AMENDED Intervention-by-right, PASTOR et al, FAA Top-Safety-Project; Patent, Boeing-737-Max/D Case 2: Stipulation/Summons/Amnd."Intervention-By-Right", dlvd 06/18, signed for by MAURICE DOCKERY
U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS PASTOR, I. G. ABERIN, "MESSIANIC JEWS",§ § MONICA C. FERNANDEZ, § To: Judge Thomas M. Durkin, DAVID F. GALOR, intervention-by-right in consolidated BENJAMIN GAL-OR, Boeing-737-Max-8 Cases, e.g. 18-cv-07686; Applicants-Plaintiffs 19-cv-02394; ...1924; ... 2597; ... v. THE BOEING COMPANY Defendant
§ § § § JURY DEMAND
AMENDED "Intervention-By-Right" Reasons 737-MAX-8-Plaintiffs Should be Jury-Awarded Additional Relief 1. Pursuant to FRCP Rule 24(a), 26, U.S.C. 28A, this Intervention-by-Right is based on: 2. Federal statute explicitly conferring on these applicants unconditional right to intervene, 3. Applicants-plaintiffs' claims-of-interest relate to property or transaction of 737-MAX-8-Cases-Plaintiffs that should be JuryAwarded additional relief for the following reasons: 4. KNOWINGLY, and protected by its criminal retaliations, Boeing designs, produces and delivers stall-(image-above)-sensitive, dangerous, sometimes-deadly, Aeronautics-OnlyObsolete-Flight-control (AOOF), as the AOOF-causing the B-737-Max-8-Catastrophes, rather than the well proven U.S.-F-22-Safety-Inspired-Standard [E.g., defined by U.S. Patent 5,782,431] and enthusiastically praised-funded by FAA-20-Pilots, later Aerospace America, Aviation Week & International Aviation Conferences in China, Russia, Germany. 5.
Without changing engines or airframes, the F-22-Raptor-inspired-safety-revolution easily upgrades all (MANDATORY) air transports THRUST-REVERSERS to easily recover from ANY
1