Inside A3 Maker Fest helps children learn through hands-on activities.
Powhatan, Virginia
B1 Powhatan softball powers past Generals.
Vol. XXXI No. 39
March 28, 2018
County leaders at odds over access to staff By Laura McFarland News Editor
P
OWHATAN – An issue that had been building for months behind the scenes and finally bubbled over at the Feb. 26 Powhatan County Board of Supervisors meeting progressed even further last week when a restriction was put on how all board members have access to county staff. While a highly contentious debate on a proposed apartment complex drew a few hundred people to the Feb. 26 board meeting, the biggest fireworks of the night happened immediately before on an agenda item to reinstate language into the county’s Subdivision Code regarding auxiliary turn lanes. In that matter, David Williams, who
Citizens support board member Almost a dozen citizens spoke during the public comments of the Powhatan County Board of Supervisors’ meeting on March 19, including Sally Boese, top, and John Delong. For full story, see page 3.
DELIVER TO: Postal Patron Powhatan, VA 23139
Prsrt. Standard U.S. POSTAGE PAID Powhatan, VA Permit No.19
PHOTOS BY LAURA MCFARLAND
represents District 1, had begun questioning Bret Schardein, assistant county administrator, about a timeline of events that had led to a section of the Subdivision Code being taken out without board knowledge and approved without that language in January 2017. Before he could finish his line of questioning, Williams was interrupted in a quick line of succession by three board members who called his dressing down of a staff member in public inappropriate. But while the supervisors were the public face of the conflict at the time, during the same meeting, county administrator Ted Voorhees sent three emails that made it clear he felt Williams had crossed a line. He issued a directive that said Williams was no longer to have direct contact with staff and should direct any requests for information through the county administrator. Voorhees released the emails in response to a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request from the Powhatan Today.
Williams also released several emails he exchanged with Voorhees in the weeks that followed pertaining to the rights and responsibilities of the county administrator and the supervisors in regard to staff. The newest development in the situation came several hours before the board’s March 19 budget workshop, when Voorhees sent an email to all of the supervisors and his leadership team. In the interest of fairness to all concerned, he said he was extending his restriction against interacting directly with staff to all members of the board of supervisors. Many local residents spoke out during the March 19 meeting against restricting Williams’ access to staff (see story page 3) saying it limited his ability to do his job and their right to fair representation. Only one of the residents mentioned the extension to all board members specifically. In a separate interview, Voorhees said his initial decision to restrict Williams’ access to staff was not based solely on
the supervisors’ actions at the Feb. 26 meeting, but it was a tipping point. Leading up to that night, there was also the growing issue of an individual board member making regular requests of staff for information that put a heavy burden on their time and resources, the county administrator said. And in fact, the ever growing mountain of information stemming from the seemingly simple issue of auxiliary turn lanes shows that this situation is far more complicated and operating on several levels with many different concerns, some of which are still developing. Just a few of them already expressed by supervisors, staff or residents include: the issue of the original deletion of language and how it happened; an internal investigation that was conducted into that matter; whether that investigation should have been conducted externally instead even if it was at a high cost to the county; whether or not to make the internal investigation public in part or in see COUNTY, pg. 6
Data shows more DUIs being caught By Laura McFarland News Editor
POWHATAN – Local law enforcement has long been committed to keeping Powhatan’s roads as safe as possible, and recent data shows they continue to get stronger at successfully catching and prosecuting people driving under the influence. So far in fiscal year (FY) 2018, Powhatan County has referred 49 cases to the Virginia Alcohol Safety Action Program, which is only one less than the 50 cases it reported in the entirety of FY 2017, according to Rob Cerullo, deputy commonwealth’s attorney. Of those 49, 33 were specifically for a conviction for driving under the influence (DUI). The Virginia Alcohol Safety Action Program (VASAP) is the state system of local alcohol safety action programs, offering different educational courses mandated for those who have been convicted
of a DUI or related offense in an effort to make the roads safer. “That is DUIs, drug cases, reckless driving – any cases that we thought VASAP should be a part of, usually because
METRO CREATIVE
there is an alcohol or drug factor involved,” said Cerullo, who represents Powhatan on the regional VASAP board. In a comparison of 17 other jurisdictions in the region that referred cases to VASAP so far in FY 2018, Powhatan had the fourth highest number overall and the second when compared to agencies of
similar size, staffing levels and population. Larger localities like Chesterfield and Henrico counties far outstrip Powhatan with 445 and 571 referred cases, respectively. But after that, the only jurisdiction with a higher referral rate was Colonial Heights with 55 cases. Some of the other localities in the comparison were Emporia, Dinwiddie, Hopewell, Petersburg, Prince George, Goochland, Hanover and New Kent. “I am glad to see it because it means what we have been doing, which is putting a focus on getting drunk drivers off the street, is working. The guys are bringing us the cases so we can get the convictions so we can refer them to VASAP,” Cerullo said. Locally, DUI arrests are making up an increasing percentage of the overall arrests in Powhatan County. In 2015, deputies made 465 arrests, 46 of which were DUI see DUI, pg. 4
Snow falls on second day of spring CONTRIBUTED PHOTOS
Addison Wallace, left, greeted snow with glee while Eloise Culver was not as happy. More photos page 5.
Supervisors hear school budget details in workshop By Laura McFarland News Editor
POWHATAN – The Powhatan County Board of Supervisors got its first introduction last week to the public school system’s proposed $47.2 million operating budget for fiscal year 2019. Dr. Eric Jones, superintendent, presented the fiscal year (FY) 2019 operating budget to the supervisors during their budget workshop held on Monday, March 19. Jones’ presentation took the board through a brief introduction to the budget, how it is being affected by student enrollPHOTO BY LAURA MCFARLAND ment numbers and what remains unknown Dr. Eric Jones, superintendent, presabout the budget at this time. ents the school board’s budget. As it stands now, the division’s proposed operating expenditures stand at services and another $176,648 paid to the $46,811,227, according to documents pro- county as part of planned savings related to vided to the supervisors. When combined a school closing, these three numbers add with a transfer of $250,000 to school food up to the proposed $47,237,875 million
FY 2019 operating budget. Although it is supplemented with transfers from the operating budget so it is not entirely self-sustaining, food services has its own proposed budget of $1.35 million, according to the documents. As he had when he gave roughly the same presentation to the school board, Jones once again pointed out that the General Assembly adjourning without an adopted state budget had left a big unknown area in the district’s budget. The school district built its budget using the governor’s original proposed budget, which called for it to receive $22,226,568 in state funds. This would have been an increase of $73,982 from the adopted FY 2018 budget. But with the General Assembly still debating the budget, the version recommended by the House of Delegates would mean see SCHOOL pg. 8