Times of Tunbridge Wells 28th September 2016

Page 1

TA R

pr FOHIS c s oc U W p le to ee N IL of res ar t re d w DE L B ou en he – n ith D E r £ tly sto ew a BA 1, c re P. ma CK L 35 lo w O s ta oun EV 0,0 sed itho .S. s siv b w le g ar s e ER 00 wh ut ign dr & su Y RE ile del ob c it SI F w a es ha es , c irs (fa TH NG UR e he , w br IS LE BI re S st al ic s, l u & WIL PR H co ni lea L IC ffe ts, th B E e si er E O ta de ), bl b so U es oa fa , p rd s, TH ic s, E tu b SH A re o O bs s, W RO ol m ut O M e

T

Wednesday, September 28, 2016

All the news that matters

Local, National and International

GR

AN

Se e

YOUR

OF TUNBRIDGE WELLS

FREE

pa

D

ge

9

SA

IS CL O SE D

LE

PAPER

SISSINGHURST CELEBRITY IAN HISLOP SERVES UP A REAL TREAT Pages 12-13

County hall insists term-time holiday ban stays in force By Jonathan Banks PARENTS hoping to avoid a fine if they take their children on holiday during term-time are set to be disappointed after Kent County Council told the Times that it will not be relaxing the regulations. A county hall spokesman said that any attendance rate below 96 per cent is ‘not good enough’ – meaning it is business as usual for school holidays. Last week Derbyshire County Council decided not to hand out fines if a child takes 11 days off school – the equivalent of 94 per cent attendance. Their ‘interim’ relaxation of

‘Schools will take action’ the rules follows the High Court victory of Isle of Wight parent John Platt, who refused to pay the £60 fine for taking his children on holiday for a week during term time. A KCC spokesman said: “In Kent, through the joint efforts of schools and KCC, the average school attendance rate has been improved to nearly 96 per cent. “Kent County Council believes that an attendance rate below 96 per cent is not good enough, and schools will take initial actions to help or intervene when a pupil’s attendance rate falls below that figure without a justifiable reason.” There will be 195 school days in the county this year, meaning attendance is expected on at least 187 of them.

CHARITY AIMS TO HELP YOUNGSTERS PASS THEIR 11 PLUS

THE B4 BITURBO IS NOT ANY OLD BMW CONVERTIBLE Page 81

!

MR POPPER’S PENGUINS BRING A TOUCH OF COOL TO THE TOWN Page 92

Page 23

DIY giant sparks backlash INSIDE as its business rate is cut BUSINESS SURVEY

Most support retaining access to the single market Page 7

By Adam Hignett adam@thetimesoftunbridgewells.co.uk B&Q is at loggerheads with the borough council after claiming back more than £400,000 in business rates on its Tunbridge Wells DIY superstore. It is now seeking more money from the public purse because of the road improvements that will steer extra customers into its premises. An investigation by this newspaper has revealed that B&Q, under a complex process sometimes conducted behind closed doors, has been appealing against business rates to claw back money. In a move described by one member of Tunbridge Wells Borough Council as ‘grossly unfair’, the B&Q in Longfield Retail Park has seen the rate it has to pay retroactively revised downwards, entitling it to

the refund and lower rates in the future. The Times understands that two weeks ago the store was handed £430,000. Of this, 40 per cent had to be provided by the borough council, while the remainder is largely the liability of central government, a small portion is provided by Kent County Council and Kent Fire.

‘The building was wrongly valued by the Valuation Office’ This means that £172,000 has come from the borough council, enough to run the Assembly Hall theatre for almost a year. A B&Q spokesman told the Times: “The building was wrongly valued by the Valuation Office, meaning the rate adopted per square metre was higher than comparable units.” However, members of the council have

reacted strongly to what they say is the secretive way in which the DIY chain and the Valuation Office Agency (VOA) have gone about agreeing the reduction. “The residents of Tunbridge Wells have been mugged,” said Cllr Paul BarringtonKing, Portfolio Holder for Finance and Governance, adding: “The council had no input into the decision whatsoever.” His view was echoed by the borough council’s Director of Finance and Corporate Services, Lee Colyer, who said that while re-evaluations were not uncommon, he was ‘surprised’ by the scale of the reduction, which he said ‘came out of the blue’. “Because I like to protect the council taxpayers’ interests, I enquired about the reason for the reduction and was quite surprised to be told it was confidential.”

Full story on pages 4-5

LITERARY FESTIVAL Big name authors line up for Cranbrook event Pages 90-91

FOOD AND DRINK REBATE Superstore wins appeal

New bar brings 1920s America to Tunbridge Wells Page 70-71

CHARITY BIG RUN

wa r “ or eho de u

4 sa ava rs s W vi il HI 4 H ng ab w LE ig s l h W E S Mil , tha e to CO tr es n M eet Be e PL , n ET Tu n net E SA br LE idg PR e W EP AR A

Some 600 people took part in the hospice 10k race Page 3


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.
Times of Tunbridge Wells 28th September 2016 by One Media - Issuu