queensjournal.ca
Introducing the new
the journal Professor’s academic freedom violated, report finds
Vol. 143, Issue 1
T u e s day , J u n e 2 , 2 0 1 5
since
1873
Morteza Shirkhanzadeh brings 2005 Professor allegations of research misconduct to Queen’s
2011
Shirkhanzadeh banned from three campus buildings and email communications with Queen’s employees
creates a website to publish allegations 2012 ofShirkhanzadeh misconduct after University investigation ends
Queen’s accuses Shirkhanzadeh of harassment and 2014 threatens discipline if website not taken down
2015
CAUT report concludes that Queen’s violated Shirkhanzadeh’s academic freedom
CAUT report finds “pattern of retaliation” against professor alleging research misconduct J acob R osen News Editor According to a report published last month by a national union association, Queen’s has taken steps over the past 10 years to silence an engineering professor who attempted to expose evidence of research misconduct. Morteza Shirkhanzadeh, PhD, an associate professor in the Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, has provided Queen’s with alleged instances of plagiarism and fabricated or falsified data in scientific papers written by another Queen’s professor in 2005, who will remain unnamed due to legal concerns. The Canadian Association of University Teachers (CAUT), a nationwide union association, represents 68,000 university teachers. According to the report, “The behaviour of Queen’s Administration in this matter is a typical reaction of an organization that has to deal with issues brought to it by a whistleblower. Rather than deal with the allegations in a fair and impartial manner, it seeks
Letter from Provost and Vice-Principal Robert A. Silverman to Dr. Morteza Shirkhanzadeh, with Principal Daniel Woolf and Bill Young, chair of the Board of Trustees, copied.
to silence the whistleblower to preserve its own reputation. “We conclude that there is a pattern of retaliation against
Professor Shirkhanzadeh in response to his allegations of fraud and misconduct.” However, Queen’s Provost
SUPPLIED BY LITTLE OFFICE OF RESEARCH INTEGRITY (LORI)
Alan Harrison told The Journal that CAUT has no jurisdiction over matters of academic freedom due to the collective union agreement
between the Queen’s University and the Queen’s University Faculty Association (QUFA). Because of the agreement, Queen’s didn’t participate in the investigation. Instead, CAUT used materials provided by Shirkhanzadeh and QUFA for their report. Shirkhanzadeh said research misconduct had been occurring for years before a colleague brought it to his attention in 2005. Shirkhanzadeh brought his allegations to the University shortly after. “I thought that what I’m doing is good for the University, it’s good for the funding agencies, good for the students and public,” Shirkhanzadeh said. “My general feeling over the last 10 years is they don’t like that. They don’t want to investigate.” Shirkhanzadeh found multiple journal articles credited to the accused professor with research from a Queen’s physics experiment that he alleges contain plagiarism and falsified or fabricated data. “It was a clear case of research misconduct,” he said. His allegations of academic misconduct received media See CAUT, page 7
INSIDE THIS ISSUE NEWS
EDITORIALS
OP-ED
ARTS
SPORTS
Obituary: Queen’s mourns Madison Crich
RMC’s sexual violence culture runs deep
Canadian schools underprepare students
Students present stirring pieces in juried exhibition
Defensive back Brendan Morgan taken in CFL draft
page 2
page 9
page 10
page 12
page 15
Online:
queensjournal.ca
@queensjournal
facebook.com/queensjournal