Independent Student Newspaper for the University of Texas at San Antonio
11.02.2010 Vol. 44 Issue 11
The
Paisano
Delivering Independent Student News To UTSA Through Six Presidencies
Weekly Beak
The University of Texas at San Antonio’s varsity debate team is ranked number three in the nation after holding the position of number one last week in the National Debate Tournament. The decrease in rank happened when the team elected not to participate in the Las Vegas tournament Oct. 22 – 24 in order to concentrate on academic work. Schools preceding UTSA in ranking this week are Liberty University (1st) and Northwestern University (2nd). UTSA’s Derrick Liles and Andy Montee managed to place 18 out of 145 in this past weekend’s tournament at Harvard University, a tournament in which only a select few can participate. Tournaments are held every weekend. The team’s success is attributed to their hard work, explained the team’s coach Skip Eno. “They took part of their summer to get prepared,” Eno said. “They just believed that they could do it.” Eno won the Amy Fugate Leadership Award for lifetime contributions to the collegiate debate community. Eno, a faculty member in the communication department, has coach the debate team since 1980. The debate team meets regularly Tuesday evenings at 8 p.m. During the meetings, the team holds practice rounds with the assistant coaches. The team is open to any degree-seeking student. Some of those on the debate team are majoring in biology, political science, communication, science and business.
File Photo
UTSA debate team ranked third
Roadrunners volleyball is riding high on a 10-game win streak, including a weekend victory over Southland Conference leader Central Arkansas. At 17-9, the girls are advancing towards one of the most successful seasons in program history. See page 7 for more details.
UTSA to switch to Plus/Minus Grading System in Fall 2011 Dana Messer
paisanonews@sbcglobal.net UTSA will be implementing a plus/minus grading system by Fall 2011 for both Graduate and Undergraduate programs. There is still some debate over the finer details of the policy; nevertheless, the proposal has been approved by the Faculty Senate and the Provost Office, and is currently awaiting implementation by the Office of Registrar and OIT. With this new optional grading policy, stu-
San Antonio Symphony The San Antonio Symphony honors veterans with the free Sixth Annual Salute to Service concert on Sunday, November 7, 2010 at 7:00 p.m. Maestro Ken-David Masur, the San Antonio Symphony and guests from the San Antonio Opera will celebrate Veterans Day with the music of Copland, Sousa and more. Debate article: Dyan Lofton, Contributing writer Source: San Antonio Symphony
dents will no longer be blanketed into grades but will be more precisely placed into a plus or minus category. Currently a 4.0 is an A, 3.0 is a B, 2.0 is a C and 1.0 or below is an F. Under the new grading policy, instructors will now have the option to further classify students by using 3.67 as an A-, 3.33 as a B+, 2.67 as B-, 2.33 as a C+, 1.67 as a C-, 1.33 as a D+ and .67 as a D-. Under the current grading system, there is no distinction between a student that earns a B
and a student that earns a B+; they both receive a 3.0 on their transcripts. To make the distinction between those grades, the plus/minus grading system was first introduced to the Faculty Senate in 2006, but after two surveys of faculty members, the proposal was rejected due to a split interest in the subject, so UTSA continued with the A, B, C, D, F grading. On May 11, 2010, however, Faculty Senate member and Chair of the Academic Policy and Requirements committee, Dr. Bennie Wilson III, reintroduced the proposal of a plus minus grading system to the Faculty Senate, and the rejuvenated proposal passed in the Faculty Senate 15 to 9 in favor and has since been signed by the Provost. “The main motivation of this whole system is to be more focused on how we grade students,” Wilson said. “Under an A, B, C, D, F system, two students can have almost a 10% difference in their grades [and still] get the same grade.” With the realization that there is more to gain from hard work in courses, faculty and administration feel students are less likely to become complacent in their studies and will work to
earn the higher grade. Dr. Wilson explained the importance of students not becoming satisfied with the average. “I call it settling for mediocrity,” Wilson said. “The idea is that [the plus/minus system] will probably help some students who say, I’m not doing any more, this is enough. This wouldn’t happen as much. For example, under the plus/minus system, I may be making a C+, but if I work just a little bit harder, I could be making a B-.” Controversy arises, however, towards the lower end of the grade spectrum near the C-, C range. Although the proposal has been approved, the Faculty Senate is still questioning the passing prerequisite grade of a 2.0 when under the plus/minus system a C- equals 1.67. The approved proposal of the plus/ minus system states that courses with a prerequisite grade of C or higher will default to a C-. Provost and Vice President of Academic Affairs, Dr. John Frederick, says the shift down is an obvious decision. “The question is does [a C] devolve to a C-, and I would argue that it does simply because right now a student could earn the equivalent of 70% in See GRADES, Page 2
Women’s basketball preview
P7
P5
P3
East German art exhibit
paisano-online.com
P4
Goin’ boot shoppin’