VOLUME 3 ISSUE 18
|
WWW.NSJONLINE.COM |
WEDNESDAY, JUNE 27, 2018
Inside 81st Miss North Carolina crowned, the good life
DONNA KING | NORTH STATE JOURNAL
Farming families gathered on Bicentennial Mall in Raleigh, on June 25 for an Ag Rally in support of the Farm Act of 2018. Gov. Roy Cooper vetoed the bill hours later.
the Wednesday
NEWS BRIEFING
Supreme Court rules for Trump on travel ban, backs anti-abortion groups Washington, D.C. The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday handed Donald Trump one of the biggest victories of his presidency, upholding his travel ban targeting countries the State Department had deemed noncompliant with security laws. The 5-4 ruling ends for now a fierce fight in the courts over whether the policy represented an unlawful Muslim ban. Lower courts had blocked three travel bans in lawsuits brought by the state of Hawaii and others. The high court also struck down a California law requiring clinics that counsel women against abortion to tell them the state could pay for abortions. Justices ruled 5-4 that it violated the free speech rights of these Christianbased facilities, which are aimed at steering women away from abortion. It’s a victory for abortion opponents who operate 2,700 crisis pregnancy centers nationwide.
Republicans’ offer could triple low-skill migrant workers Washington, D.C. The GOP is trying to sweeten an immigration compromise by adding a key business-friendly measure on Tuesday. House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) proposed making any H-2B visa holders from the last two years not count against the current 66,000-worker cap. Combined with E-Verify, they say the pipeline of legal migrant workers will cut down on illegal immigration. They’re also hoping to draw moderate Republicans’ votes to support an immigration bill.
INSIDE New law requires high performing students to go into advanced classes. Jones & Blount
5
20177 52016 $2.00
8
NORTH
STATE
JOURNaL ELEVATE THE CONVERSATION
Lawmakers weigh amendments to state constitution November ballots could feature more than just candidates as lawmakers seek key issues to put before voters By David Larson for the North State Journal RALEIGH — The North Carolina General Assembly is voting on whether to put a number of constitutional amendments on this year’s ballots. Any amendment to the state’s constitution must be approved by voters, so Republican leaders need their votes to ensure these items are firmly placed in state law. Democratic leaders argue that Republicans are using constitutional amendments as an election tactic to protect their legislative supermajorities. Ballot initiatives, like constitutional amendments, can be used to drive votes by motivating supporters to turn out and help their passage. This year will see up to six constitutional amendments on the ballot. S.B. 75 — “Const. Amd. - Max. Income Tax Rate of 5.5%” was passed by the Senate in March 2017, 36-13, and after passing through the House Rules Committee last week, is calendared for a final vote this week. The bill, if passed then approved by voters, would reduce the income tax cap from 10 percent to 5.5 percent, slightly higher than its current rate of 5.499 percent. H.B. 551 — “Strengthening
Victims’ Rights” provides victims of crimes a number of enshrined rights. These would include the right to speak at the accused’s trials, notice of the accused’s trial updates and safety from them in the future. On Monday, a committee substitute passed through the Senate Judiciary and Rules committees before being passed by the full Senate 45-1. The House has the bill scheduled for a vote this week. S.B. 677 — “Protect Right to Hunt and Fish” was filed in early June of this year and two weeks later passed the Senate with a vote of 44-4. On June 25, the House passed an amended version of the bill, and the Senate concurred with the changes later in the day, making it law. The amendment, if passed by the voters, would make hunting and fishing a right and, in many cases, would prevent laws restricting it unless environmental damage could be shown as a risk. “These rights are deeply rooted in the culture of North Carolina and that is what this amendment recognizes. We are confident that voters will agree,” said the bill’s primary sponsors, Sens. Danny Britt (R-Robeson), Norman Sanderson (R-Pamlico) and Tom McInnis (R-Richmond), in a joint statement. Many members described hunting and fishing as a “heritage” in North Carolina before bipartisan votes of 92-23 in the House and 41-6 in the Senate. H.B. 1092 — “Const. Amendment - Require Photo ID to Vote” See NCGA, page AX
Cooper vetoes the Farm Act and 6 other bills The N.C. Senate overrode Gov. Roy Cooper’s veto of the Farm Act Tuesday evening, one of seven bills Cooper vetoed in a flurry on Monday. More overrides are expected Wednesday. By Donna King North State Journal RALEIGH — Just hours before Gov. Roy Cooper vetoed the Farm Act of 2018, Raleigh’s Bicentennial Mall outside his office was filled with farm families calling for him to sign it. “We are here to bring awareness about what we see as a tax on the farming community in general,” said David Knight, who traveled from Beulaville with his wife, Ce-
leste, and their four small children. The Farm Act passed the legislature on June 14, giving Cooper until midnight Monday to take action. He vetoed it, along with six others bills, Monday night. Among other elements, it contains protections for family farmers from nuisance lawsuits, requiring that a farm have a code violation in order for a plaintiff to be awarded monetary damages for smells and other noxious emissions. It also sets a deadline for lawsuits of one year from the time a farm starts operations or makes a major change in operations. “While agriculture is vital to North Carolina’s economy, so property rights are vital to people’s homes and other businesses,” explained Cooper in a press release posted on his website. “North Carolina’s nuisance laws can help alSee FARM ACT, page A2
U.S. Supreme Court throws out lower ruling against NC Republican election maps Justices said plaintiffs didn’t show “concrete and particularized” burden to the right to vote By Andrew Chung Reuters WASHINGTON, D.C. — The U.S. Supreme Court threw out a lower court’s ruling that North Carolina Republican lawmakers drew congressional district boundaries to ensure lopsided electoral victories for their party against rival Democrats. The justices sent the case back to a federal three-judge panel to reconsider whether the plaintiffs, including a group of Democratic voters, have the necessary legal standing to sue in the case involving a contentious practice called partisan gerrymandering. The Supreme Court put on hold
the lower court’s order that a new map be drawn with conservative Justice Samuel Alito saying the lower court had “committed a fundamental legal error” in analyzing the dispute. The ruling leaves the Republican-drawn districts in place for congressional elections in November, giving a boost to Republicans in their bid to maintain control of the U.S. House of Representatives. The three-judge panel in Greensboro ruled unanimously in January that the Republican-drawn map of N.C.’s 13 U.S. House districts violated the constitutional guarantee of equal protection under the law. Two of the judges found it also ran afoul of the Constitution by discriminating based on political belief and association. The high court on June 18 declined to issue a major ruling in two high-profile cases from WisSee RULING page AX