


Never underestimate the power of a small group of committed people to change the world. In fact, it is the only thing that ever has. ~ Margaret Mead
The headlines you read about education—teacher shortages, school shootings, book bannings, and artificial intelligence—capture just the tip of the iceberg about the state of education today. There is so much more hidden just below the surface. Have you ever thought about what teachers endure on a daily basis—the hours spent preparing lessons, the money spent on supplies, the constant worry they face about their own security and that of their students? How about what students go through each day—bullying, fear of microaggressions, fear of school shootings, and anxiety over Covid resurfacing and schools closing? What do you picture when you think of schools and classrooms? What images come to mind when you think about teachers and students and the issues and pressures they face today?
For us, the image is a battlefield with barren grounds; burning fires; crumbling buildings; toppled, empty desks; lonely and isolated students; and burnedout teachers walking around like they are in a war zone. We picture students in a no man’s land who have to go to school feeling unsafe; worrying about classmates entering their school with guns and shooting their friends and teachers; worrying about food, transportation, and money; and feeling left out and excluded from learning. We picture teachers in the trenches facing increased class sizes due to teacher shortages, exponential changes to the curriculum due to banned books and restrictive policies curbing race and gender discussions in the classroom, decreased funding requiring them to spend their own limited money for basic supplies, and every day feeling completely exhausted, unsupported, and burned out. Are there exceptions? Of course. However, what we describe is the lived experience of many teachers and students, especially those in Pennsylvania. Did you know that Pennsylvania was ranked 50th out of 50 U.S. public schools for students with diverse backgrounds (Research for Action)? Did you know that the attrition rate for teachers—the percentage of teachers leaving the field—was 7.7% from 2014–2023, the highest increase on record, especially for teachers of color and for the poorest school districts (Fuller, 2023)? Did you know that the average teacher salary in Pennsylvania has declined in the last 30 years (Fuller, 2023)? Did you know that 66% of school districts in Pennsylvania reported student mental health needs as one of their biggest challenges and that, on average, nearly half of students (46.4%) were estimated to have some mental health need (Pennsylvania School Boards Association, 2024)? Did you know that 19.3% of Pennsylvania students received special education services, an almost 19% increase over the past 15 years (Pennsylvania School Boards Association, 2024)?
We feel it is important to put ourselves in the shoes of others and actively imagine what others are experiencing to better understand their perspectives, feelings, and motivations. If we want to
improve education, we need to envision it from the perspectives of those who are living it. Imagining how students and teachers feel and what they experience and knowing statistics about the current state of education are a first step. It is also essential to move beyond empathy to action. We can’t remain on defense, waiting around to protect our positions and priorities; instead, we need to go on the offense, creating goals and strategies to forge forward. We are at a crossroads, positioned on a precipice, and it is up to us, dear readers, to do something. Change may be an uphill battle, but feelings of helplessness or hopelessness cannot prevail. Instead, we need to move beyond our feelings and imagine the possibilities and what we want for our children, for our students, and for our teachers. According to Ken Robinson, when we think about change in the education system, “the problem isn’t that we aim too high and fail—it’s just the opposite—we aim too low and succeed” (The Element, p. 11). We need to dream big, for as Norman Vincent Peale claimed, “Shoot for the moon. Even if you miss, you’ll land among the stars.”
What does aiming high and dreaming big look like in relation to education? When answering this question, we picture teachers, students, administrators, and parents on the education battlefield, picking up swords and fighting for what’s right, what’s just, what’s fair. While it may seem like we are fighting a losing battle and are outnumbered and outflanked, we need to remind ourselves that we have the power to make a change and that change can happen with a small idea, a glimmer, a spark, that can eventually ignite a fire. As with all battles, it is important to find a group of likeminded warriors who can work together for what is possible.
There are people in our community who care deeply about issues in education, which we discovered when the Engage for Change Journal staff hosted a public series event on equity and justice in education to hear about the educational issues community members, teachers, students, and administrators deemed urgent and to identify potential authors interested in writing about these issues in the Journal. Partnering with the Carter G. Woodson Lecture, we organized a three-part Equity and Justice in Education series, which tackled the following questions: Why is equity in schools so difficult to address? What is equity and justice in education? How do we create equity and justice in education? The series brought together over 100 Millersville University faculty and staff, students, local teachers, school administrators, school board members, and community members to discuss equity and justice in Pennsylvania education. One event in the series, organized as three TED Talk–style presentations followed by roundtable discussions, revealed a hunger for discussing educational issues, interacting with others concerned about educational
issues, and connecting with others passionate about enacting change. Participants craved the time and space to think about the issues, talk with others, grapple with questions, and brainstorm ideas for moving forward. We received overwhelmingly positive feedback from participants, who noted the urgency of the issues and the opportunity to collaborate:
• “Thanks for hosting the great Engage for Change forum! It was wonderful to meet more folks who are passionate about equity in education.”
• “The flow of the event was balanced, appropriate, and provided time for collaboration and networking.”
• “Thanks for creating this space and for getting ‘wheels turning’ at the panel, which allowed me to connect with someone new as a potential research collaborator!”
• “Thank you for your work in creating the journal and workshops. Your hard work has helped me resume scholarly writing for publication.”
Our authors, some of whom participated in the Equity and Justice in Education series, also care deeply about education—so much so that they decided to write articles for this issue of the Journal. As a whole, our authors represent a diverse group of writers, ranging from Millersville students, faculty, alumni, local teachers, and community members. Their articles reflect the news headlines but dive below the surface by revealing the possibilities and dangers of arming teachers; the causes and effects of inequitable school funding; the teacher shortage, particularly teachers of color; teacher burnout; and discrimination and sexism in education. They advocate for creating a welcoming, accepting, and inclusive learning environment for all students, including students with dyslexia, English language learners, and minoritized groups spanning K-12 to higher education. Every author has a burning desire to increase awareness of the educational issue they are passionate about and ignite change in the educational system by proposing solutions and next steps. We encourage you to read the Author Highlight article “Engage in What Matters: The Story Behind the Why and What’s Next,” which encapsulates the authors’ motivations to write about the issues and the next steps they propose to transform the current state of education.
We also care deeply about educational issues and all issues of equity and justice. In fact, our concern about equity and justice sparked us to create the Journal three years ago. For years, we read about important issues of injustice and inequity, talked to others about these issues, and then felt a spark ignite. We felt compelled to do something, even if at first we didn’t know what to do or how to do it. For Kerrie, the initial spark began when she was a little girl aware of injustice and asking questions, but not satisfied with the responses.
FROM KERRIE: Ever since I was a little girl, the idea of fairness has been important to me. When I noticed something not being fair, I would consistently point it out to my mother, exclaiming, “That isn’t fair!” While most children drive parents to their wits’ end with “why” questions, I continually made statements about things being unjust. It was sometimes a student in
class being singled out and picked on by others, but at other times, it involved seeing a homeless person on the streets of Manhattan begging for money but being ignored by everyone walking by. Whenever I said “That isn’t fair,” my mother’s reply was always the same: “Ker, life isn’t fair.” I accepted this for a little while because it rang true. Life wasn’t fair to the student being picked on. Life wasn’t fair to the person living on the streets and begging for money. However, as I grew older, I realized that accepting that life isn’t fair means that you accept that there is no control over the situation and that you don’t have the power to do anything to change it. While I don’t think my mother believed this (and maybe as a single mother with three young kids, she needed a response in the moment that would terminate the ceaseless statements), I do think that sometimes systemic problems feel daunting enough that this response is commonplace.
Although I accepted that life wasn’t fair for a little while, there was always a little voice in my head that said, “Life may not be fair, but it should be,” and if there were two things above all else that my mother taught me, it was to always stand up for yourself and others and to always fight for what you believe in. That voice became louder as I grew older and conducted research on city government for my Ph.D., which revealed that community members do not get much, if any, say in community decision-making because by the time they learn about the issues, the decisions have already been made. Talk about not being fair! Community members would sometimes come to council meetings and pour their hearts out about issues they cared about, and due to the setup and structure of the meetings, council members did not even respond or show any empathy or compassion; they simply said “thanks” and “next.” This made me think about the possibility of creating a space where community members could voice their concerns about problems and issues in their community, and I thought a journal could potentially provide a platform for community voices to be heard.
I applied for and received a sabbatical in 2020, which meant I had one semester to produce a solid plan. During this time, I created a business proposal for the journal and then ran the idea by Tatiana, who quickly said, “I’m in.” She became instrumental in refining the ideas, arranging the timeline, and subsequently implementing the plan. Together, we published the first issue of the Engage for Change Journal on Environmental Justice in 2022 and our second issue on Gender Justice in 2023. This issue, Equity and Justice in Education, will be the third edition of the Journal. We both serve as co-editors of the Journal and co-directors of the internship we run to provide students at Millersville the opportunity to learn about the fields of editing and publishing. The work is timeconsuming, but we volunteer our time because we both believe strongly in our mission.
FROM TATIANA: When Kerrie approached me with the idea of creating a community-based journal, I enthusiastically said yes. I got very excited about the numerous opportunities for change the Journal can create for the local community. I have always been inspired by the idea of bringing groups of people from diverse backgrounds together to identify problems and work on solutions in their areas of influence.
The mission of the Journal promised to do that and more: to offer diverse authors, including MU faculty/ staff, students, and community members, the space for writing about the issues that are burning in their hearts; to empower the University and the local community to unite forces to identify the issues that affect all of us; to increase awareness of important issues; and to advocate for practical solutions to better the local community.
We both see the Journal as a platform for diverse community voices expressed through multiple perspectives, research studies, impact, commonground articles, and creative pieces. The voices share a common goal, which is to contribute to social, political, and economic justice in the local community. The Journal is peer-reviewed, which means that members of our esteemed editorial board ensure that the articles address the theme and are relevant and suitable for publication. The articles in the Journal also go through a rigorous editorial process in which we and our editorial staff (our interns!) work with authors to ensure their articles are as strong as they can be. At this point, you might be wondering what you can do about the injustices you see in your community.
FIRST, you can read the Journal! The issues we publish are a way for community members to read about important issues happening right here in Lancaster County and the surrounding area, become informed about the issues, and empathize with those experiencing injustice. SECOND, you can write an article for the Journal! The Engage for Change Journal is a theme-based journal, and anyone in the community is welcome to write and submit an article. We have many different types of articles—from creative pieces like poems or short stories to research-based articles—to accommodate a diverse array of voices and perspectives. THIRD, you can contribute to the Engage for Change Journal Blog, a new platform we just launched, which serves as a town hall but not the ones Kerrie observed and wrote about where community members were ignored! Instead, we hope the blog will serve as a space for community members to discuss the issues published in the Journal, share their experiences, make connections with others, and create a community that shares a passion for the same issues. FOURTH, you can consider how to take the next steps to create change in the community! As we consider what we can do individually and collectively to transform education, let’s remember
Kerrie Farkas Professor of English: Writing Studies
that we need to be on the battlefield because we are the ones who can fight for change. Let’s also remember who we are fighting for—our students and our teachers. The articles in this issue of the Journal show what is at stake and what needs to be done. They reflect what Ken Robinson (2009), international advisor on education, argued: “Given the challenges we face, education doesn’t need to be reformed—it needs to be transformed. The key to this transformation is not to standardize education, but to personalize it, to build achievement on discovering the individual talents of each child, to put students in an environment where they want to learn and where they can naturally discover their true passions” (p. 1). As Ken Robinson (2009) posited, “Public schools were not only created in the interests of industrialism—they were created in the image of industrialism. In many ways, they reflect the factory culture they were designed to support…. Students are educated in batches, according to age, as if the most important thing they have in common is their date of manufacture” (p. 10).
As Robinson suggested, sometimes you need to metaphorically burn it all down before you can start again. We need to transform the factory model of education that follows a standardized, ubiquitous model where students are educated in a one-sizefits-all curriculum that prioritizes memorization and recall over critical thinking and problem-solving. We can’t just put another Band-Aid on the wound and hope the bleeding stops. If we want schools to foster creativity and imagination and have children motivated and excited about learning and attending school, then we need to transform the entire education system. If we want spaces where students and teachers feel safe to bring their authentic selves to the classroom; where students and teachers are free from bias, discrimination, racism, and sexism; where classrooms are free from bullying; where teachers are supported by professional development, resources, and administrators to create a culturally relevant, equitable, and inclusive learning environment for every student; where diversity among teachers and students is celebrated and welcomed; and where every student is seen, heard, and included in the learning process, then now is the time to learn about the situations in which these happen. Now is the time to make plans and work to change these situations. Now is the time to pick up our swords and go to battle.
Tatiana Pashkova-Balkenhol Undergraduate Research & Instruction Librarian
Fuller, E. (2023). Exacerbating the shortage of teachers: Rising teacher attrition in Pennsylvania from 2014 to 2023. Penn State Center for Education, Evaluation, and Policy Analysis https://ed.psu.edu/sites/default/files/inline-files/ceepa-researchbrief-2023-6-_-exacerbating-the-shortage-of-teachers-ed-fuller-1.pdf
Pennsylvania School Boards Association. (2024). The State of Education Report. https://www.psba.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/2024-State-of-Education-report.pdf
Robinson, K. (2009). The element: How finding your passion changes everything. Penguin.
By Aubrey Lenker, Kylie Loiacono, Ashton Nafziger, and Madison Reisinger
In this article, the interns of the Engage for Change Journal heard from authors about their individual perspectives on writing their articles for the Journal. We asked two types of questions to the authors: “Why?” and “What’s Next?” The former primarily asked about the background behind the author’s inspiration for their papers, while the latter sought recommendations for the next steps in the process of highlighting and hopefully changing the ways these issues present themselves in schools. These questions helped us gauge authors’ interest in their areas of study and gave us inspiration and ideas about the future of these issues and suggestions on how to raise awareness. The authors interviewed wrote a mix of research and perspective articles, so ideas differed on why and how their issues should be amended. Through this personalized, invested approach, we sought to get to know our authors better outside of the publication. Through these interviews, we found that the authors had strong opinions on what needs to be accomplished in the Lancaster schooling community to make it more inclusive for everyone.
Have you ever read an article and wondered about the author’s perspective, how they came to write it, and what they hoped readers would get from it? As interns working for the Engage for Change Journal, we certainly have. Throughout our internship experience, each of us spent hours editing and proofreading the articles featured in this issue and created specialized and personal relationships with all of our authors. The more we worked with authors on their articles, the more we found ourselves interested in what inspired them to choose their topics and what led them to publish with us. We also quickly found ourselves invested in many of the issues discussed in their articles, with each of us wanting to highlight and bring more awareness to the unjust disparities plaguing our community. This led us to “sit down” with our authors and ask for their insights regarding the issues they focus on and what they believe needs to be done to correct the injustices they discuss. In the following paragraphs, we feature authors who volunteered to discuss why they decided to write about their topic and what steps they think should come next in the fight for justice and/or equality. By doing this and sharing their responses, we hope to not only further address the issues in their articles but also uphold the Journal’s missions of contributing to public knowledge and public engagement by harnessing the collaborative potential and expert knowledge of faculty, students, and residents on social, political, and economic issues affecting the Lancaster County region as a whole.
When talking with our authors, we discovered that having such a diverse set of individuals contributing to this Journal issue presented several unique reasons for why they chose to write about what they did, with many authors having deep personal connections to the issues they discussed.
For example, in her article “How Dyslexia Affects Students in the Classroom,” Carmen Portillo discusses how the learning experience for dyslexic students is different from neurotypical students and how it should be treated as such by schools. Her insights and investment into this topic stem from her own struggles as a dyslexic student and from not knowing she had dyslexia until her sophomore year of high school. She said, “I was a good student, but severely struggled on exams. My teachers always told me I needed to study harder … but in reality, I was struggling with my dyslexia” (C. Portillo, personal communication, November 18, 2024).
Conversely, the authors of “Breaking Barriers: Exploring Sexism in Education,” Katherine Riley and Olivia Hess, are prime examples of how issues in the education system can affect more than just students; they affect teachers and faculty as well. Riley and Hess state, “We wrote about sexism in education because this is something we not only see, but experience, in our jobs every day as female math teachers” (K. Riley & O. Hess, personal communication, October 23, 2024). Where Carmen’s connection to her topic stems more from her past experiences, Katherine and Olivia continue to experience the ongoing issue of sexism, giving them a constant reminder of the problem they address.
The more we talked with our authors, the more they began to share with us, going as far as to express why they believed their issues were important to address. For instance, Nigerian immigrant and current education professor at Millersville University Dr. Abdulsalami Ibrahim has had firsthand experience in seeing poor responses to diversity in the education system, which he writes about as a coauthor of “Affecting Changes to Embrace and Invite Diversity in Our Schools.” When discussing the importance of his topic, he stated, “Our classrooms are becoming more diverse than ever before … I feel exploring and preparing preservice teachers in the areas of diversity and inclusion will not only prepare them to be culturally conscious but in addition, it will prepare them to be effective educators for all the students within the four walls of school” (A. Ibrahim, personal communication, November 20, 2024).
Similarly to Dr. Ibrahim, the author of “Armed and Safe? A Commentary on the Matter of Arming Teachers,” August Gorman, tackles the debate around arming teachers as a teacher himself. He describes the cyclical nature of the debate surrounding this issue, stating it “is a lot like the ouroboros [the snake that eats its own tail]. A school shooting happens—[we grieve and sympathize—we discuss passing laws restricting gun access—debate about changing the second amendment]—it’s a slippery slope to losing our freedoms—[months go by]—a school shooting happens [again with nothing being resolved]” (A. Gorman, personal communication, October 26, 2024). August recognizes the monolithic nature of the issue he addresses, comparing his article to “nothing more than a drop in the ocean” but also stating that “hopefully it’s a drop that will catch someone’s attention. And if that someone happens to be a person in a position to create some significant change in our country, then I guess that’s the best I can hope for” (A. Gorman, personal communication, October 26, 2024).
In addition to asking authors why they chose/wrote about the topics they did, we also asked them if they would volunteer their opinions regarding what comes next for their issues, what actions need to be taken to improve their issues, and if they think their issue has the potential to be resolved. Many of them held strong opinions (both neutral and positive) regarding the future of the issues they discussed due to their own experiences.
For example, Dr. Aileen Hower, one of the coauthors of “Affecting Changes to Embrace and Invite Diversity in Our Schools,” has spent the past two years dedicating her time to improving the teacher shortage and teacher diversity in Pennsylvania. She and her coauthors expressed their current plans to combat the issue. Dr. Hower wrote, “We are writing grants to bolster the teacher pipeline programs that Millersville University’s College of Education and Human Services has already begun [and we] continue to write and speak about these topics and train future teachers on the CRSE Competencies” (A. Hower, personal communication, November 20, 2024).
Unlike Dr. Hower, August took a metaphorical approach when answering the “what’s next” question by referring back to his comparison of the issue of arming teachers to the ouroboros. He presented the questions “Where would you cut the snake to stop the problem? Would you cut its head so that way it cannot eat its tail, while in the process killing the snake itself? Do you cut the tail, and hope that the snake doesn’t simply move further up its body to continue eating? Do you put the snake in a brace so that it cannot physically move to eat its tail, and in doing so immobilize the snake and remove its autonomy?” (A. Gorman, personal communication, October 26, 2024). With these questions, August aimed to highlight the unknown, difficult nature of his topic because we as a society have recognized that, just like with the snake, it is impossible to draw a clear plan for resolving the problem of school shootings. Despite this, he does hope that “we can one day, somehow, find an effective way of reasoning with the snake, and ask it why it feels the need to eat its own tail, when all it will result in is pain” (A. Gorman, personal communication, October 26, 2024).
Carmen, as optimistic as August, focused on the immediate next steps for teachers when it comes to improving learning for dyslexic students while also keeping in mind that the ability to find what works best can be difficult. She expressed that teachers should look into implementing educational RPGs (role-playing games) in their classrooms to improve the quality of learning for dyslexic students. She wrote, “Trying something new can be nerve-wracking, but I urge teachers to be open-minded and receptive to their students’ needs. Not everything is going to work for every student, but if a large percentage finds [RPGs] helpful and engaging, why would you not want to utilize this resource? Just try!” (C. Portillo, personal communication, November 18, 2024).
While discussing the potential next steps for their issues, the authors inevitably got into whether they believed their issues could be resolved, with several providing us with hopeful, yet realistic stances. For instance, Katherine and Olivia believe that “while discrimination and biases will likely always be prevalent in our society, [sexism in education] can become less detrimental to females in education (and all workplaces) if we fight for change now” (K. Riley & O. Hess, personal communication, October 23, 2024). The two women felt strongly that sexism in classrooms and educational institutions could be resolved with proper advocacy, stating, “We must continue the push for females to be held to the
same standard as men so [all females] can be taken seriously as students and/or educators” (K. Riley & O. Hess, personal communication, October 23, 2024).
Anne Maneval, author of “The Past and Future of Pennsylvania School Funding: Can Equal Education Be Measured Across the Board?,” also highlighted the importance of being aware of and fighting for change—in her case, unequal Pennsylvania school funding. She wrote, “With continued awareness, strategies, and talk surrounding the issue, including investments in the teacher workforce and policies and programs geared towards each school’s individual needs, I think it can [be improved] upon from gained experience of what hasn’t worked” (A. Maneval, personal communication, November 3, 2024).
In like manner, as a multiracial, “white-passing,” cisgender female who has worked with the CRSE (Culturally Relevant and Sustaining Education) competencies, Dr. Miriam Witmer advocates strongly for standing up for what is right for all students and engaging in change. As the third coauthor of “Affecting Changes to Embrace and Invite Diversity in Our Schools,” her response to our question focused on slow but impactful resolutions stemming from an awareness of the teacher shortage and lack of diversity in Pennsylvania schools. She stated, “It may take some time to see real change, but representation matters. When students can see effective teachers who look like them teaching, they may be more likely to consider teaching as a future career which could directly increase teacher diversity in PA” (M. Witmer, personal communication, November 20, 2024). She mentioned the work she, Dr. Hower, and Dr. Ibrahim are doing on the Millersville University campus to push for culturally relevant teaching to lessen hostility toward marginalized students by writing, “I am hopeful that we can ‘humanize’ education by working together and celebrating diversity” (M. Witmer, personal communication, November 20, 2024).
In this article, we explored the “why” and “what’s next” for some of our authors’ topics for the Equity and Justice in Education issue. We learned more not only about the authors themselves but also the personal experiences of those in our community who are striving to make a difference and solve issues that affect many of us. Not only do the personal experiences motivating these authors to write stem from their pasts, but they also come from ongoing struggles that persist in their daily lives. Our authors also, both in this article and in their own articles later in this issue, express actions and next steps that need to be taken to combat these pressing issues in our community and spark hope for the future in the realm of education. Read on not only to learn more about these important issues but also to help our authors in their efforts to make change!
AUBREY LENKER is an aspiring Millersville graduate. An English major with a minor in Creative Writing and Publishing, Aubrey hopes to go into the editing field in the future. Aubrey worked as the Intern and Faculty Liaison for the Engage for Change Journal, which meant she kept the pulse of each team member and fostered communication between interns and faculty. In her free time, Aubrey likes to craft, play video games, and read.
KYLIE LOIACONO is a soon-to-be Millersville University graduate. While at Millersville, she has been pursuing a Bachelor’s degree with a major in English with a concentration in Writing Studies and a minor in History. She has also interned as the Project Manager for Authors for the Engage for Change Journal, in which she oversaw the entire editing/publishing process and maintained effective communication between the authors and the Journal. In her free time, she enjoys reading, writing, playing video games, and making art. Upon graduation, Kylie hopes to pursue a career in the Editing and Publishing industry, as well as publish her own novels.
ASHTON NAFZIGER is a Media Arts Production major with a Creative Writing and Publishing minor. He is a junior at Millersville University and one of the interns on the Engage for Change Journal Team. Specifically, he was the Web Design Specialist, which meant that he was in charge of making design and infrastructure changes and improvements to the Journal’s website. In his free time, he enjoys reading comics, playing video games, and creative writing.
MADISON REISINGER is a senior majoring in English: Writing Studies with a minor in History at Millersville University. She has been the journal’s Marketing and Outreach Specialist this year, which included running the Journal’s social media and organizing outreach initiatives to help the journal gain more readers and potential authors. She is set to graduate this Spring with plans to pursue a career in the publishing industry. In her free time, Madi enjoys theatre, reading, writing, and watching sports.
Kerrie R.H. Farkas, Founder & Co-editor, English & World Languages
Tatiana Pashkova-Balkenhol, Co-editor, McNairy Library
EDITORIAL BOARD
Nivedita Bagchi, Government, Policy, and Law
Jill Craven, Film Studies
Caleb Corkery, English and World Languages
Angela Cuthbert, Geography
Adam Lawrence, Government, Policy, and Law , CCERP
Nancy Mata, Art & Design
Justin Mando, Writing Studies/Science Writing
Laura Weise Cross, Biology
Bertha DeJesus, Social Work
JOURNAL STAFF
Aubrey Lenker, English, Faculty-Intern Team Liaison
Kylie Loiacono, English: Writing Studies, Project Manager for Authors
Ashton Nafziger, Media Arts Production, Web Design Specialist
Madison Reisinger, English: Writing Studies, Marketing and Outreach Specialist
CONTRIBUTING EDITORS
Kaelyn Draucker, Speech Communication: Public Relations
Charlie Duvall, Media Arts Production
Cory Engle, Applied Engineering and Technology Management
Jacob Engle, Applied Engineering and Technology Management
Ben Kuhn, Occupational Safety & Environmental Health
Emma Ludwig, Communication: Public Relations
Bryan McGuire, Meteorology
Riley McShane, English: Writing Studies
Jarett Meisner, Communication: Journalism
Nana Sallh, Communication: Public Relations
Elena Sarkissian: Speech Communication
Austin Shive: Emergency Management
Lindsay Solderitch, Communication: Public Relations
Faith Strausbaugh, English
Haven Thomas, Communication: Journalism
GRAPHIC DESIGN
Cheryl Lockley, University Communications & Marketing
Kelly Herr, University Communications & Marketing
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We would like to express gratitude for support received from the Francine G. McNairy Library and Learning Forum; Department of English & World Languages; Office of Grants, Sponsored Programs, and Research; Positive Energy Fund; President’s Commission on the Status of Women; President’s Commission on Cultural Diversity; Mentorship Support Grant Program; University College
Unpacking educational inequalities: A personal journey into resource disparities, access challenges, and teacher diversity (Perspective Article)
Ty Bair | 10
Equity in education: Bridging the funding gap (Impact Article)
Keith Miles | 14
The past and future of Pennsylvania school funding; Can equal education be measured across the board? (Research Article)
Anne Maneval | 18
Effecting changes to embrace and invite diversity in our schools (Impact Article)
Drs. Aileen Hower, Abdulsalami Ibrahim, & Miriam Witmer | 22
Equity and inclusion: A perspective of a sense of belonging in an online doctoral program (Perspective Article)
Drs. Bertha DeJesus & Karen Polite | 30
Equity and justice in education: What do you need to unlearn? (Perspective Article)
Stacie Blake | 42
Breaking barriers: Exploring sexism in educationliterature review (Research Article)
Olivia Hess & Katherine Riley | 46
Why race should be taught in K-12 schools (Research Article) Julissa Rodriguez | 50
Don’t feel no ways tired: The neurobiological impact of workplace prejudice and discrimination on black women’s well-being in higher education ecologies (Research Article)
Dr. Valdijah Ambrose Brown | 56
Testimonial: Teacher advocates for paraeducators (Perspective Article) Greta Van Arman | 62
Inequitable causes and effects: Teacher burnout and care (Impact Article)
Alexander Rohrer | 68
Scientific, not sexualized, sex education: Updating Pennsylvania’s academic guidelines (Impact Article)
Julia Fallows | 72
How dyslexia affects students in the classroom: Literature review (Research Article)
Carmen Portillo | 76
Armed and safe? A commentary on the matter of arming teachers (Perspective Article)
August Gorman | 80
By Ty Bair
ABSTRACT
Mentors have the power to inspire students and serve as catalysts for change. They can alter a student’s path in life and ignite a spark that can transform into a flame. This article discusses my educational journey, beginning with a personal story of my difficult childhood made easier by a mentor supporting me and ending with my personal mission to mentor students like me. The mentoring I received fueled my desire to develop an intentional mentoring program, which I co-created with Shayne Meadows to address the root causes of inequitable school funding and lack of teacher diversity that I experienced as a student and as a teacher.
From an early age, my mother’s view on school was openly communicated to my siblings and I that school was not important, nor was it a way to survive in life. My mother had thirteen children and dropped out of school in seventh grade when she had her first child. As a single mother on public assistance her whole life, her housing situation was always transient, which meant ours was as well. For my K-12 education, I attended 5 elementary schools, 3 middle schools, and 2 high schools. My father was never present and did not play a significant role in my life because he was on drugs and in and out of prison. We lived in a cycle of poverty, living under that Federal government poverty line determination. Two of my brothers, who dropped out of school in ninth and tenth grade and chose gangs rather than education, were killed due to gang violence, and no one in my immediate family graduated from high school or even made it to tenth grade. The schools I attended were in the poorest areas of the city, which meant the schools were underfunded. If someone heard about a child with this story, what would they say? What would be the likelihood of that child not only graduating high school but becoming an educator and advocate for students? At the time, my instinct was survival. At the time, I was wondering how I could get out of this hell, this mess that I was living in? At a crucial moment, a counselor came into my life and showed me that there was another way. He spent time with me, tutoring me, but also allowed me to experience the world with him, taking me and two other students to the beach and other places. He spent his money feeding us and was always there to listen when we had concerns. I realize now that it was the power of mentorship that helped me continue schooling. My mentor, who came into my life and wanted to see me do better, was helping me break the cycle of poverty. In spite of attending underfunded schools, in spite of living in poverty, in spite of what my family valued, and in spite of my siblings not graduating high school, I, with the help of my mentor, continued going to school and graduated, the first in my family to do so.
How does my story address some of the deeper issues of inequality and injustice in education? My childhood experiences in school uncover the issue of lack of equitable funding. My experiences as a teacher uncover the lack of teacher diversity. As a student, I experienced lack of equitable funding but benefitted from teacher diversity. As a teacher, I advocate that both need to be addressed. We all can state the easy answer to these issues: that every school district needs more money and every school district needs more teachers of color. For the harder answers, we need to be truly honest, self-reflective, and uncomfortable, and we need to be willing to have an open conversation.
Within a school district, school funding is distributed inequitably. Why? According to Buckwalter (2015), school funding in Pennsylvania “involves a complicated soup of revenue sources but relies heavily on local real estate taxes. Many say the system is uneven, unfair and unsustainable.” I have worked at a school for over 20 years, and because of the location of the school, funds are not spent or seemingly not spent on the children attending these schools. What does that do to the morale of both staff and students? How do the staff who work in underfunded schools feel? If you work in a school that is run-down, you feel run-down, and your performance is run-down. What does attending school in a building that looks like it’s going to collapse at any second do to kids, especially since on the other side of town a school in the same school district looks like the Taj Mahal. Kids in the first building don’t have access to instruments, musicals, technologies, purposeful mentoring, or programming, while in the same district just in a different building,
other children have access, all due to the location where they live and because of inadequate funding.
Why? What is the root cause for this? Why are some families, students, and staff seemingly looked at as less than? Within a district, how is the funding distributed, especially in places where one school is funded and another underfunded? How is this decision made? According to the Board of School Director’s website for the School District of Lancaster, the Board directs the Chief Financial Officer to “establish a projected budget of expenditures and income for the current year and ensuing year,” which they then approve and implement. How does the CFO become aware of all the factors and dynamics of each school in the district to make sure they are equitable? Another question is, who is sitting on the school board? If no one from your neighborhood is on the school board, then you may not be deemed worthy enough to receive funding. Your school can be left out of funding or determined not to need such funding.
Who then holds school boards accountable? I understand that holding school boards accountable comes from the power of the vote; however, in many underserved communities, that power is not exercised, and many schools cannot afford resources and opportunities to help students succeed. In addition, the lack of funding impacts teacher recruitment and retention, especially for teachers of color. Schools with equitable funding will have a larger pool to recruit teachers of color. For example, with all else being equal, a school district with higher teacher salaries would likely have more teachers applying for those positions (and thus a larger pool from which to hire teachers) than a lower-spending state, and school districts with lower teacher salaries are not in a position to compete for teaching talent with districts that have more funding.
What impact do teachers of color have on children of color believing they can become teachers? I believe this subject is difficult to address for several factors but mainly because it touches on race. I have seen this question make people uncomfortable, make people become defensive, make people say things like why does it matter who is sitting in front of a child as long as they are qualified, but the truth is, representation matters; it has always mattered and just saying it matters is not enough. What are we going to do about it?
Growing up, I was extremely fortunate to have many educators of color, from teachers, administrators and even an assistant superintendent. This trend continued when I started teaching 24 years ago: in the building in which I taught, there were 15 teachers of color and more professionals of color in the building. That same building today has four teachers of color. All around the district and across districts is this situation the same? According to Lancaster Newspaper, which published findings from the YWCA report on equity and teacher diversity in Lancaster County, the vast majority of teachers in Lancaster County public schools are white even though their student populations are increasingly diverse. In fact, the newspaper reported that “more than a third of students in Lancaster, Columbia Borough, Conestoga Valley and Manheim Township school districts are people of color but more than 90% of teachers in these districts are white.” They further reported that “countywide, 96% of teachers are white while 65% of students are white (Stalnecker, 2023).
I ask myself, did seeing and experiencing these teachers have an effect on my belief that I could become a teacher? As a teacher of color, do I have that same impact on other students of color? What would happen if the roles were reversed and 98% of the student population was white and 95% of the teachers were teachers of color? Would we then ask if representation matters? According to the YWCA’s (2023) An Equity Profile of Lancaster, “studies have shown that all students, but especially students of color, perform better and receive better educational support when taught by teachers of color. Diverse teachers are able to be role models for students of color and better provide culturally relevant teaching” (p. 50).
If we want more teachers of color in our school districts, then we need more children of color to go into teacher education. Maybe the question we should be asking is, why aren’t more children of color pursuing a career in education? How are they supported throughout their academic career? What systems are put in place so that students don’t feel isolated on a college campus? What is the likelihood that that student of color will have a professor of color, which can make them wonder if they chose the right career and if they want to pursue it long term. And when that student graduates, what are the chances they find a career and have the support needed to sustain that career?
Where are the teachers of color, or where have they gone? Are schools doing enough to recruit more teachers of color? My sons will not have that same experience that I had when I attended school because they have less than 4% of teachers of color in their school district. If the current trend stands in that district, they will graduate without having a teacher of color in their core subject areas. How do we change this?
When I graduated college, I attended a job fair in King of Prussia, Pennsylvania, seeking a position in teaching. Two African American men approached me and said, “Son, what are you doing down here? You’re coming back home to Lancaster!” These two men were from the School District of Lancaster, recruiting an hour away to find talent, and especially teachers of color. That is the type of intentionality that it will take to find teachers of color.
I have had the fortunate or unfortunate experience of being selected to sit on two hiring committees for a superintendent and high school principal position in my sons’ school district. I asked the question to all candidates: If selected for this position, how would you try to recruit teachers of color? Their responses were pretty much the same; they said that they would try, but we need to understand that there is a teacher shortage everywhere. The follow-up question I asked to all candidates: Would you try to partner with Historically Black Colleges and Universities(HBCU)? I was amazed at how many candidates didn’t know what that was or where the closest HBCU was located. Do Human Resource departments have these schools on their radar? Are there budgets to travel and promote their school districts to in-state and out-of- universities? The type of intentionality the School District of Lancaster used when they recruited me is what should be implemented across all school districts.
When I became a teacher, I was lucky to meet the best teacher I have ever witnessed: Shayne Meadows. With his help, mentorship, energy, and passion for change, we started our own nonprofit called Advantage Lancaster. When we started the program, we struggled to find financial support, but we were not going to allow a lack of funding to stop us; instead, we sought multiple funding opportunities and engaged in various fundraising activities. We continue to seek funding each year for the program because we don’t have consistent donor support to make the program sustainable. This year, we were fortunate to partner with the School District of Lancaster.
Together, we focused on addressing what we saw as two root causes for the unserved, unrepresented, unheard voices in the city of Lancaster and surrounding areas: lack of teacher diversity and inequitable school funding. How can individuals change inequitable funding and diversity in teaching? We decided to address these issues through mentoring so that these young people in impoverished communities, especially kids of color, were seen and heard and guided by supportive mentors. The five-week program takes place in the summer months of June and July on the Franklin & Marshall campus. Students take multiple classes, including an English Language Arts class, math, science, and a social/emotional learning class, with breaks for lunch and tennis games. Once a week a guest speaker comes to discuss a career opportunity, and Tuesdays and Thursdays are dedicated to community service, college visits, or exploration of local attractions, such as museums and beaches. This year will be the program’s twenty-fourth year.
Our work as mentors begins with students in the program creating what we call “winning life plans.” What is a winning life plan for a student living in poverty? A winning life plan has five principles: education, community service, appreciation for the arts, wellness, and career exploration. A winning life plan begins with education and believing in the value of education, that education can then take students wherever they want to go, and it also includes the goals and the dreams that students have. The education component starts with a book, and our choice of book must meet two qualifications: it must be written by a minority, and it must have perseverance / determination as a core theme. We have students read the book and then experience the tangible parts of the book all while making connections back to the classroom and the readings. Some of the books we have used include the following:
Melba Pattillo Beals’s Warriors
Don’t Cry, Jacqueline Woodson’s Miracle Boys, and Andrea Warren’s Surviving Hitler. The books allow students to see themselves, their struggles, and their experiences reflected in these books. The books encourage students to experience life beyond their neighborhoods and feel that they are not alone. Every book starts with a teenager and the journey they take in life. The books serve as foundation and backbone for them to create their
own winning life plans, and they keep the books so they can start their own libraries. While dissecting the books and answering questions, they are discussing them with the thirty other students who have also read the same books, which allows them to build a community of their own through reading and sharing. They strengthen their community through peer mentoring opportunities where juniors and seniors serve as mentors to first and second year students and through field trips, by participating in rigorous and enriching conversations on the bus because we require that they use no phones and engage in deep discussions so that they learn how to effectively communicate with each other.
We address the issue of the lack of teacher diversity by creating an intentional plan to recruit teachers of color as mentors for the Advantage Lancaster program. This was not easy; we used the little time we had between professional developments to talk to teachers of color. We traveled to different schools after the school day to meet with teachers, and we found ways to introduce the program to attract them. 95% of our staff are minorities and 91% of students are minorities with 48% are Latino, 41% African American, 9% Caucasian, and 2% biracial. Once staff are committed, we find ways to use what they were passionate about to keep them in the program.
When I was growing up, I wanted to be a truck driver and only went to school to play sports. Thanks to the encouragement from the principal of color, Mr. Walker, and the teachers of color, the majority of whom taught in the lowest social-economic schools–Mrs. Dickerson (my first black teacher), Mrs. Fischer, Mrs. Glover, Mr. Blackman, Mr. Galaraz, Mr. McCloud, Mrs. Mouzon, Mrs. Nyutu, Mrs. Banks, Mrs. Perry, Coach Powell, Mrs. Cottom–I chose a winning life path. I often wonder if seeing and experiencing these teachers had an effect on my subconscious that I had the ability to be a teacher.
My experiences as a student and as an educator helped me learn valuable lessons that I have incorporated into a mentorship program, with the help and guidance of my friend and mentor Shayne Meadows, who was a teacher at a school in southeast Lancaster, a school with some many unserved, unrepresented, unheard voices. We saw the issues of inequitable funding and lack of teacher diversity and set off to do something about them through intentional mentoring. Together, we founded the nonprofit Advantage Lancaster because we were determined to stop the cycle of poverty and change lives for the better.
Finding the real issues to create equitable and just education is hard. Diving deeper into these issues is even more challenging because it requires us to be honest and uncomfortable, but I believe in that space and only in that space will we be able to find real solutions. This little boy, from a single mother of 13, whose family did not see the value in education, is extremely thankful to have come across some amazing teachers of color, who spoke life into my life, made me feel that I was worthy, and now I am able to do this for others.
Buckwalter, T. (2015, August 17). Pennsylvania school funding, explained. LNP https://lancasteronline.com/news/local/pennsylvania-school-funding-explained/article_e5b09936-4130-11e5a060-ff2dd29fad45.html
School District of Lancaster. (n.d.) School Board of Directors. https://go.boarddocs.com/pa/lanc/Board.nsf/vpublic?open# Stalnecker, E. (2023, January 10). Equity gaps apparent at Lancaster County public schools, new report says. LNP. https://lancasteronline.com/news/local/equity-gaps-apparent-at-lancaster-county-public-schools-new-report-says/ article_e1c496ca-887b-11ed-96a4-777e4be05241.html
YWCA, Lancaster. (2023). An Equity Profile of Lancaster, PA. PolicyLink and USC Dornsife. https://ywcalancaster.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Lancaster_Equity-Profile_January-2023.pdf
TY BAIR was born and raised in Lancaster City, PA, Ty Bair has worked as a secondary social studies teacher in the School District of Lancaster for 24 years. Together with his fellow colleague, Shayne Meadows, Ty developed an educational mentorship program called Advantage Lancaster, with a focus to help underserved student populations “Create Winning Life Plans.” For the past 23 years, Advantage Lancaster has helped mentor and guide over 350 students, who have graduated high schools and applied the program to create their own winning life plans and achieve their dreams.
By Dr. Keith Miles Jr.
ABSTRACT
This article examines inequitable funding in Pennsylvania and in particular, the School District of Lancaster. It also discusses how inequitable funding affects students, teachers, and school districts and how important funding is to fully address students’ diverse needs. When school districts don’t have access to equitable funding, they sometimes need to look for alternative solutions, and this article provides a solution implemented by the School District of Lancaster to cultivate inclusive learning environments where all individuals are empowered to thrive.
In today’s rapidly evolving educational landscape, the concepts of equity and justice have emerged as indispensable pillars guiding policies and practices. Ensuring that every student, regardless of background or circumstance, has equal access to a quality education and opportunities for success lies at the heart of the pursuit of equity. Funding is an essential element in providing an equitable education; however, because funding in PA is not equitable, school districts sometimes need to look to community partners to bridge the gap. This article examines what inequity looks like in a real-world classroom, how inequitable funding affects school districts, how important funding is to fully address students’ needs, and offers a potential solution to cultivate inclusive learning environments where all individuals are empowered to thrive.
Let me paint a picture for you. Imagine you are a teacher in the School District of Lancaster. You are standing in front of a class of 20 students who represent our student body—fascinating young people with amazing stories to tell. Here’s what you should know about your class: Four of your students do not speak English as their native language. Of these, two are recent immigrants, one of whom is a refugee. The refugee student has significant trauma, and his parents will not let him ride the bus, so he’s often absent. Where he’s from, buses take you to places you don’t want to go. Four of your students qualify for special education services. Seventeen of your 20 students are economically disadvantaged. One of your students does not have a place to live. At the end of this school year, these students are expected to meet the state standards for their grade in English Language Arts and Math. As their teacher, you are responsible; however, as a result of the factors mentioned above, five of your students are far behind their grade level in English Language Arts, eleven are far behind in math, nine are far behind in English Language Arts, and six in math are just behind grade level. You need to catch these students up, but at the same time, you have six students who are on grade level or advanced who can’t be allowed to fall behind. Can you do it? What do the students need? What do you need to be successful?
In order to provide equitable access to the class of 20 students with diverse learning needs, you need specially trained teachers who can work individually and in small groups with the students who do not speak English to accelerate their language acquisition. English is essential to accessing the curriculum. You need cultural navigators to assist the immigrant and refugee families in understanding the education system and acclimating to life in the United States. You need specially trained teachers to provide special education services to the qualifying students. Depending on their needs, it may take more than one, and these special education teachers need aides to assist in the classroom, sometimes required by law. Because you are required to teach the curriculum for your grade level, you need help catching up the students who are behind. For some, you can work with a classroom aide to run small groups, but for others, you again need a specialized teacher to work with students individually in what is called an “academic intervention.” You need social workers, counselors, and therapists available to support families with additional challenges, especially those who are unhoused. You need strong relationships with community partners to help remove additional barriers, helping families access things like healthcare and mental health providers, after-school programs, housing, and adult literacy programs. You may also need a community school director to coordinate all these partnerships—if your district can sustain it in the budget.
All of these strategies are costly. The School District of Lancaster invests more than $20 million annually on things like early childhood education, extended day, after school and summer programs, social work, community schools, and college and career supports, including school-to-work programs and college counseling. The District spends more on programs for English Language Learners than the state basic education funding subsidy given to two-thirds of our neighboring school districts in Lancaster County. All of this is why a Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court judge ruled that Pennsylvania’s school funding system is unconstitutional. The ruling recognized education as a fundamental right guaranteed by the Pennsylvania Constitution to all children, but this right has been denied for decades in low-wealth districts like the School District of Lancaster.
The School District of Lancaster taxpayers are doing their part. The district’s “local effort capacity index,” a measure the state uses to determine the local tax burden, is in the top 10% among all Pennsylvania school districts. However, not all tax rates are the same. The School District of Lancaster raises approximately $9,600 per student in local taxes. By comparison, the New Hope-Solebury School District (NHS), located in Bucks County along the Delaware River, raises nearly $30,000 per student–with a tax rate half that of the School District of Lancaster. Why? First, the School District of Lancaster has almost 10 times as many students as the New Hope-Solebury School District. Additionally, and unique to Lancaster, about 30 percent of properties in the School District of Lancaster are tax-exempt, including hospitals, colleges, churches, and economic development projects. In all, more than a quarter of a billion dollars in property value pays no taxes to the school district. Which school district needs more funding and resources? Almost 90% of the School District of Lancaster students are economically disadvantaged, compared to less than 9% in New Hope-Solebury School District. One in five School District of Lancaster students speaks a language other than English. In the New Hope-Solebury School District, it’s fewer than 2%. This is exactly why the courts and the Commission have found Pennsylvania’s funding system unconstitutional and inadequate.
This year, the state’s Basic Education Funding Commission, made up of state lawmakers from both houses, made appropriate and bold recommendations that the General Assembly should infuse billions of dollars into Pennsylvania’s public education system to undo decades of inadequate, inequitable funding. The commission’s report does something simple but significant. Instead of funding levels continuing in a manner deemed unconstitutional, the report sets meaningful funding targets to make up for years of shortfalls, and funding is based on students’ needs. In the School District of Lancaster, that means our annual state subsidy would increase to more than $41 million after seven years. We would also receive a tax equity supplement of $15.5 million—a recognition that our local taxpayers are bearing a much higher burden of funding our school district than, say, those in New Hope-Solebury. It would also mean that the teacher who has 20 students–17 of whom are economically disadvantaged, four of whom do not speak English as their first language, four who qualify as special education students, many of whom are behind their grade levels in English and math, and some who are at or above grade level–would be able to get the supports needed for students to be successful.
What would funding these kinds of resources look like for individual students in the school district? Take Sujan Upreti, a member of McCaskey’s Class of 2023. Sujan was born in Nepal. His family is native to Bhutan, but they were forced to migrate to Nepal before he was born because they practice Hinduism. With limited opportunities, the family moved to Lancaster in 2009. They are among the 5,000 refugees who settled in Lancaster County between 2002 and 2019. Sujan’s parents still primarily speak Nepali. When he was a student in the School District of Lancaster, Sujan benefitted from a critical partnership we have with our local intermediate unit, IU-13–the Refugee Center located at Reynolds Middle School. The Refugee Center focuses on aiding refugees and immigrants both within and outside our district to provide education, integration, wellness, and work for our refugees, leading to self-sufficiency. However, this service is costly. Cultural navigators are highly specialized. They speak numerous languages, understand traditions and cultures from around the world, and understand how our American system of education works and how to connect families with social services.
Our district spends nearly $200,000 a year on this initiative alone—certainly not an expense needed in New Hope-Solebury. The work of the cultural navigators is outstanding. Since 2020, refugee students in the School District of Lancaster attend school at a higher rate than our general education students, and their four-year graduation rate has been higher than the overall senior class for the past two years, enormous progress from 2018. The percentage of refugee students who pass ninth grade–which is a key indicator of high school success–has been increasing since the pandemic.
For the School District of Lancaster, equity is not about giving everyone the same tools, but giving students access to the tools they need to be successful. Refugee students in the School District of Lancaster need support from programs like the Refugee Center. Districts like Lancaster need the vision to identify these needs, but also the funding and resources to meet them.
The reality is, not all challenges have easy solutions. Because school districts cannot always rely on funding, they need to seek alternative solutions to meet students’ needs. One solution that The School District of Lancaster implemented was creating a partnership with a community organization to support youth who struggle. Since the pandemic, Lancaster schools have been challenged by what has been called a mental health “crisis.” In fact, CBS news reported the results of a survey last spring of children ages 9 to 13 in which 37% said they worry at least once a week.
More than half don’t think adults understand their concerns. Oftentimes, these issues surface by students acting out in school or students making poor choices. In the School District of Lancaster, discipline incidents that lead to in-school or out-of-school suspension have increased. The District needs new strategies. Unfortunately, mental health professionals are in short supply. There have been openings, but there aren’t enough applicants or mental health providers to fill them. In this case, then, it’s not a question of financial resources. Instead, it is the case of finding an alternate solution, such as a community partner.
The School District of Lancaster found a partner in the Bench Mark Program. The Bench Mark program offers free personal weight training services to youth identified as “at-risk” by local high schools and community organizations. Founder Will Keifer has testified on Capitol Hill on the importance of supporting after-school programs. The School District of Lancaster employs a full-time community partnerships specialist, who develops relationships with organizations like the Bench Mark Program. It was the Community Partnerships Specialist who first spoke to Bench Mark about their after-school program, which was only for students referred by the Lancaster County Juvenile Probation and Children & Youth Agencies. Instead of paying a fine or doing community service, students can now participate in alternative programs through Bench Mark. The School District of Lancaster thought, if it can work for the juvenile probation system, it can work in schools to prevent students from becoming involved in the juvenile justice system. Today, high school administrators partner with Bench Mark to provide a full, five-day long mentorship program at the high school to students referred as an alternative to suspension. The program combines mentoring, fitness, positive decision making, and ongoing support.
Overall suspensions at McCaskey are down 28%. Students who have successfully completed the program show improved attendance and marked improvements in academic performance. The mentorship students receive through this program, in particular, is significant. Students need mentors—particularly young mentors of color. When I was in 4th grade, a mentoring program through Howard University helped set me on a path to success.
In today’s dynamic educational landscape, the imperative of equity and justice stands as a beacon guiding our endeavors. The classroom is a microcosm of our societal challenges, where inequities manifest in the lives of our students, from language barriers to economic disparity and homelessness. However, amidst these complexities, we witness the transformative power of targeted interventions and strategic investments. The success story of Sujan Upreti exemplifies how initiatives like the Refugee Center can foster inclusion and propel students towards their passions.
What can you do to ensure equity and justice in education? Addressing systemic disparities requires not only a financial commitment, but also visionary leadership and active community involvement. By advocating for equitable funding models and cultivating mentorship programs like the Bench Mark Program, school districts and their leaders can pave the way for a more just and inclusive educational system. Parents, teachers, students, and school leaders also need to be engaged in the legislative process, speaking to local representatives and expressing support for the Basic Education Funding Commission and Governor Shapiro’s budget proposals and reminding lawmakers that Pennsylvania has a constitutional obligation to act. As we reflect on the journey ahead, it is also important to reaffirm our dedication to providing every student with the tools and opportunities they need to flourish, thereby realizing the promise of education as a fundamental right for all.
Moniuszko, S. & Blackburn, B. (2023, May 8). 86% of kids report worrying, survey finds. Here’s what parents can do to help. CBS News https://www.cbsnews.com/news/children-worrying-survey-what-parents-can-do-mental-health/
DR. KEITH MILES JR. is a lifelong learner who has dedicated his 20-year career to ensuring all students, regardless of challenges or setbacks, are afforded the same life-changing opportunities he was offered growing up in an inner city. Dr. Miles became the superintendent of the School District of Lancaster in July 2023, leading the 10,000-student district with 18 schools. In all the places where Dr. Miles has served, including Philadelphia, Campden and Trenton, NJ, he has worked to level the playing field by ensuring all students have access to critical resources and opportunities.
By Anne Maneval
ABSTRACT
The research conducted shows the origins of public education and its funding, how the funding was implemented, and how it has changed over time, specifically, how the inadequate funding received by the system did, and does not, support students and educators equally in its distribution. There have been vast improvements to education since its inception, such as including education for all genders and races. Still, the public funding to benefit all Pennsylvania students’ education in every region is starkly different, with the wealthy regions benefiting from quality education due to higher tax areas as opposed to the non-wealthy regions. Equal funding can promote equal education for all students in public education institutions and help bring higher success rates in graduation. Educational equality in Pennsylvania could give every student, in any area, higher educational opportunity.
A student in Pennsylvania can unknowingly hit a home run at the start of their education just by the location of their home. Funding in Pennsylvania is tied to the student population of an area; the students who live in areas with higher property taxes benefit more than students who live in lower-taxed areas. Equality and equity are both important concepts in society, but sometimes the intentions behind equality do not necessarily create fairness. In this circumstance, inequity is connected to education. Every student has potential, but students in lower-taxed schools are not afforded the same opportunities, nor do they have fair standings, compared to other students with quality resources. For the past 45 years, Pennsylvania has relied heavily on local property taxes to fund public schools. The funding provided has been inequitable due to each school receiving a different amount of local property taxes. Students who live in low economic areas, therefore, have fewer resources compared to students who live in wealthier regions. This is important to keep in mind because although students throughout all of Pennsylvania have had equal opportunity to go to schools in public school systems, the opportunities within the schools have been inequitable due to the resources distributed based on their differences in taxes. Because of this inequity, The Education Law center filed suit in November of 2014. Per the Education Law Center (2013) in their fight for fair funding, the formula added new weights to certain district student populations, considering factors like poverty and the percentage of English Language Learners to guide the distribution of a portion of state education funding (Funding, Formulas, and Fairness, p. 1). However, the formula, developed by the state legislature’s Basic Education Funding Commission, only recommended how funding should be distributed, not how much funding is needed to ensure adequacy. Although this formula has been used for over 45 years, it may be about to change. The funding formula was found unconstitutional per the lawsuit of William Penn School District et al. v. Pennsylvania Dept. of Education et al. as a decision recognizing that students in low-wealth districts do not have the same resources and rights to quality education as other students across the state in higher-wealth districts, since the majority of funding is provided by local taxes.
Although the statewide appellate court originally dismissed the case in 2017, on February 7, 2023, the Commonwealth Court ruled that Pennsylvania’s school funding system is unconstitutional and must be reformed; this ruling could bring gradual social change in distributing funding equally to students who need resources distributed fairly.
The History That Brought Us to Unconstitutionality-PA’s Funding Origins: Every student deserves fair funding. Unfortunately, the implementation of funding hasn’t always been fair, though several groups have continuously fought to make changes to make it more equitable. Currently, schools are funded with a combination of federal, state, and local government funds. From Pennsylvania`s beginning origins of public education in 1682, the Pennsylvania Charter of Privilege, which gave power to colonial governments, was signed by William Penn and amended in 1701. This amendment enacted privileges among the elite for education, but there was not a lot of thought for the masses in the early 1700s, such as education for women or Black citizens, and that same lack of equitable consideration continued into the late 1900s.
The Pennsylvania Association of Rural and Small Schools (PARSS), which was created by public school superintendents in 1983 to serve rural and small schools’ needs with a focus on increased funding and quality education for students, states that “Pennsylvania’s funding formula for public schools remained virtually unchanged between 1957 and 1966. Funding was distributed to districts based on district teaching units” (Bissett, Hillman, & Elliot, 2019, p. 14). After failed attempts throughout the ‘70s and ‘80s to alter the Public Code, it was somehow maintained as the authoritative school code: “The size of a school district is measured by its average daily attendance (ADA). According to PARSS, the formulas used to distribute Basic Education Funding had been based primarily on the amounts districts received in the previous year. On January 10, 1991, PARSS filed a lawsuit, PARSS v. Ridge, in both the Commonwealth Court and Federal District Court, to increase funding for all students in equal measure. The complaint described the disparities between districts with very few resources and those with great resources. On March 3, 1998, the case was decided as unjustifiable and argued that only the legislature could decide what is “thorough and efficient” on equity (Bissett, Hillman, & Elliot, 2019, p. 41). Even though the case was unsuccessful, the lawsuit was important because it increased judicial and public knowledge as a catalyst for shared groups to fight for equitable education, and PARSS continued to fight for increased funding. In 1992, the Hold Harmless Policy was put in place so that schools could not receive less funding than they did in the years prior.
Fair Funding Formula: In 2016, the Basic Education Funding Commission (BEFC) enacted the Fair Funding formula to equitably distribute state education funding across school districts, with the formula being implemented, questioned, and amended for improvement since its creation. This formula, where funds have been distributed based on population and location, replaced the Hold Harmless policy previously established in 1992. In the usage of the Fair Funding formula, school funding had two goals: to promote quality education in public schools and to see how the implementation of property taxes and federal funding promoted changes in equity.
Before the Fair Funding formula was deemed unconstitutional, per Section 123(k) of the Public School Code, the 2023 BEFC reviewed the distribution of state funding for basic education to Pennsylvania’s 500 school districts. The existing Fair Funding formula decides how much each Pennsylvania school district receives in funding and determines the findings based on the number of students, ESL students, and students in poverty while analyzing a school district’s weighted student count and applying the weighted formula. Per the House Appropriations Committee, “The fair funding formula does not allocate a specific dollar amount to each school district. Instead, it determines each district’s fair share of the amount of funding available to distribute from the state. This is the distinction between deciding what is fair and what is adequate” (Brandon, 2020, p. 5).
Equal funding can provide for quality educators, thus giving quality education to students across Pennsylvania. Due to the existing fair funding formula, many schools have lacked resources compared to areas that have higher student populations or wealthier tax areas. Students throughout the Commonwealth have been at a disadvantage in their education compared to other public school students of their age group. William Penn School District et al. v. Pennsylvania Dept. of Education, et al was filed in 2014 on behalf of parents, school districts, and statewide organizations in response to the failure of Pennsylvania’s legislature to “adequately and equitably fund public education and provide students with the resources they need to succeed academically” (The Public Interest Law Center). Originally filed by the Public Interest Law Center, Education Law Center, and law firm O’Melveny & Myers in 2014, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court reopened the case in 2017. Approximately 6 years after the case’s recommencement, Commonwealth Court Judge Renée Cohn Jubelirer issued a ruling declaring the Pennsylvania school funding system unconstitutional. According to the Education Law Center (n.d.), “It is now the responsibility of the governor and the legislature to develop and implement a plan for bringing the state’s school funding system into constitutional compliance” (para. 8).
Per the Education Law Center, the state’s Basic Education Funding Commission has taken on the task of developing a remedy responsive to the court ruling and has held a series of public hearings around the state to elicit testimony about this. The court decision concluded that inadequate state funding deprived low-wealth districts of resources. This problem of inadequacy in funding cannot be fixed with the current funding that exists; rather, it would need additional funding: “In fact, the court decision precisely says school funding in Pennsylvania is both inadequate and that low-wealth school districts need additional funding to create a constitutional school funding system” (Polson, 2023, p. 3). Because the court found that the funding formula was unconstitutional, it will be changing. These changes will branch out not only to the students’ benefits in their education from their schools’ resources but to the teachers’ potential quality in their curriculum as well.
A Teacher’s Perspective on School Funding: Many teachers are aware of funding issues, but they are not aware of the effects and ways in which funding is distributed unequally. During an interview with Catherine Smith (a pseudonym has been used to protect her identity), a second-grade teacher at a rural public elementary school in Perry County, she discussed her knowledge of state funding and the information on the funded resources that have been given to her as a teacher in her 20+ year career within the district. The conversation aimed to see what and how
information is given to the educators and staff about funding distribution and the effects of possibly limited funding at her school.
As for the resources funded to her school district (C. Smith, personal communication, November 21, 2023), “We have adequate resources from our funding; we have received iPads for educational use, and we receive a budget for notebooks and supplies. We are appropriately funded compared to other rural public schools; however, I still find a need to extend school supplies as the academic year progresses. I can independently create resources by sharing an Amazon Wish List for my classroom on social media where parents can contribute, which is helpful for special projects or additional general classroom materials.” Catherine continued, “I’d imagine we are the most funded out of the four schools in the county due to the greater number of students in the district, and that higher number of students equates to more households paying property taxes.” As for the notice of distribution of the funded resources from the school district: “We do not receive a quarterly newsletter or annual notice of the ways in which funding is distributed.”
The district where Catherine works also does not inform the teachers of the funding received from PSSA tests; this knowledge could provide more awareness of the reasoning behind the testing in preparation for the students’ success and for the teachers’ understanding of the distribution of funds received from the students’ achievement. Catherine concluded, “The teachers and educators are a resource themselves, and the increased salaries of them could better reflect the quality of education they provide as a result of funded schools, which in turn gives value to the students’ education.”
There are many disadvantaged students in lower-taxed regions in Pennsylvania whose educational journey can be impacted by how much a teacher believes in them. Teachers who have resources, policies, and strategies provided to them by their districts could pause their own preconceived beliefs about a student’s capabilities to encourage positive change toward equitable education for disadvantaged students in rural and low-wealth areas. The resources given to teachers through better funding, such as a higher base salary or skills to promote policies, can incite value, morale, and longevity in their work. This, in turn, is valuable to the students they teach across the region. According to Martin et al. (2018), “Policymakers and school funding advocates should protect and increase funding for teacher compensation and professional development, targeting low-income schools. Programs designed to reduce the cost of teacher preparation—such as the federal Teacher Education Assistance for College and Higher Education (TEACH) loan forgiveness program—should be enhanced for those willing to teach in high-poverty schools” (p. 126).
Possible Solutions-Laying the Groundwork for Change: Reworking how we spend existing funds will not solve the problem; rather, Pennsylvania should distribute more money equally and not just adequately to promote constitutionality and social change towards equitable education. Cohen (2022) argues that “one of the key ways states can mitigate school inequity is by distributing more money-reducing reliance on local property taxes to drive dollars into classrooms” (para. 10).
One solution raised outside the courts is weighted student formulas to help implement programs to create new funding systems that work against inequitable funding. Weighted student funding would allocate funding based on both the number of students and the demographics of students. Districts that have students from lower-income homes or disabilities, for example, are considered a weight towards the funding being provided above the numeric of a per-student table. According to Martin, Boser, and Benner (2018), “Weighted student funding models provide principals with discretion over the use of schools’ budgets. Principals can build their school budget, staff, and program options to best serve their students” (p. 139). This may increase staff awareness of funding distribution. With principals serving in a leadership role, they can follow policies or implement programs that are best suited for the environment of their school. If Pennsylvania allocates funding based on the number and demographics of the students they serve, there will be equality in the way funding is distributed for each region.
Various important advocacy groups have formed coalitions with other organizations to support equal educational funding. A study from one of these groups from the Education Voters of Pennsylvania (n.d.) found, “Pennsylvania ranks 45th in the nation for state share of school funding. The commonwealth provides just 38% of K-12 funding; nationally, the norm is close to 50%. When the state doesn’t pay its share, it puts enormous pressure on communities to fund their schools through property taxes. The wealthiest school districts spend, on average, $4,800 more per student than the poorest, and that gap has grown steadily wider” (“What’s the problem?” section).
Regarding the interview with Catherine Smith, the resources that are a part of the foundation for teachers and the resources that are given to teachers from funding can be valuable in their effects on the students taught across the region. The parents and community members donate towards funding in property taxes, but there is still a need for school supplies and resources after funding in just that small rural area. Overall, the district where she teaches receives
adequate funding for resources and is more advantageous compared to other regions of the state, but the funding could consider the increase in salary for teachers compared to other public school teachers of the same grade level in higher-wealth regions.
Not every school can be equal in size, programs, and policies, just as not every district can be equal in wealth. Still, lower-wealth districts that receive equal funding could benefit from resources that are in higher-wealth districts; those smaller or rural schools would become more equitable if they had the funding for additional programs or policies.
Funding for low-income schools, which would contribute to the resources needed for their demographic, can promote the value of the students in themselves as they grow and learn. Over time, there has been progress in funding, with the realization that money does matter, and as the legislature takes more of the responsibility off the taxpayers for funding, more models can grow to promote and progress equitable funding. In all areas of education, from teachers to students, fair educational equity can promote a student’s quality education not compromised by where their home is located, and it can progressively spread equitableness across the region.
Bissett, J., Hillman, A., & Elliot, E. (2019). The history of school funding in Pennsylvania. The Pennsylvania Association of Rural and Small Schools. https://www.parss.org/accnt203404/site203405/Documents/The-History-of-School-Funding-InPennsylvania.pdf
Brandon, S. (2020, October 16). PA’s Fair Funding formula for basic education explained. Fair Funding Formula–Basic Education: Budget Briefing. https://www.houseappropriations.com/files/Documents/BEF_Primer_102820.pdf
Children First (Formerly Public Citizens for Children and Youth). (2022, October 20). Report: hold harmless: a quarter century of inequity at the heart of Pennsylvania’s school system--Jan. 2021. https://www.childrenfirstpa.org/report/holdharmless/ Cohen, R. M. (2022, July 11). School funding lawsuits are long, frustrating, and crucial for fighting inequality. Vox. https://www.vox.com/23178172/public-school-funding-inequality-lawsuit-pennsylvania Education Voters of Pennsylvania. (n.d.). Adequacy & equity. https://edvoterspa.org/ Education Law Center. (2013, February). Funding, formulas, and fairness. https://www.elc-pa.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/02 /ELC_schoolfundingreport.2013.pdf
Education Law Center (n.d.) Historic victory in fight for fair funding! https://www.elc-pa.org/historic-victory-in-the-fight-forfair-funding/
FundOurSchoolsPA. (2023, September 14). The Basic Education Funding Commission: How you can help make fair school funding a reality. https://www.fundourschoolspa.org/news/basiceducationfundingcommission
Gasbarro, N. (2016, October 30). History of education in Pennsylvania, 1776-1937. Lykens Valley: History & Genealogy. https://www.lykensvalley.org/history-of-education-in-pennsylvania-1776-1937/
Gilligan, C. (2022, August 26). Which states invest the most in their students? The U.S. News & World Report. https://www.usnews.com/news/best-states/articles/2022-08-26/which-states-invest-the-most-in-their-students Klick, J. (2000). Do dollars make a difference? The relationship between expenditures and test scores in Pennsylvania’s public schools. The American Economist, 44(1), 81-87.
Martin, Carmel, Boser, Ulrich, & Benner. (2018, November 13). A quality approach to school funding. Center for American Progress. https://www.americanprogress.org/article/quality-approach-school-funding/
Polson, D. (2023, October 11). Despite a claim to the contrary, the Commonwealth Court’s decision precisely said Pennsylvania needs to provide additional resources to low-wealth school districts. Keystone Research Center and Pennsylvania Budget and Policy Center. https://krc-pbpc.org/research_publication/despite-a-claim-to-the-contrary-the-commonwealth-courts-decisionprecisely-said-pennsylvania-needs-to-provide-additional-resources-to-low-wealth-school-districts/
POWER Interfaith. (2024, February 7). POWER Interfaith urges swift action for education equity amid Governor Shapiro’s historic $1.1 billion budget proposal. https://powerinterfaith.org/power-urges-swift-action-for-education-equity-amid-historicbudget-proposal/
Public Interest Law Center. (n.d.). School funding lawsuit update: School funding lawsuit will proceed, Commonwealth court rules. https://pubintlaw.org/cases-and-projects/school-funding-lawsuit-will-proceed-commonwealth-court-rules/
ANNE MANEVAL lives in Newport, PA and is an online part-time student at Millersville University pursuing her B.A. degree in English with a concentration in Writing Studies. She obtained her paralegal associate degree in 2014 from Central Penn College and currently works as the senior underwriter at Quality Builders Warranty, where she has been employed for the last 10 years. She enjoys spending time with her husband, Kyle, and their 12-year-old black Labrador mix, Leroy. Anne’s favorite pastimes are nature walks with Kyle and Leroy at their local state park or near their home, crafting, kayaking, and barre classes.
By Drs. Aileen Hower (EMEE), Abdulsalami Ibrahim (EDFN), and Miriam Marguerita Gomez Witmer (EDFN)
Worldwide, the teacher shortage is growing at a staggering rate. Of equal note, teachers in PK-12 schools are predominantly White, female, and of a middle socioeconomic class status. To address the shortage of teachers, especially teachers from underrepresented populations, this article outlines the specific efforts put forward through multiple avenues to inform professors, current teachers, and prospective teachers of the importance of Culturally Relevant and Sustaining Education (CRSE) competencies. The article also shows how to embrace and implement essential changes to promote diversity in the classroom, which will make working in these spaces more welcoming and sustainable for underrepresented individuals who hope to teach. It is essential for Black students to be taught by teachers who look like them and have had similar experiences to serve as mentors and teachers in schools. This article shares ways that a local university is working on the dire issue of underrepresentation within Pennsylvania schools. The authors hope their ideas may lead others to replicate or create new ideas to also help address these issues in their educational settings.
Around the world, the teacher shortage is increasing at an alarming rate. In Pennsylvania, for example, 21,045 Instructional I teaching certificates were issued from 2010–2011, while only 6,937 were issued from 2019–2020, with the national average declining over one-third in the past decade (Boyce & Morton, 2023; Pennsylvania Educator Diversity Consortium, 2023). At the same time, those teachers who are in the profession are predominantly White, female, and come from a middle-class socioeconomic status. To address the shortage of teachers, especially teachers from underrepresented populations, a team of teacher educators from Millersville University took the stance that if PK-12 schools and institutions of higher education worked to integrate Culturally Relevant and Sustaining Education (CRSE) competencies into their practices, they could work to foster more inclusive school environments, thereby helping to recruit diverse students into the teaching profession and addressing the teacher shortage and lack of diversity in the teacher workforce. Being culturally relevant means having “a strong knowledge base about cultural diversity. Teachers should understand different racial and ethnic groups’ cultural values, traditions, and contributions to society, and incorporate that knowledge into their instruction” (Will & Najarro, 2022, para. 16). Moreover, to be culturally relevant, “[t]eachers should include multiple perspectives in their instruction and make sure the images displayed in classrooms—such as on bulletin boards—represent a wide range of diversity. Teachers should also contextualize issues within race, class, ethnicity, and gender” (Will & Najarro, 2022, para. 16). This article describes various efforts this team of professors put forward to address the teacher shortage as well as the recruitment, training, and retention of underrepresented teachers. Moreover, this article explains the various grant-funded initiatives to inform professors, teachers, and prospective teachers of the importance of CRSE competencies and demonstrate how to implement them in the classroom.
The team organized several initiatives to address the need for change for faculty and both preservice and in-service teachers in the following sequence:
a. Faculty development
i. Social Justice Summit
ii. Faculty CRSE workshops
b. Preservice and in-service teachers
i. Bringing CRSE Curricular Changes into the Classroom
ii. CRSE Awareness
c. Partner outreach initiatives
i. Social Justice Summits
d. Prospective college students
i. Future Educator Pathway Mentoring
The Future Educator Pathway (FEP) is a comprehensive “Grow Your Own” (Toshalis, 2014) program designed to recruit, motivate, and mentor students of color so they can attend college and become future educators (Gist et al., 2018). The curriculum of FEP is grounded in Culturally Relevant Teaching (Ladson-Billings, 2014): teaching that incorporates students’ cultural experiences, funds of knowledge, and backgrounds into the curriculum and instruction. It is also rooted in Self-Determination Theory (Ryan & Deci, 2013), which focuses on building autonomy,
belongingness, and competence for teaching, in this case. The assumption is that when high school students build these skills, they may likely see themselves as future educators. The FEP is a collaboration between Millersville University and local school districts, and it consists of five unique programs offered to middle school and high school students, typically at no cost to students or their families.
The United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) reports that “approaching 2030, a major issue looms: The world is facing a significant teacher shortage” (UNESCO, 2024, para. 1). UNESCO’s global report on teachers “reveals an urgent need for 44 million primary and secondary teachers worldwide by 2030” (UNESCO, 2024, para. 1). This includes “a demand for seven out of ten teachers at the secondary level and the need to replace over half of the existing teachers leaving the profession” (UNESCO, 2024, para. 2). The United States is not an exception. Over the years, teacher shortages have been a concern. Specifically, the underrepresented teacher shortage has been alarming. For example, “across the country’s 3.2 million full-time-equivalent teachers in the fall of 2024, only about 9.4% are Hispanic, 6.1% Black, and 2.4% Asian” (Riser-Kositsky, 2024, para. 31). In the next five years, these numbers are projected to decline (Irwin et al., 2024).
Research into the disproportionate distribution of underrepresented males in educational settings reveals the impact on underrepresented students and several critical insights that highlight systemic issues and the urgent need for change. First, Black males in educational settings face disproportionate discipline rates, which ultimately can affect their desire to go into the profession in the future. Studies consistently show that Black male students are overwhelmingly subjected to suspensions and expulsions compared to their peers (Nowicki, 2024). Data from the U.S. Department of Education often reveal that Black students are suspended at a rate much higher than their White counterparts, even when the behaviors leading to suspension are similar. Additionally, research indicates that Black males (and females) are more frequently punished for subjective offenses, such as “disrespect” or “disruption,” which are often interpreted more harshly by educators than similar behaviors by White students (Nowicki, 2024). Unfortunately, many Black students are also educated in school systems that promote zero-tolerance policies. This type of policy can lead to a higher likelihood of severe consequences for minor infractions (Nowicki, 2024).
One reason behind Black males being disproportionately disciplined is teachers and school staff having unconscious biases that affect their perceptions and treatment of Black students. Implicit biases can lead to harsher disciplinary actions and a lower threshold for interpreting behaviors as problematic. Additionally, differences in communication styles and cultural expressions can be misinterpreted as disruptive or disrespectful, leading to disproportionate disciplinary measures.
Teachers and school systems must be aware that disproportionate disciplinary actions can lead to increased absenteeism and academic disengagement because of the negative factors discussed above. Suspension and expulsion can disrupt learning and contribute to lower academic achievement. The negative effects of disproportionate discipline can extend beyond school, affecting future educational and employment opportunities and contributing to higher rates of involvement in the juvenile justice system. Black males do not see teaching as a viable occupation because of the caustic school environment. Some Black males believe that becoming a teacher is “selling out” to the oppressive education system (Boateng et al., 2021). Therefore, there’s a critical need to be proactive in finding ways to increase the number of Black males in the teaching profession to serve the growing need for underrepresented teachers.
To address the issues of not enough teachers and not enough teachers from underrepresented populations, the team first set out to work with higher education faculty on how to be more culturally aware and engaged, especially as they work to train local and future educators on the same issue. Specifically, the professors (referred to as the grant team from here on out) wanted to accomplish this by supporting faculty at the University to incorporate the Pennsylvania Department of Education’s Culturally Relevant and Sustaining Education (CRSE) competencies in their curricula. They also wanted to inform local schools and educators about ways to incorporate the CRSE competencies into their daily work. To accomplish these goals, the professors applied for and received the Pennsylvania’s Department of Education Prep2Practice grant, which was a grant to promote and foster innovative ideas around implementing the CRSE competencies, and immediately started to facilitate and plan opportunities to learn about and work toward implementing the CRSE competencies with PK-12 educators, faculty members on campus, and undergraduate education majors.
The first initiative that the grant team implemented was to host a Social Justice Summit in the spring of 2023 to ensure that attendees were aware of the CRSE competencies and could start to think about how to implement them into their work. The event was planned in coordination with the School of Social Work’s Global Well-Being and Social Change Conference and in collaboration with the Pennsylvania Chapter of the National Association for Multicultural Education (PA-NAME). The conference was attended in person by local educators and virtually by others across the state.
At the conference, Mr. Matthew Kay, a high school English teacher at Science Leadership Academy in Philadelphia and author of Not Light, But Fire: How to Lead Meaningful Race Conversations in the Classroom (2018), was the keynote speaker, who shared with teachers how to have meaningful and relevant conversations about issues of race with students. In addition, Drs. Donna-Marie Cole-Malott and Juliet Curci, who were instrumental in constructing the CRSE competencies, presented the purpose of the CRSE competencies. Local teachers and others invested in presenting
how to be a culturally relevant educator also spoke in various breakout sessions. In a closing circle, the educators in attendance shared that they were excited to learn more about the topics that were presented. They felt they learned a great deal about CRSE, diversity, and inclusion, and ways to be more inclusive and CRSE-aligned in their practices.
In the fall of 2023, the grant team hosted a second Social Justice Summit with a different format, hoping to improve attendance. Again, the grant team allowed for both in-person and online attendance of educators primarily from central to eastern Pennsylvania, with one participant from another state who wanted to learn how others were implementing the CRSE competencies and how to address “pushback” to implementation initiatives. The Summit consisted of a panel discussion that included educators, administrators, and community members who shared how they approach CRSE and DEI work in their professional environments. There was a great deal of engagement on the part of the attendees, which prompted the formation of affinity groups for continued connections around the CRSE competencies and DEI work. It was clear to the grant team that these types of events and spaces for educators to talk and process information are vital to fostering change in education.
Faculty: CRSE Competencies Workshops
On campus, the grant team planned for workshops through the spring and fall 2024 semesters, led by Dr. Donna-Marie Cole-Malott. These workshops started with CRSE competency 1: Reflect on One’s Cultural Lens and were taught through an iterative process. Dr. Cole-Malott introduced CRSE concepts, the competencies, and provided opportunities for faculty and the dean of the College of Education and Human Services to reflect and discuss. After each session, Dr. Cole-Malott collected feedback from faculty about what the upcoming session(s) should include. She used this feedback and conversations with the grant team to plan each of the remaining five sessions. Toward the end of our collaboration with Dr. Cole-Malott, faculty were provided with background information and afforded time to review and reflect on their syllabi, assignments, and teaching activities. This resulted in faculty participating in an analysis via a matrix listing all of the competencies and all of the education courses, per department, of where the CRSE competencies were being addressed and to what degree in all six departments across the College of Education and Human Services, in other education-related departments (music, art, etc.), and among student-teaching supervisors. This process facilitated several curricular changes within the faculty’s individual courses.
To address the issues of not enough teachers and not enough teachers from underrepresented populations, the grant team identified a need for change in teacher preparation programs to develop culturally responsive preservice and in-service teachers who will make affirming decisions in the classroom so all students feel valued. When this happens, more marginalized students may see teaching as a viable career, so this may increase the number of teachers, especially teachers from traditionally marginalized groups, to consider a career in education. Representation of diverse teachers matters in schools and can impact student success (Lee & Riordan, 2018).
In-service teachers historically have not been prepared to meet all the needs of all their students, which is even more crucial with the rapidly changing demographics of students in the United States (Ingersoll et al., 2021). In Pennsylvania, the Department of Education addressed this need by mandating that all school districts educate their faculty on the CRSE competencies (Pennsylvania Department of Education, 2022) to make all students feel valued in schools1. In collaboration with the Pennsylvania Educator Diversity Consortium (https://www.paeddiversity.org/), Teach Plus (https://teachplus.org/pa/), and #PANeedsTeachers (https://www.paneedsteachers.com/), Pennsylvania higher education faculty have focused on supporting PK-12 schools, colleges, and universities in various ways.
Addressing these needs for change in schools requires a multifaceted approach that includes acknowledging and addressing implicit biases, revising school policies, implementing supportive practices, and engaging with the community. By tackling these issues, educational institutions can work toward more equitable and just environments for all students.
The grant team led the implementation of classroom activities and strategies with preservice and in-service teachers within their classroom practice. One example occurred in the Foundations Bloc, where sophomore education majors take an Introduction to Literacy course. This course is aligned with an urban public school district field placement at approximately five school districts local to the University. Within this literacy course, students are exposed to an interactive read-aloud, which is a highly structured literacy event involving the teacher selecting a high-quality book to use with children and then designing a lesson plan that focuses on explicitly teaching vocabulary and comprehension development. Working solo or in pairs, candidates plan and conduct an interactive read-aloud using a book aligned to a CRSE checklist/tool. A detailed evaluation form is provided for this assignment:
“Directions: Select a recently published (within the past five years), high-quality picture book (fiction or nonfiction) appropriate for reading aloud in grades 3 or 4. Please note that this has nothing to do with the “reading level” of the book. Picture books allow teachers in all grade levels to plan and prepare lessons using high-quality texts featuring marginalized characters or themes/topics shown through CRSE–aligned children’s literature in preparation for your upcoming urban field placement. You will use and submit the checklist handed out in class (and turned in along with your assignment). Then, you must have your book “approved” by Dr. Hower. The purpose of this assignment is to better understand the effect of language and culturally responsive training and the use of strategically chosen picture books while working with students during the summer literacy camp. You will be
1 In 2024, the Department of Education developed the Common Ground Framework to replace and update the CRSE guidelines https://www. pa.gov/agencies/education/programs-and-services/educators/certification/new-educators/program-framework/common-ground-framework. html#_ftnref2
guided to choose appropriate picture books and offered training through readings and discussions that focus on language and culturally responsive teaching. You will be asked to write a pre- and post-reflection on your experiences of learning and teaching students as it applies to these topics. Additionally, as part of the reading camp, you will be observed working with your student, and at least one session will be recorded to be reviewed later by the two researchers. Risks may involve having your current thoughts expanded and possibly slight discomfort in learning new information associated with participation in this pilot study. There may also be slight nervousness during teaching while being recorded.”
While this assignment continues to be tweaked to add more time for reflection and processing of the task, after one semester, based on teacher observation, students seemed to show an awareness and appreciation of more diverse books; expressed appreciation for being able to use information they were learning in another course on CRSE concepts into an activity that they could then take into their teaching; and exhibited thoughtfulness around book selection prior to their enrollment in the university’s Children’s Literature course. The instructor learned that CRSE conversations and awareness cannot be rushed and need to be scaffolded and directed because while some students have some background (academic or personal) with CRSE concepts, many who attend Millersville University are not as able to reflect intentionally about the purposes behind this assignment.
Preservice Teachers: CRSE Awareness
The grant team wanted to provide CRSE competency awareness to undergraduate students. The team felt that, while the work by faculty would eventually impact students, students could directly benefit from learning about the CRSE competencies from a local, urban district leader. Dr. Danielle Miles, Project Director of Schools for the School District of the City of York, planned and delivered a training entitled “Becoming a Culturally Relevant Teacher.” This session was held online on a Saturday so that as many undergraduate students could attend without creating conflicts with students’ schedules. Over 100 students attended this online session taught by Dr. Miles about CRSE and their future as educators. There were excellent questions and scenarios proffered by the students considering what Dr. Miles discussed. Additionally, Dr. Miles successfully navigated the topic with her CRSE expertise and online teaching skills.
The grant team wanted to make sure to provide professional learning support and opportunities to PK-12 partner districts as well, as only some educators from these districts attended the two Social Justice Summits. Two members of the grant team were invited into two local urban districts to provide training on the CRSE competencies to new and returning faculty in the summer of 2024. It was important to the grant team to offer and provide more district-specific training on their campuses, as University-LEA partnerships are vital to our work in preparing future teachers to work in the field of education. The other outcome that we hope for is a sense of belonging for all students in PK-12 schools, where students can be inspired to enter the field of education.
When we have spaces in schools that are more culturally responsive to all students, schools may be more attractive to minoritized students, who may consider becoming educators. Preparing future educators to be culturally responsive in the classroom will benefit all students. Therefore, the grant team supports the Future Educator Pathway (FEP) by leading two unique and recruitment initiatives, such as the FEP, a mentorship program for underrepresented 7th–-12th- grade students since 2007, where Dr. Witmer is the director of the FEP and Dr. Hower is the assistant director of the Future Educator Academy (FEA), and the Color of Teaching Mentoring program (CoT) which provides middle and high school students opportunities to have mentors from college students, to which Dr. Ibrahim offers mentoring and support as a faculty member.
The five Future Educator Pathway (FEP) programs are as follows:
1. The Color of Teaching Mentoring Program (CoT) is a mentoring program that provides students in grades 7–12 with a college student mentor. Matched mentor-mentee pairs interact to set goals, provide encouragement, and discuss routes for college success. College student mentors may also request a college professor mentor, as this is a three-tiered mentoring program. CoT includes events hosted on the university campus, such as public lectures, athletic contests, and participation in low-ropes team-building activities, game nights, scavenger hunts, and the like.
2. Side-by-Side (SBS) is a series of seminar-style workshops offered during the regular school day for students in grades 9 and 10 to motivate and educate participants about the value of being an educator. The program is facilitated by University faculty and college student mentors to introduce high school students to the art of teaching through microteaching. SBS is offered during the school day throughout the academic year, and participants are nominated by their teachers and counselors, then invited to participate in SBS.
3. Future Educator Academy (FEA) provides students in grades 11 and 12 with opportunities to reside on campus for a week in the summer, eat in the dining halls, attend lectures taught by college professors, participate in field trips and learning activities, and learn about college from the admissions, library, and financial aid office staff, giving participants an experience of college-style living. Students in FEA also function as teacher’s aides for younger children attending an educational summer camp, providing them with practical co-teaching experience and supporting their desire to become educators. Students from area districts are selected through an application process, and special attention is paid to recruiting from underrepresented populations of high school students. Throughout the week, students read about leadership, participate in discussions and panels focused on teaching and CRSE competencies, and acquire hands-on experiences with students in either the K-5th or 6th-9th grades. Scholars set goals for themselves and their future career plans in education and present those goals to their families and faculty on the last day of the Academy. The FEA successfully encourages students, especially those from diverse cultural backgrounds, to consider entering an education-related major when they attend college. It also gives them insights into how to apply, how to afford, and how to be successful when they start their freshman year of college.
4. Dual Enrollment Courses are offered by the university. Students can take four 3-credit college classes, typically free to high school juniors and seniors, that prepare them to transition from high school into college and explore teaching and coaching as careers. EDFN 179 focuses on “college knowledge,” time management, academic skills, social skills, personal and professional development, and exploration of teaching and coaching as careers in terms of research, critical observations, and self-reflection. WELL 175 focuses on children’s health through awareness, effective practices, and knowledge of health issues, including creating safe environments, nutrition education, and planning. PSYC 100 includes an overview of motivation, emotions, sensation and perception, individual differences, the nervous system, and learning and personality from a human behavior perspective. COMM 100 is the fundamentals of speech class, providing students with public-speaking experience. Recruitment, Training, and Retention of Underrepresented Males into the Teaching Profession is an initiative started by a member of the grant team in fall 2024 aiming to recruit 9th, 10th, 11th, and 12th grade underrepresented males from Millersville University’s urban partner schools into the teaching profession. The goals of this program are as follows:
i. To create pathways to recruitment of underrepresented male students into teacher preparation programs in partnership with Millersville University.
ii. To increase enrollment of underrepresented male students into teacher preparation programs in central Pennsylvania within the next five years.
iii. To increase the retention of underrepresented male students into teacher preparation programs in central Pennsylvania within the next five years.
These five components of the FEP make it possible for a student to be inspired, educated, motivated, and mentored to pursue a career as an educator from 7th grade through college graduation.
Recruiting teachers into the workforce is a pressing issue, but it should not bring about a decline in teacher quality. Although the need for teachers is high, the quality of teaching should stay the same. Teacher quality is the critical factor affecting student achievement in the classroom (Boyce & Morton, 2023). Teacher quality also applies to diversity in the teaching force: Having teachers of color improves outcomes for all students, particularly children of color (Boyce & Morton, 2023). The recruitment and advancement of educational leaders starts with our local communities, which is a goal of the FEP. The diverse nature of students attending the FEA allows for culturally relevant discussion and opportunities to learn about other cultures.
In advocating for diversity in the teacher workforce, institutions of higher education must ensure that they are not meeting the CRSE competencies in name only, thereby creating inconsistent preparation induction. According to Boyce and Morton (2023), inconsistent preparation induction is a critical factor because “[u]nfortunately, in Pennsylvania, preparation and induction experiences can be of varying quality and consistency, sometimes lacking in exposure to rigorous subject area content, sufficient pre-service clinical experience, effective support from highly skilled and experienced mentor teachers, and alignment between educator preparation programs and districts” (p. 18). This creates a stressful work environment when students enter the teaching field; it causes some to not remain in the profession.
Teaching all students about the CRSE competencies staves off unattractive working conditions from a climate and culture perspective. When teachers from underrepresented groups work in a school or district where there are high numbers of teachers from white, middle class, female backgrounds, which is a statistical certainty, it is essential to have these colleagues understand how to be culturally relevant. When these colleagues are committed to teaching diversity, equity, and inclusion, they can create a more positive environment in which everyone can teach, especially the teachers from underrepresented groups.
Diversity indicates quality and should be viewed as a necessity in the education system. Educator diversity is a fundamental goal of FEP, specifically the Color of Teaching mentoring program. Having a teacher, principal, or counselor of the same race correlates to higher test scores for students of color, and they are more likely to reach graduation in addition to earning other academic and extracurricular achievements (Pennsylvania Educator Diversity
Consortium, 2023). However, it will be easier to diversify the educator workforce if barriers are removed from the Pennsylvania teacher preparation programs and certification process. Solutions include investments in pathways into teaching such as special education, STEM, and secondary instruction.
The worldwide teacher shortage is reaching a critical point. Of equal importance, there is a dire need for underrepresented teachers to join the teacher ranks. The disproportionate distribution of underrepresented male teachers within our classrooms is alarming. For Black students, “it’s crucial to have Black teachers to confide in, to lean on, and learn from” (Richard-Crave, 2024, para. 4). Therefore, there is a critical need for schools to find ways to turn the page regarding the abysmal representation of underrepresented teachers within our schools. This article shares some of the approaches and strategies currently in place at one university in central Pennsylvania. The authors hope that this will inspire others to try these or create their own ideas to help address these issues for the students in their area. By organizing CRSE training and summits for higher education faculty, pre-service and in-service teachers and implementing Future Education Pathway through five unique recruitment programs the authors contribute to creating an inclusive learning environment and increasing teacher diversity in the Lancaster County and surrounding region. They particularly hope to inspire other educators to create change in the PA education system.
Boateng, A. B., Casey, I. B., Klupe, J. C., Moorman, J. C., & Williams-Jackson, A. (2021). An education system built on the pillars of White supremacy and anti-Blackness: A collection of autoethnographic studies depicting how Black kids never had a chance. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Missouri-St. Louis]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. https://irl.umsl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2080&context=dissertation
Boyce, L., & Morton, A. (2023). PA needs teachers: Addressing Pennsylvania’s teacher shortage crisis through systemic solutions. NCEE & Teach Plus. https://teachplus.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/PNT_AddressingPennsylvaniasTeacherShortage CrisisThroughSystemicSolutions.pdf
Gist, C. D., White T., & Bianco M. (2018). Pushed to teach: Pedagogies and policies for a Black women educator pipeline. Education and Urban Society, 50(1), 56–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124517727584
Ingersoll, R., Merrill, E., Stuckey, D., Collins, G., Harrison, B. (2021). The demographic transformation of the teaching force in the United States. Education Sciences. 11(5), 234. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11050234
Irwin, V., NCES; Bailey, T. M., Panditharatna, R., & Sadeghi, A. S&P Global. (2024). Projections of education statistics to 2030. National Center for Educational Statistics https://nces.ed.gov/programs/PES/section-2.asp#:~:text=New%20Teacher% 20Hires-,Introduction,decline%20in%20pupil/teacher%20ratios.
Kay, M. (2018). Not light but fire: How to lead meaningful race conversations in the classroom. Stenhouse Publishers. Ladson-Billings, G. (2014). Culturally relevant pedagogy 2.0: A. K. A. the remix. Harvard Educational Review, 84(1), 74–84. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.84.1.p2rj131485484751
Lee, A., & Riordan, M. (2018, August 15). Equity and voice: How a sense of belonging promotes students’ agency. Education Week https://www.edweek.org/teaching-learning/opinion-equity-and-voice-how-a-sense-of-belongingpromotes-students-agency/2018/08
Nowicki, J. M. (2024). K-12 education: Nationally, Black girls receive more frequent and more severe discipline in school than other girls (GAO-24-106787). United States Government Accountability Office. https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-24-106787.pdf
Pennsylvania Department of Education. (2022). Culturally relevant and sustaining education (CRSE) program framework guidelines. https://www.education.pa.gov/Documents/Teachers-Administrators/Certification%20Preparation%20Programs/ Framework%20Guidelines%20and%20Rubrics/Culturally-Relevant%20and%20Sustaining%20Education%20Program% 20Framework%20Guidelines.pdf
Pennsylvania Educator Diversity Consortium (PEDC). (2023). Increasing educator diversity in PA. https://www.paeddiversity.org
Riser-Kositsky, M. (2024). Education statistics: Facts about American schools. Education Week https://www.edweek.org/ leadership/education-statistics-facts-about-american-schools/2019/01?utm_source=goog&utm_medium=cpc&utm_ campaign=ew+specific+content&ccid=ew+specific+content&ccag=education+statistics&cckw=education%20statistics &cccv=content+specific+ad&s_kwcid=AL!6416!3!394596142535!b!!g!!education%20statistics&gclid=Cj0KCQjwjryjBhD0ARIs AMLvnF_xq4xLNZ6RS6X9A2V5T11W1hSz_r9voT3N7hNUUb3cgInrw_1p25waAvUaEALw_wcB
Richard-Crave, M. (2024). There’s a black teacher shortage: Here’s why it matters. Forbes https://www.forbes.com/sites/mayarichard-craven/2024/07/03/theres-a-black-teacher-shortage-heres-why-it-matters Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2013). Toward a social psychology of assimilation: self-determination theory in cognitive. Self-regulation and autonomy: Social and Developmental Dimensions of Human Conduct, 40, 191.
Toshalis E. (2014). Grow your own teachers for urban education. In Milner H. R., Lomotey K. (Eds.), Handbook of urban education (pp. 217–238). Routledge.
UNESCO (2024). Global report on teachers: What you need to know. https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/global-report-teachers-what-you-need-know Will, M., & Najarro, I. (2022, April 18). What is culturally responsive teaching? Education Week https://www.edweek.org/ teaching-learning/culturally-responsive-teaching-culturally-responsive-pedagogy/2022/04#:~:text=A%20strong%20 knowledge%20base%20about,class%2C%20ethnicity%2C%20and%20gender
AILEEN HOWER , Ed.D., is an Associate Professor of Literacy at Millersville University of Pennsylvania, where she teaches undergraduate and graduate courses, the graduate coordinator for the M.Ed. in Language and Literacy with reading specialist and ESL certification pathways, and the coordinator of the Online Degree Completion Program in Early Childhood. She earned her Ed.D. in Reading and Language Arts with a Leadership emphasis from Widener University, an M.A.T. in English from The College of New Jersey, an M.A. in American Studies from the University of Wyoming, and a B.A. in English from Bloomsburg University of Pennsylvania.
DR. ABDULSALAMI IBRAHIM earned a Doctor of Education in Curriculum and Instruction from Indiana University of Pennsylvania, an M.Ed. in Educational Foundations (Sociology of Education), and a BSc. Science Education (Biology Education) from Usmanu Danfodiyo University Sokoto, Nigeria. He was a secondary school science teacher and a teacher educator in Nigeria, and was a teaching associate for two years in the Department of Professional Studies in Education at Indiana University of Pennsylvania. Currently, Dr. Ibrahim is an Assistant Professor of Education at Millersville University, where he teaches in the Department of Educational Foundations. Dr. Ibrahim’s background in teacher education stirred his research interest in technology integration, science education, multicultural instructional methods, culturally relevant and sustainable strategies, and mixed-method research.
MIRIAM MARGUERITA GOMEZ WITMER, Ph.D., is an Associate Professor of Educational Foundations at Millersville University of Pennsylvania. She teaches undergraduate and graduate education majors and supervises teaching interns. Presently, she serves on Millersville University President’s Commission on Cultural Diversity and Inclusion. She is also an advisor of the Color of Teaching mentoring program and coordinator of the Future Educator Pathway, as well as cofounder of the Social Justice Collective for Educators at Millersville University, a group of professionals who value identity, diversity, justice, and action and seek to provide a safe space for dialogue, learning, and change for each other. Her diversity work led her to participate in the Pennsylvania Educator Diversity Consortium’s Community of Practice, where she worked on implementing the Culturally Relevant and Sustaining Educator Competencies into teacher preparation courses. Her research interests range from establishing pathways for students of color to get to college, teacher diversity in education, and mentoring. Miriam earned a Ph.D. in Education from Temple University. She currently serves on the board of the International Mentoring Association and as a member of the PEDC Community of Practice.
By Karen E. Hinton-Polite and Bertha Saldana De Jesus
ABSTRACT
The concept of a sense of belonging is crucial to the academic experiences of many students, particularly underrepresented students in higher education. While institutions have tried to promote diversity, equity, and inclusion in the classroom, these initiatives often need reevaluation, as they can inadvertently exclude certain students. This exclusion can lead to feelings of alienation, unworthiness, and a diminished ability to connect with peers. This article shares the perspectives and experiences related to the sense of belonging of two doctoral students (one African American and one Latina) within a predominantly White institution (PWI). It is followed by recommendations on how faculty can foster an equitable learning environment and use mentoring to support equity and inclusion, as well as how students can advocate for such an environment..
A sense of belonging is viewed as the social support students perceive on campus and through online educational platforms. This feeling encompasses connectedness, being valued, and experiencing care, acceptance, respect, and recognition within the campus community from faculty and peers (University of Wisconsin-Madison, n.d.). Peacock et al. (2020) clarify that a sense of belonging is “more than perceived liking or warmth; it also involves support and respect for personal autonomy for the students as individuals” (p. 20). This clarification of a sense of belonging fits how we anticipated we would belong in our doctoral program. Instead, we often found ourselves alienated, leaving us with a diminished sense of belonging. Moreover, Dost and Mazzoli-Smith (2023) expressed our unspoken thoughts about belonging: “[Although] . . . belonging is significant to all students, there are reasons to believe that stigmatized racial and ethnic groups may have substantial concerns about belonging at a university due to their social identities, which make them vulnerable to stereotypes and social identity threat or the fear that one’s social group will be negatively viewed” (p. 845). More specifically, these authors confirmed our experience during the first residency weekend and throughout most of our doctoral journey at a PWI.
This article examines the experiences and challenges of two doctoral students regarding their sense of belonging at their university: an African American woman working as a human service educator and a Latina social work practitioner. While their experiences shared some similarities, they also revealed distinct aspects unique to each student. Ultimately, both students cultivated a strong sense of belonging, persevered through graduation, and now serve as mentors and “other mothers” to underrepresented students following in their footsteps.
Excited to embark on the doctoral journey, we approached the intensive residency weekend enthusiastically, yet somewhat apprehensive about what lay ahead. Upon attending the first day, when we met our cohort members, we quickly noticed the limited diversity among us, as few of our peers resembled us. Although the setting was designed to welcome doctoral students and offer the opportunity to network, we could not shake the sense that we did not fit in or belong, as we were two of six students of color in a cohort of 20 students, or 30% of students in the room at a PWI. This percentage differs significantly from the national average of 59% diverse students reported by the Council for Standards in Social Work (2024). Moreover, Kane (2019) defines PWI as “colleges or universities where 50% or more of the overall student population is White” (p.18). This definition confirms our experience of limited student diversity, the impact of which positions minority students at PWIs to feel isolated and alienated by default of their minority status in a majority-White learning space. In short, the lack of diversity within the doctoral learning environments at this PWI impacted our experience as minority students. Research further shows that not only are minority students impacted by the lack of diversity in the learning environment, but White students are also negatively affected because they miss out on the richness of diverse backgrounds, perspectives, and experiences that minority students add to the learning environment when they feel freer to share with their White peers (Boatright et al., 2023; Kane, 2019; Yuan, 2017).
During the first residency weekend, we likened ourselves to “fish out of water,” struggling to find footing and connect with those around us. One of us vividly recalls when she had the opportunity to engage with peers and professors around the dining table. As the conversations flowed, she quickly observed that many of her peers
belonged to relatively homogeneous groups, allowing them to bond over shared backgrounds and experiences. These individuals often celebrated their individual and collective achievements, displaying what she called “war badges.” These badges symbolized their professional journeys and milestones, representing high-ranking positions within their organizations, significant community involvement, and prestigious board roles, leaving her feeling out of place. The absence of shared experiences hindered her ability to relate to the conversations and created an unintentional barrier to open dialogue, amplifying her feelings of exclusion. Comparing herself to her peers further alienated her from her White peers. Pore (2024) notes, “The fear of not belonging increases when first-year doctoral students compare themselves to their peers. This comparison can lead to internalized doubts about belonging and quietly questioning one’s admission to the doctoral program as a ‘fluke’” (pp. 42–43).
Despite our genuine enthusiasm to contribute and share our insights, we often felt overlooked and unheard by our White peers, which left us grappling with isolation and minimal support within the academic environment. For example, there were times when we participated in small group and classroom discussions and felt our responses were minimally acknowledged or ignored. These interactions increased our feelings of isolation, which exacerbated an already diminished sense of belonging. Research shows that students of color who feel ignored or disregarded by White peers tend to feel a diminished sense of belonging and will further isolate themselves, which further diminishes their sense of belonging (Cropps, 2018; Juarez, 2023; Museus et al., 2018; Rost & Krahenbuhl, 2023).
As the residency weekend continued, one of us continued to encounter silence in the classroom in response to her contributions, making her feel that her input was neither valued nor acknowledged. This lack of interaction left her feeling isolated as if her thoughts and perspectives did not resonate with those around her. This sense of exclusion prompted her to adopt a strategy of emotional and physical distance, which she viewed as a necessary means of protecting her well-being. She believed she could better understand the discussions’ social and academic dynamics by stepping back from active engagement. Doing so gave her a sense of control and security in an unpredictable and overwhelming environment. She thought that maintaining this distance would allow her to observe the interactions among her peers more closely, enabling her to absorb information without the risks associated with direct participation, which often felt intimidating. However, this stance unintentionally led to her withdrawal from conversations. This disconnect essentially went unnoticed by her peers, as they made no attempts to connect with her, which perpetuated alienation. Unfortunately, it became evident that many of our White peers tended to interact predominantly with others who shared similar backgrounds and experiences. This tendency limited the richness of diverse voices and discussions in the learning environment. It contributed to isolation among those seeking to foster deeper connections across racial and cultural lines.
Research indicates that the lack of deep engagement between White and minority students in doctoral programs can lead to alienation and diminish the sense of belonging, particularly in online learning environments (Dortch, 2024; Rost et al., 2020; Naidoo et al., 2023). This research provides valuable insights into the challenges faced by minority students in online doctoral programs. It underscores the importance of fostering genuine engagement and support to enhance their sense of belonging. Moreover, the research concludes that increasing minority students’ sense of belonging and reducing feelings of alienation at PWIs involves not only promoting stronger engagement with minority students but also providing faculty with training to enhance diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) pedagogy and create a more welcoming learning environment (Dortch, 2024; Rost et al., 2020; Naidoo et al., 2023).
In further exploration, we noted that all the professors in the program were part of a homogeneous group, except for one Latina professor; meanwhile, the Council of Social Work Education (2024) reports that “the majority of full-time faculty in Social Work programs are White (59.1%), while 38% are American Indian/Alaska Native (1.2%), Hispanic/ Latinx (8.3%), Asian (7.8%), Black/African American (19.5%), two or more races (1.4%), and Unknown (2.4%)” (p. 46). This data supports the need for this program to increase the diverse representation of faculty to better reflect the national data provided by CSWE. Moreover, this lack of diversity further challenged our sense of belonging, as none of our professors resembled us, creating a visually inequitable learning environment.
There were also times when we felt our professors treated us differently than our White peers. These interactions impacted our self-esteem, leaving us feeling left out and consequently impacted our fitting in and sense of belonging in the learning environment. Research demonstrates that the implicit bias by White faculty who treat minority students differently than nonminority students can alienate minority students and impact students’ sense of belonging (Costa et al., 2021; Hussain et al., 2021; Beltran et al., n.d.). Felder et al. (2011) further explain the need for nonminority faculty and PWIs to understand better the experiences of graduate students from various cultural backgrounds and how this understanding can reduce alienation, increase the sense of belonging, and increase retention. In one of our cases, nonminority faculty needed to understand Latino values of respect for faculty or those in authority. Pina-Frodsham (2023) shares a “cultural script of Respecto, or respect, which is a critical concept in Latino culture, emphasizing the importance of showing deference to authority and demonstrating humility.” Speaking up and sharing an unpopular opinion or differing with a leader can be difficult. This is especially true if one has been taught that “respecting your elders or respecting your boss [those in authority] means that you are compliant, grateful and doing what they say” (paras. 7 & 8).
By the end of the weekend residency, a heavy dread loomed over us. The classroom environment felt suffocating, and instead of engaging in meaningful learning, we felt like we were merely occupying space without making any fundamental contributions. As the day wore on, one of us was hit by a wave of imposter syndrome as she compared herself to others, deepening feelings of isolation and finding it hard to shake the nagging feeling that she did not belong in this academic environment. Mednard and Chittle (2022) define the features of the imposter phenomenon as follows: “(1) the belief that, despite objective evidence of success, one is not … intelligent but rather has fooled others;
(2) the belief that one’s success may be due to errors in evaluation or external factors (e.g., luck, knowing the right people); and (3) a fear of being discovered, judged and outed as a fraud” (p. 2). These features of imposter syndrome can further diminish students sense of belonging.
Research shows that the impact of underrepresentation of minority students at PWIs causes social and cultural isolation, lack of representation and role models, and challenges in forming peer relationships, all of which can contribute to a limited sense of belonging (Hussain, 2019; Miller et al., 2020). This research provides important insights into the challenges minority students face in PWIs and the importance of creating inclusive learning environments to decrease isolation and alienation and enhance a sense of belonging.
As we entered the program, we quickly noticed limitations in the representation of diversity in language, policies, tasks, textbooks, and required reading assignments as outlined in the syllabi. More specifically, the textbooks for our courses did not include diverse authors. Although there were single chapters in some of our textbooks that included discussions about DEI, there were limited discussions about DEI as related to the content within our courses. These limitations within the curriculum made it a challenge for us to identify with the contents of the course, as we did not see ourselves reflected in the curriculum. These limits in inclusive curriculum served to create a further sense of alienation. The scholarly literature describes the importance of discussions about DEI in the curriculum and how its presence fosters an inclusive learning environment, engaging students of color more by reducing alienation and ultimately cultivating a greater sense of belonging (Iweuno et al., 2024; Lewis E., 2022; Myrie, 2024; Roland et al., 2023). The limits of diversity in the curriculum made us feel out of place as we attended classes and navigated discussions utilizing a curriculum that did not include our voice. Although the diminished sense of belonging lingered, we persisted because quitting was not an option.
By the end of our first year in the doctoral program, we faced a sobering realization: The level of support we had initially anticipated from the institution would not be as forthcoming as we had hoped. This lack of institutional backing was particularly challenging as we found ourselves navigating the complexities of our coursework and the demands of our respective dissertations.
During the final semester of our second year in the program, one of us encountered significant writing challenges that tested her abilities, resolve, and perseverance. Although she spoke English fluently, it was her second language, and she held her first language, Spanish, close to her heart. One particularly impactful moment occurred when one of our professors bluntly told her, “I do not know how you will succeed with your current writing skills; it is not scholarly.” This harsh assessment shook her confidence and left her feeling vulnerable. Another professor went further, suggesting that she hire an “editor” if she hoped to complete the program successfully. These comments made her feel increasingly isolated and solidified her belief that she did not belong in this academic environment and would never be able to finish the program. Hiring an editor was far from feasible for her due to financial constraints. Witnessing one of us struggle under such harsh feedback was profoundly discouraging. Despite the criticism, she found solace in believing she would prevail through prayer and self-advocacy. To bolster her confidence and skills, she requested independent study courses to expand her knowledge of theoretical frameworks, which also challenged her writing skills.
In contrast, the other student, who was an educator, felt more confident in her writing abilities. She recognized that she needed to dedicate extra time and effort to her assignments and edit her papers before submission. She utilized Grammarly and secured an editor during the dissertation phase of the program. Lewis et al. (2024) identify key research findings about the need for institutions to provide academic support for multilingual writers in doctoral programs: “(a) early recognition of the writing needs of language diverse students; (b) consistency in feedback for content and writing across learning team members; (c) creating opportunities for multicultural communities and connectedness in the learning environment; (d) education of faculty members and academic support teams regarding multilingual student needs and strengths; and (e) learner support including individualized tutoring or online meetings led by someone well versed on translation difficulties” (p. 49). Additional research describes traditional and nontraditional academic support institutions can provide to support doctoral student success (Fernandez, 2024; Dukes, 2024; Thakore-Dunlap, 2023; Jonathans et al., 2024). In summary, adequate academic resources are essential in fostering a sense of belonging for underrepresented students in PWIs. Having academic resources to bolster students’ academic writing skills is crucial at all programming levels (undergraduate and graduate programs).
Regarding mentoring, there was no formalized mentoring program in our doctoral program, and informal mentoring by faculty was not evident. The key challenges minority students face regarding mentoring include a lack of representation, in that minority students often find few relatable role models and face significant barriers in accessing mentoring relationships compared to their White peers due to this lack of representation (Welkey, 2018). Another challenge in mentoring minority students is that they often experience cultural misunderstandings and microaggressions that can create an unwelcoming environment. Also, bias and stereotyping by nonminority faculty can impact faculty members’ ability to provide equitable support to minority students. For example, suppose a White faculty member holds a bias or stereotype about a minority student. In that case, the faculty member might provide less access to opportunities, making it challenging for the minority student to thrive (Villarreal & Campbell, 2023). Lastly, minorities face an “invisible workload” of being expected to educate others about their culture and experiences. This additional burden, coupled with the demanding nature of doctoral work, can be overwhelming without adequate mentorship to navigate these challenges (Villarreal & Campbell, 2023). Improved mentorship at PWIs can create a more equitable and supportive environment for minority students, ultimately enhancing their academic and professional journeys.
In addition to the support we offered to each other, we uncovered various effective solutions that significantly contributed to our academic and personal success and strategies to create a diverse, equitable, and inclusive learning environment. These strategies foster a sense of belonging for all students, ensuring they have the support and resources necessary to thrive as they pursue their educational goals. A multifaceted approach to enhancing diversity, equity, and inclusion within doctoral programs can profoundly enrich the learning experience for all students and pave the way for meaningful progress toward inclusivity. By providing diverse representation among faculty and students, creating inclusive curriculums and pedagogy, and providing academic support and mentoring, doctoral programs can build a more just and equitable educational environment where all students can thrive.
More diversity and inclusion among faculty and students. Research demonstrates the significant impact of minority professors on minority students’ sense of belonging in higher-education institutions (Martinez et al., 2020; Smith et al., 2021; Williams et al., 2022). Collectively, these studies highlight the role of faculty of color in enhancing students’ sense of belonging, reducing feelings of isolation, and improving academic performance. Furthermore, research indicates that White instructors can negatively affect minority students’ sense of belonging through microaggressions, discrimination, bias, lack of cultural competence, insufficient support and mentorship, and implicit bias in academic interactions (Chesler, 1996; Henderson, 2019; Hu et al., 2024; Ju et al., 2020; Kaler-Jones et al., 2022; Kavanaugh, 2019; Vaccaro et al., 2019). Enhancing faculty diversity must be a priority and a crucial step in fulfilling a university’s commitment to fostering a sense of belonging for all students. In efforts to create a genuinely inclusive academic environment, it is imperative that PWI actively increase the representation of faculty from diverse backgrounds. This enhancement will give all students a richer and more varied learning experience, allowing them to engage with various perspectives and ideas. By prioritizing hiring faculty of color, higher education institutions can significantly diversify faculty membership, which is vital for fostering an environment where students can see themselves represented by their teachers and role models. This representation is key to helping students feel valued and understood, which can profoundly impact their academic success and sense of belonging within the learning community. To effectively recruit and retain this talented population, it is necessary to rethink hiring processes by creating programs that would allow hiring candidates and offering them hands-on teaching experience. This involves the following:
1. Creating unique hiring practices that specifically address the challenges faced by underrepresented groups.
2. Providing a teaching program allows candidates to gain experience to enhance their teaching pedagogy and support their professional development and scholarly endeavors.
3. Establishing robust mentoring programs to help faculty grow academically and professionally, providing guidance and support as they navigate their academic careers.
By prioritizing and implementing a strategic initiative focused on faculty diversity, PWIs can ensure that their educational programs align with the workforce’s evolving needs. This commitment will produce graduates who are not only well-rounded and competent in their disciplines knowledge but are also ready to thrive in a diverse and interconnected world (Baker et al., 2023; Kane, 2019; Rayford, 2023).
Regarding diversity enhancement among students, residency weekends would benefit from organized, diverse networking sessions, which can significantly improve the atmosphere. Such events could foster inclusivity and support, allowing students from various backgrounds to share their stories, celebrate each other’s differences, and cultivate a sense of community. Rossmann (2023) confirms that facilitating networking sessions where students can engage meaningfully would enable everyone to benefit from richer dialogues and strengthen connections, ultimately promoting a more collaborative and inclusive environment and enhancing all students’ overall sense of belonging. These experiences underscore the need for diversity and inclusion while networking within academic settings. Museus et al. (2018) describe the importance of culturally engaging campus environments, including academic spaces where students can engage in communications relevant to their cultural communities. In hindsight, during the residency weekend, it was evident that our cohort overlooked valuable opportunities to take emotional risks by openly sharing our fears and anxieties about returning to an academic environment after being out of school for years. Engaging in conversations about our experiences and feelings might have fostered a stronger sense of community and support.
Additionally, the program could have benefited significantly from incorporating an early icebreaker activity to enhance participants’ sense of belonging. Such an activity would have provided a platform for individuals to express their thoughts and concerns about embarking on this doctoral journey, helping to break down barriers and facilitate deeper conversations from the outset. We could have created a more connected and supportive learning environment by encouraging authentic dialogue.
Further research about the importance of student diversity summarizes how all students can benefit and how White students specifically benefit (Chin et al., 2018; Fine et al., 2025; Juvonen et al., 2025). For example, when White students are in diverse academic settings, they exhibit reduced racial prejudice, are more open to different cultural perspectives, and learn to engage with a broader range of ideas, reducing potential biases. Additional benefits include enhanced critical thinking from discussing multiple perspectives and previously unexplored alternatives and increased problem-solving and analytical skills (Chin et al., 2018; Fine et al., 2025). A final way White students benefit from a diverse learning environment is preparation for a diverse workforce. We live in an increasingly globalized world, and a diverse workforce is necessary and often essential to a more innovative and productive workforce. Active engagement in a diverse learning environment during a White student’s academic years prepares them for real-world employment settings (Juvonen et al., 2025).
More Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Curriculum and Pedagogy. Research supports the importance of including DEI content in textbooks and integrating materials by diverse authors, which cultivate inclusive pedagogy, creating a more welcoming learning experience for all students, particularly those from diverse backgrounds. Furthermore, when instructors integrate current DEI pedagogy into their teaching practices, they are better equipped to support and challenge all learners to think more critically about the application of DEI knowledge in discussions and assignments (Brock et al., 2020; Cora Learning, 2020; Nelson, 2005). The research concludes that when faculty apply DEI pedagogy in the learning environment, students of color experience a greater sense of belonging and are more apt to engage in the learning experience, which brings a diverse perspective to the learning environment and consequently benefits all faculty and students (Cora Learning, 2020; Nelson, 2005).
Through various effective strategies, instructors can enhance their teaching by better integrating diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) concepts into their pedagogy. One approach is to explicitly discuss how DEI principles apply to the specific content covered in each chapter of the course, allowing students to see the relevance of these concepts in real-world contexts. Discrepancies between concrete DEI curriculum and pedagogy versus what is required and discussed in the learning environment illustrate the need for DEI to move from a discussion about the importance of DEI to the practice of DEI in the learning environment. The research is replete with discussions about the responsibility of faculty members to commit to ongoing DEI pedagogy, as it significantly influences doctoral students’ academic and social experiences (Hall, 2022; Fuentes, 2021). Moreover, the research discusses the importance of the practice of DEI beyond mentioning DEI in the syllabus to enrich scholarly discourse and innovation. In practice, DEI in the learning environment can address systemic inequities and provide equitable opportunities for all students (Hall, 2022; Fuentes, 2021). The research concludes that addressing discrepancies between DEI in theory within the syllabi and the application of DEI in the learning environment will encourage collaboration among diverse students, aiming to reduce alienation and increase a sense of belonging in the learning environment. Another valuable method is to design assignments that challenge learners to assess the importance of DEI in their practice area critically. This could involve case studies, reflection essays, or group projects that require students to analyze and propose solutions to issues related to DEI. By employing these strategies, instructors can create a more inclusive learning experience that emphasizes the significance of DEI in both academic and professional settings. Additionally, creating opportunities for both large and small group discussions in the classroom can foster an inclusive environment where students feel comfortable sharing their perspectives and engaging with the ideas of their peers. Instructors might also consider utilizing online discussion boards, where students can reflect on and discuss DEI topics outside of class, encouraging thoughtful dialogue.
Instructors can also enhance their teaching by developing and implementing a more inclusive curriculum that integrates contemporary scholarship from various authors from diverse backgrounds and perspectives. This enriched curriculum will broaden the scope of knowledge available to all learners and cultivate essential skills necessary in today’s dynamic learning environments. Also, integrating multiple viewpoints and experiences creates an educational atmosphere where learners from underrepresented groups feel valued and empowered. This empowerment is crucial, as it encourages these individuals to embrace their roles as change agents within their communities and beyond, ultimately fostering a more equitable and just society. Moreover, instructors must expand their pedagogy to include professional development training, focusing on current DEI concepts. These training sessions must enhance educators’ knowledge of inclusive teaching strategies beyond what they already know to help create safe and supportive environments for all students (Allen et al., 2024; Foste, 2019; Naidoo et al., 2023; Rossman, 2023). In addition, nonminoritized faculty are challenged to consider the practice of cultural humility, where they commit to lifelong self-evaluation and critique to redress power imbalances and develop mutually beneficial and nonpaternalistic partnerships with the communities they serve (Gottlieb, 2020; Harindranathan et al., 2021; Lekas et al., 2020). Finally, faculty can consider reflective writing activities as a tool for themselves to increase awareness, as well as use this tool with learners to reduce isolation and stress and improve critical thinking and problem-solving (Tullet et al., 2024; Zarestky et al., 2022; Zhai et al., 2023).
Booker et al. (2018) describe the importance for instructors to intentionally use inclusive language and practices to help establish a sense of belonging among students from diverse backgrounds. This involves acknowledging and valuing diverse perspectives and encouraging student engagement and participation. Hussain et al. (2021) describe how the language instructors use can either affirm students’ identities or contribute to their alienation. For example, using culturally responsive language and examples in teaching materials can make students feel seen and respected. Conversely, language that ignores certain groups can lead to a feeling of exclusion. Dawson et al. (2022) posit that instructors who incorporate students’ cultural references in teaching enhance learning experiences and foster inclusion. This approach also validates students’ identities and promotes a sense of belonging. The language instructors’ use is vital in shaping students’ educational experiences. By adopting inclusive language and practices, instructors increase students’ sense of belonging and reduce alienation, prompting a more equitable and effective learning environment.
More Academic Support and Mentoring. Minority doctoral students at PWIs face unique challenges that can hinder their academic progress. PWIs are charged with providing academic support tailored to the needs of minority students that enhances their academic skills, professional development, and personal well-being. Effective academic support systems promote diversity, equity, and inclusion, ensuring that minority students have equal opportunities to succeed. Such initiatives improve retention, increase diversity in academic spaces, and ensure that the voices of underrepresented groups contribute to the academic discourse (Gasman et al., 2021). Enhanced academic support includes workshops tailored to minority students’ needs, one-on-one tutoring sessions, editorial resources, and materials designed to address graduate scholars’ unique writing challenges. By investing in these initiatives, PWIs can
effectively support students in developing their academic writing skills, improving their confidence, and ultimately fostering their success in graduate programs. This comprehensive approach can equip students to tackle their writing assignments, conduct thorough research, and effectively communicate their ideas (Mantai, 2019). Other specific types of academic support that could help minority students succeed include writing centers that are equipped to support the higher-level writing needs of doctoral students; peer writing groups where students can share their work, receive feedback, and improve their writing skills; dissertation boot camps where students are offered guidance from faculty and writing experts as well as the provision of a structured environment to promote productivity; providing research assistantships, which provide hands-on research experience under the guidance of faculty mentors; and, lastly, support for publishing in academic journals via skill-building workshops and connection to professional organizations that support minority students in disseminating their research findings (McCoy, 2014; Lord & Vracar, 2018; Torres Acosta et al., 2023).
While facing our program’s lack of academic support, we decided to cultivate our support network actively. We recognized the importance of creating a nurturing environment for ourselves, so we set aside dedicated time each week to meet and discuss our academic responsibilities. We chose a cozy corner of the lobby where we taught as adjunct faculty members, transforming this informal setting into a welcoming space for genuine dialogue. During these meetings, we not only tackled our academic assignments—sharing insights, brainstorming ideas, and providing constructive feedback—but we also took the time to explore our emotional experiences. We discussed the feelings of isolation and alienation many doctoral students encounter, allowing us to express vulnerabilities, share personal stories, and affirm each other’s struggles. These heartfelt discussions began to foster a sense of camaraderie and empowerment between us. As we supported one another, our confidence grew, and we felt increasingly determined to persevere through the rigorous demands of our respective research projects. Over time, this commitment strengthened our resolve, and we began to envision our future with optimism, looking forward to the day we would walk across the graduation stage, knowing we had overcome significant challenges together.
In addition to academic support, mentoring is pivotal for the success of minority doctoral students. Effective mentoring relationships provide guidance, support, and resources that help students navigate the challenges of postgraduate programs and prepare for their future careers (McNeil & Moore, 2020). Traditional mentoring programs pair students with faculty mentors who understand minority students’ unique experiences. Cross-cultural and same-culture mentoring can help students navigate the academic environment and establish professional networks (Barker, 2016). The benefits of formal mentoring include academic success, as mentors provide guidance on research, coursework, and dissertation writing, which enhances students’ academic performance. Moreover, mentors offer valuable career advice, helping students expand their professional networks and navigate the job market (McNeil & Moore, 2020; Barker, 2016). McNeil and Moore (2020) emphasize that mentoring bridges the gap between doctoral education and professional careers, preparing minority students for academic and nonacademic roles. Villarreal and Campbell (2023) describe how mentoring relationships and mentoring programs help minority students manage stress, build resilience, and enhance well-being, reducing feelings of isolation and fostering a sense of belonging.
As we advanced in our academic careers, we actively sought out three accomplished women of color who had successfully earned their doctorate degrees and had extensive backgrounds in both secondary and postsecondary education. Recognizing the challenges we faced, we turned to these extraordinary women for mentorship and guidance. These inspiring mentors were instrumental in providing us with informal tutoring and support, which
proved invaluable as we navigated the often daunting and overwhelming academic landscape of a PWI. Their presence was not just comforting; it was a beacon of hope in a space where we sometimes felt out of place.
They took the time to share their personal stories and professional journeys, which helped validate our feelings of alienation and isolation. By discussing their experiences, they illuminated the struggles and triumphs of their academic paths, allowing us to see that we were not alone in our challenges. Through their encouragement, we found the strength to overcome our self-doubt and tackle imposter syndrome. They provided us with constructive feedback on our work and served as a sounding board for our ideas and concerns. Their belief in our potential inspired us to persist and strive for success, even in the face of adversity. Pore (2024) emphasizes the importance of peer and faculty interactions in enhancing the sense of belonging. Importantly, this study highlighted how students often sought support beyond the confines of their institutions. Holloway-Friesen (2021) found that Hispanic students with mentors during their graduate experience reported an enhanced sense of belonging and higher academic self-efficacy than their peers who were not mentored. In addition, Rinfret et al. (2023) discuss the importance of the mentor/faculty member’s race or gender because it does affect the mentorship a person receives—formal or informal. This research affirms that mentorship is important in helping students secure their sense of belonging and supporting them to degree completion.
In reflecting on our experience with these women of color as our informal mentors, we realized they embodied the “other mothering” concept in the academy. This dynamic, often observed between African American teachers and their African American students, transcends traditional definitions of mentorship. Other mothering involves a holistic approach to support grounded in sharing oneself, fostering an interactive and collective relationship, and forging a spiritual connection that reflects the cultural values of sharing, caring, and accountability. Other mothering often manifests as informal advisement, encompassing academic guidance and personal support. Other mothers can act as an informal support group where faculty members generously pass on their knowledge and experiences to facilitate success (Bernard et al., 2013). Insoon and Onchwari (2018) underscore the significance of culturally responsive mentoring, proposing a mosaic model that integrates various mentoring frameworks while incorporating culturally responsive elements. Their research posits that culturally responsive mentoring should provide a safe space for individuals to share their stories and explore their identities. This approach emphasizes the importance of guidance from peers and elders, focusing on members’ strengths rather than limitations or risk factors. It seeks to address the whole person—psychological, social, and professional—by creating opportunities for community involvement in designing, implementing, and evaluating the mentoring program. Furthermore, the research outlines additional specifics that contribute to the success of a culturally responsive mentoring program, highlighting its comprehensive nature and the communal support it fosters (Insoon & Onchwari, 2018).
When considering the importance of academic resources and mentoring programs for academic success, we realize how the types of resources and mentoring identified and discussed in this article would have provided invaluable support for us, allowing us to build confidence and increase our sense of belonging much quicker. However, through our collective efforts, we navigated the challenges we faced, strengthened our resolve, and achieved our educational objectives. In the process, we proactively addressed our unique learning needs and enhanced our learning experience. Lastly, it is vital for students of color to be proactive in identifying and pursuing their academic needs and to actively seek out mentors who will support them as they fill educational gaps to persist in meeting their goal of graduating. Meanwhile, doctoral programs at PWIs must focus on enhancing academic support services and mentoring programs to enhance a sense of belonging and to support minority doctoral students in completing their degrees to launch successful careers.
While our experiences were similar yet different during our doctoral education at a PWI, our bond and resilience strengthened as we navigated the obstacles and barriers together. Moreover, we refused to let demotivation hold us back. Instead, we channeled our determination and tackled these challenges with grit and grace. We took proactive steps to enhance our skills by enrolling in independent study courses focused on topics related to our dissertations. Also, we sought mentorship from experienced faculty members of color in and outside the university, who inspired us and provided invaluable guidance and constructive feedback. We hired an affordable editor and used other available writing support. All these actions fostered our sense of belonging, bolstering our confidence to persist in graduating with a Doctor of Social Work from a PWI!
As a call to action, doctoral programs in PWI must address the lack of diversity among faculty and students, the lack of inclusivity in curriculum and pedagogy, and the lack of academic support and mentoring for students. The need for a more active pursuit of diversity, equity, and inclusion within doctoral programs is overdue. Administrators and faculty have an ethical imperative to cultivate a learning environment that genuinely reflects the diverse society it serves. One cannot overstate the positive effects of diverse faculty and students, inclusive curriculum and pedagogy, and robust academic support in cultivating transformative doctoral education. By committing to these goals, doctoral programs can take critical steps in laying the groundwork for a more equitable future in higher education and beyond. We owe it to our profession, our students, and to the greater community we serve to build a legacy of inclusion and to fulfill the ethics of equity, which are the heart of professional practice.
The profound implications in academia include the need for improved representation of faculty and students of color, as well as role models and mentorship by faculty of color who have navigated similar challenges at PWIs. To improve student engagement and learning outcomes, it is important to cultivate an inclusive curriculum that reflects and respects all students’ experiences and adopt teaching methods that are culturally responsive and inclusive.
Moreover, creating culturally responsive pedagogy can help create a learning environment where all students feel valued and supported. In addition, it is vital for programs to periodically review and update curricula to address emerging DEI issues, ensuring that programs remain relevant and responsive to the changing needs of the field. Implications for additional support include providing academic support services tailored to the unique needs of minority students to help address barriers to success. These services could include mentoring, tutoring, writing assistance, and mental-health support. Lastly, creating a supportive and inclusive learning environment where students of color feel safe to express their identities and experiences is more crucial now than ever before. (Chin et al., 2018; Dewidar et al., 2022; University of Cincinnati Online, 2025; Yeshiva University, 2023).
Addy, D. D., Mitchell, K. A., & SoRelle, M. E. (2021). What inclusive instructors do: Principles and practices for excellence in college teaching. Sterling, VA. Stylist Publishing, LLC.
Allen K. A., Kern M. L., Rozek, C. S., McInerney, D., & Slavich, G. M. (2021). Belonging: A review of conceptual issues, an integrative framework, and directions for future research. Australian Journal of Psychology, 73(1), 87–102.
Allen, K., Slaten, C., Hong, S., Lan, M., Craig, H., May, F., & Counted, V. (2024). Belonging in higher education: A twenty-year systematic review. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 21(5), 1–55.
Baker, F., Harris, L., Langford, J., & Salina, M. (2023). Becoming the reflection: Exploring the experiences and sense of belonging of black women graduate students at Indiana University–Bloomington. Journal of the Student Personnel Association at Indiana University, 56–73.
Barker, M. (2016). Mentoring and retention of minority students in STEM: A review of the literature. Journal of Studies in Higher Education, 41(6), 1204–1224.
Beltran, J., & Buskirk-Cohen, A. (n.d.). How Experiences of Racism Impact Sense of Belonging & Imposter Syndrome in College Students. https://delval.edu/sites/default/files/2022-12/How%20Experiences%20of%20Racism%20Impact% 20Sense%20of%20Belonging.pdf
Bernard, W. T., Issari, S., Moriah, J., Njiwaji, M., Obgan, P., & Tolliver, A. (2013). Othermothering in the academy: Using maternal advocacy for institutional change. Journal of the Motherhood Initiative for Research and Community Involvement, 3(2), 103–120.
Boatright, D., London, M., & Soriano, A. (2023). Strategies and best practices to improve diversity, equity and inclusion among US graduate medical education programs. JAMA Network Open, 6(2)1–11. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2801104
Booker, K., & Campbell-Whatley, G. (2018). How faculty create learning environments for diversity and inclusion. InSight: A Journal of Scholarly Teaching, 13, 14–27.
Brock, C., Sanchez, N., & Sharpe, D. L. (2019). Pen as a bridge: Instructor perspectives on incorporating diversity and inclusion in writing intensive courses. Teaching in Higher Education, 25(8), 992–1009. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2019.1628733
Chesler, M. A. (1996). Perceptions of faculty behaviors by students of color. The Center for Research on Learning and Teaching. The University of Michigan. https://crlt.umich.edu/sites/default/files/resource_files/CRLT_no7.pdf
Chin, M., Hawkins, J., Krings, A., Peguero-Spencer, C., & Gutiérrez, L. (2018). Investigating diversity in social work doctoral education in the United States. Journal of Social Work Education, 54(4), 762–775. https://ecommons.luc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1130&context=socialwork_facpubs
Cora Learning (2020). Employing equity-minded & culturally-affirming teaching practices in virtual learning communities. https://coralearning.org/webinars/. Retrieved December 12, 2022, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aMrf_MC5COk Costa, S., Langher, V., & Pirchio, S. (2021). Teachers’ implicit attitudes toward ethnic minority students: A systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 1–12.
Cropps, T. (2018, May 1). Predominantly White institutions, Black women grad students and a sense of belonging. Diverse Issues in Higher Education https://www.diverseeducation.com/students/article/15102425/predominantly-whiteinstitutions-black-women-grad-students-and-a-sense-of-belonging
Crumb, L., Cartwright, A. D., Hammonds, D. S., & Harris, J. A. (2023). Code-switching 101: Black women counselor educators’ personal and professional identity development. Counselor Education and Supervision, 62, 233–247. https://doi.org/10.1002/ceas.12274
Dawnson, B., Kilgore, W., Rawcliffe, R. (2022). Strategies for creating inclusive learning environments through a social justice lens. Journal of Educational Research & Practice, 12 (0), 3–27. DOI: 10.5590/JERAP.2022.12.0
Dewilder, O., Elmestrekawy, N., Welch, V. (2022). Improving equity, diversity and inclusion in academia. Research Integrity and Peer Review, 7(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-022-00123-z
Dias-Broens, A., Meeuwisse, M., & Severiens, S. (2024). The definition and measurement of sense of belonging in higher education: A systematic literature review with a special focus on students’ ethnicity and generation status in higher education. Educational Research Review, 45, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2024.100622
Dortch, D. (2024, October 3). Black taxes: African American doctoral students experiencing tokenism at predominantly White institutions. GW Today. https://gwtoday.gwu.edu/gw-professors-research-shows-challenges-black-doctoralstudents-predominantly-white-institutions
Dortch, D., & Chen, Q. (2024). In the midst of the collective: The experience and influence of African American peer groups in graduate school at predominantly White institutions. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 0(0), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/15210251241279910
Dost, G., & Mazzoli-Smith, L. (2023). Understanding higher education students’ sense of belonging: A qualitative metaethnographic analysis. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 47(6), 822–849. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 0309877X.2023.2191176
Dukes, D. (2024). To be heard and seen: Students of color call for a sense of belonging and support in higher education. [Thesis, Merrimack College].
Felder, P., & Castillo, M. (2011). A commentary about the Black and Latino doctoral experience in the United States. Academic Leadership: Online Journal, 9(3), 1–7.
Fernandez, R. (2024, January 5). Retaining students of color in grad school. Inside Higher Ed. https://www.insidehighered.com/ opinion/career-advice/2024/01/05/advice-retaining-graduate-students-color-academe-opinion.
Fine E., & Handlesman, J. (2025). Benefits and challenges of diversity in academic settings. University of California Davis. https://diversity.ucdavis.edu/sites/g/files/dgvnsk731/files/inline-files/Fine%20and%20Handelsman%2C%20Benefits% 20and%20Challenges%20of%20Diversity.pdf
Foste, Z. (2019). Reproducing whiteness: How White students justify the campus racial status quo. Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice, 56(3), 241–253.
Fuentes, M. A., Zelaya, D. G., & Madsen, J. W. (2021). Rethinking the course syllabus: Considerations for promoting equity, diversity, and inclusion. Teaching of Psychology, 48(1), 69–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628320959979
Gasman, M., Castro Samayoa, A., & Conrad, C. (2021). Educating a diverse nation: Lessons from minority-serving institutions Harvard University Press.
Gottlieb, M. (2020). The case for a cultural humility framework in social work practice. Journal of Ethnic & Cultural Diversity in Social Work, 30(6), 463-481.
Hall, N. (2022). A spotlight on the classroom: Faculty responsibility for advancing institutional diversity, equity, and inclusion. [Thesis, California State University, Sacramento]. https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/graduate/A-spotlight-on-theclassroom-faculty/99257909455501671
Harindranathan, P., Addo, R., Koers, G., Parra-Perez, L. (2021). Developing cultural humility in an international social work classroom. Social Work Education, 41(4), 1–14. 10.1080/02615479.2021.1892053
Henderson, C. (2019). When stereotypes speak louder than our words: black female doctoral students and their experience with race, invisibility, and self-censorship at a predominantly white institution. [Doctoral dissertation, The University of Alabama]. https://ir.ua.edu/items/61b8437a-1b0e-47b5-a4bb-87ebcf600a43
Henning, T. (2023). Addressing bias from faculty in higher education by implementing bias training. [Thesis, Grand Valley State University]. https://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1299&context=gradprojects
Holloway-Friesen, H. (2024). The role of mentoring on Hispanic graduate students’ sense of belonging and academic self-efficacy. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 20(1), 46–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/1538192718823716
Hu, X., & Hancock, A. M. (2024). State of the science: Implicit bias in education, 2018–2020. The Kirwan Institute for the Study of Race and Ethnicity. https://kirwaninstitute.osu.edu/research/state-science-implicit-bias-education-2018-2020
Hussain, M., & Jones, J. M. (2019). Discrimination, diversity, and sense of belonging: Experiences of students of color. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 14(1), 63–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000117
Insoon-Han, I., & Onchwari, J. (2018). Development and implementation of a culturally responsive mentoring program for faculty and staff of color. Interdisciplinary Journal of Partnership Studies, 5(2), 1–26.
Jonathans, P., Cahyono, B., Widiati, U., &Kweldju, S. (2024). Enhancing factors for doctoral students’ writing self-efficacy: A narrative approach. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14(1), 143–156. https://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/IJAL/ article/view/70397
Ju, J., Merrell-James, R., Kelly Coker, J., Ghoston, M., Casado Pérez, J., & Field, T. Recruiting, retaining, and supporting students from underrepresented racial minority backgrounds in doctoral counselor education. The Professional Counselor, 10(4), 581–602.
Juarez, D. (2023). How female BIPOC students at a predominantly White institution think about belonging: A multiperspective study. [Dissertation, Brigham Young University].
Juvonen, J., Nishina, A., & Graham, S. (2025). How students benefit from school diversity. Greater Good https://greatergood.berkeley.edu/article/item/how_students_benefit_from_school_diversity
Kaler-Jones C., Briscoe K., Moore C., & Ford, J. Yes, teaching and pedagogical practices matter: Graduate students of color stories in hybrid higher education/student affairs (HESA) graduate programs. Urban Review, 55(2), 204–223.
Kane, A. (2019). Race, sense of belonging, and the African American student experience at predominantly White institutions. [Dissertation, Duquesne University].
Kavanaugh, G. (2019). Implicit bias and racism in higher education. [Thesis, Northeastern University].
Lekas, H., Pahl, K., & Lewis-Fuller, C. (2020). Rethinking cultural competence: Shifting to cultural humility. Health Services Insights, 20(13), 1–4.
Lewis, D., Bakke, A., Cook, A., James, J., & Griffiths, C. (2024). The experience of multilingual doctoral students related to academic success: A descriptive qualitative study. Journal of Educational Research & Practice, 14(1), 37–51. DOI: 10.5590/JERAP.2024.14.1.03.
Lewis, E. (2022, February 15). How to create a sense of belonging for black students in a majority white academy. Times in Higher Education. https://www.timeshighereducation.com/campus/how-create-sense-belonging-black-students-majoritywhite-academy
Lord, S., & Vracar, S. (2018). Navigating the doctoral journey: A handbook of strategies for success. Routledge. Mantai, L. (2019). “A source of sanity”: The role of social support for doctoral candidates’ belonging and becoming. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 14, 367–382. https://doi.org/10.28945/4275
Martinez, D., & Gomez, S. (2020). Mentorship and representation. The influence of minority faculty on minority students’ outcomes. Journal of Higher Education, 91(4), 555–577.
McCoy, D. (2014). Comprehensive support systems to enhance student success in minority-serving Institutions. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 7, 3–15.
McNeil, T., Moore, S. (2020). Bridging mentoring and professional development for African American doctoral student success. In D. Chapman & A. Wilkerson (Eds.), From student to scholar: Mentoring underrepresented scholars in the academy. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42081-9_2
Ménard, A. D., & Chittle, L. (2023). The impostor phenomenon in post-secondary students: A review of the literature. Review of Education, 11(2), 82–97.
Miller, A., Orsillo, S. (2020). Values, acceptance, belongingness in graduate school: Perspectives from underrepresented minority students. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 15, 197–206.
Museus, S., Varaxy, Y., & Saelua, N. (2018). How culturally engaging campus environments influence sense of belonging in college: An examination of differences between White students and students of color. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 11(4), 467–483.
Myrie, C. (2024, April 30). Diversifying the curriculum. London Borough of Wandsworth. https://s4s.wandsworth.gov.uk/ Article/157760#:~:text=The%20phrase%20%27diversity%20in%20the,equitable%20distribution%20of%20curriculum %20content
Naidoo, K., Quaynor, L., & Shen, Y. (2023). Doctoral students’ experiences, self-efficacy, and sense of belonging related to academic writing in an online program. Education Sciences, 13(11), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13111097
Ngozi Iweuno, B., Nkwocha, S., Cnyinyechi, E., Omorotionmwan, A., & Makinde, P. (2024). Impact of racial representation in curriculum content on student identity and performance. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 23(1), 2913–2933.
Peacock, S., Conwan, J., Irvine, L., & Williams, J. (2020). An exploration into the importance of a sense of belonging for online learners. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 21(2), 19–34.
Pieterse, A. L., Roberson-Miranda, K. L., Paiko, L., & Kirkinis, K. (2023). Exploring the experiences of students of color in United States counseling psychology doctoral programs: A qualitative investigation. The European Journal of Counselling Psychology https://doi.org/10.46853/001c.91442
Pina-Fordsham, M. (2023). The power of respect: How my Latino upbringing has shaped my career progression. Latino Career Assessment—a CMP Company. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/power-respect-how-my-latino-upbringing-has-shaped-d8raf Pore, K. (2024). First-generation doctoral students, impostorism, and belonging. [Doctoral Dissertation, Liberty University].
Rayford, T. (2023). A phenomenological approach to understanding Black graduate students’ sense of belonging to their program. [Master’s Thesis, University of Illinois].
Rinfret, S., Young, S., & McDonald, B. (2023). The importance of mentorship in higher education: An introduction to the symposium. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 29(4), 398–403. https://doi.org/10.1080/15236803.2023.2260947
Roland, E., Hughes, T., & Simmons, F. (2023). Imagine paying for a course, then you end up teaching: Black woman doctoral students in equity, social justice, and diversity courses. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 16(6), 661–672.
Rossman, J. (2023, May 19). Dear White faculty, we must do better. https://www.insidehighered.com/opinion/career-advice/ diversity/2023/05/19/dear-white-faculty-we-must-do-better
Rost, J., & Ktshrnnuhl, K. (2020). Improving social belonging to increase success in an online doctorate program. Impacting Education: Journal on Transforming Professional Practice, 8(1), 1–5. DOI 10.5195/ie.2023.28.
Smith, J. A., & Johnson, L. M., (2021). Faculty diversity and student belonging: Examining the impact of minority professors on minority students’ academic experiences. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 14(3), 245–258.
Torres Acosta, M. A., Chandra, S., Li, S., Yoon, E., Selgrade D., Quinn, J., & Ardehali, H. (2023). The impact of underrepresented minority or marginalized identity status on training outcomes of MD-PhD students. Medical Education, 23, 2–11. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10251672/pdf/12909_2023_Article_4399.pdf
Thakore-Dunlap, U. (2023). Understanding the lived experiences of students of color in graduate counseling education: Implications for educators and leaders. [Dissertation, San Francisco State University].
Thomas, K. Willis, L., & Davis, J. (2007). Mentoring minority graduate students: Issues and strategies for institutions, faculty and students. Equal Opportunities International, 26(3), 178-192.
Tullet, J., Leigh, J., Coke, B., Fisher, D., Haszczyn, J., Houghton, S., Fish, J., Freeman, L., Garcia, I., Penman, S., & Hargreaves, E. (2024). Using reflective practice to support PhD students in the biosciences. eLife, 13, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.9236
University of Cincinnati Online (2025, January 15). Embracing diversity, equity and inclusion: Catalysts for transformative social work. https://online.uc.edu/blog/embracing-diversity-equity-and-inclusion-catalysts-for-transformative-social-work/ University of Wisconsin-Madison. (n.d.). Sense of belonging. https://students.wisc.edu/who-we-are/strategic-plan/senseof-belonging/
Vaccaro, A., Swanson, H. J., Marcotte, M. A., & Newman, B. M. (2019). Insights into the sense of belonging from women of color: Interconnections of cultural competence, expectations, institutional diversity, and counterspaces. Journal Committed to Social Change on Race and Ethnicity (JCSCORE), 5(2), 33–65.
Villareal, M., & Campbell, N. (2023). Scholars from underrepresented groups in engineering and the social sciences (SURGE) capacity in disasters: The benefits and challenges of mentoring for racial and ethnic minority graduate students. Higher Learning Research Communications, 13(1), 70–92. https://doi.org/10.18870/hlrc.v13i1.1381
Vital, L., Lane, T. B., Perez, E., & Patterson-Stephens, S. (2024). Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 17, 869–881. https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000474
Welkey, D. (2018). Threads of support: Mentoring of online doctoral students. [Doctoral Dissertation, University of New England]. https://dune.une.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1186&context=theses
Williams, R. T., & Nguyen, P. H. (2022). The role of faculty diversity in student engagement and success. Educational Researcher, 51(2), 120–132.
Yeshiva University (2023, December 20). Addressing diversity and inclusion in a social work practice. https://online.yu.edu/wurzweiler/blog/addressing-diversity-and-inclusion-in-a-social-work-practice
Yuan, H. (2017). Respond to diversity: Graduate minority students’ perceptions on their learning experiences in an American university. International Academic Forum, Journal of Education, 5(1), 33–45. https://iafor.org/journal/iafor-journal-of-education/volume-5-issue-1/article-2/
Zarestky, J., Bigler, M., Brazile, M., Lopes, T., & Bangerth, W. (2022). Reflective writing supports metacognition and self-regulation in graduate computational science and engineering. Computers and Education Open, 3, 1–12.
Zengilowski, A., Lee, J., Gaines R., Park, H., Choi, E., & Schallert, D. (2023). The collective “we”: The role of students’ sense of belonging on their affective, cognitive, and discourse experiences of online and face-to-face discussions. Linguistics and Education, 73, 1–14.
Zhai, N., Huang, Y., Ma, X., & Chen, J. (2023). Can reflective interventions improve students’ academic achievement? A meta-analysis. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 49, 1–15.
KAREN E. HINTON-POLITE holds a Doctor of Social Work degree and is certified in Human Services Management. She is a retired Pennsylvania Licensed Social Worker (LSW) and has 25 years of teaching and social work experience. She is Professor Emerita of Human Services at Harrisburg Area Community College and serves as an adjunct instructor at Millersville University and Simmons University. Dr. Hinton-Polite remains an advocate for intuitional commitment and the practice of diversity, equity, and inclusion. Dr. Hinton-Polite has knowledge and experience serving on accreditation boards and committees. She is accomplished in Human Services and Social Work program development and evaluation and is masterful at curriculum mapping and assessment. She is an adept qualitative researcher and uses this knowledge and skill to support doctoral students in completing their dissertations. Dr. Hinton-Polite proudly serves as elder and “other mother” for many in her community.
BERTHA SALDANA DE JESUS , a beacon of knowledge and experience, holds a Doctor of Social Work degree from the Kutztown and Millersville joint program in Pennsylvania. She obtained her Master of Social Work degree (MSW) from Widener University and her Bachelor of Social Work degree (BSW) from Shippensburg University, both in Pennsylvania. With over 20 years of experience in child welfare, behavioral health, and hospice, she is currently sharing her expertise as a practice courses instructor at Millersville University. Her role as a mentor to social workers locally and abroad is a testament to her commitment to the field. She is also an advisory board member of the Lancaster County Children and Youth Social Service Agency, and her research interests lie in field education, professional development, mentoring, and international social work. Dr. Saldana De Jesus also extends her teaching experience as a volunteer biblical instructor in her church community locally and abroad, teaching online and in person.
By Stacie Blake
ABSTRACT
Measurable inequities in Pennsylvania public schools are persistent in the education system and debilitating for children. They persist because we fail to see the biases we have learned and then perpetuate, and we fail to interrupt this cycle. Currently, there is an opportunity for the Legislature to correct the economic inequities for school districts across the Commonwealth; in the meantime, we all are responsible to examine our own biased learning and unlearn that which impedes equity.
Do you remember kindergarten? What was one thing you learned? In his book, All I Really Need to Know I Learned in Kindergarten, Robert Fulgham writes, “It wasn’t in books. It wasn’t in a church. What I needed to know was out there in the world.” What Fulghum fails to mention in his book is that we learn the bias and discrimination of our culture at school even though they aren’t part of the traditional curriculum; they permeate our education system across the country, including Pennsylvania. Despite its claims to equity, Pennsylvania public education is anything but equitable. While law and policy changes have impacted many students over the years, inequities in public school education in the Commonwealth persist.
One of the most important figures in public education in Pennsylvania was Thaddeus Stevens, who was famous for several reasons related to equity, justice and education. In 1835, as a Pennsylvania state legislator from Gettysburg, he became known as the ‘savior of public education.’ In fact, he led a successful effort to establish public schools across the Commonwealth with opposition coming from those who supported and preferred the system of private, religious schools. Stevens believed that even the poorest, most marginalized child had the right to an education. Later, living in Lancaster, Stevens was elected to Congress. He was steadfast in his abhorrence of slavery and eventually was the father of the 13th, 14th and 15th amendments to our Constitution: outlawing slavery, providing for equal protection under the law and prohibiting the denial of voting rights based on race or previous servitude. Stevens consistently championed reforms toward equality for Black Americans in freedom, suffrage, finance and education.
Although the Pennsylvania public school system was established in 1835 with the intention to provide access to every child, the state is still struggling to be equitable more than 200 years later. How do we know? We know because in 2014, the Public Interest Law Center, on behalf of the School District of Lancaster, along with NAACP Pennsylvania and others, sued the Commonwealth. They argued that Pennsylvania’s school funding system was unconstitutional and shortchanged students in districts with a high percentage of low-income families. After ten years of court proceedings, the Commonwealth Court in 2023 determined that Pennsylvania’s school funding system does not meet the requirements of the state Constitution and must be overhauled, nearly 200 years after its founding. The Court found that poor school districts did not have the resources they needed to educate their students, despite having higher than average property taxes and that the General Assembly had the responsibility to provide for equitable and adequate funding for all public schools. The Court also found that all students can learn and should have access to a system of public education that is comprehensive, effective and contemporary.
Thus, while Pennsylvania had committed to free, public education, it did not provide this education equitably across the state nor in our county. We also know because in 2023, a group of local entities collaborated to publish the Lancaster County Equity Profile, Pennsylvania’s first county-wide review of equity across many social indicators, including health outcomes, employment, wages, and, of course, youth preparedness. The results document inequity in child poverty (with 33% of Black children living in poverty to 9% of white children); a disconnect with student and teacher demographics (with 35 percent of students of color, but only 4 percent of teachers are people of color); more children of color attending high poverty schools (50%), unequal application of out of school suspension by race, and more.
We are now faced with a system that for nearly 200 years has perpetuated inequity, yet when we talk about Pennsylvania public schools (or likely any American public school system), we are often only considering the factors in the school itself, rather than the structural challenges affecting both the communities and the students themselves and overlooking how what we learn in the standard/formal curriculum and what we learn outside of the curriculum can create pockets of bias that produce systems of inequity.
All I Really Need to Know I Learned in Kindergarten was published nearly 30 years ago and sold seven million copies. Fulghum’s premise is that the kindergarten ‘curriculum’ is where we learn the initial values that serve us through our lives. Some examples include the following: Share everything; play fair; don’t hit people; take a nap every afternoon; and when you go out into the world, watch out for traffic, hold hands, and stick together. These are sweet sentiments and core values familiar to many of us that we learned from kindergarten, at home, at church, or in our communities.
I, too, learned these lessons, but I also began to think about additional learning I had in kindergarten that also was formative, and actually started to form my unconscious biases. These lessons were not part of the curriculum but were part of the culture and the very society I grew up in. I learned by observation of my surroundings and the actions taken by adults. These learnings included the following:
• Deaf children are different and have their own classroom and recess.
• Girls can only wear dresses.
• Bad kids get paddled.
• You can have milk for a snack if you have 5 cents.
• The Black adult is the janitor, Mr. Taylor. Teachers are not Black, all of them are white.
• Men are not teachers, only women. Principals, however, are men.
I didn’t know it then, but I was learning within a system of inequity so deep that by the time I was a senior in high school, the courts imposed forced busing of students to desegregate the public school systems across Columbus, Ohio where I lived. In the earliest days of my education, this system taught me bias about people with disabilities, gender, class and race that to this day, I actively work to unlearn.
While our education system continues to evolve, there are still aspects we need to include as part of the formal curriculum and aspects we need to unlearn to prevent them from perpetuating the inequities. The Brown vs. Board of Education decision, the Education for all Handicapped Children Act, Title IX, and more have changed the educational experience for generations of children. Many gained rights not from our original Constitution, but from the lawsuits, new laws and amendments that granted things like suffrage, equality, and status. And still, inequities persist. In my own backyard, elected officials from Lancaster County are currently deciding, negotiating, and debating just how far they will actually go to address the documented inequity in funding schools the courts have already found, yet the Lancaster Equity Profile shows disparities for our residents and our children, happening right now.
While education includes the standard curriculum, we keep uncovering more formative ways that shape experiences for all outside of this. Our education also includes acculturation: the values and biases we learn, the norms we internalize, the teachers we have (or don’t have). When Nikole Hannah-Jones developed The 1619 Project, a seminal work documenting our nation’s racist origins and challenging our modern telling of history, astonishing stories were revealed, but there was significant push back and banning of the book. These are the stories we need to hear to improve equity in education, yet these are the stories that some are trying to conceal. Across Lancaster County, elected officials
threaten or cut library funding, citing ‘conservative values’ and Drag Story Hour controversies. Across the country, Black and LGBTQ+ authors and the characters they create are the most frequently banned books in libraries; the top three banned books across the country are written by Black and queer authors: Maia Kobabe, George M. Johnson, and Toni Morrison. Even The Color Purple by Alice Walker is banned in some places. Banning these voices compromises the opportunity for all children to see themselves and others reflected in their full humanity and allows bias to thrive unchecked.
If you care about education, you must care about education for all children and about all children. You must care about equity in that education, and you cannot fully understand the realities of others unless you examine your own bias and what you may have learned in addition to the standard curriculum. Bias is the foundation of prejudice, an insidious force that can make school unbearable for so many students across the country, manifesting as bullying, discrimination, and so many other kinds of harm, both micro and macro.
We have to look in the mirror and begin to unlearn. Whether you were educated in Pennsylvania or elsewhere, after 200 years of inequity in public education, what do we need to unlearn? Who is in the room, and who isn’t? Who is speaking, and who isn’t?
Which books are students allowed to read and which are forbidden? Why do you think that is? Even considerations as simple as “how long did it take someone to get here this morning?” can unlock a world of important examination into the ways our society creates barriers in housing and transportation, which translates to education, jobs, and wages, which inevitably impacts things as fundamental as health outcomes.
Whether you learned it in kindergarten or elsewhere, I challenge you to question your bias about ability, gender, race, class, language, ethnicity, and more. In his book, All I Really Needed to Know I Learned in Kindergarten, Robert Fulghum (2004) writes, “It doesn’t matter what you say you believe - it only matters what you do” (p. 226). Equity and justice in education is an unrealized goal within our reach. Act with urgency, because our children can’t wait.
Fulghum, R. (1986). All I really need to know I learned in kindergarten: Uncommon thoughts on common things. New York, Ivy. Miller, G. (2024). Mountville will give Lancaster library branch $13k after Drag Story Hour controversy. WHP Harrisburg. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/mountville-will-give-lancaster-library-branch-13k-after-drag-story-hourcontroversy/ar-BB1mrz4h?ocid=BingNewsSearch
Sholtis, B. (2022, November 24). Citing ‘conservative values,’ a town in Lancaster County, Pa. plans to cut local library funding. WITF. https://www.wesa.fm/politics-government/2022-11-24/citing-conservative-values-a-town-in-lancaster-county-paplans-to-cut-local-library-funding
YWCA, Lancaster. (2023). An Equity Profile of Lancaster, PA. PolicyLink and USC Dornsife. https://ywcalancaster.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Lancaster_Equity-Profile_January-2023.pdf
STACIE BLAKE’S passion for justice guides Stacie’s career in the social sector with previous leadership positions at the local, state, and national levels in Vermont, Florida, District of Columbia and now Pennsylvania. She has led national advocacy efforts on behalf of refugees, immigrants, survivors of trafficking or torture, and unaccompanied migrating children. Leading YWCA Lancaster is an opportunity for Stacie Blake to create impact on the issues that matter to her the most, eliminating racism and empowering women.
By Katherine “Katie” Riley and Olivia Hess
ABSTRACT
While progress has been made in addressing overt sexism in education, implicit bias continues to permeate classrooms and curricula. The underrepresentation of women in leadership positions within educational administration perpetuates a power imbalance that disadvantages female educators and creates a culture that subtly disadvantages girls. This highlights the need for ongoing efforts to dismantle systemic bias and create truly inclusive learning environments. This article reviews the literature on gender bias in educational settings through the lens of female students, as they may be presented with a self-fulfilling prophecy that they will not excel in STEM-related topics. This article also explores gender bias through the lens of female educators, who may not be taken as seriously as their male counterparts. It then identifies potential strategies and interventions that can alleviate the negative impacts of sexism on the classroom environment. While sexism may not be eradicated entirely, being cognizant of its implications on education will better the system as a whole.
Gender inequity has been a long-standing issue within the education system. Sexism and gender biases persist within society today, so why would that be any different in education? Implicit biases against gender among teachers, administrators, and students still prevail and affect the way youth view themselves and others. School is a space where both students and teachers should feel safe, in control, and able to take risks; however, the gender biases that have persisted generation after generation make this ideal seem impossible and unattainable for some. While many strides have been made over the past decades to combat sexism and gender bias, certain stereotypes have been ingrained into our curriculum and norms. For example, girls are frequently discouraged from pursuing STEM (science, technology, engineering, and math) fields, while boys are discouraged from pursuing female-dominated fields such as nursing or education. In addition, male students are frequently given a “pass” when they make inappropriate comments toward female students and teachers, with their actions being excused as “boys being boys.” Sexism is prevalent among educators as well, where leadership qualities that are deemed “assertive” for men may be considered “pushy” for women. Gender bias continues to infiltrate our schools’ hallways and must be addressed. Dr. Ila Deshmukh Towery, a partner at Education First Consulting, examines the ongoing prevalence of institutional gender bias in her article Fostering Gender Equity in Schools Through Reflective Professional Development: A Critical Analysis of Teacher Perspectives. According to Towery (2007), “the very presence of gender bias and gender inequity is often invisible to teachers. Some of the teachers in this study believed that gender inequity was not an area of concern in their school (p. 18).” By dissecting the interplay of societal norms, institutional expectations, and firsthand experiences, this article brings light to the injustices impacting females in schools every day. It also provides insight into potential strategies and interventions needed to advocate for change with the vision that educators must continue to fight for equity and belonging in all realms of education. Acknowledging gender bias and gender inequity would be the first step toward making vital changes in persisting deep-rooted biases within education.
Despite the progress that has been made, gender inequity in education still endures. Marquette University researchers Oswald, Baalbaki, and Kirkman (2019) shed light on blatant versus subtle sexism in their article Experiences with Benevolent Sexism: Scale Development and Associations with Women’s Well-Being. Traditionally, sexism is viewed through an aggressive lens, but their study examined how the sexism women face can often be simply complementary behaviors that reinforce gender roles and put limitations on women. According to Oswald et al., the threat of benevolent sexism lies in its deceptive nature, where the behaviors appear positive and harmless but lead to downplaying discrimination because they are not overt. Because of this deceptive nature, benevolent sexism in education often goes unnoticed. It could happen to female educators who are told that specific students act out in class because they have a tough time with female teachers. This could also happen to female students who get praised for doing well in STEM, whereas their male peers who are doing just as well are not being praised because it is expected of them. The frequency this happens to professionals and students in education can be exhausting and must be addressed.
The education system is the foundation where many students discover who they are and what they can achieve, and allowing benevolent sexism to prevail can have detrimental outcomes. It is not enough only to discuss the
issues students face regarding gender bias, as change can only happen as a result of action. Educators have their pulse on this issue daily, and they have an ethical and moral obligation to maintain standards of equity and equality within their classrooms and schools. Several empirical studies indicate that teachers should confront issues of discrimination and prejudice rather than ignore them (Boysen, 2013, Czopp et al., 2006, Dickter et al., 2012). Educators have the critical opportunity to be allies to students to achieve gender equality for them all. Some could even argue that without educators taking a stand for this goal, gender equity would be nearly impossible.
One area where sexism has been well documented is the treatment of girls and women in STEM. Rachael Robnett and Jennifer John, researchers at the University of Nevada, depict how female students view the sexism and gender discrimination they face in STEM fields in It’s Wrong to Exclude Girls From Something They Love. Survey data from Robnett and John’s (2020) study demonstrate that the majority of girls in school face academic discouragement when showing interest in areas such as math and science. This research states, “Some of the best students in my math class are girls, so it must be pretty bad if women were discouraged from joining a math/science field and thus didn’t get to contribute. And by bad, I mean detrimental to our collective knowledge and survival as a human race” (Robnett & John, 2020, p. 242). Adolescent girls who go through school showing high aptitude, appreciation, or enjoyment for any type of STEM classes find it harder to receive support in those areas. Not only are they lacking the support they need to feel valued, but girls in STEM also feel as though they must work harder than their male classmates to be noticed as contenders in those classes (Robnett & John, 2020). Since sexism is such a prevalent issue for students, this also must become a focus for educators to try to eradicate this prejudice plaguing education.
Female teachers may experience gender bias concerning their perceived authority over students. This phenomenon is examined in Robinson’s (2000) study ‘Great Tits, Miss!’ The silencing of male students’ sexual harassment of female teachers in secondary schools: a focus on gendered authority.” As detailed in the study, gendered authority highlights the juxtaposition of women in positions of power. Females are stereotyped to be gentle and sensitive, which contrasts with the characteristics of a person in authority, making female teachers appear less powerful. According to students interviewed in Robinson’s study, “males were stronger, louder, more in control, more intimidating and thus had greater authority than females.” (p.5). The study further asserts that female teachers are perceived to be poor disciplinarians and even less credible than men in male-dominated subjects such as STEM.
The lack of perceived authority and credibility in female teachers is likely a leading cause of sexual harassment by male students. Professor Kerry Robinson obtained her data in “Great Tits, Miss!” through in-depth interviews with male and female students and teachers in Tasmania and New South Wales. Participants from her study acknowledged that it is easier to make jokes about or target female teachers, as there will be minimal repercussions. Even when sexual harassment against teachers is recognized, women are still blamed, as it’s deemed “the result of women’s ineffectual discipline strategies and consequent lack of control” (Robinson, 2000, p. 83). There is a connotation that teachers who are sexualized are “bad” teachers, as they are unable to control their students.
Many times, incidents of harassment are written off as the student seemingly not knowing any better. Younger female teachers receive the brunt of sexual harassment from male students, as they are perceived as more attainable. Thus, the minimal authority that these teachers had is diminished even more. These stereotypes of females in positions of power make it increasingly difficult for female teachers to be taken seriously, thus leading to instances of disrespect and sexual harassment in the workplace.
Although education is a female-dominated workforce, there still seem to be many more male administrative figures than females. Many female educators find it difficult to move into higher positions, and gender bias often appears to be a contributing factor, according to Husain et al.’s (2023) study “Do Male Workers Prefer Male Leaders? An Analysis of Principals’ Effects on Teacher Retention.” This study found that male teachers are significantly more likely to leave a school when it is led by a female principal, while female teachers’ likelihood to leave does not change. This could be due to professional experiences or personal biases. According to the researcher, male principals typically have a more democratic and collaborative approach than male counterparts, who are more direct. While some male teachers may simply prefer the leadership attributes of a standard male principal, others may have a bias against females in positions of power in general, as “male teacher attrition increases even in anticipation of the female principal’s arrival” (Husain et al., 2023, p. 1482).
There are concerning implications for male teachers leaving schools with female principals. First, high teacher turnover causes staffing and budget issues, which take away the potential positive model of a woman leading men in a professional capacity. Second, the phenomenon can impede female administrators’ ability to be successful and move up through the education system. According to Husain et al. (2023), principals are often evaluated based on teacher turnover, making them appear ineffective if turnover rates are high. Thus, it becomes increasingly difficult for female principals to retain their positions and advance professionally. Whether in the role of a teacher or administrator, females’ perceived authority can negatively impact their success.
Sexism is also prevalent among professors in the post-secondary realm. Psychology professors El-Alayli, Hansen-Brown, and Ceynar (2018) explore some of the additional burdens felt by female professors as a result of gender in their research study “Dancing Backwards in High Heels.” To start, it is worth noting that men typically come to mind when thinking of the word “professor,” but “female professor” must be clarified when it is a woman. According to El-Alayli et al., women are perceived to be warm and nurturing, while men are perceived to be agentic and powerful. The study says that female professors are leaders and thus should be agentic and powerful, which conflicts with their nurturing expectations as women. When female professors do exert their power and give direction to students, they are often viewed as pushy. According to El-Alayli et al., students perceive male professors as having a higher level of expertise in their field, requiring female professors to overcompensate their abilities.
As a result of expecting nurturance and emotional labor from female professors, El-Alayli et al. (2018) found that female professors receive more requests for standard work demands, special favors, and friendship behaviors. This may include students requesting longer office hours and assignment extensions. As a result of the nurturing female stereotype, students are more likely to approach female professors with these requests than male professors. Supportive findings are shared in Morgante’s (2019) study “It’s Not Easy Being a Woman Professor: Subverting Sexism in Higher Education,” which references increased student demands to female professors to give extra credit and retakes, along with heightened emotions when these demands are denied. El-Alayli et al. show that students with high academic entitlement have a higher expectation that female professors will grant their special requests, making them even more likely to make requests in the first place. Additionally, Morgante states it has been found that “students give lower ratings to a professor with a female name—- even when the actual professor was a male under a female pseudonym” (p. 16). Female professors are more likely to be judged by their interpersonal connections with students, rather than their teaching or content. According to Morgante, her colleagues reported similar findings to her, as they would be called “unapproachable,” “rigid,” and “unreasonable” in situations where male professors were considered “tough but fair.” These microaggressions strip female professors of their credibility and sense of power, and they must be addressed with all other forms of sexism in education.
It is imperative that further steps are taken to fight against sexism in education. “Fostering Gender Equity in Schools Through Reflective Professional Development: A Critical Analysis of Teacher Perspectives” takes a closer look at how schools are an optimal forum to combat gender inequality, institutional sexism, and homophobia (Towery, 2007). Schools have resources and access to young minds who can help reshape social norms and biases. However, according to Towery, there are significant gaps in teachers’ abilities to recognize and react to gender inequities that they observe amongst students and teachers. In order to be a positive force for change, all teachers could benefit from training and
education to effectively identify and respond to gender bias in the workplace. This could start a ripple effect for school faculty and community members to increase awareness of the deeply ingrained biases that impact both colleagues and students.
Being able to achieve true gender equity in society can only begin by dismantling gender inequality in education. Schools are often a place where children first see and experience overt or subtle sexism. Bridging this gender gap is not only about equal access; it is about liberating girls to demand that they are spoken to and treated with the same respect as their male peers. Continuing to ignore subtle sexism paves the way for overt sexism to prevail. This cycle of inequity can only be stopped if parents, teachers, administrators, and members of the community work together to educate themselves and those around them on these injustices and discuss opportunities to question our current systems and beliefs
Boysen, G. (2013). Confronting math stereotypes in the classroom: Its effect on female college students’ sexism and perceptions of confronters. Sex Roles, 69(5–6), 297–307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-013-0287-y
Czopp, A. M., & Monteith, M. J. (2003). Confronting prejudice (literally): Reactions to confrontations of racial and gender bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 532–544. doi:10.1177/0146167202250923
Dickter, C. L., Kittel, J. A., & Gyurovski, I. I. (2012). Perceptions of non-target confronters in response to racist and heterosexist remarks. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 112–119. doi:10.1002/ejsp.855
El-Alayli, A., Hansen-Brown, A. A., & Ceynar, M. (2018). Dancing backwards in high heels: Female professors experience more work demands and special favor requests, particularly from academically entitled students. Sex Roles, 79(3–4), 136–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0872-6
Husain, A. N., Matsa, D. A., & Miller, A. R. (2023). Do male workers prefer male leaders? An analysis of principals’ effects on teacher retention. Journal of Human Resources, 58(5), 1480–1522. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.58.5.1118-9838r2
Morgante, C. (2019). It’s not easy being a woman professor: Subverting sexism in higher education. Mutuality Magazine, 26(3).
Oswald, D. L., Baalbaki, M., & Kirkman, M. (2019). Experiences with benevolent sexism: Scale development and associations with women’s well-being. Sex Roles, 80(5/6), 362–380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-018-0933-5
Robinson, K. (2000). ‘Great tits, Miss!’ The silencing of male students’ sexual harassment of female teachers in secondary schools: A focus on gendered authority. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/01596300050005510
Robnett, R. D., & John, J. E. (2020). “It’s wrong to exclude girls from something they love.” Adolescents’ attitudes about sexism in science, technology, engineering, and math. Child Development, 91(1), e231–e248. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13185 Towery, I. D. (2007). Fostering gender equity in schools through reflective professional development: A critical analysis of teacher perspectives. Penn GSE Perspectives on Urban Education, 5(1), 1–25.
KATHERINE “KATIE” RILEY is a graduate student in Millersville’s math education program. Katie graduated from Millersville with her undergraduate degree in 2022, majoring in Secondary Math Education and minoring in Psychology. She is currently in her third-year teaching seventh-grade math at Elizabethtown Area Middle School. In her free time, Katie enjoys being outside, reading, and traveling.
OLIVIA HESS graduated from Millersville University with her undergraduate degree in secondary math education and is currently a graduate student in Millersville’s math education program. She is currently teaching eighth-grade mathematics at Cocalico Middle School. In her free time, Olivia enjoys reading a good book and playing with her dog.
By Julissa Rodriguez
ABSTRACT
This paper discusses why the topics of race and racism should be taught in K-12 schools. It begins with a definition of Critical Race Theory and then examines the culturally relevant and sustaining education guidelines that support the teaching of race in the classroom. Afterwards, it discusses student learning gaps on race and how lack of representation in the curriculum impacts students of color. Furthermore, this article compares arguments for and against a Pennsylvania policy that could potentially ban discussions of race in the classroom due to concerns they cause emotional discomfort. and ends by discussing the Crispus Attucks History and Culture Center in the City of York to demonstrate how the city’s history highlights the importance of minority representation in U.S. history.
The topic of racism in America has always been the giant elephant in the room that many White Americans do not want to address. Before the Black Lives Matter protests of 2020, it seemed taboo to discuss topics having to do with race—such as systemic racism and racial inequity—almost as if it were considered a step backward to discuss the ways in which people of color have been and continue to be marginalized. However, the murders of George Floyd, Breonna Taylor, and Ahmaud Arbery, among countless other Black lives, sparked a nationwide debate over whether to teach about race and racism in K-12 schools.
At the center of the debate on teaching about race in K-12 schools is the term Critical Race Theory (CRT), which can be defined as “an academic theory that views racism as not just a matter of individual prejudice but rather as embedded into and upheld by law, policy, and other societal structures” (Joyce, 2022, p. 1). The theory was created in the 1970s by Derrick Bell and other law scholars after they discovered that civil rights cases had failed to overturn systemic racism, which is when social, political, and economic institutions are structured to disadvantage people of color (Toraif et al., 2023). There seems to be confusion surrounding what CRT is, since many believe it is taught in K-12 schools, but this is not the case. In practice, CRT guides educators on how to have discussions about race and racism with students. According to Elspeth Wilson, a public law and government professor at Franklin & Marshall College, Critical Race Theory is a legal study that is not studied outside of graduate and law institutions of higher education (Geli, 2021). This paper explores policies and positions for and against teaching race and ultimately argues for the importance of teaching about race and racism to K-12 students so that students from all ethnic backgrounds can see themselves represented in history.
While it is imperative for students to feel supported and represented when learning about race, it is also imperative for teachers to create a curriculum that adequately informs students about racial history in the United States. Kate Shuster (2018), along with other researchers at the Southern Poverty Law Center, highlighted learning gaps about race in their study that surveyed high school seniors on their knowledge of racial history in the United States. In their study, researchers found that 92% of students could not identify slavery as the main cause of the Civil War, 68% did not know a constitutional amendment formally ended slavery, and 78% did not know the Constitution contained advantages for slaveholders. According to Edwin Flores (2023), a journalist at NBC News, a study conducted by the Johns Hopkins Institute for Education Policy and UnidosUS, a national Latinx advocacy and research organization, found that 87% of key Latinx history topics were either not covered in U.S. history textbooks or only covered in a few sentences despite more than 25% of all U.S. public school students identifying as Latinx.
One reason why students lack a critical understanding of U.S. racial history is because public schools teach about slavery without all the pieces of the puzzle. Shuster (2018) explains that when students first start learning about slavery in elementary school, they learn about the Underground Railroad and other feel-good stories about slavery’s end. In high school, there is a focus on slave abolitionists like Frederick Douglass and the Emancipation Proclamation. Strikingly, little focus is devoted to understanding the brutal realities of slavery and how America’s foundation was built by slave labor. This unfocused lens of teaching only about slavery’s end creates the false impression that slavery was not a severe and long-lasting issue when, in actuality, slavery has had many long-lasting effects that are still felt today. LaGarrett J. King (2017), a professor of social studies at the University of Missouri-Columbia, finds it concerning that a student’s first exposure to Black history is slavery and notes that thousands of years of Black history existed
before slavery. He stresses that students should be taught this history and the positive contributions of Black historical figures. King (2017) also states that it is important to acknowledge the differences between Black and White American experiences throughout history. For example, for Black Americans, July 4, 1776, does not hold as much meaning as June 19, 1865, also known as Juneteenth, which marked the liberation of Black slaves. The concept of the United States being a country of immigrants voluntarily coming to live has not been as true for Black Americans as it has been for White Americans.
Another reason K-12 students lack an understanding of the impact of racial history on their lives is because many educators do not make connections between slavery and present-day racial inequalities. It is impossible to talk about the Civil Rights Movement, the Harlem Renaissance, or the Jim Crow era without tracing their origins back to slavery. For instance, according to George Hutchinson (2024), a Newton C. Farr Professor of American Culture at Cornell University, once slavery ended in 1865, White Americans needed a way to control Black Americans who were now free, so they created Jim Crow laws, which legalized racial segregation. Then in 1918, in order to combat Jim Crow and the stereotypes forced upon them, the Harlem Renaissance was born, which was a literary and artistic movement that helped Black artists gain control of their cultural representation and placed them in elite Western culture. The Harlem Renaissance also influenced the future Civil Rights Movement and laid the foundation for all African American literature going forward. Before this, however, according to Egede et al. (2023), Black Americans were further subjugated by racist curfews which were enforced by White vigilantes. Racist acts like these were legitimized in 1933, when the Home Owners’ Loan Corporation (HOLC), which used race as a central factor to rank neighborhoods and determine if a family was worthy of a mortgage, was created. By HOLC standards, Black neighborhoods were considered unstable and hazardous, and as a result, they were “redlined” (where ethnic minorities usually living in urban communities were systematically denied services); that is, Black families were largely excluded from receiving HOLC loans. Although the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Fair Housing Act of 1968 implemented a race-neutral housing policy, discriminatory housing practices still impact Americans today. For example, recent studies have shown a correlation between historical redlining and present-day health problems, including higher risk of diabetes and early death due to heart disease. Notably, historically redlined neighborhoods had worse COVID-19 outcomes than residents within non-redlined neighborhoods. Kraus et al. (2024) conducted a systematic review to find studies between 1990 and 2014 that correlated redlining with poor health outcomes. The majority of the 36 articles they evaluated (86%) found a significant correlation between living in a redlined neighborhood and adverse health outcomes, and the populations studied ranged from 250 to 38 million people. Kraus et al. also found that the people most impacted by poor health outcomes as a result of redlining were non-White, Black, and Hispanic individuals.
Parallels can also be drawn between the Civil Rights Movement and the Black Lives Matter Movement. For instance, on August 28, 1955, 14-year-old Emmett Louis Till was falsely accused of sexually assaulting a White woman named Carolyn Bryant Donham, and he was murdered by her husband Roy Bryant and brother-in-law J. W. Milam. His murderers were acquitted of their crime. This became the catalyst for the Civil Rights Movement. Decades later, on February 26, 2012, 17-year-old Trayvon Benjamin Martin was walking home with candy and an iced tea in hand when he was gunned down by George Zimmerman. Zimmerman was acquitted of second-degree murder. This became the catalyst for the Black Lives Matter Movement (Morris, 2021). The murders of two innocent Black children and the subsequent acquittal of their murderers by the U.S. court system sparked two of the most significant movements in U.S. history. This is why it is important for K-12 educators to highlight the impact that racial history has on the present so that students can understand the lasting impact racial inequality has on their everyday lives.
Race should be taught in the classroom so that Black students feel included and represented in their nation’s history. According to CNN journalist, Scottie Andrew (2020), in 2019, students from Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Early College in Denver, Colorado, visited the National Museum of African American History and Culture in Washington, D.C., and were shocked that they had to travel 1,000 miles to learn about their history. Students experienced feelings of heartbreak, anger, and confusion because they were never taught about the influential Black artists, politicians, and activists they learned about at the museum that day. After the museum trip, the students demanded that their school have an African American Studies course in their curriculum, and they succeeded. Jesse Hagopian, a high school teacher in Seattle, notes how history is taught through a Eurocentric whitewashed (or assimilationist) lens, and stories of people of color are often excluded. He describes how this lack of representation affects Black students: “When Black students don’t see themselves in the curriculum, it’s truly destructive to their sense of self” (Andrew, 2020, para. 7). As Hagopian states, representation is crucial for Black students to connect with historical figures that share their identity so they can develop a strong sense of self.
Opponents of teaching about race and racism claim it will have a negative effect on the emotional well-being of students-especially White students. Opponents also claim that learning about race will cause White students to feel like they are oppressors and will cause them to feel guilt and shame (Point: Critical Race, 2022). Laws in more than a dozen U.S. states have placed limits on how teachers can discuss topics of race and sexuality. On June 7, 2021, two
Pennsylvania lawmakers, Russ Diamond (Republican-Lebanon) and Barb Gleim (Republican-Cumberland), introduced the Teaching Racial and Universal Equality (TRUE) Act, which, if passed, would strictly prohibit the teaching of “racist and sexist concepts” (Kirkland, 2021). This law would essentially ban teachers from making anyone feel shame, guilt, anger, or other signs of psychological distress when discussing the topic of race.
Sarah Schwartz (2021), a journalist at Education Week, explains how these kinds of laws are difficult for teachers to enforce because conversations about racial inequality in America are bound to be uncomfortable for everyone. Also, teachers cannot control how their students will react to learning about slavery and racial inequality. This has worried teachers because if, for example, a student goes home after a lesson on slavery and expresses discomfort to their parents, the teacher could be prosecuted for causing distress. Laws like the TRUE Act call into question the First Amendment right to freedom of speech. Many teachers opposed to these ban laws fear that they will be silenced with legal action for having conversations about how racism might affect someone in present-day America. School districts also run the risk of losing funding. Dave Oglesby, an elementary school teacher in Nashville, expressed his disappointment in these laws: “It’s unfortunate, because it’s going to have the biggest impact on students of color. It’s saying we know that you have a history in this country, but we’re not going to discuss it in this classroom” (Schwartz, 2021, para. 23). This is a valid point. The history in which White Americans overcame oppression is a story that will always be told—as it should be. Because of this, it is only right that the oppressive histories of Black, Latinx, Native, Asian, and every minority American be told alongside it.
Jarvis R. Givens, a scholar and supporter of race curriculum, points out that while teaching about racial inequality and injustice will make White students uncomfortable, Native Americans and Black Americans have felt disturbed for generations due to land repossessions, slavery, lynching, and other racial injustices. He stresses that while teaching about the history of race and racism will be uncomfortable for everyone, it is a necessary discomfort to understand why racial inequalities exist in America today. According to Illing (2021), Givens, the author of Fugitive Pedagogy: Carter G. Woodson and the Art of Black Teaching, highlights the positive impact Black educators have had while teaching about race in the classroom. He states:
A fundamental part of being … an educator committed to justice and equality, means being committed to reckoning with the history of racial injustice and trying to teach students in a way that supports the development of a critical awareness of that past, which includes acknowledging how that past continues to structure the ways in which we’re in relationship with one another in the present. ( para. 37)
Givens says that when teaching about race, educators should follow in the footsteps of Black educators who have made it a priority to reassure Black students that their self-worth is not tied to the ways in which our history and institutions have oppressed them (Illing, 2021).
Before the Black Lives Matter (BLM) protests in 2020, only a handful of states required schools to teach their students about race in America, and in those schools, only 8%–9% of class time was devoted to teaching about race (King, 2017). After the BLM protests, policymakers started having serious discussions about teaching race in the classroom. In Pennsylvania, former Governor Tom Wolf introduced Culturally Relevant and Sustaining Education, known as CRSE, in November 2022¹. According to the Pennsylvania Department of Education (2023), the goal of CRSE is to train educators to reflect on their own cultural lenses and biases and acknowledge the inequities that exist in the education system. CRSE contains nine competencies in total. Some of these competencies include creating equitable and differentiated opportunities for students, integrating multiple perspectives based on students’ real-world experiences and identity, and encouraging students to value their culture and address bias. Former Pennsylvania Education Secretary Eric Hagarty states, “Culturally Relevant and Sustaining Education is really all about making sure that our teachers are equipped to be welcoming and inclusive of all the different types of students that they’re going to interact with on a day-to-day basis” (Delano, 2023, para. 5).
There has been some pushback to CRSE. One critic, Pennsylvania State Representative Aaron Bernstine, says, “This is an example of bureaucrats overstepping their bounds. They’re putting regulations on educators in which they are basically forcing the teaching of critical race theory” (Delano, 2023, para. 2). This is false. The goal of CRSE is to train educators to acknowledge and appreciate cultural differences and develop a sense of cultural sensitivity, not to force the teaching of Critical Race Theory. Additionally, school districts can choose whether or not to follow the guidelines.
¹On Wednesday, November 13, 2024, the Pennsylvania Department of Education rescinded the Culturally Relevant and Sustaining Education (CRSE) guidelines as part of a mediated settlement agreement with the Thomas More Society, which issued a lawsuit against the department back in April 2023. The Department also announced new guidelines called the Common Ground Framework, which encourages educators to understand students dealing with food insecurity, trauma, a military lifestyle, and other issues. A spokesperson for the Pennsylvania Department of Education, Erin James, stated that the Common Ground Framework is an improvement to CRSE because it has a greater focus on digital literacy, mental health, and trauma. In fact, the Common Ground Framework includes three sets of competencies: cultural awareness, trauma-aware mental health and wellness, and technological and virtual engagement (Tomasic, 2024). In a letter to school districts, the Department encouraged but did not require educators to implement these guidelines.
In Lancaster County, although school board members and administrators have tried to reassure parents that CRT is not being taught in schools, parents have argued against it in school board meetings across the county (Geli, 2021). Three Pennsylvania school districts—Mars Area, Laurel, and Penncrest—are suing the state due to CRSE. The lawsuit is being filed by the Thomas More Society, a nonprofit law firm that has challenged birth control, abortion, LGBTQ+ rights, pandemic safety measures, and the election results of 2020. One count from the lawsuit disagrees with the guideline that asks educators to “disrupt harmful institutional practices” and claims that the guidelines usurp a school district’s right to determine their own curriculum. This count implies that educators should avoid advocating for change when they recognize harmful racist and biased policies being implemented in their schools (Greene, 2023).
Despite this pushback, CRSE could be an effective way to make marginalized students and teachers feel included and accepted. Penn Manor High School social studies teacher Todd Mealy, who is the founder and director of the Equity Institute of Race Conscious Pedagogy, says, “It’s really tough to teach a subject like history and say we’re going to ignore race the whole time, especially when you have Black students that sit in the class and they know there are things that happened to their ancestors, and yet their teacher is glossing over the topic” (Geli, 2021, para. 36). Mealy is absolutely right: It is crucial for Black students to feel represented in history just like any other student. In Lancaster, Black students recognize that many of their teachers do not look like them. There are some schools in Lancaster County that do not even have Black educators. On a national scale, the number of students of color is 2.5 times more than teachers of color. In Pennsylvania, that number of students of color is six times more than teachers of color, and out of Pennsylvania’s 500 school districts, only about 37% employ teachers of color (Greene, 2023). Peter Greene, who is a retired Pennsylvania secondary English teacher of 39 years, had this to say regarding the implementation of CRSE: “It has long been a teacher ideal to meet students where they are; why not acquire some more tools to better meet students who are somewhere that you have never been?” (2023, para. 6). Training teachers to be more culturally sensitive could lead to greater understanding between students and teachers, creating a more inclusive learning environment.
A local example of minority student representation is the Crispus Attucks History and Culture Center in York, Pennsylvania. This will be home to Black and Latinx history and is scheduled to open in March 2025, according to Jim McClure of The York Daily Record (2023). The Center had a groundbreaking ceremony on November 15, 2023, when Crispus Attucks students used ceremonial shovels to break ground on the new center. Crispus Attucks was an African American who escaped slavery and led the Boston Massacre, which fueled the start of the American Revolution, and he was the first person to die at the hands of the British. York County has a unique Black and Latinx history dating back to slavery. According to McClure (2023), the first U.S. Census in 1790 reported 499 enslaved people in York County—the highest number of enslaved people in Pennsylvania—and the number of freed slaves stood at 837, also the highest in Pennsylvania. In comparison, Lancaster County’s census that same year reported 347 slaves and only 16 free people of color (Lititz Public Library). In 1931, the Crispus Attucks Community Center was created to fulfill the educational, recreational, and social needs of the Black community. During World War II, York County farmers experiencing labor shortages employed Latinx workers, German prisoners of war, and fruit pickers from Jamaica. By the 1960s, the Latinx community was starting advocacy groups to combat the same racial injustices the Black community faced. Because both communities faced the same racial inequities, the Black and Latinx communities worked together to protest these inequities (McClure, 2023). According to Crispus Attucks York, the purpose of the future Center will be to “explore, document, and showcase the African American story and impact on York City as well as African Americans’ important place in and contributions to our country’s history” (2023). The Center will be a great resource for historical and cultural education for the Black and Latinx communities.
In sum, it is undeniably necessary for K-12 educators to teach about the history of race in America so students of all ethnic backgrounds can see themselves reflected in the people’s history they’re learning about. By holding conversations about race, teachers can help students draw parallels between America’s racist past, its present, and how racial inequality continues to affect us today. Ultimately, everyone deserves to see themselves represented in history, for when we see ourselves reflected in history, it makes us want to do better for those who came before and those who will come after.
Andrew, S. (2020, August 25). There’s a movement to get more schools to teach Black history, and it’s being led by teens CNN. https://www.cnn.com/2020/08/25/us/black-history-in-schools-trnd/index.html
Counterpoint: Schools must address the US history of anti-black racism truthfully and sensitively. (2022). Points of View: Teaching Black History in K-12 Schools, 1–2. Crispus Attucks York (2023, November 15). CAY History and Culture Center groundbreaking ceremony. Crispus Attucks York. https://crispusattucks.org/event/cay-history-and-culture-center-groundbreaking-ceremony/#:~:text=We%20are%20 excited%20to%20begin,contributions%20to%20our%20country’s%20history
Delano, J. (2023, August 11). Pennsylvania’s Culturally Relevant and Sustaining Education guidelines causing controversy. CBS News. https://www.cbsnews.com/pittsburgh/news/pennsylvania-crse-education-guidelines/ Egede, L. E., Walker, R. J., Campbell, J. A., Linde, S., Hawks, L. C., & Burgess, K. M. (2023). Modern day consequences of historic redlining: Finding a path forward. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 38(6), 1534–1537. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-023-08051-4
Flores, E. (2023, May 17). Most U.S. Latino history is left out of high school textbooks, study finds. NBC News. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/latino/us-latino-history-left-out-textbooks-high-school-study-rcna84730
Geli, A. (2021, October 3). Are Lancaster County schools ‘indoctrinating’ children with critical race theory? Educators, experts say no. Lancaster Online. https://lancasteronline.com/news/local/are-lancaster-county-schools-indoctrinatingchildren-with-critical-race-theory-educators-experts-say-no/article_9fb7b1c2-22ec-11ec-bcd2-9359e05780fa.html
Greene, P. (2023, April 24). 3 Pennsylvania school districts take state to court over guidelines to help teachers become more culturally sensitive. Bucks County Beacon https://buckscountybeacon.com/2023/04/3-pennsylvania-school-districtstake-state-to-court-over-guidelines-to-help-teachers-become-more-culturally-sensitive/ Hutchinson, G. (2024). Harlem Renaissance. Britannica https://www.britannica.com/event/Harlem-Renaissance-American-literature-and-art
Illing, S. (2021, June 11). Is there an uncontroversial way to teach America’s racist history? Vox https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/22464746/critical-race-theory-anti-racism-jarvis-givens
Joyce, E. (2022). Teaching black history in K–12 schools: Overview. Points of View: Teaching Black History in K-12 Schools, 1–4. King, L. J. (2017). The status of Black history in U.S. schools and society. Social Education, 81 (1), 14–18. https://www.socialstudies.org/system/files/publications/articles/se_810117014.pdf
Kirkland, T. (2021, June 9). PA lawmakers propose bill stripping critical race and gender education from the classroom CBS 21 News. https://local21news.com/news/local/pa-lawmakers-propose-bill-stripping-critical-race-and-gendereducation-from-the-classroom
Kraus, N. T., Connor, S., Shoda, K., Moore, S. E., & Irani, E. (2024). Historic Redlining and Health Outcomes: A Systematic Review. Public Health Nursing, 41, 287–296. https://doi.org/10.1111/phn.13276
Lititz Public Library. Early Lancaster County and African Americans. Lititz Library. https://lititzlibrary.org/early-lancastercounty-and-african-americans/#:~:text=The%20First%20United%20States%20Census,3003%20free%20persons%20of%20color.
McClure, J. (2023, December 28). York County Black, Latino communities’ history intersected for decades. York Daily Record. https://www.ydr.com/story/opinion/columnists/2023/12/28/york-pa-black-latino-communities-history-intersected-fordecades/72030411007/
Morris, A. (2021, February 3). From Civil Rights to Black Lives Matter. Scientific American https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/from-civil-rights-to-black-lives-matter1/ Pennsylvania Department of Education. (2022). Culturally Relevant and Sustaining Education. Pennsylvania Department of Education. https://www.education.pa.gov/Documents/Teachers-Administrators/Certification%20Preparation%20Programs/ Framework%20Guidelines%20and%20Rubrics/Culturally-Relevant%20and%20Sustaining%20Education%20Program% 20Framework%20Guidelines.pdf
Point: Critical race theory has no place in the K–12 classroom. (2022). Points of View: Teaching Black History in K-12 Schools, 1–2. Retrieved May 3, 2023, from https://web.p.ebscohost.com/pov/detail/detail?vid=4&sid=547e9662-dc68-47dc-851c20f9295a36bd%40redis&bdata=JkF1dGhUeXBlPXNzbyZzaXRlPXBvdi1saXZl#AN=155233738&db=pwh
Richards, E. & Wong A. (2021, September 10). Parents want kids to learn about ongoing effects of slavery—but not critical race theory. They’re the same thing. USA Today https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/education/2021/09/10/crt-schoolseducation-racism-slavery-poll/5772418001/
Schwartz, S. (2021, May 17). Four states have placed legal limits on how teachers can discuss race. More may follow. EducationWeek https://www.edweek.org/policy-politics/four-states-have-placed-legal-limits-on-how-teachers-candiscuss-race-more-may-follow/2021/05
Shuster, K. (2018, January 31). Teaching hard history. Southern Poverty Law Center https://www.splcenter.org/20180131/teaching-hard-history#part-ii
Tomasic, M. (2024, November 15). Pennsylvania rolling back cultural competency standards for teachers following lawsuit. Pittsburgh Post-Gazette https://www.post-gazette.com/news/education/2024/11/15/pennsylvania-culturalcompetency-standards-lawsuit-teachers/stories/202411150078
Toraif, N., Gondal, N., Paudel, P., & Frisella, A. (2023). From colorblind to systemic racism: Emergence of a rhetorical shift in higher education discourse in response to the murder of George Floyd. PLOS ONE, 18(8), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0289545
JULISSA RODRIGUEZ is a recent graduate of Millersville University with a Bachelor’s Degree in English: Writing Studies with a minor in Sociology. She grew up in Lancaster, PA, and is a first-generation American and college student. As an undergraduate, she was a research assistant for The Center for Public Scholarship and Social Change in which she assisted the affordable housing organization HDC Mid Atlantic with analyzing surveys and interviews from residents to improve residential services. She also helped successfully advocate for Pennsylvania undergraduate research funding in Washington D.C. Additionally, she was a Millersville Writing Center intern in which she created educational materials to be used in writing workshops. Her goal is to attend graduate school for Sociology or Public Health and to work within community research to address social needs and make a positive impact in her community. In her free time, she enjoys reading, karaoke, and volunteering.
By Valdijah Ambrose Brown, Ed.D., LMSW
ABSTRACT
This study sought to understand Black women’s faculty experiences with prejudice and discrimination as measured by the Workplace Prejudice Discrimination Inventory in their predominantly White higher education ecologies. It further sought to understand to what extent those women also experienced negative health outcomes. Longitudinal studies utilizing biometrics such as fMRI technology have been advancing understandings about the impacts of prejudice and discrimination on health disparities in Black women. Results of this study found that Black women faculty experienced prejudice and discrimination at both the institutional level (supervisors and higher-level authority) and the personal level (colleagues). Further, this study found that the participants who experienced prejudice and discrimination also reported having experienced negative health outcomes. Specifically, Black women faculty reported negative health outcomes such as anxiety, sleeplessness, depression, and being overweight.
A traditional gospel hymn says, “I don’t feel no ways tired. I’ve come too far from where I started from. Nobody told me the road would be easy” (Cleveland, 1978), and for many Black women faculty in higher education, the road has not been easy. While Black women have been one of the fastest-growing populations of women to earn a doctorate in the United States (Howard-Hamilton, 2004), Black women only account for 2% of full professors based on the latest data from the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES, 2021). While the road may not be easy, one might believe that the road in academia should become more inclusive and equitable. Black women faculty continue to experience prejudice and discrimination inside and outside the classroom, which may be potentially taking a toll on their brain health and impacting their physical, psychological, and emotional well-being. Such manifestations often lead to weathering, the deterioration of ventromedial prefrontal matter in the brain (Okeke et al., 2022) affecting telomeres, which are deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) sequences located at the ends of chromosomes that typically shorten with biological age, suggesting a type of premature aging in the body (Menakem, 2017; Solórzano & Huber, 2020). This research sought to explore the impact of prejudice and discrimination on Black women’s well-being in higher education ecologies.
Prejudice and discrimination include microaggressions, microinsults, and intersectional discrimination of race and gender. Intersectionality, when multiple forms of discrimination happen concurrently, means that Black women faculty may experience higher rates of racism and sexism than White women faculty (Esposito & Evans-Winters, 2021; Howard-Hamilton, 2004). Research has shown that Black women’s ongoing encounters with prejudice and discrimination may increase stress responses in the body and brain (Fani et al., 2022; Menakem, 2017; Williams, 2021). The current study differs from other published research in that it sought to understand how Black women faculty working in predominantly White institutions of higher education (IHE) rate their experiences with prejudice and discrimination and their experiences with negative health outcomes, and it used a survey to capture these self-reported experiences.
National data suggest that three out of four Black women experience racial discrimination with variability in frequency. Black women in the professoriate reveal common themes of prejudice and discrimination: higher expectations for Black women compared to White colleagues, unwelcoming institutional climates, and unwritten rules (Breeden, 2021; Coles & Pasek, 2020; Dillard, 2022; Howard-Hamilton, 2004). For many Black women faculty, prejudice and discrimination happen frequently and contribute to an ongoing, persistent form of stress (Fani et al., 2022).
Racial discrimination is considered a national public health epidemic that contributes to negative health outcomes such as cardiovascular health, mental health, and brain health (Fani et al., 2022). Research shows that racial discrimination contributes negatively to mental health. Black women faculty’s experience with prejudice and discrimination in their predominantly White higher education workplaces may cause allostatic overload, producing a state of chronic stress. When the body perceives prejudice and discrimination, it may experience a visceral “fight or flight” response that activates survival commands in the brain and a stress response (Hammond, 2015; Menakem, 2017). According to Fani et al. (2021a), discrimination is associated with a disproportionately greater response in the nodes of emotion that impact emotion regulation and fear inhibition, which leads to mental health concerns such as anxiety, depression, and posttraumatic stress disorder.
Research (Fani, 2021a) also found that racial discrimination has a clear impact on physical health–related outcomes. While the body works in concert with the mind, embodied cognition suggests that our bodies measure the depth of an experience more quickly, more precisely, and more accurately than the mind does (Shonstrom, 2020). This triggers the release of cortisol, stimulating the vagus nerve, which feeds into a complex system including the brain stem, heart, stomach, gut, spine, lungs, and pharynx (Menakem, 2017). Watson (2019) examined the physiological effects of racial microaggressions that measured the length of telomeres using DNA samples. Findings showed that telomere lengths were shorter in research participants, signifying premature chronological aging and shortening of lifespan. Black women’s bodies hold the stories of their intersectional lives with race, gender, and the experience of discrimination (Menakem, 2017; van der Kolk, 2014; Shonstrom, 2020).
Research by Fani et al. (2022) also identified a pathway by which racial discrimination can negatively impact microstructures of white-matter neuroarchitecture in the brain that results in negative health implications such as neurodegenerative diseases. Solórzano & Huber (2020) identified research by Chester Pierce, who through years of research found negative physiological and psychological effects of racial microaggressions. These findings align with public health researchers who examined race-related stress and its connections to emotional, physiological, psychological, and brain deterioration (Solórzano & Huber, 2020).
This study sought to understand the extent of prejudice and discrimination for Black women faculty in higher education and the cumulative impact of prejudice and discrimination on their health.
Research Questions
This study sought to answer the following research questions:
1. To what extent did Black women faculty in higher education at predominantly White institutions (PWIs) experience prejudice and discrimination?
2. For study participants who experienced prejudice and discrimination, what negative health outcomes did they report?
The method used for this study was a quantitative design that collected data from a 25-item survey (see Appendix B). Snowball sampling was used to identify Black women employed at PWIs. The survey was composed of three components: demographic data, ratings of prejudice and discrimination within the workplace on the Workplace Prejudice Discrimination Inventory (WPDI), and self-reported health outcomes.
The WPDI is a 14-item validated inventory designed to assess experiences of prejudice and discrimination in the workplace (James, Lovato, & Cropanzano, 2004). James et al. (1994) examined the reliability of the WPDI as well as its construct- and criterion-related validity, thus providing psychometric evidence for it. The WPDI is grounded in social identity theory, which postulates that identity influences an individual’s behaviors, cognitions, and emotions (Burkard, Boticki, & Madson, 2002). Each item on the WPDI used a seven-point Likert scale, ranging from (1) “disagree completely” to (7) “completely agree.” The higher the WPDI score, the greater the experiences with prejudice and/or discrimination in the workplace.
The target participants were Black women faculty who taught in either public or private two-year or four-year colleges or universities. Participants were recruited using snowball sampling on social media platforms such as Facebook, LinkedIn, and Instagram as well as higher education organizations’ list-servs. Recruitment included three rounds of posts to social media sites as well as two rounds of emails to professional development organizations. To maximize peer-to-peer solicitation, the presidents of these organizations were asked to share the invitation to their network of colleagues via word of mouth.
The survey collected demographic information that included institution state, type of institution, years of teaching, and faculty status (see Table 1). Participants were given pseudonyms to protect their identity. Eleven participants completed the survey and met the inclusion criteria: racial identifier of Black, gender identifier of female, teaching employment for at least 6 months at a PWI, and completed WPDI items.
Table 1
Institutional Demographics of Survey Participants (Ambrose Brown, 2023)
PARTICIPANT
FACULTY STATUS
Gail DE Community College 1–2 Years Instructor
Lisa PA 4-Year Private >10 Years Adjunct
Kyra PA Community College >10 Years Professor
Keisha PA
4-Year Public 6–12 Months Professor
Bonita PA 4-Year Public 3–5 Years Adjunct
Tyneisha AZ
4-Year Private 6–10 Years Associate Professor
Bryn PA 4-Year Public 6–10 Years Instructor
Rochelle TX 4-Year Private >10 Years Adjunct
Sandra DC
4-Year Private 3–5 Years Adjunct
Denise CO 4-Year Public 6–10 Years Associate Professor
Donita DC 4-Year Public 3–5 Years Assistant Professor
As Table 1 indicates, most participants were from the East Coast of the United States, while two were from the central United States and one from the southwestern part of the United States. Twenty-seven percent had taught at a PWI for more than 10 years. Another 27% had taught at a PWI for 6 to 10 years, 27% had taught for 3 to 5 years, and 19% taught for less than 3 years.
As Table 2 shows, 73% of the participants were over the age of 45, while 27% were aged 36 to 45. Sixty-four percent of the participants held a doctoral degree, 27% held a master’s degree, and 9% held an associate degree.
Table 2
Demographics of Survey Participants and WPDI Score (Ambrose Brown, 2023)
Snowball sampling was a limitation of the study because it prevented the researcher from randomly recruiting study participants. The study timeline also resulted in a limited sample size. The study was unable to control for self-reporting bias, and it also did not control for confounding variables for participant self-reported health outcomes, which means that while the study could establish a correlation between prejudice and discrimination and negative health outcomes, it could not ascertain causality.
The results of the WPDI characterized the experiences of the participants, namely Black women faculty at PWIs. WPDI scale ranged from 1 (low perceived prejudice/discrimination) to 7 (high perceived prejudice/discrimination).
The mean and standard deviations of the WPDI were calculated using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS). Overall WPDI scores ranged from 23 to 61 (see Table 2). The high standard deviations demonstrate the unique ways Black women faculty experience prejudice and discrimination in higher education ecologies (see Table 3).
3
Descriptive Statistics of Workplace Prejudice Discrimination Inventory Responses (Ambrose Brown, 2023)
Workplace Prejudice Discrimination Inventory Questions N Mean Standard Deviation
Q7: Prejudice exists where I work.
Q18: At my present place of employment, people of other racial/ethnic groups do not tell me some job-related information that they share with members of their own group.
Q6: I have sometimes been unfairly singled out because of my racial/ethnic group.
Q13: Supervisors scrutinize the work members of my group more than that of members of other racial/ethnic groups.
Q16: There is discrimination where I work.
Q15: At my present job, some people get better treatment because of their racial/ethnic group.
Q12: Where I work, members of some racial/ethnic groups are treated better than members of other groups.
Q10: At work, minority employees receive fewer opportunities. 11
Q17: At work, I am treated poorly because of my racial/ ethnic group.
Q8: Where I work, all people are treated the same, regardless of their racial/ethnic group.
IBM SPSS 28 was used to calculate the mean and the standard deviation (how far each score lies from the mean) of each question on the WPDI (IBM Corp., 2021). Results showed that the highest level of perceived prejudice was indicated in response to Question 7, “Prejudice exists where I work.” Responses to Q7 had a mean of 5.55 (Agree) and a standard deviation of 1.753. This shows that although there was a relatively high level of agreement, the standard deviation indicated the spread of the distribution would equate to participants perceiving their experience of prejudice as unique to themselves. Responses to Q18, “At my place of employment, people of other racial/ethnic groups do not tell me some job-related information that they share with members of their own group,” showed a mean of 4.91, which leaned toward Somewhat Agree, and the smallest standard deviation, 1.514. Responses to Q6, “I have sometimes been unfairly singled out because of my racial/ethnic group,” showed a mean of 4.82 (Somewhat Agree) and a standard deviation of 1.834. This suggests that participants leaned more toward agreement but also experienced prejudice as even more unique to themselves.
The WPDI revealed that Black women faculty had unique lived experiences with prejudice and discrimination in their PWIs. Participants assigned ratings to the following three questions: (Q6) I have sometimes been unfairly singled out because of my racial/ethnic group; (Q17) At work, I am treated poorly because of my racial/ethnic group; and (Q18) At my present place of employment, people of other racial/ethnic groups do not tell me some job-related information that they share with members of their own group. Ratings for these three items are shown in Table 4.
Table 4
Descriptive Statistics of All Participants’ Unique Experiences With Prejudice and Discrimination (Ambrose Brown, 2023)
Health Indicators
In the survey, participants also self-reported their experiences with negative health outcomes (see Table 5), including sleeplessness, anxiety, high blood pressure, high body weight, heart disease, heart attack, diabetes, and chronic headache. The data showed that all participants experienced some negative health outcomes, ranging in time from “currently experiencing” to “experienced within the past 5 years.” Anxiety and high body weight were the most universally experienced outcomes, reported by 10 participants.
Of those 10 participants, 50% indicated that they were experiencing anxiety currently, 20% experienced it in the past 2 years, 10% experienced it in the last 1 to 3 years, and 10% experienced it 3 to 5 years ago. Seventy-three percent of participants indicated they were currently overweight, 9% had been overweight within the past year, and 9% had been overweight within the past 5 years or more. Twenty-seven percent indicated they were currently experiencing sleeplessness, 9% experienced it over the past year, 9% experienced it in the past 3 to 5 years, and 9% experienced it 5 or more years ago. Twenty-seven percent experienced chronic headaches within the past 1 to 3 years.
Table 5
Health Outcomes and Demographics of Survey Participants (Ambrose Brown, 2023)
Participant Age Institution Type
Sandra >45 4-Year Private
Keisha 36–45 4-Year Public
Reported HealthOutcomes
Within last year, high blood pressure, sleeplessness, anxiety, overweight
Currently, sleeplessness, anxiety; within last year, chronic headache, overweight
Bryn >45 4-Year Public Currently, overweight; 1–3 years, chronic headache; 3–5 years, sleeplessness, anxiety
Bonita >45 4-Year Public More than 5 years, overweight, diabetes
Rochelle >45 4-Year Private Currently, anxiety, high blood pressure, overweight; more than 5 years, sleeplessness
Kyra >45 Community College Currently, overweight; within last year, anxiety
Donita >45 4-Year Public Currently, overweight; within last year, anxiety
Denise 36–45 4-Year Public Currently, overweight; within last year, sleeplessness, anxiety; 1–3 years, high blood pressure
Lisa 36–45 4-Year Private 1–3 years, anxiety, high blood pressure
Tyneisha >45 4-Year Private Currently, sleeplessness, anxiety, high blood pressure, overweight
Gail >45 Community College Currently, anxiety, overweight; 1–3 years, chronic headache
This quantitative study of Black women’s well-being in higher education ecologies found that Black women faculty experienced prejudice and discrimination at both the other racial/ethnic groups (M = 4.64). These faculty also perceived receiving poorer treatment institutional and personal levels. The results of the WPDI found significance in Black women faculty experiencing discrimination (M = 4.46). Greater significance was found in discriminatory practices based on their race, such as not sharing job-related information with Black women that they (White employees) share with members of their own group (M = 4.91), being unfairly singled out because of their race (4.82), and their work being scrutinized more than members of because of their race (M = 4.45); thus, they did not believe that people were treated the same in their workplace regardless of race (M = 3.18).
Survey results on health outcomes found that these Black women faculty reported experiencing significant negative health outcomes either currently or within the past 3 years. Ninety percent of these women reported being overweight; 55% were experiencing sleeplessness; and 50% indicated they were currently experiencing anxiety. Many researchers, including Harrell et al. (2003), Menakem (2017), Fani et al. (2021a, 2021b, 2022), and Okeke (2022), affirm that racial trauma leads to exhaustion syndrome, which is characterized by stress, fatigue, broken sleep, and attention issues. This syndrome can lead to brain changes and is a precursor to neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s, as well as psychological conditions such as depression and anxiety.
While the current study identified a correlation between prejudice and discrimination and negative health outcomes, these findings warrant further investigation into the quantitative responses of the faculty who participated in the study to interrogate causality. Two major implications for practice require institutions to be mindful of campus climate and institutional practice. Creating inclusive and equitable environments where Black women faculty can have a strong sense of belonging has major implications for fostering Black women’s well-being in their higher education ecologies.
Ambrose Brown, V. Q. (2023). Institutional demographics of survey participants [Data set]. ProQuest LLC. DOI: 10.17918/00001831
Ambrose Brown, V. Q. (2023). Demographics of Survey Participants [Data set]. ProQuest LLC. DOI: 10.17918/00001831
Ambrose Brown, V. Q. (2023). Descriptive Statistics of Workplace Prejudice Discrimination Inventory Responses [Data set]. ProQuest LLC. DOI: 10.17918/00001831
Ambrose Brown, V. Q. (2023). Health Outcomes of Survey Participants [Data set]. ProQuest LLC. DOI: 10.17918/00001831
Ambrose Brown, V. Q. (2023). Descriptive Statistics of All Participants’ Unique Experiences with Prejudice and Discrimination [Data set]. ProQuest LLC. DOI: 10.17918/00001831
Breeden, R. L. (2021). Our presence is resistance: Stories of black women in senior-level student affairs positions at predominantly white institutions. Journal of Women and Gender in Higher Education, 14(2), 166–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/26379112.2021.1948860
Center for Intersectional Justice (n.d.). What is intersectionality? https://www.intersectionaljustice.org/what-is-intersectionality Cleveland, J. (1978). I don’t feel no ways tired [Song]. Savoy.
Coles, S. M., & Pasek, J. (2020). Intersectional invisibility revisited: How group prototypes lead to the erasure and exclusion of Black women. Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 6(4), 314–324. https://doi.org/10.1037/tps0000256
Dillard, C. B. (2022). The spirit of our work. Beacon Press. Esposito, J., & Evans-Winters, V. E. (2021). Introduction to intersectional qualitative research (1st Ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc. Fani, N., Carter, S. E., Harnett, N. G., Ressler, K. J., & Bradley, B. (2021a). Association of racial discrimination with neural response to threat in Black women in the US exposed to trauma. AMA Psychiatry, 78(9), 1005. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2021.1480
Fani, N., Harnett, N. G., Bradley, B., Mekawi, Y., Powers, A., Stevens, J. S., Ressler, K. J., & Carter, S. E. (2021b). Racial discrimination and white matter microstructure in trauma-exposed Black women. Biological Psychiatry, 91(3), 254–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2021.08.011
Hammond, Z. (2015). Culturally responsive teaching and the brain: Promoting authentic engagement and rigor among culturally and linguistically diverse students. Corwin.
Harrell, S. P. (2000). A multidimensional conceptualization of racism-related stress: Implications for the well-being of people of color. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 70, 42–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/ h0087722
Howard-Hamilton, M. F. (2004). Meeting the needs of African American women. Jossey-Bass. IBM Corp. (2021). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 28.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.
James, K., Lovato, C., & Cropanzano, R. (1994). Correlational and known-group comparison validation of a workplace prejudice discrimination inventory. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24(17), 1573–1592. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1994.tb01563.x
McEwen, B. S. (1998). Stress, adaptation, and disease. Allostasis and allostatic load. Annals of the New York Academy of Science, 333–44. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1998tb09546.x.PMID: 9629234
Menakem, R. (2017). My grandmother’s hands: Racialized trauma and the pathway to mending our hearts and bodies. Central Recovery Press.
National Center for Education Statistics (2021). The NCES fast facts tool. National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) U.S. Department of Education, https://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=61.
Okeke, O., Elbasheir, A., Carter, S. E., Powers, A., Mekawi, Y., Gillespie, C. F., Schwartz, A. C., Bradley, B., & Fani, N. (2022). Indirect effects of racial discrimination on health outcomes through prefrontal cortical white matter integrity. Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging, S2451902222001203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpsc.2022.05.004
Shonstrom, E. (2020). The wisdom of the body: What embodied cognition can teach us about learning, human development, and ourselves. Rowman & Littlefield.
Solórzano, D. G., & Huber, L. P. (2020). Racial microaggressions: Using critical race theory to respond to everyday racism. Teachers College Press.
Sue, D. W., Capodilupo, C. M., Torino, G. C., Bucceri, J. M., Holder, A. M. B., Nadal, K. L., & Esquilin, M. (2007). Racial microaggressions in everyday life: Implications for clinical practice. American Psychologist, 62(4), 271–286. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.62.4.271
van der Kolk, B. A. (2014). The body keeps the score: Brain, mind, and body in the healing of trauma. Viking. Williams, N. E. (2021, May). Black women and cortisol: How chronic stress affects your fitness. Healthline https://www.healthline.com/health/fitness/black-women-cortisol-and-fitness
VALDIJAH AMBROSE BROWN , Ed.D., LMSW, is a mind, brain, education scientist; researcher; administrator; and adjunct faculty in higher education. As a researcher and practitioner, Valdijah’s expertise spans the fields of mind, brain, education science; endarkened feminism; embodied cognition; learning sciences; student success; expressive arts; and creativity. Valdijah earned her doctorate in mind, brain, learning science at Drexel University; a master’s degree in higher education with a triple concentration in organizational development, student development and affairs, and academic development, instruction, and technology at Drexel; a Master of Social Work at Temple University; and her undergraduate degree in psychology from Millersville University. Valdijah is pursuing a certificate in Trauma Informed Behavioral Health with a focus in Expressive Art Therapy. Valdijah is a member of the American Educational Research Association and American Psychological Association (Division 10: Society for the Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts).
By Greta Van Arman
ABSTRACT
The relationship between paraeducators and the education system is historically rooted in power dynamics. This article consists of the personal testimonial of a third-year, self-contained classroom special-education teacher. Within the testimonial, the teacher expands on her personal experiences, research-based findings on the current crisis, and the absence of supporting paraeducators, advocating for their professional advancement in the education system. Paraeducators are often referred to as the “backbone” of schools. Without paraprofessionals, students would not receive a sufficient and fair education. This testimonial focuses on the issues and potential solutions relating to paraeducator training, teacher preparation for supporting paraeducators, and the benefits of paraeducators becoming classroom teachers.
I was a 19-year-old paraeducator who became a special education teacher at the age of 23. This is not the typical educational route for the average White female teacher, but it is my experience, which has impacted me in more ways than one. I now have my own self-contained autistic support classroom that is in an urban school district. In my classroom, I am a 25-year-old teacher who oversees seven paraeducators (all significantly older than me) who have limited education beyond their high school diplomas. For me, this task has been more difficult than managing students. Almost daily, I watch my paraeducators break down emotionally due to the high-stress environment. I see my paraeducators struggle to implement behavior plans, despite the number of times I have reviewed expectations and corrected their previous attempts. I watch my paraeducators handle situations in ways that are not culturally sensitive and require me to advocate for antiracist teaching (half of my students are students of color). Usually, they do not understand my short explanations on this crucial teaching philosophy.
However, I do not blame my paraeducators for their actions. They lack knowledge on how to manage the behavior of students and respond to situations through the lens of culturally responsive teaching. It is not their fault that they do not know these best practices because they have never received, and are not required to receive, intensive and formal training in the areas that challenge my classroom daily. I hear my paraeducators voicing frustration and hopelessness in the stressful classroom environment. To their credit, it is clear they want to do better. I watch them struggle as they look to me for help. The bigger problem is that I do not know how to help them.
Every day, I leave work with an immense amount of guilt and an increasingly impossible workload as I desperately brainstorm ways to help my paraeducators in my classroom. I am fortunate enough to work for an educational agency that provides me with a special education consultant and a board-certified behavior analyst. When I contact them for assistance, I am given suggestions such as making each paraeducator their own personalized schedule detailing exactly what they should be doing for every 15–30-minute increment of the 7.5-hour work day, creating and running a weekly team meeting to train paraeducators on behavioral interventions ( I do not get a lunch away from the students, nor do I have a teacher-preparation period), or purchasing my paraeducators gifts to thank them for staying in my classroom (something that I already do multiple times a year with my own earnings). However, despite the suggestions being valid and potentially helpful in better circumstances, they require me to work outside of my contractual hours, and because I do not have adequate time, the issues in my classroom remain. The reality is that I am a burned-out second-year teacher due to my inadequate ability to support my paraeducators despite my best efforts. The feeling of failing my paraeducators, which directly affects the quality of education my students receive, has brought me to research whether this is a common occurrence among special education teachers and paraeducators. It is. Teachers need an increase in training and support when it comes to managing and leading paraeducators within the classroom. Ultimately, this will improve the school environment and directly benefit our students’ learning and development.
Paraeducators are the backbone of special education. It is not unreasonable to state that the absence of paraeducators would have a significantly negative impact on the ability of classrooms to function. A paraeducator’s roles and responsibilities are essentially those of a teacher. They are expected to know all student behavior plans within their Individualized Education Programs (IEPs), which are legal documents containing the plans and services for a student’s education based on their most pressing educational, social, and behavioral needs. Paraeducators are expected to consistently and accurately follow these plans with fidelity, understand each student’s goals within their IEPs, and assist with academic, social, and behavioral instruction. Often, paraeducators are required to deliver the curriculum or plan and run their own small lessons. Teachers rely on them to collect an immense amount of data that are then used for lesson planning, tracking student progress, and many other essential purposes (Sheehey et al., 2018). Paraeducators take on a personal care assistant role, which consists of supporting students with self-care tasks such as toileting and feeding needs (Borosh et al., 2023). Although teachers help with these tasks, these responsibilities primarily fall back on paraeducators.
As much as teachers rely on classroom staff, families do too, particularly in their role as cultural liaisons and translators. The demographics of paraeducators within schools often mirror the student and family population,
TESTIMONIAL:
which helps create a sense of trust and understanding among paraeducators and families. They have a higher ability compared to the teacher to create relationships with student families surrounding their shared cultures and strong presence within the community (Frantz et al., 2022). My paraeducators live in the same distressed city that is home to many of my students. Often, they run into students and their family members in the community. It is true that the paraeducators in my school have a stronger understanding of the town culture and a stronger sense of that community than I do. They have shared experiences with students and families that I do not have as a White female living in a suburban area. I am thankful that my staff can connect and create strong bonds with families, as these aid in bridging the gap between home and school. My paraeducators have great potential for success in my classroom and to truly make a lasting impact on the students. However, many barriers impede the full realization of that potential.
The most prevalent barrier is the lack of paraprofessional and teacher training. Successful and sufficient training largely plays a role in decreasing high rates of teacher attrition in urban and low-income districts, as well as directly affecting student learning and sense of belonging (Chu & Garcia, 2021). Neither teachers nor paraeducators are given enough formal training or professional development to be successful in the classroom. I have sufficient training when it comes to culturally responsive teaching, trauma-informed practices, and other training areas that are focused on applied behavior analysis (behavior management). However, most teachers do not receive adequate training on culturally responsive teaching practices that support culturally and linguistically diverse students. Despite my substantial training in culturally relevant teaching, which is sadly not the norm for most of the teacher population, the majority of teachers like me have not received any formal training on how to manage and supervise paraeducators. Compounding this problem, most teachers do not have the time to train paraeducators within their already occupied schedules (Nover & Farrell, 2022). Special education teachers in particular are failed in this area at the very beginning of their educational careers. Teacher-preparation programs do not even touch on the practices of supervising and managing paraprofessionals. In-service special education teachers also do not receive direct training and professional development on how to guide paraeducators on top of their other professional duties (Borosh et al., 2023). This lack of training and time to help my paraeducators has been the most difficult part of my teaching experience. I strongly relate to a quote from a teacher cited in Exploring the Professional Development Needs of Early Childhood Paraeducators and Supervising Teachers: “There’s no formal support. We’re just expected to manage and know how to manage…I graduated Monday, and then I was expected to manage TAs (teacher assistants)” (Frantz et al., 2022, p. 26). It is an overwhelming feeling to not know how to manage adults but know that you must in order to be successful.
My education agency does have a special education consultant who oversees my classroom and provides some training and support with managing paraeducators. While appreciated, the support is not sufficient. The special
education consultant assigned to my classroom has valuable experience as a previous classroom teacher and provides many helpful suggestions when it comes to training paraeducators. However, our special education consultants are spread across many classrooms and are required to fill in as substitutes if teachers are absent, handle classroom disputes among teachers and paraprofessional staff, serve as editors and finalizers of all IEPs within our program, create activities and materials for teachers, and respond to calls for behavioral help with students in the classroom. My special education consultant’s caseload is overflowing, much like mine. This restricts the special education consultant’s ability to be highly effective when providing the much-needed training and mentorship. Many districts face the same issue where they have experts, but these experts are shared across multiple classrooms, making them inaccessible for regular and adequate everyday support (Borosh et al., 2023). Even with the support my special education consultant attempts to provide for my classroom, I do not feel as if it makes a difference, and neither do my classroom staff. The special education consultant’s assistance in our classroom, with our individual students and classroom dynamic, is not sufficient or personalized enough to be truly effective.
My paraprofessionals are suffering from my lack of direction and knowledge, but they are also lacking direct training from our organization. Not only are teachers unable to provide effective direction and support to paraeducators (Sheehey et al., 2018), but paraeducators are also not being provided with other meaningful professional development and training opportunities that might set them up for success in the classroom. They are not required to receive training on crucial topics such as cultural sensitivity, trauma, how to communicate with families, what is considered professional conduct within the school setting, and research-based behavior management (Frantz et al., 2022), all of which are vital for a successful classroom.
Paraeducators do not receive training on how to instruct and manage students with disabilities based on the specific disabilities of their students and the evidence-based behavioral strategies effective for these disabilities (Borosh et al., 2023). Schools have an increasing number of students who are culturally and linguistically diverse, who have experienced trauma, and who have a disability. There are few incentives for paraeducators to attend training and expand upon their skill sets (Frantz et al., 2022). Paraprofessionals are not required to complete intensive training, and they are not always compensated if they choose to do so on their own time. When offered pay to attend training outside of their work hours, with the little pay they receive and no real requirements for them to attend training sessions, most do not see the value of attending. This has a direct effect on how paraprofessionals and teachers interact and deliver instruction to students who are culturally and linguistically diverse, have traumatic childhood experiences, and who have a disability. From an overwhelmed teacher’s perspective, I am sympathetic because I am encouraged to seek professional development on my own time, on top of the overflowing workload that already exists
for me as a teacher. We are placing paraeducators in the classroom with no real background knowledge and training while expecting them to carry out duties that require such background knowledge and training. These circumstances are unfair to paraprofessionals, the teachers who support them, and, ultimately, the students.
I often reflect on my own past experiences as a paraeducator. My experience as a 19-year-old paraeducator further drove my passion for special education and ultimately challenged me to become a classroom teacher. The paraeducators in my current classroom, although older than I am, remind me of myself when I was in their position. They, like me, are hard workers who dedicate themselves to our students. In many instances, I have thought my staff would be great teachers if they wished to further their education and go down that path. I have spoken to paraeducators about their desire to become teachers, but there are many personal and systemic barriers that make the process nearly impossible for them. This was not my own experience as a young White woman who came from a family that was able to support and fund my tuition and housing.
Paraeducators have proven their ability to carry out many of the same responsibilities of a teacher as they simultaneously hold a deep connection and commitment to the community and students. I believe paraeducators would make outstanding certified teachers, and research reinforces my belief. Especially as student-of-color demographics continue to rise, teachers who look like their students and who share similar cultural experiences have a higher impact on students and learning (Chu & Garcia, 2021).
Research has shown paraeducators to be representatives of students and their communities and cultures. Many paraeducators have experiences, like students, where they encounter unfair and unavoidable adversity and setbacks. They are resilient and determined, especially when it comes to supporting themselves and their community (Gist, 2021). This is exactly the person who students deserve and need to see as their teacher: someone who looks like them, grew up like them, understands and cares for them; someone who truly believes in them and is a positive, successful role model.
After getting to know the members of my team, I became interested in researching the roadblocks that paraprofessionals would encounter if they decided to become classroom teachers. I acknowledge my privilege as a well-off White woman who has never had to deal with these barriers, and I knew it was my responsibility to engage in research on these different experiences and perspectives. This is where I found Grow Your Own (GYO) programs that focus on recruiting paraeducators (and other members of a school’s neighborhood community) to become trained educators. GYO programs consist of collaborative arrangements between school districts, community organizations, and teacher-preparation programs at institutions of higher education. There is a high level of teacher attrition throughout the entire United States, and with a growing student population that is more culturally and linguistically diverse, recruiting culturally diverse and linguistically diverse paraeducators from the same communities where these students live would combat teacher attrition (Gist, 2021). GYO programs offer a different route to becoming an educator that addresses this need.
Primary and secondary education is a field that is dominated by White women who went to college to get a degree. The system currently favors fast-tracking this demographic of college graduates with limited experience as teachers over alternative pathways available to paraeducators or other community members. There are prohibitory program entry requirements for universities and colleges, biased exams that cost money and do not take into consideration culture, inflexible course schedules, and a lack of financial support for those who are unable to produce the funds required (Gist et al., 2022).
I have spoken to paraeducators who state they cannot afford the cost of tuition, nor do they have the time to attend multiple classes at once because they need to work, sometimes multiple jobs, to support themselves and their families. Many are also concerned that they would not be accepted into a traditional teacher-preparation program because of lower high school GPAs and relatively limited extracurricular activities that other incoming college students had the privilege to experience. They are not the typical and preferred candidates, even though we need more teachers in our schools from underrepresented backgrounds. Many paraeducators state that it is nearly impossible to become a teacher without sacrificing their basic needs to live their current lives, and this is understandably not something they are fully willing to do.
Paraeducators do not receive adequate compensation and training from school districts despite having similar responsibilities as teachers and making essential contributions to the classroom. Furthermore, few districts have incentive programs that would aid in paraeducators furthering their professional education toward becoming certified teachers (Frantz et al., 2022). Fortunately, GYO programs are expanding and provide an alternative route to traditional teacher-preparation programs and requirements.
Finding solutions for the problems that paraeducators, teachers, and schools face is not going to be simple and immediate. These issues are complex, and addressing them will require time, collaboration, research, and persistence. There is also not a singular solution that will address teacher preparation and training when it comes to managing paraeducators, training paraeducators on research-based practices, or providing a smooth pathway for paraeducators to become certified teachers.
However, there are starting points. As part of their teacher education programs, universities and colleges need to provide preservice special education teachers with courses on how to manage and support paraprofessionals within their classrooms. In-service teachers need their administration to provide them with structured support, professional development, and ongoing training on how to manage paraprofessionals within their classrooms. The most effective means of preparation is behavioral skills training, which consists of multiple forms of other methods such as didactic training (lectures and workshops), video/live-modeling (step-by-step implementation of strategies), role-play (providing teachers with practice opportunities for contrived scenarios), and performance feedback (corrective
feedback provided on observed skills) (Borosh et al., 2022). The use of behavioral skills training for how to instruct and manage paraprofessionals in the classroom is something that I never received. However, I have received it for behavior management and have seen success from it in my classroom. With this additional aspect of teacher education programs, new teachers would also be able to coach their paraeducators with behavioral skills training when given the opportunity.
Another solution that I believe is one of the most essential is to increase paraeducator wages concurrent with increasing the training and professional development required within their contracts. Paraeducators work extremely hard under stressful conditions, and they deserve to be compensated and professionally supported much more than they are currently. Increased pay or increased total compensation for training or professional development would have a direct impact on paraprofessional motivation, confidence in the classroom, and retention rates. In return, this would also decrease the amount of stress placed upon teachers to support and train their paraeducators with given time constraints within the school day. In addition to teachers receiving more training and paraeducators an increase in pay, laws and policies should be enacted that require school districts to provide paraprofessionals with appropriate training prior to entering the classroom, as well as ongoing training and professional development (Frantz et al., 2022). This would hold school districts legally accountable to ensure that staff are knowledgeable and able to provide students with the highest level of education and support.
Additionally, these strategies could be supplemented by GYO programs, which provide wonderful opportunities for partnerships among school districts, universities and colleges, and community organizations (Gist, 2021). I believe GYO programs pave the way for universities to increasingly provide culturally diverse preservice teacher candidates with an appropriate and equitable education, with the additional outcome that these teachers will be successful in their community school districts. It is my hope that paraeducators will receive information on these GYO programs from their employers, followed by the support to get them through these programs successfully if they wish to seek teacher certification. Given my newly formed knowledge and insight on the issues surrounding the lack of training and support for paraeducators and teachers, alongside the barriers for paraeducators to become certified teachers, I will continue to advocate for myself, fellow teachers, and all paraeducators to get what we need in order to be (and feel) successful in the classroom. I will also be an advocate for equitable treatment of paraeducators and an advocate to assist with GYO programs getting started and remaining successful in my neighboring school districts.
Despite all the ongoing challenges in education and my own personal struggles within my classroom, I love being a teacher, and I love my students. At the end of the day, I also love working with my paraprofessional teams and am so thankful for their hard work and dedication to my students. I do not wish to be the burned-out second-year teacher that I am. I am desperately searching for solutions so that we teachers and paraeducators can continue doing what we love. It is my biggest hope that other teachers who are in the same position as I am can read this article and feel some relief that there are others who feel this way. I hope they can also recognize that there are in-progress solutions to these issues if we all work together and continue to advocate for change and growth within the education system.
Borosh, A. M., Newson, A., Mason, R. A., Richards, C. D., & Collins Crosley, H. (2023). Special education teacher-delivered training for paraeducators: A systematic and quality review. Teacher Education and Special Education, 46(3), 223–242.
Chu, S.-Y., & Garcia, S. B. (2021). Collective teacher efficacy and culturally responsive teaching efficacy of in-service special education teachers in the United States. Urban Education, 56(9), 1520–1546. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085918770720
Frantz, R., Douglas, S., Meadan, H., Sands, M., Bhana, N., & D’Agostino, S. (2022). Exploring the professional development needs of early childhood paraeducators and supervising teachers. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 42(1), 20–32.
Gist, C. D. (2022). Shifting dominant narratives of teacher development: New directions for expanding access to the educator workforce through Grow Your Own programs. Educational Researcher, 51(1), 51–57.
Gist, C. D., Garcia, A., & Amos, Y. T. (2022). An essential but overlooked workforce: Elevating the need to investigate the career development of paraeducators. Journal of Career Development, 49(5), 1039–1047.
Nover, C. H., & Farrell, A. (2022). Trauma-informed paraeducator training in the United States. Education and Treatment of Children, 45(2), 231–237.
Sheehey, P. H., Wells, J. C., & Ogata, V. F. (2018). Paraeducators’ perceptions and experiences working with diverse families. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 37(1), 44–51.
GRETA VAN ARMAN is a 3rd year middle school autistic-support teacher employed by an education agency in Lancaster County. Her current classroom is in a small, rural school district. Greta graduated from Millersville University with a degree in Special Education PreK-8 and Early Childhood Education PreK-4 and recently became certified to teach special education PreK-12. She began her career in education as a 19-year-old paraeducator, working for the same education agency that she does now. Teaching students with disabilities has always been her passion. Greta strives to make the current special education system a better place for educators, administrators, support staff, paraprofessionals, and most importantly students and their families
By Alexander Rohrer
ABSTRACT
Teachers have been leaving the profession (attrition) at alarmingly high rates, especially in recent years. What causes even greater alarm is the disproportionately high rate at which teachers of color are leaving the field. In Pennsylvania, Black teachers have the highest attrition rate with over 15% leaving the field as compared to Hispanic teachers (10%) and White teachers (6%). Teacher attrition is a critical challenge facing the education system, as classrooms need to be staffed to provide quality instruction to students, and staffing turnover is a costly endeavor for school districts. A root cause associated with teacher attrition is burnout, relating to teacher mental health. Upon investigation, care for teachers experiencing burnout is inequitable, with mental health providers mirroring the educational sector with predominantly White professionals providing care. Those engaging in mental health care often seek out professionals who share characteristics with them, including race and gender. However, with not enough mental healthcare professionals of color, a disparity emerges and further limits their ability to seek care in the same way that White individuals do. It is critical to diversify the teaching profession through retention of teachers of color, as the benefits extend to all students, regardless of racial/ethnic identity.
Attention has been brought to the challenge of teachers leaving the field (attrition), but the issue becomes even more concerning in terms of which teachers are leaving at the highest rates. When examining teacher burnout, inequitable causes and effects and subsequent care emerge as a specific area in need of discussion and action. Dr. Ed Fuller (2023) of Penn State studied teacher attrition in Pennsylvania and indicated the statewide teacher attrition rate, a metric that measures the number of teachers leaving the field, was the highest ever recorded in 2022-2023 at 7.7%. In 2023, approximately 9,500 teachers left the profession statewide. The mid-state region has some of the highest teacher attrition rates in the Commonwealth, with York, Lancaster, and Franklin Counties at 6.2% or above. Dauphin County surpasses the state average (6.7%), at a rate of 7.3%. The foregoing rates are in stark contrast to those in counties such as Mercer (4.7%) and Lawrence (4.1%). Black teachers have the highest attrition rate (over 15%) of all teachers, with Hispanic, Asian American, and Pacific Islander rates over 10% (Fuller, 2023). These rates are greater than those of White teachers, at approximately 6%. Moreover, districts with more than 65% students of color had double the teacher turnover rate of districts with less than 35% students of color. The School District of Lancaster (2024) has a student population consisting of over 77% students identifying as either Hispanic or Black. Alternatively, Mercer Area School District (in Mercer County, Pennsylvania) has a student population consisting of approximately 2.4% identifying as Hispanic or Black (U.S. News & World Report, 2024). Lancaster County’s teacher attrition rate was 6.3% as compared to Mercer County’s rate of 4.7% (Fuller, 2023). Higher diversity indexes indicate a greater population of persons of color. Therefore, diversity within each of these counties needs to be considered. According to the U.S. Census Bureau (2020), Dauphin County had a diversity index of 58%, with Lancaster County at 35%. This is in contrast to Mercer and Lawrence Counties whose diversity indexes were 22.6% and 21.9%, respectively. Why does diversity within the teaching profession matter? Consider the power of students of color seeing themselves in their educators. In a 2016 report, Stuart Wells and colleagues discussed how diversity in the classroom benefits all students regardless of their backgrounds by expanding perspectives and offering increased critical thinking skills. Additionally, it specifically benefits students of color academically and encourages them to pursue pathways in education themselves (Stuart Wells et al., 2016).
Teacher attrition, or when teachers leave their profession, is an important issue because schools need enough teachers in the classroom to provide quality instruction to students. Teachers leaving at high rates can impact student academic achievement and be costly to school districts that constantly have to find replacements (Ronfeldt et al., 2013).
The American Psychological Association defines burnout as “physical, emotional or mental exhaustion, accompanied by decreased motivation, lowered performance and negative attitudes towards oneself and others” (Cleveland Clinic, 2022). In order to address the challenge of teacher attrition, the root causes of teachers, especially people of color, leaving the profession must be investigated. Burnout has been associated with working more than one’s scheduled hours and feelings of inadequate salaries (Doan et al., 2024), among other things such as mental health (Marken & Agrawal, 2022). A 2022 Gallup Poll found K-12 educators had the highest burnout level (reported “always” or “very often” feel burned out at work) at 44%, which is much higher than the average of all other industries (30%) (Marken & Agrawal, 2022). Doan and colleagues (2024) reported an even higher burnout level for teachers (60%) compared to the general population of working adults (45%) or those with a bachelor’s degree and working 35 hours per week
(33%). Black teachers were more likely to report they intend to leave their job than White teachers (35% vs. 20%), and they were also more likely to report they intend to leave the profession (24% vs. 17%) (Doan et al., 2024). Hispanic teachers were more likely to report symptoms of depression than White teachers (25% vs. 19%) (Doan et al., 2024). If burnout is a potential root cause of teachers leaving the profession, then addressing the exceedingly high rates of it is an important first step. By understanding which groups of teachers have disproportionately high rates of burnout, practitioners and policymakers can focus on how to best tailor support to those with the highest need.
According to the Teacher Well-Being and Intentions to Leave Survey (2024), Black teachers reported working significantly more hours than their peers and feeling unsatisfied with their working hours. They were also less likely to report their base pay was adequate in comparison to their peers (Doan et al., 2024). Putting race and ethnicity aside, female teachers reported higher burnout rates than male teachers (55% vs. 44%) and also reported lower base salary pay than male teachers (Doan et al., 2024; Marken & Agrawal, 2022).
When teachers are experiencing burnout, one systemic response is to refer or encourage them to engage in mental health care. A challenge that teachers of color may then face is a lack of providers who reflect their demographic identities, further exacerbating the inequitable care available to them. The majority of the mental health workforce identifies as White; 86% of psychologists, 70% of social workers, and 88% of mental health counselors (Kim, 2022). Research supports the concept of racial concordance, where clients prefer having a provider who matches their racial/ ethnic identity (Moore et al., 2023). The reasons provided for why clients prefer racially similar providers included increased feelings of comfort and safety, enhanced rapport building, cultural humility, and feelings of trust (Moore et al., 2023). Regardless of the benefits of racially concordant mental health providers, actual or reported, clients desire to have increased choices among providers (Moore et al., 2023). In other words, people of color need more diverse choices when it comes to mental health providers. If teachers of color are not able to access care that supports the foregoing, they may not seek care at all or less frequently, further exacerbating the issue of inequitable causes and care related to burnout for teachers of color. In sum, if they cannot access the appropriate care to relieve symptoms of burnout, the rates of burnout for teachers of color will continue to be disproportionately higher than for teachers who are White.
One of the best supported solutions currently in practice to increase diversity in the teaching profession is grow-your-own programs (Edwards & Kraft, 2024). A benefit of these programs is they can address both the recruitment and retention of all teachers, including teachers of color (Edwards & Kraft, 2024). Locally, the School District of Lancaster is implementing a version of the grow-your-own program called Educators Rising, whereby students in high school take classes and engage in experiences like classroom teaching to prepare them to enter the field of education as teachers (Stalnecker, 2024). The majority of participants in these programs are high school students (60%) but can be community members, college students, and already practicing professionals in other positions within education (Edwards & Kraft, 2024). The essential practices of grow-your-own programs include high school courses related to becoming teachers, opportunities for certifications to prepare, scholarships, field experiences, and commitment to the local community (Edwards & Kraft, 2024). Another practice that may occur is a partnership between the high school and local universities or institutes of higher education (Edwards & Kraft, 2024). The programs are designed to address teacher shortages and have participants remain in the community in which they learned. However, these programs are not a fix-all, and it is important to address the other challenges facing a diverse teacher workforce, such as inadequate pay and increased workforce demands (Edwards & Kraft, 2024).
Inequities in the teaching profession extend from differences in pay to differences in rates of burnout and attrition. These inequities involve systemic challenges, policies, and practices that advocates seek to change. Additionally, one of the key supports for teachers (or any professional) experiencing mental health challenges is mental health providers. However, when those providers lack diversity and do not match the needs of the community, this further compounds the issues facing teachers. There are already fewer teachers of color than White teachers in the field, and if the attrition and burnout rates of those teachers of color remain disproportionately high, the teaching profession will
continue to struggle to diversify. If the profession continues to become more homogeneous by losing teachers of color or does not attract them in the first place, the identified benefits of having a diverse education workforce will not be passed on to students of all backgrounds.
Cleveland Clinic. (2022, Feb. 1). What is burnout? https://health.clevelandclinic.org/signs-of-burnout
Doan, S., Steiner, E. D., & Pandey, R. (2024, June 18). Teacher well-being and intentions to leave in 2024. RAND Corporation. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA1108-12.html
Edwards, D., & Kraft, M. A. (2024, July 17). Grow Your Own teacher programs: What are they, and what can (and can’t) they accomplish? Brookings. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/grow-your-own-teacher-programs-what-are-they-and-what-canand-cant-they-accomplish/#:~:text=GYO%20programs%20have%20potential%2C%20but%20they%20aren’t%20a%20 panacea.&text=While% 20GYO%20programs%20can%20increase,college%20before%20entering%20the%20profession
Fuller, E. J. (2023, July 30). Pennsylvania teacher attrition and turnover from 2014 to 2024. Center for Education Evaluation and Policy Analysis. https://ceepablog.wordpress.com/2024/07/30/pennsylvania-teacher-attrition-and-turover-from-2014-to-2024/ Kim, R. (2022, March 7). Addressing the lack of diversity in the mental health field. NAMI. https://www.nami.org/mental-healthprofessionals/addressing-the-lack-of-diversity-in-the-mental-health-field/
Marken, S., & Agrawal, S. (2022, June 13). K-12 workers have highest attrition burnout rate in U.S. Gallup. https://news.gallup.com/ poll/393500/workers-highest-burnout-rate.aspx
Moore, C., Coates, E., Watson, A., de Heer, R., McLeod, A., & Prudhomme, A. (2023). “It’s important to work with people that look like me”: Black patients’ preferences for patient-provider race concordance. Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities, 10(5), 2552–2564.
Ronfeldt, M., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. (2013). How teacher turnover harms student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 50(1), 4-36.
School District of Lancaster. (2024). Our richly diverse community https://sdlancaster.org/discover-sdol/diversity/ Stalnecker, A. (2024, Aug. 11). ‘Grow your own’ teacher preparation program at McCaskey draws statewide attention. LNP https://lancasteronline.com/news/local/grow-your-own-teacher-preparation-program-at-mccaskey-draws-statewide-atten tion/article_bd49de34-5428-11ef-b297-8bfbd462782e.html#:~:text=School%20District%20of%20Lancaster%20Superinten dent% 20Keith%20Miles,implementing%20Educators%20Rising%2C%20noting%20that%20a%20grow%2Dyour%2Down
Stuart Wells, A., Fox, L., Cordova-Cobo, D. (2016). How racially diverse schools and classrooms can benefit all students. The Century Foundation. https://tcf.org/content/report/how-racially-diverse-schools-and-classrooms-can-benefit-all-students/
U.S. Census Bureau. (2020). State profile https://www.census.gov/library/stories/state-by-state/pennsylvania-population-changebetween-census-decade.html
U.S. News & World Report. (2024). Mercer area school district https://www.usnews.com/education/k12/pennsylvania/districts/ mercer-area-sd-105690
ALEXANDER ROHRER (he/him/his) has a doctorate in Prevention Science from Wilmington University, a master’s degree in Forensic Psychology from Fairleigh Dickinson University, and a bachelor’s degree in Psychology with minors in English and Sociology from Millersville University. Alex is currently employed full-time as a community school director in an elementary school in Lancaster city. In addition, he works as an adjunct instructor for Wilmington University in their Behavioral Science program, where he teaches sociology courses and recently developed/ designed a course on juvenile delinquency. His previous work experiences have been in the mental health and criminal justice fields. In addition to the above experience and education, Alex has completed a certification in trauma studies. He has served for three years on the Lancaster County Behavioral Health and Developmental Services Community Advisory Board and recently joined the board of directors for Compass Mark. Alex’s current research interests in prevention science focus on challenges facing law enforcement, violence prevention (including school safety), and mental health/illness. Alex has authored several opinion editorials on the topics of violence prevention in schools, community collaboration, and substance misuse.
By Julia Jane Fallows
ABSTRACT
This article examines the shortcomings of Pennsylvania’s academic standards for health, safety, and physical education, as they have little to no requirement for sex, reproductive, anatomy, menstrual, or puberty education. It calls for the guidelines to be updated to include scientifically supported resources to facilitate safe and healthy sex education. These revisions would provide students with critical information for making informed decisions about their sexual health and prevent radical organizations’ propaganda from infiltrating our schools. This article advocates for collaboration with public health specialists and transparent parental involvement in shaping sex education curriculums. Furthermore, it addresses concerns about misinformation, bullying, and the significance of inclusive environments in promoting healthy relationships and understanding gender diversity. This article underscores the urgency of prioritizing children’s rights to receive medically accurate education and calls for proactive measures to protect their well-being.
The integrity of health, safety, and physical education is being threatened in Pennsylvania. Due to the lack of explicit state academic guidelines, sexual health education is a constant target for ill-intended agendas that do not have students’ health and safety in mind. Certain political factions, advocates of abstinence-only education, and those who spread misinformation work to restrict or manipulate sexual health education for personal gain. For example, several Pennsylvania-based hate groups recognized by the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) directly target sexual health education. One worrisome hate group, the John Birch Society (JBS), which has an active chapter in Lancaster, Pennsylvania, shares unsupported views on sex that have close to no facts and are entirely subjective. The society claims that “[p]ublic schools are doing what they were created to do: Destroy Americanism and the values of the religious faith that built this nation” (John Birch Society, 2022, “Is it Ineptness?” section), which is blatant defamation of everything public schools and those in the education field work tirelessly to accomplish. Their solution to “reclaim America’s children” is to remove children from public schools, defund sex and health education programs, and encourage faith leaders to crusade against public education (John Birch Society, 2022). Their solutions are plagued with bigotry and disturbingly conventional thinking. Their growing disdain for scientific, resource-providing, and structured education for our children is frankly un-American and anti-education.
We must pick our battles, but we are now at war for children’s right to receive comprehensive and scientific education, particularly sex and puberty education. Influence from outdated and erroneous sources causes students to be at risk for uninformed sexual health decisions. Pennsylvania’s curriculum guidelines for public schools are vague and weak. Pennsylvania’s health, safety, and physical education academic standards must be updated and revised to include scientifically supported resources to facilitate safe and healthy sex education.
Currently, Pennsylvania’s academic standards for health, safety, and physical education have few requirements for education on anatomy, puberty, menstruation, sex, or reproduction. The lack of consideration of guidance for public education has left schools with weak materials and resources, rendering them defenseless against unregulated organizations that infiltrate the public education system. Figure 1 highlights the existing guidelines from the Pennsylvania Department of Education (PDE) and its Division of Instructional Quality (DIQ). While the PDE oversees public education across the state, the DIQ provides materials and resources to educators regarding curriculum, assessment, and regulations passed by the Pennsylvania Board of Education. For instance, the DIQ stated that “health and physical education provides students with the knowledge and skills that will enable them to achieve and maintain a physically active and healthful life, not only during their time in school but for a lifetime” (Pennsylvania Department of Education, n.d./2023). These guidelines emphasize the importance of medically accurate sex education, which is intended to equip students with essential health knowledge.
Nevertheless, the guidelines lack specificity and fail to offer comprehensive support for educators. While the DIQ states that school districts must develop and implement local assessment systems to determine proficiency in health and physical education, it does not provide clear benchmarks or medically reviewed recommendations. This absence of standardized guidance leaves significant gaps in the curriculum, allowing for inconsistent implementation across
school districts. Furthermore, there is no mandate for medical professionals to oversee the creation or revision of these guidelines, undermining their accuracy and effectiveness. It is time for the curriculum to be updated, and when updating curriculum guidelines involving sexual health education, the board should be required to consult public health specialists.
The weakness of these guidelines leaves Pennsylvania’s schools vulnerable to external influences, including radical organizations with anti-education agendas. These groups, often run by extremists attempting to use their religious traditions to manipulate public education, seek to influence legislation in ways that undermine evidence-based teaching practices. These groups often raise concerns about sex education content such as teaching contraception, advocating for sexual rights, and addressing topics like condom use—all of which they claim fail to promote abstinence as the primary goal. Without detailed and clearly defined guidelines, schools will struggle to uphold evidence-based educational practices against these negative pressures. This vulnerability not only undermines the quality of education but also risks spreading misinformation, which can have long-term negative effects on students’ health and well-being.
Figure 1 The official academic standards from the State Board of Education website:
The victims of such loose guidelines are the most vulnerable population: children. Suppose the State Board of Education of Pennsylvania does not at least consider working with public educators in developing sexual health curriculum guidelines. In that case, we will be allowing propaganda and misinformation to spread and damage children as they grow through puberty and engage in sexual activity. Suppose Pennsylvania does not take action to develop a strong and cohesive curriculum for sex education. In that case, the state will be confirming the shared fear parents discussed in the 2010 study titled “Parents’ Perspectives on Talking to Preteenage Children About Sex.” The study shines light on parents’ fear of their children receiving information about sex from a wide range of negative sources, stating parents want “to correct any inaccurate information their children might hear and to communicate their own values about sex” (Wilson et al., 2010, p. 59). Considering that the statewide public education guidelines for sex education are already separated by age group, a start to the solution would be to adjust the scientific-based content for the respective comprehension levels of the age groups. By establishing updated guidelines, the state can move away from antiquated ideas of abstinence and allow children the freedom and safety education provides.
Empowering Educators and Enhancing the Solution
Concerning the student population, the age range typically includes students between five and 18, covering students from kindergarten through 12th grade (Pennsylvania Department of Education, 2023). Age is often the most prominent point of contention: When do we start sharing this information with children, and when do we stop? Science tells us most girls get their first menstrual period between 10 and 15 years old, with the average being 12, but every girl’s body has its own schedule (Miller, 2018). With the starting point usually being fifth grade, it is fair to say maturity levels are in a broad range, and, therefore, fifth grade should be the starting point for sexual health education.
We must set a precedent and structure for middle schools and high schools by asking public schools to begin discussions concerning puberty and sexual education around fifth grade, since “[s]ome girls start puberty at 8 years old, and some boys do by 9.… Don’t wait for your kids to come to you with questions about their changing body. They might not, especially if they don’t know it’s okay to ask you about this sensitive topic” (Gavin, 2020, Start “The Talks” Early section ). As age and maturity levels increase, so does the range of topics to which children and teens can be exposed. Similarly, the Wilson et al. 2010 study on parents’ perspectives regarding sexual health education in schools revealed parents “seemed to accept or even appreciate that their children received sex education in the fifth grade” (p. 59). The value of starting these conversations with students in fifth grade allows for a growing dialogue over time, all the way through 12th grade.
The significance of cumulative education is seen in numerous subjects, from English to mathematics, so why not in health, safety, and physical education classes? While schools would be allowed to separate male and female students, the Nemours Kids Health website stresses the importance of girls learning about the changes boys go through and vice versa.
Making substantive guidelines and opening up mandatory discussions prepare public elementary, middle, and high schools to provide cohesive education. “The more kids understand their bodies, the better they can make healthy choices” (Miller, 2018, Looking Ahead section), so it is our job as educators to ensure children have access to reliable and trusted sources. If the standards are updated to include clear guidelines related to sexual health and education beyond the basics, educators, parents, and children will benefit.
Although Pennsylvania does not acknowledge medically accurate sex education in its standards (Sex Education Collaborative, n.d.), the curriculum requires instruction on STDs, including HIV. This is a jarring hypocrisy since the curriculum is not required to explain intercourse but must explain the consequences of having it; the mystifying of sex will easily confuse and possibly frighten students. This could create many questions that an unsuspecting teacher would be unprepared to answer. By providing public schools with a curriculum guideline that includes the already required STD and HIV instruction, we are arming our teachers with scientifically accurate puberty and sex education information that will enable them to answer the questions their students ask.
Age and maturity levels are concerns that parents have due to cultural norms, levels of discomfort, or the fear of triggering curiosity too early in a child’s development. Some parents have voiced worry about determining when and where a student receives their sex education, at home or public school. A solution is to provide an “opt-out” policy. This policy states that when a school is following the state’s guidelines for sex education, the school district will publicize the fact that parents and guardians can review curriculum materials. Parents and guardians whose principles or religious beliefs contradict instruction may excuse their children from the programs (Sex Education Collaborative, n.d.). Transparency within the lesson will allow parents and educators to provide cohesive sex education at school and at home. Children’s safety will flourish through the collaboration of home and classroom, and communication between parents and educators. For the collaborative space to truly blossom, policymakers of Pennsylvania must ask themselves if a child’s right to a medically accurate education and a safe space to ask questions and share concerns is worth preserving.
In light of the increased access to sexual content—both accurate and misleading—via digital platforms. A 2023 study conducted in the United States revealed “19%–37% of teens reported intentional use (of porn) while unintentional pornography use in adolescents ranges from 35% to 66%. Both intentional and unintentional use of pornography has increased in frequency with age and sexual development” (Jhe et al., 2023, p. 1). Updating the state’s guidelines will empower public schools to designate space and time for medically accurate sex, reproductive, anatomy, and menstrual education. This will arm students with knowledge and protect them from learning falsified information through social media and extremist groups. Ultimately, a comprehensive, medically accurate, and cohesive educational framework—modeled on successful programs from other states—will strengthen the health and well-being of Pennsylvania’s youth.
Recent concerns over some children transitioning and no longer identifying with their birth sex have caused a backlash against sex education in public schools. While these questions and interests are often discussed within the classroom, they do not specifically pertain to medically accurate guidelines, meaning that such discussions may not be directly relevant to the core physical objectives of sex education discussed in this article. Nevertheless, this does not mean they should be discouraged. Guidance counselors should be educated on these topics and allow an easy pipeline from sex education class to their office if students are curious. By allowing a channel, curious students can dive deeper into the LGBTQIA+ community in an environment fit for them. This pipeline prevents targeted bullying and ostracizing students simply for being curious. Solid relationships (i.e., parent-teacher, teacher-student, and student-parent) are needed to promote a healthy environment for sex education.
The Wilson et al. (2010) study demonstrates this importance. The researchers found that most parents not only believe it is critical to talk to their children about sex but that “they were compelled to have conversations about sex with their children when their children had a sex education class in school” (Wilson et al., 2010, p. 59). Nevertheless, the study shows the value of breaking the barrier of sex education and, if so inclined, allowing questions about gender.
The Wilson et al. 2010 study provides a breakdown of their focus group discussions and how modern parents deal with sex. The study highlights parents’ worries about peer pressure and parents’ recognition that “their children are regularly exposed to a wide range of harmful sexual influences, whether they are ready for it or not” (Wilson et al., 2010, p. 61). Parents’ recognition of their children’s ability to access such information upholds more reasons why trained educators and health professionals should be allowed, with consent, to discuss such topics in a safe environment, such as a classroom.
Whether a child is curious, confused, or cautious, they have the right to medically accurate information. Further,
Wilson et al. (2010) affirm, “Parents from all three sites reported that their children’s school provides sex education in the fifth grade” (p. 59), with each school being in a different region of the United States. Since fifth grade is typically the starting point for sex education, and Pennsylvania academic standards mandate its introduction by sixth grade, it is essential to provide cumulative sex and health education in every succeeding grade. Without it, children will not have the chance to build upon and develop healthy habits, such as proper care during menstruation, shaving safety, and how to put on condoms.
Future educators should want future generations of children who are entering a digitized, information-overload climate to know they can rely on the support of their public education system. We must stop extremist ideologies from entering the legislation and affecting the classroom and instead preserve that space for the innocent curiosity of children. Education policymakers must collaborate and develop curriculum guidelines within the academic health, safety, and physical education standards that mandate scientific research and resources to produce the most comprehensive and secure sex education. Children will continuously be exposed to and manipulated into believing false information regarding puberty and sex without such changes. We can prevent this damage through collaboration, research, and listening to science with open and objective minds and hearts.
Gavin, M. (2020, October). Talking to your child about puberty. Nemours Kids Health. https://kidshealth.org/en/parents/talk-about-puberty.html
Jhe, G. B., Addison, J., Lin, J., & Pluhar, E. (2023). Pornography use among adolescents and the role of primary care. Family Medicine and Community Health, 11(1). http://doi.org/10.1136/fmch-2022-001776
John Birch Society. (2022, June). The problem with public education. https://jbs.org/children Miller, R. (2018, October). Talking to your child about periods. Nemours Kids Health. https://kidshealth.org/en/parents/talk-about-menstruation.html
Mitchell, K. J., Wolak, J., & Finkelhor, D. (2007). Trends in youth reports of sexual solicitations, harassment and unwanted exposure to pornography on the Internet. Journal of Adolescent Health, 40(2), 116–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2006.05.021
Pennsylvania Department of Education (n.d.). Health and physical education. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. https://www.pa.gov/agencies/education/programs-and-services/instruction/elementary-and-secondary-education/ curriculum/health-and-physical-education.html
Pennsylvania Department of Education. (2002, July 18). Academic standards for health, safety and physical education Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. https://www.pa.gov/content/dam/copapwp-pagov/en/stateboard/documents/ regulations-and-statements/state-academic-standards/sandyhealth.pdf
Pennsylvania Department of Education. (2023, June 1). Enrollment of students. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. https://www.pa.gov/agencies/education/resources/policies-acts-and-laws/basic-education-circulars-becs/purdonsstatutes/enrollment-of-students.html
Privara, M., & Bob, P. (2023t 1) Pornography consumption and cognitive-affective distress. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 211(8), 641–646. https://doi.org/10.1097/NMD.0000000000001669
Sex Education Collaborative. (n.d.). Pennsylvania: State sex education policies and requirements at a glance. https://sexeducationcollaborative.org/states/pennsylvania
Southern Poverty Law Center. (2023, April). Hate watch. https://www.splcenter.org/?gclid=CjwKCAjw__ihBhADEiwAXEazJjwyfI vEWyNMh4AHAQPnRDU7WyOnXqcX14-js8mDboR7AjKHQjTBoCIgUQAvD_BwE
Wilson, E. K., Dalberth, B. T., Koo, H. P., & Gard, J. C. (2010). Parents’ perspectives on talking to preteenage children about sex. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 42(1), 56–63. https://doi.org/10.1363/4205610
JULIA JANE FALLOWS is originally from Delaware County, Pennsylvania, where she attended Marple Newtown High School. She is currently a female student-athlete studying Secondary Education English at Millersville University. At Millersville, she is a women’s track and field team member, president of the Color of Teaching Mentoring Program, president of the Iota Phi chapter of Sigma Tau Delta National English Honor Society, vice president of the American Association of University Women, and Cygnus Society member. Through her service, Julia has built a network of like-minded individuals who are passionate about education and enhancing everyday community life. After graduation, Julia plans to get a master’s degree and serve as an English educator, as she firmly believes in the opportunity public education provides for youth.
By Carmen Portillo
ABSTRACT
This article reviews the literature on dyslexia to bring awareness to dyslexic students and offer teachers student-centered approaches to incorporate in their classrooms. Oftentimes, students with dyslexia get left behind in the traditional education system, but there are some research-based ways to prevent that from happening. Dyslexic students need a change in the ways of teaching, and this article dives deeper into dyslexic learning and understanding and highlights specific teaching methods that are proven to be more beneficial to not just dyslexic students but all students. Not every dyslexic student is the same, and it is important to appeal to more than just one way of learning.
Dyslexia, a learning disorder that occurs in the brain when reading and processing written language or symbols, affects one in every five students in a classroom, which is 20% of the population (Elias, 2023). According to Vizhi and Rathnasabapathy (2023), “20% of dyslexics have attention and motor ability deficiencies, and 50% have visual focusing issues” (p. 1). Dyslexic students struggle to thrive in everyday classroom settings because teachers are often not meeting their needs or utilizing teaching styles that engage students who struggle to learn in a traditional learning environment. Students who face learning difficulties are far too often neglected when it comes to teaching styles in the classroom. Dyslexic students particularly need a more student-focused teaching approach due to the hurdles they must overcome regarding reading, word tracking, word processing, and phonetics. Educators need to note that adjustments are not just changes in teaching but also in attitude when teaching and interacting with dyslexic students. How can educators meet the needs of dyslexic students and help them to feel included in the classroom? Are there resources for students with dyslexia to help with their reading and understanding? What changes need to be made in the classroom to give these students the best chance at academic success? Dyslexic students have been silently struggling in education for years, and teachers need to make the adjustments necessary to give dyslexic students the best opportunity to succeed in academic settings.
Teachers need to find ways to factor alternative methods of teaching into the classroom not just for dyslexic students but for any student who would benefit from these methods. Dyslexic students in particular struggle to learn in stagnant environments and need more active, hands-on learning. Educationally focused activities such as board games, pen and paper, cards, and video games can keep students engaged and improve their learning and understanding. Games like Scrabble, Word Whomp, flashcards, and anagram or spelling games can be a great resource to incorporate in the classrooms. According to Gatsakou et. al. (2022), such an experience of an “alternative way of learning could be exceptional for both the educator and the students” (p. 6). With computers becoming more prevalent in classrooms, video games designed for educational purposes are appearing more frequently, proving there are a plethora of ways to implement games into students’ learning. Gatsakou et al. further state, “a specifically designed educational RPG (role-playing game) is capable of assisting students to obtain knowledge and develop multiple skills and abilities in cognitive, affective, social, physical, and emotional levels” (p. 6). Overall, RPGs have benefits for all students and create a more active, hands-on learning environment for students.
Bringing RPGs into the classroom has the capability not only to be more inclusive to dyslexic students but also to help them build their skills in comprehension.
A.S. Drigas, a coauthor of “The Usage of RPGS as an Interdisciplinary Method of Teaching Dyslexic Students,” states that RPGs “could provide
the students with a multitude of skills and abilities in both cognitive and emotional level. It could be the cornerstone for the development of the metacognition, the consciousness and the emotional intelligence” (Gatsakou et al., 2022, p. 8). Dyslexic students most commonly struggle with symbolism, writing, reading, and social behavior; RPGs can be a beneficial resource for dyslexic students to develop and strengthen their reading comprehension abilities and build on weaker skills that need more development. Similar to RPGs, live-action role-playing (LARP) games are the most effective in helping students to better grasp knowledge. LARPing not only increases students’ social, cognitive, and emotional skills; it also has other benefits that include, but are not limited to the following:
• development of metacognition
• solution finding
• prediction skills
• development of productive and constructive discussion
• ability to categorize concepts effectively
• enhanced memory
• improved reading skills
Multisensory approaches (relating to or involving multiple senses) in education can also help provide students with beneficial skills. Not only will these approaches provide options for students to further their knowledge, but they will also help them develop strong socialization skills needed in life. Dyslexic students often benefit from multisensory, interdisciplinary, and experiential approaches because traditional classroom instruction that relies primarily on reading is generally not an effective learning strategy for these learners. In fact, “the use of multisensory training, assistive technology, and a supportive and inclusive learning environment have been found to be effective ways to improve dyslexic learners’ reading skills and academic achievement” (Vizhi & Rathnasabapathy, 2023, p. 7). Dyslexic students need to learn in more engaging environments, and Vizhi and Rathnasabapathy (2023) provide evidence that “multisensory education improves reading and phonological awareness in dyslexic individuals” (p. 2).
Examining the needs of dyslexic students and fostering a sense of acceptance in the classroom can also have monumental benefits not only for their learning but also for their engagement. Stuart and Yates’ (2018) article, “Inclusive Classroom Strategies for Raising the Achievement of Students with Dyslexia” can aid teachers in finding resources for students with dyslexia and help them feel more included in the classroom. This article discusses the adjustments needed to be made in the classroom to give these students the best chance at academic success. Additional tutoring, preferred learning styles, and coping programs are modifications that could be implemented in classrooms to strive for greater inclusivity for all students. More individualized teaching can also help students find coping skills that build on their learning. These skills could help dyslexic students develop their understanding and build their self-confidence when it comes to learning in the classroom. Stuart and Yates’ (2018) article examines three independent studies to determine how acceptance benefited dyslexic students.
The first independent study they examined was conducted by Waldie et al. (2014), who gave 42 students 60 tutoring sessions—each session was 45 minutes, twice a week during school hours. The tutoring sessions were designed to focus on areas of weakness for students with dyslexia: “phonological awareness, phoneme/grapheme knowledge, visual and auditory processing, processing speed, and sequencing” (Stuart & Yates, 2018, p. 2). In the study, they withdrew students from class to work with tutors who followed multisensory approaches, which “use visual, auditory, and tactile-kinesthetic pathways to explicitly teach phonology, phonological awareness, and sound-symbol correspondence” (Stuart & Yates, 2018, p. 3). The study showed that one-on-one sessions contribute to dyslexic students’ learning and understanding and “all 42 students showed an increased gain in verbal comprehension and phonemic awareness” (Stuart & Yates, 2018, p. 1). From their findings, Waldie et al. (2014) determined that all cognitive abilities’ tests showed significant improvement, demonstrating that when dyslexic students are met with more flexibility in teaching, they benefit in their learning and understanding. Waldie et al. (2014) found that at the end of the study, the students’ and teachers’ responses were, “‘I feel better on the inside now’ and ‘He feels much happier to attempt to read words for himself’” (p. 14). This gain in achievement for students fostered better classroom acceptance and confidence. Although working one-on-one with students can be difficult due to class size and time, dyslexic students can benefit from more individualized learning.
The second study examined by Stuart and Yates (2018) was conducted by Exley (2003), who dove deeper into students’ preferred learning styles (visual and kinesthetic) to see if their learning and understanding would improve. In the study, seven dyslexic students identified “visual learning as their preferred option, closely followed by kinesthetic learning” (p. 2). The study shows that by taking preferred learning methods into account, teachers can widen students’ horizons and broaden their scope of learning. It also shows that by exposing dyslexic students to different learning methods, teachers can show dyslexic learners teaching styles that work better than others, which allows students autonomy in their learning, making decisions that best suit their education. Exley concluded that students with dyslexia “found that employing their learning style preferences enabled them to focus and use their differences not only in a withdrawal situation but also in mainstream lessons” (p. 4). Exley found that “all seven students improved their performance once their preferred learning style had been established and had been used to teach them specific
ways of learning” (p. 6). Just this simple adjustment can cater to dyslexic students’ learning in the classroom and create a more accepting environment for learning.
The third study examined by Stuart and Yates (2018) was conducted by Firth et. al. (2012), who evaluated the success of a dyslexic program to help students develop positive coping strategies to aid students when they experienced frustrations and challenges. Along with one-on-one attention and preferred learning styles, teaching dyslexic students positive coping strategies can improve their learning and understanding. The study brought to light issues of addressing the need to “help students to replace negative perceptions or behaviours with positive coping strategies” (Stuart & Yates, 2018, p. 3). The experimenters had two models in which they conducted their findings: model one, a whole-school model where a coping program was given to all year 6 students, and model two, a whole-school approach where all learning disability students were involved in support groups. Teaching students helpful coping strategies to combat their negative self-talk was found to be beneficial, based on teacher reports, interviews, school documents, and surveys. In fact, there was an overall reported increase in the coping strategies used by dyslexic students. The Firth et al. study helps remind teachers that “strategies do not need to center on direct learning interventions. It is just as important to teach students key coping skills in order to build resilience and overcome challenges” (Stuart & Yates, 2018, p. 4). Furthermore, the study concluded that “teachers who took part in the study reported several positive effects, including increased awareness of learning disabilities, increased confidence displayed by some students and a ‘sense of inclusion and engagement by all students’” (Stuart & Yates, 2018, p. 3). By exposing dyslexic students to positive coping strategies, teachers can limit the students’ feelings of frustration, build positive self-esteem, and foster acceptance into students learning.
Overall, all three studies found simple adjustments to build students’ confidence, self-esteem, and create an accepting environment to learn in. Having an accepting space to learn in is fundamental for students to better their knowledge and thrive. When students feel acceptance is lacking, they are less inclined to try new things and branch out, but when teachers establish acceptance in the classroom, students are more willing to try and put in the effort.
When students have higher self-efficacy (belief that one can achieve a goal or task), they are more likely to step out of their comfort zone and feel more confident in their academic abilities. It is crucial that dyslexic students feel their psychological needs—in particular, students’ motivation for learning and their relationships with instructors—are met in order to feel more prepared and confident to continue postsecondary education. Students’ self-efficacy plays more of a role in dyslexic learners than most people would think. Goegan et al.’s (2023) study found that when examining the experiences of classroom assessment as satisfying or frustrating for students with dyslexia, dyslexic students reported high levels of stress and anxiety, difficulty managing deadlines and academic demands, and a lack of resources and support. Cognitive difficulties are also frequently reported, such as phonological awareness, working memory, and processing speed, all of which require more effort in their postsecondary pursuits. Intrinsic motivation plays a huge role in not just dyslexic students but all students. While performing their study, Goegan et al. concluded that “students reported statistically significantly higher grades and more success attached to assessments that satisfied rather than frustrated their need for competence” (p. 6). Overall, when these students felt their needs were met, they reported higher grades and successes in assignments that were found to be more satisfying rather than frustrating.
Students pick up on things like willingness to help and how teachers react towards their students. Goegan et al.’s (2023) study in the Journal of Postsecondary Education & Disability took note of what students noticed about the instructors who were teaching them when their needs were satisfied versus when they were unsatisfied. The researchers stated, “Participants noted that, during assessment, some instructors were simply not helpful or supportive to anyone. Likewise, they struggled when assessment instructions were vague or the format was disorganized” (Goegan et al., 2023, p. 9). This information is important because it is frequently not considered. A teacher’s attitude affects how their students think and feel about themselves. When students feel put down or like they have failed, it greatly impacts how they see themselves and what they are capable of, which diminishes their confidence.
The issue of educational confidence is crucial as it highlights the experiences of many students who, despite their persistent efforts to improve and perform better, often leave feeling defeated, frustrated, and inadequate. Dyslexic learners struggle with classroom anxiety because they are reminded time and time again about how they do not learn like others. They do not have the same experiences as “normal” students do at school; they must figure out how they learn best in addition to learning in school. A book written by Jeffery Wilhelm called You Gotta BE the Book tells teachers the importance of building up their students’ self-efficacy. Dyslexic students tend to struggle with self-efficacy and doubt themselves when it comes to reading, writing, and math concepts. Vizhi and Rathnasabapathy (2023) state that “dyslexic students also exhibit worse self-esteem and social skills” (p. 2). Their findings solidify the importance of self-efficacy and confidence-building for these students. They need to believe in themselves, but they also need to feel like their teachers believe in them, too.
It is important to understand that adjustments are not just changes in teaching but also in attitude. When students feel “less than” because of an instructor’s demeanor or attitude toward them, they are not as inclined to ask for help or seek other resources. Vizhi and Rathnasabapathy’s (2023) study found that the students’ attitudes changed depending on the students’ “success” or “failure.” When students were spoken to or felt as though they were less than, they took note of that. Adjustment goes beyond teaching; it encompasses the way educators speak, think, and act towards their students.
Future teachers need to be aware of these studies, which should be more widely known. Being aware of effective adjustments that can be made in the classroom allows teachers to create a more comprehensive environment, especially for dyslexic learners. This call to teachers is not to spread them thin but to aid them in finding more student-centered activities to incorporate in the classroom, making it more inclusive for all students. Clearly, making even small adjustments to students’ preferred learning styles has positive impacts on their overall learning, and making dyslexic students feel accepted can have significant benefits both inside and outside the classroom. Giving students who already feel isolated in education a level playing field could change the game for them and show them how to adapt to their dyslexia. Many educators overlook straightforward adjustments that could make their classrooms more accessible to dyslexic students. The findings from these studies were positive and demonstrated significant development in students’ reading, comprehension, and mathematical abilities. Finding ways to help dyslexic learners identify the learning styles that work best for them can strengthen their self-efficacy and demonstrate that they are capable of overcoming the challenges they face.
The current ways of teaching in classrooms are outdated and need to evolve, not just for dyslexic students but for all students. The significance that language, confidence, reading, and writing have on dyslexic students is too big of an issue to ignore any longer. These improvements to classroom environments identify effective strategies for dyslexic learners and highlight the necessary modifications teachers must make in their methods when working with students with dyslexia. For example, incorporating RPGs, LARPing, and multisensory learning into the classrooms will vastly benefit not just dyslexic students but all students. With that in mind, educators must be aware of their attitude, demeanor, and tone to help dyslexic students feel as though they can achieve success in their academics. Most dyslexic students have struggled with “failure” at some point, but we can change that by making the adjustments necessary to give dyslexic students the best opportunity to succeed in academic settings.
Elias, M. (2023, October 31). 21 dyslexia statistics & facts: How common is it? Discovery ABA. https://www.discoveryaba.com/statistics/dyslexia
Exley, S. (2003). The effectiveness of teaching strategies for students with dyslexia based on their preferred learning styles. British Journal of Special Education, 30(4), 213–220. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0952-3383.2003.00313.x
Firth, N., Frydenberg, E., & Bond, L. (2012). An evaluation of Success and Dyslexia – a multi component school-based coping program for primary school students with learning disabilities: Is it feasible? Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties, 17(2), 147–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/19404158.2012.713368
Gatsakou, C., Bardis, N. G., & Drigas, A. (2022). The usage of RPGs as an interdisciplinary method of teaching dyslexic students. Technium Social Sciences Journal, 27, 207–216. https://doi.org/10.47577/tssj.v27i1.5438
Goegan, L. D., Parker, P. C., & Daniels, L. M. (2023). Connecting basic psychological needs and assessment: Perspectives of postsecondary students with dyslexia. Journal of Postsecondary Education & Disability, 36(3), 241–255.
Stuart, A., & Yates, A. (2018). Inclusive classroom strategies for raising the achievement of students with dyslexia. New Zealand Journal of Teachers’ Work, 15(2), 100–104. https://doi.org/10.24135/teacherswork.v15i2.260
Vizhi, P. K., & Rathnasabapathy, M. (2023). Language learning difficulties of students with dyslexia: A case study at a primary school. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 13(11), 2734–2742. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1311.02
Waldie, K. E., Austin, J., Hattie, J. A., & Fairbrass, M. (2014). SPELD NZ remedial intervention for dyslexia. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 49(1), 21–36.
Wilhelm, J. D. (2016). You gotta be the book: Teaching engaged and reflective reading with adolescents. Teachers College Press.
CARMEN PORTILLO is an undergraduate student at Millersville studying English Education. She has always had a passion for teaching and learning but struggled in school due to her learning disabilities, which were undiagnosed until her sophomore year in high school. Once diagnosed, Carmen began working with a tutor and an academic support teacher who turned her educational experience around; it was then she knew her future belonged in education. After graduating from Millersville, she hopes to obtain her Master’s degree as a reading specialist and make a difference for students who struggle as she did. In her free time, she enjoys reading Romantasy books and fostering large-breed dogs in need of fur-ever homes. In the future, Carmen hopes to obtain a PhD so she can teach future teachers how to be more inclusive in the classroom for all students and be the change needed in education.
By August Gorman
Columbine was one of the deadliest mass school shootings to have transpired in the United States. Eight years later, in 2007, the shooting at Virginia Tech occurred, followed by Sandy Hook fifteen years later. Then Uvalde. Now Apalachee. As time goes on more school shootings occur, and with each one less and less emphasis is placed on them. We are at a point where we have become almost complicit with school shootings, as though we are accepting them as an inevitability in our country. It is because of this shift that we now hear less talk in regard to preventing gun violence, and more focus on arming teachers. This paper explores not only my own thoughts and feelings on the matter, but also what the US public has to say when it comes to arming school faculty, whether members of law enforcement believe this to be wise, and how the students feel about it, especially students who are members of ethnic minorities. I take into account factors such as the cost analysis of training and arming school faculty, how police officers would communicate and coordinate with armed teachers in the event of an active shooter, and how arming teachers can be a major issue in concerns to teachers with racial biases. I end the article by using the information I have gathered and presented to support my decision to not arm teachers, and instead offer alternative solutions to hopefully lessen, and maybe one day eliminate, school shootings.
Most people remember or know of the Columbine school shooting that took place on April 20, 1999, at Columbine High School. Twelve students and one teacher were killed, and the ensuing discussions of that event lasted for years afterward, as it was one of the first instances of a mass school shooting in America. Eight years later, the massacre at Virginia Tech transpired, in which a 23-year-old student shot and killed 32 students and faculty members before taking his own life. Even after a couple of years, it was an occurrence that news stations kept revisiting to keep the discussions going.
Fifteen years later, Sandy Hook happened, where 19 children and two teachers were murdered by 20-year-old Adam Lanza. The discussions for this shooting lasted a bit longer, mostly due to it having involved elementary-aged children. The Uvalde school shooting, in which 18-year-old Salvador Ramos shot and killed 19 students and two teachers, was spoken about for a few months; however, most of the discussion was focused on the incompetence of the police officers delegated to guard the school as opposed to the actual shooting itself. Apalachee, located near Winder, Georgia, happened just last year. On September 4, 2024, 14-year-old Colt Gray entered the high school brandishing a gun. Four students were killed and seven were injured, yet this is the first I, and perhaps even you, am hearing about it.
We have gotten to a point where school shootings have, appallingly, become commonplace enough that their “shelf life,” with regard to the attention given to them, has noticeably become shorter and shorter. Since Columbine, there have been 417 school shootings, resulting in more than 383,000 students having experienced gun violence in school (Cox et al., 2024). Due to school gun violence becoming more and more rampant, we as a society have all but stopped discussing ways in which we can prevent future school shootings. Instead, we have come to expect or even normalize them, which is why many discussions concerning them have veered away from prevention. Now, we are hearing more talk concerning arming teachers; after all, if more school shootings are inevitable, then should we not focus on ensuring that teachers are properly armed? On the contrary, arming teachers is not only the incorrect way of responding to the increase in school shootings, but it will actively endanger law enforcement, students, and the school environment itself.
The notion of arming school faculty began in earnest in 2018, after the shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida, where an armed man killed 17 individuals. It was after this tragedy that the state commission charged with investigating the shooting concluded that an armed teacher could have substantially reduced casualties. The discussion surrounding arming teachers took hold, yet it is noteworthy that those in favor of arming teachers are predominantly White, cis men (Baranauskas, 2024). This is important because in the discussion of arming teachers, we must take into account how the public, specifically non-White citizens, feel about it.
Concerning POC’s (people of color) feelings about arming teachers, we must discuss the “school-to-prison pipeline,” as the two go hand-in-hand. The “school-toprison pipeline,” the idea that “you do the crime, you do the time,” upon which the American criminal system is built has spread to public schools. Many schools have adopted “zero-tolerance” policies, and the presence of School Resource Officers (SROs) in schools has led to students becoming involved with the criminal justice system for relatively minor behavioral offenses (Baranauskas, 2024). Students of color, primarily Black students, are targeted by these policies, naturally leading to a distrust in the school system and those that enforce it, namely teachers. As these students of color exit the education system and become adults, the presence of overly aggressive enforcement of the law remains ever-present. In fact, an argument can be made that armed teachers targeting students of color is a logical successor to how adults of color are already treated by the criminal justice system. Research has shown that people are likely to hold specific prejudices against Black people, seeing them as “being dangerous,” and these prejudices often lead to undue attention and violence. For instance, police are more likely to stop and search and use excessive force against people of color who are, in turn, more likely than White suspects to die in police custody (Baranauskas, 2024).
Andrew J. Baranauskas, author of “Racial Sentiment and Public Support for Arming Teachers with Guns in the United States”, even performed a study in 2020, wherein he surveyed individuals and measured whether or not their support for arming teachers was in any way tied with racial resentment. Racial resentment, as described by Baranauskas, is a sentiment (one which is held by many White Americans) that African Americans violate the traditional American values of self-reliance and hard work (Baranauskas, 2024). The results of Baranauskas’s study found that not only are those who hold racial resentment significantly more likely to support arming teachers, but racial resentment is the strongest variable of any with regard to support for arming teachers (Baranauskas, 2024). Therefore, it is only logical that adults of color, whether or not they have children of their own in the education system, would be staunchly opposed to arming teachers. They know, firsthand, the prejudices people hold against them simply because of the color of their skin, and how those people will weaponize these prejudices to be overtly violent and aggressive towards them in the name of “upholding the law.” With this in mind, when it comes to the discussion of arming teachers, we must consider how everyone in the public, especially marginalized individuals, feels about it.
It is equally vital to consider law enforcement’s opinion on the matter. After all, people become police officers with the intention of protecting others, especially in cases where firearms are involved. Teachers, on the other hand, go into the field of education to teach and support students academically. How does law enforcement, those who intend to use guns to protect civilians, feel about the idea of arming teachers?
Law enforcement officers, otherwise known as LEOs, normally serve as first responders in instances of school violence, such as an active shooter, and could be in high-stress situations when they would have to engage with armed teachers. In this regard, they are in a position to offer a unique perspective on the benefits and consequences of policies that involve arming teachers. However, research on the matter of arming school faculty has largely overlooked LEOs’ thoughts and opinions, with only three studies to date exploring this line of inquiry (Schildkraut & Martaindale, 2023).
Jaclyn Schildkraut and M. Hunter Martaindale, authors of “Arm the Educators…but Not Without Conditions: A Qualitative Assessment of Law Enforcement Officers’ Support for Armed Teacher Policies”, write how LEOs in supervisory positions or who were SROs and, therefore, may have had more contact with teachers, were significantly less likely to endorse policies allowing teachers to carry guns. Training was a primary concern of LEOs, believing that teachers lacked the necessary skills to respond to an active shooter (Schildkraut & Martaindale, 2023). The LEOs in the article believed specific areas of training necessary for teachers who wished to be armed included the following: the impacts of stress on decision-making, safe handling and storage of firearms, scenario-based training, and effective communication with police during an active-shooter event (Schildkraut & Martaindale, 2023).
In their 2022 study, Schildkraut and Martaindale asked LEOs questions about their opinions on arming teachers and broke the answers down into three themes: Value of Armed Teachers (how armed teachers can be beneficial or detrimental to an educational environment); Training (both general and specific requirements that LEOs felt should be taught before arming teachers); and Other Considerations (concerns such as safe storage of the gun, handling, policy requirements, communication with LEOs, and the capabilities and prior experience of the potential firearm carrier). From this study, the two authors concluded that, despite a majority of the LEOs supporting the general idea of arming teachers, it is not unanimously endorsed nor done so without conditions (Schildkraut & Martaindale, 2023).
One lieutenant from a Florida state law enforcement agency summarized relative to his support, “The RIGHT teacher absolutely should be armed. The WRONG teacher absolutely should not be armed” (Schildkraut & Martaindale, 2023, p. 10) The lieutenant meant that teachers who are properly trained in carrying firearms and have a well-maintained temperament could be entrusted with being armed. However, if a teacher shows any indication of angering easily, having racial bias, or being unable to properly handle a gun in any capacity, then they should not under any circumstances be carrying in school. This sentiment, and similar others, were shown to be shared by other LEOs (Schildkraut & Martaindale, 2023).
The primary issue arises in that there are simply too many variables to account for. Any inherent value of having armed teachers is vastly outweighed by the issues that surface when it is put into practice. Consideration would need to be made for the fact that teachers would require intense and specific training to properly prepare themselves in the event of a school shooter, and law enforcement would need a way of communicating and coordinating with armed teachers during a school shooting. When all is said and done, even LEOs who support arming teachers acknowledge that it would be an immense undertaking, for the teachers, local law enforcement, and the district.
There is also a lot more beyond the training and practicalities of arming teachers. Everything comes with a price tag, and the training and arming of educators is a hefty one. A report from 2013 assessed the cost of placing an armed SRO in every elementary and secondary school across the United States, accounting for estimated variations in salary, student population size, and number of hours worked per academic year (Rajan & Branas, 2018, p. 1). Drawing on these estimates, the cost would range from “$19.1 to $22.6 billion annually, which accounts for nearly 30% of the current federal education budget” (Rajan & Branas, 2018, p. 1). According to the report from 2018, “Arming Schoolteachers: What Do We Know? Where Do We Go From Here?”, there were an estimated 3.1 million teachers employed full-time in the United States. Even if only 20% of them were armed, as was suggested by the White House at that time, it would result in similarly significant increases in the federal budget (Rajan & Branas, 2018).
Let that percentage, 30%, sink in. That is the estimated percentage the federal government would allot to arming a mere 20% of teachers, and it is important to keep in mind that roughly 93% of the money that goes towards education comes from state and local sources, with the federal government only contributing the rest through programs like Title I, Impact Aid for schools that serve students who live on federal land, and Indian Education, for Native American students (Lieberman, 2022). Not only is the federal government only supplying 7% of the financial need for education in the United States, but then an estimated 30% of that 7% would be used for arming teachers, leaving only about
4.9% of funding left for schools to utilize for resources like textbooks, school equipment, computers, teacher’s salaries, upkeep of the building itself, and more.
However, we are not talking about a hypothetical situation here; as of January 2020, more than 500 school districts in 28 states permit teachers to carry firearms (Schildkraut & Martaindale, 2022, p. 117). This should not keep us from questioning and analyzing the effects of arming school teachers, as there remains a vitally important aspect we must take into consideration: how the students themselves feel about it. So far, only two studies have specifically examined youths’ attitudes toward arming teachers. The first study assessed high school students’ attitudes toward school violence and gun policies. Overall, approximately three-quarters of students believed that “schools that have properly trained [and] armed nonteaching staff would become safer places” (Shamserad, 2023, p. 261). The second study used a sample of high school students who were participating in the 2018 national administration of the ACT Test; this study showed that “46% of students opposed the idea of allowing teachers and staff members to receive special training to carry guns in school, and 38% of students believed that their school would be less safe if teachers/staff were armed” (Shamserad, 2023, p. 261).
In Rajan’s & Branas’s study of arming teachers (2018), it was noted that predominantly White, male students were the ones in favor of arming teachers (Shamserad, 2023). Meanwhile, students of color and female students were found to be more against it. Again, this makes sense, considering the studies that have found racial differences in youths’ experiences with, and subsequent attitudes toward, school authority figures. During the 2015-16 school year, Black students made up only 15% of the overall school population, yet they represented 31% of students who were referred to law enforcement or arrested (Shamserad, 2023).
Faraneh Shamserad, author of “Race Differences in Youths’ Attitudes Toward Arming Teachers: Investigating the Role of Procedural Justice,” conducted a three-year study concerning students’ opinions regarding teachers carrying guns. Participating students from 12 middle schools across six districts in a Midwestern county were asked, “Should teachers be allowed to carry guns? (yes or no)” and “How would your feelings of safety change if teachers in your school were allowed to carry guns?” (on a scale of 1 to 5, with 1 being ‘a lot safer,’ to 5 being ‘a lot less safe’). The study results showed that the odds of Black youth supporting the arming of teachers were 36% less than that of their White peers. Furthermore, this study found that Black students viewed teachers and the government as less fair towards them relative to their fellow White students (Shamserad, 2023).
This is by no means the final word in this area of study; these were merely the observations made in a three-year study with 3,640 middle school aged students. However, it does begin to give us an idea as to how students feel about the idea of their teachers carrying guns. Just in Shamserad’s small sample pool of a few thousand students alone, Black students, compared to White students, were less likely to support arming teachers (16% vs. 26%) and admitted that they would feel somewhat, or a lot, less safe if teachers were armed (19% vs. 28%) (Shamserad, 2023).
This wariness that students of color feel towards their teachers, specifically White teachers, was studied further in “Bias in the Air: A Nationwide Exploration of Teachers’ Implicit Racial Attitudes, Aggregate Bias, and Student Outcomes”. Chin et al. (2020) observed and reported on teachers’ responses to Project Implicit, which was “an archive of internet volunteers who visited the Project Implicit website [...] The data [included] visitors’ scores on the Black/White [Implicit Association Task (IAT)] and responses to survey items including explicit racial attitudes, demographics, and occupation” (Chin et al., 2020, p. 8). Upon collecting the data from this site, numerical scores were used to indicate “how much more strongly the respondent associates ‘African American’ with a negative [reactivity] and ‘European American’ with a positive [reactivity], versus associating ‘African American’ with a positive [reactivity] and ‘European American’ with a negative [reactivity]” (Chin et al., 2020, pp. 8-9). Positive scores indicated an implicit preference for European Americans, while negative scores indicated the reverse. A score of zero indicated neutrality.
The results of the study found that, in regard to student achievement, there were significant negative unadjusted associations between test score inequality and pooled implicit or explicit bias scores. This essentially means that White students were shown to score higher on assessments than Black students in counties with higher levels of pro-White/ anti-Black implicit and explicit bias. Furthermore, when it came to student discipline outcomes, Black students were found to be “twice as likely to receive one or more suspensions (in-school and out-of-school) than White students in the average county; for in-school suspensions, the rates [were] 14% and 6%, respectively, and for out-of-school suspensions, the rates [were] 13% and 5%” (Chin et al., 2020, p. 16).
As indicated, there is a clear and understandable correlation between Black students’ feelings towards their educators, primarily in regard to the idea of their teachers being armed and how these students have found themselves to be treated by said teachers in the American school system. Teachers are people, and just like anyone else, they may hold racial biases, whether those are implicit or explicit. The problem herein lies with the fact that these teachers’ biases are reflected in how they grade and discipline their students of color, specifically their Black students. If there already exists measurable evidence that teachers’ prejudice influences their decisions regarding punishments they give students and how they score assessments, then who is to say that these racial biases won’t also come into play if these same teachers were given guns?
As for how I feel on the matter, my initial standing before delving into this research was staunchly against arming teachers; after all, I am becoming a teacher to educate, help mold young minds, and nourish students’ souls. If I
wanted to be in an environment where I was constantly on high-alert and carrying a deadly weapon that I had trained extensively to use, I would have enlisted myself in the military. However, throughout my research, I realized that there is the matter of taking into consideration the reality of the situation. Even though school shootings accounted for less than 3% of youth homicides in the past 30 years, active shooters on a school campus are still a very real threat within the United States. I wish I could say that I could trust myself and my colleagues with a gun in school but the truth of the matter is I do not.
No matter how much training I receive, I will never feel ready to pull the trigger, especially in a high-stakes situation such as an active school shooter. This does not even begin to account for the matter of my fellow teachers being armed. How can I be sure that the teacher who consistently forgets to turn off the lights in their classroom at the end of the day will remember to ensure the safety is set on their gun? How can I be sure that the teacher who angers easily will not try to use the fact that they are carrying a gun as an indirect threat to students? How will I know that, despite any and all mandated training, the teacher who is clumsy and trips over their own feet will not unintentionally shoot a police officer, another teacher, or a student during a school shooting? I understand life has no guarantees; there is no way to ensure that each and every teacher equipped with a gun is 100% capable and ready to utilize said gun. It is precisely because of this, though, that I cannot endorse teachers being armed. There is just too great a risk, too much evidence of racial bias within the school system, and too many variables when it comes to properly handling a gun that I cannot, in good conscience, support the arming of teachers.
Obviously, not everyone feels the same way; there are those who very much support the arming of teachers, including Second Amendment lobbying groups such as the National Rifle Association (NRA) and the politicians they fund, such as Senator Marco Rubio and President Donald Trump. In contrast, The Washington Post and the Teach Plus Survey have found that most teenagers, teachers, and parents oppose arming teachers (Arambula, 2023). This entire discussion on arming teachers is starting to feel increasingly less like a consideration in protecting students and more like another topic of debate that further polarizes this country. We are seeing that predominantly White, male conservatives are pro-arming teachers, and the majority of individuals against arming teachers are POC, female, and liberal leaning. In this, we must ask ourselves if ensuring that all school faculty have a gun is done so with the primary goal of protecting students in the case of an active shooter, or has it become another issue where one group simply wishes to trump the other, regardless of the consequences that may follow the decision?
This begs the question: If I am so opposed to arming teachers, then what can we do to better protect our students and hopefully prevent further school shootings from occurring? A good place to start is taking preventive action and doing what we can to keep any further school shootings from happening. One approach to school safety includes addressing bullying, mental health, and social isolation, all of which contribute to school violence. Emphasizing the importance of fostering positive relationships among administration, teachers, students, and parents is key, as well as addressing the physical structure of the school and its external environment (Arambula, 2023).
An investigation into the shooter at Uvalde revealed that by the time he reached fourth grade, he was struggling academically and, therefore, identified as “at risk.” According to testimonies from the shooter’s family members, a speech impediment that was not addressed or treated likely contributed to his overall lack of friends and the bullying that he was subjected to by other students (Davis, 2022). Though this in no way excuses what he did, the reasoning does give validity to the idea that students who are bullied, or feel isolated, are at greater risk of becoming resentful towards their school and student body and, in turn, possibly acting on said resentment.
This notion that bullying can lead to school shootings is further compounded by a 2019 report by the U.S. Secret Service National Threat Assessment Center. The report analyzed 41 incidents of school violence at K-12 schools between 2008 and 2017, and while the analysis only looked at behavioral histories for 35 of the 41 attackers, “80% of those 35 were bullied by classmates, and 57% faced bullying that lasted for weeks, months or years” (Merod & Arundel, 2024, p. 1).
With this in mind, it is imperative that schools work towards being a community that fosters a mentally and emotionally safe environment that reassures students they are safe to express concerns and freely be who they are. This idea goes hand in hand with the implementation of bystander education, a program that “includes teaching students what to do if they’re involved in or witness a bullying situation” (Merod & Arundel, 2024, p. 1). Stephanie Frederick, an associate director of the Alberti Center for Bullying Abuse Prevention at the University at Buffalo, says “‘[t]here’s just so much that adults don’t know about what’s happening in the school. Students are often not telling adults what’s happening, but peers know. That bystander component is key to preventing bullying, including bullying that might lead to these more violent instances including school shootings’” (Merod & Arundel, 2024, p. 1). Frederick recognizes that bullying prevention can be difficult to implement, as schools are often under resourced, and staff are overworked. “‘Even so, prevention is a crucial part of addressing bullying in schools,’ [Frederick] said, ‘and schools should try to consistently implement a program over time instead of using a one-off occasion such as a schoolwide assembly without any follow-up’” (Merod & Arundel, 2024, p. 1). In utilizing this bystander education tactic, school faculty can work toward reducing the amount of bullying that takes place in school, which, in turn, can greatly reduce the possibility of bullied individuals becoming school shooters later down the line.
Bullying recognition and prevention is only one component, however; maintaining safe practices is just as vital. Nothing in life is guaranteed, and even if school staff take every measure possible to accommodate students, making sure they feel safe and heard, an active threat entering the building is still a real possibility, especially if the shooter’s motive does not lie in seeking revenge against a school that they felt wronged them. Some of these efforts include
threat assessment protocols and anonymous tip lines. Another avenue focuses on responses to those attacks that do come to fruition, with efforts like lockdowns and active-shooter drills designed to minimize injuries or the loss of life in such situations (Schildkraut & Martaindale, 2022, p. 117). There are also methods of better fortifying the school building itself, such as installing bulletproof glass, having metal detectors located at school entrances, and staffing enough school security to ensure that a possible shooter would be unable to enter the building without being noticed and stopped.
Ultimately, we must come to terms with the fact that in an ideal world, we would not be having this discussion in the first place, and school shootings would be unheard of. Unfortunately, our reality is a far cry from that; it is imperative that we acknowledge that school shootings are a very real danger, and we must, therefore, be properly prepared for them. However, as evidenced by this article, many people strongly feel that arming teachers is neither the best nor safest way to go about it. Arming teachers leads to a plethora of new problems: ensuring the teachers are properly trained, the cost of funding that would go into the training, knowing that the teachers who are armed will not use their guns as leverage or as an implied threat toward others, and maintaining a safe school setting for students of color while having armed faculty. This alone is merely scratching the surface of issues that would arise with arming teachers. In short, arming teachers is not a solution but rather the start of a new problem; there are safer and smarter ways to resolve the issue of school shootings, and we must work together to find and implement these solutions.
Arambula, H. (2023). Arming teachers: A dangerous blunder in school safety—an ecological perspective. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 1–12.
Baranauskas, A. J. (2024). Racial sentiment and public support for arming teachers with guns in the United States. Race and Justice, 14(1), 76–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/21533687211038950
Chin, M. J., Quinn, D. M., Dhaliwal, T. K., & Lovison, V. S. (2020). Bias in the air: A nationwide exploration of teachers’ implicit racial attitudes, aggregate bias, and student outcomes. Educational Researcher, 49(8), 566–578. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x20937240
Cox, J. W., Rich, S., Trevor, L., Muyskens, J., & Ulmanu, M. (2024, September 6). There have been 417 school shootings since Columbine. The Washington Post https://www.washingtonpost.com/education/interactive/school-shootings-database/ Davis, W. (2022, July 17). A report detailed the missed warning signs and motives of the Uvalde gunman. NPR https://www.npr.org/2022/07/17/1111945402/uvalde-shooter-warning-signs-report
Lieberman, M. (2022, May 11). What America spends on K-12: The latest federal snapshot. Education Week https://www.edweek.org/policy-politics/what-america-spends-on-k-12-the-latest-federal-snapshot/2022/05
Martaindale, M. H., & Schildkraut, J. (2022). Armed and considered capable? Law enforcement officers’ attitudes about armed teacher policies in the USA. Crime Prevention and Community Safety, 24(2), 116–131. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41300-022-00142-4
Merod, A., & Arundel, K. (2024, January 10). Bullying is linked to school shootings. What do schools need to know? K-12 Dive https://www.k12dive.com/news/bullying-school-shootings-prevention/704206/
Rajan, S., & Branas, C. C. (2018, June 6). Arming schoolteachers: What do we know? Where do we go from here? American Journal of Public Health, 108(7), 860-862. https://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/full/10.2105/AJPH.2018.304464
Schildkraut, J., & Martaindale, M. H. (2023). Arm the educators…but not without conditions: A qualitative assessment of law enforcement officers’ support for armed teacher policies. Police Practice and Research, 25(4), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/15614263.2023.2287218
Shamserad, F. (2023). Race differences in youths’ attitudes toward arming teachers: Investigating the role of procedural justice. Youth & Society, 55(2), 259-279. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X211046637
AUGUST “AUGGIE” GORMAN is a 28-year-old graduate student currently working to achieve his certification in Art Education K-12. Having graduated Savannah College of Art and Design in 2019 with a BFA in animation, August went on to substitute teach as a means to pay the bills, only to discover that teaching was a perfect fit for him. Since then, he has worked for Boerne Independent School District in Boerne, Texas, and West Chester Area School District in West Chester, Pennsylvania, as a go-to substitute teacher. In 2022 August made the decision to combine his two passions, art and education, and in 2023 began attending Millersville University to become an Art Teacher. August is currently in his final year of his certification program, and is happily living in Millersville where he works as a crew member at the local Cinnabon, and spends his free time drawing while re-watching cartoons.
What do equity and justice look like for mental health?
According to Mental Health America (2024), PA was ranked 18th in the country for having access to mental health resources (down from 2022’s rating of 8th), yet according to Hourglass (2023), mental health conditions were rated as the #1 health issue affecting community members in Lancaster County.
Do Pennsylvania and Lancaster County provide equal access to mental health care compared to the rest of the country? Do individuals feel seen, heard, and understood? Who is disproportionately affected by mental health issues? Are mental health conditions misunderstood, overgeneralized, or ignored in Pennsylvania and Lancaster County? In the country?
How are you affected by access to mental health resources, representation, and advocacy? Is there a change you want to see in how mental health is discussed and/or supported?
The Engage for Change Journal focuses on issues affecting Lancaster and the surrounding region and is now accepting submissions for its 2026-2027 issue on Mental Health and Well-Being: Justice for All. We accept submissions from undergraduate and graduate students, alumni, faculty, staff, and community members. Collaborative submissions are highly encouraged. We accept a diverse range of articles, from research articles to personal perspectives and creative pieces.
DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSIONS: September 14, 2026
Find out more information on article types, writing tips, and the submission process: blogs.millersville.edu/engageforchangejournal/home
Contact Kerrie R.H. Farkas, Founder and Co-Editor: engageforchangejournal@millersville.edu