NHD EXTRA: PUBLIC HEALTH
GIVE ME ENERGY . . . Review by Ursula Arens Writer; Nutrition & Dietetics
While sweet and sugary drinks face all-round critique from dietitians, it is a mystery that the sector of self-proclaimed ‘energy’ drinks seems to be thriving. Correction: not ‘seems to be’ - ‘is’…
Ursula has spent most of her career in industry as a company nutritionist for a food retailer and a pharmaceutical company. She was also a nutrition scientist at the British Nutrition Foundation for seven years. Ursula guides the NHD features agenda as well as contributing features and reviews
The link to virile masculinity and gungho disruptiveness seems to transcend any concerns over bad teeth and obesity. In debates about energy drinks amongst politicians and regulators, the sugar content of energy drinks is low down over the other contentious ingredients of too much caffeine and mysterious herbals. The sector is booming. More than half of the global market is dominated by two brands: Red Bull and Monster. According to market researcher Euromonitor International, global sales of energy drinks in 2015 were more than €38 billion. More than one third of the global market is the US. China had lower sales than Western Europe in 2015 (€6 vs €7 billion), but is the fastest growing market, predicted to double by 2020 and overtake the US by 2025. Interestingly, two of the top three brands are privately owned: Dietrich Mateschitz owns Red Bull and Russ Weiner owns Rockstar - perhaps they swim in the stuff. The number two brand, Monster, is coowned by the Coca Cola Company.
The success of energy drinks must be due to the many meanings of the word ‘energy’. Dietitians need no review of the meaning of food energy. However, the consumer meaning drives the communication of these products: take your pick of the string of synonyms: vigor/forceful effect/power/capacity to do work/ oomph/ get-up-and-go/ drive/vim - and many other terms. Clearly, a drink that delivers these traits is valued, rather than the dietetic interpretation that the drink contains calories. However, the energy contents of energy drinks are very similar to levels found in other sweet beverages (Table 1). The quandary is that the drinks correctly state that they contain energy (kcals); however they are strongly communicating other meanings of the word. And this is the meaning that (young, male) consumers are receiving loud-and-clear. So what do food labelling experts mean by the word ‘energy’. Statements about energy are permitted on food labelling, but relate entirely to absolute
Table 1: Sugars and caffeine contents Per 100ml
kcals
sugars
caffeine
Red Bull
46
11g
32mg
Monster
42
11g
32mg
Rockstar
59
13.5
32mg
Lucozade energy*
70
8.7g
12mg
Coca cola
42
10.6g
10mg
Orange Juice
36
8.6g
-
-
-
50mg
Pro Plus tablet (1)
* Lucozade Energy contains less sugars but more energy than other similar drinks. This is because some of the carbohydrate in the ingredient ‘glucose syrup’ is in the form of oligosaccharide.
www.NHDmag.com August / September 2016 - Issue 117
57