pelawreport.com
January 19, 2021
TAX
Techniques for Preserving Qualified Small Business Stock Benefits for Early‑Stage Investments (Part One of Two) By Michael B. Gray, Jeffrey S. Shamberg and Eric M. McLimore, Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP
Entrepreneurs and investors – ranging from venture capital, PE, hedge funds or family offices – working with early-stage businesses have become increasingly familiar with the potential tax advantages of holding Qualified Small Business Stock (QSBS) under Section 1202 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (Code). Although entrepreneurs and investors have become aware that qualifying investments in QSBS may reduce or eliminate federal income taxes on future exits from their investments, uncertainty remains about certain techniques for transforming existing investments into QSBS.
and “Current Tax Challenges for Funds With European Investments” (Sep. 29, 2020).
Overview of Section 1202 Although Section 1202 has existed since 1993, the investment community did not express much interest at first because the benefits it provided were limited in comparison to the costs. Section 1202 has become more relevant, however, and investors increasingly are demanding that their investments be QSBS eligible.
This two-part series details the primary tenets and considerations for fund managers to obtain favorable tax treatment from holding QSBS. This first article discusses some techniques for converting certain existing businesses operated through non-qualifying “flow-though” or “pass-through” entities into qualified small businesses (Qualified Small Businesses). The second article will address how fund investments, Simple Agreements for Future Equity and convertible instruments can receive and preserve QSBS status.
The increased significance of the QSBS exclusion can be traced to two primary events. First, between 2009 and 2010, the percentage of eligible gain on a sale of QSBS that could be excluded under Section 1202 was increased twice, first from 50% to 75% in 2009, and then from 75% to 100% in 2010. In addition, gains from the sale of QSBS were excluded from the alternative minimum tax (AMT) and net investment income tax. Second, in 2017, the Tax Cut and Jobs Act of 2017 (Tax Act) reduced the U.S. federal corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21%.
For coverage of additional tax guidance, see “How the Proposed Carried Interest Regulations Could Affect Fund Managers” (Nov. 10, 2020);
See our two-part series on the impact of the Tax Act: “Treatment of Carried Interest and the Business Interest Deduction Limitation”
©2021 Private Equity Law Report. All rights reserved.
1