Issue 126 cystic fybrosis nutritional strategies and management

Page 1

CONDITIONS & DISORDERS

Jacqui Lowdon Paediatric Dietitian, RMCH Presently team leader for Critical Care and Burns, Jacqui previously specialised in gastroenterology and cystic fibrosis. Although her career to date has focused on the acute sector, Jacqui has a great interest in paediatric public health.

For full article references please email info@ networkhealth group.co.uk

CYSTIC FIBROSIS: NUTRITIONAL STRATEGIES AND MANAGEMENT It is well documented that optimal growth and nutrition in children with cystic fibrosis (CF) is crucial to maintain health and lung function.1-3 Lung disease and nutritional status are closely related4 and so, both are strong predictors of morbidity and mortality.5-7 It is essential that this patient group is assessed and monitored on a routine basis to help identify the most appropriate nutritional strategies and assess their outcomes. Debate has ensued, however, as to the best measures to use in order to assess growth in patients with CF, in view of recently published guidelines. There is then the struggle to maintain the optimal nutritional status and how best to achieve this. ASSESSMENT OF GROWTH

In CF, nutrition is considered to be adequate when growth is similar to that of an age-matched healthy population.8 It is, therefore, paramount that growth in children with CF is closely monitored. Appropriate growth charts should be used, according to the nationality and ethnicity of the child. In the absence of those, the World Health Organisation (WHO) growth charts should be used. In a busy clinical setting, Body Mass Index (BMI), being quick and simple to calculate, is accepted as being the most appropriate measure of nutritional status in children with CF over the age of two years. (BMI cannot be used in children under the age of two years, as there are no reference values for BMI percentiles (BMIp) for this age group.9-11)

BMI determines whether weight is in the appropriate range for height. In children, BMIp has been reported to be a more sensitive marker of nutritional failure than other weight and height based measures such as percentage ideal body weight.12 In children over the age of two years, a BMIp of less than or equal to the 20th percentile is associated with a reduced lung function and low bone mineral density, compared to a BMIp greater or equal to the 50th percentile which is associated with better lung function.1,9 The US Cystic Fibrosis Foundation (CFF) and the European CF Society both emphasise the use of BMI percentile for older children and adolescents, aged two to 20 years, with a BMI target at or above the 50th percentile for healthy children.8,9 The CFF Consensus Report criteria defines nutrition-related compromise as BMI <C10th, nutritional risk BMI C10th25th and acceptable nutritional status BMI >C25th.13 However, as BMI adjusts for height, this can mask nutritional stunting and so it must not be used in isolation in growing children. It is still important to review any change in height percentile/ SD score.14-16 Pubertal delay may also affect BMI, so requires consideration when www.NHDmag.com July 2017 - Issue 126

33


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.