Portfolio Volume II

PAUL CLEMENTS

ARCHITECTURE

D O C U M E N TAT I O N

AERIAL IMAGING

WH EN I LOO K BACK AT TH E I N FLU EN CE S O N M Y D E SIG N S EN SI B I LIT Y, TH E G EN E SIS O F M Y AE S TH E TIC I NTER E S T HA S TO B E VEH ICLE S— E S PECIALLY FA S T C ARS . M OS T O F TH E M EDIA THAT I N OW I NTER AC T WITH WER E FI RS T EN CO U NTER ED TH RO U G H M Y AUTO M OTIVE O B S E S SI O N . WH E TH ER IT B E HAN D D R AWI N G , 3 D M O D ELI N G , PH OTOG R APH Y, O R E VEN PR ECED ENT R E S E ARCH , C ARS D ROVE M Y I NTER E S T I NTO TH E R E ALM O F D E SIG N . M Y CH I LD H OO D D R E AM WA S TO B E A C AR D E SIG N ER , H OWE VER TH IS D E SI R E E VENT UALLY GAVE WAY TO ARCH ITEC TU R E, A S I B EGAN TO U N D ERS TAN D TH E G R E AT VARI E T Y AN D CO M PLE XIT Y O F B U I LDI N G S . DOCU M ENTATI O N HA S PROVED I M P O RTANT I N M Y U N D ERS TAN DI N G O F PR AC TICE AN D R E S P O N SI B I LIT Y, M OS T R ECENTLY, AERIAL I MAG I N G HA S PROVI D ED A N E W S E T O F TOO L S WITH WH ICH TO I N S PEC T AN D I N FO R M TH E PROCE S S O F D E SIG N AN D CO N S TRU C TI O N .

ARCHITECTURAL PROJECTS 5 / E u fa u l a I n d i a n H e a lt h C e n t e r 11 / T r i b a l R ei n t e g r at i o n C a m p u s 17 / T r a i n i n g & D e v e l o p m e n t C e n t e r 2 3 / T e r r a H ei g h t s R e s i d e n ce 2 9 / Pa l a z z o E v e n t s C e n t e r

D O C U M E N TAT I O N P R O J E C T S 37 / 1A r chi t ec t u r e W e b P r e s e n ce 41 / R e q u e s t F o r P r o p o s a l T e m p l at e 45 / S i t e O b s e r vat i o n R e p o r t T e m p l at e

AERIAL IMAGING 5 1 / O k e m a h C o m m u n i t y H o s p i ta l 55 / S a n d y P a r k A pa r t m e n t C o m p l e x

1 / 56

ARCHITECTURAL PROJECTS WO R K CO M PLE TED AT 1ARCH ITEC TU R E, LLC I N TU L SA , O K

2 / 56

E u fa u l a I n d i a n H e a lt h C e n t e r / 2016 - 2018 T r i b a l R ei n t e g r at i o n C a m p u s / 2016 - 2017 T r a i n i n g & D e v e l o p m e n t C e n t e r / 2017 - 2019 T e r r a H ei g h t s R e s i d e n ce / 2017 - 2019 P a l a z z o E v e n t s C e n t e r / 2018 -

3 / 56

4 / 56

STAKEHOLDERS

MUSCOGEE (CREEK) NATION, INDIAN HEALTH SERVICE

TYPOLOGY TRANSECT SCALE SIZE APPLICABLE CODES OCCUPANCY CONSTRUCTION TYPE PROJECT DELIVERY TIMELINE

OUTPATIENT HEALTH CLINIC RURAL, GREENFIELD LOW RISE, 24.7 74,260

ac

sf

ICC 2009, ANSI A117.9 B IIB CM - GMP 2016 - 2018

INVOLVEMENT

DD THROUGH CA

ACHIEVEMENT

AIA OK - CITATION AWARD, USGBC - LEED CERTIFIED

*DOCUMENTS BY REQUEST

COLLABORATION WITH SMITHGROUP JJR

EUFAULA INDIAN HEALTH CENTER A H E A D O F T H E C U R V E , C A R E F O R T H E N E X T G E N E R AT I O N

Designing a new facility for the Creek Nation Eufaula Indian Health Center was a large undertaking for 1Architecture. I was introduced to this project amidst a significant redesign after an initial two-story design had reached developmentlevel documentation. 1Architecture had partnered with a national firm providing minor oversight in the design of this outpatient care facility that provides optometry, audiology, dentistry, radiology, bariatric care, behavioral health, and a fitness center.

A chief target for this facility was to consider wellness holistically and continued funding assistance from the Indian Health Service supports that goal.

My role during this project focused heavily on the building envelope as well as consultant coordination. The masterplan for this project site incorporated an off-site sanitary force-main and a large geothermal wellfield beneath the parking area.

Connecting so many building functions under one roof necessitated thoughtful approaches to material changes along its length. Our braced frame structure utilized a ventilated rainscreen approach finished with large-format phenolic panels and thinveneer brick for a surprisingly affordable and striking faรงade. Some of the challenges of the selected design included structural independence at the FEMA storm shelter and building expansion joint of this long structure, and the coordination of openings and penetrations along the curved faรงades. The Construction Administration phase for this project was thorough and grew my comfort working at scale among many disciplines and trades on-site. The distinction between teams focusing on interior vs. exterior scopes came and went during this project as our small office tackled aggressive deadlines and parameters.

AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH JUNE 15, 2018 5 / 56

H T "

NG

ON

L "

ED PVC E 1/8"

7 A302

SIM

MODIFIED BITUMEN ROOFING SYSTEM

T.O. LOW PARAPET 117' - 0"

5 A303

STEEL ANGLE RE: STRUCTURAL

METAL DECK RE: STRUCTURAL

MODIFIED BITUMEN ROOFING SYSTEM

T.O. LOW PARAPET 117' - 0"

METAL DECK RE: STRUCTURAL

STEEL ANGLE RE: STRUCTURAL 10 A503

STEEL BEAM, RE: STRUCTURAL ALUMINUM PANEL SYSTEM

MODIFIED BITUMEN ROOFING SYSTEM

SLIP TRACK WITH 1" CAPACITY WEATHER BARRIER COMPOSITE INSULATING WALL SHEATHING

STEEL BEAM RE: STRUCTURAL

STEEL ANGLE RE: STRUCTURAL

SLIP TRACK WITH 1" CAPACITY

T.O. STOREFRONT 111' - 0" METAL CEILING SYSTEM RE: ROOM FINISH SCHEDULE

CEILING SYSTEM RE: ROOM FINISH SCHEDULE

16 A502

STEEL BEAM RE: STRUCTURAL

CEILING SYSTEM RE: ROOM FINISH SCHEDULE

BOX HEADER, RE: STRUCTURAL

PHENOLIC WALL PANEL SYSTEM

ALUMINUM CURTAINWALL SYSTEM RE: FRAME TYPES

ALUMINUM CURTAINWALL SYSTEM RE: FRAME TYPES

CEILING SYSTEM RE: ROOM FINISH SCHEDULE

WEATHER BARRIER COMPOSITE INSULATING WALL SHEATHING METAL STUDS RE: STRUCTURAL

102 MAIN CIRCULATION

SPRAY FOAM INSULATION

106 MAIN CIRCULATION

107 VESTIBULE

2

WS @ CANOPY NORTH 1/2" = 1'-0"

RE

AUTOMATIC SLIDING DOORS RE: DOOR SCHEDULE

FLOORING RE: ROOM FINISH SCHEDULE

FLOORING RE: ROOM FINISH SCHEDULE

6 A303 FLOORING RE: ROOM FINISH SCHEDULE

CONCRETE SLAB RE: STRUCTURAL

CONCRETE SLAB RE: STRUCTURAL

FINISH FL 100' - 0"

FILTER FABRIC WRAPPED AROUND 4" DIAMETER PVC DRAINAGE PIPE, SLOPE COLLECTOR PIPE MIN. 1/8" PER FOOT

NO.

107 VESTIBULE

AUTOMATIC SLIDING DOORS RE: DOOR SCHEDULE

BASE RE: ROOM FINISH SCHEDULE 7 A303

EUFAULA

500 E

GYPSUM BOARD RE: ROOM FINISH SCHEDULE

SIDEWALK RE: CIVIL

MUSC

10 A502

5 A301

Sim

SIDEWALK RE: CIVIL

P

FINISH FL 100' - 0"

CONCRETE FOUNDATION RE: STRUCTURAL

CONCRETE FOUNDATION RE: STRUCTURAL

1

FILTER FABRIC WRAPPED AROUND 4" DIAMETER PVC DRAINAGE PIPE, SLOPE COLLECTOR PIPE MIN. 1/8" PER FOOT

WALL SECTION EXCERPTS

WS @ ENTRY VESTIBULE - EAST 1/2" = 1'-0"

CONCEALED BUILDING EXPANSION JOINT MARCH 15, 2018

MATERIAL JUNCTIONS MARCH 15, 2018 6 / 56

ISSUE 4 - CONS

WAL

A

A REFLECTION OF ITS SURROUNDINGS PHOTO BY AARON KIMBERLIN

7 / 56

SHELTER AMONG THE “TREES” JUNE 15, 2018 8 / 56

COURTYARD WITHIN AN ATRIUM JUNE 15, 2018

GENTLE MATERIAL ADJACENCY JUNE 15, 2018

9 / 56

10 / 56

STAKEHOLDERS TYPOLOGY TRANSECT SCALE SIZE APPLICABLE CODES OCCUPANCY CONSTRUCTION TYPE PROJECT DELIVERY TIMELINE INVOLVEMENT

MUSCOGEE (CREEK) NATION OFFENDER REENTRY FACILITY RURAL, GREENFIELD LOW RISE, 12.4 26,470

ac

sf

ICC 2009, ANSI A117.9 B, F-1, R-2 VB, IIB CM - GMP 2016 - 2017 CA

TRIBAL REINTEGRATION CAMPUS A F R E S H P E R S P E C T I V E F O R T H E R E C E N T LY I N C A R C E R AT E D

Of all projects I have worked on, the Reintegration Campus was most challenging.

My introduction to the life of a project was luckily started with a completed set of construction documents and procedures, without the hindrance of learning to properly develop them first. I have been able to incorporate my observations and reflections from the construction of this project into the design of those since.

Challenges began with the construction method of the structures, Structurally Insulated Panel System (SIPS). Another tribal entity was a manufacturer of SIPS and the expectation was that this project could be an exposé for their system. Unfortunately the remote location left the project with a weak labor pool and inexperience with this novel construction method. We documented repeated instances of noncompliant work, including destructive penetrations of the panels’ structural skin in regular obesevation reports. Tensions between the Owner and Contractor came to a head at one of the most inopportune moments in the construction process: after erection of the panels, but before application of weatherproofing.

At the conclusion of an three month stop-work period, the installed work was in poor shape and in need of remediation. After a series of contentious and political high-level meetings, work was able to resume and in the end, the client has a wonderful facility that will smooth the transition back to normal life for this underserved population. I learned to be extremely conscious of communication methods and recordkeeping over the course of this tense project, but it is also where I developed my passion for solving problems in the field.

ACROSS THE POND JULY 27, 2017 11 / 56

CLOSE QUARTERS GEOTHERMAL SEPTEMBER 20, 2016 12 / 56

THERMAL SANDWICH MARCH 22, 2016

STRESSED SKIN SPANNING MARCH 22, 2016 13 / 56

CLERESTORY CLARITY JULY 27, 2017

THE GLASS IS GREENER MAY 1, 2017

14 / 56

ZINC CANOPY JULY 27, 2017 15 / 56

16 / 56

STAKEHOLDERS TYPOLOGY

BUSINESS IMAGING SYSTEMS HISTORIC REHABILITATION, COMMERCIAL OFFICE

TRANSECT SCALE SIZE APPLICABLE CODES OCCUPANCY CONSTRUCTION TYPE PROJECT DELIVERY TIMELINE INVOLVEMENT

URBAN CENTER, BROWNFIELD LOW RISE, 0.5 10,157

ac

sf

ICC 2015, ANSI A117.9 A-2, B VB DBB 2017 - 2019 SD THROUGH CD

*DOCUMENTS BY REQUEST

TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT CENTER E XPERIM ENTS IN EG RESS , FOR ALL TO SEE

A former sign shop on a prominent corner in Tulsa’s Blue Dome District has seen the city grow around its forgotten site. Our client saw the potential in this property and its sturdy three-wythe masonry walls to house a training facility surrounded by Tulsa’s cultural heritage. Most of our efforts focused on exposing the character of the aged masonry with elegant structural systems and reoriented egress pathways.

Two of the three structures on the property were part of our intervention, a two-story office space and a single-story flexible event space designed to support external rentals for large groups. The two-story structure was first to be designed. The second floor only required a topping slab for leveling and acoustic properties, but the roof structure was new, a single-span steel-supported membrane stout enough to carry the rooftop units without deflection. An exterior stair was introduced as a second means of egress. It was cantilevered off the existing masonry wall, and fabricated out of aircraft-grade aluminum and fiber cement panels for a high-tech look, emblematic of our client’s expertise.

Our next task was to transform the long, slender structure adjacent into a capacious event center with sufficient facilities and egress paths. The existing access drive along the east property line provided an opportunity for usable outdoor amenity space for event rentals. Once we redefined this area as an egress court that also entertains, exciting details started to appear. A raw steel canopy that engages with the fire-rated windows and a stout wall along the property protect the area from adjacent car traffic and support robust steel bar grate privacy fencing.

ALUMINUM STAIR MARCH 15, 2019 17 / 56

ALUMINUM STAIR MARCH 21, 2019 18 / 56

ALUMINUM LADDER FEBRUARY 12, 2019

PERFORATION WITH GRIP AUGUST 10, 2018

E

D

2

FIXED ALUMINUM LADDER

C

B

A

125' - 3" ROOF

1

8' - 0"

6' - 8"

MINUMUM

110' - 3" LANDING

360 E 2626 E Tuls

1' - 0"

P 15 W Tuls

2' - 3"

4' - 0"

114' - 3" SECOND FLOOR

EQ EQ

18 RISERS AT 6.85" EACH

10' - 3"

7 RISERS AT 6.85" EACH

LOCKABLE ALUMINUM COVER

100' - 0" FIRST FLOOR

EXTERIOR STAIR SECTION EQ

EQ

EQ

EQ

EQ

5' - 6"

5' - 6"

5' - 0"

15' - 7"

LANDING

6 TREADS AT 11" EACH

LANDING

17 TREADS AT 11" EACH

19 / 56

EQ NOTE: ALIGN HANDRAIL SUPPORTS WITH VERTICAL GUARDRAIL SUPPORTS

ROBUST SCREEN MARCH 21, 2019

CONCEPT VIGNETTE SKETCH

CONCEPT VIGNETTE SHADED VIEW 20 / 56

STEEL ENCLOSURE MARCH 21, 2019

21 / 56

22 / 56

STAKEHOLDERS TYPOLOGY

PRIVATE CLIENT HISTORIC DISTRICT, CUSTOM RESIDENTIAL

TRANSECT SCALE SIZE APPLICABLE CODES CONSTRUCTION TYPE PROJECT DELIVERY TIMELINE INVOLVEMENT

GENERAL URBAN LOW RISE, 0.3 3,611

ac

sf

IRC 2015 STABILIZED RAMMED EARTH CM 2017 - 2019 SD THROUGH CONSTRUCTION

*DOCUMENTS BY REQUEST

TERRA HEIGHTS RESIDENCE W H AT ’ S O L D I S N E W, T H E R M A L M A S S M E E T S P R A I R I E

I have always been enamored by the design of single-family houses and their endless customization and opportunity. I was lucky enough to have the first residential project I worked on be a first for the city as well. Tulsa’s first rammed earth home takes its form from the Prairie School. Our clients—executives for a local advertising agency— had acquired a sloping lot in the historic overlay district of Brady Heights. In order for the project to be approved by the Tulsa Preservation Commission, we had to base our design on styles and materiality present in the district. We gravitated towards a couple of Prairie-style homes that were contributing structures to the district’s inclusion on the National Register of Historic Places.

Our clients came to us with a contractor partner well-versed in rammed earth construction from his years as a carpenter in Australia. We were lucky to have open-mindedness across the project team, because changes and adaptation were abundant for this project. Two of the main challenges for the structural scheme of this home were cost of materials and constructibility. Our constant coordination between the contractor and structural engineer pertained to the generous overhang protecting the front porch and the concrete bond-beam atop the rammed earth walls. Validating our architectural clearances for schemes involving steel versus LVL framing at the overhang and developing a logic for span tables where the bond beam acted as a lintel were valuable learning experiences for me.

Thanks to our clients’ patience, they now live in an experimental, unquestionably modern home that fits in snugly with its neighbors.

RAMMED EARTH JUNE 18, 2018 23 / 56

A PROMINENT CORNER

24 / 56

10

ASPHALT SHINGLE ROOFING SYSTEM

SECTION PERSPECTIVE WEATHER BARRIER

FRONT PORCH SECTION

EXTERIOR GRADE PLYWOOD

4

WOOD STUD FRAMING RE: STRUCTURAL

WEATHER BARRIER

ANGLED BOX GUTTER WITH HIDDEN HANGERS. COLOR TO MATCH TRIM 5 1/4"

EXTERIOR GRADE PLYWOOD RE: STRUCTURAL

7°

3 A301

Sim

WOOD STUD FRAMING RE: STRUCTURAL

3 1/2"

11

12

ASPHALT SHINGLE ROOFING SYSTEM

METAL FLASHING WITH HEMMED DRIP EDGE

WATER RESISTIVE BARRIER

1x9.25 PAINTED CEMENT BOARD TRIM

CEMENT BOARD SOFFIT

2x WOOD BLOCKING

CAULK

9

3 3/4"

109' - 8" TOP OF BOND BEAM 109' - 0" BOTTOM OF SOFFIT

1x5.5 PAINTED CEMENT BOARD TRIM

2 1/4"

PAINTED SMOOTH 7.25" CEMENT BOARD LAP SIDING

PAINTED CEMENT BOARD SOFFIT

CONCRETE BOND BEAM RE: STRUCTURAL 2'-8" x 7'-0" PAINTED WOOD ENTRY DOOR

EXTERIOR SHEATHING 1' - 0"

5 A301

RAMMED EARTH WALL RE: STRUCTURAL

WEATHER BARRIER

107' - 0" HEAD HEIGHT

WATER RESISTIVE BARRIER

2x WOOD STUD FILL CAVITY WITH BATT INSULATION

WOOD STUD FRAMING RE: STRUCTURAL

6' - 5"

1' - 6"

6' - 6"

2x WOOD STUD FRAMING PAINTED GYPSUM BOARD CEILING RE: REFLECTED CEILING PLAN

0' - 6"

7 TREADS AT 11" EACH

3' TALL (1/2" x 4") STEEL BAR HANDRAIL POWDER COATED WITH EASED EDGES CONCRETE BOND BEAM RE: STRUCTURAL

103' - 0" PORCH WALL

0' - 5 1/2"

RAMMED EARTH WALL RE: STRUCTURAL

FILL CAVITY WITH BATT INSULATION, TYPICAL

CONCRETE STAIR WITH 1" NOSING

ASPHALT SHINGLE ROOFING SYSTEM

WEATHER BARRIER

EXTERIOR GRADE PLYWOOD

3' TALL (1/2" x 4") STEEL BAR HANDRAIL, BEYOND POWDER COATED WITH EASED EDGES CONCRETE PAVING SLOPE 1/4" PER FOOT AWAY FROM STRUCTURE RIGID INSULATION, RUN HORIZONTAL AND TO BASE OF FOOTING 2'-0" FROM INSIDE FACE OF FOOTING VAPOR RETARDER

100' - 0" FIRST FLOOR

1

ents\Documents\1704-004 Johnson Residence_paul.clements.rvt

OUTH WALL

EDGE OF EXTERIOR GRADE BEYOND

8 RISERS AT 6" EACH

CONCRETE PAVING SLOPE 1/4" PER FOOT AWAY FROM STRUCTURE 96' - 0" SIDEWALK

4' - 0"

EXTENT OF CONCRETE PLANTER BEYOND

0' - 1" TYP

CONCRETE FOOTING RE: STRUCTURAL FILTER FABRIC WRAPPED AROUND 4" DIAMETER PVC DRAINAGE PIPE, SLOPE COLLECTOR PIPE MIN. 1/8" PER FOOT

DETAIL AT ENTRY OVERHANG 1/2" = 1'-0"

RAMMED EARTH COORDINATION

0' - 6" CONCRETE BOND BEAM 0' - 8" CONCRETE BOND BEAM

3

25 / 56

POLISHED CONCRETE FLOORING CONCRETE FOOTING RE: STRUCTURAL CONCRETE SLAB RE: STRUCTURAL GRANULAR FILL

STRIATIONS OF PERMANENCE JUNE 18, 2018

26 / 56

HORIZONTALITY NOVEMBER 4, 2019

THE PROPER CHANNELS NOVEMBER 10, 2017 27 / 56

28 / 56

STAKEHOLDERS TYPOLOGY TRANSECT SCALE SIZE APPLICABLE CODES OCCUPANCY CONSTRUCTION TYPE PROJECT DELIVERY TIMELINE INVOLVEMENT

PRIVATE CLIENT BOUTIQUE EVENT VENUE RURAL, GREENFIELD LOW RISE, 0.3 12,471

ac

sf

ICC 2015, ANSI A117.9 A-3 VB CM - GMP 2018 SD THROUGH CD

*DOCUMENTS BY REQUEST

PALAZZO EVENTS CENTER A C H A L L E N G I N G S I T E P U T S I T S B E S T FO OT FO RWA R D

Establishing a masterplan scheme for a boutique events center in Broken Arrow has pushed the limits of our rural site. Our client, a commercial property developer with past experience as a wedding photographer, came to us with a mature concept and site in hand. He envisioned a network of pristine spaces and supporting infrastructure, down to florist and vendor storefronts whose most ideal clients would be high-end weddings. A pasture comprises the majority of the site, but is surrounded by forest and a steeply-banked creek bisects the site. We produced a scheme that maximized the site’s resources and facilitated multiple events on a given weekend.

Historic palazzos of Italy were the inspiration for our client’s vision and all facets of the site aesthetics would have to reflect this authentic materiality to be convincing.

Given the modest budget of a project at this scale, we defined an economical construction system that would support the premium cladding. EIFS over a mediumspan hybrid steel/convential shell with a rooftop equipment court was my main focus for this project.

In order for the first-phase centerpiece of the property to impress, extensive site coordination was undertaken. Through the various iterations the site, a FEMA Letter of Map revision was considered for the floodway at the forest’s edge, overburdening of the inferior soils was proposed to enable more economical foundations to be utilized, and numerous manicured stormwater detention facilities graduated to formal gardens.

Every angle is intended as a photographic backdrop to draw the most discerning clientele for events. As of writing, this project is under construction documentation.

EARLY SITE PLAN OF PHASED DEVELOPMENT

29 / 56

RENDERED VIEW OF EXTERIOR STAIR

M

L 8 A310

Sim

CLAY TILE ROOF SYSTEM

BATT INSULATION = R-38

122' - 0" MID ROOF

122' - 0" MID ROOF

CONTINUOUS INSULATION FINISH SYSTEM WITH HIGH IMPACT REINFORCING MESH APPLIED OVER 1 1/2" EPS FOAM INSULATION ADHERED TO APPROVED TROWEL APPLIED WEATHER RESISTIVE BARRIER

STRUCTURAL FRAMING RE: STRUCTURAL

NATURAL STONE PAVER SYSTEM ON ADJUSTABLE PEDESTALS OVER FULLY ADHERED TPO SINGLE PLY ROOFING MEMBRANE ON COVER BOARD OVER TAPERED INSULATION ON PLYWOOD DECKING RE: STRUCTURAL

STONE PILASTER AND CAP BEYOND ROOF FLASHING AT PILASTER BEYOND

CLAY HIP TILE TERMINATION AT PILASTER BEYOND

115' - 6" TOP OF WALL

GYPSUM BOARD RE: ROOM FINISH SCHEDULE FULL CAVITY BATT INSULATION

11 A502

LOW PROFILE BALCONY GRATE DRAIN BEYOND RE: PLUMBING

12 A502

WALL BASE FLOORING RE: ROOM FINISH SCHEDULE 112' - 0" LEVEL 2

CLAY TILE ROOF SYSTEM BATT INSULATION = R-38 STRUCTURAL FRAMING RE: STRUCTURAL

112' - 0" LEVEL 2 COLOR MATCH FLASHING TO CIFS

STRUCTURAL FRAMING RE: STRUCTURAL

ROOF WALKWAY SECTION EXCERPT BATT INSULATION = R-38

30 / 56

CEILING RE: ROOM FINISH SCHEDULE

RENDERED VIEW OF ENTRY

31 / 56

32 / 56

RENDERED VIEW OF PERGOLA

9' - 0" WIDTH OF ARCH

BETWEEN BAYS

DRYWALL GRID SYSTEM CROSS TEES DRYWALL GRID SYSTEM MAIN BEAMS - NOTCHED AND SPLICED

COLONNADE - PLAN EAST 1/4" = 1'-0"

6

NOTE: SYSTEM DEPICTS A TYPICAL GROIN VAULT SYSTEM BY ARMSTRON CEILING & WALL SYSTEMS

DRYWALL CEILING SUSPENSION SYSTEM

0' - 6"

1/4" = 1'-0"

11' - 6" APEX OF ARCH

9' - 9"

7

COLONNADE - PLAN WEST

0' - 9"

8

SPRING LINE (START) OF ARCH

BETWEEN BAYS FIELD VERIFY

8' - 6" WITDH OF ARCH

EVENT SPACE BEYOND

EVENT SPACE BEYOND

EVENT SPACE BEYOND

EVENT SPACE BEYOND

11' - 6"

COLONNADE - PLAN SOUTH 1/4" = 1'-0"

0' - 6"

< RENDERED VIEW OF COLONNADE

0' - 9"

4

EVENT SPACE BEYOND

APEX OF ARCH

9' - 9"

EVENT SPACE BEYOND

SPRING LINE (START) OF ARCH

7' - 0"

EVENT SPACE BEYOND 1' - 6"

9' - 10"

START OF SINGLE VAULT

INTO EVENT SPACE FIELD VERIFY

COLONNADE DOCUMENTATION EXCERPT

33 / 56

5

D O C U M E N TAT I O N P R O J E C T S WO R K CO M PLE TED AT 1ARCH ITEC TU R E, LLC I N TU L SA , O K

34 / 56

1 A r chi t ec t u r e W e b P r e s e n ce / 2016 R e q u e s t F o r P r o p o s a l T e m p l at e / 2016 S i t e O b s e r vat i o n R e p o r t T e m p l at e / 2016 - 2018

35 / 56

36 / 56

1ARCHITECTURE WEB PRESENCE LEF T TO ITS OWN DE VICES

Over the course of my time at 1Architecture, I have pushed for a more refined and maintainable web presence for the firm. Our momentum on projects large and small shouldnâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;t have to slow to show the world a sampling of our most recent work, and the sampling should be eye-catching to inspire the next projects. Upon my introduction to the firm, sectors of expertise and deeper insights from each project were not present.

Unless you were familiar with 1Architecture, it would be hard to navigate our body of work.

To anchor a refreshed presence, I compiled higher resolution assets into a custom Squarespace website. The new site takes advantage of the screen real estate different types of device provide versus the old site, relegated to the middle third of any past visitorâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s screen. Declaring Who, What, Why in the top-level navigation of our site made it easy to get familiar with the principles and principals that guide our work.

Project pages now feature enlargeable images and walkthroughs accompanied by qualitative information all grouped within core competencies. The robust analytic features of the platform have refocused our efforts on reaching the most loyal audience with our content, rather than the scattershot approach of the past.

Reducing the friction of adding new content to the site has allowed regular updates from the construction site and charrette table to complement award-winning completed project photos and video. Prioritizing select social media endpoints has provided more meaningful engagement that keeps our clients coming back.

MOBILE DEVICE WEBSITE MOCKUP

37 / 56

CURRENT WEBSITE 2016 OLD WEBSITE 2003 - 2016

38 / 56

SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORMS, ONGOING

39 / 56

40 / 56

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL TEMPLATE A G I L E D O C U M E N T S W I T H B R O A D C U S T O M I Z AT I O N

A necessary evil of the new business world is putting together replies to Requests for Proposal. The involved effort seems to vanish into “marketing” time. A complication of the process is the variety of requested formats and bits of information. For 1Architecture, we realized the wasteful previous approach was ripe for optimization and decided to tackle this problem.

After some thorough research, I discovered the power of Adobe InDesign’s Book functionality. No longer would long, heavy files have to be edited in minor ways for each separate proposal, a compact “style source” file would take care of that for us.

When using a style source, the rest of the chapters in a book derive their aestheitic particulars from the first chapter only. We built a template for standard projects and project team members, then added the relevant elements per proposal.

Migrating to a library of proposal elements that automatically react to each others placement in a document allows for a lean, rapid response to project opportunities.

My design of the RFP template has defined graphic motifs and strategies of many documents in the time since its inception.

A SEAT AT THE TABLE

41 / 56

STEP INTO FRAME

42 / 56

THE RHINOCEROS IN THE ROOM

EVERYTHING IN ITS PLACE

43 / 56

44 / 56

SITE OBSERVATION REPORT TEMPLATE “ I N T E R VA L S A P P R O P R I AT E T O T H E S TA G E O F C O N S T R U C T I O N ”

As I grew confidence during the construction administration phase of projects, I started to realize an opportunity for streamlining. Prior to this method, site observation reports were created piecemeal in Microsoft Word. After uploading photos from the day’s site visit, there was no target for descriptive and location information to be attributed to each photo in a report.

By taking the template into Adobe InDesign, order and clarity came to the forefront.

Master pages were created for portrait and landscape oriented photos, as well as dedicated fields for references to plan locations, relevant specifications, and indications for responsible parties. Providing such rich information with consistency eliminated countless RFIs and misunderstanding among the project team.

The final format of the template is the result of iterations and evolution over several projects and phases of a project. As phases required ground-level versus aerial imagery in varying combinations, more precise locating information and relevant references to the Contract Documents were incorporated and into an effective punchlist companion and template.

DOWN TO THE NITTY-GRITTY

45 / 56

Site Observation Report

PROJECT: ####-### Client Project Address City, State ZIP

Client – Project Project – Milestone City, State

Owner Architect CM File

FIELD REPORT NUMBER: #

DATE: TIME: WEATHER:

XX.XX.2020 X:XX PM Clear (XX °F)

EST. % COMPLETION: CONFORMANCE WITH SCHEDULE: WORK IN PROGRESS:

Approx. XX% On schedule per 6 week look-ahead In progress work here.

PRESENT AT SITE: 1Architecture, Contractor, Owner, Subcontractor OBSERVATIONS: See attached comments below photos.

ITEMS VERIFIED: None FOLLOW UP INFORMATION/ACTION NEEDED: See attached comments below photos.

ONE ARCHITECTURE, LLC 1319 E. 6TH STREET – TULSA , OKL AHOMA 74120 PH. 918.764.9996

F X . 1.866.834.9074

ONE CAN MAKE A DIFFERENCE

46 / 56

1

ALL SCALES OF OBSERVATION

PROVIDE CONSTRUCTIVE DIRECTION

47 / 56

AERIAL IMAGING PROJ EC TS CO M PLE TED U N D ER FA A PART 1 07 R EM OTE PI LOT CERTI FIC ATE

48 / 56

O k e m a h C o m m u n i t y H o s p i ta l / 2018 S a n d y P a r k A pa r t m e n t C o m p l e x / 2018

49 / 56

50 / 56

STAKEHOLDERS

MUSCOGEE (CREEK) NATION

TYPOLOGY

INPATIENT HOSPITAL

TRANSECT

RURAL, GREENFIELD

SCALE SIZE APPLICABLE CODES OCCUPANCY CONSTRUCTION TYPE PROJECT DELIVERY TIMELINE

LOW RISE, 60.5 122,175

ac

sf

ICC 2009, ANSI A117.9, ASME A17.1 A-2, A-3, B, I-2, R-2, S-1, S-2 IIA, VB CM - GMP 2017 - 2018

INVOLVEMENT

POST-COMPLETION

ACHIEVEMENT

AIA EAST. OK HONOR AWARD COLLABORATION WITH SMITHGROUP JJR

OKEMAH COMMUNITY HOSPITAL A B I R D ’ S - E Y E V I E W O F P R O G R E S S A M O N G U N PAV E D R OA D S

1Architecture’s ability to produce a large, complex project such as the Creek Nation’s Okemah hospital was a big surprise to many. It’s a lot of work for a 12-employee firm to design, document, and advise on the construction of a $50 million dollar project such as this. Okemah’s hospital was a large undertaking for our client too. What had previously been an overcrowded, underequipped facility would be succeded by a state-of-the-art Critical Access facility to serve more than just tribal citizens. We were lucky to have a partner like SmithgroupJJR to build the knowledge, reputation and familiarity necessary to continue developing such impressive projects in the area.

My architectural contributions were limited on this project, as the project had already started construction upon my introduction to the firm. I did assist in the coordination of a third-party review of the building envelope system during the early stages of construction however. My largest contribution to the project was documenting its completed form from the air—the only medium appropriate to its scale. During the course of this project, I became fixated on the emerging uses of drones in architecture and construction. I decided to earn my FAA remote pilot license and be able to analyze and document projects at all stages of completion. The completion of the Okemah hospital was my first opportunity to learn aerial videography and produce a film that displayed the firm’s ability to punch above our weight class, so to speak.

From the air you can see the grand gestures present in the design of this facility from its early days of the design process.

AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH MAY 4, 2018 51 / 56

AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH SEPTEMBER 21, 2017

AERIAL VIDEO STILL IMAGES MAY 4, 2018 PLEASE VISIT THE LINK AT LEFT FOR FILM OF THIS PROJECT

52 / 56

53 / 56

54 / 56

STAKEHOLDERS

TULSA HOUSING AUTHORITY, PGIM REAL ESTATE FINANCE, U.S. DEPT. OF HOUSING & URBAN DEV.

TYPOLOGY TRANSECT SCALE SIZE APPLICABLE CODES OCCUPANCY CONSTRUCTION TYPE TIMELINE INVOLVEMENT

PUBLIC HOUSING APARTMENT COMPLEX GENERAL URBAN LOW RISE, 17.4 74,260

ac

sf

ICC/IRC 2015, ANSI A117.1, UFAS A-3, R VB 2018-2020 SD THROUGH CD

*DOCUMENTS BY REQUEST

SANDY PARK APARTMENT COMPLEX CONNEC TING THE DOTS , FROM THE AIR

Developing a masterplan for the Sandy Park Apartments public housing complex gave 1Architecture the opportunity to experiment with new information-gathering methods. Tight budgetary and access constraints limited the extent of on-the-ground observations and meaurements we could make of this occupied site. In addition to thorough measurements of unoccupied dwelling units, we supplemented a lack of survey information with aerial images transformed into a site-wide point cloud.

Originally built in 1973 adjacent to the Arkansas River levee, the 160 unit complex was due an extensive overhaul. In addition to the large community center, 5 building types composed of 1-4 bedroom units were arranged on the site without clear order.

In the absence of clear documentation or an up-to-date survey, we compiled our building measurements into BIM models of each building type for schematic design.

To accelerate the site planning aspect of our scope, I planned flight paths that we captured and processed into a point cloud. With this information in hand, we could place all structures on site in three dimensions and generate accurate takeoffs of the surfaces to be refreshed for the project.

Utilizing aerial imaging to generate a photogrammetric point cloud allowed for the accelerated design of this large site. With the rich data from the point cloud and accurately placed building modules, our team was able to respond to recurring changes from the owner and extensive financial stakeholder list for this tightly regulated project. 1Architecture served as the design architect for the redevelopment of the complex, with another entity handling construction administration.

CONNECTING THE DOTS

55 / 56

56 / 56

UNIT SCHEDULE ADDRESS 6101 6102 6103 6104 6105 6106 6107 6108 6109 6110 6111 6112 6113 6114 6115 6116 6117 6118 6119 6120 6121 6122 6123

TYPE 2BR 2BR 2BR 2BR 2BR 2BR 2BR 2BR 2BR 2BR 2BR 2BR 2BR CLINIC 2BR CLINIC 3BR 2BR 3BR 2BR 3BR 2BR 3BR

UNIT SCHEDULE NOTES

ADDRESS 6124 6125 6126 6127 6128 6129 6130 6131 6132 6133 6134 6135 6136 6137 6138 6139 6140 6141 6142 6143 6144 6145 6146

* * * *

TYPE 2BR 3BR 2BR 3BR 2BR 3BR 2BR 3BR 2BR 3BR 2BR 3BR 2BR 3BR 2BR 3BR 2BR 3BR 3BR 3BR 3BR 3BR 3BR

UNIT SCHEDULE NOTES *

ADDRESS 6147 6148 6149 6150 6151 6152 6153 6154 6155 6156 6157 6158 6159 6160 6161 6163 6165 6167 6169 6170 6171 6172 6173

*

*

UNIT SCHEDULE

TYPE 3BR 3BR 3BR 3BR 3BR 3BR 3BR 3BR 3BR 3BR 2BR 3BR 2BR 3BR 2BR 2BR 2BR 2BR 2BR 1BR 2BR 1BR 3BR

NOTES

ADDRESS 6174 6175 6176 6177 6178 6179 6180 6181 6182 6183 6184 6185 6186 6187 6188 6189 6190 6191 6192 6301 6302 6303 6304

* *

*

TYPE 1BR 3BR 1BR 3BR 1BR 3BR 1BR 3BR 1BR 3BR 1BR 3BR 1BR 3BR 1BR 3BR 1BR 3BR 1BR CC 3BR 3BR 3BR

UNIT SCHEDULE NOTES

* *

ADDRESS 6305 6306 6307 6308 6309 6310 6311 6312 6313 6314 6316 6318 6320 6322 6324 6326 6328 6330 6332 6334 6336 6338 6340

TYPE 3BR 3BR 3BR 3BR 3BR 3BR 3BR 3BR 3BR 3BR 3BR 3BR 3BR 3BR 3BR 3BR 3BR 4BR 4BR 4BR 4BR 4BR 4BR

UNIT SCHEDULE NOTES

ADDRESS 6342 6344 6346 6347 6348 6349 6350 6351 6352 6353 6354 6355 6356 6357 6358 6359 6360 6361 6362 6363 6364 6365 6366

UNIT SCHEDULE

TYPE 3BR 3BR 3BR 3BR 3BR 3BR 3BR 3BR 3BR 3BR 3BR 3BR 3BR 3BR 4BR 3BR 4BR 3BR 4BR 3BR 4BR 3BR 4BR

NOTES

ADDRESS 6367 6368 6369 6370 6371 6372 6373 6374 6375 6376 6377 6378 6379 6380 6381 6382 6383 6384 6385 6386 6388 6390 6392

BUILDING TYPE

TYPE 3BR 4BR 3BR 3BR 3BR 3BR 3BR 3BR 3BR 3BR 3BR 2BR 3BR 2BR 3BR 2BR 3BR 2BR 3BR 2BR 2BR 2BR 2BR

NOTES

"CC"

COMMUNITY CENTER

"A"

1 BEDROOM RESIDENTIAL UNITS

"B"

2 BEDROOM RESIDENTIAL UNITS

"C"

3 BEDROOM RESIDENTIAL UNITS x4

"D"

3 BEDROOM RESIDENTIAL UNITS x6

"E"

4 BEDROOM RESIDENTIAL UNITS

NOTES: 1. * DENOTES LOCATION OF DWELLING UNIT(S) IN COMPLIANCE WITH UAFS (UNIFORM FEDERAL ACCESSIBILITY STANDARDS) AND ICC/ANSI A117.1-2009 2. 8% (12 TOTAL UNITS) TO BE PROVIDED. 3. REFERENCE PACKAGE 01 FOR LANDSCAPING NOT SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING SET.

EARLY PLACEMENT VALIDATION WITH POINT CLOUD CONTEXT

NO ACCESSIBLE UNITS IN THIS BUILDING

16 61 10 61

6174

6180

P TY

P TY

EB

02 61

6182

EB

04 61

6178 01 61

6312

6310

6316

6314

6320

6318

6184

P TY

06 61

6188

TYPE A

03 61

6190

6186

08 61

B

20 61

12 61

6192

11 61

E

18 61 22 61

14 61

6172

6176

13 61

6170

09 61

TYPE A

07 61

TY P

6158

6160

24 61

30 61

TYPE A

6308

TYPE D

B/ PE TY LINIC C

EC

15 61

6306

6324

63 44

28 61

P TY

6304

6326

63 46

26 61

17 61

05 61

63 42

32 61

38 61

6302

6328

6322

63 48

27 61

C

C

EXISTING CLINIC IN UNITS 6114 AND 6116 (NOT IN SCOPE)

25 61

6350

19 61

D

63 40

21 61

E

6352

TYPE

63 36 63 38

6354

ED

P TY

TYPE

63 34

6356

TY P

23 61

31 61

LAUNDRY PAINT EXISTING EXTERIOR PT-10

E

63 32

TYPE D

61 37

29 61

E

61 39

TYPE D

35 61

63 30

61 41

6191

33 61

TY P

63 60

61 43

6189

TYPE D

63 58

EB

61 45

6187

COMMUNITY CENTER "CC"

6313

63 64

P TY

61 47

6185

6301

6311

E

63 66

EB

6181

6309

63 62

P TY

6183

6307

6374

E

EB

36 61

6351

6353

6149

6305

TY P

6151

34 61

6179

6303

63 68

P TY

6153

6355

6376

6370

6155

6177

TYPE D

6372

6142 TYPE C

40 61

TYPE C

6347

6380

6349

6382

6378

6146 6144

61 57

6173

6357

6384

61 59

6175

6359

TYPE D C

6148

6156

6363

TYPE B

61 63

TYPE C

6361

NO ACCESSIBLE UNITS IN THIS BUILDING

61 65

TYPE

EB

6152

6385

TY P

61 61

6154

6365

EB

61 67

6150

61 71

TYPE D

6383

TYPE B

61 69

6367

6369

6373

6371

6381

6388

6386

6377

6379

6375

6390

6392

TY P

TYPE D

TYPE C

EB

NO ACCESSIBLE UNITS IN THIS BUILDING

< AERIAL COMPOSITE - JUNE 4, 2018

ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN

SITE PLAN

END

SELECTED WORKS 2020