Container tracking app by adm0001 Streamline your logistics operations with a container tracking application. Track the movement of your shipments in real time, ensuring transparency and efficiency throughout the supply chain. Get instant updates on container status, location, and estimated arrival times. Simplify the management of your cargo and enhance collaboration with shipping partners, empowering you to stay ahead in the global marketplace. This is a real-time and live feeding direct to your workstation computers, laptops, or even you mobile devices. Once it is activated, will work as an alarm signal if the infrastructure is compromised, works a camera too, and real-time feeding as well. Anything out the normality, you receive an alert and your track feeding, and footage. The vessels admins will be informed on the emergency too. There is in fact a significant difference for the vector without pre allocation, that is 20% faster than with the previous version. Indeed, since it knows that the operation cannot throw it can use a faster path for reallocation and still guarantees its exception safety. Overall, for insertions, the vector and deque are the fastest for small types and the list is the fastest for the very large types. colony offers a medium performance on this benchmark but is quite stable for different data types. When you know the size of the collection, you should always use reserve() on vectors. Moreover, if you can use noexcept operations, you should always do it since it can significantly speedup the vector performance. Empace: The next operation is very similar to the first except that we use emplace insertions instead of pushes. As expected, there is no difference between push_back and emplace_back for trivial types. The preallocated vector is the fastest container, followed by the deque and then significantly slower are the colony and vector without preallocation. However, here is a very large difference between the push version and the emplace version. Indeed, it is much slower. This may seem hard to believe that emplace is slower than normal insert since it should be at least as fast, and generally faster. This in fact due to the version of GCC that is still using Copy-On-Write for string. Therefore, the previous version was much faster because the copies were not done since the string was not modified and this saved a lot of time in that case. However, this is an artificial case since a collection filled of all the same string is not highly likely in practice. Generally, I think it's better to use Small-StringOptimization than Copy-On-Write and now COW is not allowed by the standard anymore in C+ +11. Overall, for the tested types, emplace should have exactly the same performance as normal