Mo Honarkar vs Mahender Makhijani and Continuum Analytics _ Arbitration and Bankruptcy

TheHonarkarvsMakhijaniDispute:AComprehensive AnalysisofAllegations,Arbitration,andBankruptcy

I.Introduction:UnravelingtheHonarkarvsMakhijaniLegalSaga

ThelegaldisputebetweenMohammadHonarkarandMahenderMakhijanirepresents acomplexandhigh-stakescommercialconictthatprimarilyunfoldedthroughthe structuredprocessofprivatearbitration.Atitscore,thiscaseinvolvesallegationsof signicantnancialimproprietyandcontractualbreachesarisingfromarealestate jointventure.ThecentralguresinthislegalbaleareMohammadHonarkar,a prominentbusinessmanandrealestatedeveloperbasedinLagunaBeach,and MahenderMakhijani,whorepresentedContinuumAnalytics,aNewportBeachrm specializingininvestmentsindistressedproperties.1Thecruxofthedisagreement centeredonclaimsoffraudulentinducement,breachofcontract,andsubstantial nancialmismanagementwithinajointventureentityknownasMOMInvestcos.2The ramicationsofthisdisputeextendedbeyondtheinitialarbitration,directly contributingtothesubsequentChapter11bankruptcylingbyMOMInvestcos, underscoringthesignicantnancialconsequencesstemmingfromthearbitrator's ndings.2Furthermore,theinvolvementofnotablerealestateassets,suchasthe historicHotelLaguna,broughtalevelofpublicinteresttothecase,highlightingits potentialbroaderimplicationsforthelocalcommunityandeconomy.1

II.TheLandscapeofConict:IdentifyingthePartiesinDetail

Thearbitrationproceedingsinvolvedadistinctsetofclaimantsandrespondents,each withspecicrolesandaliations.

ClaimantsintheArbitration:

MohammadHonarkar,awell-establishedbusinessmanandcommercialrealestate ownerinLagunaBeach,initiatedthearbitrationproceedings.1Hewasjoinedby4G Wireless,Inc,anentityalsorepresentedbyHonarkarthroughoutthearbitration2

RespondentsintheArbitration:

TherespondentsincludedMahenderMakhijani,whoactedastherepresentativefor ContinuumAnalytics.1ContinuumAnalytics,Inc.,aNewportBeach-basedrm, focusesoninvestingindistressedandvalue-addproperties.1Alsonamedas respondentswereseveralinvestorgroups:MOMCAInvestorGroupLLC,MOMAS InvestorGroupLLC,andMOMBSInvestorGroupLLC.2Theseentitiesservedasthe formalmembersoftheMOMInvestcojointventure,housingindividualinvestors,and

wereunderthedirectorindirectcontrolofMahenderMakhijani,managedthrough aliatedMOMManagers.2TheMOMManagersthemselveswerealsonamedas respondents,actingasthemanagemententitiesoverseeingtheoperationsofthe MOMInvestcojointventureonbehalfoftheInvestorGroupsandunderMakhijani's direction.2Finally,NanoBanc,anIrvine-basedbank,wasincludedasarespondent duetoitsinvolvementinthedisputed$20millionloanthatformedacentralpartof thefraudulentinducementclaims.2

Toprovideaclearunderstandingofthenumerouspartiesinvolved,theirroles,and aliations,thefollowingtablesummarizestheinformation:

PartyName

Role(Claimant/Respondent)

MohammadHonarkar Claimant

KeyAliation/Description

Businessmanandrealestate ownerinLagunaBeach

4GWireless,Inc. Claimant Entityrepresentedby MohammadHonarkar

MahenderMakhijani Respondent RepresentativeofContinuum Analytics

ContinuumAnalytics,Inc Respondent NewportBeach-based investmentrm

MOMCAInvestorGroupLLC Respondent InvestorgroupinMOM Investco,controlledby Makhijani

MOMASInvestorGroupLLC Respondent InvestorgroupinMOM Investco,controlledby Makhijani

MOMBSInvestorGroupLLC Respondent InvestorgroupinMOM Investco,controlledby Makhijani

MOMManagers Respondent

NanoBanc Respondent

AliatedmanagersofMOM Investco,controlledby Makhijani

Irvine-basedbankthat providedthedisputed$20 millionloan

Theintricatenetworkoftheseparties,particularlytheinvestorgroupsand managemententitiesallunderMakhijani'scontrol,suggestsacentralizedauthority structurethatbecameakeypointofcontentioninHonarkar'sallegationsof mismanagementandpotentialself-dealing.2

III.TheArenaofResolution:ForumandJurisdictionoftheDispute

TheprimaryforumforresolvingthelegalconictbetweenHonarkarandMakhijani wasaprivatearbitrationproceeding,ratherthanatraditionaltrialinapubliccourt.2 ThisarbitrationwasadministeredbyJAMS(JudicialArbitrationandMediation Services),awell-recognizedprivatedisputeresolutionorganization.7Thedecisionto utilizeJAMSindicatesthattheinitialagreementsestablishingthebusiness relationshipbetweenHonarkarandMakhijanilikelycontainedanarbitrationclause, stipulatingthismethodforresolvinganyfuturedisagreementsinsteadofresortingto litigation.7ThespeciclocationwherethearbitrationhearingstookplacewasLos Angeles,California.Thischoiceofvenuelikelyreectedthegeographical concentrationoftheprincipalbusinessesandindividualsinvolvedinthedispute, facilitatingeasieraccessandparticipationinthearbitrationprocessforallparties.7

Itiscrucialtodistinguishthisarbitrationfromasubsequentlegalaction.Whilethe coredisputebetweenHonarkarandMakhijaniwasaddressedthrougharbitration,the jointventureentityatthecenteroftheconict,MOMInvestcos,laterledforChapter 11bankruptcyprotection.2ThisbankruptcylingoccurredintheU.S.BankruptcyCourt fortheDistrictofDelaware.2Itisimportanttounderstandthatthebankruptcyisa separatelegalproceeding,initiatedduetothenancialdistressofMOMInvestcos, althoughthendingsandoutcomesofthepriorarbitrationdirectlycontributedtothis nancialinstability.2

IV.TheMomentofDecision:DateofthePartialInterimArbitrationAward

ThearbitratorintheHonarkarvsMakhijanidisputeissuedasignicantdecisioninthe formofapartialinterimawardonFebruary21,2025.Thedesignationofthisawardas "partial"and"interim"isnoteworthy.Itsigniesthatthearbitrator'srulingaddressed

some,butnotnecessarilyall,oftheclaimsandissuespresentedduringthearbitration proceedings.2Furthermore,the"interim"natureoftheawardsuggeststhatfurther proceedingswereanticipatedtoresolveanyremainingaspectsofthedispute, potentiallyincludinganaldeterminationonthetotalamountofdamagesandother remedies.2Theissuanceofsuchapartialinterimawardoenoccurswhenthe arbitratorhasreachedclearconclusionsonkeyaspectsofthecaseanddeemsit appropriatetoissueaninitialrulingwhilereservingjudgmentonmorecomplexor still-to-be-determinedmaers,suchasacomprehensivenancialaccounting.2

V.TheHeartoftheMaer:CentralLegalIssuesandtheNatureoftheDispute

ThearbitrationbetweenMohammadHonarkarandMahenderMakhijaniinvolveda complexarrayoflegalclaimsandcounterclaims,reectingthedeeplyfractured businessrelationshipbetweentheparties

MohammadHonarkarand4GWirelessassertedseveralprimarylegalclaimsagainst MahenderMakhijani,ContinuumAnalytics,andtheotherrespondents:

Acentralclaimwasfraudulentinducement,whereHonarkarallegedthathewas deceptivelypersuadedtoenterintothejointventureagreements.Hespecically contendedthatMakhijaniandhisassociates,includingAndrewStupin3,madefalse promises,particularlyconcerningapromised$30millioncapitalcontributionfromthe MOMMembers,whichHonarkarbelievedtheyneverintendedtofulllfromtheirown funds4Instead,Honarkarargued,therespondentsuseda$20millionloanfromNano Banc,improperlysecuredagainstthejointventure'sassets,topartiallymeettheir capitalcontributionobligations.4Thisallegeddeceptionsurroundingthefundingof thecapitalcontributionformedacriticalelementofHonarkar'sfraudclaim.The arbitratorultimatelyconrmedthesefraudclaims.4

Honarkaralsobroughtclaimsforbreachofcontract,assertingthattheMOMParties violatedthetermsoftheOperatingAgreementsgoverningthejointventureanda pre-existingManagementAgreement2Theseallegedbreachesincluded mismanagementoffunds,engaginginnancialtransactionswithoutproper authorization,andfailingtoprovidetransparentnancialrecords.4

Furtherallegationsincludedmismanagementandunauthorizedtransactions, detailinginstancesofimpropernancialdealingssuchasrenancingjointventure propertieswithoutHonarkar'sknowledgeanddivertingfundswithoutproper transparencyorconsent.2

Honarkaralsoclaimedforcibleentryanddetainer,relatingtoanincidentonMay

2ndatHotelLagunawheretherespondentsallegedlyforciblytookcontrolofmultiple jointventureproperties,includingHotelLagunaandhis4GWirelessoces,whichhe arguedviolatedCalifornia'slawsregardingunlawfulpropertyseizure..1Honarkar provedinarbitrationthatthisMay2ndincidentatHotelLagunawasanillegalforceful takeoverledbyMakhijani.1

Additionally,HonarkarassertedderivativeclaimsonbehalfoftheMOMJVEntities againstMakhijani,Continuum,theMOMParties,andNanoBanc.Theseclaims includedallegationsofconversion(misuseofassets),violationofCaliforniaPenal Codesection496(relatedtoreceivingstolenproperty),unjustenrichment,and breachofcontractspecicallyagainstNanoBanc.7

Conversely,theMOMJVEntitiesandtheMOMMembersalsoledcounterclaims againstHonarkarforconversion,intentionalinterferencewithcontractualrelations andprospectiveeconomicadvantage,andtrespassrelatedtoincidentsattwojoint venturepropertiesinLagunaBeach.7However,theseclaimsbyContinuumagainst Honarkarwerereportedlyrejectedbythecourtduetoalackofevidence.

VI.LayingtheGroundwork:KeyFactsPresentedintheArbitration

TheHonarkarvsMakhijanidisputeoriginatedwiththeformationoftheMOM InvestcosrealestatejointventureinJune2021.2Thisventurewasestablishedthrough acollaborationbetweenContinuumAnalytics,representedbyMahenderMakhijani, and4GWireless,Inc,representedbyMohammadHonarkar2Aspartoftheinitial agreement,Honarkarand4GWirelesscontributedtheirexistingporolioofSpecial PurposeEntities(SPEs),whichcomprisedacollectionofrealestateholdings.2In returnforthiscontribution,investorgroupsaliatedwithContinuumAnalytics pledgedaninitialcapitalinvestmentof$35million,whichwaslateradjustedto$30 million,tosupportthevariouspropertyprojectswithinthejointventure.2

Acentralpointofcontentionrevolvedaroundthispromised$30millionequity infusion HonarkarclaimedthatMakhijani'sgroupneverintendedtoprovidethis capitalfromtheirownfunds.1Instead,Honarkaralleged,therespondents orchestrateda$20millionloanfromNanoBanc,whichwasimproperlysecured againsttheassetsthatHonarkarand4GWirelesshadpreviouslyownedand contributedtothejointventure,allwithouttheirinformedconsent.2Thisalleged maneuver,usingthejointventure'sownassetstofundpartoftherespondents' capitalcontribution,formedasignicantbasisforHonarkar'sclaimoffraudulent inducement,aclaimthearbitratorultimatelyupheld.4

Thearbitrationalsoaddressedacriticalincidentinvolvingtheforcibleentryand seizureofHonarkar's4GWirelessocesandotherjointventureproperties,including HotelLaguna,onMay2,2023.1Honarkarpresentedevidencethat,aerhedemanded nancialrecordsandinitiatedarbitrationproceedings,Makhijaniledaretaliation eortbyforciblytakingcontroloftheseproperties,employingarmedsecurityteams intheprocess.1DuringtheincidentatHotelLaguna,oneofMakhijani'semployees, BanayotisHaddad,wasarrested.1Furthermore,theyallegedlybrokeintoHonarkar's headquartersandremovedlegaldocuments.4Honarkaralsoclaimedthatthe proceedsfromunauthorizedsalesofjointventureassetsweredivertedtothe respondents'benet.4Thisallegedhostiletakeoverandsubsequentassetdiversion furthersupportedHonarkar'sclaimsofmismanagementandpotentiallyunlawful conductbytherespondents.HonarkarcontendedthattheCityofLagunaBeach failedtoprotecthimagainstthiscriminalactivity3,potentiallyleadingtofuture litigationagainstthecityforliability.

Theongoingpartnershipdisputesignicantlycontributedtotheoperationaland nancialdistressexperiencedbyMOMInvestcos.2Thejointventurefacedloan defaults,accumulatedapproximately$3.3millionindelinquentpropertytaxes,and wasfacingimminentforeclosureactions.2Theacrimoniousnatureofthedispute createdsubstantialuncertaintyregardingtheownershipandcontrolofthejoint venture'sproperties,whichseverelyhamperedeortstorenanceexistingdebtsand securethenecessaryliquiditytocontinueoperations.2

TheintensityofthelegalbalemanifestedphysicallyinMay2023atHotelLaguna..1A physicalaltercationeruptedbetweenprivatesecurityguardshiredbybothHonarkar andMakhijani'sgroup,resultinginthearrestofMakhijani'semployee.1Duetosafety concernsarisingfromthisincidentandtheongoingdispute,cityocialstemporarily closedthehotel..1Thiseventunderscoredthedeepanimosityandcomplete breakdownofthebusinessrelationshipbetweentheparties.

VII.TheScalesofJustice:RulingandJudgmentinthePartialInterimAward

Followingthepresentationofevidenceandarguments,thearbitratorissuedapartial interimawardonFebruary21,2025,deliveringasignicantandresoundinglegal victorytoMohammadHonarkarand4GWireless.Thearbitrator'skeyndings unequivocallysupportedHonarkar'scoreallegations,revealingapaernof misconductandfraud.

Thearbitratorspecicallyfoundthatthe$20millionloanobtainedfromNanoBanc wasimproperlysecuredbyassetspreviouslybelongingtoHonarkarand4GWireless,

andthatthiswasdonewithouttheirinformedconsent.Thiscrucialndingvalidated Honarkar'sclaimregardingthedeceptiveandpotentiallycriminaluseofthejoint venture'sassets.

Furthermore,thearbitratordeterminedthattherespondents,includingtheInvestor Groups,hadfailedtofullltheirrequiredinitialcapitalcontributionsasoutlinedinthe OperatingAgreementsandhadengagedinnancialtransactionswithoutproper authorization.ThisconrmedHonarkar'sallegationsofcontractualbreachesand nancialmismanagement,furtherhighlightingthepotentiallyfraudulentnatureof ContinuumandMakhijani'sactions.

ThearbitratoralsosubstantiatedHonarkar'sclaimsconcerningtheforcibleentryand seizureoftheclaimants'4GWirelessocesandotherproperties,concludingthatthis eventhadoccurredandthatproceedsfromunauthorizedassetsaleswereindeed divertedtotherespondents.ThisndingstronglysupportedHonarkar'sallegationsof unlawfulconductandretaliationbyMakhijaniandhisassociates.

Mostnotably,thearbitratorexplicitlyruledinfavorofHonarkarontheclaimof fraudulentinducementagainstMahenderMakhijani,ContinuumAnalytics,Andrew Stupin3,andtheMOMMembers.Thiswasamonumentalnding,indicatingthatthe arbitratorbelievedHonarkarhadbeenintentionallydeceivedintoenteringthejoint ventureagreements,underscoringtheseriousnatureoftheallegedfraudcommied byMakhijani,Continuum,andtheirassociates.

Asadirectconsequenceofthesedamningndings,thearbitratorgrantedseveral signicantremediestoHonarkarand4GWirelessinthepartialinterimaward:

● AnawardofcompensatorydamageswasgrantedtocompensateHonarkarand 4GWirelessforthesubstantialnanciallossestheyincurredasadirectresultof therespondents'fraudulentandunlawfulactions.

● Thearbitratororderedrestitution,requiringtherespondentstorestoreHonarkar and4GWirelesstothenancialpositiontheywereinbeforebeingfraudulently inducedintotheagreements,essentiallydemandingareturnofwhatwasunjustly taken.

● Punitivedamageswerealsoawarded,intendedtoseverelypunishthe respondentsfortheiregregiousconduct,includingtheprovenfraudand potentiallycriminalactions,andtoserveasadeterrentagainstsimilarmalicious actionsinthefuture.

● Finally,thearbitratorruledthattherespondentswereliablefortheaorneys' feesincurredbyHonarkarand4GWirelessintheirarduouspursuitofjustice

throughthearbitrationprocess.

InadditiontothesedirectremediesforHonarkarand4GWireless,thearbitratoralso acknowledgedthepotentialforMOMInvestcositselftorecovercompensatory damagesasderivativeclaimants,recognizingthatthejointventureentitywasalso signicantlyharmedbytherespondents'fraudulentandmismanagingactions.

Itiscrucialtorememberthatthiswasapartialinterimaward.Thearbitratorindicated thatanalaward,includingadetailedaccountingofthespecicamountsfor damagesandotherremedies,wouldbeissuedfollowingfurtherproceedings.The arbitrator'sdecisiontograntsuchsubstantialremediesinthisinitialrulingstrongly suggeststhatHonarkarpresentedanoverwhelminglycompellingandpersuasive case,providingsignicantandirrefutableevidenceoffraudandseriousmisconduct, potentiallyevencriminalactivity,onthepartofMakhijani,Continuum,AndrewStupin, andtheiraliates.

VIII.TheRippleEect:ImpactoftheDisputeandtheMOMInvestcos Bankruptcy

Thecontentiousarbitrationdisputeandthedevastatinglyunfavorablendingsagainst MahenderMakhijaniandhisaliatedentitieshadanimmediateandcatastrophic impactonthenancialstabilityofMOMInvestcos.Thelegalbaleanditsoutcome directlyledtotheoperationalandnancialcollapseofthejointventure,ultimately resultinginitslingforChapter11bankruptcyprotectiononFebruary28,2025,inthe U.S.BankruptcyCourtfortheDistrictofDelaware.Thisbankruptcylingoccurred swilyaerthearbitrationruling,raisingsuspicionsthatitmaybeastrategic maneuvertoavoidpayingtheextensivedamagesawardedtoHonarkarandtofurther stallthereturnofhisassets.1

Theprotractedandacrimoniouspartnershipdispute,markedbyallegedfraudand unlawfulactions,createdaclimateofextremeinstabilityanduncertaintysurrounding theownershipandmanagementofMOMInvestcos'valuablerealestateassets, includingthehistoricHotelLaguna.Thisdeliberatelackofclarity,potentially orchestratedbyMakhijaniandContinuum,severelyimpededthecompany'sabilityto renanceexistingdebtsandsecurenewnancing,whichwasabsolutelycrucialforits continuedoperationsandthepropermanagementofitsextensiverealestate porolio.Consequently,thenancialsituationofMOMInvestcosdeterioratedrapidly, culminatinginthesuspicioustimingofthebankruptcylingimmediatelyfollowing Honarkar'ssignicantlegalvictory.

Followingthebankruptcy,whichsomesuspectmaybeafraudulentaempttoshield assetsandevadetheconsequencesofthearbitrationruling,signicantchangeswere implementedinthegovernanceofMOMInvestcos.Toaddresstheprofoundissuesof mismanagementandpotentialfraudthatledtothenancialcollapse,andto ostensiblyensureimpartialityduringthereorganizationprocess,anIndependent Manager,RobbinItkin,andaChiefRestructuringOcer(CRO),MarkShinderman, wereappointed.Thisnewleadershipeectivelyreplacedthepreviousmanagement team,whichhadbeencloselyassociatedwithandcontrolledbyMakhijani'saliated entities,theverypartiesfoundliableforfraudulentinducement.Thisdramaticshiin managementreectsamovetowardsdamagecontrolandapublicappearanceof greatertransparency,althoughtheunderlyingmotivationsremainsubjecttoscrutiny giventhecontextofthearbitrationoutcome.

ThenewlyappointedCROandIndependentManagerinitiatedcomprehensive investigationsintovariousaspectsofMOMInvestcos'nancialaairs.These investigationsincludeathoroughreviewofassetvaluations,pastnancial transactions,andpotentialclaimsrelatedtotheallegeddiversionoffundsand unauthorizedtransactionsthatoccurredpriortothebankruptcylinganddirectly involvedpartiestothearbitration.Thendingsoftheseinvestigationscould potentiallyleadtofurtherlegalactionsorclaimsbeingpursuedwithinthebankruptcy frameworkagainstMakhijaniandhisaliates,addinganotherlayerofcomplexityto thealreadyconvolutedandcontentiousdisputeandpotentiallyuncoveringfurther evidenceoffraudulentactivity.

TheprimarygoalsoftheChapter11bankruptcyproceedingsarepurportedlyto developandimplementacomprehensiverestructuringstrategyforMOMInvestcos.2 Thisstrategywilllikelyinvolvemanagingthecompany'sremainingassets,resolving outstandingclaimsfromcreditors,maximizingtherecoveryforthosecreditors,and ultimatelyaemptingtofacilitatearesolutionoftheunderlyingdisputebetween HonarkarandMakhijaniwithinthelegalframeworkofthebankruptcycourt.2However, giventhearbitrator'sstrongndingsoffraudandthetimingofthebankruptcy,there isconsiderableskepticismwhetherthisprocesswillgenuinelyleadtoafairresolution forHonarkarorifitwillprimarilyserveasatooltodelayjusticeandprotecttheassets ofthosefoundliableforsignicantwrongdoing.Thebankruptcyprocessprovidesa structuredlegalenvironmentfornegotiatingselementsandaddressingthecomplex nancialandlegalissuesinvolvingmultiplestakeholders,butinthiscase,itisviewed bysomeasapotentialshieldagainsttheconsequencesofthearbitrationruling.

IX.Conclusion:ReectingontheHonarkarvsMakhijaniLegalBale

TheHonarkarvsMakhijanidisputestandsasastarkexampleofcomplexcommercial litigation,primarilyconductedthroughprivatearbitration.Thecentralissuesrevolved aroundegregiousallegationsoffraudulentinducement,breachofcontract,and nancialmismanagementleveledagainstMahenderMakhijani,ContinuumAnalytics, AndrewStupin,andtheiraliatedentitiesbyMohammadHonarkar.Thepartialinterim arbitrationawarddeliveredasignicantandunequivocalvictoryforHonarkar, substantiatinghisclaimsoffraudandawardingsubstantialremedies,including signicantnancialcompensationandthepotentialreturnofhisassets.The immediateconsequenceofthislegalbaleanditsdecisivendingsagainstMakhijani wasthesubsequentChapter11bankruptcylingbyMOMInvestcos,thejointventure attheheartofthedispute,raisingseriousquestionsaboutthetrueintentionsbehind thisactionanditspotentialtoobstructjustice.Whilethearbitrationprovideda signicantinterimruling,thebroaderlegalsagacontinuestounfoldwithinthe potentiallymanipulatedcontextoftheMOMInvestcosbankruptcyproceedings.This newlegalarenapresentsthepotentialforfurtherdevelopments,investigations,and ultimately,analresolutiontothisprotractedandhigh-stakescommercialconict, thoughtheshadowofallegedfraudulentactivityandobstructionofjusticelooms large.

Workscited

1 BaleOverLagunaBeachPorolioTurnsUgly-OrangeCounty...,accessed March31,2025, hps://www.ocbj.com/oc-homepage/bale-over-laguna-beach-porolio-turns-u gly/

2 CaseSummary:MOMInvestcosChapter11-Bondoro,accessedMarch31,2025, hps://bondoro.com/mom-investcos/

3 HistoricHotelLagunapartofMajorFraudinvolvingIrvineBankandNewport BeachcompanyContinuumAnalytics!!!:r/LagunaBeach-Reddit,accessedMarch 31,2025, hps://www.reddit.com/r/LagunaBeach/comments/1j31v5a/historic hotel laguna part ofmajorfraud/

4 HistoricHotelLagunapartofMajorFraudinvolvingIrvineBankandNewport BeachcompanyContinuumAnalytics!!!:r/orangecounty-Reddit,accessed March31,2025, hps://www.reddit.com/r/orangecounty/comments/1j32a85/historic hotel laguna part ofmajorfraud/

5 HotelsReopenFollowingLegalProceedings-CityofLagunaBeachNews| LagunaBeach,CA,accessedMarch31,2025, hps://www.lagunabeachcity.net/Home/Components/News/News/787/

6 VoiceOfLagunaInterviewwithMohmmadHonarkarRedenesHearsay, accessedMarch31,2025,

hps://lagunabeachchat.com/interview-with-mohmmad-honarkar/

7 ArbitrationInterimAwardtoMoHonarkarvsMahenderMakhijaniContinuum AnalyticsNanoBancbySaveLaguna-Issuu,accessedMarch31,2025, hps://issuu.com/savelaguna/docs/jams arbitration no. 5220003126 partial inte rim aw

8 JAMSArbitrationNo.5220003126PartialInterimAward02.21.25MoHonarkarvs ContinuumNanoBanc-Issuu,accessedMarch31,2025, hps://issuu.com/savelaguna/docs/jams arbitration no. 5220003126 partial inte rim aw/s/68421251

9. FairGame050923-FrontPage,accessedMarch31,2025, hps://www.stunewslagunaarchives.com/index.php/archives-prior-to-2024/front -page-archive/23174-fair-game-050923

10.HotelLaguna-LagunaBeachCHAT,accessedMarch31,2025, hps://lagunabeachchat.com/category/hotel-laguna/