29ﻣـــﺎﺭﺱ 2013
ﭘــﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻛﻮﺩﺗــﺎﻯ 22ﺑﻬﻤﻦ ،1357ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻯ ﻧﺎﺗﻮ ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺁﺳــﺘﺎﻧﺔ ﻧﻮﺭﻭﺯ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﻳﻚﺳــﻮﻳﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻗﻤﺎﺵ ﺗﺮﻭﺭ ،ﻛﻮﺩﺗﺎ ،ﺑﻤﺒﺎﺭﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺗﺠﺰﻳﺔ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻯ »ﻏﻴﺮﺧﻮﺩﻯ« ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺑﻬﺎﻧﺔ »ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ« ﮔﺴــﺘﺮﺵ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﺍﻣﺴــﺎﻝ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻗﺒﺮﺱ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﻬﺎﺟﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺁﺩﻣﺨــﻮﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ؛ »ﺗﻬﺎﺟﻢ ﻣﺎﻟﻰ« ﺑﻪ ﺑﻬﺎﻧــﺔ »ﻧﺠﺎﺕ« ﺑﺎﻧﻚﻫﺎﻯ ﻗﺒﺮﺱ! ﻭ ﺍﻳﻨﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺳﻴﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪ ﻋﻼﻗﻤﻨﺪ ﺷﺪ!
ﻭﻗﺘﻰ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺳﻴﺎ ﺑﻪ »ﻓﻠﺴــﻔﻪ« ﻣﻰﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﺩ» ،ﺍﻳﺪﻩﺁﻟﻴﺴﻢ« ﻫﮕﻞ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷــﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺮﭼﺸﻤﺔ ﻧﮕﺮﺵ ﺍﻧﺴــﺎﻥﻣﺤﻮﺭ »ﻣﺪﺭﻧﻴﺘﻪ!« ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻫﻢ ﺭﻭﺷــﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ؛ ﺭﺍﻳﺤﺔ ﻧﻔﺖ ،ﺑﻪ ﻭﻳــﮋﻩ ﻧﻔﺖ ﺩﺭﻳﺎﻯ ﺧﺰﺭ ﻫﻮﺵ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺮ ﺁﻧﮕﻠﻮﺳﺎﻛﺴﻮﻥﻫﺎ ﺭﺑﻮﺩﻩ: »] [...ﺭﻳﺸﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺭﻭﻥ ﺑﺰﺭگﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻭ ﺍﺛﺮﮔﺬﺍﺭﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺍﻳﺪﻩﻫﺎ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﺓ ﻣﺪﺭﻧﻴﺘﻪ ﺑﻴﺮﻭﻥ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻫﮕﻞ ﺻﺮﺍﺣﺘﺎً ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﺭﻭﺡ ،ﻏﺮﺏ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﺷــﺮﻕ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﺒﺐ ﺩﺭﻫﻢ ﺁﻣﻴﺨﺘﮕﻰ ﺑﺎ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺖ، ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﻣﺴــﻴﺮ ﺭﻭﺡ ﺭﺍ ﮔﻢ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻧﻤﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻯ ﺩﺳﺖ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﭘﺲ ﻻﺯﻡ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺤﺖ ﻫﺪﺍﻳﺖ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﻴﺮﺩ ]«[... ﻣﻨﺒﻊ :ﺭﺍﺩﻳﻮ ﻓﺮﺩﺍ ،ﻣﻮﺭﺥ 28ﻣﺎﺭﺱ 2013 ﺑﻠﻪ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﻤﺎﺵ »ﻣﺪﺭﻧﻴﺘﻪ« ﻛﻪ »ﺣﻖ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ« ﻭ »ﻣﺴــﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖ« ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺴــﺎﻥ ﺳﻠﺐ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ »ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻯ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥ« ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺒﻬﻤﺎﺕ ﻭ ﻣﺰﺧﺮﻓﺎﺗﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻗﻤﺎﺵ »ﻫﺪﺍﻳــﺖ ﺭﻭﺡ« ﭘﻴﻮﻧﺪ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﺪ ،ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﻧﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﺗﺎﺏ ﺍﻓﻜﺎﺭ ﻫــﮕﻞ ،ﻛﻪ ﻛﺎﻻﻯ ﺗﻮﻟﻴــﺪﻯ ﻃﻮﻳﻠﺔ ﻣﻚﻛﺎﺭﺗﻰ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻃﻮﻳﻠﺔ ﻣﻘــﺪﺱ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﭘﻴﺎﻣﺒﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺩﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻤﻰ ،ﺟﻬﺖ ﻣﺮﺯﺷــﻜﻨﻰ ﻭ ﺗﻬﺎﺟــﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺮﻳــﻢ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻰ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﻭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺑــﺮﺍﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ »ﻣﺄﻣﻮﺭﻳﺖ
ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻰ« ﻗﺎﺋﻞ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ »ﻗﻀﺎﻭﺕ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻰ« ﻣﻰﻧﺸﻴﻨﺪ .ﻃﻮﻳﻠﺔ ﻛﺬﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﺔ ﺍﻋﻀﺎء »ﻣﺄﻣﻮﺭﻳﺖ« ﻣﺸﺎﺑﻪ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ .ﭘﺎﺩﻭﻫﺎﻯ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺳﻴﺎ ،ﺑﻪ ﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ »ﻭﻇﻴﻔﻪ« ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺑﻤﺐ ﻭ ﭼﻤﺎﻕ ﺭﺍﻩ »ﺭﺳﺘﮕﺎﺭﻯ« ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﺸــﺎﻥ ﺩﻫﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻣﻰﺑﻴﻨﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻮﻓﻖ ﻫﻢ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ! ﺷﻴﺦﻧﺸﻴﻦﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ،ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺍﺳﻔﺒﺎﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺷﺎﻫﺪﻯ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺪﻋﺎ. ﻭﻟﻰ ﻃﻮﻳﻠﺔ ﻣﻚﻛﺎﺭﺗﻰ ﺍﺧﻴﺮﺍ ً »ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻰ« ﻫﻢ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ! ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﻤﺎﺵ »ﻣﺴــﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖ« ﺭﺍ ﻓﺎﺭﻳﻦﭘﺎﻟﻴﺴــﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺍﻣﻮﺭﺧﺎﺭﺟﻪ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﻪ ﺍﻫﺪﺍء ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺗﺮﺟﻤﺔ ﺁﻧﻬﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﻳﺖ »ﺩﻳﭙﻠﻤﺎﺳــﻰ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ« ،ﻣﻮﺭﺥ 4 ﻓﺮﻭﺭﺩﻳﻦﻣﺎﻩ ﺳﺎﻟﺠﺎﺭﻯ ﻣﻨﺘﺸﺮ ﺷﺪﻩ .ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺍﻣﻮﺭﺧﺎﺭﺟﻪ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﻪ »ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ« ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻈﻢ ﻧﻮﻳﻦ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﻣﻰﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳــﺎﺱ »ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺖ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ« ﺗﻨﻈﻴﻢ ﺷــﻮﺩ ،ﭼــﺮﺍ؟ ﭼﻮﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﻤﺎﺵ »ﺧﻮﺍﺳــﺖ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ« ﺟﺰ ﺗــﺪﺍﻭﻡ ﺍﺑﻬﺎﻡ ﻭ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪﺳﺎﺯﻯ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺍﻭﺑﺎﺵ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻄﺢ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻫﺪﻑ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ:
»] [...ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴــﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻰ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻘﺶ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻳﻔﺎ ﻛﻨﺪ :ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﻳــﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻈﻢ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪﺍﻯ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻰ ﺩﺭﺧﻮﺍﺳــﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻋﺰﺕ ،ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻯ ﻭ ﺣﻜﻤﺮﺍﻧﺎﻧﻰ ﺧﻮﺏ ] [...ﺑﺎﺯﺳﺎﺯﻯ ﺷﻮﺩ ]«[... ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻧﻜﻪ ﻣﻰﺑﻴﻨﻴﻢ »ﺍﺑﻬﺎﻡ« ﺑﺮ ﺳﻄﻮﺭ ﻓﻮﻕ ﺳﺎﻳﻪ ﺍﻓﻜﻨﺪﻩ ﻭ ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻯ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻜﺮﺍﺭ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ» ،ﺍﺑﻬﺎﻡ« ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺍﺑﺰﺍﺭﻯ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺟﻬﺖ ﻓﺮﻳﺐ ﻋﻮﺍﻡﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ .ﺭﻭﺷﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺑﺎ »ﻋﺰﺕ« ﻭ »ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻯ« ﻭ ﺍﻳﻨﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﻭﺍژﮔﺎﻥ »ﺟﺎﺩﻭﺋﻰ« ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ ،ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺍژﮔﺎﻥ ﭘﻮچ ،ﺳﺮﺍﺑﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻓﺮﻳﺒﻨﺪﻩ! ﻭ ﺳﺮﺍﺏ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻓﺎﻗﺪ ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺏ ﺣﻘﻮﻗﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻭﻟﻰ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ »ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻯ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥ« ﺩﺭ ﭼــﻪ ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺑﻰ ﻣﺪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ،ﺁﻧﻮﻗﺖ ﻭﺍﻛﻨﺶ »ﻣﺮﺩﻡ« ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑــﻮﺩ .ﺑــﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﺜﺎﻝ ،ﺍﮔﺮ »ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻯ ﺍﻧﺴــﺎﻥ« ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺏ ﻣﻔﺎﺩ ﺍﻋﻼﻣﻴﺔ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻰ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﺑﺸﺮ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ،ﻣﻰﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﺮ »ﺑﻨﻴﺎﺩ ﺧﺎﻧﻮﺍﺩﻩ«، ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﻛﺎﻫﺶ »ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭﺍﺕ« ﺳــﻨﺘﻰ ﭘﺪﺭ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻣــﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﺄﺋﻴﺪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﻫﻴﻢ .ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻨﺼﻮﺭﺕ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺩﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻰ ﺍﺣﺰﺍﺏ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻰ ﻭ ﺁﺗﺎﺗﺮﻛﻰ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ »ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻯ ﺩﻣﻜﺮﺍﺗﻴﻚ« ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻒﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﺋﻰﻫﺎ ﻧﻴﺰ ﭼﺸــﻢ ﺩﻳﺪﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺗﺤﺖ ﺳﻠﻄﻪﺷﺎﻥ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ،ﭼﺮﺍ؟ ﭼﻮﻥ ﺁﺗﺎﺗﺮﻛﻴﺴﻢ، ﺍﺳﻼﻡﮔﺮﺍﺋﻰ ﻭ ﭼﭙﺎﻭﻝ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻤﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ »ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﻳﻚﺳﻮﻳﻪ« ﺗﻐﺬﻳﻪ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ. ﺍﺯ ﻛﻮﺩﺗــﺎﻯ ﺁﺗﺎﺗــﺮﻙ ﺗﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ،ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺻﻄــﻼﺡ ﻻﺋﻴﻚ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﻪ ،ﻛﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺗﻮﺣﺶ ﻳﻌﻨﻰ »ﺧﺎﻧﻮﺍﺩﺓ ﺳــﻨﺘﻰ« ﺭﺍ ﺩﺳﺖ ﻧﺨﻮﺭﺩﻩ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ .ﻭ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻮﺣﺶ ﺑﺮ ﻛﻞ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﻪ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﺷــﺪﻩ؛ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚﺳــﻮ ﺁﻣــﻮﺯﺵ ﺩﻳﻨﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺪﺍﺭﺱ ﺑﻪ ﻛﻮﺩﻛﺎﻥ ﺗﺤﻤﻴﻞ ﻣﻰﺷــﻮﺩ ،ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻮﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺯﻥﻧﻤﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﻼﻡﭘﻨﺎﻩ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺗﺤﻤﻴﻞ ﻧﻤﺎﺩ ﺗﺤﺠﺮ ﭘﺪﺭﺳــﺎﻻﺭ ﺑﻪ ﻋﺮﺻﺔ ﺩﻭﻟــﺖ ﺗﻈﺎﻫﺮﺍﺕ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺍﻩ ﻣﻰﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻧﺪ. ﺑﻠﻪ ،ﺍﻭﺑﺎﺵ ﻣﻮﻧﺚ ﻣﻰﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ »ﺣﺠﺎﺏ« ﺭﺍ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ! ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻮﺗﺎﻩ ﻣﺪﺕ ،ﺗﻮﺣﺶ ﺧﺎﻧﻮﺍﺩﺓ ﺍﺳﻄﻮﺭﻩﺍﻯ ﺑﺮ ﻛﻞ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺗﺤﻤﻴﻞ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷﺪ؛ ﺁﺵﻓﺮﻭﺵﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺗﺸــﻜﻴﻞ ﻣﻰ ﺩﻫﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻰﺑﻰﺳﻰ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﻓﺮﻭﺵ »ﻣﺘﺪﻳﻦ ﻣﺘﻤﺪﻥ« ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺩﺍﺩ! ﺳــﺎﻳﺖ ﺑﻰﺑﻰﺳﻰ ،ﻣﻮﺭﺥ 27ﻣﺎﺭﺱ ﺳﺎﻟﺠﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ »ﻧﺸﺨﻮﺍﺭ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ« ﻣﻮﻓﻖ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺿﻤــﻦ ﺑﺎﺯﻧﻮﻳﺴــﻰ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ،ﺍﻭﺑــﺎﺵ ﭘﻴﺮﻭ ﺧﻂ ﺍﻣــﺎﻡ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻒ »ﻧﻬﻀــﺖﺁﺯﺍﺩﻯ« ﺟﻠﻮﻩ ﺩﻫﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﻳﺰﺩﻯ ﻭ ﺷــﺮﻛﺎء »ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮ ﺩﻟﭙﺬﻳﺮ« ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺑﻪ ﻧﺤﻮﻯ ﻛﻪ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻜﻰ ﺩﺍﺭﻭﺩﺳــﺘﺔ ﺷــﻴﺦ ﻣﻬﺪﻯ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺴــﻜﻮ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺐ ﺍﻟﻘﺎء ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ! ﺣﺎﻝ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﺍﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﻳﺰﺩﻯ ﻃﻰ ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥﻫﺎﻯ ﻗﻔﻘﺎﺯ ﺭﺳــﻤﺎً ﻃﺮﻓﺪﺍﺭ ﺟﺪﺍﺋﻰﻃﻠﺒﺎﻥ ﭼﭽﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ! ﺑﻪ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺕ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ،ﺷــﺨﺺ ﺍﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﻳﺰﺩﻯ ـ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻧﮕﻮﺋﻴﻢ ﻛﻞ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺟﻤﻜﺮﺍﻥ ـ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﺑﺮﻩﺯﻭﻓﺴــﻜﻰ ،ﺟﺮﺝ ﺳﻮﺭﻭﺱ، ﺍﻟﻰ ﻭﻳﺰﻝ ،ﻭ ﺷــﺮﻛﺎء ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﺳــﻨﮕﺮ ﻧﺸﺴــﺘﻪ .ﺧﻮﺷــﺒﺨﺘﺎﻧﻪ ﻃﻰ ﺟﻨﺠﺎﻝ »ﻫﻴﺰﺍﻛﺴﻠﻨﺴــﻰ« ﻭ ﻣﻴﺮﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﻣﻮﺳــﻮﻯ ﺍﺳﻨﺎﺩ ﻭ ﺷــﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﻣﻼﻣﻤﺪ ﺧﺎﺗﻤﻰ ﺑﺎ ﺳــﻮﺭﻭﺱ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺭﺳﻤﻰ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ ﺍﻧﺘﺸﺎﺭ ﻳﺎﻓﺖ ،ﻭ ﭼﺮﺍ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺩﻭﺭ ﺑﺮﻭﻳﻢ؟ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﻣﺤﺎﻓﻞ ﺍﺳــﺮﺍﺋﻴﻞﻧﻮﺍﺯ ﻏﺮﺏ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻮﺗﻮﭘﻴﺎ ـ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﺮﺍﺭ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻟﻬﻰ ﻭ ﺗﺠﺰﻳﺔ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳــﺎﺱ ﺗﻌﻠﻘــﺎﺕ ﺩﻳﻨﻰ ﻭ ﻗﻮﻣﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﺭﺳــﻴﺪﻩ؛ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﺔ ﺗﻠﺦ ﻳﻮﮔﺴــﻼﻭﻯ ﻭ ﺑﻬﺎﺭ ﻋﺮﺏ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﻣﺎﺳــﺖ .ﻭﻟﻰ ﺣﺎﻛﻤﻴــﺖ ﺑﺮﻳﺘﺎﻧﻴﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺎﺕ ﻛﺎﺭﻯ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ؛ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻰ ﮔﺴــﺘﺮﺵ ﺗﻮﺣﺶ
ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﺑﻪ ﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺮﺯﻫﺎﻯ ﺭﻭﺳــﻴﻪ .ﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺩﺳــﺘﻴﺎﺑﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﺪﻑ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺑﺎ ﻛﻤﻚ ﺁﻟﻤﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ »ﻗﺒﺮﺱ« ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥ ﻛﺸﻒ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ! ﺁﻧﮕﻠﻮﺳﺎﻛﺴﻮﻥﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻭ ﺳﻮﻯ ﺁﺗﻼﻧﺘﻴﻚ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﻧﻮﺭﺍﻧﻰ ﻫﻴﺘﻠــﺮ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻯﺷــﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺮﺍﺳــﺮ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺑﺴــﻴﺞ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ! ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺴﻴﺞ »ﻣﻘﺪﺱ« ﺑﺎ ﻧﺸﺨﻮﺍﺭ ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺷﺒﻜﺔ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻧﻰ »ﺁﺭﺗﻪ« ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺷــﺪ .ﺷــﺒﻜﺔ ﻛﺬﺍ ﺿﻤﻦ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺷــﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﺯ »ﻇﻠﻢ ﻭ ﺳــﺘﻢ« ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻭﻳﮋﻩ »ﺍﺳﺮﺍﻑ« ﺗﺰﺍﺭﻫﺎ ،ﺳــﻮءﻗﺼﺪ ﺑﺮﺍﺩﺭ ﻟﻨﻴﻦ ﻭ ﻫﻤﺪﺳﺘﺎﻧﺶ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻥ ﺗﺰﺍﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻮﺟﻴﻪ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﺘﺎﻳﺶ ﺍﺯ »ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﺍﺕ« ﻟﻨﻴﻦ ﮔﺸﻮﺩ .ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻫﻢ ﺭﻭﺷــﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ؛ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺻﻄﻼﺡ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﺍﺕ ﺩﺭ »ﻧﻔﺮﺕ« ﻭ »ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻡ« ﺭﻳﺸﻪ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ ﻭ ﺍﺑﺰﺍﺭﺵ ﻧﻴﺰ »ﺣﺬﻑ« ﻭ »ﺧﺸــﻮﻧﺖ« ﺑــﻮﺩ .ﭼﻨﺪ ﺭﻭﺯ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺮﺍﺳﻢ ﺳﻮﮔﻮﺍﺭﻯ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺿﻪ ﻭ ﺯﻭﺯﻩ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ »ﻟﻨﻴﻦ« ،ﺩﺭ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ 16ﻣﺎﺭﺱ » ،2013ﺑﻠﺸــﻮﻳﻚﻫﺎ« ﺍﻳﻨﺒﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺒــﺮﺱ »ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ« ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ »ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﺁﺯﺍﺩ ﺳــﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪ« ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﻣﺘﻮﻗﻒ ﺷــﺪ ،ﭼﺮﺍ؟ ﭼﻮﻥ ﺷــﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺑﺎﻧﻚﻫﺎﻯ ﺭﻭﺳــﻴﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺒﺮﺱ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺩﺭ »ﻭﻳﺮﺍﺳﺖ ﺭﺳﻤﻰ« ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ »ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﻧﻘﺪﻳﻨﮕﻰ ﺑﺎﻧﻚﻫﺎ« ﺩﺭ ﻗﺒﺮﺱ 7ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ »ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻧﺎﺧﺎﻟﺺ ﻣﻠﻰ« ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﺳﺮﭼﺸــﻤﻪ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ! ﺍﻣﺎ ﺟﺎﻟﺐ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﻟﻮﻛﺰﺍﻣﺒﻮﺭگ ،ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﻧﻘﺪﻳﻨﮕﻰ ﺑﺎﻧﻚﻫﺎ 20ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪﻧﺎﺧﺎﻟﺺ ﻣﻠﻰ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﻭ ﻫﻴــﭻ ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﻫﻢ ﭘﻴﺶ ﻧﻴﺎﻣﺪﻩ! ﺳــﺎﻳﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﻟﻮﻣﻮﻧﺪ ﻭ »ﺭﻭﺳــﻴﺔ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ« ،ﻣــﻮﺭﺥ 28ﻣﺎﺭﺱ ﻭ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺎﻳﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﻌﺘﺒﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻨﻤﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﻔﺴﻴﺮ ﻭ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ، ﭘﺲ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﺟﺰﺋﻴﺎﺕ ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥ »ﻣﻮﻫﻮﻡ« ﺑﺎﻧﻚﻫﺎﻯ ﻗﺒﺮﺱ ﻧﻤﻰﺷﻮﻳﻢ ،ﻓﻘﻂ ﻣﻰﮔﻮﺋﻴﻢ ﻫﺪﻑ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥﺳﺎﺯﻯ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻴﺘﻠﺮ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺩﺳﺘﻴﺎﺑﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﻛﻞ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻛﺸــﺎﻧﺪ :ﻫﺪﺍﻳﺖ ﺳــﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻮﻯ ﻣﺮﺍﻛﺰ ﺗﺤﺖ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕ ﺁﻧﮕﻠﻮﺳﺎﻛﺴﻮﻥﻫﺎ. ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻛﻨــﺶ ﺑــﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﻣﺰﻭﺭﺍﻧﻪ ﺑــﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺎﺭﻳــﺦ 20ﻣﺎﺭﺱ ﺳــﺎﻟﺠﺎﺭﻯ ،ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﺑﺎﻧﻚﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﻣﻤﻨﻮﻉ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﺷﺪ .ﻭ ﻫﻴﺌﺖ ﺣﺎﻛﻤﺔ ﺑﺮﻳﺘﺎﻧﻴﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺷــﺒﻜﺔ ﻃﺮﻓﺪﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﺍﻣﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ ﻗﻔﻘﺎﺯ ﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ .ﺑﻪ ﺍﺳــﺘﻨﺒﺎﻁ ﻣﺎ ،ﻣﺮگ »ﺑﺮﻩﺯﻭﻓﺴﻜﻰ« ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻰ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻔﺎﻯ ﺩﻳﻮﻳﺪ ﻣﻴﻠﻴﺒﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺭﺳﺎﻝ ﻭﻯ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻨﮕﻪﺩﻧﻴﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍﺳﺘﺎ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻰ ﺷــﻮﺩ .ﺑﻮﺭﻳﺲ ﺑﺮﻩﺯﻭﻓﺴﻜﻰ ﻭ ﻣﻴﻠﻴﺒﻨﺪ ،ﻫﺮ ﺩﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﻣﺤﻔﻞ ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﺗﻌﻠﻖ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ ،ﻣﺤﻔﻠﻰ ﻛﻪ »ﻛﺸﻮﺭ« ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ »ﺷﺮﻛﺖ ﺳﻬﺎﻣﻰ« ﺩﺭ ﺗﺮﺍﺩﻑ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺤﻔﻞ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺨﺮﻳﺐ ﻭ ﺗﺠﺰﻳﺔ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﺗﻘﻮﻳﺖ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ ،ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄﻮﺭﻛﻪ ﺁﺧﻮﻧﺪ ،ﺗﺮﻭﺭﻳﺴﺖ ،ﻭ ...ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭﻛﻠﻰ ﻓﺎﺷﻴﺴﺖﻫﺎ ﺑﺎ »ﻣﺮگ« ﻭ »ﺗﺨﺮﻳﺐ« ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻣﻰﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪ .ﺧﻼﺻﻪ ﺗﻤﺎﻳﻞ ﺑﻌﻀﻰﻫﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﻫﻴﺘﻠﺮ ﺭﻭﺷﻦﺿﻤﻴﺮ »ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻣﻮﺟﻪ« ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﺔ ﻳﻮﺭﻭ ﻧﻘﺶ ﻫﻴﺘﻠﺮ ﺭﺍ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺩﺍﺩﮔﺴــﺘﺮﻯ ﻭ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﺋﻰ ﺁﻟﻤﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﻋﻬﺪﻩ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ. ﺍﻭﻟــﻰ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴــﺖ ﻧﺌﻮﻧﺎﺯﻯﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ »ﻣﺠﺎﺯ« ﻣﻰﺷــﻤﺎﺭﺩ ،ﻭ ﺩﻭﻣﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻓﺮﺍﺭ
ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﺔ ﻳﻮﺭﻭ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪﺳﺎﺯﻯ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ ﭼﻤﺎﻕ »ﺳﺎﺩﻩ ﺯﻳﺴﺘﻰ« ﻭ ﺍﺑﺮﺍﺯ ﻧﻔﺮﺕ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻓﺎﻩ ﻣﺎﺩﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮ ﻓﺮﻕ ﺳﺎﻛﻨﺎﻥ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﻓﺮﻭﺩ ﻣﻰﺁﻭﺭﺩ. ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻧﻜﻪ ﮔﻔﺘﻴﻢ ﺍﺯ ﻧﺸــﺨﻮﺍﺭ ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺳــﻜﻮﻯ ﭘﺮﺵ ﺗﺒﻠﻴﻐﺎﺗﻰ ﺍﺳــﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎ ﺷــﺒﻜﺔ »ﺁﺭﺗﻪ« ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻟﻨﻴﻦ ﻣﺎﺗﻢ ﻣﻰﮔﻴــﺮﺩ ﻭ »ﺍﺳــﺮﺍﻑ« ﻭ ﻇﻠﻢ ﻭ ﺳــﺘﻢ ﺗﺰﺍﺭﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻜﻮﻫــﺶ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺗﻤﺎﻳﻼﺕ ﻣﺤﺎﻓﻞ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺳــﺮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﺯﺗﺎﺏ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﺪ .ﻣﺤﺎﻓﻠﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊﺷﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ »ﺭﻭﺱﺳــﺘﻴﺰﻯ« ﭘﻴﻮﻧﺪﻯ ﻧﺎﮔﺴﺴــﺘﻨﻰ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺗﻼﺵ ﺍﺑﻠﻬﺎﻧﺔ ﺑﻰﺑﻰﺳــﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﭼﺴﺒﺎﻧﺪﻥ ﺍﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﻳﺰﺩﻯ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩ ﺷﻮﺭﻭﻯ .ﻓﺪﺍﺋﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﻼﻡ ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﺍﺑﺰﺍﺭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺘﮕﺰﺍﺭﻯ ﺁﻧﮕﻠﻮﺳﺎﻛﺴﻮﻥﻫﺎ ﺑﻮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ: »] [...ﺍﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﻳﺰﺩﻯ ]ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﺪ[ ﻣﺎ ﻣﻰﺩﺍﻧﺴــﺘﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺑﺎ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﭘﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﻬﻤﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ]«[... ﺑﻠــﻪ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺑﺪﺍﻧﻨﺪ »ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ« ﺣﺎﺝ ﺭﻭﺡﺍﷲ »ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻓﺮﺍﺭﻯ ﺩﺍﺩ« ،ﻭ ﺍﺷــﻐﺎﻝ ﺳﻔﺎﺭﺕ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺿﺮﺑﺔ ﺧﺮﺩﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩﺍﻯ ﺑﺮ ﭘﻴﻜﺮ »ﺍﻣﭙﺮﻳﺎﺱ« ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﺁﻭﺭﺩ! ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺰﺧﺮﻓﺎﺗﻰ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻃﻰ ﺳــﻪ ﺩﻫﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻮﻕﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻙ ﭘﺨﺶ ﺷﺪﻩ ،ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺮﻓﻨﺪﻫﺎ »ﺍﻗﺘﺪﺍﺭ« ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺩﺳﺖﻧﺸــﺎﻧﺪﺓ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻴﺎﻥ ﺛﺎﺑﺖ ﺷــﻮﺩ! ﺣﺎﻝ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﮔﺬﺷــﺖ 34ﺳــﺎﻝ ،ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺍﻣﻮﺭﺧﺎﺭﺟﺔ ﺑﺮﻳﺘﺎﻧﻴﺎ ﺩﻭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻋﻮﺍﻣــﻞ ﻓﻜﻞﻛﺮﺍﻭﺍﺗﻰ ﻛﻮﺩﺗﺎﻫﺎﻯ 28ﻣــﺮﺩﺍﺩ ﻭ 22ﺑﻬﻤﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻣﺎ ﻣﻠﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻓﺮﻭﺵ ﮔــﺬﺍﺭﺩﻩ ،ﭼﺮﺍ؟ ﭼﻮﻥ ﻣﻰﭘﻨﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﺳــﻮﺍﺑﻖ ﺗﻮﺣــﺶ ﺍﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﻳﺰﺩﻯ ﻭ ﺷــﺮﻛﺎﻯ ﻭﻯ ﻓﺮﺍﻣﻮﺵ ﺷــﺪﻩ .ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﺗﻮﻫﻢ ﺑﻌﻀﻰﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺁﺵﻓﺮﻭﺵﻫــﺎﻯ ﺟﻤﻜﺮﺍﻥ ﻛــﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺮﺻﺔ ﺗﻮﺣﺶ ﺑﺮ ﻣﻼﻳﺎﻥ ﭘﻴﺸــﻰﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺟﺎﻳﺰﺓ ﺳﻴﻤﻮﻥ ﺩﻭﺑﻮﻭﺍﺭ ﺩﺭﻳﺎﻓﺖ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ! ﺟﻬﺖ ﺁﺷﻨﺎﺋﻰ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺑﻌﺎﺩ ﺗﻮﺣﺶ ﺍﻳﻨﺎﻥ ﻧﮕﺎﻫﻰ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻴﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺎﻳﺖ »ﻣﺪﺭﺳﺔ ﻓﻤﻴﻨﻴﺴــﺘﻰ« ،ﻣﻮﺭﺥ 14ﺩﻳﻤﺎﻩ .1391ﺁﺵﻓﺮﻭﺵﻫﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﺑﺮﺍﺯ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖ ﺑﺎ ﻃــﺮﺡ »ﻣﻤﻨﻮﻋﻴﺖ ﺧﺮﻭﺝ ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﺯﻳﺮ 40ﺳــﺎﻝ« ،ﺑــﺎ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻯ ﻛﻤﻴﺘﺔ ﺣﻘﻮﻗﻰ »ﺍﺋﺘﻼﻑ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻰ ﺯﻧﺎﻥ« ﻭ ﺍﺣﺰﺍﺏ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍ ﺩﺭ »ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺯﻳﻨﺐ« ﻳﻚ ﻧﺸﺴــﺖ ﺑﺮﮔــﺰﺍﺭ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﻭ ﻃﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺸﺴــﺖ ،ﺑﻪ ﺑﻬﺎﻧــﺔ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖ ﺑﺎ ﻃﺮﺡ »ﻓﺮﺿﻰ« ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ،ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚﺳــﻮ »ﺯﻥ« ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻟﮕﻮﻯ ﺗﻮﺣﺶ »ﻓﺎﻃﻤﻪ« ﺩﺭ ﺗﺮﺍﺩﻑ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻮﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺳــﺘﺎﻳﺶ ﻣﻔﺼﻠﻰ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﺯ ﺣﺎﺝ ﺭﻭﺡﺍﷲ ﻭ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏﺷــﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻤﻞ ﺁﻣﺪ! ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺸﺴــﺖ ﺗﺤﺖ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﮔﻮﺳﺎﻟﻪﭘﺴﻨﺪ »ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﺣﺮﻳﻢ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻰ ﺧﺎﻧﻮﺍﺩﻩﻫﺎ ﻧﺸﻮﻳﺪ« ،ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻳﺖ ﺁﺵﻓﺮﻭﺵﻫﺎ ﻣﻨﻌﻜﺲ ﺷــﺪﻩ .ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺑﻼگ ﺑﺮﺭﺳــﻰ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺯﻥﻧﻤﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻧﺸﺴــﺖ ﻣﺬﻛﻮﺭ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ ،ﻓﻘﻂ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻘﻞ ﺑﺨﺸــﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻳﻨﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺏ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﺯﻥ ﺍﻛﺘﻔﺎ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﺗﺎ ﻣﺸــﺨﺺ ﺷــﻮﺩ ﺯﻥﻧﻤﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺟﻤﻜــﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺮﺻﺔ ﺗﻮﺣﺶ ﮔﻮﻯ ﺳﺒﻘﺖ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻼ ﻣﻰﺭﺑﺎﻳﻨﺪ: »] [...ﺷﻬﻨﺎﺯ ﺳﺠﺎﺩﻯ ،ﺣﻘﻮﻗﺪﺍﻥ ] [...ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ] [...ﺩﺭ ] [...ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﻣﺪﻧﻰ ﻣﺎ ] [...ﺳﻦ 9ﺳﺎﻝ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﺳﻦ ﺑﻠﻮﻍ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ] [...ﻃﺒﻖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ] [...ﺩﺧﺘﺮ 9ﺳﺎﻟﻪ ﻣﻰ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﺮﻭﺩ ﻭ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻰ ﻛﻨﺪ ] [...ﺩﺍﺩﮔﺎﻩﻫﺎﻯ
ﺧﺎﻧﻮﺍﺩﻩ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺣﻀﺎﻧﺖ ﺩﺧﺘﺮ 9ﺳــﺎﻟﻪ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻗﻀﺎﻭﺕ ﻧﻤﻰﺷﻮﻧﺪ ﭼﻮﻥ ][... ﺩﺧﺘﺮ 9ﺳﺎﻟﻪ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ] [...ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻰ ﻛﻨﺪ ] [...ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﺠﺎ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻰ ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﺩﺍﺩﮔﺎﻩ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﭘﺪﺭ ﻭ ﻣﺎﺩﺭ ﻧﻤﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﻭ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﺗﻜﻠﻴﻒ ﻛﻨﺪ ] [...ﺣﺎﻝ ﭼﻄﻮﺭ ﺩﺧﺘﺮ 39ﺳﺎﻟﻪ ﻧﻤﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺳﻔﺮ ﺑﻜﻨﺪ؟]«[... ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻧﻜــﻪ ﻣﻰﺑﻴﻨﻴﻢ ،ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ »ﻣﺪﻧﻰ« ﭼــﺎﻩ ﺟﻤﻜﺮﺍﻥ ،ﻫﻴﭽﻜﺲ ﺣﻖ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ »ﺩﺧﺘﺮ 9ﺳــﺎﻟﻪ« ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﺗﻜﻠﻴﻒ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻫﻢ ﺭﻭﺷﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ! ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳــﺎﺱ ﺑﻰﺑﻰﮔﻮﺯﻙﻫﺎﻯ ﺷﻴﻌﻰﻣﺴــﻠﻜﺎﻥ ،ﭘﺎﻧﺰﺩﻩ ﺳــﺪﺓ ﭘﻴﺶ ،ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﺻــﺎﺩ ،ﻳﻚ ﺩﺧﺘﺮ ﺑﭽﺔ 9ﺳــﺎﻟﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ »ﻋﻴﻦ« ﺍﻫــﺪﺍء ﻓﺮﻣﻮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﻜﺎﻳﺖ ﻣﻬﻮﻉ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻻﺕ ﻧﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﺎ »ﺭﺧﺪﺍﺩ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻰ« ﺗﺮﺍﺩﻑ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻣﻮﻇﻒﺍﻧﺪ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ »ﺗﻜﺮﺍﺭ« ﺗﺪﺍﻭﻡ ﺑﺨﺸﻨﺪ! ﺭﻭﺷﻦﺗﺮ ﺑﮕﻮﺋﻴﻢ ،ﻻﺕ ﺩﺭ ﭼﻨﺒﺮﺓ ﺗﻌﻠﻘﺎﺕ ﺩﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﭘﺎ ﻣﻰﺯﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺴــﻴﺮ »ﺗﻜﺮﺍﺭ« ﻭ »ﺑﺎﺯﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ« ﺭﻭﻧﺪ ﺗﻮﺣــﺶ »ﭘﺪﺭ« ﮔﺎﻡ ﺑﺮﻣﻰﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻨﺮﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻫﺰﺍﺭﺓ ﺳــﻮﻡ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻫﻤﺔ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻴﺎﻥ »ﻭﻇﻴﻔــﻪ« ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻟﮕﻮﻯ ﺗﻮﺣﺶ »ﺻﺪﺭﺍﺳــﻼﻡ« ﭘﻴﺮﻭﻯ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ »ﻣﺪﻧﻰ« ﺟﻤﻜﺮﺍﻧﻴﺎﻥ ﺣﺪﺍﻗﻞ ﺩﻭ ﭘﺮﺳــﺶ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻰ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ. ﻧﺨﺴــﺖ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺑﭽﺔ 9ﺳﺎﻟﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻧﺎﺕ ﻣﺎﺩﻯ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ »ﺗﻨﻬﺎ« ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻰ ﻛﻨــﺪ ،ﻭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﻛــﺪﺍﻡ »ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﮕﺰﺍﺭ« ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﺟﺎﺯﻩ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻛﻮﺩﻙ 9 ﺳــﺎﻟﻪ »ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖ« ﻗﺎﺋﻞ ﺷﻮﺩ؟! ﺑﺎﺭﻯ ،ﻳﻜﻰ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺯﻥﻧﻤﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻧﺸﺴﺖ ﻛﺬﺍ ،ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺪﺡ ﻭ ﺳﺘﺎﻳﺶ ﻓﺮﺍﻭﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﺯﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺳﻼﻡ ،ﻃﺮﺡ ﻣﻤﻨﻮﻋﻴﺖ ﺧﺮﻭﺝ ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ »ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﺟﺎﻫﻠﻴﺖ« ﻣﻨﺴﻮﺏ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ .ﺑﻪ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺕ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ،ﺁﺵﻓﺮﻭﺵﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻫﺰﺍﺭﺓ ﺳــﻮﻡ ﻣﻴﻼﺩﻯ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻰ ﻧﻤﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ؛ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻰ ﺍﻳﻨﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺻﺤﺮﺍﻯ ﻋﺮﺑﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺪﺓ ﻫﻔﺘﻢ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ: »] [...ﺩﺑﻴﺮ ﺍﺋﺘﻼﻑ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ ] [...ﮔﻔﺖ :ﺩﺭ ﺍﺳﻼﻡ ] [...ﺯﻥ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺩ ] [...ﻧﻔﺲ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﻩ ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ] [...ﭼﻄﻮﺭ ﻣﻰ ﺷــﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻧﮕﺮﺷﻰ ] [...ﻻﻳﺤﻪﺍﻯ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﺷــﻮﺩ ﻛــﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺯﻥ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺩ ﺭﺍ ] [...ﻧﺎﺑﺮﺍﺑــﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻰﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪ ][... ﺗﻔﻜﺮﺍﺗﻰ ﻛﻪ ﭘﺸــﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻻﻳﺤﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺟﺎﻫﻠﻴﺖ ﻭ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺳﻼﻡ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺍﻧﮕﺎﺭ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺁﻥ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﺯﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ]«[... ﺑﻠﻪ ،ﻓﻮﺍﻳﺪ ﻧﺎﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ »ﻣﺎﺩﻳﺎﺕ« ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ! ﺩﺭ ﺍﺳﻼﻡ ،ﺯﻥ ﻳﻚ ﺩﻭﻡ ﻣﺮﺩ ﺍﺭﺙ ﻣﻰﺑﺮﺩ؛ ﻗﺮﺑﺎﻧﻰ ﺗﻌﺪﺩ ﺯﻭﺟﺎﺕ ﺍﺳﺖ؛ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻖ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ،ﺣﺘﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻖ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﭘﻮﺷــﺶ ﻣﺤﺮﻭﻡ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩ ،ﻭﻟﻰ ﻻﺕ ﻭ ﺍﻭﺑــﺎﺵ ﻣﺆﻧﺚ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺎﺕ ﭼﺸــﻢ ﺑﺴﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺸﺨﻮﺍﺭ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺯﻧﺸﺨﻮﺍﺭ »ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﺯﻥ« ﺩﺭ ﺍﺳﻼﻡ ﺍﺩﺍﻣــﻪ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﻨﺪ ،ﭼﺮﺍ؟ ﭼﻮﻥ ﻻﺕ ﻣﻰﭘﻨﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﺑﺎ »ﺗﻜﺮﺍﺭ« ﭘﻮﭼﻴﺎﺕ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺁﻓﺘﺎﺏ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻳﺪ ﻫﻤﮕﺎﻥ ﭘﻨﻬﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ! ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪ ،ﺳﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﻳﺮﻧﺎ ،ﻣﻮﺭﺥ 17ﻣﺎﺭﺱ ﺳﺎﻟﺠﺎﺭﻯ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻣﻴﺪ »ﺗﻮﺟﻴﻪ ﺗﻮﺣﺶ« ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ ﻣﻰﻧﻮﻳﺴﺪ، »ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ،ﺍﻛﺜﺮﻳﺖ ﺍﺧﻼﻕﮔﺮﺍ ،ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻗﻠﻴﺖ ﻏﺮﺏﮔﺮﺍ ﺗﺤﻤﻴﻞ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ!« ﺑﻪ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺕ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ،ﺍﻳﺮﻧﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺐ ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﺪ ،ﻫﻤﻪ ﺑﺪﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ »ﻣﺎ«
ﻫﻢ ﺍﻛﺜﺮﻳﺖﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﺧﻼﻕﮔﺮﺍﺳﺖ ،ﭘﺲ ﺑﺎ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺗﻰ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻳﻢ! ﻭﻟﻰ ﺑﻮﻕ ﺳﺎﻭﺍﻙ ﻣﻼﻳﺎﻥ ﺩﻭ ﻧﻜﺘﺔ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻰ ﺭﺍ ﻓﺮﺍﻣﻮﺵ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ. ﻧﺨﺴﺖ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻮﺍﻣﻊ ﻏﺮﺏ ﻧﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ »ﺍﺧﻼﻕ« ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻫﺴــﺖ ،ﻭﻟﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ »ﺟﺎﻧﺒﺪﺍﺭ« ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ؛ »ﻣﺒﻨــﺎﻯ ﺣﻘﻮﻗﻰ« ﺩﺍﺭﺩ! ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺗﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻭﺣﺸــﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺭﻙ ﺁﻥ ﻋﺎﺟﺰ ﻣﻰﻣﺎﻧﺪ .ﺑﻪ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺕ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ، ﺩﺭ ﺟﻮﺍﻣﻊ ﺩﻣﻜﺮﺍﺗﻴﻚ» ،ﺑﺮﺗﺮﻯ« ﻓﻰﻧﻔﺴــﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺳــﻤﻴﺖ ﺷﻨﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﻧﻤﻰﺷﻮﺩ. ﺩﺭ ﻧﺘﻴﺠــﻪ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺗﺤﺖ ﻗﻴﻤﻮﻣﺖ ﺁﺧﻮﻧﺪ ﻭ »ﺍﺭﺯﺵﻫﺎﻯ« ﺩﻳﻦ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻧﻤﻰﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪ. ﭼــﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺟﺮﻡ ﺑﺎ ﮔﻨﺎﻩ ﺗﺮﺍﺩﻓﻰ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﻏﺮﺏ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺭﺍ »ﻣﺴــﺌﻮﻝ« ،ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ »ﭘﺎﺳﺨﮕﻮ« ﻣﻰﺩﺍﻧﺪ .ﺣﺎﻝ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻃﻮﻳﻠﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺷﺮﻳﻌﺖﻣﺤﻮﺭ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺳﻴﺎ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ »ﺍﻟﻬﻰ ـ ﻣﺎﻓﻴﺎﺋﻰ« ،ﻳﻌﻨﻰ »ﺳﺎﺩﻩﺯﻳﺴﺘﻰ«» ،ﺗﻘﻮﻯ« ﻭ »ﺧﺎﻧﻮﺍﺩﻩ ﺳــﺎﻻﺭﻯ« ﺑﻪ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩﻩ .ﭘﺎﻛﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ،ﻃﻴﻒ ﺣﺎﻛﻤﻴﺖ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻓﺴﺎﺩ ﻣﺎﻟﻰ ﻭ ﺍﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﻏﻮﻃﻪ ﻣﻰﺧﻮﺭﺩ ،ﻭ ﻫﻤﺰﻣﺎﻥ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ »ﺍﻟﮕﻮﻯ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻰ« ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻰ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻛﻪ »ﻻﺕ« ﻳﺎ ﺁﺧﻮﻧﺪ ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﺑﺮﺗــﺮ ﻣﻰﺑﻴﻨﺪ! ﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ »ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﺗﻜﻠﻴﻒ« ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ .ﻣﺒﻨﺎﻯ »ﺍﺧﻼﻕ« ﻻﺕ ،ﺍﻧﺴــﺎﻧﻰ ﻭ ﻣﻌﺎﺻﺮ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ؛ ﺭﻭﻯ ﺑﻪ ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﺔ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﻡ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﺍﻭ »ﺑﺮﺗﺮ«» ،ﺍﻟﻬﻰ« ﻭ »ﻳﻚﺳﻮﻳﻪ« ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﺩﻳﭙﻠﻤﺎﺳﻰ ﺑﻤﺐ ﺑﺮ »ﻧﻔﻰ« ﻭ »ﻧﺎﺑﻮﺩﻯ« ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﺍﺳﺘﻮﺍﺭ ﺷﺪﻩ .ﺭﻭﺷﻦﺗﺮ ﺑﮕﻮﺋﻴﻢ ،ﻻﺕ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺧﺪﺍﻭﻧﺪﺵ ﺷﻨﺎﺳــﺎﺋﻰ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ،ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻨﺮﻭ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﭘﻴﺎﻣﺒﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺩﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻤﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﺄﻣﻮﺭﻳﺖ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻰ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻗﺎﺋﻞ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ .ﻭ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻧﻜﻪ ﻃﻰ ﺳﺪﺓ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﺷﺎﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩﻩﺍﻳﻢ ،ﻣﺄﻣﻮﺭﻳﺖ ﻛﺬﺍ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ »ﺟﻨﮓ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ« ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻧﭙﺬﻳﺮ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷﺪ. ﺣﺎﺝ ﺭﻭﺡﺍﷲ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻓﺘﺎﺑﻪ ﻭ ﺷــﺐﻛﻼﻩ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺿﻴﺢﺍﻟﻤﺴــﺎﺋﻞ »ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ«ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﻗﺼﺪ »ﺻــﺪﻭﺭ« ﺍﻧﻘــﻼﺏﺍﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ؛ ﺟﺮﺝ ﻭﺍﻟﻜــﺮ ﺑﻮﺵ ﻫﻢ ﻣﻰﺧﻮﺍﺳــﺖ ﺑﺎ »ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻋﺪﻩ« ،ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﺑــﺎ ﻫﻢﺁﺧﻮﺭﻯﻫﺎﻯﺍﺵ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻨﻴﺎﺩ ﻛﺎﺭﻻﻳﻞ ﺑﺠﻨﮕﺪ؛ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﻣﺎﺳــﺖ .ﻭ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻮﺵ ﻧﻮﺑﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺎﺭﺍﻙ ﺍﻭﺑﺎﻣﺎ ﺭﺳــﻴﺪﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﺄﻣﻮﺭﻳﺖ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻰ ﻗﺎﺋﻞ ﺷــﻮﺩ .ﻣﺄﻣﻮﺭﻳﺖ ﺍﻳﺸــﺎﻥ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻧﻜﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻮﻧﺲ ،ﻟﻴﺒﻰ ﻭ ﻣﺼﺮ ﻣﻰﺑﻴﻨﻴﻢ ،ﺗﺪﺍﻭﻡ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﺔ ﻛﺎﺭﺗﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺳــﺖ؛ ﺑﺮﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻯ ﻭ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺁﺷــﻮﺏ ﺟﻬﺖ ﺗﺄﻣﻴﻦ ﺣﺎﺷــﻴﺔ ﺍﻣﻦ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﺳﺮﺍﺋﻴﻞ. ﻭﻟﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻧﻜﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺼﺮ ﺷﺎﻫﺪﻳﻢ ﺑﺎ ﺷﻜﺴﺖ ﺭﻭﺑﺮﻭ ﺷﺪﻩ .ﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺟﺒﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﻜﺴــﺖ ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻳﻚ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺍﻣﻨﺔ ﺗﻮﺣﺶ »ﻭﻳﺮﺍﺳﺖ ﺭﺳﻤﻰ« ﻭ ﺷﻴﻮﺓ »ﺳﻠﺐ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖ« ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺵ ﭼﺸﻤﮕﻴﺮﻯ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ .ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎ ﺳــﺎﻭﺍﻙ ﺟﻤﻜﺮﺍﻥ ﻛﺸﺘﺎﺭ ﻭ ﻏﺎﺭﺕ ﻭ ﺷﻜﻨﺠﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ »ﺑﻰﺍﺩﺑﻰ« ﺩﺭ ﺗﺮﺍﺩﻑ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﺪ: »] [...ﺑﻰﺍﺩﺑﻰﻫﺎﺋﻰ ﭼﻮﻥ :ﻛﺸــﺘﺎﺭ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ] [...ﺗﺤﻘﻴﺮ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ] [...ﺩﻋﻮﺕ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺑﻪ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﺵ ﻭ ﭘﺮﻭﺭﺵ ﺩﺭﻭﻍ ﻭ ﺭﻳﺎ ﻭ ﭼﺎﭘﻠﻮﺳﻰ ]«[... ﻣﻨﺒﻊ :ﻣﻘﺎﻟﺔ ﻧﻮﺭﻯﺯﺍﺩ ،ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ .ﻧﺖ ،ﻣﻮﺭﺥ 17ﻣﺎﺭﺱ 2013 ﻫﻤﻪ ﺑﺪﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﻛﺸﺘﺎﺭ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ »ﺑﻰﺍﺩﺑﻰ« ﺍﺳﺖ! ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ ﺣﺎﻛﻤﻴﺖ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ، ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺟﻤﻜﺮﺍﻥ »ﺑــﻰﺍﺩﺏ« ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﻭ ﺑﻰﺍﺩﺑﻰ ﻫﻢ ﻛﻪ »ﺟﺮﻡ« ﻧﻴﺴﺖ! ﺑﻠﻪ ،ﺳﺎﻭﺍﻙ ﺟﻤﻜﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺗﺄﻣﻴﻦ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﺍﺭﺑﺎﺏ ﺗﻼﺵ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﮔﺴــﺘﺮﺵ »ﺳــﻠﺐ ﻣﺴــﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖ« ﻭ ﺗﺤﻜﻴﻢ ﭘﺎﻳﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺗﻮﺣﺶ ﺧﺎﻧﻮﺍﺩﻩﺳﺎﻻﺭﻯ
ﺑــﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘــﻪ ﺗﺎ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺭﺑــﺎﺏ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚﺗﺮ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺟﺎﻟﺐ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺁﺵﻓﺮﻭﺵﻫﺎﻯ ﺟﻤﻜﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻣﺴــﻴﺮ ﮔﺎﻡ ﺑﺮﻣﻰﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﺍﻳﻨﺎﻥ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺟﻨﺒﺶﻫﺎﻯ ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺷﻨﺎﺳــﺎﺋﻰ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ! ﻭ ﺭﻭﻧﺪ ﻛﺎﺭﺷــﺎﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻃﺒﻖ ﻣﻌﻤﻮﻝ ﺗﻮﺳــﻞ ﺑﻪ »ﺗﺮﺍﺩﻑ ﻛﻠﻰ« ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﻨﺪ ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺣﻖ ﺭﺃﻯ ﻧﺪﺍﺷــﺘﻨﺪ ،ﻣﺎ ﻫﻢ ﻧﺪﺍﺷــﺘﻴﻢ! ﺁﻥﻫﺎ ﺣﻖ ﺭﺃﻯ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳــﺖ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻧﺪ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻢ ﻫﻤﻴﻨﻄــﻮﺭ! ﺟﺎﻟﺐ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻓﺘﻦ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﻮﭼﻴﺎﺕ ﺑــﺎ ﺗﻜﻴﻪ ﺑﺮ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪﺍﺕ »ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻰ« ﺍﺭﺗﺶ ﻧﺎﺗﻮ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺍﺭﺷﺎﺩ ﺟﻤﻜﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻧﭙﺬﻳﺮ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ. ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪﺍﺕ ﺑﻼﺩ ﺍﺭﺑﺎﺏ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺮﺟﻤﻪ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻰﭼﺴﺒﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺑﻪ »ﺩﻣﺐ« ﺍﺭﺑﺎﺏ: »ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝ 1820ﻣﻴﻼﺩﻯ ] [...ﺩﻭ ﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﺯﻥ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﺋﻰ ] [...ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﺎﺭ ﺍﻋﻄﺎﻯ ﺣﻖ ﺭﺃﻯ ﺑﻪ ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﺷــﺪﻧﺪ [...] .ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ،ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﻧﻤﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺷــﺮﻛﺖ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ] [...ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﺍﺕ ﺯﻧــﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺍﺩﺍﻣــﻪ ﻳﺎﻓﺖ ] [...ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻫﻢ ] [...ﺯﻧــﺎﻥ ] [...ﺍﺯ ﺣﻖ ﺭﺃﻯ ﻣﺤﺮﻭﻡ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ] [...ﺍﺯ ﺻﺪﻳﻘﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖﺁﺑﺎﺩﻯ ﺗﺎ ﻣﻬﺮﺍﻧﮕﻴﺰ ﻣﻨﻮﭼﻬﺮﻳﺎﻥ ،ﺷﺮﻭﻉ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ] [...ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ] [...ﺩﺭ 12ﺍﺳﻔﻨﺪﻣﺎﻩ [...] 1341ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ 56ﺳﺎﻝ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﻭ ﺗﻼﺵ ،ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ ] [...ﺍﺯ ﺣﻖ ﺭﺃﻯ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﺍﺭ ﺷﺪﻧﺪ ]«[... ﺑــﻪ ﺍﻳــﻦ »ﺯﻥ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯ« ﻳﺎﺩﺁﻭﺭ ﺷــﻮﻳﻢ ،ﺩﺭ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺯﻧــﺎﻥ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩﺍﻯ ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥﺩﻫﻰ ،ﻧﮕﺮﺵ ﻓﻠﺴــﻔﻰ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺧــﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﻭ ﻣﺎﻟــﻰ ﻧﻴــﺎﺯ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺑﻪ ﻋﺒــﺎﺭﺕ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ،ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﻣﻰﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺧﻮﺍﺳــﺘﺎﺭ ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺏﻫﺎﻯ ﺣﻘﻮﻗﻰ ﻧﻮﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺷــﻨﺪ؛ ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﺩﺭ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻣﺴــﻴﺮﻯ ﺣﺮﻛــﺖ ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﺍﻋﻄﺎﻯ ﺣﻖ ﺭﺃﻯ ﺑﻪ ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ،ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ »ﻛﺸــﻒ ﺣﺠﺎﺏ« ﺑﻰﭘﺎﻳﻪ ﻭ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪﺍﻯ ﻛﻪ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﻭ ﻣﻘﺮﺭﺍﺕ ،ﺣﺎﻛﻤﻴﺖ ﺑﻼﻣﻨﺎﺯﻉ ﻣﺮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮ ﺯﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺳــﻤﻴﺖ ﺷــﻨﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺩﺍﻣﻦ ﻣﻰﺯﻧﺪ ،ﻛﺸــﻒ ﺣﺠﺎﺏ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﺋﻰ ﻧﻤﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﻋﻄﺎﻯ ﺣﻖ ﺭﺃﻯ ﺑﻪ ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺗﺸــﻮﻳﻖ »ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺯﻥ« ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ،ﺁﻧﻬﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺘﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺳﺘﺒﺪﺍﺩ ﺍﺳــﺘﻌﻤﺎﺭﻯ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻫﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﻧﺴــﺎﻥ ﻗﺎﺋﻞ ﻧﺸــﺪﻩ .ﺩﺭ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻄﻰ، ﺁﺵﻓﺮﻭﺵﻫﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺮﻫﺎﺕﺑﺎﻓﻰ ﻣﻰﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ »ﺯﻳﺮﺟﻠﻜﻰ« ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻮﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺯﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻗﻴﺎﺱ ﻛﺸﻨﺪ! ﺍﻳﻨﺎﻥ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﺯﻥ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﺑﺎ ﺯﻥ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﺋﻰ ﻫﻤﺴــﺎﻧﻰﻫﺎﺋﻰ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﭼﺮﺍ؟ ﭼﻮﻥ ﺍﻭﺑﺎﺵ ﻣﻮﻧــﺚ ﺟﻤﻜﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﺍﻧﺴــﺎﻧﻰ ﺯﻥ ﻛﺎﺭﻯ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ ،ﺍﻳﻨﺎﻥ »ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺯﻥ« ﺭﺍ ﺑﺠﺎﻯ »ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﺍﻧﺴــﺎﻧﻰ« ﺍﻭ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ ،ﻭ ﻣﻰﭘﻨﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻘﻠﻴﺪ ﺍﺯ ﭘﺮﺳﻮﻧﺎژﻫﺎﻯ ﻫﻮﻟﻴﻮﻭﺩ ،ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﺍﻧﺴــﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﺴــﺐ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ! ﺑﺎﺭﻯ ﻗﺼﺔ ﺧﺎﻟﻪﺳﻮﺳــﻜﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﻳﺖ »ﻣﺪﺭﺳﻪ ﻓﻤﻴﻨﻴﺴــﺘﻰ« ﻣﻮﺭﺥ 14 ،ﺩﻳﻤﺎﻩ 1391ﻭ ﺗﺤﺖ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ »ﻣﺎﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﺣﻖ ﺭﺃﻯ ﺑﻪ ﺯﻧﺪﺍﻥ ﺭﻓﺖ« ﺍﻧﺘﺸــﺎﺭ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ .ﺩﺭ ﺑﻼﺩ ﺟﻤﻜﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮ ﻃﺮﻑ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻨﮕﺮﻳﺪ ﭼﻨﺪﻳﻦ ﭼﻤﺎﻕ »ﻣﺎﻣﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺑﺎ« ﺑﺮ ﻓﺮﻕ ﺳــﺮﺗﺎﻥ ﻓﺮﻭﺩ ﻣﻰﺁﻳﺪ ﺗــﺎ ﺑﺪﺍﻧﻴﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺯﻧﺠﻴﺮ ﺍﺳــﺎﺭﺕ »ﺧﺎﻧﻮﺍﺩﻩ« ﻭ »ﺍﻃﺎﻋــﺖ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ« ﺑﺮ ﮔﺮﺩﻥﺗﺎﻥ ﺟﺎﻭﺩﺍﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ!
ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻣﻮﺱ ﻣﺮﺩﻩﺷﻮﻳﺎﻥ ،ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻧﻜﻪ ﭘﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﻫﻢ ﮔﻔﺘﻴﻢ» ،ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺧﺎﻧﻮﺍﺩﮔﻰ« ﺑﺮ ﺍﻟﮕﻮﻯ ﺗﺤﺠﺮ ﺻﺤﺮﺍﻯ ﻛﺮﺑﻼ ﻣﻨﻄﺒﻖ ﺷــﺪﻩ؛ ﺑﺠﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﭘﺪﺭ ﻭ ﻣﺎﺩﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﻓﺮﺯﻧﺪ »ﻣﺴــﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖ« ﻭ ﻭﻇﻴﻔﻪ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷــﻨﺪ» ،ﺑﻪ ﮔﺮﺩﻥ« ﻓﺮﺯﻧﺪﺷﺎﻥ »ﺣــﻖ« ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ! ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﻳﻚﺳــﻮﻳﻪ ﻭ ﻭﺍژﮔﻮﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﻴﻨﺠﺎ ﺳﺮﭼﺸــﻤﻪ ﻣﻰﮔﻴــﺮﺩ .ﭘــﺪﺭ ﻭ ﻣــﺎﺩﺭﻯ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨــﺪ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺑﭽﻪﺩﺍﺭ ﺷــﺪﻥ »ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢ« ﺑﮕﻴﺮﻧﺪ ،ﻣﺴــﺌﻮﻝ ﻧﻴﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ،ﻭﻟﻰ ﻛﻮﺩﻛــﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﭘﺎﻯ ﮔــﺬﺍﺭﺩﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻧﻴﺎ »ﺣﻖ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ« ﻧﺪﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦﺍﺵ »ﻣﺪﻳﻮﻥ« ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ! ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﮕﺮﺵ »ﺧﺮﺩﺭﭼﻤﻦ« ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ »ﺷﻴﺦﻭﺷﺎﻩ« ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﻳﺖ ﺑﺨﺸــﻴﺪﻩ ،ﻭ ﺁﺵﻓﺮﻭﺵﻫﺎﺋﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ »ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﺋﻰ« ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ ،ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﻃﺮﺡ ﻣﻤﻨﻮﻋﻴﺖ ﺧﺮﻭﺝ ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻋﻠﻢ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖ ﺑﺮﺍﻓﺮﺍﺷﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ ،ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺻﻞ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻰ ﺗﺄﻛﻴﺪ ﻓﺮﻣﻮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺭﺿﺎﻳﺖ ﻭﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﺑﺮ ﺯﻥ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺩ »ﻭﺍﺟﺐ« ﺍﺳﺖ: »ﻃﺎﻫﺮﻩ ﺭﺣﻴﻤﻰ ،ﺩﺑﻴﺮ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻓﺎﻃﻤﻴﻮﻥ :ﺭﺿﺎﻳﺖ ﻭﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ،ﻫﻢ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺯﻥ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻣﺮﺩ ﻭﺍﺟﺐ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﺍﻣﺎ ﭼﺮﺍ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﺍﺳــﺖ ] [...ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻴﻜﻪ ﺯﻧﺎﻥ 6ﺳﺎﻝ ﺯﻭﺩﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺮﺩﻫﺎ ﻣﻜﻠﻒ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﻧﺪ ] [...ﻫﻢ ﺯﻥ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﻣﺮﺩ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺳﻔﺮﺷــﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺟﺎﺯﻩ ﻳﻜﺪﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ] [...ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﺎَ ﺑﺎ ﺣﻖ ﺳﻔﺮﺷﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﻧﻮﺍﺩﻩ ﺻﺪﻣﻪ ﻣﻰﺯﻧﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ]«[... ﺑﺎ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﺔ ﻋﻤﻴﻖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺮﻫﺎﺕ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﺭﺳــﻴﺪﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺴﺎﻓﺮﺕ ﻫﻤﻪ ،ﭼﻪ ﺯﻥ ﻭ ﭼــﻪ ﻣــﺮﺩ ﻭ ﭼﻪ ﻛــﻮﺩﻙ ﻭ ...ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺟﺎﺯﺓ ﻭﻟﻰﻓﻘﻴﻪ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ؛ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ »ﻣﺴﺎﻓﺮﺕ« ﻣﺴﺌﻠﻪﺳــﺎﺯ ﺷﺪﻩ! ﻣﻰﺑﻴﻨﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺲ ﭘﺮﺩﺓ »ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮﻯﻃﻠﺒﻰ« ﻣﺮﺩﻩﺷــﻮﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻮﻧﺚ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺗﻼﺵ ﺟﻬﺖ ﮔﺴــﺘﺮﺵ ﺩﺍﻣﻨــﺔ ﺗﻮﺣﺶ ﭘﻨﻬﺎﻥ ﺷﺪﻩ .ﺍﻳﻨﺎﻥ ﺑﺠﺎﻯ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﺯﻥ ﺗﺤﺖ »ﻗﻴﻤﻮﻣﺖ« ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ، ﻣﻰﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﻣﺮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢ ﺗﺤﺖ ﻗﻴﻤﻮﻣﺖ ﺑﮕﺬﺍﺭﻧﺪ! ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﺴــﺘﺮﺵ ﺗﻮﺣﺶ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﺍﺯ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻯ ﺯﻥ ﻧﺎﻡ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ! ﻭﻟــﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺟﺎﻟﺐﺗﺮ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖ ﺁﺵﻓﺮﻭﺵﻫﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺩﺧﺎﻟﺖ ﺑﻪ »ﺣﺮﻳﻢ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻰ« ﺍﺳــﺖ! ﻳﺎﺩﺁﻭﺭ ﺷﻮﻳﻢ ﺍﺳﺘﻨﺒﺎﻁ ﻣﺮﺩﻩﺷــﻮﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻮﻧﺚ ﺍﺯ ﺣﺮﻳﻢ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻰ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃــﻰ ﺑﺎ ﺭﻋﺎﻳﺖ ﺣﺮﻳﻢ ﺧﺼﻮﺻــﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻮﺍﻣﻊ ﺩﻣﻜﺮﺍﺗﻴﻚ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ؛ ﺍﺯ ﻗﻀﺎﻯ ﺭﻭﺯﮔﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻀــﺎﺩ ﺑــﺎ ﺁﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘــﻪ .ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻨــﺎﻥ ﺣﺮﻳﻢ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ »ﭼﺎﺭﺩﻳﻮﺍﺭﻯ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭﻯ« ﺑﻪ ﺷــﻴﻮﺓ »ﺩﺍﺵﻣﺸــﺪﻯﻫﺎ« ﺍﺷﺘﺒﺎﻩ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ؛ ﻣﻰﭘﻨﺪﺍﺭﻧــﺪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ »ﺣﻖ ﺩﺧﺎﻟﺖ« ﺩﺭ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩﺓ ﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ! ﺣﺎﻝ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻮﺍﻣﻊ ﺑﻬﻨﺠﺎﺭ ،ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﺮ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺧﺎﻧﻮﺍﺩﮔﻰ »ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕ« ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻰ ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ. ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺪﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭﻯ ﺑﺎ ﻛﻮﺩﻛﺎﻥ ،ﺑﻪ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ »ﺁﺯﺍﺩ« ﻭ »ﻣﺨﺘﺎﺭ« ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻨﺪ! ﺩﺭ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻣﺸﺎﻫﺪﺓ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺑﺪﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭﻯﻫﺎﺋﻰ ﻗﺎﺿﻰ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ »ﺣﻖ ﺳﺮﭘﺮﺳــﺘﻰ« ﻭﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺳــﻠﺐ ﻛﻨــﺪ .ﻭﻟﻰ ﺧﻮﺏ ﺟﻤﻜــﺮﺍﻥ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ »ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻰ« ﻭ ﺟﻨﮕﻠﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﻳﻚﺳﻮﻳﻪ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ: »ﺍﺷﺮﻑ ﮔﺮﺍﻣﻰﺯﺍﺩﮔﺎﻥ ،ﺣﻘﻮﻗﺪﺍﻥ ،ﺩﺭ ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﺽ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻻﻳﺤﻪ ﮔﻔﺖ ] [...ﺍﺻ ً ﻼ ﻣﺘﻮﺟﻪ ﺣﺮﻳﻢ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻰ ﺧﺎﻧﻮﺍﺩﻩﻫﺎ ﻧﻴﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ] [...ﺑﺎ ﻭﺭﻭﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻰ ﺧﺎﻧﻮﺍﺩﻩﻫــﺎ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺪﻳــﻦ ﻭ ﺑﭽﻪﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑــﻪ ﺟﺎﻥ ﻫﻢ ﻣﻰﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻧــﺪ] [...ﻭﻗﺘﻰ ﻻﻳﺤﺔ
ﮔﺬﺭﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﺷــﺪ ] [...ﻳﺎﺩ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻰ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩﻡ ﻛﻪ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ] [...ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﺔ ﺣﻖ ﺭﺃﻯ ،ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺟﺰﻭ ﻣﺠﺎﻧﻴﻦ ﻭ ﻣﺤﺠﻮﺭﺍﻥ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ]«[... ﺑﺎ ﻧﻴﻢ ﻧﮕﺎﻫﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭﻳﺎﻓﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻴﺎﻫﻮﻯ »ﻻﻳﺤﻪ ﮔﺬﺭﻧﺎﻣﻪ« ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻨﺮﻭ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺗﺎ ﺩﺳﺘﮕﺎﻩ ﺗﺒﻠﻴﻐﺎﺗﻰ ﺳﺎﻭﺍﻙ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻜﻴﻪ ﺑﺮ ﺯﻥﻧﻤﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﺗﻮﺣﺶﮔﺴــﺘﺮ ﻣﻼﻳﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻫﺮ ﭼﻪ ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮ ﺭﻭﺍﺝ ﺩﻫﺪ ،ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﺎﻧﻮﺭﺍﻥ ﭼﻨﺪﻳﻦ ﻭ ﭼﻨﺪ ﭘﻴﺎﻡ ﺗﻮﺣﺶ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻴﺎﻥ ﺑﻔﺮﺳﺘﺪ ﻭ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﺪ» ،ﺩﺧﺘﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ 9ﺳﺎﻟﮕﻰ ﺑﺎﻟﻎ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﻧﺪ؛ ﺭﺿﺎﻳﺖ ﻭﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﺑﺮ ﺯﻥ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺩ ﻭﺍﺟﺐ ﺍﺳﺖ؛ ﻭ ...ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻣﻬﻢﺗﺮ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ ،ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﺤﺠﻮﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻤﺎﺭ ﻣﻰﺁﻣﺪﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺮﻛﺖ ﺍﺳــﻼﻡ ﺑﻪ ﺣﻘﻮﻕﺷــﺎﻥ ﺩﺳــﺖ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ «...ﻭ ﺧﻼﺻﻪ ﻣﺰﺧﺮﻓﺎﺗــﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﻤﺎﺵ .ﻭﻟﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻧﺸﺴــﺖ ﻛــﺬﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺟﺎﻟﺐﺗﺮ ،ﺗﺄﻛﻴﺪ ﺁﺧﻮﻧﺪﭘﺮﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﭼﺎﺩﺭﺳﻴﺎ ﺑﺮ »ﺣﻖ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕ ﻣﺮﺩ« ﺑﺮ ﺍﻣﻮﺍﻝ ﺯﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ: »ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻰﭘﻨﺎﻩ ،ﺍﺳﺘﺎﺩ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﻭ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﺳﺎﺑﻖ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ] [...ﮔﻔﺖ ][... ﭘﺪﺭ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻦ ﺑﻠﻮﻍ ﺩﺧﺘﺮ ،ﻭﻻﻳﺖﺍﺵ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻭ ﺯﺍﺋﻞ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ ،ﻣﮕﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺴﺌﻠﻪ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﮔﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻣﻮﺍﻝ ] [...ﻣﺴﺌﻠﺔ ﻗﻴﻤﻮﻣﻴﺖ ] [...ﻓﻘﻂ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﻣﺎﻟﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ]«[... ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﺍﺕ »ﻓﻠﺴــﻔﻰ« ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﺩ ﺩﺍﻧﺸــﮕﺎﻩ ،ﻓﺎﻃﻤﻪ ﺭﺍﻛﻌﻰ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺧﺮﻭﺝ »ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﻓﺎﺳﺪ« ﺭﺍ ﻣﻔﻴﺪ ﺍﺭﺯﻳﺎﺑﻰ ﻣﻰﻓﺮﻣﺎﻳﻨﺪ: »ﻓﺎﻃﻤــﻪ ﺭﺍﻛﻌــﻰ ] [...ﻳﻚ ﺣﻖ ﻣﺴــﻠﻢ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺭﻓﺖ ﻭ ﺁﻣﺪ ﻭ ﺳــﻔﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﻣﻰﮔﻴﺮﻧــﺪ ] [...ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﻨﺪ ] [...ﺯﻧﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻨﺤﺮﻑ ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ] [...ﺩﺭ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻣﻔﺴــﺪﻩ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ ] [...ﭼﺮﺍ ﻧﻤﻰﮔﺬﺍﺭﻳﺪ ] [...ﺑﺮﻭﻧﺪ ] [...ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺧﻮﺩﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﻤﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺟﺎ ﻣﻔﺴﺪﻩ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ]«[... ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺗﻮﺣﺶ ﺷﺒﻪﻓﻤﻴﻨﻴﺴــﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺟﻤﻜــﺮﺍﻥ ،ﻫﻢ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ »ﺣﻜﻤﺖ« ﺍﻫﺪﺍء ﺟﺎﻳﺰﻩ ﺳــﻴﻤﻮﻥ ﺩﻭﺑﻮﻭﺍﺭ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﭙﺎﻟﻜﻰﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﻀﺮﺍﺕ ﭘﻰ ﺑﺮﺩ ،ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻻﺋﻞ ﺷﻴﻔﺘﮕﻰ »ﺍﻳﺰﺍﺑﻞ ﻛﻮﺗﺎﻥ ﭘﻴﻴﺮ« ﺑﻪ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺟﻤﻜﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﺍﺕ ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻯ »ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥﺳﺘﻴﺰ« ﺁﮔﺎﻩ ﺷﺪ. ﺣﺎﻝ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ »ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥﺳــﺘﻴﺰ« ﺭﺳــﻴﺪﻳﻢ ،ﺑﮕﻮﺋﻴﻢ ﺳﺎﻳﺖ ﺭﺍﺩﻳﻮ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻰ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴــﻪ ،ﻣﻮﺭﺥ 14ﻣﺎﺭﺱ ﺳــﺎﻟﺠﺎﺭﻯ ﻓﺮﺩﻯ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﻡ »ﻋﻤﻮﭘﻮﺭ« ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺻﺤﻨﻪ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻩ ﺗﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺎ »ﺗﺨﻔﻴﻒ« ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ »ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺩﺧﺘﺮﻡ ﻫﺮﮔﺰ« ﺭﺍ »ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥﺳﺘﻴﺰ« ﺍﺭﺯﻳﺎﺑﻰ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ! ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﺮﺳﺶ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ »ﻋﻤﻮﭘﻮﺭ« ﺑــﻪ ﭼﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﻗﻀﺎﻭﺕ ﻧﺸﺴــﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺑــﺮﺍﻯ »ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻯ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ« ﺣﺪ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺯ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ؟ ﺷــﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻬﺘﺮ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﺑﭙﺮﺳﻴﻢ ﺑﻪ ﭼﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺳﺎﻳﺖ ﺭﺍﺩﻳﻮﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺳﺨﺎﻭﺗﻤﻨﺪﺍﻧﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺎﻥ »ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻯ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ« ﺗﺮﻳﺒﻮﻥ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﺪ؟! ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﺮﺳﺶ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻭﻳﺮﺍﺳﺖ ﺭﺳﻤﻰ ﺑﻰﺑﻰﺳﻰ ﺍﺯ »ﺍﺳﺘﺎﻟﻴﻨﮕﺮﺍﺩ« ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﻳﺎﻓﺖ!
ﺳﺎﻳﺖ ﺑﻰﺑﻰﺳﻰ ،ﻣﻮﺭﺥ 14ﻣﺎﺭﺱ 2013ﺑﺎ ﺍﻧﺘﺸﺎﺭ ﻣﻄﻠﺒﻰ ﺗﺤﺖ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ »ﺭﺯ ﺳــﻔﻴﺪ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﻟﻴﻨﮕﺮﺍﺩ ﭼﻪ ﻛﺴــﻰ ﺑﻮﺩ؟« ﻣﻮﻓﻖ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻧﺒﺮﺩ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﻟﻴﻨﮕﺮﺍﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻭﺳــﺮﻯ ﻭ ﺳــﻨﺖ ﭘﺪﺭﺳــﺎﻻﺭ ﭘﻴﻮﻧﺪ ﺑﺰﻧﺪ! ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ،ﻃﻰ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻰ ﺩﻭﻡ ،ﻓﻘﻂ ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﺷﻮﺭﻭﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺒﻬﺔ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﻣﻨﻈﻢ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ! ﺑﻪ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺕ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ،ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺯﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺷﻮﺭﻭﻯ »ﻳﮕﺎﻧﻪ« ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻳﮕﺎﻧﮕﻰ ﻛﺎﻡ ﺑﺮﺗﺮﻯﻃﻠﺒــﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻠﺦ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ،ﭼﻨﺪ ﺭﻭﺯ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ 8ﻣﺎﺭﺱ، ﺑﻰﺑﻰﺳﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻟﺠﻦﭘﺮﺍﻛﻨﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ،ﻳﻚ ﻗﺼﺔ ﺧﺎﻟﻪ ﺳﻮﺳﻜﻪ ﺳﺮ ﻫﻢ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺣﺶ ﻭ ﺗﻌﺼﺐ ﭘﺮﺳﻮﻧﺎژ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﻡ ﺯﻳﻨﺐ ﻭ ﻣﻴﻬﻦﭘﺮﺳﺘﻰ ﮔﺮﺩﺁﻓﺮﻳﺪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﺯﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩ ﺷﻮﺭﻭﻯ ﻭ ﻧﺒﺮﺩ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﻟﻴﻨﮕﺮﺍﺩ ﻣﻰﭼﺴﺒﺎﻧﺪ. ﻳﻜــﻰ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻳﻜﻰ ﻧﺒــﻮﺩ! »ﻟﻴﻠﻴﺎ« ﺩﺧﺘﺮﻯ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺧﺠﺎﻟﺘﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺷــﻬﺎﻣﺖ ﻗﺪﻡ ﺑﺮﺩﺍﺷــﺖ ﻭ ﺧﻠﺒﺎﻥ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻯ ﺟﻨﮕﻰ ﺷﺪ! ﻟﻴﻠﻴﺎ ﺩﻭ ﺍﻧﮕﻴﺰﻩ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ،ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻴﺜﻴﺖ ﭘﺪﺭ ﻭ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻴﻬﻦ! ﺍﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻮﺍﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺭﻓﺘﻪ ﺩﺭ ﭼﺘﺮ ﻧﺠﺎﺕ ﺭﻭﺳﺮﻯ ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩ ،ﻭ ﺑﻘﻴﺔ ﻗﻀﺎﻳﺎ: »ﻟﻴﻠﻴﺎ ﻟﻴﺘﻮﻳﺎﻙ ،ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﺧﻠﺒﺎﻧﺎﻥ ﺯﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺒﻬﺔ ﺷــﺮﻕ ] [...ﺩﺭ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻦ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻯ ﺟﻨﮕﻨﺪﻩﺍﺵ ﺩﺳــﺘﻪﺍﻯ ﮔﻞ ﻭﺣﺸــﻰ ﻧﮕﻪ ﻣﻰﺩﺍﺷﺖ] [...ﺩﺭ ﻃﻮﻝ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺘــﺶ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺧﻠﺒﺎﻥ ،ﻳﻚ ﺩﻭﺟﻴﻦ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻬﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺧﻠﺒﺎﻥﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺭﺗﺶ ﺁﻟﻤــﺎﻥ ﻧﺎﺯﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻰ ﺩﻭﻡ ﺭﺍ ﺳــﺎﻗﻂ ﻛﺮﺩ] [...ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﺧﻠﺒﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺭﻛﻮﺭﺩﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﺳــﺖ [...] .ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﮕﻴﺰﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻭ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﺍﺯ ﺁﺑــﺮﻭ ﻭ ﺣﻴﺜﻴﺖ ﺧﺎﻧﻮﺍﺩﮔــﻰﺍﺵ ﺑﻮﺩ ] [...ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﻃــﺮ ] [...ﺍﺗﻬﺎﻣﺎﺕ ﺩﺭﻭﻍ ﻣﻨﺴــﻮﺏ ﺑﻪ ﭘﺪﺭﺵ ﻟﻜﻪﺩﺍﺭ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ] [...ﺍﻧﮕﻴﺰﻩ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻟﻴﺪﻳﺎ ،ﻧﺠﺎﺕ ﻭﻃﻨﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺍﺭﺗﺶ ﻣﻬﺎﺟﻢ ﻫﻴﺘﻠﺮ ﺑﻮﺩ ] [...ﻟﻴﻠﻴﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍ ﺩﺧﺘﺮﻯ ﺳﺎﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺑﻰﺍﺩﻋﺎ
ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻰﺧﻮﺍﺳــﺖ ﺧﻠﺒﺎﻥ ﺷــﻮﺩ.ﺍﻭ ﺭﻭﺯ 18ﺍﻭﺕ [...]1921ﺩﺭ ﻣﺴﻜﻮ ﺑﻪﺩﻧﻴﺎ ﺁﻣﺪ ] [...ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻫﺎﻯ ﻫﻮﺍﻳﻰ ﺷــﺮﻛﺖﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻰ ﺩﻭﻡ، ﺗﻨﻬــﺎ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻯ ﻫﻮﺍﻳﻰ ﺍﺭﺗﺶ ﺳــﺮﺥ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛــﻪ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﻫــﺎﻯ ﺁﻥ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺍﺯ ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ][...ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻝ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻧﺪﻫﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻨﮓﻫﺎ ﻣﺎﺭﻳﻨﺎ ﺭﺍﺳﻜﻮﻭﺍ ،ﺧﻠﺒﺎﻥ ﺯﻥ ﻧﺎﻣﺪﺍﺭ ﻭ ﺭﻛﻮﺭﺩﺷــﻜﻦ ﺷــﻮﺭﻭﻯ ﺑﻮﺩ] [...ﻟﻴﻠﻴﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻮﺍﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺭﻓﺘﻪ ﺩﺭ ﭼﺘﺮ ﻧﺠﺎﺕ ،ﺭﻭﺳﺮﻯ ﻣﻰﺳﺎﺧﺖ ]«[... ﺑﻠﻪ ،ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻰﺑﻰﺳــﻰ ﭘﺎﻯ »ﺯﻳﻨﺐ« ﻭ »ﻓﺎﻃﻤﻪ ﻛﻤﺎﻧﺪﻭ« ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺒﺮﺩ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﻟﻴﻨﮕﺮﺍﺩ ﺑﺎﺯ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ »ﺯﻳﻨﺐ« ﺑﺎ ﺭﻭﺳﺮﻯ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻫﻴﺘﻠﺮ ﻣﻰﺭﻭﺩ! ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳــﺎﺱ ﺗﺒﻠﻴﻐﺎﺕ ﻣﺤﻔﻞ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻙ ،ﻫﻴﺘﻠﺮ ﻭ ﻣﻮﺳﻮﻟﻴﻨﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ »ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻭﺍﺗﻴــﻜﺎﻥ« ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻤﻞ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻧﺪ» ،ﺑﻰﺩﻳﻦ« ﺑﻮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ! ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﮔﺴــﺘﺮﺵ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﺮﻭﭘﺎﮔﺎﻧﺪ ﺍﺑﻠﻪ ﭘﺴــﻨﺪ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ »ﺩﻳﻨﺪﺍﺭﺍﻥ« ﻛــﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺣﺎﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﺻﻠﻰ ﻓﺎﺷﻴﺴﻢ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ،ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺩﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ »ﺿﺪﻓﺎﺷﻴﺴﺖ« ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻰ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﺷﺪ. ﺩﺭ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ،ﺧﺎﺩﻣﺎﻥ ﻭﻓﺎﺩﺍﺭ ﺁﻧﮕﻠﻮﺳﺎﻛﺴــﻮﻥﻫﺎ ،ﺍﺯ ﻗﻤﺎﺵ ﻣﺼﺪﻕ ،ﻣﻴﺮﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﻣﻮﺳــﻮﻯ ﻭ ﺍﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﻳﺰﺩﻯ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩ ﺷــﻮﺭﻭﻯ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻰﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺣﺎﺷﻴﺔ ﺧﺰﺭ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﻳﻠﻪ ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ .ﺣﺎﻝ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭﻳﺎﻓﺖ ﺑﻪ ﭼﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺳﻴﺎ »ﻣﺪﺭﻧﻴﺘﻪ « ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ »ﺍﻳﺪﻩﺁﻟﻴﺴﻢ« ﻭ »ﻫﮕﻞ« ﭘﻴﻮﻧﺪ ﻣﻰﺯﻧﺪ!