PBN - Employment Law - Year in Review 2020 Edition

Page 7

7 Notwithstanding the broad array of available accommodations, it still is the case that an employer need not accommodate a nondisabled employee or provide an accommodation that poses an “undue hardship.” Factors considered in determining undue hardship include the following: • • • • • •

the nature and cost of the accommodation needed; the overall financial resources of the facility making the reasonable accommodation; the number of persons employed at this facility; the effect on expenses and resources of the facility; the overall financial resources, size, number of employees, and type and location of facilities of the employer (if the facility involved in the reasonable accommodation is part of a larger entity); the type of operation of the employer, including the structure and functions of the workforce, the geographic separateness, and the administrative or fiscal relationship of the facility involved in making the accommodation to the employer; and the impact of the accommodation on the operation of the facility.

This always must be a careful and individualized assessment. TAKE AWAY: In the broader analysis, what has emerged from a review of relevant anti-discrimination laws and health-related guidance is something approaching a tiered system of accommodation. Federal statute continues to compel employers to provide reasonable accommodations to disabled employees. Meanwhile, federal agency guidance recommends that employers treat employees, who are and who may be particularly vulnerable to COVID-19, similar to disabled employees, to the extent the employer is able. Neither disabled nor non-disabled employees are entitled to a specific accommodation nor one that presents an undue hardship.

1

A COVID-19 diagnosis is not, in and of itself, a disability, giving entitlement to reasonable accommodation. Rather, the disability determination associated with a COVID-19 diagnoses will depend

on the severity of the employee’s symptoms. If medical information and/or response to inquiry indicate a severe COVID-19 experience, the employee should be deemed to have a disability warranting reasonable accommodation. 2

The CDC has explained that severe illness means that the person with COVID-19 may require hospitalization, intensive care, or a ventilator to help them breathe, or they may even die.

3

This CDC list is current as of September 2, 2020 (list last revised by CDC on July 17, 2020).

4

This CDC list is current as of September 2, 2020 (list last revised by CDC on July 17, 2020).

Returning to Work Amid COVID-19: What Employers Should Know About Assessing And Accommodating At-Risk Employees Employment Law Monthly - July 2020 Authored by Melanie D. Lipomanis By now, employers are well-informed that employees with underlying health conditions are at greater risk for developing serious medical complications if they contract COVID-19, and that these employees’ medical conditions might warrant accommodations when returning to work under the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) and state anti-discrimination laws. Employers need to be prepared when their doors re-open to accommodate these employees and implement policy to safeguard their operations from potential lawsuits. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has identified the following underlying medical conditions that place an employee in the at-risk category: (1) age (65 and over; (2) severe obesity; (3) asthma; (4) heart conditions; (5) diabetes; (6) kidney or liver disease; and (7) an immunocompromised condition caused by a variety of factors, including cancer treatment, smoking, and certain immune weakening drug therapies and medical conditions. The broad scope of identified underlying medical conditions means most employers will face the dilemma of handling at-risk employees returning to work as businesses reopen and resume operations.


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook

Articles inside

Guidance Released on New Jersey’s Equal Pay Act

9min
pages 56-59

Lessons Learned From Walmart: Best Practices For Employers Regarding COVID-19 Preparation and Communication

9min
pages 52-55

OSHA Enforcement Guidance for Recording Cases of COVID-19 Goes Into Effect Today, May 26, 2020

2min
pages 50-51

The Road Back” for Stage 2 and Federal Paid Leave Considerations

7min
pages 47-49

The Conscientious Employee Protection Act

7min
pages 44-46

Overruled: the NLRB Restores Employers’ Rights

5min
pages 35-36

but Should Exercise Caution

7min
pages 41-43

Challenges for New Jersey Employers Facing COVID-19 Related Workforce Reductions

2min
page 40

The NLRB Sets the Stage for a Sea of Change in Employment Practices for 2020

9min
pages 32-34

What Employers Need to Consider When Recalling Furloughed Workers

7min
pages 37-39

Marijuana

3min
pages 30-31

All New Jersey Employers Must Comply With Latest COVID-19 Executive Order

2min
page 9

Federal Court Severs Portions of Department of Labor Rules on FFCRA/EPSLA Leave

3min
page 21

The Fate of the FFCRA: Mandatory Paid Leave For Employees Impacted By COVID-19 Will Become Voluntary In 2021 Under The Consolidated Appropriations Act

1min
pages 28-29

DOL Releases New Back-to-School FFCRA Guidance

6min
pages 17-18

Returning to Work Amid COVID-19: What Employers Should Know About Assessing And Accommodating At-Risk Employees

5min
pages 7-8

New Jersey Expands Leave and Insurance Benefits To Employees Impacted by COVID-19

16min
pages 22-27

What Employers Do and Don’t Have to Do

5min
pages 4-6

Discrimination

2min
page 16
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.
PBN - Employment Law - Year in Review 2020 Edition by Porzio Marketing - Issuu