6ژﻭﺋــﻦ 2012
ﺑﺎﺭﻫــﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﺐ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﻭﺑﻼگ ﻣﺴــﺌﻠﺔ ﻓﻮﻕﺍﻟﻌﺎﺩﻩ ﺑﺎﺍﻫﻤﻴﺘــﻰ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺘﺬﻛﺮ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻳﻢ ،ﻭ ﺁﻧﻬﻢ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﻡﻭﺍﺭ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﻓﻜﺮﻯ »ﻟﻨﻴﻨﻴﺴﺖ ـ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﻟﻴﻨﻴﺴﺖ« ﺑﺎ ﭘﺪﻳﺪﺓ ﻓﺎﺷﻴﺴﻢ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﻻﺯﻡ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻳﺎﺩﺁﻭﺭ ﺷﻮﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻨﻈﺮ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻰ ،ﻫﻤﺂﻭﺍﺋﻰ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﻟﻴﻨﻴﺴﻢ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻛﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﭼﺮﭼﻴﻞ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺯﻭﻟﺖ
ﺩﺭ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺳﻮﻡ ،ﺧﺼﻮﺻﺎً ﻃﻰ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺩﻭﻡ ﻭ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎﺋﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻰ ﺁﻣﺪ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﻟﻤﺲ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻟﻨﻴﻨﻴﺴﻢ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺸﻜﻞ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﺎ ﻓﺎﺷﻴﺴﻢ ﻣﺮﺗﺒﻂ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ .ﻭﻟﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻤﺎﻝ ﺗﺄﺳﻒ ،ﺍﻳﻦ »ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ« ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﻭ ﺩﻫﻪﻫﺎ ﭘﻴﺶ ،ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﺁﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺻﺤﻨﺔ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻞ ،ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺳﻪ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ »ﻧﺨﺎﻟﺔ« ﺍﻭﺍﺋﻞ ﻗﺮﻥ ﺑﻴﺴﺘﻢ ـ ﻫﺎﺭﺩﻳﻨﮓ ،ﻛﻮﻟﻴﺞ ﻭ ﻫﻮﻭﺭ ـ ﻭ ﺳﭙﺲ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎﻯ »ﭘﻠﻴﺴﻰ ـ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺘﻰﺍﻯ« ﻛﻪ »ﻫﻮﻭﺭﻳﺴﻢ« ﻭ ﺍﻑ .ﺑﻰ .ﺁﻯ ﻭ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﻣﺮ ﻣﻚﻛﺎﺭﺗﻴﺴﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﺁﻭﺭﺩ ،ﻓﺎﺷﻴﺴﻢ ﻳﻨﮕﻪﺩﻧﻴﺎﺋﻰ ﻧﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺑﺎ ﻟﻨﻴﻨﻴﺴــﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻛﻠﻰ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺳــﺘﻔﺎﺩﺓ ﺗﺒﻠﻴﻐﺎﺗﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻟﻬﺎﻣﺎﺕ ﭼﭗﮔﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ،ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭﻧﻮﺭﺩﻳﺪ .ﭘﺮ ﻭﺍﺿﺢ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺷــﻜﻞﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ »ﻣﻴﻤﻮﻥ« ﻭ »ﻣﻮﻓﻘﻴﺖ« ﺁﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ،ﺩﺭ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﻓﺮﺻﺖ ﺍﻟﮕﻮﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺮﺗﺒﻂ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻖ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﺍﻳﺎﻻﺕ ﻣﺘﺤﺪ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺻﺎﺩﺭ ﺷﻮﺩ، ﻭ ﺩﻳﺪﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻗﻴﻘﺎً ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺷﺪ.
ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﭘﺮﻫﻴﺰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻃﺎﻟﺔ ﻛﻼﻡ ،ﻭﺑﻼگ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﭘﺪﻳﺪﺓ ﻓﺎﺷﻴﺴﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺑﻌﺎﺩ ﻭﻃﻨﻰ ﺁﻥ ﻭ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﺎً ﺭﺧﺪﺍﺩ ﻫﻮﻟﻨﺎﻙ ﻭ ﺿﺪﺍﻧﺴﺎﻧﻰ »ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻰ« ﺍﺧﺘﺼﺎﺹ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﻴﻢ .ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ،ﺗﻮﺿﻴﺢ ﻓﺎﺷﻴﺴــﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺑﻌﺎﺩ ﻓﻠﺴــﻔﻰ ،ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻰ ﻭ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﺎً ﺭﻳﺸﻪﻳﺎﺑﻰﻫﺎﻯ ﺁﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻖ ﻣﺨﺘﻠــﻒ ﺟﻬــﺎﻥ ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻣﻨﺪ ﻧﮕﺎﺭﺵ ﭼﻨﺪﻳﻦ ﻭ ﭼﻨــﺪ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷــﺪ .ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ،ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻴﻨﺠﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻓﻬﺮﺳــﺖﻭﺍﺭ ﻣﻰﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﭼﻨﺪ ﻣﻄﻠﺐ ﺍﺷــﺎﺭﻩ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ .ﻧﺨﺴﺖ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻓﺎﺷﻴﺴﻢ ﻳﻚ ﭘﺪﻳﺪﺓ ﻣﻌﺎﺻﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻫﻴﭽﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﻰ ﺑﺎ »ﺍﺳﺘﺒﺪﺍﺩ« ﺩﺭ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺳﻨﺘﻰ، ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻰ ﻭ ﺍﻗﻠﻴﻤﻰ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻴﺖ ﻭﻳﮋﺓ ﻓﺎﺷﻴﺴــﻢ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻰﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻴﻄﺔ ﺟﻐﺮﺍﻓﻴﺎﺋﻰ ﺁﻥ ﺟﺴــﺘﺠﻮ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ .ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﺩﺭﻭﻥ ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﺟﻮﺍﻣﻊ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺩﺍﺭﻯ ،ﻓﺎﺷﻴﺴــﻢ ﺍﺑﺰﺍﺭﻯ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺟﻬﺖ ﺟﻠﻮﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻓﺮﻭﭘﺎﺷــﻰ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﻃﻰ »ﺑﺤــﺮﺍﻥ« ،ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻤﺎﻝ ﺗﻌﺠﺐ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻓﺎﺷﻴﺴــﻢ ،ﺩﺭ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺮﺯﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺧﺼﻮﺻــﺎً ﺩﺭ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩﺓ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﺳــﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﻏﺮﺏ ﺑﻪ ﭘﺪﻳﺪﻩﺍﻯ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ ﺟﻬﺖ ﭘﻴﺸﮕﻴﺮﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺷــﻜﻞﮔﻴﺮﻯ »ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺩﺍﺭﻯ« ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺗﺤﺖ ﺳﻠﻄﻪ .ﺩﺭ ﻧﮕﺮﺵ ﻓﺎﺷﻴﺴــﺘﻰ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﺧﺎﺻﻴﺖ »ﺩﻭﮔﺎﻧــﻪ« ﻭ ﺟﺎﻟﺐ ﻳﻜــﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻬﻢﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻭﻳﮋﮔﻰﻫﺎﺋﻰ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺑﺰﺍﺭ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﺟﻬﺖ ﭼﭙﺎﻭﻝ ،ﺳﺮﻛﻮﺏ ﻭ ﺍﺳﺘﺜﻤﺎﺭ ﻣﻠﻞ ﺗﺤﺖ ﺍﺳﺘﻴﻼ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ. ﺑــﺎ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸــﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻮﺿــﻮﻉ ﻭﺑﻼگ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺮﺭﺳــﻰ ﺭﻳﺸــﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻓﺎﺷﻴﺴــﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﭘﺴــﺎ »ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺑﻰ« ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺌﻠﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻰﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﺘﺬﻛﺮ ﺷــﻮﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺑــﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻛﻠﻰ ،ﺁﺧﻮﻧﺪﻳﺴــﻢ ،ﺍﺯ ﻫﺮ ﻧﻮﻉ ﻣﺘﺼﻮﺭ ﺁﻥ ،ﻓﺎﻗﺪ ﻧﮕﺮﺵ ﻣﻨﺴــﺠﻢ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻧﺨﺴﺖ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺁﺧﻮﻧﺪﻳﺴــﻢ ﺑﻰﺭﻳﺸﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻰﺭﻳﺸﮕﻰ ﺩﻻﺋﻞ ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺩﺓ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻰ ﻭ ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻰ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ. ﺍﺯ ﻣﻨﻈﺮ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻰ ،ﺭﻳﺸﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺁﺧﻮﻧﺪﻳﺴﻤﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻭﺍﺧﺮ ﺩﻭﺭﺓ ﭘﻬﻠﻮﻯ ﺩﻭﻡ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻥ ﺭﻭﺑﺮﻭ ﺑﻮﺩﻳﻢ ،ﻧﻪ ﺩﺭ »ﺻﺪﺭﺍﺳــﻼﻡ« ﻭ »ﻓﺎﺟﻌﺔ« ﻛﺮﺑﻼ ،ﻭ ﻳــﺎ »ﺍﺣﻜﺎﻡ« ﺩﻳﻨــﻰ ﻭ ﺩﻭﺍﺯﺩﻩ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﻭ ﭼﻬــﺎﺭﺩﻩ ﻣﻌﺼﻮﻡ ﻭ »ﺣﻘﺎﻧﻴﺖ« ﺩﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﻼﻡ ،ﻛﻪ ﺻﺮﻓﺎً ﺩﺭ ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺵ ﭘﺪﻳﺪﺓ ﺷﻬﺮﻧﺸﻴﻨﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻭﺍﺧﺮ ﺩﻭﺭﺓ ﻗﺎﺟﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﻣﻰﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺟﺴــﺘﺠﻮ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺪﺭﻳﺞ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻭﺑﺎﺵ ﻭ ﺩﻻﻻﻥ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻴﻄﺔ ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭ ،ﺩﺭ ﺍﻃﺮﺍﻑ »ﻗﻠﻌﻪﻫﺎ« ﻭ ﺷــﻬﺮﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻏﺎﺭﻧﺸﻴﻨﻰ ﻭ »ﺭﻳﺰﻩﺧﻮﺍﺭﻯ« ﺍﺯ ﭘﺪﻳﺪﺓ ﻧﻮﻳﻦ ﺷﻬﺮﻧﺸﻴﻨﻰ ﻣﺸﻐﻮﻝ ﺷﺪﻧﺪ ،ﻭ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﻣﺮ ﻧﻮﻋﻰ ﻣﺮﻛﺰﻳﺖ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﻋﻄﺎء ﻛﺮﺩﻧــﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻧﺘﻴﺠــﻪ» ،ﺁﺧﻮﻧﺪ« ﺩﺭ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻣﻰ ﻛــﻪ ﻃﻰ ﺍﻳﻨﺪﻭﺭﻩ ﭘﺎﻯ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﮔﺬﺍﺷــﺖ ،ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻧﻰ ﺑﺎ ﻟﺶﻭﻟﻮﺵ ،ﻻﺕ ﻭ ﺗﻴﻎﻛﺶ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺖ ،ﻭ ﭼﻪ ﺑﺴﺎ ﻛﻪ ﺣﺘﻰ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ،ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﮔﺬﺷﺖ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ 150ﺳــﺎﻝ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ »ﺩﮔﺮﺩﻳﺴــﻰ« ﻧﻴﺰ ﺷــﻘﺎﻕ ﺑﻴﻦ »ﺍﻭﺑﺎﺵ« ﻭ ﺁﺧﻮﻧــﺪ ﺁﻧﻘﺪﺭﻫﺎ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺭﻭﻳﺖ ﻧﺒﺎﺷــﺪ .ﺧﻼﺻــﻪ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ،ﺁﺧﻮﻧﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﺷﻬﺮﻧﺸﻴﻨﻰ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﮔﻪﺍﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻭﺑﺎﺵ ﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪﻧﺸﻴﻦ ﺷﻬﺮﻯ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻗﺴﻤﻰ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻭﺑﺎﺵ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ »ﺯﻳﻨﺖ« ﺩﺍﺩﻥ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻤﺎﻣﻪ ﻭ ﺩﺳــﺘﺎﺭ ﻭ ﻳﻚ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪ »ﺍﺩﺍ ﻭ ﺍﻃــﻮﺍ ِﺭ« ﻣﻀﺤﻚ ﻭ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺁﻳﺔ ﻗﺮﺁﻥ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﺩﻟﻘﻚﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎﻯ ﻗﺮﻭﻥﻭﺳــﻄﻰ ﺳــﻌﻰ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻭﺍﺑﺴــﺘﮕﺎﻥﺍﺵ ﺍﻣﺘﻴﺎﺯﺍﺕ ﻣﺎﻟﻰ ﻭ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﻛﺴﺐ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﻣﺴﻠﻢ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﻭﺍﭘﺲﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺳــﻨﺘﻰ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ،ﻛﻪ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺷــﺎﻩ ﻣﺴــﺘﺒﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺳــﺘﮕﺎﻩ ﻭﻯ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ﺍﺯ »ﺍﻣﺘﻴﺎﺯﺍﺕ« ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﺍﺭ ﺷﻮﻧﺪ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻟﻘﻚﻫﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺳــﻬﻮﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻭﺑﺎﺵ ﻭ ﺑﻰﺳــﺘﺎﺭﮔﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ »ﻣﺪﺍﻓﻌﺎﻥ«
ﺣﻘــﻮﻕ ﻏﻴﺮﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻳﺎﻥ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﺷــﻮﻧﺪ .ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺴــﺮﻭﻯ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﺐ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﺑــﻪ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﻡﻭﺍﺭ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺁﺧﻮﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻭﺑﺎﺵ ﺍﺷــﺎﺭﻩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﺒﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺘﺄﺳﻔﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺄﺧﻴﺮ ﻓﺮﺍﻭﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻯ ﺧﺎﻧﻢ ﻫﻤﺎ ﻧﺎﻃﻖ ﺑﺮ ﺷﺒﻜﺔ ﺍﻳﻨﺘﺮﻧﺖ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ،ﻣﻰﺑﻴﻨﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﻟﺨﺘﻰﻫﺎ ،ﻟ ُﻨﮕﻰﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺍﻭﺑﺎﺵ ﺑﺎ ﺁﺧﻮﻧﺪﻳﺴﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺻﺮﺍﺣﺖ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﺷﺪﻩ. ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻰ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻰﺭﻳﺸــﮕﻰ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﻭ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻰ ،ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺑﻰﺭﻳﺸﮕﻰ ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻰ ﻭ ﻧﻈﺮﻯ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﺁﻭﺭﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﻗﺼﻪﻫﺎ، ﺣﻜﺎﻳﺎﺕ ﻓﻜﺎﻫــﻰ ﻭ ﻓﻮﻟﻜﻮﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻴــﺎﻥ ،ﺍﺯ ﻣﻼﻧﺼﺮﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺗﺎ ﻭﻳﺮﺍﺳــﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺣﺴﻦﻛﭽﻞ ﻭ »ﺧﺎﻟﻪ ﺳﻮﺳﻜﻪ« ،ﭘﺮﺳﻮﻧﺎژ ﺁﺧﻮﻧﺪ ﻫﻤﻴﺸــﻪ ﻣﺤﻴﻞ ،ﺳــﻮﺩﺟﻮ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥﺳﺘﻴﺰ ﺍﺳﺖ؛ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﺍﻭﺑﺎﺵ ﺷﻬﺮﻯ .ﻧﺘﻴﺠﺘﺎً ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﻧﺰﺩ ﺁﺧﻮﻧﺪ »ﻧﮕﺮﺵ ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻰ« ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﻣﻰﺷــﻮﺩ ،ﻧﻬﺎﻳــﺖ ﺍﻣﺮ ﻓﻘــﻂ ﺩﺭ ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺏ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺳــﻮﺩﺟﻮﺋﻰ، ﻛﻼﺷــﻰ ﻭ ﺩﻻﻟﻰ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻰﮔﻴﺮﺩ .ﻭﻟــﻰ ﻃﻰ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﭘﻬﻠﻮﻯ ،ﻛﻪ ﺑــﻪ ﻏﻠﻂ »ﺳــﻠﻄﻨﺖ ﭘﻬﻠﻮﻯ« ﻧــﺎﻡ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ،ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺑﻰﺭﻳﺸــﮕﻰ ﭘﻬﻠﻮﻯﻫــﺎ ،ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺗﻨﮕﺎﺗﻨﮓ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺩﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﺍﻧﮕﻠﻴﺲ ،ﻳﻌﻨﻰ »ﺳــﺮﺑﺎﺯﺧﺎﻧﺔ« ﭘﻬﻠﻮﻯ ﻭ »ﻣﺴــﺠﺪ« ﺩﺭ ﻓﻀﺎﻯ ﺷﻬﺮﻯ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺮﻋﺖ ﺭﺷﺪ ﻭ ﻧﻤﻮ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﭘﻬﻠﻮﻯﻫﺎ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻭﺑﺎﺵ ﺭﻳﺸﻪ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ، ﻗﺼﺪ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻨﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺭﺗﺒــﺎﻁ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﻡﻭﺍﺭ ﺩﻭ ﭘﺪﻳﺪﺓ ﻳﻚﺳــﺎﻥ ـ ﺁﺧﻮﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻭﺑــﺎﺵ ـ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋــﻪﺍﻯ ﻣﺘﻀﺎﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻤﺎﻳــﺶ ﺑﮕﺬﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍﺳــﺘﺎ ،ﺩﺭ ﻓﺮﺩﺍﻯ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺍﻭﻝ» ،ﻣﺴــﺠﺪ« ﻭ »ﺳﺮﺑﺎﺯﺧﺎﻧﻪ« ﻛــﻪ ﻫﺮ ﺩﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻠــﻪ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪﺍﺕ »ﺟﻨﺒﻰ« ﺳــﻠﻄﻨﺖ ﺍﺳــﺘﺒﺪﺍﺩﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺑﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺻﻠﻰ ﺷــﺒﻜﺔ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻤﺎﺭﻯ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﺷﺪ .ﻭ ﻋﻠﻴﺮﻏﻢ »ﺗﻀﺎﺩﻫﺎﻯ« ﺻﻮﺭﻯ ،ﺷــﺎﻫﺪﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ »ﭘﺪﻳﺪﻩ« ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﺎﻫﻨﮕــﻰ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺗﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﺍﻧﮕﻠﺴــﺘﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺨﻮﺑﻰ ﺣﻔﻆ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ. ﺩﺭ ﻭﺑﻼگ »ﻭﻳﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﻭ ﻭﺑﺎ« ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ ﺳــﺎﺧﺖ ﻭ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺖ ﻣﺼﻨﻮﻋﻰ ﺗﺰﻫــﺎ ﻭ ﺁﻧﺘﻰﺗﺰﻫﺎ ﺗﻮﺳــﻂ ﺍﻧﮕﻠﺴــﺘﺎﻥ ﺗﻮﺿﻴﺤﺎﺗــﻰ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻩﺍﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﭽﺔ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﻳﺖ »ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻳﺒﺨﺶ ﻓﻠﺴــﻄﻴﻦ« ﻭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﺳــﺮﺍﺋﻴﻞ ﺷــﺎﻳﺪ »ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍﺋﻰﺗﺮﻳﻦ« ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ؛ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﺗﻮﺿﻴﺢ ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮﻯ ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻄﻠﺐ ﻧﻤﻰﺩﻫﻴﻢ .ﻭﻟﻰ ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﮔﻔﺘﻴﻢ ﺳــﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻨﺎﻃــﻖ ﺗﺤﺖ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﺯ »ﻓﺎﺷﻴﺴﻢ« ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻧﻮﻋﻰ ﻋﺎﻣﻞ ﺑﺎﺯﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ
ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺟﻨﮓﺳــﺮﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻋﺎﻣﻞ ﺩﻭ ﻭﻇﻴﻔﺔ ﺍﺳﺎﺳــﻰ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ :ﺳﺮﻛﻮﺏ ﻛﻤﻮﻧﻴﺴــﻢ ﻭﺍﺑﺴﺘﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻮﺭﻭﻯ ،ﻭ ﺟﻠﻮﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺭﺷﺪ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺗﺤﺖ ﺳﻠﻄﻪ. ﻣﺴــﺌﻠﺔ ﺳــﺮﻛﻮﺏ ﻛﻤﻮﻧﻴﺴﻢ ﻭﺍﺑﺴﺘﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺷــﻮﺭﻭﻯ ﺭﻭﺷﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻮﺿﻴﺢ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ،ﻭﻟﻰ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﻓﺎﺷﻴﺴــﻢ ﺑﺎ ﺳــﺮﻛﻮﺏ ﺳــﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺗﺤﺖ ﭼﭙﺎﻭﻝ ﺷــﺎﻳﺪ ﺁﻧﻘﺪﺭﻫﺎ ﺭﻭﺷﻦ ﻧﻨﻤﺎﻳﺪ .ﺧﻼﺻﻪ ﺑﮕﻮﺋﻴﻢ ،ﺭﺷــﺪ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻖ ﺗﺤﺖ ﭼﭙﺎﻭﻝ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﺄﺋﻴﺪ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻤﺎﺭﻯ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺖ ﻏﻴﺮﻗﺎﺑــﻞ ﺍﻧﻜﺎﺭ ﺳــﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺩﺍﺭﻯ ،ﺑﻴــﻦ ﺍﻳﻨﺪﻭ ﭘﺪﻳﺪﻩ ،ﭘﻴﻮﺳــﺘﻪ ﻧﻮﻋﻰ »ﺗﻘﺎﺑﻞ« ﭘﻴﺶ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺁﻣﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ،ﻓﺎﺷﻴﺴﺖﻫﺎ ﻣﻰﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﭘﻴﻮﺳﺘﻪ ﺩﺭ »ﺧﻄﻰ ﻣﻴﺎﻧﻪ« ﺳــﻴﺮ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺧﻂ ﺟﺎﺩﻭﺋﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻓﺎﺷﻴﺴﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ »ﺷﻜﺎﻑ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺳﻨﺖ ﻭ ﻣﺪﺭﻧﻴﺘﻪ« ﻳﺎﺩ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ، ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺧﻄﻰ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﻗﺘﻞﻋﺎﻡ ﻛﻤﻮﻧﻴﺴﺖﻫﺎ ﻣﻨﺠﺮ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ، ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﺭﺷــﺪ ﺳــﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﻣﺤﻠﻰ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺍﻳﺴﺘﺎﺩﮔﻰ ﻣﻰﻛﻨــﺪ .ﺍﻳﻨﻬﻤــﻪ ﺗﺎ ﻣﻨﺎﺑــﻊ ﻣﺎﻟﻰ ﻭ ﻛﺎﻧﻰ ﭼﭙﺎﻭﻝ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻰ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻰ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ »ﺗﻬﺪﻳﺪ« ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻧﮕﻴﺮﺩ. ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎﺳــﺖ ﻣﻌﻨــﺎ ﻭ ﻣﻔﻬــﻮﻡ ﻭﺍﻗﻌــﻰ ژﺳــﺖﻫﺎﻯ »ﺳﻮﺳﻴﺎﻟﻴﺴــﺖ« ﺍﻋﻠﻴﺤﻀﺮﺕ ﺷﺎﻫﻨﺸــﺎﻩ ﺁﺭﻳﺎﻣﻬﺮ! ﻣﻠﻰ ﻛــﺮﺩﻥ ﺟﻨﮕﻞﻫﺎ ،ﻣﻠﻰﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺁﺏﻫﺎ ،ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﺑﺎ ﮔﺮﺍﻧﻔﺮﻭﺷــﻰ ،ﻣﻠﻰ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺵ ﻋﺎﻟﻰ ﻭ ...ﻫﻤﻪ ﻭ ﻫﻤــﻪ ﻳﻚ ﻫﺪﻑ ﻣﺸــﺨﺺ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩ :ﺑﻬﻴﻨــﻪ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ »ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪﻯ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻰ« ﺩﺭ ﻣﺴﻴﺮ ﺑﻬﺮﻩﻛﺸﻰ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻰ .ﻫﻤﻴﻨﺠﺎ ﻣﻰﺑﻴﻨﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ »ﺳﻮﺳﻴﺎﻟﻴﺴــﻢ« ﻋﻤﻠﻰ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻰ ﻧﻈﺮﻯ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺪﻣﺖ ﻓﺎﺷﻴﺴــﻢ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﻴﺮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ،ﺁﺧﻮﻧﺪﻳﺴﻢ ﻓﺎﺷﻴﺴﺖ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳﺖ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ـ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﻛﻮﺩﺗﺎﻯ 22ﺑﻬﻤﻦ 57ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺳــﺮﻧﻴﺰﺓ ﺍﺭﺗﺶ ﺷﺎﻫﻨﺸﺎﻫﻰ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ـ ﺁﻧﻘﺪﺭﻫﺎ ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻣﻨﺪ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪﺳــﺎﺯﻯ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ؛ ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺁﺭﻳﺎﻣﻬﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ. ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺭﺍﺳــﺘﺎ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﻏﺎﺋﻠﺔ ﺁﺧﻮﻧﺪﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ،ﺷــﺒﻜﺔ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻰ »ﺧﺒﺮﺳــﺎﺯﻯ« ﻭ ﺳــﺨﻦﭘﺮﺍﻛﻨﻰ ﺟﻬﺖ ﺟﻠﻮﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻫﺮ ﮔﻮﻧﻪ »ﺍﻧﺤﺮﺍﻑ« ﺍﺣﺘﻤﺎﻟﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻫﺪﺍﻑ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﺷﺪﻩ ،ﺁﻧﺎً »ﺳﻮﺳﻴﺎﻟﻴﺴﻢ« ﺭﺍ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺴﺎﻁ ﺟﺎﺳﺎﺯﻯ ﻛﺮﺩ! ﺍﻳﻨﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺴﺘﻀﻌﻔﺎﻥ ،ﭘﺎﺑﺮﻫﻨﻪﻫﺎ، ﻛﻮﺥﻧﺸــﻴﻨﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ »ﻋﺰﻳﺰﺩﺭﺩﺍﻧﻪﻫﺎﻯ« ﺍﻳﻦ ﻏﺎﺋﻠﻪ ﻧﺸﺴﺘﻨﺪ؛ ﻭ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺷــﺪ ﺗﺤﺖ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕ ﺳــﺎﻭﺍﻙ ﺁﺭﻳﺎﻣﻬﺮ ﻭ ﺍﺭﺗﺶ ﺷﺎﻫﻨﺸــﺎﻫﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ »ﺍﻧﻘــﻼﺏ ﻋﺰﻳﺰ« ﺑﻪ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺩﻧﻴﺎ ﻫﻢ »ﺻﺎﺩﺭ« ﺷــﻮﺩ! ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ
ﻏــﺮﺏ ،ﺟﻬــﺖ ﻣﻬﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻬﺎﻣــﺎﺕ ﻭ ﺗﺤﻮﻻﺕ ﻧﺎﺧﻮﺷــﺎﻳﻨﺪ ،ﺑﺠﺎﻯ ژﺳــﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﻠﻮﻛﺎﻧﺔ »ﺳﻮﺳﻴﺎﻟﻴﺴــﺘﻰ« ،ﺗﺮﺟﻴﺢ ﺩﺍﺩ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻧﻮﻋﻰ »ﺍﻧﺘﺮﻧﺎﺳﻴﻮﻧﺎﻟﻴﺴــﻢ ﺧﺮﺧﺮﻛﻰ« ﺩﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺷﺒﻜﺔ »ﺁﺧﻮﻧﺪ ـ ﺍﺭﺗﺶ« ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﻫﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺭﺍﺳــﺘﺎ ،ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺑﻪ ﻋﺎﺭﻳﺖ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻟﻨﻴﻨﻴﺴــﻢ ﻭ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﻟﻴﻨﻴﺴــﻢ ،ﺍﺯ ﻗﻤﺎﺵ »ﻫﻨــﺮ ﻣﺘﻌﻬﺪ«، »ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻫﺎﻯ ﺗﻮﺩﻩﻫــﺎ«» ،ﻣﻄﺒﻮﻋﺎﺕ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ«» ،ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ« ﻭ ...ﺳــﺮﻳﻌﺎً ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺑﻠﻨﺪﮔﻮﻫﺎﻯ ﻓﺎﺷﻴﺴﻢ ﺁﺧﻮﻧﺪﻯ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺏ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﻧﻮﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻤﺎﺭﻯ ﻣﻌﺎﻧﻰ ﻭ ﻣﻔﺎﻫﻴﻢ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﻯ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ. ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄــﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﮔﻔﺘﻴﻢ ،ﺁﺧﻮﻧﺪﻳﺴــﻢ ﺍﺻﻮﻻً ﻓﺎﻗﺪ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﺔ ﻣﻨﺴــﺠﻢ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ،ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻰ ،ﻫﻨﺮﻯ ﻭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﻭ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺘﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ؛ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻨﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻫﻪﻫﺎﺳــﺖ ﺍﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﺑﻨﻰﺻﺪﺭ ،ﻋﺒﺪﺍﻟﻜﺮﻳﻢ ﺳﺮﻭﺵ ،ﺷﺮﻳﻌﺘﻰ، ﺁﻝﺍﺣﻤﺪ ﻭ ﻣﻄﻬﺮﻯ »ﻓﻴﻠﺴﻮﻓﺎﻥﺷــﺎﻥ« ﺑﻪ ﺷﻤﺎﺭ ﻣﻰﺁﻳﻨﺪ ،ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭﺍﺗﻰ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻰ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﻫﺪﻑ ﻛﻠﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺩﺍﺩﻥ ﺷﻌﺎﺭﻫﺎﻯ »ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ« ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﺓ ﺁﺭﻳﺎﻣﻬﺮ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﻣﻰﺷﺪ :ﺳﺮﻛﻮﺏ ﻛﻤﻮﻧﻴﺴــﻢ ﻭﺍﺑﺴﺘﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺷــﻮﺭﻭﻯ ،ﻭ ﭘﺮ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺟﻴﺐ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﺑﺮﻳﺘﺎﻧﻴــﺎ .ﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴــﻴﺮ ﻛﺸــﺘﺎﺭ 7ﻫــﺰﺍﺭ ﺯﻧﺪﺍﻧﻰ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﻣﻰ ﻣﻰﺷــﺪ ،ﭼﻪ ﺑﺎﻙ؟! ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﻣﻴﺮﺣﺴــﻴﻦ ﻣﻮﺳﻮﻯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﻳﺸــﺎﻥ ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﻨﺪ» :ﻣﺎ ﻧﻤﻰﺩﺍﻧﺴــﺘﻴﻢ!« ﺑﻪ ﻧﺨﺴــﺖﻭﺯﻳﺮﻯ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻤﻰﺩﺍﻧﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻧﺪﺍﻥﻫﺎﻯ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ 7ﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﻧﻔﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻋــﺪﺍﻡ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ ،ﺟﺎﻳﺰﻩ ﻫــﻢ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺍﺩ! ﺍﻳــﻦ ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺻﺮﺍﺣﺖ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻛﻪ »ﺑﻰﻣﺴﺌﻮﻟﻴﺘﻰ« ﻧﺰﺩ ﻣﻘﺎﻣﺎﺕ ﻓﺎﺷﻴﺴﻢ ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺑﻌﺎﺩ ﺍﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻋﺎﺭﺿﺔ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ. ﺑــﻪ ﻫــﺮ ﺗﻘﺪﻳــﺮ ،ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺷــﻌﺎﺭﻫﺎﻯ »ﭼــﭗ« ،ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪﻫــﺎﻯ ﺁﻟﻤــﺎﻥ ﻧﺎﺯﻯ ﻭ ﺍﻳﺘﺎﻟﻴﺎﻯ ﻣﻮﺳــﻮﻟﻴﻨﻰ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﺷــﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺷــﻌﺎﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻧﻰ ﻋﻤــﺎﻝ ﺑﺎﻧﻚﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻧﮕﻠﻴــﺲ ﻭ ﺟﻴﺮﻩ ﺧﻮﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﻟﻨﺪﻥ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻣﻰﻣﺎﻧﺪ ﺑﺮﺭﺳــﻰ ﺷﻴﻮﺓ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩ ﭼﭗ ﻭ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫــﺎﻯ ﭼﭗ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﺮﻭﺳــﻪ .ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻟﺔ ﻭﺑﻼگ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺍﺧﺘﺼﺎﺹ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﻴﻢ. ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ،ﻣﻮﺭﺧﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭ ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪ »ﭼﭗ« ﺳﺨﻦ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﻰﺁﻭﺭﻧﺪ: ﭼﭗ ﺗﻮﺩﻩﺍﻯ ﻭ ﭼﭗ ﻣﺴــﺘﻘﻞ! ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻴﻨﺠﺎ ﺑﮕﻮﺋﻴﻢ ،ﺣﺪﺍﻗﻞ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺮﺯﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩ ﺷــﻮﺭﻭﻯ ﺳــﺎﺑﻖ ،ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻭﺝ »ﺟﻨﮓﺳــﺮﺩ« ﺗﺼﻮﺭ ﺷــﻜﻞﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﻳﻚ »ﭼﭗ ﻣﺴــﺘﻘﻞ« ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈــﺎﻡ ﭘﺎﺩﮔﺎﻧﻰ ﭘﻬﻠﻮﻯﻫﺎ ﮔﺰﺍﻓﻪﮔﻮﺋﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ »ﭼﭗ« ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻞ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ ،ﻭﺍﺑﺴﺘﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ
ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺮﺍﺕ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺑﻼگ ﻧﻮﺷﺘﻪﺍﻳﻢ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻛﻮﺩﺗﺎﻯ 28 ﻣﺮﺩﺍﺩ ،32ﻭ ﺟﻬﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺰﻭﺍ ﻛﺸــﺎﻧﺪﻥ ﺣﺰﺏ ﺗﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻓﺮﻭﭘﺎﺷﺎﻧﻰ ﺍﻧﺤﺼﺎﺭ ﻣﻄﻠﻖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺰﺏ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺤﺎﻓﻞ ﺭﻭﺷﻨﻔﻜﺮﻯ ﻭ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻫﻰ» ،ﭼﭗ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻞ« ﺭﺍ ﺧﻠﻖ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺧﺮﻭﺝ ﻣﺠﺎﻫﺪﻳﻦ ﺧﻠﻖ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺍﻣﺎﻥ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ »ﭼﭗ« ،ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻥ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﺔ ﭼﺮﺧﺶ ﻣﺤﻴﻂﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻫﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻮﻯ ﺁﺧﻮﻧﺪﻳﺴﻢ ﻣﻨﺠﺮ ﺷﺪ ﺷﺎﻫﺪﻯ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺪﻋﺎ .ﻫﺮ ﭼﻨﺪ ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ »ﭼﭗ« ﺍﺯ ﻧﻘﺶ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻰ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﻰﺧﺒﺮ ﺑﺎﺷــﻨﺪ ،ﻓﻠﺴــﻔﺔ ﻭﺟﻮﺩﻯﺷﺎﻥ ﺟﺰ ﺧﺪﻣﺖ ﺑﻪ ﭘﺎﺩﮔﺎﻥ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ. ﺟﺎﻯ ﺗﻌﺠﺐ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ »ﭼﭗ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻞ« ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺗﺸﻜﻞﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﺳﺖﺳــﺎﺯ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻤﺎﺭ ﺭﻭﻳﺎﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯ ،ﺭﻭﻣﺎﻧﺘﻴﻚ ،ﭘﻴﺸﻤﺮﮔﻪ ،ﺧﻠﻘﻰ ﻭ ﺧﺎﻛﻰ ﻭ ﺩﺭﻭﻳﺶﺻﻔــﺖ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺩﺭﺁﻳﺪ .ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ،ﻧﻘﺶ ﺍﻳﻨﺎﻥ ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻥ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﺔ ﻣﻨﺎﺳــﺐ ﺟﻬﺖ ﺗﺤﻮﻻﺕ ﺭﻳﺸــﻪﺍﻯ ﺩﺭ »ﺷــﻴﻮﺓ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ«» ،ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋــﻰ« ﻭ ...ﻧﺒــﻮﺩ ،ﻭﻇﻴﻔــﺔ ﺣﻀﺮﺍﺕ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪﺳــﺎﺯﻯ ﺟﻬﺖ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻗﺒﻮﻝﻋــﺎﻡ ﺍﺯ ﻓﻮﻟﻜﻠﻮﺭ ﺷﻴﻌﻰﻣﺴــﻠﻜﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺁﺧﻮﻧﺪﭘﺮﺳــﺘﺎﻥ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻫﺴــﺖ. ﻓﻮﻟﻜﻠﻮﺭﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺟﺰ ﺭﻭﻳﺎﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﻯ ﻭ ﻗﺼﻪﺳــﺮﺍﺋﻰ ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ ﺧﻠﻘﻰ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﻓﻼﻥ ﻭ ﺑﻬﻤــﺎﻥ »ﺍﻣﺎﻡ« ،ﻭ ﻋﺎﻟﻢ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﺑﺎﻗﺮ ﺑﻘﺎﻝ ﻭ ﻋﺎﺩﻝ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﺟﺎﺑﺮ ﺟﺒــﺎﺭ ،ﻭ ﺣﻘﺎﻧﻴﺖ ﻗــﺮﺁﻥ ﻭ ﻣﻔﺎﺗﻴﺢ ﻭ ﻧﻬﺞﺍﻟﺒﻼﻏــﻪ ﻭ ...ﺣﺮﻑ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ »ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﻯ« ﻣﺼﻨﻮﻋﻰ ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ ﻓﻮﻟﻜﻠﻮﺭ ﺷــﻴﻌﻴﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﺍﻳﻦ »ﻗﺼﻪﻫــﺎ« ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﺔ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰ ﺁﻧﻘﺪﺭ ﭘﺎ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺷــﺎﻫﺪ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﺍﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﺑﻨﻰﺻﺪﺭ ﻭ ﺍﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﻳﺰﺩﻯ ،ﺳــﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺷــﺮﻭﻉ ﻣﺄﻣﻮﺭﻳﺖﺷــﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﻳﻢ .ﺍﻳﻨﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺳﻞ ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﻣﺘﺤﺠﺮ، ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭﻯ ﻭ ﺑﻰﭘﺎﻳﻪ ﺳﻌﻰ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺍﻳﻦ »ﭼﭗ« ﺑﻪ ﺍﺻﻄﻼﺡ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻞ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎﺭﻛﺴﻴﺴﻢ »ﺭﻭﻣﺎﻧﺘﻴﻚ« ﻭ ﺩﺭﻭﻳﺸﻰ ﺭﺍ ﻗﻄﺮﻩ ﻗﻄﺮﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻫﻰ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺷــﻨﻔﻜﺮﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺗﺰﺭﻳﻖ ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩ ،ﺑﺎ ﻓﻮﻟﻜﻠﻮﺭ ﻣﻀﺤﻚ ﺍﻣﺎﻣﺎﻥ ﺷﻴﻌﻪ ﭘﻞ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﻰ ﺑﺮﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﻧﺎﻡ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺧﻴﺎﻧﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﻣﻠﻰ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ »ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻯ« ﻛﺸﻮﺭ! ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎ ،ﻗﺘﻞ ﻣﺸﻜﻮﻙ »ﻛﺎﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻋﺪﻝ« ﺩﺧﺘﺮ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺍ ً »ﭼﭗﮔﺮﺍﻯ« ﭘﺮﻭﻓﺴﻮﺭ ﻋﺪﻝ ،ﺩﺭ ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻂ »ﻭﻳﮋﻩ« ﻧﺸــﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺰﺭﻳﻖ ﺭﻭﻣﺎﻧﺘﻴﺴﻢ ﭼﭗ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺭﻭﻥ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻯ ﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﺷﺎﺧﻪﻫﺎ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻰﮔﻴﺮﺩ. ﻭﻟــﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﻣﻴﺎﻧــﻪ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﺣﺰﺏ ﺗــﻮﺩﻩ ﺟﺰ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﺑــﻮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻨﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺻﺮﺍﺣــﺖ ﻣﻰﺩﻳﺪﻧﺪ ،ﻛﻪ ﺁﻣﺮﻳــﻜﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺭﻭ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻛﺎﺭﺕ »ﭼﭗ ﻣﺴــﺘﻘﻞ« ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﭼﻮﺏ ﺣﺮﺍﺝ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﺍﻧﺤﺼﺎﺭﻯ »ﺣﺰﺏ« ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺭﻭﺷــﻨﻔﻜﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻫﻰﻫﺎ ﺯﺩﻩ؛ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻛﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺖﺷﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﻧﻤﻰﺁﻣﺪ .ﻧﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪﺳــﺎﺯﻯﻫﺎ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺷــﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻳﺪﻳﻢ .ﮔﻠﺔ ﻓﺎﺷﻴﺴــﺖﻫﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﺔ »ﺍﻧﺘﺮﻧﺎﺳــﻴﻮﻧﺎﻝ ﺧﺮﺧﺮﻛﻰ« ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﻛﻮﺩﺗﺎﻯ 22ﺑﻬﻤﻦ 57ﺑﻪ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺭﺳﻴﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻰ ﻛﻪ »ﭼﭗ« ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺎﺭﺵ ﺍﻳﺴﺘﺎﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﻛﻪ ﺍﮔﺮ »ﭼﭗ ﺭﻭﻣﺎﻧﺘﻴﻚ« ﻧﻤﻰﺩﺍﻧﺴــﺖ ﺑﺮﺍﻯﺍﺵ ﭼﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﻰ ﺑﺎﺭ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ، ﺗﻮﺩﻩﺍﻯﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﺎﺕ ﻓﺮﺍﻣﺮﺯﻯﺷــﺎﻥ ﺑﺨﻮﺑــﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺤﺘﻮﺍﻯ ﺩﻳﮓ »ﺩﻝﺍﻧﮕﻴﺰ« ﺁﮔﺎﻫﻰ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ .ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺷﻤﺸﻴﺮﺷﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺯﻣﻴﻦ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻪ ،ﺑﺎ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ ،ﺁﺧﻮﻧﺪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻟﺶﻭﻟﻮﺵﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ »ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺳﺘﻰ« ﻭ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﻯﻫﺎﻯ »ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺑﻰ« ﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪﻧﺪ!
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﻯﻫﺎ ﺗﺎ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺳﺎﻝ ﭘﻴﺶ ﮔﺎﻡ ﺑﻪ ﮔﺎﻡ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﻣﻰﺷﺪ، ﻭ ﺣﺘﻰ ﭼﺎپ ﻋﻜﺲﻫﺎﻯ ﺭﻭﺡﺍﷲ ﺧﻤﻴﻨﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻳﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﻭﺍﺑﺴﺘﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺣــﺰﺏ ﺗﻮﺩﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ،ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨــﻮﺍﻥ »ﺭﻫﺒﺮ« ﺧﺮﺩﻣﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺩﻣﻰ ﺗﺎ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﭼﻨﺪ ﻣﺎﻩ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺳــﻜﺔ ﺭﺍﻳــﺞ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﺣﺰﺏ ﺗﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﺐ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﮔﻔﺘﻪﺍﻳﻢ؛ ﺍﻳﻨﺎﻥ ﺳــﻌﻰ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻏﺮﺏ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺳــﻮﺭﺍﺧﻰ ﺑﮕﺰﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﮔﺰﻳﺪﻩ ﺷــﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ :ﺳــﻮﺭﺍﺥ ﻣﻼ ،ﺁﺧﻮﻧﺪ ،ﻓﻮﻟﻜﻠﻮﺭ ﺻﻨﺎﺭﻯ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭﻯ ﻭ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﻣﺮ ﭘﻮﻛﺮ ﻧﻔﺮﺕﺍﻧﮕﻴﺰ ﭘﻮﭘﻮﻟﻴﺴــﻢ ﻭ »ﻧﺒﺮﺩ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ«. ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺭﺍﺳــﺘﺎ ﺷﺎﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻬﺮﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺷﻨﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﺓ ﻏﺮﺏ ﺍﺯ ﻗﻤــﺎﺵ ﺑﻨﻰﺻﺪﺭ ،ﻗﻄﺐﺯﺍﺩﻩ ،ﻳﺰﺩﻯ ،ﺭﺟﻮﻯ ،ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻭﺍﺧﺮ ﺣﺘﻰ »ﺧــﻂ ﺍﻣــﺎﻡ« ﻭ ﻻﺕﻭﻟﻮﺕﻫﺎﻯ »ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪﭼﻰ« ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻰ ﻳﻚ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻴﻄﺔ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻰ ﺑﻴــﺮﻭﻥ ﺭﻓﺘﻨﺪ .ﺧﺮﻭﺟﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺻﺪﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺟﻬﺖ ﺣﻔﻆ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺑﺮﺗﺮ ﻏﺮﺏ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺑﺎ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﺩﺍﺧﻠــﻰ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻣﻰﮔﺮﻓﺖ ،ﻭ »ﺗﻄﻬﻴــﺮ« ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻬﺮﻩﻫﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻏــﺮﺏ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻭﻟﻰ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻣﻬﺮﻩﻫﺎ ﻛﻪ ﻋﻤﺮﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻧﮓﻭﺭﻭﻏﻦ ﺯﺩﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ ﮔﺬﺭﺍﻧﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﺑﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺎﻧﺎﻝﻫﺎﻯ »ﻏــﺮﺏ« ﺍﻳﺴــﺘﺎﺩﮔﻰ ﺣﺰﺏ ﺗﻮﺩﻩ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺷــﺪﺕ ﻣــﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻰﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ! ﺑﻠــﻪ ،ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺎﺯ ﺑﺎ ﭘﺮﻭژﺓ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻤﺎﺭﻯ »ﺭﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﭼﭗ« ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻴﻢ .ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ ﺭﺍ ﻏﺮﺏ ﺑﻪ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻣﻰﺭﺳﺎﻧﺪ؛ ﺳﺮﻳﻌﺎً ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻧﻮﻛﺮﺍﻥﺍﺵ »ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻒ« ﻣﻰﺳــﺎﺯﺩ ،ﺗﺎ ﺯﺑﺎﻥﻣﺎﻥ ﻻﻝ ﻓﻀﺎﻯ ﺧﺎﻟﻰ ﺭﺍ ﻓﺮﺩ ﻭ ﻳﺎ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻼﺗﻰ ﻏﻴﺮﻭﺍﺑﺴﺘﻪ ﭘﺮ ﻧﻜﻨﺪ! ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻣﺜﺎﻝ ،ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﺠﺎﻫﺪﻳﻦ ﺧﻠﻖ ﺩﺭ »ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ« ﺑﺎ ﺣﺰﺏ ﺗﻮﺩﻩ ﺗﺎ ﺁﻧﺠــﺎ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺭﻓﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ »ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻓــﺮﻭﺵ« ﻣﻰﻧﺎﻣﻴﺪ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﻣــﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺣﺰﺏ ﺗﻮﺩﻩ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻓﺮﻭﺵ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺷــﻜﻰ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻳﻢ، ﺍﻳﻨﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﺭﺓ ﺍﺳــﻜﻨﺪﺭ ﻣﻴﺮﺯﺍ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻣﻰﻓﺮﻭﺧﺘﻨﺪ ،ﺟﺪﻳﺪﺍ ً ﺍﻳﻨﻜﺎﺭﻩ ﻧﺸــﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﻭﻟﻰ ﺑﻬﺘﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻛﺬﺍ ﻧﺨﺴﺖ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺎﻻﺋﻰ ﺳﺨﻦ ﺑﮕﻮﻳــﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ »ﻓﺮﻭﺵ« ﮔﺬﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ،ﺗﺎ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺑﺮﺳــﻴﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻮﺩﻩﺍﻯﻫﺎ .ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻳﻚ ﺧﺮﻭﺍﺭ ﺍﺩﻋــﺎﻯ »ﻛﻨﻮﻧﻰﺍﺕ« ،ﺩﺭ ﺟﺒﻴﻦ ﺁﺧﻮﻧﺪ ﻭﺣﺸــﻰ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﺳﺘﻴﺰﻯ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﻃﺎﻟﻘﺎﻧﻰ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻭ ﺯﻥ ﻋﻘﺪﻯﺍﺵ »ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯ ﻧﺴــﺘﻮﻩ« ﻣﻰﺑﻴﻨﺪ ،ﺑﻪ ﻗﻮﻝ ﻣﻌﺮﻭﻑ ﺑﻬﺘﺮ ﺍﺳــﺖ »ﺩﺭﺵ« ﺭﺍ ﺑﮕﺬﺍﺭﺩ. ﻭﻟﻰ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺮﻭژﺓ ﺣﺰﺏ ﺗﻮﺩﻩ ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺣﺪﺱ ﺯﺩ ﻓﺮﻭﭘﺎﺷﻰ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩ ﺷﻮﺭﻭﻯ ﺳــﻜﺘﺔ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﻣﻬﻤﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺁﻭﺭﺩ ،ﺍﻳﻨﺎﻥ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺕ ﮔﺴــﺘﺮﺩﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﺩﻭﮔﺎﻩ ﺷﺮﻕ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻰ ﻛﺎﻧﺎﻝﻫﺎﻯ ﺣﺎﻣﻰ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻨﻈﺮ ﺍﺳــﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻳﻚ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳــﺖ ﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ .ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺑﺎﺯﺑﻴﻨﻰ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﺳــﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻯﻫﺎ ﺑــﺮﺍﻯ ﺗﻮﺩﻩﺍﻯﻫــﺎ ﺍﺟﺒﺎﺭﻯ ﺷــﺪ ،ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻣﻮﻗﻊ ﺍﻳﻨﺎﻥ ﺳــﻌﻰ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺳﻞ ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮ ﺭﻳﺴــﻤﺎﻥ ﭘﻮﺳﻴﺪﻩﺍﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺴــﻴﺮ ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻨﺠﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺑﻦﺑﺴﺖ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﻣﻰﺷــﺪ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ. ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﺮﺻــﺖ »ﻃﻼﺋﻰ« ﺩﺭ ﺑﻠﻮﺍﺋﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﺎﺳــﺒﺖ »ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ« ﻣﺠﺪﺩ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺁﻣﺪ .ﺣﺰﺏ ﺗﻮﺩﻩ ﻛﻪ ﻋﻴﻦ ﮔﺮﺑﻪ ﻣﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻣﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﺩﻡ ﺳﻮﺭﺍﺥ ﻣﻮﺵ ﺑﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﻭﻝ ﻧﺸﺴﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺁﻧﺎً ﭘﺮﻳﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺨﻢ ﻣﻮﺳــﻮﻯ ﺩﺧﻴﻞ ﺑﺴﺖ ﻭ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻭ ﻓﺮﻳﺎﺩ ﻛﻪ» ،ﺣﻖ« ﻣﻮﺳﻮﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺯﻳﺮ ﭘﺎ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻌﻤﻞ »ﺿﺪ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺑﻰ« ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻒﺍﻳﻢ! ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺷــﻤﺎ ﭼﻪ ﭘﻨﻬﺎﻥ ،ﮔﻮﺭﺑﺎﺑﺎﻯ ﻣﻮﺳــﻮﻯ ﻭ ﺧﺎﺗﻤﻰ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ،ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﻳﻨﺎﻥ ﺣﻘﻰ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷــﻨﺪ ﻫﻤﺎﻧﺎ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﺩﺍﺩﮔﺎﻩ ﻭ ﭘﺎﺳــﺨﮕﻮﺋﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻨﺎﻳﺎﺕﺷﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻧﻪ »ﺣﻖ« ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ! ﻭﻟﻰ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺲ ﻫﻴﺎﻫﻮ ﻭ ﻏﻮﻏﺎﺳــﺎﺯﻯ ،ﺗﻼﺵ ﺣﺰﺏ ﺗﻮﺩﻩ ﻣﺎﻫﻰ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﺍﺯ ﺁﺏﮔﻞﺁﻟﻮﺩ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺗﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺴــﺎﺏ ﺧﻮﺩﺷــﺎﻥ »ﺧــﻂ« ﺟﺪﻳﺪﻯ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ »ﺍﻧﻘــﻼﺏ« ﺑــﺎﺯ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ؛ ﺧﻄﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻛﻤﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻜﺒﺖ ﻭ ﺍﺩﺑﺎﺭ ﺁﺧﻮﻧــﺪ ﻭ ﻣــﻼ ﺁﻟﻮﺩﻩ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ،ﻭ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧــﺪ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﺯ »ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ« ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ »ﺑﺮگ ﺑﺮﻧﺪﻩ« ﻭ »ﺍﻧﺴــﺎﻧﻰ« ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ! ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻗﺒﻮﻝ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻨﻈﺮ »ﺟﻴﺐﺑﺮﻯ« ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰ ﻛﺎﺭﺷــﺎﻥ ﺣﺮﻑ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ، ﻭﻟــﻰ ﻣﺴــﺎﺋﻞ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻣﻌﺎﺻﺮ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳــﺎﺩﮔﻰﻫﺎ ﺣﻞ ﻭ ﻓﺼﻞ ﻧﻤﻰﺷــﻮﺩ .ﮔﺬﺷﺖ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺷــﻴﺮﻳﻦ »ﺟﻨﮓ ﺳﺮﺩ« ،ﺧﻼﺻﻪ ﺑﮕﻮﺋﻴﻢ »ﺭﻓﻘﺎ« ﻛﻮﺭ ﺧﻮﺍﻧﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ. ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﺠــﺎ ﻛﻪ ﮔﺬﺭ ﭘﻮﺳــﺖ ﺑــﻪ ﺩﺑﺎﻍﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﺩﺭ ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻂ »ﻧﻮـ ﺍﺳــﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻳﻚ« ﺣﺰﺏ ﺗﻮﺩﻩ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺳﺖﺍﺵ ﺭﻭ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ ،ﻭ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﺗﻨﮓﻧﻈﺮ ﻭﺍﺑﺴــﺘﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻀﺎﻯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺟﺎﺭﻯ ﺁﺑﺮﻭﻯ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻪﺍﺵ ﺑﺮ ﺑﺎﺩ ﻣﻰﺭﻭﺩ .ﺩﻳﺪﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺩﺳــﺖ ﺁﻗﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺧﺎﺗﻤﻰ ،ﻣﻮﺳــﻮﻯ، ﺧﺎﻣﻨﻪﺍﻯ ﻭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ »ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﺍﻥ« ﺭﻭ ﺷــﺪ ،ﺣﺰﺏ ﺗﻮﺩﻩ ﻫﻢ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﻩ ﻣﺴﺘﺜﻨﻰ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺟﺎﻟﺐ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺳﻮﺭﺍﺧﻰ ﮔﺰﻳﺪﻩ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺎ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ »ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﭘﻮﺋﻦﻫﺎﻯ« ﻣﺜﺒﺖ ﺣﺰﺏ ﺍﺳــﺖ! ﺑﻠﻪ ،ﺗﻜﻴﻪ ﺑﺮ ﻣﻴﺮﺍﺙ ﺿﺪﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻰ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﻟﻴﻨﻴﺴﻢ ،ﺛﻤﺮ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺸــﻜﻴﻼﺕ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺭﻣﻐﺎﻥ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺁﻭﺭﺩ .ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ »ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍ« ﺑﺎ ﻫﻴﺎﻫﻮﺋﻰ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺸــﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮ ﺳﺮ ﻳﻚ ﺧﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪﺓ »ﭘﺎپ« ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﻡ ﺷﺎﻫﻴﻦ ﻧﺠﻔﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩ. ﻧﺨﺴــﺖ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺧﻮﺩﻣﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻰ ﭘﺎپ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻴﻨﺠﺎ ﺑﮕﻮﺋﻴﻢ؛ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻮﻉ ﻣﻮﺳــﻴﻘﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻃﻴﻒ ﻭﺳــﻴﻌﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺍﺳــﺖ؛ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺩﻝ ﺑﺒﻨﺪﻧﺪ ،ﻭﻟﻰ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺐ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻮﻉ ﻣﻮﺳــﻴﻘﻰ ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺛﺎﻧﻰ ،ﭼﻪ ﺍﺷﻜﺎﻟﻰ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻓﺮﺩﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺳﺎﺯ ﻭ ﺁﻭﺍﺯ ﻭ ﻳﺎ ﻧﻮﺁﻭﺭﻯﻫﺎﻯ ﺷــﺨﺼﻰﺍﺵ ﺑﻪ ﮔﻔﺘﻤﺎﻧﻰ »ﻫﻨﺮﻯ« ﺩﺳﺖ ﻳﺎﺑﺪ؟ ﺁﻥﻫﺎ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻭﺳــﺖ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﮔﻮﺵ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ ،ﻛﺴﻰ ﻫﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻭﺳﺖ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﮔﻮﺵ
ﻧﻤﻰﻛﻨﺪ .ﻣﺸﻜﻞ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻮﺩﻩﺍﻯ ﺟﻤﺎﻋﺖ ﻋﻴﻦ ﺁﺧﻮﻧﺪ ﻫﻤﻪ ﭼﻴــﺰ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻓﻖ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﻣﻰﺑﻴﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﺑﺮﺩ »ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰ« ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻮﻉ ﻫﻨﺮ ﺍﺻﻮﻻً ﭼﻴﺴــﺖ ،ﻭ ﻳﻚ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻼﺕ »ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ـ ﻋﻘﻴﺪﺗﻰ« ﺍﺯ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻫﻨﺮﻫﺎﺋﻰ ﭼﻪ ﺍﺳــﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩﻫﺎﺋﻰ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺩﻫﺪ ﺟﺎﻯ ﺑﺤﺚ ﻭ ﮔﻔﺘﮕﻮ ﻓﺮﺍﻭﺍﻥ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻭﻟــﻰ ﺣﺪﺍﻗﻞ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﺔ ﻧﻮﻳﻦ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺻﺤﻪ ﮔﺬﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺻﻮﻻً ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﻫﺮ ﭘﺪﻳﺪﺓ ﻫﻨﺮﻯ ﺩﺭ ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺏ ﺍﻳﺪﺋﻮﻟﻮژﻯ ﺍﺷﺘﺒﺎﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺍﺷﺘﺒﺎﻫﻰ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻰ ﻭ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ. ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ »ﻫﻨﺮ ﻣﺘﻌﻬﺪ« ﺑﺎ ﺳــﻘﻮﻁ »ﻫﻨﺮﺩﻭﺳــﺘﺎﻥ« ﺑﻠﺸﻮﻳﻚ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩ ﺷﻮﺭﻭﻯ ﺑﻪ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻩ .ﻫﻢ ﺍﻳﻨﺎﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﻯ ﺑﺎ »ﻫﻨﺮ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ« ﺭﺍ ﺁﻧﻘﺪﺭ ﺟﺪﻯ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺑﺮ ﻫﺮ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺁﻓﺮﻳﻨﺶ ﻫﻨﺮﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩ ﺷــﻮﺭﻭﻯ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻧﻘﻄﺔ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﮔﺬﺍﺷــﺘﻨﺪ .ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩ ﺷﻮﺭﻭﻯ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻧﻬﻤﻪ ﺗﻮپ ﻭ ﺗﻔﻨﮓ ﻭ ﺍﺩﻋﺎ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﺍﺯ 70ﺳــﺎﻝ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﻳﺖ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰﺍﺵ ﺑﺎﺭﻳﻜــﻪﺍﻯ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺍﻋﺘﻨــﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻜﺎﺗﺐ ﻫﻨﺮﻯ ،ﺍﺩﺑﻰ ﻭ ﻣﻮﺳــﻴﻘﺎﺋﻰ ﺑﺠﺎﻯ ﮔﺬﺍﺭﺩ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﺑﺸــﺮ ﺣﺬﻑ ﺷــﺪ ،ﻭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻣــﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﮕﻮﺋﻴﻢ، ﺩﻧﺒــﺎﻝ ﻛــﺮﺩﻥ ﺍﻳﺪﺋﻮﻟﻮژﻯ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﺗﺮﺍﻧﻪ ،ﻭ ﻫﻴﺎﻫﻮﺋﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮ ﺳــﺮ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺍﻩ ﻣﻰﺍﻓﺘﺪ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺩﻳﻮﺍﻧﮕﻰ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ ،ﻣﺴــﻠﻤﺎً ﻣــﺮﺩﻡﺁﺯﺍﺭﻯ ،ﺁﺩﺭﺱ ﻋﻮﺿﻰ ﺩﺍﺩﻥ ﻭ ﻏﻮﻏﺎﺳﺎﻻﺭﻯ ﻫﺴﺖ .ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻛﺎﺭﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ ﻃﻰ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻪ ﺩﻫﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﻳﺖ ﻧﻔﺮﺕﺍﻧﮕﻴﺰﺵ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻳﻦ، ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ،ﭼﺎﺩﺭﺳــﻴﺎ ،ﮔﻴﻼﺱ ﺷــﺮﺍﺏ ﻭ ...ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺷــﺎﻫﺪﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺭﮔﺎﻩ ﻗﺪﺭﺕﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺳــﺘﻌﻤﺎﺭﻯ ﻣﻼﺟﻤﺎﻋــﺖ ﻧﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺜﺎﻓﺘﻜﺎﺭﻯﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺧــﻮﺏ ﺧﻮﺭﺩﻩ .ﺭﺍﻩ ﺗﻮﺩﻩ ،ﻣﻮﺭﺥ 15ﺧﺮﺩﺍﺩﻣﺎﻩ ،1391ﺩﺭ ﻣﻄﻠﺒﻰ ﺗﺤﺖ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ »ﺩﺭﺱﻫﺎﺋﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﺠﺎﻝﺁﻓﺮﻳﻨﻰ ﺷــﺎﻫﻴﻦ ﻧﺠﻔﻰ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ!« ﻳﻚ ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺷــﺎﻫﻴﻦ ﻧﺠﻔﻰ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻣﻰﻧﻮﻳﺴﺪ، ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺮﺍﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ »ﺗﺒﻠﻴﻎ« ﺳﺎﺯﺵ ﺑﺎ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺳﺮﻭﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ: »ﺗﺮﺍﻧﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺷﺎﻫﻴﻦ ﻧﺠﻔﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺭﺍﻯ ﻋﺼﻴﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺍﻓﺸﺎﮔﺮﻯ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﻯ ﺁﻥﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﺗﺒﻠﻴﻎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺗﺤﻮﻝ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ ﻭ ﻧﺎﮔﺰﻳﺮ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺗﻦ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻭ ﺳﺎﺯﺵ ﻛﺮﺩ ﺑﺴﻮﺩ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ«. ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﺪﺋﻮﻟﻮگ »ﻣﺤﺘﺮﻣﻰ« ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﺗﺮﺍﻧﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻬﻤﻪ »ﻋﻨﺎﺻﺮ« ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﻭ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺑﻰ ﻭ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻰ ﻣﻰﺑﻴﻨﺪ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺎً ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺁﻓﺮﻳﻦ ﮔﻔﺖ! ﻣﮕﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﺎﻫﻴﻦ ﻧﺠﻔﻰ ﺭﻫﺒﺮ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻬﻤﻪ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﻭ ﺗﺒﻠﻴﻐﺎﺗﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺗﺮﺍﻧﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻭ ﺳــﺮ ﻫــﻢ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻳﺪ؟ ﺧﺠﺎﻟﺖ ﻫﻢ ﺧﻮﺏ ﭼﻴﺰﻯ ﺍﺳــﺖ. ﺍﻳﺪﺋﻮﻟــﻮگ ﻣﺤﺘﺮﻡ ﺗﻮﺩﻩﺍﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﻣﻰﺭﺳــﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﺎﻫﻴﻦ ﻧﺠﻔﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻋﻘﺐ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﺒﺶ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻭ ﺳﺒﺰﻫﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻚ ﻣﻰﺧﻮﺍﻫــﺪ ﺑﺎ »ﺩﻭﺭﻭﺋﻰ« ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻛﺎﺭﻯ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻭ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﺟﺎﺋﻰ ﺑﺎﺯ ﻛﻨﺪ:
»ﺑﻦ ﺑﺴــﺖ ﺷــﺎﻫﻴﻦ ﻧﺠﻔﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ]ﺟﻨﺒﺶ ﺳــﺒﺰ[ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺷــﺪ[...] . ﻛﻮﺷــﺶ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻋﻘﺐ ﻧﻤﺎﻧﺪﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺒﻴﻦ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﺒﺸــﻰ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﻭ ﺷــﻌﺮ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﻭ ﻋﺼﻴﺎﻥ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﻯ ﻭ ﺑﻰ ﭼﺸﻢ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﭘﺸﺖ ﺳﺮ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﻧﻪ ﻛﻮﺷــﺶ ﺻﺎﺩﻗﺎﻧﻪ ،ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﻛﻮﺷﺶ ﺩﻭﺭﻭﻳﺎﻧﻪ ،ﺑﺎ ﻓﺮﺍﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻠﻮ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻤﺖ ﺍﺭﺍﺟﻴﻒ ﻭ ﺟﻨﺠﺎﻝ«. ﺑﻠﻪ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳــﺨﻨﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﻛﺴﺎﻧﻰ ﻣﻰﺷــﻨﻮﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺯﻧﺪﺍﻥ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺧﺘﻦ ﻧﻮﻳﺴــﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ،ﭼﻪ »ﻣﺮﺩﻣﻰ« ﻭ ﭼﻪ »ﻛﻼﺳــﻴﻚ« ،ﺩﺭ ﺍﺗﺤــﺎﺩ ﺷــﻮﺭﻭﻯ ﺗﻮﺟﻴﻪ ﻛــﺮﺩﻩ ،ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺒــﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻣﭙﺮﻳﺎﻟﻴﺴــﻢ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻣﻰﻧﺎﻣﻴﺪﻧﺪ! ﻭﻟﻰ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻴﻜﻪ ﺑﺮژﻧﻒ ﮔﻮﺭ ﺑﻪ ﮔﻮﺭ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﭘﻨﻬﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻦ ﺷﻜﺴــﺖ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﻣﺎﺕ ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻳﻚ ﭼﻴﻦ ،ﺑﻪ ﻭﻳﺘﻨﺎﻡ ﺷﻤﺎﻟﻰ ﻣﻮﺷﻚﻫﺎﻯ »ﺳــﺎﻡ «6ﺩﺍﺩ ﺗﺎ ﻓﺮﻭﭘﺎﺷﻰ »ﻗﺼﺮ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻤﺎﺭﻯ« ﻳﺎﻧﻜﻰﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺁﺳــﻴﺎﻯ ﺟﻨﻮﺏ ﺷﺮﻗﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺴﺎﺏ »ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﺍﺕ« ﻣﺴﻜﻮ ﻧﻮﺷﺘﻪ ﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺁﻟﻮﻯ ﺍﺳــﺘﺎﻟﻴﻦ ﺗﻮﻯ ﺩﻫﺎﻥ ﺗﻮﺩﻩﺍﻯﻫﺎ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺁﻥ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻰﺑﺎﻳﺴــﺖ ﺍﺯ »ﻓﺮﺍﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻠﻮ« ﺳﺨﻦ ﮔﻔﺖ ﺧﻔﻘﺎﻥ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﺩﺭ ﻻﻳﭙﺰﻳﻚ ﺁﺑﺠﻮﻯ ﺗﮕﺮﻯ ﺭﻓﻴﻖ ﻫﻮﻧﻜﺮ ﻫﻮﺭﺕ ﻛﺸــﻴﺪﻩ ،ﺑﺮﺍﻯﻣﺎﻥ ﺩﻳﺎﻟﻜﺘﻴﻚ ﻣﻰﺧﻮﺍﻧﺪﻧﺪ. ﺣﺎﻝ ﺁﻣﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻪ ﺩﻫﻪ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﻯ ﭘﺸــﺖ ﭘﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﺎ ﺳــﺮﻛﻮﺑﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺁﺩﻣﻜﺸــﺎﻥ ،ﺟﻬﺖ ﺣﻔﻆ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﻳﺖ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﻣﻨﺤﻮﺱ ﻳﻚ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻼﺕ ﻭﺍﺑﺴــﺘﻪ ﻭ ﻧﻮﻛــﺮ ﺍﺟﻨﺒﻰ ﮔﺮﻳﺒﺎﻥ ﻳﻚ ﺧﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪﺓ ﭘــﺎپ ﺭﺍ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﺭﺳــﻤﺎً ﺑﻪ ﺻﺤﻨﺔ ﻧﺒﺮﺩ »ﺣﻖ ﻭ ﺑﺎﻃﻞ« ﺩﺭ ﺩﺭﺍﺯﻧــﺎﻯ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﻭﻗﺘﻰ ﻣﻰﮔﻮﺋﻴﻢ ﺧﺠﺎﻟﺖ ﺧﻮﺏ ﭼﻴﺰﻯ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﺍﺻ ً ﻼ ﺷﻮﺧﻰ ﻧﻤﻰﻛﻨﻴــﻢ .ﭘــﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻔﻨﮓﺑﺎﻓﻰﻫــﺎﻯ ﻭﻳﮋﺓ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﻟﻴﻨﻴﺴــﻢ ﻭﺍﺑﺴــﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺧﺎﻙﺑﺮﺳﺮ ،ﺍﻳﺪﺋﻮﻟﻮگ ﻣﺤﺘﺮﻡ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﻳﻚ ﺧﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪﺓ ﭘﺎپ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺧﻄﺮﻯ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ »ﺟﻨﺒﺶ ﺳﺒﺰ« ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﺪ: »ﺗﺤﻮﻝ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ] [...ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻯ ﻳﻚ ﺷﻨﺎﺳﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻯ ﻳﻚ ﻧﺎﻡ ﻭ ﻳﻚ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻯ ﺷﻨﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﻣﺤﺒﻮﺏ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺟﻮﺍﻧﺎﻥ ] [...ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﺷﺎﻫﻴﻦ ﻧﺠﻔﻰ ﺭﻓﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻤﺖ ﺩﻭﺭﻭﻳﻰ ﻭ ﺍﺑﻬﺎﻡ«. ﻧﻮﺍﺧﺘﻦ ﻳﻚ ﻗﻄﻌﻪ ﻣﻮﺳــﻴﻘﻰ ﻭ ﮔﺬﺍﺷــﺘﻦ ﭼﻨﺪ ﻛﻼﻡ ﻭ »ﻭﺍژﻩ« ﺑﻪ ﺭﻭﻯ ﺁﻥ ﭼﻪ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﻰ ﺑﺎ »ﺩﻭﺭﻭﺋﻰ« ﻭ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻯ »ﺷــﻨﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺷــﺪﻩ« ﺩﺍﺭﺩ؟ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﭘﺮﺳــﻴﺪ ﻛﺪﺍﻡ »ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻯ ﺷﻨﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺷــﺪﻩ؟« ﺍﮔﺮ ﻣﻘﺼﻮﺩﺗﺎﻥ ﻣﻮﺳﻮﻯ ﺁﺩﻣﻜﺶ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺁﻗﺎ ﮔﺮﺑﻪ ﻭ ﺳﻮﺭﺍﺥ ﻣﻮﺵ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻻﺗﺮ ﺑﺮﺍﻯﺗﺎﻥ ﮔﻔﺘﻴﻢ .ﻓﻜﺮ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻳﺪ ﻫﻤﺔ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺷﺎﻫﻴﻦ ﻧﺠﻔﻰﺍﻧﺪ؟ ﺧﻴﺮ! ﺍﻭﻝ ﻭ ﺁﺧﺮﺗﺎﻥ ﺩﺳﺖ ﻣﺎﺳﺖ ،ﻫﻤﻪ ﻣﻰﺩﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﭼﻪ ﻣﻰﮔﻮﺋﻴﺪ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻣﻰﺩﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﺍﺯ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺳــﺘﻮﺭ ﻣﻰﮔﻴﺮﻳﺪ .ﻋﻤﺮﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻤﻠﻜﺖ ﻧﺎﻥ ﻓﺎﺷﻴﺴــﻢ ﻛﻮﻓﺖ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻳــﺪ؛ ﭼﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻫﻢﺻﺪﺍﺋﻰ ﻭ ﭼــﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ »ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻒﺧﻮﺍﻧﻰ«، ﻭﻗﺘﻰ ﺩﺭﻳﺎﻓﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭﻳﺎﻓﺘﻴﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻧﻮﻳﻦ ﻣﻰﺭﻭﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺩﺭﺧﺖ ﭘﻮﺳﻴﺪﻩﺍﻯ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ ﻓﺎﺷﻴﺴﻢ ﺭﺿﺎﺧﺎﻧﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺮﺯﻣﻴﻦ ﻏﺮﺱ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻳﺸﻪ ﺑﺴﻮﺯﺍﻧﺪ، ﺍﻭﻝ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺨﻢ ﻣﻮﺳــﻮﻯ ﺁﻭﻳﺰﺍﻥ ﺷــﺪﻳﺪ ،ﺣﺎﻝ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﻣﻴﺪﻯ ﺑﻪ »ﺧﻂ
ﺍﻣﺎﻡ« ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ ،ﮔﺮﻳﺒﺎﻥ ﻳﻚ ﺧﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪﺓ ﭘــﺎپ ﺭﺍ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭﺭﻭﺋﻰ ﻭ ﻓﺮﺻﺖ ﻃﻠﺒﻰ ﻣﺘﻬﻢ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻴﺪ ،ﺍﺯ ﺍﻭ ﻋﺎﻣﻞ ﺣﺎﻛﻤﻴﺖ ﻭ ﻣﺴــﺒﺐ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺍﺳﺘﺒﺪﺍﺩﻯ ﻣﻰﺳﺎﺯﻳﺪ .ﺗﻒ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻭﻯ ﻫﺮﭼﻪ ﺁﺧﻮﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻋﻮﺍﻡﻓﺮﻳﺐ ﺍﺳﺖ؛ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺠﺎ ﺑﻪ »ﻧﻴﺖ« ﺷﺎﻫﻴﻦ ﻧﺠﻔﻰ ﭘﻰ ﺑﺮﺩﻩﺍﻳﺪ؟ ﻧﻴﺖ ﺳﻨﺞ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺍﺭﺷﺎﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳﺖ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪﺍﻳﺪ؟ ﭼﺮﺍ ﺍﺯ »ﻧﻴﺖ« ﺍﺭﺑﺎﺑﺎﻥﺗﺎﻥ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻧﻤﻰﮔﻮﺋﻴﺪ؟ ﺑﻠﻪ ،ﻣﻰ ﺩﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﺍﺭﺑﺎﺏ »ﺧﻠﻮﺹ ﻧﻴﺖ« ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﻣﻰﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺭﺍﺳﺖ ﻫﺪﺍﻳﺖ ﺷــﻮﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺑﺎ »ﺟﻨﺠﺎﻝ« ﻳﺎ ﺑﻬﺘﺮ ﺑﮕﻮﺋﻴﻢ ﺑﺎ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻯ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻒ ﺍﺳﺖ: »ﻓﺮﺍﺭ ﺭﻭﺯﺑﺮﻭﺯ ﺁﺷــﻜﺎﺭﺗﺮ ﺷــﺎﻫﻴﻦ ﻧﺠﻔﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﻤﺖ ﺍﺭﺍﺟﻴﻒ ﻭ ﺟﻨﺠﺎﻝ ﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺑﻮﺩ«. ﻣﺎ ﻫﻢ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻴﻢ ،ﺑﻪ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺧﻮﺩﺗﺎﻥ »ﻓﺮﺍﺭ ﺭﻭﺯﺑﺮﻭﺯ ﺁﺷــﻜﺎﺭﺗﺮ« ﺣﺘﻤﺎً ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺑﺮ ﭼﻴﺰﻯ ﻣﻰﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ،ﭘﺲ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﭘﺮﺳــﻴﺪ ﻓــﺮﺍﺭ ﺣﺰﺏ ﺗﻮﺩﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﻮﻯ ﺍﺭﺍﺟﻴﻒ ﻓﻮﻕ »ﺣﺎﺻﻞ« ﭼﻴﺴﺖ؟ ﺷــﻤﺎ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﮔﺮﻳﺒﺎﻥ ﻳﻚ ﺧﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪﻩ ﭘﺎپ ﺭﺍ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪﺍﻳﺪ ،ﻭ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ »ﺩﺭﻯﻭﺭﻯ« ﮔﻔﺘﻦ ﻣﺘﻬﻢ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻴﺪ، ﺧﻮﺩﺗــﺎﻥ ﻃﻰ 50ﺳــﺎﻝ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺻﻄﻼﺡ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰ ،ﻭ ﻭﻟﮕﺮﺩﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻟﻤﺎﻥ ﺷــﺮﻗﻰ ،ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴــﻪ ﻭ ﺁﻟﻤﺎﻥ ﻏﺮﺑﻰ ﭼﻪ ﮔﻠﻰ ﺑــﻪ ﺟﻤﺎﻝ ﻣﻠﺖ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺯﺩﻩﺍﻳﺪ؟ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﻣﺎﺭﻛﺴﻴﺴﻢ ﺳﺨﻦ ﮔﻔﺘﻪﺍﻳﺪ ،ﺷﻤﺎ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﻣﺎﺭﻛﺲ ﻭ ﻟﻨﻴﻦ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﻓﺎﺭﺳﻰ ﺑﺮﻧﮕﺮﺩﺍﻧﺪﻩﺍﻳﺪ؟ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﭽﺔ ﺣﺰﺏﺗﺎﻥ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻛﻨﻴﺪ ،ﺗﺎ ﺑﺒﻴﻨﻴﺪ ﺍﺷــﻜﺎﻝ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻤﻠﻜﺖ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺠﺎ ﻣﻰﺁﻳﺪ: »ﺍﻳﻦﻫﺎ ﺩﺭﺱﻫﺎﺋﻰ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺮﻧﻮﺷــﺖ ﺷــﺎﻫﻴﻦ ﻧﺠﻔﻰ ﻭ ﺗﺒﻠﻴﻐﺎﺕ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺘﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻭﻯ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ«. ﺑﻠﻪ» ،ﺳﺮﻧﻮﺷــﺖ« ﻧﺠﻔﻰ ﻣﺸــﺨﺺ ﻧﺸــﺪﻩ ،ﻭﻟﻰ ﺩﺭﺱ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﺍﺑﻌﺎﺩ ﻓﺮﺍﻭﺍﻧﻰ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ :ﺍﮔﺮ ﺣﺰﺏ ﺗﻮﺩﻩ »ﺟﺮﺍﺡ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﭘﻴﺰﻯ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺟﺎ ﺑﻴﺎﻧﺪﺍﺯﺩ!« ﺷــﻤﺎ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻮﺳــﻴﺪﻥ ﻛﭙﻞ ﻣﻼ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﺗﺒﺔ »ﻭﺍﻻﻯ« ﺑﺮﭼﺴﺐ ﺯﺩﻥ ﺑــﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺧﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪﺓ ﭘﺎپ ﺭﺳــﻴﺪﻩﺍﻳﺪ ﺩﺭﺱﻫﺎﻯﺗــﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺧﻴﻠﻰ ﺧﻮﺏ ﺑﻠﺪﻳــﺪ! ﻭﻟﻰ ﺟﻮﺍﺏ ﭘﺮﺳــﺶﻫﺎﺋﻰ ﻛــﻪ ﺑﺎﻻﺗﺮ ﻋﻨــﻮﺍﻥ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ ﻫﺮ ﭼﻪ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ،ﻳﻚ ﺍﻣﺮ ﻏﻴﺮﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺍﺟﺘﻨﺎﺏ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﺩﻣﻴﺪﻥ ﺟﺎﻥ ﺗﺎﺯﻩ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺎﻟﺒﺪ ﻓﺎﺷﻴﺴﻢ ﺍﺳــﺘﻌﻤﺎﺭﻯ ،ﭘﻮﭘﻮﻟﻴﺴــﻢ ﺁﺧﻮﻧﺪﻯ ،ﻭ ﺁﺭﻳﺎﻣﻬﺮﻳﺴﻢ ﻟُﻨﮕﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻧﭙﺬﻳﺮ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ،ﭼﻪ ﺷﺎﻫﻴﻦ ﻧﺠﻔﻰ ﺑﺎ »ﺩﻭﺭﻭﺋﻰ« ﺑﺮﺍﻯﺗﺎﻥ »ﺩﺭﻯﻭﺭﻯ« ﺑﺨﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﭼﻪ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻧﺪ؛ ﺑﻰﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻣﺎﻣﺰﺍﺩﻩﺍﺵ ﻗﻔﻞ ﺯﺩﻩﺍﻳﺪ، ﭘﻴﺰﻯ ﺍﻓﻨﺪﻯﻫﺎ! ﺑﺠﺎﻯ ﺭﺳــﺘﻢ ﺻﻮﻟﺘﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻳــﻚ ﺧﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪﺓ ﭘﺎپ ،ﻓﻜﺮ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺧﻮﺩﺗﺎﻥ ﺑﻜﻨﻴﺪ.