www.vkonte.com/

Some Anti-Theist Religious Bits & Pieces: Round Ten www.vkonte.com/ Of those Big Questions vital to philosophical ideas that encompass life, the universe and everything, the domains of religious philosophy and religions and the idea of divinities keep on intriguing. Feelings multiply in books, articles, recordings, discussions in bars and bars, and truth be told anyplace and wherever at least two people are in nearness. There's the star side; there's the counter side. There aren't an excess of fence-sitters. I'm as yet in the counter theist camp as the accompanying pieces and pieces delineate.

With respect to *Even if America was established as a Christian country - a legend [#] sustained by the limit strict Right, particularly Right-wing pseudo-'antiquarian' David Barton who demands that the Constitution and the Bill of Rights were established on the Bible despite the fact that neither notice Christianity, God, Jesus or the Bible - that would in any case not of need imply that Christianity is the most important thing in the world of strict truth. [#] The initial architects were deists, not theists. *The greatest danger to any religion is its own regulation. (through Dark Matter 2525) *There are two kinds of divine beings, or God. There are the strict divine beings (or God) which by and large have numbered in the large numbers each with their own particular arrangement of characteristics.

Zeus is nevertheless one model. At that point there is the philosophical idea of a divine being or God. 1000 philosophical scholars would think of 1000 minor departure from the subject of what a god ought to resemble. Regardless of what direction you cut up things, you can discover a divinity to coordinate your philosophical or religious perspective. What we need is for god, God or the divine beings to really show their damn faces and settle these consistently progressing religious and philosophical issues unequivocally.

Obviously perhaps there are no divine beings, god or God. At that point too the divine beings, god or God would have been simply E.T. Any adequately trend setting innovation is unclear from sorcery on the off chance that you're not possessing that innovation or don't comprehend that it even is innovation. An electric lamp to an individual who lived 50,000 years prior would be an otherworldly thing.

As to versus Science *The beneficial thing about science is that it stays genuine whether or not or not you trust it. *Another delineation of the twofold norms that religion embraces is that assuming science should uphold their convictions, it is a thumb's up and science rules, OK? Obviously assuming that identical science discredits their convictions, it is a flat out thumb's down. For instance, in the event that one discovers a piece of wood that may have some association with Noah's Ark and scientifically measuring

dates that wood to the time period related with Noah's Ark, well that is a thumb's up. Obviously when scientifically measuring doesn't uphold a reasonable age for the Shroud of Turin, well obviously scientifically measuring is absolutely problematic and needs validity so it's a thumb's down. Sorry True Believers, you can't have it the two different ways.

Concerning and Belief *Say you stroll into a bar and tell one and all boisterous and clear that you trust in the real presence of the accompanying: the Creature from the Black Lagoon; the Cyclops; mythical serpents; the Easter Bunny; pixies at the lower part of your nursery; human-outsider crossovers; an imperceptible sorcery man in the sky; ghost trains; Santa Claus; phantom dogs; talking snakes; Thor; the Tooth Fairy; unicorns and the strolling dead (zombies). In essentially all cases, you'd be given rather bizarre looks and kept away from at all costs as a crackpot. I said "almost" all cases. What's the special case for the abovementioned, the one model where no one would think you odd by any means? In the event that you addressed "an undetectable sorcery man in the sky" you'd be right! [Actually you may likewise get pats on the head for winged serpents, talking snakes, unicorns and zombies since they are totally refered to in the Bible.] *It is a lot simpler to be determined what to think than to really have an independent perspective. That is the entire magnificence of religion. (through Dark Matter 2525) As to *Why is murder wrong? Either murder isn't right since it is autonomously, essentially, naturally off-base, or, more than likely is murder isn't right since God says it isn't right. We should inspect the last first.

God Says Murder Is Wrong 1: If God says murder isn't right, at that point God is a complete charlatan since God Himself murders. God's way of thinking concerning murder is do as I say, not as I do. That is God of the twofold norm. In the event that it's not homicide when God does it, isn't this an instance of exceptional arguing? Regardless, this religious conundrum at that point recommends that if murder isn't right since God says it isn't right, despite the fact that God murders, at that point all that simply implies is that profound quality is self-assertive because it is various strokes for various people (and gods).

God Says Murder Is Wrong 2: Many contend that assuming God made you, God has the privilege to uncreate you (for example - murder you). Obviously God may have gotten mankind going by making Adam and Eve, however God didn't make some other human and unquestionably didn't make me thus accordingly has no ethical option to murder them or me.

God Says Murder Is Wrong 3: Most theists would say that murder is against God's tendency (where case these theists haven't read the Bible), however then what gives these theists the position to choose what God's temperament ought to be? Regardless, if murder is against God's inclination, was it God Himself who figured out what His tendency would be or was it controlled by conditions outside God's ability to control?

God Says Murder Is Wrong 4: If God murders, at that point that murder/those killings are totally done by God's Master Plan and God's Master Plan is at last acceptable. Obviously theists are simply creating things here, similar to a Master Plan and further that any Master Plan of God must by definition be acceptable. That rationale doesn't follow. Hitler had a Master Plan and glance how that ended up!

Murder Is Really Wrong 1: If murder isn't right since it's truly off-base, and wrong whether God exists or whether truth be told God says murder isn't right, at that point ethical quality doesn't need God which would mean God is certainly not an imperative of or for ethical quality.

Murder Is Really Wrong 2: On the other hand, assuming there truly is no God, murder is outlandish (on the grounds that there is no God setting us an awful model) and in this way exceptionally significant.

Murder Is Really Wrong 3: Well the non-adherent doesn't have faith in a the great beyond which implies their present life is all they get. In this way, a) assuming they murder somebody, their lone shot at life is demolished by investing energy in jail or being executed; b) by ending somebody's life they would accept that they had abbreviated such individual's reality always - a definitive infringement. Compassion, regardless of whether for self or for the person in question, would make that demonstration of homicide hence an exceptionally indefensible recommendation.

Murder Is Okay 1: It is great to kill for God is acceptable and God sets us a genuine model by being a killer Himself (and a mass killer at that!). Murder can't not be right however long God exists. God exists forever, so all through endlessness, murder is right. So if God exists in addition to the fact that murder is not off-base it's completely advocated! Why? Murder Is Okay 2: Since everything occurs as per God's Master Plan, a Plan which should at last be acceptable, in the event that somebody submits a homicide that homicide was clearly important for God's Master Plan which is acceptable and along these lines the homicide was acceptable.

Murder Is Okay 3: It is great to kill since the killer everything needs do is simply ask God for pardoning and God will so excuse and the killer won't be rebuffed for the homicide.

Murder Is Okay 4: But murder just can't not be right if the killer is simply sending the casualty to an interminable existence with God, and what's a couple of years less of life, a day to day existence cut off, contrasted with an unfathomable length of time in Heaven? By that equivalent thinking, why does it make a difference if God murders since the casualty apparently will live on forever?

Murder Is Okay 5: If God says that murder isn't right, yet agnostics say God doesn't exist, subsequently nonbelievers should accept that murder probably won't not be right and profound quality is only a "it depends" recommendation; profound quality is along these lines emotional and profound quality is hence unimportant.

Murder Is Okay 6: It is great to kill if by slaughtering somebody, you wind up saving the existences of five others. The necessities of the many exceed the requirements of the meager few, or the one (as indicated

by Mr. Spock and who can scrutinize his rationale!).

Murder Is Okay 7: It is nice to kill to free the universe of the unbelievers and the heathens.

As to End Times *Here's another silly End Times thing. As indicated by [obviously American] Christian fundamentalists, the introducing of the End Times is about what occurs in America, either America's international strategy (particularly in the Near and the Middle East), as well as the territory of American culture. As per End Times aficionados, extremely insidious things are hatching in American culture like "merry Christmas" and the conflict on Christmas; early termination; the division of chapel and state; LGBT rights including

same-sex marriage; the educating of advancement; the expulsion of God from the Public Square; and on it goes. God isn't entertained thus God will as an immediate aftereffect of America giving God the center finger, introduce the End Times! You may review Michele Bachmann's popular expression that President Obama would without help from anyone else introduce the End Times (God isn't a Democrat). Obviously since Trump has been chosen for the administration - Trump being Bachmann's banner kid - Bachmann has been peculiarly quiet and has shut up about the End Times, likely on the grounds that Trump will fix the entirety of the above underhanded features in American culture.

As to and Hell *If you can't act naturally; consistent with yourself in Heaven (for example - evil), at that point your simply consistent with yourself eternity should be in Hell.