The first chapter delves into the contextual analysis of the project site. It begins by examining the historical development of Delhi and the challenges that have hindered the development of the area and district center. This was done as group exercise where team then identified six broad categories of issues that the site faces, ranging from socio-economic challenges to infrastructural issues. Analysis of each category was conducted to gain a deeper understanding of the context and to identify potential solutions. This thorough examination of the site’s context allowed the team to develop a comprehensive understanding of the challenges and opportunities presented by the project.
Area
Study Area : 5 sqkms
Perimeter : 13 Kms
Building: 25,930
Plots: 21,662
The site is delineated for detailed study is 5sqkm area which is delineated along the physical features. In East its eastern Yamuna canal , in west Yamuna flood banks, In north its the change of housing typology and in south its the pushta road. The site is located into two zones New Seelampur, Shastri Park in North East Zone and Old Seelampur into Shahdra zone. Both at city level are the most impacted and pressurized urban areas
CONTESTED STREETS
CLOGGED WATER CANALS
NARROW LANES
Topography - Water Accumulation in Major landmarks
Major public spaces, green spaces and district center area fall in low lying land. Embankment of Pushta Rd aids to water collection and the Eastern Yamuna Canal only has one outlet, The canal remains clogged
In-spite of good intercity and intracity connectivity and walkable urban blocks the 200m Wide transit barrier divides the two areas without intermediate connectivity restricting movement.
Context Analysis
Activity Mapping
The streets in the study area have specialized markets that cater to specific products. For example, while one street may have a market for clothes, the other may specialize in electronics. This specialization not only benefits the local economy but also attracts customers from outside the area. However, it also leads to congestion and reduced accessibility in the area.
The site presents a range of constraints and opportunities that need to be considered in any interventions and developments. We have identified several assets, such as institutions, amenities, public spaces, religious places, and market streets, that are crucial to the economy and character of the neighborhood. These assets will serve as trigger points for the proposed interventions and developments in the area, aimed at enhancing the quality of life for residents.
The second part of this portfolio is centered around the various opportunities and constraints that exist in the area identified as a result of detailed analysis.
The ultimate aim is to create a comprehensive urban design structure plan that is based on a vision to revitalize the identity of Seelampur. By taking into account the opportunities and constraints that have been identified, the plan will seek to create a cohesive and sustainable urban environment that enhances the quality of life for all residents of the area.
The structure plan framework is proposed for area of 2sqkm which is delineated on basis of concentration of asset in close proximity that will influence and aid in development of District center site
This part of the portfolio focuses on an individual project that aims to upgrade the communities and the edge of the district center. The analysis conducted involves a detailed study of the existing market and community, and proposes a possible solution for slum upgrading, district center integration, and guidelines to achieve a built form and environmental sensitivity to support ecologically sensitive areas. The aim is to create a sustainable and inclusive urban environment that caters to the needs of the local population and enhances the overall quality of life in the area.
Need to Revitalize housing and upgrade communities Intervention Area and Stakeholders
PERCEPTION NEED
The District Center not able to take off in-spite after years of suggestions because of the perception of Jamna Paar that is mainly contributed due to the presence of Jhuggi Jhopri Clusters (Slum/bastis) and the Resettlement Colonies o JJR Jhuggi Jhopri Resettlement Colonies
Even if District Center is constructed residents and business might not be able to leverage it if they are not socially or economically brought in mainstream or facilitated. Thereby there is need in order for them to leverage the development around
CONFLICT
Social conflicts that exists around the site hampers and slows down any kind of redevelopment progress as well creates a barrier so residents and users and not able to utilize the services being provided to them
Opportunities around Site
The site boasts several assets in its vicinity one of the major being market street and second being the district center which can support commercial development. Along these spaces are social edge that could help activate the site. In addition to the social infrastructure that supports housing is present within 1km radius of the site
- Slum Clusters JJC - Rehabilitation Colonies JJR
- Unauthorized Regularized Colonies
Temple Trusts
Masjid Trust
The individual proposal identifies five projects that have the potential to trigger urban transformation in the area. These projects include the Market Street, the Slum Up-gradation, the District Center Vacant Lot, the Underutilized Fire Department and Hospital Housing, and the District Center Edge. Each of these projects was analyzed in detail to develop guidelines and recommendations for their implementation
G+1, G+2 Structures
Area 12sqm-15sqm
Single Room Unit Lower as commercial Workspace and upper as Living usually Rented out.
Staircase outside unit to access upper floors, usually a iron or wooden staircase
G+2, G+3 Structures
Area 18sqm-30sqm
Lower floor as commercial with room toilet and shared staircase with frontage space.
Upper Floors with two rooms usually rented out, toilet included in housing unit
G+3 G+5 Structures
Area 30sqm-35sqm
Residential Structures with Toilet and individual staircase and each or upper floors are rented out
Three Typology of Slum housing in different Slum zones
Design Approach
Design Approach : Conservative surgery
Conservative surgery approach in situ slum up-gradation involves upgrading existing slums by improving the existing infrastructure and housing units, rather than demolishing and rebuilding them entirely. The aims is to improve the living conditions of slum residents while minimizing the social and economic disruptions that can occur with a more radical approach.
The 3 Rs - Restructuring, Reviving, and Rehabilitating - are derived from the conservative surgery approach and represent a conceptual framework for the design process as follows :-
P.A.T.H
People Centric Approach for Urban Transformation and Housing
Integrating existing economic and social fabric with district center development to create urban anchors that boost local economy and promote social inclusion.
R _ RESTRUCTURING
Restructuring of spaces is includes carving out street networks and open spaces so as to have minimum displacement of people. It helps to improve the infrastructure services and connectivity as well as increasing the area in public domain
REVIVING
Reviving involves bringing new life and vitality to a place, through the introduction of new uses, activities, and amenities. Dwelling units that are displaced to carve down the areas are rehabilitated within 2kms of original space so as not to take way social connection.
In addition to the rehabilitate plot dwelling units with smaller size less supply of light and ventilation and in deteriorated condition can be upgraded on site depending upon the individual units. R _
Why Conservative surgery
The Social conflict and divide that exists on the site will hinder and delay the development process if taken as whole thereby part to whole approach.
Availability of underutilized land adjacent to site that could be utilized to integrate the development with the district center as well the developer can have free sale component
The social infrastructure that supports any settlement already exists within the walkable distance as well as the markets that supports the economic fabric of the area
Rehabilitation Test Plot Option 2 (Unit wise {Apartment} Rehabilitation)
Units staggered horizontal to occupy larger density and dwelling units as well as semi private open spaces
District Center and Hospital Block details and guidelines
Lower floors should have commercial use in order to maintain and integrate the retail edge. 5m Setback up-to 7m in order to integrate the public edge into the built
After 7m to create arcade typology, built to edge must be followed .
Beyond 7m a 5m step back to create podium.
Corner plots along district center edge can go up-to G+15 in order to achieve maximum FAR. But as building converge towards Rehabilitation Plots the height should reduce restricted to G+5
FSI Achieved 2.5 , FSI Cap 3.0
- Apartment typology, plot to floor space allocation
- Less possibility of informality to bloom
- Option will be able to accommodate the individual units
- Will accommodate functions but less flexibility
- Accommodate more density 450 DU/Ha
Rehabilitating by creating apartment typology that allows for more open, semi public spaces within the settlement, giving them a chance for incrementation vertically and not allowing for negative spaces that can lead to informality. This option will allow for more density around 450DU/Ha. FSI is capped at 3.0 in order for rehabilitated plot to be integrated with the existing fabric and maintain G+3 to G+5 built height.
A courtyard placement creates a continuous built edge and inner edge, integrating the existing fabric into open spaces and supporting the existing commercial fabric. The upper floor of the hospital and fire-station residential plot can be subsidized towards their plots as they remain vacant, while the available vacant plot could be used for free sale component for slum rehabilitation, achieving 4 FSI as mentioned in In-situ Slum Rehabilitation Scheme. This approach integrates the slum with the existing fabric, while benefiting DDA from vacant land and slum from redevelopment.
The district center edge is being transformed into an arcade, with the lower floor integrating the continuity of the existing market. The public activity is integrated from the footpath towards the built, with a 5m setback. The continuous edge from existing market forms a space for local economy to expand as well as complement the district center development
A vendor zone has been created within the district center area adjacent to the slum block, merging slum rehabilitation with new development. This provides opportunities for local vendors to set up their businesses and create jobs while integrating the existing community with the new development.
View to the vendor zone
View to the District Center Edge
The annexure provides a list of pointers for conducting a costbenefit analysis, taking into account various considerations and revenue generation strategies. These pointers are intended to support the envisioned transformation of the area and to ensure its viability
Cost Benefit Analysis Component Programs and Policies
Cost Components
Cost of infrastructure development such as roads, drainage, water supply, and sewage
Cost of construction of houses and commercial buildings
Cost of rehabilitating and resettling displaced residents
Cost of ongoing maintenance and upkeep of the developed area
Complementing Benefit Components
Reduced social and economic disruptions compared to a more aggressive approach
Increase in economic activity and employment opportunities due to the development
Improved living conditions and access to basic amenities for residents
Increase in tax revenue for the local government
Reduction in social costs associated with slums and informal settlements, such as crime, disease, and environmental degradation
The conservative surgery approach to in situ slum up-gradation can be a cost-effective and socially responsible way to improve living conditions for slum residents while minimizing the negative social and economic impacts of more aggressive approaches.
Due to time constraints and the volatility of the project site, certain costs were difficult to calculate and may require further analysis in the future. However, the components of the cost-benefit analysis have been outlined to provide a general understanding of the potential benefits of the proposed project.
Pradhan Mantri Awas
Yojana - Urban (PMAY-U):
This is a flagship program of the Government of India that aims to provide affordable housing to the urban poor. The program provides financial assistance to eligible beneficiaries for the construction or enhancement of housing units.
Delhi State Slum and JJ
Rehabilitation and Relocation Policy:
The policy provides financial assistance for the construction or enhancement of housing units, as well as for the provision of infrastructure improvements, such as water supply and sanitation.
The program provides financial assistance to municipalities and urban local bodies for the construction of toilets and the provision of sanitation infrastructure.
Janalakshmi Financial Services: Janalakshmi Financial Services is a microfinance institution that provides loans to low-income households for income-generating activities, housing improvements, and other needs.
