1. The
rims
il,,
Any extra weight in the rim is magnified on these big wheels - it's spinning
/
on the end of a longer lever than 26in or 650b mass, so it's harder to
brake or accelerate. Mass closer to the hub has less effect, so rim weight is in many ways more
important than the overall weight
I
2. The material Many manufacturers are
turning to carbon for their top wheels. Why? Because it's incredibly $iff for its weight (almost too stiff for smaller wheels, in truth). Carbon is well suited to 29in hoops, but we're looking at aluminium here - it s much cheaper.
-
The extra stiffness that
=
screw{hru axles add to the long fork legs and rear stays of a 29er - over
tr
Done right it still does a pretty good job.
i:#
old{ashioned
QRs
-
is
massively obvious. Hubs that can be converted are a wise investment, as they'll let you get the
3. The spokes 29er spokes are long and suffer greater leverage than smaller wheels - theyTe
full benefit of later fork or frame upgrades.
under a lot of stress. The fewer spokes, the more stress each one is under; thankfully most manufacturers have realised low spoke counts and big wheels are a bad mix. But there are still straight-pull or traditional L bend'spokes - in several gauges - and various lacing paterns to choose from. See the reviews
for how they shape up.
Y, -', :,r.:11:1*#.ffi
5. The
hub
There are loads of hub designs, all claiming some sort of advantage over the 0pp0siti0n. t0r the most part they just look a bit more exciting but don't perform noticeably better. How well the bearings are sealed against weather and how long the freehub lasts internally and externally when youTe giving it full gas up a staccato power climb does make a massive difference. The lag
*
between the pawls picking up drive after freewheeling also varies a surprising am0unt 0nce y0u start c0unting the clicks.
'
sets they were competing with - and Kinesis followed
,
suitwithitsownexcellent
,
lXwheels. Carbon certainly
0ur northern test crew chief seems hell bent on redefining relentles with a
and affotdable but hearry.
hasn't had it all its own way
testing schedule that 0nly the best
That]/llas before Hope
here, despite its suitability.
components come through unscathed.
Bigwheels used to either be
a)$iff afld
tight
expensive, b)
butscarily
lightltut
frighteningly bendy or c) stiff
launched its Stan's+immed Hope Hoops, which combined
' ,
50.
Guy (esteven, bike test editor
hasthesituation
changed?
tanthe latest alloy
decent weight and stiffness
wheels beat the established
,amie Booth, tester
with excellent hub reliabiiity
benchmarks for performance,
Junior racer Jamie puts in more training
r
price... orboth? We'vetaken
,
tothetrailsandknocked
miles in a week than most of us do in months, making him an ideal perpetual motion wheel punishment machine.
and a good price. Then
llavic
$epped in with seriously stiff tubeless wheels - at a Iot{er cost than the rarbon
seven bells out of six sets
of
metal wheels to find out.
ffisfilE *+::i"i*r71o7