This book is a result of not just the students’ efforts but the contributions, collaboration, and support from an incredible group of people. To the Seed Lab staff—Bridget, Heather, Erik, Trey, and Faye—for your enthusiasm and time. Your effort to meet with us and excitement for the project were invaluable in shaping a meaningful and functional design. To all the guests—Tony Waller, Tom McNab NCARB, AIA, CSI, LEED AP, and Elizabeth Johnson Ph.D., MS-CRM, RN—who graciously offered their time and insights during our critiques. To Jordan Zignego, for your guidance and encouragement throughout the semester. Lastly, to Laura Craig with Interface, who not only helped guide us to make a decision on flooring material but also generously sent us a vast amount of flooring samples. To everyone who contributed, whether big or small, thank you for being a part of this project.
FINAL PRODUCT
Drawings
Materials & Finishes
Renderings
Spatial
INTRODUCTION
The Seed Lab redesign is a collaboration between the Montana State Community Design Center and the staff at the Seed Laboratory within the Marsh Laboratory building. The Seed Lab needed an updated space, including workstations, a receiving area, storage systems, and a new programmatic layout. The redesign is an interior design project that focused on creating a functional, collaborative, and aesthetic environment for the Seed Lab staff.
Our goals for this project placed a strong emphasis on participatory design to ensure that the clients were actively involved in the design process. By working closely with the Seed Lab team, it was of utmost importance that their needs and preferences were met. Before beginning the design process, we researched in depth the importance of community design centers and the value of participatory design within architecture, thus inspiring us to follow in the footsteps of the CDC studios before us that practiced participatory design.
Our goal for this project is to create a reimagined space that offers a new programmatic layout for the laboratory, updated furniture and cabinetry, improved material selection, all while fostering productivity and comfort. The design strategy went through several stages, from assessment to development, and finally to the completed product. The intent of our design strategy is to integrate practical solutions with thoughtful aesthetics, making the Seed Lab a modern, adaptable workspace for its users.
CLIENT
MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY SEED LABORATORY
LOCATION
MARSH LABORATORY | BOZEMAN, MONTANA
SEED LAB STAFF
BRIDGET WESTFALL | SEED LAB MANAGER
FAYE JORGENSEN | SEED ANALYST
HEATHER CROSBY-MUSSELMAN | SEED ANALYST
TREY JOHNSON | SEED ANALYST
ERIK HAYES | PROGRAM MANAGER
DESIGN TEAM
SAM MALETIC
BRIAR BELL
CAMERON BALTER
HISTORICAL CONTEXT
In 1898, the USDA initiated the Plant Introduction Program to collect and study plant germplasm from around the world. The program aimed to support agricultural development through testing various crop varieties. The early laboratories focused on purity and germination testing to ensure the quality and viability of crops. These early efforts, led by the USDA, laid a foundation for broader plant studies and additional programs across the United States.
Montana’s agriculture industry began in the late 19th century and early 20th century, driven mainly by grain crops such as wheat and barley. To support the growing industry, the state implemented programs to study and ensure the quality of seeds and crops. The Montana Seed Growers Association, or MSGA for short, was founded in 1910. The MSGA played an essential role in the certification and distribution of quality seeds to farmers.
Built in 1961 as part of the agriculture programs within MSU, the Marsh Laboratory serves to study and provide analysis for farmers and regulatory agencies, as well as veterinary diagnostics. The Seed Laboratory, housed within the Marsh Laboratory, provides seed testing and analysis. Some of the tests conducted by the Seed Lab include germination rates and seed purity. The seed analysts ensure that all seeds meet state and federal standards. The Seed Lab serves the MSGA, farmers across Montana, and the Montana Department of Agriculture. The Montana State Seed Lab has played an essential role in establishing the reputation and prosperity of farming in Montana.
WILLIAM H. TAYLOR | HARVESTING WHEAT NEAR MANHATTAN, MONTANA (CIRCA 1880-1915)
ALBERT SCHLECLTEN | SPRING WHEAT IN WEST BOZEMAN, MONTANA (CIRCA 1920)
MONTANA STATE LIBRARY | THRESHING IN BOZEMAN, MONTANA (UNKNOWN DATE)
ALBERT SCHLECLTEN | WHEAT FIELD IN THE GALLATIN VALLEY NEAR BOZEMAN, MONTANA (CIRCA 1910-1929)
ALBERT SCHLECLTEN | SHOCKING WHEAT NORTH OF BOZEMAN MONTANA (CIRCA 1910-1930)
PRECEDENTS
Our first look into design began with the exploration of precedents. These studies informed the initial steps of our vision. We studied aspects such as program and materiality to develop a basic understanding of the architectural components of a laboratory.
INRESTUDIO | THE GAMELLE LABORATORY
The Gamelle Laboratory is located in central Vietnam. The lab was designed by Inrestudio, with Kosuke Nishijima as the lead architect. The small lab, approximately 1,780 square feet, serves as a product inspection lab for the adjacent factory. The building mediates between the outside and inside. The exterior skin introduces small courtyards placed outside each room, creating intermediary spaces. The lab is divided into six lines, resulting in a program that provides distinct spaces and views. Windows and openings of various sizes invite engaging perspectives from both inside and outside.
The materials reflect a clear separation between the interior and exterior. The exterior skin uses locally sourced bricks to convey a sense of texture and durability. The interior adopts a minimalistic approach. The epoxy-finished floors provide a unified and clean surface. The central inspection work table incorporates shelving and large surfaces to enhance productivity and workflow. The white walls and large windows allow natural light to fill each room.
OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY SEED LABORATORY
Originally started in 1909, the Oregon State University Seed Laboratory has become one of the largest seed labs in the United States. In its early days, the laboratory provided basic purity and germination tests. Over the past decades, as the lab grew, so did its capabilities, and today it offers a wide range of seed testing that extends to crops from the United States, Australia, and Canada.
The lab today is relatively large, spanning approximately 10,500 square feet. The programmatic layout of the lab allows for productive workflow and sufficient space for the staff. The large reception area, located at the front of the building, facilitates efficient processing operations for incoming samples to be tested. Other spaces include designated areas for purity, germination, special testing, and sample storage. Additionally, the lab features a multipurpose training and overflow testing room. The abundance of natural light, coupled with the adjacent OSU greenhouse complex, promotes a healthy work environment for its occupants.
OSU SEED ANALYST CONDUCTING A SEED GERMINATION TEST
Located northwest of Jinze Town in the Shuangxiang Village of China, just on the edge of a forest, sits the Shuangxiang Rural Revitalization Laboratory. The construction of the laboratory involved remodeling an existing machinery workshop and adding extensions to the original structure. Designed by Atelier Archmixing Architects, the laboratory is part of an ongoing effort in China to revitalize and innovate agriculture in rural villages.
To preserve the old machinery building, the design took a conservative approach to limit significant modifications to the existing structure. Instead, the additions act as a shell over the original building, maintaining its preservation while creating space for new construction. The exterior design incorporates a protected corridor that runs along the rectilinear building, as well as an upper-level lookout. The interior layout remained mostly unchanged, with the exception of a few partitions, new fixtures, and updated material finishes. Additionally, the glazed portions of the exterior shell allow an abundance of natural light to flood the interior spaces, enhancing the ambiance inside. The success of this project stems from the design team’s ability to create new shared spaces while preserving the existing structure and meeting low-budget requirements.
Located in Hashimoto, Japan, is the Yunosato Aquaphotomics Laboratory. The laboratory has a unique purpose: to study water. The architectural design of the Yunosato Laboratory blends scientific inquiry with elements of the natural environment. The minimalist design emphasizes functionality through the spatial organization of the lab.
The large window openings flood the interior spaces with natural light and offer pleasant views, further embracing the natural environment. The materials are thoughtfully selected and kept to a minimum. The subtle color palette, combined with natural materials such as wood and stone, creates a warm and inviting aesthetic within the building.
The focal point of the design is its delicate balance of function and aesthetics. The architecture evokes a calm atmosphere while also addressing the functional requirements of a laboratory.
SURVEY
Located on the east side of the Marsh Laboratory is the Seed Lab. Covering roughly 980 sq ft, the Seed Lab is a small portion of the Marsh Laboratory. The spaces within the Seed Lab include the receiving space, the purity laboratory, the dividing room/hood room, the seed library, and the director’s office. Other spaces within the Seed Lab that were not included in the redesign are the germination lab and the germination/growth chamber room.
Before the design process, a thorough survey was required to ground the design team in the space. The early stages of the project involved a survey of the existing space to better understand the circulation, dimensions, programmatic layout, storage, workspaces, and the use of equipment within the lab. The survey stage wasn’t simply about taking measurements; it was about understanding the nuances of the lab, how it was used, and the personal aspects of the space. It allowed us to understand what aspects worked well and what aspects did not. Throughout the design process, we would refer back to the survey notes and documentation frequently.
MARSH LABORATORY
SEED LABORATORY
GERMINATION LAB & GERMINATION/ GROWTH CHAMBER ROOMS (NOT INCLUDED IN REDESIGN)
FIRST SITE VISIT
The first site visit gave us the chance to see the Seed Laboratory firsthand and understand the operations of the lab. The Seed Lab Manager, Erik, showed us each space and its functions. Additionally, Seed Lab analysts explained the work they conduct in the laboratory and the functions of certain equipment and areas. Overall, the first meeting was an opportunity for us to get acquainted with the Seed Lab staff and gain a broad understanding of the space.
The admin space is where all the logistics happen in the lab. Seed samples are first shipped here to begin the processing stage, to later be tested by the seed analysts. Packages are shipped to and from the admin desk daily, so this space sees a lot of traffic throughout the day.
The purity lab is where the quality and reliability of seeds are tested. The primary focus of the seed analysts is to analyze the composition of seed samples, identify contaminants, and determine the proportion of pure seeds. This process helps maintain standards for seed distribution.
PURITY LAB
The herbarium contains a collection of preserved, dried seeds. The seed collection provides analysts with a reference when accurately identifying certain species.
The seed library serves to organize, preserve, and provide. The room is climate-controlled to ensure the viability of seeds over time for research and testing, conservation, and seed distribution to farmers or other community members.
The hood room is where seeds are first brought when being processed. It serves to clean and treat seeds before they are brought into the purity lab.
HOOD ROOM
DIRECTORS OFFICE
SITE OBSERVATIONS
Our initial steps in the survey were to document the space. The first phase of documentation, before taking measurements, was photographing elements of the lab. This included the space as a whole, down to small details. In later stages, such as 3D modeling, the reference photos were an important factor in guiding the design process. Additionally, the photographs allowed us to understand the personal aspects of the lab and provided insight into the staff’s story. Small details helped us understand what the staff might value and what makes them comfortable.
VIEW FROM ADMIN ROOM LOOKING NORTH
Part of a seed analyst’s testing involves checking the quality and health of seeds. A cut test allows the analyst to review the internal structure of a seed.
ANALYST CUTTING INTO SEEDS
Seeds brought into the lab must first be cleaned before they can be transferred to purity testing.
When seeds first arrive at the lab, they vary from large quantities to smaller quantities.
The seed counter accurately counts large quantities of seeds, ensuring efficiency within the lab. The seed blower allows analysts to separate seeds based on size and weight. Additionally, it can be used to clean seeds.
SEED COUNTER
SEED BLOWER
Each preserved seed sample in the herbarium is accurately labeled and organized. The labels include the scientific name, common name, and collection date.
HERBARIUM
Similar to the herbarium, each seed sample in the seed library is labeled and organized. Seed samples are placed into envelopes and remain in the climate-controlled room until they are needed elsewhere.
The Seed Lab is filled with technical documents and books that analysts frequently reference. The reference material is essential for their work.
DIMENSIONS
The next step of the survey process was to take dimensions of the space and understand the existing programmatic layout. The measurement process was more than just technical drawing; it became a dialogue to learn what we didn’t know. During our time measuring at the Seed Lab, we asked questions to the analysts and had them explain certain aspects, rather than just assuming based on the drawings. The back-and-forth dialogue became an essential process, as the Seed Lab, although small, is complex in many ways.
EXISTING PROGRAM ANALYSIS
After the initial documentation and survey stages, we began analyzing the spaces of the lab and how each space currently supports the primary functions of the lab. The analysis focused on organization, storage, and circulation. We aimed to study the current problems the lab faces in order to identify, prioritize, and resolve them in later design steps. A comprehensive review of the lab’s equipment, functionality, and layout would be the first step in envisioning what the new redesign might look like.
CURRENT PROGRAM LAYOUT
1. ADIMIN / LAB ENTRY
2 - 5 ANALYST WORK STATIONS
6. SEED BLOWERS
7. SINK 8. SINK / BREAK AREA
9. SEED COUNTER 10. FLAT FILE SYSTEM FOR HERBARIUM 11. FUME HOOD
ISSUES
- Lack of space for analysts
- Overwhelmed storage and insufficient amount of storage in lab
- No stations for student workers
- Need for more organization within spaces
- Degradation of materials
VISUAL EXPLORATIONS
After our existing program analysis, we wanted to imagine what the redesign might look like. It was important that, beyond a new programmatic layout, we explored and emphasized color themes, materials, and accents. Ultimately, our goal was to evoke feelings of warmth, calmness, and productivity to align with the lab’s purpose of research and agriculture. To begin this process, we did simple visual explorations for inspiration.
WOOD CABINETRY
ACCENT CABINETRY
COLOR STUDY
Color plays a critical role in the experience of a space. It has psychological effects on mood and character. With that in mind, we recognized that we wanted to choose colors that would encourage feelings of comfort and productivity. For example, shades of green are associated with growth and the natural environment, which aligns with the lab’s purpose. Cool color tones, such as blue or gray, encourage concentration, which is essential to a seed analyst’s work. Brighter color accents, such as yellow and orange, produce feelings of energy and creativity. For our color study, we aimed to create cohesive palettes that would complement each other effectively. We went through several iterations to find palettes that would convey a professional yet inviting setting.
PANTONE 13-1420
PANTONE 13-1250
PANTONE 13-1521
PANTONE 13-2551
PANTONE #FFED00
PANTONE #FFF570
PANTONE #FFF791
PANTONE #FFFCD5
#78A2CC
PANTONE #96B9D0
PANTONE #A5D1E6
PANTONE #D3F3FF
PANTONE
PANTONE
PANTONE
PANTONE
PANTONE
FIRST ITTERATION
Our first iterations included a variety of palettes, some with bold accent colors, while others incorporated softer shades. Ultimately, our goal was to explore a range of options.
PANTONE #FFED00
PANTONE #A5D1E6
PANTONE 13-2551
PANTONE 18-1660 TCX
PANTONE 17-1563 TCX
PANTONE 13-1420
PANTONE 1585 XGC
PANTONE 1585 XGC
PANTONE #FFFCD5
PANTONE #FFFCD5
PANTONE #FFF570
PANTONE #D3F3FF
PANTONE #FFED00
PANTONE #A5D1E6
PANTONE #78A2CC
PANTONE #A5D1E6
PANTONE 13-1420
PANTONE 13-1521
PANTONE #FFFCD5
PANTONE #FFFCD5
PANTONE #FFF791
PANTONE #FFFCD5
PANTONE #D3F3FF
PANTONE #D3F3FF
SECOND ITTERATION
After reviewing our initial palettes, we decided to further explore green-based color schemes. We felt that green aligned with our design and complemented the project’s overall direction. From the green palettes, we chose to further develop and implement earthtone greens. Through our color studies, we agreed on the importance of keeping the color palette minimal to avoid a visually overwhelming space.
PANTONE
PANTONE 13-2551 TCX
PANTONE 18-0107 TCX
PANTONE
PANTONE
PANTONE
PANTONE
PANTONE #8DD88D
PANTONE 7489 U
PANTONE 13-0116 TCX
PANTONE #289F28
PANTONE #B2E6B2
PANTONE 385 U
PANTONE #D8F3D8
PANTONE #43BC43
PANTONE #68CA68
PANTONE 16-1124 TCX
PANTONE 7486 U
PANTONE 13-6107 TCX
MATERIAL STUDIES
For our material studies, we wanted to build an understanding of materials that reflected our vision of a space with a connection to nature and comfort. We explored options like wood and wood finishes, natural-based flooring, tile backsplashes of various colors and patterns, and material finishes that would fit with the color scheme. Additionally, it was important to explore materials that would support the practical elements of the lab, including ease of maintenance, durability over time, and compatibility with the environmental conditions.
CEILING SYSTEMS FLUTED
ARMSTRONG CEILINGS ® | WOODWORKS GRILLE TEGULAR
CEILING SYSTEMS WOOD PANELED
ARMSTRONG CEILINGS ® | WOODWORKS TEGULAR
CEILING SYSTEMS EXPOSED
1100 ARCHITECTS | GERMAN TOWN ACADEMY M MOSER ASSOCIATES | M MOSER OFFICES SAN FRANCISCO
FLOORING EPOXY RESIN
Epoxy resin floors are a popular flooring choice for laboratories because of their high chemical resistance. However, these floors are not resistant to everyday wear and tear and require replacement every few years.
FLOORING VINYL
Vinyl floors are easily replaced and create an aesthetic environment. Repairs are easy, and they are fairly durable. Vinyl floors are generally more affordable than hardwood, stone, or ceramic tiles. They offer a cost-efficient solution that mimics the high-end look of wood floors. Additionally, vinyl floors offer durability and can withstand heavy foot traffic.
FLOORING SEALED CONCRETE
Sealed concrete provides a durable, cost-effective option for lab floors. However, it can also become a very slick surface and may increase heating costs if installed without a radiant heating system.
FLOORING MARMOLEUM
Marmoleum floors are a brand of linoleum made from natural, sustainable materials such as linseed oil, wood flour, rosin, limestone, and natural pigments. Not only does it offer an eco-friendly option for flooring, but it also provides durability.
FORBO ® FLOORING SYSTEMS | MARMOLEUM SOLID
FLOORING RUBBER
Rubber flooring is known for its durability and ease of maintenance. It is widely used in healthcare buildings and laboratories. The resilient surface can withstand heavy foot traffic, chemical spills, and dropped equipment. Additionally, the non-porous surface, coupled with antimicrobial properties, provides a hygienic and easy-to-clean surface.
NORA ® BY INTERFACE | RUBBER FLOOR COVERINGS
COUNTERTOP EPOXY RESIN
Epoxy resin countertops are a popular choice for labs due to their high durability and non-porous surface. Additionally, epoxy resin can be customized in terms of color and finish.
DEEP BLACK CHARCOAL GREY
PASTEL GREY WHITE
COUNTERTOP LAMINATE
Laminate countertops are a cost-effective and versatile option. They offer a wide range of colors and finishes. The downside to laminate countertops is that they aren’t very durable in the long term.
GREY NEBRASKA OAK LAMINATE
OAK LAMINATE
WHITE LAMINATE
BLACK LAMINATE
COUNTERTOP BUTCHER BLOCK
Butcher block countertops offer a natural aesthetic and durability. That said, they aren’t durable over long periods and can be damaged. Depending on the seal and finish, butcher block countertops are not completely resistant to chemical spills.
HARD ROCK MAPLE
ASH
WHITE OAK
RED OAK
BASKSPLASH TILES
A tile backsplash within the lab would offer a personalized touch to the space, tying back to our vision for a natural aesthetic. We explored several different patterns and colors.
TILEBAR ® | EMERY YELLOW
TILEBAR ® | MANCHESTER BIANCO WHITE
TILEBAR ® | CAROLINA SKY BLUE
TILEBAR ® | BIANCO DOLOMITE WHITE
TILEBAR ® | BETTINA BLUE GREEN
TILEBAR ® | LOS LUNAS GREEN
TILEBAR ® | MEDITERRA TERRACOTTA
TILEBAR ® | CURVE FLUTED GREEN
MATERIAL AND COLOR FINISHES
STEELCASE ® | SMOKED WALNUT
PANTONE
PANTONE
CLOUD DANCER
STEELCASE
WALNUT
STEELCASE
STEELCASE
FURNITURE STUDIES
The furniture studies played a crucial role in the design process. One of the main issues in the lab is the storage and organization system. Finding furniture that not only addressed this issue but also increased the functionality of the lab was paramount to the project. For our study, we mainly focused on exploring casework options to accommodate the various workflows of the lab.
In addition to functionality, we explored different furniture options with customizable material finishes so we could fine-tune the best options to fit within the overall aesthetic. We also took inspiration from precedents, which allowed us to identify certain details that we wanted to implement later on, such as storage systems, finishes, and casework layout.
PERKINS & WILL ARCHITECTS | C16 BIOSCIENCES, HUDSON RESEARCH CENTER
MITCHELL GIURGOLA ARCHITECTS | MOUNT SINAI RESEARCH AND CLINICAL CENTER
ENNEAD ARCHITECTS + BORA ARCHITECTS | KNIGHT CAMPUS
HERMAN MILLER ® | CO/STRUC SYSTEM
Herman Miller’s Co/Struc system is designed for healthcare and laboratory applications. The system is highly modular, allowing for flexibility and adaptation over time. Additionally, the Co/Struc system offers several storage options that enable its users to stay highly organized.
The Convey Modular casework is popular for healthcare applications. Like the Co/Struc system, Convey Modular offers a vast amount of customization. The casework meets high standards in terms of durability, and many of the materials used are sustainably sourced.
MATERIAL FINISHES
STEELCASE ® | BISQUE WENGE 2LBW
STEELCASE ® |DARK OLIVINE 2HAE
STEELCASE ® | WINTER ON MAPLE 2511
STEELCASE ® | SATIN STONE 24H3
HERMAN MILLER ® | SIT TO STAND
One aspect of the redesign we wanted to include was standing desks for some of the workstations. Herman Miller offers the Sit-to-Stand desk, which has a wide range of options to choose from, including home and workspace applications.
MATERIAL FINISHES
STEELCASE ® | ELECTIVE ELEMENTS
While designed for business applications, the Elective Elements furniture series offers several shelving and storage options that we explored and would work well within the lab. Additionally, we discovered that we could match the material finishes of the Convey Modular casework to the Elective Elements cabinets.
MATERIAL FINISHES
STEELCASE ® | AGED ASH 8844-58
® | WINTER ON MAPLE 2511
STEELCASE ® | ACACIA 2LAT
STEELCASE ® | WAXED MAPLE 8905-58
STEELCASE
SEATING
We explored several seating options that would offer analysts ergonomic support while also providing an updated, modern look to the lab. Additionally, we explored alternative seating options from Pineapple Furniture. The Ryno series from Pineapple is designed for mental health and healthcare applications. The seating is created for safety and ease of cleaning.
HERMAN MILLER ® | AERON CHAIR
STEELCASE ® | ENEA LOTTUS STOOL
PINEAPPLE - RYNO ® | TUB CHAIR
PINEAPPLE - RYNO ® | LOUNGE CHAIR
STEELCASE ® | KARMAN
STEELCASE ® | LEAP CHAIR PLUS
FIRST CLIENT MEETING
After our initial visits to the seed lab, we quickly wanted to identify what was working and what wasn’t within the existing space, and overall, what would be best for the clients. We did not come with any new programmatic or floor plan layouts for our first client meeting, but rather focused on big-picture items to grasp a general understanding of both the existing space and the dynamics of the analysts who work in the space every day.
As part of our research on past community design center studios, we learned a lot about the process of participatory design. Participatory design focuses on involving the client more in the design stage. For the first meeting, we wanted to actively engage the seed lab staff. We brought a blank floor plan for the seed lab to draw on and a 1/2” = 1’ 0” scale model with movable furniture for the seed lab staff to interact with. By coming with a blank slate rather than new plan concepts, we built a strong foundation to guide the next steps of the design process.
The half-scale model was not only a useful and engaging tool, but everyone also enjoyed interacting with it. It opened up another avenue for collaboration. During the process, the seed lab staff moved the scale furniture around the model, providing us with insights on the nuances of the lab. Overall, the interaction fostered a positive relationship between the design team and the clients.
Having physical material and paint samples gave the seed lab staff the ability to quickly discern their favorite color schemes and materials. They decided that the neutral greens were their favorites, and the wood vinyl flooring was quickly ruled out, as the texture could be problematic in a seed lab (loose seeds that fall on the floor could be difficult to find on a wood grain texture).
After our first client meeting, we determined several valuable takeaways going into the early design stages. Some of the points discussed in the meeting were the need for increased storage, countertop space, uniform furniture, better circulation, and overall revitalized aesthetics, which were top priorities in the redesign of the space. We were also informed about the orientation of the interior space and how every analyst must have a relation to the large windows that cover the north side of the building, highlighting the importance of the gentle northern sunlight. After taking this initial information in, it allowed us to begin our jumping-off point in the interior redesign of the seed lab. This first meeting was by far one of our most crucial meetings with the clients, not only because of the key information shared between the clients and designers, but also because it created a crucial relationship and trust among everyone involved with the project.
Key Takeaways
• 4 Full Time Analyst Stations
• 2 Student Workers
• More Efficient Admin Space
• Increased Storage and Organization
• Increased Counter top Space
• Uniform Furniture
• Better Circulation
• Revitalized Aesthetics
• Orientation
• Relationship with the Northern Window
• Importance of Natural Northern Light
• Client and Designer Relationship
DESIGN ITTERATIONS 1
Going into our first design iterations, we began with simple programmatic layouts that primarily focused on improving circulation within the lab and meeting the spatial needs for four full-time analyst spaces and two flexible student spaces. We experimented with new orientations for workspaces, as well as relocating the admin desk. The first iterations of the floor plans were an experiment in moving components around and learning the challenges of redesigning a space. The initial design iterations were challenging because, for one, the Seed Lab is a small space, and it was difficult to make new additions while accommodating the spatial needs. Additionally, we were just beginning the process of figuring out what casework and furniture would work in the lab. While the first stage was difficult, we began to translate our initial concepts and ideas from our research into the design.
SEED ANALYST DESKS
WORKSTATIONS AND COUNTER TOPS
STORAGE AND SHELVING
ADMIN DESK
LAB STORAGE
HOOD ROOM
ADMIN STORAGE AND ENTRY
STUDENT DESK
SEED LIBRARY
Initially, we did not consider the director’s office as part of the redesign, but after the first client meeting, we all came to an agreement to utilize that space and possibly relocate the admin desk there.
DIRECTORS OFFICE
WORKSTATIONS AND COUNTER TOPS
STORAGE AND SHELVING
LAB STORAGE
SEED ANALYST DESKS
STUDENT DESK
SEED LIBRARY
ADMIN STORAGE AND ENTRY
ADMIN DESK
HOOD ROOM
STUDENT DESK
LAB STORAGE
SEED ANALYST DESKS
BREAK AREA
ADMIN STORAGE AND ENTRY
WORKSTATIONS AND COUNTER TOPS
STORAGE AND SHELVING
ADMIN STATIONS
STUDENT WORK STATIONS
BREAK STATION
ADMIN DESK
SEED LIBRARY
HOOD ROOM
STUDENT DESK
LAB STORAGE
SEED ANALYST DESKS
BREAK AREA
ADMIN STORAGE AND ENTRY
WORKSTATIONS AND COUNTER TOPS
STORAGE AND SHELVING
ADMIN STATIONS
STUDENT WORK STATIONS
BREAK STATION
ADMIN DESK
SEED LIBRARY
HOOD ROOM
Although the first iterations were mostly programmatic changes, we began to explore implementing furniture and casework within the spaces. In preparation for our second meeting, we made a simple diagram to provide the clients with a visual reference for the furniture in the space.
SECOND CLIENT MEETING
In our second client meeting, we discovered more about the usable space within the seed lab, along with some feedback on our initial concepts and the steps we took toward a final redesign. For this meeting, we came prepared with new floor plan options, updated material and color palettes, and furniture options.
Compared to our first meeting with the seed lab, the second meeting was less interactive and focused more on the technical aspects of the layout, materials, and furniture.
We brought several floor plans and a variety of furniture specifications to present to the clients. Rather than choosing just one floor plan as their favorite, the clients worked through each option and selected aspects they liked. Additionally, by providing a wide range of furniture specifications and material finishes, we were able to narrow down the options with the clients to select those best suited for the design.
Some feedback that we deemed important from the clients included a designated area for the printer and other office supplies, additional admin workspace, larger countertop space in comparison to chairs, privacy barriers, extra storage and receiving space, and specific material choices suited for the lab’s use, with an emphasis on the ability to be easily cleaned and maintained in a sterile environment. This feedback allowed us to refine our current design and selections according to these standards, ensuring the satisfaction of the clients.
Key Takeaways
• Designated Printer Area
• Additional Admin Workspace
• Larger Countertop Space Compared to Chairs
• Privacy Barriers
• Increased Countertop Space
• Additional Storage and Receiving
• Specific Material Choices
• Refinement of Design and Design Choices
DESIGN ITTERATIONS 2
The second series of design iterations marked a turning point in our design process. Building on the feedback we received from our last meeting, our focus shifted toward refinement and practicality. During the second iteration of design, we had the opportunity to hear from several guest speakers who provided valuable insights into our process. Elizabeth Johnson from the Montana State College of Nursing visited our studio to discuss her experience designing for healthcare. She offered several ideas and options for cabinetry and casework. Laura Craig from Nora Flooring explained various flooring materials and guided us in selecting the most suitable option for our project. We began prioritizing updates to casework, desks, cabinetry, and storage. Simultaneously, we narrowed down the material and color finish palettes, getting closer to a final selection that matched both the client’s preferences and the project vision.
Additionally, we started working on a landscaping plan to add another layer to the redesign. Our goal was to develop a relationship between the lab and the surrounding environment, where both could complement each other. Despite many of our advancements, we had yet to finalize a programmatic layout to build our final design from. Creating a workspace that accommodates all the needs of the laboratory and its users remained the biggest challenge at this stage.
EXHISTING HARDSCAPE
LANDSCAPE EDGING
LANDSCAPING PAVER STONES
OUTDOOR PICNIC TABLES
WATER CONNECTION / UNUSABLE SPACE
OUTDOOR SEATING
The first iteration of the landscaping took a practical approach, focusing on a functional outdoor space to complement the interior. By using simple pavers and benches, we aimed to establish an inviting space that prioritized low maintenance and ease of construction.
NATURAL FOLIAGE DESIGN
FINISHES
For the wall paint, we decided on white to brighten up the space and create an open, airy atmosphere, coupled with an earth-tone accent green to connect back to the natural theme. The accent green is matched with a textured tile backsplash. The wood cabinetry and casework finishes further emphasize this theme by evoking a warm, comfortable feeling in the space. Lastly, we decided on different shades of gray for both the flooring and countertops. With the color theme established, the next step was to gather final preferences from the clients. FLOORING
CABINETRY & CASEWORK COUNTERTOPS
NORA ® | 5304
NORA ® | 6710
NORA ® | 5114
NORA ® | 0749
STEELCASE ® | WINTER ON MAPLE
STEELCASE ® | ACACIA
® | CLEAR OAK
® | SMOKED WALNUT
BACKSPLASH TILE PAINTS
® | REJUVINATION
BEHR
STEELCASE
STEELCASE
PANTONE ® | COOL GRAY 2c
PANTONE ® | COOL GRAY 11c
PANTONE ® | CLOUD DANCER
TILEBAR ® | CURVE FLUTED GREEN
CLAY RENDERINGS
In preparation for our third client meeting, we developed clay renders to visually communicate the scale and spatial relationships of the floor plans. The absence of color and materiality shifts the focus to proportions and spatial organization.
THIRD CLIENT MEETING
In our third meeting before the final review of our design, we met with our clients to finalize the program, materials, furniture, and finishes. We found this feedback to be some of the most crucial because it was the design meeting with our clients. Beyond this point, we knew it was up to us, the designers, to bring the ideas our clients had to life.
The critique we received included the need for additional countertop space, more room for chairs underneath desks to allow for more movement, more base cabinet storage, and more counter space for the admin area. The successful elements of the meeting were the incorporation of a center island to create more workable space for the analysts, maintaining the existing horseshoe with updated desks and casework, removing a lot of dead space within the existing layout, making final selections of finishes and colors, and coming to a final programmatic layout.
The feedback was crucial because it provided us with enough information to move forward with the design. Going into the meeting, we were nervous, as our weakest point was the program, but slowly working through the problems with the clients and taking aspects of each floor plan allowed us to find practical solutions to each problem.
DRAWINGS
The final products of this project represent a culmination of months of research, refinement, and collaboration. Each decision was informed by client feedback, material and furniture studies, guest speakers, and the creativity and dedication of each group member.
The main issues the lab faces include inadequate storage, the need for four analyst workstations plus two student workstations, a congested admin space, insufficient counter space for processing incoming and outgoing seed samples, dead counter space, and the need for updated casework and material finishes.
Throughout the semester, we focused on solving each of these main issues. Every iteration of the design brought us one step closer to finalizing the layout. The final design and materials reflect our attempt to create a modern, practical, and comforting space for the Montana State Seed Laboratory.
FLOOR PLAN
The final layout features an updated entry to the lab, with coat hangers and a divider to create a clear distinction between the lab and the hallway.
Upon entering the laboratory, the admin space includes a shelving system on the east wall for incoming and outgoing packages. The west side of the admin space features an extended countertop to provide additional space for processing packages and logistical tasks.
In the workspace, the southeast corner includes a kitchenette, along with the seed blower and seed counter station, both enclosed with dividers to contain those areas.
The center of the lab features an island work station for two analysts. Surrounding the island are the additional two student stations and two analyst stations. The island not only improves circulation within the lab but also promotes a collaborative work environment. The existing horseshoe layout is maintained, with updated desks and base cabinets.
On the east side of the lab, the hood room is updated with a smaller fume hood, allowing for more counter space and larger base cabinets. The back counter from the existing layout is removed to create more maneuverability within the space.
The herbarium remains largely unchanged, except for the addition of a new flat-file system with a maple finish.
The seed library is enhanced with a new mobile storage system, providing additional storage capacity.
Finally, the director’s office, located across the hall on the southern side of the lab, has updated shelving, cabinetry, desks, and a new couch.
LANDSCAPING PLAN
The landscaping design for this project was an essential step that we, as designers, took to enhance the experience not only for the occupants of the seed lab but for the seed lab as a whole.
Our goal was to create a harmonious blend of built and natural elements that would elevate the green space surrounding the lab. We chose a combination of shrubs, bushes, and trees to create a natural layering effect, providing privacy while offering a pleasing view. The objective was to direct the occupants’ gaze toward the Bridger Mountains, obscuring any unwanted views of traffic or construction below the mountain range.
Along with the natural cover, we designed a space that could serve as an outdoor escape for the analysts. The hardscape area features a pattern of simple stone pavers, providing a foundation for picnic tables and outdoor benches where staff can relax.
We also reimagined the existing flower beds outside the seed lab, redesigning them to complement the aesthetics of the new landscaping while highlighting native plant species. This added landscaping design became a crucial aspect of the overall redesign, especially given the clients’ emphasis on providing a space where they could escape the confines of the indoor lab and enjoy the beautiful outdoor environment that Montana has to offer.
Double-High Overhead Cabinets Open and Closed Combination x 1
Double-High Overhead Cabinets Open and Closed Combination x 1
D, W, H
x 60” x 30”
D, W, H 15
x 60” x 30”
Coupe Lounge Sofa x 1
STEELCASE®
STEELCASE®
STEELCASE® ELECTIVE ELEMENTS
Eames Desk x 2
D, W, H
28” x 60” X 29”
D, W, H
17” x 18” x 23”
D, W, H
17” x 95 ¾” x 36”
D, W, H
15” x 30” x 72 ¾”
HERMANMILLER®
Dang File Pedestal x 1
Flex Active Frames x 1
Open
Bookcase x 1
Base Cabinet with Two Small Side-by-Side Drawers and Doors x 1
Floor-Extended Base Cabinet with Door x 1
Pullout Trash Cabinet x 1
STEELCASE®
Floor-Extended
Floor-Extended
D,
MODULAR
Sink Base Cabinet with Double Doors x 1
CONVEY MODULAR
Base Cabinet with Two Small Side-by-Side Drawers and Doors x 1
Floor-Extended Base Cabinet with Door x 1
Base Cabinet with Two Small and One Large Drawer x 1
STEELCASE® CONVEY
Floor-Extended
D, W, H
24” x 36” x 34 ½”
STEELCASE®
Floor-Extended
D, W, H
24” x 30” x 34 ½”
STEELCASE® CONVEY MODULAR
STEELCASE® CONVEY MODULAR
Floor-Extended
D, W, H 24” x 24” x 34 ½”
D, W, H
24” x 24” x 34 ½”
STEELCASE® CONVEY MODULAR
STEELCASE® CONVEY MODULAR
Floor-Extended Base Cabinet with Two Small and One Large Drawer x 1
Floor-Extended Base Cabinet with Four Small Drawers x 1
D, W, H
24” x 18” x 34 ½”
D, W, H
24” x 18” x 34 ½”
STEELCASE® CONVEY MODULAR
Floor-Extended Pullout Trash Cabinet x 1
D, W, H
24” x 15” x 34 ½”
STEELCASE® CONVEY MODULAR
STEELCASE® CONVEY MODULAR
Upper Storage Cabinet with Double Doors x 3
Upper Microwave Cabinet x 1
D, W, H
12” x 31” x 24 ¾”
D, W, H
12” x 39” x 30 ¾”
Upper Storage Cabinet with Door x 2
W, H
x 18” x 24 ¾”
Upper Corner Cabinet x 1
x 23” x 24 ¾”
STEELCASE® CONVEY MODULAR
STEELCASE® CONVEY MODULAR
D,
12”
D, W, H
23”
CONVEY MODULAR
Upper Storage Cabinet with Double Doors x 5
HOOD ROOM
STEELCASE® CONVEY MODULAR
Floor-Extended Base Cabinet with Two Small Side-by-Side Drawers and Doors x 1
STEELCASE® CONVEY MODULAR
Floor-Extended Base Cabinet with Two Small Side-by-Side Drawers and Doors x 2
STEELCASE®
D, W, H
x 31” x 24 ¾”
STEELCASE® CONVEY MODULAR
Floor-Extended Base Cabinet with Double Doors x 1
D, W, H
STEELCASE® CONVEY MODULAR
STEELCASE® CONVEY MODULAR
Floor-Extended Base Cabinet with Door x 1
Floor-Extended Base Cabinet with One Small Drawer and One Door x 1
D, W, H
24” x 24” x 40 ½”
D, W, H
LABCONCO® D,
DIVERSIFIED SPACES ®
Flat File System x 1
D, W, H
28 ¼” x 41” x 55 ¾”
SEED
MONTEL ®
D, W, H
56” x 9’ 5
x 6’ 11
Mobile X Storage x 1
Floor-Extended Base Cabinet with Two Small Side-by-Side Drawers and Doors x 1
Floor-Extended Base Cabinet with Two Small Side-by-Side Drawers and Doors x 2
Floor-Extended Base Cabinet with Double Doors x 1
Floor-Extended Base Cabinet with Door x 1
Floor-Extended Base Cabinet with One Small Drawer and One Door x 1
Floor-Extended Base Cabinet with Double Doors x 1
Floor-Extended Sink Base Cabinet with Double Doors x 1
Floor-Extended Printer Cabinet with Two Small Side-by-Side Drawers x 2
Floor-Extended Base Cabinet with Two Small Side-by-Side Drawers and Doors x 2
Floor-Extended Base Cabinet with Door x 2
Floor-Extended Base Cabinet with Two Small and One Large Drawer x 1
Floor-Extended Base Cabinet with Two Small and One Large Drawer x 1
Floor-Extended Base Cabinet with Four Small Drawers x 1
Floor-Extended Pullout Trash Cabinet x 1
Floor-Extended Pullout Trash Cabinet x 1
Floor-Extended Base Cabinet with Double Doors x 1
Floor-Extended Printer Cabinet with Two Small Side-by-Side Drawers x 1
Floor-Extended Base Cabinet with Two Small Side-by-Side Drawers and Doors x 2
Floor-Extended Base Cabinet with Three Small Drawers x 5
Floor-Extended Base Cabinet with Door x 2
24” x 36” x 40 ½”
24” x 30” x 40 ½”
24” x 30” x 40 ½”
24” x 24” x 40 ½”
24” x 15” x 40 ½”
24” x 36” x 34 ½”
24” x 36” x 34 ½”
24” x 30” x 34 ½”
24” x 30” x 34 ½”
24” x 24” x 34 ½”
24” x 24” x 34 ½”
24” x 18” x 34 ½”
24” x 18” x 34 ½”
24” x 18” x 34 ½”
24” x 15” x 34 ½”
24” x 36” x 27”
24” x 30” x 27”
24” x 30” x 27”
24” x 24” x 27”
24” x 15” x 27”
Winter on Maple
Winter on Maple
Winter on Maple
Winter on Maple
Winter on Maple
Winter on Maple
Winter on Maple
Winter on Maple
Winter on Maple
Winter on Maple
Winter on Maple
Winter on Maple
Winter on Maple
Winter on Maple
Winter on Maple
Winter on Maple
Winter on Maple
Winter on Maple
Winter on Maple
Winter on Maple
STEELCASE® CONVEY MODULAR UPPER CABINETS
Upper Storage Cabinet with Double Doors x 16
Upper Storage Cabinet with Door x 2
Upper Microwave Cabinet x 1
Upper Corner Cabinet x 1
STEELCASE® ELECTIVE ELEMENTS CABINETS
Double-High Overhead Cabinets Open and Closed Combination x 2
Double-High Overhead Cabinets Open and Closed Combination x 1
Double-High Overhead Cabinets Open x 1
STEELCASE® FURNITURE
Coupe Lounge Sofa x 1
Elective Elements Open Bookcase x 1
Dang File Pedestal x 1
Flex Active Frames x 1
Flex Active Frames x 1
MILLER® FURNITURE
Renew Sit to Stand x 2
OE1 Table x 2
x 96” x 30” 29” x 82 ½” x 30 ¾”
15” x 30” x 72 ¾”
17” x 18” x 23”
17” x 80” x 67 ½”” 17” x 95 ¾” x 36” 46” x 70” x 29 ¼” 15 ¾” x 60” x 30” 30” x 60” x 28 ½”
Eames Desk x 2 12” x 31” x 24 ¾”
Winter on Maple
Winter on Maple
Winter on Maple
Winter on Maple
Winter on Maple
Winter on Maple
Winter on Maple
HERMAN
SPACES®
Flat File Unit, 5 Drawers x 3
Finished Top x 1
Flat File Base x 1
Mobile X Storage x 1
Airo Fume Hood x 1
Wellgaurd Seperation Panel x 2
Wellgaurd Seperation Panel x 1
Dayton ® Equal Double Bowl Undermount Sink
Semi-Pro Kitchen Faucet, 2-Spray x 1
x 40 ½” x 4” ½” x 23” x 24”
x 70” x 24”
ELKAY®
Rejuvination
Cornucopia
Behr Pistachio
6710 Charcoal
Epoxy Resin, Gray
Curved Fluted Green Ceramic Tile
FINAL PRESENTATION
In the final review of this project, we had the opportunity to present the collaborative effort behind the redesign of the Seed Lab to the Seed Lab staff, our professor, fellow classmates, and additional architecture faculty. This review not only allowed our clients to see the culmination of months of work and iterations, but it also provided us, as designers, with valuable feedback on components of the design that we may have overlooked during the process.
The greatest success of this project was seeing the Seed Lab staff excited and pleased with the final design. Their involvement was integral throughout the semester, and their guidance was crucial to ensuring that the redesign met their needs and vision.
We provided our reviewers with a comprehensive set of materials, including plans, elevations, details, landscaping designs, a detailed spec sheet, renderings, and a 1/2” = 1’ 0” scale model of the newly redesigned Seed Lab.
The feedback we received from the faculty reviewers focused on improving architectural client relations, making graphical and visual adjustments to the final boards, and refining skills for successful client presentations. Overall, this final review marked a fitting conclusion to the project, leaving us, our clients, and all those involved with a sense of satisfaction and accomplishment.
Rooted in creativity and collaboration, this redesign for the Montana State University Seed Lab reflects the enduring connection between science, community, and the natural landscapes of Montana. By creating a space that nurtures growth—both for seeds and ideas—we honor the spirit of discovery and the shared vision for a sustainable future.
Dorgan, Kathleen A. “Principles of Engagement: (Mis)Understanding the Community-Design Studio.” Cityscape 10, no. 3 (2008): 9–19. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20868667.
Robertson, Toni, and Jesper Simonsen. “Challenges and Opportunities in Contemporary Participatory Design.” Design Issues 28, no. 3 (2012): 3–9. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23273834.
Sanoff, Henry. “Evidence Based School Design: A Case Study.” Lernumgebungen: Erziehungswissenschaftliche Perspektiven Auf Schulgebäude Und Klassenzimmer, edited by Ulrike Stadler-Altmann, Verlag Barbara Budrich, 2016, pp. 101–12. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/j. ctvbkk1r7.9. Accessed 8 Dec. 2024.
English, Mary R., et al. “BUILDING COMMUNITIES WHILE BUILDING PLANS: A REVIEW OF TECHNIQUES FOR PARTICIPATORY PLANNING PROCESSES.” Public Administration Quarterly, vol. 28, no. 1/2, 2004, pp. 182–221. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/41288217. Accessed 6 Dec. 2024.
Finn, Donovan, and Jason Brody. “THE STATE OF COMMUNITY DESIGN: AN ANALYSIS OF COMMUNITY DESIGN CENTER SERVICES.” Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, vol. 31, no. 3, 2014, pp. 181–200. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/44114603. Accessed 6 Dec. 2024.
Newman, Herbert S. “First Year Building Project: Learning Experience and Community Service.” JAE, vol. 34, no. 2, 1980, pp. 26–28. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/1424755. Accessed 8 Dec. 2024.
Cushing, Debra Flanders, et al. “PEDAGOGY AND COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT IN ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN COURSES.” Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, vol. 30, no. 2, 2013, pp. 167–80. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/43031087. Accessed 8 Dec. 2024.
U.S. Department of Agriculture. History of NCGRP. Agricultural Research Service, https://www.ars.usda.gov/plains-area/fort-collins-co/ center-for-agricultural-resources-research/paagrpru/docs/seed/history-of-ncgrp/. Accessed 6 Dec. 2024.
Zhang, Huan, and Val Schlautman. “USDA Plant Introduction Program.” Crop Wild Relatives and Their Use in Plant Breeding, Colorado State University Libraries, 2023, https://colostate.pressbooks.pub/cropwildrelatives/chapter/usda-plant-introduction-program/. Accessed 30 Nov. 2024.
