RMA - RATED - Youth Sexual Violence - References

Page 1

Rajlic, G. and Gretton, H. M. (2010) ‘An examination of two sexual recidivism risk measures in adolescent offenders: The Moderating Effect of Offender Type.’ Criminal Justice and Behavior 37(10), 1066 1085. Access Here

Rojas Mejia, E. Y. (2013), Violence risk assessment with youth who have sexually offended: A psychometric examination of the Violence Risk Scale: Youth Sexual Offender Version (VRS:YSO). Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Saskatoon, Saskatchewan: University of Saskatchewan. Access Here

Chu, C. M., Ng, K., Fong, J. and Teoh, J. (2011) ‘Assessing Youth Who Sexually Offended: The Predictive Validity of the ERASOR, J SOAP II, and YLS/CMI in a Non Western Context.’ Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment 24(2), 153 174. Access Here

Hersant, J. L. (2006). Risk assessment of juvenile sex offender reoffense. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Carbondale, Illinois: Southern Illinois University. [Not accessible]

Chávez, V. (2010). Is everyone rated equal? An examination of factors related to sexual risk in ethnically diverse male adolescents who have sexually offended. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Lincoln, Nebraska: University of Nebraska. [Not accessible]

Barra, S., Bessler, C., Landolt, M. A. and Aebi, M. (2018) ‘Testing the Validity of Criminal Risk Assessment Tools in Sexually Abusive Youth.’ Psychological Assessment 30(1), 1430 1443. Access Campbell,HereF.,

RATED page updated: August 2019 © Risk Management Authority 2019

Edwards, R., Beech, A., Bishopp, D., Erikson, M., Friendship, C. and Charlesworth, L. (2005) ‘Predicting dropout from a residential programme for adolescent sexual abusers using pre treatment variables and implications for recidivism.’ Journal of Sexual Aggression 11(2), 139 155. Access Here

McCoy, W. K. (2007). Predicting treatment outcome and recidivism among juvenile sex offenders: The utility of the JSOAPII and ERASOR in an outpatient treatment program Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Hunstville, Texas: Sam Houston State University. [Not Morton,accessible]K.E. (2003). Psychometric properties of four risk assessment measures with male adolescent sex offenders. Unpublished Master’s thesis. Ottawa, Ontario: Carleton University. [Not Nelson,accessible]R.(2011).

ERASOR

VALIDATED TOOLS

Edwards, R., Whittaker, M. K., Beckett, R., Bishopp, D. and Bates, A. (2012) ‘Adolescents who have sexually harmed: An evaluation of a specialist treatment programme.’ Journal of Sexual Aggression 18(1), 91 111. Access Here

Predicting Recidivism Among Juvenile Sex Offenders: The Validity of the ERASOR. Unpublished Thesis. Paper 13, Roger Williams University, Rhode Island. Access Here.

Booth, A., Stepanova, E., Hackett, S., Sutton, A., Hynes, K., Sanderson, J. and Rogstad, K. (2016) Harmful sexual behaviour in children: evidence for identifying and assessing risk in children and young people who display harmful sexual behaviour. London, UK: NICE Evidence Review. Access Here

Chu, C. M., Daffern, M., Thomas, S. and Lim, J. Y. (2012) ‘Violence risk and gang affiliation in youth offenders: a recidivism study.’ Psychology, Crime & Law 18(3), 299 315. Access Here.

J SOAP II

Prentky, R. and Righthand, S. (2003) Juvenile Sex Offender Assessment Protocol (JSOAP II) Manual. Bridgewater, MA: Justice Resource Institute. Access Here

Skowron, C. (2004) Differentiation and predictive factors in adolescent sexual offending. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Ottawa, Canada: Carleton University. Access Here.

Aebi, M., Plattner, B., Steinhausen, H. C. and Bessler, C. (2011) ‘Predicting Sexual and Nonsexual Recidivism in a Consecutive Sample of Juveniles Convicted of Sexual Offences.’ Sexual Abuse 23(4), 456 473. Access Here

Worling, J. R. and Curwen, T. (2001). Estimate of Risk of Adolescent Sexual Offense Recidivism (ERASOR; Version 2.0). Ontario, Canada: Ontario Ministry of Community and Social Services. Access Here.

WorlingHere.,

J. R. (2004) ‘The Estimate of Risk of Adolescent Sexual Offense Recidivism (ERASOR): Preliminary Psychometric Data.’ Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research 16(3), 235 254. Access Here

2019 © Risk Management Authority 2019

Viljoen, J. L., Elkovitch, N., Scalora, M. J. and Ullman, D. (2009) ‘Assessment of Re offence Risk in Adolescents who have Committed Sexual Offences: Predictive Validity of the ERASOR, PCL:YV, YLS/CMI and Static 99.’ Criminal Justice and Behavior 36(10), 981 1000. Access

Barra, S., Bessler, C., Landolt, M. A. and Aebi, M. (2018) ‘Testing the Validity of Criminal Risk Assessment Tools in Sexually Abusive Youth.’ Psychological Assessment 30(1), 1430 1443. Access Barroso,Here.R.,Pechorro, P., Ramião, E., Figueiredo, P., Manita, C., Gonçalves, R. A. and Nobre, P. (2019) ‘Are Juveniles Who Have Committed Sexual Offenses the Same Everywhere? Psychometric Properties of the Juvenile Sex Offender Assessment Protocol II in a Portuguese Youth Sample.’ Sexual Abuse. Access Here.

RATED page updated: August

Worling, J. R. and Langton, C. M. (2015) ‘A prospective investigation of factors that predict desistance from recidivism for adolescents who have sexually offended.’ Sexual Abuse 27(1), 127 142. Access Here

Martinez, R., Flores, J. and Rosenfeld, B. (2007) ‘Validity of the Juvenile Sex Offender Assessment Protocol II (J Soap II) in a Sample of Urban Minority Youth.’ Criminal Justice and Behavior 34(10), 1284 1295. Access Here

Worling, J. R., Bookalam, D. and Littlejohn, A. (2012) ‘Prospective validity of the Estimate of Risk of Adolescent Sexual Offense Recidivism (ERASOR).’ Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment 24(3), 203 223. Access Here

Martinez, R., Rosenfeld, B., Cruise, K. and Martin, J. (2015) ‘Predictive validity of the JSOAP II: Does accuracy differ across settings?’ International Journal of Forensic Mental Health 14(1), 56 65. Access Here.

Vilijoen, J. L., Gray, A. L., Shaffer, C., Latzman, N. E., Scalora, M. J. and Ullman, D. (2017) ‘Changes in JSOAP II and SAVRY scores over the course of residential, cognitive behavioural treatment for adolescent sexual offending.’ Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment 29 (4), 342 374. Access Here

© Risk

Viljoen, J. L., Scalora, M., Cuadra, L., Bader, S., Chávez, V., Ullman, D., and Lawrence, L. (2008) ‘Assessing Risk for Violence in Adolescents Who Have Sexually Offended: A Comparison of the J SOAP II, J SORRAT II, and SAVRY.’ Criminal Justice and Behavior 35(1), 5 23. Access Here.

Prentky R. A., Li N. C., Righthand S., Schuler A., Cavanaugh D. and Lee A. F. (2010) ‘Assessing risk of sexually abusive behavior among youth in a child welfare sample.’ Behavioral Sciences and the Law 28(1), 24 45. Access Here

Schwartz Mette, R. A., Righthand, S., Hecker, J., Dore, G. and Huff, R. (2019) ‘Long Term Predictive Validity of the Juvenile Sex Offender Assessment Protocol II: Research and Practice Implications.’ Sexual Abuse Access Here

Yates, H. M. (2005) A Review of Evidence Based Practice in the Assessment and Treatment of Sex Offenders. Pennsylvania: Office of Planning, Research, Statistics and Grants. Access Here.

Wijetunga, C., Nijdam Jones, A., Rosenfeld, B., Martinez, R. and Cruise, K. R. (2018b) ‘Using the Juvenile Sex Offender Assessment Protocol Revised to Assess Psychopathy: A Preliminary investigation.’ Criminal Justice and Behavior 45(4), 483 502. Access Here.

MEGA♪: Epperson, D. L., Ralston, C. A., Fowers, D., DeWitt, J. and Gore, K. S. (2006) ‘Actuarial risk assessment with juveniles who offend sexually: Development of the Juvenile Sexual Offense Recidivism Risk Assessment Tool II (JSORRAT II).’ In Prescott, D. (Ed.), Risk assessment of youth who have sexually abused: Theory, controversy, and emerging strategies Oklahoma City, OK: Woods ‘N’ Barnes, 118 169 Access Here

RATED page updated: August 2019 Management Authority 2019

Rajlic, G. and Gretton, H. M. (2010) ‘An Examination of Two Sexual Recidivism Risk Measures in Adolescent Offenders: The Moderating Effect of Offender Type.’ Criminal Justice and Behavior 37(10), 1066 1085. Access Here.

Ralston, C. A. and Epperson, D. L. (2013) ‘Predictive validity of adult risk assessment tools with juveniles who offended sexually.’ Psychological Assessment 25(3), 905 916. Access Righthand,Here

Viljoen, J. L., Mordell, S. and Beneteau, J. L. (2012) ‘Prediction of adolescent sexual reoffending: A meta analysis of the J SOAP II, ERASOR, J SORRAT II, and Static 99.’ Law and Human Behavior 36(5), 423 438. Access Here

Wijetunga, C., Martinez, R., Rosenfeld, B. and Cruise, K. (2018a) ‘The Influence of Age and Sexual Drive on the Predictive Validity of the Juvenile Sex Offender Assessment Protocol Revised.’ International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 62(1), 150 169. Access Here

S., Prentky, R., Knight, R., Carpenter, E., Hecker, J. E. and Nangle, D. (2005) ‘Factor Structure and Validation of the Juvenile Sex Offender Assessment Protocol (J SOAP).’ Sexual Abuse 17(1), 13 30. Access Here.

Miccio Fonseca, L. C. (2016b, May) MEGA♪: Second cross validation findings on sexually abusive youth. Presentation given at the Annual conference of the California Coalition on Sexual Offending (CCOSO), San Diego, CA. [Not accessible]

MiccioHere

Miccio Fonseca, L. C. (2017b, September) Issues in assessment of sexually abusive youth: Intimacy deficits and erotically related protective factors and sexually abusive youth. 22st International Conference on Violence, Abuse, & Trauma and the National Summit on Interpersonal Violence & Abuse, San Diego, CA. [Not accessible]

Fonseca, L. C. (2010) ‘MEGA♪: An Ecological Risk Assessment Tool of Risk and Protective Factors for Assessing Sexually Abusive Children and Adolescents.’ Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma 19(7), 734 756. Access Here

© Risk

Miccio Fonseca, L. C. (1996) ‘Comparative Differences in the Psychological Histories of Sex Offenders, Victims, and Their Families.’ Journal of Offender Rehabilitation 23(3 4), 71 83. Access Here

Epperson, D. L. and Ralston, C. A. (2015)’ Development and validation of the Juvenile Sexual Offender Recidivism Risk Assessment Tool II.’ Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 27(6) 529 558. Access Here

Miccio Fonseca, L.C. (2005) Fonseca Inventory of Sex Offenders’ Risk Factors (FISORF) Professional Manual. San Diego, CA: Author. [Not accessible]

RATED page updated: August 2019 Management Authority

Miccio Fonseca, L. C. (2009) ‘MEGA ♪: a new paradigm in protocol assessing sexually abusive children and adolescents.’ Journal of Child and Adolescent Trauma 2(2), 124 141. Access

2019

Fagundes, M. (2013) ‘DSM IV TR diagnoses and risk levels of sexually abusive youth.’ Perspectives: California Coalition on Sexual Offending Quarterly Newsletter, Summer/Fall, 1, 5 8, 13. Access Here.

Miccio Fonseca, L. C. (2013) ‘MEGA: A New Paradigm in Risk Assessment Tools for Sexually Abusive Youth.’ Journal of Family Violence 28(6), 623 634. Access Here.

Miccio Fonseca, L. C. (2017d, September) The anomalies among juvenile sex offenders: Sexually violent & predatory sexually violent. 22st International Conference on Violence, Abuse, & Trauma and the National Summit on Interpersonal Violence & Abuse, San Diego, CA. [Not accessible]

Miccio Fonseca, L. C. (2017c) ‘The anomaly among sexually abusive youth: The juvenile sex trafficker.’ Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 26, 5, 558 572. Access Here

Miccio Fonseca, L. C. (2016a) ‘MEGA cross validation findings on sexually abusive females: implications for risk assessment and clinical practice.’ Journal of Family Violence 31(7), 903 911. Access Here

Miccio Fonseca, L. C. (2017a, Fall) Innovative scientific advancement in risk assessment of sexually abusive youth. Perspectives: California Coalition on Sexual Offending (CCOSO), Quarterly Newsletter, 7 10. Access Here

Miccio Fonseca, L. C. (2018b, Spring) Sexually abusive youth who are transgender. Perspectives: California Coalition on Sexual Offending (CCOSO) Quarterly Newsletter, 1, 14 17. Access Here.

Miccio Fonseca, L. C. and Rasmussen, L. A. (2018) ‘Scientific evolution of clinical and risk assessment of sexually abusive youth: A comprehensive review of empirical tools. Special Issue on risk assessment of sexually abusive youth.’ Journal of Child Sexual Abuse 27(8), 871 900. Access Here

Rasmussen, L. A. L. (2017) ‘Comparing predictive validity of JSORRAT II and MEGA♪\ with sexually abusive youth in long term residential custody.’ International Journal of Offender Rehabilitation and Comparative Criminology 62(10), 2937 2953. Access Here.

Carson, C. (2019) AIM Assessment Model for Children Under 12 years old with Problematic Harmful Sexual Behaviours (3rd edition). Stockport: The AIM Project. [Not accessible]

Miccio Fonseca, L. C. (2019) Family Lovemap, protective factors: Sex, intimacy, and sexually abusive youth. In Ireland, J. L., Ireland, C. A. and Birch, P. (eds.) Violent and sex offenders handbook (2nd edition). Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon, UK: Routledge, 114 127. Access Here.

Leonard, M. and Hackett, S. (2019) The AIM3 Assessment Model: Assessment of Adolescents and Harmful Sexual Behaviour. Stockport: AIM Project. [Not accessible]

Miccio Fonseca, L. C. (2018c) ‘MEGA : Empirical Findings on the Preternatural: Sexually Violent and Predatory Sexually Violent Youth.’ Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma, 1 11. Access Here

Miccio Fonseca, L. C. and Rasmussen, L. A. (2014) ‘MEGA♪: Empirical support for nomenclature on the anomalies: Sexually violent and predatory youth.’ International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 59(11), 1222 1238. Access Here.

J. and Swann, R. (2019) Technology Assisted Harmful Sexual Behaviour: Practice Guidance (2nd edition). Stockport: AIM Project. [Not accessible]

Miccio Fonseca, L. C. (2018a) ‘Family Lovemap and erotically related protective factors. Special Issue: Risk assessment of sexually abusive youth.’ Journal of Child Sexual Abuse 27(8), 901 917. Access Here

Miccio Fonseca, L. C. and Rasmussen, L. A. (2009) ‘New nomenclature for sexually abusive youth: Naming and assessing sexually violent and predatory offenders.’ Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma 18(1), 106 128.

AR RSPB

Allotey,AIM3

Miccio Fonseca, L. C. (2017e) ‘The juvenile female sex trafficker.’ Journal of Aggression and Violent Behavior 35, 26 32. Access Here.

RATED page updated: August 2019 © Risk Management Authority 2019

AWAITING VALIDATION

Beech, A. R. and Ward, T. (2004) ‘The integration of etiology and risk in sexual offenders: A theoretical framework.’ Aggression and Violent Behavior 10(1), 31 63. Access Here.

Curwen, T. and Costin, D. (2007) ‘Toward assessing risk for repeated concerning sexual behavior by children with sexual behavior problems: What we know and what we can do with this knowledge.’ In Prescott, D. S. (ed.), Knowledge & practice: Challenges in the treatment and supervision of sexual abusers. Oklahoma City, OK: Wood ‘N’ Barnes, 310 344. Access Here.

Curwen, T. (2011a). A framework to assist in evaluating children’s risk to repeat concerning sexual behaviour. In M. Calder (Ed.), Contemporary Practice with Young People who Sexually Abuse: Evidence based Developments. Russell House Publishing, Lyme Regis: Dorset, 263 291. Access Here.

Curwen, T., Jenkins, J. and Worling, J. D. (2009) ‘Differentiating children with and without a history of repeated sexual behaviors.’ Journal of Child Sexual Abuse 23(4), 462 480. Access

Barra, S., Bessler, C., Landolt, M. A. and Aebi, M. (2018) ‘Testing the Validity of Criminal Risk Assessment Tools in Sexually Abusive Youth.’ Psychological Assessment 30(1), 1430 1443. Access Campbell,HereF., Booth, A., Stepanova, E., Hackett, S., Sutton, A., Hynes, K., Sanderson, J. and Rogstad, K. (2016) Harmful sexual behaviour in children: evidence for identifying and assessing risk in children and young people who display harmful sexual behaviour. London, UK: NICE Evidence Review. Access Here

Rajlic, G. and Gretton, H. M. (2010) ‘An examination of two sexual recidivism risk measures in adolescent offenders: The Moderating Effect of Offender Type.’ Criminal Justice and Behavior 37(10), 1066 1085. Access Here.

ERASORHere

Curwen, T. (2011b) Current evidence regarding the utility of a framework to assess risk to repeat concerning sexual behaviour (AR RSPB). Unpublished manuscript. [Not accessible]

Chu, C. M., Ng, K., Fong, J. and Teoh, J. (2011) ‘Assessing Youth Who Sexually Offended: The Predictive Validity of the ERASOR, J SOAP II, and YLS/CMI in a Non Western Context.’ Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment 24(2), 153 174. Access Here

Nelson, R. (2011). Predicting Recidivism Among Juvenile Sex Offenders: The Validity of the ERASOR. Unpublished Thesis. Paper 13, Roger Williams University, Rhode Island. Access Here

Edwards, R., Whittaker, M. K., Beckett, R., Bishopp, D. and Bates, A. (2012) ‘Adolescents who have sexually harmed: An evaluation of a specialist treatment programme.’ Journal of Sexual Aggression 18(1), 91 111. Access Here.

RATED page updated: August 2019

Skowron, C. (2004) Differentiation and predictive factors in adolescent sexual offending. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Ottawa, Canada: Carleton University. Access Here

© Risk Management Authority 2019

Viljoen, J. L., Elkovitch, N., Scalora, M. J. and Ullman, D. (2009) ‘Assessment of Re offence Risk in Adolescents who have Committed Sexual Offences: Predictive Validity of the ERASOR, PCL:YV, YLS/CMI and Static 99.’ Criminal Justice and Behavior 36(10), 981 1000. Access Here.

(2009) Juvenile Sexual Offenders: A Comprehensive Guide to Risk Evaluation. New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons, Ltd. Access Here

(2009) Juvenile Sexual Offenders: A Comprehensive Guide to Risk Evaluation. New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons, Ltd. Access Here.

Rich,Here.P.

Worling, J. R. and Langton, C. M. (2015) ‘A prospective investigation of factors that predict desistance from recidivism for adolescents who have sexually offended.’ Sexual Abuse 27(1), 127 142. Access Here.

RATED page updated: August 2019 © Risk Management Authority 2019

Hempel, I., Buck, N., Cima, M. and Marle, H. van. (2013) ‘Review of Risk Assessment Instruments for Juvenile Sex Offenders: What is Next?’ International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 57(2), 208 228. Access Here

Witt, P. H., DelRusso, J., Oppenheim, J. and Ferguson, G. (1996) ‘Sex offender risk assessment and the law.’ Journal of Psychiatry & Law 24(3), 343 377. Access Here

Worling, J. R. and Curwen, T. (2001). Estimate of Risk of Adolescent Sexual Offense Recidivism (ERASOR; Version 2.0). Ontario, Canada: Ontario Ministry of Community and Social Services. Access Here.

JRAS

Ralston, C. A. and Epperson, D. L. (2013) ‘Predictive validity of adult risk assessment tools with juveniles who offended sexually.’ Psychological Assessment 25(3), 905 916. Access

Ferguson, G. E., Eidelson, R. J. and Witt, P. H. (1998) ‘New Jersey’s Sex Offender Risk Assessment Scale: Preliminary Validity Data.’ The Journal of Psychiatry & Law 26(3), 327 349. Access Here.

JSORRAT Epperson,IID. L., Ralston, C. A., Fowers, D. and DeWitt, J. (2005) Development of a sexual offence recidivism risk assessment tool II (JSORRAT II). Unpublished manuscript. University of Iowa. [Not accessible]

Caldwell, M. F., Ziemke, M. H. and Vitacco, M. J. (2008) ‘An examination of the sex offender registration and notification act as applied to juveniles: evaluating the ability to predict sexual recidivism.’ Psychology, Public Policy and Law 14(2), 89 114. Access Here

Worling, J. R. (2004) ‘The Estimate of Risk of Adolescent Sexual Offense Recidivism (ERASOR): Preliminary Psychometric Data.’ Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research 16(3), 235 254. Access Here

Worling, J. R., Bookalam, D. and Littlejohn, A. (2012) ‘Prospective validity of the Estimate of Risk of Adolescent Sexual Offense Recidivism (ERASOR).’ Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment 24(3), 203 223. Access Here

J Rich,RATP.

Hiscox, S. P., Witt, P. H. and Haran, S. J. (2007) ‘Juvenile Risk Assessment Scale (JRAS): A predictive validity study.’ Journal of Psychiatry & Law 35(4), 503 539. Access Here

Rasmussen, L. A. L. (2017) ‘Comparing predictive validity of JSORRAT II and MEGA♪ with sexually abusive youth in long term residential custody.’ International Journal of Offender Rehabilitation and Comparative Criminology 62(10), 2937 2953. Access Here.

Hollis, V. and Belton, E. (2017) Children and young people who engage in technology assisted harmful sexual behaviour; a study of their behaviours, backgrounds and characteristics London: NSPCC. Access Here.

© Risk

Viljoen, J. L., Scalora, M., Cuadra, L., Bader, S., Chávez, V., Ullman, D., and Lawrence, L. (2008) ‘Assessing Risk for Violence in Adolescents Who Have Sexually Offended: A Comparison of the J SOAP II, J SORRAT II, and SAVRY.’ Criminal Justice and Behavior 35(1), 5 23. Access Here.

RATED page updated: August 2019 Management Authority 2019

Ralston, C. A., Epperson, D. L. and Edwards, S. R. (2016) ‘Cross validation of the JSORRAT II in Iowa.’ Sex Abuse 28(6), 534 554. Access Here.

Ralston, C. A., Sarker, A., Philipp, G. T. and Epperson, D. L. (2017) ‘The impact of using documented but uncharged data on J SORRAT II predictive accuracy.’ Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment 29(2), 186 202. Access Here

Worling,PROFESORJ.R. (2017) Protective + Risk Observations for Eliminating Sexual Offense Recidivism Access Here

Andrews,SHARP D. A. and Bonta, J. (2010) The Psychology of Criminal Conduct (5th edition) Cincinnati, Ohio: Anderson Publishing. Access here.

Belton, E. and Hollis, V. (2016) A review of the research on children and young people who display harmful sexual behaviour online: what is developmentally appropriate online sexual behaviour, do children and young people with online versus offline harmful sexual behaviours (HSB) differ, and is there an association between online and offline HSB. London: NSPCC. Access Here

Epperson, D. L. and Ralston, C. (2015) ‘Development and Validation of the Juvenile Sexual Offence Recidivism Risk Assessment Tool II.’ Sexual Abuse 27(6), 529 558. Access Here.

Richardson, G. (2009) ‘Sharp Practice: The Sexually Harmful Adolescent Risk Protocol (SHARP).’ In Calder, M. C. (ed.) Sexual Abuse Assessments: Using and Developing Frameworks for Practice. Dorset: Russell House Publishing. Access Here.

Christodoulides, T. E., Richardson, G., Graham, F., Kennedy, P. J. and Kelly, T. P. (2005) ‘Risk assessment with adolescent sex offenders.’ Journal of Sexual Aggression 11(1), 37 48. Access Here

TA Allotey,HSB J. and Swann, R. (2019) Technology Assisted Harmful Sexual Behaviour: Practice Guidance (2nd edition). Stockport: AIM Project. [Not accessible]

Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.