8ﻣــﻪ 2012
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺳﻴﺪ ،ﻭ ﻫﺮ ﭼﻨﺪ »ﺟﻨﺎﺡﺑﻨﺪﻯﻫﺎ« ﭼﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﻭ ﭼﻪ ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ ﺷﻜﻞﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﻣﺸــﺨﺺ ﻧﺸــﺪﻩ ،ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺣﺪﺱ ﺯﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺧﺮﻭﺝ ﺑﺎﻧــﺪ ﺳــﺮﻛﻮﺯﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺣﺎﻛﻤﻴﺖ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻰﺁﻣﺪ ﺑﺮ ﻣﺴــﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺎﻭﺭﻣﻴﺎﻧﻪ ﺗﺄﺛﻴﺮ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﮔﺬﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﺧﺮﻭﺝ ﺍﻳﻦ »ﺑﺎﻧﺪ« ﺍﺯ ﺣﺎﻛﻤﻴﺖ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴﻪ ،ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﮕﺰﺍﺭﻯ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺗــﺪﺍﻭﻡ ﻳﺎﺑﺪ ،ﺗﺒﻌﺎﺕ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭ ﻣﻬﻤﻰ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻰ ﺧﻮﺍﻫــﺪ ﺁﻭﺭﺩ ،ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺻﺮﺍﺣﺖ ﺑﮕﻮﺋﻴﻢ ،ﺻﺮﻓﺎً ﻣﺴﺌﻠﺔ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ.
ﺍﺯ ﺩﻳﺮﺑﺎﺯ ،ﭘﺎﺭﻳﺲ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﭘﻠﻰ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﺤﺎﻓﻞ ﺁﻧﮕﻠﻮﺳﺎﻛﺴــﻮﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺷﺎﺧﻚﻫﺎﻯ ﻓﺮﻋﻰﺷﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻗﺼﻰ ﻧﻘﺎﻁ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻔﺎﻯ ﻧﻘﺶ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ، ﻭ ﺩﻟﻴﻠﻰ ﻧﻤﻰﺑﻴﻨﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ »ﻧﻘﺶ« ﺍﺯ ﭘﺎﺭﻳﺲ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺷﻮﺩ. ﻣﺴــﺌﻠﻪ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺏ ﺭﻭﺍﺑــﻂ ﻧﻮﻳﻦ »ﻛﻼﻥ ـ ﺍﺳــﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻳﻚ« ،ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴــﻪ ﭼﮕﻮﻧــﻪ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴــﺖ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﺑــﻪ ﺍﻳﻔﺎﻯ ﻧﻘــﺶ »ﺣﺎﺋﻞ« ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺩﻫﺪ؟ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺑﻼگ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺳــﻌﻰ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ »ﻧﻘﺶ« ﺭﺍ ﺗﺎ ﺣﺪ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺑﺸــﻜﺎﻓﻴﻢ .ﭘﺲ ﻧﺨﺴﺖ ﻧﮕﺎﻫــﻰ ﺑﻴﺎﻧﺪﺍﺯﻳﻢ ﺑﻪ ﻓﺮﺩﺍﻯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺩﻭﻡ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻰ ،ﺑﻪ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎﺋﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ »ﻧﻘﺶ« ﺑﻪ ﺣﺎﻛﻤﻴﺖ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴﻪ ﺗﻔﻮﻳﺾ ﺷﺪ. ﺁﻧﭽــﻪ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦﻧﮕﺎﺭﻯ »ﺭﺳــﻤﻰ« ﻛﻤﺘﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺸــﺮﻳﺢ ﺁﻥ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺘﻪ، ﻧﻘﺶ ﺑﻮﺭژﻭﺍﺯﻯ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴــﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻧﺔ ﻣﻴﺪﺍﻥ ﺗﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﻓﺎﺷﻴﺴﻢ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎﻯ ﻣﺮﻛﺰﻯ ﺑﺎ ﺳﻮﺳﻴﺎﻟﻴﺴﻢ ﺍﺳﭙﺎﻧﻴﺎ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺟﺒﻬﻪﺍﻯ ﺩﻭﮔﺎﻧﻪ
ﺗﺸــﻜﻴﻞ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺣﺎﻛﻤﻴﺖ ﻛﻨﻮﻧﻰ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺯﻳﺮ ﺿﺮﺑﺎﺕ ﺧﺮﺩﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩﺍﺵ ﻭ ﺑﺮ ﺳــﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﺍﺕ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﭼﭗ ﺑﺎ ﻓﺎﺷﻴﺴﺖﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻣﻠﻰﮔﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺷﻜﻞ ﺩﺍﺩ .ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ ،ﻭ ﻃﻰ ﺩﻫﺔ ،1930ﺑﻮﺭژﻭﺍﺯﻯ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴــﻪ ﺍﺯ ﭼﭗﻧﻤﺎﺋﻰﻫﺎﻯ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﻣﻮﺳــﻮﻟﻴﻨﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺘﺎﻟﻴــﺎ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩ ،ﻭ ﭘﺸــﺘﻴﺒﺎﻧﻰﺍﺵ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺒﻠﻴﻐﺎﺕ ﻓﺎﺷﻴﺴــﻢ ﻭ ﻣﻠﻰﮔﺮﺍﺋﻰ ،ﺗﺒﺪﻳــﻞ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻜﻴﻪﮔﺎﻫﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﻟﻬﺎﻣﺎﺕ ﺁﺗﻰ ﻧﺎﺳــﻴﻮﻧﺎﻝ ﺳﻮﺳﻴﺎﻟﻴﺴــﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﻫﻴﺘﻠﺮﻯ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺷﺪ. ﻭﻟــﻰ ﻋﻠﻴﺮﻏﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻤﺎﻫﻨﮕﻰﻫــﺎ ﻭ ﻫﻢﺁﻭﺍﺋﻰﻫﺎ ،ﺟﻨﺒﺶ ﭼﭗ ﺩﺭ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴﻪ ﺗﺤﺖ ﺗﺄﺛﻴﺮ ﺗﺤﻮﻻﺕ ﺍﺳﭙﺎﻧﻴﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺷﺪﺕ ﺭﺍﺩﻳﻜﺎﻝ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻀﺎﻯ »ﭘﺴﺎﺑﻠﺸﻮﻳﺴــﻢ« ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎﻯ ﺁﻥ ﺭﻭﺯ ،ﺣﺎﻛﻤﻴﺖ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺳــﺎﻻﺭﻯ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺎﺭﻳــﺲ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﻬﺪﻳﺪ ﺟﺪﻯ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻰﺩﺍﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝ ،1940ﻳﻜــﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻻﺋﻞ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺍﺭﺗﺶ ﻓﺎﺷﻴﺴــﺖ ﻫﻴﺘﻠﺮ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺎﺭﻳــﺲ ﭼﻴﺰﻯ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ ﺟــﺰ ﺗﻼﺵ ﺟﻬﺖ
ﺟﻠﻮﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﺍﺯ ﮔﺴــﺘﺮﺵ ﺗﺤــﺮﻛﺎﺕ ﭼﭗ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴــﻪ .ﺗﺤﺮﻛﺎﺗﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺣﺎﻛﻤﻴﺖ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﻣﺤﻠﻰ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻗﺎﺩﺭ ﺑﻪ ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ ﺁﻥﻫﺎ ﻧﻤﻰﺷﺪ. ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﺐ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺑﻼگ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻳﻢ ،ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻰ ﺭﻳﺸﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺩﻭﻡ ﻭ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﻣﺮ »ﻧﺘﺎﻳﺞ« ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻤﻰﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺏ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦﻧﮕﺎﺭﻯ »ﺭﺳــﻤﻰ« ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻰ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻮﻉ »ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦﻧﮕﺎﺭﻯ« ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻭﺍﻧﻤﻮﺩ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻧﺎﺕ ﻓﺎﺷﻴﺴــﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻟﻤــﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺍﻳﺘﺎﻟﻴــﺎ ﻫﻤﭽــﻮﻥ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺟﻤﻜﺮﺍﻥ ،ﻳﻚﺷــﺒﻪ ﺍﺯ »ﺁﺳﻤﺎﻥ« ﺑﺮ ﺯﻣﻴﻦ ﻧﺎﺯﻝ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ! ﺩﺭ ﺻﻮﺭﺗﻴﻜﻪ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﻯ ﺑﺎﻧﻚﻫﺎ، ﻣﺤﺎﻓﻞ ﺳــﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﻭ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﺎً ﻣﺮﺍﻛــﺰ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢﮔﻴﺮﻯ »ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻰ ـ ﺻﻨﻌﺘﻰ« ﺁﻧﮕﻠﻮﺳﺎﻛﺴــﻮﻥ ﺑﺎ ﻓﺎﺷﻴﺴــﺖﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﺍﺗﺐ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺷــﺮﻭﻉ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﻭ ﺣﺘﻰ ﻃﻰ ﺩﺭﮔﻴﺮﻯﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻴﻢ ﺩﺭ ﻗﻠﺐ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ »ﺣﺸﺮﻭﻧﺸــﺮﻫﺎ« ﻫﻤﭽﻨــﺎﻥ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﻳﺎﻓﺖ .ﺑﻪ ﻗﻮﻟﻰ، ﻫﻢ ﻣﻰﺟﻨﮕﻴﺪﻧﺪ؛ ﻫﻢ ﻣﺬﺍﻛﺮﻩ ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ؛ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺮ ﺳــﺮ ﺗﻘﺴــﻴﻢ ﻏﻨﺎﻳــﻢ ﺟﻨﮕــﻰ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻢ »ﭼﺎﻧــﻪ« ﻣﻰﺯﺩﻧﺪ؛ ﺧﻼﺻــﺔ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺑﻪ ﻗﻮﻝ »ﻛﻼﺳــﻮﻳﺘﺲ« ،ﺍﺳــﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋ ﺳﺮﺷــﻨﺎﺱ ﺁﻟﻤﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺛﺮ ﻣﻌﺮﻭﻑﺍﺵ »ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺏ ﺟﻨﮓ« ﺭﺍ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﺮ ﺑﺎﻟﻴﻦ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺮﻛﺮﺩﮔﺎﻥ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻳﺎﻓﺖ: »ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺯﻫﺪﺍﻧﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺷﺪ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ [...] .ﺟﻨﮓ ﭘﺪﻳﺪﺓ ﻣﺴــﺘﻘﻠﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻤﺎﺭ ﻧﻤﻰﺭﻭﺩ ،ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪﺍﻯ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﺮ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻴﻤﺎﺋﻰ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ«. ﺑﺪﻳﻬﻰ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺩﻭﻡ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﻩ ﻣﺴــﺘﺜﻨﻰ ﻧﺒﺎﺷــﺪ. ﻣﻤﺎﺷﺎﺕ ﻏﺮﺏ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻴﺘﻠﺮ ﻭ ﻣﻮﺳﻮﻟﻴﻨﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺗﺤﺮﻛﺎﺕ ﻓﺎﺷﻴﺴﺖﻫﺎ، ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﻯ ﻭ ﻫﻤﺎﻫﻨﮕﻰ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻧﮕﻠﺴﺘﺎﻥ ،ﺳﻮﺋﺪ ،ﻫﻠﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺍﻧﻤﺎﺭﻙ ﺑﺎ ﻧﺎﺯﻯﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻋﻘﺪ ﭘﻴﻤﺎﻥ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺗﺨﺎﺻﻢ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩ ﺷﻮﺭﻭﻯ ﻭ ﺁﻟﻤــﺎﻥ ،ﻫﻤﮕــﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻨﻈﺮ ﺍﺳــﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻳﻚ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﻧــﺪﺍﺯﻩ ﺣﺎﺋﺰ ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺣﻤﻠﺔ ﺑﻌﺪﻯ ﻧﺎﺯﻯﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩ ﺷﻮﺭﻭﻯ ﻭ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴﻪ. ﺑﺪﻳﻬﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻴﺎﻫﻮﻯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺩﻭﻡ ،ﻣﺬﺍﻛﺮﺍﺕ ،ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﻯﻫﺎ، ﺩﺳﻴﺴﻪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺗﻮﻃﺌﻪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻫﻤﺎﻫﻨﮕﻰﻫﺎ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ؛ ﺍﻟﺒﺘــﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻫﺮ ﻣﻘﻄﻊ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺗــﻰ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺤﻮﻯ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ! ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺘﺎً ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ ،ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﻨﮓ ،ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﺍﺳــﺘﺎﻟﻴﻦ ،ﺭﻭﺯﻭﻟﺖ ﻭ ﭼﺮﭼﻴــﻞ ﻃﺮﺡﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﺍﻓﻖ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻰ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺗﺤﺖ ﺳــﻴﻄﺮﻩ ﺑﻪ ﻣــﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﮔﺬﺍﺭﺩﻧــﺪ .ﺁﻧﭽﻨﺎﻧﻜﻪ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﻣﻌﺎﺻﺮ ﻧﺸــﺎﻥ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴــﻪ ،ﺍﺳــﭙﺎﻧﻴﺎ ،ﭘﺮﺗﻐﺎﻝ ﻭ ﺍﻳﺘﺎﻟﻴﺎ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﺑﺎ
»ﭼﭗ« ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻬﻢﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻣﺄﻣﻮﺭﻳﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺣﺎﻛﻤﺎﻧﻰ ﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺬﺍﻛــﺮﺍﺕ »ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺟﻨﮓ« ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺬﻛﻮﺭ ﺑﻪ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻧﺪ. ﻣﺄﻣﻮﺭﻳــﺖ ﺍﺻﻠــﻰ ﺍﻳﻨــﺎﻥ ﻣﺒــﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﺑــﺎ ﺍﻟﻬﺎﻣﺎﺕ ﺳﻮﺳﻴﺎﻟﻴﺴــﻢ ﺑــﻮﺩ .ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺗﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺳــﺮﻛﻮﺏ ﺳﻮﺳﻴﺎﻟﻴﺴــﺖﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻴﺖﺧﻮﺍﻫــﻰ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺳــﺎﻻﺭﻯ ﺣﺪ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺯﻯ ﻧﺸﻨﺎﺳــﺪ ،ﻭ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺳﺎﻻﺭﻯ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻰ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺩﻳﻜﺘﺎﺗﻮﺭﻯ ﻣﺴﺨﺮﺓ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﻟﻴﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩ ﺷــﻮﺭﻭﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ »ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﮕﻮﻯ« ﺳﻮﺳﻴﺎﻟﻴﺴﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻠﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺑﻔﺮﻭﺷــﺪ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﻧﺪ ﺩﻭﺟﺎﻧﺒﻪ، ﺩﺭ »ﺗﺌــﻮﺭﻯ« ﻣﻰﺑﺎﻳﺴــﺖ ﺟﻠﻮﻯ ﺭﺷــﺪ ﻓﺎﺷﻴﺴــﻢ ﻣﺤﻠﻰ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻴــﺰ ﻣﻰﮔﺮﻓﺖ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﻣﻤﺎﻧﻌﺖ ﺍﺯ ﮔﺴــﺘﺮﺵ ﻓﺎﺷﻴﺴــﻢ ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺗﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﺁﻭﺭﺩ .ﻣﻰﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﺫﻋﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻛﻪ »ﭘﻴﺶﻓﺮﺽ« ﻛﺬﺍ ﻫﻢ ﮔﻠﻴﻢ ﺳــﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺩﺍﺭﻯﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﻐﺮﺏ ﺯﻣﻴﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺁﺏ ﮔﻞﺁﻟﻮﺩ ﭘﺴــﺎﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﻴﺮﻭﻥ ﻛﺸﻴﺪ ،ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺍﺟﺎﺯﻩ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻃﻰ ﺣﺪﻭﺩ 5ﺩﻫﻪ ،ﺍﺳــﺘﺒﺪﺍﺩ ﻭ ﺧﻮﺩﻛﺎﻣﮕــﻰ ﻭ ﺩﻳﻮﺍﻧﮕﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩ ﺷﻮﺭﻭﻯ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺗﻚ »ﻋﻠﻤﻴﺖ« ﻧﻴﺰ ﺁﺭﺍﺳﺘﻪ ﺷﻮﺩ! ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﻣﺮ ،ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻓﺮﻭﭘﺎﺷــﻰ ﺩﻳــﻮﺍﺭ ﺑﺮﻟﻴﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﺭﺥ ﺩﺍﺩ ،ﺟﺰ ﺗﺰﻟﺰﻝ ﭘﺎﻳﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ »ﭘﻴﺶﻓﺮﺽﻫﺎﻯ« ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﺍﻓﻖ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ .ﻭ ﺩﻳﺪﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺧﺮﻭﺝ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﻫﺎﻯ »ﺟﻨﮓ ﺳﺮﺩ« ﻧﺨﺴﺘﻴﻦ ﺛﻤــﺮﻩﺍﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﮕﻠﺴــﺘﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻟــﺐ ﻫﻤــﻜﺎﺭﻯ ﻭ ﻫﻤﺎﻫﻨﮕﻰ ﺣــﺰﺏ »ﭼﭗﮔﺮﺍﻯ« ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍﺟﻮﻳــﺎﻥ ﻧﺌﻮﻛﺎﻥ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﺋﻰ ﺑــﻪ ﻧﻤﺎﻳــﺶ ﮔــﺬﺍﺭﺩ .ﺧﻼﺻﺔ ﻛﻼﻡ ،ﺍﻧﮕﻠﺴــﺘﺎﻥ ﺑــﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍﺳــﺖﮔﺮﺍﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎﻯ ﻏﺮﺑﻰ ،ﻧﺘﻮﺍﻧﺴﺖ ﻓﺮﺻﺖ ﻃﻼﺋﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳــﺖ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺭﺍ ﺟﻬﺖ ﭼﺮﺧﺶ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﻭ ﻛﻤﺎﻝ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﻮﻯ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺳﺎﻻﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳــﺖ ﺑﺪﻫﺪ؛ ﺍﻳﻨﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ »ﭼﭗ« ﺍﻧﮕﻠﺴــﺘﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﻋﻘﺐﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩﻩﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻭ ﺭﺍﺳﺖﮔﺮﺍﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺎﻻﺕ ﻣﺘﺤﺪ ،ﺩﺭ ﻫﻨﮕﺎﻣﺔ ﺟﻨﮓﻫﺎﻯ ﺿﺪ ﺑﺸﺮﻯ ﺍﻓﻐﺎﻧﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﻫﻢﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺷــﺪ! ﺟﺎﻟﺐ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻮﻉ ﻫﻤﺪﺍﺳﺘﺎﻧﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻴﺌﺖ ﺣﺎﻛﻤﺔ ﺍﻧﮕﻠﻴﺲ ﻧﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻑ ﭼﭗ ﺑﻪ ﺯﻳﺮ ﺳﺌﻮﺍﻝ ﺭﻓﺖ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻮﻯ ﻣﺤﺎﻓﻈﻪﻛﺎﺭﺍﻥ! ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻄﻰ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺁﻣﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻋﻤ ً ﻼ »ﺩﻣﻜﺮﺍﺳﻰ« ﺍﻧﮕﻠﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩ .ﺻﺪﺍﻯ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺎﻥ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻛﺎﻧﺎﻟﻰ ﺷــﻨﻴﺪﻩ ﻧﺸﺪ؛ ﻧﻪ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪﻧﮕﺎﺭﺍﻥ ﺣﺮﻓﻰ ﺯﺩﻧﺪ ،ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﺻﺪﺍﻯ »ﺣﺎﻣﻴﺎﻥ« ﻓﺮﺿﻰ ﻭ ﭘﺮﺳﺮﻭﺻﺪﺍﻯ ﺣﻘﻮﻕﺑﺸﺮ ﻭ ﻏﻴﺮﻩ ﻭ ﺫﺍﻟﻚ ﺭﺍ ﺷﻨﻴﺪﻳﻢ!
ﺑــﻪ ﻫــﺮ ﺗﻘﺪﻳــﺮ ،ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍﺟﻮﺋﻰ ﭼﭗﻧﻤﺎﻳــﺎﻥ ﺍﻧﮕﻠﺴــﺘﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻛﺎﺏ ﻻﺕﻭﻟﻮﺕﻫﺎﻯ ﻳﺎﻧﻜﻰ ﻛﺎﺭﺵ ﺑﺠﺎﺋﻰ ﻧﺮﺳــﻴﺪ ﻭ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﻣﺮ ،ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ،ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻨﻈﺮ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰ ﺁﻧﻘﺪﺭﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﻯ ﺣﺰﺏﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮ ﺑﺎ ﺭﺍﺳــﺖﺍﻓﺮﺍﻃﻰ ﺍﻳﺎﻻﺕ ﻣﺘﺤﺪ ﻣﻘﺒﻮﻝﺗﺮ ﻧﻤﻰﻧﻤﻮﺩ ،ﺭﺍﺳــﺘﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﺤﺎﻓﻈﻪﻛﺎﺭ ﻳﺎ »ﺗﻮﺭﻯﻫﺎ« ،ﺗﺤﺖ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖ ﺩﻳﻮﻳﺪ ﻛﺎﻣﺮﻭﻥ ﺯﻣﺎﻡ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳــﺖ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻨﺪ! ﻭﻟﻰ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻧﮕﻠﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﺑــﺎ ﺗﻜﻴﻪ ﺑﺮ ﻣﺮﺩﻩﺭﻳﮓ »ﺟﻨﮓﺳــﺮﺩ« ﻣﺸــﻜﻞ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧــﺪ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺩﻭ ﺷــﻖ ﺗﻜﺮﺍﺭﻯ ﻭ ﻛﺴــﺎﻟﺖﺁﻭﺭ »ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮ ـ ﻣﺤﺎﻓﻈﻪﻛﺎﺭ« ﺭﺍﻩ ﺧﺮﻭﺝ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥﻫﺎﻯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻳﻨﺪﺓ ﺍﻧﮕﻠﺴــﺘﺎﻥ ﺑﺠﻮﻳﺪ .ﺷﻜﺴــﺖ ﻏﻴﺮﻗﺎﺑــﻞ ﺗﺮﻣﻴﻢ ﺍﺧﻴــﺮ ﻣﺤﺎﻓﻈــﻪﻛﺎﺭﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺷــﻮﺭﺍﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺻﺮﺍﺣﺖ ﻧﺸــﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻛــﻪ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺧﺮﻭﺝ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥ ﻓﻌﻠﻰ ﻧﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺳــﺖ »ﺣﺰﺏ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮ« ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻳﺪ »ﺗﻮﺭﻯﻫﺎ!« ﻭﻟﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎﻯ ﻏﺮﺑﻰ ،ﻃﻰ ﻣﺪﺗﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻮﻧﻰ ﺑﻠﺮ ﻭ ﺟﺎﻧﺸــﻴﻦ »ﻣﺤﺎﻓﻈﻪﻛﺎﺭ« ﻭﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﮕﻠﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﻧﺨﺴﺖﻭﺯﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﮔﻴﺞ ﻭ ﻣﻨﮓ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻌﺎﺷــﻘﺔ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﺟﺮﺝ ﺑﻮﺵ ،ﺩﻳﻚﭼﻨﻰ ﻭ ﺑــﺎﺭﺍﻙ ﺍﻭﺑﺎﻣﺎ ﻣﺸــﻐﻮﻝ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﺷــﺎﻫﺪ ﻓﺮﻭﭘﺎﺷــﻰﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﺷﺪﻳﻢ .ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺑﻠﮋﻳﻚ ﻋﻤ ً ﻼ ﻣﺎﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﻃﻮﻻﻧﻰ ،ﺍﮔﺮ ﻧﮕﻮﺋﻴﻢ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﻓﺎﻗــﺪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻣﺮﻛﺰﻯ ﺑﻮﺩ! ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﻧﻴﺰ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳــﺘﻴﺎﺑﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ »ﺗﻮﺍﻓﻘﻰ« ،ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺳــﺎﻳﺔ ﺷﻤﺸــﻴﺮ ﺩﻭﻟﺒﺔ »ﺗﺠﺰﻳﻪ« ﺑﺮ ﺳــﺮ ﻫﻴﺌﺖ ﺣﺎﻛﻤﺔ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺳــﻨﮕﻴﻨﻰ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻫﻠﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻳﺮﺑﺎﺯ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻏﻠﻂ ﻣﺮﻛﺰ »ﺩﻣﻜﺮﺍﺳﻰ« ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﻧﺎﻡ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺷﺎﻫﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻥ ﺭﻭﺯﺍﻓﺰﻭﻥ ﻓﺎﺷﻴﺴﺖﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻣﺤﺎﻓﻞ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭ ﻭ ﻫﻢﻳﺎﺭ ﻧﺎﺯﻯﻫﺎﻯ ﺳــﺎﺑﻖ ﺑﻮﺩﻳﻢ! ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺘﺎﻟﻴﺎ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻳﻚ ﺧﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪﺓ ﺳــﺎﺑﻖ ﻛﺎﺑﺎﺭﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﻧﺎﭘﻞ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﻡ ﺑﺮﻟﻮﺳــﻜﻨﻰ ،ﻋﻠﻴﺮﻏﻢ ﺭﺳﻮﺍﺋﻰﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻰ ﻋﺠﻴﺐ ﻭ ﻏﺮﻳﺐ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﺋﺘﻼﻑ ﺑﺎ ﻓﺎﺷﻴﺴــﺖﻫﺎﻯ »ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩ ﺷﻤﺎﻝ« ﺩﺭ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺑﺎﻗﻰ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ. ﺩﺭ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴــﻪ ،ﻓﺮﺩﻯ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﻡ ﻧﻴﻜﻮﻻ ﺳﺮﻛﻮﺯﻯ ،ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﭘﻴﺸﻴﻨﺔ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰ ،ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﻭ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻰ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ »ﻣﺮﺩ ﻫﻤﻪﻛﺎﺭﺓ« ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯ ﭘﻨﺠﻢ! ﺁﻟﻤﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﭼﺸــﻢﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩﻯ ﺍﺩﺍﺭﻩ ﻣﻰﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺟﺎﺋﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻴﺌﺖ ﺣﺎﻛﻤﻪ ﻧﻤﻰﺑﺎﻳﺴﺖ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ ،ﻭ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺁﻧﺠﻼ ﻣﺮﻛﻞ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﺍﺳﺖ؛ ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﻛﺴﻰ ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﺟﺰ ﺁﺧﺮﻳﻦ ﺳﺨﻨﮕﻮﻯ ﺣﺰﺏ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ »ﺍﺳﺘﺎﻟﻴﻨﻴﺴﺖ« ﺁﻟﻤﺎﻥ ﺷﺮﻗﻰ!
ﭼﺸﻢﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯ ﺑﺎﻻ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﺷﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻋﻤﻖ ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭﻯ ﺩﺭ ﻗﻠﺐ ﻫﻴﺌﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺣﺎﻛﻤﺔ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎﻯ ﻏﺮﺑﻰ ﺁﺷــﻨﺎ ﺷــﻮﻳﻢ .ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛــﻪ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺩﻭﻡ ،ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺴــﺎﺋﻠﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎﻯ ﻏﺮﺑــﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻠــﻪ »ﻧﺎﮔﻔﺘﻪﻫــﺎﻯ« ﺗﻮﺍﻓﻘــﺎﺕ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺷــﻤﺎﺭ ﻣﻰﺭﻓــﺖ ،ﺗﺄﺋﻴﺪ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖﻣﺪﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎﻯ ﻏﺮﺑﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ »ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺖﻫﺎﻯ« ﺑﺰﺭگ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻰ ﺑﻮﺩ! ﻫﺮ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺍﻣﺜﺎﻝ »ﻛﻮﺭﺕ ﻭﺍﻟﺪﻫﺎﻳﻢ« ﻭ »ﻣﻴﺠﺮﺯ« ﻛﻢ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﺗﻤﺎﻳﻞ ﺍﺻﻠﻰ ﭘﺮﻭﭘﺎﮔﺎﻧﺪ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳــﺘﻮﺍﺭ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎﻯ ﻏﺮﺑﻰ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩﻯ »ﻣﺘﺸﺨﺺ« ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ! ﻭ ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ »ﺗﻘﺪﺱ« ﺍﻳــﻦ ﺷــﺨﺼﻴﺖﻫﺎ ،ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄــﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻤﻮﻧــﺔ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴــﻮﺍ ﻣﻴﺘﺮﺍﻥ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴــﻮﻯ ،ﻫﻠﻤﻮﺕ ﺍﺷــﻤﻴﺖ ﺁﻟﻤﺎﻧﻰ ﻭ ﺍﻭﻻﻑ ﭘﺎﻟﻤﺔ ﺳﻮﺋﺪﻯ ﻧﺸــﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩ ،ﻛﻢ ﻗﺼﻪ ﻭ ﺣﻜﺎﻳﺖ ﻭ ﺩﺍﺳــﺘﺎﻥ ﺳــﺮ ﻫﻢ ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻧﺪ. ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﭼﺸــﻢﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ »ﻣﻴﺘــﺮﺍﻥ« ،ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﺍﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻭﻳﺸﻴﺴﺖ ،ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﺷﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﭼﻬﺮﻩﻫﺎﻯ »ﺿﺪﻓﺎﺷﻴﺴﺖ« ﻭ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺑﺎﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ! ﺳﻮﺍﺑﻖ ﺍﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﻛﻮﺭﺕ ﻭﺍﻟﺪﻫﺎﻳﻢ ﻭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﺯ ﭼﺸﻢ »ﺭﺃﻯﺩﻫﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ« ﭘﻨﻬﺎﻥ ﻣﻰﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ. ﻭﻟــﻰ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻴﻜــﻪ ﺩﻳــﻮﺍﺭ ﺑﺮﻟﻴــﻦ ﻓﺮﻭﺭﻳﺨــﺖ ،ﺍﻳــﻦ ﭘﺮﻭﭘﺎﮔﺎﻧﺪ »ﺗﺸﺨﺺﻓﺮﻭﺷــﻰ« ﻧﻴﺰ ﻫﻤﺰﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻘﻄﺔ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻧﻰ ﺭﺳــﻴﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎﻯ ﭘﺴﺎﺟﻨﮓﺳــﺮﺩ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺘﻤﺪﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻳﺪﻳﻢ» ،ﺁﻭﺍﺯﻩﺧﻮﺍﻥ« ،ﻛﺎﺭﻣﻨﺪ ﺩﺳــﺘﮕﺎﻩ ﭘﻠﻴﺲ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ، ﻣﺠﺮﻡ ﻭ ﻓﺎﺷﻴﺴــﺖ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ؛ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻤﺎﻝ ﺗﻌﺠﺐ ﻣﺸﻜﻠﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﻤﻰﺁﻣﺪ! ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﺍﻯ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﺟﺒﺎﺭﻯ ﺟﻬﺖ »ﺑﺰﻙ« ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ »ﺷــﺨﺼﻴﺖﻫﺎﻯ« ﻓﺮﻭﻫﺸــﺘﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻧﻤﻰﺩﻳﺪ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﻻﻻﻥ ﻣﺤﺒﺖ ﺍﺯ ﻗﻤﺎﺵ ﻫﻮﺷﻨﮓ ﺍﻧﺼﺎﺭﻯ ﻭ ﻣﺠﺮﻣﻴﻨﻰ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﺍﻣﻴﺮﻋﺒﺎﺱ ﻫﻮﻳﺪﺍ ﺑﺎ ﻻﺕﻭﻟﻮﺕﻫﺎﺋﻰ ﻧﻈﻴﺮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺧﺎﻣﻨﻪﺍﻯ ،ﻣﺤﺴــﻦ ﺭﺿﺎﺋﻰ ﻭ ﻣﻴﺮﺣﺴــﻴﻦ ﻣﻮﺳﻮﻯ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺰﻳﻦ ﻣﻰﺷــﺪﻧﺪ ،ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﺔ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺳﺎﻻﺭﻯ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎﻯ ﻏﺮﺑﻰ ﺭﻭﺷــﻦ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺰﻳﻨﻰ »ﺯﺑﺎﻟﻪ« ﺑــﺎ »ﺯﺑﺎﻟﻪ« ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺟﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺳــﺘﻮﺭ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ .ﻓﺮﺍﻣﻮﺵ ﻧﻜﻨﻴﻢ ،ﻃﻰ ﻧﺨﺴــﺘﻴﻦ ﺩﻫﻪﺍﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻓﺮﻭﭘﺎﺷــﻰ ﺩﻳﻮﺍﺭ ﺑﺮﻟﻴﻦ ﻣﻰﮔﺬﺷــﺖ ﺗﺒﻠﻴﻐﺎﺕ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺳــﺎﻻﺭﻯ ﺭﻭﺷﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ» :ﺳــﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺳﺮﺩ ﺍﺳﺖ!« ﺑﻪ ﻗــﻮﻝ ﮔﺎﻟﺒﺮﺍﻳﺖ ،ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﺩﺍﻥ ﺷــﻬﻴﺮ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﺋﻰ» ،ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻯ ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻯ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺰﻙ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ! ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﻬﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺯﻳﻨﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ!« ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ
ﭼﺎﺭﭼــﻮﺏ ،ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺳــﺎﻻﺭﻯ ﻫﻢ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺩﻟﻴﻠﻰ ﺑــﺮﺍﻯ »ﺑﺰﻙ« ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎﻯﺍﺵ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﻧﻤﻰﺩﻳﺪ .ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻮﻛﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻰﺳﺮﻭﭘﺎﻯ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺳــﺎﻻﺭﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻗﻄﺮ ﻭ ﻋﺮﺑﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﻣﻠﺖﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺳﺮﻛﻮﺏ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﭼﭙﺎﻭﻝ ﺑﺎﻧﻚﻫﺎ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﻨﺪ ،ﺑﺴــﺎﻁ ﺳــﺮﻛﻮﺏ ﺑــﻪ ﻗﻮﻝ »ﺟﻮﺭﺝ ﺑﻮﺵ« ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴــﺖ »ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻰ« ﻫﻢ ﺑﺸــﻮﺩ .ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻪ؟! ﻭ ﺑﻌﻀﻰﻫﺎ ﻣﻰﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻨﺪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺑﺴﺎﻁ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻗﻠﺐ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎﻯ ﻏﺮﺑﻰ ﺑﻜﺸﺎﻧﻨﺪ ،ﻭ ﺩﻳﺪﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﻴــﻦ »ﺑﻌﻀﻰﻫﺎ« ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﻻﺕﻭﻟﻮﺕﻫــﺎ ،ﻣﺠﺮﻣﻴﻦ ،ﻣﺘﺠﺎﻭﺯﺍﻥ ﺟﻨﺴﻰ ،ﺩﺯﺩﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻗﻄﺎﻉﺍﻟﻄﺮﻳﻖﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺤﺖ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ »ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ« ﻭ ﻧﺨﺴــﺖﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﻭ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﻭ ﻭﻛﻴﻞ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻴﺌﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺣﺎﻛﻤﺔ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﺑﺴﻴﺞ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ، ﺗﺤﺖ ﭘﻮﺷــﺶ »ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﺎﻟﻰ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻰ« ﭼﻪ ﺑﺴــﺎﻃﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺧﺘﻨﺪ. ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻨﮕﺎﺭﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻳﻨﺪﺓ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ ﻣﺴﻠﻤﺎً ﻓﺮﺻﺖ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﻳﺎﻓﺖ ﺗﺎ ﺩﻗﺎﻳﻖ ﺍﻳﻦ »ﺑﻴﺸــﺮﻣﻰ« ﻭ ﻟﺠﺎﻡﮔﺴﻴﺨﺘﮕﻰ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺳﺎﻻﺭﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﺍﺗﺐ ﺑﻬﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺎ ﺗﺸــﺮﻳﺢ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﻭﻟﻰ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺑﺎ ﻓﺮﻭﭘﺎﺷــﻰ ﺩﻛﺎﻥ ﻧﻴﻜﻮﻻ ﺳﺮﻛﻮﺯﻯ ﺩﺭ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴــﻪ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﻴﺪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ »ﺗﺠﺎﺭﺕ« ﻧﻮﻳﻦ ﻭ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻰﺷﺪﺓ ﻫﺰﺍﺭﺓ ﺳﻮﻡ ﺑﻪ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﻛﺎﺭﺵ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ ﺷﻮﺩ. ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ ﺣﻴﺎﺗﻰ ﻭ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻰ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯ ﺩﺭ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺟﺰﺋﻴﺎﺕ ﻣﻰﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺟﺴﺘﺠﻮ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﻣﺤﺎﻓﻞ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺳﺎﻻﺭﻯ، ﺗﺤﺖ ﺯﻋﺎﻣﺖ ﺍﻳﺎﻻﺕ ﻣﺘﺤﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﺟﻨﺎﺡﻫﺎﻯ ﺭﺍﺳــﺖﮔﺮﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺴﻜﻮ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺷﻜﺎﺭ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ،ﻏﺎﺭﺕ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎﺋﻴﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻓﺮﻭﭘﺎﺷﺎﻧﺪﻥ ﺍﻟﮕﻮﻫﺎﻯ »ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ـ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ« ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺎﺭﻩ ﺑﺴﻴﺞ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﻣﻬﻢﺗﺮﻳﻦ »ﺍﻟﮕﻮﺋﻰ« ﻛﻪ ﻫﺪﻑ ﺍﻳﻨﺎﻥ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻬﺎﻣﺎﺕ »ﺳﻮﺳــﻴﺎﻝ ﺩﻣﻜﺮﺍﺳــﻰ« ﻏﺮﺑﻰ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻧﮕﺮﺷــﻰ ﻛﻪ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺩﻭﻡ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﺍﻳﺎﻻﺕ ﻣﺘﺤﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﻯ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩ ﺷــﻮﺭﻭﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎﻯ ﻏﺮﺑﻰ ﻣﺴــﺘﻘﺮ ﺷﺪ ،ﺗﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺧﻴﺎﻝﺍﺵ ﺭﺍﺣﺖ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ﻭ »ﻭﻳﺘﺮﻳﻦ« ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻧﻈﺮﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺯﻳﺮ ﺩﻣﺎﻍ ﻣﺴــﻜﻮﻳﺖﻫﺎ ﺑﮕﺬﺍﺭﺩ ،ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺷــﻮﺭﻭﻯﻫﺎ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺮﻛﻮﺏ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ »ﺳﻮﺳﻴﺎﻟﻴﺴﻢ ﻏﺮﺑﻰ« ﻣﻰﺧﻮﺍﻧﺪﻧﺪ ،ﺩﺭ ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺴﻜﻮ ﻭ ﻟﻨﻴﻨﮕﺮﺍﺩ ﺟﻮﻯ ﺧﻮﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻧﺪ. ﺍﻳــﻦ »ﺍﻟﮕﻮ« ﭘــﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻓﺮﻭﭘﺎﺷــﻰ ﺩﻳﻮﺍﺭ ﺑﺮﻟﻴــﻦ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺑــﺮﺍﻯ ﻣﺤﺎﻓﻞ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺳﺎﻻﺭﻯ ﭼﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺴﻜﻮ ﻭ ﭼﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﺷﻨﮕﺘﻦ »ﻧﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺁﺑﻰ« ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﻣﻰﺑﺎﻳﺴــﺖ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﺑﻦﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﻮﻧﺴــﻰ ،ﻛﻠﻨﻞ ﻗﺬﺍﻓــﻰ ﻟﻴﺒﻴﺎﺋﻰ ﻭ ... ﺷــﺮﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﺮ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺳــﺎﻻﺭﻯ »ﻣﺤﺘﺮﻡ« ﻛﻢ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺗﻼﺵ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﭘﺎﺷﻨﻪ ﻣﻰﭼﺮﺧﺪ .ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﺳﺮ ﺑﺴﺘﻪ ﺑﮕﻮﺋﻴﻢ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﺎً ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ ﺷﻴﻮﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺯﻳــﻊ ﺩﻭﺭ ﻣﻰﺯﻧﺪ .ﭘﺎﺋﻴﻦ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻥ ﻣﺎﻟﻴﺎﺕ ﺑــﺮ ﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪ ﺛﺮﻭﺗﻤﻨﺪﺍﻥ، ﭘﺎﺋﻴﻦ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻥ ﺩﺳــﺘﻤﺰﺩ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ،ﺍﺯ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺑﺮﺩﻥ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺭﻓﺎﻩ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ،ﺑﻪ ﺑﻦﺑﺴــﺖ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﺪﻥ ﭘﺮﻭﺳﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺯﻳﻊ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ
ﺗﻮﺳــﻂ ﺷــﺒﻜﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﭼﻴﻨﻰ ﻭ ﻭﺍﺑﺴﺘﮕﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺍﺷــﻨﮕﺘﻦ ،ﻭ ...ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﺠﻤﻠﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ. ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻴﻜﻪ ﻧﻪ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺳــﺮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ،ﻭ ﻧــﻪ ﺗﺨﺎﻟﻔﻰ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﻭﺍﺷﻨﮕﺘﻦ ﻭ ﻣﺴﻜﻮ ،ﺳﻮﺳﻴﺎﻝﺩﻣﻜﺮﺍﺳﻰ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎﺋﻰ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺩﺭﺩﻫــﺎﻯ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﺭﻭﭘــﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭﻣﺎﻥ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ؟ ﭘﺮ ﻭﺍﺿﺢ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻪ ﻟﺸــﻜﺮ ﻻﺕﻭﻟﻮﺕﻫﺎﻯ ﻃﺒﻘﺔ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﺩﺳﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺴﻜﻮﻳﺖ ﻭ ﻳﺎﻧﻜــﻰ ﻫﻴﭽﻜــﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﺯ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ »ﺍﻫﺪﺍﻑ ﺍﺣﻤﻘﺎﻧــﻪ« ﻭ »ﻏﻴﺮﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺗﻮﺟﻴﻬﻰ« ﭘﺸــﺘﻴﺒﺎﻧﻰ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ ،ﻭ ﺩﻳﺪﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻜﺮﺩ .ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ »ﺗﺨﺎﻟﻒ« ﺷﺮﻕ ﻭ ﻏﺮﺏ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﻳﺖ ﻭ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻯ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻰ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ،ﺩﺭ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﻓﻠﺴــﻔﺔ ﻭﺟﻮﺩﻯ ﺍﻟﮕﻮﻫﺎﻯ »ﺩﻟﭙﺬﻳﺮ« ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎﺋﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺟﻨﮓﺳﺮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻳﺎﺩﮔﺎﺭ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻩ .ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﺑﺮﻟﻮﺳــﻜﻮﻧﻰ ،ﻣﺮﻛﻞ ﻭ ﺳــﺮﻛﻮﺯﻯ ﺳﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﺭﺍﺥﻫﺎ ﺑﻴﺮﻭﻥ ﻛﺸــﻴﺪﻧﺪ ،ﻭ ﺳﺨﻨﮕﻮﻳﺎﻥ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺳﺎﻻﺭﻯ ﺑﻰﺣﺪ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺯ ﻭ ﭼﭙﺎﻭﻝ ﺍﻣﻮﺍﻝ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻰ ﺷﺪﻧﺪ. ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴــﻮﺍ ﺍﻭﻻﻧﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴــﻪ ،ﻫﺮ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﻣﺤﺎﻓﻞ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺏ ﺍﻫﺪﺍﻓﻰ ﻣﺸــﺨﺺ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ، ﺍﺯ ﻣﻨﻈﺮ ﺭﺃﻯﺩﻫﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﭼﭗ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ،ﺗﻼﺷــﻰ ﺗﻠﻘﻰ ﻣﻰﺷــﻮﺩ ﺟﻬﺖ ﺗﺤﻜﻴﻢ ﺩﻭﺑﺎﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﮕﻮﻫﺎﺋﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻓﻠﺴــﻔﺔ ﻭﺟﻮﺩﻯﺷﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺪﻩﺑﺴــﺘﺎﻥﻫﺎﻯ »ﻣﺴــﻜﻮ ـ ﻭﺍﺷــﻨﮕﺘﻦ« ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﻪ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻩ، ﺟﻬــﺖ ﺣﻔﻆ ﺭﻓﺎﻩ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ،ﮔﺴــﺘﺮﺵ ﻋﺪﺍﻟــﺖ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ،ﻭ ﺗﺄﻣﻴﻦ ﺻﻠﺢ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﺭﺓ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﺣﻴﺎﺗﻰﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺣﻴﺎﺗﻰ ﺑﺎﻗﻰ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﻣﺎﻧﺪ. ﻓﻘﻂ ﻣﻰﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﻨﺘﻈﺮ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺩﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺣﺰﺏ ﺳﻮﺳﻴﺎﻟﻴﺴــﺖ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺖ ﺑﺎ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩﻫﺎﻯ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﺔ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ،ﻫﻢ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﺍﻟﮕﻮﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﮔﺮﻓﺘــﻦ ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩﻳﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ »ﺑﻪ ﺭﻭﺯ« ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﻓﺸﺎﺭ ﻣﺤﺎﻓﻞ ﻭﺍﭘﺲﮔﺮﺍ ،ﺑﺎﻧﻚﻫﺎ، ﻓﺎﺷﻴﺴــﺖﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﺎً ﭼﭗﻧﻤﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﺮﺩﻣﻔﺮﻳﺐ ﻭ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﻟﻴﻨﻴﺴﺖ ﺣﺎﺋﻠﻰ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﺟﻬﺖ ﺣﻔﻆ ﺩﻣﻜﺮﺍﺳــﻰ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎﻯ ﻏﺮﺑﻰ. ﺍﻳﻦ ﺁﺯﻣﻮﻧﻰ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻳﻨﺪﺓ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ ﻣﻠﺖ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴﻪ ﻣﻰﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﭘﻴــﺮﻭﺯ ﺷــﻮﺩ .ﻭ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺁﺯﻣــﻮﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎﺋﻰ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ ،ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻛﻨــﻮﻥ ﺗﻼﺵﻫﺎ ،ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﺎﺕ ﻭ ﺩﻳﺪﺍﺭﻫــﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻗﻠﺐ ﺍﺭﻭﭘــﺎ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺣﺰﺍﺏ ﺗﺮﻗﻰﺧﻮﺍﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻭﺝ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺳــﻴﺪﻩ .ﻭﻟﻰ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻼﺵﻫﺎ ﺳــﺮ ﺑﺮ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺑﻪ ﺻﺮﺍﺣﺖ ﺭﻭﺷﻦ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ.