Outlook
Volume 46 Issue 10
Student Press
February 3, 2014 outlookpress.net Rockland Community College
Is Bridgegate Only the Beginning? Suzanne Peguero
Managing Editor
Style 9 “The most unbelievable aspect about “The Wolf of Wall Street” is that everything on screen is no exaggeration from the truth.” Marina Watts, Student Martin Scorsese’s latest film takes us through the highs and the lows of illegal stockbroker activity.
Style 12 “My brain was slowly melting from the obnoxiousness of it all.”
Chris Christie hasn’t been doing so well lately. It started on January 8, when news broke that a top aide Christie aide had sent an email to David Wildstein, a Christie confidante and the governor’s appointee to the Port Authority. The Port Authority operates the nation’s busiest bridge, the George Washing ton Bridge. The mayor of Fort Lee had declined to endorse Christie, and two or three lanes of traffic were shut down, causing major traffic problems including delayed school
This trainwreck of an awards show was beyond awkward, but everyone still tuned in.
Sports 15 “Even with Cano leaving, the Yankees were able to have a significant mark on the offseason.” Benedict Tagle, Student
New York is getting ready for an interesting baseball season.
the Christie aide. It said, “Time for some traffic problems in Fort Lee.” The aide responsible for writing this email (named Bridget Anne-Kelly) was
Christie administration could not be blamed for the problems. Finally, an email surfaced from
revealed to have been fired in a lengthy news conference on January 9, 2014. Christie
said he was “embarrassed and humiliated” by the “abject stupidity” of the actions that were made. The scandal, now commonly referred to as “Bridegate,” resulted in Christie’s image being tarnished and four members of the Christie administration being fired. Then came another scandal, this one relating to Hurricane Sandy. There are allegations that Christie threatened to not provide aid to the New Jersey town of Hoboken unless the mayor, Dawn Zimmer (a Democrat), supported a private development project. But this isn’t all. Not only is Christie accused of CHRISTIE FROM PAGE 1
The NSA May Target Your Texts Suzanne Peguero
Suzanne Peguero, Student
buses. Immediately, there were suspicions regarding whether this traffic jam had been caused purposely; however, as there was no substantive evidence, the
Managing Editor
It has been the outrage of a nation: after leaks from the now infamous Edward Snowden, details of the NSA surveillance program have surfaced and shocked many. It was revealed that the NSA records the audio content of some phone calls, records of calls placed, collects the data on email, Facebook posts, instant messaging, and raw internet traffic, and collects almost 200 million text messages a day, From that data, they have been extracting locations, contact networks, and credit card details. Many have been angered by what has been revealed. A U.K. spy agency, GCHQ, has revealed that rather than focus on certain surveillance targets that were under investigation or considered to be a threat, it merely “collects pretty much everything it can.” The development about text messages has been the latest piece of information that the public now knows about. What has been particularly astonishing (and not in a good way) is that
it is an untargeted global data sweep. They are not focusing on individuals who are surveillance targets, but rather collecting data from people everywhere. They are able to find the exact location
of any individual based on the content of the messages; this task was simpler for the NSA when the text messages included requests
for route info and meetings being set up. To promote this program, the NSA made a presentation on this program (the program itself is called, “PRISM”). This presentation was subtitled “SMS Text Messages: A Goldmine to Exploit.” This presentation included bullet points such as, “(S//SI// REL) such gems are often not in current metadata stores and would enhance current analytics: contact chaining, geolocation, alternative identifiers (including DNI & DNR links), travel, finance…(S// REL) Rich data set, high impact. Usage is increasing. Features & Notifications available on mobile phones are increasing ® rich data set awaiting e x pl o i t a t i o n .” U n s u r p r i s i n g l y, many have become outraged about this; the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board recently published a report against this program—it was obtained by the New York Times on
Thursday, January 23. The 238-page report will raise new concerns and voices into this situation. President Obama gave a high profile speech that entailed he was making adjustments to the availability of the data and declared intentions to end the government collection of the data, but stated the program should be preserved. The report explicated that that the program “PRISM” had “minimal” for the aid of counterterrorism is not legal, and the program should be terminated. As of now, no one knows what the future of this program will be, but it will likely be dealt with soon as it is such a source of controversy.
News
February 3, 2014
Chris Christie Scandal Only Gets Worse
scandals, an affordable housing advocate and a prominent Democrat are investigating to determine whether Christie is justly
Sandy scandal breaking out, only 14% view him favorable, while 23% view him unfavorably. The largest group, 38%,
distributing federal Sandy aid dollars. When the bridge scandal hit, it didn’t affect Christie too badly. 53% of polled individuals said it hadn’t changed their views; however, with the Hurricane
say that they have not heard enough information. Since October, Christie’s favorability rating fell 35 points with Democrats, 20 points with independents, and seven points with Republicans. With
African Americans, Christie saw his favorability rating drop 42 points. With Caucasians, he has dropped 22 points. With Hispanics, he has dropped 10 points. With women, he as dropped 16 points. With men, he’s dropped 29 points. This does not bode well for Christie, who is considering running for President. With his numerous scandals (there are other that are now being linked to his name), this greatly diminishes his chances for being a viable candidate for presidency. It is unclear how— or if—Christie will be able to recover from these blows. It is unsure if his method of recovery is working (so far he has been seemingly ignoring all of his troubles, except for the mandatory press conference), but we will see what occurs during the Super Bowl Week. Picture Credit: The New Yorker
CHRISTIE FROM PAGE 1 threatening to withhold relief from Hoboken unless he was supported in a project, he also helped channel $6 million in federal recovery dollars to a project called Franklin Manor. The mayor of the town Belleville, New Jersey formally endorsed Christie for reelection, and two weeks before that, the funding was pushed for this project. It was said that this project would provide housing for those who were displaced from their homes in Belleville and Essex because of the storm. However, it was noted by Belleville Mayor Raymond Kimble that while Belleville did suffer some flooding, fallen trees and week-long power outages, he did not know of any residents that were displaced from their homes. With these
Features
February 3, 2014
Fall in Love With These Rom-Coms
Marina Watts
Editor In Chief
“Crazy, Stupid Love” (2011): Shakespearean in nature and filled with an amazing cast, “Crazy, Stupid Love” is a quintessential rom-com. Starring Steve Carrell, Julianne Moore, Ryan Gosling and Emma Stone, “Crazy Stupid Love” mixes miscommunications and misinterpretations into contemporary California. Emily (Moore) asks Cal (Carrell) for a divorce because she had an affair. Cal’s whole world gets thrown into disarray until Gosling offers him
a chance to rediscover who he is. In this film, everyone falls for the wrong person. You laugh, you cry, you root for Steve Carrell and then wish him hell. But like all Shakespearean plays, this movie leaves you reminded that love perseveres all. “How to Lose a Guy in Ten Days” (2003): Starring Mathew McConaughey and Kate Hudson, this film is the perfect guide to what not to do when you meet the man of your dreams. A journalist covering the “How To” section in her magazine, Andie (Hudson) volunteers to write a piece on how to lose a guy in ten days. Ben (McConaughey) makes a bet with his coworkers that he can make a girl fall in love with him in ten days. By happenstance the two meet, initiating a rollercoaster of a relationship. As Andie pushes Ben away
with her turn-offs, she falls for him, and Ben falls for Andie even though he only needs to seduce her for his bet. Filled with dramatic irony, you will cringe as much as you laugh at the nuances Andie and Ben share throughout their
relationship. “How to Lose a Guy in Ten Days” is an off-beat yet equally hilarious rom-com. “Wedding Crashers” (2005): Though it isn’t as chic-flick esque as many romantic comedies are, this film features Owen Wilson and Vince Vaughn at their finest. These two comedic geniuses would play improvising lines off each other over games of pool, and it clearly shows their work paid off. Veterans of crashing weddings to meet girls, Wilson and Vaughn crash their biggest wedding yet. As though this wasn’t a challenge enough, they run into trouble when invited back to Secretary of State Cleary’s house (Christopher Walken). Wilson longs for something more with Clare Cleary (Rachael McAdams), while Vaughn is clung onto by an infatuated Gloria Cleary (Isla Fischer). Not a line is wasted, and although it’s not your conventional/ stereotypical rom-com, it is definitely funny and romantic in its own way. “Midnight in Paris” (2010): Directed by Woody Allen, this movie teaches an important lesson: no matter how much you drink in Paris, unless you are Owen Wilson, you won’t travel back
in time. After getting a little too tispy at a Parisian winetasting, the aspiring author Gil (Wilson) is transported to 1920s Paris, where the modern arts flourished. He embarks on a love affair with (Marion Cotillard) and mingles with Pablo Picasso and F. Scott Fitzgerald. This movie teaches that life is unsatisfying no matter what time period you live in. Romantic, beautiful Paris and a fabulous cast including Kathy Bates and Rachael McAdams makes this film a must-see. “The Five Year Engagement” (2012): What if you get engaged to your soul mate, but can’t plan a wedding for any sooner than five years after the proposal? “The Five Year Engagement” plays out this scenario in the form of Jason Segel and Emily Blunt. Hopelessly in love with each other, the pair must make huge sacrifices for each other to further their careers. Pressures of work, families and adapting to new lifestyles strain the bond that Segel and Blunt’s characters’ have. It assesses the question of whether or not love can last through all, no matter what life
throws at you. “It’s Complicated” (2009): Alec Baldwin and Meryl Streep have excellent chemistry in this film. Ten years after divorcing, Jill (Streep) and Jack (Baldwin) go out one night in New York. After a few drinks and some reminiscing of their marriage, they embark on a love affair. Confused and excited, they try to hide their happenings from their family and f r i e n d s . However, this bit tersweet adventure doesn’t run s m o o t h . Feat u r ing J o h n Krakinski and Steve Martin, “It’s Complicated” is a comedic reflection of whether or not we can honor that the decisions we made were right. “Love Actually” (2003): Various vignettes compose this rom-com, as viewers follow the lives of eight different couples living in contemporary England. December before Christmas in London makes
the perfect backdrop, giving all viewers the warm-fuzzy feeling, and with the heartwarming stories laced in enhances the overall film. Featuring the talents of Hugh Grant, Colin Firth, Emma Thompson, and Keira Knightley, “Love Actually” is a classic romantic comedy that holds your attention with its various stories pieced together. “When Harry Met Sally” (1989): Brought to you by Rob Reiner, “When Harry Met Sally” poses the question of whether men and women can just be friends. Billy Crystal and Meg Ryan star in this film as two friends who meet each other over the course of several years. Crystal believes that men and women can be friends without sex getting in the way. Ryan disagrees, as some women believe that what can seem a simple compliment can be called out as a pass. This film traces Harry and Sally through their relationships, as Harry and Sally meet up and reminisce over love lost. Ryan and Crystal’s chemistry is flawless, as life takes them back to each other various times. The soundtrack is also pretty stellar, as Harry Connick Jr. is the main attraction of it. This film will leave viewers sure that love isn’t hopeless, and worth the risk. French Kiss (1995): A disheartened Kate (Meg Ryan) heads to Paris, in fear that her fiancé is straying from her. On her flight, she meets Luc (Kevin Kline) a Frenchman, and their meeting drags her into his plant smuggling. Kate searches the country for her fiancé with Luc, but the time they spend together makes them fall for each other. Ever twisting and turning, their adventure teaches them that sometimes if you let go of someone, you can find someone better when you least expect it. Quirky and light-hearted, “French Kiss” is a wonderful film that proves you can find love in the most peculiar places. “27 Dresses”(2008): Stuck being a bridesmaid for 27 weddings, Jane (Katherine Heigl) is about to be one for the twenty-eighth time. This wouldn’t be such a big deal if the man her sister was marrying wasn’t someone she had been secretly in love with for quite a while, plus plan the wedding. When she meets Kevin (James Marsden), her world gets turned upside-down further, as he clings onto her possibly to advance his own career as a writer. This film is a lighthearted reminder of how even when things seem completely hopeless, it is important to stay true to yourself. Even if you always say yes to others, it is important to put yourself first every now and again. Although it is a pretty stereotypical chick-flick, “27 Dresses” is a must-see for anyone who loves staring at James Marsden for a good couple hours.
February 3, 2014
Opinions
A Meditation on Relationships
Marina Watts
Editor In Chief
Due to a chain of events, some more recent, along with one that has spanned over a few years, I have begun to contemplate what it means to be in a relationship. I go through each day and look to experience things to the fullest and make the best of what life throws at us. Granted, I am no love guru, but I can’t help but wonder how these beautiful things are really meant to work. Is it a vacation from reality? Like a long-distance relationship. Do you just go to work, go to school, whatever your daily routine may be, and live in your own monotony? Sure, you may strive and shine in whatever you do alone, but it just feels so empty sometimes. Once the day comes when you are reunited with your loved one, you escape the usual burdens of life and spend every possible second
with them. You get coverage at work. You take some days off from the gym. Money loses its value, as the sky’s the limit. Extravagant dinners and lavish gifts fill your materialistic desires beyond belief. And once you two depart, it’s back to reality. The first few days hurt, to be sure. But these days with Facebook, Twitter, Skype, Instagram, Snapchat, instant messaging, texting, phone calls and Facetime (I think that’s it?), keeping in touch will be anything but challenging. Is that kind of relationship even real? Where is the room for development? Sure, you may get to know the other person on a deep level, but if it isn’t consistent, who’s to say whether what you feel is even real? There is just something irreplaceable about the physical presence of someone. Now, I’m not talking sex. God no. Just the
feeling of being with someone. That lack of loneliness, knowing you can do things with them, whether it is a trivial errand to pick up some bread or go on a romp through Manhattan. On the other hand, if you think your
love can survive any distance, maybe this person really is your soul mate. It’s hard to say, because if they were home and at your side all the time, how would things be different?
Is it a job? Something you have on the forefront of life’s daily responsibilities? You see them quite often, and as time progresses, you develop alone and together. Your relationship b e c o m e s something you work for, and it feels real. But don’t let it engulf your entire existence, you know? Be sure to balance it with going out with friends, spending time with your family. Go do you on the occasion, something you
enjoy that your significant other may not appreciate as deeply as you. At the end of the day, you still have someone you adore waiting for you. Is it worth the n ig ht ma r ish moments to strive for those precious few? Fighting over phone calls that leave you so choked up you can’t even manage the words “I’m sorry,” whether or not the person on the other line deserves them. Yelling across a table for hours, breaking plates and ruining a perfectly good meal cooked so lovingly. Becoming the center of attention at parties that aren’t even yours to relish, due to nuances that have become unsettling over a few days and only come to a boil at that very moment? It can come to the point where acquaintances tell you how unhealthy your relationship is. Just because the sweet parts are even more sweet because of the bitterness doesn’t mean we all need to become masochists to achieve some sense of satisfaction. Only until you take a stand and get out do you realize how liberating it is to be alone and work up from your lowest point. Is it constant fighting to eventual reconciliation, or is it living in so much bliss that it is a dream come true? All the arguments may seem worth it in the end, but no relationship is worth constant pain and suffering. As important as it is to put others before you, you should never let that interfere with your own happiness. It is better to be unhappy
alone than unhappy with someone after all. At that point, things really can only get better. No amount of argument and negative energy will ever be a reason to stay with
someone. As much as the feeling of being wanted by someone can give you confidence, it can also bring you down greatly. Reader, never stoop to that level. Don’t stick around with someone just to glorify the fact that you are romantically associated with someone. It is never worth the heartache, and the guilt that builds up will surface. Even after exhausting this idea, this aspect of life, it’s difficult to say what it really means to have a relationship with someone. As much as humans love to be loved, we also love to love. It’s the way we are wired, and it makes it all the better when you get a chance to start again with love. So don’t let me tell you how to relationship. Only you can really decide.
Opinions
February 3, 2014
Twitter Fiasco Leans Towards “One Direction” Suzanne Peguero
Managing Editor
January 18 was an interesting day on Twitter. It all began when One Direction
member Liam Payne tweeted Duck Dynasty star Willie Robertson, the son of Phil Robertson. Phil Robertson has recently been criticized for making homophobic and racist comments in GQ’s January issue. Payne sent a tweet that said, “huge love to you/your family huge respect for your business prosperities and
the family values you still all behold. big fan.” The responses to this were rapid. Some immediately jumped to Payne’s defense, saying he was being sarcastic or didn’t know about the recent controversy surrounding the show and its stars. Others, meanwhile, were rightfully upset that Payne tweeted support to people whose “family values” are of homophobia and racism. Openly gay YouTuber and One Direction fan Tyler Oakley tweeted, “Wow. Very confused and disappointed by this @Real_ Liam_Payne tweet. This literally changes everything...” Liam Payne responded to Oakley (in an exquisitely eloquent manner) with, “that changes everything you obviously wernt [sic] a fan I said nothing I liked a show that was on my tv nothing about you or whatever.” At this point, the gates of Hades were opened. One Direction fans began using the hashtag #TYLEROAKLEYJUSTGOTSLAYED (although it is impossible to “slay” someone with grammar as atrocious as that) and began to verbally abuse
Oakley. Many sent him death threats, and it culminated in Oakley leaving the Internet momentarily to get away from all the madness. Payne sent a barrage of angry tweets in which it had appeared that he had somewhat lost is mind and really does not like journalists and bloggers. Meanwhile, I was once again, hitting my head on a desk. Payne later tweeted, “Being a fan of someones show and the way they still hold a family together doesnt [sic] mean i am ok with all they say.” I understand this. I understand what he is saying, and I do sympathize with the amount of frustration he must have on account of the fact that every detail of is life is made into a news story. But nonetheless, it isn’t
as though he doesn’t understand how our culture works. We are obsessed, sometimes a frightening amount, with the lives of the famous. We want to know every single aspect of who they are, and this is especially applicable to the age group that fans of One Direction are (mainly teenagers). These are their role models, their idols. And Payne, and any other celebrity, must realize this. They have to understand that while they may have not had homophobic, or racist, or sexist intentions in mind when an incident like this occurs, their words are consequently supporting those things all the same. And in a chain reaction, their fans that follow them blindly may begin to believe those things are okay. And they most certainly are not. In a perfect world, that wouldn’t happen. But this isn’t a perfect world, and words—especially words coming from someone who has such a huge amount of attention put on them—have more power than one would think. Next time, Payne will hopefully think carefully about what he says and how it can affect others.
Opinions
February 3, 2014
Outlook Student Press Marina Watts, Editor-in-Chief Suzanne Peguero, Managing Editor Julie DeVito, Production Manager
Anuj Chokshi, Photography Editor Benedict Tagle, Sports Editor
Outlook Student Press is published every other week except during exam periods and summer. It is an independent newspaper produced by students and paid for by advertising revenue and student activities fees. Submissions and articles become the property of Outlook Student Press. Outlook Student Press invites you to submit your opinions and ideas for publication. We strongly encourage letters to the editor. Content does not necessarily reflect the views of the Outlook editors or staff. Submissions may be edited for clarity, length, style, and taste. Outlook does not accept anonymous submissions.
On the web: Outlookpress.net Facebook.com/outlookpress Email: Outlookstudentpress@gmail.com Office: Student Union Room 3200 Phone: (845) 574-4389 Fax: (845) 356-6261
Contributors: Linus McCormick Staff: Valissa Hicks, Sarah Peguero
Snail mail:Outlook Student Press Rockland Community College 145 College Road, Suffern, NY 10901 Professor Fuentes, Advisor
www.facebook.com/OutlookPress
www.twitter.com/OutlookPress
Like to write? E-mail us at outlookstudentpress@gmail.com
t u o b A l e e F u o Y o D w o H . . . . . ? x e t r o The Polar V
Anuj Chokshi
Marina Watts
Suzanne Peguero
Benedict Tagle
Since I grew up in maximum 40 degrees cold in India, this winter was little bit challenging for me, but at the same time I had never experienced this much snow and cold before, which made me love this winter. I really enjoyed snow during this winter break, while reading books, watching movies and the best, drinking hot chocolate. I also enjoyed cleaning out the snow from the drive-way and turned that work into play. Some people really hated this cold and all but to be honest it was really fun for me to experience this much cold and snow. Of course it was really very hard for people who have to go out every day in snow and all but there is nothing you can do about, so instead of freaking out we should enjoy the nature.
With the wind chill, it is almost as cold as my soul. Nonetheless, this polar vortex needs to stop. The fact that it is warmer in certain parts of Alaska than it is in New York this January is extremely unsettling. I am not one for winter, but this is ridiculous. When the temperature has reached single digits, I lose all desire to leave my house, let alone my bed. Unfortunately, it is not socially acceptable to walk around in a bathrobe at work and school. Otherwise, I would. I hate bundling up and having to start my car before I go anywhere to warm it up. I hate how I cannot escape to Florida where they complain about it being 50 degrees out. It is way too cold, I would take a sweltering summer’s day over the subzero climate any day.
I live for polar vortexes and the barrenness of winter. I live for cold weather that makes others shrink in fear as I laugh and flip my worn red scarf over my shoulder, walking out confidently into the coldness of air and life. I have no fear for the cold, as it is what gives me courage when all others fail. You may dress in layers upon layers of clothing and may be frantically drinking coffee to stay warm, but I absorb the cold, and with it, strength. You may gingerly avoid the snow on the street, but I walk directly into it, and feel the warmth of power. I live for the wind whipping into my face, reminding me of who I am—the Abominable Snowman.
So, I was told it was really, really cold on the east coast this past December and January. That’s too bad. I can’t write much about it, because I spent all that time on the other side of the country. It was glorious. The sky was blue every single day. There was not one drop of precipitation over there. The temperature was absolutely perfect. Every single day, the temperature was in the mid-60s to early-70s. It was incredible. I felt sorry for all my friends and relatives on this side of the country as they complained about the weather. The most complaining we had on the west coast was when there was a “cold spell” one morning, when it was about 50 degrees. It was an outrage, nobody could wear shorts. West coast winters are so much better than winters over here.
Style & Entertainment
February 3, 2014
Cinematic Excess Done Right: “The Wolf of Wall Street” Marina Watts
Editor In Chief
I just sat through the fastest threehour movie of my life. Directed by Martin Scorsese, “The Wolf of Wall
Street” hit theatres Christmas Day 2013. Based on the best-selling memoir of the same name, “The Wolf of Wall Street” is the second movie in the past year to portray Leonardo DiCaprio as the posterchild for the American Dream gone wild. The overall excess of Baz Luhrmann’s “The Great Gatsby” distracted us from the message at hand, regardless of Leo’s quality portrayal of Jay Gatsby. This time around, Scorsese builds a cinematic roller coaster from start to finish, filled with hookers, cocaine and illegal Wall Street dealings galore. Jordan Belfort had it all, and lost it all, and it all is squeezed into three hours of nonstop action. All the excess is memorizing to a fault, yet we still need to remind ourselves that it is reality. It is in fact so real that we almost wish half of it never happened. “The Wolf of Wall Street” tells the
story of a New York stockbroker, Jordan
Belfort (Leonardo DiCaprio). His first boss, Mark Hanna (Matthew McConaughey) recommends adding hookers and obscene amounts of drugs to his lifestyle in order to make it big on Wall Street. After the 1987 Rothschild crash on Wall Street, a money-hu ng r y Belfort takes his set of skills and learns the ins and outs of selling stocks. Soon, he develops his own firm, “ St r at t o n Oakmont Inc.” and with the help of his friend Donnie (Jonah Hill) and father Max (Rob Reiner), he is able to take the world by storm. Soon enough, Belfort lives the ultimate life of luxury. Complete with a trophy wife (Margot Robbie), yachts, and enough drugs daily to sedate Manhattan for a month, he has the life anyone would kill to have. However, as soon as he
thinks he has broken enough laws and made enough money, things take a turn for the Wolf. Soon, he puts other people’s financial existence in danger as he tries to snake around certain laws to get his way. Regardless of your moral standards about prostitution, drugs and stockbrokers, “Wolf of Wall Street” does an excellent job of showing all three in their most outrageous form. Quite often the three are intertwined onscreen. The most unbelievable aspect about “The Wolf of Wall Street” is that
everything on screen is no exaggeration from the truth. When reading the novel I was blown away everything ongoing. I couldn’t put the book down; it was such a page turner. It is no wonder how Jordan Belfort was dynamic enough to be making shy of $1 million a week at one point in his life. His charismatic nature was more than enough to make me wish I could have his moving nature. However, his drug addiction and stock
fraud is more than enough reason to not wish such tragedy upon even my worst
enemies.
The insane drug scenes and obscenely sexual aspects of the film were only filmable because Warner Brothers pictures wasn’t part of the production. Since the film was financed independently, lines were crossed and envelopes were pushed. If it wasn’t for the MPAA’s request of Scorsese to edit certain parts of the film, “Wolf of Wall Street” could have easily had an NC-17 rating. Is Leonardo DiCaprio’s performance Oscar-worthy? Surely his fifth collaboration with Scorsese could earn him some gratification that he is, in fact, a fantastic actor. In the past, he has starred in Scorsese’s “Gangs of New York,” “Shutter Island,” “The Departed,” and “The Aviator.” Granted, I am biased. I love the man. Every role he takes on seems to move audiences to believe he is a different persona than in the film before. Regardless of how good or bad a film can be, Leonardo DiCaprio can be anyone on the silver screen. His performance in “Wolf” is no exception. He shows a high range of acting ability, portraying a man who uses his power of rhetoric to sell anything and everything. DiCaprio met onset with real-life Jordan Belfort to get some behavior coaching, allowing for an accurate portrayal of the stockbroker. The two paid particular attention to the way DiCaprio had to react to the Quaaludes onscreen. But for some unknown reason, the Academy dislikes Leonardo DiCaprio. It could be perhaps that he peaked too soon as an actor. However, if that is the case, it would be hard to figure out his highest point. His early performances, his more recent ones, and several in between were rather impressive. Perhaps Leo just has really, really bad luck. Regardless, he put so much energy into this film, and his collaboration with Scorsese has audiences and critics beyond satisfied. This film is an unforgettable one. Where else will you find in a film with over five hundred uses of the word “fuck” in a film? How about one where the dialogue was improvised rather often? With the talents of DiCaprio, Hill, and Reiner (just to name a few) it’s no surprised how they were able to keep a scene or two going. “Wolf of Wall Street” is currently nominated for Best Motion Picture-Musical or Comedy for the Golden Globes, along with countless other awards. Brad Pitt had originally bid for the rights to a film version of Belfort’s memoir. However, Leo beat him to it and I cannot imagine Mr. Pitt in this film. After seeing “Wolf,” I can honestly say it has my vote for best film this year at the Academy Awards ceremony.
Style & Entertainment
February 3, 2014
Will Season 13 Be Lucky for American Idol? Linus McCormick
Contributing Writer
“American Idol” is back! After a disastrous stumble in Season 12 where ratings hit an all-time low, as a casual viewer, I was cautious about tuning in this time around. However, all my worries turned out to be for naught as the season’s premier week and subsequent episodes did nothing but deliver. The way things are looking, the ratings will manage to make a speedy rebound. The show clearly is trying everything it can to make a turn-around happen. With a star studded panel consisting of country superstar Keith Urban, musical icon Jennifer Lopez and acclaimed actor and singer Harry Connick Jr., the season’s potential is looking optimistic. After only a short while into the first episode, the chemistry between the judges is nothing more than hilarity; Connick and Urban seem to have formed a bromance and Lopez is always there to keep the two in check. The result leaves the viewers with a relaxed and welcoming impression that really keeps you watching. Enough about the judges; now onto the part of the show that makes tuning in worth it: the talent. The first four episodes featured spellbinding performances from contestants like vocal powerhouse Megan Miller, singer/songwriter Sam Woolf and
soulful Briana Oakley. One such standout, returning contestant David Oliver Willis, demonstrated on guitar, an artistic and creative ability in his acoustic, switched up cover of the Alex Clare hit “Too Close” and easily scored his ticket to Hollywood. Another standout, budding country star Brandy Neelly, stuck to her country roots and sang a passionate cover of a Hunter Hayes hit, “Wanted.” While judges Lopez and Connick gave her some minor critiques, Urban gave her an enthusiastic round of applause. In the end, Brandy received a unanimous vote of yes and received
a golden ticket on to the next round in Hollywood. However, the nights were not without their trademark laugh out loud moments. In the past, the show has been criticized for openly mocking contestants for their poor vocal abilities. This season, the joke auditions were done in better taste and most people who left without their golden ticket to Hollywood were able to take some advice away from the judges. While the talent thus far is at an upward high, the true breakout star of the season so far is judge Harry Connick Jr. While not only having hilarious, but insightful
critiques, he has shown to have a vast musical knowledge, and even at one point teaches Lopez about the pentatonic scale. Each contestant that was judged by Connick wasn’t simple told whether they were good or bad, rather he would explain to them in detail just why they were getting the golden ticket or were leaving empty handed. Connick is harsh when he needs to be, but can be open and insightful when a true talent is witnessed and these first few episodes highlighted his polarizing opinions. With Connick, even some of the best auditions were given constructive advice and told how they could get even better. However, Connick’s notoriously harsh, but honest critiques didn’t sit well with some contestants and earned him the nickname “Harsh Harry.” In later episodes, if Connick can keep up his attitude of telling it how it is and not sugarcoating things like judges in the past have done, then “American Idol” just might have found the correct formula for the perfect judge in him. Pers Blankens, the new American Idol producer, has clearly devoted time and effort to trying to rebuild the show and thus far, reviews have been coming out favorably of the thirteen year old show. But will the show manage to make the turn around it needs to keep going after this season? We will take this journey together. Stay tuned...
Whatever Happened to Drake and Josh? In 2004, actors Drake Bell and Josh Peck were at the peak of their popularity in the Nickelodeon hit TV show “Drake and Josh.” The show would go on for another few years and even spawned two movies, but unfortunately, in late 2007, “Drake
in multiple films over the years such as “Red Dawn,” “ATM,” “What Goes Up,” and “The Timber,” he has amassed a large following on social media. On the social six second video app, Vine, Peck was even at one point the most followed user. With Vine, Peck managed to total almost four million followers and gather a loyal fan base. Outside of social media and on television, one notable appearance of Peck
Bell took his time in the limelight to establish himself as a musician. Frequently on the show, Bell would demonstrate his musical talent and even performed the opening musical theme. When the show ended, Bell still made some cameos on other Nickelodeon TV shows, but focused more on his music and eventually put out an album and EP titled “It’s Only Time” and “A Reminder” respectively. In 2010,
singles from it. You can look out for his album to be released some time this year. With some child stars, the transition from child star to adult has been rough and even in some cases have drastic effects. However with Drake Bell and Josh Peck, the transition left them respectable and recognizable. Today, the pair are still active in the showbiz world and still hold onto strong fan bases. Both Bell and Peck
and Josh” ended. While a few years later a movie of the show aired with all the original cast, afterwards the two stars of the show faded away from the spotlight. After “Drake and Josh” ended, the two starring actors pursued different career paths: Drake went for music and Josh acting. For Josh, while not only appearing
outside of Drake and Josh was on the hit TV show “The Big Bang Theory,” where he guest starred and played Jessie, a comic book store owner. Peck still has multiple upcoming film appearances that you can look out for him in such as “Imagine” and “Bukowski.” When “Drake and Josh” ended, Drake
Bell was also awarded the Pioneering Spirit Award for his support and funds towards The Thirst Project, which raises awareness to the importance of clean water. After a few year gap since A Reminder debuted, Bell announced that a new album would be released in 2014 and since then, he has released multiple
have multiple upcoming projects and still sometimes make cameos on television and despite everything, the two are said to still be best friends. And as a bit of a teaser, on the website Reddit, Bell teased that a potential third Drake and Josh movie might be more than just a possibility.
Linus McCormick
Contributing Writer
10
February 3, 2014
Style & Entertainment
10 Reasons To Give Leo an Oscar
Marina Watts
Editor In Chief
1. “The Aviator” (2004): My favorite DiCaprio film, and probably his best performance. He portrays Howard
Hughes, the OCD inflicted film mogul and aviation fanatic throughout the high and low points of his career. Hughes was very particular about everything in every aspect of his life, ranging from which steering wheel he wanted to use in a plane to how many chocolate chips should be existent on his cookie. OCD heavily affected Hughes, and he spent four months in a viewing room not leaving to bathe, relieve himself, or anything. DiCaprio accurately depicted Hughes in his ruined state. In preparation for his role, DiCaprio spoke with Jane Russell, Hughes’s starring actress in his film “The Outlaw” to further understand the stubborn man. He also spent time with an OCD patient named Edward in order to understand the mannerisms and habits that go along with the mental disorder. DiCaprio won the Golden Globe for this performance and received a nomination from the Academy, as his thorough homework and research paid off. 2. “Wolf of Wall Street”(2013): His latest film and Golden-Globe winning performance as Jordan Belfort is dynamic. We love him as much as we hate him, and want to be him as much as we wish him hell. DiCaprio’s performance is a memorable one, especially in the Lemmons scene. As he inch-worms around a country club reenacting how Belfort responded to the expired drugs is horrifying. Real-life Jordan Belfort was on-set with DiCaprio, coaching him on how he should behave to make it as accurate as possible. Ever since he read the novel which the film is based on in 2007, DiCaprio obsessed on making it into a film with him as Belfort. He wanted to portray Belfort throughout his career’s highs and lows as honestly as they could be onscreen. DiCaprio has won a Golden Globe and received a nomination from the Academy for his work in this film. 3. “What’s Eating Gilbert Grape?” (1993): DiCaprio’s first Oscar nomination came from this film as Best Supporting Actor, and brought his existence to the attention of moviegoers worldwide. In this film, his role as Arnie Grape, Gilbert’s (Johnny Depp) mentally retarded brother is moving. Upon
learning that he was just a normal teenaged kid acting in a role, many were shocked. In preparation for this role, DiCaprio spent a few days in a home for mentally retarded teens, describing the experience as “refreshing.” His performance is moving, and we grow to love Arnie irrevocably by the film’s conclusion. It’s pretty safe to say that the Oscar is 20 years overdue. 4. “Django Unchained” (2012): Tarantino knew what he was doing when he cast the DiCaprio as unscrupulous plantation owner, Calvin Candie. Though this performance snubbed him from an Oscar nomination as the Academy favored his co-star Christoph Waltz as Dr. Schulz, it is still a great one. His teeth are grimy and his beard is intimidating, but we love this villain as much as we hate him. Candie intrigues us with his incest-dripping relationship and love for brutality. In “Django Unchained,” there is a scene where he
takes Broomhilda (Kerry Washington) and threatens to kill her. Before, he bangs his fist on the table and cuts it, credited by a piece of glass. Even though he was in excruciating pain, DiCaprio worked his way through the scene. Tarantino liked the take so much that made it into the final product. 5. “Revolutionary Road” (2008): Probably the u n c o m fo r t a bl e performance to sit through, as far as brutality of a character goes. He plays Frank Wheeler, a man caught up in the expectations of the American Dream and suburban lifestyles of the 1950’s. Engrossed in being the perfect patriarch to a perfect family, he and Alice (Kate Winslet) struggle every second to fulfill their dreams. Wheeler is a brutish character, and unlike Candie in Django, we are not intrigued by
him and wish the worst for him. DiCaprio’s screaming matches and heartless nature truly brings Frank Wheeler to life. The realization of their personal problems only forms itself in instances of complete loss. Their performances together are far more moving, as their characters are able to develop further than they did in “Titanic.” It’s pretty clear why so many fanatics are lobbying for another Winslet-DiCaprio film. 6. “Catch Me If You Can” (2002): Despite the real-life Frank Abagnale Jr.’s doubt, DiCaprio was an excellent choice to portray him in the adaptation of the memoir of the same name. Here, DiCaprio plays the suave Frank Abagnale Jr., a young man who charades as a pilot, laywer and a doctor and steals millions-all before he turns 21. The smooth-talking teenager made millions illegally, met many people and went under several different names to accomplish his goals. DiCaprio has the capability of selling ice to an eskimo in this film, and nobody is as simultaneously slick and charming. His con-man nature and emotional struggles that emerge from his relationship with his father give DiCaprio the motive to do all this crazy scheming. The best part of the film? Everything is accurate to what actually happened to Abagnale Jr. 7. “Shutter Island” (2010): Further proving that whoever Leo portrays becomes damaged and undone, he stars in this Scorsese film as US Marshal Teddy Daniels. Daniels suffers from PTSD after serving in the Second World War, and is sent to Shutter Island on a wild goose chase to find an escaped prisoner. Watching reality become lies and vice versa for Daniels is
ever-confusing. In fact, audiences are just as confused as DiCaprio’s character is. However, DiCaprio shows legitimate despair throughout the gloomy film. Scorsese and DiCaprio’s fourth collaboration at that point seems to be working, as both are brilliantly talented. 8. “Romeo + Juliet” (1996): As horrible as this film was, it is important to give credit where credit is due. Aside from being every teenage girl’s crush in the 1990s, Leo is romantic as hell in this film as the titular character, the ideal Romeo. The soft look in his eyes and articulation of all things Shakespeare are hard to ignore. Not many people who aren’t Shakespearean trained actors can do Shakespeare well. DiCaprio’s version of Romeo’s speech outside of Juliet’s window was so beautiful that Claire Danes (Juliet) cried, even though she wasn’t meant to at the moment. It will make any girl croon from their window, “Romeo, Romeo.” 9. “The Great Gatsby” (2013): Another nightmarish film, but there are few actors who could pull off Gatsby well. Leo is one of them. His good looks
and reassuring smile are enough for him to carry us through Luhrmann’s adaptation of F. Scott Fitzgerald’s classic. Caught up once more in the American Dream gone haywire, DiCaprio plays a man who can be “interpreted in so many ways: a hopeless romantic, a completely obsessed wacko or a dangerous gangster, clinging to wealth.” Although DiCaprio is no Robert Redford, his charm brings Gatsby to life in a tasteful way. The imaginative look in DiCaprio’s eyes are enchanting, but also bring the mystery behind Gatsby’s wealth to the forefront. 10. “The Departed” (2006): His Oscar-worthy performance was once more overlooked by the Academy, but the competition was stiff alone, as his co-stars included Matt Damon, Mark Wahlberg and Jack Nicholson, and the film did recieve Best Picture in its year. DiCaprio plays Billy Costigan, an undercover cop working to unfoil a mob scheme. Once more, DiCaprio plays a character who is misunderstood and pretending to be something he is not. It takes great skill to play both ends of the spectrum as a character, as well as acting both roles. DiCaprio takes on this ultimate challenge in other films as well as The Departed and his work paid in the film paid off, as one of the main characters in an Oscar-winning film. 11
Style & Entertainment
Suzanne Peguero
Managing Editor
Oh, the wonderful Grammys. Every year you grace us (or rather, hit us in the face with large, heavy object) with your presence. You are the Oscars of the music industry, a pinnacle of refinery and elegance (no one likes the VMAs. We all know they are the Golden Globes of music awards). This year, the illustrious event took place on Sunday January 26. Let’s take at the highlights see how it all went down. The Opening Act: “Drunk In Love” Performed by Beyoncé and Jay-Z Oh hi, Beyoncé. How are you, Beyoncé? Why is your hair wet? Why do you look like you have assumed your ultimate form while your hair is wet? That shouldn’t be possible. I look like a wet mop when my hair is wet. Not like a beautiful, fierce, feminist goddess. I also just spilled my cinnamon bun on the couch. Is this another way in which I will never reach your level of mind-blowing perfection (which I’m not too sad about because it is actually a privilege to just sit on my couch with a cinnamon bun and cry over your greatness)? Also, how can you sing “Drunk In Love” in no other way then perfection while dancing in a chair—which was fabulous, by the way. And now your husband, Jay-Z has joined you. And I’m crying because of how wonderful you two are, and also ruining my face mask. I hate
you, Beyoncé. I hate you and remember that I am always up for adoption. The Host Sigh. LL Cool J is back on the Grammy stage as host once again, with more family friendly jokes and mediocre monologues. The first award: Best New Artist This one is being presented by Pharrell 12
Williams and Anna Kendrick, who are making jokes that everyone is laughing politely and uncomfortably to. And the Best New Artist award goes to: Macklemore and Ryan Lewis, who everyone knew would win but really hoped they wouldn’t.
He is also the first one to take too many pauses in his speech, resulting in a long monologue and the music being played to tell him to get off the stage, thank you very much. Lorde performs “Royals” Lorde is onstage, performing Royals and doing everything right. Here is a list of things she is conquering that is inspiring me to start a new movement called Please Just Give Lorde All The Awards And Accolades Thank You Very Much: crisp white shirts, black pleated pants, chunky platforms, tops of fingers dip-dyed in black, amazing remixes of intelligent, haunting crowd-pleasing songs, and excellence in general. Nothing will be able to top this performance. Hunter Haynes: “Invisible” I wish Hunter Haynes would “dare to be different” with his songwriting. Best Pop Duo Group Anna Farris is presenting and is wisely not making any jokes like the fallen Anna before her. And the winner is: Daft Punk and Pharrell for “Get Lucky”. That’s not too much of a surprise. What is a surprise is the amount of time it takes for Pharrell to get a sentence out. Please hurry up or they will begin to play music and will take you and your ridiculous hat off stage. Katy Perry and Juicy J perform “Dark Horse” I don’t really know how to feel about this. I don’t really care for Katy Perry’s music, I can’t hear her voice and the flames are a bit much (leave the witching
February 3, 2014
to Stevie Nicks, honey). On a side note to the Grammy sound mixing people: please stop making the instruments or backtracks overpower the singer’s voice. It is annoying and I am now beginning to get a migraine. Chicago performs with Robin Thicke If this horrible, misogynistic man doesn’t win any Grammys, I will be satisfied. Keith Urban is singing with Gary Clark Jr. for a mediocre performance featuring admittedly good guitar playing. John Legend sings a sweet love ballad called “All Of Me” that is a welcome break from the hysteria that is giving me a headache and what feels like cabin feverlevels of insanity. Best Rock Song… Goes to Paul M c C a r t n e y, D a v e Grohl, Krist Novoselic, and Pat Smear for “Cut Me Some Slack.” They give a speech that basically says, “This song we merely messed around with is better than your studio song that you probably took months working on.” Taylor Swift head bangs while singing, “All Too Well” Surprisingly, this worked. And her performance was stellar as usual. “Just Give Me A Reason” ft. Nate Ruess I know many say they are tired of P!nk and her acrobatics, but I will never get over the fact that she can sing so well while holding herself in the air on few ropes. Also, Nate Ruess’ mustache is making me sad. Best Pop Solo Performance Lorde won! And she rolled her eyes and then gave a satanic sighing noises onstage, which gives me yet another reason to love and admire her. Ringo Starr He performed a forgettable song that made us understand why he was the drummer for the Beatles, not a front man.
At this stage, I stopped taking notes because my brain was slowly melting from the obnoxiousness of it all. The rest of the highlights are as follows: • Jay-Z and Justin Timberlake won Best Rap Song
• Daft Punk won both Record Of The Year and Album Of The Year, and disappointingly, they did not take off their helmets • Bruno Mars won Best Pop Vocal Album • Casey Musgraves won Best Country Album • Lorde won two Grammys: Best Pop Solo performance and Song of the Year • Daft Punk and Pharrell Williams did a mash-up of “Get Lucky” and “Freak Out” • Metallica and Lang-Lang did a bizarre performance together • Macklemore and Ryan Lewis performed (and thirty-four couples, gay and straight, got married onstage. Queen Latifah officiated, and Madonna sang the wedding song, which makes me sad because I know Madonna will never sing to me, not matter the occasion.) That’s about it. Same time, same place
Science & Health
February 3, 2014
Spicy Ginger Chicken Lettuce Cups
Valissa Hicks
Staff Writer
Spicy Ginger Chicken Lettuce Cups Ingredients: 3 tbsp. soy sauce 1 tbsp. peeled and grated fresh ginger 1 tsp. sugar 1/8 tsp. crushed red pepper 1 clove garlic, crushed 1 lb. ground chicken 2 medium stalks celery, chopped ½ cup sliced water chestnuts ¼ cup dry-roasted peanuts, coarsely chopped 10 large Boston lettuce leaves Directions: In a bowl, combine soy sauce, ginger, sugar, crushed red pepper, and garlic, then set the mixture aside. Heat a nonstick skillet over medium-high heat until hot. Add chicken and cook 4 to 5 minutes or until no longer pink, breaking up meat with side of spoon. Add celery to chicken in skillet, and cook 2 minutes, stirring occasionally. Add water chestnuts and soy-sauce mixture; cook 1 minute to blend flavors. Stir in peanuts. Divide chicken mixture among lettuce leaves. Fold leaves over chicken mixture and eat out of hand.
Spaghetti all’Amatriciana Sarah Peguero
Staff Writer
Spaghetti all’Amatriciana Ingredients: Salt ¼ extra virgin olive oil 4 ounces of sliced bacon 1 medium red onion, sliced ¼ cup tomato paste 1 ½ to 2 teaspoons hot red pepper flakes ¼ tomato sauce 1 box of spaghetti or pasta ½ cup freshly grated parmesan cheese ½ cup freshly grated romano cheese 1/3 cup coarsely chopped fresh parsley Preparation: Bring a large pot of water to a boil with a little salt and vegetable oil. Once the
water is boiling, drop in the pasta and cook until just al dente. Drain, reserving about ½ of the pasta water. Afterwards, combine the oil, bacon, and onion in another pot and cook over medium-high heat, stirring frequently, until the bacon is browned and the onion is softened and carmelized, about 10 minutes. Stir in the tomato paste and red pepper flakes and stir continously until fragrant, about 1 minute. Stir in the tomato sauce and remove from the heat. Add the pasta and ¼ cup of the reserved pasta water to the bacon and onion mixture. Stir and toss over medium heat until the pasta is well coated (add another splash or two of the reserved pasta water to add extra moisture to the sauce). Stir in the cheeses and parsley and serve immediately, with additional grated parmesan or romano on the side. Makes 6 servings.
13
Technology
Why We Need “Her”
February 3, 2014
Marina Watts
Editor In Chief
This January, Spike Jonze released his latest film, “Her.” Starring Joaquin Phoenix and Scarlett Johansson as the voice of Samantha, it has already won a Golden Globe for Best Original Screenplay, and is up for the Academy Award for Best Picture and Best Original Screenplay. The story that Jonze tells is original and profound. Feeling lonely and in the process of a painful divorce, writer Theodore Twombly (Phoenix) purchases an operating system. Samantha (voiced by Scarlett Johansson) is designed to meet every need of Theodore, and they develop a relationship. As he grows closer to Samantha, Theodore’s attachment is unrealistic, and their interaction, though touching, he slowly loses the desire to live life beyond the confines of Samantha. He takes his OS out on dates, and lets her experience things vicariously through him through the camera attached to her system. She is able to respond only so much, but develops from the experience nonetheless. As their relationship slowly deepens, Samantha tries to figure out whether how she feels about Theodore is real, or just programming. Either way, she develops more than she thought she could. Theodore alienates h i m s e l f from human contact, and doesn’t care that she isn’t real. He has finally gained acceptance for who he is, and it is through something designed to make him feel exactly as he needs to be felt. I’ll be h o n e s t , though the premise of falling in love with a computer is a bit pathetic, “Her” made me tear up in the theater. Theodore holds Samantha close to himself, and constantly says that she’s not just a computer. If you tell yourself something often enough, you start to believe it is true, regardless of its veracity. However, when facing the reality that human interaction is an important part of life, he realizes that Samantha isn’t what he needs if he wants to develop a real relationship. Amy (Amy Adams) keeps him grounded, however. She tells him that sometimes all that matters is your own happiness, since “we are only here briefly, and in this moment I want to allow myself joy.” Theodore does this, by finalizing his divorce. The signing of the papers however is accompanied by his ex-wife (Rooney Mara) telling him that Samantha is the perfect girl for him, since he doesn’t have to deal with the actual aspects of being there for someone., as even the emotional and psychological aspect is synthetic to a fault. This is an excellent point. Samantha isn’t physically present. She is no more than a voice that reassures Theodore 14
that he is still attractive and a wonderful partner. This is very important, considering intimacy is no more than an illusion. There is nothing physical about
her, even though he may want her in a physical sense and be fulfilled by nothing more than experiences similar to that of phone sex. What is Spike Jonze really saying about the way we use technology these days with his film? Is Theodore’s dependency relatable to us today? To what extent are we using technology? Should we stray from reliance on our phones? Is having the world at our fingertips detrimental to our interpersonal relat ionsh ips? Then again, can technology enhance our p e r s o n a l relat ionsh ips? According to “Her,” even if it is one where you fall in love with an operating system,
yes. Yes it can. Sure, having a smartphone is helpful for little things throughout the day. If we need to look up directions to a friend’s house, or find out the weather to dress a p p r o p r i a t ely, our dependency is deemed reasonable. If we need to get in touch with someone to solidify plans is exactly what phones are made for, anyhow. The communication realm has grown more in the past ten years than it ever has. Though many people consider anyone who sits around on their phone texting the day away anti-social, they are being more social than ever before. However, these conversations are no more than simply a virtual exchange. The aspect of physically being in someone’s presence
is a lot more powerful than a meaningful text message.
With the amount of technology available to us today and the fact that we can have the world at our fingertips is profound, even intimidating at times. Even though it can help us do everything, we shouldn’t use it for everything. The fact that Theodore completely personifies Samantha in such an intense fashion is a little worrisome for viewers. His lack of desire for human interaction is obvious, and maybe if we become too attached to technology, the world will be graced with the presence of six trillion Theodore’s. Don’t get me wrong, I doubt that the world will come to us all dating our computers. For one thing, reproducing would be a nightmare. How would you even engage in an actual public date without society judging you? Humans aren’t wired to show affection to just one person anyhow. We all love to be loved, but even more so we love to love. So, we needed “Her” to bring us back to Earth and help us realize that although it is nice to have technology to rely on, falling in love with something intangible, like Samantha, is unrealistic. Even though critics have deemed it “slightly futuristic,” we are far away from this becoming a reality. Perhaps “Her” was just a warning of what could happen if we fell in love with the voice of Scarlett Johannson. Hopefully the Academy recognizes the originality presented here with a concept that makes us take a step back, saying “huh. I wish I could have written this.” A love story like this has been in our subconscious, and now with Jonze bringing it to life, we can consider its flaws and strong points. Leave it to Spike Jonze to explore a virtual relationship even Siri isn’t capable of.
February 3, 2014
Sports
Hot Winter for New York Baseball
Benedict Tagle
Sports Editor
RBI and 102 runs scored. He also had a season best 43 home runs. In both seasons, he was an All Star for the
and these additions, the Mets certainly have a bright future. As for the Yankees, every team was looking at how they would handle star second baseman Robinson Cano. The best at his position in the entire league, he had been a Yankee for the entirety of his career. With rumors of Cano’s camp seeking a 10 year, $300 million deal and Yankee GM Brian Cashman stating that the team would not be willing to pay that high of a sum, doubts concerning the Yankees’ ability to keep Cano started creeping in. After a lengthy courting period, the star second baseman from the Dominican Republic agreed to a deal with the Seattle Mariners for 10 years and $240 million. The deal is tied for the fourth-largest in league history. With Cano departing the Yankees, the Bronx Bombers had substantial
American League. Adding Colon and Granderson to their team improved the Mets instantly in different ways. With a young core
amounts of money left that they had reserved for Cano. Perhaps Cano leaving the pinstripes was a best-case scenario. They could now use the extra money
Picture Credit: metro.us
This winter has been quite busy for both local MLB franchises. Let’s take a quick look at both of them.
substantial. In 2011, Granderson had a batting average of .262. In the 583 atbats he had that season, Granderson had a career best 119 RBI, as well as a career best 136 runs scored. He had 143 hits that season, as well as 41 home runs. The following season, he had 106
For the Mets, this was the first time in a long time the team was able to spend significant money. With that money, the team from Flushing made numerous transactions. The two major transactions that drew the attention of most fans were the signings of Bartolo Colon and Curtis Granderson. Colon, who in recent years has revived his career with the Oakland Athletics, signed with the Mets on a two year deal, worth approximately $20 million. The right-handed pitcher from the Dominican Republic is a former Cy Young winner, and last year with the Athletics, proved it. Colon went 18-6 with an outstanding 2.65 ERA. In addition, Colon had the lowest WHIP of his entire career, at 1.166. While there are reservations about his age, the Mets did a good job of signing Colon to a short term deal. Even if Colon is not able to replicate the same success with the Mets, the short term deal combined with the salary makes the deal an attractive one. The Mets can easily sever ties with Colon with no problem, allowing for increased flexibility while still adding a rotation pitcher. By adding Colon to their starting pitching, the Mets helped ease the loss of young stud Matt Harvey. It also allows for the continued gradual progression of prized young arm Noah Syndergaard. In the rotation of the Mets are now Colon, Zach Wheeler, John Niese, Dillon Gee. The Mets have numerous options for a fifth starter. In addition to helping their pitching, the Mets added to their hitting. Desperate for offense, they signed Curtis Granderson to a four year deal worth approximately $60 million. Granderson had a poor season in 2013, especially compared to the two season prior. In a season limited by injury, Granderson played in only 61 games. He only had seven home runs and 15 RBI, with a batting average of .229. Compare those numbers to the production he had in 2011 and 2012, and the difference is
toward improvements all over the field. Firstly, they added Brian McCann.
For the first time since Jorge Posada, the Yankees now have a threat at catcher on both sides of the ball. McCann is towards the top of the list, in regard to his multi-faceted ability. McCann signed a deal with the Yankees for 5 years and $85 million. With McCann only 29 years old, the Yankees will have him during the prime of his career. In addition to McCann, the Yankees signed the other big name free agent this offseason, Jacoby Ellsbury. An All-Star caliber player who has received MVP consideration in the past, he was a major signing for the Yankees. Having signed him away from the team’s rival, the Boston Red Sox, is just a plus. Ellsbury, one of the premier players at his position, has a career batting average of .297. He adds to both the offensive and defensive side of the ball. Perhaps the biggest signing of the offseason for the Yankees was Japanese pitcher Masahiro Tanaka from the Rakuten Eagles. The Japanese sensation was the hottest pitcher on the market, and all 30 teams tried to convince Tanaka to sign for them. The Yankees signed Tanaka to a seven year deal for $155 million. The deal is the fourth largest ever for a pitcher and the highest amount ever given to a player from Japan. The deal also allows Tanaka the option to become a free agent following his fourth season, allowing him to seek another big deal before his prime is over. Tanaka was incredibly effective in Japan, reflected in his performance this past season. In 2013, Tanaka was undefeated; he had a record of 24-0 and a blistering ERA of 1.27. His career numbers of 99-35 and a 2.30 ERA made him a hot commodity. Even with Cano leaving, the Yankees were able to have a significant mark on the offseason. They were able to improve on many of the team’s weaknesses. Even more importantly, they were able to retain the services of their manager Joe Girardi. With the official beginning of the season in April and camps opening soon, there still might be time for both the Yankees and Mets to make a move. 15
Sports
February 3, 2014
Sherman Steals Spotlight of Seahawks Benedict Tagle
Sports Editor
The NFC Championship Game between the San Francisco 49ers and Seattle Seahawks was a great game. The 12th man provided an amazing atmosphere in Seattle throughout the game. There were great plays made by both teams, on both the offensive and defensive side of the ball. Who could forget the punishing runs made by Marshall Lynch? Who could forget the goal line stands made by the 49ers to stuff their division rivals? The NFC Championship that pitted the two division rivals was overshadowed by an event at the end of the game. At the end of the game, Seahawks CB Richard Sherman was matched up with Michael Crabtree. 49er quarterback Colin Kaepernick kept his eye on Crabtree, with every intention to pass the ball to him on first down. With a fade into the corner of the end zone and the game on the line, Sherman made a spectacular play to prevent San Francisco from winning. While the play on the field from both teams were deserving of attention following the game, Sherman’s actions made headlines. Following the play,
16
Sherman excitedly advanced toward Crabtree. Not audible, he talked to the 49er wide receiver, and excitedly moved towards him. In response, Crabtree pushed Sherman in the face. After that interaction with Crabtree, Sherman turned towards
Sherman attracted the eyes and ears of non-football fans with his statements. In the interview with Fox, Sherman yelled, “Well, I’m the best corner in the game! When you try me with a sorry receiver like Crabtree, that’s the result you gonna get!
Colin Kaepernick and made a mocking, choking gesture towards the quarterback and other 49ers in the vicinity. Afterwards, Erin Andrews had a postgame interview with the star cornerback. When asked about the game, Sherman yelled into the microphone.
Don’t you ever talk about me! Crabtree! Don’t you open your mouth about the best, or I’m gonna shut it for you real quick! LOB!” LOB, a reference to the Seahawks’ secondary, backed Sherman’s comments. During the formal postgame press
conference, Sherman and his teammates did not shy away from the limelight. In reaction to Sherman’s comments, many people voiced their opinions. Many argued the cornerback was unprofessional in his actions during the game and his comments after his game. Others argued the cornerback was deserving of talking loudly. Twitter was set ablaze in seconds following the game. Even the players involved were not shy to participate in the banter between the two teams. In response to Sherman’s statements about the “best,” Crabtree vented on Twitter, “Film don’t lie... @nflnetwork @ espn pull up the tape of that game and show me where this guy is the best? #fake #fake #fake .” Sherman in response on Twitter said, “A lion doesn’t concern himself with the opinions of a sheep.” Sherman has certainly taken the attention away from the team and put it all on himself. There were concerns leading up to the game that the extra media attention surrounding the team hurts the Seahawks’ Super Bowl chances. Media companies and other publications were lining up to interview the outspoken Sherman. With a good game during the Super Bowl, Sherman may shut everyone else up indeed.