Planned Actions and Expenditure - Academic Year 2020 – 20201 i. Quality of Teaching for All svisits 4.

Action Intended outcome

What is the evidence and

How will you ensure it is

Staff

When will you review

rationale for this choice?

implemented well?

lead

implementation?

Ensure the teaching

High quality of

End of Key Stage 2 data

Progress of PPG children will be a

Ongoing – termly Pupil

teams (Teachers and

teaching and

analysis shows PPG children

focus of regular Pupil Progress

Progress meetings.

Teaching Assistants)

learning for all

were outperformed significantly

meetings (at least termly)

are aware of PPG

pupils.

by non-Disadvantaged peers (a

attended by SLT and Learning

End of year review – July

reversal of the position in the

Mentor.

2021

children in class and provide additional

The significant gaps

support as appropriate.

in achievement in

previous year).

Lesson observations and book

some cohorts

Data analysis shows that in

scrutinies will focus on the

further down the

some subjects and in some

attainment and progress of

school will reduce

cohorts there is a significant

targeted pupils.

and disappear by

gap between the achievement of

the end of KS2.

PPG children and their peers

Total budgeted cost

£28,000

Targeted Support Action

Intended outcome

What is the evidence and

How will you ensure it is

Staff

When will you review

rationale for this choice?

implemented well?

lead

implementation?

SLT

Ongoing – termly Pupil

Enhance capacity of TA

Targeted small

Data analysis shows that in

Progress of PPG children will be a

Team to provide a range

group sessions will

some subjects and in some

focus of regular Pupil Progress

of targeted intervention

help build

cohorts there is a significant

meetings (at least termly)

programmes – individual

confidence and lead

gap between the achievement of

attended by SLT and Learning

End of year review – July

and small groups.

to increased self-

PPG children and their peers.

Mentor.

2021

Progress meetings.

esteem and help All classes now have a

pupils to catch up

Analysis of the impact of well

Lesson observations and book

full time Teaching

with peers.

targeted interventions shows

scrutinies will focus on the

that misunderstandings can be

attainment and progress of

effectively addressed through

targeted pupils.

Assistant.

the use of 1:1 and small group sessions.

Learning Mentor to

Children can

Due to a variety of factors

A member of the SLT line manages

Learning

Ongoing – termly Pupil

provide dedicated time

overcome a range of

including home circumstances,

the Learning Mentor with oversight

Mentor

Progress meetings.

to support PPG children

barriers to learning,

many of our children experience

of written reports and regular

in building resilience and

both at home and in

barriers to learning including

performance management

End of year review – July

self-esteem. (Growth

school, and become

lack of confidence and low self -

discussions.

2021

Mindset) to improve

confident

esteem.

mental health and

independent

wellbeing.

learners.

Positive feedback from parents and The role of Learning Mentor is a

pupils in end of year

key position in school and helps

questionnaires.

Also providing whole

to overcome a range of barriers

class ‘mindfulness

to learning experienced by PPG

sessions’ and accessing

children (and others).

external providers for targeted pupil groups.

Learning Mentor and

Parents have more

Many of our parents experience

A member of the SLT line manages

Learning

Ongoing – termly Pupil

Parent Governor to

confidence in

difficulties with behaviour

the Learning Mentor with oversight

Mentor

Progress meetings.

offer ‘Parent Drop-in

engaging with school

management at home and

of written reports and regular

sessions’ to support with

and supporting their

regularly seek advice and

performance management

End of year review – July

behaviour issues at

child’s learning at

support from school.

discussions.

2021

home.

home as evidenced

In addition, some of our ‘hard to

in homework being

reach’ parents are more likely to

Positive feedback from parents and

completed on time,

approach the LM as opposed to

pupils in end of year questionnaires

more frequent

the HT

entries in the Reading Record etc.

Total Budgeted Cost

£25,835 35

ii. Other Approaches Action

Intended outcome

What is the evidence and

How will you ensure it is

rationale for this choice?

implemented well?

Staff lead

When will you review implementation?

Ensure PPG children

Participation in extra-

Evidence from past

Business Manager/Office

Various

End of year review – July

have opportunity to

curricular activities is

registration in extra-

Manager will promote and

outside

2021

participate in extra-

accessible for all.

curricular clubs shows low

monitor participation.

providers

curricular clubs which may incur cost

numbers of participation by Removal of financial

PPG children

pressures from parents of PPG children.

Ensure PPG children

Increased participation

Recognised talents are

Business Manager/Office

Minshall

End of year review – July

have opportunity to

in 1:1 music tuition

sometimes not developed due

Manager will promote and

Music

2021

develop talents by

to lack of parental ability to

monitor participation. Minshall

taking part in 1:1 music

support financially.

Music will highlight possible

tuition, and have access

participants

to the instrument of choice Fund all field study

100% participation

Some parents experience

Business Manager/Office

Class

End of year review – July

visits, workshops and

rates in all trips and

financial hardship and feel

Manager will promote and

Teachers

2021

residentials for PP

workshops for Pupil

under pressure in the face of

monitor participation.

pupils.

Premium children.

requests for payment for school activities.

Removal of financial pressures from parents of PPG children.

Total Budgeted Cost

£7,0000