Page 1


How To Critique Qualitative Research Articles In 5 Simple Steps When ​critiquing a qualitative research article​, essentially what you’re doing is highlighting its strengths in weaknesses in an argumentative way. Since the process may seem more complicated than it really it, we’ve decided to break it down into 5 simple steps that are easy to follow.

Critique qualitative research 1. Choose a suitable article to review Your ​qualitative research article critique first needs to be based upon a suitable research article. When choosing one, keep in mind the target audience and ask yourself whether it’s more biased than it should be. Is the research process it tried to describe fully documented? It’s best if the article was published in a well-acclaimed scientific journal – that way you know it’s good, since these tend to be quite strict in terms of which articles they are willing to accept. Finally, check whether this particular article is often cited by others – a higher number is an indicator of quality.


2. Know which areas to focus on It’s a good idea to study a ​qualitative research critique example before proceeding. But in general, here’s what you should be focusing on: - Did the research respect the ethical standards? Were there animals involved in the testing etc.? - Analyze the research instrument. Do you think it’s reliable enough? - Does the study have a suitable sample size? - Are the sources correctly cited? - etc.

3. Familiarize yourself with the overall structure Upon studying any ​qualitative research critique sample​, you’ll quickly see that it follows the same structure. Typically, they always begin with the title and include a list of references at the end. Speaking of which, is the title too short to convey any meaningful information or too long so it seems overly complicated? 4. The general writing strategy explained Here, we will look at ​how to critique a qualitative research article in general. As already established, each section needs to address different areas, so


we’ll be giving you a basic idea on how to approach things. Since we’ve covered the title, let’s move on to the abstract. The easiest thing to do is to measure whether it has the right length or not (ideally, it should be 50-250 words). Then, proceed to evaluate whether it addresses the overall research topic well. The introduction should follow similar principles and should be evaluated from the same angle. The literature review needs to be focused on the issue, based upon a suitable theoretical framework, and fairly represent opposing views. In the overall evaluation, it’s very important if the study can be replicated and whether the methods chosen were reliable and consistent. 5. The reference list (important) This is the last and the final step of successfully writing a ​qualitative research critique​. See if all the sources are cited correctly and whether the range of works cited is wide enough. Also, how dated is the literature cited? Does it only cite older research or does it cite some newer one as well?

Conclusion Here we have it – 5 steps to writing qualitative research articles that should give you a broad idea about the content you should aim to produce. Whenever you need additional inspiration, a good way to get it is by analyzing pre-existing examples online to see what other critique writers wrote about.

You will find more about critique qualitative research articles below: http://www.qualitativeresearchcritique.com/

How to Critique Qualitative Research Articles in 5 Simple steps  

Hello! Today we've prepared for you an information on how to critique qualitative research articles in 5 simple steps. If you need more info...

How to Critique Qualitative Research Articles in 5 Simple steps  

Hello! Today we've prepared for you an information on how to critique qualitative research articles in 5 simple steps. If you need more info...

Advertisement