Natalie J. Park, DArch 2016 Architecture Portfolio

Natalie J. Park, Darch portfolio 2016

portfolio 2016

RESUME EDUCATION

PRESENTATIONS

DOCTORATE OF ARCHITECTURE (DArch) School of Architecture (cum laude) University of Hawaii at Manoa 2012 - 2016

PAST, PRESENT, AND FUTURE: TALL BUILDING DELIRIUM SoA, Paper Architecture Night by AIAS Honolulu, Hawaii April 2016

INTERIOR DESIGN (CIDA & ACICS) Design Institute of San Diego 2008 - 2010

NEXT GENERATION TMT: UPCYCLING THE VERTICAL NEIGHBORHOOD 8th European TMT Workshop Dresden, Germany May 2014

MARKETING - BACHELORS OF SCIENCE (BS) School of Business Administration Portland State University 1998 - 2002 EXPERIENCE STIR ARCHITECTURE Los Angeles, CA ARCHITECTURAL DESIGNER Fall Internship 2015 RIDER LEVIT BUCKNALL Honolulu, HI PROJECT MANAGEMENT Summer Internship 2015 STARBUCKS COFFEE COMPANY WA/OR/CA/HI MARKETING COORDINATOR | BARISTA - ASSISTANT MANAGER 1997 - 2002 / 2008 - 2014 SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE, UH AT MANOA TEACHING ASSISTANT,QUALITATIVE STRUCTURES CRN 723 Fall 2014 TREETOP, SELAH, WA CUSTOMER SERVICE - FRESHSLICE & STARBUCKS TL 2007 WESTIN REGINA RESORT, CONDOMINIUM SALES 2005-2006

LOS CABOS, MEXICO

ACOSTA SALES AND MARKETING, PORTLAND, OR BUSINESS SALES MANAGER, FOODSERVICE-OR 2002-2005

DESIGNING WITH THERMALLY MODIFIED WOOD (TMT) American Wood Preservation Association Waikiki Sheraton May 2013 HOMELESSNESS IN HAWAII - TRANSFORMING LEADERSHIP NWPR+WMR AIA Conference Tucson, Arizona October 2012 A W A R D S 2016 ARCHITECTURE RESEARCH Honolulu Architecture Foundation (HAF) 2015 PRACTICUM FUND SCHOLAR- SoA Scholarship Committee 2012 AWARD OF MERIT- STUDENT DESIGN COMPETITION Department of Hawaiian Homelands EXHIBITIONS 2016 EXHIBITION AT THE CAPITAL - DARCH HONOLULU, HAWAII 2014 HAIGO & IRENE SHEN GALLERY- URBAN MATTERS HONOLULU, HAWAII TECHNICAL AUTODESK: REVIT, AUTOCAD RHINO: GRASSHOPER, V-RAY, DIVA ADOBE: PHOTOSHOP, ILLUSTRATOR, INDESIGN MICROSOFT OFFICE: WORD, EXCEL, POWERPOINT L A N G U A G E SPANISH: SPEAK (moderately) / READ / WRITE

PUBLICATIONS TALL BUILDING DELIRIUM: SECOND LIFE OF THE METLIFE 2016 UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII DOCTORAL DISSERTATION TRADEWIND TOWERS, BY CURT SANDBURN 2013 HONOLULU WEEKLY FEATURING THE REDESIGN OF KUKUI TOWERS

O

T

H

E

R

2009 SHERIDAN VINEYARDS TASTING CONSULT 98 Points - Wine Spectator 2005 ADIDAS NW ADVENTURING RACING TEAM Sponsored Athlete 2004 Xterra REGIONAL CHAMPION NW Off-Road Triathlon Series

Natalie J. Park, darch njpark@hawaii.edu

CONTENTS

A C A D E M I A

RE-IMAGINING THE CONTEMPORARY MUSEUM 04 TATE RED. EAST BANK, LONDON, ENGLAND repositiong & transforming

metlife2: A SECOND LIFE FOR THE metlife:

10

ECONOMICAL AND ECOLOGICAL RE-GENERATION. MANHATTAN, NYC

18

kukui towers: HOUSING FOR THE 21ST CENTURY: ADAPTATION OF THE VERTICAL NEIGHBORHOOD. HONOLULU, HAWAII

MIRRORING CULTURE VIA THE MODERN MALL 22 THE VILLAGE. KUNSHAN PROVINCE, CHIna PROFESSIONAL

MIXED USE PROJECT 24 NOHO WEST. LIVE, WORK, SHOP. NORTH HOLLYWOOD, CALIFORNIA

EVOKING RED IN ITS ABSENCE

tate red

4

ENTRY / EXIT

BLACKFRIARS BRIDGE

urban edge response

TRANSITIONAL SPACE

ART EXHIBITS

PLAZAS

SIRI / “socialites”

JEN & ETHAN / ”pods”

WILL “lunchEONneer”

the non-visitING VISITors

BLACKFRIARS RAIL

east bank MILLENNIUM PEDESTRIAN

users

RE-IMAGINING THE CONTEMPORARY MUSEUM

SITE

thames

SOU THW ARK CAN NON

RAIL

PAM & DONALD / “broken watches”

N BRID GE

CATEGORY user data and projections DURATION (HOURS / VISIT) 6

4

AVG.￡ SPENT / VISIT/ VISTIOR 1-4

1.4

N/A

2.1

4

12

100

2-12

30

378

60

3-5

0.33

140

20

2<6

2

ESTIMATED VISITS / YR IN MILLIONS

1

156

260

1/2 VISITS / YR

1.4

1-4

1.8 1 # IN PARTY

63

15

0

0 TOTAL￡ SPENT / CATEGORY / YR. IN MILLIONS

5

USER & SITE DIAGRAMS EAST BANK’S FILTERING WAYFINDER

LONDO

STRE ET

SKIN OPENING_CHANGING SEASONS

FURLED

UNFURLED

6

SEMI-FURLED

BUILT MODEL

4<6 ARTISTS ON DISPLAY_ART OF MAKING INTERPLAY OF LIGHT & STRUCTURE

tate red

7

RE-IMAGINING THE CONTEMPORARY MUSEUM

8

SUMMERTIME VIEW AT EAST ENTRANCE

9

6<6

WINTERTIME VIEW OF SOUTH ENTRANCE

tate red RE-IMAGINING THE CONTEMPORARY MUSEUM

A SECOND LIFE FOR THE METLIFE

metlife2

O B S E R VAT O R Y S E C O N D _ S K I N

MetLife Building : 200 Park Avenue, New York City, NY Architect : Emery Roth & Sons, Pietro Belluschi, (Walter Groupius) Constructed : 1960-1963 Use : Office Architectural Height : 808 ft. /246.3 m Floors Above Ground : 59 Tower GFA: 2,841,511 ft² / 263,985 m² Elevators: 85 Top Elevator Speed : 7.1 m/s repositioning & transformation : 2016 /visionary status 10

P

O

V

I

D A

I D

U U

C

M T

REPOSITIONING & TRANSFORMING In 2001 it was rumored that an investigation revealed age-related defects in the faรงade of the MetLife Building. The precast faรงade was reaching the end of its life and with it was bringing a new opportunity.

A new opportunity exists to address design issues related to site, energy use, observation deck, users, faรงade, and architectural legacy through renovation.

The goal of using this well-known Park Avenue landmark is to demonstrate the power of renovations, and to show a sustainable way to renew the city.

The Second Life of the

MetLife Building is to bring relevance and to contribute positively to the twenty-first century in an ecological and economical way. the second life of the metlife renovation uses timely principles of adaptive - reuse, passive strategies, urban parks, and courtyard spaces to maintain its presence as a mid-town icon AND RECLAIM LOST PARK SPACE THAT GAVE PARK AVENUE ITS NAMESAKE. The renovation increases retail space to 57,340 sf, adds 65,00 sf of green space, a mixed-mode naturally ventilated tower, observation deck, AND REUSES THE ORIGINAL VERTICAL FACADE ELEMENTS..

2<8 SYLINE VIEW EXISTING METLIFE BUILDING

The Pan Am building (now MetLife Building) was conceived in 1958, but its deeply found origins started long before.

11

12

12

VIADUCT_ WALL SECTION

REPOSITIONING & TRANSFORMING 5 6 9

8

7

4 3 2 1

12345678910-

planter- catch all openings - size varies to control species extruded layers for perching / protection wall cavity - nesting 4â&#x20AC;? plank tiles one way vision glass stone pavers 1% slope for drainage to planter translucent floor panels transitional landscape

metlife2

4<8 URBAN REGENERATION PODIUM TRANsfORMATION-STREET LVL

10

13

14

URBAN PARK LAYER_PODIUM ROOF

REPOSITIONING & TRANSFORMING YOUNG WOODLANDS

GRASSLAND OVERLOOK

TALL MEADOWS

Original mass

urban park layer WOODLAND THICKET retail layer

MIXED PERENNIAL MEADOW

5 floors = sf

MOSS LAND nesting

woodland thicket / mound

mixed perennial meadow / ramp

tall meadow / plane

young woodland / step up

year round birds summer birds nocturnal

fl-6

fl-2

metlife2

15

URBAN REGENERATION PODIUM TRANSFORMATION

moss land / Pit

6<8

park activated retail

EFFICIENCY RATIOS

sameness factor floor to floor change

consistency of lease span core v. exterior geometry

1.00

0.76

vertical commute

columnless plannable factor

duration of lunch hour traveling ground -top

0.042

density

plannable area

useable area

Individuals per total sf of floor

plannable office space

Efficiency of a towers non-vertical elements

0.0067

0.72

0.80

Perimeter office

Spatial interruptions

quantity of daylight

0.99

0.39

0.47

plannable aspect ratio

16

useful illuminance

amount of desired office space

sectional usability

depth of dedicated tenant occupation

floor to ceiling v. floor to floor

5.86

0.69

floor area ratio density of site development

16.5

typical window units

Deviation from simplest form

0.63

1.00

carbon footprint

weighted aspect ratio

Material & construction per floor

measuring slenderness

0.23

8.13

volume optimization

Perceptible volume 0.53

rate of form change

1.00

weighted core aspect ratio

perimeter enclosure factor

*core setback is assumed

deviation from simplest form

Extrusion of base geometry

measuring core slenderness

1.00

8.22

shadow area avg. SHADOW AREA compared to gROSS FLOOR AREA 8AM-5PM

occupiable v. gross volume

tapering factor

1.17

REPOSITIONING & TRANSFORMING

surface area ratio

0.7 7

surface area to volume ratio

enclosure transparency overall view of surface area

0.021

0.61

plannable area to exterior surface area

sail area to the perpendicular

2.11

2.49

wind interaction & counterforce

metlife2

8<8 TALL BUILDING ANALYSIS SPATIAL_ENVIRONMENTAL_STRUCTURAL

curtain wall units

17

HOUSING FOR THE 21ST CENTURY

kukui towers honolulu, hawaii

Presented at AWPA Annual Conference,Waikiki, HI 2013 Presented at 8th European TMT Workshop, Dresden, Germany 2014 Curated for Urban Matters, Irene & Haigo Shen Gallery, Honolulu, HI 2015 18

KT makai THE EXISTING DESIGN OF KUKUI TOWERS TRANSLATES ITS DEPENDENCE TOWARDS ENERGY GUZZLING AIR CONDITIONERS. RESEARCH SHOWS THAT IF RESIDENTS WERE TO USE A 5,000 BTU 900 KW AIR CONDITIONER FOR ONLY 4 HOURS PER DAY, THE YEARLY ELECTRIC BILL WOULD TOTAL $12,610 (BASED ON HAWAIIAN ELECTRIC RATE OF $0.32/ KWH).

IF ALL 908 UNITS WERE TO USE THE A/C IN THE GIVEN CAPACITY IT WOULD COST KUKUI RESIDENTS $11,453,875 PER YEAR. ENERGY SAVINGS OFFSET

BY NATURAL VENTILATION AND PASSIVE COOLING STRATEGIES ARE THE FOCUS OF THE KUKUI TOWERS REDESIGN.

REPOSITIONING & TRANSFORMING

mauka

iNTERIOR CHANGES OFFER FLEXIBLE UNIT SIZES ENCOURAGING SOCIAL ENGINEERING AS WELL AS ACCOMMODATING FUTURE GROWTH.

-

Envelope

-

slab openings

+ Periphery slabs + Periphery structure + Louvers & frame

core with slabs

KUKUI TOWERS INTRODUCES TMT, THERMALLY MODIFIED TIMBER, A NATURALLY TREATED WOOD IMPERVIOUS TO TERMITES AND ROT. TMT IS USED FOR INTERIOR WALLS, FLOORING, AND EXTERIOR SHADING.

2<4 BIOCLIMATIC RESPONSE VIEW THROUGH TMT LOUVERS

existing

19

THE MOVEABLE DWELL WALL

+38’

8’-6” 64’

’

36

8’-6”

17’

+28’-6”

’

28

3’

+28’-6”

+28’-6”

+28’-6”

+28’-6”

+28’-6” 24’ MAX

6’ MIN

3’

3’

3’

+28’-6”

+19

+19

+9’-6” +9’-6”

20

FLOOR PLAN

FLOOR

REPOSITIONING & TRANSFORMATION

PLAN

PLAN

kukui towers

4<4 UNIT CONFIGURATIONS TYPICAL FLOOR PLAN ARRANGEMENTS

FLOOR

21

V I L L A G E

SHOPPING CENTER

STRUCTURAL AXON &

DIAGRAMS

THE

22

1 Fiber-cement slate (square cut over sheathing of

bitumen roofing felt with sanded finish laid length

wise with laps of > 80mm, over Battens 24 x 48mm

on top of concrete roof decking slab) 2 Mono ridge tiles (long and short) 3 Sheet metal soffit 4 Mesh screen to ventilate opening 5 Ridge batten 6 Thermally modified timber (treated)

boards (stained and oiled) 7 Ventilated Cavity (air space) 8 Waterproofing 9 Masonry Anchor (tie back) 10 Thermal Insulation 11 CMU 150mm (joints aligned) 12 Mortar 13 Concrete column 400x600mm 14 Wood wash 15 Duratherm wood commercial grade window mullion 16 Double pane glass 17 Backer rod and sealant 18 Cement plaster 19 Steel angle 20 Pavers 21 Pipe railing connection 22 Safety glass railing 23 Bolts in expansion shield 24 Steel capping w/flashing 25 Closed cell polystyrene under protection board 26 All-level drain on suspended base

I. BLDG. 1 STRUCTURE FUNCTION MATERIAL size / method

FLOOR PLATE supports columns and roof plate POUR IN PLACE CONCRETE slab 100mm /casted w/parallel beams

MINOR BEAM supported by major beam pour in place concrete 400x200mm

major beam supported by columns pour in place concrete 400x500mm

columns supported by concrete floor pour in place concrete 400x600mm II. BLDG. 2 STRUCTURE FUNCTION MATERIAL size / method

FLOOR PLATE supports columns and roof plate POUR IN PLACE CONCRETE slab 100mm /casted w/parallel beams

MINOR BEAM supported by major beam pour in place concrete 400x200mm

major beam supported by columns pour in place concrete 400x600mm

columns supported by concrete floor pour in place concrete 400x600mm

ridge beam support roofs/supported by purlins & columns pour in place concrete 400x400mm III. BLDG. 3 STRUCTURE FUNCTION MATERIAL size / method

FLOOR PLATE supports columns and roof plate POUR IN PLACE CONCRETE slab 100mm /casted w/parallel beams

MINOR BEAM supported by major beam pour in place concrete 300x200mm

major beam supported by columns pour in place concrete 400x400mm

columns supported by concrete floor pour in place concrete 400x600mm

ridge beam support roofs/supported by purlins & columns pour in place concrete 400x400mm IV. BLDG. 4 STRUCTURE FUNCTION MATERIAL size / method

FLOOR PLATE supports columns and roof plate POUR IN PLACE CONCRETE slab 100mm /casted w/parallel beams

MINOR BEAM supported by major beam pour in place concrete 400x200mm

major beam supported by columns pour in place concrete 400x500mm

columns supported by concrete floor pour in place concrete 400x600m

ridge beam support roofs/supported by purlins & columns pour in place concrete 400x500mm V. BLDG. 5 STRUCTURE FUNCTION MATERIAL size / method

FLOOR PLATE supports columns and roof plate POUR IN PLACE CONCRETE slab 100mm /casted w/parallel beams

MINOR BEAM supported by major beam pour in place concrete 400x200mm

major beam supported by columns pour in place concrete 400x400mm

columns supported by concrete floor pour in place concrete 400x600mm VI. BLDG. 6 STRUCTURE FUNCTION MATERIAL size / method

FLOOR PLATE supports columns and roof plate POUR IN PLACE CONCRETE slab 100mm /casted w/parallel beams

MINOR BEAM supported by major beam pour in place concrete 400x200mm

major beam supported by columns pour in place concrete 400x800mm

columns supported by concrete floor pour in place concrete 400x600mm

ridge beam support roofs/supported by purlins & columns pour in place concrete 400x600mm IV. BLDG. 7 STRUCTURE FUNCTION MATERIAL size / method

FLOOR PLATE supports columns and roof plate POUR IN PLACE CONCRETE slab 100mm /casted w/parallel beams

MINOR BEAM supported by major beam pour in place concrete 400x200mm

major beam supported by columns pour in place concrete 400x500mm

columns supported by concrete floor pour in place concrete 400x600m

ridge beam support roofs/supported by purlins & columns pour in place concrete 400x500mm

MIRRORING CULTURE VIA THE MODERN MALL

6

7

23

MATERIAL PALETTE BUILDING DETAILS

1

2

4 5

2<2

3

500,000 SF REPURPOSED + 200,000SF NEW

NOHOwest a transformation is underway for this new mixed-use lifestyle center at the current Macyâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s site on laurel canyon boulevard. at oxnard street in north hollywood. the redevelopment re-purposes the existing macyâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s building to serve office and retail uses MET by a walkable main street retail concept with amenityrich residential apartments. *content created while working at stir architecture.

24

25

2<2

WINTER 2015 MASTERPLAN NODES_ SOCIAL SPACE

ARCHITECTURE

LIVE. WORK. SHOP. NOHO WEST