E-Paper PDF 30th December (ISB)

Page 1

CMYK

Monday, 30 December, 2019 I 2 Jamadi-ul-Awwal, 1441 I Rs 19.00 I Vol X No 180 I 60 Pages I Islamabad Edition

NAB lAw AmeNded for ‘effective’ AccouNtABility, sAys Pm's Aide g

g

Shahzad akbar claimS amendmentS won’t help govt, allieS, termS them attempt to ‘Strengthen’ inStitutionS SayS in a caSe of power abuSe, nab will only act when there’S perSonal monetary benefit attached ISLAMABAD

A

STAFF REPORT

s the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) faces a volley of criticism from the opposition parties and analysts for promulgating a controversial National Accountability Bureau (NAB) Amendment Ordinance 2019, the two government ministers on sunday held a press conference to assuage the concerns expressed about the newly-approved law. special Assistant to Prime Minister on Accountability shahzad Akbar, flanked by Communication Minister Murad saeed, said the amendment in the NAB law would not benefit the sitting ministers and termed it a move to “strengthen institutions”. The ordinance had come under vehement criticism, being dubbed as NRO-Plus by the opposition lawmakers, who alleged that the ordinance would facilitate Prime Minister Imran Khan, his ministers and ‘friends’ to save their skins. It was also challenged in the courts. Interestingly, the ordinance that highlighted the news on Friday — the day it was approved by the federal cabinet– was devoid of many of its clauses when it was issued by the Law Ministry with a new title ‘Revised Updated NAB Ordinance’ on saturday. The revised ordinance didn’t restrict NAB from taking up cases involving corruption or

g

g

akbar SayS nab lawS regarding bail and remand are not changed; tax evaSion will be dealt by fbr

SayS if ordinary perSon haS diSproportionate aSSetS, he will be probed by fbr, while nab will inveStigate govt officialS in Such inStanceS

corrupt practices below an amount of Rs500 million as well as from issuing public statements at the stage of inquiry/investigation of a complaint. The new law neither specify any time period for completion of an inquiry nor bar NAB from reopening any inquiry/investigation. The procedure to appoint prosecutor general accountability, the 90-day period of physical remand and shifting of burden of proof that rests on accused were not even touched in the new ordinance. There is no mention of a six-member “scrutiny committee”, suggested in the earlier version, whose permission was necessary for NAB before conducting any inquiry, investigation or arresting a government servant. The same was relayed by the PM’s aide in his presser, probably to remove the confusion prevalent in the certian sections of media about the fate of NAB. He said that the amendment does not change the laws pertaining to bail and remand. Giving reasons for the amendment in NAB, he said that matters pertaining to federal and provincial taxation, levies or imposts will not fall under the ambit of the accountability watchdog and the cases will be handled by the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) instead. “similarly, the watchdog will not scrutinise any person or entity, or transaction in relation thereto, who or which are not directly or indirectly connected with a holder of public office,” he added. Akbar said another aim of bringing in the

amendments was to address the clause of “misuse of authority”. He said previously the law was such that a person could be embroiled in a NAB case simply for having made a wrong decision. “so an addition to the clause has been made whereby when a person is using their authority — whether its a public office holder or a minister or a businessman — and they are charged with having misused it, it will be examined whether there was personal monetary benefit attached to their decision.” “If such an advantage emerges only then will it be considered corruption.” The adviser said that section 4(2) B was also a very important section. Under it, it has been outlined that the NAB law will not be applicable to any person who himself is not a public officer holder, has no relation with a public office holder, and does not have any means of “using authority”. “Cases in which government officeholders have used their authority for kickbacks already do fall within the scope of NAB’s investigations. “In cases of ‘assets beyond known sources of income’, a government official can be probed by NAB but not a common man. In the case of the common man, he will be investigated by FBR,” explained Akbar. Akbar said that if a common man or businessman cheats the public at large, for example with a modarba scam, the case will fall within NAB’s jurisdiction.

CONTINUED ON PAGE 02

pm amended nab law to save ministers, allies: ppp STORY ON BACK PAGE

PM directs Punjab, KP govts to provide shelter to homeless STORY ON PAGE 03

at least 50 dead as cold wave sweeps through bangladesh STORY ON BACK PAGE

in today’s issue


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.