Industrial Difference between Fire Bricks and High Alumina Bricks Bio Link:
https://www.futuretechtimes.com/fire-bricks-vs-high-alumina-bricks/ There is no doubt that the standards are fire refractory bricks and high alumina bricks. But while they are common refractory materials, it does not mean one can use them interchangeably. Fire refractory bricks and high alumina bricks serve similar purposes. But that does not mean that their applications are the same. That is why one needs to do thorough research to decide which one would better fit them. And in this blog, you will learn the major industrial difference between them.
High Alumina Bricks These are aluminum silicate refractory and contain over 55 percent alumina content. These bricks have high thermal stability, and their refractoriness is above 1770 degrees. Their slag resistance is excellent as well. They are used in lining blast furnaces, rotary kilns, electric furnace tops, etc. They have an affinity towards alkaline, compared to fire bricks closer to acid.
Fire Clay Bricks Fire Clay bricks (or acid proof bricks) are another standard refractory material. These bricks contain around 30 percent Al2O3 content and are weak refractory bricks. These bricks can easily resist acid gas or slag. But they have weaker resistance to alkaline substances, a disadvantage against alumina bricks. Good thermal property and resistance to heat are some benefits of fire bricks.
Fire Clay Bricks Vs High Alumina Bricks Standard differences between fire clay bricks and high alumina bricks:
Presence of Aluminum Oxide Aluminum oxide is a major component in refractory bricks. And while there are still disputes about the limit of aluminum oxide content in these bricks, it is widely accepted that high alumina bricks have over 55% Aluminum oxide. Similarly, fire bricks have an aluminum oxide content lower than 55%.
Refractoriness Another industrial difference between these two is their different refractoriness. In general, high alumina bricks have higher refractoriness than fire clay bricks.
Refractory Under Load (RUL) Refractory Under Load is directly linked to Al2O3 content. Fire bricks have lower aluminum oxide content and hence lower RUL capacity.
That indicates that one can apply fire clay in the subordinate parts of furnaces. They have been used in sealing regenerator walls, lining furnace doors, etc.
pH Value High alumina bricks have a pH value closer to 7, making them neutral refractory bricks. That makes them useful in the presence of both acid and basic environments. Acid bricks, as the name suggests, are acidic. That is because they contain acidic impurities. But while they are useful in an acidic environment, they are useless against basic elements.
Thermal Shock Fire brick has a better thermal shock resistance than its high alumina counterpart. Reason? Because corundum is less likely to form transition. They also have higher thermal expansion as well over mullite.
Linear Change for Reheating These bricks expand as the temperature rises, specifically before 1000 degrees. But the fire clay expansion rate is around 0.6 % which is half of the high alumina bricks. So after the temperature goes over 1200 degrees, the bulk begins to shrink, leading to the collapse of the structure. As is obvious from the differences listed, fire clay bricks and high alumina bricks are not the same. One needs to utilize them appropriately to get the best possible result with their usage. But another critical element is crucial to get the best possible result. That element is the quality of the refractory bricks used. One must ensure that they only use the finest quality refractory bricks for their needs. And for that, they could not find a better companion than one of the leading fire brick manufacturers. Whatever your need, you will find suitable solutions with us. We also offer castable refractory cement. Source Link: https://www.futuretechtimes.com/fire-bricks-vs-high-alumina-
bricks/