Is college worth it?
Lynn Hickey Interview Page 12
See page 9
Independent Student Newspaper for the University of Texas at San Antonio
Volume 46
August 23, 2011
Issue 1
ALCOHOL ARRIVES
Coker, football program not distracted by scandal Chili’s Too starts serving alcohol first day of classes at University of Miami Vanessa Elizararras
Victor H. Hernandez
news@paisano-online.com
news@paisano-online.com
On Aug. 16, Yahoo! Sports reported that Nevin Shapiro, a University of Miami booster, who had provided at least 72 athletes with gifts including travel, cash and prostitutes from 2002-2010. During 2002-2006 Larry Coker, UTSA’s head football coach, was head football coach at Miami. After the story broke, Coker released a statement in which he declined to comment on the issue, stating that the NCAA had not contacted him, and he did not have any insight into the current investigation. UTSA Athletics Director Lynn Hickey stated her support for Coker. “Coach Coker is a great person, a very ethical person with high values. I think the key to remember in this whole situation is that after five months of the investigation his name is not even on the list to talk to. We are very confident that he handled his business appropriately at Miami.” The news of this story comes just as UTSA is prepares for its inaugural football game on Sept. 3. Practices were held as usual last week and on Aug. 19, just three days after the Yahoo! Sports report, UTSA held its football media day. During the media day Hickey had this to say about Miami, “Major college football at the level Miami was competing, as we have seen all year across the country, there are some things that need
tion of former SGA President Derek Trim and continued by current president Xavier Johnson. As many other controversial subjects, such as handguns on campus, the decision was submitted for online voting. These polls are often characterized by lack of participation and poor student involvement. See ALCOHOL, Page 3
Burk Frey/ The Paisano
Burk Frey/ The Paisano
It’s been more than two dec a d e s s i n c e U T S A students could legally enjoy a beer without going off campus. In the eighties, a bar existed at UTSA called the Roost. Ultimately, the bar was closed, and UTSA remained dry until now. Happy times are here again. With a vibrant football debut, beer at Chili’s Too might be an all too natural step to take. On Wednesday, Aug. 24 at 3:00 pm, students will be able to purchase alcoholic beverages at Chili’s Too. The drinks are limited to beer, wine and wine-based margaritas. The beer will be in bottles only, since installing draft beer pipelines proved problematic. Spirits are also excluded; Chili’s Toon does not have a license to sell hard liquor. “It isn’t necessary,” Louis Keefe, resident district manager of Aramark (the firm that manages the restaurant) said. “We want to start responsibly; we don’t want to turn this into a bar.” Controversy surrounded the decision to offer alcohol on campus. “This is another example of why UTSA students need to vote,” writes Gabriel Rubio on the event page Beer at Chili’s Too at UTSA! “When the proposition for the football team passed, many students were outraged and felt like UTSA should strictly focus on academics and build a bigger library. When the proposition to increase transportation fees in order to improve the shuttle routes didn’t pass, the end result was longer wait times and crowded shuttles.” Alcohol on campus was one of the cornerstones for the many Student Government Association campaigns. It was promoted during the administra-
The university recently held the first media day at the Alamodome.
The innermost fight for higher education News insight
Victor H. Hernandez news@paisano-online.com
“Excellent meeting with Rick. Are you ready to get this show on the road?” asked Francie Frederick in a private e-mail to Gene Powell, Chairman of the Board of the UT System. “Next stop would be to craft a short job description and for you to give me the target salary range.” They chose a man; they only needed to create a job for him. Rick O’Donnell, the former director of Colorado’s Department of Higher Education, was the person the regents wanted. Francie Frederick, head of the General Counsel to the UT System Board of Regents, was the connection. According to e-mails published by the Texas Tribune, Frederick started to outline a new job opening along-
side Chairman Gene Powell the day after she met with O’Donnell. Three days later they posted a new position as available. They received eight applications, while H.R. e-mails flew, “the reason for non-hire on the applicants not selected look good.” While another said, “Please put that the successful candidate had more experience in working with higher education issues.” The job was tailored for O’Donnell and modeled after a position recently created in Texas A&M for Jim Kimbrough, former chief of staff to Gov. Perry, which aimed to reform the A&M System. Now was the time for U.T. “I have quietly checked with A&M and when Jay was there before he was at $260k. He is coming back at over $300k in June,” wrote Powell. The newcomer at UT, O’Donnell, didn’t have as much luck in Austin
as his counterpart in College Station. Observers believe that the inclusion of O’Donnell into the highest chamber of the UT system was orchestrated by Perry’s supporters to implement a new agenda, based on the ideas of wealthy entrepreneur Jeff Sandefer, the author of a polemic document called the “7 Breakthrough Solutions,” which targets higher education. Sandefer proposes a budgetary rapture between teaching and research, a heavier impact of students’ teacher evaluation, required evidence of teaching skills for tenure, and the creation of a result-based teaching environment. Sandefer is part of the conservative think tank, Texas Public Policy Foundation (TPPF), as is the newly appointed O’Donnell and the governor’s strongman on College Station, Kimbrough. With O’Donnell earning $200,000
and with a position that answered directly to the Board of Regents instead as to the Chancellor, many believed Perry had successfully triggered an impending attack on the autonomy of the UT System. The expectancy was short lived, his chain of command was changed to ultimately respond to the Chancellor Francisco Cigarroa, and O’Donnell was fired 49 days after taking office, amidst controversies of academic plagiarism and political conflicts between the board members. The reason for his termination, he told the Texas Tribune, was because he denounced “that people in the highest levels of the university, not just once or twice, had consistently tried to resist to provide the public with data that the regents needed to do the job.” O’Donnell refers to university’s expenses and in particular how cost-effective certain teachers are. It was data
to rethink the real value of research and teaching. He threatened to sue the university on grounds of violation of his First Amendment right, before eventually settling for $70,000. On the other hand, Perry’s supporters at Texas A&M embraced Jim Kimbrough, but his measures didn’t take long to backlash. “The Association of American Universities does not, as a general rule, comment on the structure of governance or the processes its member institutions employ,” began an emphatic letter written by Robert M. Berdahl, former president of U.T. Austin, now president of the AAU, addressed to Michael D. McKinney, who was then Chancellor of the Texas A&M University System in March, after part of the Sandefer reforms were implemented. See REGENTS, Page 4