Porzio - Employment Law Monthly - A Year in Review 2021

Page 30

30

Misclassification Of Employees As Independent Contractors Recently Became More Costly Employment Law Monthly - August 2021 Authored by Vito A. Gagliardi, Jr. and Melanie D. Lipomanis On July 8, 2021, Governor Phil Murphy signed into law legislation that will enable regulators to pursue worker misclassification in New Jersey aggressively, increasing penalties and enforcement against businesses that misclassify employees as independent contractors. Part of that legislation, Assembly Bill No. 5892, which pertains to penalties and fines and becomes effective on January 1, 2022, is going to make misclassification a very expensive mistake. Misclassification is when employers, purposefully or inadvertently, label workers as contractors instead of employees, often to pay them off the books, or to avoid paying the employer’s share of employment taxes, insurance contributions, and other legal obligations. Employers who routinely use independent contractors in any part of their business models, should closely watch new regulatory developments governing these relationships and adjust their employment practices if necessary. In addition to increased penalties and fines, the new law creates additional liability for employers’ “purposeful or knowing” misclassification of workers “for the purpose of evading payment of insurance premiums” as a violation of the New Jersey Insurance Fraud Prevention Act, subjecting them to harsh penalties and criminal investigation by the New Jersey Department of Banking and Insurance. Under the new law, the state will create and fund the Office of Strategic Enforcement and Compliance (“OSEC”) within the Department of Labor and Workforce Development, for oversight and coordination of the law with other state agencies. The OSEC is tasked to implement a more robust process of identifying employers who misclassify employees, issue stop-work orders at worksites, impose much stricter penalties and fines, and create a database to track employer payrolls. Worker misclassification is more common than you may think. New Jersey uses the “ABC” test for determining whether independent contractors are properly classified. Codified in the state’s Unemployment Compensation Law, the ABC test deems a worker an employee unless the employer can prove all three of the following: (A) The worker has been and will continue to be free from control or direction over performance of the service, both under a contract of service and in fact; and (B) The service is either outside the usual course of the business for which such service is performed, or the service is performed outside of all the places of business of the enterprise for which such service is performed; and (C) The worker is customarily engaged in an independently established trade, occupation, profession or business.


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook

Articles inside

Reductions in Force: Recent Developments and Statutory Guidance Impacting Public Employers

7min
pages 54-56

Giallombardo v. Kyriak: A Clarification Of The Punitive Damages Standard

2min
page 57

Impact of the Legalization of Marijuana on Public Employers

4min
pages 52-53

Recreational Cannabis Law

5min
pages 49-51

• “No Credible Threat” of Federal Liability: NJ Supreme Court Orders That Employer Reimburse Injured Employee’s Costs for Medical Cannabis • Adult-Use Cannabis and Employee Protections: The Difficulties of Enforcing New Jersey’s Proposed

2min
page 48

• The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Proposes New Rules Governing Workplace Wellness Incentives

3min
page 47

The Employer’s Life Vest for the American Rescue Plan

7min
pages 43-46

• There Are Zero Reasons Not To Enforce Zero-Tolerance Policies Prohibiting Discriminatory Workplace Language

6min
pages 40-42

Independent Contractors Based Upon “Economic Realities”

3min
pages 35-37

Misclassification of Employees As Independent Contractors Recently Became More Costly

3min
pages 30-31

• The Joint Employer Merry-Go-Round Comes Full Circle: The USDOL Proposes to Change the FLSA Joint Employer Rules Yet Again • U.S. Department of Labor Issues New Final Rule Setting Forth Test For Classifying Workers As

7min
pages 32-34

Updates in Federal Agency COVID-19 Guidance for Employers: Where We Are in February 2021

10min
pages 24-29

Employers Will Soon Face Increased Scrutiny Of Restrictive Covenants With Employees

4min
pages 38-39

CDC Guidance Update For Vaccinated Individuals/Employees

1min
page 23

President Biden Takes a Tough Stand On Employer-Mandated Vaccination And Testing

1min
page 13

Who Refuse To Be Vaccinated

7min
pages 20-22

Executive Order No. 271 – Vaccination or Testing Requirement for Employees of State Contractors

2min
page 10

Employees Mandated to Provide Proof of Vaccination – Now What?

6min
pages 8-9

Compulsory COVID-19 Vaccination Policies in the Employment Context • What Employers Need To Know About Mandatory Vaccine Policies And What To Do With Employees

9min
pages 16-19

Federal Vaccine Mandate for Large Employers

1min
page 7

Federal And State Governments Expand Vaccine And Testing Mandates For Employees

3min
pages 11-12

State of New Jersey Mandates Vaccinations/Testing for Certain Workplaces

1min
pages 14-15
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.
Porzio - Employment Law Monthly - A Year in Review 2021 by Porzio Marketing - Issuu