THE ROSE REVIEW DIRECTOR’S REPORT Kenneth P. Miller, J.D., Ph.D. In the Spring 2024 edition of The Rose Review, I argued that the Rose Institute has flourished over time because it has maintained a steady commitment to its threepart mission--that is, developing students; producing high-quality, policy-relevant, data-driven research; and enhancing public understanding of state and local government, with an emphasis on
Fall 2024 3 - Student Management Report 4 - Project Updates 7 - 1946 Challenge 8 - Summer Reflections 12 - New Hires 15 - Speaker Series 16 - Alumni Spotlight: Christiana Dominguez ’01 18 - BOG Spotlight: Scott Ochoa ’93 19 - New Board Members
California. Last time, I shared how the Institute is promoting student development. In this report, I will highlight our recent research achievements. Research: High quality, policy-relevant, data driven We are a small institute and don’t aspire to produce research at the volume of a large think tank. However, we strive to achieve the same quality of research as the nation’s best policy institutes, and we want our research to contribute meaningfully to academic scholarship, political analysis, and policy debates. How do we pursue this goal? We begin by carefully selecting projects that fit within our mission and capacity. Our projects explore a range of state and local government policy and governance topics throughout Southern California and the state as a whole. When our research extends to other states, we generally seek to make comparisons between those states and California. We limit ourselves to research that can be supervised by Rose-affiliated professionals who have expertise in the subject. In addition, we look for projects that will allow for meaningful participation by students, thereby enhancing their education and practical training. Finally, we prioritize research that is accessible to civic leaders and the general public, thus advancing their understanding of complex policy and governance issues. To maintain the highest research standards, we identify experts to oversee our projects. We draw from the Rose Institute’s staff, as well as our team of Faculty Advisors, other CMC faculty members, and outside consultants. Often, these consultants are Rose Institute alumni who have pursued careers in or around state and local government and welcome the opportunity to work with current students. Finally, we support our research with adequate resources. Among other things, we invest in hiring outside experts, contracting with other entities (such as YouGov) to help implement our research, and purchasing data, such as the National Establishments Time Series (NETS) database. Some of our projects are funded by outside organizations; others are financed by the Rose Institute’s internal resources. We insist that all our research, including externally funded work, be independent, objective, and non-partisan. In recent years, we have pursued an ambitious research agenda within these parameters. Our projects have included: multiple national public opinion polls; an in-depth study of San Francisco’s governance (followed by helping convert that research into a City Charter Amendment); several policy and governance reports for the City of Ontario; analyses of California’s statewide ballot measures; research on California’s fast-changing housing policies and their implementation at the local level, including in the City of Long Beach; surveys of the cost of doing business in cities in California and other states;