TNR 3.28.13

Page 1

the 132-year-old award-winning independent student-run newspaper of the university of cincinnati

Vol. CXXXIIi Issue LVVVVVVVVII

The News Record THURSDAY | MARCH 28 | 2013

free - additional copies $1

Preservation board backs Goetz House Owners plan to sell Clifton Heights mansion, activists rally to save building JAKE GRIECO SENIOR reporter newsrecordnews@gmail.com The Cincinnati Historic Conservation Board voted 3-1 in favor of designating the Goetz House a historic landmark. Although the board’s recommendation is good news for the CUF Neighborhood Association, the organization trying to preserve the house, the Clifton Heights mansion is not saved yet. The Windholtz family currently owns the building and operated the Lenhardt’s Restaurant. The family wants to sell the Goetz House to Gilbane Development Company, who plans to turn the property into student housing. The Windholtz family claims the property drained their money for years and they can no longer continue to maintain it. “We have put over $20,000 dollars in

roof repairs over the last 10 years,” said Christy Lamice, daughter of Erika and Joe Windholtz. “We cannot afford to keep this building.” The lawyers for the Windholtz family argued designating the Goetz House as a historic landmark takes away property rights of the owners. Erika Windholtz compared CUF’s plans for historic designation of her property to her experience in Yugoslavia. “Why are you doing this to me, CUF?” Windoltz said. “My family, we had property in Yugoslavia and it was taken from us. And I feel like this is happening to me right now here in the United States.” The building is considered historically significant because of its connection with Christian Moerlein, a prominent figure in Cincinnati’s brewing history. Moerlein gifted the house to his daughter Lizzie when she married John Goetz.

The Windholtz family argued their family’s presence in the building outweighs the significance of John Goetz. “The real estate at 151 W. McMillan Street has been in the Windholtz family for 60 years,” said Arthur Weber, attorney for the Windholtz family. “Far greater than the seven years John Goetz lived in the house.” Students from the University of Cincinnati and university alumni spoke in support of CUF. Natalie Blaire, UC alumna and former server at Lendhardt’s, claimed the interior of the Goetz house is rare and unique. “There is craftsmanship inside that building that hands down does not exist — at least in most places in the city,” Blaire said. The board requested officials revise the guidelines proposed for historic conservation of the Goetz House before its recommendation is forwarded to the Cincinnati Planning Commission.

keith bowers | staff photographer

UC trustee disbarred in Kentucky UC community reacts to Chesley

disbarment, future on UC board uncertain alexis o’brien staff reporter newsrecordnews@gmail.com

The Kentucky Supreme Court disbarred attorney Stan Chesley, a member of the University of Cincinnati Board of Trustees, last Thursday for his involvement in a $200 million diet-drug settlement. In 2011, the Kentucky Bar Association moved to revoke Chesley’s law license for ethical violations. The board determined he wrongfully took $7.5 million from clients in a 2001 settlement. The Kentucky Board of Governors unanimously adopted the charges and penalties levied against Chesley. The case then went to the Kentucky Supreme Court. The justices’ unanimous vote charged him with eight counts of professional misconduct including engagement in behavior involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation. “Obviously, there are many grave concerns relative to what the Kentucky Supreme Court did,” said Fran Barrett, the UC Board of Trustees chairman.“This is something [Chesley and I] are going to have to talk about to see what we can do in the university’s best interest.” Chesley’s term on UC’s Board of Trustees began in 2009 and is set to expire in 2018. Because the state holds board jurisdiction, neither the chairman nor fellow members can expel trustees. There are no state policies in relation to Kentucky’s ruling that would affect Chesley’s tenure on the board, said Paul Nick, director of the Ohio Ethics Commission. Chesley has not announced plans regarding his future on the board. “It’s really hard to tell how this news affects UC,” said Richard Miller, chair of the Faculty Senate and Board of Trustees faculty representative. “When you’re dealing with someone like Mr. Chesley, who’s very well known, people tend to have an opinion about him.” Chesley could not be reached for comment. A statement issued by Sheryl Snyder, Chesley’s attorney, noted his “previously unblemished record of legal service.” see CHESLEY | 2

lauren purkey | PHOTO editor

FIGHTING FOR RIGHTS Gay marriage supporters rallied outside of the court house Tuesday as SCOTUS considered legislation.

COURTING EQUALITY Cincinnatians in support of gay marriage cheer on justices BEN GOLDSCHMIDT CHIEF REPORTER newsrecordNEWS@gmail.com

Gay marriage supporters gathered in Downtown Cincinnati Tuesday to endorse marriage equality as the Supreme Court of the United States considers legislation prohibiting gay marriage. SCOTUS is currently determining whether Proposition 8 and the Defense of Marriage Act are constitutional. The ruling on Proposition 8 will determine whether or not individual states can choose to not recognize gay marriage, and the ruling on DOMA will determine if a federal ban on gay marriage is constitutional. Over the past two days, there were 170 protests across the country in support of gay marriage. About 40 people gathered in front of the Potter Stewart US Courthouse to cheer on the nine Supreme Court Justices, said Morgan Bonney of Get Equal Ohio and Freedom to Marry Ohio, two groups dedicated to marriage equality in Ohio. “The fire is lit, things are moving in the right direction,” Bonney said. “If things go

well in the next couple of days, it’s just going to push the movement along even faster.” Bonney cited a recent Saperstein poll that showed 54 percent of Ohioans now support gay marriage. About 62 percent of Ohioans supported the 2004 amendment requiring the state to only recognize marriages between a man and a woman. “I just got back from a trip to Mexico City, and in Mexico City now you can be gay married — the whole country recognizes gay marriage,” Sands said. “The world is slowly, slowly getting it. They’re seeing how beautiful love is no matter who you choose to be with.” Larry Jost, a philosophy professor at the University of Cincinnati, also attended the rally on 5th Street, and spoke to the group about the importance of the state recognizing gay marriage as a legal institution. He also raised questions over whether banning gay marriage is an infringement on one of the principles America was founded on — the separation of church and state. “The reason that the founders made it so clear that there would be no religious tests for any office is that they were sick of

all the religious wars in Europe,” Jost said. “Nobody’s religious liberty is being violated by allowing civil marriages. [They] think their religion should be the law of the land, but that’s not the American way.” Jost added that religions have a right to decide what marriage is in their own institutions, but the law should not be able to reflect that. Members of the UC LGBTQ community believe SCOTUS ruling will be a huge step forward, but are worried people will see this ruling as the end of the road. Though it is illegal, people are still getting fired and evicted from their homes because of their sexuality, said Kalilah Montgomery, a second-year political science student. “It happens a lot more than people care to admit,” Montgomery said.“I don’t want the federal government to think [gay marriage] is the end-all-be-all, because I realize this is the biggest thing that people focus on. Especially if you’re not in the community … gay discrimination might not be on your radar.” SCOTUS is expected to make its ruling by the end of June.

City council reacts to U-Square controversy Council passes motion to ensure union wages paid for future projects Ben goldschmidt chief reporter newsrecordnews@gmail.com

phil didion | chief photographer

PREVAILING WAGES City council passed a motion to prevent underpayment of workers.

Cincinnati City Council lost the battle over paying prevailing wages with developers for U-Square @ the Loop, but it passed a motion Wednesday to prevent future public-private developments from underpaying workers. From now on, development projects receiving financial support totaling 30 percent or more of the project’s funds will have to ensure all contractors and subcontractors pay employees the prevailing wage of $23.17 an hour. City Councilmembers Cecil Thomas, Wendell Young and Laure Quinlivan found multiple workers who were paid $500 a week for more than 40 hours of work when they investigated the U-Square development in 2012. Two of those workers, Demetrius

CHIEF.NEWSRECORD@GMAIL.COM | 513.556.5908

Garnes and Garrett Foxx, said Wednesday they were forced to sign documents when they were hired stating they would be paid union wages, but actually received close to minimum wage. Upon speaking to city council members investigating the development, Garnes and Foxx were fired by Midwest Framing, the contractor that hired them. “It was clear from these individuals there were problems,” Thomas said. “They were not properly trained, they were not paid the wage required by the contract and there were a number of other concerns.” Forge Lumber, a company that subcontracted to Midwest Framing, offered Garrick and Foxx settlements for any lost wages after city council looked into their employment with Midwest Framing. “We found that when you have a workforce that is comprised of see U-SQUARE | 2


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.