Friday, 23 October, 2020 I 5 Rabi-ul-Awwal, 1442 I Rs 15.00 I Vol XI No 114 I 12 Pages I Islamabad Edition
Centre rejeCts Claim of forCing sindh govt to arrest safdar
ISLAMABAD/KARACHI staff report
a
MId growing calls urging the Supreme Court (SC) to take suo motu notice of purported manhandling of Sindh police chief, the federal government on Thursday rejected Sindh chief minister’s claim of receiving threat of dismissal of the provincial government in case of failure in the lodging police case against Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) leader Captain (r) Safdar Awan. Addressing a session of the provincial assembly on Wednesday, Sindh Chief Minister Murad Ali Shah had said, “A federal minister gave me an ultimatum that if an FIR [First Information Report] was not registered [against Awan], the Sindh government will face consequences.” Karachi police had arrested Awan from his hotel room early Monday morning for slogan-mongering inside the mausoleum of Quaid-e-Azam Muhammad Ali Jinnah. Later in the day, claims of “kidnapping” of the provincial police chief Mushtaq Mahar to pressure the force into arresting Awan had emerged. Amid controversy and mystery surrounding the arrest, the following day, Chief of Army Staff (COAS) General Qamar Javed Bajwa, while taking notice of the incident, ordered an immediate inquiry into
the incident. Addressing a press conference, Minister for Information and Broadcast Senator Shibli Faraz “condemned” the “lie peddled” by Shah. “They [Sindh government] are mentally distressed by the [lukewarm] public response offered to their rallies,” said Faraz, who was flanked by Adviser to Prime Minister on Accountability and Interior Mirza Shahzad Akbar. The Sindh government was trying to hide its “incompetency and corruption” through the incident, Akbar said. “The video footage of the incident shows Safdar sitting in the police car very comfortably,” the minister said, highlighting that it was “evident” that there was no element of force in the arrest. When asked if the Pakistan Tehreek-eInsaf (PTI) lawmakers in the province were involved in the process, Akbar said they were involved in the filing of the police case against the PML-N leader. Akbar, while narrating the incident as it occurred, said: “A few days ago, a ruckus was observed at the Mazar [of Jinnah].” “First, there was a ruckus. Afterward, some people from Karachi, including PTI workers, gave an application at a police station to file an FIR,” he added. He explained under the established procedure, police receive an application and then report it. He added that police
Coronavirus in
Pakistan
CONFIRMED CASES:
325,480
LAST UPDATED AT 7:19 AM ON OCTOBER 22, 2020
DAY'S DEATH TOLL:
10
RECOVERED:
NEW CASES:
736
DEATHS:
309,136 6,702 SINDH:
PUNJAB:
142,641
102,107
KP:
BALOCHISTAN:
AJK/GB:
ISLAMABAD:
38,810
15,738
3,639/4,107 18,438
officials develop an opinion, take a legal view, and thereafter register an FIR. “PTI’s total role in all this was that we gave an application. The laws that were [allegedly] violated were written down and a written application was given that action should be taken,” said the adviser. Akbar aide said that after this process, “everyone’s role finished” and the role of the Sindh government started. “After we woke up in the morning, we saw that an FIR had been registered at night and Safdar Awan was arrested,” Akbar claimed. He also added that the claims of police breaking into the hotel room still needs to be investigated. “The thing that came forward in camera footage was that Safdar Awan was seen leaving the hotel in the front seat of a Sindh Police vehicle,” Akbar said. He reiterated that it was clearly Sindh Police that arrested the PML-N leader. The PM’s aide also said he disagreed with the arrest, saying there was no point for it as Awan’s crime was a “bailable offense”. “Everyone knows where Sindh Police gets its directives from,” he said. He also added that the Sindh CM should disclose which federal minister called him and threatened to end his government. SBC CALLS FOR SUO MOTU NOTICE OF INCIDENT: The Sindh Bar Council (SBC) on Thursday joined opposition leaders in urging the Supreme Court to take suo motu notice of the incident to address the implications the situation poses for the rule of law and constitutionalism in the country. In a resolution, the body said it was “shocked” at reports of Mahar allegedly being abducted from his residence “by Rangers/agencies” and forced to issue orders for the arrest of [the] Pakistan Muslim League (Nawaz) leader Mohammad Safdar. “Till now, this report has not been contradicted by the relevant authority and has been tacitly confirmed by the Sindh government,” it said, adding the leave applications submitted by dozens of senior police officers over the demoralisation of the force due to this incident was a sign of “complete breakdown of the rule of law and an undeclared martial law.”
CONTINUED ON PAGE 05
Security agencies directly take orders from PM: Abbasi on Safdar’s arrest ISLAMABAD staff report
While the controversy and mystery surrounding the arrest of Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) Vice President Maryam Nawaz’s husband is nowhere near settling down, former prime minister and party leader Shahid Khaqan Abbasi on Thursday said security agencies take their orders from the prime minister, implying the involvement of the highest office in the incident. Speaking to media in Islamabad, Abbasi observed the institutions such as the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) and Rangers take their orders directly from the premier, saying the ultimate responsibility of the whole incident falls on Prime Minister Imran Khan. “Both the institutions, the ISI and Rangers, directly report to the premier. Someone gave them instructions and that person can only be the prime minister. No one else can do that. The officials of these institutions take their orders from the country’s premier,” he said. Karachi police had Karachi Police arrested Awan early Monday morning for slogan-mongering inside the mausoleum of Quaid-eAzam Muhammad Ali Jinnah which — according to Quaid-e-
FO rejects claims of Saudi vote against Pakistan in FATF ISLAMABAD staff report
The Foreign Office (FO) on Thursday rejected as “false” the Indian media reports claiming Saudi Arabia voted against Pakistan during the ongoing plenary of the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) which is being held virtually to decide, among other things the economic fate of the country. Addressing his weekly press briefing, FO spokesperson Zahid Hafeez Chaudhri “categorically rejected the story circulating on a segment of the media as false and baseless”, according to a press release. Earlier in the day, Azhar Mashwani, Punjab chief minister’s focal person for digital media, tweeted that report of Saudi voting against Pakistan during the full-scale review meeting was fake news and that the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MoFA) would issue a statement on this. “Pakistan and Saudi Arabia enjoy strong fraternal ties and the two countries have always cooperated with each other on all matters of bilateral, regional and international importance,” said the FO statement. “Pakistan greatly values its relations with […] brotherly Saudi
Arabia and firmly rejects such malicious propaganda.” A virtual meeting of the global watchdog will decide if Pakistan should be excluded from the grey list, based on a review of Islamabad’s performance to meet global commitments and standards on the fight against money laundering and terror financing. The Asia-Pacific Group (APG) of the body, in its first follow-up report (FUR) on the mutual evaluation of Pakistan earlier this month, had shown the country “improving” its full compliance on two of
the 40 FATF recommendations. However, the APG report would have “no immediate bearing” on the on-going review. The FATF plenary was earlier scheduled in June but Islamabad got an unexpected breather after the global watchdog against financial crimes temporarily postponed all mutual evaluations and follow-up deadlines in the wake of grave health risk following the Covid-19 pandemic. The Paris-based agency also put a general pause in the review process, thus giving additional four months to Pakistan to meet the requirements. The plenary had formally placed Pakistan in the grey list in June 2018 due to “strategic deficiencies” in its anti-money laundering, combating financing terror (AML/CFT) regime after a push from India supported by the United States, the United Kingdom, and some European countries. The body will examine if the country had demonstrated remedial actions and sanctions applied in cases of AML/CFT violations, relating to terrorist financing (TF) risk management and TFS (terror financing sanctions) obligations.
CONTINUED ON PAGE 05
Azam’s Mazar (Protection and Maintenance) Ordinance, 1971, governing the premises — is punishable by “imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years, or a fine, or both”. Later in the day, claims of “kidnapping” of the provincial police chief to pressure the force into arresting Awan emerged. The following day, Chief of Army Staff (COAS) General Qamar Javed Bajwa, while taking notice of the incident, ordered an immediate inquiry into the incident. “This is the reality behind this incident [and] this is the reality that the country’s premier gave the order to violate the sanctity of the chaddor and char dewari,” Abbasi said, adding that giving such an order was unlawful. “These matters are very serious. The Constitution was violated, the authority of the province was challenged and the province’s top officer was kidnapped. These are not small matters [and] all things go back to the premier’s office,” he added “The premier will have to give an answer. Please read the oath you took when you assumed office. Not only did you break your own oath, you also directed other officials to break their own oaths.”
CONTINUED ON PAGE 05
more inside
Safdar’s arrest: PML-N leader raises questions over PPP’s shifting of blame STORY ON PAGE 02
Bilawal launches GB campaign with harsh criticism of PTI’s governance STORY ON PAGE 03
NAB approves another graft reference against Nawaz Sharif STORY ON PAGE 03
Accountability courts ordered to hear cases daily and without adjournments
STORY ON PAGE 03