Schedule
C21
33A
• Explore and understand the frequency, variety, and hypothesized causes of wrongdoing in research. • Identify when a researcher’s wrongdoing can be addressed adequately using traditional means, and when more specialized interventions are required. • Outline the kinds of interventions that research data indicates may be most effective in reducing recidivism rates.
schedules
Informed Consent in Internet Research: Realities and Possibilities (Research Involving the Internet and Social Networking Track)
Faculty: Emily Anderson, Elizabeth Buchanan, Laura Odwazny [Please note this is a double session and will end at 1:45 PM. Please pick up your boxed lunch before proceeding to the session room. Pre-registration was required to attend and a lunch ticket will be included on your name badge.] In this session, faculty and attendees will: • Identify the unique settings and conditions for consent in internet research. • Discuss how to apply the federal regulatory requirements for informed consent to internet research. • Highlight regulatory flexibilities that are applicable to consent in internet research. • Discuss parental consent and child assent in internet research involving minors. • Share sample language on data security and confidentiality of research-related information for informed consent documents for internet research. C22
Understanding and Responding to Wrongdoing in Research (Responsible Conduct of Research Track)
33C
didactic session
23C
Speed it Up: Exempt… Expedite… Relax! (SBER I Track)
Faculty: Dean Gallant, Lorna Hicks, Irene Stith-Coleman [Please note this is a double session and will end at 1:45 PM. Please pick up your boxed lunch before proceeding to the session room. Pre-registration was required to attend and a lunch ticket will be included on your name badge.] In this session, faculty and attendees will: • Use case-based scenarios to explore regulatory flexibilities while assuring that research is conducted ethically. • Discuss the process for determining when behavioral, educational, and social research must undergo review by the full IRB, when it qualifies for expedited review, when it is exempt, and when it does not constitute research involving human subjects. C24
Faculty: James DuBois [Please note this is a double session and will end at 1:45 PM. Please pick up your boxed lunch before proceeding to the session room. Pre-registration was required to attend and a lunch ticket will be included on your name badge.] In this session, faculty and attendees will:
Icon Key
C23 Basic
31C
50 Shades of Risqué Research (SBER II Track)
Faculty: Patricia MacCubbin, Susan Miller Often, IRBs are confronted with reviewing a proposal to study a socially or politically sensitive issue. Even if the proposed study has the potential to generate valuable information, pressures from inside and outside the institution might make the review and
interactive workshop
p ri m & r’ s 20 1 2 adv anci ng e th i ca l r e s e a rc h c on f e r e n c e
recorded session
receives CME credit