The Epitaph, Issue 6, 2015-16

Page 1

the

epitaph

HOMESTEAD HIGH SCHOOL

VOL. 54

ISSUE 6

WEDNESDAY, MARCH 30, 2016

21370 HOMESTEAD RD. CUPERTINO, CALIF.

Court rules for release of student info

Parents fight to ensure equal education opportunities for disabled students By Gabriella Mrozowski and Elinda Xiao California courts have ruled to allow the release of student information, such as medical information and Social Security numbers, to two parent associations as of Feb. 2016. The new law affects all students who have entered into the public school system since Jan. 1, 2008, according to USA Today’s website. All records of these students will be accessible and reviewed by members of the California Concerned Parent Association (CCPA) and the Morgan Hill Concerned Parent Association (MHCPA) with a designated master, according to the California Department of Education. “The judge has set up very tight parameters about who will be viewing these and how they will be handled,” Jane Floethe-Ford, director of education services at Parents Helping Parents (PHP), said. PHP is a non-profit organization that provides help to families for children of all ages with disabilities in San Jose and the South Bay. The MHCPA and the CCPA sued the California Department of Education (CDE) for the right to

access student information in order to make sure that disabled students were getting the help they needed in April 2012. After three years of litigation in U.S. District Court Judge Kimberly Mueller ruled in favor of the MHCPA and CCPA, allowing them to view these records. The MHCPA and the CCPA are the only organizations outside of the C D E that are allowed to view this information. The CCPA claims the CDE fought for students’ privacy rights to save money from funding the Individualized Education Program (IEP), a specialized course designed for students on an individual basis. IEPs are often chosen to aid children in special education. Implementation of IEP costs more than less personalized alternatives, and most students lose their access to an IEP after first grade, according to the CCPA website. According to the case summary,

provided by the United States District Court, “Plaintiffs allege the CDE has violated the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, IDEA, among other

related laws by failing to monitor, investigate, provide services to, and enforce the rights of children with disabilities consistent with its obligations under the law.” The CDE opposed the release of student information, claiming it is a breach of student privacy. “We have fought vigorously to protect students’ privacy rights and will continue that fight,” State Superintendent of Public Instruction Tom Torlakson said in an online press release from Feb. 17. Students under the age of 18 must defer to their parents on whether or not they would like their information to be released. In order to keep their student’s information private, parents or guardians can sign a form and submit it to the CDE. “If [parents] feel like there is no way that they want their information out there, then they can make the choice that they would like to opt out,” Floethe-Ford said. An objection form can be found

Mandatory tutorial gets off to a rocky start The tutorial check-in system introduced last year to a group of volunteer teachers yielded no substantive results, librarian Amity Bateman said. The tutorial system was originally designed to aid teacher communication in helping struggling students get to classes in which they struggle, Principal Greg Giglio said. Giglio referenced the tutorial check-in system that Fremont High School currently uses to attest to the potential of full implementation of the software across campus. The system at Fremont currently works successfully in helping students, Giglio said, but unfortunately has not come to fruition at Homestead yet. “I think we’re still in the process of working out some of the kinks… because we were having some overall network

Sections:

issues,” Giglio said. “I think we’re at a point where we’re continuing to add people to it.” Although the administration hoped full implementation of the ID scanning system would be in place by this semester, the software has still not advanced past initial testing stages, Giglio said. Giglio said that administration and staff are still testing if the system works on a smaller scale before rolling it out to the whole school. No clear timetable for complete implementation has been set, though Giglio said he unofficially aims for the system to take full effect by next fall. “The idea is to keep moving up until we can test the full capacity of it so that the hope would be, by the beginning of next year, we will be up and running with this,” Giglio said. Bateman said that because there have been technological problems with a handful of

News Opinion

2–3 4–6

Transparent Elections

“Yes, the winners are announced... but by what margins did they win?”

teachers using the software, administration wants to make sure the software and internet infrastructure are strong enough to handle widespread use within the entire school. “There have definitely been some tech glitches along the way,” Bateman said, “and that, I think, has gotten in the way of a better roll-out to test whether this is a useful tool or not.” Bateman said the tutorial system has not been “terribly useful” since it is still in its trial phase, and would be effective only when the whole school implements it. However, she said the system holds promise in multiple functions in the future, such as reserving computers in the library. “I think everybody’s goal was to do it a little bit faster, hopefully it will happen eventually,” Bateman said. “I envision it being more useful in the future than it currently is.”

Lifestyles Spread

7,10 8–9

Want to learn more? Scan both codes for more information about the case!

INSIDE:

New tutorial system has an uncertain future By Michael Huang

on the CDE and the HHS website. Parents, guardians or former students over the age of 18 can submit the form by mailing a printed copy to the CDE. However, the objection form is not an “opt-out,” as there is no actual way for a student or parent to opt out of sharing their information. “I always want [the parents] to have all the information so you can make a strong, informed decision because no one is going to be sitting next to your child or you in the years to come,” Floethe-Ford said. “So you have to be the one to say ‘I knew what I was doing and this is what I did.’” Letters or objection forms should be mailed to the Honorable Kimberly J. Mueller c/o Clerk of the Court, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California, 501 I Street, Room 4-200, Sacramento, CA 95814.

Entertainment Sports

Pg. 4

Suicide Awareness “Having good mental health can mean the difference between life and death.” Pg. 7

Tennis Profile “Our best chance to go deep in CCS is this year.” Pg. 14 11,13 14–15

Last Word

16

PAGE DESIGN BY RON HASSON AND DANIEL MOSCOVITCH PHOTOS BY KARSHIN GUPTA, DANIEL MOSCOVITCH AND JEANNA TOTAH ILLUSTRATIONS BY MILA SVIDERSKAYA AND ELINDA XIAO


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.
The Epitaph, Issue 6, 2015-16 by Natalie Owsley - Issuu