ULI competition

Page 1

The Ascend West Water Street Development ULI Competition Team Number 2

November 2016


ULI Competition Proposal: The Ascend

November 2016

Project Team Architecture

Sadaf Arsalani, Master of Architecture

Architecture

Kellie Dunaway, Master of Architecture

Real Estate

Andrew Hannah, Bachelor of Business Administration, Real Estate

Planning

Sadaf Khalilzare, Master of Community Planning

Business

Sutanu Majumdar, Master of Business Administration


ULI Competition Proposal: The Ascend

Executive Summary The Ascend will develop 20.6 acres across three parcels: - two parcels owned by Hilltop Basic Resources (Parcels A & B) - third parcel owned by Hamilton County (Parcel C) Project Goals: - bringe more population to the riverfront - enhance the experience of living downtown - extend the park system west along the river - create a new market in a previously industrial-dominated area Major Nearby Amenities: - Great American Ballpark - Paul Brown Stadium - The Banks - Smale Riverfront Park

November 2016


ULI Competition Proposal: The Ascend

November 2016

Executive Summary Proposed Development: - Residential complex of 203 family units at market rate - Commercial space of 246,000 SF - office, hotel, retail, restaurants, gym - Addition to park system: variety of park spaces, boardwalk - Parking facilities to accomodate needs of the development and surrounding attractions Theme of Healthy Urban Living RESTAURANT:


ULI Competition Proposal: The Ascend

November 2016

Background & Site Overview Desired way of living for Millenials, Baby Boomers, and Generation Z: - Downtown apartments - Leisurely walks along riverfront - Harmony between work and life This site can act as a gateway for Cincinnati - contributing to new ideas of urbanism through sustainable, walkable cities. The location of this site can illustrate the identity of Cincinnati for visitors: - proximity to transportation, residential complexes, employment, & sports and recreation - riverfront location facing Northern Kentucky - diverse and growing population - fast adoption of technology - rising awareness of sustainability - local entrepreneurs seeking space and capital

䌀䈀䐀 吀爀愀渀猀瀀漀爀琀愀琀椀漀渀 栀甀戀  吀栀攀 䈀愀渀欀猀

䤀渀搀甀猀琀爀椀愀氀 䐀椀猀琀爀椀挀琀

匀琀愀搀椀甀洀 倀愀爀欀

刀椀瘀攀爀

匀琀愀搀椀甀洀


ULI Competition Proposal: The Ascend

November 2016

Zoning

䴀䜀

䴀䜀

䐀䐀

䐀䐀 倀䐀

倀䐀

刀䘀ⴀ䴀

Existing Zoning: General Manufacturing & Riverfront Manufacturing (Parcels A & B) Planned Development (Parcel C)

倀䐀

Proposed Zoning Change: Change: Planned Development (Parcels A & B) Keep: Planned Development (Parcel C)


ULI Competition Proposal: The Ascend

Design: City Analysais

Green infrastructure Recreation Residential Commercial Cultural Mixed Use Religious Industrial

November 2016


ULI Competition Proposal: The Ascend

November 2016

Design: Site Access

Commute to Downtown: 3 minutes Commute to to Downtown: Commute Downtown: 13 minutes 33 minutes minutes 5 minutes 1313 minutes minutes minutes 5 22 minutes 5 minutes 2222 minutes minutes 47

Walk Score: Car Dependent most errands require a car

Score: Car Dependent 47 Walk Walk Score: errands require aCar car Dependent 47 most most errands require a car 62 Transit Score: Good Transit

many nearby public transportation options

Score: Good Transit 62 Transit Transit Score: Good Transit nearby public transportation options 62 many many nearby public transportation options Score: Somewhat Bikeable 47 Bike Flat as a pancake, minimal bike lanes Score: Somewhat Bikeable 47 Bike Score:minimal Somewhat as a pancake, bike lanes Bikeable 47 FlatBike Flat as a pancake, minimal bike lanes

500 ’ 500 ’ 500

100 0 100 ’ 0’ 100

0’

150 1500’ 0’ 150 0’

200 200 0’ 0’ 200

0’

N

N N

crosswalk crosswalk crosswalk stop sign stop sign stop sign stoplight stoplight stoplight Rt. 85 shuttle stop Rt. 85 shuttle stop Rt. shuttle stop Red85 Bike station Red Bike station Red Bike station Ohio River Trail bike path Ohio River Trail bike path shared roadway: autopath + bike Ohio River Trail bike shared roadway: auto + bike distance radii shared roadway: auto + bike distance radii distance radii


ULI Competition Proposal: The Ascend

November 2016

Design: Site Analysis floodplain noise radii bridge clearance

water easement

temp. construction easement sewer easement

Ohio River setback views from site highway bridges

71dB

74dB

80dB

70dB

wind

64dB 61dB

easement

500

distance radii

100

0’ 150

0’ 200

0’

N floodplain noise radii bridge clearance

water easement

temp. construction easement sewer easement

Site Analysis

Ohio River setback

scale: 1” = 400’

views from site highway bridges

71dB

74dB

80dB

70dB

wind

64dB 61dB

easement

500

distance radii

100

0’ 150

0’ 200

0’

N


ULI Competition Proposal: The Ascend

Site Plan

November 2016


ULI Competition Proposal: The Ascend

November 2016

Site Plan: Materials

Wolmanized Lumber

Concrete slab

Vegetation

Timber

Rubber tiles

Sprinturf


ULI Competition Proposal: The Ascend

November 2016

Design

The design begins by mimicking the downtown grid, but at an angle to improve views from the site. The landscaping continues the park system through our site. Then, the greenspace gradually rises to inhabit the buildings’ rooftops to elevate the landscape.


ULI Competition Proposal: The Ascend

Design: Walkability & Accessibility

November 2016


ULI Competition Proposal: The Ascend

November 2016

Design

By positioning parking on the first few floors, we were able to elevate the main functions of the building out of the floodplain. Gradually rising the height of the massing allowed us to provide more units with better views and visually continue the park space.


ULI Competition Proposal: The Ascend

November 2016

Design

The main functions of the exterior space include a fitness lawn, skate park, boardwalk, garden space, a children’s playground, bike paths, a dog park, and other greenspace. In red, the main parking and pedestrian entries for each building are called out.


ULI Competition Proposal: The Ascend

Design

November 2016


ULI Competition Proposal: The Ascend

Concept: Health & Sustainability

November 2016


ULI Competition Proposal: The Ascend

Building Plans Mixed-Use Restaurant: 396 Retail: 194 Gym: 260 ---Hotel: 103 Office: 87 1038 Parking spaces are needed Residential 328 Parking spaces are needed West Building 2 floors parking: 368 Parking spaces Central Building: 3 floors parking: 837 Parking spaces East Building: Residential 2 floors parking: 161 Parking spaces PARKING

RESIDENTIAL

Total of 1366 Parking spaces HOTEL

OFFICE PARKING

RESTAURANT

RESIDENTIAL

FITNESS CENTER

HOTEL

RETAIL

OFFICE

TERRACE

RESTAURANT

November 2016


ULI Competition Proposal: The Ascend

Building Plans West Building: Mixed-Use Restaurant, Retail, Gym, Hotel (103 keys), Office 7 floors total (2 floors parking) Central Building: Residential 168 units (2 penthouse) 9 floors total (3 floors parking) East Building: Residential 35 units 6 floors total (2PARKING floors parking) RESIDENTIAL HOTEL OFFICE PARKING

RESTAURANT

RESIDENTIAL

FITNESS CENTER

HOTEL

RETAIL

OFFICE

TERRACE

RESTAURANT

November 2016


ULI Competition Proposal: The Ascend

November 2016

Building Sections

N


ULI Competition Proposal: The Ascend

November 2016

Building Elevations: Materials A

D

B

E

F

H C

G

I

L

J

K

N


ULI Competition Proposal: The Ascend

November 2016


ULI Competition Proposal: The Ascend

November 2016


ULI Competition Proposal: The Ascend

November 2016


ULI Competition Proposal: The Ascend

Market Analysis Market Feasibility - Average income within the 1 mile radius is 68,000 and inside 3 miles 53,000 - Over 80,000 employees in the 1 mile large commuter presence - Surrounading developments (street cars) show promise to bring more People closer to the site Use Vacancy - Multifamily: Market occupancy rate would vary between 94-96% throughout 2016 - Hotel: Occupancy rate remains steady at 60% - Office: Class A vacancy rate remains around at 15%. - Retail: 8.1% Vacancy around the city Use Development - Multifamily: 6000 new units planned over 3 years - Hotel: 900 rooms added in the last 5 years - Office: 950,000 SF Development scheduled for 2016 - Retail: 29 Retail and Restaurants fronts opened in 2015 within 3 miles

November 2016


ULI Competition Proposal: The Ascend

Development Plan Two Phases starting with residential and finishing with office. Use of TIF funding: TIF District 2 Downtown South/ River Front Final Phase comes online January 2019

Development Team – Carter Construction Management – Turner Construction November 2016 Architect / Site Planning - GBBN Architects

Development Schedule Schedule Item Development Team Identified Planning Land Acquisition Approved for TIF Funding Lending Approved Phase 1 Residential & Garage Begin Preleasing Residential Permanent Financing Phase 2 Hotel and Commercial Residential & Garage Online Begin Preleasing Commercial Hotel and Commercial Online Rents Stabilize

Month Start Duration End Nov-16 2 Dec-16 Dec-16 1 Dec-16 Jan-17 1 Jan-17 Feb-17 1 Mar-17 Mar-17 1 Mar-17 Apr-17 12 Mar-18 Jul-17 5 Nov-17 Dec-17 1 Dec-17 Jan-18 12 Dec-18 Jan-18 1 Jan-18 Mar-18 8 Oct-18 Jan-19 1 Jan-19 Jan-22 1 Jan-22


ULI Competition Proposal: The Ascend

Development Costs

November 2016


ULI Competition Proposal: The Ascend

Development Funding

November 2016


ULI Competition Proposal: The Ascend

Income-Residential + Hotel + Parking

November 2016


ULI Competition Proposal: The Ascend

Income-Commercial

November 2016


ULI Competition Proposal: The Ascend

Operating Expenses and Reserves

November 2016


ULI Competition Proposal: The Ascend

Returns

November 2016


Thank you


Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.