Holladay Feb 2018

Page 1

February 2018 | Vol. 15 Iss. 02

FREE

MALL SITE PROCEDURE TRUDGES ON By Aspen Perry | a.perry@mycityjournals.com

T

he Holladay City Planning Commission voted 5-1 to deny the proposal by Ivory Development and Woodbury Corp. to redevelop the old Cottonwood Mall Site. The controversial will next have a public hearing at the Feb. 1 city council meeting. Improvements on the initial plan submitted by Ivory and Woodbury in regards to the Cottonwood Mall redevelopment were aplenty during planning commission meetings held in early January. Whether those improvements will be enough to satisfy some of the development’s harshest critics remains to be seen. “We like the incorporation of green space, although we’d like to see more,” said Timothy Schimandle, Holladay resident with Holladay Citizens for Responsible Development (HRCD). In response to recommendations proposed by the planning commission during December meetings, the development plan now includes a little over an acre of open green field space. This addition increased the proposed landscaping and open space to anywhere between 11 and 15.41 acres. Directly across from the open green space, an event plaza has been proposed, which includes a permanent community gathering space, with the potential to expand for special events. During festival events the space can be made larger by blocking the street to prohibit parking, similar to how Park City blocks Main Street from parking during various events. Once widened, the event space would be comparable to the size of the University of Utah football field, as shown via slides by Ivory Development. In an effort to address concerns regarding the height of the office and commercial buildings, developers showed commissioners a rendering of tiered buildings set further into the de-

Mall site along Arbor Lane where the field caught fire over the summer. (Aspen Perry/City Journal).

velopment, which would be less obtrusive than buildings going seven to eight stories straight up. One building is proposed to be 136 feet tall. Though developers explained that height includes roof mechanics which are rarely visable, making the viewable height closer to 116 feet. “We like that the latest rendition set the taller building back from the road,” said Schimandle. However, as much as HRCD appreciates the proposed plan

improvements, there is still concern. During recent correspondence, Schimandle wrote HRCD hoped to see the developers lower the building height down to 60 feet. Considering the site is currently zoned for building heights of 90 feet, it’s a request that can come off as unreasonable, though HCRD would still like it to be considered. “Many residents move to Holladay from Salt Lake to escape buildings just like this,” Schimandle noted. Continued on Page 5...

Telling the stories of Holladay residents through art.

page 6

Local Postal Customer ECRWSS

page 4

Scan Here: Interactive online edition with more photos.

Teen prodigy loves sharing her music with others.

page 17

Skyline girls basketball working to make their presence known.

Thank You to our Community Sponsors for supporting City Journals

Presort Std U.S. Postage PAID Riverton, UT Permit #44


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.