2022 Swanson School Summary of Faculty Research

Page 114

MECHANICAL ENGINEERING & MATERIALS SCIENCE

Hessam Babaee, PhD

1102 Benedum Hall | 3700 O’Hara Street | Pittsburgh, PA 15261

Assistant Professor

P: 412-383-0560 h.babaee@pitt.edu

A Stochastic Framework for Computation of Sensitivities in Chaotic Flows

The work of Dr. Babaee’s research group is at the intersection of high performance computing, uncertainty quantification and predictive modeling. Advances in the field of machine learning provide a rigorous mathematical framework that have begun to allow combining data with variable fidelities from different sources to generate or improve predictive models. Furthermore, the advent of efficient numerical techniques, particularly in the field of stochastic differential equations and high performance computing have paved the way for quantifying uncertainty in complex engineering systems. The combination of these components is just starting to bear fruit and unprecedented opportunities exist for constructing predictive models endowed with rigorous certificates of fidelity in multi-physics/multi-scale engineering systems. This is the scope of Dr. Babaee’s research group.

Uncertainty Quantification and Stochastic Modeling Complex thermo-fluid systems are often poorly understood due to the uncertainties in the models, parameters, experimental measurements and numerical simulations, and operating conditions. Propagating and managing uncertainty in these systems is a daunting task. These systems are often governed by multi-physics/multiscale phenomenon – described by highdimensional coupled differential/integral equations – such as heat transfer in gas turbines or turbulent two-phase flows.

Time-Dependent Basis

Low-dimensional Attractor

Our group develops stochastic reduced order models (ROM) by exploiting the correlations among the different (a) (b) realizations of a physical system. ROM has orders of magnitude smaller dimension Figure 1 Figure 2: PI Babaee’s research on a minimization principle for bui than the full-dimensional model and it (a) Featured on the Cover Page of Proceedings of the Royal Society serves two main purposes: (1) ROM is a diagnostic tool that can be used to characterize Physical and Engineering Sciences [33]; (b) Smoke: volume rendering o and analyze the behavior of complex dynamical systems; (2) ROM can be used instead time-dependent (OTD) modes. of the full-dimensional model to significantly reduce the computational burden of propagating uncertainty in high-dimensional dynamical systems.

increases the influence of the unresolved fluctuations becomes more s the non-linearity of dynamical system results in growth of the unresolv prediction of the flow structure, it is essential to account for the e↵ Multi-Fidelity Modeling for Design and Optimization not, the aliasing errors will surely lead to non-physical results. This Engineering designs and resilient systems require management of compressible flow research for over 60 yeas now [34–38]. The crux of data from a variety of sources, efficient allocation of interaction of pressure and vorticity modes, with escalated complexity a

computational resources, and, most importantly, quantification of uncertainty inherent in multi-physics models of variable We fidelity would like to examine several means of accounting for the e↵ect and operating conditions, as well as utilization of such information high Reynolds number flows. We recognize that there are certain simi in risk-averse decision making. Even for classical engineering modal decomposition and the filtering operation as employed in LES systems that can be described at various levels of fidelity and that some of the ideas is subgrid scale (SGS) modeling may be useful for which experimental data may exist, currently there are no the issue is closure of the correlation: Tij = E[ui uj ] E[ui ]E[uj ]. Th mathematically rigorous methods to combine these disparate many of such closures [39–41]. Some of them appear promising for our p information sources into a viable framework for the purpose of Figure 2 design and optimization. In our group we develop multi-fidelity First, we would like to examine the scale-similarity model (SSM) [42–4 framework by employing modern elements of machine learning provide an information-fusion framework, in which prediction natural for our purpose. With this model, simulations will be conduct – such as non-parametric Bayesian regression – that are capable for quantities of interest and their associated uncertainties resolutions. This can be achieved by increasing r. These results will b of blending information from sources of different fidelity, and can are determined.

114

the unresolved fluctuations. Another possibility would be the mixed m based on the combination of the SSM and the general SGS viscosity ty simulations with varying resolutions neededAND to determine the e↵ects DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL are ENGINEERING MATERIALS SCIENCE

We will also consider a stochastic methodology. Since this method is n


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook

Articles inside

Xiayun (Sharon) Zhao, PhD

37min
pages 133-154

Jörg M.K. Wiezorek, PhD

2min
page 131

Wei Xiong, PhD, D.Eng

1min
page 132

Guofeng Wang, PhD

2min
page 130

Jeffrey Vipperman, PhD

2min
page 129

Albert C. To, PhD

1min
page 128

Patrick Smolinski, PhD

1min
page 127

Inanc Senocak, PhD

1min
page 126

David Schmidt, PhD

2min
page 125

Ian Nettleship, PhD

2min
page 124

Scott X. Mao, PhD

2min
page 123

Jung-Kun Lee, PhD

3min
page 122

Tevis D. B. Jacobs, PhD

1min
page 121

William W. Clark, PhD

2min
page 118

Daniel G. Cole, PhD, PE

2min
page 119

Katherine Hornbostel, PhD

1min
page 120

Minking K. Chyu, PhD

2min
page 117

Heng Ban, PhD, PE

2min
page 115

Hessam Babaee, PhD

2min
page 114

Michael D. Sherwin, PhD, P.E

2min
pages 111-113

Markus Chmielus, PhD

1min
page 116

M. Ravi Shankar, PhD

2min
page 110

Amin Rahimian, PhD

1min
page 108

Jayant Rajgopal, PhD, P.E

2min
page 109

Lisa M. Maillart, PhD

2min
page 107

Paul W. Leu, PhD

1min
page 106

Daniel R. Jiang, PhD

1min
page 105

Oliver Hinder, PhD

2min
page 104

Joel M. Haight, PhD, P.E., CIH, CSP

2min
page 103

Renee M. Clark, PhD

2min
page 102

Karen M. Bursic, PhD

1min
page 100

Youngjae Chun, PhD

3min
page 101

Mary Besterfield-Sacre, PhD

2min
page 99

Minhee Yun, PhD

2min
pages 96-97

Mostafa Bedewy, PhD

1min
page 98

Nathan Youngblood, PhD

2min
page 95

Jun Yang, PhD

3min
page 94

Gregory F. Reed, PhD

3min
page 91

Feng Xiong, PhD

2min
page 93

Inhee Lee, PhD

2min
page 88

Guangyong Li, PhD

2min
page 89

Alexis Kwasinski, PhD

2min
page 87

Hong Koo Kim, PhD

2min
page 86

Alex K. Jones, PhD

3min
page 85

Brandon M. Grainger, PhD

2min
page 83

Alan D. George, PhD, FIEEE

2min
page 82

Masoud Barati, PhD

2min
page 81

Mai Abdelhakim, PhD

1min
page 80

Meng Wang, PhD

1min
pages 78-79

Radisav Vidic, PhD

2min
page 77

Julie M. Vandenbossche, PhD, PE

2min
page 76

Aleksandar Stevanovic, PhD, P.E., FASCE

2min
page 75

Piervincenzo Rizzo, PhD

2min
page 74

Xu Liang, PhD

2min
page 71

Jeen-Shang Lin, PhD, P.E

2min
page 72

Carla Ng, PhD

2min
page 73

Sarah Haig, PhD

2min
page 69

Lei Fang, PhD

3min
page 66

Andrew P. Bunger, PhD

2min
page 65

Alessandro Fascetti, PhD

2min
page 67

Melissa Bilec, PhD

2min
page 64

Judith C. Yang, PhD

2min
pages 61-63

Götz Veser, PhD

2min
page 59

Christopher E. Wilmer, PhD

1min
page 60

Sachin S. Velankar, PhD

2min
page 58

Tagbo Niepa, PhD

2min
page 55

Jason E. Shoemaker, PhD

1min
page 57

Giannis Mpourmpakis, PhD

2min
page 54

Badie Morsi, PhD

3min
page 53

James R. McKone, PhD

1min
page 52

Lei Li, PhD

1min
page 50

Steve R. Little, PhD

2min
page 51

John A. Keith, PhD

2min
page 49

J. Karl Johnson, PhD

2min
page 48

Susan Fullerton, PhD

2min
page 47

Robert M. Enick, PhD

2min
page 46

Eric J. Beckman, PhD

2min
page 45

Ipsita Banerjee, PhD

2min
page 44

Ioannis Zervantonakis, PhD

2min
pages 41-43

Savio L-Y. Woo, PhD, D.Sc., D.Eng

2min
page 40

Justin S. Weinbaum, PhD

1min
page 39

Jonathan Vande Geest, PhD

1min
page 37

David A. Vorp, PhD

2min
page 38

Sanjeev G. Shroff, PhD

2min
page 34

Gelsy Torres-Oviedo, PhD

3min
page 36

George Stetten, MD, PhD

2min
page 35

Joseph Thomas Samosky, PhD

2min
page 33

Warren C. Ruder, PhD

1min
page 32

Partha Roy, PhD

2min
page 31

Prashant N. Kumta, PhD

2min
page 27

Spandan Maiti, PhD

2min
page 29

Mark Redfern, PhD

2min
page 30

Patrick J. Loughlin, PhD

2min
page 28

Mangesh Kulkarni, PhD

1min
page 26

Takashi “TK” Kozai, PhD

2min
page 25

Katrina M. Knight, PhD

2min
page 24

Bistra Iordanova, PhD

1min
page 23

Alan D. Hirschman, PhD

1min
page 21

Mark Gartner, PhD

1min
page 20

William Federspiel, PhD

2min
page 18

Neeraj J. Gandhi, PhD

2min
page 19

Tamer S. Ibrahim, PhD

5min
page 22

Richard E. Debski, PhD

1min
page 17

Lance A. Davidson, PhD

2min
page 16

Rakié Cham, PhD

2min
page 13

Steven Abramowitch, PhD

2min
page 8

Moni Kanchan Datta, PhD

2min
page 15

Bryan N. Brown, PhD

1min
page 12

Kurt E. Beschorner, PhD

2min
page 10

Harvey Borovetz, PhD

1min
page 11

Aaron Batista, PhD

4min
page 9

Tracy Cui, PhD

2min
page 14
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.