Times of Tunbridge Wells 26th October 2016

Page 1

Local, National and International

OF TUNBRIDGE WELLS

COMEDY BLOG QUEEN LAUGHS ALL THE WAY TO MUMSNET FINALS

SUPERB BREAK SETS UP THE WELLS’ GOAL: SEE SPORTING TIMES

Page 6

Pages 86-87

ON PATROL Officers with the red body cameras

From page 7

Campaigners warn against assuming that ‘battle is won’ adam@timesoftunbridgewells.co.uk

Full story on page 2

Pages 10-11

ICONIC REMAIN CARTOON IS ACQUIRED BY TOWN’S MUSEUM FOR POSTERITY

Heathrow chosen over Gatwick for runway

By Adam Hignett

Behave – you are now being filmed on police cameras

BACKLASH AS OFFICE SPACE IS CONVERTED INTO RESIDENTIAL USE

r ur Yo EE pe a FRwsp

All the news that matters

Ne

Wednesday, October 26, 2016

PROTEST groups yesterday gave a cautious welcome to the news that Heathrow has been named over Gatwick as the most suitable site for the next runway. They also urged people not to be ‘complacent’. The government ended 14 years of controversy and arguments when it named the West London airport as its preferred option yesterday [October 25]. Campaigners had argued that another runway at Gatwick would ‘double’ the number of aircraft over Tunbridge Wells and establish ‘a major motorway above our heads’. But despite what can be seen as a victory for the numerous grassroots campaigns that have sprung up to oppose expansion at the West Sussex airport, those leading the groups remain wary about future developments. They argue the current issues with noise from Gatwick-bound aircraft has yet to be resolved, and the Government’s decision to let Parliament debate the runway issue means it is not completely off the table. Irene Fairbairn, Chairman of the Tunbridge Wells Anti Airport Noise Group (TWAANG), said: “We are of course relieved that the Gatwick option has been rejected. “However, the announcement is merely the start of what promises to be a long, acrimonious and legal minefield before a new runway is operational at Heathrow. “We cannot afford to be complacent,

or to assume that the battle is won. “TWAANG continues to make the case to Gatwick that its current flight paths at all times of the day and night are unacceptable. We will be looking to Government to force similar environmental restrictions on Gatwick as will be applied to Heathrow. Kent and Sussex residents are not second-class citizens.”

‘It would be wrong to support an airport that specialises in exporting UK citizens’ Her sentiments were echoed by Sally Pavey, head of the Wealden-based Communities Against Gatwick Noise Emissions (CAGNE) group, who said the issues surrounding the airport ‘won’t go away’.

“The year or so debate, and eventual MP vote, leaves the door open for Gatwick to continue lobbying. We are concerned that, as a ‘cop-out’, some expansion will be allowed at Gatwick, which would be totally unacceptable. “It would be fundamentally wrong to support an airport that specialises in exporting UK citizens overseas on lowcost holidays, which brings the least into the UK economy… Gatwick is quite simply the wrong side of London to benefit all of the UK, to grow cargo movements in and out of this country, or to allow the UK to be seen as open for business post Brexit.” Martin Barraud of Gatwick Obviously Not, said while his Penshurst-centred group were ‘relieved’, they were still sympathetic with those who would now be ‘blighted’ by noise around Heathrow. GOOD NEWS No runway at Gatwick means no extra planes overhead

Continued on pages 2 & 16


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.