The City as a University by pantarheicollaborative

The City as a University

PANTA RHEI COLLABORATIVE

FLOATING UNIVERSITY BERLIN

Berlin 01/10 – 03/10 2021

THE CITY AS A UNIVERSITY

The pandemic has further emphasised the ongoing crisis of the commons a valuable right that has been under threat for some time from the forces of capitalist urbanization. Offering alternatives to the public spaces we have been deprived of already before the pandemic, David Harvey brings to light the important role of education, alongside health and social care, as the few readily available public goods that still allow people to exercise their right to the commons. “Public education becomes a common when social forces appropriate, protect, and enhance it for mutual benefit.” He continues to state that “as neoliberal politics diminishes the financing of public goods, so it diminishes the available common, forcing social groups to find other ways to support that common (education, for example).”1 Despite this, our fundamental right to education has diminished. The commercial rhetoric in universities across the Global North has transformed higher education into a commodity where “every student is a customer, every professor is an entrepreneur, and every institution is seen as a seeker of profit”2, and there is no better example to demonstrate this than through studying Architecture.

But how has the pandemic affected this perception of a course of studies that requires students to spend on average 1000 Euros annually on printing and models alone?3 With reduced access to institutions’ facilities, even the wealthy have struggled to justify such an expensive road to becoming an architect. This has offered an opportunity to rethink the notion of the commons as a truly accessible pedagogical space. What could we learn if we look beyond the institution allowing the City to become our University? Harvey goes on to explain that if public goods become a “mere vehicle for private accumulation... and if the state withdraws from their provision” it is up to populations “to self-organise to provide their own commons.”4 By shifting attention from institutionalised forms of teaching, there is the opportunity to focus instead on open-ended forms of learning that emphasise process over product.

Endnotes 1 David Harvey: Rebel Cities: From the Right to the City to the Urban Revolution, Verso, London 2012, p73. 2 David Kirk: Shakespeare, Einstein,and the Bottom Line: The Marketing of Higher Education, Harvard, 2004 3 Ella Jessel: “Student Survey: “Only the rich need apply to study architecture”, Architect’s Journal (25/07/2018) [Accessed 23/05/2021] 4 Harvey, Rebel Cities, p87.

WE NEED TO READ OUR COMMONS DIFFERENTLY

We ran an experimental workshop as part of the Floating University 2021 Free Radicals Programme from Friday 1st October to Sunday 3rd October to test this radical pedagogy. The workshop used Berlin as its laboratory, through several walking tours exploring three districts: Wedding/Gesundbrunnen, Schöneberg and Neukölln. We visited localised initiatives and sites of collective selfgovernance, witnessed places of stark contrasts between cultures and came across radical typologies for new learning environments. The group was comprised of 20 participants from all over Europe and beyond, each bringing with them a variety of tools and a unique perspective and cultural background. Over the three days we walked, cycled, talked, debated, worked, ate and laughed together. We all had something to learn from one another, and we were equals in opinion and position, meaning that every person’s word was as valid and important as the other’s. But most importantly, we enjoyed one another’s company and forged friendships and connections that will last. 7

THE COMMONS

REDEFINING THE COMMONS

The average Western European population spends 90 percent of their life time indoors. Most evidently, the other 10 percent become even more so important. During the pandemic, we witnessed record heights in private equity, that immediately appeared in renders promising a lively re-occupation of the deserted streets. Yet the reality was a landscape populated by those not fortunate enough to find shelter indoors, whilst the pandemic kept us apart. Fluctuating capital, the rush to metropolitan zones and more than one and a half years without public programmes for cultural workers, have all deepened the ongoing crises of the 10 percent of life that happens outside our four walls. Some have fled to the seemingly unquantifiable realm of our virtual Common, whereas its controlling platforms originate from the same drive for profit as their concrete pendants in the capitals of the world. Ubiquitously affected by the climate emergency, spatial planners are in need to find rapid solutions for our physical and virtual Commons. We turned to ask young practitioners: what kind of actions in the built environments of today, demonstrate a resistance to those forces that so fervently try to restrict our access to free space?

“Can we create spaces of resilience and resolution?”

“What can we learn from the freely reachable urban environments that we inhabit, especially the ones formed by users?”

“How can we enable spatial practice that goes beyond binary correlations?” 11

The Grove Skatepark

The Grove Tavern and its accompanying overgrown carpark had remained derelict for the better part of eight years. During the first lockdown at the beginning of the pandemic, a group of skateboarders decided to take over this abandoned and forgotten space, to transform it into a DIY skatepark and community project in South East London. As a community began to grow around the site, the landowners ordered its demolition and destruction despite the dormant and stagnant nature of the development proceedings around it. In response to this power play from the orchestrating hands of private ownership, the community gathered over 3000 signatures to save the skatepark. The Grove DIY is now a beacon of resistance and opposition to the forces of economic development - “common land occupied and reclaimed from the wasteful logic of capital.” 12

Photographs taken by Charlie Edmonds. Charlie Edmonds is a designer and researcher, whose guiding focus is to explore novel methods through which architecture and urban design may contribute to social programs and combat inequality. He co-launched Future Architects’ Front, a group campaigning to end exploitation of UK’s architectural assistants.

“More and more in London, common land is land occupied and reclaimed from the wasteful logic of capital.” – Charlie Edmonds

“Sheffield is changing rapidly, with overseas investment and mass privatisation of public space. On the ground, grassroots organisations are responding to exactly what people need. The city needs space to dance, play, eat and create. The following initiatives have been contributing to a more equitable and accessible Sheffield and in doing so they are keeping the city’s soul intact.”

Sheffield

“The city needs space to dance, play, eat and create.”

– MatriArch

“MatriArch is a feminist collective and campaign group working to challenge the rhetoric that practicing and studying architecture must be an arduous, isolating and gruelling pursuit. MatriArch regards change within the architecture profession as an imperative not just for greater equity, but because our built environments demand a better, more reflexive architecture profession.”

Top left: Algorave at the DINA club, © StayHappening. Bottom left: FoodHall, © ReNew Sheffield. Top right: Bakk Heia takeover at Gut Level, © Gut Level. Bottom right: © SheffieldToolLibrary.

PRC: Is there something that we can directly learn from in today’s changing urban environments? JS: In many cities, the pandemic lockdowns exposed how little public space really exists. Increasingly, the “civic realm” is only imagined as an environment of consumption (shops and restaurants). You have to buy something to be there. When all commerce was closed, the city became ghostly empty. I would like to imagine that even during isolation and separation, our cities do not become prisons, but can have visible and active public space. PRC: Have there been initiatives that are worth investigating? Where should we focus our attention? JS: We should focus our attention on COP26 in Glasgow. This is one of our last chances as a species to make the change needed to survive this century.

Greenwich Peninsula This part of London is the epitome of top-down, corporate urbanism. Towers of glass and steel, interspersed with carparks, four lane roads and shopping malls, define the built lansdcape. This approach to fabricating ‘new neighbourhoods’ with exclusive luxury residences for the rich served by commercial hubs, is merely a veil for economic profit and growth. It is only appropriate that the new adjacent Design District will act as a playground of consumption for another type of customer: the Architect. These models and scale of development must be left behind if we wish to preserve our planet. Photos by PRC. 16

“We should focus our attention on COP26 in Glasgow. This is one of our last chances as a species to make the change needed to survive this century.” – Jack Self Jack Self is an architect and writer based in London. He is Director of the REAL foundation and Editor-in-Chief of the Real Review. 17

Before the workshop, we asked each participant to send us a brief text and visual input relating to their place of residence. We asked them to describe what it has that makes it uncanny or inspiring to them and others; whether it relies on unusual methods of inclusive spatial practice or demonstrates that potential. Excerpts from these conditions are presented alongside their process throughout the workshop. We encouraged participants to develop critical positions on key issues and access situations that were present in these areas, relating to the notion of the commons. The participants approached their positions with regards to four lenses: the social, cultural, ecological and/or economic.

PROCESS

CONDITION

neukölln 1

HERMANNPLATZ

KINDL-AREAL

Sonnenallee U

Karl-MarxStraße

RICHARDPLATZ

St. Thomas-Kirchhof II

Hermannstrasse U

3 Thomashöhe

Körnerpark

“What if the Karstadt building becomes itself a projection surface, mirroring the subtle contestations for attention on the ground?”

hermannplatz

“On our tour through Neukölln we discovered that Hermannplatz is not only a highly frequented space of public transit but furthermore a highly contested space of subtle political messages. A condition which we later came to characterise as “attention arena” where common surfaces of lamp posts, handrails, electrical panels and physical objects such as statues became carriers and mediums of protest and propaganda.”

“Confronted with this over-saturation of attention-seeking messages, we were perplexed by our observation that the facade of the Karstadt building stood in stark contrast to the messy and layered condition of Hermannplatz. Its glassed surface is smooth and reflective, it’s appearance sterile and repellent, yet the building is so present, not only in its physical mass, but also in the public imagination as landmark and historic building reminiscent of the great infrastructure projects of the 1920’s.” 24

istanbul “The very existence of this city, always in the middle of a crisis, is enough to prove that all can be transformed, adjusted, (re)used, included.” Photo: Helin Can. Sirkeci, Istanbul. 2020.

Every summer, I go back to being a temporary resident of Istanbul. The very city that I so willingly have ran away from, always accepts me back one way or another. Not that it has some kind of an affinity towards me, this is a city that leaves no room for exclusion. There’s no space left here, it’s filled to it’s maximum, yet it continues accumulating more people, adding always more to everything. What Istanbul does at this point is generating problems: pushing its hostility even further. This is what pushes us to come up with spatial solutions: the very fullness, lack of space, the feeling that you’re exposed with no shelter. Then you form communities, build Gecekondu’s, hang up clothes you’re selling on ropes spanning from one building to the other, cover already existing buildings with more and more cultural & historical layers, add information. The multiplicity of Istanbul comes from the abundance of different people living together, with different issues and solutions. The very existence of this city, always in the middle of a crisis, is enough to prove that all can be transformed, adjusted, (re)used, included.

– Helin Can

“cemeteries present a radical typology which proves exceptionally stable and unstable to external forces.” – Pascal Müller

berlin 25

hermannplatz

“As subject of hot debates around gentrification it dominates the conception of Hermannplatz and the surrounding Kiez. The ways that actors claim the building today are manifold but diffused and often opposed; in such a way that all parties drift away from a common ground.” “This is an attempt to democratize the building’s facade – so to invite people to become part of the scene not only by consuming inside but by seeing, recognising and discussing it from outside. We imagine a type of commons that triggers more meaningful discussions (yes, that also means discussions that are painful for some) and that sparks public fantasies – just as the guerrilla knitting artefact does on the micro scale at Hermannplatz.”

hallway leading to nowhere. To the left a door alike – its only difference: its locked. (?) To the right, the arc is sealed with a thin layer of glass, inhibiting an unconscious step on to the floor made up by glass blocks, flanked by a mirror, guiding down the light of a roof top window to the spaces beneath. Th These situations are perceived more as an interlock or an extension than a cut-off of the by the roof’s inclination already limited, util spaces. They contribute profoundly to the intimate atmosphere; I perceive, whenever I am there.

sao pedro do estoril

“The uncanny space is found in the midst of the apartment, two arching openings flanking the hallway leading to nowhere.” Albert Papenhausen Fuster

– Albert Fuster

kindl areal

“A place of tensions – aggressive development versus ad-hoc resistance. Chaotic diversity versus ordered mono-culture.”

“Sharing space is a popular idea in urban design, people use this concept to compose an ideal space that could be common heaven for people of different backgrounds, or even creatures. But can this kind of space bring these beings closer together or push them further apart?”

“Starting with the plants, following their locations and diverse species, a strong contrast appears between the two sharing spaces – they already speak for us. The openminded idea of a community garden brings together plants but also people, who come here for a meeting place without stress. By contrast, the well-designed beer garden that chose to plant only one species of tree also suggests a privatised monoculture. The awkward meeting of two diametrically opposed shared spaces in front of the museum aggravates the chaos of the surrounding environment. Can we do anything for them? No, probably just accept and share the chaos.” 32

“Imagining a walk that welcomes curiosity, sharing this new habitat in the city and allowing cohabitation and coesistence of all sorts.” – Hanna Lindenberg

lausanne “In-between the underground passage for the metro becomes the weak link to bring the people together.” – Xinyi Xiang

milan 33

“It is better that the youth squats houses, than for them to own flats!”

richardplatz

“How can we turn Richardplatz into a space of communication and connection? The duality of inhabitants of Neukölln caused by gentrification, created a threshold in-between Karl-Marx Platz and Böhmischer Platz. We used Richardplatz as a tool to communicate differences and needs in order to find common ground.”

unusual methods in inclusive spacial practice?

“A two week long, free of charge music festival all over the city, that not only allowed young artists to perform but also gave tourists the opportunity to become part of a community.” A City in between mountains with such breathtaking nature as Innsbruck’s, at-

W e wa n t t o f i n d way s t o s o lv e t h i s p r o b l e m by i n v e s t i g at i n g l o c a l i s e d i n i t i at i v e s

tracts tourists all over the year, but every summer Innsbruck becomes a place

t h a t u n i t e t h e s t r a n g e r w i t h t h e c i t y. W e a l l w a n t t o l i v e g l o b a l l y a n d n e e d t o

of the placeless. A huge part of the city identity goes missing for three months.

s ta r t t o c o n v e r t t e m p o r a r y s tay s i n t o s u s ta i n a b l e s y n e r g i e s .

A p p r o x i m at e ly 3 0 , 0 0 0 p e o p l e w h o s p r e a d m o v e m e n t, c r e at i v i t y a n d v e r v e d i s a p p e a r f r o m t h e c i t y s c a p e . W h i l e w a l k i n g t h r o u g h t h e c i t y o n e b a r e ly r e c o g n i s e s

T h i s s u m m e r t h e c i t y o f I n n s b r u c k f u n d e d “ A l l e s G u t e F e s t i v a l” , a t w o w e e k l o n g

f a m i l i a r f a c e s , I n n s b r u c k s s t u d e n t s l e f t t h e c i t y. T h e i r v o i d i s f i l l e d w i t h v i s i -

f r e e o f c h a r g e m u s i c f e s t i v a l a l l o v e r t h e c i t y, t h a t n o t o n l y a l l o w e d y o u n g

t o r s , w h o s tay o n ly f o r a s h o r t t i m e a n d w h o ’ s p a r t i n t h e c i t y i s n o t t o g i v e , b u t

artists to perform but also gave tourists the opportunity to become part of a

t o c o n s u m e . I t ’ s h a r d f o r t h e m t o r e a l ly i n t e g r at e a n d t r a n s f o r m t h e c i t y i n t o

c o m m u n i t y.

s o m e t h i n g n e w.

– Louisa Sommer, Selina Wach

innsbruck

Selina Wach, Louisa Sommer

schöneberg 1

NOLLENDORFKIEZ

PALLASSEUM

ROTE INSEL U

1 Bülowstrasse U

Winterfeldtplatz

Heinrich-vonKleist-Park

Schöneberger Wiese

Park am Gleisdreieck

3 Yorckstrasse S

Alter St.-Matthäus Kirchhof

gleisdreieck park

“An (un) functional park... but a safe space for whom?”

“Walking through Schöneberg, an archipelago of safe islands, the Park am Gleisdreieck is one of the most publicly accessible. Passively observing, we found any function one would expect from a public park: space for recreation and leisure, sport facilities, playgrounds, a tailored experience of wilderness.”

home “what makes a place uncanny is when it makes you feel like home – when it makes you feel like you are part of it and you belong there.” ‚The cats I have met’ Kinga, 6years old, 2021 crayons on stick notes

– Anna Szczepaniak

“With minimum berlin intervention to the (infra/supra)structure of the street, this urban negative could be overtly turned around into space positive.” – Anjiang Xu 43

gleisdreieck park 45

karlsruhe

karlsruhe “The open space is a stage for the most colorful actors, a space of possibilities and open to every idea.” The open space is a stage for the most colorful actors, a space of possibilities and open to every idea. And there are people with ingenuity filling them with life. I was most inspired by the security officer of the castle who, before closing the museum, puts a few chairs outside, so that a group of cellists can fill the surroundings with their music pieces. Things like this can be found in the most hidden locations all around the city. The city creates spaces where people can share their knowledge, enthusiasm and ideas and inspire each other. This symbiosis is an enrichment for the city and the people.

– Lena Schenek

“PLATZProjekt is shaped by individual appropriation and the conversion into an experimental area where alternative use of space and financing approaches are being tested and developed.” – Sophie Kalwa

hannover

PLATZPROJEKT The former industrial site of „PLATZProjekt“ is shaped

gleisdreieck park

“Nevertheless something was off. After passing the filter of glamorous, expensive houses, we arrived in a park that seemed as if it has an anti-adhesive coating. The space appeared neat and orderly composed and the functions well separated by physical, subconscious or social borders, preventing any friction and unwelcome use. Can this island of curated appropriation, where little unexpected happens, be called apolitical? And for whom is this park a safe space?”

“Wherever Stuttgart encounters its voids it stuttgart exerts a strong pull and fills them with dedication. These voids teach people to grow food in car parks and share in between tram tracks.” – Catherine Greiner

“a compound of different cultural and social backgrounds living haag an der amper there, correlating with a disconnected community, is what makes it uncanny” Home

Returning to my childhood home

during covid is a opportunity to be able to reflect on my former safe haven.

The now 25 year old project,

started as a collective cooperative community, where children enjoyed

car-free outdoors and parents,

from a more or less homogeneous white background, shared duties and spare time.

While growing up this utopia fragmented itself with the disperse

of shared realities. Surveying now a compound of different cultural and

– Vitus Michel

social backgrounds living there,

correlating with a disconnected community,

what

makes

uncanny for me. > image taken from: https:// clickamericana.com/topics/ home-garden/look-whats-happening-to-prefabs-1958 last seen on 30th of August 2021

wedding /gesundbrunnen 1

NETTELBECKPLATZ

EX ROTAPRINT

BBK KULTURWERK

Park a Brunn Schultrasse

Leopoldplatz

Max-JosefMetzger-Platz

Osloer Strasse

am nenplatz

Badstrasse

Gesundbrunnen U

Flakturm III Humboldthain

bbk kulturwerk

“An artistic institution, not Bildhauerwerkstatt Bildhauerwerkstatt Kulturwerk desintroverted. bbk berlin GmbH publicised, Kulturwerk des bbk berlin GmbH Aimed at

a bourgeois public, a closed circle of people, artists – this is the Bildhauerwerkstatt Kulturwerk.” Bildhauerwerkstatt Kulturwerk des bbk berlin GmbH A womb for art was I, but yours not. A costant pain afflicts my spaces. “Things will change, today”.

“A multi-ethnic complex neighbourhood, rich in difference. Swarmed by speculative investment, segregation and gentrification – this is Wedding.

A womb for art was I, but yours not. A costant pain afflicts my spaces. “ThingsAwill change, today”. womb for art was I, but yours not. A costant pain afflicts my spaces. “Things will change, today”.

Köthener Straße 44, 10963 Berlin

A ritual, an action, a public announcement. An information, a provocation, a denunciation – this is Laudatio Funebris. Köthener Straße 44, Köthener Straße 44, 10963 Berlin 10963 Berlin

The BBK and the people of Wedding share the former, deliberately estranged from the latter; in the same portion of the city, yet never coming into contact.

Laudatio Funebris is a public celebration of the presumed death of the classical art institution, which professes to be public. It has as its sole purpose the genesis of reactions which might, who knows, lead to some change and question about the role of the institution.”

“Informal living as a solution. What about the informal university?” – Riccardo Bettini

durrës “Incessant additions to every place, public, private; of temporary fragments of space and life. With taste.” – Edoardo Quattrucci

reggio calabria

nettelbeckplatz

“Would you like a seat ? Let’s play. Have you heard of the musical chair? Well this time, it’s not all about music, dance, and laughter. The rules are different; the chairs are different; the elimination process is different. Some seats are clean; others, dirty. Some seats are fixed and stiff; others, flexible and comfortable. Some seats are publicly accessible; others, privately commodified. This time, it’s about (urban) agencies, money, and sociocultural belongings. You might start with an advantage. or maybe a disadvantage. Still want to play? Then, let’s start.”

“What makes my place(s) of residence uncanny is not the spatial qualities per se, but my relation to that place” – Jennifer Jiang

1 unprecedented year; 7 more or less comfortable beds; 3 cities across the waters; 9 kind souls to share meals together. all were places of residence to me, just some more than others. What makes my place(s) of residence uncanny is not the spatial qualities per se, but my relation to that place(s), to which I hold different senses of belonging. Today, I walked the nth street of my new place, meandering through my own walking tour. My Kiez since 32 hours ago. Just got back inside on this rainy day, ready to unpack my things and make it my place of residence— of belonging. 30.08.2021

home “Minibar is itself a public resistance, not through political events or demos, but through how people occupy the street” Jennifer Jiang, The CIty as a University

– Burçu Ates

ankara

nettelbeckplatz

“What does consumption look like? How does it inhabit and effect public space? A park bench top is a depository for empty glass bottles; metal grates an organised home for rusting bottle caps; a scooter thrown flat on it side a sign of a journey to the square. Nettelbeckplatz is a visual depository for fleeting moments of human activity.

“What is interesting for me in Wedding is its minor communities. In our trip to the neighborhood, a Romanian community caught my attention, occupying a bench which was facing a Spätkauf, that was separated from Nettelbeckplatz by a green buffer. The Spätkauf saleswoman told us they are living further away but they spend most of their time here. They chose here, because they felt most comfortable! This observation may trigger the question of future gentrification in Wedding – how will this affect the minor communities present? Will they still feel comfortable? Is there a way that they can be involved in the future development of the neighborhood?” 

Across borders and thresholds there are signs of resistance – an effort to expand or contract the commons – the public square is extended by breaking through the facade of a vacant building; the public square is reduced by lining the edge with private seating. These thresholds manipulate the commons to suit varying forms and ideals of consumption.” 

“A quay considered as a resource and not a deficit, collectively reimagined through sensitive inhabitation. ” – Ailbhe Cunningham

cork “What I like about both of the cities is that they are both chaotic and resilient in facing the rules – Mashid Balazadeh of a city.”

tehran/berlin

EXCHANGE

After having identified their positions, we worked with the participants to explore and experiment with alternative media to convey their points of view. The complexity of reaching solutions in such a small time frame was quickly revealed. Yet, with no pre-determined end goals in mind – and due to the open-ended nature of the working process – participants turned to varied forms of communication to attempt to convey critical points of view in new ways. Each participant brought unique skills and perspectives due to their diverse backgrounds, and so everyone’s input was as valuable as the other’s, contributing to a shared voice within the discussions. By bridging conversations and punctually instigating speaking times within the group, we aimed to balance voices to be heard, whether in agreement or in contrast.

DISCUSSION AS PRACTICE

The investigations from the preceding days culminated in a presentation and discussion of each response, joined by Angelika Hinterbrandner and Dimitra Andritsou, whose experience as practitioners working at the intersection of several fields of research and practice – and as citizens of Berlin – provided valuable input into understanding the next steps towards implementing change within social, political, spatial or cultural frameworks, to address the issues that were raised through the projects. How can the lessons learnt from these past few days in Berlin be applied to other urban contexts around the globe? What measures can be explored by scaling? How can we reclaim the common spaces that we have a right to occupy? These are all questions that emerged from the discussions had around and about the key themes explored during the workshop. Having excercised a degree of agency in posing these questions, this paves the way to adopt certain sensibilities within the design process. The Commons of Berlin and around the world teach us the necessity of struggle for a shared future. After these three days, the group proved that by collectivising in the very Now, this future can be more than the propagated dead-end.

“How can the lessons learnt be applied to other urban contexts?”

“What measures can be explored by scaling?”

“How can we reclaim the common spaces that we have a right to occupy?” 69

LIST OF PARTICIPANTS

SPECIAL THANKS TO

Helin Can Sophie Kalwa Mashid Balazadeh Riccardo Bettini Xinyi Xiang Anna Szczepaniak Yannick Schulze Vitus Michel Ailbhe Cunningham Anjiang Xu Zoë Brennan Edoardo Quattrucci Albert Fuster Catherine Greiner Jennifer Jiang Hanna Lindenberg-Kappmeyer Pascal Müller Louisa Sommer Selina Wach Burçu Ates Lena Schenek

Floating University Sarah Bovelett Jeanne Astrup-Chauvaux Felix Wierschbitzki

WORKSHOP PHOTOGRAPHY BY Sophie Kalwa Mashid Balazadeh Xinyi Xiang Anna Szczepaniak Ailbhe Cunningham Anjiang Xu Catherine Greiner Jennifer Jiang Lena Schenek Nico Edwards Panta Rhei Collaborative PRC TEAM Bene Wahlbrink Eugenio Cappuccio Julius Grambow 82

Sto-stiftung Sebastian Röcher Tecklenborg Verlag Brigitte Tecklenborg Practitioners and guests Angelika Hinterbrandner Dimitra Andritsou Niloufar Tajeri Jack Self Charlie Edmonds MatriArch Kindl Areal Peter Hübert bbk Berlin Jan Maruhn Habibi, U Südstern