A human being living in america

A human being living in America We can jump and voice our opinion to our opponents on bailouts of corporations but if they are repaying those funds we will need to address the full picture, is it helping to establish the economy or not. And once they are on track are they utilizing their infrastructure in a way not to benefit the executives but the people that contributed that money we the people.

As human beings, I reiterate human beings; we all admire those who have reached a certain pinnacle in their life in a monetary sense.

But as they excel to that point in their life, as for me if I was so lucky I would know deep down inside my heart the total responsibilities of my input to assist in maintaining a government that is changeable when it is needed to help in its infrastructure.

But some of the wealthiest individual has traditionally invested in themselves and the gain of opulence that came their way in which was in many ways.

So the poor who are peeping through the glass window are amazed at the life style they may live today, as the crumbs fall from the table of the rich and the poor are gathering them up which is just enough to make a meal.

We aren't attesting those who have done well, we celebrate their success.

But to my assessment I would gesture the inner self that they should reflect a self analysis of life and their part in it.

It maybe said the mandate of regulations in certain areas of government, should not be imposed that maybe true in some individuals mind of those who are so quick to judge.

But in my mind I maybe on the opposite of the scale, as I see those in need should be able to gain some assistance when rightfully needed.

So if we are told in the media of those who are spending as if it was no tomorrow, who has engaged in an over assessment of buying everything around them for self needs than we can determine they are wasteful and should not be

glorified, but if they are contributing to the foundation of our government than we can praise them.

Of cause we can determine that they did reach their expertise that elevated them to the top of the financial world than I will bow to them. We are fully aware that everyone has not had a chance to elevate their family because they did not have the proper start in life.

They weren't lifted up and until this day they are still fighting to gain a piece of the pie.

Me myself I have worked around folks who are very well off in the area of positions, financial opportunities, because of family associations, education and otherwise.

Some of them, I would say are cheap in giving at least to organization being distributed throughout their work establishment for the needy and me as being the lowest paid will come forward and do my part to help others.

This should be the mindset of all of us who are in a certain position to stand up and help out.

They are the ones who are having their accountants setup loopholes that that their taxes are minimized in some way or just evading their duties as citizens of the United State.

In life we all are snowed under with views of what government should be.

And as I see it those views comes from within our governing body of families who are blinded by utter nonsense with a transposing facts of being true to a common cause that has nothing to do with anyone's financial base. So it's the parents will interject their views as to what we as individual will take as fact, or truth.

But as we grow we undertake a self-view of what is and is not. Some will shift to the right or the left, in verbal terms as I see it that of a liberalism entity and that of a conservatism entity.

But as I see it within that determination of fact that we are so steadfast in conserving in our mindset we have a narrow view of what is and what is not. We all will come to the rescue to save any of our family members if needed, and in most cases disasters on a large scale most of the time.

So as I see it we all need to assess any given situation when it comes to unifying our structural future.

But as I aforementioned that we need to see and understand the accommodating views to be included in a prescribed set of views by examining just what we as a people want in our government.

And it doesn't have to be my way or your way but the best way to govern a country.

As for years we have read of those will it sacrifice something just to help others who are not as able or who are in a different category of needs.

So I would gesture that those who are so conservative in pathway of their life really isn't that way. As I would say I was somewhat conservative in some of my past views that of abortion, and gay rights.

I was blinded and not following the human attributes of a human being, seeing the full script of human development.

I cannot say outright that women, shouldn't be objective in her determination of aborting a fetus, this is an inner self responsibility and a question between her and her god, and the gay person wanting to be married, or those who are receiving assistance through governmental resources.

So it isn't the issue of what's right and what's wrong when it comes to food stamps, Medicaid, unemployment, tax breaks, and any other disagreement that mushrooming around in someone's head.

And as I grew older I capitulated in my views, I could now see through the blinders I which was impeding my view of life.

Should I have chastised anyone for the way they lived because of my feelings that were different than theirs "NO"?

So I have concluded that this was an oversight of their development in some way as they would see the same in me as I may have been considered as some sort of deformity as human beings should not be contested of that way of life unless we can transpose ourselves in their body, and then we could understand how different they may feel.

So as I see it those who are in the frameworks of calling themselves conservative, and who are always objective in an aim purpose to be on the godly side of all human endeavors of rightness.

And it is those who will put aside any view of the liberals who are only trying to interject a more I would say a more sensitive godly approach to a common cause, what god would do in this particular case.

So the views of the biblical attribute, I believe cannot be failsafe in following god's laws and mankind's laws we have to walk the grounds to determine if we are on the right track and are we equal to all, and not exempting others.

So it is the latter of the few who are so adamant in connecting the dots that of being in a category of opulence and who are trying to concede to only those of the upper level of society as we see it today.

So why compare the life of the upper class unless you feel you are a part of the clique.

But if you aren't in the upper level that of $250,000.00 class then why do you or anyone persistently broadcast their unwanted view of class, and who should be mandated to carry the country when it's in need.

Yes I'm aware of the contributions being done by those with more. But me as a little person willing to contribute more of my funds in a way to make sure those who follow me one day will have, and those who are in need will get the needed assistance when addressed.

So the history of how a individual attained their wealth through investing, creating a commodity by way of being so inventive, or those who receive their

monetary gain through family acquired dividends or anyway it was obtained, as some were breaking the laws of our governmental regulations so many decades ago.

So the few who were deceive and didn't acquire the monetary gain as of their heritage never did receive that uplift as so many did in the past at the starting block was moved for some and not for others to gain ground.

So we must be objective in our assessment when it comes to the downtrodden of the world, because of educational means, living conditions, literacy, dysfunctional attributes, rural living and all of the above than they cannot be a question as to their financial needs.

Not everyone is going through life with a built in program to beat the government out of something unless they are receiving a crazy check from social security.

So what I have written maybe arranged differently but it is my way of expressing what I see, hear, and feel. So we can beat the drum as loud as we want and no one will listen, until we place our objectives on the voting bloc, by choosing those with integrity, and not those wanting fame and power.

I have observed conservatism as it wobbled its way across America some of us quiver at just the sound of the word. I was somewhat abreast as to its meaning.

That is during the changing of the guard from the Democratic Party to that of the Republican Party under President Ronald Reagan, during those days most folks saw problems in the country and me as one wasn’t that unbending when it came to governmental revolutionary progress.

I and most individuals followed the frame of mind of their government officials somewhat. There was destination emanating from party to party but I can’t remember that much diversity as we have it today.

So I as an American citizen wondered if I was misleading myself on this subject.

I attempted to observe the pragmatic practical ways each of the right and the left, as to just how they saw administrative management of government.

The first thing I needed to do was to look up each of the so called words that are being broadcast across this country with headings that were so opposite of each other.

So here we have liberalism which was a prescribed text that most referred to as being from the Latin liberalis, "of freedom") is the belief in the importance of liberty and equal rights. Liberals espouse a wide array of views depending on their understanding of these principles, but most liberals support such fundamental ideas as constitutions, liberal democracy, free and fair elections, human rights, capitalism, free trade, and the freedom of religion.

These ideas are widely accepted, even by political groups that do not openly profess a liberal ideological orientation. Liberalism encompasses several intellectual trends and traditions, but the dominant variants are classical liberalism, which became popular in the eighteenth century, and social liberalism, which became popular in the twentieth century. So as we are forging ahead into the 21th, century the liberalism has taken a new direction in its meaning, as that of conservatism.

Yes all of the above can comply but to the observation of a conservative, or someone who has the mindset of conservatism position. Which seems to differ beyond anyone’s’ inner knowledge of placing them in a juxtapose position these days.

Conservatism is a concept which has evolved over the history of the country, encompassing somewhat different political stances in various eras. The history of American conservatism has been marked by tensions and outright contradictions, with intellectual debates not only between types of anti-communists and antistatists, but between traditionalist and individualists who affirmed the primacy of religion, politics, or economics. So is it the preservation of the rules of law and the Christian religion, and a defense of, Western civilization from the challenges of modernist culture and totalitarian government’s takeover, and that of communism from being interjected in the United State. I as young fellow I truly remember the hearing people like William F Buckley Jr, Barry Goldwater, and religious groups connected the Moral Majority.

But to African Americans we never distant the party from being the party of Lincoln, which most see at the time as a liberators of liberty for the African Americans, hence we had the “Emancipation Proclamation�.

And that of Franklin D Roosevelt, passing of the Social Security act, which we all look forward in our old age. So one would gesture what would have happen if these laws and rulings were adhere to where would we be today even those our social security system has expanded beyond its originally inception, and what would have happen if the emancipation proclamation was put in place, we would be a backwoods country with no direction. And of cause I will have to place on the table the movement of Harry Truman, desegregation of the arm forces.

So as I can see it both parties has contributed their good deeds in various ways that will go do in history.

So the shifting of the parties in grabbing the white house is a pertinent notion of accessibility as to what will each do once they are inducted onto the grounds of the white house it’s want they will do to better the nation.

We realize that those in congress and the senate are there for a reason, not for self not for their community but for country and nothing else matter in times of peril.

If one saw a building about to collapse wouldn't that person warn the inhabitant of such a peril before it became a disaster?

So the inclination that each is so different that someday they will wear different uniforms so that we can one from other with them even voting.

To me this destination of liberalism and conservatism needs to be undone, as most on the opposite side of the fence will gesture as signal that if you are republican than you are more racist in your quest for the people and those in the higher bracket of monetary opulence, and against those of a different hue.

If we were to poll those on the opposite side of the podium, and survey them we would get an overall nod declaration of non-caring of hat group. We can place all of those areas of contributors, women rights, gay rights, religion, the poor, uneducated, the homeless; I can go on and on. This is what is placed in these individuals mind because of the looseness of those speaking for the Republican

Party. It is the concept of the Birthers, the Tea Party all who are showing a dark side of their political beliefs.

And if you are liberal than you are more the common folks, the ones who are trying to juggle table in some sort of management to stable the books for the poor, women rights, religion rights, gay rights, aid for the poor, affordable health plan, the homeless, education the deprived.

So as I can see it, it is the overtone that’s shifting the minorities from the Republican Party even if they are for smaller government, it is the way and the action that these policies are put to the test with words of disrespect and beaded eye way of looking at those on the opposite side of the table.

Created by AVS Document Converter www.avs4you.com