2007 UNREGULATED ATTEMPTED MURDER FILES

3230 Cruger Avenue #6B Bronx, New York 10467 April 18, 2007

Deborah Platt Majoras, Chairman Pamela Jones Harbour, Commissioner J. Thomas Rosch, Commissioner William E. Kovacic, Commissioner Consumer Response Center Federal Trade Commission 600 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W. Washington, D.C. 20580 Federal Trade Commission Consumer Fraud Division Regional Office 1 Bowling Green Suite 318 New York, New York 10004 Henry Waxman, Chair Person Committee On Oversight And Government Reform U.S. House Of Representatives 2157 Rayburn House Office Building Washington, D.C. 20515 ..

EMAILED TO: OIG@ftc.gov, idt-brt@ftc.gov, sentinel@ftc.gov RE: LAWLESS USRPED AND IINFLICTED CONSUMER FRAUDS AND DEFRAUD PATTERNS, PRACTICES AND CRIMINAL TRENDS, OBSTRUCTING, IMPEDING, AND INTERFERING WITH STATE AND FEDERAL CONSUMER AND EQUAL PROTECTION LAWS, SPECIFICALLY THE FAIR DEBT COLLECTIONS PRACTICES ACT AND THE INTERNATIONAL AND STATE HUMAN RIGHTS LAWS. PLEASE SEE ATTACHED 5 BINDERS. Dear Federal Trade Commission Public Officials: I am writing you regarding consumer fraud practices that facilitate killing under disguise.

Please see the attached Jonathan Lippman Judicial Trespasser complaints I have had to file to document these crimes. Foremost, attached you will find multiple criminal fraud and Identity Theft complaints I recently filed due to the multiple usurped identity thefts and frauds inflicted on me in retaliation to documenting Jonathan Lippman’s patterned and practiced deadly usurpations and conspiracy against rights. Jonathan Lippman is a NYS Chief Judicial Trespasser, disguised killer and Fraud Phenomenon Specialist. See the attached evidence, 5 binders documenting his fraud and defraud.

Second, I ask that you read the attached FDCPA complaints filed as organizations are willfully enjoined in violating consumer protections secured under the Fair Debt Collection Practices.

Attached is the written section of the Identity Theft Complaint I recently submitted. The OMB Number is 3084-0047. In addition I am submitting over 23 counts of inflicted criminal fraud patterned off of and in retaliation to filing complaints against Jonathan Lippman’s fraud and defraud disguised killing operations. See attached Judicial complaint dated March 8, 2007. All of the inflicted criminal fraud crimes obstruct, impede and dismantle universal human rights laws and consumer protection laws. The attachments will show violations of constitutional secured equal protection laws embedded in the below human rights laws and the FTC Consumer protection laws. The attachments show clear obstructions, interferences and disregards of equal protection laws. The attachments show: HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS INFLICTED AS DEADLY CRMINAL DOCUMENTED PHENOMENA: 

    

  

All are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimination to equal protection of the law. All are entitled to equal protection against any discrimination in violation of this Declaration and against any incitement to such discrimination.

Everyone has the right to an effective remedy by the competent national tribunals for acts violating the fundamental rights granted him by the constitution or by law.

Everyone has the right to work, to free choice of employment, to just and favourable conditions of work and to protection against unemployment.

Everyone, without any discrimination, has the right to equal pay for equal work.

Everyone who works has the right to just and favourable remuneration ensuring for himself and his family an existence worthy of human dignity, and supplemented, if necessary, by other means of social protection.

Everyone has the right to a standard of living adequate for the health and wellbeing of himself and of his family, including food, clothing, housing and medical care and necessary social services, and the right to security in the event of unemployment, sickness, disability, widowhood, old age or other lack of livelihood in circumstances beyond his control.

All peoples have the right of self-determination. By virtue of that right they freely determine their political status and freely pursue their economic, social and cultural development.

The States Parties to the present Covenant undertake to ensure the equal right of men and women to the enjoyment of all economic, social and cultural rights set forth in the present Covenant.

The States Parties to the present Covenant recognize the right to work, which includes the right of everyone to the opportunity to gain his living by work which he freely chooses or accepts, and will take appropriate steps to safeguard this right.

CONSUMER PROTECTIONS VIOLATED TO DISGUISE KILLING AN INNOCENT PERSON VIA LAWLESS INCOME BLACKLISTINGS, LAWLESS REPEATED AND ONGOING INCOME EXECUTIONS, DEMISE OF BANK ACCOUNTS, INFLICTED CRIMINAL FRAUD CREDIT REPORTING, REPEATED AND ONGOINF FTC CONSUMER PROTECTION VIOLATIONS EMBEDDED IN: Prohibited Communications Practices ยง 1692 c(a)(1) At any unusual time, unusual place, or unusual time or place known to be inconvenient to the consumer, before 8:00 am or after 9:00 pm ยง 1692 c(a)(2) After it knows the consumer to be represented by an attorney unless attorney consents or is unresponsive ยง 1692 c(a)(3) At place of employment when knows that the employer prohibits such communications ยง 1692 c(B) With anyone except consumer, consumerโ s attorney, or credit bureau concerning the debt ยง 1692 cยฉ After written notification that consumer refuses to pay debt, or that consumer wants collector to cease communication Harassment or Abuse ยง 1692 d Any conduct the natural consequence of which is to harass, oppress, or abuse any person ยง 1692 d(1) Used or threatened the use of violence or other criminal means to harm the consumer or his/her property? ยง 1692 d(2) Profane language or other abusive language? ยง 1692 d(3) Published a list of consumers who allegedly refuse to pay debts? ยง 1692 d(4) Advertised for sale any debts? ยง 1692 d(5) Caused the phone to ring or engaged any person in telephone conversations repeatedly ยง 1692 d(6) Placed telephone calls without disclosing his/her identity?

False or Misleading Representations in Communications ยง 1692 e Any other false, deceptive, or misleading representation or means in connection with the debt collection ยง 1692 e(1) Affiliated with the United States or any state, including the use of any badge, uniform or facsimile ยง 1692 e(2) Character, amount, or legal status of the alleged debt ยง 1692 e(3) Any individual is an attorney or that any communication is from an attorney ยง 1692 e(4) Nonpayment of any debt will result in the arrest or imprisonment of any person or the seizure, garnishment, attachment ยง 1692 e(5) Threaten to take any action that cannot legally be taken or that is not intended to be taken ยง 1692 e(6) Sale or transfer of any interest in the debt will cause the consumer to lose any claim or defense to payment of the debt ยง 1692 e(7) Consumer committed any crime or other conduct in order to disgrace the consumer ยง 1692 e(8) Threatens or communicates false credit information, including the failure to communicate that a debt is disputed ยง 1692 e(9) Represent documents as authorized, issued or approved by any court, official, or agency of the United States or state.

§ 1692 e(10) Any false representation or deceptive means to collect a debt or obtain information about a consumer § 1692 e(11) Communication fail to contain the mini-Miranda warning: "This is an attempt to collect a debt… communication is from a debt collector.” § 1692 e(12) Debt has been turned over to innocent purchasers for value § 1692 e(13) Documents are legal process when they are not § 1692 e(14) Any name other than the true name of the debt collector's business § 1692 e(15) Documents are not legal process forms or do not require action by the consumer § 1692 e(16) Debt collector operates or is employed by a consumer reporting agency Unfair Practices § 1692 f Any unfair or unconscionable means to collect or attempt to collect the alleged debt § 1692 f(1) Attempt to collect any amount not authorized by the agreement creating the debt or permitted by law § 1692 f(2) Accepted or solicit postdated check by more than 5 days without 3 business days written notice of intent to deposit § 1692 f(3) Accepted or solicited postdated check for purpose of threatening criminal prosecution § 1692 f(4) Depositing or threatening to deposit a post-dated check prior to actual date on the check § 1692 f(5) Caused any charges to be made to the consumer, e.g., collect telephone calls § 1692 f(6) Taken or threatened to unlawfully repossess or disable the consumer's property § 1692 f(7) Communicated with the consumer by postcard § 1692 f(8) Any language or symbol on the envelope that indicates the communication concerns debt collection h –Multiple Debts § 1692 h Collector must apply payments on multiple debts in order specified by consumer and cannot apply payments to disputed debts 30 Day Validation Notice § 1692 g Failure to send the consumer a 30-day validation notice within five days of the initial communication § 1692 g(a)(1) Must state Amount of Debt § 1692 g(a)(2) Must state Name of Creditor to Whom Debt Owed § 1692 g(a)(3) Must state Right to Dispute within 30 Days § 1692 g(a)(4) Must state Right to Have Verification/Judgment Mailed to Consumer § 1692 g(a)(5) Must state Will Provide Name and Address of original Creditor if Different from Current Creditor § 1692 g(B) Collector must cease collection efforts until debt is validated Legal Actions § 1692 i(a)(2) Brought any legal action in a location other than where contract signed or where consumer resides Deceptive Forms by Creditor § 1692 j Forms been designed, compiled and/or furnished to create the false belief that pa person other than creditor is collecting.

The attachments will show ongoing and repeated violations of the :

     

FAIR CREDIT REPORTING ACT FAIR CREDIT BILLING ACT FAIR DEBT COLLECTION PRACTICES ACT STATE STATUTES OF LIMITATIONS STATE STATUTES OF LIMITATIONS STATE LAWS RELATING TO CREDIT

In this fraud complaint I have attached the following: 1. A separate binder Notarized March 8, 2007 documenting NYS Chief Judicial Trespasser and multifaceted Disguised killer Jonathan Lippman Criminal Complaint for his Documented Conspiracy to Offend and Defraud the United States, patterned and practiced lawless Usurpations, abuse and use of NYS government for fraud and fiction administration to subterfuge and advance his documented disguised killing operations tiled and defined under his name as phenomena. He is abusing bar associations to target witnesses of his crimes. He enjoins members of the bar and others in his disguised killing operations via schools, courts, businesses, churches, unions, etc to advance his disguised killing operations, particularly as it relates to the attached criminal fraud and defraud activities.

2. Jonathan Lippman criminal usurpation and fraud trend conspiracy against rights emulation documents since 1999 enjoining the state of NY in non validated, criminal fraud, non existent, alleged debts, created to lawlessly block transcript release.

3. Attorney Kosnic, Jonathan Lippman’s conflict of interest designated fraud and FDCPA violations specialist being used to attempt to steal property to lawlessly execute housing and obstruct the pending criminal Jonathan Lippman investigation. This is Jonathan Lippman’s third time lawlessly executing housing to facilitate his disguised killing operations. The income and housing lawless executions facilitate creating a phenomenon to disguise the attempted murder. Attorney Kosni’c fraud and FDCPA violations advance the Jonathan Lippman attempted murder plan currently in place.

4. Attorney Keith Rothman atrocious, malicious, criminal fraud embedded in Criminal fraud on the courts, willful violations of and willful non compliance with the Fair Credit Billing Act, Fair Debt Collection Practices Act , State Statutes Of Limitations, State Statutes Of Limitations, State Laws Relating To Credit. This attachment epitomizes fraud specialist materials.

5. Judge Quinn and Rubin and Rothman attorneys, Court Fraud administration.

6. Trans Union fraud based Credit Reporting malicious violations that advance attorney Kosnik’s inflicted fraud and disguised killer Jonathan Lippman’s attempted murder and ongoing income blacklisting. These violations include willful violations in Fair Credit Reporting Act, Fair Credit Billing Act, Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, State Statutes Of Limitations, State Statutes Of Limitations, And State Laws Relating To Credit. They have refused to remove non validated and disputed items which compel court intervention when the courts are being used to obstruct equal protection and consumer protection laws as exhibited in the Rothman fraud attachment. See attachments.

7. Experian fraud based malicious and retaliatory credit reporting advancing Attorney Kosnik’s inflicted fraud and disguised killer Jonathan Lippman’s attempted murder and ongoing income blacklisting. These violations include willful violations in Fair Credit Reporting Act, Fair Credit Billing Act, Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, State Statutes Of Limitations, State Statutes Of Limitations, And State Laws Relating To Credit. They have refused to remove non validated and disputed items which compel court intervention when the courts are being used to obstruct equal protection and consumer protection laws as exhibited in the Rothman fraud attachment. See attachments 8. Equifax fraud based malicious and retaliatory credit reporting advancing attorney Kosnik’s inflicted fraud and disguised killer Jonathan Lippman’s attempted murder and ongoing income blacklisting. These violations include willful violations in Fair Credit Reporting Act, Fair Credit Billing Act, Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, State Statutes Of Limitations, State Statutes Of Limitations, State Laws Relating To Credit. They have refused to remove non validated and disputed items which compel court intervention when the courts are being used to obstruct equal protection and consumer protection laws as exhibited in the Rothman fraud attachment. See attachments 9. Wachovia Law Department Bank fraud and non validated, unauthorized lien based on an unsigned fraudulent, non validated, judgment based on a summons that was never served, violations of the Fair Credit Billing Act, Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and willful defamation.

10. Washington Mutual Bank Usurped and Inflicted Criminal Bank Fraud documents. See the multitude of false representation letters subterfuing the attached Signed Master Account Agreement form. See the attached Washington Mutual criminal mischief embedded in the unauthorized returning of money I deposited in the account and paid bills. The unauthorized returned has caused me financial damages and the bank has violated and undermined the integrity of the bank system by committing this fraud that advances demise under disguise. SEE attached FTC Identity theft complaint.

11. Public Notice Affidavit of Truth regarding Identity Theft Usurpations at : Washington Mutual Bank, Romans: Credit Card Division: Financial Network National Bank, American Express One credit card, Discover credit card, Orchard Bank/HSBC credit card, Household Bank/HSBC credit card, 12. Romans willful violations Fair Credit Reporting Act, Fair Credit Billing Act, Fair Debt Collection Practices Act 13. American Express willful harassment and non compliance with FDCPA via utilizing non validated defaming communications embedded in Washington Mutual’s fraud to the financial and reputation damage of Miriam Snyder. Leaving fraudulent unauthorized $1,000 billings on my account after documenting that the bill was not authorized. Using fraud to deny me credit I was entitled.

14. Bank of America Usurpation based Identity theft and fraud racquet with Usurped lawless non validated and unauthorized Pay Pal transactions, 15. Westchester Community College usurped fraudulent W2 tax forms listing $0.000 tax withholdings while check stubs epitomize over $3,600.00 tax withholdings, 16. New York State Department of Labor fraudulent Usurped Determination Notice listing earnings from Westchester Community College as $0.00 while check stubs epitomize over $30,000 earnings.

17. Mathew Dimicco Criminal Computer fraud crimes. See attached filed complaints disregarded by Jonathan Lippman lawless ( Britsh Accreditated Registry criminals) bar associates despite testimony, Mathew Dimmico criminal and malicious acts, evidence and facts. Under Jonathan Lippman’s fraud and defraud judicial trespass position, lawyers and judges are being used to implement and disregard fraud and deceit, which is deliberately calculated to demise walls of protection, demise accountability and designed to destroy the God created and given sovereignty of the American people. The sad thing is most lawyers are not aware of Jonathan Lippman’s ruthless diabolical plan of the American people demise, his eugenic agenda and global elite false phenomenon of supremacy.

18. Con Edison newly erupted usurped based fraud and willful violations of FDCPA via refusal to validate a non existent past due bill that I do not owe.

19. Cablevision/phone company newly erupted fraud and willful violations of FDCPA via refusal to validate a non existent past due bill that I do not owe and while they owe me money.

20. New York State Department of Taxation and Finance usurped fraud and willful violations of FDCPA via refusal to validate a non existent alleged debt that I do not owe and while they owe me money. Here we have patterned defraud practices rooted in non enforcement of consumer protections and deliberate lack of accountability.

21. IRS usurped fraud and willful violations of FDCPA via refusal to validate a non existent alleged debt that I do not owe and while they owe me money. Jonathan Lippman’s defraud patterns are evident here with counterfeit 1040 forms and a host of non accountability of the American people’s stolen monies.

22. March 2007 letter to Experian documenting and requesting public protection enforcement against the usurped and maliciously inflicted identity theft and fraud trends.

23. Wells Fargo law department enjoinment in usurped fraud trends and via not identifying nor verifying what is an over $2,000 debit on my auto loan. There are two Wells Fargo documents listing two different over $2,000.00 debits and neither form lists what is the debit for.

24. NYS Teachers Retirement System usurped fraud trends via listing fraudulent smaller amounts of time for service credit. This non verified information serves to fraudulently deny me tears of service.

25. Borough of Manhattan Community College lawless income execution and firing due to the above lawless, unauthorized, criminal, non validated usurpation based fraud judgment effectuating stolen monies under the fraud of a garnishment based on the unauthorized fiction administration judgment, for a non validated and paid claim,.

26. Several fraudulent small debt collectors’ fraud.

The above is a listing of effective criminal fraud stratagems and activities that kill innocent people under disguise via fictional administration of law in the courts, disregard of such, obstruct and interfere with equal protection human rights laws and obstruction of Consumer Protection laws secured by the FTC. Above all, the evidence exemplifies Jonathan Lippman’s patterned and practiced fraud and defraud emulations deliberately calculated to retard, silence and neutralize the American people.

I AM SUFFERING THE RAMIFICATIONS OF 9 INCIDENTS OF INFLICTED IDENTITY THEFT/INFLICTED USURPED FRAUD. THIS MEANS I AM FACING MULTIPLE INCIDENTS OF LAWLESS USURPATIONS AND FRAUD IN MY BANKING, CREDIT CARDS, UTILITY, PHONE, AND ON LINE SERVICES. NO ONE HUMAN BEING HAS THE POWER TO INFLICT THIS MUCH FRAUD OTHER THAN DOCUMENTED PATTERNED LAWLESS JUDICIAL USURPATIONS. I HAVE FILED THE INFLICTED

AND USURPED FRAUD/IDENTITY THEFT CHARGES WITH THE NYS ATTORNEY GENERAL, ANDREW CUOMO, THE BRONX DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROBERT JOHNSON’S OFFICE, NYC DEPARTMENT OF INVESTIGATIONS, AND A HOST OF OTHER DEPARTMENTS.THE FRAUD STILL CONTINUES. I WRITE AFFIDAVITS EVERYDAY AND SEND THEM OUT. SPECIFICALLY, THE IDENTITY THEFT FRAUD INFLICTION I CAUGHT HAS ESCALATED SINCE THE END OF JANUARY 2007. ONE INCIDENT I CAUGHT WAS INFLICTED FRAUD WITH OPENING AND DEPOSITING MONEY AND PAYING BILLS IN THE BRONX, WHITE PLAINS ROAD WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK. I OPENED THE BANK ACCOUNT ON JANUARY 25, 2007 ON THE PHONE WITH NO PROBLEM. JANUARY 26, 2007 I DEPOSITED $250.00 IN THE WASHINGTON MUTUAL CKING ACCOUNT NUMBER 3950594462 LOCATED AT 2178 WHITE PLAINS ROAD. JANUARY 28, 2007 I PAID THE FOLLOWING CREDIT CARDS ABOUT 50.00 EACH FROM THE ABOVE ACCOUNT: AMERICAN EXPRESS, ROAMANS, CAPITAL ONE, HSBC ORCHARD BANK, HSBC HOUSEHOLD BANK, AND DISCOVER. I RECEIVED RECEIPTS FOR THE PAYMENTS. ON OR ABOUT FEBRUARY 1, 2007 LAWLESS USURPATION CAN YOU PROVE IT POWERS WERE INFLICTED IN MY ACCOUNTS THAT FRAUDULENTLY RETURNED ALL OF MY CREDIT CARD PAYMENTS WITHOUT MY CONSENT, AUTHORIZATION, OR KNOWLEDGE AND FOR THE MALICIOUS SOLE PURPOSE OF CREATING PENALTIES FOR FRAUD THAT I HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH. UP TO TODAY APRIL 3, 2007 MY $265.00 IS STILL SITTING IN THE WASHINGTON MUTUAL CHECKING ACCOUNT DESIPTE THIS MONEY BEING USED TO PAY THE CREDIT CARDS ABOVE. DESPITE SEVERAL AFFIDAVITS WRITTEN REQUESTING A REASON FOR THE FRAUDLENT RETURN OF MONEY PAID ON THE CREDIT CARDS, NO RESPONSE HAS BEEN RENDERED.YET, I HAVE BEEN PENALIZED LATE FEES AND RETURNED PAYMENT CHARGES AND OTHER CHARGES DESPITE THE FACT THAT I DID NOT AUTHORIZE AND OR CONSENT TO ANY RETURN PAYMENTS AND DESPITE THE FACT THAT I HAVE MY RECEIPTS, THE MONEY IS IN THE ACCOUNT, AND I PAID THE CREDIT CARD BILLS. ADDITIONAL USURPED FRAUD DISGUISED AS IDENTITY THEFT HAS BEEN INFLICTED IN ANOTHER CHECKING ACCOUNT I HAVE WITH BANK OF NEW YORK IN MOUNT VERNON NEW YORK. IN FACT I OPENED THE WASHINGTON MUTUAL CKING ACCOUNT BECAUSE OF THE BANK OF AMERICA IDENTITY THEFT AND FRAUD. BANK OF AMERICA CHARGEG MY ACCOUNT WITH 68.00 WORTH OF PENALTIES FOR TRANSACTIONS I NEVER AUTHORIZED. USURPED IDENTITY THEFT WAS USED TO CREATE A BILL IN THIS ACCOUNT THAT I HAD NOTING TO DO WITH. EARLY JANUARY I BOUGHT SOME BIBLICAL BOOKS ON LINE THROUGH PAY PAL. I CHARGED THE BOOKS TO MY DISCOVER CARD. USURPED LAWLESS POWER PAID A PAY PAL AGENT OR DID SOMETHING, CHANGED MY DISCOVER CARD PAYMENT TO BANK OF AMERICA, WHERE THERE WAS NO MONEY ALLOCATED FOR THE BOOKS TO BE PAID. I PAID PAY PAL WITH MY DISCOVER CARD AND AN UNKNOWN USURPED IDENTITY THEFT FORCE WENT INTO PAY PAL AND CHANGED MY DISCOVER CARD PAYMENT TO BANK OF AMERICA CHECKING ACCOUNT AND DID THIS DESPITE THE FACT THAT THE BANK OF AMERICA CHECKING ACCOUNT IS NOT EVEN VERIFIED ON PAY PAL. THIS IS DEEP AND REAL. ARE YOU LISTENING TO THESE CRIMES?

THESE LAWLESS USURPATION SET UPS, IDENTITY THEFTS, AND INFLICTED FRAUDS ARE CRIMINAL AND ARE THE EXACT WAY MANY INNOCENT PEOPLE ARE SET UP AND KILLED UNDER DISGUISE. I AM DEALING WITH A PROFESSIONAL, EXPERT, DISGUISED KILLER, TRESPASSING AS A JUDGE AND WITH UNREGULATED USURPATION POWERS AND AN UNREULATED 2 BILLION DOLLAR BUDGET. THIS IS CALLED A BONFIDE DEMON. PRIOR TO THIS INFLICTED IDENTITY THEFT AND BANK FRAUD, I HAD A BANK ACCOUNT WITH WACHOVIA BANK IN YONKERS NEW YORK. THIS ACCOUNT WAS TERRORIZED

BY A FRAUDULENT, UNSIGNED, JUDGMENT, THAT WAS NEVER VERIFIED/VALIDATED AND THE SUMMONS WAS NEVER SERVED TO ME. I WENT TO COURT VIA ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE DOCUMENTING LACK OF SERVICE AND VALIDATON AND THE COURTS WERE ENJOINED IN JONATHAN LIPPMAN'S PATTERNED FRAUD AND DEFRAUD TO CONTINUE TO KILL UNDER DISGUISE. I FOUND THIS AMAZING. I FILED SEVERAL ORDERS TO SHOW CAUSES IN HEMPSTEAD NEW YORK SMALL CLAIMS COURT AND EACH WAS LAWLESSLY DENIED. BASED ON THIS FRAUD WACHOVIA BANK LAWLESSLY LIENED MY ACCOUNT BASED ON AN UNAUTHORIZED AND NON VALIDATED JUDGMENT. LAWLESS USURPATION POWERS WERE USED AGAIN IN THE COURTS AND IN THE WACHOVIA CHECKING ACCOUNT WHICH MADE WAY FOR THE IDENTITY THEFT IN THE ABOVE. WITH RESPECT TO MY UTILITY, LAWLESS USURPATIONS HAVE BEEN INFLICTED HERE. OUT OF NO WHERE THE CON EDISON COMPANY HAS CREATED A NON VALIDATED BILL OF OVER $1,000 DOLLARS THAT I DO NOT OWE. THEY HAVE REFUSED TO VALIDATE THE DEBT AND CONTINUE TO THREATEN MY UTILITIES ALL IN VIOLATION OF FDCPA AND THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION LAWS. ADDITIONALLY, NOW OUT OF NO WHERE CABLE VISION HAS JOINED IN, IN CREATING BILLS I DO NOT OWE. I PAID CABLE VISION OVER 600.00 BETWEEN NOVEMBER 2006 AND JANUARY 2007. I SENT THEM COPIES OF MY PAID CABLE RECEIPTS AND REQUESTED VIA AFFIDAVITS FOR THEM TO VALIDATE THEIR FRAUDULENT BILLING OR JUST VERIFY PAYMENTS THEY HAVE RECEIVED SO I CAN KNOW WHAT IS GOING ON.CABLE HAS REFUSED TO PROVIDE ME ANY VERIFIABLE PAYMENT HISTORY AND JUST KEEP FRAUDLENT BILLING ME AN ADDITIONAL 300.00 A MONTH IN VIOLATION TO MY PAID RECEIPTS AND IN VIOLATION TO FDCPA. LAWLESS USURPATION FORCES BEYOND NORMALACY ARE BEING USED TO INFLICT AND SUBTERFUGE FRAUD ON MY IDENTITY. THESE ARE DOCUMENTED FRAUD AND DEFRAUD CRIMES THAT HAVE A PATTERN OF LEAVING PEOPLE DEAD UNDER DISGUISE. I WILL FORWARD MY IDENTITY THEFT DOCUMENTATION AND USURPATION EVIDENCE TO THE NYC FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION OFFICE. I JUST DISCOVERED IT RECENTLY. ADDITIONALLY, TO FACILITATE THIS DISGUISED DEMISE MY PART TIME ADJUNCT POSITION AT WESCHESTER COMMUNITY COLLEGE WAS UNCONSTITUTIONALLY TAKEN FROM ME WITHOUT CAUSE, REASON OR EXPLANATION AND DESPITE OUTSTANDING DOCUMENTED COMMENDATIONS. THEREAFTER I RECEIVED A FRAUDULENT IDENTITY THFET W2 FORM FROM THE COLLEGE WITH $O.OO FEDERAL AND STATE TAX WITHOLDINGS WHILE MY CHECK STUBS SHOW THAT OVER $3,600 WAS TAKEN OUT OF MY CHECK FOR FEDERAL AND STATE TAXES. THE LAWLESS USURPATIONS AND IDENTITY THEFT WENT FROM MY 3 BANK

ACCOUNTS, TO THE UTILITY COMPANY TO THE CABLE/PHONE COMPANY TO MY JOB, TO THE IRS. IS ANYONE LISTENING, IN NYS WE HAVE A SICK KILLER JUDICIAL TRESPASSER THAT WANTS ME DEAD UNDER DISGUISE BECAUSE I HAVE UNRAVELLED AND EXPOSED HIS GENERATIONAL DISGUISED KILLING OPERATIONS. THIS MAN IS A HIT MAN THAT MUST STOP USURPING LAWLESS POWERS IN GOVERNMENT TO FACILIATE HIS HITS. I WILL SEND MY EVIDENCE AND AFFIDAVITS. GOD BLESS YOU AND THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME.

3230 Cruger Avenue # 6B Bronx, New York 10467 March 16, 2007 To Ministers across the Nation Chief Judge Judith Kaye 230 Park Avenue, Suite 826 New York City, New York 10169-0007 John Conyers, Committee on the Judiciary US House of Representatives Washington Office 2426 RHOB Washington, D.C. 20515-2214 Maxine Waters, Committee on the Judiciary US House of Representatives 2138 Rayburn House Office Building Washington, DC 20515 Charles Schumer U.S. Senator 757 Third Avenue New York, New York 10017 Hillary Clinton, U.S. Senator 780 3rd Avenue New York, New York 10017 Robert Johnson Bronx District Attorney 198 East 161st Bronx, New York 10451 Andrew Cuomo, NYS Attorney General 120 Broadway New York, New York 10271

NYC Mayor Bloomberg 100 Church Street New York, New York 10007 Rose Gill Hearn, Commissioner City of New York Department of Investigation

80 Maiden Lane New York, New York 10038 Mr. Emery, Administrator New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct 61 Broadway New York, New York 1006 Alberto Gonzalez, Attorney General US Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20530-0001 Second Circuit Court of Appeals Office of Legal Affairs Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse New York, New York 10007 Re: Added Affidavits to be amended to the Jonathan Lippman Criminal Complaint Truth Affidavit Notarized March 8, 2007 and submitted to the above offices thereafter.

Dear Above Noted Public Officials: Attached you will find additional Jonathan Lippman lawless and malicious fiction administration and usurpation replications, as well as 3 additional affidavits I have filed in self defense against patterned and practiced Jonathan Lippman fraud and defraud usurpations, inflicted and vindictive lawlessness, malicious, unauthorized, criminal practices, that have no lawful place in society, but facilitate and implement a documented disguised killing. Please let me know if further information is needed. Thank you.

Sincerely, Miriam Snyder

JONATHAN LIPPMAN DOCUMENTED MALICIOUS FICTIONAL ADMINISTRATION AND LAWLESS MALICIOUS USURPATIONS. SEE ATTACHED JONATHAN LIPPMAN STIPULATION MALICE REPLICATIONS AND LAWLESS USURPATIONS.

3230 Cruger Avenue #6B Bronx, New York 10467 April 19, 2007 To Ministers across the Nation hrwnyc@hrw.org hrwdc@hrw.org hrwsf@hrw.org toronto@hrw.org chicago@hrw.org hrwpress@hrw.org shahu@hrw.org ny1@ic.fbi.gov Chief Judge Judith Kaye 230 Park Avenue, Suite 826 New York City, New York 10169-0007 Henry Waxman, Chair Person Committee On Oversight And Government Reform U.S. House Of Representatives 2157 Rayburn House Office Building Washington, D.C. 20515 Deborah Platt Majoras, Chairman Federal Trade Commission 600 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W. Washington, D.C. 20580 John Conyers, Committee on the Judiciary US House of Representatives Washington Office 2426 RHOB Washington, D.C. 20515-2214 Maxine Waters, Committee on the Judiciary US House of Representatives 2138 Rayburn House Office Building Washington, DC 20515 Charles Schumer U.S. Senator 757 Third Avenue New York, New York 10017

Hillary Clinton, U.S. Senator 780 3rd Avenue

New York, New York 10017 Robert Johnson Bronx District Attorney 198 East 161st Bronx, New York 10451 Andrew Cuomo, NYS Attorney General 120 Broadway New York, New York 10271 NYC Mayor Bloomberg 100 Church Street New York, New York 10007 Rose Gill Hearn, Commissioner City of New York Department of Investigation 80 Maiden Lane New York, New York 10038 Mr. Emery, Administrator New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct 61 Broadway New York, New York 1006 Alberto Gonzalez, Attorney General US Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20530-0001 Second Circuit Court of Appeals Attorney Control Board Office of Legal Affairs Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse New York, New York 10007 Kosnik & Tracz, LLp George Kosnik Associates, Inc. 12-55 150th Street Whitestone, New York 11357 Re: Jonathan Lippman: Continued and Ongoing Human Rights Abuses/Violations, Deadly Conspiracy Against Rights, Kosnik Enjoinment in fraud, and Jonathan Lippman Ongoing Attempted Murder Embedded in Lawless Usurpation Fraud and Defraud Pattern and Practices Disguised as Phenomena, but effectively Killing, Destroying families, and Inflicting Homelessness Under Disguise.

Dear Public Officials and Jonathan Lippman Fraud Enjoinment Attorney Kosnik: I write this letter with respect to the attached Kosnik letter sent to me as the tenant in the attached Fraudulent and Deceptive Notice of Sale. Foremost, my lawful status is co tenantfamily member of Vernon Daniels, the holder in due course of the property targeted to get to me again under Jonathan Lippman’s patterned and practiced lawless usurpations, frauds, defrauds, and documented political persecution for documenting and validating his multiple disguised killing operations. See the attached criminal complaint I have had to file against Jonathan Lippman, just to stay alive and hide, from Jonathan Lippman’s ongoing attempted murder stratagems, in the property in question.

I received asylum from Vernon Daniels because I was forced into exile due to Jonathan Lippman’s vindictive deadly and ongoing persecution of me because God rescued me from many of his unregulated 2 billion dollar disguised killing operations. I have documented, detailed, and validated Jonathan Lippman’s multiple disguised killing operations in several Documentaries I have written. The Jonathan Lippman Multifaceted, well financed, disguised killing operations are validated and described in detail in the many Documentaries and Criminal Complaints I have filed with the above offices.

In 2002, I moved with the Daniels family because Jonathan Lippman was trying to kill me via continuous and ongoing inflicted human rights abuses, effectuating multiple lawless housing and income lawless executions and black listings.

In summary, Jonathan Lippman has obstructed law and order via documented lawless usurpation patterns and practices in every aspect of government and business to get to me.

Jonathan Lippman’s lawless usurpation patterns and practices hurt the Children in the Yonkers Public School system to get to me, obstructed 3 public school districts to get to me, obstructed and defrauded statutory tenure and human rights laws to get to me, and his documented lawless usurpation practices were used to enforce hate crimes in public schools as a method of management.

Since his deadly crimes have not been regulated, Jonathan Lippman has expanded his criminal usurpation and fraud practices. He has enjoined and abused the NYS court system.

He has judges acting as hit men retarding human rights, education, and civil rights laws.

Judges can not act fairly as long as Jonathan Lippman is administering deadly pathogens and the court system at the same time, as this is a threat to the lives of the judges. See the attached documentation. Jonathan Lippman’s dual life as a deadly pathogen administrator while administering the courts is a threat to New York State as a whole. The documents can not lie and his political persecution of me for identifying, documenting, and detailing his dual life, is evident.

Jonathan Lippman’s criminal fraud and defraud usurpations and practices have been extended to my bank accounts, credit reporting agencies, credit card companies, and identity theft divisions, all to get to me.

Jonathan Lippman’s lawless usurpations and criminal practices followed me to the Colleges. He obstructed the administration of education to get to me at: PACE University, the Borough of Manhattan Community College, and Westchester Community College. Every job I have had, I was commended by students, parents, administrators and staff for excellent work,

yet due to Jonathan Lippman’s unregulated and unrestrained criminal usurpation practices, my income was lawlessly and repeatedly targeted and executed.

Despite documentation and validation, his crimes were left unregulated. Consequently, the criminal practices, human rights violations and attempted murder stratagems continued and continues. Unfortunately, since Mr. Daniels provided a place for me to rest, his finances and his property has been lawlessly targeted and inflicted with fraud to make me homeless.

Jonathan Lippman is abusing NYS government to retard law and order, to continue to kill under disguise, destroy families and his targets via financial demise, lawless income executions, beyond wicked income black listings, and instituting fraud based foreclosures, to silence and kill his targets under the disguise of a phenomenon. Please note these are only some of his disguised killing operations. I have filed criminal complaints of Genocide regarding his other validated disguised killing operations. It is hard to live and continue to live while a documented killer is trying to kill you under the disguise of a phenomenon.

Vernon Daniels finances have been victimized because of Jonathan Lippman’s vengeance and unregulated quest to kill me under disguise. Mr. Daniel’s property financing is suffering because Jonathan Lippman will kill, use, and demise anybody to get to me. He is a Killer that must be arrested. There are 23 counts of inflicted human rights violations and patterned and practiced criminal fraud and defraud charges against Jonathan Lippman. Until these crimes are regulated nothing can be done. Crime will no longer control my housing and income. This country is a land of laws that protect the people as such this property will be paid for by me when the Human rights violations and fraud crimes are stopped and the human rights laws are enforced. I seek an end to the income blacklisting, an end to the inflicted fraudulent credit reporting, and end to the attempted murders disguised as ongoing and repeated phenomena.

Above all, Jonathan Lippman’s deadly income blacklisting has been prioritized above the needs of the state. I am a bilingual educator living in NYS where millions of immigrants live that need to learn English. Despite the need for ESL services I am qualified to render, Jonathan Lippman’s disguised killing income blacklisting and lawless income executions have been prioritized.

Consequently, I urge all who gets this complaint via email and United States mail to forward these documents to arrest Jonathan Lippman’s lawless and deadly usurpation and fraud practices and patterns that obstruct/cause interference with State and Federal laws and kill under the disguise of phenomena. Above all, I ask that the attached criminal complaint be sent to the International Criminal Court so Jonathan Lippman will explain his name on the attached genocidal operations that have left over 13 million dead under a Jonathan Lippman stated phenomenon.

With respect to attorney Kosnik’s enjoinment, his attached letter violates NYC Consumer Protection laws and the Federal laws in the Fair Debt Collection Practices. Mr. Kosnik’s attached letter is false, abusive, has misleading communications, enforces vindictive, bad faith, unfair practices, obstructs validation laws, violates contacting third party laws, violates prohibited Communications practices and interferes with State, Federal, and International Human Rights and Retaliation Protection laws.

Mr. Kosnik’s attached letter fraudulently states that no warranty relating to title, possession, quiet enjoyment, or the like is involved in this disposition. This is quite untrue. The property in disposition is my domicile. It is in possession and I seek quiet enjoyment. The attached Kosnic Sales advertisement would not only disrupt the peace, while I am trying to buy the apartment, it would interfere with state and federal human rights laws and the pending criminal investigations I have launched in order to stay alive and away from Jonathan Lippman’s multiple fraud based usurped pattern and practiced attempted killings of me.

Kosnik’s lawless sales advertisement is being used to subterfuge Jonathan Lippman’s quest to make me homeless again and is being done to facilitate another Jonathan Lippman disguised killing phenomena.

As soon as human rights protection laws are enforced, and Jonathan Lippman disguised killing operation is arrested, I will buy the property as I seek validation of the debt owed on the property so I can secure a purchase price.

Jonathan Lippman’s attorney Kosnik’s letter further violates the NYC Consumer Protection laws and the FDCPA in that Kosnick defames Mr. Daniels name by advertising for sale alleged debts. Mr. Kosnic’s letter represents misleading representation in communications via his communications of the character, amount and legal status of the alleged debt. Kosnik letter uses unconscionable means to collect or attempt to collect the alleged debt.

Kosnik’s letter exemplifies the use of usurped fraud and defraud pattern and practices, couple with a documented conspiracy against rights to target me and lawlessly execute housing. This is not in good faith, facilitates human rights abuses and violations and makes way for another Jonathan Lippman disguised murder.

The attached default is directly caused because of Jonathan Lippman’s documented, deadly, inhumane, unregulated criminal activities under the disguise of phenomena embedded in lawless income and job black listings.

Jonathan Lippman is using NYS government offices and attorneys to facilitate another one of his disguised killing operations. He has enforced a relentless, deadly, and vicious income blacklisting, coupled with multifaceted deadly income executions. He has an unregulated 2 billion dollar budget and is using that budget to obstruct government and target me in every capacity imaginable, because my living testimony of how his disguised killing operations work and how I have lived through them are true, validated and uncontested. Jonathan Lippman is trying to have me killed under disguise and another lawless housing execution must be stopped pursuant to every human rights protection law on this earth.

The results of Jonathan Lippman’s documented phenomena leave only dead bodies. See the attached Africa phenomena projects listed under his name. Consequently, knowing this, I must in self defense document his continuous inflicted deadly phenomena, as I will not be one of his dead victims listed as a phenomenon. Please see the attached deadly phenomena pathogen administration programs listed under Jonathan Lippman’s name.

Jonathan Lippman is used to Killing under the disguise of phenomena and it is not happening over here via housing, income, and or my life execution. The United States is a country with laws that protect people from these documented human rights violations and abuses. Enforcement of Human Rights Protection laws must be in place. This is an appeal for such.

Jonathan Lippman is trying to have me killed under disguise. Mr. Daniel’s mortgage has suffered the ramifications of Jonathan Lippman’s unrestrained and unregulated criminality and target of me. Every job I have had has been lawlessly executed via Jonathan Lippman patterned frauds and criminal civil rights conspiracy against rights.

Additionally, I have sent out over one million professional resumes, but because Jonathan Lippman has a 2 billion dollar unregulated budget, and wants revenge for God’s rescue of me from many of his disguised killer operations, I have been income blacklisted for the last 6 years, so Jonathan Lippman can continue killing innocent people under the disguise of phenomena.

Jonathan Lippman’s criminal usurpations have obstructed, public schools, colleges, unions, courts, law departments in churches, schools, banks, and now mortgage companies, credit reporting agencies, to get to me.

These lawless executions have been enforced for no other purpose but to facilitate another one of his disguised attempted murders. I have written several documentaries of the details to his multifaceted disguised killing operations and his unregulated 2 billion dollar.

Despite this, Jonathan Lippman’s attempt to kill me via no income has been prioritized and has effectuated a deadly income blacklisting that I am appealing to the above public officials to end.

When I moved in this apartment, I paid 6 months advance rent. Consequently, I have and know the value of paying timely and properly. This duty was taken from me when I became lawlessly blacklisted.

Jonathan Lippman is a professional disguised killer and must be known for what he is and what he is doing. He has arranged this entire default via conspiracy to get to Miriam Snyder.

His criminal income blacklisting has destroyed Mr. Daniel’s due finances. In fact, Mr. Daniel’s has suffered from Lippman’s target of Miriam Snyder. In fact, after moving in here, Mr. Daniel’s other property’s were miraculously set up four times, and thereafter, burned down under a phenomenon immediately after renting me this apartment. His mother’s house was burnt down under a criminal phenomenon because Jonathan Lippman is without restraint and wants Miriam Snyder killed under a disguised called a phenomenon because this is what he does and has been doing too long.

I seek to have human right laws enforced and to be allowed to live free from Jonathan Lippman’s attempted murder of me and inflicted fraud.

At present, I have filed criminal charges against Jonathan Lippman for several documented crimes, in addition to having 23 counts of inflicted fraud put on me to obstruct my finances. Consequently, the non payment foreclosure is a documented deadly conspiracy to kill me to silence the truth and obstruct the evidence.

I seek human rights enforcement to work and earn an income like anybody else.

Jonathan Lippman has used the legal system and lawless attorneys to facilitate his conflict of interest killing agenda and to enforce his disguised killing operations embedded in use of the United States government for persecution on the basis of one’s sex, race, religion, and nationality. It is my professional opinion that he is a sick and deadly eugenicist with an unregulated 2 billion dollar budget.

He has used lawless usurpation pattern and practices to force me from 9 jobs/incomes and multiple housings. In self defense, I can not allow these lawless and inflicted losses to reoccur. To this end, I am appealing for intervention end human rights protection enforcement to stop the attached corrupted and conspired irreparable damages, particularly, when a private contract between Mr. Daniels and I, is pending. This letter shall serve as notice to cease the sale of the property as a private contract is being negotiated regarding the sale of the apartment. I live in the apartment and based on commercial reasonableness I seek to buy the property.

The rent and mortgage can not be paid until Jonathan Lippman's attempted murder plan is stopped. I can not be uprooted and made homeless again for the third time because Jonathan Lippman is trying to have me killed under disguise. This can not continue. This is criminal.

Prior to finding evidence and research on Jonathan Lippman’s disguised killing operations, I was working full time, despite arranged law department lawless and vindictive income executions.

I have worked all my life and have proudly paid my bills on time. In retaliation to surviving several of Jonathan Lippman’s disguised killer operations since 1994, Jonathan Lippman’s is criminally using all aspects of government to subterfuge his well conspired attempted murder disguised as a phenomenon.

This untimely and lawless Notice of Sale not only would disrupt the peace, it would obstruct needed evidence for the most needed Jonathan Lippman criminal arrest. Above all, I ask that the sale ceases as I will buying the property as soon as the financial laws of this country are respected and enforced.

I am appealing to each entity identified above under Special Circumstances of Urgency pursuant to the Declaration of Human Rights rule 86, of its rules and procedures.

I seek interim measures with a view to averting irreparable harm before my complaint is investigated, and Jonathan Lippman’s ongoing and repeated usurpation frauds and defrauds are regulated. .

Compliance with such a request is inherent in a State party's obligations under the Equal Protection Under the law clauses. The below United Nations Preamble has been violated due to the disregard of the inflicted crimes:

PREAMBLE Whereas recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world,

Whereas disregard and contempt for human rights have resulted in barbarous acts which have outraged the conscience of mankind, and the advent of a world in which human beings shall enjoy freedom of speech and belief and freedom from fear and want has been proclaimed as the highest aspiration of the common people, Whereas it is essential, if man is not to be compelled to have recourse, as a last resort, to rebellion against tyranny and oppression, that human rights should be protected by the rule of law, Whereas the peoples of the United Nations have in the Charter reaffirmed their faith in fundamental human rights, in the dignity and worth of the human person

and in the equal rights of men and women and have determined to promote social progress and better standards of life in larger freedom, Whereas Member States have pledged themselves to achieve, in co-operation with the United Nations, the promotion of universal respect for and observance of human rights and fundamental freedoms, Whereas a common understanding of these rights and freedoms is of the greatest importance for the full realization of this pledge, Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person.

Article 6.

Everyone has the right to recognition everywhere as a person before the law.

Article 7.

All are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimination to equal protection of the law. All are entitled to equal protection against any discrimination in violation of this Declaration and against any incitement to such discrimination.

Article 8.

Everyone has the right to an effective remedy by the competent national tribunals for acts violating the fundamental rights granted him by the constitution or by law.

Article 17.

(1) Everyone has the right to own property alone as well as in association with others.

(2) No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his property.

1) Everyone has the right to work, to free choice of employment, to just and favourable conditions of work and to protection against unemployment.

(2) Everyone, without any discrimination, has the right to equal pay for equal work.

(3) Everyone who works has the right to just and favourable remuneration ensuring for himself and his family an existence worthy of human dignity, and supplemented, if necessary, by other means of social protection.

(4) Everyone has the right to form and to join trade unions for the protection of his interests.

Article 25.

(1) Everyone has the right to a standard of living adequate for the health and well-being of himself and of his family, including food, clothing, housing and medical care and necessary social services, and the right to security in the event of unemployment, sickness, disability, widowhood, old age or other lack of livelihood in circumstances beyond his control.

Article 1 1. All people have the right of self-determination. By virtue of that right they freely determine their political status and freely pursue their economic, social and cultural development.

Article 3 The States Parties to the present Covenant undertake to ensure the equal right of men and women to the enjoyment of all economic, social and cultural rights set forth in the present Covenant.

Article 6 1. The States Parties to the present Covenant recognize the right to work, which includes the right of everyone to the opportunity to gain his living by work which he freely chooses or accepts, and will take appropriate steps to safeguard this right.

Article 7 The States Parties to the present Covenant recognize the right of everyone to the enjoyment of just and favourable conditions of work which ensure, in particular: (a) Remuneration which provides all workers, as a minimum, with: (i) Fair wages and equal remuneration for work of equal value without distinction of any kind, in particular women being guaranteed conditions of work not inferior to those enjoyed by men, with equal pay for equal work; (ii) A decent living for themselves and their families in accordance with the provisions of the present Covenant; (b) Safe and healthy working conditions;

(c) Equal opportunity for everyone to be promoted in his employment to an appropriate higher level, subject to no considerations other than those of seniority and competence; Article 11 1. The States Parties to the present Covenant recognize the right of everyone to an adequate standard of living for himself and his family, including adequate food, clothing and housing, and to the continuous improvement of living conditions. The States Parties will take appropriate steps to ensure the realization of this right, recognizing to this effect the essential importance of international co-operation based on free consent.

Finally, I, Miriam Snyder seek an end to this lawless, persecution, embedded in human rights abuses/violations and attempted disguised murder stratagems.

The attached untimely, orchestrated, fraud based, conspired lawless housing execution phenomenon substantiates the allegations made in the March 8, 2007criminal complaints against Jonathan Lippman.

The lawless housing execution was conspired and is being implemented to obstruct justice, impede due exercise of rights, and to advance Jonathan Lippman’s disguised murder plan phenomena. This plan effectively: ( a ) Causes serious bodily and mental harm to members of the group; ( b ) Deliberately inflicts on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; I seek an end to Jonathan Lippman and all of his lawless bar associates fraud. I seek an end to human rights violations and seek the implementation of holding abusers accountable. I seek an end to abusive practices and enforcement of international human rights law. I am appealing to and urge the public and the international community to support the cause of human rights for all.

In this matter, the right to asylum and an income is a matter of life and death and cannot be compromised. Human rights abuses have to stop and human rights violators must be held accountable and arrested. I am calling on the United Nations and on governments everywhere to intervene and uphold their obligations to protect people and to respect human rights - regardless of where they are from or where they seek refuge.

Finally, this letter shall serve notice to Mr. Kosnik of the, tenancy at hand, the Peace contract, the disputes and the private contract being negotiated between

New York State Unified Court System Future Court Appearance System NEW!! Case Information Updated 4 Times Daily* (Now includes ALL pending cases in ALL New York Counties**)

CASE DETAIL Rji Noi Post Calendar Disposi Pre Wa Noi Justic # tion Noi s Disp e Jury Date Deadl File Deadl Name Status ine d ine

Clic Attor Click for k for ney Appeara Moti For nce on Info

Index No Case Name

County Case Type Track

4519/200 2

Queens MEDICAL MALPRACTICE Complex

23AUG03

22AU G03

22- W005511 JAMES FUMUSO,KELLY,DEVERN NOVJury at P. A,SNYDER, 04 Ps DOLLA request RD

D

X

6

Queens

23AUG03

22AU G03

22- W005511 JAMES NOVJury at P. 04 Ps DOLLA request RD

KOSNIK & TRACZ LLP

D

X

6

Queens MEDICAL MALPRACTICE Complex

23AUG03

22AU G03

22- W005511 JAMES NOVJury at P. 04 Ps DOLLA request RD

MCMAHON, MARTINE & MERRITT

P

X

6

Queens MEDICAL MALPRACTICE Complex

23AUG03

22AU G03

22- W005511 JAMES NOVJury at P. 04 Ps DOLLA request RD

RYAN & HENDERSON, P.C.

D

X

6

URBAN, KATHLE EN R v.

NASSAU RADIOLO GIC GROUP 4519/200 2 URBAN, KATHLE EN R v.

NASSAU RADIOLO GIC GROUP 4519/200 2 URBAN, KATHLE EN R v.

NASSAU RADIOLO GIC GROUP 4519/200 2 URBAN, KATHLE EN R v.

NASSAU RADIOLO GIC GROUP

MEDICAL MALPRAC TICE Complex

Attorney Firm

3230 CRUGER AVENUE #6B BRONX, NEW YORK 10467 April 10, 2007

KEITH ROTHMAN 1787 VETERANS HIGHWAY ISLANDIA, NEW YORK 11749

Re: ATTORNEY FRAUD: KEITH ROTHMAN ATTACHED UNAUTHORIZED CRIMINAL FRAUD UPON THE COURT EFFECTUATING A VOID, LAWLESS, CRIMINAL, NON SUMMONS SERVED, AB INITIO, CONSPIRED AND CORRUPTED DEFAULT JUDGMENT, OBSTRUCTING AND IMPEDING STATE AND FEDERAL EQUAL AND CONSUMER PROTECTION LAWS EXEMPLIFYING THE PRIORITIZATION OF CORRUPTION AND FRAUD IN THE NYS COURT SYSTEM.

AFFIDAVIT OF REQUEST FOR VALIDATION This is a request for validation of the attached judicially unsigned, unauthorized, unserved summons, criminal fraud judgment. This request for validation is submitted pursuant to the Fair Debt Collections Practices Act, § 809. Validation of debts 15 USC 1692g, § 808. Unfair practices 15 USC 1692f, unfair or unconscionable means to collect, and § 807. False or misleading representations 15 USC 1692e.

Please be advised that I am not refusing to pay, but I need the information requested in this correspondence before I can make any offer to settle this account. I would like to settle this account as soon as possible and I may have a counter claim to setoff or indemnify the disputed balance, this is why I am sending you this validation request. Please answer the following questions relating to the non validated attached judicially unsigned fraudulent judgment that has lawlessly defamed and injured me maliciously.

Please answer the below validation and return to me within ten (10) business days upon receipt. If you need more time, or if you need any question restated, please make your request to me in writing. I do not wish to speak to you under any circumstances; therefore, anything you wish to say to me must be presented in writing. Phone calls and other communication will be recorded, ignored and considered a non-response. Please have the person validating the attached fraudulent judgment answer the following: 1. Please state your name, occupation and mailing address.

2. Please identify the source of the funds in the account that is the subject of this “judgment”.

3. Please furnish a copy of the original contract redacting my social security number to prevent identify theft and state under penalty of perjury that your client is the bona fide party in interest of the contract and will produce the original for my own and a judge’s inspection should there be a trial to contest these matters.

4. Please produce the account and general ledger statement showing the full accounting of the alleged obligation that you are now attempting to collect.

5. Please identify by name and address all persons, corporations, associations, or any other parties having an interest in legal proceedings regarding the alleged debt.

6. Please verify under penalty of perjury, that as a debt collector, you have not purchased evidence of debt and are proceeding with collection activity in the name of the original contracting party.

7. Please verify under penalty of perjury that you know and understand that certain clauses in a contract of adhesion, such as a so-called forum selection clause, are unenforceable unless the party to whom the contract is extended could have rejected the clause without impunity.

8. Please provide verification from the stated creditor that you are authorized to act for them.

9. What was the account number of the account in which the funds were held prior to the opening of the account that is the subject matter of this lawsuit?

10. Who was the owner of each account, or list those individuals having signature rights to each account?

11. Identify the account that was debited when the disputed account was created.

12. Who was the owner of each account or list those individuals having signature rights to each account?

13. Identify the source of the funds that created the disputed account.

14. Did the funds for the disputed account originate from another account or lending institution?

15. List the names and addresses of all lending institutions from which any funds were purportedly originated.

16. Please identify the account number from which the funds originated in order to create the disputed account.

17. Admit that no other account was debited when the disputed account was created.

18. If you denied that no other account was debited when the disputed account was opened or created, please identify the account that was debited by account number and the name or names of the debited account’s signer, holder and/or owner, and explain how the funds for this account were originated.

19. If you denied that no other account was debited when the disputed account was opened or created, state the total balance of this debited account at the time the debit was made and, list the names of the signers on the account and the date that the account was opened along with the opening balance.

20. Admit that the Miriam Snyder was the depositor for the account that is the subject matter of this lawsuit.

21. Please produce all documents and information, related in any way, to your implication or allegation that a loan was given to Miriam Snyder.

22. Which employee of the bank authorized the transaction?

23. If any loan origination system, software or other procedures were used in the opening of the disputed account, please identify the system by name and describe how it works.

24. According to the alleged loan agreement, was the purported lender of the financial institution involved in the alleged loan to use their money as adequate consideration to purchase the promissory note from the alleged borrower? YES or NO. 25. According to the bookkeeping entries, did the purported lender or financial institution involved in the alleged loan, use their money as adequate consideration to purchase the promissory note from the alleged borrower?

YES or NO. 26. According to the alleged loan agreement, was the purported lender or financial institution involved in the alleged loan to accept anything of value from the alleged borrower that would be used to fund a check or similar instrument in approximately the amount of the alleged loan? YES or NO. 27. According to the bookkeeping entries, did the purported lender or financial institution involved in the alleged loan accept anything of value from the alleged borrower that would be used to fund a check or similar instrument in approximately the amount of the alleged loan? YES or NO. 28. Was the intent of the purported loan agreement that the party that funded the loan should be repaid the money lent? YES or NO. 29. Was the purported lender involved in the alleged loan follow Generally Accepted Accounting Principals (GAAP)? YES or NO. 30. Were all material facts disclosed in the written agreement? YES or NO.

31. What is the name and address of any bank auditor or certified public accountant involve with or having any relation to the accounting function regarding the disputed account?

32. Identify the name of the records system of account records or ledgers reflecting the transaction for the disputed account.

33. Were any loan numbers assigned to the disputed account?

34. If you answered yes to the above question, please list those account numbers.

35. Explain how each account was created or originated.

36. Explain how the funds for each account were deposited and where they originated.

37. Was an account created with the purported loan amount then debited to fund the disputed account?

38. Please explain your answer to the above question.

39. Please produce all records and tangible evidence relating to the question herein and send them along with your response.

40. Please reply with a copy of your Department of State filing information that authorizes you to operate your business in this state, for out of state claims as in this matter, as this will also verify if your filing has expired or is valid.

41. Provide evidence that the statute of limitations has not expired on this account; 42. Provide evidence of notification of due process rights pursuant to the FDCPA, 43. Please verify that you know and understand that collecting on this alleged non validated fraudulent debt without providing procedurally proper validation of the debt constitutes criminal fraud as such criminal charges will be filed accordingly.

From the date of your receipt of this letter, you are granted ten (10) days to reply directly to the questions put forth in order to validate your claim of this alleged debt.

If after the ten (10) day period you do not reply directly to these questions, this silence shall serve as tacit procuration, serve as valid proof that this is a fraudulent/imaginary account that has no origination and you may not pursue this fraudulent/imaginary account further.

ESTOPEL BY ACOUIESCIENCE: In the event Rubin and Rothman admits the statements and claims by TACIT PROCURATION, all issues are deemed settled RES

JUDICATA, STARE DECISIS and COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL. Rubin and Rothman may not argue, controvert, or otherwise protest the finality of the administrative findings in any subsequent process, whether administrative or judicial.

Any action(s), by Rubin and Rothman, in any court or other forum, undertaken against Miriam Snyder outside this Administrative Remedy by Rubin and Rothman, is a trespass against Miriam Snyder and will result in an increase in the amount of the True Bill of ten (10) times the original amount and will continue to increase in the same amount of any additional trespasses.

Rubin and Rothman is granted 10 days from the date of service to respond to the statements and claims herein and/or to provide Rubin and Rothman own answers to inquires upon receipt of this letter which will be tracked using delivery confirmation and Certified Mail through the US Postal Service.

Rubin and Rothman may, after agreeing to all claims put forth by Miriam Snyder, enter into negotiations to settle the agreement contract with terms to be agreed upon, signed under penalty of perjury.

Please note that any correspondence not presented in the form of a written request/answer format, will be ignored and/or considered an INVALID/NON-RESPONSE. In case of a misunderstanding, and you try to communicate with me without your correspondence being sent through the US Mail (US POSTAL SERVICE/Post Office) is a violation of my right to privacy, making unsolicited calls, causing annoyance, disturbance, shock, aggravation, depression, frustration, distress and rage causing me commercial damages, I will proceed accordingly holding you personally liable. The damages for these violations are listed below for your future reference. Understand that you will be held commercially liable for such actions, as you have been fully notified and after this point, if you continue with your fraudulent claims, you are willfully violating my rights, making unsolicited visits to a private property, causing harassment, contributing to stress, depression, rage, angina, chest constrictions, shock, Loss of appetite, Crying, Nightmares, insomnia, night sweats, Emotional paralysis, Inability to think or function at work, Headaches, Shortness of breath, Anxiety, nervousness, fear and worry, Hypertension (elevation of blood pressure), Irritability, Hysteria, Embarrassment, humiliation, Indignation and pain and suffering.

Once you are in default, you have agreed that the above statements cannot be proven and you will be bound to correct the following errors: 1.

Close this Criminal fraud account acknowledging the attached current paid status and zero (0) balance. See attached Experian credit reporting verification showing the Ford Motor Credit account is paid in full.

2.

Cease and desist from creating, sending, and/or collecting false non validated claims.

3.

Withdraw/Remove and dismantle all degrading and derogatory judgments you created, conspired and lawlessly placed in the courts via a corrupted clerk, as exemplified on the attached court clerk signed, lawless fraudulent, void, no summons served, non due process, lawless, no judge signature judgment that lawlessly, and without any authority garnished my check, liened my bank account, and maliciously defamed my name, while the judgment has been paid in full as stated on the attached verified credit report.

4.

Send a confirmation of the fraudulent judgment withdrawal/dismissal to me, signed under penalty of perjury, via Certified or Registered Mail within 10 days of receipt.

5.

After sending a confirmation, cease and desist from communicating with me further.

Second Circuit Court of Appeals Office of Legal Affairs Attorney Fraud Control Board Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse New York, New York 10007 Robert Johnson Criminal Fraud Division Bronx District Attorney 198 East 161st Bronx, New York 10451 Rose Gill Hearn, Commissioner Fraud and Corruption City of New York Department of Investigation 80 Maiden Lane New York, New York 10038 Charles Schumer U.S. Senator Constituent Fraud Protection Enforcement Unit 757 Third Avenue New York, New York 10017 Chief Judge Judith Kaye 230 Park Avenue, Suite 826 New York City, New York 10169-0007 John Conyers, Committee on the Judiciary US House of Representatives Washington Office 2426 RHOB Washington, D.C. 20515-2214 Mr. Emery, Administrator New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct 61 Broadway New York, New York 1006 Alberto Gonzalez, Attorney General US Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20530-0001

SEE BELOW DOCUMENTATION THAT THE FORD LOAN IS PAID WHILE ATTORNEY FRAUD IS STILL ADMINISTERED.

DECEMBER 21, 2006 MINISTERS ACROSS THE NATION

Alberto Gonzalez, Attorney General US Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20530-0001 Honorable Chief Judge Judith Kaye 230 Park Avenue, Suite 826 New York City, New York 10169-0007 Maxine Waters, Committee on the Judiciary US House of Representatives 2138 Rayburn House Office Building Washington, DC 20515 John.Conyers@mail.house.gov Elena Ruth Sassower, Coordinator of the Center for Judicial Accountability Inc...

Post Office Box 8220 White Plains, New York 10602 Gerald Stern, Administrator Commission on Judicial Conduct 801 Second Avenue, 13th Floor New York, NY 10017

Rose Gill Hearn, Commissioner City of New York Department of Investigation 80 Maiden Lane New York, New York 10038 Desiree Kim, Esq. Special Inspector General for Bias Matters New York State Unified Court System 25 Beaver Street, New York, NY 10004 Senator Schumer 757 Third Avenue New York, New York 10017 George E. Pataki Governor State Capitol Albany, NY 12224 Honorable Denise Sher Supervising Judge District Court Nassau County 99 Main Street Hempstead, New York 11550

Honorable Kathleen Rice Nassau County District Attorney 262 Old Country Roaf Minneola, New York 11501 Bonnie Garone, Commissioner of Investigations 1 West Street Minneola, New York 11501 Antonio Perez Borough of Manhattan Community College The City University of New York 199 Chambers Street New York, New York 10007 aperez@bmcc.cuny.edu Attorney General Spitzer 120 Broadway New York, New York RE:

JONATHAN LIPPMAN

DOCUMENTED DISGUISED KILLER CONTINUED USE OF THE COURT SYSTEM AND NYS GOVERNMENT TO KILL UNDER THE DISGUISE OF ORGANIZED CRIME , HATE CRIME ENFORCEMENT AND PRIORITIZATION, AS WELL AS USING NY GOVERNMENT TO VENT HIS PERSONAL VENDETTA AGAINST ME FOR GOD RESCUING ME FROM ONE OF HIS MANY EXPERT, WELL FINANCED, MULTIFACETED DISGUISED KILLING OPERATIONS. SEE ATTACHMENTS. THE DOCUMENTED JONATHAN LIPPMAN CAN YOU PROVE IT SOCIAL PHENOMEN HAS MOVED TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF NASSAU COUNTY IN THE MATTER OF INDEX NUMBER 021456-04. THIS IS A WELL DOCUMENTED DISGUISED KILLING PATTERN. PLEASE SEE SNYDER V. HEMPSTEAD PUBLIC SCHOOLS ET AL, SECOND CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS, DOCKET NO. 02-9386, IN THE EASTERN DISTRICT COURT, SNYDER V. HEMPSTEAD PUBLIC SCHOOLS DOCKET NO. 02-3589, IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT COURT, SNYDER V. YONKERS PUBLIC SCHOOLS, DOCKET NO: 03 CIV. 0263.

THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK APPELLATE TERM: NINTH AND TENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICTS, HDW APARTMENTS INDEX NO: SP242/00 AND

20001220NC. JONATHAN LIPPMAN IS DEADLY AND SICK AND THE REVENGE BASED HATE CRIME ENFORCEMENT MUST STOP.

Dear Public officials: I write this letter as a Truth Affidavit pursuant to God given authority to defend myself from and live free from documented and continued enforced deadly lawlessness and organized crime premised off of, Jonathan Lippman’s deadly Can You Prove It, While I Kill documented deadly social phenomenon. I am a survivor of one of his many multifaceted killing operations and a one millionth time victim of his revenge, this qualifies me to write this letter.

I am documenting his newest disguised killing stratagem subterfuge under court corruption; court judicially masterminded, conspired and implemented organized crime and phenomena. Please see the attached court fraud inflicted on me because Jonathan Lippman is without restrain.

Consequently, he deserves a public audience as he uses the court system for phenomena again to vent his revenge for not killing me under disguise after multiple attempts.

For purposes of clarity, Jonathan Lippman is a dual life Deadly Pathogen Specialist and a New York State Chief Injustice that has followed me from job to job and place to place inflicting deadly, ruthless, revengeful enforced lawlessness. Please read the above law suits, the Documentaries and Affidavits I have filed with each of the above NYC officials. Please read the attached September 30, 2006 Affidavit summarizing some of Jonathan Lippman’s disguised killing operations. He is an expert disguised killer and he wants revenge for the one time survival. See attachments documenting over 13 million people dead, under the Jonathan Lippman titled, Can You Prove It Social Phenomenon Program.

In his dual life capacity, he works out of the University of Rochester Medical Center and specializes in government corruption and organized crime via pathogen administration.

His first and second life is a threat to all of humanity.

I am from Rochester, New York. He tried to have me killed under the disguise of a phenomenon in 1994. It took me 12 years to unravel his killing operations because he has phenomenal disguised killing death rates and programs nationwide and he is covered by every aspect of government. The sad thing is that, today he is doing this to me and tomorrow it could be you. The only way one can live through a Jonathan Lippman hit is by the grace of God, because his disguised killing operations are well financed and operate in the same manner as the organized crime in the attached documents. They are premised off of ruthless acts designed not to be proven, but can be, because God is God. I am probably one of his only survivors and can and have detailed his deadly disguised operations somewhat thoroughly based on what I have lived through and researched. He has used every aspect of government to disguise his killing attempts and to silence the truth about his dual life deadly and corrupted organized crime operations.

Jonathan Lippman has followed me to every job and inflicted ruthless, murdersome lawlessness. Just like he is doing in this court case. The only difference is now he has a public audience that can watch him retard law and order to get to me. I am in the District Court of Nassau County First District- Civil Term because of fraud, again. Jonathan Lippman stacks the courts with judicial appointments, people that retard law, to target Jonathan Lippman’s victim. He is using the court system and NYS government for his personal and deadly interest.

This must and will end, because if it does not, there will be more people killed under the disguise of a phenomenon, when the disguised killings can and must be prevented.

Attached you will find a warning letter I sent a public official, regarding Jonathan Lippman and his hit man’s attempted to kill me and warning that they would kill the public official under disguise to get a top presidential position, for control. As stated, she was killed her under the exact phenomenon I warned her of, because no one did the right thing and investigated this sick man and or his attached deadly disguised programs that have left over 13 million people dead under his leadership and disguise.

Attached you will find inflicted and enforced lawlessness in the courts under the leadership of Jonathan Lippman. Specifically, you will find:

FRAUD AND PHENOMENA IN THE ADMINISTRATION OF THE COURT, Index No. 021456-04; TRESPASSING ON RIGHTS; UNLAWFUL JUDGMENT BASED ON LACK OF JURISDICTION: SUBJECT AND PARTIES, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE; VIOLATION OF DUE PROCESS; A FRAUDULENT JUDGMENT HAS BEEN RENDERED WHEN NO LAWFUL JURISDICTION HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED OR OBTAINED, AND NO AUTHORITY EXIST TO DO SO; BREACH OF CONTRACT [UCC]; VIOLATION OF RIGHTS; COERCION; HARASSMENT; DETRIMENT OF CHARACTER/NAME DEFAMED; EMOTIONAL AND MENTAL ANGUISH, HATE CRIME ENFORCEMENT, BIAS, UNREASONABLE TREATMENT/DECISIONS, A FRAUDULENT JUDGMENT WITH NO JUDGES NAME, THAT HAS BEEN USED TO ENJOIN THE BOROUGH OF MANHATTAN COMMUNITY COLLEGE., BOUNTIFUL PHENOMENA IN THE COURT THAT MUST BE CORRECTED. Attached you will find: 1. Letter to Judge Quinn dated December 20, 2006. I was told he was the acting supervising judge. However, the court files show the above Ms. Sher as the judge.

Consequently, I have addressed her as such. This letter discusses a CAN YOU PROVE IT ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. This document was removed from the files under Can You Prove It, just like Can you Prove It made it to the Borough of Manhattan Community College. This document has the certified return receipt with it.

2. December 19, 2006 Stamped Second Order To Show Cause, 3.

December 19, 2006 Notarized Affidavit of Support/Merit and indisputable court fraud exhibits.

4. December 14, 2006 Notarized Affidavit In Support of The Order To Show Cause that Disappeared,

Equal protection of the law is paramount and needed. Thank you.

Sincerely,

Miriam Snyder

3230 Cruger Avenue #6B Bronx, New York 10467 December 20, 2006

FAXED TO: 516 571- 0760 Sent Certified Mail Receipt #: 7006 2760 0003 2210 5959 US Signature Confirmation Requested Certified JUDGE CHRISTOPHER QUINN ACTING AND/OR SUPERVISING JUDGE District Court of Nassau County 99 Main Street Hempstead, New York 11550-2405 In Regards to: FRAUD AND PHENOMENA IN THE ADMINISTRATION OF THE COURT, Index No. 021456-04; TRESPASSING ON RIGHTS; UNLAWFUL JUDGMENT BASED ON LACK OF JURISDICTION; OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE; VIOLATION OF DUE PROCESS; A FRAUDULENT JUDGMENT HAS BEEN RENDERED WHEN NO LAWFUL JURISDICTION HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED OR OBTAINED, AND NO AUTHORITY EXIST TO DO SO; BREACH OF CONTRACT [UCC]; VIOLATION OF RIGHTS; COERCION; HARASSMENT; DETRIMENT OF CHARACTER/NAME DEFAMED; EMOTIONAL AND MENTAL ANGUISH. Dear Judge CHISTOPHER QUINN: I am writing to inform you of the above documented fraud and phenomena in the above court. Yesterday, I received a DENIED decision dated 12/18/06 that stated no basis, regarding the attached VOID, judicially unsigned, lacking jurisdiction Index Number 021456-04 Judgment, by Judge Randy Sue Miller. The no basis was created via a phenomenon. My Order to Show Cause which was notarized by the clerk Karen, (no one would give me her last name), disappeared. Stated again, legal documents are phenomenally disappearing from files when they should not be. The Order to Show Cause disappeared from my file as a phenomenon. This disappearance made way for the decision of No Basis. My papers were improperly presented to the judge. This resembles organized crime. As such, I asked to speak to Karen, the clerk who notarized the Order to Show Cause dated December 14, 2006 and she disappeared too.

I asked to speak to the Supervisor. I spoke to Ms. Kathy Wankmuller. She said she was the supervisor. She said that sometimes papers in the files disappear. The disappearance of this legal document made way for a lawless decision. This should not be allowed.

PAGE 1 0F 51.

Consequently, I respectfully request that you put in place a docket description sheet in each Small Claims file or some type of system that can certify, confirm, verify and document legal documents in the files so these type phenomenon do not continue, as they obstruct justice and can possibly promote organized crime and or legal vendettas.

Above all, this phenomenon could have made way for me to lose my God given right to have this matter in its entirety dismissed under lack of jurisdiction because the denial was used to refuse my Affidavit of Merit Dated April 19, 2006 with exhibits outlining documented fraud and court rendered fraud documents, specifically, A COURT JUDGMENT WITH NO JUDICIAL SIGNATURE, that is being used to enforce lawlessness in the workplace and steal money.

The phenomenon was corrected via a new Order To Show Cause was submitted with my Affidavit In Support of the Order To Show Cause/Affidavit of Merit with documented fraud and misrepresentation as exhibits. The exhibits attached to the Order To Show Cause dated December 19, 2006 epitomize and detail the fraud used that made way for the judicially unsigned fraudulent judgment, that is being used to lawlessly steal money via a lawless garnishment.

Please note that this complaint letter shall serve as notice that no jurisdiction exists, and as such and as a matter of law, the entire matter must be dismissed. I seek no sanctions against the attorney because there is no jurisdiction for such.

This complaint letter will be notarized and will additionally serve as an Affidavit of NOTICE OF CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE TO CONTRACT pursuant to the following facts: 1) Regarding the attached commercial presentment, titled JUDGMENT DATED 12/04/04 ,Declarant conditionally accepts for value the courts offer to contract, and return contract to the courts for full discharge, closure, and settlement.

2) Declarant made a Special Appearance in Propria Persona based on commercial threat, duress, and coercion, on December 19, 2005 to inform the DISTRCT COURT OF THE COUNTY OF NASSAU, FIRST DISTRICT NASSAU: HEMPSTEAD and the alleged plaintiff: FORD MOTOR CREDIT COMPANY and the following third party interveners: RUBIN AND ROTHMAN, LLC that jurisdiction has not been established nor obtained based on several factors, in addition to improper service on the part of the alleged plaintiff.

3) Declarant has NOT received, NOR IS IN possession of any official SUMMONS AND OR JUDGMENT bearing a judge, magistrates, or clerks valid signature indicating that a LAWFUL, REAL, AND NON COLORABLE JUDGMENT in fact exists. Since the case record in The Small Claims Office has been available since the onset of this case, Declarant has not seen, nor is in possession of any official valid document or proof which demonstrates that a lawful SUMMONS, OR JUDGEMENT was ever issued at any point by any party in this matter. See attached alleged Ford Motor Credit Judgment with no Judge or Magistrate’s signature.

4) The court has allowed the alleged plaintiff to move in violation of ALL of the standard due process procedures established by LAW, at the expense of Declarant.

5) The alleged Complaint was not Verified in accordance with CPLR § 3215(f), an affidavit of facts from the Plaintiff has not been provided.

6) Prior to Court Intervention there was no controversy in this matter. Declarant ensured that alleged debt would be paid in full UPON: a) Upon proof of claim that debt in fact exist. b) Upon verification that debt exists.

c) Upon proof that RUBIN AND ROTHMAN have a valid contract to represent FORD MOTOR CREDIT., d) Upon proof that RUBIN AND ROTHMAN is not a third party intervener to this matter. e) Upon the production of a valid contract demonstrating that RUBIN AND ROTHMAN have a contract valid or otherwise to conduct business with Declarant. f) Upon production of any instrument that demonstrates that RUBIN AND ROTHMAN have a lawful claim (not colorable claim) to act as a moving party against Declarant.

7) Declarant has not seen or been presented with any evidence that demonstrates that a contract exists between Declarant and Respondent, and believes that none exists; 8) Declarant has not seen or been presented with any evidence that demonstrates that Declarant has a debt owing to Respondent, and believes that none exists; In this matter, there is no jurisdiction and the attached judgment is missing a required judicial signature and has no lawful signature. Consequently, it is indisputable that the Judgment in this matter is colorable, a disguise, and fraudulent. It is a void judgment. The below void judgment authorities, coupled with lack of jurisdiction substantiate the fact that the judgment in this matter must be vacated/dismissed. I am attaching Authorities on Void Judgments from Black's Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition, page 1574: Void judgment. One which has no legal force or effect, invalidity of which may be asserted by any person whose rights are affected at any time and at any place directly or collaterally.

Reynolds v. Volunteer State Life Ins. Co., Tex.Civ.App., 80 S.W.2d 1087, 1092.

One which from its inception is and forever continues to be absolutely null, without legal efficacy, ineffectual to bind parties or support a right, of no legal force and effect whatever, and incapable of confirmation, ratification, or enforcement in any manner or to any degree.

Judgment is a "void judgment" if the court that rendered judgment lacked jurisdiction of the subject matter, or of the parties, or acted in a manner inconsistent with due process. Klugh v.

U.S., D.C.S.C., 610 F.Supp. 892, 901. See also Voidable judgment.

Other Authorities on Void Judgments: Void judgments are those rendered by a court which lacked jurisdiction, either of the subject matter or the parties. See: Wahl v. Round Valley Bank, 38 Ariz. 411, 300 P.955 (1931) Tube City Mining & Milling Co. v.

Otterson, 16 Ariz. 305, 146 P. 203 (1914) Milliken v. Meyer, 311 U.S. 457, 61 S.Ct. 339, 85 L.Ed. 2d 278 (1940) A void judgment which includes judgment entered by a court which lacks jurisdiction over the parties or the subject matter, or lacks inherent power to enter the particular judgment, or an order procured by fraud, can be attacked at any time, in any court, either directly or collaterally, provided that the party is properly before the court. See Long v. Shorebank Development Corp., 182 F.3d 548 (C.A. 7 Ill. 1999)

A void judgment is one which, from its inception, was a complete nullity and without legal effect. See Lubben v. Selective Service System Local Bd. No. 27, 453 F.2d 645, 14 A.L.R. Fed. 298 (C.A. 1 Mass. 1972) Void judgment is one that, from its inception, is complete nullity and without legal effect.

Holstein v. City of Chicago, 803 F.Supp. 205, reconsideration denied 149 F.R.D. 147, affirmed 29 F.3d 1145 (N.D. Ill. 1992).

Void judgment is one where court lacked personal or subject matter jurisdiction or entry of order violated due process, U.S.C.A. Const. Amend. 5-Triad Energy Corp. v. McNell, 110 F.R.D. 382 (S.D.N.Y. 1986).

Judgment is a void judgment if court that rendered judgment lacked jurisdiction of the subject matter, or of the parties, or acted in a manner inconsistent with due process, Fed Rules Civ. Proc., Rule 60(b)(4), 28 U.S.C.A.; U.S.C.A. Const Amend. 5. Klugh v. U.S., 620 F.Supp. 892 (D.S.C. 1985).

A void judgment is one which, from its inception, was a complete nullity and without legal effect, Rubin v. Johns, 109 F.R.D. 174 (D. Virgin Islands 1985).

A void judgment is one which, from its inception, is and forever continues to be absolutely null, without legal efficacy, ineffectual to bind the parties or to support a right, of no legal force and effect whatever, and incapable of enforcement in any manner or to any degree. Loyd v.

Director, Dept. of Public Safety, 480 So.2d 577 (Ala.Civ.App. 1985). A judgment shown by evidence to be invalid for want of jurisdiction is a void judgment or at all events has all attributes of a void judgment, City of Los Angeles v. Morgan, 234 P.2d 319 (Cal.App. 2 Dist.

1951).

Void judgment which is subject to collateral attack, is simulated judgment devoid of any potency because of jurisdictional defects, Ward. v. Terriere, 386 P.2d 352 (Colo. 1963). A void judgment is a simulated judgment devoid of any potency because of jurisdictional defects only, in the court rendering it and defect of jurisdiction may relate to a party or parties, the subject matter, the cause of action, the question to be determined, or relief to be granted, Davidson Chevrolet, Inc. v. City and County of Denver, 330 P.2d 1116, certiorari denied 79 S.Ct. 609, 359 U.S. 926, 3 L.Ed. 2d 629 (Colo. 1958).

Void judgment is one entered by court without jurisdiction of parties or subject matter or that lacks inherent power to make or enter particular order involved and such a judgment may be attacked at any time, either directly or collaterally, People v. Wade, 506 N.W.2d 954 (Ill. 1987).

Void judgment may be defined as one in which rendering court lacked subject matter jurisdiction, lacked personal jurisdiction, or acted in manner inconsistent with due process of law Eckel v. MacNeal, 628 N.E.2d 741 (Ill. App.Dist. 1993).

Void judgment is one entered by court without jurisdiction of parties or subject matter or that lacks inherent power to make or enter particular order involved; such judgment may be

attacked at any time, either directly or collaterally People v. Sales, 551 N.E.2d 1359 (Ill.App. 2 Dist. 1990).

Res judicata consequences will not be applied to a void judgment which is one which, from its inception, is a complete nullity and without legal effect, Allcock v. Allcock, 437 N.E.2d 392 (Ill.App.3 Dist. 1982).

Void judgment is one which, from its inception is complete nullity and without legal effect In re Marriage of Parks, 630 N.E.2d 509 (Ill.App. 5 Dist. 1994).

Void judgment is one entered by court that lacks the inherent power to make or enter the particular order involved, and it may be attacked at any time, either directly or collaterally; such a judgment would be a nullity. People v. Rolland, 581 N.E.2d 907 (Ill.APp. 4 Dist. 1991).

Notarized copy.

THIS FRAUDULENT JUDGMENT HAS NO JUDGE’S SIGNATURE, HAS NO JURISDICTIONAL POWER, HAS NO LEGITIMACY, BUT HAS BEEN USED TO GARNISH MY CHECK AND EFFECTIVELY CAUSE HAVOC IN THE WORK PLACE. THIS IS A PATTERNED AND PRACTICED JONATHAN LIPPMAN CAN YOU PROVE IT PHENOMENON, JUST LIKE HIS DISGUISED KILLING CAN YOU PROVE IT SOCIAL

PHENOMENON PROGRAM IN AFRICA, THAT HAS LEFT OVER 13 MILLION DEAD UNDER CAN YOU PROVE IT! JONATHAN LIPPMAN IS A DANGER TO HUMANITY.

DID ANYBODY SEE A JUDGES SIGNATURE IN THE ABOVE JUDGMENT, THAT IS BEING LAWLESSLY USED TO GARNISH WAGES? CERTIFIED RETURN RECEIPT MAILED. JONATHAN LIPPMAN’S NEWEST ENOINMENT!

THIS IS MY SECOND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE BECAUSE THE FIRST ONE DISAPPEARED FROM THE COURT FILES UNDER A PHENOMENON.

THIRD: Nassau County Courts have no jurisdiction over this matter as the alleged respondent lives in the Bronx, New York and Ford Motor Credit is located in another state. See exhibit 2, acknowledging the fact that Ford Motor Credit knew of the Defendants correct address, but fraudulently, frivolously,

and harassingly litigated the matter outside the jurisdiction of alleged Defendant’s residence, in violation to CPLR Commercial Claim procedures.

FOURTH: The alleged Respondent does not owe any money to the attorney and or Ford Motor Credit and the fraudulent debt can not be validated, because no money is owed.

FIFTH:

The Alleged Defendant seeks an immediate vacate of the judgment and dismissal of the

complaint based on the fact that the entire matter is based on fraud, specifically, misrepresentation of facts, no personal or proper service as required, a Plaintiff defective/fraudulent affidavit of service citing improper service rule codes, and above all because the alleged defendant owes no money to the Plaintiff and or his attorneys AND THE DEBT CAN NOT BE VALIDATED. SIXTH:

The alleged Defendant seeks the immediate vacate of the attached garnishment because

it is based on fraud and greed, the alleged Defendant owes no money whatsoever, the debt can not be validated.

SEVENTH:

The Alleged Respondent will win on the merits of the case because she does not owe the

Plaintiff any money and Petitioner’s claims cannot be validated.

EIGHTH:

The Alleged Respondent does not have any outstanding debt with Ford

Motor Credit.

NINTH:

The alleged Defendants First Cause of Defense is that the alleged Defendant does not

reside in the county in which this action is brought. See Exhibits 2 and 3, verifying and confirming Alleged Defendant’s place of residence. Second, as a result of Defendants non/improper service and fraud, embedded in Commercial Claims Procedural Violations and the Plaintiff’s inability to validate the debt, the entire matter must be dismissed and the judgment vacated. The fraud is exhibited in the attorney’s willful misrepresentation in the citing of CPLR 3215 (g) on his Affidavit of Additional Mailing, when this citation has nothing to do with serving a commercial transaction notice and or summons. In fact, this citation and or authority is supposed to be used when more than one

year has elapsed between the date of the default and the filing of the motion. The attorney improperly served the default judgment motion upon respondent misrepresenting CPLR 3215(G). THIS IS FRAUD! Third, the Plaintiff complaint is in violation of Section 1809-A of the Uniform City Court Act, in that the Plaintiff does not have its principal office in the State of New York.

TENTH:

The Plaintiff’s affidavit of Additional Mailing is fraudulent, improper, and defective

and exemplifies Plaintiff conspiracy to defraud and convolute via using CPLR 3215 as authority to serve a summons and or complaint, when CPLR 3215 is for judgment for excess where counterclaim interposed. See Defendant Exhibit 4, Plaintiff’s fraud and defective Affidavit of Additional Mailing sworn August 5, 2004 citing CPLR 3215 as authority for service. See Defendant Exhibit 8, citing CPLR 3215.G authority, which has nothing to do with summons service and or additional mailing rules.

ELEVENTH: See alleged Defendant’s Exhibit 5, which is the Plaintiff’s fraudulent, non procedural and conspiracy to defraud the courts Affidavit of Service. This Plaintiff’s Affidavit of Service is non procedural, epitomizes “sewer service” of legal documents, and is in violation of Section 212.06 and Section 214.41-aCommercial claims procedure. Summons, see Defendants Exhibit 6, Section 212.06, Civil practice summons rules clearly state that the summons is served by PERSONAL DELIVERY. The Plaintiff’s fraudulent Affidavit of Service is additionally in violation of procedures set forth for serving a commercial summons in that there is no personal service and or mailing receipts to validate sending the summons and or complaint to the Defendant and or in compliance with rules set forth .

TWELFTH:

Up to today’s date the application and the files show that the Plaintiff failed to offer

proof that the mailing of process was made by first class mail and or certified mail, as required.

Defendant has copied the entire file and there are no mailing receipts whatsoever because Plaintiff’s entire case is based off of fraud, misrepresentation, and attorney misconduct in filing non procedural, defective, improper, and fraudulent documents in the court. See Defendant exhibits exemplifying such.

THIRTEENTH: Pursuant to CPLR 5015 the alleged Defendant has presented excusable default via Plaintiff non service documentation, Plaintiff Affidavits epitomizing willful sewer serving to a wrong address, when personal service is required. Defendant has provided evidence substantiating her correct address the same date/time frame this fraud was being initiated August 2004. Plaintiff fraud, misrepresentation and attorney misconduct are exemplified in the Plaintiff use of defective forms, citing improper rules and plaintiff failure to provide any mailing receipts. Above all, Plaintiff fails to establish and or present any evidence that the alleged defendant received a copy of the summons and complaint prior to the default judgment being entered against her. Additionally, the alleged defendant decrees lack of jurisdiction.

FOURTEENTH:

The Alleged Defendant Snyder specifically objects to the allegations of the

complaint and asserts affirmative defenses as noted above. This demonstrates that Snyder has a meritorious defense to the action (Beverage Distributors of Nevada, Inc. v SchenleyIndustries,Inc.,supra; In view of the above, and the well established public policy that favors a

determination on the merits wherever possible, so that the parties may have their day in court to litigate the issues (see, Crooks v Lear Taxi Corp., 136 AD2d 452 [1st Dept 1988]; Stark v Marine Power & Light Co., 99 AD2d 753 [2d Dept 1984]), the Alleged Defendant Snyder’s motion to vacate the default judgment should be granted.

FIFTEENTH: The alleged Defendant further states that she has requisitioned and copied the entire file, and that there is no certification and or proof of mailing of any demand letter as required pursuant to UDCA section 1803-A.a. This is another procedural violation exemplifying attorney frivolous conduct in litigating civil matters.

SIXTEENTH: The Alleged Defendant attests to the fact that a copy of this affidavit and Order to Show Cause will be mailed via U.S. Certified mail to the attorney incorporating this fraud upon court acknowledgment.

Rubin and Rothman, LLC Attorneys At Law 1787 Veterans Highway, Suite 32 P.O. Box 9003 Islandia, N.Y. 11749

AFFIDAVIT OF MERIT SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION WITH VALIDATING LAW ON THE DOCUMENTED ATTORNEY FRAUD AND MISREPRESENTATION.

The alleged defendant further reinstates that she has requisitioned the files again and there IS NO PROOF OF SERVICE MAIL RECEIPTS for anything. Defendant objects fully to placing any backdated mailing receipts in these files.

When one reviews the false allegations made in the attorney’s documents, one can see that the attorney violated his ethical obligation to be truthful. He used false papers to lie and say he served the alleged defendant when he did not. He used sewer service documentation to subterfuge the fraud and to substitute required personal service procedure. Thereafter, he used defective forms and obstructed procedural rules to defraud the court. See exhibits. An attorney's reputation for veracity is the measure by which he/she is regarded and which holds one in good stead with courts and fellow attorneys. The presumption of good faith dealing which this Court assumes all attorneys conduct themselves, should not be cavalierly dissipated for the simple expediency of attempting to prevail on a motion at all costs.

Counsel needs to be reminded of the Disciplinary Rules contained within the Code of Professional Responsibility. Specifically DR 1-102 [22 NYCRR ยง 1200.3] providing in pertinent part that a lawyer shall not engage in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation; or engage in conduct which is prejudicial to the administration of justice; and DR 7-102 (A)( 5) [ 22NYCRR ยง 1200.33] which provides a lawyer shall not knowingly make a false statement of law or fact. (see Matter of Aaron, 232 AD2d 119 (1997), where the Appellate Division, Second Department found submitting a false affidavit, affirmation to the Bankruptcy Court violated DR 1-102(A) (4) and (5) and DR 7-102(A) (5); and Matter of Kramer, 235 AD2d 87 (1997), lv denied 91 NY2d 805, lv dismissed 93 NY 883, cert denied 528 US 869, where the Appellate Division, First Department found that making false statements in an affidavit to the District Court violated DR 1-102(A) (4) and (5) and DR7-102 (A) (5) ). As was stated in the case of Matter of Schildhaus, 23 AD2d 152 (1st Dept 1965), affd 16 NY2d 748, appeal dismissed, cert denied by Schildhaus v Association of the Bar of the City of New York, 382 US 370 (1966).

Attorney Rothman should be held strictly accountable for his statements, documents, procedural violations, obstruction of justice, and unethical conduct which reasonably could have the effect of deceiving or misleading the court in the action to be taken in a matter pending before it. The court is entitled to rely upon the accuracy of any statement of a relevant fact unequivocally made by an attorney in the course of judicial proceedings.

Part 130-1.1 of the Rules of the Chief Administrator [22 NYCRR 130-1.1] provides for the imposition of financial sanctions for frivolous conduct in civil litigation. Under Part 130-1.1(c)(3) frivolous conduct includes the assertion of material factual statements that are false. The defective attorney Affidavit of Additional Mailing, his fraudulent, sewer service, non procedural Affidavit of Service, and his misrepresenting CPLR 3215 (g), and his imaginary, fictitious, invalidated debt created out of thin air, all exemplify assertion of material factual statements that are false, procedurally incorrect, and fictitious.

The affidavit of service can not be validated, just like the fraudulent out of thin air created debt, can not be validated. There are no mailing receipts and there was no personal service, despite this being a procedural requirement. There is no proof of MAILING ANYTHING in the file as of today because the alleged defendant was not served or mailed notice of this fraud or she would have answered, like she is doing now.

Additionally, the attorney frivolous and contemptible conduct is further exemplified in his CPLR 3215 attached Affidavit of Additional Mailing. This frivolous non procedural form epitomizes the creation of a document to appear as if it cites authority to serve notice, when it is pure fraud, in that it is improper, misrepresents, violates the rules for servicing a summons, and has no proof of mailings.

The citation of CPLR 3215 on the attorneys affidavit, when CPLR 3215 has nothing to do whatsoever with serving a summons, is a prime example of frivolous litigation.

Defendant is invoking a counter claim for the attorney fraud, misrepresentation and frivolous civil litigation acts. Defendant asks the courts to award the $5,000 to the Defendant for having to work hard in correcting, outlining, researching and unraveling the attorney’s multifaceted fraud, misrepresentation and frivolous litigation stratagems. The courts should award the defendant, vacate the judgment and dismiss the complaint based on the unethical, fraud based, and procedurally corrupted documents and attorney conduct.

Moreover, the court should set an example via sanction so these corrupted practices will discontinue immediately. Defendant Snyder respectfully requests that the court sanction the attorney and award monies to the Defendant for being victimized by this indisputable, contemptible, and documented attorney misrepresentation and mischief. Please see the below exhibits which validate and document the Plaintiff’s fraud and Defendants defense. Thank you.

EXHIBIT #

DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION

1.

FRAUD BASED GARNISHMENT OF WAGES,

2.

RUBIN AND ROTHNAN ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF NON SERVICE AND CORRECT ADDRESS ACKNOWLEDGEMENT,

3.

PROOF OF ADDRESS WHEN PLAINTIFF FRAUD INITIATED AUGUST 2004,

4.

PLAINTIFF FRAUD: PLAINTIFF IMPROPER, FRAUDULENT, AFFIDAVIT OF ADDITIONAL MAILING WITH NO PROOF OF MAILING RECEIPTS AND 3 DAYS LAPSED NOTICE FROM THE PLAINTIFF’S FRAUDULENT AFFIDAVIT OF SEWER SERVICE.

5.

PLAINTIFF’S FRAUDULENT AFFIDAVIT OF SEWER SERVICE IS IN VIOLATION OF UNIFORM RULES SECTION 212.O6: SUMMONS AND IN

VIOLATION OF COMMERCIAL CLAIMS PROCEDURE SECTION 212.41. THIS PLAINTIFF FRAUD DOCUMENT HAS NO PROOF OF MAILING RECEIPTS.

6.

UNIFORM CIVIL RULES FOR THE DISTRICT COURTS SECTION 212:06

7.

SECTION 212.41 COMMERCIAL CLAIMS PROCEDURE

EXHIBITS THE PUREST FORM OF DOCUMENTED ORGANIZED CRIME BASED ON FRAUD AND MISREPRESENTATION

EXHIBIT # 1, FRAUD BASED GARNISHMENT OF WAGES

EXHIBIT # 2 RUBIN AND ROTHMAN ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF NON SERVICE, CORRECT ADDRESS ACKNOWLEDGEMENT, AND ALLEDGED DEFENDANT PROOF OF ADDRESS.

EXHIBIT #3 DEFENDANT’S PROOF OF ADDRESS WHEN PLAINTIFF FRAUD INITIATED AUGUST 2004

DEFENDANT WAS NOT SERVED. DEFENDANT WAS NEVER SERVED.

EXHIBIT # 4.

DOCUMENTED PLAINTIFF FRAUD: PLAINTIFF MISREPRESENTING CPLR 3215 (G), PROCEDURALLY VIOLATING AND IMPROPER, FRAUDULENT, AFFIDAVIT OF ADDITIONAL MAILING WITH NO PROOF OF MAILING RECEIPTS AND 3 DAYS LAPSED NOTICE FROM THE PLAINTIFF’S FRAUDULENT AFFIDAVIT OF SEWER SERVICE.

EXHIBIT # 5.

DOCUMENTED PLAINTIFF’S FRAUDULENT AFFIDAVIT OF SEWER SERVICE IS IN VIOLATION OF UNIFORM RULES SECTION 212.O6: SUMMONS AND IN VIOLATION OF COMMERCIAL CLAIMS PROCEDURE SECTION 212.41. BOTH RULES STATE PERSONAL SERVICE FOR SUMMONS AND OR CERTIFIED RETURN RECEIPTS. NEITHER WAS DONE. THIS PLAINTIFF FRAUD DOCUMENT HAS NO PROOF OF MAILING RECEIPTS IN THE COURT FILES.

EXHIBIT # 6.

UNIFORM CIVIL RULES FOR THE DISTRICT COURTS SECTION 212:06, PERSONAL SERVICE SUMMONS RULES AND CERTIFICATION PROOF OF SERVICE RECEIPT RULES. PLAINTIFF’S SUMMONS AND OR UDCA SECTION 1803-A CERTIFICATION WAS NEVER SERVED OR FILED AND THERE IS NO PROOF OF SERVICE MAILING RECEIPTS FOR SERVING AND OR MAILING ANYTHING, IN THE COURT FILES.

Uniform Rules for N.Y.S. Trial Courts PART 212. Uniform Civil Rules For The

District Courts Commercial reuse of the Rules as they appear on this web site is prohibited.

The official version of the Rules published in the NYCRR is available on Westlaw.

Section 212.06 Summons. (a) The summons shall state the district and location of the court in which the action is brought, as well as the names of the parties, and shall comply with all the provisions of the UDCA applicable to summonses. (b) Where an action is brought in any district where there are subdivisions designated as parts for a particular location, there shall also be set forth in the caption of the summons the name of the part, as, for example, "Third District, Great Neck Part." (c) The following form shall be used in a case in which: (1) the cause of action is for money only; (2)

the summons is served by personal delivery to the defendant within Nassau or Suffolk County; and (3) a formal complaint is not served therewith:

EXHIBIT #7. SECTION 212 41-A COMMERCIAL CLAIMS AND PROCEDURE

EXHIBIT # 8 ATTORNEY ROTHMAN MISREPRESENTATION PLAINTIFF FICTITIOUS AND IMAGINARY AUTHORITY CITATION OF CPLR 3215 G, DEFINED AS JUDGMENT FOR EXCESS WHERE COUTERCLAIM INTERPOSED. THIS CITATION IS USED IMPROPERLY IN THE PLAINTIFF’S AFFIDVIT OF ADDITIONAL MAILING, EXHIBIT # 4 ABOVE. THIS FRAUD IS DELIBERATE MISREPRESENTATION IN THAT IT IS SUPPOSED TO BE USED WHEN MORE THAN ONE YEAR HAD ELAPSED BETWEEN THE DATE OF THE DEFAULT AND THE FILING OF THE MOTION. THE ATTORNEY/PLAINTIFF IMPROPERLY CITED THE DEFAULT JUDGMENT MOTION UPON DEFENDANT MISREPRESENTING CPLR 3215(G).

CPLR 3215. Default judgment. (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f)

Default and entry.

Procedure before court.

Default not entered within one year.

Multiple defendants.

Proof.

Notice.

g) Judgment for excess where counterclaim interposed. (

(h) Default judgment for failure to comply with stipulation of settlement.

EXHIBIT # 9.

SECTION 1809-A OF THE UNIFORM CITY COURT ACT STATES THAT THE CLAIMANT

CORPORATION, PARTNERSHIP OR ASSOCIATION MUST HAVE ITS PRINCIPAL OFFICE IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK. PLAINTIFF PRINCIPAL OFFICE AS NOTED ON THE PLAINTIFF’S NON SERVED AND FRAUDLENT SUMMONS IS OUT OF NEW YORK STATE AND IN LIVONIA, MI, COUNTY OF WAYNE. SEE PLAINTIFF FRAUDULENT NON SERVED SUMMONS ATTACHED AS EXHIBIT _______.

§ 1809. Procedures relating to corporations, associations, insurers and assignees.

1. No corporation, except a municipal corporation, public benefit corporation, school district or school district public library wholly or partially within the municipal corporate limit, no partnership, or association and no assignee of any small claim shall institute an action or proceeding under this article, nor shall this article apply to any claim or cause of action brought by an insurer in its own name or in the name of its insured whether before or after payment to the insured on the policy.

2. A corporation may appear in the defense of any small claim action brought pursuant to this article by an attorney as well as by any authorized officer, director or employee of the corporation provided that the appearance by a non-lawyer on behalf of a corporation shall be deemed to constitute the requisite authority to bind the corporation in a settlement or trial. The court or arbitrator may make reasonable inquiry to determine the authority of any person who appears for the corporation in defense of a small claims court case.

Excerpts from New York State Law...

EXHIBIT # 10.

PLAINTIFF AND ATTORNEY RUBIN ROTHMAN DOCUMENTED CONTINUED MISREPRESENTATION VIA VIOLATION OF THE URBAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ACT, A PART OF THE COMMERCIAL CLAIM PROCEDURES. THE FILES DO NOT HAVE THE REQUIRED UCDCA 1803 AND 1803-A CERTIFICATIONS

EXHIBIT # 11, 4 PAGES OF DOCUMENTED ORGANIZED CRIME

THE NEVER SERVED SUMMONS.

THE NEVER SERVED COMPLAINT. THE NEVER SERVED AFFIDAVIT OF FRAUD.

THE NO JUDGE’S SIGNATURE JUDGMENT USED TO GARNISH AND DESTROY CREDIT RATING.

THE NO JUDGE’S SIGNATURE JUDGMENT USED TO GARNISH AND DESTROY CREDIT RATING. UNDER JONATHAN LIPPMAN EVERYBODY JOINS IN THE DISGUISED KILL!

THE BELOW IS THE UNSIGNED COURT FURTHERANCE OF FRAUD. THE ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE DISAPPEARED UNDER A PHENOMENON JUST LIKE OVER 13 MILLION PEOPLE ARE DEAD IN AFRICA UNDER JONATHAN LIPPMAN’S DISGUISED KILLER LEADERSHIP.

CIVIL COURT OF THE COUNTY OF NASSAU ______________________________________________x Index No. 021456-04

FORD MOTOR CREDIT COMPANY, PETITIONER ALLEDGED RESPONDENT’S AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF THE ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE -AgainstMIRIAM SNYDER, ALLEDGED RESPONDENT/DEMANDANT ________________________________________________x ALLEDGED RESPONDENT’S/DEMANDANT AFFIDAVIT THE LAW DOES NOT PERMIT FRAUD AND IMPOSSIBILITIES Respondent/Demandant Miriam Snyder, deposes and says under penalty of perjury, that the below is true and states that the below documents are needed to resolve this matter in a fair, equitable, truthful manner consistent with and to ensure equal protection of the law. In order for this matter to be adjudicated fairly respondent respectfully requests the following documents pursuant to the Civil Rules Of Procedure, all laws and defenses related to unconscionable bargains/contracts and all applicable Freedom of Information and Privacy Act laws. This affidavit shall serve as a request for validation. Please be advised that alleged respondent/demandant needs the information requested in this affidavit before any offer to settle can be made on this matter. Alleged Respondent/Demandant Snyder would like to settle this account as soon as possible as she may have a counter claim to set-off or indemnify the disputed balance.

First:Upon the affidavit of Miriam Snyder, sworn to on December 14, 2006, be it known that Ms. Snyder states under oath the following: FIRST: I recently received the attached letter dated December 11, 2006 with a fraud based garnishment, erupting out of thin air, premised off of Ford Motor Credit and attorney fraud and legal abuse, but effectively enforcing enforced lawlessness in the workplace.

SECOND: Respondent was not served any notice whatsoever.

THIRD: Nassau County Courts have no jurisdiction over this matter as the alleged respondent lives in the Bronx, New York and Ford Motor Credit is located in another state.

FOURTH: This matter is based on fraud and identity theft because the alleged Respondent does not owe any money to the attorney and or Ford Motor Credit.

FIFTH: The Alleged Respondent seeks an immediate emergency stay of the attached garnishment because it is based on fraud and greed, and the alleged respondent owes no money whatsoever.

SIXTH: The Alleged Respondent will win on the merits of the case because she does not owe the Petitioner any money and Petitioner’s claims cannot be substantiated.

SIXTH: The Alleged Respondent does not have any outstanding debt with Ford Motor Credit and or its attorney/s. As such and on behalf of equal protection of the law, the following information is needed in order for the alleged respondent to understand the rights and duties of all parties concerned. The following Freedom of Information documents are needed: 1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

All documentation concerning how the amount of the alleged debt was determined In what year or years was the alleged debt created?

What contract or agreement was signed between Ford Motor Credit and myself?

Kindly provide the certified documents bearing my authorized signature.

What was the value of the product provided?

How did Ford Motor Credit obtain the product provided?

Kindly provide certified documentation of the loss incurred by Ford Credit.

What was the consideration for the contract or agreement I allegedly entered into with Ford Credit?

9. What was the consideration for Ford Credit to enter into the alleged contract or agreement?

10. Was there any interest involved with the alleged debt?

11. What was the interest rate?

12. What was the basis for the interest rate?

13. Were there any changes in said interest rate during the time the alleged debt?

14. Why isn’t Ford Credit Company seeking to collect the alleged debt?

15. Did Ford Credit Company ever attempt to collect the alleged debt?

If yes, kindly provide proof.

18. Kindly provide the Federal law or laws that govern the attorney involvement in collecting the alleged debt.

19. Kindly answer all questions true, correct, and complete under the penalty of perjury, on a point by point basis, citing all relevant Code Sections, Regulations, and/or Court Cases.

Kindly state with particularity if there are no documents or information responsive to any request. Your failure to respond as such to this request will be deemed as an act of bad faith.

20. Please identify the source of the funds in the account that is the subject of this “judgment”.

21. What was the account number of the account in which the funds were held prior to the opening of the account that is the subject matter of this lawsuit?

22. Who was the owner of each account, or list those individuals having signature rights to each account 23. Identify the account that was debited when the disputed account was created.

24. Who was the owner of each account or list those individuals having signature rights to each account?

25. Identify the source of the funds that created the disputed account.

26. Did the funds for the disputed account originate from another account or lending institution?

27. List the names and addresses of all lending institutions from which any funds were purportedly originated.

28. Please identify the account number from which the funds originated in order to create the disputed account.

29. Admit that no other account was debited when the disputed account was created.

30. If you denied that no other account was debited when the disputed account was opened or created, please identify the account that was debited by account number and the name or names of the debited account’s signer, holder and/or owner, and explain how the funds for this account were originated.

31. If you denied that no other account was debited when the disputed account was opened or created, state the total balance of this debited account at the time the debit was made and, list the names of the signers on the account and the date that the account was opened along with the opening balance.

32. Admit that the Miriam Snyder was the depositor for the account that is the subject matter of this lawsuit.

33. Please produce all documents and information, related in any way, to your implication or allegation that a loan was given to Miriam Snyder.

34. Which employee of the Ford Motor Credit authorized the transaction?

35. If any loan origination system, software or other procedures were used in the opening of the disputed account, please identify the system by name and describe how it works.

36. According to the alleged loan agreement, was the purported lender of the financial institution involved in the alleged loan to use their money as adequate consideration to purchase the promissory note from the alleged borrower? YES or NO. 37. According to the bookkeeping entries, did the purported lender or financial institution involved in the alleged loan, use their money as adequate consideration to purchase the promissory note from the alleged borrower? YES or NO. 38. According to the alleged loan agreement, was the purported lender or financial institution involved in the alleged loan to accept anything of value from the alleged borrower that would be used to fund a check or similar instrument in approximately the amount of the alleged loan? YES or NO.

39. According to the bookkeeping entries, did the purported lender or financial institution involved in the alleged loan accept anything of value from the alleged borrower that would be used to fund a check or similar instrument in approximately the amount of the alleged loan? YES or NO. 40. Was the intent of the purported loan agreement that the party that funded the loan should be repaid the money lent? YES or NO. 41. Was the purported lender involved in the alleged loan following Generally Accepted Accounting Principals (GAAP)? YES or NO. 42. Were all material facts disclosed in the written agreement? YES or NO. 43. What is the name and address of any bank auditor or certified public accountant involve with or having any relation to the accounting function regarding the disputed account?

44. Identify the name of the records system of account records or ledgers reflecting the transaction for the disputed account.

45. Were any loan numbers assigned to the disputed account?

46. If you answered yes to the above question, please list those account numbers.

47. Explain how each account was created or originated.

48. Explain how the funds for each account were deposited and where they originated.

49. Was an account created with the purported loan amount then debited to fund the disputed account?

50. Please explain your answer to the above question.

51. Please produce all records and tangible evidence relating to the question herein and attach them along with your response.

52. Please reply with a copy of your Department of State filing information that authorizes you to operate your business in this state, as this will also verify if your filing has expired or is valid.

53. The Petitioners answers directly to the questions put forth are needed in order to validate the claim of this alleged debt.

54. If the Petetioners do not reply directly to these questions, this silence shall serve as tacit procuration, serve as valid proof that this is a fraudulent/imaginary account that has no origination and that this fraudulent/imaginary account can not be pursued further.

55. Respondent decrees ESTOPEL BY ACQUIESENCE, in the event Ford Motor Credit admits the statements and claims by TACIT PROCURATION, all issues are deemed

settled RES JUDICATA, STARE DECISIS and COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL. Ford Motor Credit may not argue, controvert, or otherwise protest the finality of the administrative findings in any subsequent process, whether administrative or judicial.

56. Be it further understood that any action(s), by Ford Motor Credit or attorneys, in any other court or other forum, undertaken against Miriam Snyder outside this Administrative Remedy by Ford Motor Credit, is a trespass against Miriam Snyder and will result in an increase in the amount of the True Bill of ten (10) times the original amount and will continue to increase in the same amount of any additional trespasses.

57. Ford Motor Credit is granted the time period allowed in this Order To Show Cause to respond to the statements and claims herein and/or to provide Ford Motor Credit own answers to inquires upon receipt of this letter which will be tracked using delivery confirmation and Certified Mail through the U.S. Postal Service.

58. Ford Motor Credit may, after agreeing to all claims put forth by Miriam Snyder, enter into negotiations to settle the agreement contract with terms to be agreed upon, signed under penalty of perjury.

59. Please note that any correspondence not presented in the form of a written request/answer format, will be ignored and/or considered an INVALID/NON-RESPONSE and default.

60. In case of a misunderstanding, you are to communicate with me only in writing and if you

try to communicate with me without correspondence being sent through the U.S. Mail (U.S. POSTAL SERVICE/Post Office), that communication shall be a violation of my right to privacy. This will exemplify the willful making of unsolicited calls, causing annoyance, disturbance, shock, aggravation, depression, frustration, distress and rage causing me commercial damages, I will proceed via counter suit accordingly, holding you personally liable. The damages for these violations are listed below for your future reference. Understand that you will be held commercially liable for such actions, as you have been fully notified and after this point, if you continue with your fraudulent claims, judgments and garnishment, you are willfully violating my rights, making unsolicited visits to a private property, causing harassment, contributing to stress, depression, rage, angina, chest constrictions, shock, Loss of appetite, Crying, Nightmares, insomnia, night sweats, Emotional paralysis, Inability to think or function at work, Headaches, Shortness of breath, Anxiety, nervousness, fear and worry, Hypertension (elevation of blood pressure), Irritability, Hysteria, Embarrassment, humiliation, Indignation and pain and suffering.

61. Once you are in default, you have agreed that the above statements cannot be proven and you will be bound to correct the following errors: The Ford Motor Credit default will effectuate the following: A. Close this fraudulent account with a zero (0) balance.

B. Cease and desist from obtaining fraudulent, non jurisdictional, non existent judgments effectuating fraud based garnishments.

C. Remove/Correct all degrading and/or derogatory remarks you placed on my credit profile and report “Paid as Agreed� or other favorable comment to all the credit reporting agencies you are providing my information to.

D. Cease and desist from adding further remarks on my credit profile.

E. Send a confirmation of these corrections to me, signed under penalty of perjury, via Certified or Registered Mail.

F. After sending a confirmation, cease and desist from communicating with me further.

62.

This affidavit and the requests are in accordance with the Fair Credit Reporting Act and the Fair Debt Collection Act. 63.

Upon receipt of this affidavit, unless disputed with proper explanation, Ford Motor Credit agrees to the terms and conditions of this letter. Furthermore, if Ford Motor Credit decides to communicate with me outside my wishes for privacy; Ford Motor Credit agrees to pay all associated damages.

64.

Thank you for your prompt consideration in this matter as the information requested has direct bearing upon the subject matter and is needed for me to understand the nature and cause of this action.

NOTARIZED PAGE.

3230 Cruger Avenue #6B Bronx, New York 10467 April 9, 2007 SENT CERTIFIED RETURN RECEIPT # 7006 2150 0004 1503 5605 Transunion Customer Disclosure Center Trans Union Consumer Relations PO Box 2000 Chester, PA 19022-2000 Re: Inaccurate Information of 125-52-1484 Credit Report Dear Transunion Dispute Specialist: This letter is two fold: First to make sure there is an identity theft alert on my record as several unauthorized transactions have occurred under my name and I have been wrongfully penalized for such since about February 2, 2007. See the attached identity theft documented payment to credit cards and thereafter unauthorized returned payments while the money was and is the account. See attached checking account deposit receipts.

In sum, I paid several small bills that were lawlessly returned unpaid with money in my account to pay the bill. A usurped phenomenon maliciously went into my account and returned payment without my authority, consent or approval and while the bill was paid and the money is still in my checking account held hostage for unknown reasons. This fraud is being investigated.

Second, I am very distressed that you have included the below information in my credit profile in a most inaccurate manner. Due to its damaging, fraudulent, and non validated effects on my good credit standing, I urge deletion. As you are no doubt aware, credit reporting laws ensure that bureaus report only accurate credit information. No doubt the inclusion of the below malicious, non verified, inaccurate information is a mistake.

I have been wrongfully denied credit recently for the inaccuracies reported which was highly embarrassing and has negatively impacted my lifestyle.

I'm attaching to this letter a credit denial letter from Citi bank due to the usurped and inflicted fraudulent activities on my account, as well as credit

reporting embedded in inaccuracies, improper and non verification of alleged debts.

Therefore, the following information needs to be verified and deleted from the report as soon as possible. Prior to sending me a wasted non verified printout, please provide the method of verification, pursuant to FCRA section 611 (a) (7) for any alleged debts you state you have verified.

Please delete the following non validated inaccuracies as quickly as possible: I have attached copies of the tax default disputes and certified mailings which require removal, as the alleged debts are non validated pursuant to 1. Public records: BRONX COUNTY CLERK, Docket # 838524, NYS TAX COMMISSION FRAUD, 19-60 Benedict Avenue, Bronx, New York 10462.

2. Public Records: BRONX COUNTY CLERK , Docket # 828179, NYS TAX COMMISSION FRAUD, 19-60 Benedict Avenue, Bronx, New York 10462 .

3. GMAC # 103 900 253943 THIS WAS PAID IN FULL. REMOVE THE FRAUDULENT NEGATIVE RATING AND COMMENT. 4. HSBC # 5215317400912257, FRAUDULENT ACTIVITIES HAVE BEEN REPORTED ON THIS ACCOUNT AND SEVERAL DISPUTE LETTERS PURSUANT TO FDCPA HAVE BEEN FILED. REMOVE ALL NEGATIVE INFORMATION AS THE DISPUTE IS DOCUMENTED AND VERIFICATION IS SOUGHT FOR THE FRAUD. 5. ROAMANS: # 160971664 FRAUDULENT ACTIVITIES HAVE BEEN REPORTED ON THIS ACCOUNT AND SEVERAL DISPUTE LETTERS PURSUANT TO FDCPA HAVE BEEN FILED. REMOVE ALL NEGATIVE INFORMATION AS THE DISPUTE IS DOCUMENTED AND VERIFICATION IS SOUGHT FOR THE FRAUD. 6. LEW MAGRAM # 16007121500522366 THIS ACCOUNT IS OUTDATED AND WAS OPENED IN 1996 AND PAID IN FULL. PLEASE REMOVE. 7. FORD MOTOR CREDIT # 19733432 THIS IS AN OUTDATED ACCOUNT FROM 1995 THAT WAS PAID IN FULL. THIS IS FRAUD. PLEASE REMOVE THIS. 8. FIRST PREMIER # 4610078700661663 AND 4610078734237860. I NEVER HAD AN ACCOUNT WITH THESE PEOPLE. PLEASE REMOVE.

9. PLEASE REMOVE THE 18 COUNTS OF RJM ACQUISITION NOTES OFF OF MY ACCOUNT AS I NEVER AUTHORIZED THEM TO CHECK MY CREDIT OR TO BE ON MY CREDIT REPORT. PLEASE NOTE THE BELOW CITATIONS:  FDCPA Section 807 , used false, deceptive, or misleading representations or means, on numerous occasions, in connection with the collection of a debt,  Falsely representing the character, amount, or legal status of any debt, in violation of Section 807(2)(A) of the FDCPA, 15 C. 1692e(2)(A);  Threatening to take any action that cannot legally be taken in violation of Section 807(5) of the FDCPA , 15 U. C. 1692e(5);  Communicate to any person credit information that this office knows or should have known to be. false , in violation of Section 807(8) of the FDCPA, 15 C. 9 1692e(8);  Threatening and submitting communications and credit information that this office knows is non validated and or should have known to be false , in violation of Section 807(8) OF THE FDCPA, 15 C. 9 1692E(8); In closing, you know, under FDCPA Section 809 (b), you are not allowed to pursue collection activity until the debt is validated. You should be made aware that in TWYLA BOATLEY, Plaintiff, vs. DIEM CORPORATION, No. CIV 030762 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA, 2004, the courts ruled that reporting a collection account indeed is considered collection activity.

I require a response, on point, in writing, hand signed, and in a timely manner.

Please stop violating the Fair Credit Reporting Act and treat people the way you would want to be treated. Stop the defamation.

After the corrections are made, please send me a verified clean credit report.

Thank you. Thank you.

Sincerely, Miriam Snyder, All Rights Reserved Xc: Federal Trade Commission

PLEASE SEE ATTACHED JONATHAN LIPPMAN SYNDER CODES THAT INFLICTED AND EFFECTUATED MALICIOUS, GROSS, CRIMINAL INCOME EXECUTIONS. THE BELOW SYNDER CODE IS USED TO ENJOIN AND INFLICT TRANS UNION FRAUD AND DECEIT.

3230 Cruger Avenue #6B Bronx, New York 10467 April 9, 2007 SENT CERTIFIED RETURN RECEIPT # _____________________ Experian NCAC PO Box 9556 Allen TX 75013 888-397-3742 Re: INACCURATE, RETALITORY, FRAUDULENT, MALICIOUS ESCALATED CREDIT REPORTED INFORMATION OF 125-52-1484 CREDIT REPORT Dear Experian Dispute Specialist: This letter is two fold: First to make sure there is an identity theft alert on my record as several unauthorized transactions have occurred under my name and I have been wrongfully penalized for such since about February 2, 2007. See the attached American Express letter Dated March 23, 2007 penalizing me for paying my bill and thereafter being victimized by identity theft. I paid a bill that returned unpaid with money in my account to pay the bill. A usurped phenomenon maliciously went into my account and returned payment without my authority, consent or approval and while the bill was paid and the money still in my checking account. This fraud will be stopped. Please note the attached documented malicious usurped fraud and inflicted identity theft.

Second, I am very distressed that Experian has included the below information in my credit profile in a most retaliatory and inaccurate manner. Due to its damaging, fraudulent, and non validated effects on my good credit standing, I urge deletion. As you are no doubt aware, credit reporting laws ensure that bureaus report only accurate credit information. No doubt the inclusion of the below retaliatory, malicious, non verified, inaccurate information is a mistake.

I have been wrongfully denied credit recently for the inaccuracies reported which was highly embarrassing and has negatively impacted my lifestyle.

I'm attaching to this letter a letter from American Express that maliciously affected my credit. In fact, your inaccurate reporting effectuated a denial of extended credit that I had before.

The timing of your inaccurate reporting appears to have escalated and is in retaliation to my letter of complaint to you dated March 15, 2007. Since my complaint letter to you, I have received the attached double Advanta credit denial due to Experian defamation disguised as inaccurate reporting. Bank of America denied me credit due to Experian’s escalated inaccurate credit reporting.

I respectfully the following information verification and deletion accordingly, from the report as soon as possible. Prior to sending me a wasted non verified printout, please provide the method of verification, pursuant to FCRA section 611 (a) (7) for any alleged debts you state you have verified.

Please delete the following non validated inaccuracies as quickly as possible.

Also, for the record note the attached NYS Notice of Tax Disputed Default, Notice of Dispute HSBC, Notice of Dispute Roman’s, pursuant to FDCPA Section 809 (b), you are not allowed to pursue collection activity until the debt is validated.

1. Public records: BRONX COUNTY CLERK, NYS TAX COMMISSION FRAUD, 19-60 Benedict Avenue, Bronx, New York 10462.

2. Public Records: BRONX COUNTY CLERK , NYS TAX COMMISSION FRAUD, 19-60 Benedict Avenue, Bronx, New York 10462 .

3. GMAC # 103 900 253943 THIS WAS PAID IN FULL. REMOVE THE FRAUDULENT NEGATIVE RATING AND COMMENT. 4. HSBC # 5215317400912257, FRAUDULENT ACTIVITIES HAVE BEEN REPORTED ON THIS ACCOUNT AND SEVERAL DISPUTE LETTERS PURSUANT TO FDCPA HAVE BEEN FILED. REMOVE ALL NEGATIVE INFORMATION AS THE DISPUTE IS DOCUMENTED AND VERIFICATION IS SOUGHT FOR THE FRAUD. 5. ROAMANS: # 160971664 FRAUDULENT ACTIVITIES HAVE BEEN REPORTED ON THIS ACCOUNT AND SEVERAL DISPUTE LETTERS PURSUANT TO FDCPA HAVE BEEN FILED. REMOVE ALL NEGATIVE INFORMATION AS THE DISPUTE IS DOCUMENTED AND VERIFICATION IS SOUGHT FOR THE FRAUD. 6. LEW MAGRAM # 16007121500522366 THIS ACCOUNT IS OUTDATED AND WAS OPENED IN 1996 AND PAID IN FULL. PLEASE REMOVE.

7. FORD MOTOR CREDIT # 19733432 THIS IS AN OUTDATED ACCOUNT FROM 1995 THAT WAS PAID IN FULL. THIS IS FRAUD. PLEASE REMOVE THIS. 8. FIRST PREMIER # 4610078700661663 AND 4610078734237860. I NEVER HAD AN ACCOUNT WITH THESE PEOPLE. PLEASE REMOVE.

9. PLEASE REMOVE THE 18 COUNTS OF RJM ACQUISITION NOTES OFF OF MY ACCOUNT AS I NEVER AUTHORIZED THEM TO CHECK MY CREDIT OR TO BE ON MY CREDIT REPORT.

10. I did not authorize the below inquiries. Please remove them.

Address: 12395 FIRST AMERICAN WAY POWAY, CA 92064 No phone number available

Date of Request: 10/23/2006

Comments: Real estate loan . This inquiry is scheduled to continue on record until Nov 2008.

CIS INC Address: ROUTE 517 ALLAMUCHY, NJ 07820 No phone number available

Date of Request: 10/11/2006

Comments: Real estate loan on behalf of UNION AMERICA MORTGAGE. This inquiry is scheduled to continue on record until Nov 2008.

SUNRISE CREDIT SERVICES Address: 260 AIRPORT PLAZA BLVD FARMINGDALE, NY 11735 No phone number available

Comments: Real estate loan on behalf of CAPITAL EQUITIES SERVIC. This inquiry is scheduled to continue on record until Oct 2008.

Date of Request: 09/24/2006

SUNRISE CREDIT SERVICES Address: 260 AIRPORT PLAZA BLVD FARMINGDALE, NY 11735 No phone number available

Date of Request: 09/23/2006

Comments: Real estate loan on behalf of CAPITAL EQUITIES SERVIC. This inquiry is scheduled to continue on record until Oct 2008.

CAPITAL ONE BANK Address: 4851 COX ROAD RICHMOND, VA 23229 No phone number available

Date of Request: 09/15/2006

Comments: Permissible purpose. This inquiry is scheduled to continue on record until Oct 2008.

GMAC Address: PO BOX 2150 GREELEY, CO 80632 No phone number available

Date of Request: 05/15/2006

Comments: Collection purpose. This inquiry is scheduled to continue on record until Jun 2008.

ADP/BOSS MOTORS INC Address: 350 SAINT NICHOLAS AVE RIDGEWOOD, NY 11385 No phone number available

Date of Request: 03/03/2006

Comments: Auto loan. This inquiry is scheduled to continue on record until Apr 2008.

RUBIN & ROTHMAN ATTYS Address: 1787 VETERANS HWY

Date of Request: 02/08/2006

ISLANDIA, NY 11749 No phone number available

Comments: Permissible purpose. This inquiry is scheduled to continue on record until Mar 2008.

PLEASE NOTE THE BELOW CITATIONS: 

FDCPA Section 807 , false, deceptive, or misleading representations or means, on numerous occasions, in connection with the collection of a debt,



Falsely representing the character, amount, or legal status of any debt, in violation of Section 807(2)(A) of the FDCPA, 15 C. 1692e(2)(A);



Threatening to take any action that cannot legally be taken in violation of Section 807(5) of the FDCPA , 15 U. C. 1692e(5);



Communicate to any person credit information that this office knows or should have known to be. false , in violation of Section 807(8) of the FDCPA, 15 C. 9 1692e(8);



Threatening and submitting communications and credit information that this office knows is non validated and or should have known to be false , in violation of Section 807(8) OF THE FDCPA, 15 C. 9 1692E(8);

In closing, you know, under FDCPA Section 809 (b), you are not allowed to pursue collection activity until the debt is validated. You should be made aware that in TWYLA BOATLEY, Plaintiff, vs. DIEM CORPORATION, No. CIV 03-0762 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA, 2004, the courts ruled that reporting a collection account indeed is considered collection activity.

I require a response, on point, in writing, hand signed, and in a timely manner. Please stop violating the Fair Credit Reporting Act and start treating people the way you would want to be treated. Stop the defamation.

After the corrections are made, please send me a verified clean credit report. Thank you.

Sincerely,

Miriam Snyder, All Rights Reserved

3230 CRUGER AVENUE #6B BRONX, NEW YORK 10467 MARCH 20, 2007 SENT CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT 700621500004 1503 5445 EXPERIAN PO BOX 9556 ALLEN, TX 75013

RE: FALSE AND NON VERIFIED CHARGES ON MIRIAM SNYDER SS# 125 52 1484 CREDIT REPORT. REPORT NUMBER 2298040529

DEAR EXPERIAN: FIRST: I AM IN RECEIPT OF AN ERRONEOUS MULTUFACETED NON VERIFIED EXPERIAN CREDIT REPORT DATED FEBRUARY 20, 2007. THIS REPORT STATES THAT EXPERIAN HAS VERIFIED NON EXISTENT DEBTS. TO THIS END, PLEASE FORWARD VERIFICATION FOR EACH DEBT EXPERIAN ALLEDGES TO HAVE VERIFIED. SECOND: YOU ARE IN RECEIPT OF NOTICE UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF THE FAIR DEBT COLLECTIONS PRACTICES ACT REGARDING  GMAC,  NCO MARLIN, Z TEL CHARGES,  ROAMANS,  SCA/LEWMAGRAM, THIRD: PLEASE REMOVE THE ABOVE FALSE CHARGES UNLESS YOU CAN DOCUMENT AND VERIFY THE “DEBT” BY COMPLYING IN GOOD FAITH WITH THIS REQUEST FOR VALIDATION AND NOTICE THAT I DISPUTE PART OF OR ALL OF THE ALLEGED DEBT. 1. PLEASE FURNISH A COPY OF THE ORIGINAL CONTRACT REDACTING MY SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER TO PREVENT IDENTITY THEFT AND STATE UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT THE

ABOVE DEBTORS ARE THE BONA FIDE PARTY IN INTEREST OF THE CONTRACT AND PRODUCE THE ORIGINAL FOR MY OWN AND A JUDGE’S INSPECTION SHOULD THERE BE A TRIAL TO CONTEST THESE MATTERS.

2. PLEASE PRODUCE THE ACCOUNT AND GENERAL LEDGER STATEMENT SHOWING THE FULL ACCOUNTING OF THE ALLEGED OBLIGATION THAT YOU ARE NOW SLANDERING MY CREDIT WITH.

3. PLEASE IDENTIFY BY NAME AND ADDRESS ALL PERSONS, CORPORATIONS, ASSOCIATIONS, OR ANY OTHER PARTIES HAVING AN INTEREST IN LEGAL PROCEEDINGS REGARDING THE ALLEGED DEBT.

4. PLEASE VERIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY, THAT EXPERIAN HAS EVIDENCE OF DEBT AND IS SLANDERING MY NAME IN THE NAME OF THE ORIGINAL CONTRACTING PARTY.

6. PLEASE PROVIDE THE SO CALLED VERIFICATION THIS OFFICE USED. 7. PLEASE PROVIDE VALIDATION OF THE DEBT OWED. 9. PLEASE

PROVIDE UNDER WHAT AUTHORITY DID YOU PLACE THE FRAUD

BASED

NOT

VALIDATED ABOVE CLAIMS ON MY CREDIT RECORD.

10. PLEASE

VERIFY THAT YOU KNOW AND UNDERSTAND THAT SLANDERING MY NAME BY

NOT REMOVING THE OF THIN

AIR,

ABOVE NON VERIFIED, FRAUD BASED, MALICIOUS, NEWLY CREATED OUT

FALSE

CLAIMS, AFTER

RECEIPT

OF

THIS NOTICE

WITHOUT PROVIDING

PROCEDURALLY PROPER VALIDATION/VERIFICATION OF THE DEBT, CONSTITUTES USE OF INTERSTATE COMMUNICATIONS IN A SCHEME OF FRAUD BY ADVANCING A WRITING THAT YOU KNOW IS FALSE, WITH THE INTENTION THAT OTHERS RELY ON THE WRITTEN COMMUNICATION TO THE DETRIMENT OF MIRIAM SNYDER.

REMOVE THE DISPUTED AND NON VERIFIED ABOVE CLAIMS, AT MINIMUM REMOVE THE FALSE CLAIMS UNTIL THEY ARE VALIDATED AND THIS DISPUTE RESOLVED.

FOURTH: REMOVE THE MULTIPLE FRAUD AND NON VERIFIED INQUIREIS AS I DID NOT AUTHORIZE OR CONSENT THE FOLLOWING INQUIRES AND I DO NOT AUTHORIZE EXPERIAN PLACING THESE UNAUTHORIZED INQUIRIES ON MY CREDIT REPORT. PLEASE VERIFY CONSENT OR REMOVE THE FRAUDLENT BELOW INQUIRIES. 1. GMAC 2. RUBIN AND ROTHMAN SHYSTERS, 3. CITI AUTO 4. NATIONAL, 5. CITI AUTO 6. SOVERIGN BANK,

7. GMAC, FIFTH: PLEASE DO NOT ADD ANY NEW NAMES TO MY NAME. MY NAME IS MIRIAM SNYDER. REMOVE MIRIAM SAYDER, JONATHAN LIPPMAN, MIRIAM SCHNIEDER, MIRIA,SNUDER, MIRUM SNYDER, MARIAM SNYDER,. THESE ARE UNKNOWN NAMES AND MUST BE REMOVED. THEY HAVE BEEN CREATED BY THIS OFFICE AND I RESENT IT. REMOVE THEM. FOURTH: PLEASE SEND ME A CORRECTED COPY OF MY CREDIT REPORT AND ANY ALLEGATIONS OF VERIFICATION , FORWARD SUCH. THANK YOU. DISPUTING THE “DEBT”

MIRIAM SNYDER, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

3230 Cruger Avenue #6B Bronx, New York 10467 January 25, 2007 SENT CERTIFIED MAIL # ___________________________ Experian 1 800 493 1058 PO Box 9556 Allen, TX 75013

Re: FALSE CHARGES ON MIRIAM SNYDER SS# 125 52 1484 CREDIT REPORT. Please Remove the Lawless, Non Validated, Not Owed, and Non Verified GMAC and Z Tel Charges on my Credit Report. I Dispute Each and Mandate Removal of the fraud.

Sir: You are in receipt of NOTICE under the authority of The Fair Debt Collections Practices Act regarding GMAC and Z Tel Charges you have fraudulently placed on my credit record. Please remove the false GMAC and Ztel charges unless you can document and verify the “debt” by complying in good faith with this request for validation and notice that I dispute part of or all of the alleged debt.

1. Please furnish a copy of the original contract redacting my social security number to prevent identity theft and state under penalty of perjury that GMAC AND ZTEL are the bona fide party in interest of the contract and produce the original for my own and a judge’s inspection should there be a trial to contest these matters.

2. Please produce the account and general ledger statement showing the full accounting of the alleged obligation that you are now slandering my credit with.

3. Please identify by name and address all persons, corporations, associations, or any other parties having an interest in legal proceedings regarding the alleged debt.

4. Please verify under penalty of perjury, that Experian has evidence of debt and is slandering my name in the name of the original contracting party.

6. Please provide the so called verification this office used.

7. Please provide validation of the debt owed.

9. Please provide under what authority did you place the fraud Based not validated GMAC claim and the Fraud based ZTel claim on my credit record.

10. Please verify that you know and understand that slandering my name by not removing the GMAC and ZTEL non validated, fraud based, malicious, newly created out of thin air, false claims, after receipt of this notice without providing procedurally proper validation of the debt, constitutes use of interstate communications in a scheme of fraud by advancing a writing that you know is false, with the intention that others rely on the written communication to the detriment of Miriam Snyder.

Remove the disputed and non validated GMAC and Ztel claims, at minimum remove the false claims until they are validated and this dispute resolved. Thank you.

Disputing the “debt�

Miriam Snyder, All Rights Reserved XC: GMAC, see attached.

3230 Cruger Avenue #6B Bronx, New York 10467 April 9, 2007 Ms. Nadia Jabbour, Bank Manager: Wachovia Bank 598 Tuckahoe Road Yonkers, New York 10710 Dear Ms. Nadia Jabbour, Bank Manager: I am in recent of a fraudulent unauthorized, undated Shyster letter from Keith Rothman sent to me from an out of state Wachovia Bank, in response to the Notice of Default I sent you dated March 15, 2007.

Foremost, this shyster letter is not authority to lien any account. It is attorney fraud that this bank is advancing.

By using this fraud to financially harm me via lawlessly lien my account, you have enjoined this bank in violating the below Fair Debt Collection Practices Act: 

FDCPA Section 807 , used false, deceptive, or misleading representations or means, on numerous occasions, in connection with the collection of a debt,



FDCPA, 15 U. C. 1692e, including but not limited to the following:



falsely representing the character, amount, or legal status of any debt, in violation of Section 807(2)(A) of the FDCPA, 15 C. 1692e(2)(A);



threatening to take any action that cannot legally be taken in violation of Section 807(5) of the FDCPA , 15 U. C. 1692e(5);



threatening to communicate to any person credit information that this bank knows or should have known to be. false , in violation of Section 807(8) of the FDCPA, 15 C. 9 1692e(8);

I am not in receipt of any lawful judgment authorizing any lien. I demand that the lien be removed and the account closed as stated in and by the March 15, 2007, Notice of Default I sent you.

This is a non validated, criminal, conspiracy against rights, fraudulent alleged debt that the attorney or this bank can not prove otherwise. You have to April 15, 2007 to remove the lien or civil and criminal fraud charges will be pursued accordingly. Thank you.

Sincerely, Miriam Snyder

XC: Federal Trade Commission Debt Collector Fraud and Harassment Shyster Keith Rothman, acting attorney

I Received the below for the first time April 2007.

3230 Cruger Avenue #6B Bronx, New York 10467 March 15, 2007 Wachovia Bank 598 Tuckahoe Road Yonkers, New York 10710 SENT CERTIFIED RETURN RECEIPT # 7006 2150 0004 1503 5377

NOTICE OF FAULT WITH OPPORTUNITY TO CURE THIRD AND FINAL NOTICE FOR WACHOVIA BANK TO PROVIDE THE LAW THEY ARE USING TO REFUSE TO CLOSE BANK ACCOUNT #1010119817843, DUE TO INFLICTED PATTERNED AND PRACTICED LAWLESS USURPATIONS COUPLED WITH INTERNAL FRAUD REGARDING AN UNAUTHORIZED LAWLESS FRAUDLENT LIEN THAT WACHOVIA BANK HAS REFUSED TO PRODUCE, AND INTERNAL BANK HARRASSMENT Dear Ms. Nadia Jabbour, Bank Manager: This is my final notice to you prior to filing criminal charges of aggravated harassment and bank fraud against you for not complying in good faith with providing the law you are using to keep the above mentioned account open against my consent and authorization. You have 10 days to respond and or close the account. I have given you many chances to substantiate your fraud and harassment. You have refused to put in writing the law you are using to harass me.

You have furthered this harassment by sending me a Wachovia Bank Hospital Placement Plan that has not been sent to other customers. I find your Hospital threat letter and your lawless actions, threatening, unwarranted and bold faced harassing.

Consequently, this is your FINAL NOTICE WITH OPPORTUNITY TO CURE. I have sent you several letters. One letter was dated December 6, 2006 and another letter was dated January 25, 2007. Your refusal to comply with the laws of this country may place you in a criminal proceeding. I urge you to seek counsel.

I have asked you to provide the authority in writing that you used to lien, therafter removed the lien and thereafter refused to close the account. What kind of nonsense is this? You have held my account hostage and have refused to provide the law authorizing such. You have failed to respond. You have failed to provide any authority supporting your actions as bank manager in this matter.

If it is law, it will be found in the books; if it is not to be found there, it is not law.” A law must be valid to exist, and must exist to be enforced. In its absence, you can not lawlessly create law and or break equal protections secured in the law.

Under what authority of the law was my account liened? Under what authority of the law was the lien removed? Under what authority are you keeping my bank account open against my consent and authorization? Under what authority are you refusing to obey the law? Under what authority did the attached Wachovia personal Hospital Placement letter get sent to me and not other customers, in the midst of your fraud being disputed by me? Under what authority are you acting? What good faith Business practices have been enforced in the above or below?

Please note that this NOTICE OF FAULT WITH OPPORTUNITY TO CURE is THE THIRD lawful notification and is sent pursuant to the federal Constitution, specifically, the Bill of Rights, in particular, the First, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Seventh, Ninth and Tenth Amendments, and pursuant to your job, and requires your written response to me specific to the subject matter. Your failure to respond, as stipulated, and rebut, with particularity, everything in this letter with which you disagree, is your lawful, legal and binding agreement with and admission to the fact that everything in this letter is true, correct, legal, lawful and fully binding upon you in any court in America, without your protest or objection or that of those who represent you.

Your silence is your acquiescence. See: Connally v. General Construction Co., 269 U.S. 385,391.

Notification of legal responsibility is “the first essential of due process of law”. See also: U.S. V. Tweel, 550 F.2d.297. “Silence can only be equated with fraud where there is a legal or moral duty to speak or when an inquiry left unanswered would be intentionally misleading.”

You have 10 days to respond or I will aggressively take action against you, for your failure to comply with the law in its insistence upon perpetrating fraud for and/or its alleged client’s financial gain, to my legal and financial detriment, injury and mental anguish.

You will answer me either through a response letter or through harassment and banking fraud charges filed against you. I find your method of managing this bank lawless, indecent, unprofessional and conspiratorial. You have no lawful reason to not provide the law to keep this account open in my name without my consent or authorization. You have attempted to extort money from my account that I do not owe. You told me about a fraudulent lien with no lawful signatures, yet you have failed to produce such.

You personally have injured me with your unauthorized refusal to close my account and your refusal to substantiate the fraudlent lien you mentioned and failed to produce for the record. I take offense to your lawless acts and advise you to discontinue such.

Your refusal to abide by the law, as well as your acts against public policy, specifically, your refusal to notify me in writing regarding your internal so called lien, your refusal to close my account as requested, your refusal to provide any law to which you are acting, have caused me emotional trauma, disruption to my family and professional life, and the labor spent dealing with this matter has amounted up to well over $5,000.00.

You have lied about me and to me and are attempting to extort money I do not owe. Prove your authority to do this, correct the injury and close the account. You will not use this bank to enslave me to fraud and lawless usurpations. You will respect the law.

There is no Constitutional authority for your criminal conspiracy. You have acted like a co conspirator and as such you will be dealt with.

There exists no Constitutional authority for

this bank to exempt itself and public officers from laws to which the Public are held.

There is no Constitutionally compliant, valid law which requires me to participate, under duress and against my will, in this fraudulent banking system that has defamed and harassed me. To this end, provide the law under which you are acting.

If you disagree with anything in this letter, then rebut that with which you disagree, in writing, with particularity, to me, within 10 days of this letter’s date, and support your disagreement with evidence, fact and law. Your failure to respond, as stipulated, is your agreement with and admission to the fact that everything in this letter is true, correct, legal, lawful, and is your irrevocable agreement attesting to this, fully binding upon you, in any court in America, without your protest or objection or that of those who represent you.

Finally, I am returning to you your bold face Wachovia Bank Hospital Banking Placement Plan, which was sent in the midst of this dispute. I find this notice to be quite unusual, distasteful and threatening. I advise you to use the form as it is designed for conspirators.

I urge you to provide the authority under which you are lawlessly acting and close the account.

I am sending a copy of this letter and your Bold face Wachovia Bank Hospital Placement Threat, that has been sent to me in a most retaliatory and threatening manner to the following authorities as help is needed in compelling this bank to recognize and enforce Equal Protection of the Law.

Chief Judge Judith Kaye 230 Park Avenue, Suite 826 New York City, New York 10169-0007 John Conyers, Committee on the Judiciary US House of Representatives Washington Office 2426 RHOB Washington, D.C. 20515-2214

Maxine Waters, Committee on the Judiciairy US House of Representatives 2138 Rayburn House Office Building Washington, DC 20515 Charles Schumer U.S. Senator 757 Third Avenue New York, New York 10017 Hillary Clinton, U.S. Senator 780 3rd Avenue

New York, New York 10017 Robert Johnson Bronx District Attorney 198 East 161st Bronx, New York 10451 Andrew Cuomo, NYS Attorney General 120 Broadway New York, New York 10271 NYC Mayor Bloomberg 100 Church Street New York, New York 10007 Rose Gill Hearn, Commissioner City of New York Department of Investigation

3230 Cruger Avenue #6B Bronx, New York 10467 January 25, 2007

Wachovia Bank 598 Tuckahoe Road Yonkers, New York 10710 Faxed To: 914 779-4456 and 704 427-3684 Re: SECOND NOTICE TO CLOSE Account Number 1010119817843, Miriam Snyder DUE TO RUBIN AND ROTHMAN, LAWLESS ATTORNEYS MULTIPLE LAWLESS, FRAUDULENT AND NON VALIDATED LIEN FILINGS. Dear Ms. Nadia Jabbour, Bank Manager: This is my second notice to you of the above bank account closing due to the attorney’s fraud in filing multiple contested and non validated fraudulent liens.

Consequently, you are in receipt of NOTICE under the authority of The Fair Debt Collections Practices Act regarding your file RUBIN AND ROTHMAN FRAUDULENT NON EXISTENT DEBT DISGUISED AS A LIEN FOR GMAC. Since this bank is acting as one of the enforcers of the attorneys multiple lawless lien filings, it is imperative that this bank document and verify the “debt” by complying with this request for validation and notice that I dispute part of or all of the alleged debt.

1. Please furnish a copy of the original contract redacting my social security number to prevent identity theft and state under penalty of perjury that your client is the bona fide party in interest of the contract and will produce the original for my own and a judge’s inspection should there be a trial to contest these matters.

2. Please produce the account and general ledger statement showing the full accounting of the alleged obligation that you have slandered my name regarding and are attempting to collect.

3. Please identify by name and address all persons, corporations, associations, or any other parties having an interest in legal proceedings regarding the alleged debt.

4. Please verify under penalty of perjury, that as a debt collector, you have evidence of debt and are proceeding with collection activity in the name of the original contracting party.

5. Please verify under penalty of perjury that you know and understand that certain clauses in a contract of adhesion, such as a so-called forum selection clause, is unenforceable unless the party to whom the contract is extended could have rejected the clause without impunity.

6. Please provide verification from the stated creditor that you are authorized to act for them.

7. Please verify that you know and understand that further taking monies and restraining this account by not allowing closure, after receipt of this notice without providing procedurally proper validation of the debt, constitutes the use of interstate communications in a scheme of fraud by advancing a writing that you know is false, with the intention that others rely on the written communication to the detriment of Miriam Snyder.

I advise you to close the account as Wachovia is being enjoined in Rubin and Rothman documented FRAUD. I urge you and the legal department to act accordingly pursuant to constitutionally protected Due process guarantees and the Fair Debt Collections Practices Act. Moreover, have the person ordering these crimes via the law department put his name on what they are telling the local bank to do. Please take notice the non existent debt is disputed in full and this is my second demand to have this account closed due to the inflicted lawlessness and malice. Thank you.

Disputing the “debt” Miriam Snyder, All Rights Reserved

Xc:

U.S. Department of Justice/ Attorney General U.S. Banking Commission and Authorities

3230 Cruger Avenue #6B Bronx, New York 10467 December 6, 2006 Wachovia Bank 598 Tuckahoe Road Yonkers, New York 10710 Faxed To: 914 779-4456 Re: No Bank Notification of Fraudulent Levy, Account Number 1010119817843, Miriam Snyder Dear Bank Manager: I write this letter with respect to the above. Foremost, this bank has not sent me any notification whatsoever of the current fraudulent levy on the account. I found out by having a purchased denied and thereafter I called the bank. The bank’s non notification procedure facilitates the fraudulent levy.

I am in the process of suing the lawless attorneys who have obtained a lawless order without any due process despite multiple order requests for such.

Due to the bank’s willful participation in this fraud via non procedural levy, I am closing the account. This letter shall serve as notice of such. The account must be closed upon receipt of this letter via fax and mail, effective today. I will contact the appropriate authorities regarding this fraud based conspiracy against rights.

In closing, please forward Wachovia’s written bank policy and procedures for informing the customer of a levy prior to the levy. Please forward such within thirty days from the date of this letter.

Thank you.

Sincerely, Miriam Snyder Xc:

U.S. Department of Justice U.S. Banking Commission and Authorities

WASHINGTON MUTUAL INTERNAL INFLICTED FRAUD DOCUMENTS 3230 Cruger Avenue 6B Bronx, New York 10467

April 10, 2007 FAXED TO: 210 489 8705 206 461 2000 Telephone Banking Management Washington Mutual Bank P.O.Box 659587 San Antonio, Texas 78265-9587 Executive Office Account Number: FIFTH TIME: MAILING, FAXING AND HAND DELIVERING THE ATTACHED SIGNED SINCE 1/26/07 CHECKING ACCOUNT MASTER AGREEMENT Miriam Snyder, 3950594462 Dear Telephone Banking Manager: I write this letter with respect to the attached unsigned threatening unwarranted and unauthorized legal restraint threat letter dated March 27, 2007. Foremost this letter is a fraudulent letter. It is attempting to make it look like this bank does not have a signed Master Account Agreement for my checking account when I have sent the attached signed and dated January 26, 2007 Master agreement form in five times. I have hand delivered it to the local bank, I faxed it several times to this number and I mailed it with an affidavit documenting internal inflicted fraudulent banking practices that damaged my credit.

In summary, as you know I opened this account on January 25, 2006. January 26, 2006, I deposited $250.00. and signed the checking account Master Account agreement in person at the White Plains Branch identified on the attached Wamu receipts. If the bank made an error by not giving me a savings Master Account Agreement when I signed the checking account Master Account Agreement, then say so. Do not cover this negligence by threatening the customer.

Please note that on or about January 29, 2007 I paid several small bills with the money deposited in the new checking account. Each bank I paid a bill to, from this account said that a phenomenon out of Washington Mutual Bank returned money to my account that I had paid my bills with. The money was returned to my checking account criminally, without my consent, approval and or authorization. To this end, I seek an apology letter at minimum acknowledging this error.

This criminal mischief is similar to the attached material misrepresentation letter. The fraudulent electronic transfer crimes, coupled with the attached material misrepresentation, disguising the attached signed checking account agreement as non existent, should not be taken lightly. In fact many people are killed from these types of disguises and fraudulent activities. Above all, they undermine the integrity of the banking system and further victimize witnesses of these criminal fraud crimes.

To this end, I expect an apology letter for the wrongs enforced and embedded in fraud, returning bill money I paid out of the checking account, without my consent, authorization and or approval. This inflicted fraud has damaged my credit rating. The attached material misrepresentation Washington Mutual unsigned letter undermines the integrity of the banking system. I urge this bank to correct these usurped criminal fraud practices.

To this end, please close the savings account and file for the fifth time the signed checking account Master card agreement. Should you need further documentation for the closing of the savings account, please contact me in writing.

Please note I went to the Yonkers, New York 2361 Central Park Avenue Washington Mutual Bank on April 5, 2007. I met with the Bank Manager, Letisha Castillo. I, again, hand delivered the attached checking account Master Account Agreement. I was told it was already on file since January 2007. Consequently, the attached letter and new checking account agreement misrepresents the truth and disregarded the already filed and signed checking account Master Account Agreement.

Finally, please make sure the money paid from the checking account to my January 2007 credit card payments is released. The money has been lawlessly held hostage for too long.

This letter shall serve as notice that the savings account is closed. You may send me the money in the account or put it in the checking account. Please let me know in writing, if further documentation is needed.

Please correct Washington Mutual’s records as indicated above. Should further information be needed, please contact me in writing. Thank you.

Sincerely,

Miriam Snyder Attached: 1. Miriam Snyder signed and dated 1.26/07 WaMu checking Master Account Agreement, 2. Washington Mutual unsigned letter requesting the attached signed Master Account Agreement, 3. Washington Mutual Checking account deposit receipts.

4. Washington Mutual Return payment fraud for unknown reasons under a phenomenon,

XC:

Federal Trade Commission NYS Attorney General, Andrew Cuomo, Consumer Fraud Protection Division

FEBRUARY 2, 2007 ACTIVITY SINCE LAST STATEMENT Click the TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION to view a detail of the transaction.

Sort By: TRAN Sort By: DATE POSTED Sort By: TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION Sort By: DATE TWX*AOL SERVICE 0107 800-827-6364 01/23/2007 01/23/2007 NY WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK 20601/25/2007 01/27/2007 4902632 CA 01/27/2007 01/29/2007 METABANK Brooklyn, NY

Amount $9.95 $30.00 $61.75

01/29/2007

01/29/2007

PAYMENT - THANK YOU

-$50.00

01/29/2007 01/29/2007

01/29/2007 01/31/2007

CASH FEE FINANCE CHARGE HERRING NATIONAL BAN BRONX NY

$5.00 $101.50

01/29/2007

02/01/2007

RETURNED PAYMENT

01/31/2007

01/31/2007

CASH FEE FINANCE CHARGE

02/01/2007

02/01/2007

02/01/2007

02/01/2007

RETURNED PAYMENT FEE LATE CHARGE ASSESSMENT

$50.00 $5.07 $15.00

$30.00

Re:

Jonathan Lippman

Dear Creditor and Public Official: My name is Miriam Snyder. I have a banking account with you. Attached you will find a banking affidavit documenting the infliction of lawless banking practices that have caused me much pain and suffering. Jonathan Lippman is a New York State Chief Administrative Injustice that is venting revenge on me for documenting his criminal practices in government and now banking. He is trying to have me killed under disguise. Consequently, his newest attempt is legal fraud through all of my financial transactions. He wants me dead under disguise. God wants me alive. I ask that you read the affidavit carefully and act accordingly.

Please monitor my account for internal inflictions, legal fraud, actions that make no sense, but cause financial harm and disappearance of money. Thank you.

Sincerely,

Miriam Snyder,

FEBRUARY 3, 2007 MIRIAM SNYDER’S

PUBLIC NOTICE AND AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH AND FACT REGARDING UNWARRANTED, INFLICTED, UNCONSTITUTIONAL, MISCHIEVIOUS, LAWLESS, HARMFUL AND USURPATION OF AUTHORITY PATTERNED JONATHAN LIPPMAN INFLICTED LEGAL FRAUD AND INTERNAL ABUSIVE BANKING PRACTICES IN THE WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, NEW ACCOUNT OPENED 1/25/07

CHECKING ACCOUNT NUMBER 3950594462 1. I, Miriam Snyder, hereby affirm, under oath, that the information contained in this affidavit is true and correct.

2. I, Miriam Snyder further affirm that the attached banking documents exemplify internal, unconstitutional, hoax based malicious, mischievous manipulation of the subject above bank account, done with designed misrepresentation made to deceive and cause me further and additional injury.

3. I, Miriam Snyder further attest that I have filed several complaints with New York State and nationwide authorities, regarding Jonathan Lippman, a New York State Chief Administrative Power crazed, Lethal Injustice, similar abusive, fraudulent, malicious, lawless, unconstitutional, destructive acts in government and now banking. Jonathan Lippman has lawlessly used every aspect of government and now banking, to demise my existence under several deadly disguises, including legal fraud, in retaliation and as a relentless vendetta.

4. I, Miriam Snyder, further attest that Jonathan Lippman has a documented history of: exercising power he does not legitimately possess, actions that usurp authority, and subverting the Constitution. See the attached lawsuit documenting these sick behaviors. 1 NO. 1: LEONARD J. LEVENSON, ET AL. V. JONATHAN LIPPMAN,&C., ET AL.

5.

I, Miriam Snyder attest to the fact that the attached banking documents, specifically the taking and unauthorized returning of money paid on accounts from Washington Mutual Bank, exemplify Jonathan Lippman’s documented history of exercising authority he does not legitimately possess as well as his retarding law and orderly procedures, as documented in his above law suit.

6. I, Miriam Snyder attest to the fact that, each of the Washington Mutual Bank account number 3950594462 returned monies, to each of my creditors was unauthorized, without consent, and maliciously done t to vent revenge, injure me

financially, and facilitate Jonathan Lippman’s in progress disguised legal killing agenda.

7. I, Miriam Snyder find no other reason for the attached inflicted legal fraud, inflicted usurped banking power, over me, on my account.

8. I, Miriam Snyder attest to the fact that the attached banking documents have allowed an invisible force to take ruler ship over the subject matter new account, over the accountholder. I further attest that this same power crazed lawless ruler ship unauthorized force/power is exemplified in the lawsuit mentioned above.

9. I, Miriam Snyder have never had any good, bad or indifferent relations with the above mentioned bank and find the below and attached inflicted lawless practices to be unethical, unwarranted and a threat to public safety.

10. I, Miriam Snyder attest to the fact that the attached banking documents, specifically the Washington Mutual Bank, taking and unauthorized returning of monies, to harm one, undermines public confidence and integrity in banking due to a documented unrestrained, sick, judge.

11. I, Miriam Snyder, affirm, by and through personal, first-hand knowledge, that the following actions and events took place regarding the subject matter Washington Mutual Bank new checking account number 395059446 inflicted lawlessness.

12. I, Miriam Snyder opened a bank account on January 25, 2007 with Washington Mutual Bank. Jonathan Lippman has inflicted similar legal fraud in other accounts requiring the opening of this new account. This account was opened on the phone.

The account was opened with a thirty dollar deposit from my Household credit card.

13. I, Miriam Snyder attest to the fact that the attached Household credit card statement documents the 1/25/07 thirty dollar debit to Washington Mutual Bank for this subject matter account opening. The thirty dollars was distributed as such: fifteen dollars was used to open a checking account and fifteen dollars was used to open a savings account. The following checking account number was rendered: 3950594462. This is the account that has been exploited and violated via legal fraud, used to harm me and used as a hoax to facilitate the above vendetta.

14. I, Miriam Snyder attest to the fact that on January 26, 2007 I deposited $250.00 into the above Washington Mutual Bank checking account number 3950594462.

15. I, Miriam Snyder attest to the fact that the attached Washington Mutual Bank receipt further confirms the above transaction.

16. I, Miriam Snyder attest to the fact that I paid the following creditors with the above mentioned checking account number 3950594462 money deposited in the attached receipt.

17. I, Miriam Snyder further attest that I did use the money I put in the Washington Mutual Bank account number 3950594462, to pay the below bills listed from a-d. I further state, that, I DID NOT AND DO NOT AUTHORIZE, OR CONSENT, TO ANY RETURN OF MONEY TO WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK FOR THE BELOW BILLS I PAID WITH MY MONEY, FROM THE ABOVE MENTIONED WASHINGTON MUTUAL CHECKING ACCOUNT. I DID NOT RETURN OR RESCIND THE MONEY. CONSEQUENTLY I DO NOT ACCEPT ANY PENALTIES OR FEES AND ATTEST TO THE DISPUTING OF SUCH, IF IMPOSED, AND DUE TO THIS INFLICTED MALICIOUS LEGAL FRAUD. The following accounts were paid with the Washington Mutual Bank checking account: a. b. c. d.

Household Bank credit card $ Orchard Bank credit card Romans Credit Card American Express

$50.00, $ 50.00 $70.00 $50.00

18. I attest to the fact that there is supposed to be $45.00 remaining in the Washington mutual checking account.

19. I, Miriam Snyder, further attest to the fact that my Household Bank account balance should be over $320.00 with the 50.00 payment and according to the attached $270.00 money transfer into this account.

20. I Miriam Snyder attest to the fact that I paid the above mentioned $70.00 on my Romans account and the account is paid in full. The seventy dollar payment was the only payment due. There is a zero balance on the account and I had a line of credit of $400.00.

21. I Miriam Snyder attest to the fact that The Orchard Bank account has over $260.00 in it with the $50.00 payment mentioned above.

22. I, Miriam Snyder attest to the fact that the American Express card was paid the above $50.00 and there was over $550.00 dollars in this account including a recent money transfer of $500.00 into this account from one of my other accounts not mentioned in this affidavit. .

23. I, Miriam Snyder, attest to the fact that this affidavit is being forwarded to the below entities as well as to authorities to document the ramifications of enforced lawlessness and lawless leadership. I am attaching Jonathan Lippman’s impeachable/removable law suit and ask each person involved to forward a copy of this affidavit, his law suit, and the attachments to as many Congressman and Senators as possible. Public exposure is needed to witness this sick judge’s obsession with exercising power he does not legitimately possess and his abuse of governmental and banking systems, to facilitate his many documented disguised killing operations.

24. I, Miriam Snyder, attest to the fact that Jonathan Lippman’s ruthless enforced lawlessness, exercising power he does not legitimately possess, invisible lawless ruler ship powers, and willful disregard of a judge’s proper role, has undermined the orderly administration of the courts, the schools and now the banking systems.

25. I, Miriam Snyder state that the purpose of this affidavit is to document and stop the repetition of the above inflicted, lawless, fraudulent, unconstitutional, merit less, negligent, malicious, mischievous, unwarranted, ruthless, Jonathan Lippman documented, patterned and practiced lawless leadership patterns.

26. I, Miriam Snyder again state that I did not and do not condone, authorize, and or consent to any of the money returns of payments I paid from my Washington Mutual Bank account to the below creditors. I do not accept any penalties assessed for this inflicted, abusive, lawless, and malicious and done with intent to harm fraud.

27. I, Miriam Snyder further state that the purpose of this affidavit is to seek enforcement of Equal Protections secured in the Fourteenth Amendment under Title 42, U.S. Code Section 1983 and protections established in the Federal Constitution, specifically, the Bill of Rights, in particular, Amendments I, IV, V, VI, VII, IX and X,.

28. I, Miriam Snyder state that if Jonathan Lippman’s continued attempts to kill me via legal fraud and other mechanisms and or practices are not regulated, they will only get worse as Jonathan Lippman has a history of killing under disguise, has a history of abnormal obsessions with power, is trying to have me killed under legal fraud, inflicted financial obstruction in other financial accounts, and other means documented in other settings. Jonathan Lippman is a public safety threat and I ask that these matters be taken seriously as to prevent his continued disguised killing operations. I have been documenting them for years.

29. I, Miriam Snyder am asking each creditor to abide by the law and not entertain lawless practices that clearly demonstrate I did not do and that harm and or injure me financially and otherwise.

30. I, Miriam Snyder am sending a copy of these documents to the Federal Trade Commission so they can see how sick Judge Jonathan Lippman is. I have attached a copy of his law suit. He has masterminded and set up conditions to target people/me to destroy their/my credit by inflicting lawlessness to stop the documentation of on line payments so the target has no evidence.

31. I, Miriam Snyder attest to the fact that I have been told by Creditors that they can not take an on line payment due to the inflicted lawlessness on my account. I ask that the Federal trade Commission intervene and make each entity/creditor abide by the law and not enforce further lawless and or arbitrary practices that facilitate malicious and preventable financial demise and harm.

32. I, Miriam Snyder attest to the fact that the following documents substantiate Affiant’s goof faith timely payments:

A. Washington Mutual $265.00 bank receipt documenting the checking account number for cash money deposited into checking account number 3950594462 on 1/26/07.

B. Household Bank $50. 00 payment receipt for 1/29/07 C. Household Bank Activity Sheet documenting inflicted and Injurious banking, specifically this sheet documented the lawless and unauthorized payment returned and malicious additional charges.

D. Orchard Bank $50.00 payment receipt.

E. Romans Payment receipt for $70.00.

F. American Express Payment for 50.00 These payments were made in good faith and not returned by me the accountholder. Consequently, I do not accept any penalties and or assessments for such.

G. Letter dated February 2, 2007 to HSBC Card Service H. Letter dated February 2, to Kendal Linier of Washington Mutual Bank, I. Letter to Orchard bank not authorizing standard automatic payments and confirming non return of the $50.00 payment.

J. $270.00 Money Transfer into the Household account.

33. I, Miriam Snyder attest to the fact that, this affidavit is being sent to the following entities: 1.

Household Bank Orchard bank HSBC Card Services Fraud Division PO Box 60102 City of Industry, CA 91716-0102

2.

General Inquiries American Express P.O. Box 297812 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33329-7812

3.

Romans Credit Card World Financial Network National Bank PO 182121 Columbus, Ohio 43218-2121

4.

Federal Trade Commission, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20580

NOTARIZED COPY

3230 Cruger Avenue 6B Bronx, New York 10467 February 2, 2007 FAXED TO: 210 489 8705 206 461 2000 Kendall Lanier, Account Executive Washington Mutual Bank Executive Office Account Number: Miriam Snyder, 3950594462 Dear Mr. Lanier: I write this letter with respect to criminal mischief with the above new account. I ask that you forward the attachments accordingly.

In summary, as you know I opened this account on January 25, 2006. January 26, 2006, I deposited $250.00. I transferred over $30.00 to you when I opened the account. Consequently, I had $265.00 in my checking account and $15.00 placed in my savings.

On or about January 29, 2007 I paid several small bills with the money deposited in the new checking account. Each bank I paid a bill to from this account said that someone from Washington mutual called and took back my money. This criminal mischief is being reported to authorities. I urge you to read the attached evidence carefully, forward the evidence to the appropriate person that can launch an investigation and prosecute accordingly. Plead read the 7 pages attached carefully. Thank you.

Sincerely,

Miriam Snyder

3230 Cruger Avenue 6B Bronx, New York 10467 February 2, 2007 FAXED TO: 847 843 5669 HSBC CARD SERVICE PO BOX 81622 SALINAS, CALIFORNIA 93912

Re: Household Bank Credit Card # 5155970008258747, Internal Fraudulent Acts and missing money IN THE CREDIT CARD ACCOUNT Dear Bank Officer: I am writing you regarding missing monies in my credit account due to the attached documented internal mischief. I called the credit card division this morning and was told that possibly Washington Mutual took the money back. I called Washington Mutual Bank and was told that they did not take any money back and they have nothing to do with the attached household return payment.

Consequently, I am attaching my Washington Mutual January 26, 2007 deposit receipt demonstrating that the money was in my account when I paid the Household bill. On behalf of public safety and finances, please find out who lawlessly and maliciously took the payment out of my credit card account.

Foremost, attached you will find my Household Bank credit card statement for February 2, 2007. On this statement you will see that a $50.00 payment was made on January 29, 2007. The bill pay due date is January 30, 2007. I paid the bill earlier in the week. It posted before the due date as evidenced.

February 1, 2007 someone internally, returned my payment for unknown, appearing malicious/fraudulent reasons. Thereafter I was wrongfully billed for $ 15.00 for a returned payment fee. Thereafter, I was wrongfully billed me for a late charge assessment fee of $30.00. $95.00 was stolen from my account which created an obstruction with negative charges and a balance.

Please make sure the $95.00 is put back in my account and all late and or excess charges due to this internal fraud is removed. Please send me a letter explaining and correcting this fraud. Your response is needed within 10 days from the date of this letter or I will be forced to contact authorities. I urge you to get the name of the person who did this and prosecute them.

These mischievous practices do not belong in banking. I await an expeditious response.

Also, please note $270.00 was mistakenly transferred to this account on February 1, 2007 from one of my other accounts. See attached Household Bank Cash Transaction Posted, notice. See attached $270.00 transfer from one of my other accounts to Household Bank. However, I have a Household Bank notice of a cash transaction and my documentation of my money being transferred to Household

Bank, yet the $270.00 are not posted in the Household Bank credit card account. This resembles more fraud. Please have my account credited properly. See attached receipts and documents.

Please investigate these matters seriously and find out who is committing these internal crimes.

Please note also that I am advocating getting a criminal and deadly New York State Judge removed from office for this exact type of , abusive practices, using power he does not legitimately possess, and he is abusing his position to obstruct my finances and life. The sick Judge’s name is Jonathan Lippman.

He is lethal. I must contact authorities as these fraudulent acts are being inflicted repeatedly. Please do an investigation and correct the fraud. Please see attachments. Thank you.

Sincerely,

Miriam Snyder

Attached:

1. Household Bank Credit card statement February 2007, 2. Household Bank Credit card statement January 2007, 3. This is my money transfer documentation. I transferred money from another account into my Household account. The money is not showing as of today. Yet I have a cash Transaction Posted note.

4. This is the Household Bank Cash Transaction Posted notice. The cash has not been posted on the account despite the notice and my bank’s receipt.

Where is my money?

5. Washington Mutual 1/26/07 Deposit receipt. This is the account I paid the Household bill with.

6. Summary of the missing money. I should have approximately $325.00 in my account right now.

Xc: NYS Chief Judge Judith Kaye US NY Senator Schumer, Committee on the Judiciary Department of Justice

Search All Transactions

01/29/2007 01/29/200701/29/2007CASH $5.00 FEE FINANCE CHARGE

01/29/2007

PAYMENT - THANK YOU

-$50.00

01/29/2007

01/31/2007

HERRING NATIONAL BAN BRONX NY

01/31/2007

CASH FEE FINANCE CHARGE

$101.50

01/29/2007

02/01/2007RETURNED$50.00 PAYMENT

01/31/2007 02/01/2007

02/01/2007RETURNED$15.00 PAYMENT FEE

02/01/2007

LATE CHARGE ASSESSMENT

02/01/2007

$30.00

To dispute a transaction click on the TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION.

PENDING CHARGES 01/3pen NO $50.

1/20ding RM 00 07 AN RO BE RTS ON MIN IS 02/01/2007 pending USPS 3558250157$59.20 02/01/2007pendingFEDEX $1.00 KINKO'S #0265 02/01/2007pendingStaples, Inc.$22.96

3230 CRUGER AVENUE #6 B BRONX, NEW YORK 10467 MARCH 16, 2007 ROAMAN’S CREDIT CARD DIVISION FINANCIAL NETWORK NATIONAL BANK PO BOX 182273 COLUMBUS, OHIO 43218-2273 ACCOUNT NUMBER: 160 971 664

$5.07

TRUTH AFFIDAVIT REGARDING ROAMAN’S CREDIT CARD ACCOUNT # 160 971 664 1. I, MIRIAM SNYDER HAVE ATTACHED THE ROMAN’S FINAL BILL PAYMENT RECEIPT OF $70.00 PAID ON JANUARY 30, 2007.

2. I PAID THE FINAL BILL. 3. DUE TO FRAUD THE BILL PAYMENT HAS NOT BEEN ACCOUNTED. 4. I HAVE RECEIVED NO VERIFICATION FOR THE REASON OF NON ACCOUNT OF THE ATTACHED FINAL BILL PAYMENT. 5. I HAVE ATTACHED THE WASHINGTON MUTUAL ACCOUNT NUMBER AND MY PAID RECEIPT SHOWING THE MONEY WAS IN THE ACCOUNT WHEN I PAID. 6. I WILL NOT PARTAKE IN BANK FRAUD. 7. I HAVE ATTACHED MY FINAL PAYMENT BILL RECEIPT AND EXPECT ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SUCH. 8. I HAVE NEVER STOPPED PAYMENT. 9. I NEVER RETURNED PAYMENT AND WILL NOT SUFFER THE RAMIFICATIONS FOR THIS INFLICTED FRAUD. 10. THERE IS NO LAWFUL REASON FOR THE RETURNED PAYMENT. THE PAYMENT WAS RETURNED UNAUTHORIZED, UNCONSENTED, UNWARRANTEDLY AND MALICIOUSLY, 11. I AM REPORTING THE FRAUDLENT RETURN PAYMENT AND EXPECT THE FRAUD TO STOP AND BE CORRECTED. 12. I HAVE REVEIWED MY CREDIT REPORT AND ROAMANS HAS PLACED FRAUDULENT INFORMATION ON MY ACCOUNT INCONSISTENT WITH THE ATTACHED FINAL BILL PAYMENT RECEIPT OF $70.00 THAT I MADE. 13. THIS AFFIDAVIT IS A NOTICE OF FAULT AND OPPORTUNITY TO CURE. I URGE ROAMAN’S TO CORRECT THE RECORDS AND NOTE AND ACKNOWLEDGE THE ATTACHED AUTHORIZED $70.00 FINAL PAYMENT RECEIPT. 14. I MIRIAM SNYDER DID NOT AUTHORIZE, DID NOT CONSENT, AND DID NOT RETURN PAYMENT.

15. THE RETURNED PAYMENT IS A FRAUD THAT I HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH. I PAID THE BILL AND URGE YOU TO GET YOUR MONEY AND PROSECUTE WHOEVER COMMITTED THE FRAUD. 16. I URGE YOU TO DISCONTINUE LYING ON MY NAME IN CREDIT REPORTS. 17. FINALLY AND FOR THE RECORD, I PAID THE FINAL BILL OF $70.00 ON JANUARY 30, 2007 AS INDICATED ON THE ATTACHED ROAMANS RECEIPT. I DID NOT RETURN PAYMENT. I DID NOT AUTHORIZE, WARRANT, OR CONSENT TO ANY RETURN PAYMENT. I HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH THE NON VERIFIED AND UNAUTHORIZED RETURN PAYMENT. I HAVE ATTACHED VERIFICATION AND A RECEIPT OF THE MONEY IN THE ACCOUNT TO PAY THE FINAL BILL. 18. I AM URGING ROAMAN’S TO STOP PARTAKING IN FRAUD AND UTILIZATION OF SUCH TO MY FINANCIAL DETRIMENT AND YOUR FINANCIAL LIABILITY TO ME. CORRECT THE FRAUD AND CLEAR MY NAME. 19. I AVE ATTACHED THE FOLLOWING: A. ROAMANS $70.00 FINAL PAYMENT PAID RECEIPT. B. WASHINGTON MUTUAL TELLER DAVID CABRERA BUSINESS CARD. MR. CABRERA GAVE ME THE ATTACHED RECEIPT

3230 CRUGER AVENUE #6 B BRONX, NEW YORK 10467 MARCH 16, 2007 ORCHARD BANK HOUSEHOLD BANK HSBC CARD SERVICE PO BOX 81622 SALINAS, CALIFORNIA 93912 SENT CERTIFIED RETURN RECEIPT 70062150000415035407

NOTICE OF FAULT WITH OPPORTUNITY TO CURE

FOURTH TRUTH AFFIDAVIT DISPUTING THE INFLICTED FRAUD THAT COULD HAVE BEEN PREVENTED BY VERIFYING HOUSEHOLD BANK AND ORCHARD BANK UNAUTHORIZED AND UNWARRANTED RETURNED PAYMENT FRAUD 20. I, MIRIAM SNYDER HAVE ATTACHED THE ORCHARD BANK BILL PAYMENT RECEIPT OF $50.00 PAID ON JANUARY 29TH, 2007.

21. I PAID THE ATTACHED BILL AND MY ACCOUNT HAS NOT BEEN CREDITED. FURTHERMORE, I WAS PENALIZED AN ADDITIONAL LAWLESS $30.00 FOR PAYING THE BILL ON TIME AS REQUIRED. THIS IS INTERNAL BANK INFLICTED LEGAL RETARDATION AND FRAUD. 22. DUE TO THE USURPED PRIORITIZATION OF FRAUD, THE BILL PAYMENT HAS NOT BEEN ACCOUNTED, DESPITE THE PAYMENT BEING MADE. 23. I HAVE RECEIVED NO VERIFICATION FOR THE REASON OF NON ACCOUNT OF THE ATTACHED BILL PAYMENT. 24. I HAVE ATTACHED THE WASHINGTON MUTUAL ACCOUNT NUMBER AND MY PAID RECEIPT SHOWING THE MONEY WAS IN THE ACCOUNT WHEN I PAID. 25. I WILL NOT PARTAKE IN BANK MALICE. 26. I HAVE ATTACHED THE ORCHARD BANK PAYMENT BILL RECEIPT AGAIN AND EXPECT ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SUCH ON MY ACCOUNT. 27. I HAVE NEVER STOPPED ANY PAYMENT. 28. I NEVER RETURNED PAYMENT AND WILL NOT SUFFER THE RAMIFICATIONS FOR THIS INFLICTED INTERNAL BANK FRAUD. 29. THERE IS NO LAWFUL REASON FOR THE RETURNED PAYMENT. THE PAYMENT WAS RETURNED UNAUTHORIZED, UNCONSENTED, UNWARRANTEDLY AND MALICIOUSLY. 30. THE PUBLIC NEEDS TO KNOW WHY ORCAHRD BANK RETURNED A PAYMENT THE CUSTOMER, I, MIRIAM SNYDER MADE.

31. I AM REPORTING THE FRAUDLENT UNWARRANTED AND UNVERIFIED RETURN PAYMENT AND EXPECT THE FRAUD TO STOP AND BE CORRECTED. 32. THIS AFFIDAVIT IS A NOTICE OF FAULT AND OPPORTUNITY TO CURE, AS WELL AS THE FIFTH AFFIDAVIT AND NOTICE OF DISPUTE PURSUANT TO THE FAIR DEBT COLLECTIONS ACT. 33. I URGE ORCHARD BANK TO CORRECT THE RECORDS AND NOTE AND ACKNOWLEDGE THE ATTACHED AUTHORIZED $50.00 PAYMENT RECEIPT TO THE ACCOUNT. 34. I MIRIAM SNYDER DID NOT AUTHORIZE, DID NOT CONSENT, AND DID NOT RETURN PAYMENT. 35. THE RETURNED PAYMENT IS A FRAUD THAT I HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH. I PAID THE BILL AND URGE YOU TO GET YOUR MONEY AND PROSECUTE WHOEVER COMMITTED THE FRAUD. 36. I URGE YOU TO DISCONTINUE LYING ON MY NAME.

37. FINALLY AND FOR THE RECORD, I PAID THE BILL OF $50.00 ON JANUARY 29, 2007 AS INDICATED ON THE ATTACHED ORCHARD BANK RECEIPT. I DID NOT RETURN PAYMENT. I DID NOT AUTHORIZE, WARRANT, OR CONSENT TO ANY RETURN PAYMENT. 38. I HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH THE NON VERIFIED AND UNAUTHORIZED RETURN PAYMENT. I HAVE ATTACHED VERIFICATION AND A RECEIPT OF THE MONEY IN THE ACCOUNT USED TO PAY THE BILL. 39. I AM URGING ORCHARD BANK TO STOP PARTAKING IN FRAUD AND UTILIZATION OF SUCH TO MY FINANCIAL DETRIMENT AND YOUR FINANCIAL LIABILITY TO ME. CORRECT THE FRAUD AND CLEAR MY NAME. 40. I AVE ATTACHED THE FOLLOWING: A. ORCHARD BANK $50.00 PAYMENT PAID RECEIPT DATED JANUARY 29, 2007 AND NOT NOTED ON MY ACCOUNT FOR LAWLESS, MALICIOUS AND NON VERIFIABLE REASONS. B. WASHINGTON MUTUAL TELLER DAVID CABRERA BUSINESS CARD. MR. CABRERA GAVE ME THE ATTACHED RECEIPT FOR MY $265.00 DEPOSITED IN THE WASHINGTON MUTUAL CHECKING ACCOUNT HE WROTE ON THE ATTACHED PIECE OF PAPER. THE $265.00 WAS DEPOSITED ON JANUARY 26, 2007 AND A PAYMENT WAS SCHEDULED TO BE WITHDRAWN ON JANUARY 29, 2007 FOR $50.00 TO THE ORCHARD BANK ACCOUNT AS INDICATED ON THE RECEIPT. THE

CHECKING ACOUNT NUMBERS ARE CORRECT AND WERE THE NUMBERS RENDERED FOR THE ABOVE MENTIONED PAYMENT. 17. IF A VERIFIED RESPONSE IS NOT RECEIVED IN 10 DAYS CORRECTING THE INFLICTED FRAUD TO THE DETRIMENT OF MY NAME, A CRIMINAL COMPLAINT, AS WELL AS A CIVIL COMPLAINT, AGAINST ORCHARD BANK WILL BE FILED FOR HARRASSMENT, BANK FRAUD AND INFLICTED UNWARRANTED EMOTIONAL DISTRESS. THIS MATTER SHOULD HAVE BEEN RESOLVED. MY MONEY PAID, MY RECEIPT AND THE LAW WILL BE RESPECTED BY ANY MEANS NECESSARY. 18. I URGE ORCHARD BANK AND OR LAW DEPARTMENT TO NOT PARTAKE IN A WELL DOCUMENTED USURPATION LED CRIMINAL AND DEADLY INFLICTED CONSPIRACY AGAINST RIGHTS THAT IS AND WILL BE PUBLICIZED ACROSS THE NATION UNTIL IT IS STOPPED. SEE ATTACHED PAYMENT RECEIPT NOT ACKNOWLEDGED IN MY ACCOUNT AND LAWLESS PENALIZATIONS.

19. ORCAHRD BANK IS OPERATING TO RETARD THE LAWS OF THE COUNTRY. SEE ATTACHED PAYMENT RECEIPT NOT NOTED IN MY ACCOUNT. 20. I AM IN RECEIPT OF A HOUSHOLD LAWLESS BILL. PLEASE NOTE THE RECORD I DISPUTE EACH FRAUDLENT NON VERIFIED BILL PURSUANT TO THE FAIR DEBT COLLECTIONS ACT. 21. I DISPUTE THE ORCHARD BANK NON VERIFIED MALICIOUS RETURN PAYMENT. 22. I DISPUTE HOUSEHOLD BANK NON VERIFIED FRAUDLENT BILL. 24. PLEASE VERIFY YOUR CONVOLUTED ATTACHED LETTER STATING YOU MISTAKENLY RETURNED PAYMENT. CORRECT YOUR ERRORS AND NOTE THE DISPUTES PURUANT TO THE ABOVE MENTIONED LAW. 25. I LOOK FORWARD TO VERIFCATION OF YOUR LAWLESS ACTS. SEE ATTACHED PAYMENT RECEIPTS, COMPARE AND CONTRAST THE INTERNAL BANK FRAUD PENALIZING ME FOR TIMELY PAYMENT VIA RETURNING PAYMENT UNWARRANTEDLY, UNAUTHORIZED, UNCONSENTED, AND MALICIOUSLY. THEREAFTER BILLING ME FOR THE BANK’S INTERNAL MALICIOUS FRAUD. 26. WE WILL BE ON TV AND I WILL SEE THE PERSON IN JAIL THAT IMPLEMENTED THIS VINDICTIVE, CONSPIRATORIAL, MALICIOUS RETARDATION OF LAW DEFINED AS FICTIONAL ADMINISTRATION OF FRAUD, ALL TO DISGUISE THE FINANCIAL AND EMOTIONAL KILLING OF A FELLOW AMERICAN UNDER THE DISGUISE OF LAWLESSLY USURPED POWER AND REVENGE. 27. I URGE HSBC TO CORRECT THE ERRORS, NOTE THE DISPUTE, NOTE THE OPPORTUNITY TO CURE AND OBEY THE LAWS OF THIS COUNTRY AS I WILL NOT

BE KILLED UNDER THE DISGUISE OF INFLICTED LAWLESSNESS AND REPEATED DOCUMENT USURPED FRAUD. 28. I PAY ALL LAWFUL DEBTS I OWE. I DO NOT PAY DEBTS I DO NOT OWE. I DO NOT ENTERTAIN MALICE AND INFLICTED VINDICTIVE FRAUD. 29. I URGE HSBC BANK TO DEJOIN OUT OF THIS WELL DOCUMENTED AND DEADLY CONSPIACY AGAINST RIGHTS AS THE MATTER WILL REACH TELEVISION BY ANY MEANS NECESSARY AS THE ABOVE AND ATTACHED INFLICTED ORCAHRD BANK MALICE SHOULD NOT HAVE HAPPENED AND WILL NOT CONTINUE.

Sent To: OrchardBank.61186317.547170.111527348@ebusiness.orchardbank.com Subject: Re: Online Bill Pay Confirmation February 3, 2007 Dear Orchard Bank Representative: This is Miriam Snyder. Thank you for the $50.00 pay confirmation receipt noted attached. Please note I have never authorized or consented to the standard automatic payment system, as stated in the below email.. I made a one time payment for fifty dollars on January 29, 2007.

Please note that my account is being maliciously tampered with. I do not know who authorized any thing other than the 50.00 payment. I do not consent or authorize automatic payments. I will make monthly payments accordingly.

Please note again, the below was a one time payment.

Please note many of my accounts are being inflicted with legal fraud. An invisible force is trying to take rulership over my account to harm me. After paying several monthly payments, the money is being returned without my consent and or authorization. This has happened to two other accounts and I am reporting the crimes.

I have not had time to check this account, but I want you to know that I do not consent to automatic payments as implied in the below Orchard Bank email.

If the below payment was returned, please note th $50.00 payment was returned without my consent or authority. I will check the account later. If any fees were assessed due to this legal fraud, please remove them and note that I paid the $ 50.00 payment as a one time payment in good faith. I never returned the 50.00 payment.

To this end, please note I have not returned the below payment, nor consented to the return of the below payment.

There is a sick NYS Chief administrative Injustice named Jonathan Lippman using legal fraud, deception, and financial hoaxes, in his attempt to have me killed under disguise. He is trying to set me up because I have reported his documented lawless and lethal practices. I have contacted authorities and will continue to do such until he is restrained and removed. These fraudulent practices are inflicted and must be stopped.

Inflicted fraud and lawlessness is Jonathan Lippman's method of operation. This is all he knows.

I apologize for his lawless usurpation and obstruction of the banking process to get to me, harm and injure my finances. I will forward documentation of such to this office.

Sincerely,

Miriam Snyder

Subject: Online Bill Pay Confirmation Date: 1/27/2007 10:20:16 A.M. Eastern Standard Time From: OrchardBank@ebusiness.orchardbank.com Reply To: OrchardBank.61186317.547170.111527348@ebusiness.orchardbank.com To: MIRISNI@AOL.COM

Sent from the Internet (Details)

Dear Miriam Snyder, Your Standard Payment request of $50.00 with a payment confirmation number of 66ZJPT6R6S is scheduled to post to your account on 01/29/2007.

If you would like to see your posted payment online, please log on to the site www.orchardbank.com the day after your requested post date.

For questions, please login to Online Account Access

3230 Cruger Avenue #6B

Bronx, New York 10467 February 6, 2007 Faxed To: 1800 542 0999 American Express General Inquiries PO Box 297812 Ft Lauderdale, Florida 33329-7812 Re: Fifty Dollar Missing Payment, Account Number 37170790237XXX Attached Certified Receipt for My Affidavit Documenting the Inflicted Fraud Dear Representative at the above fax: This is Miriam Snyder. Thank you for forwarding this fax number to me and trying to resolve the inflicted unauthorized usurpation this credit card is experiencing. I spoke to a young lady this morning regarding my account. I am faxing you the Washington Mutual Information given to me in exchange for my cash money placed in the account for on line bill pay.

You will find the bank agreement that was given to me, the teller’s business card I requested, the routing number the teller gave me, the checking number the teller gave me, and my receipt for depositing $250.00 to make on line payments.

My bills were paid appropriately by me. Also, I have included another example of legal fraud suplementation/documentation, to show that the account was and is fine. In this attached document, Household Bank statement, you will see that my bill was paid from the below Miriam Snyder Washington Mutual checking account, as noted in the thank you for payment. Thereafter, a usurping force, lawlessly went into my account and rescinded my money, maliciously causing damages, and exemplifying pure legal fraud.

Some malicious internal force is stopping my money from getting to this account as I authorized. Some type of lawless usurpation is going on. I can tell you I put my money in the bank as exemplified on the receipt and you should have been paid. See the four attachments.

Again, the account is fine. There is some Washington Mutual internal malice going on. I pray that it will be corrected immediately. Also, please note the below certified mail receipt to American Express. I sent a Truth Affidavit outlining the inflicted Unauthorized Usurpation and Washington Mutual legal fraud. Again, thank you for trying to clarify this inflicted havoc. Please get the fifty dollar payment in my account I authorized or have them contact you and I explaining why not? Please see the above mentioned attachments. Thank you.

Sincerely, Miriam Snyder

PUBLIC NOTICE OF LAWLESSLY USURPED AND INFLICTED BANK OF NEW YORK

FRAUD. SEE BELOW AFFIDAVIT SENT U.S. CERTIFIED MAIL 3230 Cruger Avenue 6B Bronx, New York 10467 February 22, 2007 Bank of New York 515 South Columbus Avenue Mount Vernon, New York 10550 RE: checking account number 6704299530, TRUTH AFFIDAVIT NOTICE OF INFLICTED LAWLESS PATTERNED AND PRACTICED USURPATIONS AND NOTICE OF OPPOSITION OF FRAUDLENT CHARGES AND PENALTIES ON THE ACCOUNT Dear BANK OF NEW YORK LAW DEPARTMENT:

1. I , Miriam Snyder, write this affidavit as established pursuant to the Constitution for these united States of America, and any replicas thereof, in particular, the Bill of Rights, and specifically, the First, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Seventh, Ninth and Tenth Amendments 2. I, Mriam Snyder write this affidavit to document the attached PATTERNED AND PRACTICED usurped and inflicted fraud in the above mentioned bank account which resulted in a lawless disappearance of my money.

3. I do not owe Bank of New York $68.02 as I have not authorized, consented nor used any of my money in this account that effectuated the attached debt.

4. I am owed the money in this account prior to the lawless usurpation and inflicted fraud.

5. The inflicted fraud is a pattern and practice that must be regulated. See attachments.

6. A psychotic, power crazed, lawless character named Jonathan Lippman is trespassing NYS courts as a judge and is abusing every aspect of government and business to disguise his patterned and practiced disguised killings. At present, he has usurped lawless power in the banking systems to target me. He has usurped power to steal money from other accounts for no other reason but to harm me, he has lawlessly usurped power to execute entitled income and money due me for no other reason but to do what he does best, kill under multiple disguises. See the attached documentation. It is the disguise that fascinates him. Consequently, he has lawlessly usurped power in several of my accounts, jobs, income, housing, targeted family members, and a host of crimes under his patterned and practiced CAN YOU PROVE IT WHILE I KILL OPERATIONS. Please see attached documentation. I have researched, studied and am tired of the lawless ramifications of Jonathan Lippmman’s patterned and practiced usurpations.

6. The deadly usurpation specialist trespassing as a judge name is Jonathan Lippman. He is a disguised expert killer, usurpation specialist and is lawlessly trespassing NY courts as a Judge.

See attachments. He specializes in lawless and deadly usurpations.

7. Consequently, the attached fraud may look like small money disappearance but it is part of a major plan to continue to kill under disguise. The inflicted financial demise serves no other purpose but to subterfuge a documented patterned and practiced JONATHAN LIPPMAN DISGUISED KILLING OPERATION. See his attached usurpations that have left millions dead under disguise and under one of his legal fiction administrations, listed under his name.

8. In retaliation for documenting his ruthless, abusive, lawless usurpations, he has advanced his Can You Prove It While I kill operations, via deadly usurpations for the last 12 years, and now I am faced with escalated and expanded deadly Jonathan Lippman patterned usurpations, because the crimes have not been stopped as required under the Constitution.

9. Since Constitutional protections embedded in equal protection of the law, have been disregarded, I must defend my self as my right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness has been destroyed via Jonathan Lippman’s patterned and practiced deadly usurpations.

10. Jonathan Lippman is intrigued with killing under disguise; under a phenomenon called CAN YOU PROVE IT WHILE I KILL! Since documenting his crimes, his criminal defrauds against America, money and people, his patterned lawless usurpations have been used to disguise the killing of me via malicious lawless income executions, economic demise, internally inflicted disappearance of money, targeting of my family, terrorization of all financial accounts, terrorization of my home, dereliction of duty by officials and a host of other ungodly, ruthless, crimes. I have filed several complaints with valid and documented evidence.

See attachments. I will continue documenting and filing complaints until this trespasser is arrested and I or my family will not be killed under disguise, because of a Jonathan Lippman false phenomenon of above the law and or supremacy fallacy.

11. The law is simply not being enforced. Consequently, I must appeal and expose his documented crimes to each of his enjoinments. See attached. Until he is arrested, documentation must continue as the inflicted crimes usually enjoin merchants for no other reason but to subterfuge his lawless usurpations and to inflict pure havoc and fraud that facilitates a disguised killing. See the attached usurped bank account documentation that was inflicted for no other purpose but to harm me financially.

12. To this end, I urge you to review and correct my account as I dispute the stealing of my money under documented patterned and practiced malice, fraud lawless usurpations defined as fictional administration.

13. I have never had problems with this bank and resent the disappearance of monies out of my account and the malicious penalties due to the fraudulent disappearance. This is done to lawlessly and maliciously demise my credit, exploit my name, and faciliatate subterfuging a patterned and practiced lawless usurpation. The stealing of money as well as the inflicted fraud usurpation, is part of Jonathan Lippman’s patterned and practiced disguised killing operation.

14. Please correct my account and respond by an affidavit as to where and what happened to my money.

15. Please forward a bank affidavit of truth within 10 days of this letter explaining who authorized dispensing the money in this account that caused the negative balance.

16. It is my sworn testimony that I have not withdrawn any money on this account that justifies the attached malicious billing, penalties, and or fees.

17. Please note lawless usurpations are impeachable crimes, when they are overlooked they simply multiply. See the attached Jonathan Lippman documented lawless usurpation lawsuit titled: 1 NO 1 LEONARD J. LEVENSON, ET AL., RESPONDENTS, V. JONATHAN LIPPMAN ETAL. APELLANTS, 2005 NY INT.9 18. Crime is contagious and when it is committed by a lawless, trespasser holding a leadership position, the above fraud is what happens, particularly, when criminal trespassers are not removed.

19. There is no other reason why my credit has been consistently and maliciously inflicted with lawless usurpations embedded in Jonathan Lippman’s deadly Can You Prove It while I Kill Usurpations. On behalf of humankind, decency and a fellow American, please correct the bank records and note this affidavit of truth.

20. Please correct the account and forward a verified explanation as to the disappearance of my money from the Bank of New York account, as I have not authorized any withdrawals with respect to the attached deficit. This fraud must be stopped. Please read the attachments carefully.

21. It is my sworn testimony, that the little bit of money placed in this account was left alone to monitor Jonathan Lippman patterned inflicted bank fraud, lawless usurpations and unreasonable transacting, all to harm me as his power crazed disguised revenge. Jonathan Lippman’s documented lawless usurpations are deadly, obstruct law, order and kill under disguise. See the attachments.

22. Jonathan Lippman is trespassing NY Courts as a judge and his record shows that he is reluctant to acknowledge the Constitutional authority to which he was supposed to swear an oath; who declines to perform accordingly; who persists in subjugating Constitutional Law via implementing fictional rulings and lawless usurpations which overtly contradict the Constitution and is a threat to America as his documented attached lawless criminal actions undermine the integrity of banking, the judiciary and all of government. He has no regard for law, order or decency. He is a disguised killer seeking revenge via inflicting deadly, lethal, inhumane usurpations in my accounts, jobs, family, friends, housing, and everything imaginable all to disguise one of his masterminded killing operations, as he has many.

22. The Constitution is the Supreme Law of this Land, and ALL public officers, judges and politicians have sworn oaths, and are bound thereby, to support and uphold the Constitution. Those public officers who deny the Constitution commit insurrection and sedition to it and, further, commit treason against the Citizens. It is the responsibility of the American People to oppose all enemies, foreign and domestic. Any public officer who has taken an oath to the Constitution and then denies the Constitution, as exemplified in the attached law suit against Jonathan Lippman, its powers and Rights guaranteed therein, is a domestic enemy and must be exposed as such.

23. Jonathan Lippman patterned and practiced usurpations go back to enjoining Pay Pal, and other banks in his fraud against me. It is time the truth be known. I have not consented to any money from being withdrawn from this account. Usurpation forces were used and usurpation documentation is being used to expose such via this affidavit. I use my credit card with my Pay Pal account and usurpation forces will not be used to disseminate my money I put in this account to monitor Jonathan Lippman inflicted, lawless usurpations.

24. Again, I did not authorize any withdrawals from this account that incurred the attached inflicted penalties. Please remove the fraud and document my complaint stating that these crimes are being inflicted under the direct pattern and practice of Jonathan Lippman documented deadly, criminal usurpations via his trespassing as a NYS judge. Please reference his above cited and attached law suit and the administration to dictate what accounts will be used. This is my right and authority.

Again, I never authorized a withdrawal of money from this account that effectuated the attached penalties. Please correct this inflicted fraud.

3230 Cruger Avenue #6B Bronx, New York 10467 February 1, 2007 SENT CERTIFIED RETURN RECEIPT American Federation of Teachers Members of The Board 555 New Jersey Ave. N.W. Washington, Dc 20001 Anne.D'Orazio@sunywcc.edu WCC Teacher Union President Westchester Community College 75 Grasslands Road Valhalla, New York 10595 Honorable US Senator Schumer, U.S. Committee on the Judiciary 757 Third Avenue New York, New York 10017 Honorable John Conyers, Jr, U.S. Committee on the Judiciary 2426 Rayburn Building Washington, DC 20515 (202) 225-5126 Honorable Chief Judge Judith Kaye 230 Park Avenue, Suite 826 New York City, New York 10169-0007 Andrew Cuomo, Attorney General

Public Integrity Unit 120 Broadway New York, New York, 10271 Rose Gill Hearn, Commissioner City of New York Department of Investigation 80 Maiden Lane New York, New York 10038 Re: JONATHAN LIPPMAN ENJOINMENT OF WESTCHESTER COMMUNITY COLLEGE IN HIS DOCUMENTED, INFLICTED, MALICIOUS, LAWLESS, CONTINUED, UNRESTRAINED, GOVERNMENT CORRUPTION VIA DOCUMENTED PATTERENED AND PRACTICED UNAUTHORIZED USURPATION OF POWER, FRAUD, DECEPTION, GRAVE MISUSE OF ONE’S OFFICIAL POSITION, PATTERNED UNCONSTITUTIONAL PRACTICES, AND CORRUPTION IMPLEMENTATION. PLEASE SEE ATTACHED JONATHAN LIPPMAN PATTERENED FRAUD DISGUISED AS WESTCHESTER COMMUNITY COLLEGE NEWLY CREATED FRAUDULENT, DECEPTIVE, MONEY MONOPOLY/MANIPULATION, TRICKERY BASED 2006 WAGE AND TAX STATEMENT IN CONTRAVENTION TO THE ATTACHED OVER 10 PERCENT WCC 2006 TAX DEDUCTION CHECK STUBS. DOCUMENTATION OF ANOTHER JONATHAN LIPPMAN PATTERENED, CORRUPTED, UNCONSTITUTIONAL, INFLICTED ARBITRARY DEPRIVATION OF PROPERTY IN VIOLATION TO TITLE 42 U.S CODE SECTION 1983. JONATHAN LIPPMAN’S CONTINUED LAWLESS LEADERSHIP, ENJOINMENTS, AND CORRUPTION IS UNDERMINING THE CONFIDENCE OF PUBLIC EDUCATION ADMINISTRATION, NEW YORK STATE GOVERNMENT AND THE COURTS. SEE ATTACHED EVIDENCE OF JONATHAN LIPPMAN DOCUMENTED UNAUTHORIZED USURPATION, CORRUPTION AND DISGUISED KILLING PRACTICES AND PATTERNS. See the attached lawsuit filed against him documenting his enforced lawless leadership, power crazed megalomaniac acts, hate crime enforcement, and impeachable/removable behaviors each undermining public confidence, public integrity, and demising New York State Government, public education, rights of teachers and others, and obstructing the orderly administration of New York State Government Dear Ms. D’Orazio and Public Officials: I am writing this letter regarding the above and attached inflicted fraud and corruption at Westchester Community College exemplifying documented patterns and practices of lawless Jonathan Lippman, NYS Chief Administrative Injustice, Deadly Pathogen Administrator and Disguised Killer.

See attachments.

Please note countless power crazed men in history have aspired to rule the world through corruption and fraud. One of these great megalomaniacs is Jonathan Lippman. He misuses his judicial position to establish unconstitutional practices, fraud, corruption and hate crime enforcement as a means of governmental operation. Unfortunately, since he has not been restrained, Westchester Community College has been enjoined in his patterned corrupted activities. Jonathan Lippman’s organized crime based unconstitutional practices maliciously and psychotically fester, rule, exterminate, execute and kill under disguise.

Jonathan Lippman’s lawless leadership is deadly and well documented in history and court files. He is using his judicial position to turn New York State into the wild, wild, west, with no regard for law and or order. See the attachments and see him in full color in the following case: 1 NO. 1: LEONARD J. LEVENSON, ET AL. V. JONATHAN LIPPMAN,&C., ET AL. This is attached as Exhibit 1.

This case exemplifies the ramifications of Jonathan Lippman’s lawless leadership, in subverting the Constitution, invading the powers of the legislature, exercise of power that he does not legitimately possess, lawless, godless, and malicious unauthorized usurpation of power. The domino effect of lawless leadership is listed below and in the attached evidence.

He is using NYS government for personal purposes, a vendetta, against me because God rescued me from one of his killer operations. Jonathan Lippman wants me dead under disguise, but God wants me alive! Consequently, Jonathan Lippman has turned NYS government and all of my jobs up side down, via retarding law and order to target me. See attached evidence.

Jonathan Lippman’s documented lawless acts go beyond mere mistakes of judgment, rather they involve a willful disregard and abuse of a judge’s proper role and authority as he obstructs government administration and exercises power he does not legitimately posses. See his attached lawsuit noted above and the attached government fraud documents and implementation practices, exemplifying the ramifications of lawless leadership and unauthorized usurpation power.

Jonathan Lippman has a documented usurpation of unauthorized power problem and has inflicted corruption in every aspect of government. He has used his lawless usurpation of power in every job I have had to target me for God rescuing me from one of his documented disguised killer programs and for my testimony under oath of such.

Consequently, since lawless leadership breeds enforced and inflicted lawlessness and exploitation, attached you will find his most recent fraud enjoinments. This document is attached as Exhibit ________. This is a fraudulent Westchester Community College W-2 form that maliciously and arbitrarily deprive me of property invested in money due me for services rendered.

This fraud document has no meaning, no explanation, uses numbers that make no sense, but effectively and arbitrarily deprive me of my property, entitled earned money for my labor. This is what Jonathan Lippman does best. Usurps power to inflict corruption that simply makes no sense. Jonathan Lippman used his usurpation phenomenon powers and created this fraudulent W-2 as well as arranged another arbitrary deprivation of property via WCC lawless extermination of employment.

The money number monopolies/distributions make no sense, resemble malicious fraud, are not explained and are not verifiable. It appears as the Federal Income withheld section is missing a digit, while over ten percent of my labor was taken for tax deductions. See Exhibit ______, check stubs documenting over $3600.00 taken out of my check under the disguise of tax deductions, yet not applied to the federal income tax on the attached fraudulent WCC W-2 form.

This internally inflicted phenomena, fraud, and exploitation has caused much conspiratorial unwarranted havoc, lawless financial threats, and must be explained and verified.

With respect to the fraud based W-2 form , the money formula, the distribution of the money numbers, and the numbers themselves, appear to have erupted out of thin air, are mysterious, exemplify a phenomenon, are trickery based, epitomize FRAUD in the deliberate, willful, deceitful, schemed, unexplained, and misrepresented dissemination of monies extorted. This undermines public confidence.

To this end, I am asking the Weschester Teacher Union president, Ms. D’Orazio to provide a written explanation of the money formula used that left the missing numbers on the federal income section, despite the fact that over $ 3,600 was lawlessly disseminated and taken in a slavery type peonage manner that has not been explained. These unconstitutional acts must be corrected and explained as they breed further fraud, manipulation and unconstitutional practices. The ramifications of inflicted fraud, deception, money monopoly, and non existent explanations of such, undermines public policy, undermines public confidence/integrity and demises public protection walls secured by

the Constitution. Only a megamaniac could mastermind and implement this unwarranted, exploitative fraud.

I have attached another example of malicious, Jonathan Lippman megalomaniac fraud. See the attached inflicted NYS Department of Labor, Unemployment Insurance Monetary Benefit Determination notice with Weschester Community College erroneous employment earnings documentation. This document lists zero dollars for my labor at Weschester Community College from January 2006 to October 2006, despite the fact that I worked hard, above the call of duty as documented, and despite the fact that this is in contradiction to the attached January 2006 to October 2006 check stubs. I have attached The Monetary Notice Determination Notice with the erroneous 2005 and 2006 zero wages from Westchester Community College as Exhibit _________. I have attached my check stubs for 2006 as Exhibit _______. These check stubs exemplify that the information on the above Monetary Determination Notice is fraudulent/erroneous. Based on these megamaniac fraudulent/erroneous listings, entitled benefits were minimized and delayed.

Further, megalomaniac fraud and phenomena, is identified in the attached newly errupted, out of thin air, uncashed check and stub miraculously appearing in my home yesterday. For the record, when I get paid, I cash my money. I work part time and cash all monies due me in a timely fashion.

Miraculously the attached Weschester Community College/WCC check dated 11/16/2006, check number 0000638308 errupted out of thin air in my home yesterday. I have attached this possible check fraud, as Exhibit ________.

Based on several years of surviving Jonathan Lippman’s patterned and practiced documented fraud, disguised killer operations, usurpation of unauthorized power, deadly trickery, deception, and enforced lawlessness, I must request that Ms. D’ Orazio, WCC Union President, let me know if the attached WCC check dated 11/16/06 is legitimate. One of Jonathan Lippman’s megalomaniac stratagems is to inflict multiple fraud and lawlessness on his target, at one time. These lawless stratagems serve multiple purposes.

First, they further exploit his target, create additional fraud, shift wrongdoing from the fraudulent check writer to the target if the check is cashed, and simply criminally and megalomaniacly demise justice. Jonathan Lippman’s lawless leadership distorts truth, prioritizes fraud, usurps unauthorized power, enforce corruption and unconstitutional practices as a means of operation, retard law and order, invade prerogatives of the legislature, exercise and enforce powers one does not legitimately possess. He enforces these lawless acts in a most unusual, power crazed, phenomenon, psychotic and abusive manner, requiring documentation.

Another example of Jonathan Lippman’s orchestrated megalomaniac fraud is the attached American Federation of Jonathan Lippman Phenomenon check for his usurped disguised killing practices enforced in the Hempstead Public Schools. This deceptive insurer check is attached as Exhibit _____. I have attached a summary of Jonathan Lippman crimes that required the settlement.

This check states that it comes from the Interstate Insurance Group, if they exist, and the entity insured is a phenomenon. See attached.

The deception, fraud, and scheme are clearly identified in the unknown name of the insurer.

The check states insured by the American FederatI11 0. What’s this? This fraud resembles the same type of fraud in the W-2 form attached.. Yet this check with an unknown, deceptive, fraud based, non existent insurer, cashed, because under the lawless leadership of Jonathan Lippman fraud, deception, lack of clarity, ungodliness, schemes, misrepresentation, and unorganized practices are prioritized and used in exchange for money. Under the lawless leadership of Jonathan Lippman invisible lawless forces and entities rule and fester. See the attached invisible insurer check, with check cashing powers. This is attached as Exhibit 5.

The Hempstead Teachers Association facilitated negotiations for the above money due to Jonathan Lippman’s similar crimes that have been and are being repeated in the Weschester Community College ESL Department. Jonathan Lippman’s unauthorized usurpation of power and enforced unconstitutional practices still continue despite every human effort to end them.

Jonathan Lippman’s enforced lawlessness, unconstitutional practices, hate crime enforcement practices, and documented lawless usurpation powers are being repeated at the expense of public education and students again, despite repeated attempts to regulate such unconstitutional replications.

Judicial restraint is needed over Jonathan Lippman’s documented unconstitutional, tyrannical, impeachable and removable practices previously demising the court system and now demising public education administration.

Lawless leadership breeds lawlessness. See his attached documented power crazed law suit inflicting long range, masterminded, malicious, above and beyond racist, megalomaniac, power crazed corruption. See the attached law suit: 1 No. 1 Leonard J. Levenson, et al.,Respondents, v. Jonathan Lippman, &c., et al., Appellants. 2005 NY Int. 9 February 15, 2005. In this case the court system safeguarded their territory from Jonathan Lippman’s megalomaniac corruption. To the above Public Education Officials, who is going to safe guard teachers and students from Jonathan Lippman’s documented megalomaniac, power crazed, unconstitutional, deceptive, deadly, malicious, lawless leadership and acts in education institutions?

Additional Jonathan Lippman megamaniac social phenomenon corruption implementation, unconstitutional practices, court administration usurpation of unauthorized power in judge picking, is resembled in the attached Monroe v. Weschester Community College judicial selection. See Exhibit ______, an attached article titled: ESL Adjuncts Abused At Westchester Community College. Under Jonathan Lippman’s lawless leadership, court administration is being used to pick select judges, to repeatedly deny Teachers and students Constitutional protections embedded in Equal Treatment of the law.

The same judge used to deny me Constitutional protections and who invaded prerogatives of the legislature, such as tenure laws, in Snyder v. Yonkers Public Schools, 03 CIV . 0263 and 03 CIV 9857, filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, was the same judge used to further injure teachers in the attached Monroe V. Westchester Community College matter. This resembles lawless administration of law suits. This resembles using judges as Public Education hit men. Under lawless leadership, judge picking is prioritized and implemented to further obstruct education and deny educators Equal Protections secured in the Fourteenth Amendment under Title 42, U.S. Code Section 1983, particularly in the distribution of monetary entitlements as epitomized in each of the above cases. See attachments.

Specifically, under the lawless leadership of Jonathan Lippman, selected members of the judiciary, are repeatedly and boldly being used to invade the prerogatives of the legislature, dismantle tenure laws and rights, render unconstitutional opinions, misinterpret law, and subvert the Constitution. Jonathan Lippman selected judges are being used to exercise powers they do not legitimately possess. See attachments. Had justice been rendered and fraud stopped previously, the continuation of such crimes and the attached inflicted corruption exhibits would not exist now. Lawless leadership has a domino effect.

Additional megamaniac patterned Jonathan Lippman usurpation of unauthorized power, is epitomized in his repeated and patterned obstruction of the educational process, which has effectuated in this matter, multiple lawless, arbitrary deprivations of property, specifically, unconstitutional executions of money owed, entitled, and employment. The salary executions have been done and are

being done in a most unconstitutional, arbitrary and discriminatory manner, with no regards for law and order, with no due process, without reason, cause, and in contravention to each and every public protections and Equal Protection laws guaranteed in the New York and United States of America Constitutions.

To this end, I have attached my Westchester Community College 2006 observation report submitted and commended for. Yet, my salary was executed without any reason and or due process.

Additionally, I have attached the 2006 student ratings. Each student rating rates the services I rendered as above average. In fact, the majority of ratings exemplify the highest rating achievable. Yet, needed, qualified, exemplary rated services were exterminated.

I ask that Ms. D’Orazio, Westchester Community College, Union President read, consider, comprehend and implement the Constitutional protections identified in the attached Memorandum of Law. Above, all I respectfully request her to provide answers to the below questions, based only in and supported by laws, statutes and case law in agreement with, and not in opposition or contradiction to, the National Constitution, specifically, the Bill of Rights.

I respectfully request that the Westchester Community College (WCC) administrative and union Public Officials honor, uphold and abide by the Constitution of the United States of America, Article VI, Clauses 2 and 3, and Constitutional requirements thereof; Pursuant to such, I respectfully request, that Ms. D’Orazio answer the attached questions, in law or case law which is Constitutionally compliant and which will not: (A) deny the powers of and Rights guaranteed in the National Constitution; (B) deny Constitutional Rights to American Citizens, in the instant case, Miriam Snyder; (C) violate federal and/or state Constitutionally compliant laws; (D) shield, exonerate or hold abusive administrators harmless and immune from violating federal or state laws, federal or State Constitutions, violating Snyder’s Constitutional Rights and Rights of due process of law, wrongdoing(s), crimes, criminal activity(ies), fraud, collusion and conspiracy, insurrection, sedition and anarchy.

I respectfully request that the WCC union acknowledges that American Citizens/Teachers in the instant case, Miriam Snyder, is a Sovereign in this Nation, and that the government, union, and or other administrative entities, serve the American Citizens pursuant to: (A) limited powers delegated from the Constitution, which delegated powers are derived from the People; (B) oaths taken to uphold the Constitution; (C) the Constitution, specifically, the Bill of Rights; (D) powers authorized only by the Constitution or laws in full compliance therewith, specifically, the Bill of Rights, and (E) acknowledge that lack of Constitutional authority precludes any action and voids any ruling by this entity, Westchester Community College.

Since the Constitution is the Supreme Law of this Land, to which this public education facility and union have been sworn, Miriam Snyder, respectfully requests answers and actions based in and supported by the federal Constitution, for the aforesaid reasons, to honor and uphold her Constitutional Rights during all administrative proceedings, to read Snyder’s documentation and represent her based only in law and case law compliant with, and not in opposition or contradictory to, the Constitution.

To this end, on behalf of public education, in good faith, seeking clarity, I am asking the Westchester Community College Union president, Ms. D’Orazio to please launch the below investigation/grievance and answer the below questions in writing. This is an attempt to exhaust

administrative remedies via written discussion, for purposes of clarity and correction. The following issues and questions are presented to Ms. D’Orazio for written responses/answers and or materials accordingly: 1. Please forward a copy of the WCC Teacher Protection handbook/manual, if one exists. I have never received one.

2. Please launch an investigation and provide a clear written explanation for the attached, unexplained Westchester Community College WCC W-2 money distribution formula?

3. Please list and or reference the authorities used to distribute, manipulate, monopolize, the WCC tax statement money numbers.

4. Pursuant to the attached WCC W-2 tax statement,, please provide an explanation as to how come over $3,600 was taken out of my check, under the disguise of tax deductions and only 300.00 was applied to the Federal income tax? Please reference the tax formula and authorities section which effectuated this.

5. Please provide an explanation for the filing of zero wages for teacher employment at Weschester Community College on the attached form for the 2005 to 2006 academic year?

6. Why was my expected salary taken from me in a most unconstitutional manner, meaning, why was I not rehired in the same manner as other ESL adjuncts?

7. Why was my employment exterminated without any due process, without cause, without reason, despite and with exemplary ratings and commended observation reports?

8. What law authorizes an arbitrary deprivation of property?

9. How does terminating me and or any other good standing ESL teacher without cause, reason, notice and or due process conform with the Equal Protection laws of the Constitution?

10. What constitutional protections, if any, are in the ESL Department’s teacher treatment, hiring and firing, policies and procedures?

11. What equal protection of the law clauses and or public protections, if any, are in the ESL Department’s polices and procedures ?

12. Is it policy and procedure for the ESL department to terminate good standing, qualified and needed ESL instructors, without notification, due process, reason and or cause? If so, under what Constitutional authorities are these practices being enforced?

13. Please list the ESL Department’s Constitutional protections in the policies and procedures that protect teachers from abuse?

14. What Constitutional protections are in the ESL Department’s policies and procedures that would protect teachers from retaliation, discrimination and or race based teacher placements and or assignments?

15. What constitutional protections, if any, exist that protect WCC ESL teachers from being terminated at the whim of an invisible, malicious, lawless, abusive, unauthorized usurped power force?

16. Does the ESL department understand that the United States of America Constitution, with Equal Protection and Equal treatment laws, is the Supreme law of the land and all other laws, contracts, policies, regulations, practices, must conform with such? What has the union done to ensure the ESL department’s understanding and conformity to such?

17. With respect to this matter, why was documented and established exemplary teaching not appreciated via continued employment, at this college?

18. Why are less rated, less qualified, and less senior level ESL instructors presently working while this opportunity was taken from me without any authority, reason, justification and or notice?

19. What is the criteria for ESL continued teaching?

20. How come and why does the attached article, Exhibit ___, state that 70 other ESL teachers have been unconstitutionally terminated without the enforcement of Equal Protection laws secured in the Constitution?

21. Is the hire and fire criteria race based? Yes or no, please explain with verifiable evidence.

22. Why are competent, qualified, caring, compassionate, excellent rated teachers not wanted at Westchester Community College?

23. What is the purpose of teacher observation reports and exemplary student ratings of teachers, if the teacher can be exterminated despite exemplary documentation and work?

24. Are WCC ESL teachers fired at the mercy, whim and or prejudice of an abusive force, in violation of all Equal Protections secured in the Constitution? Yes or no, please explain with verifiable evidence.

25. What teacher protections exist that protects ESL teachers from race based teacher placement/assignments and or retaliatory practices?

26. Are the current continued teacher employment criteria, in contravention to the ESL Teacher preference sheet and or in contradiction to the Equal Protection of the Law Constitutional protections? Yes or no, please explain.

27. Why do you, Ms. D’Orazio think my salary was lawlessly exterminated despite documented exemplary ratings and work?

28. Why is the arbitrary deprivation of property via termination of expected wages not represented and or addressed by this office?

29. Is it constitutional to arbitrarily deprive one of property rights?

In summary, I worked at WCC for several years with regular renewals based on satisfactory performance. As such, continued employment was expected in the same manner that equal level ESL instructors were rehired and treated. This did not happen and I want to know what Constitutional law was used to authorize such?

In an attempt to understand what has happened to me, in good faith, I am asking Ms D’Orazio, the union president to please forward answers and explanations to the above questions. No person and or public education entity is above the law and or allowed to fester off of unconstitutional, lawless practices under the disguise of a public education institution and at the expense of students. This second class treatment retards civilization.

I am asking Ms. D’Orazio, in good faith, to please have the attached megamaniac usurped unauthorized power crazed phenomenon document disguised as a fraudulent Westchester Community College W-2 money monopoly statement explained in detail in writing and in conformity with Constitutional laws. The unexplainable and appearing malicious distribution of money numbers on the WCC attached 2006 Tax statement must be verified. The trickery formula must be defined and explained in writing and shared with the public.

I am also requesting that Ms. D’Orazio, union president please forward the correct Westchester Community College teacher wages information to the NYS Department of labor Monetary Benefit Determination office. See Exhibit _____, attached NYS Department of Labor Monetary Determination form with the fax number.

I am requesting that Ms. D’Orazio, let me know if the attached WCC check, attached as Exhibit _____, is authorized/cashable.

I am requesting Ms. D’Orazio to review the attached laws, attached inflicted fraud, inflicted corruption, inflicted deception, inflicted unconstitutional employment practices, attached teacher ratings, attached performance portfolio and negotiate a settlement. A settlement can serve to advance teacher rights and Constiutional protections, because no one deserves to arbitrarily be deprived of their property.

A settlement can prevent further documentation of the attached repeated and documented Weschester Community College ESL Teacher abuse and scandal. It can prevent the need for filing suit and packing the court house with students and church members fighting to end documented and preventable inflicted unconstitutional employment practices and inflicted injustices at the expense of ESL students and under the disguise of ESL programming.

Finally, settlement discussion is welcomed as I seek to be made whole and as the attached evidence documents malicious, unconstitutional, abusive, repetitive, employment practices against teachers and that harm students. Please contact me within 10 days from the above date. I look forward to working with you in resolving these matters in the best interest of Equal protections secured in the Constitution of New York and the United States of America, on behalf of teachers and public education as a whole. Thank you.

Respectfully,

Miriam Snyder, All Rights Reserved.

Attachments: Memorandum of Law Dated February 1, 2007, Prepared for the Westchester Community College Teacher Association The below Exhibits are defined and submitted with this letter.

Exhibit #

Description

1. 1 NO. 1: LEONARD J. LEVENSON, ET AL. V. JONATHAN LIPPMAN,&C., ET AL. 2. This exhibit is Jonathan Lippman’s mega maniac patterned fraud disguised as Westchester Community College erroneous 2006 W-2 wage and tax statement. This fraud lists $300.30 as the total federal tax deduction when the below check stubs epitomize over $ 3,600 taken out for federal tax deductions. The erroneous money number distribution, extortion, deception, laundering, and monopoly has been lawlessly and maliciously inflicted under Jonathan Lippman’s documented mega maniac power crazed usurpation to deprive me from monetary entitlements secured by my labor. This demonstrates Jonathan Lippman’s mega maniac, ruthless, lawless infiltration and abuse of power practices to attempt to lawlessly make me penniless, but God is a provider, so Jonathan Lippman loses again!

3. This exhibit contains Miriam Snyder’s Westchester Community College 2006 check stubs with over $3,600 missing to tax deductions. The monies taken from my check under the disguise of tax deductions are not listed in the above mentioned fraudulent federal tax exhibit. This is the clearest form of unconstitutional, malicious, money laundering and extortion practices. This is the clearest form of the use of one’s money to the detriment of the person in violation to amendments secured in the Constitution and in violation to civilized, lawful, and just business practices.

4. Monetary Benefit Determination Notice with Westchester Community College fraudulent wage listing of Zero wages from 2005 to 2006. Letter to the NYS Department of Labor correcting Westchester Community College’s erroneous wage information.

5. Newly errupted check dated 11/16/06: possible additional Jonathan Lippman Fraud.

6. Jonathan Lippman Megamaniac Fraudulent, Public Education Settlement Check to Miriam Snyder for Jonathan Lippman’s education and hate crime enforcement , with no Insurer Name.

7. Public Education Settlement Agreement dated July 2000, documenting Jonathan Lippman’s patterened and practiced hatecrime enforcement.

8. ARTICLE: ESL Adjuncts Abused At Westchester Community College 9.

Weschester Community College student evaluations/ ratings of Ms. Snyder. Evidence of Ms. Snyder receiving the highest achievable rating.

10. Commended Westchester Community College 2006 Observation Report 11. New York State Office of the Attorney General: Completed Public Integrity Complaint form.

MIRIAM SNYDER’S MEMORANDUM OF LAW SEEKING EFFECTIVE, COMPETENT, AND CONSTITUTIONALLY COMPLIANT UNION REPRESENTATION TO END THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTED FRAUD, ABUSE OF POWER AND UNCONSTITUTIONAL EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES EMBEDDED IN THE ARBITRARY DEPRIVATION OF PROPERTY OF TEACHERS

SUBMITTED WITH THE ATTACHED NOTARIZED LETTER DATED FEBRUARY 1, 2007 SUBMITTED TO ANNE D’ORAZIO, PRESIDENT OF THE WESTCHESTER COMMUNITY COLLEGE TEACHERS ASSOCIATION

DATED: FEBRUARY 1, 2007

OFFICIAL NOTICE: THE FACTS OF LAW No man in this country is so high that he is above the law. No officer of the law may set that law at defiance, with impunity. All the officers of the Government, from the highest to the lowest, are creatures of the law and are bound to obey it.

It is the only supreme power in our system of government, and every man who, by accepting office, participates in its function, is only the more strongly bound to submit to that supremacy, and to observe the limitations which it imposes upon the exercise of the authority which it gives.

Courts of justice are established not only to decide upon the controversial rights of the citizens as against each other, but also upon rights in controversy between them and the Government, and the docket of this court is crowded with controversies of the latter class.

Shall it be said, in the face of all this, and of the acknowledged right of the judiciary to decide in proper cases, statutes which have been passed by both branches of Congress and approved by the President, to be unconstitutional, that the courts cannot give remedy when the citizen has been deprived of his property by force, his estate seized and converted to the use of the Government without any lawful authority, without any process of law and without any compensation, because the President has ordered it and his officers are in possession?

If such be the law of this country, it sanctions a tyranny which has no existence in the monarchies of Europe, or in any other government which has a just claim to well regulated liberty and the protection of personal rights. [106 U.S. at 220] ...

While by the Constitution the judicial department is recognized as one of the three great branches among which all the powers and functions of the Government are distributed, it is inherently the weakest of them all.

Dependent as its courts are for the enforcement of their judgments, upon officers appointed by the Executive and removable at his pleasure, with no patronage and no control of purse or sword, their power and influence rest solely upon the public sense of a tribunal to which all may appeal for the assertion and protection of rights guaranteed by the Constitution and by the laws of the land, and on the confidence reposed in the soundness of their decisions and the purity of their motives. [106 U.S. at 223] United States v. Lee (1882), 106 U.S. 196, 27 L.Ed. 171, 182, 1 S.Ct. 240.

2. The first part of the statement made in United States v. Lee was reaffirmed in Butz v. Economou (1978), 438 U.S. 478, 57 L.ED.2d 895, 915, 98 S.Ct. 2894: Our system of jurisprudence rests on the assumption that all individuals, whatever their position in government is subject to federal law: "No man in this country is so high that he is above the law. No officer of the law may set that law at defiance with impunity. All the officers of the Government, from the highest to the lowest, are creatures of the law and are bound to obey it." United States v. Lee, 106 U.S. at 220, 27 L.Ed. 171, 1 S.Ct. 240.

3. The first part of the statement made in Lee was again affirmed in Davis v. Passman (1979), 442 U.S. 228, 60 L.Ed.2d. 846, 863, 99 S.Ct. 2264: As Butz v. Economou stated only last term: "Our system of jurisprudence rests on the assumption that all individuals, whatever their position in government is subject to federal law: “‘No man in this country is so high that he is above the law. No officer of the law may set that law at defiance with impunity. All the officers of the Government, from the highest to the lowest, are creatures of the law and are bound to obey it.' United States v. Lee, 106 U.S. [196,] 220, [27 L.Ed. 171, 1 S.Ct. 240] [(1882)]." 438 US, at 506, 57 L Ed 2d 895, 98 S CT 2894.

4. According to SHEPARD'S UNITED STATES CITATIONS: UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT REPORTS, LAWYERS' EDITION, 1994, 1996 Supp., 1998 Supp., 2000 Supp., none of the three cases has been reversed, vacated, or overruled.

EQUAL PROTECTION UNDER THE LAW Giozza v. Tiernan, 148 U.S. 657, 662 (1893), Citations Omitted "Undoubtedly it (the Fourteenth Amendment) forbids any arbitrary deprivation of life, liberty or property, and secures equal protection to all under like circumstances in the enjoyment of their rights...

It is enough that there is no discrimination in favor of one as against another of the same class. ...And due process of law within the meaning of the [Fifth and Fourteenth] amendment is secured if the laws

operate on all alike, and do not subject the individual to an arbitrary exercise of the powers of government."

Kentucky Railroad Tax Cases, 115 U.S. 321, 337 (1885) "The rule of equality... requires the same means and methods to be applied impartially to all the constituents of each class, so that the law shall operate equally and uniformly upon all persons in similar circumstances".

Truax v. Corrigan, 257 U.S. 312, 332 "Our whole system of law is predicated on the general fundamental principle of equality of application of the law. 'All men are equal before the law,' "This is a government of laws and not of men,' 'No man is above the law,' are all maxims showing the spirit in which legislatures, executives, and courts are expected to make, execute and apply laws. But the framers and adopters of the (Fourteenth) Amendment were not content to depend... upon the spirit of equality which might not be insisted on by local public opinion. They therefore embodied that spirit in a specific guaranty."

CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS: Boyd v. United, 116 U.S. 616 at 635 (1885) Justice Bradley, "It may be that it is the obnoxious thing in its mildest form; but illegitimate and unconstitutional practices get their first footing in that way; namely, by silent approaches and slight deviations from legal modes of procedure. This can only be obviated by adhering to the rule that constitutional provisions for the security of persons and property should be liberally construed. A close and literal construction deprives them of half their efficacy, and leads to gradual depreciation of the right, as if it consisted more in sound than in substance. It is the duty of the Courts to be watchful for the Constitutional Rights of the Citizens, and against any stealthy encroachments thereon. Their motto should be Obsta Principiis.

Downs v. Bidwell, 182 U.S. 244 (1901) "It will be an evil day for American Liberty if the theory of a government outside supreme law finds lodgment in our constitutional jurisprudence. No higher duty rests upon this Court than to exert its full authority to prevent all violations of the principles of the Constitution."

Gomillion v. Lightfoot, 364 U.S. 155 (1966), cited also in Smith v. Allwright, 321 U.S. 649.644 "Constitutional 'rights' would be of little value if they could be indirectly denied."

Juliard v. Greeman, 110 U.S. 421 (1884) Supreme Court Justice Field, "There is no such thing as a power of inherent sovereignty in the government of the United States... In this country, sovereignty resides in the people, and Congress can exercise power which they have not, by their Constitution, entrusted to it. All else is withheld."

Mallowy v. Hogan, 378 U.S. 1 "All rights and safeguards contained in the first eight amendments to the federal Constitution are equally applicable."

Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 426, 491; 86 S. Ct. 1603 "Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no 'rule making' or legislation which would abrogate them."

Norton v. Shelby County, 118 U.S. 425 p. 442 "An unconstitutional act is not law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties; affords no protection; it creates no office; it is in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed."

Perez v. Brownell, 356 U.S. 44, 7; 8 S. Ct. 568, 2 L. Ed. 2d 603 (1958) "...in our country the people are sovereign and the government cannot sever its relationship to them by taking away their citizenship."

Sherar v. Cullen, 481 F. 2d 946 (1973) "There can be no sanction or penalty imposed upon one because of his exercise of constitutional rights."

Simmons v. United States, 390 U.S. 377 (1968) "The claim and exercise of a Constitution right cannot be converted into a crime"... "a denial of them would be a denial of due process of law".

Elmore v. McCammon (1986) 640 F. Supp. 905 "... the right to file a lawsuit pro se is one of the most important rights under the constitution and laws."

Robb v. Connolly, 111 U. S. 624, 637, 28 L. ed. 542, 4 S. Ct. 544.

Upon the state courts, equally with the courts of the United States, rests the obligation to guard and enforce every right secured by that Constitution [of the United States].

Warnock v. Pecos County, Texas., 88 F3d 341 (5th Cir. 1996) Eleventh Amendment does not protect state officials from claims for prospective relief when it is alleged that state officials acted in violation of federal law.

Sherar v. Cullen, 481 F. 2d 946 (1973) "There can be no sanction or penalty imposed upon one because of his exercise of Constitutional Rights."

Schware v. Board of Examiners, United State Reports 353 U.S. pages 238, 239.

"The practice of law cannot be licensed by any state/State."

Sims v. Aherns, 271 SW 720 (1925)

"The practice of law is an occupation of common right."

Cooper v. Aaron (1958), 358 U.S. 1, 18, 3 L.Ed.2d 5, 17, 78 S.Ct. 1401.

Every state legislator and executive and judicial officer is solemnly committed by oath taken pursuant to Art 6, cl 3, "to support this Constitution." Chief Justice Taney, speaking for a unanimous Court in 1859, said that this requirement reflected the framers' "anxiety to preserve it [the Constitution] in full force, in all its powers, and to guard against resistance to or evasion of its authority, on the part of a State. . . ." Ableman v Booth (US) 21 How 506, 524, 16 L ed 169, 176.

No state legislator or executive or judicial officer can war against the Constitution without violating his undertaking to support it.

Ex parte Virginia, 100 US 339, 346-347, 25 L Ed 676 (1880).

The Constitution constrains governmental action "by whatever instruments or in whatever modes that action may be taken." Ex parte Virginia, 100 US 339, 346-347, 25 L Ed 676 (1880). And under whatever congressional label. ...

Even Congress itself appeared to acknowledge, at least until recent years, that Government-created and -controlled corporations were part of the Government. The Government Corporation Control Act of 1945, discussed above, which brought to an end an era of uncontrolled growth of Government corporations, provided that, without explicit congressional authorization, no corporation should be acquired or created by "any officer or agency of the Federal Government or by any Governmental corporation for the purpose of acting as an agency or instrumentality of the United States ...." sec 304(a), 59 Stat, at 602 (emphasis added). That was evidently intended to restrict the creation of all Government-controlled policy-implementing corporations, and not just some of them. And the companion provision that swept away many of the extant corporations said that no wholly owned government corporation created under state law could continue "as an agency or instrumentality of the United States," sec. 304(b), 59 Stat, at 602. ...

It surely cannot be that government, state or federal, is able to evade the most solemn obligations imposed in the Constitution by simply resorting to the corporate form.(emphasis added) Lebron v. National R. Passenger Corp. (1995), 513 U.S. 574, 130 L.Ed.2d 902, 914-923, 115 S.Ct. 961.

The 16th American Jurisprudence, Second Edition, Section 177: “The general misconception is that any statute passed by legislators bearing the appearance of law constitutes the law of the land. The U.S. Constitution is the supreme law of the land, and any statute, to be valid, must be in agreement. It is impossible for both the Constitution and a law violating it to be valid; one must prevail. This is succinctly stated as follows: “The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form and name of law, is in reality no law, but is wholly void, and ineffective for any purpose; since unconstitutionality dates from the time of its enactment, and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it. As unconstitutional law, in legal contemplation, is as inoperative as if it had never been passed. Such a statute leaves the question that it purports to settle just as it would be had the statute not been enacted.”

“Since an unconstitutional law is void, the general principles follow that it imposes no duties, confers no right, creates no office, bestows no power or authority on anyone, affords no protection, and justifies no acts performed under it…”

“A void act cannot be legally consistent with a valid one. An unconstitutional law cannot operate to supersede any existing valid law. Indeed, in so far as a statute runs counter to

the fundamental law of the land, it is superseded thereby. No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it.�

Any court, government or government officer who acts in violation of, in opposition or contradiction to the foregoing, by his own actions, commits treason and invokes the self-executing Sections 3 and 4 of the 14th Amendment and vacates his office. It is the duty of every American Citizen to oppose all enemies of this Nation, foreign and DOMESTIC.

CORRUPTION OF AUTHORITY: (People v. Tenerowicz, 266 Mich. 276 [253 N.W. 296].)

Lorenson v. Superior Court (1950), 35 Cal.2d 49, 59-60, 216 P.2d 859.

A conspiracy with or among public officials not to perform their official duty to enforce criminal laws is an obstruction of justice and an indictable offense at common law.

Ex Parte Young, 209 US 123.

"No change in ancient procedure can be made which disrupts those fundamental principles . . . which . . . protect the citizen in his private right and guard him against the arbitrary action of the government."

Butz v. Economou, 98 S. Ct. 2894 (1978); United States v. Lee, 106 U.S. at 220, 1 S. Ct. at 261 (1882) "No man [or woman] in this country is so high that he is above the law. No officer of the law may set that law at defiance with impunity. All the officers of the government from the highest to the lowest, are creatures of the law, and are bound to obey it." *Cannon v. Commission on Judicial Qualifications, (1975) 14 Cal. 3d 678, 694 Acts in excess of judicial authority constitutes misconduct, particularly where a judge deliberately disregards the requirements of fairness and due process. *Geiler v. Commission on Judicial Qualifications, (1973) 10 Cal.3d 270, 286 Society's commitment to institutional justice requires that judges be solicitous of the rights of persons who come before the court. *Gonzalez v. Commission on Judicial Performance, (1983) 33 Cal. 3d 359, 371, 374 Acts in excess of judicial authority constitutes misconduct, particularly where a judge deliberately disregards the requirements of fairness and due process.

Olmstad v. United States, (1928) 277 U.S. 438 "Crime is contagious. If the Government becomes a lawbreaker, it breeds contempt for law; it invites every man to become a law unto himself; it invites anarchy."

Owen v. City of Independence

"The innocent individual who is harmed by an abuse of governmental authority is assured that he will be compensated for his injury."

Perry v. United States, 204 U.S. 330, 358 "I do not understand the government to contend that it is any less bound by the obligation than a private individual would be..." "It is not the function of our government to keep the citizen from falling into error; it is the function of the citizen to keep the government from falling into error." *Ryan v. Commission on Judicial Performance, (1988) 45 Cal. 3d 518, 533 Before sending a person to jail for contempt or imposing a fine, judges are required to provide due process of law, including strict adherence to the procedural requirements contained in the Code of Civil Procedure. Ignorance of these procedures is not a mitigating but an aggravating factor.

U.S. v. Lee, 106 U.S. 196, 220 1 S. Ct. 240, 261, 27 L. Ed 171 (1882) "No man in this country is so high that he is above the law. No officer of the law may set that law at defiance, with impunity. All the officers of the government, from the highest to the lowest, are creatures of the law are bound to obey it."

"It is the only supreme power in our system of government, and every man who, by accepting office participates in its functions, is only the more strongly bound to submit to that supremacy, and to observe the limitations which it imposes on the exercise of the authority which it gives."

Warnock v. Pecos County, Texas, 88 F3d 341 (5th Cir. 1996) Eleventh Amendment does not protect state officials from claims for prospective relief when it is alleged that state officials acted in violation of federal law.

Glazier v Hubbard, 42 SW 1114, (1887) A judge is not such at all times, and for all purposes, when he acts he must be clothed with jurisdiction and acting without this, he is but an individual assuming an authority he does not possess.

Blincoe v Head, 44 SW 374, (1898); Reed v Taylor, 78 SW 892, (1904) judges . . . who step outside of the circle of duty thus drawn by the letter of the statute, they must answer in damages to such individuals as may suffer from such unauthorized acts. jMcDonald v Goodman et al, 239 SW2d 97, (1951)e is . a conspiracy is a corrupt or unlawful combination or assuming an authority he does not possess. G conspiracy is a corrupt or unlawful combination or agreement between two or more persons to do by concerted action . . .a lawful act by unlawful means. . .)

US v Townsend, 924 F2d 1385, (7th Cir 1991) . . . single or multiple conspiracy is a question of fact; joining the agreement, not the group is the requirement of conspiracy; names of other conspirators are not required to convict one conspirator; agreement to conspire is one offense; substantive offense is separate and independent . . . . tortous act; US v Pan Am Petroleum, 55 F2d 753 at 778, (9th Cir 1932)4, (18);

fraud and conspiracy are not the cause of action, but rather the overt acts done in furtherance of the fraudulent plan. . . . The gist of the action is the damage and not the conspiracy. The charge of conspiracy where unsupported by evidence will be considered mere surplusage, not necessary to be proved to support the action. He may yet recover damages against one or more of the defendants shown to be guilty of the torts

Title 18 USC SECTION 241. Conspiracy against rights If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same; or If two or more persons go in disguise on the highway, or on the premises of another, with intent to prevent or hinder his free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege so secured— They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, they shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.

JUDICIAL IMMUNITY: Nowhere was the judiciary given immunity, particularly nowhere in Article III; under our Constitution, if judges were to have immunity, it could only possibly be granted by amendment (and even less possibly by legislative act), as Art. I, Sections 9 & 10, respectively, in fact expressly prohibit such, stating, "No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States" and "No state shall... grant any Title of Nobility Article III, Sec. 1, "The Judicial Power of the United States shall be vested in one supreme court, and in such inferior courts, shall hold their offices during good behavior."

Tort & Insurance Law Journal, Spring 1986 21 n3, p 509-516, "Federal tort law: judges cannot invoke judicial immunity for acts that violate litigants' civil rights." Robert Craig Waters.

Ableman v. Booth, 21 Howard 506 (1859) "No judicial process, whatever form it may assume, can have any lawful authority outside of the limits of the jurisdiction of the court or judge by whom it is issued; and an attempt to enforce it beyond these boundaries is nothing less than lawless violence."

Chandler v. Judicial Council of the 10th Circuit, 398 U.S. 74, 90 S. Ct. 1648, 26 L. Ed. 2d 100 Justice Douglas, in his dissenting opinion at page 140 said, "If (federal judges) break the law, they can be prosecuted." Justice Black, in his dissenting opinion at page 141) said, "Judges, like other people,

can be tried, convicted and punished for crimes... The judicial power shall extend to all cases, in law and equity, arising under this Constitution".

Cooper v. Aaron, 358 U.S. 1, 78 S. Ct. 1401 (1958) Any judge who does not comply with his oath to the Constitution of the United States wars against that Constitution and engages in acts in violation of the supreme law of the land. The judge is engaged in acts of treason.

The U.S. Supreme Court has stated that "no state legislator or executive or judicial officer can war against the Constitution without violating his undertaking to support it". See also In Re Sawyer, 124 U.S. 200 (188); U.S. v. Will, 449 U.S. 200, 216, 101 S. Ct. 471, 66 L. Ed. 2d 392, 406 (1980); Cohens v.

Virginia, 19 U.S. (6 Wheat) 264, 404, 5 L. Ed 257 (1821).

Cooper v. O'Conner, 99 F.2d 133 There is a general rule that a ministerial officer who acts wrongfully, although in good faith, is nevertheless liable in a civil action and cannot claim the immunity of the sovereign.

Davis v. Burris, 51 Ariz. 220, 75 P.2d 689 (1938) A judge must be acting within his jurisdiction as to subject matter and person, to be entitled to immunity from civil action for his acts.

Forrester v. White, 484 U.S. at 227-229, 108 S. Ct. at 544-545 (1987); Westfall v.Erwin, 108 S. Ct. 580 (1987); United States v. Lanier (March 1997) Constitutionally and in fact of law and judicial rulings, state-federal "magistrates-judges" or any government actors, state or federal, may now be held liable, if they violate any Citizen's Constitutional rights, privileges, or immunities, or guarantees; including statutory civil rights.

A judge is not immune for tortious acts committed in a purely Administrative, non-judicial capacity.

Gregory v. Thompson, F.2d 59 (C.A. Ariz. 1974) Generally, judges are immune from suit for judicial acts within or in excess of their jurisdiction even if those acts have been done maliciously or corruptly; the only exception being for acts done in the clear absence of all jurisdiction.

Hoffsomer v. Hayes, 92 Okla 32, 227 F. 417 "The courts are not bound by an officer's interpretation of the law under which he presumes to act."

Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. (2 Cranch) 137, 180 (1803) "... the particular phraseology of the constitution of the United States confirms and strengthens the principle, supposed to be essential to all written constitutions, that a law repugnant to the constitution is void, and that courts, as well as other departments, are bound by that instrument."

"In declaring what shall be the supreme law of the land, the Constitution itself is first mentioned; and not the laws of the United States generally, but those only which shall be made in pursuance of the Constitution, have that rank".

"All law (rules and practices) which are repugnant to the Constitution are VOID".

Since the 14th Amendment to the Constitution states "NO State (Jurisdiction) shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the rights, privileges, or immunities of citizens of the United States nor deprive any citizens of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law, ... or equal protection under the law", this renders judicial immunity unconstitutional.

Piper v. Pearson, 2 Gray 120, cited in Bradley v. Fisher, 13 Wall. 335, 20 L.Ed. 646 (1872) "Where there is no jurisdiction, there can be no discretion, for discretion is incident to jurisdiction."

Pulliam v. Allen, 466 U.S. 522 (1984); 104 S. Ct. 1781, 1980, 1981, and 1985 In 1996, Congress passed a law to overcome this ruling which stated that judicial immunity doesn't exist; citizens can sue judges for prospective injunctive relief.

"Our own experience is fully consistent with the common law's rejection of a rule of judicial immunity. We never have had a rule of absolute judicial immunity. At least seven circuits have indicated affirmatively that there is no immunity... to prevent irreparable injury to a citizen's constitutional rights..."

"Subsequent interpretations of the Civil Rights Act by this Court acknowledge Congress' intent to reach unconstitutional actions by all state and federal actors, including judges... The Fourteenth Amendment prohibits a state [federal] from denying any person [citizen] within its jurisdiction the equal protection under the laws. Since a State [or federal] acts only by its legislative, executive or judicial authorities, the constitutional provisions must be addressed to those authorities, including state and federal judges..."

"We conclude that judicial immunity is not a bar to relief against a judicial officer acting in her [his] judicial capacity."

Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 94 S. Ct. 1683, 1687 (1974) By law, a judge is a state officer. The judge then acts not as a judge, but as a private individual (in his person). When a judge acts as a trespasser of the law, when a judge does not follow the law, the Judge loses subject-matter jurisdiction and the judges' orders are not voidable, but VOID, and of no legal force or effect.

The U.S. Supreme Court stated that "when a state officer acts under a state law in a manner violative of the Federal Constitution, he comes into conflict with the superior authority of that Constitution, and he is in that case stripped of his official or representative character and is subjected in his person to the consequences of his individual conduct. The State has no power to impart to him any immunity from responsibility to the supreme authority of the United States."

Stump v. Sparkman, id., 435 U.S. 349

Some Defendants urge that any act "of a judicial nature" entitles the Judge to absolute judicial immunity. But in a jurisdictional vacuum (that is, absence of all jurisdiction) the second prong necessary to absolute judicial immunity is missing.

A judge is not immune for tortious acts committed in a purely Administrative, non-judicial capacity.

Rankin v. Howard, 633 F.2d 844 (1980) The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed an Arizona District Court dismissal based upon absolute judicial immunity, finding that both necessary immunity prongs were absent; later, in Ashelman v.

Pope, 793 F.2d 1072 (1986), the Ninth Circuit, en banc, criticized the "judicial nature" analysis it had published in Rankin as unnecessarily restrictive. But Rankin's ultimate result was not changed, because Judge Howard had been independently divested of absolute judicial immunity by his complete lack of jurisdiction.

U.S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co. (State use of), 217 Miss. 576, 64 So. 2d 697 When a judicial officer acts entirely without jurisdiction or without compliance with jurisdiction requisites he may be held civilly liable for abuse of process even though his act involved a decision made in good faith, that he had jurisdiction.

U.S. v. Lee, 106 U.S. 196, 220 1 S. Ct. 240, 261, 27 L. Ed 171 (1882) "No man in this country is so high that he is above the law. No officer of the law may set that law at defiance with impunity. All the officers of the government, from the highest to the lowest, are creatures of the law and are bound to obey it."

"It is the only supreme power in our system of government, and every man who, by accepting office participates in its functions, is only the more strongly bound to submit to that supremacy, and to observe the limitations which it imposes on the exercise of the authority which it gives."

Zeller v. Rankin, 101 S.Ct. 2020, 451 U.S. 939, 68 L.Ed 2d 326 When a judge knows that he lacks jurisdiction, or acts in the face of clearly valid statutes expressly depriving him of jurisdiction, judicial immunity is lost.

FRAUD JONATHAN LIPPMAN’S MEGA MANIAC USURPED FRAUDULENT DOCUMENT DISGUISED AS WESTCHESTER COMMUNITY COLLEGE’S W-2 TAX FOR: Legal Fraud – Blacks Law Dictionary 4th Edition (Page 1040) Contracts or acts as, though not originating in actual evil design to perpetrate fraud, yet by their tendency to mislead others or to violate confidence, are prohibited by law.

Blacks Law Dictionary 4th Edition False Representation - A representation which is untrue, willfully made to deceive another to his injury

Blacks Law Dictionary 4th Edition Falsification - - In equity practice. The showing an item in the debit of an account to be either wholly false or in some part erroneous.

Blacks Law Dictionary 4th Edition False Pretenses - Designed misrepresentation of existing fact or condition whereby person obtains another's money or goods. People v. Gould, 363 ill. 348, 2 N.E.2d 324.

Blacks Law Dictionary 4th Edition False or Fraudulent Claim - A "false or fraudulent claim" within meaning of statute providing for punishment of any one receiving proceeds of fraudulent audit or payment, since to be "false or fraudulent," must be a claim for services or materials not actually rendered or furnished. People v.

Dally, 175 Misc. 680, 24 N.Y.S.2d 692, 695.

Blacks Law Dictionary 4th Edition Negligence - The omission to do something which a reasonable man, guided by those ordinary considerations which ordinarily regulate human affairs, would do, or the doing of something which a reasonable and prudent man would not do.

Blacks Law Dictionary 4th Edition Deceit - - A fraudulent and cheating misrepresentation, artifice, or device, used by one or more persons to deceive and trick another, who is ignorant of the true facts, to the prejudice and damage of the party imposed upon. People v. Chadwick, 143 Cal. 116, 76 P. 884.

Webster Hoax: A deception for mockery or mischief; To deceive by a hoax. Syn. see dupe.

Dupe: One who has been or is easily deceived. To delude; deceive; gull. - dupe, gull, trick, hoax mean to delude one by underhanded means. Dupe suggests unwariness in the person deluded and the acceptance of what is false as true, of counterfeit as genuine, or the like; WEBSTER. Fraud- The unlawful obtaining of another's property by design, but without criminal intent, and with the assent of the owner obtained by artifice or misrepresentation. Any cunning deception or artifice used to circumvent, cheat, or deceive another. Story, Eq. Jur. 9 186.

Blacks Law Dictionary 4th Edition Defamation -- The taking from one's reputation. The offense for injuring a person's character, fame, or reputation by false and malicious statements. The term seems to include both libel and slander.

Blacks Law Dictionary 4th Edition

Malicious - Characterized by, or involving, malice; having, or done with, wicked or mischievous intentions or motives; wrongful and done intentionally without just cause or excuse. People v. Knapp, 274 N.Y.S. 85, 152 Misc. 368.

Blacks Law Dictionary 4th Edition Torts - to defame or injure a person’s reputation by a published writing.

TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 63 > § 1341 § 1341. Frauds and swindles

Whoever, having devised or intending to devise any scheme or artifice to defraud, or for obtaining money or property by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises, or to sell, dispose of, loan, exchange, alter, give away, distribute, supply, or furnish or procure for unlawful use any counterfeit or spurious coin, obligation, security, or other article, or anything represented to be or intimated or held out to be such counterfeit or spurious article, for the purpose of executing such scheme or artifice or attempting so to do, places in any post office or authorized depository for mail matter, any matter or thing whatever to be sent or delivered by the Postal Service, or deposits or causes to be deposited any matter or thing whatever to be sent or delivered by any private or commercial interstate carrier, or takes or receives therefrom, any such matter or thing, or knowingly causes to be delivered by mail or such carrier according to the direction thereon, or at the place at which it is directed to be delivered by the person to whom it is addressed, any such matter or thing, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both. If the violation affects a financial institution, such person shall be fined not more than $1,000,000 or imprisoned not more than 30 years, or both.

§ 1983. Civil action for deprivation of rights

Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress, except that in any action brought against a judicial officer for an act or omission taken in such officer’s judicial capacity, injunctive relief shall not be granted unless a declaratory decree was violated or declaratory relief was unavailable. For the purposes of this section, any Act of Congress applicable exclusively to the District of Columbia shall be considered to be a statute of the District of Columbia.

ARE THE BELOW PLAINTIFF’S DEAD OR HOSPITALIZED UNDER A PHENOMENON? I HOPE SOMEONE DOES THE GODLY THING AND CHECKS.

New York Court of Appeals 

main page



about



search

1 No. 1 Leonard J. Levenson, et al.,

Respondents, v.

Jonathan Lippman, &c., et al., Appellants.

2005 NY Int. 9 February 15, 2005 This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports.

Michael Colodner, for appellants.

Peter J. Macdonald, for respondents.

City of New York; New York County Lawyers' Association; Association of Justices of the Supreme Court of the State of New York et al.; New York State Defenders Association, et al., amici curiรฆ.

PER CURIAM: The issue presented in this appeal is whether the Chief Administrative Judge acted within the authority granted him by the New York State Constitution when he amended section 127.2 (b) of the Rules of the Chief Administrator of the Courts (22 NYCRR 127.2[b]). As amended, the rule permits an administrative judge to review an order of a trial judge setting an award of compensation in excess of the statutory limits set forth in section 722-b of the New York County Law. We conclude that the Chief Administrative Judge acted within his authority and declare that Rule 127.2 (b) is valid.

Article 18-B of the County Law requires all counties to maintain a plan to provide counsel to individuals charged with a crime or who are otherwise statutorily entitled to representation (County Law ยง 722). One manner in which a county may furnish representation is through a bar association plan in which the services of private counsel are rotated and coordinated by an administrator (the Assigned Counsel Plan)(County Law ยง 722 [3]). Section 722-b of the County Law governs the compensation rates for attorneys who participate in the Assigned Counsel Plan. During the period relevant to this case, County Law ยง 722-b provided that attorneys participating in the Assigned Counsel Plan be compensated at a rate not to exceed $25 per hour for work performed outside of court and $40 per hour for work performed in court, plus reasonable expenses. The provision further imposed a cap of $800 for misdemeanor cases and $1,200 for felony cases and all appellate matters.[1] However, upon application to the court, compensation in excess of these statutory limits could be paid upon a showing of "extraordinary circumstances."

These assigned counsel rates, in effect since 1986, have worked a hardship upon the assigned counsel system as the number of attorneys willing to participate in the program severely decreased because the fees were inadequate. At the same time, the number of individuals in

need of assigned representation increased, causing many trial courts to struggle to find attorneys willing to represent indigent defendants in criminal proceedings. There arose a growing concern that the lack of attorneys available to represent indigent criminal defendants threatened to deny such individuals their federal and state constitutional rights. To alleviate the problem, a number of trial judges authorized enhanced compensation awards for assigned counsel. These judges concluded that the loss of attorneys from the assigned counsel panels due to the existing rate structure constituted an extraordinary circumstance justifying an enhanced hourly rate to ensure the availability of qualified attorneys to provide constitutionally required representation.

This practice prompted protests from localities responsible for paying these enhanced awards.

There was, however no mechanism to review these enhanced awards, either judicially or administratively. In 2001, after consulting with the Administrative Board of the Courts, the Chief Administrative Judge amended Rule 127.2 to vest the power to review these awards with the appropriate administrative judge. Specifically, the Chief Administrative Judge amended Rule 127.2 (b) to give administrative judges the power to review enhanced awards, with or without application, and to modify an award “if it is found that the award reflects an abuse of discretion by the trial judge."[2] Plaintiffs Leonard Levenson, Richard A. Siracusa and James H. Tatem are all criminal defense attorneys who participate in the Assigned Counsel Plan, Felony Panel for the County of New York, representing indigent defendants in criminal proceedings. As relevant here, plaintiffs were appointed to represent indigent defendants in five separate criminal proceedings. In each of the underlying proceedings, plaintiffs submitted applications to the presiding trial judge requesting compensation in excess of the statutory limit, and in each instance the respective trial judge determined that extraordinary circumstances warranted an upward departure from the statutory rates. One Justice ordered compensation for Levenson at an hourly rate of $75 for work performed in and out of court, for an aggregate compensation of $10,462.50. Upon Levenson's application in a separate trial, another Justice ordered that Levenson be compensated at an hourly rate of $65 for in court work and $25 for out of court work, totaling $4,007.50. Similarly, a Justice ordered that Siracusa be paid an hourly rate of $75, for a total of $4,875. Tatem's application for compensation in one case resulted in a Justice ordering that he be paid at a rate of $75 per hour, for a total of $2,118.75. Pursuant to an application in a separate case, another Justice ordered that Tatem be compensated at a rate of $75 per hour, for an aggregate of $3,488.35.

In each case, the Director of the Assigned Counsel Plan submitted a request for review of the enhanced fee awards to Administrative Judge Micki A. Scherer, whom the Chief Administrative Judge appointed pursuant to Rule 127.2 (b) to review such excess compensation awards in the Supreme Court, Criminal Term, First Judicial District. Judge Scherer modified each enhanced award by reducing the compensation to the maximum rates set forth in County Law § 722-b.

In January 2002, plaintiffs Siracusa and Tatem commenced a declaratory judgment action against defendants Jonathan Lippman, in his official capacity as the Chief Administrative Judge of the Courts, Judge Scherer and the New York State Office of Court Administration challenging the constitutionality of Rule 127.2 (b). In May 2002, plaintiff Levenson brought a similar action, which was subsequently consolidated with the Siracusa/Tatem action pursuant to a stipulation.

Plaintiffs, in their respective complaints, asserted that Rule 127.2 (b) “unconstitutionally permitted the establishment of an appellate court by delegating the power to review a trial court's order to” an administrative judge.

Ruling on plaintiffs' declaratory judgment action, Supreme Court declared that (1) in amending Rule 127.2 (b), the Chief Administrative Judge did not exceed the authority granted to him by the New York Constitution and the New York Legislature; (2) Rule 127.2 (b) is neither invalid nor unconstitutional; and (3) Judge Scherer's orders modifying the awards of compensation

granted by the trial judges are valid. Rejecting plaintiffs' argument that the trial court's exercise of discretion in the award of enhanced compensation fees was not subject to review, the court, relying on Matter of Werfel v Agresta (, 36 NY2d 624 [1975]) and Matter of Director of Assigned Counsel Plan of the City of New York (Bodek) (87 2 191 [1995]), stated that "compensation awarded to assigned counsel is not reviewable by the appellate courts, but can only be reviewed on an administrative level.” The court also concluded that Rule 127.2 (b) was validly amended pursuant to the power conferred upon the Chief Administrative Judge by article VI, § 28(b) of the Constitution to “adopt administrative rules for the efficient and orderly transaction of business in the trial courts,” as delegated by the Chief Judge in 22 NYCRR 80.1.

The Appellate Division reversed Supreme Court's judgment, vacated Judge Scherer's orders modifying the trial courts' excess compensation awards, reinstated the original excess compensation awards and declared Rule 127.2 (b) null and void. The court concluded that the authority of the administrative judge to review the trial judge's award of enhanced compensation provided in Rule 127.2 (b) was inconsistent with New York Constitution article VI, § 30, which grants individual courts the power to adopt such rules and regulations as are "consistent with the general practice and procedure as provided by statute or general rules." In particular, the court stated that Rule 127.2 (b) violated article VI, § 30 because it usurped the Appellate Division's authority, pursuant to CPLR 5501 (c) and 5701, to review the merits of an order of the Supreme Court. Thus, the court held that Rule 127.2 (b), as amended, effectuated an unconstitutional transfer of appellate jurisdiction from the Appellate Division to administrative judges, who “lack[] any constitutional or statutory appellate authority and who [are] further constrained by the well-settled proscription against issuing a ruling in contravention of a court of coordinate jurisdiction.”

Defendants appealed to this Court as a matter of right on constitutional grounds, pursuant to CPLR 5601(b) , and we now reverse the order of the Appellate Division and reinstate the judgment of Supreme Court.

In Matter of Werfel v Agresta (, 36 NY2d 624 [1975]), the petitioner was a participant in the Assigned Counsel Plan and was awarded compensation that fell within the statutory limits. The petitioner brought a CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking an increase in compensation.

Concluding that the assignment of compensation to assigned counsel pursuant to County Law § 722-b was administrative in nature and did not concern the performance of an adjudicative function, we held that "there was no basis for justiciable review of allowances to counsel made within the maximums provided by the statute" ( id. at 626-27). We did, however, leave open the possibility that an assigned attorney entitled to an adjustment in compensation could apply for it through the appropriate administrative judge or even to the Administrative Board of the court system (see id. at 627).

In Matter of Director of Assigned Counsel Plan of the City of New York (Bodek) (87 2 191 [1995]) we reaffirmed our determination that a trial judge's award of compensation pursuant to County Law § 722-b was an administrative act not subject to judicial review. There, two trial judges awarded excess compensation to a court-appointed social worker pursuant to County Law § 722-c. After the same trial judges denied the requests from the Director of the Assigned Counsel Plan to reduce the compensation awards, the Director attempted to appeal the awards.

The Appellate Division declined to consider the merits of the appeals, holding that they were not reviewable. This Court affirmed.

Initially, we noted that, as to appealability, there was no meaningful distinction between the County Law §§ 722 and 722-b assigned-counsel compensation orders to be appealed in Werfel and the County Law § 722-c assigned-expert compensation orders in Bodek. We went on to hold that "such orders are essentially administrative in nature and, accordingly, are not amenable to judicial review on the merits by an appellate panel." Finally, this Court stated, "[t]o the extent that the trial courts' unreviewable discretion produces truly anomalous

consequences or patterns of abuse in particular situations, the problem can and should be addressed through the available administrative tools."

We reaffirm our holdings in Werfel and Bodek today. In doing so, we disagree with the Appellate Division's conclusion that, by promulgating Rule 127.2 (b), the Chief Administrative Judge unconstitutionally divested the Appellate Division of its jurisdiction to review compensation orders issued by the Supreme Court by assigning that power to administrative judges. Indeed, the Appellate Division's holding is the very opposite of its holding in Bodek, which we affirmed. Because, under Bodek and Werfel, the appellate courts have no power to review a trial courts' excess compensation award, and this Court's decisions contemplated administrative review of such awards, Rule 127.2 (b) does not confer upon an administrative judge any authority that would otherwise belong to the appellate courts.

We further conclude that the Chief Administrative Judge properly adopted Rule 127.2 (b) pursuant to his regulatory power under the state constitution and the Judiciary Law. New York Constitution article VI, § 28(b) states: "The chief administrator, on behalf of the chief judge, shall supervise the administration and operation of the unified court system. In the exercise of such responsibility, the chief administrator of the courts shall have such powers and duties as may be delegated to him or her by the chief judge and such additional powers and duties as may be provided by law."

Moreover, Judiciary Law § 212 states that it is the role of the Chief Administrator of the courts to "supervise the administration and operation of the unified court system" on behalf of the Chief Judge. In the exercise of that responsibility, § 212 provides that the Chief Administrator "shall have the powers and duties as may be delegated to him by" the Chief Judge.

The powers and duties of the Chief Administrative Judge, as delegated by the Chief Judge, are set forth in 22 NYCRR 80.1, which in pertinent part provides: "In the exercise of this delegated responsibility and in accordance with the standards and administrative policies established, approved and promulgated pursuant to article VI, section 28(c) of the Constitution, the Chief Administrator shall: *** “(6) adopt administrative rules for the efficient and orderly transaction of business in the trial courts, including but not limited to calendar practice, in consultation with the Administrative Board of the Courts or the appropriate Appellate Divisions."

Defendants maintain, and we agree, that with the advice and consent of the Administrative Board, the Chief Administrator properly promulgated Rule 127.2 (b) pursuant to his delegated authority to adopt rules for the efficient and orderly transaction of trial court business. The allocation of finite financial resources for the payment of assigned counsel is a concern for court administrators, and the Chief Administrator validly adopted Rule 127.2 (b) pursuant to the authority delegated to him under 22 NYCRR 80.1.

Finally, we find unpersuasive plaintiffs' argument that Rule 127.2 (b) violates New York Constitution article VI, § 30 by intruding upon the Legislature's authority to regulate proceedings in law.[3] More particularly, plaintiffs maintain that the regulation conflicts with the Legislature's intent, as expressed in County Law § 722-b, to vest trial courts with exclusive authority to fix assigned counsel fees. We disagree. By making no provision in the County Law for any review of excessive compensation awards, the Legislature simply created a gap in the administrative process that the Chief Administrator was entitled to fill. Otherwise, these awards

would be wholly unreviewable. While plaintiffs seek this result, we cannot agree with it.

Additionally, given that the award of compensation fees is an administrative rather than a judicial act of the trial judge, the Legislature could not by statute divest the Chief Administrator of his authority under New York Constitution article VI, ยง 28 to supervise the administration and operation of the Unified Court System on behalf of the Chief Judge ( see Met Council, Inc. v Crosson, , 84 NY2d 328, 335 [1994][where the powers of the Chief Administrator flow from the State Constitution, they cannot be abrogated by statute]).

Accordingly, the order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and the judgment of Supreme Court, reinstated.

Levenson, et al. v Lippman, et al. No. 1 ROSENBLATT, J. (concurring): Although I join the Court's opinion without reservation, I write separately to acknowledge the Appellate Division's concern -- so ardently expressed in the case before us -- that section 127.2 (b) would divest that court of the power to review orders of the kind involved here. Although I agree that the Chief Administrative Judge had the authority to promulgate section 127.2 (b), I note that he did so only after the Legislature did not enact 1995 NY Senate Bill S 4481. Under that bill, which was introduced at the request of the Office of Court Administration on the recommendation of the Administrative Board of the Courts, the Appellate Division would have been given authority to conduct expedited reviews of enhanced payment vouchers. [4] That would have satisfied the issues raised by the Appellate Division, while filling "a void in the . . . statutory framework" (Senate Introducer Mem in Support, 1995 NY Senate Bill S 4481), which otherwise lacked any provision for review of enhanced payment vouchers.

As amici, the Association of Justices of the Supreme Court of the State of New York and Association of Supreme Court Justices for the City of New York oppose section 127.2 (b), in part because it allows administrative judges to overrule the orders of other judges of "coordinate jurisdiction." S 4481 would have also obviated that objection.

A decade ago, keenly sensitive to the viewpoint of the trial and appellate Justices, the court administration sought passage of S 4481, which would have authorized review by the Appellate Division, instead of review by administrative judges. Because the Senate Bill was never enacted, the Chief Administrative Judge exercised his powers to provide for administrative review, the only review he could institute without legislation. Given this background, the Legislature may wish to consider vesting the Appellate Division with the authority to review vouchers of this type, as contemplated by S 4481. In that fashion, the best of both worlds would be realized: filling a void in oversight and giving that oversight to an appellate tribunal.

Order reversed, with costs, and judgment of Supreme Court, New York County, reinstated.

Opinion Per Curiam. Judges Smith, Ciparick, Rosenblatt, Graffeo, Read and Smith concur, Judge Rosenblatt in a separate concurring opinion. Chief Judge Kaye took no part.

Decided February 15, 2005

Footnotes 1 County Law ยง 722-b has since been amended. Effective January 1, 2004, compensation rates for assigned counsel were increased to $75 per hour (for work performed in and out of court) for felony cases and appeals, with a maximum compensation limit of $4,400. For misdemeanor cases, the compensation rates were increased to $60 per hour, with a maximum limit of $2,400.

2 Prior to the amendment, Rule 127.2 (b) provided that, upon proper application to review an award of enhanced attorney's fees, the trial judge could reconsider the award in consultation with the appropriate administrative judge. The final determination of the fees, however, remained with the trial judge.

3 New York Constitution, article VI, section 30 states: "The legislature shall have the same power to alter and regulate the jurisdiction and proceedings in law and in equity that it has heretofore exercised. The legislature may, on such terms as it shall provide and subject to subsequent modification, delegate, in whole or in part, to a court, including the appellate division of the supreme court, or to the chief administrator of the courts, any power possessed by the legislature to regulate practice and procedure in the courts. The chief administrator of the courts shall exercise any such power delegated to him or her with the advice and consent of the administrative board of the courts. Nothing herein contained shall prevent the adoption of regulations by individual courts consistent with the general practice and procedure as provided by statute or general rules."

4 In pertinent part, the proposed legislation read, "Any order of a trial court determining a claim for compensation or reimbursement hereunder shall be subject to review in the court having appellate jurisdiction of the action in which the claim was made upon application of the claimant or the political subdivision upon which payment of the claim is a charge. The appellate court shall provide for the expedited determination of such application and may confirm, increase, or decrease the compensation or reimbursement awarded."

ATTACHMENTS

LIPPMAN AT HIS BEST!

JONATHAN LIPPMAN’S NEWEST FRAUD. HE IS WAITING FOR ME TO CASH THIS TO DISTORT THE FOCUS. HE IS A SICK MAN.

MIRIAM SNYDER INSTRUCTOR

ESL

DATE: NOVEMBER 5, 2006

COURSE:

ESL 6

OBSERVATION DATE:

NOVEMBER 7, 2006

EDUCATION INSTITUTION:

WESTCHESTER COMMUNITY COLLEGE

TOPIC: THE INTEGRATION OF READING, WRITING, SPEAKING, LISTENING AND USING MODALS EFECTIVELY

MS. SNYDER

NOVEMBER 5, 2006

COURSE: ESL 6

BACKGROUND THE ESL STUDENTS IN THIS CLASS CAN COMMUNICATE SOMEWHAT FLUENTLY IN ENGLISH, BUT DEMONSTRATE WEAK, GRAMMAR, READING, PRONUNCIATION AND WRITING SKILLS. THEY HAVE A LIMITED VOCABULARY AND GRASP OF ENGLISH CONCEPTS. THEY LACK LINGUISTIC COMPETENCE IN ENGLISH BECAUSE OF AN INABILITY TO SPEAK, READ, OR WRITE WITHOUT NUMEROUS ERRORS IN ENGLISH GRAMMAR AND USAGE. THE MISTAKES MADE ARE USUALLY NOT THOSE OF A NATIVE SPEAKER OF ENGLISH, BUT OF SOMEONE EXPERIENCING A GREAT DEAL OF INTERFERENCE FROM ANOTHER LANGUAGE SYSTEM. CONSEQUENTLY, THE LESSONS ARE MODIFIED TO MEET THE NEEDS OF ESL STUDENTS AT VARYING HIGH INTERMEDIATE/ADVANCED LEVELS. THE INSTRUCTIONAL STRATEGIES ARE FOCUSED ON DEALING WITH ANOTHER LANGUAGE INTERFERENCE AS OPPOSED TO NATIVE REMEDIATION.

INSTRUCTIONAL GOALS  LEARNERS WILL DEVELOP STRATEGIES FOR IMPROVED READING, WRITING, PRONOUNCIATION, LISTENING, SPEAKING, GRAMMAR AND VOCABULARY COMPREHENSION,  LEARNERS WILL REFINE ACADEMIC SKILLS ACQUIRED AT EARLIER LEVELS,  LEARNERS WILL READ AND WRITE WITH A FOCUS ON COMPREHENSION, REPITITION, AND CRITICAL THINKING,  LEARNERS WILL USE READING, WRITING, LISTENING AND THINKING SKILLS FOR CRITICAL ANALYSIS AND EVALUATION,  LEARNERS WILL IMPROVE ACADEMIC SKILLS NECESSARY TO FUNCTION IN AN ENGLISH SETTING,  LEARNERS WILL DEMONSTRATE UNDERSTANDING OF NEW VOCABULARY, READING COMPREHENSION VIA THE ATTACHED MAHATMA GHANDI STORY AND DEVELOP A CLEAR UNDERSTANDING OF KEY GRAMMATICAL STRUCTURES ASSOCIATED WITH MODALS,  LEARNERS WILL USE THE INSTRUCTIONAL PROCESS TO DEVELOP CROSS

CULTURAL AWARENESS IN DEVELOPING THEIR UNDERSTANDING OF THE MEANING OF ELECTION DAY, MS. SNYDER

NOVEMBER 5, 2006

INSTRUCTIONAL OBJECTIVES STUDENTS WILL:  LEARN, READ AND WRITE ABOUT MAHATMA GHANDI ,  DISTINGUISH BETWEEN TOO NARROW AND TOO BROAD MAIN IDEAS,  DEMONSTRATE UNDERSTANDING OF MINOR AND MAJOR DETAILS, INFERENCES, AND DERIVE INFORMATION FROM THE READING TO UNDERSTAND AND UTILIZE VOCABULARY EFFECTIVELY,  DEMONSTRATE SKILL IN INTERPRETIVE AND CRITICAL READING, AS WELL AS ANALYTICAL PROFICIENCY,  EXPAND KNOWLEDGE OF GRAMMATICAL CONCEPTS AS IT RELATES TO USING MODALS TO EXPRESS SPEAKERS’ ATITUDES,  UNDERSTAND AND USE ADVISABILITY MODALS, THE PAST FORM OF SHOULD, AND THE EXPECTATION MODAL, BE SUPPOSED TO,  UNDERSTAND AND USE MODALS TO FACILITATE WRITING SKILLS, AS WELL AS USE REASONING SKILLS TO DECIDE WHAT PEOPLE SHOULD DO AND SHOULD HAVE DONE IN DIFFERENT SITUATIONS,  APPLY READING, WRITING, GRAMMAR, SPEAKING AND LISTENING SKILLS FOR CRITICAL ANALYSIS AND EVALUATION,  DEMONSTRATE MASTERY OF THE SKILLS AND COMPETENCIES BY UTILIZING CRITICAL THINKING AND INFERENTIAL SKILLS IN ANSWERING READING, WRITING, GRAMMAR AND VOCABULARY EXERCISES, QUIZZES AND TESTS,

INSTRUCTIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: THIS IS A THREE HOUR CLASS AND AT THE REQUEST OF THE STUDENTS HALF OF THE TIME IS SPENT ON READING ON TUESDAYS THE FIRST DAY OF THE WEEK. THE OTHER HALF OF THE PERIOD IS SPENT ON GRAMMAR ON TUESDAYS. THE FIRST HALF OR THE FIRST HOUR OF THE LESSON IS FOCUSED ON READING, SUMMARIZING, PARAPHRASING, AND ANSWERING READING COMPREHENSION AND VOCABULARY DEVELOPMENT EXERCISES.

INSTRUCTIONAL/ENVIRONMENTAL MODIFICATIONS: STUDENTS WILL DEMONSTRATE ACTIVE PARTICIPATION BY TEACHER ELICITED COVERT AND OVERT INVOLVEMENT. COVERT INVOLVEMENT WILL BE ENCOURAGED

BY ASKING QUESTIONS THAT REQUIRE STUDENTS TO USE THINK TIME, BEFORE ANSWERING. QUESTIONS WILL BE PHRASED WITH WORDS LIKE:  CONSIDER,  THINK ABOUT,

 TAKE A FEW MOMENTS AND CONSIDER,  IMAGINE, PHRASING QUESTIONS LIKE THIS WILL INVITE STUDENTS TO PARTICIPATE COVERTLY. THE KEY ISSUE HERE IS TO GIVE STUDENTS THE TIME NEEDED TO THINK. OVERT INVOLVEMENT WILL BE DEMONSTRATED BY:    

CHORAL RESPONDING, SIGNAL THE ANSWER, WRITE THE ANSWER DOWN, DISCUSS THE ANSWER,

ACTIVE PARTICIPATION WILL BE DEMONSTRATED BY IMPLEMENTING THE QUESTIONING TECHNIQUES DESCRIBED ABOVE. THESE STRATAGEMS WILL BE USED TO CHECK UNDERSTANDING AND MEASURE STUDENT LEARNING.

MOTIVATION: STUDENTS WILL REVEIW THE VOCABULARY AND READING HOMEWORK. THE HOMEWORK WAS TO READ THE MAHATMA GHANDI STORY AND TO COMPLETE PAGES 160 TO 167 IN THE BELOW MENTIONED GRAMMAR BOOK. STUDENTS WILL REVIEW VOCABULARY ACCORDINGLY. I WILL ELICIT SYNONYMS AS NEEDED. STUDENTS WILL DISCUSS THE SETTING OF THE STORY, GHANDI.

ACTIVITY: READING: STUDENTS WILL READ THE STORY ALOUD. WE WILL REVIEW USE AND APPLICATION OF MODALS IN THE STORY AS THIS IS THE GRAMMATICAL CONCEPT BEING STUDIED AT THIS TIME. STUDENTS WILL IDENTIFY HOW MODALS CAN BE USED TO CONTROL TONE IN THIS READING. SYNONYMS WILL BE USED FOR QUESTIONABLE VOCABULARY. STUDENTS WILL SUMMARIZE AND PARAPHRASE ACCORDINGLY. STUDENTS WILL READ FOR INFORMATION, KNOWLEDGE, INTERPRETATION AND EVALUATION. GRAMMAR: THE SECOND HALF OF THE LESSON WILL FOCUS ON THE USE OF ADVISABILITY MODALS: OUGHT TO, HAD BETTER, AND THE PAST FORM OF SHOULD, GRAMMAR BOOK PAGES 160 TO 168. STUDENTS WILL WORK IN GROUPS AND USE MODALS IN CONVERSATIONS. STUDENTS WILL WRITE DIALOGUES USING MODALS EFFECTIVELY. STUDENTS WILL DIFFERENTIATE BETWEEN SHOULD AND MUST HAVE AND DISCUSS THE DIFFERENT MEANINGS. STUDENTS WILL WORK IN PAIRS AND DEVELOP CONVERSATIONS USING SHOULD HAVE + PAST PARTICIPLE.

EVALUATION/ASSESSMENT: READING: STUDENTS WILL DEMONSTRATE UNDERSTANDING OF THE READING BY COMPLETING THE ATTACHED CRITICAL READING EXERCISES AND WILL GET A CRITICAL READING SCORE AS A FOLLOW UP. STUDENTS WILL IDENTIFY THE THESIS STATEMENT, USE NEW

VOCABULARY IN CONTEXT, SUMMARIZE, PARAPHRASE, INTEGRATE UNDERSTANDING OF TONE THROUGH MODALS, UNDERSTAND THE AUTHOR’S PURPOSE AND EMPLOY CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS. STUDENTS WILL WRITE TO RESPOND TO THE READING. THEY WILL WRITE A PERSONAL RESPONSE AND A SELF ASSESSMENT/ANAYSIS OF THE STORY. GRAMMAR: STUDENTS WILL WORK IN GROUPS AND WRITE WHAT THEY THINK PEOPLE IN SPECIFIC SITUATIONS SHOULD HAVE DONE AND SHOULD NOT HAVE DONE. EACH GROUP WILL BE ASSIGNED SEPARATE SITUATIONS AND EACH GROUP WILL PRODUCE ONE FINAL WRITING FOR THE GROUP. STUDENTS WILL DIFFERENTIATE BETWEEN NECESSITY, ADVISABILITY, AND PROHIBITION MODALS. STUDENTS WILL IDENTIFY THE STRONGEST MODALS IN A VARIETY OF SENTENCES.

HOMEWORK: STUDENTS WILL COMPLETE THE ATTACHED MODAL QUIZZES AS ASSIGNED. STUDENTS WILL COMPLETE THE ATTACHED WHAT SHOULD YOU DO AND WHAT SHOULD HE HAVE DONE MODAL WORKSHEETS. THE GRAMMATICAL WORKSHEETS HAVE BEEN ASSIGNED TO REINFORCE/REPEAT AND INTEGRATE GRAMMATICAL AND READING CONCEPTS TAUGHT. STUDENTS WILL COMPLETE THE LAST FOUR PAGES OF THE CHAPTER OR COMPLETE THE CHAPTER FROM WHERE WE END. WRITING: STUDENTS WILL COMPLETE PAGE 168, EXERCISE 22, WRITING ASSIGNMENT FROM THE BELOW MENTIONED GRAMMAR BOOK. BASED ON THE ASSIGNMENT, STUDENTS WILL CHOOSE A TOPIC TO WRITE ABOUT AND INCLUDE SELECTED MODALS IN THE WRITING.

SUPPLEMENTAL INSTRUCTION: STUDENTS WILL COMPLETE THE ATTACHED SUPPLEMENTAL CROSS CULTURAL ELECTION DAY EXERCISES AS NOVEMBER 7, 2006 IS ELECTION DAY AND STUDENTS SHOULD UNDERSTAND THE ELECTORAL PROCESS AS NEW AMERICANS.

FOLLOW UP ASSESSMENT TOOLS AND TECHNIQUES: STUDENTS WILL DEMONSTRATE PROGRESS AND UNDERSTANDING OF THE INSTRUCTIONAL CONCEPTS TAUGHT BY OBTAINING A CRITICAL READING SCORE AND A GRAMMATICAL MODAL TEST SCORE. SEE ATTACHMENTS. ADDITIONALLY, STUDENT WRITINGS WILL BE ASSESSED AND GRADED. TEACHER OBSERVATIONS WILL BE USED TO ASSESS INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRESS AND TO MODIFY INSTRUCTION IF AND AS NEEDED. STUDENTS WILL PLAY A MODAL GAME AND DEMONSTRATE UNDERSTANDING AND USAGE OF MODALS EFFECTIVELY. FURTHERMORE, TO FOLLOW UP ON CROSS CULTURAL AWARENESS AND READING SKILLS DEVELOPMENT, LATER IN THE WEEK, STUDENTS WILL COMPLETE THE ATTACHED VETERANS DAY READING FILL IN AND DISCUSS ITS MEANING.

RECOMMENDED WEEKLY WRITING ASSIGNMENT DOCUMENTATION: STUDENT WRITINGS, JOURNALS AND PORTFOLIOS ARE VALIDATED IN THE STUDENT WRITINGS FROM THE BELOW ASSIGNMENTS: TWO PICTURE PROMPTS, ESSAY WRITING:HISTORICAL FIGURES WITH THEIR ACCOMPLISHMENTS, PASSIVE VOICE BUSY PICTURE WRITING, SIMILES AND METAPHORS IN HALLOWEEN STORIES, AND WEEKLY JOURNAL WRITINGS ON THE CRITICAL READING SCORE SHEET BASED ON THE NUMEROUS SHORT STORIES WE HAVE READ. STUDENT WRITTEN RESPONSES/JOURNAL ENTRIES INDICATE THAT THE STUDENTS EXTREMELY ENJOY THE MULTICULTURAL, HIGH INTEREST, INTERMEDIATE TO ADVANCED LEVEL, ESL APPROPRIATE COLLEGE LEVEL SHORT STORIES. SEE ATTACHED STUDENT WRITTEN ENTRIES.

MATERIALS:  UNDERSTANDING AND USING ENGLISH GRAMMAR VOL. A, BY BETTY AZAR, CHAPTER 9, PART 1, MODALS,  THE AZAR GRAMMAR SERIES: TEST BANK FOR UNDERSTANDING AND USING ENGLISH GRAMMAR,  HEROES: EXTRAORDINARY STORIES WITH EXERCISES FOR DEVELOPING CRITICAL READING SKILLS, HENRY AND MELISSA BILLINGS,  ESL SKILL SHARPENERS BOOK 4, JUDY DEFLIPPO AND CHARLES SKIDMORE  ESL TEACHER’S HOLIDAY ACTIVITIES KIT, BY ELIZABETH CLAIRE

REFERENCES: TEACHING MAKES A DIFFERENCE, CAROL CUMMINGS, NEW WAYS IN TESOL SERIES II, INNOVATIVE CLASSROOM ASSESSMENTS AND TECHNIQUES, JACK C. RICHARDS AND J.D. BROWN, ENHANCING READING IN THE LANGUAGE CLASSROOM, T. FEUERSTEIN AND M. SCHOLNIK, THE TEACHING OF LANGUAGE ARTS TO ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS, A RESOURCE GUIDE, THE NEW YORK STATE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT,

THE INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS ARE ATTACHED AND WILL BE PLACED IN MS. MCGEE’S MAILBOX. THANK YOU.

3230 CRUGER AVENUE #6B BRONX, NEW YORK 10467 MARCH 14, 2007 NYS DEPARTMENT OF LABOR PO BOX 15130 ALBANY, NEW YORK 12212-5130

AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH DISPUTING THE VALIDITY OF THE ATTACHED WESTCHESTER COMMUNITY COLLEGE REPORTED EARNINGS ON THE ATTACHED NYS DEPARTMENT OF LABOR UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE MONETARY BENEFIT DETERMINATION FORM 1. I, MIRIAM SNYDER SUBMIT THIS AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE OF THE 14 TH AMENDMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CONSTITUTION. I AM DISPUTING THE ATTACHED FRAUD IN THE NYS DEPARTMENT OF LABOR WESTCHESTER COMMUNITY COLLEGE REPORTED EARNINGS. THE REPORTED EARNINGS ARE FRAUDULENT HAVE NOT BEEN VERIFIED, CAN NOT BE VERIFIED, AND ARE INCONSISTENT WITH THE ATTACHED EVIDENCE. 2. THE ATTACHED WESTCHESTER COMMUNITY COLLEGE FRAUDULENT EARNING REPORT IS DAMAGING, MALICIOUS, ENSLAVING ONE TO PARTAKE IN AND ENTERTAIN FRAUD, AND IS IN VIOLATION OF ALL EQUAL PROTECTIONS UNDER LAW. 3. I, MIRIAM SNYDER WORKED AT WESTCHESTER COMMUNITY COLLEGE DURING THE 2005 YEAR AND EARNED OVER 11, 000 DOLLARS AS DEMONSTRATED ON THE ATTACHED PAY STUB DATED 12/29/05.

4. I, MIRIAM SNYDER WORKED AT WESCHESTER COMMUNITY COLLEGE DURING THE 2006 YEAR AND EARNED OVER 30,000 DOLLARS. SEE THE ATTACHED WESTCHESTER COMMUNITY COLLEGE W-2 STATEMENT VERIFYING EARNINGS OVER $30,000.

5. I, MIRIAM SNYDER LOST MY JOB FOR UNKNOWN REASONS, WITH EXEMPLARY RATINGS AND ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND AS PART OF A DOCUMENTED CONSPIRACY TO KILL UNDER DISGUISE. 6. I, MIRIAM SNYDER, AM SUBMITTING WITH THIS AFFIDAVIT WESTCHESTER COMMUNITY COLLEGE PAY STUBS ENTITLING ME TO THE FULL MONETARY BENEFIT ALLOWED THAT HAS BEEN MINIMIZED BASED

ON THE ATTACHED FRAUD. I AM SUBMITTING THE FOLLOWING PAY STUBS: PERIOD ENDING: 1. 12/17/2006 2. 9/24/06 3. 7/02/06 4. 4/23/06 5. 2/26/06 6. 10/09/05 7. 12/18/ 2005 7. I RESENT BEING COMPELLED TO DEFEND MYSELF AGAINST THIS INFLICTED FRAUD EMBEDDED IN FICTIONAL ADMINISTRATION OF LAW. 8. THE ATTACHED MONETARY BENEFIT DETERMINATION WITH FRAUDULENT WAGE INFORMATION HAS BEEN USED TO DENY ME ENTITLED BENEFITS WHEN THIS SHOULD NOT HAVE HAPPENED. 9. I EXPECT TO BE TREATED AND RECEIVE BENEFITS IN A MANNER CONSISTENT WITH THE EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CONSTITUTION. 10. I HAVE VERIFIED THE WAGES PAID TO ME AND SHOULD NOT BE COMPELLED TO PARTAKE IN THE ATTACHED NON VERIFIED FRAUD ANY MORE. 11. THE ATTACHED NYS DEPARTMENT OF LABOR WESTCHESTER COMMUNITY COLLEGE EARNING REPORT IS FRAUDUENT AND NOT VERIFIED AND CAN NOT BE VERIFIED BECAUSE IT IS FRAUD. 12. I AM SUBMITTING THIS VERIFIED AFFIDAVIT WITH EVIDENCE ESTABLISHING ENTITLEMENT TO THE CORRECT MAXIMUM AMOUNT. I ASK THAT THE MONETARY BENEFIT DETERMINATION BE CORRECTED BASED ON THE VERIFIED EVDIENCE SUBMITTED. 13. I ATTEST TO THE FACT THAT I AM ENTITLED TO THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT AS WELL AS THE BACK DATED AMOUNTS DUE TO ME BECAUSE OF THE ATTACHED FRAUD BEING PRIORITIZED.

3230 Cruger Avenue #6B Bronx, New York 10467 February 12,2007

Andrew Cuomo, NYS Attorney General Robert Johnson, Bronx District Attorney

Re: JONATHAN LIPPMAN, DISGUISED KILLING OPERATION IN FULL EFFECT, PATTERNED AND PRACTICED UNCONSTITUTIONAL USURPATIONS, LEGAL FICTIONS THAT DEMISE, TERRORIZATION OF MY MOTHER'S HOME. COMPLAINT SEEKING ARREST AND REMOVAL OF JONATHAN LIPPMAN FOR CONTINUOUSLY DEFRAUDING THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT AND PEOPLE VIA UNCONSTITUTIONAL USURPATIONS AND INFLICTED LEGAL FICTIONS THAT HARM AND KILL UNDER DISGUISE. PLEASE SEE ThE ATTACHED DOCUMENTATION OF SUCH IN: 1 NO.1 LEONARD J. LEVNSON ETAL .โ ข RESPONDENTS V. JONATHAN LIPPMAN, & C ., ET AL ., APPELLANTS. THE CLEAREST FORM OF U.S. DEFRAUD DOCUMENTATION AND LAWLESS CONSTITUTIONAL USURPATIONS. Dear Mr. Cuomo and Mr. Johnson: I write this letter with respect to the above, on behalf of public safety, and in hopes of no more dead people under Jonathan Lippman's multiple disguised killing operations via lawless usurpations, legal fiction inflictions that violate the Rules Governing Judicial Conduct, such as violation of ยง 100.1 Judge Shall Uphold the Integrity and Independence of the Judiciary, ยง 100.2 Judge Shall Avoid Impropriety and the Appearance of Impropriety of the Judge's Activities, (A) A judge shall respect and comply with the law and shall act at all times in a manner that promotes public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary, ยง 100.3 A Judge Shall Perform the Duties of Judicial Office Impartially and Diligently, (B) A Judge Shall be Faithful to the law and Maintain professional confidence in it. A judge shall not be swayed by partisan interest, public clamor, or fear of criticism. The attached lawsuit against Jonathan Lippman as well as the hundreds of complaintS filed against him document and establish his violation of the above sections as well as his lawless UNCONSTITUTIONAL USURPATIONS. The attached Africa program with over 13 million dead people under a legal fiction medical program listed under Jonathan Lippman's name clearly violates the above note Judicial Rules.

Foremost, via usurpation, my computer has been obstructed. I am TYPINGNERIFYING the attached handwritten notarized JONATHAN LIPPMAN COMPLAINT dated February 11,2007 with his most recent legal fiction enjoinment, Mathew Di Micco of Total Securityny.

Consequently, this complaint is two fold, one against Jonathan Lippman as cited above and two against Mathew Di Micco as cited below. My computer has been obstructed via patterned and practiced Jonathan Lippman lawless usurpation, fraud implementation, and infliction of legal fictions to impede due exercise of rights by attempting to prevent, obstruct, impede or interfere with same, 18 V.S.C. Section 1509. Consequently, the attached

complaint is handwritten and this complaint shall confirm and supplement such. My computer was obstructed to stop this needed complaint.

My computer has been maliciously obstructed by Mathew Di Micco, a legal fiction company that came to my house under false pretenses. Specifically, I called Total Security Inc. listed as located in Manhattan to come to my house to install a computerized surveillance system. An appointment was made. See the attached yellow pages advertisement that I called listed as Total Security Inc and see the Mathew Di Micco business card that is a legal fiction to the company I called. Mathew Di Micco came to my house under the false pretenses of Total Security Inc. Mathew Di Micco acting as an agent for Total Security Inc exemplifies criminal practices in violation of GBS Section 352-c Prohibited Acts constituting misdemeanor; felony.

Mathew Di Micco came to my house under false pretenses and deception and maliciously obstructed my computer making way for no surveillance in my apartment, to facilitate Jonathan Lippman's patterned and practiced, pathogen administration/lawless deadly injections, to kill under disguise, like his name is listed on the Africa deadly pathogen programs that have left over 13 million dead under disguise. Mathew Di Micco is a co conspirator to Jonathan Lippman's disguised Killing operation of me via stealing $1, 400, obstructing my computer, and impeding due exercise of rights.

Jonathan Lippman is trying to have me killed under disguise as he has been doing for years. Look at Africa. Look at his name on top of the attached deadly pathogen program dissemination in Africa, while obstructing the courts of New York. He is trying to have me killed under disguise because this is what he does best. I seek protection and enforcement of the law. I seek the arrest of Jonathan Lippmann as his name is listed as leadership to deadly pathogen programs that have left millions dead under the disguise of one of Jonathan Lippman's deadly pathogens. I seek his arrest as authorized in his self-inflicting lawless unconstitutional usurpations documented in the attached lawsuit.

He is a killer and he administers deadly pathogens over lawsuits and to kill under disguise. The man is sick. My home is being terrorized by Jonathan Lippman patterned and practiced usurpations and legal fiction inflictions. I have recently spoken to my mother and have found out that her home too is being terrorized. Above all, it is my professional opinion that Jonathan Lippman is trying to kill my mother to get to me, as her home has been terrorized. She is 77 years old and the terrorism must stop. I stayed at her house recently and discovered that gases were being erupted that could kill one in their sleep as my mouth was dried up ridiculously. It is my opinion that Jonathan Lippman is orchestrating another inflicted disguised killing by having her home obstructed with gases to make it appears as if something happened while a sleep, while the lack of oxygen is apparent during my stay.

Something malicious is been done to my mother via her heating system and oxygen levels to get to me. Additionally, her home is being terrorized, meaning foods are being tampered with, and things are being arranged different from where we have left them. She is afraid to leave her house because of the terrorism. This has to stop. Jonathan Lippman will not kill my mother to get to me and or inflict a deadly pathogen to silence his needed removal and my documentation of such authorized need.

Jonathan Lippman needs to be arrested so these concerns would no longer linger, as a documented Killer program leadership specialist and documented Unconstitutional Usurper must be put away on behalf of public safety.

The same way Jonathan Lippman usurped unauthorized power in the attached Levenson v. Jonathan Lippman law suit, is the same way he usurped lawless power that has left the people in the Africa attached programs dead, over 13 million. Jonathan Lippman's affixation to deadly pathogens, legal fictions to demise people, power craze unconstitutional usurpations, and lawless megamaniac acts require his arrest and removal. See attachments.

I am attaching a new patterned and practiced legal fiction, which is a lawless, unconstitutional, retardation of equal protection laws, unauthenticated, no judicial signature, legal fiction document titled Decision and Order On Motion listed as from the State of New York Supreme Court Appellate Division, Third Judicial Department, Case # 99503. I am requesting that Mr. Cuomo, Attorney General, please intervene and make sure this lawless patterned and practiced legal fiction with no authority, does not further harm me in denying me entitled benefits. Please note, to demonstrate the ruthfullness and psychotic level of hatred, this motion was not opposed, yet this legal fiction was created, that could me harm me unless regulated. This requires documentation.

I am attaching with this letter more Jonathan Lippman patterned and practiced deception and fraud, all to facilitate his disguised killing of me: o

Mathew Di Micco's Business card which is a legal fiction to the attached Yellow Pages company I called in Manhattan. o My affidavit documenting Mathew Di Micco taking $1, 400.00 from me under false pretenses and obstructing of my computer, not allowing me to use my computer or internet. I am at an alternate site right now and afraid to use the internet because of usurping powers that are inflicted to take all of my money.

I am only typing on this computer because I know what I am dealing with. I am dealing with a sick man named Jonathan Lippman who wants me dead and will

1.

inflict any kind of fraud to stop his removal documentation and playing with my money so more will require my attention. This is called the Jonathan Lippman patterened and practiced lawless Inflicted Diversion plan. 路

Notarized letter to American Express re Mathew Di Micco fraudulent claim,

路

$ 700.00 dollar check I signed and gave to Mathew Di Micco under false pretenses. He told me to sign the attached check and give it to him for the surveillance system that is not working. I have requested the check back and for him to sign a disclaimer to American Express for his obstructive program within the first day. I have demanded that he comes and picks up his useless surveillance system. He has refused. I noted the program was not working the first day. See attached letters to him. He has refused to pick up

his obstructive program. He is deliberately trying to compel this documented lawless transaction. He has refused to come and get his obstructive computer and surveillance programs. Mathew Di Micco was sent to obstruct my computer to stop documenting Jonathan Lippman's in progressdisguised killing of me. 路

February 3, 2007 Bank Affidavit,

Please note additionally, I have deposited via credit card from Bank of America $1,900 dollars on my Discover card. This money has been tied up lawlessly and it is my belief that Jonathan Lippman has usurped power again to demise my banking and inflict fraud. My hands are tied. I am afraid to go on line because of Jonathan Lippman's documented above legal fictions and fraud. This is a public attempt to kill me under disguise via lawless and corrupted usurpations and legal fictions. For his arrest, you may use his documented attached lawsuit. This lawsuit shows that Jonathan Lippman committed the following crimes: 1. Conspiracy to offend or Defraud the United States ( 18 U.S.C Section

371)

2. Perjury against his oath of office ( 18 U.S.C. Section 1621) 3. Subornation of Perjury by procuring ( 18 U.S.C. Section 1622) 4. Insurrection against the Constitution by inciting, assisting, or engaging in rebellion against the Constitutional authority of the United States of America ( 18 USC Section 2383 ) 5. (18 U.S.C. Section 1509) I n the attached lawsuit Jonathan Lippman has impeded due exercise of rights by attempting to prevent, obstruct, impede or interfere with same.

In closing, I wish these acts happen to no other human being. Jonathan Lippman is a sick man. His mass murderer name is listed under programs that have been killing under disguise for too long. My mother or I will not kill be killed under disguise because Jonathan Lippman is sick and without restrain. Today me, tomorrow could be anyone else. What else could a person do to fight off these inflicted crimes, lawless usurpations, lawless legal fictions, and continual UNCONSTITUTIONAL PRACTICES AGAINST WE THE PEOPLE OF NEW YORK. Constitutional ENFORCEMENT IS NEEDED. Thank you.

Subscribed & sworn to before me on this 12th day of February 2007

Notary Public, State of New York No. 01AH6 084340, Qualified in Queens CountyCommission Expires, December 02, 2010

Dear Mathew Save your documents.I am forwarding them again for your presentation.

I will let you know when we can meet in the District Attorney's office, I will give you your junk. the broken useless surveillance system and you will give me the 1,400 dollars I paid you under your false pretenses.

A claim will be filed since you have wilfully chosen to enjoin in a malicious documented Jonathan Lippman conspiracy to kill me under multiple disguised operations. Because of your malicious enjoinment, I have no surveillance system and you corrupted my computer.

You maliciously and under false pretense, took my computer out of my house to input whatever garbage you put in here that now causes it to not work properly. You were sent and the world needs to know. We will start with the attorney General and move to the District Attorney's office. You maliciously came to my home and took my computer under false pretenses. The joke is on you because what you did and your refusal to resolve this matter in a civilized manner, is going to lead you where you belong. You came to my house as a legal fiction. You were not the Manhattan company i called. You came to my house via usurped malice. I have offered you choices to resolve this matter. Take your equipment and give me my money. You said no. This means you want to play dirty. You want something to look like it is not. Well, lets keep it public so the world will know your agenda and fraud. Everyone will watch you.

All of this could have been avoided. You could have picked up your garbage and returned the check and sign a letter stating you would not bill American

Express. You chose not to. Why? You wilfully partook in an orchestrated demise of me, when I told you there was a sick judge trying to kill me, that was the reason I needed the system. So you sold me a dysfunctional system and you took my computer to your office for what?

I do not take your wilful enjoinment or you coming in my house under false pretenses lightly. Consequently, the ball will be bounced in the public domain!

So everybody will now just exactly what is going on since you maliciously arranged to tie up my 1400 dollars to leave me here with no surveillance system, despite the fact that you were not the company I called. Your company is a legal fiction of what is in the Yellow pages. You are working for and with a documented killer. You may not know all the details to the plan, but you wilfully took part For the record, should anything happen to me, you will be a co conspirator as I told you the urgency and need for a proper working surveillance and audio system. You deliberately installed a non working system, why???? What is the agenda? To have no evidence, to kill me in my sleep?

For one of Jonathan Lippman's documented usurped injections, while sleeping.

Without a working surveillance system, it will look like what is going on in Africa. What is the agenda? Let the world know because I do not take your actions and or fraud lightly as many innocent people are dead behind these type conspiracies.

YOU HAD NO BUSINESS IN MY HOUSE. YOU WERE NOT THE COMPANY I CALLED FROM THE YELLOW PAGES. THE WORLD NEEDS TO KNOW WHAT LENGTHS JONATHAN LIPPMAN GOES TO, TO FACILAITE USURPATION AND INJECTIOn. I KNOW WHAT TIME IT IS AND COULD CARELESS WHO AGREES. WHAT HAPPENED IN AFRICA, WILL NOT HAPPEN IN MY HOUSE. BE VERY CLEAR. TELL JONATHAN TO BE VERY CLEAR...... THAT I AM NOT GOING TO BE KILLED UNDER THE DISGUISE OF ONE OF HIS DEADLY INJECTIONS. IT IS NOT HAPPENING HERE. IT WILL NOT HAPPEN QUIETLY. I WILL NOT MIRACULOUSLY AND PHENOMENALLY BECOME ILL BECAUSE USURPATION ORCHESTRATED NO SURVELLANCE AND IMMEDITELY AND MIRACULOUSLY THEREAFTER I LOOK LIKE HIS VICTIMS IN AFRICA. ITS NOT HAPPENING HERE. YOU HAD NO BUSINESS IN MY HOUSE. YOU HAD NO BUSINESS WITH MY COMPUTER, YOU HAD NO BUSINESS LEAVING AN OBSTRUCTED SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM IN MY HOUSE THAT WILL FACILIATE ANOTHER DEADLY USURPATION. YOU HAD NO BUSINESS IN MY HOUSE, AND YOU HAVE NO BUSINESS TYING UP MY MONEY FOR A DECENT WORKING SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM.

WATCH WHERE I AM SENDING THIS EMAIL. TO CONGRESS AND EVERY OTHER OFFICE I DEEM APPROPRIATE AS YOUR ENJOINMENT IN LIPPMANS PATTERNED AND PRACTICED USURPATIONS AND DISGUISED KILLINGS, WILL NOT BE TAKEN LIGHTLY. YOU HAD NO BUSINESS IN MY HOUSE, MATHEW DI MICCO, UNDER A DUAL NAME LEGAL FICTION TOTAL SECURITY AND TOTAL SECURITYNY. . THE COMPANY I CALLED IS OUT OF MANHATTAN AND THE NAME IS TOTAL SECURITY INC. YOU HAVE MISREPRESENTED A COMPANY TO FACILATE A DISGUISED KILLING. WHY DID YOU DO IT? TELL JONATHAN LIPPMAN I WILL NOT GET ANY INJECTION IN MY HOUSE WHILE SLEEPING OR ANY OTHER WAY. I WILL GET A WORKING SURVELLANCE SYSTEM AND YOU WILL RETURN MY 1400 DOLLARS YOU HAVE TIED UP SO USURPATION POWERS CAN BE USED TO COME IN MY HOUSE. LET'S KEEP THIS PUBLIC. YOU ARE A FARCE AND WAS SENT TO PREPARE THE SETTING FOR DEADLY USURPATIONS AND FURTHER INFLICTED FRAUD. IT'S NOT HAPPENING HERE UNDER OR OVER DISGUISE. TELL JONATHAN LIPPMAN I SAID SO. Your excuse to compel me to do business with you, by not picking up your non functioning malicious, convoluted, worthless surveillance system is weak, while my life is on the line. Tell whoever ordered you the set up , IT will not work. The bank has been notified and so has American Express. You will give me my money back and I will buy the needed resources to stay alive and WELL AND NOT VICTIM TO JONATHAN LIPPMAN'S DISGUISED KILLING OPERATIONS. HIS NEWEST ATTEMPT IS TO USE USURPATION POWER TO INFLICT HIS PATHOGEN ADMINISTRATION AGENDA AND IT IS NOT HAPPENEING HERE. Be very clear on this.

You took my computer under false pretenses. Now my computer is ruined, barely working. I had to call aol twice tonight because of your malice. A usurped entity is changing words while writing. This did not happen prior to your false pretense visit to my home, and your taking of my computer to your so called office.

I have documented your fraud and working under false pretenses. Maybe you did not know how deep this is, but now you do. Monday, I file this email and the letter I sent to you demanding you take your useless equipment and give me my money. Everyday I am here without the surveillance sytem I paid for, is another day you made easier for Jonathan Lippman's patterned and practiced usurpations. If I end up sick or dead, I want it clear that you made way for such a phenomenon, by coincidentally creating havoc with my money for a needed

surveillance system. The check and credit card billing has been stopped, make an appointment to get your junk out of my house before Monday.

Keep listening to usurpations and malice and you will be in jail with him too. I am a child of God and no demon from the pit of hell will be taking me out under the disguise of an injection or anything else because of no surveillance. I know what I am dealing with. I am dealing with a nut with money. He would love me to be here with no protection or security so usurpation powers can create a social phenomenon. it's not happening here.

The world needs to know!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! . It's up to you, but be very clear, I will not be killed or injected under disguise because of this additional documented lawless usurpation Return my money and pickup your junk immediately. Be well....................

Faxed info To: 1800 542 0999 Faxed to: 954 503 1094 Mayor Bloomberg NYC Mayor US Senator Schumer, U.S. Committee on the Judiciary 757 Third Avenue New York, New York 10017

Honorable John Conyers, Jr, U.S. Committee on the Judiciary 2426 Rayburn Building Washington, DC 20515

(202) 225-5126 Chief Judge Judith Kaye 230 Park Avenue, Suite 826 New York City, New York 10169-0007

Andrew Cuomo, Attorney General Public Integrity Unit 120 Broadway New York, New York, 10271

Robert Johnson Bronx District Attorney 198 East 161st

Bronx, New York 10451

3230 Cruger Avenue 6B Bronx, New York 10467 February 9, 2007 Mathew Di Micco Total Security 22 North Tyson Avenue Floral Park, New York 11001 Re: Attached Legal Fiction Documentation in Your Business Card and the Company I called from the Yellow Pages: Demand For You To Schedule An Appointment To Pick Up Your Surveillance System ASAP, Demand For Return of the Signed Check I gave You, Documentation of you taking My Computer tower and Returning It In a malicious manner.

Dear Mathew: This will document that I do not want the surveillance system you put in my computer because it is not working as promised. There is no audio, the recordings are convoluted, the number system is in army time. Above all the recorder is not working PROPERLY. I simply do not want your system and ask that you pick it up as soon as possible, when I am home.

I feel this was a usurped, malicious, fraudulent intervention. This does not seem like the same company I called in Manhattan and when I look at your business card I see that your company is a LEGAL FICTION, TO THE COMPANY I CALLED. Whatever the case, I want no problems. Please schedule a time and get your system. I will suffer the damages you put in my computer when you took it. Please return the check I signed and gave to you for $700.00, from the last installer, check number 132 from Ilya Mirakov. You told me not to sign it over to you and in good faith I did not. However, I signed the check. I signed the check and gave it to you.

All of this leaves room for pure fraud.

In good faith, please schedule a time to pick up your materials and return the check I negligently signed and gave to you.

Please schedule a time as soon as possible and take back your surveillance system, as it is maliciously not working. Please do not cash the check. Please return the check. I will contact American Express and forward this agreement.

You were here yesterday February 8, 2007 and I am within the 7 day time period to end this association. This business transaction exemplifies inflicted legal fraud. This is exemplified in your attached business card which is different from the company I called from the yellow pages. I wish you chose not to enjoin in this documented lawless usurpation and fraud. Despite all, may your conscience be your guide. Please make arrangements to pick up the surveillance system and return the check I signed and gave you. God bless you. Thank you.

Sincerely, Miriam Snyder

----------------Forwarded Message: fyi Fwd: Handle your business..

Subj: Date: 2/9/2007 7:17:37 P.M. Eastern Standard Time From: MIRISNI To: MIRISNI, imirakov@yahoo.com, glenn_vickers@yahoo.com Right-click picture(s) to display picture options

----------------Forwarded Message: Handle your business..

Subj: Date: 2/9/2007 5:25:28 P.M. Eastern Standard Time

From: MIRISNI To: VIDEOACCESS@HOTMAIL.COM Right-click picture(s) to display picture options

3230 Cruger Avenue 6B Bronx, New York 10467 February 9, 2007 Mathew Di Micco Total Security 22 North Tyson Avenue Floral Park, New York 11001 Re: Attached Legal Fiction Documentation in Your Business Card and the Company I called from the Yellow Pages: Demand For You To Schedule An Appointment To Pick Up Your Surveillance System ASAP, Demand For Return of the Signed Check I gave You, Documentation of you taking My Computer tower and Returning It In a malicious manner.

Dear Mathew: This will document that I do not want the surveillance system you put in my computer because it is not working as promised. There is no audio, the recordings are convoluted, the number system is in army time. Above all the recorder is not working properly. I simply do not want your system and ask that you pick it up as soon as possible, when I am home.

I feel this was a usurped, malicious, fraudulent intervention. This does not seem like the same company I called in Manhattan and when I look at your business card I see that your company is a LEGAL FICTION, TO THE COMPANY I CALLED. Whatever the case, I want no problems. Please schedule a time and get your system. I will suffer the damages you put in my computer when you took it.

Please return the check I signed and gave to you for $700.00, from the last installer, check number 132 from Ilya Mirakov. You told me not to sign it over to you and in good faith I did not. However, I signed the check. I signed the check and gave it to you. All of this leaves room for pure fraud.

In good faith, please schedule a time to pick up your materials and return the check I negligently signed and gave to you.

Please schedule a time as soon as possible and take back your surveillance system, as it is maliciously not working. Please do not cash the check. Please return the check. I will contact American Express and forward this agreement.

You were here yesterday February 8, 2007 and I am within the 7 day time period to end this association. This business transaction exemplifies inflicted legal fraud. This is exemplified in your attached business card which is different from the company I called from the yellow pages. I wish you chose not to enjoin in this documented lawless usurpation and fraud. Despite all, may your conscience be your guide. Please make arrangements to pick up the surveillance system and return the check I signed and gave you. God bless you. Thank you.

Sincerely,

Miriam Snyder

FEBRUARU 17, 2007

JONATHAN LIPPMAN’S DEADLY FICTIONAL ADMINISTRATION OF LAW WHILE TRESPASSING AS A JUDGE AT THE EXPENSE OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE’S GOD GIVEN AUTHORITY 

CONSPIRACY TO OFFEND AND DEFRAUD THE UNITED STATES 18 USC SEC 371,



OBSTRUCTING A CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION BY PREVENTING THE COMMUNICATION OF INFORMATION RELATING TO A VIOLATION OF ANY CRIMINAL STATUTE OF THE UNITED STATES TO A CRIMINAL INVESTIGATOR 18 USC 1510



PERJURY AGAINST HIS OATH OF OFFICE BY SUBSCRIBING TO A MATERIAL HE KNOWS TO BE FALSE 18 USC SEC. 1621



MISPRISON OF TREASON BY FAILING TO REPORT TREASON WHEN SO NOTED 18 USC SEC 2382



MISPRISON OF FELONY BY FAILING TO REPORT COMMISSION OF A FELONY WHEN SO NOTED 18 USC SEC 4



IMPEDING A MATTER UNDER AGENCY/DEPARTMENT INVESTIGATION, ADMINISTRATION, JURISDICTION BY IMPEDING, OBSTRUCTING OR INFLUENCING ANY SUCH MATTER BY DESTROYING, MUTILATING, ALTERING, CONCEALING, COVERING UP, FALSIFYING, OR MAKING A FALSE ENTRY IN ANY RECORD, DOCUMENT, OR TANGIBLE OBJECT 18 USC SEC. 1519



RETAILIATION AGAINST A WITNESS 18 USC SEC 1513



TAMPERING WITH A WITNESS 18 USC SEC 1512



SUBORNATION OF PERJURY BY PROCURING ANOTHER TO COMMIT PERJURY (18 USC SEC. 1622 )



INSURRECTION AGAINST THE CONSTITUTION BY INCITING, ASSISSTING, AND ENGAGING IN REBELLION AGAINST THE CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 18 USC SEC 2383



SEDITION/SEDITIOUS CONSPIRACY BY CONSPIRING TO OVERTHROW THE CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNMENT OR DELAY THE EXECUTION OF A LAW OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 18 USC SEC 2384

·

IMPEDING DUE EXERCISE OF RIGHTS BY ATTEMPTING TO PREVENT, OBSTRUCT, IMPEDE, AND INTERFERE WITH SAME 18 USC SEC 1509,

·

FRAUD BY A JUDGE BY FALSIFYING AND CONCEALING A MATERIAL FACT, MAKING A FALSE REPRESENTATION, WRITING A FALSE DOCUMENT, OR HAVING KNOWLEDGE THAT A DOCUMENT IS FALSE.

·

MAKING A FALSE DECLARATION BEFORE A UNITED STATES COURT 18 USC SEC 1623,

·

RACKETEERING BY CONDUCTING AN ONGOING ENTERPRISE OF ROBBERY, BRIBERY, EXTORTION, OR THREATS OF SAME

FEBRUARY 18, 2007

JONATHAN LIPPMAN'S CONTINUED AND ESCALATED REVENGE BASED PATTERNED AND PRACTICED DISGUISED KILLING OPERATION IN EFFECT THIS IS MIRIAM SNYDER'S DAILY LOG AND REPORT OF JONATHAN LIPPMAN’S PATTERNED AND DEADLY DISGUISED KILLING PRACTICES COMMITTED UNDER HIS CAN YOU PROVE IT WHILE I KILL INREGULATED 2 BILLION DOLLAR BUDGET. JONATHAN LIPPMAN IS A CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE LEGAL FICTION ADMINISTRATOR, USURPATION SPECIALIST, DISGUISED KILLER SPECIALIST, EUGENICIST, CRIMINAL EXPERT, TRESPASSING AS A NYS CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE. JONATHAN LIPPMAN' S PATTERNED AND PRACTICED LETHAL, LAWLESS, AND HATEBASED USURPATIONS, CONTINUED AND ESCALATED DISGUISED KILLING ATTEMPT OF MIRIAM SNYDER AND FAMILY. THIS THE JONATHAN LIPPMAN CONTINUED: CAN YOU PROVE IT WHILE I KILL OPERATIONS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! PLEASE SEE THE FIVE JONATHAN LIPPMAN CAN YOU PROVE IT WHILE I KILL OPERATIONS DOCUMENTARIES I HAVE WRITTEN DOCUMENTING HIS MULTIFACETED DISGUISED KILLING OPERATIONS. THESE DOCUMENTARIES DETAIL HOW HE KILLS UNDER DISGUISE, ADMINISTERS LEGAL FICTIONS AND PAY OFFS TO SILENCE HIS KILLINGS UNDER A PHENOMENON. EACH DOCUMENTARY HAS BEEN SUBMITTED TO THE NYS CHIEF JUSTICE’S OFFICE, JUDITH KAYE AND THE NYC FBI, YET HE STILL HAS AN UNREGULATED 2 BILLION DOLLAR BUDGET AND CONTINUES KILLING UNDER DISGUISE. SEE HIS AFRICA DISGUISED KILLING PROGRAMS ATTACHED WITH OVER 13 MILLION DEAD, UNDER HIS NAME AND USURPATIONS. HE TARGETS ME FOR REVENGE FOR GOD RESCUING ME FROM ONE OF HIS MAJOR DISGUISED KILLING ATTEMPTS AND GOD’S RESCUE FROM SEVERAL OF HIS OTHER DISGUISED KILLING ATTEMPTS. AT PRESENT HE IS TRYING TO HAVE ME KILLED UNDER THE BELOW DISGUISES: BACKGROUND: IN THE LAST SIX MONTHS HIS LAWLESS AND DEADLY USURPATIONS HAVE HEIGHTENED REQUIRING DAILY DOCUMENTATION. JONATHAN LIPPMAN’S LAWLESS PATTERNED AND PRACTICED ADMINISTERED LAWLESS USURPATIONS AND LEGAL FICTIONS INCLUDES: 

OBSTRUCTED 2 JOBS LAST SEMESTER, LEGAL FICTION ADMINISTRATION LAWLESSLY EXECUTED TWO INCOMES, NO REASON OR CAUSE, AND NOTHING HAS BEEN DONE DESPITE LAWFUL REQUESTS,



TERRORIZED AND TERRORIZES MY HOME AND MY MOTHER’S AND NOTHING HAS BEEN DONE DESPITE LAWFUL REQUESTS,



OBSTRUCTED INCOME TAX MONEY DUE VIA PATTERNED AND PRACTICED JONATHAN LIPPMAN LAW DEPARTMENT USURPED FRAUD IMPLEMENTATION, AND NOTHING HAS BEEN DONE DESPITE LAWFUL REQUESTS,



OBSTRUCTED LABOR DEPARTMENT BENEFITS VIA PATTERNED AND PRACTICED JONATHAN LIPPMAN LAW DEPARTMENT USURPED FRAUD IMPLEMENTATION, AND NOTHING HAS BEEN DONE DESPITE LAWFUL REQUESTS,



OBSTRUCTED PUBLIC PROTECTIONS EMBEDDED IN THE NYS PUBLIC COMMISSION, LAWLESSLY USURPED POWER AND CREATED DOCUMENTED FRAUD BASED LEGAL FICTIONS TO HAVE MY ELECTRICITY TURNED OFF WHILE THE BILL IS PAID AND WHILE DOCUMENTED INVESTIGATIONS ARE GOING ON, , AND NOTHING HAS BEEN DONE DESPITE LAWFUL REQUESTS,



OBSTRUCTED PUBLIC PROTECTIONS EMBEDDED IN THE FAIR DEBT COLLECTIONS PRACTICES ACT, VIA PATTERNED AND PRACTICED JONATHAN LIPPMAN LAW DEPARTMENT USURPED FRAUD IMPLEMENTATION, AND NOTHING HAS BEEN DONE DESPITE LAWFUL REQUESTS,



OBSTRUCTED PUBLIC PROTECTIONS IN THE NYS ATTORNEY GENERAL’S OFFICE, VIA A FEBRUARY 16, 2007 UNCONSTITUTIONAL, SECOND CLASS CITIZEN, SLAVERY TYPE LETTER DISREGARDING THE CONSTITUTIONAL OATH OBLIGATIONS EMBEDDED IN THE ATTORNEY GENERAL’S OFFICE AND IMPLEMENTED UNDER THE LAWLESS LEADERSHIP OF THE JONATHAN LIPPMAN LAW DEPARTMENT FICTION, WHERE THE LAW HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH ANYTHING. THE ABOVE MENTIONED UNCONSTITUTIONAL LETTER WILL BE CORRECTED AS IT IS WRITTEN FOR SOMONE WHO DOES NOT KNOW THE AUTHORITYOF THE SUPREME LAW OF THIS LAND AND THE OATH OBLIGATION OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL’S OFFICE TO ENFORCE THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT’S EQUALPROTECTION CLAUSE. JONATHAN LIPPMAN WILL NOT LAWLESSLY USURP POWER AGAIN TO MISUSE AND DEFRAUDTHE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA GOVERNMENT TO FACILITATE HIS DIGUISED KILLING ATTEMPT OF MY FAMILY, ME AND OTHER PEOPLE NOT ASTUTE TO HIS DISGUISED KILLING OPERTIONS. EACH OF THE ABOVE OBSTRUCTIONS FACILTATE A DISGUISED KILLING. CONSEQUENTLY, PURSUANT TO THE CONSTITUTION I AM RESUBMITTING CONSTITUTIONALLY PROTECTED CLAIMS FOR ENFORCMENT OF LAW OVER USURPED LEGAL FICTIONS THAT KILL UNDER DISGUISE TO THE CHIEF LEGAL OFFICER OF THE STATE ON BEHALF OF PUBLIC SAFETY. HE WILL NOT CONTINUE DEFRAUDING GOVERNMENT TO IMPLEMENT WILLIE LYNCH TO SUBTERFUGE HIS DOCUMENTED DEFRAUD ON THE AMERICAN PEOPLE. THE ONLY ESTABLISHED DOCUMENTED CRIMINAL IS JONATHAN LIPPMAN AS ESTABLISHED IN HIS LAW SUIT : 1 NO. 1: LEONARD J. LEVENSON, ET AL. V. JONATHAN LIPPMAN,&C., ET AL. HE COMMITTED THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTED AND ESTABLISHED CRIMES, WHICH GIVES THE ATTORNEY GENERAL CRIMINAL DIVISION JURISDICTION, ABOVE AND BEYOND, RACE BASED BRONX JURISDICTION, AS JONATHAN LIPPMAN’S DISGUISED KILLINGS AND CRIMES ARE BEYOND RACIST, AS HE HAS KILLED UNDER DISGUISE WHITE AND BLACK PEOPLE. DESPITE THIS, HIS ARREST IS ESTABLISHED IN THE CRIMES DOCUMENTED IN THE ABOVE LAW SUIT, WHICH ARE: CONSPIRACY TO OFFEND AND DEFRAUD THE UNITED STATES 18 USC SEC 371,

 

PERJURY AGAINST HIS OATH OF OFFICE BY SUBSCRIBING TO A MATERIAL HE KNOWS TO BE FALSE 18 USC SEC. 1621



SUBORNATION OF PERJURY BY PROCURING ANOTHER TO COMMIT PERJURY (18 USC SEC. 1622 )



INSURRECTION AGAINST THE CONSTITUTION BY INCITING, ASSISSTING, AND ENGAGING IN REBELLION AGAINST THE CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 18 USC SEC 2383



SEDITION/SEDITIOUS CONSPIRACY BY CONSPIRING TO OVERTHROW THE CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNMENT OR DELAY THE EXECUTION OF A LAW OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 18 USC SEC 2384

·

IMPEDING DUE EXERCISE OF RIGHTS BY ATTEMPTING TO PREVENT, OBSTRUCT, IMPEDE, AND INTERFERE WITH SAME 18 USC

SEC

1509,

THE ABOVE JONATHAN LIPPMAN CRIMES ARE ESTSBLISHED IN: 1 NO. 1: LEONARD J. LEVENSON, ET AL. V. JONATHAN LIPPMAN,&C., ETAL., DUE TO MISPRISON OF TREASON BY FAILING TO REPORT TREASON WHEN SO NOTED 18 USC SEC 2382 AND MISPRISON OF FELONY BY FAILING TO REPORT COMMISSION OF A FELONY WHEN SO NOTED 18 USC SEC 4.

THE BELOW JONATHAN LIPPMAN CRIMES ARE BEING REPEATED BECAUSE HE WAS NOT INCARCERATED FOR THE ABOVE CRIMES AS REQUIRED. IT IS UNFORTUNATE, THAT MR CUOMO IS NEW, BUT HE IS THE CHIEF LEGAL OFFICER OF NEW YORK STATE AND HAS THE OATH OBLIGATION TO RID THE STATE OF THIS DOCUMENTED ENEMY OF CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY THE FOUNDING FATHERS OF THIS COUNTRY FOUGHT AND DIED FOR, ENEMY OF THE STATE AND ENEMY OF THE PEOPLE. THIS IS NOT A DISTRICT ATTORNEY’S JOB. THE ARREST FOR THE CRIMES ABOVE AGAINST THE PEOPLE OF NEW YORK AND AGAINST

THE CONSTITUTION IS THE JURISDICTION OF THE CHIEF LEGAL OFFICER AS ESTABLISHED IN HIS CONSTITUTIONAL OATH TO THE PEOPLE OF NEW YORK. JONATHAN LIPPMAN’S CRIMES WERE

AGAINST THE PEOPLE OF NEW YORK, TO PLAY WITH BRONX JURISDICTION AND OR ANY OTHER JURISDICTION IS TO MAKE A MOCKERY OF THE ABOVE EMEMY OF THE STATE CRIMES CITED, AND IS TO WELCOME AND ALLOW THIS DOCUMENTED ENEMY OF THE STATE TO CONTINUE THE ABOVE DOCUMENTED DIABOLICAL CRIMES. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL HAS APPROPRIATE JURISDICTION. THE BELOW JONATHAN LIPPMAN ADDITIONAL AND MATHEW DIMICCO CRIMES MAY BE PROSECUTED IN THE BRONX JURISDICTION. LET US BE VERY CLEAR SO NO MORE GAMES WILL BE PLAYED.

JONATHAN LIPPMAN HAS LAWLESSLY USURPED AUTHORITY AND WORKED AGAINST THE CONSTITUTION OF THE STATE AND THE COUNTRY. THE ADDITIONAL BELOW JONATHAN LIPPMAN USURPATION CRIMES MAY BE CONSIDERED JURISDICTIONAL, BUT NOT HIS ABOVE CRIMES. THOSE ARE CRIMES AGAINST THE STATE OF NEW YORK’S CONSTITUTION, AS WELL AS CRIMES AGAINST THE COUNTRY’S CONSTITUTION. JONATHAN LIPPMAN’S ADDITIONAL LOCAL LEVEL CRIMES ARE: 

OBSTRUCTING A CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION BY PREVENTING THE COMMUNICATION OF INFORMATION RELATING TO A VIOLATION OF ANY CRIMINAL STATUTE OF THE UNITED STATES TO A CRIMINAL INVESTIGATOR 18 USC 1510, REPEATED CRIMINAL USURPATION BY SENDING MATHEW DIMICCO, UNDER FALSE PRETENSES, TO OBSTRUCT MY COMPUTER,



OBSTRUCTED MY BANK ACCOUNTS. SEE MY BANK AFFIDAVIT DUE TO LAWLESS USURPATIONS,



LAWLESSLY USURPED POWER BY CAMERIZING MY HOME AND SENT MATHEW DIMICCO, A SECURITY SURVEILLANCE PERSON TO MY HOME UNDER FALSE PRETENSES TO STEAL MY COMPUTER AND OBSTRUCT FILES TO IMPEDE JONATHAN LIPPMAN’S CRIMINAL AND NEEDED INVESTIGATION, ARREST, REMOVAL, AND IMPEACHMENT ON BEHALF OF PUBLIC SAFETY.

TODAY FEBRUARY16, 2006 WHILE VISITING MY MOTHER SHE INFORMED ME THAT THINGS SHE THROW AWAY ARE PUT BACK IN HER HOUSE. HER NEW SHOPPING CART WAS DESTROYED THE OTHER DAY WHEN SHE WENT TO THE STORE AND CAME BACK. THE NEW WHEELS ON HER SHOPPING CART WERE MALICIOUSLY TWISTED AND BUSTED. SHE SHOWED ME HER NEW GREASE THAT WAS MALICIOUSLY REPLACED WITH LARD. HER HOUSE HAS BEEN CAMERARIZED TO TERRORIZE HER LIKE MINE HAS BEEN. SHE IS SCARED TO LEAVE HER HOME DUE TO LAWLESS, LETHAL, USURPATIONS, CAN YOU PROVE IT WHILE I KILL IS IN HER HOME. SHE IS SCARED TO THROW AWAY GARBAGE LIKE LIGHT BULBS BECAUSE THE THROWN AWAY LIGHT BULBS HAVE BEEN PLACED BACK IN HER HOME. TODAY I SAW HER DISH CABINET AND HER DISHES HAVE DISAPPEARED UNDER CAN YOU PROVE IT. TODAY I PACKED CLOTHES FOR THE GYM IN MY HOUSE. I TOOK THE PACKED GYM CLOTHES WITH ME. I STOPPED AT A STORE. I GOT TO THE GYM AND THE CLOTHES I PACKED WERE NOT WITH ME. THE CLOTHES I PACKED WERE TAKEN OUT OF MY CAR WHEN I WENT TO THE STORE. WHEN I GOT HOME, THE CLOTHES WERE PLACED ON MY BED. THIS IS CLEAR TERRORIZATION, KNOWING DEADLY USURPATION IS GOING TO AND FROM MY HOME, DESPITE CHANGING LOCKS OVER 100 TIMES. I AM DOCUMENTING THIS SO THE WORLD KNOWS WHAT JONATHAN LIPPMAN PATTERNED AND PRACTICED DEADLY DISGUISED KILLINGS INCLUDE. THIS IS HIS PATTERNED OPERATION. HE PLANTS CAMERAS IN THE TARGETS HOUSE, TERRORIZES THE TARGET, POISONS THE TARGET, AND IF THE TARGET IS NOT AWARE TO THIS KILLER AND HIS HIT TEAM, HIS TEAM INJECTS, HYPNOTISES, CUTS, SLICES, AND KILLS UNDER DISGUISE. THIS IS JONATHAN LIPPMAN AT HIS BEST. THIS IS THE REAL JONATHAN LIPPMAN AN EXPERT CRIMINAL DISGUISED KILLER AND PATHOGEN ADMINISTRATOR. EACH DAY I WILL NOTARIZE THESE DAILY LOGS SO THERE WILL BE NO MORE TARGETS AND HIS DISGUISED KILLING OPERASTION WILL BE DOCUMENTED AND STOPPED. PLEASE NOTE THAT I AM A JOGGER. I HAVE A PAIN WITH A NEEDLE MARK IN MY ANKLE THAT CAN NOT BE ACCOUNTED FOR. THIS ANKLE PAIN AND THE NEEDLE MARK IS UNDER CAN YOU PROVE IT. IT IS MY PRAYER THAT I WAS NOT MADE UNABLE TO JOG IN PREPARATION FOR A FINALEE INJECTION, AS THESE TYPE PHENOMENONS IS WHAT JONATHAN LIPPMAN ADMINISTERS BEST. IT IS SAD TO EVEN THINK LIKE THIS, BUT THIS TYPE THINKING IS REQUIRED WHEN THERE ARE OVER 13 MILLION PEOPLE DEAD UNDER JONATHAN LIPPMAN’S NAME, LEGAL FICTION ADMINISTRATION, USURPATIONS, AND DOCUMENTED CAN YOU PROVE IT WHIE I KILL MULTIFACETED OPERATIONS. SEE THE BELOW DOCUMENTED JONATHAN LIPPMAN LAWLESS USURPATIONS, LEGAL FICTION RULING IMPLEMENTATION, CAN YOU PROVE IT LEGAL FICTION PROGRAMS EFFECTUATING OVER 13 MILLION DEAD UNDER DISGUISE. THE CONSTITUTION IS CLEAR. I, AS WELL AS ALL NEW YORKERS ARE ENTITLED TO THE CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTIONS INVESTED IN THE ATTORNEY GENERAL’S OFFICE AS CHIEF LEGAL OFFICER OF THE STATE. I WILL NOT BE KILLED UNDER THE DISGUISE OF LAWLESS USURPATIONS, LEGAL FICTION ADMINISTRATION, AND UNCONSTITUTIONAL PRACTICES BY OFFICES OBLIGATED BY OATH AND OUR VOTES. THE LAW IS CLEAR. JONATHAN LIPPMAN ISA PUBLIC SAFETY THREAT AS EXEMPLIFIED IN THE RAMIFICATIONS OF

HIS BELOW NAMED LEDERSHIP IN HIS LEGAL FICTION PROGRAMS. I PRAY THAT THE LAW WILL BE ENFORCED TO STOP THE PATTERNED AND PRACTICED MILLIONS OF DEAD PEOPLE UNDER JONATHAN LIPPMAN’S NAME AND DOCUMENTED PATTERNED CAN YOU PROVE IT SOCIAL PHENOMENON THAT LEAVES PEOPLE DEAD UNDER DISGUISE.

SENT CERTIFIED RETURN RECEIPT John P. Thompson, Office of Consumer Services Public Service Commission 90 Church Street New York, New York 10007-2919 Re: Con Edison Acct # 30 1103 1720-0012-5

CON EDISON NOTICE OF DEFAULT Dear Mr. Thompson: This letter is being sent to you in response to a letter you sent me with non validated Con Edison computer printouts. Be advised that this is not a refusal to pay, but a default notice sent pursuant to the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 USC 1692g Sec. 809 (b) that the Con Edison claim has been disputed and validation was requested. See attached Notice of Dispute and certified receipts.

The Con Edison office has been unable to verify the accuracy and completeness of the disputed debt and the original holder in due course, with respect to the grant, they are acting for.

Consequently the debt has not been verified within the 30 day statute pursuant to Fair Debt Collection Practices Act; the alleged debt must be removed.

Please note that I did NOT a request “verification� or proof of my mailing address, but a request for VALIDATION made pursuant to the above named Title and Section. I requested competent evidence that I have any legal obligation to pay Con Edison a past due bill that was paid via a grant I was compelled to get, due to prioritized corruption persecution and disguised execution attempts.

In summary, the following was requested: * What the money Con Ed says I owe is for; Is it for the utility grant? Is the grant a loan? * Explain and show me how Con Ed calculated what is said I owe; * Provide me with copies of any papers that show I agreed to pay what is said I owe and to whom; * Provide a verification; * Identify the original grant creditor;

* Prove the Statute of Limitations has not expired on this account; * Proof that Con Edison is licensed to collect in NY State for a grant provider; * Provide me with the license numbers and Registered Agent; The attached continued Con Edison collection notice is a: * Violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act - continuing collection activity on a debt which has not been validated; The attached bill and printouts exemplify fraud in that they attempt to verify an account as accurate when in fact there is no provided proof that they are.

To this end, I respectfully request that these lawless practices CEASE AND DESIST. I would also like to request, in writing, no further contact regarding this non verified alleged arrears Con Edison bill, either in writing or telephone, unless it is to provide validation or release of liability of the debt.

If Con Edison continues to communicate with me regarding this third party alleged debt, it will be willful harassment and I will have no choice but to seek remedy to end the harassment.

It would be advisable that Con Edison regulates its verification practices, and put records in order before I am forced to take legal action. This is an attempt to correct Con Edison’s records; any information obtained shall be used for that purpose.

Best Regards, Miriam Snyder, Good Standing Con Edison Consumer Attached: Con Edison Notice of Dispute dated February 3, 2007 and certified receipt dated February 5, 2007 certificate # 7006 2150 0004 1503 5704 and certified receipt to the Public Service Commission 7006 2150 0004 1503 5728 Xc: Federal Trade Commission

NOTICE OF DISPUTE RECEIPTS

3230 CRUGER AVENUE #6B BRONX, NEW YORK 10467 APRIL 5, 2007 SEAN OCCONOR NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION AND FINANCE AUDIT DIVISION WA HARRIMAN STATE CAMPUS ALBANY, NEW YORK 12227-0001

NOTICE OF DEFAULT AFFIDAVIT GREETINGS: THIS LETTER IS SENT TO THE NYS TAX DEPARTMENT IN RESPONSE TO THE ATTACHED LETTER SENT TO ME WITH NON VALIDATED IRS COMPUTER PRINTOUTS. BE ADVISED THAT THIS IS NOT A REFUSAL TO PAY, BUT A DEFAULT NOTICE SENT PURSUANT TO THE FAIR DEBT COLLECTION PRACTICES ACT, 15 USC 1692G SEC. 809 (B) THAT THE TAX CLAIMS HAVE BEEN DISPUTED AND VALIDATION WAS REQUESTED. SEE ATTACHED NOTICE OF DISPUTE AND CERTIFIED RECEIPTS.

THE NYS TAXATION AND FINANCE OFFICE HAS BEEN UNABLE TO VERIFY THE ACCURACY AND COMPLETENESS OF THE DISPUTED DEBT AND THE ORIGINAL HOLDER IN DUE COURSE. CONSEQUENTLY THE DEBT HAS NOT BEEN VERIFIED WITHIN THE 30 DAY STATUTE PURSUANT TO FAIR DEBT COLLECTION PRACTICES ACT; THE ALLEGED DEBT MUST BE REMOVED. PLEASE NOTE THAT I DID NOT REQUEST “VERIFICATION” OF PROOF OF MY MAILING ADDRESS, BUT A REQUEST FOR VALIDATION MADE PURSUANT TO THE ABOVE NAMED TITLE AND SECTION. I REQUESTED COMPETENT EVIDENCE THAT I HAVE ANY LEGAL OBLIGATION TO PAY THE NON VALIDATED ASSESSMENTS. IN SUMMARY, THE FOLLOWING WAS REQUESTED: * WHAT THE MONEY YOU SAY I OWE IS FOR; * EXPLAIN AND SHOW ME HOW YOU CALCULATED WHAT YOU SAY I OWE;

* PROVIDE ME WITH COPIES OF ANY PAPERS THAT SHOW I AGREED TO PAY WHAT YOU SAY I OWE; * PROVIDE A VERIFICATION, A SWORN STATEMENT;

* IDENTIFY THE ORIGINAL CREDITOR; * PROVE THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS HAS NOT EXPIRED ON THIS ACCOUNT; * SHOW ME THAT YOU ARE LICENSED TO COLLECT IN NY STATE; * PROVIDE ME WITH YOUR LICENSE NUMBERS AND REGISTERED AGENT; THE ATTACHED CONTINUED NYS TAXATION AND FINANCE COLLECTION NOTICE IS A: * VIOLATION OF THE FAIR DEBT COLLECTION PRACTICES ACT - CONTINUING COLLECTION ACTIVITY ON A DEBT WHICH HAS NOT BEEN VALIDATED; THE ATTACHED BILL AND PRINTOUTS DISGUISED AS ASSESSMENTS EXEMPLIFY FRAUD IN THAT THEY ATTEMPT TO VERIFY AN ACCOUNT AS ACCURATE WHEN IN FACT THERE IS NO PROVIDED PROOF THAT THEY ARE.

TO THIS END, I RESPECTFULLY REQUEST THAT THESE LAWLESS TAX PRACTICES CEASE AND DESIST. I WOULD ALSO LIKE TO REQUEST, IN WRITING, NO FURTHER CONTACT REGARDING THESE NON VERIFIED ALLEGED TAX ASSESSMENTS, EITHER IN WRITING OR TELEPHONE, UNLESS IT IS TO PROVIDE VALIDATION OR RELEASE OF LIABILITY OF THE DEBT.

TAKE NOTE OF THE FOLLOWING ACTIONABLE VIOLATIONS THIS OFFICE HAS IMPLMENTED:



ON NUMEROUS OCCASIONS, IN CONNECTION WITH THE COLLECTION OF THESE NON VALIDATED ALLEDGED TAX DEBTS, THE NYS DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION AND FINANCE HAVE COMMUNICATED WITH ME AFTER I HAVE NOTIFIED THEM IN WRITING THAT I DISPUTE THE NON VALIDATED ALLEDGED DEBT AND I WISH THE TAX DEPARTMENT DEBT COLLECTORS TO CEASE FURTHER COMMUNICATION WITH THE CONSUMER. THE NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE HAVE CONTINUED IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 805(C) OF THE FDCPA, 15 U.S. C. 9 I 692C(C).



ON NUMEROUS OCCASIONS, THE NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION AND FINANCE AGENTS ENGAGED IN CONDUCT THE NATURAL CONSEQUENCE OF WHICH IS TO HARASS, OPPRESS, OR ABUSE A PERSON, ON NUMEROUS OCCASIONS, IN CONNECTION WITH THE COLLECTION OF THE NON VALIDATED ALLEDGED DEBTS. THE TAX AGENTS HAVE REPEATEDLY SENT NON VALIDATED THREATENING ASSESSMENTS IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 806 OF THE FDCPA, 15 C. G 1692D, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING: SENDING AND COMMUNICATING UNAUTHORIZED THREATS REPEATEDLY OR CONTINUOUSLY WITH THE

INTENT TO ANNOY, ABUSE, OR HARASS IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 806(5) OF THE FDCPA , 15 D. C. 1692D(5). 

ON NUMEROUS OCCASIONS, USED FALSE, DECEPTIVE, OR MISLEADING REPRESENTATIONS OR MEANS, IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 807 OF THE FDCPA.



ON NUMEROUS OCCASIONS, IN CONNECTION WITH THE COLLECTION OF THE NON VALIDATED DEBT , THE NYS TAX DEPARTMENT AGENTS HAVE VIOLATED FDCPA, 15 U. C. 1692E, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING:



FALSELY REPRESENTING THE CHARACTER, AMOUNT, OR LEGAL STATUS OF ANY DEBT, IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 807(2)(A) OF THE FDCPA, 15 C. 1692E(2)(A);



FILED A NON VALIDATED WARRANT AND CONTINUED THREATS TO TAKE FURTHER CRIMINAL ACTIONS THAT CANNOT LEGALLY BE TAKEN SECTION 807(5) OF THE FDCPA , 15 U. C. 1692E(5);



THREATENING AND SUBMITTING COMMUNICATIONS AND CREDIT INFORMATION THAT THE NYS TAX DEPARTMENT KNOWS IS NON VALIDATED AND OR SHOULD HAVE KNOWN TO BE. FALSE , IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 807(8) OF THE FDCPA, 15 C. 9 1692E(8); THE NYS TAX FRAUD WARRANT HAS BEEN PLACED ON MY CREDIT RECORD WHILE THE ALLEDGED DEBT IS NON VALIDATED, DISPUTED AND CREATED OUT OF THIN AIR,

IF THE NYS TAXATION AND FINANCE DEPARTMENT AGENTS DO NOT REMOVE THE FRAUDLENT, UNAUTHORIZED, NON PROCEDURAL, NON VALIDATED, CRIMINAL

FRAUD WARRANT AND CONTINUE TO COMMUNICATE WITH ME REGARDING THIS THIRD PARTY NON VALIDATED FRAUD DISGUISED AS ALLEGED TAX ASSESSMENTS, CRIMINAL FRAUD CHARGES, AS WELL AS OTHER CHARGES WILL BE PLACED ON DONNA BAHRY AND SEAN OCCONNOR FOR THEIR WILFUL CRIMINAL TAX ASSESSMENT FRAUD, EMBEDDED IN WILFULUL VIOLATIONS OF THE FDCPA CONSUMER FRAUD PROTECTION LAWS. REMEDY TO END THE CRIMINAL TAX FRAUD AND HARASSMENT WILL BE ENFORCED BY ANY MEANS NECESSARY.

IT WOULD BE ADVISABLE THAT THE NYS TAXATION AND FINANCE MANAGEMENT TEAM AND LAW DEPARTMENT REGULATE THEIR TAX ASSESSMENT AND CONTRACTUAL VERIFICATION/VALIDATION PRACTICES, AND PUT RECORDS IN ORDER BEFORE I AM FORCED TO FILE CRIMINAL AND CIVIL FRAUD COMPLAINTS.

THIS IS AN ATTEMPT TO CORRECT THE NYS TAXATION AND FINANCE RECORDS. ANY INFORMATION OBTAINED SHALL BE USED FOR THAT PURPOSE. THERE IS NO LAW THAT EXEMPTS THE NYS TAX DEPARTMENT AND PUBLIC OFFICERS FROM LAWS TO WHICH THE PUBLIC ARE HELD.

ATTACHED: NOTICE OF DISPUTE MAIL RECEIPTS XC: FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION NYS ATTORNEY GENERAL, CONSUMER FRAUD

3230 CRUGER AVENUE 6B BRONX, NEW YORK 10467 APRIL 6, 2007

LAW DEPARTMENT INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE 210 E. POST ROAD WHITE PLAINS, NEW YORK 10601 MR. J. GERENCSER, REVENUE OFFICER 210 E POST ROAD, 2ND FLOOR WHITE PLAINS, NEW YORK 10601 SENT CERTIFIED RETURN RECEIPT NUMBER: 7006 2150 0004 1503 5469

NOTICE OF DEFAULT GREETINGS: ENCLOSED FIND COPIES OF THE FEBRUARY 28, 2007 NOTICE OF DISPUTE TRUTH AFFIDAVIT, I SENT TO MR GERENCSER AND THE IRS LAW DEPARTMENT REGARDING THE ALLEDGED DEBT I DO NOT OWE OR HAVE ANY VERIFICATION OF. ALSO, ATTACHED IS A COPY OF THE IRS FISHING EXPEDITION RESPONSE DATED MARCH 3, 2007. THE IRS RESPONSE LETTER PROVIDES NO AUTHORITY AND OR VERIFICATION AS REQUIRED AND AS I HAVE REQUESTED.

CONSEQUENTLY, SINCE THE IRS HAS BEEN UNABLE TO VERIFY THE ACCURACY AND COMPLETENESS OF THE DISPUTED DEBT AND THE ORIGINAL HOLDER IN DUE COURSE WITHIN THE 30 DAY STATUTE PURSUANT TO FAIR DEBT COLLECTION PRACTICES ACT, THE ALLEDGED DEBT MUST BE REMOVED AND MY REFUND FORWARDED.

THE ATTACHED IRS LETTER IS WILLFUL HARRASSMENT EMBEDDED IN AIDING AND ABETTING A DOCUMENTED CONSPIRACY TO OFFEND AND DEFRAUD THE UNITED STATES PURSUANT TO 18 USC SECTION 371. THE SCHEME OF FRAUD IS IDENTIIFED IN THE IRS INABILITY TO VERIFY THE ALLEDGED DEBT AND

ORIGINAL HOLDER IN DUE COURSE, THE IRS IMPEDE AND OBSTRUCTION OF THE FAIR DEBT COLLECTION PRACTICES ACT. THE LACK OF PROCEDURALLY PROPER VALIDATION OF THE ALLEDGED DEBT CONSTITUTES THE USE OF INTERSTATE COMMUNICATIONS IN A SCHEME OF FRAUD BY ADVANCING WRITINGS, THE IRS KNOWS IS FALSE AND MALICIOUSLY DETRIMENTAL AND DAMAGING TO MIRIAM SNYDER.

THIS AFFIDAVIT IS NOTICE OF DEFAULT BASED ON THE IRS WILFULL FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE VERIFICATION REQUIREMENTS OF THE FAIR DEBT COLLECTIONS PRACTIC ACT. CONSEQUENTLY, IN GOOD FAITH, THIS IS MY FINAL NOTICE TO THIS IRS OFFICE PRIOR TO FILING CRIMINAL CHARGES OF AGGRAVATED HARASSMENT AND FRAUD FOR NOT COMPLYING IN GOOD FAITH WITH CONSUMER PROTECTION LAWS OF THIS COUNTRY EMBEDDED IN VERIFCATION AND PUBLIC PROTECTIONS AGAINST FRAUD.

THE IRS WILLFUL VERIFICATION AND PUBLIC PROTECTION VIOLATIONS ARE HARRASSING AND CRIMINAL AS NOTED ABOVE. TO THIS END, THE IRS HAS 10 DAYS TO RETURN THE TAX MONIES OWED ME AS VERIFIED ON THE ATTACHED FEBRUARY 28, 2007 NOTICE OF DISPUTE.

IN THE FEBRUARY 28, 2007 ATTACHED DISPUTE AFFIDAVIT I SENT YOU UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF THE FAIR DEBT COLLECTIONS PRACTICES ACT, I MADE LAWFUL CONTRACTUAL AND ASSESSMENT VALIDATION REQUESTS TO FACILIATE THE PAYING OF AN OBLIGATION WHICH MAY BE OWED. IN SUMMARY, I REQUESTED THE ATTACHED AFFIDAVIT VERIFICATIONS SUMMARIZED AS: 1. VALIDATION OF THE ALLEDGED DEBT (THE ACTUAL ACCOUNTING); 2. VERIFICATION OF THE CLAIM AGAINST ME SUCH AS A SWORN AFFIDAVIT AND, 3. A COPY OF THE ORIGINAL CONTRACT BINDING BOTH PARTIES.

I SEEK THE RETURN OF TAX MONEY DUE ME UNDER PUBLIC POLICY AND UNDER SECTION 6402 - AUTHORITY TO MAKE CREDITS OR REFUNDS: (A) GENERAL RULE IN THE CASE OF ANY OVERPAYMENT, THE SECRETARY, WITHIN THE APPLICABLE PERIOD OF LIMITATIONS, MAY CREDIT THE AMOUNT OF SUCH OVERPAYMENT, INCLUDING ANY INTEREST ALLOWED THEREON, AGAINST ANY LIABILITY IN RESPECT OF AN INTERNAL REVENUE TAX ON THE PART OF THE PERSON WHO MADE THE OVERPAYMENT AND SHALL, SUBJECT TO SUBSECTIONS (C), (D) AND (E), REFUND ANY BALANCE TO SUCH PERSON. PLEASE NOTE THAT IRS PUBLICATION 1 (CATALOG NUMBER 64731W) STATES, IN PART: THE LAW GENERALLY PROVIDES FOR INTEREST ON [MY] REFUND IF IT IS NOT PAID WITHIN 45 DAYS OF THE DATE [I] FILED [MY]…CLAIM FOR REFUND. UNBEKNOWST OF THE IRS DOCUMENTED DEFRAUD EMBEDDED IN THE IRS VIOLATIONS OF 5 CFR 1320.5 AND 44 USCS SECTIONS 3512 , AS WELL AS THE IRS DOCUMENTED FRAUDULENT 1040 FORMS, I FILED A 1998 REFUND IN 1999 AND HAVE NOT RECEIVED THE REFUNDS YET, DESPITE MUTIPLE REQUESTS. TO THIS END I EXPECT ALL RETURNS DUE ME WITH INTEREST.

PLEASE NOTE THE BELOW IRS "PUBLICATION MISSION STATEMENT: THE IRS MISSION  PROVIDE AMERICA'S TAXPAYERS TOP QUALITY SERVICE BY HELPING THEM UNDERSTAND AND MEET THEIR TAX RESPONSIBILITIES AND BY APPLYING THE TAX LAW WITH INTEGRITY AND FAIRNESS TO ALL. SINCE THE IRS POSITION IS ONE OF NON- VERIFICATION OF ALLEDGED DEBTS AND NON COMPLIANCE WITH PUBLIC PROTECTIONS SECURED IN THE FAIR DEBT COLLECTIONS PRACTICES AND 5 CFR 1320.5 AS WELL AS 44 USCS SECTION 3512, SUCH POSITION LACKS "INTEGRITY AND FAIRNESS". ABOVE ALL, IT RETARDS LAW AND ORDER TO FACILITATE FRAUD. THE IRS WILLFUL NON VERIFICATION OF ALLEDGED DEBT AFFORDS NO ONE A RIGHT TO EQUAL PROTECTION UNDER THE LAW, NOR DOES IT AFFORD ONE THE RIGHT TO DUE PROCESS UNDER THE UNIFIED COMMERCIAL CODES AND OR ANY FUNDAMENTAL COMMON AND OR CONSTITUTIONAL LAWS.

THE IRS DEFAULT, REFUSAL TO VERIFY THE ALLEDGED DEBT, REFUSAL TO PAY ME MONIES DUE AND THE ATTACHED GENERIC IRS HARRASSING EXTORTION FORM LETTERS ARE CRIMINAL AND ARE MEANT TO BE INTIMIDATING. WITH THESE DESPERATE TACTICS, BY WHICH IS UNDERTAKEN AN EFFORT TO MISLEAD AND INTIMIDATE A LAWFUL CLAIMANT.

MR. GERENCSER AND OTHER LAWLESS IRS AGENTS ARE PERILOUSLY EPITOMIZING OUTRIGHT FRAUD. THESE ACTS ARE IN VIOLATION OF THE BELOW IRS PUBLIC PROTECTIONS. IRM 13.1.15.2 (10-31-2004) STATES, IN PART: THE TAXPAYER BILL OF RIGHTS II DEFINES THREE ELEMENTS OF MISCONDUCT:  AN EMPLOYEE VIOLATED A LAW, REGULATION, OR RULE OF CONDUCT…  AN IRS SYSTEM FAILED TO FUNCTION PROPERLY OR WITHIN PROPER TIME FRAMES…  AN IRS EMPLOYEE TREATED A TAXPAYER INAPPROPRIATELY IN THE COURSE OF OFFICIAL BUSINESS. FOR EXAMPLE, RUDENESS, OVER ZEALOUSNESS, EXCESSIVE AGGRESSIVENESS, DISCRIMINATORY TREATMENT, AND INTIMIDATION. MR. GERENCSER’S REFUSAL TO VALIDATE AND OR VERIFY HIS ABUSIVE INFLICTED ALLEDGED DEBT DISGUISED AS AN ASSESSMENT, IS FRAUD AND IS A DIRECT VIOLATION OF THE FAIR DEBT COLLECTION PRACTICES ACT. ADDITIONALLY, HIS NON VALIDATED EXTORTION LETTERS WHILE THE IRS OWES ME THE MONEY ON THE ATTACHED FEBRUARY 28, 2007 DISPUTE AFFIDAVIT, EPITOMIZES FRAUD AND GROSS MISCONDUCT. MR. GERENSCSER’S MISCONDUCT REQUIRES REFERRAL TO MANAGEMENT FOR §1203 VIOLATIONS, SPECIFICALLY FOR: 

COMING TO MY HOME WITHOUT CONSENT, AUTHORITY, IN AN UNTIMELY FASHION, FOR UNKNOWN REASONS AND LEAVING HIS PHONE NUMBER WITH A NOTE, WHEN THIS IS NOT NEEDED IN A CIVILIZED TECHNOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF EFFECTIVE MEANS OF COMMUNICATION VIA, PHONE, FAX, INTERNET, LETTERS, ETC…IF I WAS A MAN, I DOUBT HE WOULD HAVE USED

THIS INTIMIDATING, UNWARRANTED, UNAUTHORIZED, UNTIMELY, UNCALLED FOR, SEXIST STRATEGEM.  SEX DISCRIMINATION  FALSIFICATION OF DOCUMENTS, SEE ATTACHED GERENCSER NON VALIDATED, UNAUTHORIZED ASSESSMENTS, THREATS, EXTORTION LETTERS AND FORMS,  INFRINGEMENT OF TAXPAYER'S CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS  HARASSMENT/RETALIATION  DISCRIMINATION  VIOLATION OF FDCPA SECTION 809. VALIDATION OF DEBTS [15 USC 1692G] (B) IF THE CONSUMER NOTIFIES THE DEBT COLLECTOR IN WRITING WITHIN THE THIRTY-DAY PERIOD DESCRIBED IN SUBSECTION (A) THAT THE DEBT, OR ANY PORTION THEREOF, IS DISPUTED, OR THAT THE CONSUMER REQUESTS THE NAME AND ADDRESS OF THE ORIGINAL CREDITOR, THE DEBT COLLECTOR SHALL CEASE COLLECTION OF THE DEBT, OR ANY DISPUTED PORTION THEREOF, UNTIL THE DEBT COLLECTOR OBTAINS VERIFICATION OF THE DEBT OR THE NAME AND ADDRESS OF THE ORIGINAL CREDITOR, AND A COPY OF SUCH VERIFICATION, OR NAME AND ADDRESS OF THE ORIGINAL CREDITOR, IS MAILED TO THE CONSUMER

BY THE DEBT COLLECTOR. PLUS, THEY MUST SHOW PROOF POSITIVE THAT YOU OWE THEM THIS DEBT. IT'S NOT ENOUGH TO SEND YOU A COMPUTER-GENERATED PRINTOUT OF THE DEBT. ADDITIONALLY, MR. GERENCSER, HAS IMPOSED FRIVOLOUS PENALTIES FOR UNKNOWN REASONS AND WITHOUT ANY BASIS IN LAW AND FACT, WHICH ESTABLISHES EXTORTION OR WILLFUL OPPRESSION UNDER COLOR OF LAW" -A VIOLATION OF 26 USC 7214(A) (1).

IF MR. GERENCSER OR ANY OTHER LAWLESS IRS AGENT CONTINUE TO HARRASS ME AFTER THIS DOCUMENTED DEFAULT, THEIR CRIMINAL ACTIONS WILL BE PUBLICALLY EXPOSED AND CRIMINAL CHARGES AND COMMERCIAL COMPLAINTS WILL BE FILED WITH THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONS AND THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, ALBERTO GONZALEZ OFFICE UNDER:  CONSPIRACY TO OFFEND AND DEFRAUD THE UNITED STATES, 18 USC SECTIONS 371, EXAMPLE: THE IRS HAS USED OMB # 1545-0074 APPEARING UPON FORM 1040 FOR 23 YEARS. THIS IS NOT A VALID OMB CONTROL NUMBER PROPERLY ASSIGNED BY THE OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT. SEE DOLE V. STEELWORKERS, 494 U.S. 26, 44 (1990), U.S. V. COLLINS, 920 F.2D 619

(10TH CIR. 1990), U.S. V. DAWES, 951 F.2D 1189 (10TH CIR. 1991) THIS IS MALICIOUSLY INFLICTED DOCUMENTED INTENTIONAL FRAUD EMBEDDED IN THE IRS UTILIZATION OF BOOTLEG, UNAUTHORIZED, FRAUDULENT IRS 1040 FORMS IN VIOLATION OF 5 CFR 1320.5 AND 44 USCS SECTION 3512.

FURTHERMORE, FRAUD IS EXEMPLIFIED IN MR. GERENCSER’S UTILIZATION OF UNAUTHORIZED, NON VALIDATED ALLEDGED ASSESSMENTS AND REFUSALS TO COMPLY WITH THE UCC HOLDER IN DUE COURSE CONTRACT LAWS.  26 USC 7214 A) UNLAWFUL ACTS OF REVENUE OFFICERS OR AGENTS, EXAMPLE: MR. GERENNCSER WILLFUL VIOLATIONS OF FDCPA SECTION 809.

VALIDATION OF DEBTS 15 USC 1692G, EXAMPLE: MR GERENCSER WILLFUL VIOLATION OF TITLE 28 SECTION 1746 2 VIA HIS REFUSAL TO PROVIDE A VALIDATED ASSESSMENT AND IRS CONTRACT. HE HAS USED UNAUTHORIZED AND UNSWORN, UNAUTHORIZED, UNQUALIFIED, LAWLESS ASSESSMENTS/DECLARATIONS/ BUSINESS RECORDS THAT ARE HEARSAY ABSENT QULIFICATIONS TO INTIMIDATE AND CREATE PRIMA FACIE FALSE EVIDENCE TO EXTORT MONIES NOT OWED.  CRIMINAL FRAUD- EXAMPLE: MR. GERENCSER DELIBERATELY DECEIVING VIA THE CREATION OF NON VALIDATED ALLEDGED ASSESSMENTS AND CONTRACTS FOR HIS PERSONAL GAIN AND PROMOTION IN THE IRS. HIS DELIBERATE CREATION AND USE OF UNAUTHORIZED NON VALIDATED CONTRACTS AND ASSESSMENTS, TO DAMAGE AND TO OBTAIN PROPERTY UNJUSTLY. HIS NON VALIDATED ASSESSMENTS ARE FORGED OBJECTS. HIS NON VALIDATED CONTRACT AND ASSESSMENTS VERIFY ATTEMPTED THEFT

BY DECEPTION," "LARCENY BY TRICK," "LARCENY BY FRAUD AND DECEPTION". ADDITIONALLY, THE IRS 23 YEARS OF USE OF UNAUTHORIZED 1040 FORMS, SPECIFICALLY, THE IRS USE OF BOOT LEG 1040 FORMS THE BELOW YEARS, VIOLATE THE PAPER REDUCTION ACT BECAUSE THE 1040 FORMS HAD UNAUTHORIZED/NON VALIDATED OMB NUMERS IN VIOLATION OF THE PAPER REDUCTION ACT, VIOLATION OF 5 CFR 1320.5 AND USC TITLE 44 SECTION 3512 PUBLIC PROTECTION. THE IRS USE OF CORRUPTED IMPROPER OBM NUMBERS ON THE 1040 FORMS, IS AN EXAMPLE OF GROSS PUBLIC FRAUD INFLICTED TO OBSTRUCT PROPER ACCOUNTABILIY OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE’S INVOLUNTARY MONIES. THIS IS CRIMINAL FRAUD. IF THERE WAS ANY GOOD FAITH PROPER OMB NUMBERS WOULD HAVE BEEN PLACED ON THE BELOW YEARS IRS 1040 FORMS. THE FRAUD AND THE GROSS HARRASSMENT WILL STOP.  SEDITION/SEDITIOUS CONSPIRACY BY CONSPIRING TO OVERTHROW THE CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNMENT OR DELAY THE EXECUTION OF A LAW OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, (18 USC SEC 2384) EXAMPLE: MR. GERENNCSER WILLFUL DELAY, OBSTRUCTION AND IMPEDE VIOLATIONS OF FDCPA SECTION 809. VALIDATION OF DEBTS 15 USC 1692G,

 IMPEDING DUE EXERCISE OF RIGHTS BY ATTEMPTING TO PREVENT, OBSTRUCT, IMPEDE, AND INTERFERE WITH SAME, (18 USC SEC 1509) EXAMPLE: MR. GERENCSER WILLFUL VIOLATIONS OF PUBLIC PROTECTIONS SECURED IN 44 USCS SECTION 3512 AND FDCPA SECTION 809,  SUBORNATION OF PERJURY BY PROCURING ANOTHER TO COMMIT PERJURY, 18 USC SEC. 1622 EXAMPLE: MR. GERENCSER ENJOINING THE IRS IN HIS DOCUMENTED UNAUTHORIZED ACTS, HIS FRAUD IS EXEMPLIFIED IN HIS IRS SCAM BUSINESS UTILIZING NON VERIFIED AND NON EXISTENT ASSESSMENTS TO EXTORT MONEY. ABOVE ALL HIS ACTS ARE PERJUROUS TO HIS DUTY BOUND PUBLIC OATH TO THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION.  CONSPIRACY AGAINST RIGHTS OF SOVEREIGN, FREE, GOD CREATED, CITIZENS, ( 18 USC , SECTION 241 ); EXAMPLE: THE IRS REFUSAL TO COMPLY IN GOOD FAITH WITH REQUESTS FOR VALIDATION AND NOTICES DISPUTING ALLEDGED DEBTS AND REFUSAL TO STATE UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT THE IRS IS THE HOLDER IN DUE COURSE OF THE ORIGINAL ASSESSMENT. THEREFORE MR. GERENCSER AND THE IRS LAW DEPARTMENT ARE HEREBY NOTICED OF THE ATTACHED DEFAULT. THE ABOVE CONSEQUENCES WILL BE ENFORCED SHOULD MR. GERENCSER AND OR ANY OTHER LAW BREAKING IRS AGENT CONTINUE TO OBSTRUCT AND IMPEDE STATE AND FEDERAL CONSUMER PUBLIC PROTECTION LAWS AGAINST FRAUD.

BE IT FURTHER NOTICED THAT: IN 5 CFR 1320.5 AND 44 USCS SECTION 3512, SEE ATTACHMENTS, THERE ARE PUBLIC PROTECTIONS THAT PROTECT THE PUBLIC FROM MR. GERENSCER AND OTHER LAWLESS IRS AGENTS CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES EMBEDDED IN AIDING AND ABETTING A DOCUMENTED CONSPIRACY TO OFFEND AND DEFRAUD THE UNITED STATES PURSUANT TO 18 USC SECTIONS 371.

PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING LAWS AS THEY RELATE TO THE IRS CORRUPTED 1040 FORMS THAT ARE IN DIRECT VIOLATION TO THE BELOW LAWS. THE BELOW MENTIONED 1040 FORMS FOR 23 YEARS HAVE BEEN CREATED, IMPLEMENTED, AND ENFORCED WHILE THEY WERE IN VIOLATION TO THE BELOW LAWS. FOR MANY YEARS THE IRS 1040 FORMS HAVE BEEN CORRUPTED BECAUSE THEY VIOLATE THE PAPER REDUCTION ACT, JUST LIKE

IRS ASSESSMENT NON VALIDATION CORRUPTS THE FAIR DEBT PRACTICES ACT. THE IRS MUST BEGIN TO OPERATE WITHOUT PRIORITIZED CORRUPTION AND VIOLATION OF PUBLIC PROTECTION CONSUMER FRAUD LAWS.

44 USCS SECTION 3512 STATES THAT: (A) NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER PROVISION OF LAW, NO PERSON SHALL BE SUBJECT TO ANY PENALTY FOR FAILING TO COMPLY WITH A COLLECTION OF INFORMATION THAT IS SUBJECT TO THIS CHAPTER IF-(1) THE COLLECTION OF INFORMATION DOES NOT DISPLAY A VALID CONTROL NUMBER ASSIGNED BY THE DIRECTOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS CHAPTER; OR (2) THE AGENCY FAILS TO INFORM THE PERSON WHO IS TO RESPOND TO THE COLLECTION OF INFORMATION THAT SUCH PERSON IS NOT REQUIRED RESPONDING TO THE COLLECTION OF INFORMATION UNLESS IT DISPLAYS A VALID CONTROL NUMBER. ` (B) THE PROTECTION PROVIDED BY THIS SECTION MAY BE RAISED IN THE FORM OF A COMPLETE DEFENSE, BAR, OR OTHERWISE AT ANY TIME DURING THE AGENCY ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS OR JUDICIAL ACTION APPLICABLE THERETO.

THIS LAW CLEARLY STATES THAT NO ONE MAY BE SUBJECT TO ANY PENALTY FOR FAILING TO COMPLY WITH AN AGENCY’S COLLECTION OF INFORMATION REQUEST (SUCH AS A 1040 FORM), IF THE REQUEST DOES NOT DISPLAY A VALID CONTROL NUMBER ASSIGNED BY THE OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET (OMB) IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ACT, OR IF THE AGENCY FAILS TO INFORM THE PERSON WHO IS TO RESPOND TO THE COLLECTION OF INFORMATION THAT HE IS NOT REQUIRED TO RESPOND TO THE COLLECTION OF INFORMATION REQUEST UNLESS IT DISPLAYS A VALID CONTROL NUMBER.

IN SECTION 3512 CONGRESS WENT ON TO AUTHORIZE THAT THE PROTECTION PROVIDED BY SECTION 3512 MAY BE RAISED IN THE FORM OF A COMPLETE DEFENSE AT ANY TIME DURING AN AGENCY’S ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS (SUCH AS AN IRS TAX COURT OR COLLECTION AND DUE PROCESS HEARING) OR DURING A JUDICIAL PROCEEDING.

IN SUM, THE PRA (PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT) REQUIRES THAT ALL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES DISPLAY VALID OMB CONTROL NUMBERS AND CERTAIN DISCLOSURES DIRECTLY ON ALL INFORMATION COLLECTION FORMS THAT THE PUBLIC IS REQUESTED TO FILE.

MY DEFENSE IS CLEAR. I AM NOT IN RECEIPT OF ANY DOCUMENT WHICH VERIFIES THAT I AM A TAX PAYER OWING A TAX TO THE TREASURY.

PLEASE NOTE I AM NOT IN RECEIPT OF ANY VALIDATED, AUTHORIZED, CORRECT OMB NUMBER 1040 FORM, CONSTITUTIONALLY AND OR STATUTORILY COMPLIANT BELOW IRS FORMS. Form Form Form Form Form Form Form Form Form

1040 with OMB # 1545-0074 for years 1992 through 2005 1040A with OMB # 1545-0085 for years 1992 through 2004 1040A with OMB # 1545-0074 for year 2005 1040EZ with OMB # 1545-0675 for years 1992 through 2004 1040EZ with OMB # 1545-0074 for year 2005 1040ES with OMB # 1545-0087 for years 1992 through 2005 1040ES with OMB # 1545-0074 for year 2006 2555 with OMB # 1545-0067 for year 2004 2555 with OMB # 1545-0074 for year 2005

THE ABOVE IRS FORMS HAVE NOT DISPLAYED A VALID CONTROL NUMBER ASSIGNED BY THE OMB DIRECTOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PRA. THIS INITSELF EPITOMIZES INFLICTED PUBLIC DEFRAUD.

THE IRS LAW DEPARTMENT AND IRS AGENTS KNOW AND OR SHOULD KNOW THAT FRAUDULENT, COUNTERFEIT 1040 FORMS HAVE BEEN USED TO DEFRAUD THE PUBLIC.

THE IRS ONGOING REFUSAL TO COMPLY WITH LAW VIA PROVIDING LAWFUL VERIFICATION OF ALLEDGED DEBT PURSUANT TO THE FDCPA AND THE REFUSAL TO COMPY WITH THE PRA, EXEMPLIFY AN ORGANIZATION ACTING CRIMINALLY TO DEFRAUD THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES, AND TARGETTING AND RETALIATING AGAINST WITNESSES DOCUMENTING AND DEFENDING AGAINST THE CRIMES.

PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS NOTICE OF DEFAULT IS THE FINAL LAWFUL NOTIFICATION FOR YOU TO EXECUTE THE NON VALIDATED ALLEDGED DEBT AND REFUND TAX MONEY OWED ME.

THIS DEFAUT NOTICE IS SENT PURSUANT TO THE FAIR DEBT COLLECTIONS PRACTICES ACT, THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION, SPECIFICALLY, THE BILL OF RIGHTS, IN PARTICULAR, THE FIRST, FOURTH, FIFTH, SIXTH, SEVENTH, NINTH AND TENTH AMENDMENTS, AND PURSUANT TO MR. GERENCSER’S JOB. THE ATTACHED DISPUTE AFFIDAVIT REQUIRED HIS WRITTEN RESPONSE SPECIFIC TO THE CONTRACT AND NON VALIDATED ALLEDGED TAX ASSESSMENT MATTER. HIS FAILURE TO RESPOND, AS STIPULATED, AND REBUT, WITH PARTICULARITY, EVERYTHING IN THE ATTACHED DISPUTE AFFIDAVIT IS HIS LAWFUL, LEGAL AND BINDING AGREEMENT WITH AND ADMISSION TO THE FACT THAT EVERYTHING IN THIS AFFIDAVIT IS TRUE, CORRECT, LEGAL, LAWFUL AND FULLY BINDING UPON HIM, WITHOUT HIS PROTEST OR OBJECTION OR THAT OF THOSE WHO REPRESENT HIM. HIS SILENCE IS HIS ACQUIESCENCE. SEE: CONNALLY V. GENERAL CONSTRUCTION CO., 269 U.S. 385,391.

NOTIFICATION OF LEGAL RESPONSIBILITY IS “THE FIRST ESSENTIAL OF DUE PROCESS OF LAW”. SEE ALSO: U.S. V. TWEEL, 550 F.2D.297. “SILENCE CAN ONLY BE EQUATED WITH FRAUD WHERE THERE IS A LEGAL OR MORAL DUTY TO SPEAK OR WHEN AN INQUIRY LEFT UNANSWERED WOULD BE INTENTIONALLY MISLEADING.” I SENT THE DISPUTE NOTICE ATTACHED ALLOWING HIM TIME TO VALDATE HIS ASSESSMENT AND CONTRACT. HE DID NOT. THE DEFAULT IS NOTED.

IN GOOD FAITH, THE IRS HAS 10 DAYS TO SEND ME THE TAX MONEY OWED OR I WILL AGGRESSIVELY TAKE ACTION AGAINST MR. GERENSCER AND THE IRS, FOR

FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE LAW IN ITS INSISTENCE UPON

PERPETRATING FRAUD FOR AND/OR

HIS AND ITS ALLEGED CLIENT’S

FINANCIAL GAIN, TO MY LEGAL AND FINANCIAL DETRIMENT, INJURY AND MENTAL ANGUISH.

MR. GERENSCER’S REFUSAL TO ABIDE BY THE LAW, AS WELL AS HIS ACTS AGAINST PUBLIC POLICY, SPECIFICALLY, HIS REFUSAL TO VERIFY THE ALLEDGED DEBT AND CONTRACT, AS WELL AS HIS REFUSAL TO SEND TAX RETURN MONEY DUE ME AS VERIFIED IN THE ATTACHED AFFIDAVITS, AND PREVIOUS 1040’S FILED, HIS REFUSAL TO PROVIDE ANY LAW TO WHICH HE IS ACTING, HAVE CAUSED ME EMOTIONAL TRAUMA, DISRUPTION TO MY FAMILY AND PROFESSIONAL LIFE, AND THE LABOR SPENT DEALING WITH THIS MATTER HAS AMOUNTED UP TO WELL OVER $10,000.00.

MR. GERENCSER HAS LIED ABOUT ME AND TO ME AND IS ATTEMPTING TO EXTORT MONEY I DO NOT OWE. HE SHOULD HAVE PROVEN HIS AUTHORITY TO DO THIS IN A TIMELY AND PROCEDURALLY CORRECT MANNER. HE DID NOT. HE MUST CORRECT THE INJURY AND SEND THE TAX RETURN MONEY OWED. MR. GERENSCER AND OTHER LAWLESS IRS AGENTS WILL NOT USE THE IRS TO FURTHER DEFRAUD THE PUBLIC, ENSLAVE ME TO FRAUD AND LAWLESS USURPATIONS. THERE IS NO LAW THAT EXEMPTS THE IRS AND PUBLIC OFFICERS FROM LAWS TO WHICH THE PUBLIC ARE HELD. If MR. GERENCSER AND OR ANY OTHER IRS AGENT DISAGREES WITH ANYTHING IN THIS NOTICE OF DEFAULTED DISPUTE AFFIDAVIT, THEN THAT WITH WHICH IS DISAGREED, SHOULD HAVE BEEN IN WRITING, WITH PARTICULARITY, TO ME, IN A TIMELY FASHION WITH SUPPORT, EVIDENCE, VERIFICATION, HOLDER IN DUE COURSE CONTRACTS, FACT AND LAW.

THIS FAILURE TO RESPOND, AS STIPULATED, AND PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE FDCPA IS THE IRS AGREEMENT WITH AND ADMISSION TO THE FACT THAT EVERYTHING IN THIS AND THE ATTACHED AFFIDAVITS IS TRUE, CORRECT, LEGAL, LAWFUL, AND IS THE IRS IRREVOCABLE AGREEMENT ATTESTING TO THIS, FULLY BINDING DEFAULT, WITHOUT PROTEST OR OBJECTION OR THAT OF THOSE WHO REPRESENT THE IRS.

THE IRS FRAUD HAS VIOLATED THE FAIR DEBT COLLECTIONS PRACTICES ACT. SOME OF THE SECTIONS THEY HAVE VIOLATED ARE LISTED BELOW. ยง

805. Communication in connection with debt collection

[15 USC 1692c]

(a) COMMUNICATION WITH THE CONSUMER GENERALLY. Without the prior consent of the consumer given directly to the debt collector or the express permission of a court of competent jurisdiction, a debt collector may not communicate with a consumer in connection with the collection of any debt -(1) at any unusual time or place or a time or place known or which should be known to be inconvenient to the consumer. In the absence of knowledge of circumstances to the contrary, a debt collector shall assume that the convenient time for communicating with a consumer is after 8 o'clock antemeridian and before 9 o'clock postmeridian, local time at the consumer's location; (2) if the debt collector knows the consumer is represented by an attorney with respect to such debt and has knowledge of, or can readily ascertain, such attorney's name and address, unless the attorney fails to respond within a reasonable period of time to a communication from the debt collector or unless the attorney consents to direct communication with the consumer; or (3) at the consumer's place of employment if the debt collector knows or has reason to know that the consumer's employer prohibits the consumer from receiving such communication. (b) COMMUNICATION WITH THIRD PARTIES. Except as provided in section 804, without the prior consent of the consumer given directly to the debt collector, or the express permission of a court of competent jurisdiction, or as reasonably necessary to effectuate a post judgment judicial remedy, a debt collector may not communicate, in connection with the collection of any debt, with any person other than a consumer, his attorney, a consumer reporting agency if otherwise permitted by law, the creditor, the attorney of the creditor, or the attorney of the debt collector. (c) CEASING COMMUNICATION. If a consumer notifies a debt collector in writing that the consumer refuses to pay a debt or that the consumer wishes the debt collector to cease further communication with the consumer, the debt collector shall not communicate further with the consumer with respect to such debt, except -(1) to advise the consumer that the debt collector's further efforts are being terminated; (2) to notify the consumer that the debt collector or creditor may invoke specified remedies which are ordinarily invoked by such debt collector or creditor; or (3) where applicable, to notify the consumer that the debt collector or creditor intends to invoke a specified remedy.

If such notice from the consumer is made by mail, notification shall be complete upon receipt. (d) For the purpose of this section, the term "consumer" includes the consumer's spouse, parent (if the consumer is a minor), guardian, executor, or administrator. ยง 806. Harassment or abuse [15 USC 1692d] A debt collector may not engage in any conduct the natural consequence of which is to harass, oppress, or abuse any person in connection with the collection of a debt. Without limiting the general application of the foregoing, the following conduct is a violation of this section: (1) The use or threat of use of violence or other criminal means to harm the physical person, reputation, or property of any person.

(2) The use of obscene or profane language or language the natural consequence of which is to abuse the hearer or reader.

(3) The publication of a list of consumers who allegedly refuse to pay debts, except to a consumer reporting agency or to persons meeting the requirements of section 603(f) or 604(3) 1 of this Act. (4) The advertisement for sale of any debt to coerce payment of the debt.

(5) Causing a telephone to ring or engaging any person in telephone conversation repeatedly or continuously with intent to annoy, abuse, or harass any person at the called number.

(6) Except as provided in section 804, the placement of telephone calls without meaningful disclosure of the caller's identity. ยง 807. False or misleading representations [15 USC 1692e]

A debt collector may not use any false, deceptive, or misleading representation or means in connection with the collection of any debt. Without limiting the general application of the foregoing, the following conduct is a violation of this section: (1) The false representation or implication that the debt collector is vouched for, bonded by, or affiliated with the United States or any State, including the use of any badge, uniform, or facsimile thereof.

(2) The false representation of -(A) the character, amount, or legal status of any debt; or (B) any services rendered or compensation which may be lawfully received by any debt collector for the collection of a debt.

(3) The false representation or implication that any individual is an attorney or that any communication is from an attorney.

(4) The representation or implication that nonpayment of any debt will result in the arrest or imprisonment of any person or the seizure, garnishment, attachment, or sale of any property or wages of any person unless such action is lawful and the debt collector or creditor intends to take such action.

(5) The threat to take any action that cannot legally be taken or that is not intended to be taken.

(6) The false representation or implication that a sale, referral, or other transfer of any interest in a debt shall cause the consumer to -(A) lose any claim or defense to payment of the debt; or (B) become subject to any practice prohibited by this title.

(7) The false representation or implication that the consumer committed any crime or other conduct in order to disgrace the consumer.

(8) Communicating or threatening to communicate to any person credit information which is known or which should be known to be false, including the failure to communicate that a disputed debt is disputed.

(9) The use or distribution of any written communication which simulates or is falsely represented to be a document authorized, issued, or approved by any court, official, or agency of the United States or any State, or which creates a false impression as to its source, authorization, or approval.

(10) The use of any false representation or deceptive means to collect or attempt to collect any debt or to obtain information concerning a consumer.

(11) The failure to disclose in the initial written communication with the consumer and, in addition, if the initial communication with the consumer is oral, in that initial oral communication, that the debt collector is attempting to collect a debt and that any information obtained will be used for that purpose, and the failure to disclose in subsequent communications that the communication is from a debt collector, except that this paragraph shall not apply to a formal pleading made in connection with a legal action.

(12) The false representation or implication that accounts have been turned over to innocent purchasers for value.

(13) The false representation or implication that documents are legal process.

(14) The use of any business, company, or organization name other than the true name of the debt collector's business, company, or organization.

(15) The false representation or implication that documents are not legal process forms or do not require action by the consumer.

(16) The false representation or implication that a debt collector operates or is employed by a consumer reporting agency as defined by section 603(f) of this Act. ยง 808. Unfair practices [15 USC 1692f]

A debt collector may not use unfair or unconscionable means to collect or attempt to collect any debt. Without limiting the general application of the foregoing, the following conduct is a violation of this section: (1) The collection of any amount (including any interest, fee, charge, or expense incidental to the principal obligation) unless such amount is expressly authorized by the agreement creating the debt or permitted by law.

(2) The acceptance by a debt collector from any person of a check or other payment instrument postdated by more than five days unless such person is notified in writing of the debt collector's intent to deposit such check or instrument not more than ten nor less than three business days prior to such deposit.

(3) The solicitation by a debt collector of any postdated check or other postdated payment instrument for the purpose of threatening or instituting criminal prosecution.

(4) Depositing or threatening to deposit any postdated check or other postdated payment instrument prior to the date on such check or instrument.

(5) Causing charges to be made to any person for communications by concealment of the true propose of the communication. Such charges include, but are not limited to, collect telephone calls and telegram fees.

(6) Taking or threatening to take any nonjudicial action to effect dispossession or disablement of property if -(A) there is no present right to possession of the property claimed as collateral through an enforceable security interest; (B) there is no present intention to take possession of the property; or (C) the property is exempt by law from such dispossession or disablement.

(7) Communicating with a consumer regarding a debt by post card.

(8) Using any language or symbol, other than the debt collector's address, on any envelope when communicating with a consumer by use of the mails or by telegram, except that a debt collector may use his business name if such name does not indicate that he is in the debt collection business. ยง 809. Validation of debts [15 USC 1692g] (a) Within five days after the initial communication with a consumer in connection with the collection of any debt, a debt collector shall, unless the following information is contained in the initial communication or the consumer has paid the debt, send the consumer a written notice containing -(1) the amount of the debt; (2) the name of the creditor to whom the debt is owed; (3) a statement that unless the consumer, within thirty days after receipt of the notice, disputes the validity of the debt, or any portion thereof, the debt will be assumed to be valid by the debt collector; (4) a statement that if the consumer notifies the debt collector in writing within the thirty-day period that the debt, or any portion thereof, is disputed, the debt collector will obtain verification of the debt or a copy of a judgment against the consumer and a copy of such verification or judgment will be mailed to the consumer by the debt collector; and (5) a statement that, upon the consumer's written request within the thirty-day period, the debt collector will provide the consumer with the name and address of the original creditor, if different from the current creditor. (b) If the consumer notifies the debt collector in writing within the thirty-day period described in subsection (a) that the debt, or any portion thereof, is disputed, or that the consumer requests the name and address of the original creditor, the debt collector shall cease collection of the debt, or any disputed portion thereof, until the debt collector obtains verification of the debt or any copy of a judgment, or the name and address of the original creditor, and a copy of such verification or

judgment, or name and address of the original creditor, is mailed to the consumer by the debt collector. (c) The failure of a consumer to dispute the validity of a debt under this section may not be construed by any court as an admission of liability by the consumer. ยง 810. Multiple debts [15 USC 1692h] If any consumer owes multiple debts and makes any single payment to any debt collector with respect to such debts, such debt collector may not apply such payment to any debt which is disputed by the consumer and, where applicable, shall apply such payment in accordance with the consumer's directions. ยง 811. Legal actions by debt collectors [15 USC 1692i] (a) Any debt collector who brings any legal action on a debt against any consumer shall -(1) in the case of an action to enforce an interest in real property securing the consumer's obligation, bring such action only in a judicial district or similar legal entity in which such real property is located; or (2) in the case of an action not described in paragraph (1), bring such action only in the judicial district or similar legal entity -(A) in which such consumer signed the contract sued upon; or (B) in which such consumer resides at the commencement of the action. (b) Nothing in this title shall be construed to authorize the bringing of legal actions by debt collectors. ยง 812. Furnishing certain deceptive forms [15 USC 1692j] (a) It is unlawful to design, compile, and furnish any form knowing that such form would be used to create the false belief in a consumer that a person other than the creditor of such consumer is participating in the collection of or in an attempt to collect a debt such consumer allegedly owes such creditor, when in fact such person is not so participating. (b) Any person who violates this section shall be liable to the same extent and in the same manner as a debt collector is liable under section 813 for failure to comply with a provision of this title. ยง 813. Civil liability [15 USC 1692k] (a) Except as otherwise provided by this section, any debt collector who fails to comply with any provision of this title with respect to any person is liable to such person in an amount equal to the sum of -(1) any actual damage sustained by such person as a result of such failure; (2) (A) in the case of any action by an individual, such additional damages as the court may allow, but not exceeding $1,000; or (B) in the case of a class action, (i) such amount for each named plaintiff as could be recovered under subparagraph (A), and (ii) such amount as the court may allow for all other class members, without regard to a minimum individual recovery, not to exceed the lesser of $500,000 or 1 per centum of the net worth of the debt collector; and (3) in the case of any successful action to enforce the foregoing liability, the costs of the action, together with a reasonable attorney's fee as determined by the court. On a finding by the court that an action under this section was brought in bad faith and for the purpose of harassment, the court may award to the defendant attorney's fees reasonable in relation to the work expended and costs. (b) In determining the amount of liability in any action under subsection (a), the court shall consider, among other relevant factors -(1) in any individual action under subsection (a)(2)(A), the frequency and persistence of noncompliance by the debt collector, the nature of such noncompliance, and the extent to which such noncompliance was intentional; or (2) in any class action under subsection (a)(2)(B), the frequency and persistence of noncompliance by the debt collector, the nature of such noncompliance, the resources of the debt collector, the

number of persons adversely affected, and the extent to which the debt collector's noncompliance was intentional. (c) A debt collector may not be held liable in any action brought under this title if the debt collector shows by a preponderance of evidence that the violation was not intentional and resulted from a bona fide error notwithstanding the maintenance of procedures reasonably adapted to avoid any such error. (d) An action to enforce any liability created by this title may be brought in any appropriate United States district court without regard to the amount in controversy, or in any other court of competent jurisdiction, within one year from the date on which the violation occurs. (e) No provision of this section imposing any liability shall apply to any act done or omitted in good faith in conformity with any advisory opinion of the Commission, notwithstanding that after such act or omission has occurred, such opinion is amended, rescinded, or determined by judicial or other authority to be invalid for any reason. ยง 814. Administrative enforcement [15 USC 1692l] (a) Compliance with this title shall be enforced by the Commission, except to the extent that enforcement of the requirements imposed under this title is specifically committed to another agency under subsection (b). For purpose of the exercise by the Commission of its functions and powers under the Federal Trade Commission Act, a violation of this title shall be deemed an unfair or deceptive act or practice in violation of that Act. All of the functions and powers of the Commission under the Federal Trade Commission Act are available to the Commission to enforce compliance by any person with this title, irrespective of whether that person is engaged in commerce or meets any other jurisdictional tests in the Federal Trade Commission Act, including the power to enforce the provisions of this title in the same manner as if the violation had been a violation of a Federal Trade Commission trade regulation rule. (b) Compliance with any requirements imposed under this title shall be enforced under -(1) section 8 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, in the case of -(A) national banks, by the Comptroller of the Currency; (B) member banks of the Federal Reserve System (other than national banks), by the Federal Reserve Board; and (C) banks the deposits or accounts of which are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (other than members of the Federal Reserve System), by the Board of Directors of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation; (2) section 5(d) of the Home Owners Loan Act of 1933, section 407 of the National Housing Act, and sections 6(i) and 17 of the Federal Home Loan Bank Act, by the Federal Home Loan Bank Board (acting directing or through the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation), in the case of any institution subject to any of those provisions; (3) the Federal Credit Union Act, by the Administrator of the National Credit Union Administration with respect to any Federal credit union; (4) subtitle IV of Title 49, by the Interstate Commerce Commission with respect to any common carrier subject to such subtitle; (5) the Federal Aviation Act of 1958, by the Secretary of Transportation with respect to any air carrier or any foreign air carrier subject to that Act; and (6) the Packers and Stockyards Act, 1921 (except as provided in section 406 of that Act), by the Secretary of Agriculture with respect to any activities subject to that Act. (c) For the purpose of the exercise by any agency referred to in subsection (b) of its powers under any Act referred to in that subsection, a violation of any requirement imposed under this title shall be deemed to be a violation of a requirement imposed under that Act. In addition to its powers under any provision of law specifically referred to in subsection (b), each of the agencies referred to in that

subsection may exercise, for the purpose of enforcing compliance with any requirement imposed under this title any other authority conferred on it by law, except as provided in subsection (d). (d) Neither the Commission nor any other agency referred to in subsection (b) may promulgate trade regulation rules or other regulations with respect to the collection of debts by debt collectors as defined in this title. ยง 815. Reports to Congress by the Commission [15 USC 1692m] (a) Not later than one year after the effective date of this title and at one-year intervals thereafter, the Commission shall make reports to the Congress concerning the administration of its functions under this title, including such recommendations as the Commission deems necessary or appropriate. In addition, each report of the Commission shall include its assessment of the extent to which compliance with this title is being achieved and a summary of the enforcement actions taken by the Commission under section 814 of this title. (b) In the exercise of its functions under this title, the Commission may obtain upon request the views of any other Federal agency which exercises enforcement functions under section 814 of this title. ยง 816. Relation to State laws [15 USC 1692n] This title does not annul, alter, or affect, or exempt any person subject to the provisions of this title from complying with the laws of any State with respect to debt collection practices, except to the extent that those laws are inconsistent with any provision of this title, and then only to the extent of the inconsistency. For purposes of this section, a State law is not inconsistent with this title if the protection such law affords any consumer is greater than the protection provided by this title. ยง 817. Exemption for State regulation [15 USC 1692o] The Commission shall by regulation exempt from the requirements of this title any class of debt collection practices within any State if the Commission determines that under the law of that State that class of debt collection practices is subject to requirements substantially similar to those imposed by this title, and that there is adequate provision for enforcement.

5 CFR 1320.5 PART 1320_CONTROLLING PAPERWORK BURDENS ON THE PUBLIC--Table of Contents

Sec. 1320.5 General requirements. (a) An agency shall not conduct or sponsor a collection of information unless, in advance of the adoption or revision of the collection of information-(1) The agency has-(i) Conducted the review required in Sec. 1320.8; (ii) Evaluated the public comments received under Sec. 1320.8(d) and Sec. 1320.11; (iii) Submitted to the Director, in accordance with such procedures and in such form as OMB may specify, (A) The certification required under Sec. 1320.9, (B) The proposed collection of information in accordance with Sec. 1320.10, Sec. 1320.11, or Sec. 1320.12, as appropriate, (C) An explanation for the decision that it would not be appropriate, under Sec. 1320.8(b) (1), for a proposed collection of information to display an expiration date; (D) An explanation for a decision to provide for any payment or gift to respondents, other than remuneration of contractors or grantees; (E) A statement indicating whether (and if so, to what extent) the proposed collection of information involves the use of automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses, and an explanation for the decision; (F) A summary of the public comments received under Sec. 1320.8(d), including actions taken by the agency in response to the comments, and the date and page of the publication in the Federal Register of the notice therefore; and (G) Copies of pertinent statutory authority, regulations, and such related supporting materials as OMB may request; and (iv) Published, except as provided in Sec. 1320.13(d), a notice in the Federal Register-(A) Stating that the agency has made such submission; and (B) Setting forth-(1) A title for the collection of information; [[Page 150]] (2) A summary of the collection of information; (3) A brief description of the need for the information and proposed use of the information; (4) A description of the likely respondents, including the estimated number of likely respondents, and proposed frequency of response to the collection of information; (5) An estimate of the total annual reporting and recordkeeping burden that will result from the collection of information; (6) Notice that comments may be submitted to OMB; and (7) The time period within which the agency is requesting OMB to approve or disapprove the collection of information if, at the time of submittal of a collection of information for OMB review under Sec. 1320.10, Sec. 1320.11 or Sec. 1320.12, the agency plans to request or

has requested OMB to conduct its review on an emergency basis under Sec. 1320.13; and (2) OMB has approved the proposed collection of information, OMB's approval has been inferred under Sec. 1320.10(c), Sec. 1320.11(i), or Sec. 1320.12(e), or OMB's disapproval has been voided by an independent regulatory agency under Sec. 1320.15; and (3) The agency has obtained from the Director a control number to be displayed upon the collection of information. (b) In addition to the requirements in paragraph (a) of this section, an agency shall not conduct or sponsor a collection of information unless: (1) The collection of information displays a currently valid OMB control number; and (2)(i) The agency informs the potential persons who are to respond to the collection of information that such persons are not required to respond to the collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. (ii) An agency shall provide the information described in paragraph (b)(2)(i) of this section in a manner that is reasonably calculated to inform the public.

(A) In the case of forms, questionnaires, instructions, and other written collections of information sent or made available to potential respondents (other than in an electronic format), the information described in paragraph (b)(2)(i) of this section is provided ``in a manner that is reasonably calculated to inform the public'' if the agency includes it either on the form, questionnaire or other collection of information, or in the instructions for such collection.

(B) In the case of forms, questionnaires, instructions, and other written collections of information sent or made available to potential respondents in an electronic format, the information described in paragraph (b)(2)(i) of this section is provided ``in a manner that is reasonably calculated to inform the public'' if the agency places the currently valid OMB control number in the instructions, near the title of the electronic collection instrument, or, for on-line applications, on the first screen viewed by the respondent.

(C) In the case of collections of information published in regulations, guidelines, and other issuances in the Federal Register, the information described in paragraph (b)(2)(i) of this section is provided ``in a manner that is reasonably calculated to inform the public'' if the agency publishes such information in the Federal Register (for example, in the case of a collection of information in a regulation, by publishing such information in the preamble or the regulatory text, or in a technical amendment to the regulation, or in a separate notice announcing OMB approval of the collection of information). In the case of a collection of information published in an issuance that is also included in the Code of Federal Regulations, publication of such information in the Code of Federal Regulations constitutes an alternative means of providing it ``in a manner that is reasonably calculated to inform the public.'' In the case of a

collection of information published in an issuance that is also included in the Code of Federal Regulations, OMB recommends for ease of future reference that, even where an agency has already provided such information ``in a manner that is reasonably calculated to inform the public'' by publishing it in the Federal Register as a separate notice or in the preamble for the final rule (rather than in the regulatory text for [[Page 151]] the final rule or in a technical amendment to the final rule), the agency also publish such information along with a table or codified section of OMB control numbers to be included in the Code of Federal Regulations (see Sec. 1320.3(f)(3)).

(D) In other cases, and where OMB determines in advance in writing that special circumstances exist, to use other means that are reasonably calculated to inform the public of the information described in paragraph (b)(2)(i) of this section. (c)(1) Agencies shall submit all collections of information, other than those contained in proposed rules published for public comment in the Federal Register or in current regulations that were published as final rules in the Federal Register, in accordance with the requirements in Sec. 1320.10. Agencies shall submit collections of information contained in interim final rules or direct final rules in accordance with the requirements of Sec. 1320.10.

(2) Agencies shall submit collections of information contained in proposed rules published for public comment in the Federal Register in accordance with the requirements in Sec. 1320.11.

(3) Agencies shall submit collections of information contained in current regulations that were published as final rules in the Federal Register in accordance with the requirements in Sec. 1320.12.

(4) Special rules for emergency processing of collections of information are set forth in Sec. 1320.13.

(5) For purposes of time limits for OMB review of collections of information, any submission properly submitted and received by OMB after 12:00 noon will be deemed to have been received on the following business day. (d)(1) To obtain OMB approval of a collection of information, an agency shall demonstrate that it has taken every reasonable step to ensure that the proposed collection of information: (i) Is the least burdensome necessary for the proper performance of the agency's functions to comply with legal requirements and achieve program objectives; (ii) Is not duplicative of information otherwise accessible to the agency; and (iii) Has practical utility. The agency shall also seek to minimize the cost to itself of collecting, processing, and using the information, but shall not do so by means of shifting disproportionate costs or burdens onto the public.

(2) Unless the agency is able to demonstrate, in its submission for OMB clearance, that such characteristic of the collection of information is necessary to satisfy statutory requirements or other substantial need, OMB will not approve a collection of information-(i) Requiring respondents to report information to the agency more often than quarterly; (ii) Requiring respondents to prepare a written response to a collection of information in fewer than 30 days after receipt of it; (iii) Requiring respondents to submit more than an original and two copies of any document; (iv) Requiring respondents to retain records, other than health, medical, government contract, grant-in-aid, or tax records, for more than three years; (v) In connection with a statistical survey, that is not designed to produce valid and reliable results that can be generalized to the universe of study; (vi) Requiring the use of a statistical data classification that has not been reviewed and approved by OMB; (vii) That includes a pledge of confidentiality that is not supported by authority established in statute or regulation, that is not supported by disclosure and data security policies that are consistent with the pledge, or which unnecessarily impedes sharing of data with other agencies for compatible confidential use; or (viii) Requiring respondents to submit proprietary, trade secret, or other confidential information unless the agency can demonstrate that it has instituted procedures to protect the information's confidentiality to the extent permitted by law. (e) OMB shall determine whether the collection of information, as submitted by the agency, is necessary for the proper performance of the agency's functions. In making this determination, OMB will take into account the criteria set forth in paragraph (d) of [[Page 152]] this section, and will consider whether the burden of the collection of information is justified by its practical utility. In addition: (1) OMB will consider necessary any collection of information specifically mandated by statute or court order, but will independently assess any collection of information to the extent that the agency exercises discretion in its implementation; and (2) OMB will consider necessary any collection of information specifically required by an agency rule approved or not acted upon by OMB under Sec. 1320.11 or Sec. 1320.12, but will independently assess any such collection of information to the extent that it deviates from the specifications of the rule. (f) Except as provided in Sec. 1320.15, to the extent that OMB determines that all or any portion of a collection of information is unnecessary, for any reason, the agency shall not engage in such collection or portion thereof. OMB will reconsider its disapproval of a

collection of information upon the request of the agency head or Senior Official only if the sponsoring agency is able to provide significant new or additional information relevant to the original decision. (g) An agency may not make a substantive or material modification to a collection of information after such collection of information has been approved by OMB, unless the modification has been submitted to OMB for review and approval under this Part. (h) An agency should consult with OMB before using currently approved forms or other collections of information after the expiration date printed thereon (in those cases where the actual form being used contains an expiration date that would expire before the end of the use of the form).

44 USCS § 3512 § 3512. Public protection (a) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information that is subject to this subchapter [44 USCS § § 3501 et seq.] if-(1) the collection of information does not display a valid control number assigned by the Director in accordance with this subchapter [44 USCS § § 3501 et seq.]; or (2) the agency fails to inform the person who is to respond to the collection of information that such person is not required to respond to the collection of information unless it displays a valid control number. (b) The protection provided by this section may be raised in the form of a complete defense, bar, or otherwise at any time during the agency administrative process or judicial action applicable thereto.

HISTORY: (Added May 22, 1995, P.L. 104-13, § 2, 109 Stat. 181; Oct. 30, 2000, P.L. 106-398, § 1, 114 Stat.

1654.)

HISTORY; ANCILLARY LAWS AND DIRECTIVES Explanatory notes: The amendment made by § 1 of Act Oct. 30, 2000, P.L. 106-398, is based on § 1064(b) of Subtitle G of Title X of Division A of H.R. 5408 (114 Stat. 1654A-275), as introduced on Oct. 6, 2000, which was enacted into law by such § 1.

A prior § 3512 (Act Dec. 11, 1980, P.L. 96-511, § 2(a), 94 Stat. 2822) was omitted in the general revision of this chapter by Act May 22, 1995, P.L. 104-13, § 2, 109 Stat. 163, effective as provided by § 4 of such Act, which appears as 44 USCS § 3501 note. The prior section provided for public protection.

Another prior § 3512 (Act Nov. 16, 1973, P.L. 93-153, Title IV, § 409(b), 87 Stat. 593), which provided information for independent regulatory agencies, was omitted in the general revision of this chapter by Act Dec. 11, 1980, P.L. 96511, § 2(a), 94 Stat. 2812, effective April 1, 1981, as provided by § 5 of such Act. Effective date of section: This section became effective on October 1, 1995, with certain exceptions, as provided by § 4 of Act May 22, 1995, P.L. 104-13, which appears as 44 USCS § 3501 note.

Amendments: 2000. Act Oct. 30, 2000 (effective 30 days after enactment, as provided by § 1065 of H.R. 5408, as enacted into law by such Act, which appears as 44 USCS § 3531 note), substituted "subchapter" for "chapter" wherever appearing.

NOTES: Code of Federal Regulations: Small Business Administration--Administration, 13 CFR Part 101.

Related Statutes & Rules: This section is referred to in 15 USCS § 57b-2; 31 USCS § 3811.

Research Guide: Federal Procedure: 2 Fed Proc L Ed, Administrative Procedure § 2:66.

Am Jur: 37A Am Jur 2d, Freedom of Information Acts § 145.

45B Am Jur 2d, Job Discrimination § 1641.

Page 2 44 USCS § 3512 Forms: 17 Bender's Federal Practice Forms, Form CrR34:2, Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.

Annotations: Construction and Application of Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980 (PRA), 44 U.S.C.A. § § 3501 et seq. [44 USCS § § 3501 et seq.]. 200 ALR Fed 173.

Law Review Articles: Lubbers. Paperwork redux: the (stronger) Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 49 Admin L Rev 111, Winter 1997.

Interpretive Notes and Decisions:

1. Generally 2. Effect of noncompliance, generally 3. Tax matters 1. Generally Under Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980 (44 USCS § § 3501 et seq.), forms provided by government agencies for collection of information must conform to certain standards; defendant in administrative enforcement action cannot raise affirmative defenses which have not been raised in administrative proceeding, and affirmative defense that forms were not in compliance with applicable standards does not preclude enforcement where government sought relief only for periods in which report forms carried control numbers under 44 USCS § 3512. Navel Orange Administrative Committee v Exeter Orange Co. (1983, CA9 Cal) 722 F2d 449, 14 Fed Rules Evid Serv 1286, 74 ALR Fed 265.

Fact that IRS summonses were issued on IRS Form 2029 without Office of Management and Budget control number, as allegedly required by 44 USCS § 3512, was not valid basis for quashing summonses. Faber v United States (1999, WD Mich) 69 F Supp 2d 965, 99-2 USTC P 50593, 83 AFTR 2d 2764.

Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 USCS § 3512, does not create private right of action; 44 USCS § 3512 is only defense to enforcement actions. Ass'n of Am. Physicians & Surgs., Inc. v United States HHS (2002, SD Tex) 224 F Supp 2d 1115, affd (2003, CA5 Tex) 67 Fed Appx 253.

Paperwork Reduction Act does not incorporate money-mandating provision, either mandatory or permissive, into its statutory language, does not reference or indicate any intent to include such provision, and does not create entitlement in any individual or entity to collect money from sovereign automatically or upon completion of responsibility or fulfillment of duty; fact that Congress opted not to incorporate money-mandating provision in Act is significant, and results in absence of waiver of sovereign immunity to allow lawsuits premised upon Act to be brought in Court of Federal Claims. Pacific Nat'l Cellular v United States (1998) 41 Fed Cl 20.

2. Effect of noncompliance, generally Convictions for residing and working on unpatented mining claim without having sought, filed for, or obtained permit (Plan of Operations) from Forest Service would be reversed since Plan of Operations filing requirement lacked current control number. United States v Smith (1989, CA9 Alaska) 866 F2d 1092, 106 OGR 165.

Since Forest Service did not comply with PRA when it required miner to file operations plan, miner could not be subject to any penalty and information therefore failed to charge offense. United States v Hatch (1990, CA9 Nev) 919 F2d 1394, 90 CDOS 8577.

Paperwork Reduction Act does not protect individual against prosecution for making false statements on government

forms. United States v Sasser (1992, CA10 Okla) 974 F2d 1544, 36 Fed Rules Evid Serv 830, cert den (1993) 506 US 1085, 122 L Ed 2d 368, 113 S Ct 1063.

PRA's 1995 amendments allowing any adversely affected person to raise PRA violations without limitation, so long as administrative or judicial process in connection with particular license of application continues, was properly applied to cellular telephone service provider's application for license in ongoing proceedings on remand; amendments govern only conduct of litigation after their effective date and do nothing to reopen matters litigated before then, hence does not offend any norm against retroactive lawmaking. Saco River Cellular v FCC (1998, App DC) 328 US App DC 162, 133 F3d 25, cert den (1998) 525 US 813, 142 L Ed 2d 37, 119 S Ct 47.

Page 3 44 USCS § 3512 Airbag manufacturers' submissions to National Highway Traffic Safety Administration could not be considered mandatory for purposes of analyzing applicability of FOIA exemption 4, since agency failed to obtain prior approval from OMB for its request form, hence request, which on its face appeared to be mandatory, was not enforceable. Ctr. for Auto Safety v Nat'l Highway Traffic Safety Admin. (2001, App DC) 345 US App DC 248, 244 F3d 144, 58 USPQ2d 1294.

Japanese nonimmigrant visitor may not defend against charges of falsifying criminal record on visa application by citing lack of OMB control number on application, even though 44 USCS § 3512 precludes penalty against any person "for failing to provide information" to agency on information collection request not displaying current control number, because legislative history clarifies that § 3512 was intended to protect only nonfeasor bombarded by unauthorized forms, not malfeasor or fraudfeasor who gives false information on unauthorized form. United States v Takeo Matsumoto (1991, DC Hawaii) 756 F Supp 1361.

Airplane parts importer lacks standing to maintain claim under Paperwork Reduction Act (44 USCS § § 3501 et seq.), where importer challenges investigatory circular or questionnaire distributed to its customers by federal agencies, because importer was not asked to provide information and asserts no direct injury from alleged failure to comply with § 3512. Wag-Aero, Inc. v United States (1993, ED Wis) 837 F Supp 1479, affd without op (1994, CA7 Wis) 1994 US App LEXIS 27856.

3. Tax matters Act does not apply to statutory requirement to file income tax return, but only to forms themselves, so that tax protestor's

claim of ineffective assistance of counsel for failing to raise implications of Act was meritless.

United States v Wunder (1990, CA6 Ohio) 919 F2d 34, 90-2 USTC P 50575, 67 AFTR 2d 552.

Statute does not apply to statutory requirement that taxpayer must file return. United States v Kerwin (1991, CA5 Tex) 945 F2d 92, 91-2 USTC P 50547, 68 AFTR 2d 5753.

IRS investigation of taxpayer's failure to file income tax return constitutes agency action against specific individuals, hence summons were valid even absent either OMB number or statement that document request was not subject to requirements of § 3512. United States v Saunders (1991, CA9 Or) 951 F2d 1065, 91 Daily Journal DAR 15334, 92-1 USTC P 50055, 69 AFTR 2d 331.

Act did not bar prosecution for income tax evasion; it is irrelevant that Treasury regulation stating where income tax returns must be filed does not have OMB control number since Congress created duty to file returns and did not condition it on any Treasury regulation. United States v Neff (1992, CA11 Fla) 954 F2d 698, 69 AFTR 2d 788, 6 FLW Fed C 135.

PRA is not applicable to IRS instruction booklets, which merely assist taxpayer in filling out tax forms, rather than independently request information from taxpayer. United States v Ryan (1992, CA7 Ill) 969 F2d 238, 36 Fed Rules Evid Serv 148, 71 AFTR 2d 1731.

Failure to display expiration date on tax return form does not violate Act since, even if Act requires expiration date, form was expressly designated "1981" tax return which is sufficient to satisfy such requirement. Salberg v United States (1992, CA7 Ill) 969 F2d 379, 92-2 USTC P 50490, 70 AFTR 2d 5345.

Requirement of 44 USCS § 3512 that forms contain Office of Management and Budget number does not apply to collection of information during course of administrative action where investigation is against specific individuals or entities by operation of 44 USCS § 3518; process of assessment and collection of taxes appropriately falls within exception of 44 USCS § 3512. Cameron v IRS (1984, ND Ind) 593 F Supp 1540, 84-2 USTC P 9845, 54 AFTR 2d 6260, affd (1985, CA7 Ind) 773 F2d 126, 85-2 USTC P 9661, 56 AFTR 2d 5851.

Internal Revenue Service documents are not required to carry Office of Management and Budget numbers to be valid under 44 USCS § 3512. Snyder v IRS (1984, ND Ind) 596 F Supp 240, 84-2 USTC P 9894, 40 FR Serv 2d 496, 54 AFTR 2d 6425.

Accused tax evaders are not entitled to acquittal due to federal income tax instruction booklets' lack of OMB control numbers, although 44 USCS § 3512 does prohibit penalties if information collection request does not display current

control number, because tax forms--not instruction booklets--are "information collection requests" requiring OMB control numbers. United States v Stiner (1991, DC Kan) 765 F Supp 663, 68 AFTR 2d 5696, affd without op (1992,

3230 Cruger Avenue #6B

Bronx, New York 10467

SENT CERTIFIED RETURN RECEIPT 7006 2760 0003 2210 5973 March 1, 2007 Law Department Wells Fargo Auto Finance Tempe Operations Center P.O Box 29704, Phoenix, Arizona 85038-9704 Re: Account Number 502-375-9303999-9001 Dear Wells Fargo Auto Finance Law Department: I write this letter as a Truth Affidavit seeking, truth and the return of lawlessly usurped money due me that went to this account without my consent, authorization, dissemination and or knowledge. Please see the two attachments from Wells Fargo Auto Finance department dispersing monies due me, in a manner inconsistent to my consent.

Foremost, I do not consent to having any money due to me to be applied else where without my consent, knowledge or authority. This means I expect a check for the money returned for the extended warranty I cancelled on this account.

Second, the attached two documents list inconsistent over $2, 000 payment amounts.

One list the return of $2,053.42 and the other document lists a return of $2, 175.00. Please send me a verifiable letter clearly stating the amount of money applied to the account.

Third, the over $2,000 payment dates are inconsistent. One list a date of 10/31/06 as the payment date f $2,175.00 and the other document lists $2, 053.42 returned on 12/31/07. Please send me a verifiable letter clearly stating the exact date of the payment into the account.

Fourth, neither document clearly states the purpose of the over $2,000 payment. Please send me a verifiable letter clearly establishing that the money is for the return of the extended warranty fee. These ambiguous practices make way for deceptive practices and false double billing in the future. For example, the listing of the extended warranty return of funds as misc debit leaves room for the extended warranty to be billed again. This is not a consumer friendly and or good faith practice. Please send me a letter clearly stating what the over $2, 000 payment is for.

PAGE 1 OF 3 Fifth, the attached document lists the auto loan balance as N/A from March 2, 2006 to 11/27/06. I find this outrageous. Please send me a verifiable letter clearly listing the balance on the loan from March 2, 2006 to present.

Sixth, I am sending a payment of $472.00 in good faith while I dispute further payments until a verifiable letter answering the above discrepancies is received. I dispute the misapplication and dissemination manner of the attached documented returned money that I

have to pay back and that was distributed in a manner I do not agree with or consent. Please carefully note that I do not dispute any lawful debt that I may owe. I do dispute, oppose and reject business practices that are deceptive, unprofessional, and make way for fraudulent legal fiction slavery type administration of money I have to pay back.

Seventh, please note I did not request the payment history for any specific dates as mentioned in the below unsigned attached Wells Fargo letter.

Eighth, please explain why the attached internet bill payment history inflicts a $34.03 loan increase immediately after having the lawlessly usurped $2,000 placed in the account.

Please explain the good faith business practices around this malice.

Ninth, Attached you will find inflicted lawless usurpations I have been documenting by a character trespassing as a NYS judge. Please see the attachments enclosed. I am in the midst of getting this power crazed abnormal character arrested, removed and impeached as authorized under the laws of this country on behalf of public safety and so no other human being has to be set up and abused via lawless usurpations by a psychotic obsessed with disguised killings premised off of criminal expertise, abuse of power, and lawless usurpations.

Consequently, since documenting his attached crimes, lawless usurpations, inflicted fraud, and unimaginable criminal conditions have escalated for no other purpose but to impede a matter under agency/department investigation by impeding via inflicting, fraud in every business transaction I have, to derail and delay the needed complaint for his arrest.

Please see the attached. Jonathan Lippman’s lawless usurpations and criminal practices have no business in Wells Fargo. To this end, I ask that Wells Fargo law department enforce the law and end the attached lawless usurpations and inflicted fraudulent business practices.

For the law departments over standing I am submitting a copy of my criminal complaint against Jonathan Lippman’s documented lawless, deadly, inflicted patterned and practiced lawless usurpations that have effectively effectuated millions of disguised killings.

I have not had any problems with this entity and pray to keep such.

Total payment due on 03/22/07 ( Make a payment ) $942.01 Outstanding principal balance as of 02/26/07 What does this mean? $19,147.42 Year-To-Date Information Interest Paid $471.00 Total prior year interest paid $212.67 速 速 Apply now for a Wells Fargo Visa Credit Card

Transactions - All Activity Show

All Activity

View

Click on column heading to sort Date Description Amount 01/24/07 PAYMENT +$471.00 11/27/06 PAYMENT +$472.00 10/31/06 INCREASE LOAN BALANCE $34.03 10/31/06 PAYMENT +$2,175.00

To get a payoff quote or total outstanding balance, including interest, please call 1800-55-WELLS. Date of proposed payoff must be provided to ensure an accurate quote.

AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at AOL.com.

3230 Cruger Avenue #6B Bronx, New York 10467

March 20, 2007 SENT CERTIFIED RETURN RECEIPT NUMBER 7006 2150 000415035421 NYS Teachers Retirement System 10 Corporate Woods Drive Albany, New York 12211-2395 Re: Membership # 0728047 VERIFIED CORRECTIONS Dear Teachers Retirement Representative: I write this notarized letter as a Truth Affidavit verifying the below facts that need to be added to correct the attached erroneous NYS Teachers Profile Service Credit History report. I have over 20 years of Public Service Credit History. Please update your records with the below verifiable information.

First: My name is Miriam Snyder. My social security number is 125 52 1484. My address is 3230 Cruger Avenue #6B, Bronx, New York 10467. Please correct your wrong address of my residence. I have 19 years of full time Public School teaching service. Please correct the attached misinformation. It states only 15 years of my 19 years of service.

Second: I taught as an adjunct professor at Westchester Community college for 3 years, from 2002 to 2006. I am entitled to two years of service credit. Please verify any other information and or requirements you may have if disputed.

Third: I worked at Westchester BOCES for three years as a part time adult educator. I worked there from 2003 to 2006. I am entitled to at minimum one year of service credit.

Fourth: I worked full time in the Yonkers Public Schools for 2 years as noted Fifth: I worked full time in the Hempstead Public School System for 3 years, I worked the following years: 1998, 1999, and 2000.

Sixth: I worked full time in the Rosevelt Public Schools in Long Island New York for 2 years from 1996 to 1997.

Seventh: I worked at Nassau BOCES for 4 years as a part time adult educator. I am entitled to 2 years of service.

I worked at Nassau Community College as an adjunct for 1 year from September 1997 to June 1998.

Eighth: I worked full time in the NYC Public Schools from 1994 to 1996. I worked there for two years. My membership number in the NYC Teachers Retirement system is TRS Membership No. 00T778182. Please forward any papers needed to transfer such, if needed.

Ninth: I worked full time in the Rochester Public Schools for nine years from 1986 to 1994.

Tenth: I worked for the NYS Public Service for 2 years from 1984 to 1986.

Finally, if the New York State Teachers Retirement system has verifiable information different from the above, please forward the verifiable information so it may be challenged in a procedural equal protection of the law manner. Please do not report or forward non verified information. Please correct and verify your information. Please forward a corrected Service Report to the above correct address. Should there be any questions or concerns, please contact me in writing at the above address. Thank you.

ATTESTATION I, MIRIAM SNYDER, ATTEST TO THE FACT THAT THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS CORRECT AND TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. ____________________________ Miriam Snyder, All Rights reserved.

EXHIBIT # 1, FRAUD BASED GARNISHMENT OF WAGES

3230 Cruger Avenue #6B Bronx, New York 10467 November 21, 2006

Emailed To: pscoffice@psc-cuny.org Mailed To: Professional Staff Congress City University of New York 61 Broadway, Suite 1500 New York, New York 10006

Dear Union People: My name is Miriam Snyder. I am a veteran educator. I am forwarding the attached affidavit dated November 20, 2006 as it involves the Borough of Manhattan Community college. It will be mailed with exhibits later this week.

Please note the affidavit was written for no other purpose than to defend myself from documented, repeated, unregulated, and unremedied public education hate crime enforcement that kills under disguise and that I have already suffered from. Above all, the hate crime enforcement code and initiation stage is documented in the evidence attached with the affidavit mentioned above. The hate crime code reached the Borough of Manhattan Community college administration and classroom in the manner of a phenomenon. I have documented unreported phenomenon that have left many innocent people dead.

I am also sending the following email exhibits and I hope the evidence goes through the email because recently, my email is telling me files are too big when for the last 10 years I have been sending out files bigger than the ones I have been sending recently. I am emailing these files for the PCS staff to read and understand and let God do the rest. It is my hope that this office will take the information and do what is right, on behalf of truth, Godliness, public education, public safety, public protections, human life, humanity and equal protection.

I am not addressing any one person because the last union lawyer that helped me was killed, under a medical/social/ Can You Prove it, phenomenon, immediately after negotiating the attached NYSUT HATE CRIME ENFORCEMENT SETTLEMENT, which includes a NYSUT sign off on ATTEMPTED MURDER, RICO, DEFAMATION, SLANDER, US BLACK CODES ENFORCEMENT, HUMAN /CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS, VIOLATIONS OF FEDERAL AND STATE LAW ETC…………. Please see the attached settlement from the Hempstead Public Schools union under the leadership/disguise of NYSUT via the lawless leadership of NYS Chief Injustice Jonathan Lippman.

The Hempstead Public School union lawyer who was killed behind this negotiation is Daniel Gallinson. He worked for the Hempstead Public Schools. He helped negotiate the above mentioned settlement because he knew that what was done to me in the Hempstead Public schools is evidenced in the settlement. He did what was right and it cost his life, in my opinion. Unfortunately, his death remains in the Can You Prove It mode, in my opinion.

Mr. Keefe, the Hempstead union president, he did me wrong too but he did not enforce the above crimes by himself. Yet he was used to sign off on the wrongs. God used Mr. Keefe and Attorney Gallinson to get the crimes in writing. Gallinson is dead now and Mr. Keefe erupted with a deadly medical phenomenon immediately after getting the crimes in writing via the attached settlement, that never settles until the crimes are stopped and remedied. The crimes began to repeat at BMCC. The affidavit is needed.

Anyone who looks at the settlement can tell it was impossible for one man to do the crimes. Yet, God used him to get me something and now he is suffering and can not say a word because his life is in the hands of medical contacts. As you will see when you read my documentaries, the CHIEF in charge of deadly pathogens is Jonathan Lippman. The reasons the Documentaries are in the below offices is because on behalf of public safety, one question needs to be answered. How can one Chief Injustice with an unregulated 2 billion dollar budget, administer the New York court system and deadly pathogen programs at the same time? No one is answering. Why? Read the documentaries see the evidence.

I did not make or create the evidence. I went into search engines and found out the NYS Chief Injustice is leading deadly pathogen programs. I got the above address to this office, the addresses to all the offices I have contacted from search engines. The information has been accurate. All of a sudden when the search engine spits out several deadly pathogen programs under Chief Injustice Jonathan Lippman’s name, search engines are questionable? Well I sure did not put Lippman’s name in the multiple deadly pathogen program engines. Answers need to be demanded on behalf of public safety.

To get a clear understanding of this letter please read the affidavit I submitted with evidence, dated September 30, 2006 with the four documentaries to the below offices. Please note each documentary has evidence. I have compiled four documentaries with evidence on Jonathan Lippman.

The Documentaries are titled: THE JONATHAN LIPPMAN: CAN YOU PROVE IT WHILE, I KILL MULTIPLE OPERATIONS! They are located in Chief Justice Judith Kaye’s Office, Alberto Gonzalez’s office in Washington D.C., Rose Hearn’s Office, NYC Department of Investigation, and the NYC FBI office.

I have used my testimony and life story, coupled with research and investigation to simply document well detailed multifaceted disguised killing operations under Jonathan Lippman’s phenomenon/illusion of law and science. My testimony will save lives. I have no choice but to do what is right on behalf of humankind.

I am not looking for confirmation and or verification. I am living these multifaceted killing operations and I am probably the only survivor. Why else would anybody put so much effort into destroying one woman? Who would use a code to follow someone from job to job to lawlessly execute income but a sick judge who wants me silenced, killed under disguise. If he would have left me alone I probably would not be writing this now. I would be so happy with a regular income, like regular people, I would have probably forgotten all Jonathan Lippman has masterminded and organized to have me executed.

Certain things are clear the SYNDER code effectuated documentation of enforced hate crimes.

This is proven. The SYNDER Code enforced hate crimes can not be repeated. The SYNDER code settlement offer and the SYNDER Code Hate crime documentation state attempted murder. So if the documentation states attempted murder, what do you think the repeated Synder code will do? I will mail the November 20, 2006 affidavit with evidence to this office this week.

In closing, please reread this letter and my affidavits after you read the documentaries and affidavits. I am attaching the following with evidence:

1.

2.

3.

4.

Jonathan Lippman Complaint/Affidavit Dated November 20, 2006, Jonathan Lippman Complaint Affidavit Dated September 30, 2006 Article on Eugenics, Explaining Lippman’s Social Phenomenon Manuals and Guides, THE JONATHAN LIPPMAN CAN YOU PROVE IT WHILE I KILL OPERATIONS! THE DOCUMENTARY: PART ONE 5. THE JONATHAN LIPPMAN CAN YOU PROVE IT WHILE I KILL OPERATIONS! DOCUMENTARY: PART TWO 6. THE JONATHAN LIPPMAN CAN YOU PROVE IT WHILE I KILL OPERATIONS! THE DOCUMENTRAY: PART THREE 7. THE JONATHAN LIPPMAN CAN YOU PROVE IT WHILE I KILL OPERATIONS! THE DOCUMENTARY PART FOUR The semester was coming along fine and he just could not let me teach in peace. The man is sick. May God bless all of you and until Lippman is regulated, I can not involve innocent people on my part. I will continue to pray because prayer is real and it works. If it was left to man, Jonathan Lippman would have had me killed on multiple occasions and under disguise, like he has been doing for years through law, science, unions and all aspects of government. I may not be rich in money but I am rich in spirit. I thank God for life and vow to save as many as I can via my testimony. Enjoy reading and I look forward to completing the semester in a SYNDER free safe environment with a focus and prioritization on education and student achievement. Thank you for your time.

Sincerely,

Miriam Snyder

3230 Cruger Avenue #6B Bronx, New York 10467 November 23, 2006

Emailed To: pscoffice@psc-cuny.org Mailed To: Professional Staff Congress City University of New York 61 Broadway, Suite 1500 New York, New York 10006 Dear Union Persons: I am forwarding the attached response letter from Robert Diaz, Vice President for Legal Affairs. It discontinued services and mentions a letter I do not have. Please, if possible forward the appointment letter mentioned and please have him correct my address on his letter. It states 36B as the apartment. My apartment number is 6B. I did not pick up my last check, the check of November 16, 2006 and would greatly appreciate having it mailed to the correct address above, as well as the rest of payments mentioned in his letter. I recognize payments would not exist without the true meaning of unionism and thank God this Thanksgiving for such.

It is Thanksgiving and I thank God that the students and I are safe. I thank God for a wonderful and rewarding teaching experience at BMCC until the SYNDER code hate crime initiation was prioritized, as stated and attached to my letter and email of November 20, 2006 to the administration. I thank God for meeting wonderful students and staff. The students did their homework and were simply good students ready to learn. The staff was wonderful until the SYNDER code phenomenon and enforcement was prioritized.

I thank God that they, the BMCC staff and students, will no longer be used and or enjoined in the attached administratively enforced SYNDER code hate crime initiation phenomenon that I had nothing to do with. On behalf of education, it is my prayer that the leadership will be penalized for inflicting this phenomenon and obstruction of the educational process on the students because of her willingness to enjoin The Borough of Manhattan Community College in well documented and enforced education hate crimes and a documented deadly conspiracy against rights, despite being told not to. I was penalized for the administrator’s enjoinment, but I thank God I did not wait for the SYNDER code hate crime deadly implementation stage, which is designed to kill under disguise and or deceitfully destroy the victim/target. I pray that unions work to correct this so no other educator is compelled to fight off hate crime enforcement, particularly as a means of operation.

I thank God for knowing that shortly, Dual life Jonathan Lippman, NYS Chief Injustice and Deadly Pathogen Specialist coupled with Adam Urbanski, another dual life specialist, Sleep Laboratory Research Specialist and The Rochester Teachers Association Union President will be stopped from deliberately inflicting racist and hate crime phenomena in public education as well as will be stopped from having people killed under the multiple disguises researched and identified in the Documentaries I have written and submitted to the authorites below.

In summary, I worked almost ten years in the Rochester New York Public School system with Adam Urbanski. He is the teachers union president. He is a documented racist, power hungry and control fanatic. He is one of the main avenues where the public education hate crimes are ordered from. In 1994 God rescued me from one of Adam Urbanski’ s and Jonathan Lippman’s sleep research induced trauma deadly killing operations. I thank God for the rescue.

I thank God for bringing closure to the above attempted killing by finding the attempted killer programs mentioned above under Adam Urbanski’s name in the University of Rochester Medical Center search engine and the Deadly Pathogen programs under Jonathan Lippman’s name in the World Health Organization search engine. I thank God that their intricate, well financed, murder plan did not work. I thank God I have publicized it so it never ever works again. I thank God that despite them wanting revenge for God rescuing me, God has chosen not to let their revenge kill me, despite multiple documented attempts, including education hate crime enforcement, multiple lawless income executions and a vicious blacklisting that would have killed anybody not believing in God. I thank God for the little survival money that I have and thank God for the wealth I will have.

I thank God for faith and knowing that believing is seeing. I thank God for knowing that God does not lie, Godly justice will prevail. I thank God that I contacted all authorities in NYS government and forwarded my testimony of how Urbanski and Lippman’s operations tried to wipe me off this earth in a similar manner to the way their deadly programs have wiped out half of Africa. I thank God that Adam Urbanski and Jonathan Lippman’s programs will no longer be disguised killer operations. All will know of them. I thank God that my testimony, the documentation of the killer programs, the attached documented patterned public education hate crime enforcement settlement was sent to the appropriate authorities before I came here. I thank God for documenting my attempts to stop these enforced public education hate crimes prior to coming here.

I thank God that the record will show, that in good faith and out of concern for Saundra Feldman, former AFT (American Federation of Teachers) president’s, safety and life, I immediately contacted her office when I discovered the written documentation of Adam Urbanski’s sleep laboratory research/induced trauma program that was used to try to kill me and disguise a designated placement. Upon discovering that one of her staff people, Adam Urbanski, was a killer who used his dual life as a sleep pathologist to try to kill me, I contacted her to warn her that she would be a target to be killed under a medical phenomenon as long as Adam Urbanski was in the AFT, power hungry, ruthless, without restrain, and another character with an unregulated budget. I wish somebody listened. She may have been alive today. Precautions could have been taken. Please see my attached below warning letter to her.

I contacted Saundra Feldman’s office because I knew Adam Urbanski was an executive officer in the American Federation of Teachers, AFT. I knew he was power hungry, and had his eye on her position. I had worked with him for almost 10 years previously. He had tried to have me killed with his sleep research/induced trauma operation. I wanted her to know that she was working with an attempted killer. I wanted her to know of his dual life so she could protect herself.

I knew how he operated. I knew he was power hungry, racist, and was using the law and contract to make it look like he was so powerful in the Rochester Public School System.

The school’s legal department and the entire system was at Urbanski’s mercy via he had all the man made laws that was convenient to whatever he wanted. He did not hide his racism. He kept it going in all the education programs. I wrote a memo about one of his racist achievement programs by design and used law to substantiate this claim and that was it.

Phonomena were enforced ever since and the Can You Prove It Phenomena initiated and continued thereafter.

I questioned his hatred of groups of people, his use of Willie Lynch stratagems to destroy people, his control over the education system to fester racism, his lack of competency, his inability to communicate with diverse populations in a civilized manner, his year after year leadership despite teacher dissatisfaction. But, he had the legal contacts and was always able to get the most money. This fooled the teachers and if an educator went against him he/she would miraculously become ill and disappear. This pattern was ridiculous more than I have ever seen in all of down state New York.

However, nothing could be proven. But the pattern was clear, if you go against Adam Urbanski, you were phenomenally going to become ill and placed at the mercy of medical contacts, usually out of the University of Rochester medical center. This was a silencing. I watched this pattern for almost 10 years. The Adam Urbanski silencing operation and pattern was lethally inflicted on me, but I made it out before the disguised killing operation was fully implemented. Consequently, I am probably the only survivor and they want revenge, for me simply being a God chosen survivor. I thank God for life because I sure could be dead under the sleep laboratory research induced trauma placement killer program and or one of Jonathan Lippman’s other deadly programs identified in the Documentaries I have written and submitted t the below authorities.

Jonathan Lippman and Adam Urbanski want me dead because they have been using the medical and legal system to kill under disguise for years. They are eugenicist. They are sick people with money. Despite being racist, they kill anybody, because most people would not do what I am doing to fight back, most people are unaware of their effective plans and the rest are dead under disguise. Knowing this, the deep corruption embedded in Adam Urbanski’s dual life, I had to inform Saundra Feldman that one of her staff people in the AFT was someone who tried to kill me. I had to and I did. No one listened and or my mail was tampered with.

Please see the attached warning letter to Saundra Feldman dated October 30, 2003.

I warned Saundra Feldman’s office that a former union president that tried to have me killed by his sleep research induced trauma phenomenon was in the AFT. I knew she would be targeted as long as Adam Urbanski was acting like a union president in the American Federation of Teachers. I wanted everyone to know about his dual life as a sleep laboratory specialist because this is what was used to try to kill me under the medical phenomenon operations identified in the Documentaries I have written. No one listened. Yes, my letters to Ms. Feldman sounded convoluted, but I tried. I did my best notwithstanding all the corruption that was being enforced on me at the time. All of my income was targeted and lawlessly executed, enforced lawlessness was maliciously incorporated in every aspect of my life but I still tried to warn her. My money and housing was targeted to facilitate another disguised killing. But I tried to tell her she would be next to die under a medical phenomenon as long as Adam Urbanski and Jonathan Lippman’s programs were in operation and each had an unregulated and unrestrained budget. I warned Saundra Feldman that she would be killed under a medical phenomenon.

Two years later, unfortunately, she died and or was killed under a medical phenomenon, just like Gallinson. No one can prove anything, but two educators are dead under a medical phenomenon, that I was almost killed from. One immediately was killed under a medical phenomenon after helping me get the criminal settlement attached below and in my letter of November 20, 2006. The other, two years after I informed her of Adam Urbanski’s dual life as a sleep laboratory specialist and Lippman’s easy access to deadly pathogens.

I gave my warning in good faith because when I saw that Adam Urbanski was actively involved in AFT, I knew he had his eye on her position. He was creeping to the top of the United States of America’s top union. Meanwhile, God rescued me from a bonafide deadly induced Adam Urbanski sleep research initiated phenomenon that was supposed to land a trauma placement in their hospital, but did not. I could have cared less who thought what. I wanted Saundra Feldman to know about Adam Urbanski and what he did to me and what he had the potential of doing to her. I have my letters and return receipts. They sound off but if I was ever listened to and or given the proper support to substantiate what I was saying, she might be alive today.

My letters to Ms. Feldman sound off because I was dealing with a 2 billion dollar unregulated budget that was being used to drive me crazy. I had to try to keep food on my table, and stop relentless and repeated lawless income executions, homelessness set ups, like I am doing now. I read my letters to Ms. Feldman and say yes they sound off, but I tried to warn her. Remember I had nothing to gain by going public with my testimony to her. It was done

with the deliberate intent to do whatever I could do to make sure she was aware and would know that somebody deadly had his eye on her position. I wanted her to be careful because Adam Urbanski, with the judicial coverage of Jonathan Lippman, is, lethal, deadly and tried to have me killed under disguise since 1994.

I wanted her to know that all of their disguised killing operations are premised off of Can You Prove It! The only evidence usually are the dead bodies of their victims and targets. I did what was right and I wish someone listened.

The Jonathan Lippman and Adam Urbanski: Can You Prove It Disguised Killer Operations must be stopped. I wish somebody had listened because no one could make up my testimonies and no one could make up each of their names respectively being listed under their killer medical programs, while posing as top leadership in government.

A key factor with these dual life characters is to hold top leadership positions. The positions are the top positions in education, the union, the judiciary, coupled with easy access to deadly pathogens, in the United States of America. A lot of damage under the disguise of phenomenon can be done with this design. A lot of damage/deaths have occurred under the judicial leadership and coverage of Jonathan Lippman and his documented deadly pathogen programs while administering the NYS court system. One of the death programs listed under his name while he is supposed to be administering the court system effectuated over 13 million dead under the disguise of a social phenomenon. See my most recent affidavit with the evidence dated September 30, 2006 and submitted to the below offices. Each affidavit, evidence and Documentary will be sent by this Monday November 27, 2006.

First, with respect to the top position in the judiciary with an unregulated 2 billion dollar budget and deadly pathogen programs, you can wipe out the people in the continent with the richest resources on earth under the disguise of a social phenomenon, embedded in Can You Prove It! Second, Adam Urbanski ‘s motive for wanting the top union position in the United States of America’s Union, AFT, is because he can get Jonathan Lippman via the judiciary and law departments to control education departments. Urbanski would look like the great achiever to unions and teachers because everything he wants legally would be granted and in reality this would be done by design. Just like he controls the Rochester Public School system.

It appears as he has some teachers’ union phenomenal power, when in reality his power is embedded in Jonathan Lippman’s corruption, title and unregulated 2 billion dollar budget.

Adam Urbanski is Jonathan Lippman’s hit man. Urbanski’s job is to get the victim to the hospital via a trauma placement, initiated by induced sleep laboratory research. My Documentaries show the placement of the trauma patient is conveniently located in Jonathan Lippman’s program territory. They had a placement waiting for me and because God never let it happen, they want revenge. The continuous attempts to have me killed under multiple disguises compelled me to investigate and research. I almost dropped dead when I found the documentation to the killer plan I lived. I have not stopped writing since, but, because corruption has been prioritized many innocent people are dead that could be alive if authorities enforced equal protection of the law and public protection measures secured by God and the law.

The only difference between Adam Urbanski and Jonathan Lippman’s disguised killings and the disgused killing I am under now via repititiuos lawless income executions, organized crime isolations and silencing, Hate Crime enforcement, is that these killing attempts are not disguised and are PUBLICIZED as loud as I can SCREAM. I have been targeted for silencing and extermination by documented evidenced criminals with dual life indisputable phonomena and conflict of interest top government positions.

An anology of what is going is this: Someone used a gun to kill you, but because of God’s miraculous power the bullet missed and continues to miss you. Ten years later, you find the gun with the killers name on it. Only God can do this. What do you do? You contact authorities and you tell the possible next victim because of her close proximity to the killer and because you know the killer is power hungry and ruthless.

I say this to say if NYS government was functionng in a non corrupted mode and investigations were launched, the results would show that my testimony and research are quite on point, real and true. Moreover, many people would be alive that were targeted for disguised killings based on these two documented dual life phonomena specialists’, greed, power hungriness and control.

I thank God I wrote my letter of November 20, 2006 because the repeated, unregulated enforced SYNDER code hate crimes can only lead to killing another person under disguise, because the Adam Urbanski attempted murder plan and charge was disregarded by the judiciary and all of NYS government under the lawless, ruthless and deadly leadership of Jonathan Lippman. The documented public education hate crimes, targeting, enjoinments and disregard of such must be stopped.

I am sorry that NYS government allowed and disregarded the above and attached crimes and evidence. It is my prayer that other educators will not continue to be killed under the above and documented enforced public education and public safety hate crimes. On behalf of public education and public safety I have no choice but to report these repeated malicious and vicious documented public education hate crimes under the leadership of Adam Urbanski and Jonathan Lippman.

While I thank God for rescuing me from the above and for being alive, I am compelled to mention that Can You Prove It hate crime Phonomena continue because they were never regulated. To date, my home is being terrorized by Can You Prove It Phenomena. I have made several police reports. Recently all of my ESL listening CD’s were busted in half while they were in my library in my home. This is how innocent people are found dead, poisoned, and how deadly pathogens can be implanted to kill under the Can You Prove It Phonomena.

Because I can not prove this, I am additionally not supposed to mention it. I am supposed to act like my listening CD’s miraculously busted in half on their own. This is the direct reason the above characters continue killing under disguise and want me silenced because I have reported their crimes every step of the way praying that nobody else will be subjected to this inhumane, lawless, hate based, above the law treatment.

Adam Urbanski and Jonathan Lippman at minimum, should be disciplined and penalized under a direct conflict of interest, for having two deadly programs listed under their names while holding top delicate government jobs. Jonathan Lippman is administering the court system and deadly pathogens at the same time and Adam Urbanski is working close to children and educators, administering involuntary sleep research/induced trauma and destroying unionism as exemplified in the use of NYSUT, Noel Cohen letterhead. Above all, a well documented educator is telling the world how they tried to kill her and how the disguised killing operations work, coupled with over 13, million dead as evidence.

If the above the law treatment of Jonathan Lippman and Adam Urbanski was removed, coupled with taking away their easy access to deadly pathogens and money, the following would occur: The social phenomena programs listed under Jonathan Lippman’s name and leadership would be stopped.

The social phenomena killings documented under Jonathan Lippman’s name and leadership would be curtailed, at minimum or stopped.

The people in Jonathan Lippman’s social phenomena programs would have a chance to heal and AFT’s invested money for healing these places would work.

The enforced education hate crime phenomena would disappear and or be minimized, as long as there were penalties for individuals and or groups enforcing hate crimes in public education as exemplified in my exhibits.

The Education Can You Prove It hate crimes and or disguised killings would be stopped, curtailed, investigated, and monitored more carefully.

NYS local level education institutions would not suffer from the ramifications of racist and hate based enforced leadership.

NYS equal protection laws would be prioritized, monitored and enforced in an orderly manner as opposed to being enforced in a documented apartheid manner.

NYSUT will no longer be enjoined in hate crime enforcement to cover Adam Urbanski’s revenge.

Jonathan Lippman and Adam Urbanski would taste the monetary ramifications of their authenticated disguised killing programs.

NYS government would function in a somewhat Godly manner as opposed to dark force led secret society phenomenon mode.

Jonathan Lippman and Adam Urbanski have been deceived. Believing is seeing. This earth belongs to God and as such their deception has been exposed and must be stopped. Their easy access to the above must be restrained, regulated and dismantled on behalf of public safety and education.

NYS government and Africa have suffered from the influence of the above documented dual life enforced deadly eugenic program authors and apartheid system master minders and enforcers. The unregulated and unaccounted money is the direct reason the documented millions of social phenomenon deaths have occurred and innocent qualified top educators are dead under the similar social phenomenon.

The unregulated, unaccounted, public money has deceived these two characters into thinking they can maliciously control, kill, and enforce hate crimes through out NYS and nationwide without penalty or question, systematically, and under the Can You Prove It phenomenon.

What was done in Africa is being replicated in the United States of America, in a smaller capacity, targeting innocent qualified people, some holding top education and or legal positions. These crimes must, should have been stopped and can be stopped via taking away the easy access to the deadly pathogens and money.

In closing, it is clear that Adam Urbanski and Jonathan Lippman want me silenced and killed under disguise. They are using and have enjoined every aspect of government to subterfuge the above and the documents which substantiate the above. To this end, on behalf of education and public safety, I am asking BMCC, the union, law departments, and educators to do what they can to stop these bonafide well documented education hate crimes and racism, as well as end dual life conflict of interest public leadership positions, that directly obstruct education and make way for death traps.

Moreover, I ask each to read my warning letter to Saundra Feldman and ask: How did I know two years prior to her death that she would be killed under a medical phenomenon? I am not a psychic.

I am a child of God. This is real.

The deadly Adam Urbanski and Jonathan Lippman Can You Prove It Education hate crime Phonomena can be stopped. Ms. Brookes must be made to tell who directed her to enforce the documented SYNDER code or penalize her for administering the documented attached SYNDER code hate crime as a means of program operation. The unraveling can be stopped. NYS government and lawyers have the power to end this documented deadly organized crime ring destroying human rights, education and humanity as a whole. They must be stopped before another innocent person is killed from the above documented hate crime enforcement and disguised killer programs. I have done my share to undisguise these programs on behalf of human life.

The documented deadly social phenomenon is not good for Africa and it was not good for the educators who have died under this same patterned documented social phonomena, premised off of Can You Prove It! I thank God for life and the ability to write my testimony in a sound mind, and above all with the authority of being a child of God. Whether I am working or not the enforced hate crimes must stop.

God placed me in here for a reason. I did not ask for the enforced hate crimes again. In fact, I have done everything in my power to stop it. I pass the torch I can not do this alone.

I ask that all be done to stop these documented hate based, abuse of power, vicious and malicious hate crimes and killings on behalf of human life, education and all the dead educators that died under the patterned Adam Urbanski and Jonathan Lippman documented Disguised killing operations/patterned phonomenon disregarded under man made Can You Prove It standards and exemplified in millions of innocent people victimized and killed under science and legal phonomena, that could have been prevented with enforced public and equal protections.

Each educator I have identified was killed under a medical phenomenon immediately after encountering and or engaging with one of these crime ring members via the union and or the judiciary.

Mr. Keefe, the Hempstead union president is a case in point. He was not in the condition he is in now prior to this crime ring’ settlement which he took fault for the crimes Urbanski and Lippman ordered.

They promoted him to quiet him and it would be too obvious if Keefe and Gallinson each died under a phenomenon immediately after settling the crime ring’s case. Consequently, they have decided to promote him while he is dependent on medical care which Jonathan Lippman has the contacts to control.

I thank God that in God’s time, not mine, the world will see that each public education hate crime enforced and documented, coupled with the death rates and deaths documented, have been committed under the disguise of social phenomena, and could have and should have been prevented, on behalf of human life, public education and safety.

In closing, please note, that Noel Cohen’s letters dated September 7, 2001 and the other letter dated January 6, 2003 are both under the Can you prove it phonomena. His signatures epitomize this. Noel Cohen’s letters are additional phonomena that have cause me great suffrage and damage. The letters boldly, proudly and in an above the law manner, facilitated and confirmed multiple lawless income executions that were initiated via the SYNDER code phenomenon. If small phenomena like this, is not regulated, and restrained unfortunately, and based on the death rate patterns I have documented, more innocent people will be executed under the disguise of a multitude of social phenomenon.

I would stop allowing a phonomenon to use NYSUT letterhead and paper work for hate crime enforcement and confirmation.

Finally, I thank God for life and the ability to write my testimony in a sound mind, and above all with the authority of being a child of God. I thank God for each God fearing person reading this. I will forward the certified US mail receipts via email after I mail the documents with evidence to this office. Thank you.

Sincerely, Miriam Snyder Attached:

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

Two BMCC SYNDER Coded Documents: Documented Enforced Public Education Hate Crime Phenomena Hempstead Public Schools documented SYNDER Coded Public Education Hate Crime Initiation Enforcement Documentation Phenomena /legal Wonderment Public Education Hate Crime Enforcement SYNDER Code initiated, Attempted Murder acknowledgement/settlement NYSUT letters acknowledging and confirming SYNDER coded hate crime enforcement and legal phenomena that kills under disguise.

Letter to Saundra Feldman warning her of a potential death by disguise and design by the above perpetrator that worked with her, dated October 30, 2003.

Xc: Alberto Gonzalez, Attorney General Honorable Chief Judge Judith Kaye Maxine Waters, Committee on the Judiciary Rose Gill Hearn, Commissioner Antonio Perez, President of Borough of Manhattan Community College Senator Schumer Mayor Bloomberg and Betsy Gotbaum, NYC Public Advocate

BMCC Human Resources

VIA REGULAR AND CERTIFIED MAIL November 20, 2006 Ms. Miriam Snyder 3230 Cruger Ave 36B Bronx, New York 10467 Dear Ms. Snyder: Borough of Manhattan Community College 199 Chambers Street The City University of New York New York, NY 10007-1097 www.bmcc.cuny.edu tel. 212.220.8300 fax 212.220.2364

November 20, 2006 I write to advise you that the college no longer needs your services to teach ACR095108. We will, however, honor our appointment letter. You will be paid for the balance of the semester. You will be paid on each regularly scheduled adjunct pay date as if you remained at work continuously.

Very truly yours, Robert Diaz, Vice President for Legal Affairs and Faculty & Staff Relations

cc: Gloria Chao Ben O"Loughlin Senior Vice President Bragg Chairperson Gay Brookes

JONATHAN LIPPMAN AND EUGENIC BUDDIES SYNDER CODE HATE CRIME ENFORCEMENT WHICH EFFECTUATED MULTIPLE LAWLESS EXTERMINATION OF INCOME AND NO JUSTTCE IN THE COURTS. HEMPSTEAD NEW YORK

HEMPSTEAD

CLASSROOM

TEACHERS

ASSOCIATION

9/14/99 Proposal Between Miriam Synder and the District 1. The District shall place Ms. Synder on a fully paid administrative leave for the remainder of the 1999-2000 school year.

2. Ms. Synder shall receive any and all benefits and emoluments due her as an employee of the School District and as a member of the Teachers' Bargaining unit through June 30, 2000.

3. The District will supply Ms. Synder with a letter of Recommendation.

4. The District shall supply Ms. Synder 50% of her 1999-2000 school year salary, minus any payments already received, on the first payday after the execution of this document.

5. The District shall pay Ms. Synder the remaining 50% of her 1999 - 2000 school year Salary on the first pay date in February 2000.

6. Ms. Synder will resign from the District effective at the close of business on June 30, 2000.

SIGNED BY: MR. KEEFE, HEMPTSTEAD PUBLIC SCHOOLS UNION PRESIDENT

I REFUSED THE OFFER. .

CORRECTED COPY ADAM URBANSKI AND JONATHAN LIPPMAN HATE CRIME ENFORCEMENT BLOOD MONEY ENFORCED UNDER THE DISGUISE OF NYSUT REPRESENTATION TO ALL TO WHOM THESE PRESENTS SHALL COME OR MAY CONCERN, KNOW THAT MIRIAM SNYDER in consideration of the sum of

as RELEASOR,

Twelve Thousand One Hundred and Twenty-Five Dollars ($12,125.00), and the received from settlement agreement DAVID KEEFE and the HEMPSTEAD CLASSROOM TEACHERS' ASSOCIATION as RELEASEE, receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, releases and discharges DAVID KEEFE the RELEASEE, RELEASEE'S heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns from all actions, causes of action, suits, debts, dues, sums of money, accounts, reckonings, bonds, bills, specialties, covenants, contracts, controversies, agreements, promises, variances, trespasses, damages, judgments, extents, executions, claims, and demands whatever, in law, admiralty or equity, which against the RELEASEE, the RELEASOR, RELEASOR'S heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns ever had, now have or hereafter can, shall or may, have for, upon, or by reason of any matter, cause or thing whatsoever from the beginning of the world to the day of the date of this RELEASE.

This release Includes, but is not limited to, CV-04 -0472 and CV-02-3589, alleging as against David Keefe: (1) Violation of 42 U.S.C. (2) §§1964,) 198I, 1983, 1985 and 2000(d)(e); (2) Violation of the 1st, 4th, 5th, 6th, 8th, 9th, 13th, 14th, and 19th Constitutional Amendments; (3) Violation of 18 U.S.C. §§241, 201, 209; (4) Violation of the Racketeer Influenced a Corrupt organizations Act (RlCO); (5) Defamation; 6. Libel; (7) Constitutional Tort; (8) Breach of contract; (9) Coercion; (10) Attempted Murder; (11) Slavery; (12) Violation of U.S. Black Codes; (13) Breach of Duty of Fair Representation; (14) Violation of Federal Law and/or any state law; (15) And all other claims or causes of action included therein.

Whenever the text hereof requires, the use of singular number shall include the appropriate plural number as the text of the within instrument may require.

This RELEASE may not be changed orally.

In Witness whereof, the RELEASOR has hereunto set RELEASOR'S hand and seal on the day of In presence of

MIRIAM SNYDER

STATE OF New York COUNTY OF Suffolk on July 26, 2002 before me personally came Miriam Snyder, to me known, and known to me to be the individual described in, and who executed the foregoing RELEASE, and duly acknowledged to me that she executed the same.

EILEEN P. BUTLER

THIS WAS MY WARNING LETTER SENT TO SAUNDRA FELDMAN. IT IS NOT ONE OF MY BEST LETTERS. IT SOUNDS CRAZY. THIS IS DUE PRIMARILY TO THE LAWLESS CIRCUMSTANCES I WAS AND HAVE BEEN FORCED TO LIVE UNDER VIA REPITITIOUS LAWLESS INCOME EXECUTIONS. BUT I CAN COMFORTABLY SAY I TRIED TO WARN SAUNDRA FELDMAN. WHY? BECAUSE I KNEW AS LONG AS ADAM URBANSKI WAS ON THE LOOSE, WHAT HE DID TO ME, WOULD BE REPEATED, EVEN IN ANOTHER CAPACITY, BECAUSE HE HAS BEEN DECEIVED VIA LIPPMAN’S MONEY AND POSITION. HE IS UNREGULATED AND WITHOUT RESTRAIN. NO ONE LISTENED AND SHE DIED AS I STATED UNDER A MEDICAL PHONOMENON TWO YEARS LATER. NO ONE LISTENED OR A PHONOMENON STOPPED MY MAIL. PHONOMENAS KILL UNDER DISGUISE, REPORTED AND UNREPORTED. I AM NOT A PSYCHIC. BUT I WARNED HER, BECAUSE I HAD TO.

3230 Cruger Avenue #6B Bronx, New York 10467 October 30, 2003 Sandra Feldman, President American Federation of Teachers 555 New Jersey Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20001 Re: Adam Urbanski: New York State #1 Hit Man Working With the University of Rochester Medical Center, Sleep Research Laboratory, neutralizing and exterminating human kind, under the disguise, but, defined as Induced Criminal Medical Atrocities.

Dear Ms. Feldman: I write this letter to inform you of the above substantiated with the attached facts and documentation. Moreover, being a survivor of one of Mr. Urbanski’s hits qualifies me to write this letter. It is imperative that your office is informed of Mr. Urbanski’s vicious and malicious hidden abnormal agenda.

Foremost, I am a former teacher of the Rochester School District. Unfortunately, I met and worked with Mr. Urbanski for several years. He is one of the most racist, incompetent, greedy, power hungry, vindictive, and psychotic characters, I have ever met in my life.

Moreover, after surviving a deadly hit he put on me in Rochester New York, through his well designed and intricate neutralization and extermination plans, defined as his sleep research criminal regime, I am more than qualified to write this letter and share what I have experienced.

In good faith, I write this letter to do my share to save a life or lives from these documented well designed and intricate criminally insane neutralization and extermination processes I have endured and survived. Above all, I simply thank God that I was rescued from Mr. Urbanski’s attempt to kill me.

However, since there are no restraints on his criminal activities, he has chosen to follow me year after year with a vengeance. See the attached documentation.

However, several other educators have fell victim and prey to his malicious, vicious, legally intertwined, medical atrocities. Other educators and I have endured psychotic hate crimes, from Urbanski’s abuse of power in the law department, union and the medical field.

Mr. Urbanski is a danger to society as a whole, much more children. He is well intertwined in the legal and medical field, which facilitates his malicious and vicious killings, hits, and induced

malicious hospitalizations. See the attached letter to Inside Edition dated October 12, 2003. See the attached letter dated October 19, 2003 and research from the University of Rochester.

Page 1 of 5.

He is a top hit man, hiding under the union, to disguise his chosen profession as a Criminal Sleep Research Specialist working with the infectious disease department in the University of Rochester, killing and arranging malicious hospitalizations, medical atrocities and phenomenon’s, defined as criminal neutralization and extermination processes.

Mr. Urbanski put a deadly hit on my life in 1994. See the attached lawless and falsified documents, listed as Exhibit N in the attached Reply Appendix and Exhibits 8, 9, and 10 in the attached letter to Ashcroft dated September 26, 2003. Urbanshi arranged this malicious and vicious neutralization and extermination process. The doctor was enjoined by his lawless legal and medical regime.

The legal regime includes a lawless law license and one of the Chief Justices in the Unified Court Systems. See the attached letter to Inside Edition, dated October 12, 2003, the attached letter dated October 10, 2003, and the attached research from the University of Rochester attached to the letter of October 10, 2003.

The Medical Regime includes members of the legal Regime. They are all associated with the Infectious Disease Department in the University of Rochester Medical Center, through induced trauma and Emergency room placements.

Urbanski’s real job is to get the victim to the hospital by enforcing the sleep research laboratory stratagems, defined as criminal induced sleep deprivation. The induced sleep deprivation usually leads to an induced nervous breakdown coupled with the lawless stratagems identified in the letter to Inside Edition.

This leads the victim to the Emergency room. The Emergency room contact is identified in the letter to Inside Edition dated October 12, 2003 and the exhibits attached. These lawless members each hold law degrees and are members of the University of Rochester Medical Center trauma, Emergency room placements and the Infectious Disease Unit.

The plan works effectively. You can get rid of anyone, without any evidence, appearing as a medical atrocity. When in reality, it is a malicious, vicious and deadly hit to neutralize and exterminate criminally, innocent human life. This is done to keep power in the judiciary, bar, union, win lawsuits, quiet witnesses, intimidate, discredit truthful testimony, and a host of ungodly and lawless reasons.

Members in the above mentioned organizations usually have no clue because this criminal regime operates as a secret society including key players with key positions. If you are not a part of this regime, you may become a victim. Consequently, the purpose of this letter is to save any life possible by informing human beings of this criminal operation.

I have been targeted for over 10 years because I am probably one of the only survivor’s due to the grace of our Sovereign God. Consequently, maliciously and vindictively, Mr. Urbanshi continues to enforce criminal extermination processes on me through my jobs, despite exemplary evidence and ratings.

He resorted, used and abused his lawless regime and disrupted the education of children, two unions, and two school districts, epitomizing his anger and revenge for not capturing me in his deadly and criminal sleep laboratory research neutralization.

Mr. Urbanski has arranged and ordered for the last 10 years ongoing lawless exterminations of my income simply because I did not fall prey to his ungodly, masterminded, criminally insane, neutralization process that has worked successfully for years.

Mr. Urbanshi and his criminal regime psychotically targeted my senior citizen parents through their medical care to destroy them to destroy me. See the attached letters and evidence dated October 19, 2003 and October 14, 2003.

He used his lawless contacts with key positions in the Bar and judiciary association, to disrupt the legal departments in two unions and school districts, to lawlessly and vindictively target, exploit and exterminate me. Not once has a termination been for cause. None of the enforced lawless acts have anything to substantiate the many lawless acts. Evidence is clear; work is exemplary despite murderous work conditions. However, miraculously the law is disregarded and lawlessness is enforced.

He used his judicial contact to disrupt the judiciary. See the attached. The judiciary has been enjoined to disregard law and enforce lawlessness to target me for this secret society criminal regime defined as Urbanshi’s revenge for escaping his well plotted induced hospitalization and murder plan.

Members of the judiciary have been enjoined and have enforced lawlessness that facilitates Urbanshi’s criminal neutralization and extermination plan.

Consequently, Urbanski organized a death trap, a neutralization process that I escaped.

Thereafter he used his lawless legal contacts to effectuate numerous lawless exterminations. Thereafter, he used his infectious disease contacts to create and falsify medical documents. Thereafter, he used his infectious disease contacts to infect witnesses, neutralizing and eradicating their testimonies. Each union person wanting nothing to do with this crime ring has been killed and neutralized. No medical phenomenon here.

This is the same pattern and practice enforced in Rochester New York. Educators, lawyers and other innocent victims, are exterminated and neutralized under the disguise of a medical phenomenon.

Exhibit O, attached to the Reply Appendix is another example of a medical phenomenon. Just like exhibit O, was maliciously and falsely created and disseminated at my job, is the same infectious medical phenomenon that kills and infects innocent victims under the disguise of a medical phenomenon. Examples of other medical phenomenon’s Urbanshi has ordered and arranged are listed in the Reply Appendix attached.

Additionally, samples of the moving of the medical phenomenon’s to New York City under the leadership of Urbanshi, is the killing of the Hempstead Union Attorney, Daniel Gallinson under the disguise of a miraculous newly erupted medical phenomenon. The same newly erupted medical phenomenon that infected and killed the Hempstead Union attorney is the same newly erupted infected virus that victimized the Hempstead union president and my mother.

This same medical phenomenon also killed the teacher’s husband that I shared a classroom with last year. The teacher’s husband was a healthy young doctor, but miraculously died of a newly erupted medical phenomenon. His name is Dr. Schloss. He is dead. These medical phenomenons exemplify patterns and practices of the Adam Urbanshi University of Rochester Criminal Medical Center Regime, infested from the trauma and Emergency unit, straight to the psychiatric infectious disease unit.

Based on the evidence, these are not medical phenomenons. They are criminal medical hits as exemplified in each and every exhibit attached, but miraculously overlooked and disregarded, just as the law is. The evidence and laws do not lie.

Criminal infectious diseases are being maliciously disseminated to kill, neutralize and exterminate, over a law suit, threat to blow the whistle, position of power, racist reasons and for revenge.

If these criminal killings, disguised as medical phenomenon’s, from the kids who use the emergency rooms, to the infectious disease department, are not stopped, it will only get worse. These are criminal killings disguised as induced medical atrocities/phenomenon’s that must be stopped. The medical and legal regimes used to facilitate the medical killings and atrocities substantiated in this matter must be dismantled. The evidence cannot lie.

I thank God and due to the grace of God, I have never fell victim to any of the criminal induced hospital placements that usually effectuate induced death and disease, by injection and pills. However, when one puts my name in the University of Rochester Medical Center search engine, the criminally induced medical phenomenon and agenda, against God’s will, is apparent again.

The many years of observing innocent victims in Rochester, New York and now in NYC, fall prey to these criminally insane, malicious, induced neutralization and extermination processes require exposure and dismantling.

The documented criminal neutralization and extermination processes epitomize historically defined iniquitous acts. These criminal acts have to be dismantled, because, they simply get worse.

They have progressed across the states due to Mr. Urbanshi’s greed. His disguise as a union president and vice president of AFT needs to be seriously investigated. His hidden personality as a criminal sleep research laboratory specialist in the University of Rochester Medical Center needs to be investigated, with respect to motive, agenda, past practices and affiliation.

My experiences with him from Rochester New York to the unions and schools in Downstate New York require me to publicly state that Mr. Urbanski is a top hit man manifesting his criminal sleep deprivation research to destroy human kind. His sleep deprivation research practices are demonic, medical crimes and practiced to the point where he finds it pleasurable, habitual and he is without restraint.

To this end, I urge all competent educators, lawyers, judges, and competitors to be informed.

Mr. Urbanski and his criminal legal and medical regime have exerted manifested forces of darkness that can and will be destroyed by the Sovereign power of God. Please do what you can to stop the induced, criminal, psychotic, malicious and vicious documented neutralization and extermination processes detailed in the below documents, disguised and designed to facilitate criminal medical atrocities that are criminally destroying human life and dismantling justice and truth in the court.

I have attached the following documentation to substantiate the above:

1. Ongoing Lawlessness in the courts: Letter Dated October 29, 2003 to Judge Hurley and Letter from Hempstead Attorneys enforcing lawlessness in the court, both documents 6 pages. Most Recent complaint submitted to the Eastern District Court.

2. 26 pages of documented lawlessness disregarded by the judiciary facilitating lawless delay and extermination process detailed in each attachment.

3. Letter dated October 19, 2003 with research and documentation from the University of Rochester Medical Center, 15 pages, 4. Letter From the Unified Court System, Dated October 10, 2003 with attached research from The University of Rochester Medical Center, 5. Letter dated October 14, 2003 to a Dr. D’Olimpio, 6. Letter dated October 12, 2003 to Inside Edition, 16 pages.

7. A lawless medical insurance plan dated December 1994, that substantiates the facts and

lawlessness documented in the detailed neutralization crimes described in the above attachment.

8. Letter To Ashcroft dated September 26, 2003 with Exhibits 1-10.

9. Letter To Ashcroft dated September 22, 2003 with Appellant’s Memorandum Reply

Brief In Opposition To The Apellees Memorandum Brief and A Reply Appendix for The Appellant.

Sincerely, Miriam Snyder

Notary Public, State of New York

No. 4876376, Suffolk Countty

NYSUT New York State United Teachers

January 6, 2003

Ms, Miriam Snyder 2125 35th Avenue, #5E Long Island City, NY 11106 Re: Yonkers and Snyder New Matter No. 029NO203AH Dear Ms. Snyder: This will acknowledge receipt of your letter addressed to Mitchell Rubinstein of this office, dated and faxed on January 3, 2003, In the first instance, be advised that neither NYSUT nor this office represents you in any current litigation and that your representative, for purposes of employment with the Yonkers Board of Education, is the Yonkers Federation of Teachers.

Secondly, be advised that we do represent the Yonkers Federation of Teachers, The first paragraph of your letter makes clear that you are charging the Federation with unlawful activities.

Accordingly, it would be a conflict of interest for anyone in this office, including Mr. Rubinstein, to offer you any advice vis-a-vis any claim you may have, legal or otherwise, as against the Federation.

Ordinarily, I would advise a union member to consult with the Federation to discuss anyalleged contractual violation and/or to provide it with information which could form the basis for a review of the legal implications of a particular complaint. Notwithstanding the excellent reputation of the Federation and its devoted officers and agents, you apparently believe that they have wronged you in various and sundry ways. The vehemence of your opinion and animosity toward the Federation obviously precludes me from making this suggestion in your case.

260 Park Avenue* New York, NY 10010

Miriam Snyder January 6, 2003 Page 2 I close by recommending that you consult private counsel. If you do, I am sure you will come to realize that the Yonkers Federation has and will continue to process your claims with the utmost degree of professionalism.

Very truly yours, NOEL D. COHEN NDC:dt cc: Rita Seligman, Via Fax (914-793-7365) & Mail Yonkers Federation of Teachers

NYSUT New York State United Teachers Office of General Counsel James R. Sandner General Counsel Albany Rocco A. Solimando Assistant General Counsel Ivor R. Moskowitz Associate General Counsel, New York James J. Brady Assistant General Counsel Noel D. Cohen Associate General Counsel

September 7, 2001

Miriam Snyder 21-25 35th Avenue Long Island' City, NY 11106

Re.: SDHR No. 2-E-NOB-99-3505426-E-28-E New Matter No. OOlNOIO2.425 Dear Ms. Snyder: I am in receipt of your letter dated September 4,2001.

Without commenting upon the substantive assertions you make and, to the extent I understand your letter, you seek a "hearing" to contest what you claim was an illegal termination of your employment. To file a grievance, if such a grievance is now timely, must be done through your collective bargaining representative. If you believe a regulatory or statutory right has been violated, you would seek redress with the appropriate administrative agency or through litigation in court.

Whatever course you choose, please understand that this office does not represent you.

Accordingly, we will make no attempt to achieve any of the objectives alluded to in your September 4th letter.

Very truly yours,

NOEL D. COHEN "

NYC-Legal:59892.1 260 Park Avenue South.

New York. N.Y. 10010-7214' (212) 533-6300 Entrance at 48 E 21st Street (9th Floor)

3230 Cruger Avenue # 6B Bronx, New York 10467 December 12, 2006 SENT CERTIFIED RETURN RECEIPT AND EMAILED TO: aperez@bmcc.cuny.edu

Antonio Perez Borough of Manhattan Community College The City University of New York 199 Chambers Street New York, New York 10007 Dear Mr. Perez: I recently received the attached letter with an employment offer. Thank you. However, the letter is addressed to a Ms. SAYDER. I do not know a Ms. SAYDER. Was this a typographical error? If so, please have the error corrected and I will thereafter acknowledge such good faith offer.

On behalf of excellence in education, please send the below and attached letter with the correct spelling of my name as noted below. God bless and thank you.

Sincerely,

Miriam Snyder Xc: PSC UNION @ pscoffice@psc-cuny.org

Hempstead High School

201 President Street Hempstead, New York 11550

July 13, 2000 To Whom It May Concern: I have been privileged to know Miriam Snyder for the past 3 years. In that time she has served our school as a Curriculum Specialist for the Bi-Lingual ESL Department and worked directly under my supervision.

It is my observation that she is very knowledgeable performing her duties eagerly and efficiently. She has an innovative spirit and infuses our staff with a wealth of new motivational activities that has encouraged greater learning and achievement by non-English speaking students.

The students and staff members of Hempstead High School will certainly miss Ms. Snyder. It is without reservation that I recommend Ms. Miriam Snyder to you for employment.

Sincerely,

Robert Hickey, Assistant Principal

Hempstead High School 201 President Street Hempstead, New York 11550 5/14/98 Dr. Lester EDA Professor Long Island University C.W. Post Campus Brookville, New York 11548 Dear Dr. Lester: The purpose of this letter is to inform you that Ms. Snyder has successfully completed over 450 hours of administrative work at Hempstead High School.

She has coordinated and organized the ESL/Bilingual and second languages programs.

She has worked above and beyond the call of duty and this is reflected in her work.

She has accepted an additional assignment to help the school. She has developed an excellent rapport with students and staff and has been an asset to the overall educational community.

I believe she will be a most effective administrator. Please feel free to contact me if further information is needed.

Sincerely,

J)r. uJ

uL

William Mclaurin Principal

Hempstead High School Peninsula Boulevard and President Street Hempstead, New York 11550 Ms. Miriam Snyder, Curriculum Specialist Dear Ms. Snyder: After careful consideration I have decided to resign my position as English Teacher with Hempstead High School effective February 4, 1998.

While it is not my purpose in this letter to explore the factors I have considered, I do want you to know how valuable your support and counsel has been to both my students and me. My decision was in no way based on anything to do with Hempstead High School but rather on personal reasons.

Since the RCT examination is so important to several of my students. I will continue in this concentration and will be happy to cooperate in any way that is beneficial to Hempstead High School.

Again my sincere thanks for your support, professional and personal during the time I have been at Hempstead High School.

Sincerely, Hempstead High School Teacher

SPRINGFIELD GARDENS-HIGH SCHOOL Board of Education @ City of New York

143-10 Springfield Blvd. Springfield Gardens, New York 11413

Dr. Robert A. Hickson Principal

Phone: (718) 341-3033 Fax: (718) 525-8495 June 22, 2001

To Whom It May Concern: This letter shall serve as a commendation for outstanding work and volunteer services of Ms. Miriam Snyder. Reading Specialist at Springfield Gardens High School spring semester 2001.

Ms. Snyder worked as a Reading Specialist and volunteer at the high school. In this capacity, she organized, implemented, designed and developed assessment and evaluation modules for the EDL Reading Program.

She worked effectively with the entire school community. Her teaching, writing and administrative skills are commendable.

Without reservation, I commend and recommend Ms. Snyder to you, as she seeks an administrative position and/or pursues a Doctorate Degree. Unfortunately the EDL Reading program was cut and there are no administrative openings in my building.

Her performance and commitment to education are notable and commendable. Should further information be needed, please contact me at (718) 341-3033.

NASSAU TECHnological Adult Learning Center 234 Glen Cove Road. (Glen Cove Road and Westbury Avenue) Carle Place. New York, 11514

FAX: 516-739-0315

516-742-5315

516-739-2600 February 2, 1998 Educational Leadership Administration Program C.W. Post College 720 Northern Boulevard Brookville, NY 11548 To Whom It May Concern: Il is my pleasure to recommend Ms. Miriam Snyder to your educational administration program. Ms. Snyder has been a member of the Nassau BOCES Adult Learning Center faculty for the past two years as a part-time adult educator.

Ms. Snyder has demonstrated her professional skills as a teacher of adult learners, whereby her students have progressed consistently in their learning growth. Ms. Snyder has an excellent knowledge of the teaching process and is able to work in a partnership with her students. She maintains an energetic and creative learning environment. In addition, Ms. Snyder is an excellent colleague, working well with other members of the professional staff.

She is responsible and dedicated and brings to the profession her talents and enthusiasm.

If you require additional information, please call me at (516) 622-5620.

Sincerely, Lillian, Schneider, Principal

LSS:rc

STATE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT THE UNIVERSITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK,

ALBANY NEW YORK 12234 ROSEVELT U.F.S.D. RCVD February 21, 1997 Superintendents Office February 19, 1997 Dr. Will Singleton Superintendent of Schools Roosevelt Union Free School District 240 Denton Place Roosevelt, New York 11575

Dear Dr. Singleton: SECTION III

COMMENDATIONS

The ESL teacher at the Jr./Sr. High School has established a well-organized ESL program. The teacher has a very good command of second language and content-based ESL instructional methodologies appropriate to the linguistic and developmental needs of the LEP students.

Materials are varied and appropriate. Some of her materials and methodologies could be of immense value to other staff throughout the district. The teacher should explain the goals and activities of the Newcomer Class in the description of the ESL Program, which she has prepared.

Roosevelt Union Free School District 240 Denton Place - Roosevelt, New York 11575 (516) 867-8624 - FAX (516) 377-4750 July 1, 1997

To Whom It May Concern: Ms. Miriam Snyder has worked as an ESL teacher in the Roosevelt Public Schools during the 1996-97 school year. During that time, she restructured the program at the Junior-Senior High School. In addition, she developed a handbook for parents of Limited English Proficient students. She is a very caring, talented and creative teacher. Her room is always very attractively appointed with cultural posters, flags and students' work. Her room provides an atmosphere that exudes the positive types of environment conducive to learning. Students enjoy her classes.

Ms. Snyder was commended by the State Education Department during their recent monitoring visit. They acknowledged that her work was of immense value to the Program.

I highly recommend Ms. Snyder for the position she is seeking.

Terrecita E. Watkis, Ed.D. Director of Funded Programs.

TEW:pg

LONG ISLAND BUSINESS INSTITUTE TO: Miriam Snyder FROM: Dr. Philip Stander, Academic Dean DATE: March 13, 2002 SUBJECT: Reference Form of February 26, '02 It was my pleasure to have completed the reference form on your behalf. It is one of the most positive and laudatory references that I have completed. It truly and sincerely reflected my view of you as an excellent teacher and an asset to our evening session.

As I had written in the reference, "Ms. Snyder is an intelligent highly motivated teacher. She was formally observed in the classroom by the Associate Academic Dean who evaluated her and concluded that she is a caring, knowledgeable teacher. I recommend her highly and

without qualification.

Best wishes for a gratifying semester ahead. I look forward to seeing you at our next faculty meeting.

316

317

318

319

320

THE ABOVE EVIDENCE IS ONE OF JONATHAN LIPPMAN’S DOCUMENTED DISGUISED KILLING OPERATIONS. HE HAS MANY. READ THE ATTACHED CRIMINAL COMPLAINT TOO. HE IS AN ENEMY OF THE STATE AND COUNTRY. HE IS A JUDICIAL TRESPASSER WHO IS USING HIS HITLER PHENOMENON AS THE RULE OF LAW AND ENJOINING UNDER THE BRITISH ACCREDITATION REGISTRY, (BAR ASSOCIATIONS), TO RULE OVER LAWYERS BECAUSE IT IS LAWYERS AND JUDGES IN AMERICA WHO ARE IN FACT IMPLEMENTING THE FRAUD AND DEFRAUD PRACTICES. WHAT IS SAD IS THAT NOT ALL LAWYERS ARE AWARE OF JONATHAN LIPPMAN’S AND OTHERS DIABOLICAL LAWLESS USURPATIONS DELIBERATELY IMPMPLEMENTED TO ENHANCE A FALSE PHENOMENON OF GLOBAL ELITE. EACH OF THE EXHBITS FORWARDED AND ATTACHED DEMONSTRATE JONATHAN LIPPMAN’S INSIDIOUS, RUTHLESS, CRIMINAL, PATTERNED AND PRACTICED LAWLESS USURPATIONS INFLICTING FRAUD AND DEFRAUD AGAINST AMERICAN PEOPLE, TO SUBTERFUGE A DEMONIC TOTALITARIAN WORLD GOVERNMENT AND CREATION OF A "SUPERIOR RACE" THAT DOES NOT INCLUDE AMERICANS, BUT EFFECTIVELY ENSLAVE AMERICANS TO FRAUD AND DECEIT. THE ATTACHED EVIDENCE EXEMPLIFIES LAWLESS USURPED FRAUD AND DECEIT ADMINISTRATION OF LAW, EMBEDDED IN JONATHAN LIPPMAN’S UNREGULATED BUDGET, ABUSE OF USURPED POWER AND THE ENJOINMENT OF BAR ASSOCIATION MEMBERS TO ACT AS GATEKEEPERS THAT ADVANCE THE CRIMES AND NEUTRALIZE/SILENCE THE DOCUMENTATION OF SUCH:

,



CONSPIRACY TO OFFEND AND DEFRAUD THE UNITED STATES, ( 18 USC SECTION 371 )



PERJURY AGAINST SEVERAL LAWYERS OATH OF OFFICE BY SUBSCRIBING TO MATERIAL THEY KNOW TO BE FALSE, ( 18 USC SEC. 1621



INSURRECTION AGAINST THE CONSTITUTION BY INCITING, ASSISSTING,AND ENGAGING IN REBELLION AGAINST THE CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ( 18 USC SEC 2383)



SEDITION/SEDITIOUS CONSPIRACY BY CONSPIRING TO OVERTHROW THE CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNMENT OR DELAY THE EXECUTION OF A LAW OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ( 18 USC SEC 2384 )

321



IMPEDING DUE EXERCISE OF RIGHTS BY ATTEMPTING TO PREVENT, OBSTRUCT, IMPEDE, AND INTERFERE WITH SAME, (18 USC SEC 1509)



SUBORNATION OF PERJURY BY PROCURING ANOTHER TO COMMIT PERJURY ,(18 USC SEC. 1622 )



BRIBERY, EXTORTION, OR THREATS OF SAME, (18 U.S.C. SEC. 1962);



CONSPIRACY AGAINST RIGHTS OF SOVERIEGN, FREE, GOD CREATED, CITIZENS, ( 18, SECTION 241 )



U.S. CODE TITLE 10, SECTION 333, INTERFERENCE WITH STATE AND FEDERAL LAWS



ADVOCATING OVERTHROW OF GOVERNMENT, (18 U.S.C. SEC. 1962)



GENOCIDE; (B) CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT GENOCIDE; (C) DIRECT AND PUBLIC INCITEMENT TO COMMIT GENOCIDE; (D) ATTEMPT TO COMMIT GENOCIDE; (E) COMPLICITY IN GENOCIDE,

IT IS HARD TO LIVE PEACEFULLY WHEN THERE IS A DOCUMENTED DISGUISED KILLER AND TRADING WITH THE ENEMY SPECIALIST TRYING TO CONTINUE TO KILL AND KILL YOU UNDER THE DISGUISE OF A PHENOMENON.

322