Developer Packet: 11311 SW Kobbe Dr.

Developers Packet

Subject Property

11311 SW KOBBE DR BEAVERTON, 97007

Tax Lot #: 1S2360001000 Alt. Tax ID #: R399330

Jurisdiction: Washington county Compliments of WFG National Title Insurance Company Customer Service Department

Table of Contents 

Property Details



Utilities (Water, Sewer & Gas)



Zoning



Custom Maps

•

City of Beaverton S. Cooper Mt. -City of Beaverton UGB Expantion Info - City of Beaverton S. Cooper Mt plan -Upcoming Projects

The information contained is provided by WFG’s Customer Service Department as a courtesy to our customers, and while deemed reliable, is not guaranteed.

Property Details 

Property Tax Information



Assessors Tax Map



Vesting Deed

•

County Information

Property Detail Report Owner: Kobbe Farm LLC Site: 11311 SW Kobbe Dr Beaverton OR 97007 Mail: 150 NW 150th Ave Beaverton OR 97006

Washington County Data as of: 05/21/2021

Location and Site Information County: Legal Description: APN: Tax Lot: Twn-Rng-Sec: Neighborhood: Subdivision: Legal Lot/Block: Census Tract/Block

Washington ACRES 193.88, POTENTIAL ADD'L TAX LIABILITY

Lot SqFt:

8,445,413

Lot Acres:

R399330 1S2360001000 01S / 02W / 36 / SE Cpo 6 Cooper Mtn-Aloha S

Land Use: Land Use STD: County Bldg Use: # Dwellings: Map Page/Grid: Zoning: Watershed:

193.88 5515 - Specially Assessed - Zoned Farmland Improved Other OTHR - Residence Single Family 1 654-D3 Washington Co.-AF-20 Rock Creek-Tualatin River

031804 / 1033

Property Characteristics Total Living Area: First Floor SqFt: Second Floor SqFt: Basement Fin/Unfin: Attic Fin/Unfin: Garage SqFt:

4,408 1,572 820 816 / 816

Bedrooms: Bathrooms Total: Bathrooms Full/Half: Stories: Foundation: Roof Material:

4 1

01 Corrugated Metal

Year Built/Eff: Heating: Cooling: Fireplace: Pool: Kitchen:

1900 (1940) Forced Air 1

Assessment and Tax Information Market Total: Market Land: Market Structure: Asssessment Year: Assessed Total:

$1,799,470.00 $150,000.00 $456,010.00 2021 $562,080.00

Property Tax: Exemption: Market Improved %: Levy Code: Mill Rate:

$7,814.03 25.00% 39.04 13.9020

Sale and Loan Information Sale Date: Sale Amount: Document #: Deed Type: Title Co:

Lender: Loan Amount: Loan Type: Price/SqFt: Seller Name: Prepared By: WFG National Title Customer Service Department 12909 SW 68th Pkwy, Suite 350, Portland, OR 97223 P: 503 603 1700 | 360 891 5474 E: cs@wfgnationaltitle.com | cccs@wfgtitle.com

Sentry Dynamics, Inc. and its customers make no representation, warranties or conditions, express or implied, as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report.

This map/plat is being furnished as an aid in locating the herein described land in relation to adjoining streets, natural boundaries and other land, and is not a survey of the land depicted. Except to the extent a policy of title insurance is expressly modified by endorsement, if any, the company does not insure dimensions, distances, location of easements, acreage or other matters shown thereon.

7/1/20 TO 6/30/21 REAL PROPERTY TAX STATEMENT Washington County Dept. of Assessment & Taxation ∗ 155 N 1st Ave, Ste 130, MS8 ∗ Hillsboro, OR 97124 Phone: (503) 846-8801

PROPERTY DESCRIPTION

MAP: 1S2360001000

SITUS: 11311 SW KOBBE DR LEGAL: ACRES 193.88, POTENTIAL ADD'L TAX LIABILITY

VALUES MARKET VALUES: LAND NON-LSU RMV LAND-LSU SPEC USE PORTION LAND-LSU STRUCTURE NET RMV TAXABLE VALUES: NET ASSESSED VALUE

PROPERTY TAXES:

CODE AREA: 039.04

ACCOUNT NO: R399330

2020-21 CURRENT TAX BY DISTRICT: SCH-HILLSBORO COLL-PORTLAND ESD-NW REGIONAL EDUCATION TAXES:

LAST YEAR

THIS YEAR

150,000 1,193,460 295,140 128,800 439,480 1,782,940

150,000 1,193,460 297,000 132,440 456,010 1,799,470

545,930

562,080

$7,206.93

$7,814.03

2,796.29 158.96 86.45 $3,041.70

CNTY-WASHINGTON REG-METRO SERVICE-AFTER 1/1/2013 FIRE-TV FIRE & RESCUE-AFTER 1/1/2013 CNTY-WASHINGTON-AFTER 1/1/2013 SWC-TUALATIN REG-METRO SERVICE PORT-PORTLAND FIRE-TV FIRE & RESCUE GENERAL GOVERNMENT TAXES:

1,263.78 53.96 252.94 359.73 48.00 54.30 39.40 857.28 $2,929.39

SCH-HILLSBORO-BOND-AFTER FIRE-TV FIRE & RESCUE-AFTER CNTY-WASHINGTON-AFTER SCH-HILLSBORO-AFTER REG-METRO SERVICE-AFTER COLL-PORTLAND-AFTER BONDS AND MISC TAXES:

512.00 79.53 37.88 767.01 223.37 223.15 $1,842.94

2020-21 LEVIED TAX:

$7,814.03

DELINQUENT TAXES:

$0.00

(Before Discount)

Due to Covid-19, the County strongly encourages paying taxes by mail, online, or dropbox. For payment options, please visit www.co.washington.or.us/tax

TAX PAYMENT OPTIONS

(See Insert For Additional Information)

Pay By In Full 2/3 1/3

Discount

Net Amount Due

Nov 16, 2020

234.42

$7,579.61

Nov 16, 2020

104.19

$5,105.17

Nov 16, 2020

NONE

$2,604.68

TOTAL DUE:

PLEASE INCLUDE STUB TO AVOID DELAYED PROCESSING ↑ Tear Here

$7,579.61

(After Discount)

PLEASE DETACH STUB AND RETURN WITH PAYMENT. RETAIN TOP PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS. SEE BACK OF STATEMENT FOR INSTRUCTIONS.

WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON 2020-2021 Property Tax Payment Stub SITUS: 11311 SW KOBBE DR

Electronic Check $0.95 Cents Pay By Phone: 1(888)510-9274

ACCOUNT NO: R399330

Mailing Address Change On Back Of Stub.

Pay Online: co.washington.or.us/AssessmentTaxation/TaxPayment *2.45% Vendor Fee Applies

Tear Here ↑

UNPAID DELINQUENT TAX IS INCLUDED IN PAYMENT OPTIONS DUE: Nov 16, 2020 IN FULL (3% Discount) $7,579.61 DUE: Nov 16, 2020 2/3 PAYMENT (2% Discount) $5,105.17 DUE: Nov 16, 2020 1/3 PAYMENT (NO Discount) $2,604.68 Make Payable: Washington County WASHINGTON COUNTY 155 N 1st Ave., Ste 130 MS8 Hillsboro, OR 97124

Enter Amount Paid Due Date: Nov 16, 2020

34000013993300000757961000051051700002604681

Aerial Map

Parcel ID: R399330 Sentry Dynamics, Inc. and its customers make no representations, warranties or conditions, express or implied, as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report.

Overlay Information 1S2360001000 GENERAL Jurisdiction:

Rural Unincorporated Washington Co

Within Urban Growth Boundary:

No

Plat:

Property is not part of a subdivision

Assessor Area:

0

Zipcode:

97007

SERVICES and DISTRICTS Community Participation Organization

CPO6

Within Enhanced Sheriff's Patrol District [ESPD] (*Updated July 31st each calendar year):

No

Fire District (*Updated July 31st each calendar year):

TVFR

Fire Management Zone:

5984

Garbage Hauler:

Waste Management of Oregon

Garbage Dropbox:

Waste Management of Oregon

Within Metro's district boundary (*Updated July 31st each calendar year):

Yes

ODOT District:

2B

Recreation District (*Updated July 31st each calendar year):

Not in a recreation district - possibly served by a city parks and recreation department

Park System Development Charge:

No park SDC to collect

THPRD Special Area :

Not in a THPRD Special Area

School District (*Updated July 31st each calendar year):

HILLSBORO

Service District for Lighting Assessment Area/zone:

Not in an Assessment Area.

Within Urban Road Maintenance District [URMD] (*Updated July 31st each calendar year):

No

PLANNING Plan Designation:

(Zoning)

AF-20 (click to open CDC) - Land Use District Summary

General Setbacks for the Land Use District (May differ depending upon location):

Front: 30 / Side: 10 / Rear: 20 / Street Side: 30

North Bethany Plan Area:

Not in North Bethany Sub Area

Historic & Cultural Resource Inventory:

Not located within Historic and Cultural Resource Overlay District

Airport Overlay:

Not located within an Airport Overlay

POD Date Zoned:

POD:5-12/31/62

Ground Water Resouce Area:

COOPER MTN-BULL MTN

VOTING and REPRESENTATION Election Precinct:

426

Commissioner District:

1- Nafisa Fai

CENSUS and DEMOGRAPHICS Census Tract:

031804

Census Blockgroup:

410670318041

Census Block:

Block 1033

* The data layers used to derive items in the report are assembled from multiple sources. Report items flagged with an asterisk (*) are derived from the taxcode layer maintained by the Washington County Department of Assessment and Taxation. The taxcode layer is updated once a year on July 31st and may not reflect final/proposed annexations or boundary adjustments. All information should be verified with individual service districts.

Utility As Builts Water As Built Maps

No Water Service- Closest Water Service: City of Beaverton

Sewer As Built Maps No Sewer Service- Closesst Sewer Service: City of Beaverton NW Natural As Built Maps

Thei nf or mat i oncont ai nedi spr ovi dedbyWFG’sCust omerSer vi ceDepar t ment asacour t esyt oourcust omer s,andwhi l edeemedr el i abl e,i snotguar ant eed.

1-041-009

1-041-010

1-041-011

1-041-010

1-041-010

1-042-010

1-041-011

1-042-011

"B "

C OF L ROA D

~

CO L F ROA D

~

ROA D

(P) 2"

~

8' O FF

( !

1-042-011

1-042-010

#11795

~

FF 8' O A D O R F CL O

1-0 42-010 1-0 43-010

1-042-011

1-043-009 1-043-010

1-043-011

1-043-010

1-043-011

NW Natural does not warrant the accuracy of this map.

It should be used for informational purposes only.

For a current and exact location of facilities, call your local utility locate center.

250 SW Taylor Street, Portland, Oregon 97204 (503) 226-4211

³

Legend Meter Location with Address

( !

1-041-009 1-041-010

1-041-011

Gas Pipe City Limit

1-042-010 1-042-011

Plat Index

50 25

0

50

1 inch = 100 feet

100 Feet

1-043-009 1-043-010

1-043-011

Legal Location: T01S R02W Sec36 SE State: OREGON County: WASHINGTON City: BEAVERTON Wallmap: SHERWOOD

Plat ID:

1-042-010 Plot Date: 6/1/2021

R:\Engineering\Drafting_Docs\Reference_Documents\EMaps\Emaps.mxd

~

8' O F F

Zoning 

Detailed Zoning Information Washington County Zoning AF-20 (Agriculture and Forest District)



Zoning Map

•

City of Beaverton Zoning Information

For Additional Zoning Information Contact: Washington County Land Use and Planning Dept 503.846.4530

Zoning

AF-5

FD-20

FD-20

AF-5

R-6 R-6 R-6 FD-20

FD-20

EFC

AF-20

AF-20

Tax Lots

R-5 R-6 R7 R-5 R-6 R-6 R-6 AF-5 R-6 R-6 INST R-6 R-6

AF-20 AF-20

Subject Property Commercial

AF-5

Multi Family

AF-20

EFU

EFU RR-5 R4

² 362.5 725

AF-20

AF-20 AF-20 EFU

0

EFU

R2 AF-20

Customer Service Department 12909 SW 68th Parkway, Suite 350 Portland, OR 97223 (503) 603-1700 cs@wfgnationaltitle.com 1,450 Feet

R5

AF-5

Rural

Single Family

R-6

AF-20 AF-10

AF-10

AF-20 AF-10

R4

AF-20 R4

R2

R1

AF-20

RR-5 EFU R7 EFU RR-5 EFU R4 R5 R2 RR-5

EFU

R2

R2

RR-5

R5 R5 R4

R7

AF-20

R4

AF-20 R2

AF-20 R1

R2 R1

AF-20

RR-5 RR-5 R7

R5

AF-20 R4

R2

NS R-15 R-15 R-25 R-7 R-15 R-15 R-7 R-4.5 R-9 R-12 R-9 R-9

This map is a copy of public record and is provided solely for information purposes. WFG National Title assumes no liability for variations, if any, in dimensions, area or location of the premises or the location of improvements.

Zoning

700

725

640

69 5

710

70 5

63 0

670

0 64

630

690

73 5 725

56 5

60 5

590

565

71 5

5 64 650

0 73

53 505 5

62 5

585

565

520

625

66 5

625

570

5 49

470

510

420

0 70

585

0 65

0 69

4 50 35 5 46 0 49 0

62 0

575

625

50 5

645

5 59 0 60 510 605 63 580 0 5 53 56 5 56 0 610 590 590 480 67 485 615 0 545 630 5 5 6 465 9 6 675 4 0 685 68 61 0 0 0 59 615 55 5 50 565 5 695 70 660 62 0 53 55 655 0 5 58 6 0 0 515 5 520 600 560 52 575 5 53 48 0 5 540 5 44 62 49 0 0 46 445 485 5 5 47 500 4 440 55 5 505 3 430 4 410 460 400 05 4 445 390 42 415 0 380

67 5

680

345

41 0

390

685

730

5 64

5 70

0 64

5' Contours

635

Subject Property

715

0 71

73 0

5 73 0 74

5 72

620

0 72

585

745

610 595

575

0 57

62 5

675

615

600

62 0

595

515

510

53 0

59 0

670

680

5 740 73 720

595 56 0 575 555

615

570 54 0 550 51 535 545 5 50 520 5 49 30 0 5

5 52

47 0

52 5

570

510

39 0

400 65 4 5 2 4

5 49 475 445 450 0 42

365

315

Tax Lots

5 0 37 37

Contours

380

450

425

335 5 34

34 0 285

260

335 35

35 5

0

325

330

31 5

5 34

305

300

320

320

280 295 300

325

33 0

310 330

30 5

260 255

345

37 5

0 31

1,200 Feet

0

290

5 27 0 265 27

600

250 25

235 245

300

260

395

31 5

290

255

0

370

355

0 37

365

Customer Service Department 12909 SW 68th Parkway, Suite 350 Portland, OR 97223 (503) 603-1700 cs@wfgnationaltitle.com

340

350

0 35 360 375

365

5 38 5 35

36 0

²

365

335

325

340

5 320 31

This map is a copy of public record and is provided solely for information purposes. WFG National Title assumes no liability for variations, if any, in dimensions, area or location of the premises or the location of improvements.

Flood Plain Tax Lots

Subject Property Streams

Flood Plain Wetlands Rivers

² Customer Service Department 12909 SW 68th Parkway, Suite 350 Portland, OR 97223 (503) 603-1700 cs@wfgnationaltitle.com 0

362.5 725

1,450 Feet

This map is a copy of public record and is provided solely for information purposes. WFG National Title assumes no liability for variations, if any, in dimensions, area or location of the premises or the location of improvements.

Aerial Subject Property Tax Lots

² Customer Service Department 12909 SW 68th Parkway, Suite 350 Portland, OR 97223 (503) 603-1700 cs@wfgnationaltitle.com 0

300

600

1,200 Feet

This map is a copy of public record and is provided solely for information purposes. WFG National Title assumes no liability for variations, if any, in dimensions, area or location of the premises or the location of improvements.

Community

CPO 7 SUNSET WEST/ROCK CREEK/BETHANY CPO 12 CORNELIUS

Tax Lots

CPO 9 HILLSBORO/ORENCO

CPO 1 CEDAR HILLS-CEDAR MILL S

FIVE OAKS/TRIPLE CREEK

FOREST PARK

SOUTHWEST HILLS RESIDENTIAL LEAGUE

Subject Property

8 9 s : o n m n { n

CPO 6 COOPER MTN-ALOHA N

Fire Stations

CENTRAL BEAVERTON

Hospitals Schools Libraries

HILLSIDE

BRIDLEMILE

CPO 15 FERN HILL

HAYHURST WEST BEAVERTON

Neighborhoods Rivers Park

CPO 6 COOPER MTN-ALOHA S

VOSE

HIGHLAND

MULTNOMAH

SEXTON MOUNTAIN

GREENWAY

NEIGHBORS SOUTHWEST

CPO 10 LAUREL/BLOOMING/SCHOLLS/RIVER ROAD

²

OAK CREEK

CPO 4B BULL MTN

CPO 4M METZGER

MOUNTAIN PARK

WESTLAKE

LAKE FOREST

CPO 4K

BRYANT RIVERPARK

EAST TUALATIN

Customer Service Department 12909 SW 68th Parkway, Suite 350 Portland, OR 97223 (503) 603-1700 cs@wfgnationaltitle.com 0

2,150 4,300

8,600 Feet

CPO 5

CPO 5 SHERWOOD-TUALATIN N

CPO 5 SHERWOOD-TUALATIN S1

STAFFORD-TUALATIN VALLEY IBACH

CIO 6 BYROM

This map is a copy of public record and is provided solely for information purposes. WFG National Title assumes no liability for variations, if any, in dimensions, area or location of the premises or the location of improvements.

Transit

Sohi Community Park Sohi Community Park

Tax Lots

Subject Property X

X

ü Æ

£ n

Bus Stops

Light Rail Stops Park & Ride

Transit Centers Bike Routes Bus Lines

Farmington Paddle Launch

Light Rail

OHSU Tram Park

²

Eagle Landing Park Gotter Quamash Prairie Prairie II Quamash Prairie

Nicholas Acres

Butternut Park Deline Park

0

1,050 2,100

4,200 Feet

Baker Heaton Confluence

Beaverton City Park

Evelyn M. Schiffler Memorial Park

Little Peoples Park

Mountain View Westside Elsie Champions Linear Park Stuhr Future Roy E. Park Center Community Dancer Valley Hazeldale Park Park Mt Williams Park Barlow Park Park Burnsridge Fir Square Path Wonderland Thornbrook Woods Brookhaven Woods Park Park Grove Park Natural Area Natural Area Barlow Square Lowami Granada Woods Path Taliesen Park Hart Woods Northridge Natural Area Ridgecrest Hubert Lee Cain Woods Park 125th Wetlands Summercrest Vale Greenway Jenkins Natural Area Hyland Woods Extension Fanno Creek Estate Natural Area Park Vale Greenway Natural Area Greenway 125th Madrona Satterberg Heights Matrix Extension Woods Park Beacon Hill Woods Koll Center Natural Area Natural Area Wetlands Hill Hiteon Park Natural Area Morrison Wetlands Natural Area Downing Cooper Woods Mountain Greenway Shadow Creek Forest Glen Greenway Natural Area Nature Park Woods Natural Area Wetlands Park Westside Natural Areas Forest Cooper Cooper Englewood Paul and Verna Linear Glen Woods Mountain Mountain Park Winkelman Park Park Natural Area Nature Park Nature Park Englewood Park Westside Hiteon Wetlands Englewood Linear Park Natural Area Park Westside Summer Creek Greenway Linear Park Summer Scholls Tenax Woods Lake Park Wetlands Natural Dirksen Natural Area Mary Woodard Nature Westside Area Greenway Linear Park Park Progess Northview Hart Wetland David's Park Lake Park Jack Park Windsor Barrows Powerline Trail Pathfinder Wetlands Natural Area Genesis Trail Emilia Park Rockingham Westside Pathfinder Clute Ascension Trail Sabrina Park Genesis Trail Cach Sunrise Trail - East Gaarde Terrace Trails Nature Park Greenway Street Park Westside Greenway 121st Trail Starview Trail Avenue Turnaround Elizabeth Price Park Westside Trail Terraview Greenway Tualatin Orchard Park River National Turnagain Greenway Wildlife Refuge Westside Trail

River's Bend Prairie

Customer Service Department 12909 SW 68th Parkway, Suite 350 Portland, OR 97223 (503) 603-1700 cs@wfgnationaltitle.com

Lilly K. Johnson Woods

Tualatin River National Wildlife Refuge

Westside Trail Tualatin River National Wildlife Refuge Tualatin River National Wildlife Refuge

Tualatin River National Wildlife Refuge Beef Heritage Pine Bend Natural Area Natural Area

Dover Greenway

Dover Greenway

Tualatin River Greenway Tualatin River Greenway

This map is a copy of public record and is provided solely for information purposes. WFG National Title assumes no liability for variations, if any, in dimensions, area or location of the premises or the location of improvements.

Vacant

Morrison Woods Natural Area Cooper Mountain Nature Park

Tax Lots

Subject Property Vacant Lots Park

Cooper Mountain Nature Park

Cooper Mountain Nature Park

Paul and Verna Winkelman Park

Tenax Woods Natural Area

² Customer Service Department 12909 SW 68th Parkway, Suite 350 Portland, OR 97223 (503) 603-1700 cs@wfgnationaltitle.com 0

362.5 725

1,450 Feet

Emilia Park

Sabrina Park This map is a copy of public record and is provided solely for information purposes. WFG National Title assumes no liability for variations, if any, in dimensions, area or location of the premises or the location of improvements.

City of Beaverton S. Cooper Mountain -

City of Beaverton UGB Expansion Info City of Beaverton S. Cooper Mt plan Upcoming Projects

City of Beaverton Proposal to Expand the Urban Growth Boundary to Include the

COOPER MOUNTAIN URBAN RESERVE Prepared for Metro May 31, 2018

City of Beaverton UGB Expansion Proposal

ii

CONTENTS /ŶƚƌŽĚƵĐƟŽŶ

1

Housing

2

Concept Plan

4

džŝƐƟŶŐ hƌďĂŶ ƌĞĂƐ

7

īŽƌĚĂďůĞ ,ŽƵƐŝŶŐ

9

Metro Outcomes

12

Conclusion

15

Appendices A. Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Report and Plan

17

͘ ĞĂǀĞƌƚŽŶ ,ŽƵƐŝŶŐ &ŝǀĞ zĞĂƌ ĐƟŽŶ WůĂŶ

77

C. Beaverton Land Use and Zoning Maps

97

͘ ^ƚĂŬĞŚŽůĚĞƌ >ĞƩĞƌƐ ŽĨ ^ƵƉƉŽƌƚ

101

͘ > ŽŶĮƌŵĂƟŽŶ ŽĨ ,ŽƵƐŝŶŐ EĞĞĚƐ ŶĂůLJƐŝƐ

131

&͘ ĞĂǀĞƌƚŽŶ ŝƚLJ ŽƵŶĐŝů ZĞƐŽůƵƟŽŶƐ

137

'͘ &ŝŶĚŝŶŐƐ ŽĨ &ĂĐƚ ĂŶĚ ŽŶĐůƵƐŝŽŶƐ ŽĨ >Ăǁ

147

,͘ DĞƚƌŽ ĐŬŶŽǁůĞĚŐĞŵĞŶƚ ŽĨ ŽŶĐĞƉƚ WůĂŶ

537

/͘ ŐƌĞĞŵĞŶƚƐ ǁŝƚŚ ŽƵŶƚLJ ĂŶĚ ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞ ŝƐƚƌŝĐƚƐ

593

J. South Cooper Mountain Concept Plan

609

iii

City of Beaverton UGB Expansion Proposal

METRO REGIONAL FUNCTIONAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS ĞĂǀĞƌƚŽŶ͛Ɛ ƉƌŽƉŽƐĂů ƚŽ ĞdžƉĂŶĚ ƚŚĞ ƵƌďĂŶ ŐƌŽǁƚŚ ďŽƵŶĚĂƌLJ ƚŽ ŝŶĐůƵĚĞ ƚŚĞ ŽŽƉĞƌ DŽƵŶƚĂŝŶ hƌďĂŶ ZĞƐĞƌǀĞ ĐŽŵƉůŝĞƐ ǁŝƚŚ Ăůů ĂƉƉůŝĐĂďůĞ DĞƚƌŽ ZĞŐŝŽŶĂů &ƵŶĐƟŽŶĂů WůĂŶ ƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ͘ dŚĞ ƚĂďůĞ ďĞůŽǁ ƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƐ Ă ůŝƐƚ ŽĨ Ăůů ƌĞůĞǀĂŶƚ DĞƚƌŽ dŝƚůĞƐ͕ ĂŶĚ ƚŚĞ ĐŽƌƌĞƐƉŽŶĚŝŶŐ ƉĂŐĞ ŶƵŵďĞƌ ƚŚĂƚ ƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƐ ĞǀŝĚĞŶĐĞ͘

Metro Code

iv

Page

Title 1

Housing Capacity

7, 9

Title 3

tĂƚĞƌ YƵĂůŝƚLJ ĂŶĚ &ůŽŽĚ DĂŶĂŐĞŵĞŶƚ

4

Title 4

/ŶĚƵƐƚƌŝĂů ĂŶĚ KƚŚĞƌ ŵƉůŽLJŵĞŶƚ ƌĞĂƐ

7

Title 6

ĞŶƚĞƌƐ͕ ŽƌƌŝĚŽƌƐ͕ ^ƚĂƟŽŶ ŽŵŵƵŶŝƟĞƐ ĂŶĚ DĂŝŶ ^ƚƌĞĞƚƐ 7

Title 7

Housing Choice

9

Title 11

WůĂŶŶŝŶŐ ĨŽƌ EĞǁ hƌďĂŶ ƌĞĂƐ

1, 4

Title 12

WƌŽƚĞĐƟŽŶ ŽĨ ZĞƐŝĚĞŶƟĂů EĞŝŐŚďŽƌŚŽŽĚƐ

12

Title 13

EĂƚƵƌĞ ŝŶ EĞŝŐŚďŽƌŚŽŽĚƐ

4

Title 14

hƌďĂŶ 'ƌŽǁƚŚ ŽƵŶĚĂƌLJ

1-15

INTRODUCTION The City of Beaverton proposes to add Cooper Mountain Urban Reserve to the urban growth boundary to welcome new community members and provide a wide variety of housing choices to households in the city. ĞĂǀĞƌƚŽŶ ŝƐ ĐŽŵŵŝƩĞĚ ƚŽ ĞŶŚĂŶĐŝŶŐ ĞĐŽŶŽŵŝĐ ŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƚLJ͕ ŵĂŝŶƚĂŝŶŝŶŐ Ă ŚŝŐŚ ƋƵĂůŝƚLJ ŽĨ ůŝĨĞ ĂŶĚ ƉƌŽŵŽƟŶŐ ĂĐĐĞƐƐ ƚŽ ŶĂƚƵƌĂů ďĞĂƵƚLJ ĞƋƵŝƚĂďůLJ ĨŽƌ Ăůů ƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚƐ͕ ŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐ ƚŚĞ ĨƵůů ƐƉĞĐƚƌƵŵ ŽĨ ŝŶĐŽŵĞƐ ĂŶĚ ĐƵůƚƵƌĂů ďĂĐŬŐƌŽƵŶĚƐ represented in our community. ĚĚŝŶŐ ŽŽƉĞƌ DŽƵŶƚĂŝŶ hƌďĂŶ ZĞƐĞƌǀĞ ŶŽǁ ŵĂŬĞƐ ƐĞŶƐĞ ďĞĐĂƵƐĞ͗

North Cooper Mountain Cooper Mountain Urban Reserve South Cooper Mountain

UGB Beaverton Concept Plan Area Cooper Mountain Urban Reserve Rural Reserve

• The urban reserve is the “missing puzzle piece” of the South Cooper Mountain Concept Plan area. Areas already in the growth boundary ĂƌĞ ƚŽ ƚŚĞ ŶŽƌƚŚ͕ ĞĂƐƚ ĂŶĚ ƐŽƵƚŚ͘ • ĞĂǀĞƌƚŽŶ͛Ɛ ŐƌĞĞŶĮĞůĚ ŐƌŽǁƚŚ ĂƌĞĂ͕ ^ŽƵƚŚ ŽŽƉĞƌ DŽƵŶƚĂŝŶ͕ ŝƐ expected to be fully built out before the urban reserve is available for development.

• ,ŽƵƐŝŶŐ ĚĞŵĂŶĚ ŝƐ ƐƚƌŽŶŐ͕ ĂƐ ĞǀŝĚĞŶĐĞĚ ďLJ ƌŝƐŝŶŐ ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ ƉƌŝĐĞƐ ĂŶĚ ƌĞŶƚƐ͕ ĂŶĚ ĂĚĚŝŶŐ ůĂŶĚ ŶŽǁ ĐĂŶ ŚĞůƉ ƉƌĞǀĞŶƚ ĨƵƚƵƌĞ ƐŚŽƌƚĂŐĞƐ͘ • ŽŽƉĞƌ DŽƵŶƚĂŝŶͲĂƌĞĂ ƌŽĂĚƐ͕ ƐĞǁĞƌ ůŝŶĞƐ͕ ǁĂƚĞƌ ůŝŶĞƐ͕ ƚƌĂŝůƐ ĂŶĚ ŽƚŚĞƌ ŝŶĨƌĂƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞ ǁŽƌŬ ďĞƩĞƌ ŝĨ ƚŚĞ ƵƌďĂŶ ƌĞƐĞƌǀĞ͕ ƚŚĞ ͞ŵŝƐƐŝŶŐ ƉƵnjnjůĞ ƉŝĞĐĞ͕͟ ŝƐ ĮůůĞĚ ŝŶ͘ /Ŷ ĂĚĚŝƟŽŶ͕ ƚŚŝƐ ĞdžƉĂŶƐŝŽŶ ƌĞƋƵĞƐƚ ŵĞĞƚƐ Žƌ ĞdžĐĞĞĚƐ ĂƉƉůŝĐĂďůĞ ĐƌŝƚĞƌŝĂ͕ ŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐ͗ • Housing needs. Beaverton’s housing needs analysis clearly ĚĞŵŽŶƐƚƌĂƚĞƐ ƚŚĞ ŶĞĞĚ ĨŽƌ ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ͕ ŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐ ƐŝŶŐůĞͲĨĂŵŝůLJ ŚŽŵĞƐ͕ townhomes and apartments/condos.

• Required concept plan. The 2014 South Cooper Mountain Concept Plan͕ ǁŚŝĐŚ ŝƐ ĐŽŶƐŝƐƚĞŶƚ ǁŝƚŚ DĞƚƌŽ ƌƵůĞƐ͕ ƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƐ Ă ĐŽŵƉƌĞŚĞŶƐŝǀĞ ǀŝƐŝŽŶ for the urban reserve as part of the larger Cooper Mountain area.

• Growth inside the city. ĞĂǀĞƌƚŽŶ ĞŶĐŽƵƌĂŐĞƐ ŐƌŽǁƚŚ ŝŶ ĞdžŝƐƟŶŐ ƵƌďĂŶ ĂƌĞĂƐ ƚŚƌŽƵŐŚ ƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐ ĂŶĚ ƉƌŽŐƌĂŵƐ ƐƵĐŚ ĂƐ njŽŶĞ ĐŚĂŶŐĞƐ͕ ĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ ĐŽĚĞ ƵƉĚĂƚĞƐ͕ ŐƌĂŶƚƐ ĂŶĚ ƉƌŽǀŝĚŝŶŐ ƐƵƉƉŽƌƚ ǁŝƚŚ ƵƌďĂŶ renewal funds.

• īŽƌĚĂďůĞ ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ͘ Beaverton creates and funds programs that ƐƵƉƉŽƌƚ ďƵŝůĚŝŶŐ ĂīŽƌĚĂďůĞ ĂŶĚ ŵĂƌŬĞƚͲƌĂƚĞ ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ͖ ƉƌĞƐĞƌǀŝŶŐ ĞdžŝƐƟŶŐ͕ ůŽǁͲĐŽƐƚ ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ͖ ĂŶĚ ĂĚĚƌĞƐƐŝŶŐ ŚŽŵĞůĞƐƐŶĞƐƐ͘ • Metro’s desired outcomes. ĞĂǀĞƌƚŽŶ ƉƌŝŽƌŝƟnjĞƐ ĂĐƟŽŶƐ ĂŶĚ ŝŶǀĞƐƚŵĞŶƚƐ ƚŚĂƚ ĞŶƐƵƌĞ Ăůů ƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚƐ ůŝǀĞ ŝŶ ǀŝďƌĂŶƚ ĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƟĞƐ ǁŝƚŚ ĂĐĐĞƐƐ ƚŽ ũŽďƐ͖ ƐĂĨĞ ĂŶĚ ƌĞůŝĂďůĞ ƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƟŽŶ͖ ĂŶĚ ƉĂƌŬƐ ĂŶĚ ƌĞĐƌĞĂƟŽŶĂů ŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƟĞƐ͘ ĞĂǀĞƌƚŽŶ͛Ɛ ƐƵƐƚĂŝŶĂďŝůŝƚLJ͖ ĞƋƵŝƚLJ ĂŶĚ ŝŶĐůƵƐŝŽŶ͖ ůĂŶŐƵĂŐĞ ĂĐĐĞƐƐ͖ ƉůĂŶŶŝŶŐ͖ ĂŶĚ ĞĐŽŶŽŵŝĐ ĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ ĞīŽƌƚƐ Ăůů ƐƵƉƉŽƌƚ ƚŚĞ Ɛŝdž ĚĞƐŝƌĞĚ ŽƵƚĐŽŵĞƐ͘ dŚŝƐ ĚŽĐƵŵĞŶƚ ƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƐ ĂĚĚŝƟŽŶĂů ĚĞƚĂŝůƐ ĂďŽƵƚ ŚŽǁ ĞĂǀĞƌƚŽŶ͛Ɛ proposal supports regional goals and why adding the urban reserve now is important to house the region’s residents.

1

City of Beaverton UGB Expansion Proposal

HOUSING ĞĂǀĞƌƚŽŶ ƉƌŽŵŽƚĞƐ ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ ĐŚŽŝĐĞƐ ƚŚƌŽƵŐŚ ƉŽůŝĐŝĞƐ͕ ƉƌŽŐƌĂŵƐ͕ ĂŶĚ investments that respond to the needs of diverse household sizes and incomes.

The Housing Element of the city’s Comprehensive Plan includes policies that were based on Beaverton’s 2015 “Housing Strategies Report,͟ ƚŚĞ ĐŝƚLJ͛Ɛ ƟƚůĞ ĨŽƌ the state-mandated Housing Needs Analysis (HNA) (Appendix F). The Housing Element was updated to address changing housing needs such as more people ŵŽǀŝŶŐ ƚŽ ĚŽǁŶƚŽǁŶ ĞĂǀĞƌƚŽŶ͖ ŝŶĐƌĞĂƐŝŶŐ ƌĂĐŝĂů͕ ĞƚŚŶŝĐ ĂŶĚ ĐƵůƚƵƌĂů ĚŝǀĞƌƐŝƚLJ͖ ĂŶĚ ƚŚĞ ůĂĐŬ ŽĨ ĂīŽƌĚĂďůĞ ŚŽŵĞƐ ĚƌŝǀĞŶ ďLJ ƚŚĞ ƌĞŐŝŽŶĂů ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ ĐƌƵŶĐŚ͘ dŚĞ ,ŽƵƐŝŶŐ ůĞŵĞŶƚ ƌĞƐƉŽŶĚƐ ƚŽ ƚŚĞƐĞ ĐŚĂŶŐĞƐ ǁŝƚŚ ƉŽůŝĐŝĞƐ ƚŚĂƚ ƐƟŵƵůĂƚĞ ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ ŝŶ ƚŚĞ ĐĞŶƚƌĂů ĐŝƚLJ͕ ŝŶĐĞŶƟǀŝnjĞ ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ ŶĞĂƌ ƚƌĂŶƐŝƚ͕ ĂŶĚ ĞŶĐŽƵƌĂŐĞ Ă ŵŝdž ŽĨ ŝŶŶŽǀĂƟǀĞ ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ ƚLJƉĞƐ ŝŶ ůĂƌŐĞ ĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚƐ͘ &Žƌ ĞdžĂŵƉůĞ͕ ƚŚĞ ĐŝƚLJ͛Ɛ ĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ ĐŽĚĞ ŚĂƐ Ă ƐĞĐƟŽŶ ĚĞĚŝĐĂƚĞĚ ƚŽ ƚŚĞ South Cooper Mountain Community Plan ĂƌĞĂ͘ dŚŝƐ ƐĞĐƟŽŶ ƌĞƋƵŝƌĞƐ ƚŚĂƚ Ăůů ĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚƐ ŝŶĐůƵĚĞ Ă ŵŝdž ŽĨ ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ ƚLJƉĞƐ͕ ĂŶĚ ĨĂĐŝůŝƚĂƚĞ ďŽƚŚ ƌĞŶƟŶŐ ĂŶĚ ŚŽŵĞ ŽǁŶĞƌƐŚŝƉ͕ ƐŽ ƚŚĂƚ families at a variety of household incomes can live in the same neighborhood. tŝƚŚ ŚŽŵĞ ĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƟŽŶ ĂďŽƵƚ ƚŽ ďĞŐŝŶ ŝŶ ^ŽƵƚŚ ŽŽƉĞƌ DŽƵŶƚĂŝŶ͕ ĂŶĚ ŵƵůƟĨĂŵŝůLJ ďƵŝůĚŝŶŐƐ ŶĞĂƌŝŶŐ ĐŽŵƉůĞƟŽŶ ĚŽǁŶƚŽǁŶ͕ ĐŝƚLJ ƐƚĂī ŝƐ ŽďƐĞƌǀŝŶŐ ĂŶ ŝŶĐƌĞĂƐĞ ŝŶ ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ ƉƌŽĚƵĐƟŽŶ ƚŚƌŽƵŐŚŽƵƚ ƚŚĞ ĐŝƚLJ͘ ǀĞŶ ƐŽ͕ ĚĞŵĂŶĚ ĨŽƌ ŵŽƌĞ housing—and more housing choices—remains strong.

Housing Needs͘ /Ŷ ϮϬϭϱ͕ ĞĂǀĞƌƚŽŶ ĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞĚ ŝƚƐ ŵŽƐƚ ƌĞĐĞŶƚ ,ŽƵƐŝŶŐ EĞĞĚƐ ŶĂůLJƐŝƐ͕ ǁŚŝĐŚ ǁĂƐ ďĂƐĞĚ ŽŶ ƚŚĞ ϮϬϯϱ ĚŝƐƚƌŝďƵƚĞĚ ĨŽƌĞĐĂƐƚ ƌĞůĞĂƐĞĚ ďLJ DĞƚƌŽ͘ dŚĞ ŶĞĞĚƐ ĂŶĚ ƐŽůƵƟŽŶƐ ŝĚĞŶƟĮĞĚ ŝŶ ƚŚŝƐ ƌĞƉŽƌƚ ƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĚ ƚŚĞ material for 2016 Comprehensive Plan ƵƉĚĂƚĞƐ͘ ĐĐŽƌĚŝŶŐ ƚŽ ƚŚŝƐ ƌĞƉŽƌƚ͕ ĂĐŬŶŽǁůĞĚŐĞĚ ďLJ ƚŚĞ ƐƚĂƚĞ ŽĨ KƌĞŐŽŶ͕ ĞĂǀĞƌƚŽŶ ŚĂĚ ũƵƐƚ ƵŶĚĞƌ ϰϭ͕ϬϬϬ ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ ƵŶŝƚƐ͘ LJ ϮϬϯϱ͕ ƚŚĞ ƌĞƉŽƌƚ ĐŽŶĐůƵĚĞĚ ƚŚĞ ĐŝƚLJ ǁŽƵůĚ ŶĞĞĚ ĂŶ ĂĚĚŝƟŽŶĂů ϭϮ͕ϯϬϬ ƵŶŝƚƐ͕ ŝŶƐŝĚĞ ĐŝƚLJ ůŝŵŝƚƐ͕ ƚŽ ŵĞĞƚ ůŽĐĂů ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ ŶĞĞĚƐ͘ dŚŝƐ ŝƐ ĂŶ ŝŶĐƌĞĂƐĞ ŽĨ ϯϬ ƉĞƌĐĞŶƚ ŵŽƌĞ ƚŚĂŶ ƚŚĞ ĐŝƚLJ͛Ɛ ϮϬϭϱ ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ ƐƵƉƉůLJ͘ KĨ ƚŚĞ ŶĞǁ ƵŶŝƚƐ ŶĞĞĚĞĚ͗ • 47 percent are single-family detached housing.

• ϮϬ ƉĞƌĐĞŶƚ ĂƌĞ ƐŝŶŐůĞͲĨĂŵŝůLJ ĂƩĂĐŚĞĚ ;ƐƵĐŚ ĂƐ ƚŽǁŶŚŽƵƐĞƐ ĂŶĚ ƚƌŝƉůĞdžĞƐͿ͘ • ϯϮ ƉĞƌĐĞŶƚ ĂƌĞ ŵƵůƟĨĂŵŝůLJ ĂƩĂĐŚĞĚ ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ ǁŝƚŚ ĮǀĞ Žƌ ŵŽƌĞ ƵŶŝƚƐ͘ &Žƌ ƌĞŶƚĞƌ ŚŽƵƐĞŚŽůĚƐ͕ ƚŚĞ ŶĞĞĚ ŝƐ ŐƌĞĂƚĞƐƚ ĨŽƌ ůŽǁĞƌ ŝŶĐŽŵĞ ƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚƐ͘ &Žƌ ŽǁŶĞƌ ŚŽƵƐĞŚŽůĚƐ͕ ĚĞŵĂŶĚ ŝƐ ŚŝŐŚ ĨŽƌ ůŽǁĞƌ ŝŶĐŽŵĞ ƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚƐ ĂŶĚ ŚŝŐŚĞƌͲ income residents.

Comparison of Needs and Supply͘ ĞĂǀĞƌƚŽŶ͛Ɛ ,E ŝĚĞŶƟĮĞĚ ƚŚĞ ĨŽůůŽǁŝŶŐ ƵŶŵĞƚ ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ ŶĞĞĚƐ͗ • Single-family detached housing inside the city limits.

• ^ŝŶŐůĞͲĨĂŵŝůLJ ĂƩĂĐŚĞĚ ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ ;Ğ͘Ő͘ ƚŽǁŶŚŽŵĞƐͿ ŝŶƐŝĚĞ ĐŝƚLJ ůŝŵŝƚƐ͘ ^ŽŵĞ ĂĚĚŝƟŽŶĂů ƐƵƉƉůLJ ǁĂƐ ŝĚĞŶƟĮĞĚ ŝŶƐŝĚĞ ĞĂǀĞƌƚŽŶ͛Ɛ ĂƐƐƵŵĞĚ ƵƌďĂŶ ƐĞƌǀŝĐĞ ďŽƵŶĚĂƌLJ ;ĂŶ ĂƌĞĂ ǁŚĞƌĞ ƚŚĞ ĐŝƚLJ ĂƐƐƵŵĞĚ Ăƚ ƚŚĞ ƟŵĞ ŝƚ ǁŽƵůĚ ĞǀĞŶƚƵĂůůLJ ĂŶŶĞdžͿ͘ ,ŽǁĞǀĞƌ͕ ƐŽŵĞ ŽĨ ƚŚĂƚ ĐĂƉĂĐŝƚLJ ;ƐƵĐŚ ĂƐ ŝŶ EŽƌƚŚ ŽŽƉĞƌ DŽƵŶƚĂŝŶͿ ĐĂŶŶŽƚ ďĞ ƌĞĂůŝnjĞĚ ǁŝƚŚŽƵƚ ƚŚĞ ƌŽĂĚƐ ĂŶĚ ƵƟůŝƟĞƐ ƚŚĂƚ ǁŝůů ƌƵŶ through the Cooper Mountain Urban Reserve once it is added to the urban growth boundary (UGB) and urban infrastructure development can occur.

2

Factor: Is the urban reserve adjacent to a city with an acknowledged housing needs analysis coordinated with the relevant Metro forecast?

Conclusion: Yes, Beaverton has a state-acknowledged housing needs analysis that was coordinated with the Metro regional forecast and population ȱ ȱ ě ȱ ȱ ȱ analysis began.

Takeaways: • Beaverton coordinated the HNA, acknowledged by DLCD on March 23, 2016, with Metro’s 2035 distributed forecast (Appendix E).

• Beaverton’s HNA indicates a need for an additional 12,300 housing units, inside city limits, by 2035.

• The urban reserve could provide 3,760 units.

• Beaverton prepared a concept plan for the urban reserve that provides a mix of housing types designed to meet the needs of diverse household sizes and incomes.

• Beaverton has a track record of facilitating housing production in recently annexed areas that can help the region address future needs.

Housing

Projected Supply͘ KĨ ƚŚĞ ϭϮ͕ϯϬϬ ƵŶŝƚƐ ŶĞĞĚĞĚ͕ ƚŚĞ ŽŽƉĞƌ DŽƵŶƚĂŝŶ hƌďĂŶ ZĞƐĞƌǀĞ ĐŽƵůĚ ƉƌŽǀŝĚĞ ϯ͕ϳϲϬ ƵŶŝƚƐ͕ ŶĞĂƌůLJ ϯϭ ƉĞƌĐĞŶƚ ŽĨ ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ demand. The South Cooper Mountain Concept Plan ĞƐƟŵĂƚĞƐ ƚŚĂƚ ƚŚŝƐ ǁŽƵůĚ ŝŶĐůƵĚĞ Ϯ͕ϯϭϬ ƵŶŝƚƐ ĨŽƌ ƐŝŶŐůĞͲĨĂŵŝůLJ ĚĞƚĂĐŚĞĚ ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ͕ ϭ͕ϭϲϬ ƵŶŝƚƐ ĨŽƌ ƐŝŶŐůĞͲĨĂŵŝůLJ ĂƩĂĐŚĞĚ ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ͕ ĂŶĚ ϮϵϬ ƵŶŝƚƐ ĨŽƌ ŵƵůƟĨĂŵŝůLJ ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ͘

Beaverton has experience producing housing in recently annexed areas. ȱę ȱ¢ ȱ ȱ annexation, nearly 2,600 homes received land use approval in South Cooper Mountain.

Ɛ ƐĞĞŶ ĚŝƌĞĐƚůLJ ƚŽ ƚŚĞ ƐŽƵƚŚ͕ ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ ĚĞŵĂŶĚ ŝŶ ƚŚŝƐ ĂƌĞĂ ƌĞŵĂŝŶƐ ƐƚƌŽŶŐ͘ ŶŶĞdžĞĚ ŝŶ ϮϬϭϯ͕ ^ŽƵƚŚ ŽŽƉĞƌ DŽƵŶƚĂŝŶ ŝƐ ĚĞǀĞůŽƉŝŶŐ ĨĂƐƚĞƌ ƚŚĂŶ ĞdžƉĞĐƚĞĚ͘ tŝƚŚŝŶ ĮǀĞ LJĞĂƌƐ ŽĨ ĂŶŶĞdžĂƟŽŶ͕ ŶĞĂƌůLJ Ϯ͕ϲϬϬ ŚŽŵĞƐ ƌĞĐĞŝǀĞĚ ůĂŶĚ ƵƐĞ ĂƉƉƌŽǀĂů ĂŶĚ ϳϱϬ ŚŽŵĞƐ ĂƌĞ ŝŶ ĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ ƌĞǀŝĞǁ ʹ ƚŚŝƐ ŝƐ ϵϵ percent of the projected housing supply for South Cooper Mountain. tŚŝůĞ ƌĞĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ ŝŶƐŝĚĞ ƚŚĞ ĐŝƚLJ ǁŝƚŚ ĚĞŶƐĞƌ ŚŽŵĞ ƚLJƉĞƐ ŝƐ ĂŶƟĐŝƉĂƚĞĚ͕ ƚŚĞ ĐŝƚLJ ŝƐ ƌƵŶŶŝŶŐ ŽƵƚ ŽĨ ůĂŶĚ ĨŽƌ ƐŝŶŐůĞͲĨĂŵŝůLJ ĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ ŝŶ ŶĞǁ͕ ůĂƌŐĞƌ neighborhoods. Adding the Cooper Mountain Urban Reserve alleviates this constraint by providing much-needed land to increase housing supply.

What has changed since 2015? /Ŷ ƐŚŽƌƚ͕ ĚĞŵĂŶĚ ŚĂƐ ďĞĞŶ͕ ĂŶĚ ůŝŬĞůLJ ǁŝůů ďĞ͕ ŚŝŐŚĞƌ ƚŚĂŶ ŽƵƌ ,E ĂŶƟĐŝƉĂƚĞĚ͕ ĂŶĚ ƐƵƉƉůLJ ŝƐ ůŽǁĞƌ ƚŚĂŶ ĞdžƉĞĐƚĞĚ͘ tŚĞŶ ƚŚĞ ĐŝƚLJ ĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞĚ ƚŚĞ ,E ŝŶ ϮϬϭϱ͕ ĞĂǀĞƌƚŽŶ ƌĞůŝĞĚ ŽŶ DĞƚƌŽ͛Ɛ ZĞŐŝŽŶĂů ϮϬϯϱ &ŽƌĞĐĂƐƚ ŝƐƚƌŝďƵƟŽŶ͕ ĂĚŽƉƚĞĚ ŝŶ ϮϬϭϮ ĂŶĚ ďĂƐĞĚ ŽŶ Ă ƌĞŐŝŽŶĂů ĨŽƌĞĐĂƐƚ ĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞĚ ŝŶ ϮϬϬϵ͘ ^ŝŵƉůLJ ƉƵƚ͕ Ă ůŽƚ ŚĂƐ ĐŚĂŶŐĞĚ ƐŝŶĐĞ ϮϬϭϱ ;ĂŶĚ ĞǀĞŶ ŵŽƌĞ ƐŝŶĐĞ ϮϬϬϵͿ͘ dŚŝƐ ŝŶĐůƵĚĞƐ͗ /ŶĐƌĞĂƐĞĚ ƌĞŐŝŽŶĂů ƉŽƉƵůĂƟŽŶ ŐƌŽǁƚŚ͘ /Ŷ ϮϬϭϲ͕ ƚŚĞ ƌĞŐŝŽŶ ĞdžƉĞƌŝĞŶĐĞĚ ŝƚƐ ŐƌĞĂƚĞƐƚ ŐƌŽǁƚŚ ŝŶ ϭϬ LJĞĂƌƐ͕ ǁŝƚŚ ŶĞĂƌůLJ ϰϱ͕ϬϬϬ ƉĞŽƉůĞ ŵŽǀŝŶŐ ƚŽ ƚŚĞ ĂƌĞĂ͘ dŚŝƐ ŝŶŇƵdž ƉƌĞƐƐƵƌĞƐ ĐŝƟĞƐ͕ ĂůƌĞĂĚLJ ŝŶ Ă ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ ĐƌƵŶĐŚ͕ ƚŽ ƉƌŽĚƵĐĞ ŵŽƌĞ ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ͘ ƚ ƚŚĞ ƐĂŵĞ ƟŵĞ͕ ƚŚĞ ƌĞŐŝŽŶ ŝƐ ƐƟůů ƐƚƌƵŐŐůŝŶŐ ƚŽ ĐĂƚĐŚ ƵƉ ĂŌĞƌ ƚŚĞ ĨĂůů ŝŶ ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ ƉƌŽĚƵĐƟŽŶ ĚƵƌŝŶŐ dŚĞ 'ƌĞĂƚ ZĞĐĞƐƐŝŽŶ͘ ĞĂǀĞƌƚŽŶ ŚĂƐ Ă ƚƌĂĐŬ ƌĞĐŽƌĚ ŽĨ ĨĂĐŝůŝƚĂƟŶŐ ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ ƉƌŽĚƵĐƟŽŶ͕ ŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐ in recently annexed areas. Adding the urban reserve to the UGB would help the region address future housing needs. /ŶĐƌĞĂƐĞĚ ĞĐŽŶŽŵŝĐ ĂĐƟǀŝƚLJ͘ Washington County experienced the fastest ƌĂƚĞƐ ŽĨ ƉŽƐƚͲƌĞĐĞƐƐŝŽŶ ũŽď ŐƌŽǁƚŚ ŝŶ ƚŚĞ ƌĞŐŝŽŶ͘ /Ŷ ϮϬϭϭ͕ ƚŚĞƌĞ ǁĞƌĞ Ϯϰϰ͕ϭϬϬ ũŽďƐ͘ Ɛ ŽĨ ϮϬϭϴ͕ ƚŚĞƌĞ ĂƌĞ Ϯϴϴ͕ϲϬϬ ũŽďƐ͕ ĂŶ ϭϴ ƉĞƌĐĞŶƚ ŝŶĐƌĞĂƐĞ͘ /Ŷ ƚŚĞ ŚĞĂƌƚ ŽĨ ͞^ŝůŝĐŽŶ &ŽƌĞƐƚ͕͟ ĞĂǀĞƌƚŽŶ ŝƐ ŶĞĂƌ ŵĂŶLJ ũŽď ĐĞŶƚĞƌƐ͕ ĨƌŽŵ ŚŝŐŚͲƚĞĐŚ ĐŽŵƉĂŶŝĞƐ ĂŶĚ ĂƚŚůĞƟĐ ĂƉƉĂƌĞů ŐŝĂŶƚƐ ƚŽ ƐŵĂůů ďƵƐŝŶĞƐƐĞƐ ĂŶĚ ƐƚĂƌƚƵƉƐ͘ 'ŝǀĞŶ ĞĂǀĞƌƚŽŶ͛Ɛ ƉƌŽdžŝŵŝƚLJ ƚŽ ũŽď ĐĞŶƚĞƌƐ ĂŶĚ ƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƟŽŶ ŶĞƚǁŽƌŬƐ͕ ŵŽƌĞ ƉĞŽƉůĞ ĂƌĞ ůŽŽŬŝŶŐ ĨŽƌ Ă ŚŽŵĞ ŚĞƌĞ ƚŚĂŶ ĞdžƉĞĐƚĞĚ͘ ZĞĚƵĐƟŽŶ ŝŶ ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ ĐĂƉĂĐŝƚLJ͘ ĚĚŝƟŽŶĂůůLJ͕ Ă ƉĂƌƚ ŽĨ ƚŚĞ ƵƌďĂŶ service area assumed for Beaverton in the 2015 HNA is now ĚĞƐŝŐŶĂƚĞĚ ƚŽ ďĞ ƉĂƌƚ ŽĨ ,ŝůůƐďŽƌŽ͘ dŚĂƚ ŵĞĂŶƐ ϭ͕Ϭϳϵ ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ ƵŶŝƚƐ originally included in Beaverton’s capacity to meet housing demand ĂƌĞ ŶŽǁ ĂƐƐŝŐŶĞĚ ƚŽ ,ŝůůƐďŽƌŽ ĂƐ ƉĂƌƚ ŽĨ ƚŚĞŝƌ ĨƵƚƵƌĞ ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ ƐƚŽĐŬ͘ ŝƚLJǁŝĚĞ ĚĞĐůŝŶĞ ŝŶ ƐŝŶŐůĞͲĨĂŵŝůLJ ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ ĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƟŽŶ͘ /Ŷ ƚŚĞ ƉĂƐƚ ĮǀĞ LJĞĂƌƐ͕ ƚŚĞ ƵŝůĚŝŶŐ ŝǀŝƐŝŽŶ ĂƉƉƌŽǀĞĚ ƉĞƌŵŝƚƐ ĨŽƌ ϭ͕ϭϰϰ ŵƵůƟĨĂŵŝůLJ ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ ƵŶŝƚƐ ďƵƚ ŽŶůLJ ϯϭϲ ĨŽƌ ƐŝŶŐůĞͲĨĂŵŝůLJ ĚĞƚĂĐŚĞĚ ŚŽŵĞƐ ;ĂŶ ϴϴ ƉĞƌĐĞŶƚ ĚĞĐůŝŶĞ͕ ůŝŬĞůLJ ďĞĐĂƵƐĞ ƚŚĞ ĐŝƚLJ ŚĂƐ ŶĞĂƌůLJ ĚĞƉůĞƚĞĚ ŝƚƐ ŝŶǀĞŶƚŽƌLJ ŽĨ ǀĂĐĂŶƚ ůĂŶĚͿ͘ dŚĞ ,E ŝŶĚŝĐĂƚĞĚ ƚŚĂƚ ƚŚĞ ĐŝƚLJ ŶĞĞĚƐ ϱ͕ϳϴϭ ƐŝŶŐůĞͲ ĨĂŵŝůLJ ĚĞƚĂĐŚĞĚ ŚŽŵĞƐ ƚŽ ŵĞĞƚ ĚĞŵĂŶĚ ;ϰϳ ƉĞƌĐĞŶƚ ŽĨ ϭϮ͕ϯϬϬ ƵŶŝƚƐͿ͘ Expanding the UGB to include the urban reserve would provide the land to meet this demand. ϯ

City of Beaverton UGB Expansion Proposal

CONCEPT PLAN The city’s urban growth boundary expansion proposal is based on the South Cooper Mountain Concept Plan͕ Ă ŝƚLJ ŽƵŶĐŝůͲĂƉƉƌŽǀĞĚ ĐŽŶĐĞƉƚ ƉůĂŶ ĐŽŶƐŝƐƚĞŶƚ ǁŝƚŚ dŝƚůĞ ϭϭ ŽĨ DĞƚƌŽ͛Ɛ hƌďĂŶ 'ƌŽǁƚŚ DĂŶĂŐĞŵĞŶƚ &ƵŶĐƟŽŶĂů WůĂŶ ; ƉƉĞŶĚŝĐĞƐ &͕ ' ĂŶĚ ,Ϳ͘ dŚĞ ĐŽŶĐĞƉƚ ƉůĂŶ ŝŶĐůƵĚĞƐ ƚŚĞ ƵƌďĂŶ ƌĞƐĞƌǀĞ Ͷ ƚŚĞ subject of this proposal — North Cooper Mountain and South Cooper Mountain. ƚ DĞƚƌŽ͛Ɛ ƌĞƋƵĞƐƚ͕ ĞĂǀĞƌƚŽŶ ůĞĚ ƚŚĞ ĐŽŶĐĞƉƚ ƉůĂŶŶŝŶŐ ĨŽƌ Ăůů ƚŚƌĞĞ ĂƌĞĂƐ ƚŽ ĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌ ŚŽůŝƐƟĐĂůůLJ ƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƟŽŶ͕ ŝŶĨƌĂƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞ͕ ŶĂƚƵƌĂů ƌĞƐŽƵƌĐĞƐ͕ ĂŶĚ ŶĞǁ ĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ͘ ŶǀŝƐŝŽŶĞĚ ĂƐ ŽŶĞ ĐŽŶĐĞƉƚ ƉůĂŶ ĂƌĞĂ͕ ƚŚĞ ƉůĂŶ ǁŽƌŬƐ ďĞƐƚ ŝĨ ƚŚĞ ƵƌďĂŶ ƌĞƐĞƌǀĞ ŝƐ ŝŶƐŝĚĞ ƚŚĞ h' ͘ dŚŝƐ ĂůůŽǁƐ ƌŽĂĚƐ͕ ƐĞǁĞƌ ůŝŶĞƐ͕ ǁĂƚĞƌ ůŝŶĞƐ͕ ƚƌĂŝůƐ ĂŶĚ ŶĂƚƵƌĂů ŚĂďŝƚĂƚƐ ƚŽ ĐƌŽƐƐ ďŽƵŶĚĂƌŝĞƐ ĂŶĚ ĨƵŶĐƟŽŶ ĞĸĐŝĞŶƚůLJ͘ džƉĂŶĚŝŶŐ ƚŚĞ h' ƚŽ ŝŶĐůƵĚĞ ƚŚĞ ƵƌďĂŶ ƌĞƐĞƌǀĞ ǁŝůů ƚŚĞŶ ůŝŶŬ ŶŽƌƚŚ ĂŶĚ ƐŽƵƚŚ͕ ƵŶůŽĐŬŝŶŐ ƚŚĞ ĨƵůů ĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ ƉŽƚĞŶƟĂů ŽĨ ƚŚĞ ĐŽŶĐĞƉƚ ƉůĂŶ͘ ĞĂǀĞƌƚŽŶ ŚĂƐ ďĞĞŶ ĂĐƟǀĞůLJ ƉůĂŶŶŝŶŐ ƚŚĞ ĐŽŶĐĞƉƚ ƉůĂŶ ĂƌĞĂ ĨŽƌ ĮǀĞ LJĞĂƌƐ͕ ĂŶĚ ŝƐ ƌĞĂĚLJ ƚŽ ƚĂŬĞ ƚŚĞ ŶĞdžƚ ƐƚĞƉ͘ dŚŝƐ ƐĞĐƟŽŶ ďƌŝĞŇLJ ĚĞƐĐƌŝďĞƐ ƚŚĞ ŵĞƌŝƚ ŽĨ ƚŚĞ ĐŽŶĐĞƉƚ ƉůĂŶ͕ ĂŶĚ ĚĞŵŽŶƐƚƌĂƚĞƐ ƚŚĂƚ ĞĂǀĞƌƚŽŶ ŬŶŽǁƐ ŚŽǁ ƚŽ ĨĂĐŝůŝƚĂƚĞ ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ ƉƌŽĚƵĐƟŽŶ ŝŶ ƌĞĐĞŶƚůLJ ĂŶŶĞdžĞĚ ĂƌĞĂƐ͘

Factor: Has the area has been concept planned consistent with section 3.07.1110 of the Urban Growth Management Plan?

Conclusion: Yes, the South Cooper Mountain Concept Plan, adopted in December 2014 and found by Metro to be consistent with Title 11, provides a mix of housing types, transportation improvements, natural resource protections, and an infrastructure funding plan for the Cooper Mountain Urban Reserve.

Takeaways:

Housing Capacity. Beaverton’s Housing Needs Analysis shows that the city ŶĞĞĚƐ ŵŽƌĞ ŚŽŵĞƐ͕ ĞƐƉĞĐŝĂůůLJ ƐŝŶŐůĞͲĨĂŵŝůLJ ŚŽŵĞƐ Ăƚ Ă ǀĂƌŝĞƚLJ ŽĨ ŝŶĐŽŵĞ ůĞǀĞůƐ͘ dŚĞ ƵƌďĂŶ ƌĞƐĞƌǀĞ ǁŽƵůĚ ƉƌŽǀŝĚĞ ϯ͕ϳϲϬ ƵŶŝƚƐ͕ ŶĞĂƌůLJ ϯϭ ƉĞƌĐĞŶƚ ŽĨ ĐŝƚLJǁŝĚĞ ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ ĚĞŵĂŶĚ͘ dŚŝƐ ŝŶĐůƵĚĞƐ Ă ƌĂŶŐĞ ŽĨ ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ ŽƉƟŽŶƐ so that families at a variety of household incomes can live in the same ŶĞŝŐŚďŽƌŚŽŽĚ ;Ϯ͕ϯϭϬ ƵŶŝƚƐ ĨŽƌ ƐŝŶŐůĞͲĨĂŵŝůLJ ĚĞƚĂĐŚĞĚ ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ͕ ϭ͕ϭϲϬ ƵŶŝƚƐ ĨŽƌ ƐŝŶŐůĞͲĨĂŵŝůLJ ĂƩĂĐŚĞĚ ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ͕ ĂŶĚ ϮϵϬ ƵŶŝƚƐ ĨŽƌ ŵƵůƟĨĂŵŝůLJ ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ ;ǁŚŝĐŚ ǁŝůů ůŝŬĞůLJ ďĞ ƌĞŶƚĂů ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐͿ͘

• Bringing the area into Beaverton will provide for needed housing and help avoid future housing shortages.

dƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƟŽŶ. Adding the urban reserve to the UGB helps Washington ŽƵŶƚLJ ĂŶĚ ĞĂǀĞƌƚŽŶ ƵƉŐƌĂĚĞ ƌƵƌĂů ƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƟŽŶ ŝŶĨƌĂƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞ ĂŶĚ ĐůŽƐĞ ŐĂƉƐ ŝŶ ƚŚĞ ƌŽĂĚ ŶĞƚǁŽƌŬ͘ tŝƚŚŽƵƚ ƚŚĞ ƵƌďĂŶ ƌĞƐĞƌǀĞ͕ ƚŚĞ ƌŽĂĚ͕ ďŝŬĞ ĂŶĚ ƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶ ŶĞƚǁŽƌŬƐ ƌĞŵĂŝŶ ĐŽŶƐƚƌĂŝŶĞĚ͕ ĞƐƉĞĐŝĂůůLJ ĨŽƌ ŶŽƌƚŚͲƐŽƵƚŚ ƌŽƵƚĞƐ͘ ƵƌƌĞŶƚůLJ ƵŶĚĞƌǁĂLJ͕ tĂƐŚŝŶŐƚŽŶ ŽƵŶƚLJ ŝƐ ůĞĂĚŝŶŐ ƚŚĞ Cooper DŽƵŶƚĂŝŶ dƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƟŽŶ ^ƚƵĚLJ͘ dŚĞ ƐƚƵĚLJ ǁŝůů ĞǀĂůƵĂƚĞ ƌŽĂĚǁĂLJ ŶĞƚǁŽƌŬ ŽƉƟŽŶƐ ƚŽ ĚŝƐƉĞƌƐĞ ƚƌĂĸĐ ƚŚƌŽƵŐŚ ƚŚĞ ĂƌĞĂ ĂŶĚ ƵƉŐƌĂĚĞ ƌƵƌĂů ƌŽĂĚƐ ƚŽ ĂƌƚĞƌŝĂůƐ ƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐ ĐĂƉĂďůĞ ŽĨ ƐĂĨĞůLJ ĂŶĚ ĞĸĐŝĞŶƚůLJ ŵŽǀŝŶŐ ƉĞŽƉůĞ͘

• Expanding the UGB now lays early groundwork for ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱę ȱ or more years.

Natural Resources͘ ĞĂǀĞƌƚŽŶ ǁŝůů ƉƌŽƚĞĐƚ ŶĂƚƵƌĂů ƌĞƐŽƵƌĐĞƐ͕ ŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐ ŽŽƉĞƌ DŽƵŶƚĂŝŶ EĂƚƵƌĞ WĂƌŬ͕ ďLJ ŽŶůLJ ĚĞǀĞůŽƉŝŶŐ ĂďŽƵƚ ϲϬϬ ŽĨ ƚŚĞ ϭ͕ϮϬϬ ĂĐƌĞƐ ŝŶ ƚŚĞ ƵƌďĂŶ ƌĞƐĞƌǀĞ͘ /Ŷ ƚŚĞ ĐŽŶĐĞƉƚ ƉůĂŶ͕ ƚŚĞ ůĂŶĚ ƵƐĞ ĨƌĂŵĞǁŽƌŬ ŝĚĞŶƟĮĞƐ ǁĂƚĞƌ ƋƵĂůŝƚLJ ĂŶĚ ŇŽŽĚ ŵĂŶĂŐĞŵĞŶƚ ĂƌĞĂƐ ;ĐŽŵƉůŝĂŶƚ ǁŝƚŚ DĞƚƌŽ dŝƚůĞ ϯͿ͕ ĂŶĚ ƌŝƉĂƌŝĂŶ ŚĂďŝƚĂƚƐ / ĂŶĚ // ĂŶĚ ƵƉůĂŶĚ ŚĂďŝƚĂƚƐ ĂŶĚ ;ĐŽŵƉůŝĂŶƚ ǁŝƚŚ DĞƚƌŽ dŝƚůĞ ϭϯͿ͘ dŚŝƐ ŐƵŝĚĞƐ ĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ ƚŽ ƉƌŽƚĞĐƚ ƚŚĞƐĞ ƌĞƐŽƵƌĐĞƐ ǁŚŝůĞ ĂůůŽǁŝŶŐ ƚŚĞ ƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƟĂů ĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ ŝŶ ƚŚĞ ƉůĂŶ͘ /Ŷ Ă ĨŽůůŽǁͲƵƉ ĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ ƉůĂŶ ĨŽƌ ƚŚĞ ƵƌďĂŶ ƌĞƐĞƌǀĞ͕ ƚŚĞ ĐŝƚLJ ǁŝůů ĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌ ƐƚƌĂƚĞŐŝĞƐ ƚŽ ƉƌŽƚĞĐƚ ŶĂƚƵƌĂů ƌĞƐŽƵƌĐĞƐ͕ ŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐ ŶĂƚƵƌĂů ƌĞƐŽƵƌĐĞ ĚĞƐŝŐŶĂƟŽŶƐ͕ ƚƌĞĞ ƉƌŽƚĞĐƟŽŶ ƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐ͕ ŚŝůůƐŝĚĞͬƐůŽƉĞ ƉƌŽƚĞĐƟŽŶ ƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐ͕ ĂŶĚ ƚŚĞ ƉŽƚĞŶƟĂů ƚƌĂŶƐĨĞƌ ŽĨ ĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ ƌŝŐŚƚƐ͘ DĂŶLJ ŽĨ ƚŚŽƐĞ tools already exist in the city’s current code and could be applied here.

Infrastructure. The urban reserve is the missing puzzle piece that connects North ŽŽƉĞƌ DŽƵŶƚĂŝŶ ǁŝƚŚ ^ŽƵƚŚ ŽŽƉĞƌ DŽƵŶƚĂŝŶ͘ ŽŶŶĞĐƟŶŐ Ăůů ƚŚƌĞĞ ĂƌĞĂƐ 4

• Adding the urban reserve ę ȱ ȱ ȱȃ ȱ ££ ȱ piece” in the South Cooper Mountain Concept Plan.

• Adding the urban reserve allows for comprehensive planning and building of needed transportation and utility infrastructure.

• Beaverton has an infrastructure funding plan ȱ ę ȱ ȱ revenues and project costs.

• ȱ ¢ȱ ȱ ȱ Ĵ ȱ of support from property owners in the urban reserve.

Their combined land directly connects South Cooper Mountain with North Cooper Mountain, faciliating the installation of pipes through all three areas (Appendix D).

Concept Plan

Concept Plan Land Use Framework

ůů ƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚ ƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚ ƌŽƵƚĞƐ are conceptual. Washington ŽƵŶƚLJ ŝƐ ĐŽŶĚƵĐƟŶŐ the Cooper Mountain dƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƟŽŶ ^ƚƵĚLJ ǁŚŝĐŚ ŝƐ ĞǀĂůƵĂƟŶŐ ƚŚƌĞĞ ĐŽŶĐĞƉƚ packages.

Urban Growth Boundary

Future Urban Neighborhood

Cooper Mountain Urban Reserve

Future Compact Neighborhood

South Cooper Mountain Concept Plan

Future Cluster Neighborhood

Class A Upland Habitat

Future Single Family Neighborhood

Class B Upland Habitat

Future Hillside Neighborhood

WĂƌŬƐ ĂŶĚ EĂƚƵƌĂů ƌĞĂƐ

Arterial

KƉĞŶ tĂƚĞƌͬtĞƚůĂŶĚͬWƌŽďĂďůĞ tĞƚůĂŶĚ

Collector

Class I Riparian Habitat

Neighborhood Route

Class II Riparian Habitat

Proposed Arterial

Stream

Proposed Collector Proposed Neighborhood Route

SW Kemmer Rd

SW Grabhorn Rd

North Cooper Mountain Inside the UGB, located in unincorporated Washington County

SW 175th Ave

SW Gassner Rd

SW Weir Rd

Cooper Mountain hƌďĂŶ ZĞƐĞƌǀĞ Outside the UGB, located in unincorporated Washington County

tŝŶŬĞůŵĂŶ WĂƌŬ

SW Grabhorn Rd

Cooper Mountain EĂƚƵƌĞ WĂƌŬ

South Cooper Mountain Inside the UGB, located in Beaverton

SW Tile Flat Rd

SW Scholls Ferry Rd

UGB Beaverton

0

0.5

1 mile

°

Concept Plan Area C.M. Urban Reserve Rural Reserve

5

City of Beaverton UGB Expansion Proposal

ĂůůŽǁƐ ƉŝƉĞƐ ƚŽ ƌƵŶ ĨƌŽŵ ^ŽƵƚŚ ŽŽƉĞƌ DŽƵŶƚĂŝŶ͕ ƚŚƌŽƵŐŚ ƚŚĞ ƵƌďĂŶ ƌĞƐĞƌǀĞ͕ ĂŶĚ ŝŶƚŽ EŽƌƚŚ ŽŽƉĞƌ DŽƵŶƚĂŝŶ͘ dŚŝƐ ĨĂĐŝůŝƚĂƚĞƐ ƚŚĞ ĞĸĐŝĞŶƚ ĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ ĂŶĚ ĚĞůŝǀĞƌLJ ŽĨ ǁĂƚĞƌ͕ ƐĞǁĞƌ͕ ĂŶĚ ƐƚŽƌŵǁĂƚĞƌ ƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐ ŝŶ ƚŚĞ ĐŽŶĐĞƉƚ ƉůĂŶ ĂƌĞĂ͘ EŽƌƚŚ ŽŽƉĞƌ DŽƵŶƚĂŝŶ͕ ĞƐƉĞĐŝĂůůLJ͕ ĐĂŶŶŽƚ ďĞ ĞĸĐŝĞŶƚůLJ ƐĞƌǀĞĚ ǁŝƚŚŽƵƚ ĂĐĐĞƐƐ ƚŽ Ă ƌŽďƵƐƚ ƵƟůŝƚLJ ŝŶĨƌĂƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞ ŶĞƚǁŽƌŬ͘ DŽƐƚ ůŽƚƐ ŝŶ EŽƌƚŚ ŽŽƉĞƌ DŽƵŶƚĂŝŶ ƌĞŵĂŝŶ ŽŶ ŝŶĚŝǀŝĚƵĂů ƐĞƉƟĐ ƐLJƐƚĞŵƐ͘ /Ĩ ƚŚĞ ƐĞƉƟĐ ƐLJƐƚĞŵƐ ĨĂŝů͕ ůŽƚƐ ŝŶ ƚŚĞ ƐŽƵƚŚĞƌŶ ƚǁŽͲƚŚŝƌĚƐ ŽĨ EŽƌƚŚ ŽŽƉĞƌ DŽƵŶƚĂŝŶ ŚĂǀĞ ŶŽ ƐĂŶŝƚĂƌLJ ƐĞǁĞƌ ĐŽŶŶĞĐƟŽŶ ŽƉƟŽŶƐ ǁŝƚŚŽƵƚ ƉƌŽǀŝƐŝŽŶ ŽĨ ŐƌĂǀŝƚLJ ƐĂŶŝƚĂƌLJ lines through the urban reserve. Allowing it to capitalize on investments ŝŶ ƚŚĞ ƵƌďĂŶ ƌĞƐĞƌǀĞ ŶŽƚ ŽŶůLJ ƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐ ĐƵƌƌĞŶƚ ŚŽŵĞƐ͕ ďƵƚ ĂůƐŽ ƵŶůŽĐŬƐ ĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ ƉŽƚĞŶƟĂů ĨŽƌ ŶĞǁ ŚŽŵĞƐ ;ϭ͕ϬϬϬ ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ ƵŶŝƚƐ ĂĐĐŽƌĚŝŶŐ ƚŽ Metro’s buildable land inventory).

Funding͘ ĞĂǀĞƌƚŽŶ ǁŽƌŬĞĚ ĚŝƌĞĐƚůLJ ǁŝƚŚ ƐĞƌǀŝĐĞ ƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƌƐ ƚŽ ĚĞǀĞůŽƉ ĂŶ /ŶĨƌĂƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞ &ƵŶĚŝŶŐ WůĂŶ for the concept plan area (Appendix J). The ƉůĂŶ ŝŶ ϮϬϭϰ ĞƐƟŵĂƚĞĚ ΨϮϱϯ ŵŝůůŝŽŶ ŝŶ ƚŽƚĂů ŝŶĨƌĂƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞ ĐŽƐƚƐ͘ WĂƌŬƐ͕ ǁĂƚĞƌ͕ ĂŶĚ ƐĂŶŝƚĂƌLJ ƐĞǁĞƌ ŝŶĨƌĂƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞ ĐŽƵůĚ ďĞ ĨƵŶĚĞĚ ďLJ ĞdžŝƐƟŶŐ ^ Ɛ ĂŶĚ ƉƌŝǀĂƚĞ ĚĞǀĞůŽƉĞƌ ĐŽŶƚƌŝďƵƟŽŶƐ͘ ƌĞŐŝŽŶĂů ĂƉƉƌŽĂĐŚ ƚŽ ƐƚŽƌŵǁĂƚĞƌ ŝŶĨƌĂƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞ ǁŝůů ĚĞƉĞŶĚ ƵƉŽŶ ĐŽůůĂďŽƌĂƟŽŶ ĂŵŽŶŐ ƉƌŝǀĂƚĞ ƉƌŽƉĞƌƚLJ ŽǁŶĞƌƐ ĂŶĚ ƐĞƌǀŝĐĞ ƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƌƐ͘ dƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƟŽŶ ŝŶĨƌĂƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞ͕ ĂĐĐŽƵŶƟŶŐ ĨŽƌ Ψϭϭϯ ŵŝůůŝŽŶ͕ ŵĂLJ ƌĞƋƵŝƌĞ Ă ƐƵƉƉůĞŵĞŶƚĂů ^ ƚŽ ĮŶĂŶĐĞ ŝŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚƐ͘ /Ŷ ĂĚĚŝƟŽŶ͕ ƚŚĞ ĐŝƚLJ ŝƐ ƵƉĚĂƟŶŐ ŝƚƐ ŝŶĨƌĂƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞ ƉůĂŶƐ͕ ĂŶĚ ƚŚĞ ĐŽƵŶƚLJ ŝƐ using the ŽŽƉĞƌ DŽƵŶƚĂŝŶ dƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƟŽŶ ^ƚƵĚLJ to plan for road upgrades ŝŶ ŵŽƌĞ ĚĞƚĂŝů ĂŶĚ ŝĚĞŶƟĨLJ ĨƵŶĚŝŶŐ ƐŽƵƌĐĞƐ ĨŽƌ ƚŚĂƚ ǁŽƌŬ͘ Agreements with County and Special Districts. Beaverton and Washington County signed an intergovernmental agreement (IGA) providing Beaverton ǁŝƚŚ ƚŚĞ ĂƵƚŚŽƌŝƚLJ ƚŽ ĂŶŶĞdž ƚŚĞ ĂƌĞĂ͕ Žƌ ƉŽƌƟŽŶƐ ŽĨ ŝƚ͕ ĨŽůůŽǁŝŶŐ ĂĚĚŝƟŽŶ ƚŽ ƚŚĞ h' ; ƉƉĞŶĚŝdž /Ϳ͘ /Ŷ ĂĚĚŝƟŽŶ͕ Ă ƐĞĐŽŶĚ ĂŐƌĞĞŵĞŶƚ ďĞƚǁĞĞŶ ďŽƚŚ ƉĂƌƟĞƐ ĂĚĚƌĞƐƐĞƐ ƚŚĞ ƉůĂŶŶŝŶŐ ŽĨ ƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƟŽŶ ƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐ ĨŽƌ ƚŚĞ ĞdžƉĂŶƐŝŽŶ ĂƌĞĂ ; ƉƉĞŶĚŝdž /Ϳ͘ ĞĂǀĞƌƚŽŶ ĂůƐŽ ƐŝŐŶĞĚ ĂŶ /' ǁŝƚŚ dƵĂůĂƟŶ sĂůůĞLJ tĂƚĞƌ ŝƐƚƌŝĐƚ ;dst Ϳ͕ ǁŚŝĐŚ ŶŽǁ ƐĞƌǀĞƐ ƉĂƌƚ ŽĨ ƚŚĞ ƵƌďĂŶ ƌĞƐĞƌǀĞ͘ ĞĂǀĞƌƚŽŶ ǁŝůů ĞǀĞŶƚƵĂůůLJ ďĞ ƚŚĞ ǁĂƚĞƌ ƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƌ ĨŽƌ ƚŚĞ ĞŶƟƌĞ ƵƌďĂŶ ƌĞƐĞƌǀĞ͘ dŚĞ ĂŐƌĞĞŵĞŶƚ ǁŝƚŚ dst ĚĞƐĐƌŝďĞƐ ŚŽǁ ƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐ ǁŝůů ƚƌĂŶƐŝƟŽŶ ĨƌŽŵ ƚŚĞ ĚŝƐƚƌŝĐƚ ƚŽ ƚŚĞ ĐŝƚLJ͘ KƚŚĞƌ ƵƌďĂŶ ƐĞƌǀŝĐĞ ƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƌƐ ƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĚ ůĞƩĞƌƐ ŽĨ support that express their commitments to serve the area (Appendix I). ůƚŚŽƵŐŚ ƚŚĞLJ ĂƌĞ ŶŽƚ ͞ƵƌďĂŶ ƐĞƌǀŝĐĞ͟ ƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƌƐ ĂƐ ĚĞĮŶĞĚ ŝŶ ƐƚĂƚĞ ůĂǁ͕ ƚŚĞ ĞĂǀĞƌƚŽŶ ^ĐŚŽŽů ŝƐƚƌŝĐƚ ĂŶĚ ,ŝůůƐďŽƌŽ ^ĐŚŽŽů ŝƐƚƌŝĐƚ ƉĂƌƟĐŝƉĂƚĞĚ ŝŶ ƚŚĞ ĐƌĞĂƟŽŶ ŽĨ ƚŚĞ ĐŽŶĐĞƉƚ ƉůĂŶ͕ ǁŚŝĐŚ ŝŶĐůƵĚĞƐ Ă ƐĐŚŽŽůƐ ĨƌĂŵĞǁŽƌŬ͘ džƉĞƌŝĞŶĐĞ WƌŽĚƵĐŝŶŐ ,ŽƵƐŝŶŐ ŝŶ hƌďĂŶ ZĞƐĞƌǀĞƐ. Beaverton can ĨĂĐŝůŝƚĂƚĞ ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ ƉƌŽĚƵĐƟŽŶ ŝŶ ƌĞĐĞŶƚůLJ ĂŶŶĞdžĞĚ ĂƌĞĂƐ ʹ ƚŚĞ ƉƌŽŽĨ ŝƐ ŝŶ South Cooper Mountain. The city adopted the South Cooper Mountain Community Plan ŝŶ ϮϬϭϰ͕ ĞdžƉĞĐƟŶŐ ƚŚĂƚ ƚŚĞ ƉůĂŶ ĂƌĞĂ ǁŽƵůĚ ĚĞǀĞůŽƉ ŽǀĞƌ Ă ϮϬͲLJĞĂƌ ƉĞƌŝŽĚ͘ ,ŽǁĞǀĞƌ͕ ǁŝƚŚ ƚŚĞ ƵƉƚƵƌŶ ŝŶ ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ ĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ ĂĐƟǀŝƚLJ͕ ^ŽƵƚŚ ŽŽƉĞƌ DŽƵŶƚĂŝŶ ŝƐ ĚĞǀĞůŽƉŝŶŐ ĨĂƐƚĞƌ ƚŚĂŶ ĞdžƉĞĐƚĞĚ͘ tŝƚŚŝŶ ĮǀĞ LJĞĂƌƐ ŽĨ ĂŶŶĞdžĂƟŽŶ͕ ŶĞĂƌůLJ Ϯ͕ϲϬϬ ŚŽŵĞƐ ƌĞĐĞŝǀĞĚ ůĂŶĚ ƵƐĞ ĂƉƉƌŽǀĂů͘ ĞǀĞůŽƉĞƌƐ ĂŶƟĐŝƉĂƚĞ ďƵŝůĚŝŶŐ ŚŽŵĞƐ ƐƚĂƌƟŶŐ ƚŚŝƐ LJĞĂƌ͘ dŚĞ ĐŝƚLJ ĞƐƟŵĂƚĞƐ ƚŚĞ ĂƌĞĂ ǁŝůů ďĞ ůĂƌŐĞůLJ ďƵŝůƚ ŽƵƚ ǁŝƚŚŝŶ ĮǀĞ LJĞĂƌƐ͘

6

The urban reserve would provide 3,760 housing units, ¢ȱřŗȱ ȱ ȱ citywide housing demand.

This includes a mix ȱ Ȭ ¢ȱ ȱ ¢ȱ ȱȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ¢ȱ ȱ household incomes can live in the same neighborhood.

EXISTING URBAN AREAS Factor: Has the city responsible for preparing the concept plan demonstrated progress toward the actions described in section 3.07.620 (Centers, Corridors, Station Communities and Main Streets) of Metros’ Urban Growth Management Functional Plan?

Conclusion: Yes, Beaverton encourages growth in existing urban areas by assessing barriers to mixed-use, transitsupportive development and identifying actions that stimulate development in centers and corridors.

Takeaways: • Beaverton is striving to create a vibrant downtown with transit-oriented development, storefront and tenant improvement programs, street improvements, and an urban design framework that will guide future development.

• ȱ ¢ȱ ȱę ȱ assistance and land ȱ ȱ ě ȱ and market-rate housing developments downtown that further city goals.

• Job growth keeps increasing downtown, and 6,500 jobs were added in the past 10 years within two miles of the city center.

• In the past three years, Beaverton has added 463 housing units downtown ȱę ȱ ¢ȱ projects.

Beaverton’s Community Vision ŝŵĂŐŝŶĞƐ ĚŽǁŶƚŽǁŶ ĂƐ ƚŚĞ ĞĐŽŶŽŵŝĐ͕ ƐŽĐŝĂů ĂŶĚ ĐƵůƚƵƌĂů ŚĞĂƌƚ ŽĨ ƚŚĞ ĐŝƚLJ͘ dŽ ƌĞĂůŝnjĞ ƚŚŝƐ ǀŝƐŝŽŶ͕ ĐŝƚLJ ƐƚĂī ĂŶĚ ĞůĞĐƚĞĚ ůĞĂĚĞƌƐ ƉƌŝŽƌŝƟnjĞ ĂĐƟŽŶƐ ĂŶĚ ŝŶǀĞƐƚŵĞŶƚƐ ƚŚĂƚ ĞŶŚĂŶĐĞ ƚŚĞ ǀŝďƌĂŶĐLJ ŽĨ ĚŽǁŶƚŽǁŶ͘ dŚŝƐ ĨŽĐƵƐ ĞdžƚĞŶĚƐ ƚŽ ƐƚĂƟŽŶ ĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƟĞƐ͕ ĐŽƌƌŝĚŽƌƐ͕ ĂŶĚ ŵĂŝŶ ƐƚƌĞĞƚƐ͕ ĂƐ ƚŚĞLJ Ăůů ĨƵŶĐƟŽŶ ĂƐ ĐĞŶƚĞƌƐ ŽĨ ƵƌďĂŶ ůŝĨĞ ŝŶ ƚŚĞ ĐŝƚLJ͘ ŝƚLJ ƐƚĂī ĂŶĚ ĞůĞĐƚĞĚ ůĞĂĚĞƌƐ ƌĞůLJ ŽŶ ƚŚĞ Comprehensive Plan͕ Community Vision͕ ĂŶĚ ĞĂǀĞƌƚŽŶ hƌďĂŶ ZĞŶĞǁĂů WůĂŶ ƚŽ ƉƌŽǀŝĚĞ ƉŽůŝĐLJ ĚŝƌĞĐƟŽŶ ƚŚĂƚ ŐƵŝĚĞƐ ĂĐƟŽŶƐ ĂŶĚ ŝŶǀĞƐƚŵĞŶƚƐ͘ dŚŝƐ ƐĞĐƟŽŶ ŚŝŐŚůŝŐŚƚƐ ƐĞǀĞƌĂů ƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐ ĂŶĚ programs that demonstrate the city’s commitment to encouraging growth ŝŶ ĞdžŝƐƟŶŐ ƵƌďĂŶ ĂƌĞĂƐ͘ ƐƚĂďůŝƐŚ Ă ďŽƵŶĚĂƌLJ ĨŽƌ ƚŚĞ ZĞŐŝŽŶĂů ĞŶƚĞƌ͕ ŽƌƌŝĚŽƌƐ͕ ^ƚĂƟŽŶ ŽŵŵƵŶŝƟĞƐ ĂŶĚ DĂŝŶ ^ƚƌĞĞƚƐ͘ Beaverton has established boundaries for the Metro 2040 Growth Concept ĚĞƐŝŐŶ ƚLJƉĞƐ ůŝƐƚĞĚ ĂďŽǀĞ͘ dŚĞLJ ĂƌĞ ƌĞŇĞĐƚĞĚ ŝŶ ƚŚĞ Comprehensive Plan’s Land Use Element (See Appendix C for land use and zoning maps compliant with DĞƚƌŽ dŝƚůĞƐ ϭ͕ ϰ ĂŶĚ ϲͿ͘ dŚĞ >ĂŶĚ hƐĞ ůĞŵĞŶƚ ǁĂƐ ƵƉĚĂƚĞĚ ŝŶ ϮϬϭϳ ƚŽ ĨƵƌƚŚĞƌ ƐƚƌĞŶŐƚŚĞŶ ƚŚĞ ĐŽŶŶĞĐƟŽŶ ďĞƚǁĞĞŶ ůĂŶĚ ƵƐĞ ĂŶĚ ƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƟŽŶ ƉůĂŶŶŝŶŐ͘ WĞƌĨŽƌŵ ĂŶ ĂƐƐĞƐƐŵĞŶƚ ŽĨ ƚŚĞ ZĞŐŝŽŶĂů ĞŶƚĞƌ͕ ŽƌƌŝĚŽƌƐ͕ ^ƚĂƟŽŶ ŽŵŵƵŶŝƟĞƐ ĂŶĚ DĂŝŶ ^ƚƌĞĞƚƐ͘ Beaverton’s Civic Plan ƐĞƌǀĞƐ ĂƐ ĂŶ ŝŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚĂƟŽŶ ƚŽŽů ƚŽ ĂĐŚŝĞǀĞ ƚŚĞ Beaverton Community Vision. Based on community input and technical ĂŶĂůLJƐŝƐ͕ ƚŚĞ ƉůĂŶ ƉƌĞƐĞŶƚƐ ƚŚƌĞĞ ƐƚƌĂƚĞŐŝĞƐ Ͷ ĞŶƚƌĂů ŝƚLJ͕ >ĂŶĚ hƐĞ Θ dƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƟŽŶ͕ ĂŶĚ ,ŽƵƐŝŶŐ Ͷ ƚŚĂƚ ĂƐƐĞƐƐ ƉŚLJƐŝĐĂů ĐŽŶĚŝƟŽŶƐ͕ ŵĂƌŬĞƚ ĐŽŶĚŝƟŽŶƐ͕ ĂŶĚ ƌĞŐƵůĂƚŽƌLJ ďĂƌƌŝĞƌƐ ƚŽ ŵŝdžĞĚͲƵƐĞ ĂŶĚ ƚƌĂŶƐŝƚͲŽƌŝĞŶƚĞĚ ĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ ;dK Ϳ͘ /ƚ ƚŚĞŶ ŝĚĞŶƟĮĞƐ ĂĐƟŽŶƐ ƚŚĞ ĐŝƚLJ ĐĂŶ ƚĂŬĞ ƚŽ ƌĞǀŝƚĂůŝnjĞ ĚŽǁŶƚŽǁŶ͕ ŐƌŽǁ ƚŚĞ ĞĐŽŶŽŵLJ͕ ĞŶƐƵƌĞ ĚŝǀĞƌƐŝƚLJ ŽĨ ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ ƐƚŽĐŬ ĂŶĚ ĞdžƉĂŶĚ ƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƟŽŶ ŽƉƟŽŶƐ͘ ĚŽƉƚ Ă ƉůĂŶ ŽĨ ĂĐƟŽŶƐ ĂŶĚ ŝŶǀĞƐƚŵĞŶƚƐ ƚŽ ĞŶŚĂŶĐĞ ƚŚĞ ZĞŐŝŽŶĂů ĞŶƚĞƌ͕ ŽƌƌŝĚŽƌƐ͕ ^ƚĂƟŽŶ ŽŵŵƵŶŝƟĞƐ ĂŶĚ DĂŝŶ ^ƚƌĞĞƚƐ͘ WƌŝŽƌŝƟnjŝŶŐ ƚƌĂŶƐŝƚͲŽƌŝĞŶƚĞĚ ĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ. To create a dynamic urban ĐĞŶƚĞƌ͕ ƚŚĞ ĞĂǀĞƌƚŽŶ hƌďĂŶ ZĞĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ ŐĞŶĐLJ ; hZ Ϳ ƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƐ ĮŶĂŶĐŝĂů ĂƐƐŝƐƚĂŶĐĞ ĨŽƌ ƉƌŽƉĞƌƚLJ ĂŶĚ ďƵƐŝŶĞƐƐ ŽǁŶĞƌƐ ƚŽ ĞŶĐŽƵƌĂŐĞ ƌĞĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ ĚŽǁŶƚŽǁŶ͘ &Žƌ ĞdžĂŵƉůĞ͕ hZ ŝƐ ŝŶǀĞƐƟŶŐ ŝŶ ƚŚĞ ƚƌĂŶƐŝƚͲ ŽƌŝĞŶƚĞĚ ƐƵďĚŝƐƚƌŝĐƚ ĞĂǀĞƌƚŽŶ ĞŶƚƌĂů͕ Ă ĐŽůůĞĐƟŽŶ ŽĨ ƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐ Ăƚ ƚŚĞ ĨŽƌŵĞƌ tĞƐƚŐĂƚĞ ƚŚĞĂƚĞƌ ƉƌŽƉĞƌƚLJ ĂŶĚ dŚĞ ZŽƵŶĚ͘ dĂŬŝŶŐ ĂĚǀĂŶƚĂŐĞ ŽĨ DĞƚƌŽ dK ĨƵŶĚŝŶŐ ĂŶĚ ƚŚĞ ŶĞĂƌďLJ ĞĂǀĞƌƚŽŶ ĞŶƚƌĂů D y ƐƚĂƟŽŶ͕ ƚŚĞ projects within the 12-acre area will further the city’s mission to create an ĞdžĐŝƟŶŐ ĚŽǁŶƚŽǁŶ Ͷ ŝŶĐƌĞĂƐŝŶŐ ƚŚĞ ŶƵŵďĞƌ ŽĨ ƉĞŽƉůĞ ůŝǀŝŶŐ͕ ǁŽƌŬŝŶŐ͕ ĂŶĚ ǀŝƐŝƟŶŐ ƚŚĞ ĐŝƚLJ͛Ɛ ĐĞŶƚƌĂů ĐŽƌĞ͘ ZĞĐĞŶƚ ĂŶĚ ŽŶŐŽŝŶŐ ƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐ ŝŶĐůƵĚĞ͗ • DŝdžĞĚͲƵƐĞ ďƵŝůĚŝŶŐƐ. The Rise Central consists of two mixed-use ďƵŝůĚŝŶŐƐ ǁŝƚŚ ϮϯϬ ƵŶŝƚƐ͕ ŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐ ϭϱ ĂīŽƌĚĂďůĞ ƵŶŝƚƐ͘ tŝƚŚŝŶ Ă ŽŶĞͲ ŵŝŶƵƚĞ ǁĂůŬ ŽĨ ƚŚĞ ĞĂǀĞƌƚŽŶ ĞŶƚƌĂů ůŝŐŚƚ ƌĂŝů ƐƚŽƉ͕ ƚŚĞ ZŝƐĞ ĞŶƚƌĂů͕ ǁŝůů ďĞ ĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞĚ ďLJ ǁŝŶƚĞƌ ϮϬϭϴͬϮϬϭϵ͘ • Business class hotel͘ dŚĞ ,LJĂƩ ,ŽƵƐĞ ,ŽƚĞů͕ Ă ϭϮϬͲƌŽŽŵ ŚŽƚĞů ĂŶĚ ƌĞƐƚĂƵƌĂŶƚ ǁŝƚŚŝŶ ϱϬϬ ĨĞĞƚ ŽĨ ƚŚĞ ĞĂǀĞƌƚŽŶ ĞŶƚƌĂů DĂdž͕ ǁŝůů ďĞ completed in early 2020.

7

City of Beaverton UGB Expansion Proposal

• ĞĂǀĞƌƚŽŶ ĞŶƚĞƌ ĨŽƌ ƚŚĞ ƌƚƐ ; Ϳ. The BCA consultant team completed the preliminary design for a new 550-seat professional ƚŚĞĂƚĞƌ ĨŽƌ ĚĂŶĐĞ͕ ůŝǀĞ ŵƵƐŝĐ͕ ĂŶĚ ĂƌƚƐ ĞĚƵĐĂƟŽŶ͘ dŚĞ ƚĞĂŵ ƉůĂŶƐ ƚŽ ƐƵďŵŝƚ ůĂŶĚ ƵƐĞ ĂƉƉůŝĐĂƟŽŶƐ ŝŶ :ƵŶĞ ϮϬϭϴ͘ • BG’s Food Cartel. The city provided a matching grant to the developer ĨŽƌ '͛Ɛ &ŽŽĚ ĂƌƚĞů͕ Ă ĐŽůůĞĐƟŽŶ ŽĨ ϯϭ ĨŽŽĚ ĐĂƌƚƐ ĚĞǀĞůŽƉĞĚ ŽŶ Ă ǀĂĐĂŶƚ ƉƌŽƉĞƌƚLJ ĂĐƌŽƐƐ ĨƌŽŵ ŝƚLJ ,Ăůů ƚŚĂƚ ŽƉĞŶĞĚ ŝŶ &ĞďƌƵĂƌLJ ϮϬϭϴ͘ Designing downtown͘ /Ŷ ϮϬϭϳ͕ ĞĂǀĞƌƚŽŶ ŬŝĐŬĞĚ Žī ƚŚĞ ŽǁŶƚŽǁŶ ĞƐŝŐŶ WƌŽũĞĐƚ͘ LJ ƐƉƌŝŶŐ ϮϬϭϴ͕ ƚŚĞ ƉƌŽũĞĐƚ ǁŝůů ƉƌŽǀŝĚĞ͗ • Ŷ ƵƌďĂŶ ĚĞƐŝŐŶ ĨƌĂŵĞǁŽƌŬ ĨŽƌ Ă ǀŝďƌĂŶƚ ĚŽǁŶƚŽǁŶ ďLJ ĚĞĮŶŝŶŐ ĚŝƐƚƌŝĐƚƐ ĂŶĚ ŐĂƚĞǁĂLJƐ͕ ŽƵƚůŝŶŝŶŐ ďƵŝůĚŝŶŐ ĚĞƐŝŐŶ ĂŶĚ ƉůĂĐĞŵĞŶƚ͕ ŚŝŐŚůŝŐŚƟŶŐ ŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƟĞƐ ĨŽƌ ŐĂƚŚĞƌŝŶŐ ĂƌĞĂƐ͕ ĂŶĚ ŝĚĞŶƟĨLJŝŶŐ ĐŽŶŶĞĐƟŽŶƐ ĨŽƌ ƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶƐ ĂŶĚ ďŝĐLJĐůŝƐƚƐ͘ • hƉĚĂƚĞĚ ĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ ƌƵůĞƐ ƚŽ ĞŶƐƵƌĞ ƚŚĞ ƵƌďĂŶ ĚĞƐŝŐŶ ĨƌĂŵĞǁŽƌŬ ĐĂŶ ďĞĐŽŵĞ Ă ƌĞĂůŝƚLJ͕ ƌĞŵŽǀŝŶŐ ďĂƌƌŝĞƌƐ ƚŽ ŵŝdžĞĚͲƵƐĞ ĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ͘ Increasing housing density͘ /Ŷ ƚŚĞ ƉĂƐƚ ƚŚƌĞĞ LJĞĂƌƐ͕ ĞĂǀĞƌƚŽŶ ŚĂƐ ĂĚĚĞĚ ϰϲϯ ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ ƵŶŝƚƐ ĚŽǁŶƚŽǁŶ ĂĐƌŽƐƐ ĮǀĞ ŵƵůƟĨĂŵŝůLJ ƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐ͘ dŚƌŽƵŐŚ ƚŚĞ sĞƌƟĐĂů ,ŽƵƐŝŶŐ ĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ ŽŶĞ ;s, Ϳ ƉƌŽŐƌĂŵ͕ ƚŚĞ ĐŝƚLJ ƉůĂŶƐ ƚŽ ĂĚĚ ĞǀĞŶ ŵŽƌĞ͘ dŚĞ ĐŝƚLJ͛Ɛ s, ƉƌŽŐƌĂŵ ŽīĞƌƐ Ă ƉĂƌƟĂů ƚĂdž ĞdžĞŵƉƟŽŶ ƚŽ ĞůŝŐŝďůĞ ƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐ ǁŝƚŚŝŶ ĚĞƐŝŐŶĂƚĞĚ ĂƌĞĂƐ ƚŽ ĞŶĐŽƵƌĂŐĞ ŚŝŐŚĞƌ ĚĞŶƐŝƚLJ͕ ŵŝdžĞĚͲƵƐĞ ƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƟĂů ĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ ŶĞĂƌ ƚƌĂŶƐŝƚ͘ Ɛ ŽĨ DĂLJ ϮϬϭϴ͕ ƚŚĞ ĐŝƚLJ ŚĂƐ ĚĞƐŝŐŶĂƚĞĚ ƚŚƌĞĞ s, Ɛ ďƵƚ ŵĂLJ ĂĚĚ ƚǁŽ ŵŽƌĞ ŝŶ ƚŚĞ ĐŽŵŝŶŐ LJĞĂƌ͘ /ŶǀĞƐƟŶŐ ŝŶ ďƵŝůĚŝŶŐ ŝŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚƐ͘ dŽ ĂƩƌĂĐƚ ŶĞǁ ďƵƐŝŶĞƐƐĞƐ ĂŶĚ ƉƌŝǀĂƚĞ ŝŶǀĞƐƚŵĞŶƚ͕ ƚŚĞ ĐŝƚLJ ŽīĞƌƐ ^ƚŽƌĞĨƌŽŶƚ /ŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚ ĂŶĚ dĞŶĂŶƚ /ŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚ grants. The Storefront Improvement Program helps revitalize the facades of buildings downtown. The Tenant Improvement program helps restaurants ƌĞĚĞƐŝŐŶ ŝŶƚĞƌŝŽƌƐ ƚŽ ďĞ ŵŽƌĞ ŝŶǀŝƟŶŐ͘ Ɛ ŽĨ DĂLJ ϮϬϭϴ͕ ƚŚĞ ĐŝƚLJ ŚĂƐ ĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞĚ 11 storefront improvement projects and 7 tenant improvement projects. The ĐŝƚLJ ŝƐ ǁŽƌŬŝŶŐ ŽŶ Ϯϱ ĂĚĚŝƟŽŶĂů ƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐ ŝŶ ϮϬϭϴ͘ ƌĞĂƟŶŐ ƌĞƐƚĂƵƌĂŶƚ ƌŽǁ͘ dŚĞ ĐŝƚLJ ŝƐ ĂĐƟǀĞůLJ ƌĞĐƌƵŝƟŶŐ ƌĞƐƚĂƵƌĂŶƚƐ ƚŽ ƐĞƚ ƵƉ ƐŚŽƉ ǁŝƚŚŝŶ ĚŽǁŶƚŽǁŶ͛Ɛ ďƵƌŐĞŽŶŝŶŐ ƌĞƐƚĂƵƌĂŶƚ ƌŽǁ͘ dŚĞ ŶĞǁĞƐƚ ĂĚĚŝƟŽŶ ŝƐ dž EŽǀŽ ƌĞǁŝŶŐ͕ Ă ĐƌĂŌ ďƌĞǁĞƌLJ ǁŝƚŚ Ă ƌĞƐƚĂƵƌĂŶƚ ĂŶĚ ƚĂƉ ƌŽŽŵ͕ ƚŚĂƚ ǁŝůů ŽĐĐƵƉLJ ƚŚĞ ŚŝƐƚŽƌŝĐ ĂĚLJ ƵŝůĚŝŶŐ ǁŝƚŚŝŶ ďůŽĐŬƐ ŽĨ D y ĂŶĚ t ^ ƌĂŝů ůŝŶĞƐ͘ ŶŚĂŶĐŝŶŐ ĐŽŶŶĞĐƟǀŝƚLJ͘ dŚĞ ĐŝƚLJ ŝƐ ĐŽŵƉůĞƟŶŐ ĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƟŽŶ ŽŶ ƚŚĞ ĞĂǀĞƌƚŽŶ ƌĞĞŬ ƐŚĂƌĞĚͲƵƐĞ ƉĂƚŚ͕ Ă ϭϬͲĨŽŽƚ ǁŝĚĞ ƉĂƚŚ ĨŽƌ ƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶƐ ĂŶĚ cyclists that will connect the Beaverton Transit Center with the Beaverton ĞŶƚƌĂů D y ƐƚĂƟŽŶ ;ĞdžƉĞĐƚĞĚ ĐŽŵƉůĞƟŽŶ͗ ƐƵŵŵĞƌ ϮϬϭϴͿ͘ ^ƚƌĞŶŐƚŚĞŶŝŶŐ ĐƵůƚƵƌĂůůLJ ĚŝǀĞƌƐĞ ŶĞŝŐŚďŽƌŚŽŽĚƐ. The ůůĞŶ ŽƵůĞǀĂƌĚ District Plan͕ ŝŶ ƉƌŽŐƌĞƐƐ͕ ǁŝůů ŝĚĞŶƟĨLJ ŐŽĂůƐ ĂŶĚ ƉƌŝŽƌŝƟnjĞ ĂĐƟŽŶƐ ƚŽ ŚĞůƉ ĂĐŚŝĞǀĞ ĚĞƐŝƌĞĚ ŽƵƚĐŽŵĞƐ ĨŽƌ ƚŚŝƐ ĐƵůƚƵƌĂůůLJ ĚŝǀĞƌƐĞ ĚŝƐƚƌŝĐƚ͕ ŚŽŵĞ ƚŽ Ă ƐŝŐŶŝĮĐĂŶƚ ŶƵŵďĞƌ ŽĨ ůŽǁͲŝŶĐŽŵĞ ŚŽƵƐĞŚŽůĚƐ͕ ŝŵŵŝŐƌĂŶƚƐ ĂŶĚ ƌĞĨƵŐĞĞƐ͘ ŽŶŶĞĐƟŶŐ ƚŽǁŶ ĐĞŶƚĞƌƐ. If Metro approves the city’s proposal to expand ƚŚĞ ƵƌďĂŶ ƌĞƐĞƌǀĞ͕ ĞĂǀĞƌƚŽŶ ǁŝůů ĂĚǀĂŶĐĞ DĞƚƌŽ͛Ɛ ϮϬϰϬ 'ƌŽǁƚŚ ŽŶĐĞƉƚ because the urban reserve could connect two town centers – Aloha and DƵƌƌĂLJ ^ĐŚŽůůƐ ʹ ĂŶĚ ƚǁŽ ŵĂũŽƌ ĐŽƌƌŝĚŽƌƐ ʹ ^t dƵĂůĂƟŶ sĂůůĞLJ ,ŝŐŚǁĂLJ and SW Scholls Ferry Road.

ϴ

Many communities ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ Allen Boulevard.

That is why Beaverton is working with Spanish, Arabic, Korean, and Chinese community engagement liaisons to talk with residents and ȱ ȱ ȱ the Allen Boulevard District Plan.

AFFORDABLE HOUSING Factor: Has the City of Beaverton implemented best practices for preserving and increasing the ¢ȱ ȱ ¢ȱ ȱ ě ȱ housing in its existing urban areas?

Conclusion: Yes, Beaverton creates and funds programs that ȱ ȱ ě ȱ ȱ market rate housing, preserve low-cost market rate housing, and address homelessness.

Takeaways: • City Council’s top 10 ȱ ȱŘŖŗŞȱ ȱę ȱ housing initiatives.

• ȱ ȱę ȱ assistance and helps acquire land for housing projects that meet the needs of households making 0-80 percent AMI. • Beaverton’s development code facilitates a diverse ¢ȱ ȱ ě ȱ ȱ types.

• The city is creating a best practices toolkit to preserve low-cost market rate housing (not subsidized).

• Beaverton is meeting ȱ ě ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ę ȱ to discuss strategies for ȱ ě ȱ housing into the community planning process for the urban reserve.

ĞĂǀĞƌƚŽŶ͛Ɛ ŝƚLJ ŽƵŶĐŝů ŝĚĞŶƟĮĞĚ ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ ĂƐ ƚŚĞ ŵŽƐƚ ŝŵƉŽƌƚĂŶƚ ŝƐƐƵĞ ŽĨ ϮϬϭϴ ʹ ϱ ŽĨ ϭϬ ŽƵŶĐŝů ƉƌŝŽƌŝƟĞƐ ĂĚĚƌĞƐƐ ƚŚĞ ƌĞŐŝŽŶĂů ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ ĐƌŝƐŝƐ͘ Council relies on policies in the city’s Comprehensive Plan͕ Civic Plan͕ ĂŶĚ Community Vision ƚŽ ŐƵŝĚĞ ƐƚĂī ŝŶ ĂĚĚƌĞƐƐŝŶŐ ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ ŝƐƐƵĞƐ͘ /Ŷ ϮϬϭϲ͕ ƚŚĞ city updated the policies in the Housing Element of the Comprehensive Plan. dŽ ŝŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚ ƚŚĞƐĞ ƉŽůŝĐŝĞƐ͕ ŽƵŶĐŝů ĂĚŽƉƚĞĚ ƚŚĞ Beaverton Housing Five zĞĂƌ ĐƟŽŶ WůĂŶ ŝŶ ϮϬϭϳ͘ hƉĚĂƚĞĚ ĂŶŶƵĂůůLJ͕ ƚŚĞ ĐƟŽŶ WůĂŶ ƉĂŝƌƐ ƐƉĞĐŝĮĐ ĂĐƟŽŶƐ ǁŝƚŚ ĨŽƌĞĐĂƐƚĞĚ ďƵĚŐĞƚƐ͕ ĂĚĚƌĞƐƐŝŶŐ Ă ƐƉĞĐƚƌƵŵ ŽĨ ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ ŶĞĞĚƐ ĨƌŽŵ ĞŵĞƌŐĞŶĐLJ ƐŚĞůƚĞƌ ƚŽ ĞdžĞĐƵƟǀĞͲůĞǀĞů ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ͕ ǁŝƚŚ ĂŶ ĞŵƉŚĂƐŝƐ ŽŶ ĂīŽƌĚĂďůĞ ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ͘ dŚŝƐ ƐĞĐƟŽŶ ďƌŝĞŇLJ ĚŝƐĐƵƐƐĞƐ ƚŚĞ ŚŝŐŚůŝŐŚƚƐ ŽĨ ƚŚĂƚ ƉůĂŶ͘ DŽƌĞ ĐĂŶ ďĞ ƌĞĂĚ ĂďŽƵƚ ƚŚĞƐĞ ŝŶŝƟĂƟǀĞƐ ŝŶ ƉƉĞŶĚŝdž ͘ Homelessness͘ dŚĞ DĂLJŽƌ ĐŽŶǀĞŶĞĚ ĂŶ ŝŶƚĞƌŶĂů ůƵĞ ZŝďďŽŶ ŽŵŵŝƩĞĞ ŝŶ ϮϬϭϲ ƚŽ ŝĚĞŶƟĨLJ ŚŽŵĞůĞƐƐ ŝƐƐƵĞƐ ĂīĞĐƟŶŐ ĞĂǀĞƌƚŽŶ͘ ZĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚĂƟŽŶƐ ƚŽ ƐƚĂī ŝŶĐůƵĚĞĚ ŽƉĞŶŝŶŐ Ă ƐĞǀĞƌĞ ǁĞĂƚŚĞƌ ƐŚĞůƚĞƌ ;ŶŽǁ ƐĞƌǀŝŶŐ ϰϱϬ ƉĞŽƉůĞͬ LJĞĂƌͿ͕ ƉƌŽǀŝĚŝŶŐ ĮŶĂŶĐŝĂů ĂƐƐŝƐƚĂŶĐĞ ƚŽ ĞĂǀĞƌƚŽŶ &ĂŵŝůLJ WƌŽŵŝƐĞ ^ŚĞůƚĞƌ ; ĞĂǀĞƌƚŽŶ͛Ɛ ĮƌƐƚ ĨĂŵŝůLJ ƐŚĞůƚĞƌͿ͕ ĂŶĚ ŬĞĞƉŝŶŐ ƉĞŽƉůĞ ŝŶ ƚŚĞŝƌ ĚǁĞůůŝŶŐƐ ƚŚƌŽƵŐŚ ƐĞƌǀŝĐĞ ƉƌŽŐƌĂŵƐ ĂŶĚ ĮŶĂŶĐŝĂů ĂƐƐŝƐƚĂŶĐĞ͘ /Ŷ ĂĚĚŝƟŽŶ͕ ƚŚĞ DĂLJŽƌ ĂŶĚ ŽƵŶĐŝů ĂůůŽĐĂƚĞ ŶĞĂƌůLJ ΨϮϬϬ͕ϬϬϬ ƉĞƌ LJĞĂƌ ƚŽ ƐŽĐŝĂů ƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐ ƚŚĂƚ ƉƌŝŽƌŝƟnjĞ ŚŽŵĞůĞƐƐŶĞƐƐ ƉƌĞǀĞŶƟŽŶ͘ īŽƌĚĂďůĞ ,ŽƵƐŝŶŐ͘ ĞĂǀĞƌƚŽŶ ƵŶĚĞƌƐƚĂŶĚƐ ƚŚĂƚ ŝŶ ĂĚĚŝƟŽŶ ƚŽ ƉƌŽǀŝĚŝŶŐ ƐŚĞůƚĞƌ ĂŶĚ ƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐ͕ ŝƚ ŝƐ ĐƌŝƟĐĂů ƚŚĂƚ ŝƚ ĨŽĐƵƐĞƐ ƌĞƐŽƵƌĐĞƐ ŽŶ ĚĞǀĞůŽƉŝŶŐ ŶĞǁ ĂīŽƌĚĂďůĞ ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ͕ ƉƌĞƐĞƌǀŝŶŐ ůŽǁͲĐŽƐƚ ŵĂƌŬĞƚ ƌĞŶƚĂůƐ͕ ĂŶĚ ĚŝƐƉĞƌƐŝŶŐ ƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐ ƚŚƌŽƵŐŚŽƵƚ ƚŚĞ ĐŝƚLJ͘ dŚŝƐ ƐĞĐƟŽŶ ĨŽĐƵƐĞƐ ŽŶ ĂĐƟŽŶƐ ƚĂŬĞŶ ƚŽ ƉƌĞƐĞƌǀĞ ĂŶĚ ŝŶĐƌĞĂƐĞ ƚŚĞ ƐƵƉƉůLJ ŽĨ ĂīŽƌĚĂďůĞ ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ ŝŶ ĞdžŝƐƟŶŐ ƵƌďĂŶ ĂƌĞĂƐ͘ Policies. The city relies on Metro Title 7 to guide strategies ĨŽƌ ŝŶƚĞŐƌĂƟŶŐ ĂīŽƌĚĂďůĞ ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ ŝŶ ŵƵůƟƉůĞ ŶĞŝŐŚďŽƌŚŽŽĚƐ͖ ĐƌĞĂƟŶŐ ďĂůĂŶĐĞĚ ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ ŽƉƟŽŶƐ͕ Ăƚ Ăůů ƉƌŝĐĞ ůĞǀĞůƐ͖ ĂŶĚ ĂĚŽƉƟŶŐ strategies to address displacement in neighborhoods. The city pays ĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ ƌĞǀŝĞǁ ĂŶĚ ƐŽŵĞ ^ ĨĞĞƐ ĨŽƌ ĂīŽƌĚĂďůĞ ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ ƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐ͘ ĞĂǀĞƌƚŽŶ ĂůƐŽ ƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƐ ƚĂdž ĞdžĞŵƉƟŽŶƐ ĨŽƌ ĂīŽƌĚĂďůĞ ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ ƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐ͕ ĂůŽŶŐ ǁŝƚŚ Ɛŝdž ŽƚŚĞƌ ƉĂƌƚŶĞƌƐ͘ &ŝǀĞ ƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐ͕ ŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐ ϯϭϰ ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ ƵŶŝƚƐ͕ ŚĂǀĞ ƐĂǀĞĚ ŽǀĞƌ Ψϭ ŵŝůůŝŽŶ ŝŶ ƉƌŽƉĞƌƚLJ ƚĂdžĞƐ ;Ă ĐŽŵďŝŶĞĚ ƚŽƚĂů ĨŽƌ ƚŚĞ ĐŝƚLJ͕ ĐŽƵŶƚLJ͕ ĂŶĚ ƐĞƌǀŝĐĞ ƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƌƐͿ͘ /Ŷ ĂĚĚŝƟŽŶ͕ ƚŚĞ ĐŝƚLJ͛Ɛ ĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ ĐŽĚĞ ĂůůŽǁƐ͗ • ZĞĚƵĐĞĚ ŵŝŶŝŵƵŵ ƉĂƌŬŝŶŐ ƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ ĨŽƌ ŚŽƵƐĞŚŽůĚƐ ůĞƐƐ ůŝŬĞůLJ ƚŽ ŽǁŶ Ă ĐĂƌ͘ • ĞŶƐŝƚLJ ďŽŶƵƐĞƐ ĨŽƌ WůĂŶŶĞĚ hŶŝƚ ĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚƐ ƚŚĂƚ ŝŶĐůƵĚĞ ĂīŽƌĚĂďůĞ ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ͘ ZĞŐĂƌĚŝŶŐ ĐĐĞƐƐŽƌLJ ǁĞůůŝŶŐ hŶŝƚƐ ; hƐͿ͕ ƚŚĞ ĐŝƚLJ͛Ɛ ƌĞŐƵůĂƟŽŶƐ ĂƌĞ ĐůŽƐĞ ƚŽ ŵĞĞƟŶŐ ƚŚĞ ƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ ŽĨ ^ ϭϬϱϭ͕ ĂŶĚ ǁŝůů ďĞ ƵƉĚĂƚĞĚ ƐŽŽŶ ;ƚŚĞ ĐŝƚLJ ǁŝůů ĂĐĐĞƉƚ ĂƉƉůŝĐĂƟŽŶƐ ĨŽƌ h ĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ ĐŽŶƐŝƐƚĞŶƚ with SB 1051 in the interim). Beaverton is preparing to launch a study ĞǀĂůƵĂƟŶŐ ͞ŵŝƐƐŝŶŐ ŵŝĚĚůĞ͟ ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ ĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ ŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƟĞƐ ŝŶ ƚŚĞ ĐŽŵŝŶŐ LJĞĂƌ ƚŚĂƚ ǁŝůů ŝŶĐůƵĚĞ ĂŶ ƵƉĚĂƚĞ ŽĨ h ƌƵůĞƐ͕ ĨƵůĮůůŝŶŐ ƚŚĞ intent of Metro Title 1. ϵ

City of Beaverton UGB Expansion Proposal

Programs͘ ĞĂǀĞƌƚŽŶ ĞŵƉůŽLJƐ ĂŶ ĂīŽƌĚĂďůĞ ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ ƚŽŽůŬŝƚ ƚŚĂƚ ŝŶĐůƵĚĞƐ ůĂŶĚ ĂĐƋƵŝƐŝƟŽŶ ĂŶĚ ĂƐƐĞŵďůĂŐĞ͕ ƉƌĞĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ ĂƐƐŝƐƚĂŶĐĞ͕ ŐĂƉ ĮŶĂŶĐŝŶŐ͕ ^ ƌĞůŝĞĨ ĂŶĚ ǀĞƌƟĐĂů ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ ĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ njŽŶĞƐ͘ &Žƌ ĞdžĂŵƉůĞ͕ ƚŚĞ ĐŝƚLJ ŚĂƐ ĂĐƋƵŝƌĞĚ ůĂŶĚ ĂŶĚ ĐŽŶǀĞLJĞĚ ŝƚ ƚŽ ĚĞǀĞůŽƉĞƌƐ ĨŽƌ ŶĞǁ ĂīŽƌĚĂďůĞ ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ ĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚƐ Ăƚ Ă ǀĂůƵĞ ŽĨ Ψϭ͘Ϯ ŵŝůůŝŽŶ ĨŽƌ ϵϴ ƵŶŝƚƐ͘ &ƵŶĚŝŶŐ ĨŽƌ ƚŚĞƐĞ ĂĐƟŽŶƐ ĐŽŵĞƐ ĨƌŽŵ ŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ ĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ ůŽĐŬ 'ƌĂŶƚ ; 'Ϳ ĨƵŶĚƐ͕ ĞĂǀĞƌƚŽŶ hƌďĂŶ ZĞĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ ŐĞŶĐLJ ; hZ Ϳ ĨƵŶĚƐ͕ ĂŶĚ ƚŚĞ ĐŝƚLJ͛Ɛ 'ĞŶĞƌĂů &ƵŶĚ ;'&Ϳ͘ ZĞĐĞŶƚ ĂīŽƌĚĂďůĞ ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ ĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ ƐƵĐĐĞƐƐĞƐ ŝŶĐůƵĚĞ dŚĞ ĂƌĐĞůŽŶĂ ;ϰϳ ƵŶŝƚƐ ĂīŽƌĚĂďůĞͿ͕ ƌŝĚŐĞ DĞĂĚŽǁƐ ;ϯϮ ŽĨ ϯϳ ƵŶŝƚƐ ĂīŽƌĚĂďůĞͿ͕ ĂŶĚ ZŝƐĞ ĞŶƚƌĂů ;ϭϱ ŽĨ ϮϯϬ ƵŶŝƚƐ ĂīŽƌĚĂďůĞͿ͘ ZĞĐĞŶƚ ĂīŽƌĚĂďůĞ ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ ŽǁŶĞƌƐŚŝƉ ƐƵĐĐĞƐƐĞƐ ŝŶĐůƵĚĞ ĨƵŶĚŝŶŐ ůŽǁͲŝŶĐŽŵĞ ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ ƌĞŚĂďŝůŝƚĂƟŽŶ͕ ŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐ ϰϬ ƵŶŝƚƐ ĨŽƌ ,ĂďŝƚĂƚ ĨŽƌ ,ƵŵĂŶŝƚLJ͕ ĂŶĚ Ă ĮŶĂŶĐŝĂů ĐŽŵŵŝƚŵĞŶƚ ƚŽ WƌŽƵĚ 'ƌŽƵŶĚ ;ΨϯϴϬ͕ϬϬϬ in the past several years for seven homes). Proud Ground relies ŽŶ Ă ƐŚĂƌĞĚ ĞƋƵŝƚLJ ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ ƚƌƵƐƚ ƚŚĂƚ ƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƐ ŚŽŵĞƐ ƚŽ ĮƌƐƚͲƟŵĞ ŚŽŵĞďƵLJĞƌƐ ďĞƚǁĞĞŶ ϯϬͲϴϬ ƉĞƌĐĞŶƚ ƌĞĂ DĞĚŝĂŶ /ŶĐŽŵĞ ; D/Ϳ͘

,ŽƵƐŝŶŐ ĨŽƌ ĨĂŵŝůŝĞƐ ŵĂŬŝŶŐ ϬͲϯϬй D/. dŚĞ ĂƌĐĞůŽŶĂ ŝƐ Ă ϰϳͲƵŶŝƚ ĂīŽƌĚĂďůĞ ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ ĐŽŵƉůĞdž ĚŽǁŶƚŽǁŶ͕ ŐŝǀŝŶŐ ƉƌŝŽƌŝƚLJ to low-income households. The City of ĞĂǀĞƌƚŽŶ ĞdžƉĞŶĚĞĚ ΨϰϬϵ͕ϬϬϬ ŝŶ 'ĞŶĞƌĂů Fund dollars to purchase the site.

/ŶƚĞƌŐĞŶĞƌĂƟŽŶĂů ůŝǀŝŶŐ. Bridge Meadows ƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƐ ĂīŽƌĚĂďůĞ ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ Ăƚ ϯϬͲϴϬй D/ ĨŽƌ ĂĚŽƉƟǀĞ ĨĂŵŝůŝĞƐ ŽĨ ĨŽƐƚĞƌ LJŽƵƚŚ ĂŶĚ ŽůĚĞƌ ĂĚƵůƚƐ ;ϯϮ ŽĨ ϯϳ ƵŶŝƚƐͿ͘ dŚĞ ƉƌŽũĞĐƚ ďĞŶĞĮƚĞĚ ĨƌŽŵ Ă ΨϯϬ͕ϬϬϬ ƉƌĞĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ ŐƌĂŶƚ͕ Ă ΨϮϬϬ͕ϬϬϬ ůŽĂŶ͕ ĂŶĚ ĂŶ ĞdžĞŵƉƟŽŶ from all property taxes.

DĂƌŬĞƚ ƌĂƚĞ ǁŝƚŚ ĂīŽƌĚĂďůĞ ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ.

The Rise Central consists of two mixedƵƐĞ ďƵŝůĚŝŶŐƐ ǁŝƚŚ ϮϯϬ ƵŶŝƚƐ͕ ŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐ ϭϱ ĂīŽƌĚĂďůĞ ƵŶŝƚƐ͘ tŝƚŚŝŶ Ă ŽŶĞͲŵŝŶƵƚĞ ǁĂůŬ ŽĨ ƚŚĞ ĞĂǀĞƌƚŽŶ ĞŶƚƌĂů ůŝŐŚƚ ƌĂŝů ƐƚŽƉ͕ ZŝƐĞ ĞŶƚƌĂů͕ Ă DĞƚƌŽ dK ĂǁĂƌĚ ƌĞĐŝƉŝĞŶƚ͕ ǁŝůů ďĞ ĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞĚ ďLJ ǁŝŶƚĞƌ ϮϬϭϴͬϮϬϭϵ͘

10

The city’s ě ȱ ȱ ¡Ȭ ¡ ȱ ȱ reached a milestone ȱǞŗȱ ȱ ȱ leveraged subsidies in 2017.

īŽƌĚĂďůĞ ,ŽƵƐŝŶŐ

Beaverton’s ě ȱ ȱ Preservation and Development Study outlines programs ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ preserving and increasing the ¢ȱ ȱ ě ȱ housing.

Outreach͘ /Ŷ ϮϬϭϳ͕ ĞĂǀĞƌƚŽŶ ŬŝĐŬĞĚ Žī Ă ĮǀĞͲƉĂƌƚ ,ŽƵƐŝŶŐ dĂůŬƐ ƐĞƌŝĞƐ ĂƩĞŶĚĞĚ ďLJ ƚŚĞ DĂLJŽƌ͕ ŝƚLJ ŽƵŶĐŝů͕ ĚĞǀĞůŽƉĞƌƐ͕ ĂīŽƌĚĂďůĞ ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ ŶŽŶƉƌŽĮƚƐ͕ ĂŶĚ ĐŝƚLJ ƐƚĂī͘ dŚĞ ƐĞƌŝĞƐ ƐĞĞŬƐ ƚŽ ĐƌĞĂƚĞ Ă ĐŽŵŵŽŶ ŬŶŽǁůĞĚŐĞ ďĂƐĞ ƌĞŐĂƌĚŝŶŐ ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ ŝƐƐƵĞƐ ƚŚĂƚ ǁŝůů ĂƐƐŝƐƚ ƚŚĞ DĂLJŽƌ ĂŶĚ ŽƵŶĐŝů ĂƐ ƚŚĞLJ ĐŽŶƟŶƵĞ ƚŽ ĐŽŶĨƌŽŶƚ ƚŚĞ ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ ĐƌŝƐŝƐ ĂŶĚ ŵĂŬĞ ƉŽůŝĐLJ ĚĞĐŝƐŝŽŶƐ ƌĞŐĂƌĚŝŶŐ ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ ĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ͕ ƚĞŶĂŶƚ ƉƌŽƚĞĐƟŽŶƐ͕ ĂŶĚ ƚŚĞ ĐŝƚLJ͛Ɛ ƌŽůĞ ŝŶ ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ͘ dŚĞ ĐŝƚLJ ĂůƐŽ ƚĂůŬĞĚ ǁŝƚŚ ĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ ŵĞŵďĞƌƐ ǁŚŽ ĂƌĞ ĞdžƉĞƌŝĞŶĐŝŶŐ ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ ĂīŽƌĚĂďŝůŝƚLJ ŝƐƐƵĞƐ ĂŶĚ ĐŽŵƉŝůĞĚ ƚŚĞŝƌ stories in sŽŝĐĞƐ ŽĨ ĞĂǀĞƌƚŽŶ. ĞƐƚ WƌĂĐƟĐĞƐ ZĞƐĞĂƌĐŚ͘ &ƵŶĚĞĚ ďLJ Ă ΨϭϬϬ͕ϬϬϬ DĞƚƌŽ ƋƵŝƚĂďůĞ ,ŽƵƐŝŶŐ 'ƌĂŶƚ͕ ƚŚĞ ĐŝƚLJ ŝƐ ĮŶĂůŝnjŝŶŐ ƌĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚĂƟŽŶƐ ĨŽƌ ƚŚĞ Beaverton īŽƌĚĂďůĞ ,ŽƵƐŝŶŐ WƌĞƐĞƌǀĂƟŽŶ ĂŶĚ ĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ ^ƚƵĚLJ. The outcome ŝƐ Ă ƐĞƚ ŽĨ ƌĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚĂƟŽŶƐ ĨŽƌ ƉƌŽŐƌĂŵƐ ĂŶĚ ĨƵŶĚŝŶŐ ŵĞĐŚĂŶŝƐŵƐ ƚŚĂƚ ŚĞůƉ ŵĂŝŶƚĂŝŶ ƚŚĞ ĞdžŝƐƟŶŐ ƐƵƉƉůLJ ŽĨ ŝŶĐŽŵĞͲƌĞƐƚƌŝĐƚĞĚ ĂŶĚ ůŽǁͲ ĐŽƐƚ ŵĂƌŬĞƚ ƌĂƚĞ ;> DZͿ ĨĂŵŝůLJ ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ ĂŶĚ ƐƵƉƉŽƌƚ ƚŚĞ ĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ ŽĨ ŶĞǁ ĂīŽƌĚĂďůĞ Žƌ ŵŝdžĞĚͲŝŶĐŽŵĞ ŵƵůƟĨĂŵŝůLJ ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ͘ Ɛ ŽĨ :ĂŶƵĂƌLJ ϮϬϭϴ͕ ĞĂǀĞƌƚŽŶ ŚĂƐ ϭϳ͕ϮϳϬ ƚŽƚĂů ŵƵůƟĨĂŵŝůLJ ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ ƵŶŝƚƐ͗ ϴϬϱ ĂƌĞ ƌĞŐƵůĂƚĞĚ͕ ϰϰϴ ĂƌĞ ƐĞŶŝŽƌͲƐƉĞĐŝĮĐ͕ ĂŶĚ ŶĞĂƌůLJ ϭϲ͕ϬϬϬ ĂƌĞ ƵŶƌĞŐƵůĂƚĞĚ ƵŶŝƚƐ ǁŝƚŚŽƵƚ ĨƵŶĚŝŶŐ ƌĞƐƚƌŝĐƟŽŶƐ͘ dŚĞ ƌĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚĂƟŽŶƐ ďĞůŽǁ ĂƉƉůLJ ƚŽ ĞdžŝƐƟŶŐ ŵƵůƟĨĂŵŝůLJ ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ͕ ĂƐ ǁĞůů ĂƐ ĨƵƚƵƌĞ ƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐ͗ • hƐĞ ƉŽƚĞŶƟĂů ĨƵŶĚŝŶŐ ƐŽƵƌĐĞƐ ƐƵĐŚ ĂƐ ĐŝƚLJ ĨƵŶĚŝŶŐ ƐŽƵƌĐĞƐ ;ŐĞŶĞƌĂů ĨƵŶĚ ƌĞǀĞŶƵĞ͕ ƚĂdž ŝŶĐƌĞŵĞŶƚ ĮŶĂŶĐŝŶŐ ƌĞǀĞŶƵĞ͕ ĂŶĚ Ă ƉŽƚĞŶƟĂů ĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƟŽŶ ĞdžĐŝƐĞ ƚĂdžͿ ĂŶĚ ƉĂƌƚŶĞƌ ĨƵŶĚŝŶŐ ƐŽƵƌĐĞƐ ;ƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚ ĐŽƵŶƚLJǁŝĚĞ ůŽĐĂů ŽƉƟŽŶ ůĞǀLJ ĂŶĚ ƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚ DĞƚƌŽ ŐĞŶĞƌĂů ŽďůŝŐĂƟŽŶ ďŽŶĚͿ ƚŽ ŝŶǀĞƐƚ ŝŶ ƚŚĞ ƉƌŽǀŝƐŝŽŶ ŽĨ ĂŶĚ ƉƌĞƐĞƌǀĂƟŽŶ ŽĨ ĂīŽƌĚĂďůĞ ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ͘ • ŽŶƐŝĚĞƌ Ă ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ ƉƌĞƐĞƌǀĂƟŽŶ ĂŶĚ ĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ ĨƵŶĚ͕ ĂŶ ƵƉĚĂƚĞĚ ĐŝƚLJ ůĂŶĚ ĂĐƋƵŝƐŝƟŽŶ ƐƚƌĂƚĞŐLJ͕ Ă ĐŝƚLJǁŝĚĞ ŵƵůƟĨĂŵŝůLJ ƚĂdž ĞdžĞŵƉƟŽŶ͕ ĨƵůů Žƌ ƉĂƌƟĂů ^ ĞdžĞŵƉƟŽŶƐ͕ ĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ ĐŽĚĞ ĂŵĞŶĚŵĞŶƚƐ͕ Ă ĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ ůĂŶĚ ƚƌƵƐƚ͕ ĂŶĚ Ă ZĞĂů ƐƚĂƚĞ /ŶǀĞƐƚŵĞŶƚ dƌƵƐƚ ǁŝƚŚ Ă mission to preserve LCMR housing and stabilize rents.

Market Rate Housing͘ dŚĞ ĐŝƚLJ ŝƐ ĐƵƌƌĞŶƚůLJ ĨŽĐƵƐŝŶŐ ĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ ĞīŽƌƚƐ on mixed-use projects downtown and in South Cooper Mountain. A recent ƉƌŽũĞĐƚ ĚŽǁŶƚŽǁŶ ŝŶĐůƵĚĞƐ >Ă^ĐĂůĂ͕ Ă ŵŝdžĞĚͲƵƐĞ ďƵŝůĚŝŶŐ ǁŝƚŚ ϰϰ ŵĂƌŬĞƚ ƌĂƚĞ ƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƟĂů ƵŶŝƚƐ͕ ĐŽͲůŽĐĂƚĞĚ ǁŝƚŚ dŚĞ ĂƌĐĞůŽŶĂ͕ Ă ϰϳͲƵŶŝƚ ĂīŽƌĚĂďůĞ ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ ĐŽŵƉůĞdž͘ /Ŷ ^ŽƵƚŚ ŽŽƉĞƌ DŽƵŶƚĂŝŶ͕ ƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐ ĂƌĞ ƐƟůů ŝŶ ƚŚĞ ƉĞƌŵŝƫŶŐ ƉŚĂƐĞ͘ ,ŽǁĞǀĞƌ͕ ĞĂƌůLJ ƉůĂŶƐ ŝŶĚŝĐĂƚĞ Ă ŵŝdž ŽĨ ƐŝŶŐůĞͲĨĂŵŝůLJ ĚĞƚĂĐŚĞĚ͕ ƐŝŶŐůĞͲĨĂŵŝůLJ ĂƩĂĐŚĞĚ͕ ĂŶĚ ŵƵůƟĨĂŵŝůLJ ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ ƚŚĂƚ ǁŽƵůĚ respond to the needs of families at a variety of household incomes.

Next Steps͘ ĞĂǀĞƌƚŽŶ ŚĂƐ ŵĂŶLJ ĂīŽƌĚĂďůĞ ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ ŽƉƟŽŶƐ͕ ƌĞŐƵůĂƚĞĚ ĂŶĚ ůŽǁͲĐŽƐƚ ŵĂƌŬĞƚ ƌĂƚĞ͕ ĨŽƌ ĨĂŵŝůŝĞƐ ŵĂŬŝŶŐ ƵƉ ƚŽ ϴϬ ƉĞƌĐĞŶƚ D/͘ dŚĞƐĞ ŚŽŵĞƐ ĂƌĞ ůŽĐĂƚĞĚ ƚŚƌŽƵŐŚŽƵƚ ƚŚĞ ĐŝƚLJ ;ŝŶ Ɛŝdž ŽĨ ĞŝŐŚƚ ŶĞŝŐŚďŽƌŚŽŽĚƐͿ͕ ĂŶĚ ƵƐƵĂůůLJ ůŽĐĂƚĞĚ ŶĞĂƌ ƚƌĂŶƐŝƚ ƚŽ ƌĞĚƵĐĞ ƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƟŽŶ ĐŽƐƚƐ͘ dŚĞ ĐŝƚLJ ŝƐ ĐŽŵŵŝƩĞĚ ƚŽ ǁŽƌŬŝŶŐ ǁŝƚŚ ĂīŽƌĚĂďůĞ ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ ƉĂƌƚŶĞƌƐ ƚŽ ĮŶĚ ŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƟĞƐ ĨŽƌ ĂīŽƌĚĂďůĞ ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ ŝŶ ƚŚĞ ƵƌďĂŶ ƌĞƐĞƌǀĞ͕ ŬĞĞƉŝŶŐ ŝŶ ŵŝŶĚ ƚŚĂƚ ƚŚĞ ƚĂƌŐĞƚĞĚ ƉŽƉƵůĂƟŽŶ͕ ŝŶ ƚŚĞ ƐŚŽƌƚ ƚĞƌŵ͕ ŵĂLJ ŶĞĞĚ ƚŽ ďĞ ƉĞŽƉůĞ ǁŝƚŚ ĂƵƚŽŵŽďŝůĞƐ ďĞĐĂƵƐĞ ŽĨ ƚŚĞ ůĂĐŬ ŽĨ ƚƌĂŶƐŝƚ ĂŶĚ ƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐ ŝŶ ƚŚĞ ĂƌĞĂ͘ dŚĞ ĐŝƚLJ ĂůƐŽ ǁŝůů ĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌ ƉƌŝŽƌŝƟnjŝŶŐ ĂīŽƌĚĂďůĞ ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ ĂƐ ƉĂƌƚ ŽĨ ƚŚĞ community planning process that would follow UGB expansion.

11

City of Beaverton UGB Expansion Proposal

METRO OUTCOMES WĞŽƉůĞ ůŝǀĞ͕ ǁŽƌŬ ĂŶĚ ƉůĂLJ ŝŶ ǀŝďƌĂŶƚ ĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƟĞƐ ǁŚĞƌĞ ƚŚĞŝƌ ĞǀĞƌLJĚĂLJ ŶĞĞĚƐ ĂƌĞ ĞĂƐŝůLJ ĂĐĐĞƐƐŝďůĞ͘ Beaverton envisions the urban reserve as a model of sustainable ĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ Ͷ ǁĂůŬĂďůĞ ŶĞŝŐŚďŽƌŚŽŽĚƐ ůŝŶŬĞĚ ďLJ ƉĂƌŬƐ͕ ƚƌĂŝůƐ ĂŶĚ ƐĐŚŽŽůƐ͘ dŚĞ ĐŽŶĐĞƉƚ ƉůĂŶ ŝůůƵƐƚƌĂƚĞƐ ƐŝƚĞͲƐƉĞĐŝĮĐ ĚĞƐŝŐŶ ƐƚƌĂƚĞŐŝĞƐ ƚŚĂƚ ƉƌŝǀŝůĞŐĞ ŶĂƚƵƌĂů ƌĞƐŽƵƌĐĞ ƉƌŽƚĞĐƟŽŶƐ͕ ĂĐĐŽŵŵŽĚĂƚĞ ƉƵďůŝĐ ŝŶĨƌĂƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞ͕ ĂŶĚ ĐŽŶŶĞĐƚ ƚŽ ƐĂĨĞ ƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƟŽŶ ƌŽƵƚĞƐ͘ dŚĞƐĞ ŐƵŝĚŝŶŐ ƉƌŝŶĐŝƉůĞƐ ƐŚĂƉĞ the vision of the urban reserve because it is what people expect when they live in Beaverton. <ŶŽǁŶ ĨŽƌ ŐƌĞĂƚ ƐĐŚŽŽůƐ͕ ƐĐĞŶŝĐ ƉĂƌŬƐ͕ ĂŶĚ ĐƵůƚƵƌĂů ĚŝǀĞƌƐŝƚLJ͕ ƚŚĞ ĐŝƚLJ ƌĞůŝĞƐ ŽŶ DĞƚƌŽ dŝƚůĞ ϭϮ ƚŽ ƉƌŽǀŝĚĞ ŐƵŝĚĂŶĐĞ ŽŶ ĐƌĞĂƟŶŐ ůŝǀĂďůĞ ŶĞŝŐŚďŽƌŚŽŽĚƐ͘ &Žƌ ĞdžĂŵƉůĞ͕ ƚŚĞ ĐŝƚLJ ƵƉĚĂƚĞĚ ƚŚĞ Comprehensive Plan to encourage ŚŝŐŚĞƌ ŝŶƚĞŶƐŝƚLJ ĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ ŶĞĂƌ D y ĂŶĚ t ^ ƐƚĂƟŽŶƐ͕ ĐƌĞĂƟŶŐ ŵŝdžĞĚͲ ƵƐĞ ĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƟĞƐ ƚŚĂƚ ĐŽͲůŽĐĂƚĞ ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ͕ ũŽďƐ͕ ƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐ ĂŶĚ ƚƌĂŶƐŝƚ͘ dŚĞ ĐŝƚLJ ƉůĂŶƐ ƚŽ ƐƚƵĚLJ͕ ĂƐ ƉĂƌƚ ŽĨ Ă ĨŽůůŽǁͲƵƉ ĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ ƉůĂŶ ĨŽƌ ƚŚĞ ƵƌďĂŶ ƌĞƐĞƌǀĞ͕ ǁŚĞƚŚĞƌ ƐŵĂůů ĐŽŵŵĞƌĐŝĂů ŶŽĚĞƐ ĐĂŶ ďĞ ƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĚ ƐŽ ƉĞŽƉůĞ ǁŚŽ live in the urban reserve have goods and services readily available. ƵƌƌĞŶƚ ĂŶĚ ĨƵƚƵƌĞ ƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚƐ ďĞŶĞĮƚ ĨƌŽŵ ƚŚĞ ƌĞŐŝŽŶ͛Ɛ ƐƵƐƚĂŝŶĞĚ ĞĐŽŶŽŵŝĐ ĐŽŵƉĞƟƟǀĞŶĞƐƐ ĂŶĚ ƉƌŽƐƉĞƌŝƚLJ͘ /Ŷ ĐŽůůĂďŽƌĂƟŽŶ ǁŝƚŚ ŝŶĚƵƐƚƌLJ ƉĂƌƚŶĞƌƐ ĂŶĚ ůŽĐĂů ŐŽǀĞƌŶŵĞŶƚƐ͕ ĞĂǀĞƌƚŽŶ ĨƵĞůƐ ĞĐŽŶŽŵŝĐ ŐƌŽǁƚŚ ďLJ ůĞǀĞƌĂŐŝŶŐ ƌĞŐŝŽŶĂů ƐƚƌĞŶŐƚŚƐ ƚŽ ĂƩƌĂĐƚ ůŽĐĂů ŝŶǀĞƐƚŵĞŶƚƐ͘ &Žƌ ĞdžĂŵƉůĞ͕ ƚŚĞ ĐŽŶŽŵŝĐ ĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ ƚĞĂŵ ƌĞĐƌƵŝƚƐ ĂŶĚ ƐƵƉƉŽƌƚƐ ŝŶĚƵƐƚƌŝĞƐ ƚŚĂƚ ƉƌŽǀŝĚĞ ũŽďƐ Ăƚ Ă ƌĂŶŐĞ ŽĨ ƐĂůĂƌŝĞƐ͕ ĨƌŽŵ ĨĂŵŝůLJͲ ǁĂŐĞ ƚŽ ĞdžĞĐƵƟǀĞ͘ dŚĞƐĞ ŝŶĚƵƐƚƌŝĞƐ ƚĂƉ ŝŶƚŽ ƐƵďƌĞŐŝŽŶĂů ďƵƐŝŶĞƐƐ ĐůƵƐƚĞƌƐ ƐƵĐŚ ĂƐ ĞůĞĐƚƌŝĐĂů ĞƋƵŝƉŵĞŶƚ͕ ƐĐŝĞŶƟĮĐ ĂŶĚ ŵĞĚŝĐĂů ŝŶƐƚƌƵŵĞŶƚƐ͕ ĨŽŽĚ ƉƌŽĐĞƐƐŝŶŐ ĐŽŵƉĂŶŝĞƐ͕ ƐŽŌǁĂƌĞ ĂŶĚ ŝŶĨŽƌŵĂƟŽŶ ƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐ͕ ĂŶĚ ƐƉŽƌƟŶŐ ĞƋƵŝƉŵĞŶƚ ĂŶĚ ĂƉƉĂƌĞů͘ ĞĂǀĞƌƚŽŶ ĂůƐŽ ƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƐ ' ŐƌĂŶƚƐ ƚŽ ĂƌĞĂ ŶŽŶƉƌŽĮƚƐ ƚŚĂƚ ƉƌŽǀŝĚĞ ũŽď ƚƌĂŝŶŝŶŐ ƐŬŝůůƐ ĨŽƌ ƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚƐ ŽĨ ĞĂǀĞƌƚŽŶ͘

Sexton Mountain. ǁĂůŬĂďůĞ͕ ůŝǀĂďůĞ ŶĞŝŐŚďŽƌŚŽŽĚ ŬŶŽǁŶ ĨŽƌ ƐƚƌŽŶŐ ĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ ŝŶǀŽůǀĞŵĞŶƚ͕ ƚŚĞ ^ĞdžƚŽŶ DŽƵŶƚĂŝŶ EĞŝŐŚďŽƌŚŽŽĚ ƐƐŽĐŝĂƟŽŶ ŽŵŵŝƩĞĞ ƉĂƌƚŶĞƌƐ ǁŝƚŚ ƚŚĞ ůŽĐĂů ĞůĞŵĞŶƚĂƌLJ ƐĐŚŽŽů ŽŶ ƐĞǀĞƌĂů ƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐ͕ ƐƵĐŚ as the Safe Routes to School Program.

12

Factor: Has the City of Beaverton taken actions to advance Metro’s six desired outcomes set forth in Chapter One of the Regional Framework Plan?

Conclusion: Yes, Beaverton prioritizes actions and investments that ensure all residents live in vibrant communities with access to jobs, safe and reliable transportation, parks and recreational opportunities.

Takeaways: • Beaverton encourages development and land use Ĵ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ¢ȱ of transportation options.

• Beaverton will plan the urban reserve to advance Metro’s outcomes by providing walkable, mixeduse communities near jobs, parks, and multimodal transportation options.

• The DEI Plan emphasizes racial/ethnic diversity, and eliminating barriers that exist for communities of color, immigrants and refugees.

Metro Outcomes

WĞŽƉůĞ ŚĂǀĞ ƐĂĨĞ ĂŶĚ ƌĞůŝĂďůĞ ƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƟŽŶ ĐŚŽŝĐĞƐ ƚŚĂƚ ĞŶŚĂŶĐĞ ƚŚĞŝƌ quality of life. /Ŷ &ĞďƌƵĂƌLJ ϮϬϭϴ͕ ĞĂǀĞƌƚŽŶ ƌĞůĞĂƐĞĚ ƚŚĞ ĐƟǀĞ dƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƟŽŶ WůĂŶ (ATP) ƚŽ ŵĂŬĞ ƚŚĞ ĐŝƚLJ Ă ďĞƩĞƌ ƉůĂĐĞ ĨŽƌ ƉĞŽƉůĞ ƚƌĂǀĞůŝŶŐ ďLJ ďŝĐLJĐůĞ͕ ŽŶ ĨŽŽƚ͕ ďLJ ǁŚĞĞůĐŚĂŝƌ͕ Žƌ ĂĐĐĞƐƐŝŶŐ ƉƵďůŝĐ ƚƌĂŶƐŝƚ͘ dŚĞ dW ŝĚĞŶƟĮĞƐ ƐŽůƵƟŽŶƐ ƚŚĂƚ Ăŝŵ ƚŽ Įůů ŐĂƉƐ ŝŶ ƚŚĞ ŶĞƚǁŽƌŬƐ ĂŵŽŶŐ ŶĞŝŐŚďŽƌŚŽŽĚƐ͘ ĞĂǀĞƌƚŽŶ ŚĂƐ ĂůƌĞĂĚLJ ŝŶĐůƵĚĞĚ ƉƌŝŽƌŝƟĞƐ ŝŶ ƚŚĞ City’s Capital Improvement Plan͕ ŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐ ĮǀĞ ƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶ ƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐ ĂŶĚ ĮǀĞ ŶĞŝŐŚďŽƌŚŽŽĚ ďŝŬĞǁĂLJ ƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐ͘ ĞĂǀĞƌƚŽŶ ĂůƐŽ ŚĂƐ ĞdžƚĞŶƐŝǀĞ ƉůĂŶƐ ĨŽƌ Ăůů ŵŽĚĞƐ͕ ŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐ ĂƵƚŽŵŽďŝůĞƐ ĂŶĚ ĨƌĞŝŐŚƚ͕ in its dƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƟŽŶ ^LJƐƚĞŵ WůĂŶ͘ /Ŷ ĂĚĚŝƟŽŶ͕ ƚŚĞ ĐŝƚLJ ǁŽƌŬƐ ĐůŽƐĞůLJ ǁŝƚŚ tĂƐŚŝŶŐƚŽŶ ŽƵŶƚLJ ƚŽ ĞŶŚĂŶĐĞ ƚŚĞ ƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƟŽŶ ƐLJƐƚĞŵ͕ ŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐ ŵĂũŽƌ ĂƌƚĞƌŝĂůƐ ŝŶ ĞĂǀĞƌƚŽŶ͘ ůƌĞĂĚLJ ƵŶĚĞƌǁĂLJ͕ ĞĂǀĞƌƚŽŶ ŝƐ ƉƌŽǀŝĚŝŶŐ ŝŶƉƵƚ ŽŶ the county-led ŽŽƉĞƌ DŽƵŶƚĂŝŶ dƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƟŽŶ ^ƚƵĚLJ͕ ǁŚŝĐŚ ŝƐ ĐƵƌƌĞŶƚůLJ ĞǀĂůƵĂƟŶŐ ƚŚƌĞĞ ĐŽŶĐĞƉƚ ƉůĂŶƐ ĨŽƌ ƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƟŽŶ ŝŶ ƚŚĞ ƵƌďĂŶ ƌĞƐĞƌǀĞ ĂƌĞĂ͘ dŚĞ ƌĞŐŝŽŶ ŝƐ Ă ůĞĂĚĞƌ ŝŶ ŵŝŶŝŵŝnjŝŶŐ ĐŽŶƚƌŝďƵƟŽŶƐ ƚŽ ŐůŽďĂů ǁĂƌŵŝŶŐ͘ ĞĂǀĞƌƚŽŶ ĞŶĐŽƵƌĂŐĞƐ ĞŶĞƌŐLJ ĐŽŶƐĞƌǀĂƟŽŶ ĂŶĚ ĞĸĐŝĞŶĐLJ ďLJ ƉĂƌƟĐŝƉĂƟŶŐ ŝŶ ŶĂƟŽŶĂů ƉƌŽŐƌĂŵƐ ƚŚĂƚ ƌĞĚƵĐĞ ďƵŝůĚŝŶŐ ĞŶĞƌŐLJ ƵƐĂŐĞ ĂŶĚ ƉƌŽǀŝĚŝŶŐ ŝŶĐĞŶƟǀĞƐ ƚŽ ĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ ŵĞŵďĞƌƐ͘ /Ŷ ϮϬϭϳ͕ ĞĂǀĞƌƚŽŶ ĂĐŚŝĞǀĞĚ ƚŚĞ ŚŝŐŚĞƐƚ ĚĞƐŝŐŶĂƟŽŶ ŽĨ ^Žů^ŵĂƌƚ 'ŽůĚ͕ Ă ŶĂƟŽŶĂů ŝŶŝƟĂƟǀĞ ǁŚŝĐŚ ƌĞĐŽŐŶŝnjĞƐ ĐŝƟĞƐ ƚŚĂƚ ƐƚƌĞĂŵůŝŶĞ ƐŽůĂƌ ĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ ƉƌŽĐĞƐƐĞƐ͘ ĞĂǀĞƌƚŽŶ ĂůƐŽ ƉĂƌƟĐŝƉĂƚĞƐ ŝŶ ƚŚĞ ĞƩĞƌ ƵŝůĚŝŶŐƐ ŚĂůůĞŶŐĞ ǁŚŝĐŚ ĂŝŵƐ ƚŽ ŵĂŬĞ ďƵŝůĚŝŶŐƐ ϮϬ ƉĞƌĐĞŶƚ ŵŽƌĞ ĞŶĞƌŐLJ ĞĸĐŝĞŶƚ ďLJ ϮϬϮϬ͘ ůĞĂĚŝŶŐ ĐŽŶƚƌŝďƵƚŽƌ ŝƐ ƚŚĞ ĞĂǀĞƌƚŽŶ ^ĐŚŽŽů ŝƐƚƌŝĐƚ͕ ŶĂƟŽŶĂůůLJ ƌĞĐŽŐŶŝnjĞĚ ĨŽƌ ĞĸĐŝĞŶƚůLJ ŽƉĞƌĂƟŶŐ ϱ million square feet of building space in 51 schools. ƵƌƌĞŶƚ ĂŶĚ ĨƵƚƵƌĞ ŐĞŶĞƌĂƟŽŶƐ ĞŶũŽLJ ĐůĞĂŶ Ăŝƌ͕ ĐůĞĂŶ ǁĂƚĞƌ ĂŶĚ ŚĞĂůƚŚLJ ecosystems.

Beaverton protects the water supply by aligning the ĞĂǀĞƌƚŽŶ ŽĚĞ͕ ĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ ŽĚĞ͕ ĂŶĚ ƚŚĞ ĐŝƚLJ͛Ɛ Storm Drainage System Facility Plan to ŝŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚ ŵĞĂƐƵƌĞƐ ƚŚĂƚ ƉƌĞǀĞŶƚ ŇŽŽĚŝŶŐ͕ ŵŝŶŝŵŝnjĞ ĞƌŽƐŝŽŶ Ăƚ ĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƟŽŶ ƐŝƚĞƐ͕ ĂŶĚ ĞŶĨŽƌĐĞ ŐƌĂĚŝŶŐ ƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐ ƚŚĂƚ ŚĞůƉ ƉƌĞǀĞŶƚ ůĂŶĚƐůŝĚĞƐ ĂŶĚ ĚĞŐƌĂĚĂƟŽŶ ŽĨ ƐƚƌĞĂŵƐ͘ dŚĞ ĐŝƚLJ ƌĞůŝĞƐ ŽŶ ĐŽŽƉĞƌĂƟŽŶ ǁŝƚŚ ƌĞŐŝŽŶĂů ƉĂƌƚŶĞƌƐ ƚŽ ŵĞĞƚ ƚŚĞƐĞ ƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐ ĂŶĚ ĐŽŵƉůLJ ǁŝƚŚ DĞƚƌŽ dŝƚůĞƐ ϯ ĂŶĚ ϭϯ͘ /Ŷ ĂĚĚŝƟŽŶ͕

The Round. A transit-oriented development at the Beaverton Central D y ƐƚĂƟŽŶ͕ dŚĞ ZŽƵŶĚ ŝƐ Ă ŵŝdž ŽĨ ŽĸĐĞ ƐƉĂĐĞ͕ ƌĞƚĂŝů ƐŚŽƉƐ͕ ůŽĐĂů ƌĞƐƚĂƵƌĂŶƚƐ͕ ĂŶĚ luxury condominiums with light rail in the center of the plaza.

ϭϯ

City of Beaverton UGB Expansion Proposal

ƚŚĞ ĐŝƚLJ ŵĂŝŶƚĂŝŶƐ ŚĞĂůƚŚLJ ĞĐŽƐLJƐƚĞŵƐ ďLJ ƉƌŽƚĞĐƟŶŐ ƐŝŐŶŝĮĐĂŶƚ ŶĂƚƵƌĂů ƌĞƐŽƵƌĐĞƐ͕ ŽīĞƌŝŶŐ ŝŶĐĞŶƟǀĞƐ ĨŽƌ ƐƵƐƚĂŝŶĂďůĞ ĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ͕ ĂŶĚ ƉƌŽǀŝĚŝŶŐ ĂĐĐĞƐƐ ƚŽ ƉĂƌŬƐ͘ ĚĚŝŶŐ ƚŚĞ ƵƌďĂŶ ƌĞƐĞƌǀĞ ǁŝůů ĨƵƌƚŚĞƌ ĂĚǀĂŶĐĞ ƚŚŝƐ ŽƵƚĐŽŵĞ͘ dŚĞ ďĞŶĞĮƚƐ ĂŶĚ ďƵƌĚĞŶƐ ŽĨ ŐƌŽǁƚŚ ĂŶĚ ĐŚĂŶŐĞ ĂƌĞ ĚŝƐƚƌŝďƵƚĞĚ ĞƋƵŝƚĂďůLJ͘ dŽ ĂĚǀĂŶĐĞ ƚŚĞ ĐŝƚLJ͛Ɛ ĞƋƵŝƚLJ ǁŽƌŬ͕ ĞĂǀĞƌƚŽŶ͛Ɛ ǀŽůƵŶƚĞĞƌ ŝǀĞƌƐŝƚLJ ĚǀŝƐŽƌLJ ŽĂƌĚ ; Ϳ ĐƌĞĂƚĞĚ Ă ŝǀĞƌƐŝƚLJ͕ ƋƵŝƚLJ͕ ĂŶĚ /ŶĐůƵƐŝŽŶ ; /Ϳ WůĂŶ͕ ĂĚŽƉƚĞĚ ďLJ ƚŚĞ ŝƚLJ ŽƵŶĐŝů ŝŶ ϮϬϭϱ ; ƉƉĞŶĚŝdž Ϳ͘ KƌŐĂŶŝnjĞĚ ďLJ ĞŝŐŚƚ ŬĞLJ ĂƌĞĂƐ͕ ƚŚĞ ƉůĂŶ ĨŽĐƵƐĞƐ ŽŶ ĞůŝŵŝŶĂƟŶŐ ďĂƌƌŝĞƌƐ ĨŽƌ ĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƟĞƐ ŽĨ ĐŽůŽƌ͘ &Žƌ ĞĂĐŚ ŬĞLJ ĂƌĞĂ͕ ƚŚĞ ĐŝƚLJ ƚƌĂĐŬƐ ŽƵƚĐŽŵĞƐ ĂŶĚ ƌĞůĞĂƐĞƐ Ă ƉƌŽŐƌĞƐƐ ƌĞƉŽƌƚ ĞǀĞƌLJ ƚǁŽ LJĞĂƌƐ͘ ĞĂǀĞƌƚŽŶ ǁĂƐ ĂůƐŽ ƚŚĞ ĮƌƐƚ ůŽĐĂů ũƵƌŝƐĚŝĐƟŽŶ ƚŽ ĐŽŵŵŝƚ ƚŽ >ĞĂĚŝŶŐ tŝƚŚ ZĂĐĞ͗ ZĞƐĞĂƌĐŚ :ƵƐƟĐĞ ŝŶ tĂƐŚŝŶŐƚŽŶ ŽƵŶƚLJ͕ Ă ƌĞƉŽƌƚ ŽŶ ĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƟĞƐ ŽĨ ĐŽůŽƌ ƚŽ ďĞ ƌĞůĞĂƐĞĚ ŝŶ :ƵŶĞ ϮϬϭϴ͘ dŚĞ ƐƚƵĚLJ ƌĞǀĞĂůƐ ŽƵƚĐŽŵĞƐ ĂŶĚ ŝŶĚŝĐĂƚŽƌƐ ĨŽƌ ĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƟĞƐ ŽĨ ĐŽůŽƌ ŝŶ ĞĂǀĞƌƚŽŶ͘ tŝƚŚ ƚŚŝƐ ĚĂƚĂ͕ ƚŚĞ ĐŝƚLJ ĐĂŶ ĚĞǀĞůŽƉ ƉŽůŝĐŝĞƐ ƚŚĂƚ ĂĚĚƌĞƐƐ ŝŶĞƋƵŝƟĞƐ ĨŽƌ ĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƟĞƐ ŽĨ ĐŽůŽƌ Ăƚ Ă ŐƌĂŶƵůĂƌ ůĞǀĞů͘ Using data from the DEI Plan and >ĞĂĚŝŶŐ ǁŝƚŚ ZĂĐĞ͕ ƚŚĞ ĐŝƚLJ ĐĂŶ ĞǀĂůƵĂƚĞ ǁŚĞƚŚĞƌ ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ͕ ƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƟŽŶ͕ ũŽď ĂŶĚ ƉĂƌŬ ŽƵƚĐŽŵĞƐ ĂƌĞ ǁŽƌƐĞ ĨŽƌ ĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƟĞƐ ŽĨ ĐŽůŽƌ͕ ĂŶĚ ŝĨ ƐŽ͕ ǁŚĂƚ ĐĂŶ ĞĂǀĞƌƚŽŶ ĚŽ ƚŽ ĂĚĚƌĞƐƐ ƚŚĞƐĞ ŝƐƐƵĞƐ͘ /Ŷ ĞĂǀĞƌƚŽŶ͕ ĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƟĞƐ ŽĨ ĐŽůŽƌ ŐĞŶĞƌĂůůLJ ůŝǀĞ ŝŶ ŶĞŝŐŚďŽƌŚŽŽĚƐ ŶĞĂƌ ƉƵďůŝĐ ƚƌĂŶƐŝƚ ĂŶĚ ǁŝƚŚŝŶ Ъ ŵŝůĞ ŽĨ ƉĂƌŬƐ͘ ,ŽǁĞǀĞƌ͕ ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ ĂŶĚ ũŽď ŽƵƚĐŽŵĞƐ ĂƌĞ ǁŽƌƐĞ ĨŽƌ ĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƟĞƐ ŽĨ ĐŽůŽƌ͘ • Housing͘ DŽƌĞ ƚŚĂŶ ŚĂůĨ ŽĨ >ĂƟŶŽ͕ EĂƟǀĞ ŵĞƌŝĐĂŶ͕ ƐŝĂŶ͕ ŚŝŶĞƐĞ͕ &ŝůŝƉŝŶŽ͕ EĂƟǀĞ ,ĂǁĂŝŝĂŶ ĂŶĚ WĂĐŝĮĐ /ƐůĂŶĚĞƌƐ͕ ĂŶĚ DŝĚĚůĞ ĂƐƚĞƌŶ ĂŶĚ EŽƌƚŚ ĨƌŝĐĂŶ ĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƟĞƐ ŝŶ ĞŶƚƌĂů ĂŶĚ ĂƐƚ ĞĂǀĞƌƚŽŶ ƐƉĞŶĚ ŵŽƌĞ ƚŚĂŶ ϯϬ ƉĞƌĐĞŶƚ ŽĨ ƚŚĞŝƌ ŝŶĐŽŵĞ ŽŶ ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ͘ /Ŷ ĂĚĚŝƟŽŶ ƚŽ ƐƵƉƉŽƌƟŶŐ ĂīŽƌĚĂďůĞ ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ ƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐ͕ ĞĂǀĞƌƚŽŶ ƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƐ ƌĞŶƚĂů ĂƐƐŝƐƚĂŶĐĞ͕ ŽīĞƌƐ ŵĞĚŝĂƟŽŶ ƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐ ĨŽƌ ƌĞŶƚĂů ĚŝƐƉƵƚĞƐ͕ ĂŶĚ ĂĚŵŝŶŝƐƚĞƌƐ ' ŐƌĂŶƚƐ ƚŚĂƚ ƐƵƉƉŽƌƚ ĂīŽƌĚĂďůĞ ŚŽŵĞŽǁŶĞƌƐŚŝƉ ĂŶĚ ŚŽŵĞ ƌĞƉĂŝƌƐ ĨŽƌ ĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƟĞƐ ŽĨ ĐŽůŽƌ ŝŶ ůŽǁͲŝŶĐŽŵĞ ĂƌĞĂƐ͘ • :ŽďƐ͘ ůů ĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƟĞƐ ŽĨ ĐŽůŽƌ ŝŶ ĞŶƚƌĂů ĂŶĚ ĂƐƚ ĞĂǀĞƌƚŽŶ͕ ĞdžĐĞƉƚ ĨŽƌ ^ůĂǀŝĐ ŚŽƵƐĞŚŽůĚƐ͕ ŚĂǀĞ ůŽǁĞƌ ŵĞĚŝĂŶ ŚŽƵƐĞŚŽůĚ ŝŶĐŽŵĞ ƚŚĂŶ ƚŚĞ tŚŝƚĞ ĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ͘ ĞĂǀĞƌƚŽŶ ƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƐ ' ŐƌĂŶƚƐ͕ ĂŶŶƵĂůůLJ͕ ƚŽ ŶŽŶƉƌŽĮƚƐ ƉƌŽǀŝĚŝŶŐ ƚĞĐŚŶŝĐĂů ĂƐƐŝƐƚĂŶĐĞ ƚŽ ƉĞŽƉůĞ ŽĨ color to increase household income via self-employment. The city ĂůƐŽ ƉĂƌƚŶĞƌƐ ǁŝƚŚ hŶŝƚĞ KƌĞŐŽŶ ŝŶ ŚŽƐƟŶŐ ƚŚĞ K> ƉƌŽŐƌĂŵ͕ Ă leadership development and civic engagement training for emerging immigrant and refugee leaders and leaders of color in Beaverton.

WůĂŶŶŝŶŐ ƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐ ĂůƐŽ ƐƚƌŝǀĞ ƚŽ ŝŶĐůƵĚĞ ŵƵůƟĐƵůƚƵƌĂů ĞŶŐĂŐĞŵĞŶƚ ƚŚĂƚ ƌĞĂĐŚĞƐ ƉĞŽƉůĞ ǁŚŽ ƚƌĂĚŝƟŽŶĂůůLJ ĂƌĞ ƵŶĚĞƌƌĞƉƌĞƐĞŶƚĞĚ ŝŶ ƉůĂŶŶŝŶŐ ĞīŽƌƚƐ͘ &Žƌ ĞdžĂŵƉůĞ͕ ƚŚĞ ĐŝƚLJ ŚŝƌĞĚ ŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ ŶŐĂŐĞŵĞŶƚ >ŝĂŝƐŽŶƐ ; >ƐͿ ƚŽ ĐŽŶĚƵĐƚ ŽƵƚƌĞĂĐŚ ĨŽƌ Ă ƉƌŽũĞĐƚ ŝŶǀŽůǀŝŶŐ ƚŚĞ ůůĞŶ ŽƵůĞǀĂƌĚ ŝƐƚƌŝĐƚ͕ ŚŽŵĞ ƚŽ Ă ƐŝŐŶŝĮĐĂŶƚ ŶƵŵďĞƌ ŽĨ ůŽǁͲŝŶĐŽŵĞ ŚŽƵƐĞŚŽůĚƐ͕ ŝŵŵŝŐƌĂŶƚƐ͕ ĂŶĚ ƌĞĨƵŐĞĞƐ͘ ^ƉĂŶŝƐŚ͕ ƌĂďŝĐ͕ <ŽƌĞĂŶ͕ ĂŶĚ ŚŝŶĞƐĞ >Ɛ ĂƌĞ ŵĞĞƟŶŐ ƉĞŽƉůĞ ŝŶ ƚŚĞŝƌ ŚŽŵĞƐ͕ ƌĞƐƚĂƵƌĂŶƚƐ͕ ĂŶĚ ƐĐŚŽŽůƐ ƚŽ ĚĞƚĞƌŵŝŶĞ ǁŚĂƚ ŝŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚƐ they want to see in their neighborhood. Having recently completed ĞŶŐĂŐĞŵĞŶƚ͕ ƚŚĞ ĐŝƚLJ ǁŝůů ƐŽŽŶ ĚĞǀĞůŽƉ ŐŽĂůƐ͕ ƉŽƚĞŶƟĂů ĂĐƟŽŶƐ ĂŶĚ ĂŶ ŝŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚĂƟŽŶ ƉůĂŶ ĨŽƌ ƚŚĞ ĨƵƚƵƌĞ ŽĨ ƚŚŝƐ ĚŝƐƚƌŝĐƚ͘

14

Beaverton’s Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Plan places a special emphasis on racial and ethnic diversity, and eliminating the barriers that exist ȱ ȱ ȱ color, immigrants ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ community.

CONCLUSION >ŝŬĞ ŵĂŶLJ ŽƚŚĞƌ ĐŝƟĞƐ ŝŶ ƚŚĞ ƌĞŐŝŽŶ͕ ĞĂǀĞƌƚŽŶ ŝƐ ĮŶĚŝŶŐ ŝƚ ĚŝĸĐƵůƚ ƚŽ ŵĞĞƚ ĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ ŶĞĞĚƐ͘ dŚĞ ĐŝƚLJ ŬŶŽǁƐ ƚŚĂƚ ĂĚĚŝŶŐ ƚŚĞ ƵƌďĂŶ reserve will not alleviate the current crunch in housing. The land will ŶŽƚ ďĞ ƌĞĂĚLJ ƚŽ ďƵŝůĚ ĨŽƌ Ă ŶƵŵďĞƌ ŽĨ LJĞĂƌƐ ʹ ŝƚ ƚĂŬĞƐ ƐŝŐŶŝĮĐĂŶƚ ƟŵĞ ƚŽ ĐƌĞĂƚĞ ƚŚĞ ƉŽůŝĐLJ ĨƌĂŵĞǁŽƌŬ ĂŶĚ ƚŽ ƉůĂŶ ĂŶĚ ĮŶĂŶĐĞ ƚŚĞ ŝŶĨƌĂƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞ͘ dŚĂƚ ƐĂŝĚ͕ ĂĚĚŝŶŐ ƚŚĞ ƵƌďĂŶ ƌĞƐĞƌǀĞ ŶŽǁ ƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƐ ƚŚĞ ĨŽƵŶĚĂƟŽŶ ĨŽƌ ĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ ƚŽ ŽĐĐƵƌ ŝŶ ĮǀĞ Žƌ ŵŽƌĞ LJĞĂƌƐ͘ ĞĂǀĞƌƚŽŶ ŚĂƐ ƐŚŽǁŶ͕ ŝŶ ^ŽƵƚŚ ŽŽƉĞƌ DŽƵŶƚĂŝŶ͕ ƚŚĂƚ ƚŚĞ ĐŝƚLJ ŚĂƐ ƚŚĞ ĐĂƉĂďŝůŝƚLJ ŽĨ ǁŽƌŬŝŶŐ ǁŝƚŚ ƚŚĞ ĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ ĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ ƚŽ ďƵŝůĚ ŶĞǁ ŶĞŝŐŚďŽƌŚŽŽĚƐ ŝŶ ĂŶ ƵƌďĂŶ ŐƌŽǁƚŚ ĞdžƉĂŶƐŝŽŶ ĂƌĞĂ͘ ůŽŶŐ ƚŚĞ ǁĂLJ͕ ƚŚĞ ĐŝƚLJ ŚĂƐ ůĞĂƌŶĞĚ ŵĂŶLJ ůĞƐƐŽŶƐ͕ ŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐ ĐŽŽƌĚŝŶĂƟŶŐ ŝŶĨƌĂƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞ ƐĞƌǀŝĐĞ ƉƌŽǀŝƐŝŽŶƐ͕ ƵƉĚĂƟŶŐ ƚŚĞ ĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ ĐŽĚĞ ƚŽ ƌĞŇĞĐƚ ƚŚĞ ƵŶŝƋƵĞ ĂƐƉĞĐƚƐ ŽĨ ůĂƌŐĞ ŐƌĞĞŶĮĞůĚ ĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚƐ͕ ĂŶĚ ďƵŝůĚŝŶŐ ƌĞůĂƟŽŶƐŚŝƉƐ ǁŝƚŚ ƉƌŽƉĞƌƚLJ ŽǁŶĞƌƐ ĂŶĚ ƚŚĞ ĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ ĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ͘ /Ŷ ĂĚĚŝƟŽŶ͕ ƚŚĞ ĐŝƚLJ ŚĂƐ ĂůƐŽ ŚŝƌĞĚ ĂĚĚŝƟŽŶĂů ĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ ƌĞǀŝĞǁ ƐƚĂī ŝŶ ĂŶƟĐŝƉĂƟŽŶ ŽĨ ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ ƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐ ŝŶ ƚŚĞ ƉŝƉĞůŝŶĞ͘ ĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ ŝŶ ƚŚĞ ŽŽƉĞƌ DŽƵŶƚĂŝŶ hƌďĂŶ ZĞƐĞƌǀĞ ǁŝůů ďĞŶĞĮƚ ĨƌŽŵ ƚŚĞƐĞ ůĞƐƐŽŶƐ ůĞĂƌŶĞĚ͕ ĞŶƐƵƌŝŶŐ ĂŶ ĞǀĞŶ smoother process. /Ŷ ĐŽŶĐůƵƐŝŽŶ͕ ĞĂǀĞƌƚŽŶ ŝƐ ĂƐŬŝŶŐ DĞƚƌŽ ƚŽ ĂĚĚ ƚŚĞ ƵƌďĂŶ ƌĞƐĞƌǀĞ ƚŽ ƚŚĞ UGB because the city needs more land for housing. The expansion will not only increase housing supply but also connect the urban reserve with ^ŽƵƚŚ ŽŽƉĞƌ DŽƵŶƚĂŝŶ ĂŶĚ EŽƌƚŚ ŽŽƉĞƌ DŽƵŶƚĂŝŶ͕ ŵĂŬŝŶŐ Ă ƌĞĂůŝƚLJ ŽĨ the vision established in the South Cooper Mountain Concept Plan. &ƵƚƵƌĞ EĞŝŐŚďŽƌŚŽŽĚƐ. ĞĂǀĞƌƚŽŶ ǁŝůů ĐƌĞĂƚĞ ůŝǀĂďůĞ͕ ǁĂůŬĂďůĞ ĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƟĞƐ ŝŶ ƚŚĞ in the Cooper Mountain Urban ZĞƐĞƌǀĞ ƚŚĂƚ ĐŽŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚ ĞdžŝƐƟŶŐ neighborhoods and commercial areas so the area is a part of greater Beaverton.

15

South Cooper Mountain

Community Plan December 2014

Funding for the South Cooper Mountain Concept & Community Plans was provided by Metro Community Planning & Development Grants, private contributions, and the City of Beaverton.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Beaverton City Council

Beaverton Planning Commission

Cate Arnold

Mimi Doukas, Vice Chair

Betty Bode

Greg Kiene

Denny Doyle, Mayor

Jennifer Nye

Mark Fagin, Council President

Kim Overhage, Chair

Ian King

Ric Stephens

Marc San Soucie

Linda Wilson Scott Winter

South Cooper Mountain Citizens Advisory Committee Ed Bartholemy, South Cooper Mountain (SCM) property owner Ed Chadwick, Bierly Family properties, SCM Kathy Cobb, Urban Reserve Area property owner John Cooper, Urban Reserve Area property owner Mimi Doukas, Chair, City of Beaverton Planning Commission; Kim Overhage (alternate), City of Beaverton Planning Commission David Dunahugh, Crescent Grove Cemetery Association, SCM property owner Ron Dyches, Dyches Family LLC, SCM property owner David Harrison, Beaverton Committee for Community Involvement (BCCI) Liles Garcia, Washington County Planning Commission, Community Planning Organization 6 Matt Grady, Gramor Development Dan Grimberg, Arbor Homes/Crescent Grove Cemetery property interest Barbara Gross, Cooper Mountain Winery, North Cooper Mountain (NCM) and SCM property owner Alton Harvey, Neighbors Southwest Neighborhood Association Committee (NAC) Martin Moore, Urban Reserve Area property owner Jamie Morgan-Stasny, Metropolitan Land Group, SCM property owner Boyce Smith, NCM property owner; Lori Smith (alternate), NCM property owner Brian Wegener, Tualatin Riverkeepers Ramsey Weit, Community Housing Fund Justin Wood, Homebuilders Association

Please see Appendix A for Project Committees and Team.

South Cooper Mountain Community Plan November 26, 2014

Page i

TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 1 Community Plan Boundary ........................................................................................................ 1 About the South Cooper Mountain Community Plan and Concept Plan ................................... 1 Planning Process ...................................................................................................................... 6 Planning Area Context .................................................................................................................. 7 Landscape Setting ..................................................................................................................... 7 Transportation Context .............................................................................................................. 8 Services and Service Providers ................................................................................................ 8 Community Plan Elements .......................................................................................................... 10 Guiding Principles: Overarching Policies for the South Cooper Mountain Community Plan ... 10 Land Use ................................................................................................................................. 12 Transportation ......................................................................................................................... 22 Resource Protection and Enhancement .................................................................................. 27 Infrastructure Provision ........................................................................................................... 31

South Cooper Mountain Community Plan November 26, 2014

Page ii

INTRODUCTION Community Plan Boundary

Figure 1: Community Plan Context Map

The South Cooper Mountain Community Plan encompasses approximately 544 acres located at the southwest edge of the City of Beaverton (see Figure 1). This area, referred to in this plan as the Community Plan area, was added to the Urban Growth Boundary in 2011 and was annexed by the City of Beaverton in 2013.1 The plan area is located generally north of SW Scholls Ferry Road, south of Horse Tale Drive, east of SW Tile Flat Road, and west of SW Loon Drive. The Community Plan area boundary is shown in Figure 2.

About the South Cooper Mountain Community Plan and Concept Plan The South Cooper Mountain Community Plan (Community Plan) was created as part of a larger planning effort that produced the South Cooper Mountain Concept Plan (Concept Plan). The Concept and Community Plans were developed through an intergovernmental process with extensive community involvement, described beginning on page 6.

The geographic scope and role of each document are summarized below.

South Cooper Mountain Concept Plan The Concept Plan establishes the overall vision and long range planning strategies2 for South Cooper Mountain, and guides comprehensive planning for areas within the Urban Growth Boundary (UGB).

There are three subareas referenced in Concept Plan: 

The South Cooper Mountain Annexation Area, now referred to as the South Cooper Mountain Community Plan area – the 544-acre area within the UGB and the City of Beaverton that is the subject of this Community Plan;3



The Urban Reserve Area – the 1,242-acre area of land designated as Urban Reserve north of the Community Plan area;4 and

1

During much of the process that led to the creation of this plan, this area was referred to as the South Cooper Mountain Annexation Area (SCMAA).

2

The Concept Plan includes near-term recommendations which guide planning and development in the next twenty years, and long-term recommendations intended to guide planning and development in the 20-50 year time frame.

3

This is the subject area of this Community Plan, and is referred to herein as the Community Plan area.

4

The Urban Reserve adjacent to the Community Plan area was called Urban Reserve 6B during the Urban and Rural Reserves designation process. For more on the Urban and Rural Reserves program, visit http://www.oregonmetro.gov/index.cfm/go/by.web/id=26257.

South Cooper Mountain Community Plan November 26, 2014

Page 1



North Cooper Mountain – a 504-acre area included within the Urban Growth Boundary in 2002 that is within the urban area of unincorporated Washington County.

These subareas are displayed in Figure 3.

Pursuant to Metro Urban Growth Management Functional Plan (UGMFP) Title 11,5 a concept plan is intended to guide, not bind, amendments to city or county comprehensive plans or land use regulations following addition of an area to the UGB. The SCM Concept Plan lays the groundwork for amendments to City of Beaverton and Washington County comprehensive plans and land use regulations that will implement the plan. The Concept Plan also serves to guide and help coordinate future planning and infrastructure investments by the City of Beaverton and other service providers. The Concept Plan sets the stage for: coordinated and cohesive land use patterns; transportation networks; trails, bicycle and pedestrian networks; natural resource protection; access to Cooper Mountain Nature Park; public services and facilities; and infrastructure funding.

In compliance with Metro requirements,6 the Concept Plan is inclusive of land within the 1,242 acre Figure 2: SCM Community Plan Boundary Map

5

Metro UGMFP Title 11, section 3.07.1110 Planning for Areas Designated Urban Reserve.

6

Metro Ord. No. 11-1264B, Exhibit B, South Cooper Mountain, condition #1: “The city of Beaverton, in coordination with Washington County and Metro, shall adopt comprehensive plan provisions and land use regulations for Area 3 to authorize urbanization, pursuant to Metro Code section 3.07.1120. To implement Principle 1 of Exhibit B to the Reserves IGA between Metro and Washington County, the city shall undertake and complete this planning for the whole of Urban Reserve Area 6B, in order to provide appropriate protection and enhancement to the public lands and natural features, and protect and enhance the integrity of Titles 3 and 13 resources in the area. Planning for trail and pedestrian and bicycle travel shall be coordinated with Metro and the county to ensure appropriate access to Cooper Mountain Nature Park.”

South Cooper Mountain Community Plan November 26, 2014

Page 2

Urban Reserve Area, as well as the 544-acre area recently added to the UGB and annexed into Beaverton.

The landscape character of the Concept Pan area is illustrated in Figure 4, and the Concept Plan map is shown in Figure 5.

Figure 3: South Cooper Mountain Concept Plan Subareas

South Cooper Mountain Community Plan November 26, 2014

Page 3

Figure 4: South Cooper Mountain Concept Plan Landscape Character

South Cooper Mountain Community Plan November 26, 2014

Page 4

Figure 5: South Cooper Mountain Concept Plan Map

South Cooper Mountain Community Plan November 26, 2014

Page 5

South Cooper Mountain Community Plan The South Cooper Mountain Community Plan is part of the City’s Comprehensive Plan. It provides regulatory policies and maps, along with descriptions and illustrations of the context for those policies and maps. The Community Plan was developed in compliance with Metro’s requirements for new urban areas, which are codified in Title 11 of Metro’s Urban Growth Management Functional Plan. It addresses only the 544 acres that are within the City of Beaverton, and is intended to implement the vision established by the Concept Plan for the South Cooper Mountain area.

Planning Process The Concept and Community Plans were developed through an 18-month planning process that included a variety of opportunities for input from stakeholders and the general public. A Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) composed of staff from affected jurisdictions, agencies, service providers and districts, provided input and guidance to the project team about technical aspects of the planning process. A Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC) composed of community representatives including residents, property owners, businesses, developers, city and county planning commissioners, citizen involvement organizations, advocacy groups, and other affected stakeholders provided feedback to the project team throughout the planning process. In addition, the Beaverton City Council and Planning Commission provided direction at key milestones during the planning process. The general public was invited to participate at key points through open houses, online workshops, and community outreach meetings.

The first phase of the planning process included establishment of Guiding Principles for the project (see page 10) followed by study and documentation of existing conditions and future needs in the planning area. The project team evaluated land use, transportation, the real estate market, water and sewer infrastructure, stormwater, natural resources, parks, and energy as a part of the existing conditions assessment.7 The second phase of the project began with a visioning workshop, attended by roughly 60 interested parties, with another 20 people participating through an online version of the workshop. This workshop solicited input on priorities and preferences for future land use and transportation scenarios in the Concept Plan area. Results of this workshop were used to develop three initial Concept Plan “scenarios” addressing future land use and transportation patterns for the planning area.8 These three scenarios were vetted by the project’s TAC and CAC and then fully analyzed to evaluate and compare transportation, infrastructure, park, school, natural resource, and land use implications. Based on the findings from the scenario evaluation, two hybrid scenarios were created that combined the bestperforming elements of the three original scenarios. The two hybrid scenarios were discussed by the TAC and CAC and shared with the public at an open house and community outreach meetings. Based on input from those groups, a preferred scenario was developed. That preferred scenario became the basis for the Concept Plan and for the more detailed and refined set of recommendations that are embodied in this Community Plan.

7

South Cooper Mountain Concept & Community Plans, SUMMARY REPORT: Existing Conditions & Future Needs, June 6, 2013.

8

South Cooper Mountain Concept & Community Plans, Scenarios for Future Growth, September 12, 2013.

South Cooper Mountain Community Plan November 26, 2014

Page 6

PLANNING AREA CONTEXT Landscape Setting The Community Plan area sits at the base of the south slope of Cooper Mountain. The topography gradually climbs up in elevation moving north from Scholls Ferry Road (at approximately 300’ elevation), with several small hills and hummocks. There are four distinct high points that present constraints with respect to road connectivity, but also provide opportunities for viewpoints and the shaping of development patterns. Views are primarily to the southwest, capturing the scenic vista of Chehalem Ridge. Views of Mt. Hood to the east are available from the central high point.

The Community Plan area includes three small tributaries of the Tualatin River. The central tributary is surrounded by a chain of linked upland, riparian forest and wetland areas that provide important habitat value. The remaining tributaries have been degraded by farming and forestry activities. All three tributaries are recognized as resource areas under state, regional and local regulations.

Figure 6: Community Plan Area Topography and Resources

Of the 544 total acres in the Community Plan area, roughly 364 acres are considered developable after accounting for natural resource and slope constraints. The 364 acres represent a “gross buildable

South Cooper Mountain Community Plan November 26, 2014

Page 7

acreage”, and includes land for future roads, stormwater management facilities, civic uses such as parks and schools9, and commercial and residential development.

Transportation Context East-west and north-south connections are limited both within and around the Community Plan area, and several important area roadways that serve regional traffic are nearing capacity. SW Scholls Ferry Road and SW 175th Avenue / Roy Rogers Road in particular carry large volumes of through-traffic.

North-south commute patterns between Tualatin / Sherwood / Yamhill County and Washington County employment destinations rely heavily on SW 175th Avenue, despite its terrain, narrow width, and sharp curves. SW Tile Flat and SW Grabhorn Roads presently serve more through-traffic than their current rural nature and sharp curves would suggest. SW Tile Flat Road forms the western edge of the UGB in the Community Plan area.

Roads within the Community Plan area are not currently built to urban standards, and need improvements to resolve safety issues and accommodate new growth. There are no sidewalks or bike lanes at this time because existing roads were designed according to rural road standards.10 Other existing issues in the vicinity include the “kink” or hairpin turn on SW 175th Avenue at High Hill Lane, the skewed intersection at SW Kemmer Road and SW 175th Avenue, the multiple 90-degree turns on SW Grabhorn Road, and congestion at the intersection of Roy Rogers Road / 175th Avenue and SW Scholls Ferry Road. The closest transit service is available on SW Scholls Ferry Road at SW Teal Boulevard.

Transportation is the most-often cited concern of area residents, including motorist safety, bicycle and pedestrian safety, and traffic congestion.

Services and Service Providers Service providers for the Community Plan area and the current public facilities and services available to the area are summarized below. Future facilities needed to serve the area are described under “Institutional / Civic Uses” starting on page 15 for schools and parks and under “Infrastructure Provision” starting on page 31 for water, sewer, and stormwater.

Drinking Water & Sanitary Sewer The City of Beaverton will provide drinking water to the Community Plan area, although the Tualatin Valley Water District (TVWD) also has water distribution lines adjacent to the northeastern side of the Community Plan area. The City has existing water lines in SW Loon Drive and within the Churchill Forest subdivision to the east of the Community Plan area as well as a new line within SW Scholls Ferry Road as far west as SW 175th Avenue.

9

The planned Beaverton School District future high school, the location of which has been determined and land has been acquired, is not included in the “developable” acreage.

10

As of the writing of this Community Plan, SW Scholls Ferry Road is being widened by Washington County, including sidewalks and bike lanes within the UGB, with concurrent extension of sanitary sewer and water lines by the cities of Beaverton and Tigard.

South Cooper Mountain Community Plan November 26, 2014

Page 8

The City of Beaverton will be responsible for providing sanitary sewer infrastructure in the Community Plan area through an inter-governmental agreement (IGA) with Clean Water Services (CWS). The closest existing sewer facilities are located to the southeast of the Community Plan area, including a new line recently extended in SW Scholls Ferry Road as far west as SW 175th Avenue.

Fire and Public Safety Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue (TVF&R) provides fire and emergency medical services in the area. The TVF&R station closest to the Community Plan area is Station 69 on SW 175th Avenue south of SW Kemmer Road.

The Beaverton Police Department (BPD) provides law enforcement within the Community Plan area.

All BPD public services are provided through the main police department offices in Beaverton City Hall, which is the base of operations for all BPD personnel. In addition, there are inter-governmental agreements in place for emergency response that allow Sheriff’s deputies from Washington County to respond to calls within city limits based on proximity, regardless of boundaries.

Schools and Parks The Community Plan area is divided, with the Beaverton School District (BSD) serving the eastern portion, and the Hillsboro School District (HSD) serving the western portion. BSD is planning to build a new high school within the Community Plan area, at the northwest corner of SW Scholls Ferry Road and SW 175th Avenue. The site is roughly 45 acres, and will include a comprehensive high school along with sports fields and other facilities. The closest existing BSD elementary school is Scholls Heights Elementary, located just east of the Community Plan area on SW Loon Drive. On the Hillsboro School District (HSD) side, the nearest elementary school is Groner Elementary, which is located several miles west of the plan area.

The Beaverton School Facility Plan was updated and adopted as part of the city’s comprehensive plan in 2010. The Hillsboro School District last updated Population and Enrollment Forecasts in April 2012.

These plans were considered in determining the amount of land and improvements needed for public school facilities to serve the SCM Community Plan area, as required by Metro.11 Tualatin Hills Park and Recreation District (THPRD) is anticipated to be the primary park and recreation service provider for the Community Plan area.12 The city’s Development Code currently does not require annexation to THPRD if it can be demonstrated that commensurate parks and recreational facilities can be provided by the developer.13

11

Per Metro UGMFP Title 11, 3.07.1120.C.5.

12

THPRD is the designated service provider for the Community Plan area, as well as for the URA to the north; however, property owners are not required to annex into the district.

13

Per Section 40.93 of the Beaverton Community Development Code (Tualatin Hills Park And Recreation District Annexation Waiver), an applicant may request approval of a Tualatin Hills Park and Recreation District (THPRD) Annexation Waiver which would waive the requirement to annex property into the District as a condition of approval of any development as specified in Section 60.33 of the Development Code. A THPRD annexation waiver may only be requested by the property owner(s) for any development proposed outside of THPRD boundaries who wish to provide their own park and recreation facilities and services rather than annex the site to THPRD. South Cooper Mountain Community Plan November 26, 2014

Page 9

Libraries The City, as a member of the Washington County Cooperative Library Services (WCCLS) receives funding to support library services from Washington County. The branch closest to the study area is the Beaverton City Library at Murray Scholls, an approximately 10,500 square foot facility located in the Murray Scholls Town Center. The Murray-Scholls branch library is heavily used and the City is currently looking to lease additional space to expand library services in south Beaverton.

Solid Waste & Recycling The City of Beaverton Solid Waste & Recycling program regulates seven franchised haulers and sets rates for the collection of garbage, recycling and yard debris from all customers within the city limits.

Waste Management (WM) of Oregon is the hauler in the area.

Electricity & Natural Gas Portland General Electric (PGE) provides electric power to the area in and around the area. There is a new substation located immediately south of the Community Plan area across Scholls Ferry Road.

NW Natural provides natural gas to customers in the vicinity of the Community Plan area. A natural gas transmission pipeline runs down SW Scholls Ferry Road to SW Roy Rogers Road at the southern edge of the Community Plan area and another runs down SW Scholls Ferry Road to SW Pleasant Valley Road southwest of the Community Plan area; a third runs within the power line easement east of the Community Plan area.14

COMMUNITY PLAN ELEMENTS Guiding Principles: Overarching Policies for the South Cooper Mountain Community Plan Context The policies listed below are refined policy statements from the SCM Guiding Principles.15 These policies established the foundation for, and helped shape, the South Cooper Mountain Concept Plan.

Developed in 2013, the original Guiding Principles captured ideas from previous planning work and agreements by the City of Beaverton, Metro and Washington County, and, added new vision statements agreed upon by the TAC and the CAC. The principles served as broad criteria for decision making for the entire 2,300-acre SCM Concept Plan area, including the Community Plan area. In this Community Plan, the guiding principles serve as overarching policies.

14

Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, National Pipeline Mapping System Public Map Viewer: https://www.npms.phmsa.dot.gov/PublicViewer/, accessed 4/30/13. These do not include distribution pipelines serving individual users.

15

Please see South Cooper Mountain Concept Plan for the full text of the Guiding Principles.

South Cooper Mountain Community Plan November 26, 2014

Page 10

Overarching Policies 1. Implement the Concept Plan. Implement the South Cooper Mountain Concept Plan in a comprehensive and proactive manner, through the: Comprehensive Plan; Development Code; land use reviews; infrastructure planning; natural resource planning; coordination with service providers; capital improvement planning; community involvement, and other means as needed.

2. Create Beaverton’s next great community. Create a community that is walkable, family-friendly, livable, and includes quality neighborhoods, great green spaces, community focal points, a Main Street, and well-designed development.

3. Create a sustainable community. Create a community that meets the needs of Beaverton and the South Cooper Mountain area today and tomorrow, while minimizing negative environmental, social, and economic impacts. Support low-carbon economies and lifestyles, energy efficiency and security, health and well-being, and ecosystem stewardship; and enable future residents and the broader community to meet their own needs.

4. Implement a realistic funding plan for infrastructure. Work closely with the public and private sector to implement the SCM Infrastructure Funding Plan. Coordinate with Tigard, Washington County, and all service providers to plan, fund and deliver the infrastructure needed to implement community plans on South Cooper Mountain.

5. Provide housing choices. Provide a variety of housing types and densities to provide options for a range of income levels. Provide housing choices consistent with the overall housing needs of Beaverton.

6. Provide transportation options. Provide a well-connected transportation network that promotes options for all modes of travel, and encourages walking, biking and future transit service. Address north-south, east-west, and other regional travel issues in coordination with neighboring cities, Washington County, Metro, Tri-Met and Oregon Department of Transportation.

7. Provide appropriate protection, enhancement and access to Cooper Mountain’s natural resources and public lands. Avoid and minimize impacts, protect key natural resources, and design new growth so that it is integrated with natural areas and other open spaces. Provide appropriately located access to natural areas and open space.

8. Coordinate with regional requirements and plans. Coordinate with Metro, Washington County, Tigard and other governments regarding Urban Growth Boundary expansion areas and Urban Reserves. Coordinate transportation planning with the 2035 Regional Transportation Plan and Regional Transportation Functional Plan. Promote connections from South Cooper Mountain to the area’s regional trails and green spaces.

9. Coordinate with other planning in the area. Coordinate with the River Terrace and South Hillsboro Community Plans. Coordinate with planning for regional water facilities. As additional planning projects in the area are identified, provide information and promote coordination with the South Cooper Mountain Concept Plan.

10. Ensure that the plan complements existing neighborhoods and commercial areas so that South Cooper Mountain is a part of greater Beaverton.

11. Plan new civic uses so they are focal points for the community. Ensure schools, parks and other civic uses are centers of community activity. Integrate the planned new high school with neighborhoods and other development within the plan.

South Cooper Mountain Community Plan November 26, 2014

Page 11

12. Promote compatibility with adjacent rural areas. Promote compatibility between urban uses and agricultural/forestry uses outside the Urban Growth Boundary.

Land Use Land Use Implementation Context Land Use Designations Land use designations for the South Cooper Mountain Community Plan area are shown on the Land Use Map (Figure 7). The Land Use Map is the term used for the Comprehensive Plan Map in the City of Beaverton Comprehensive Plan.16 The designations on the Land Use Map displayed in Figure 7 serve as the Comprehensive Plan designations for the area. They are implemented by zoning districts as listed in Chapter 3.14 of the Comprehensive Plan and as shown in the Zoning District Matrix included in Table 1 below.

16

The Land Use Map published in this document is advisory - the city’s official Land Use Map is the controlling map of Comprehensive Plan designations.

South Cooper Mountain Community Plan November 26, 2014

Page 12

Figure 7: Community Plan Land Use Map

Table 1: Comprehensive Plan and Zoning District Matrix

Comprehensive Plan and Zoning District Matrix: South Cooper Mountain Community Plan Comprehensive Plan Designation

Zoning District

Near-Term Land Use Development Type from SCM Concept Plan

Standard Density Residential

R7, R5

Single Family Neighborhood

Medium Density Residential

R4, R2

Compact Neighborhood 50% of Urban Neighborhood

High Density Residential

R1

50% of Urban Neighborhood

Main Street

Neighborhood Service, R1, R2

Main Street Commercial

South Cooper Mountain Community Plan November 26, 2014

Page 13

The Land Use Map and Zoning Strategy – Balancing Certainty and Flexibility The Land Use Map designations have been applied to implement the South Cooper Mountain Concept Plan. The boundaries of the Land Use designations are intended to reflect key outcomes of the Concept Plan, for example: 

Providing a transition of density from areas of higher density (e.g. along SW Scholls Ferry Road) to areas of lower density (e.g. near SW Loon Drive).



Coordinating land use with the network of arterial streets, collectors, neighborhood routes, and local streets.



Protecting natural resource areas and integrating them as amenities for future development.



Providing a range of residential areas that ultimately result in a variety of housing types, neighborhood framework, and amount of new housing that is consistent with the estimates made in the South Cooper Mountain Concept Plan.

For all of the above reasons, the boundaries of the Land Use designations follow the intended outcomes of the Concept Plan. In some cases, the boundaries follow property lines; in other cases they follow planned roads or logical dimensions between property lines, resulting in more than one designation on a parcel. It is anticipated and expected that refinements to the boundaries of the Land Use designations may be needed as zoning is applied when land use applications are brought forward.

The zoning map for the Community Plan will be created over time through review of development proposals that implement the density of the land use designations. This approach allows for implementation of zoning districts based upon community designs that are sensitive to existing topography and responsive to unknown constraints associated with design and construction of new infrastructure, but still satisfy the density goals of the Community Plan. This approach is intended to achieve a balance of certainty and flexibility. The City’s intent is to: 

Implement the vision and concepts described in the Concept Plan;



Implement the policies in this Community Plan and applicable requirements of the Beaverton Development Code and other regulations; and, Provide flexibility for phased development and adjustments needed for site specific conditions, design ideas, and market needs.

Provide an efficient process for applying new zoning, through use of the City’s zone map amendment procedures, where applicable.

 

The Land Use Implementation Policies describe the steps and requirements that the City will use to achieve a balance of certainty and flexibility for land use in the Community Plan area.

Overall Development Program The overall development program for the Community Plan area is summarized in Table 2 by Land Use designation, with the projected dwelling unit capacity of each district, and total for the planning area.

For the Medium and Standard Density Residential comprehensive plan designations, capacity estimates are provided based on assumptions of the mix of the R-2 vs. R-4 and R-5 vs. R-7 zones, respectively, that are consistent with the Concept Plan. Capacity estimates for all residential zones do South Cooper Mountain Community Plan November 26, 2014

Page 14

not include the land needed for civic / institutional uses. Civic/institutional uses are identified in Table 3 – they are typically conditional uses in residential zones and the assumed acreage for these uses has been deducted from the table below.

Table 2: Land Use Designations and Capacity Estimates

Land Use Designation

Gross Acres17

Gross Residential Acres18

Net Residential Acres19

Assumed Mix of Zones

Estimated Housing Capacity (units)20

Minimum Housing Capacity (units)21

High Density

109

59

27

100% R-1

1,090

950

Medium Density

237

221

128

30% R-2 70% R-4

1,810

1,450

Standard Density

170

159

89

30% R-5 70% R-7

620

500

Main Street

9

0

0

100% NS

N/A

N/A

Total

525

438

245

3,530

2,900

Institutional / Civic Uses The need for the following civic uses has been identified through the planning process in order to meet the needs of the new growth. School needs were coordinated with the Beaverton School District and the Hillsboro School District. Park needs were coordinated with the Tualatin Hills Park and Recreation District.

Table 3: Civic Use Land Needs

Use

Estimated Land Need

Neighborhood Parks

Nine to 11 acres (three to four parks)

Elementary Schools

20 acres (two 10-acre school sites)

High School

45 acres (BSD high school site)

17

Gross acres in Table 2 excludes existing right-of-way, which accounts for the difference from the 544-acre total area of the SCM Community Plan area.

18

Excludes land for civic uses. In the Main Street designation, does not include land assumed to be designated NS. While residential uses are allowed in the NS zone, this area is anticipated to be developed primarily with commercial uses.

19

Net acreage, as defined in the city’s development code, excludes street dedications, environmentally constrained lands, and land set aside in separate tracts or dedicated to a public entity for schools, parks, or open spaces.

20

The regulatory maximum capacity under the city’s Development Code is calculated based on gross acres, per section 20.25.15 of the Beaverton Development Code. However, this calculation produces an unrealistically high estimate of capacity that is rarely, if ever, achieved in practice. The more realistic estimate of capacity included in Table 2 was based on net acres and the allowed densities in each zone, consistent with the city’s capacity estimates for the rest of the city.

21

Minimum residential density is calculated based on net acres rather than gross acres. The minimum number of units is calculated by dividing 80% of the net acres by the minimum land area per unit.

South Cooper Mountain Community Plan November 26, 2014

Page 15

It is assumed that the service providers (THPRD and Beaverton and Hillsboro School Districts) will use their standard site selection and land acquisition processes to acquire the land needed for these facilities (BSD is already in possession of the 45-acre high school site). In addition, current development review practices provide for coordination through the requirement to obtain Service Provider Letters indicating that service levels are, or can be made to be, sufficient to support proposed development.

Land Use Implementation Policies 1. The City shall adopt a Land Use Map as part of the Community Plan that establishes initial comprehensive plan map designations for the South Cooper Mountain Community Plan area.

2. Washington County zoning, as administered by the City, shall remain in place until new City zoning is applied. Existing agricultural uses in the Community Plan area shall be allowed to continue until the property owner decides to transition to urban development and submits a development application to the City, at which time the property will be rezoned consistent with the Community Plan. City of Beaverton development code requirements are applicable to all site modifications, such as resource protection and grading standards, and shall be enforced throughout the SCM Community Plan area regardless of whether urban or rural zoning is in place.

3. Zoning may be applied22 through initiation by the City or as requested by an applicant. Zoning and development review applications may be requested concurrently. The mix of zones applied to a given development site shall be generally consistent with the assumed mix of zones shown in Table 2. Deviations of up to 10 percentage points may be allowed from the mix shown in Table 2 (e.g. if the mix shown is 30/70 then the deviation may be between 20/80 and 40/60). The percentage shall be calculated based on gross site acres.

4. Amendments to the boundaries of Land Use Map designations may be proposed as individual requests prior to development, or simultaneously when development is proposed. This policy is intended to provide a means for the Land Use map and zoning to be aligned with site-specific conditions, and the placement of roads, housing densities, parks, schools and other development that will occur incrementally over time.

5. All Land Use map amendments will be required to demonstrate consistency with all policies in this Community Plan in addition to applicable Comprehensive Plan policies, Development Code requirements, and other applicable regulations. In addition, amendments to the Land Use Map will be required to demonstrate that the affected neighborhood(s) (as depicted on Figure 8) continue to provide a mix of land use designations and opportunities for a variety of housing types. The goal of this policy is to ensure that South Cooper Mountain’s neighborhoods and livability are enhanced by variety in the type and design of housing.

6. The City will support efforts by THPRD and Beaverton and Hillsboro School Districts to find, acquire and develop appropriate sites for neighborhood parks and elementary schools within the Community Plan area. The following location criteria shall guide the selection of appropriate sites: a. Neighborhood Parks

22

Section 40.97 of the Development Code of the City of Beaverton (Zoning Map Amendment) outlines various applications used in applying City zoning to properties within the City.

South Cooper Mountain Community Plan November 26, 2014

Page 16

i. ii. iii. iv. v.

Two to four acres per neighborhood park of unconstrained, relatively level land for active recreation facilities Good frontage on a local street or Neighborhood Route with on-street parking Good connections to trails Focal points for neighborhoods, with walkable “catchment areas” Co-location adjacent to a school is highly desirable

b. Elementary Schools i. ii. iii. iv. v.

Eight to ten acres of unconstrained, relatively level land per elementary school Good access from Neighborhood Routes or Collector roads Generally not adjacent to an arterial road Focal points for neighborhoods, centrally-located within walkable attendance areas Opportunities to co-locate schools adjacent to parks should be sought

7. As a matter of policy and planning for neighborhood cohesiveness, the City encourages BSD and HSD to work toward an adjustment of the boundary that would result in all of the Community Plan area being served by BSD.

Neighborhoods and Housing Context Neighborhood Framework Existing topography, natural resources and existing and planned streets provide the backdrop for new neighborhoods in the Community Plan area. Conceptual neighborhood areas have been drawn and are illustrated as yellow subareas on Figure 8. (The purple subarea on Figure 8 is the site of the planned BSD high school.) Each neighborhood is ½ mile or less across, representing a walking distance of about 5 minutes from center of the neighborhood to its edge.

Housing Variety Providing a variety of housing types can improve the aesthetic character of the neighborhoods by avoiding large, monotonous areas of the same building form. A variety of housing also helps provide different housing types for different income levels.

Table 4 below lists the housing types and supporting uses that are allowed within each of the zones that will implement the Plan Designations of the Community Plan.

South Cooper Mountain Community Plan November 26, 2014

Page 17

Figure 8: Conceptual Neighborhoods

Table 4: Allowed Uses & Housing Types

Zoning District R-1 R-2 R-4 R-5 R-7 NS

Uses & Housing Types Allowed Attached housing, detached housing allowed outright; schools, parks, churches and certain other commercial & civic uses allowed conditionally Attached housing, detached housing allowed outright; schools, parks and, churches certain other commercial & civic uses allowed conditionally Detached housing allowed outright, limited attached housing allowed conditionally; schools, parks, churches and certain other commercial & civic uses allowed conditionally Detached housing allowed outright, duplexes allowed conditionally; schools, parks, churches and certain other commercial & civic uses allowed conditionally Detached housing allowed outright; schools, parks, churches and certain other commercial & civic uses allowed conditionally Many commercial uses, including retail, service, eating and drinking establishments, and offices allowed outright; attached and detached housing allowed conditionally; schools and parks allowed outright, churches and certain other civic uses allowed conditionally

South Cooper Mountain Community Plan November 26, 2014

Page 18

Housing Affordability Planning for a mix of housing types and densities allows construction of housing units that are affordable to different income levels. The neighborhood adjacent to the Main Street is an appropriate location for a small affordable housing development because it will be zoned for mixed use and high density, will have local shops, and will be close to future transit. However, the Main Street neighborhood is not the only suitable location. For the Community Plan area, it will be important to provide a variety of options and locations where affordable housing development is possible and can be integrated into neighborhoods as they develop.

The City’s existing policies and standards provide incentives for integration of affordable housing into Planned Unit Developments. The City also uses the following tools as affordable housing incentives: 

Tax exemptions for non-profits who provide affordable housing;



Fee waivers for planning and site review fees;



SDC waivers and subsidies;



Use of Community Development Block Grants to fund infrastructure serving affordable housing;



Acquisition, banking and write-downs of land; and



Assignment of staff to assist affordable housing projects through the funding, development review and permit process.

The City is also considering a new tool that would defer payment of SDCs until occupancy for housing that qualifies as affordable.

Neighborhood and Housing Policies 1. Development shall contribute to creating walkable neighborhoods. This policy is implemented by demonstrating consistency with the neighborhood design principles listed below: a. Clear focal points shall be provided. Focal points include but are not limited to: parks, schools, community gathering spaces, neighborhood services (i.e. day care), scenic viewpoints, and/or natural areas that are visually and physically accessible to the public. Residential developments shall provide at least one focal point per 40 acres of gross site area. The decision-making authority may require additional focal points or require provision of a focal point for smaller sites in order to ensure that all neighborhoods have at least one focal point or to ensure cohesiveness and legibility among adjacent developments. b. A network of walkable blocks and trails, consistent with the Transportation Framework Plan and the Bicycle and Pedestrian Framework Plan, shall be provided. c. The orientation of streets, blocks, development and/or trails shall be planned so that natural areas are not “walled off”, but rather are as physically and visually accessible to the public as practicable. d. The provision of parks shall be coordinated with the Tualatin Hills Park and Recreation District.

South Cooper Mountain Community Plan November 26, 2014

Page 19

2. Residential developments shall provide a variety of housing types consistent with the applicable zone(s). The goal of this policy and implementing code standards is to ensure that, over time and multiple individual development reviews, South Cooper Mountain’s neighborhoods and livability are enhanced by variety in the type and design of housing in order to promote aesthetically pleasing residential neighborhoods as well as opportunities for people of varying incomes and life stages to live within the same neighborhood.

3. The City will support efforts to provide affordable housing in South Cooper Mountain. The City will evaluate the feasibility of pro-active involvement in affordable housing projects and supportive programs benefiting South Cooper Mountain.

Figure 9: Neighborhood Design Principles in a Medium Density Residential Neighborhood

Network of walkable blocks

Variety of housing types

Natural areas are physically and visually accessible

School as neighborhood focal point Additional setback adjacent to rural area

South Cooper Mountain Community Plan November 26, 2014

Colocation of school and neighborhood park

Page 20

Main Street Context “Main Streets” are a “design type” identified in Metro’s 2040 Growth Concept. As described in Chapter 3 of the Comprehensive Plan, they are intended to include small-scale retail and services to serve adjacent neighborhoods, along with some medium- to high-density housing, and should have access to transit. The City’s goal is to provide Main Street areas with a vibrant mix of neighborhood commercial and residential uses in a pedestrian friendly environment that includes wide sidewalks with pedestrian amenities. They are intended to develop as cohesive communities with design features promoting an urban scale and pedestrian environment. The Main Street Comprehensive Plan designation is implemented by the Neighborhood Service, R1 and R2 zones.

The SCM Main Street is planned to be located adjacent to the planned BSD high school (see Figure 7 and 8), creating a community focal point and potential future transit node. Visibility from Scholls Ferry Road, and proximity to the High School, are key location and site planning criteria for the Main Street.

It is planned to have a clear structure of blocks, and direct street and trail connections to the nearby neighborhoods, the high school, and the emerging River Terrace neighborhood located to the south of SCM in Tigard. Strong street, pedestrian and bike connections will support the success of the businesses in the Main Street and reduce reliance on the automobile for future SCM residents to meet their daily needs. The more pedestrian-oriented the Main Street is designed to be, the more it will establish a unique identity and draw community use.

The amount of land designated for a future Main Street was determined based on a market study considering the estimated household expenditures of existing and future residents of the South Cooper Mountain Concept Plan area. Because the portion of household expenditures on neighborhood retail varies widely, based on availability of retail, how accessible it is, and the appeal of the retail to nearby households, there is some inherent uncertainty in how much retail area the market will demand and support at this particular location. The visible location along Scholls Ferry Road and proximity to employees, students and community events at the High School are intended to enhance the viability of the retail on Main Street.

Main Street Policies 1. Plan the Main Street area to provide local shopping opportunities. Main Street should complement and not compete with larger centers such as Progress Ridge.

2. Ensure that the Main Street area is designed as a pedestrian-oriented center that also provides for excellent accessibility by car and bicycle.

3. Ensure that the Main Street area is designed to have a complementary relationship with the adjacent High School and associated civic and recreational uses. Access and pedestrian routes should be coordinated. Uses within the Main Street should support the school district’s policies for healthy food choices and active lifestyles.

4. The design of the Main Street are should follow these principles: a. Land uses and circulation should be organized into a series of walkable blocks.

South Cooper Mountain Community Plan November 26, 2014

Page 21

b. Buildings should be oriented to the street along key routes. The City should consider tailored building orientation standards so that the storefront character is continuous along the most active edges of the blocks. c. Mixed use buildings, 2 stories and taller, are encouraged. d. Future transit should be anticipated and accommodated. e. Public gathering spaces should be accommodated through a plaza, festival street, or parking area that can be converted to Saturday-market type use during community events.

Transportation Streets Context The existing major roadways that flank and run through the Community Plan area – SW Scholls Ferry Road on the south, SW 175th Avenue through the plan area, and SW Tile Flat Road on the west – have evolved over time. Historically they were farm-to-market roads and rural access routes. With the success of employment centers to the north and south, and the urbanization of the suburban communities in the Metro area, they have become even more important for regional commuting and local trips between the nearby communities. These roads will continue to serve as important routes to and through the plan area, as the land use context of south Cooper Mountain transitions from rural to urban. As urban development occurs, these arterials will provide an important new role as streets directly adjacent to urban neighborhoods, schools, and a Main Street. Accordingly, the policies in this section are intended to guide a balanced approach that provides for mobility and pedestrian safety, walking, biking, future transit, and access to urban uses.

SW Scholls Ferry Road, SW 175th Avenue and SW Tile Flat Road are under the jurisdiction of Washington County and are subject to County road standards. The policies of this plan pertaining to those streets are intended to guide selection of appropriate design treatments within the range of options allowed by the County in consultation and close coordination with the City of Beaverton and City of Tigard. A continued partnership approach will help the successful implementation of the planned transportation facilities, and adjacent land uses, in the area over time.

There are few alternatives today to the existing major roads, which all experience congestion during peak commute times. There is a need to supplement the arterial network with a connected network of collectors, neighborhood routes, and local streets to provide continuous routes that are parallel to the arterials and can offer access to and through new neighborhoods as they develop.

With several busy arterial roads bounding and splitting the Community Plan area, and important planned pedestrian destinations adjacent to them (including the future high school site and the planned Main Street area), thoughtfully designed and located pedestrian crossings will be critical to ensuring safe pedestrian access throughout the plan area. Pedestrian and bicycle connections to the planned high school and to River Terrace are particularly important for providing safe routes to school and walking and biking access that connects South Cooper Mountain and River Terrace.

South Cooper Mountain Community Plan November 26, 2014

Page 22

Figure 10: Community Plan Street Framework

Street Policies 1. The streets planned for the Community Plan area are illustrated in Figure 10. The Beaverton Transportation System Plan and Washington County Transportation System Plans will be updated consistent with Figure 10 and will be the controlling documents for transportation planning. Should conflicts arise between the maps in Chapter 6 of the City’s Comprehensive Plan and the maps in this document, those in Chapter 6 shall prevail.

2. The City of Beaverton will work with the Beaverton School District, the City of Tigard, Washington County, Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue, Tualatin Hills Park and Recreation District, and other service providers to establish appropriate access and circulation serving the community.

3. SW Scholls Ferry Road, SW 175th Avenue, and SW Tile Flat Road are under Washington County jurisdiction. The City of Beaverton will coordinate with Washington County through transportation facility design and land use regulations and review to recognize and balance the urban mobility needs with the multi-modal urban community functions of these key roadways. The city will advocate for the objectives for each street provided below during planning and design for improvement projects affecting those streets within the Community Plan area. a. SW 175th Avenue within the Community Plan area shall be improved through a coordinated approach between the City, County and adjacent land owners. The City shall proactively initiate this coordination. SW 175th Avenue should be designed to provide for mobility needs and provide an attractive and welcoming entrance to the area. Safe, protected pedestrian crossing opportunities shall be provided near important pedestrian destinations, such as the future high South Cooper Mountain Community Plan November 26, 2014

Page 23

school site, when a need is demonstrated and such crossings are appropriately and safely designed and located. b. SW Scholls Ferry Road adjacent to the Community Plan area should be designed to provide for efficient movement of vehicles, including freight, but should also provide for safe bicycle and pedestrian facilities, especially in the vicinity of the Main Street. The City of Beaverton will work with City of Tigard and Washington County to explore coordinated access, and a pedestrian crossing, in the vicinity of the high school and Main Street. c. SW Tile Flat Road adjacent to the Community Plan area should retain a rural design, particularly on the west side adjacent to land designated as Rural Reserve. All expansions requiring additional right-of-way should be to the east (urban) side. Safe bicycle and pedestrian movements shall be accommodated by a shared-use pathway adjacent to the road on the east side, with trees and other landscaping to provide a visual buffer to adjacent rural lands.

4. The new east-west Collector street is intended to provide a parallel route to SW Scholls Ferry Road that connects through the full width of the Community Plan area. This street shall be designed to provide a safe and comfortable connection for pedestrians and bicyclists as well as cars and to create a clear, direct and convenient route that connects the eastern, northern and western neighborhoods.

5. The new north-south Collector road from SW Scholls Ferry Road through the Community Plan area is intended to provide connectivity through the Community Plan area.

6. North of SW Scholls Ferry Road, this new collector shall serve as the Main Street area of South Cooper Mountain. The Main Street section of this Collector road shall be designated as a Major Pedestrian Route. Pedestrian-oriented features appropriate to a Main Street and features that encourage cars to travel more slowly through the Main Street area should be emphasized in design of the road.

7. The alignment of the North-South Collector shall account for, and not preclude, future extension to the west to SW Grabhorn Road and south to serve Urban Reserve 6C. 8. Within the Community Plan area, new neighborhoods shall be served and linked by a connected network of streets. Neighborhood Route connections shall provide connectivity between neighborhoods. The preferred network is illustrated in Figure 10. The City may permit flexibility to adapt to site specific conditions and ownerships provided the conceptual network in Figure 10, or equivalent, is provided.

9. The City shall coordinate with Washington County to evaluate the need for, and feasibility of, any proposed Neighborhood Route connections to Arterial roads.

10. In refining specific alignments for new roads identified on the Community Plan Street Framework map through the development review or project design process, impacts to natural resources shall be minimized to the extent possible while retaining key connections.

11. Low Impact Development and “green street” techniques to manage stormwater runoff shall be utilized whenever feasible in the design of new streets and urban upgrades within the SCM Community Plan area, subject to the approval of the City Engineer.

12. Conceptual Road: New roads shown located outside the current Urban Growth Boundary (UGB). Conceptual Roads demonstrate how roads within city limits may be extended or connected South Cooper Mountain Community Plan November 26, 2014

Page 24

in the long-term future. Alignments and functional classifications of Conceptual Roads are preliminary, tentative, and may ultimately be under the jurisdiction of another body.

Bicycle and Pedestrian Framework Context Provision of a diverse and connected bicycle and pedestrian network consistent with regional active transportation goals is one of the great opportunities for the Community Plan area. The bicycle and pedestrian network will provide for local travel on bike and on foot, and support the overarching goal to create Beaverton’s next great community. The network also serves to connect to destinations outside of the Community Plan area, such as Cooper Mountain Nature Park, the future Cooper Mountain Regional Trail, and River Terrace’s trail system.

While the ultimate trail widths and designs will be determined at time of design and development, the following trail typology is recommended for planning purposes, based on THPRD’s 2006 Trails Plan: 



Community Multi-Use Trails: These trails link important land uses and areas of interest with one another and connect users to the regional trail system. They are assumed to be paved paths that accommodate pedestrians (including those with disabilities) and bicyclists, recognizing that topographic constraints may be challenging. Within the planning area, it is assumed that multi-use trails that parallel roadways will be separated by a landscaped area.

Trail width should be 8 to 10 feet paved width one- to two-foot gravel shoulders.

Pedestrian-Only Nature Trails: These are assumed to be soft-surface trails that are for pedestrians only (though they should be accessible to those with disabilities whenever feasible).

They provide connections through and along natural areas, including links to the Cooper Mountain Nature Park trail system. Widths may range from 3 to 8 feet.

A conceptual bicycle and pedestrian framework plan is included in Figure 11, illustrating the plan to achieve the policy objectives listed below.

Bicycle and Pedestrian Framework Policies 1. Bicycle and Pedestrian Crossings: While the location and design of specific crossing points will be determined through further site-specific engineering evaluation, safe, protected pedestrian crossing opportunities should be provided near important pedestrian destinations, such as the future high school site, when a need is demonstrated and such crossings can be appropriately and safely designed and located, as determined by an engineering-level safety analysis.

2. Trails: Trails within the Community Plan area shall be provided as shown on Figure 11; however, the City may permit flexibility to adapt to site specific conditions and ownerships provided the conceptual network in Figure 11, or equivalent, is provided. The following principles shall provide guidance in the refinement of trail alignments within the Community Plan area: a. Stream Corridor Trails: Trails along stream corridors shall be built at the outer edge(s) of the vegetated corridors wherever possible, consistent with CWS standards. Such trails shall be designed to provide a recreational amenity and safe, pleasant pedestrian and/or bicycle connections between neighborhoods, as well as offering visual access to the resource area.

Additional native vegetation shall be provided to either side of such trails wherever possible in order to enhance their value as wildlife corridors as well as transportation corridors.

South Cooper Mountain Community Plan November 26, 2014

Page 25

b. Trails through Resource Areas: The site specific design and location of providing trail connections across wetland resource areas within the Community Plan area shall be addressed on a case-by-case basis. There is a need to provide safe and convenient pedestrian and/or bicycle across the central natural resource area located north of the high school and Main Street. There is also a need to provide access to the River Terrace Trail south of SW Scholls Ferry Road. These, and other trails through resource areas, shall be designed to minimize impacts to the natural resources. Maintenance and enhancement of wildlife corridors and connections between resource areas should be considered when designing and locating trails. c. School to School Trail: A multi-use path shall link from SW Loon Drive at Scholls Heights Elementary school to SW 175th Avenue at the planned high school site as shown in Figure 11 in order to provide safe routes to both schools and to connect neighborhoods to the east to the planned high school. d. Western Edge Trail: The community multi-use trail along the east side of SW Tile Flat Road within the Community Plan area shall be designed with trees and other landscaping to provide a visual buffer to adjacent rural lands. This trail shall be designed so that it can be extended further north, paralleling SW Grabhorn Road as far as Cooper Mountain Nature Park, when that portion of the Urban Reserve Area is brought into the UGB and developed.

3. Conceptual Trail: New pedestrian and or bicycle facilities shown located outside the current Urban Growth Boundary (UGB). Conceptual Trail demonstrate how pedestrian and bicycle facilities within city limits may be extended or connected in the long-term future. Alignments and functional classifications of Conceptual Trail are preliminary, tentative, and may ultimately be under the jurisdiction of another body.

Figure 11: Community Plan Bicycle & Pedestrian Framework

South Cooper Mountain Community Plan November 26, 2014

Page 26

Resource Protection and Enhancement Significant Natural Resources & Open Space Edges Context The two highest-quality natural areas within the Community Plan area are the central riparian/wetland area and the wetland area in the southeast corner of the plan area. These are shown in Figure 12 and described below.

Central riparian/wetland area: This area contains a diversity of native habitats, including wetland, riparian, and upland habitat. It contains the most intact stream within the Community Plan area; human disturbance throughout this resource area appears to be relatively minimal, with the exception of an existing dam (removal of which should be evaluated for feasibility and environmental impacts). The area is home to a diverse mix of vegetation and frequented by migratory birds. This area includes wetlands identified as W-A and W-C in the Local Wetlands Inventory (LWI) prepared for the Community Plan area, both of which were found to meet locally significant wetland criteria.

Eastern wetland: This wetland area covers roughly 4.5 acres, and is contiguous with wetlands on the Churchill Forest subdivision property that have been protected as part of the subdivision approval. This wetland, identified as W-H in the LWI prepared for the Community Plan area, provides diverse wildlife habitat, and meets criteria for designation as a locally significant wetland.

In addition, the two drainage corridors on the eastern and western sides of the plan area are regulated

by Clean Water Services’ (CWS) vegetated corridor regulations. Both are currently degraded, but CWS regulations will require restoration of native vegetation upon development approval.

These resources can become amenities for the future neighborhoods if they are appropriately protected and restored.

Natural Resource Policies 1. Locally significant wetlands and protected riparian corridors within the Community Plan area shall be protected and enhanced, consistent with local, state, and federal regulations.

2. Development adjacent to significant natural resource areas shall be designed to provide visual and/or physical access to the resource area and limit continuous rear lot line edges abutting a significant natural resource through one or more of the following treatments of the open space edge. a. parallel trail along the edge of the vegetated corridor with access points from adjacent roads and community focal points; b. local streets that run adjacent to the edge of the vegetated corridor, without development between the street and the vegetated corridor; or c. neighborhood parks, pocket parks, schools and similar uses that connect to the resource area and provide breaks between developed areas abutting the resource.

South Cooper Mountain Community Plan November 26, 2014

Page 27

Figure 12: Natural Resources in the Community Plan area

Urban Forestry Management Context Trees provide a variety of important environmental services, in addition to offering aesthetic benefits.

The environmental services include: contributing to stormwater management by intercepting rainfall; moderating temperature; providing habitat; enhancing air quality; and improving soil stability on sloping terrain. Large stands of mature trees in the Community Plan area were removed prior to annexation to the City of Beaverton and in the interim period during which the SCM Concept Plan and Community Plan were being developed. Efforts should be made to restore and maintain tree canopy throughout the Community Plan area.

Title 13 of Metro’s Urban Growth Management Functional Plan requires that local governments protect identified regionally significant upland wildlife areas within UGB expansion areas.23 Several areas meeting Metro’s criteria for designation as “Class A Upland Habitat” have been identified in the SCM Community Plan area, along with areas that meet the criteria for “Class B Upland Habitat” and “Class C

23

Metro UGMFP Title 13, section 3.07.1330 Implementation Alternatives for Cities and Counties and section 3.07.1370 Future Metro Urban Growth Boundary Expansion Areas.

South Cooper Mountain Community Plan November 26, 2014

Page 28

Upland Habitat”.24 The City of Beaverton has tree protection and mitigation standards for certain types of trees, including Landscape Trees, Community Trees, Significant Individual Trees, Trees within Significant Natural Resource Areas and Trees within Significant Groves.25

Urban Forestry Policies 1. The City shall explore options to encourage and incentivize tree planting and retention of mature trees within the Community Plan area.

2. Tree planting already required by City regulations (e.g. landscaped areas, street trees) shall be maximized as a method to increase the tree canopy in the Community Plan area.

3. Regionally Significant Upland Habitat within the SCM Community Plan area shall be protected through application of the City’s existing tree protection standards and incentives for Habitat Benefit Area preservation, as appropriate.

Scenic Views Context Scenic views are recognized as resources in Chapter 7 of the Comprehensive Plan. There are a number of locations within the Community Plan area that offer scenic views of the Tualatin Valley and Chehalem ridge to the southwest. These views are an integral component of the unique character of the Community Plan area, and are key amenities to be retained and enhanced as urbanization occurs.

In addition to aesthetic qualities, scenic viewpoints provide a visual connection between the contemporary growth of the city and rural heritage of the area.

Scenic View Policies 1. The city will encourage protection of view corridors for the enjoyment of adjacent neighborhoods and the broader community on lands that currently offer views of the Chehalem Ridge. Viewpoints should provide seating and space for passersby and should provide for the permanent protection of the view through measures such as easements. Techniques for view corridor preservation may include: a. Streets that “T”, stub, or curve at a location offering a viewpoint, with a break between buildings; b. Neighborhood or pocket parks situated to offer a viewpoint; c. Gaps between buildings with small seating areas adjacent to the sidewalk (see Figure 13 for an illustration of this concept); and/or d. Limitations on building heights down-slope from a viewpoint.

24

See DRAFT Natural Resources Memorandum by David Evans and Associates, Inc., June 3, 2013.

25

Beaverton Development Code Chapter 60, Section 60.60. Trees and Vegetation.

South Cooper Mountain Community Plan November 26, 2014

Page 29

Figure 13: Scenic Viewpoint Visualization

Rural Edges and Transitions Context The Community Plan area abuts land outside the UGB, west of SW Tile Flat Road, that is designated Rural Reserve and zoned for Exclusive Farm Use, a rural resource zone. Since this land is assumed to be retained for agricultural use over the next several decades, or until the urban reserves have all been added to the UGB, the border between urban and rural lands should be sensitive to adjacent rural uses.

Measures to enhance compatibility between farm/forest lands and UGB expansion areas are also required as a condition of the UGB expansion for the SCM Community Plan area.26 Due to urban density targets for the plan area, and the unconstrained nature of the land available for development immediately east of SW Tile Flat Road, it is not appropriate to substantially reduce planned densities adjacent to the rural edge in the interest of an urban-rural transition. Further, even standard single-family neighborhoods can have a visual and spill-over impact on adjacent rural areas if not carefully designed. Therefore, the policies below emphasize a design approach to rural edges and transitions.

Rural Transition Policies 1. Require that development abutting SW Tile Flat Road provide a landscaped buffer with trees and shrubs that provide a visual screen for adjacent rural uses.

26

Metro Ord. No. 11-1264B condition #4 for SCM states that “Land use regulations shall include provision – such as setbacks, buffers and designated lanes for movement of slow-moving machinery – to enhance compatibility between urban uses and agricultural and forest practices on adjacent land outside the UGB that is zoned for farm or forest use pursuant to statewide planning Goal 3 or 4.”

South Cooper Mountain Community Plan November 26, 2014

Page 30

Figure 14: Rural to Urban Transition along SW Tile Flat Road

Infrastructure Provision Context Drinking Water As with other planning strategies for South Cooper Mountain, the water system for the Community Plan was conceptually planned during the Concept Plan process and evaluating the area as a whole. The water system expansion into South Cooper Mountain, and the SCM Community Plan area specifically, will be based on the largest single point demand in the area: fire service flow. Although providing domestic and irrigation services to the area is essential, the water system expansion will be developed to provide sufficient fire flow while maintaining a minimum water pressure.

The new 24-inch water line in SW Scholls Ferry Road will extend to SW 175th Avenue and the planned High School site. Additional development to the north and west will require expanded network connections.

A new 24-inch water line is planned to extend along SW 175th Avenue, ultimately connecting to a future five-million-gallon tank to be located near the intersection of SW 175th Avenue/SW Weir Road. By supplementing the existing system with this new five million-gallon storage tank, there will be adequate water storage to serve the entire planning area. It is scheduled to be constructed by 2020.

Other major water lines will be constructed in large loops within the existing or future right-of-ways of SW Scholls Ferry Road (west of SW 175th Avenue), the planned east-west collector roadway through the Community Plan area, the planned north-south Main Street collector roadway, and SW Tile Flat Road. Development occurring within the interior of SCMAA area will connect to one of these mainlines.

The conceptual water system plan for the full Concept Plan area is shown in Figure 15. Water line alignments are conceptual and subject to further design and engineering. Water lines outside of Community Plan area are also conceptual and shown only for context and to inform future planning in the area.

South Cooper Mountain Community Plan November 26, 2014

Page 31

A planning-level cost estimate to construct these facilities is approximately $9.1 million for the Community Plan area (including soft costs such as engineering and contingency but excluding the cost of the planned storage tank).27

Sanitary Sewer The SCM Community Plan area will be served by different sewer line locations, as shown in the conceptual sanitary sewer system plan for the full Concept Plan area in Figure 15.

An existing 21-inch gravity sanitary sewer located in SW Scholls Ferry Road can serve some of the area east of 175th Avenue and north of Scholls Ferry Road as well as the planned High School site.

With the exception of the high school area, the areas west of SW 175th Avenue will be conveyed towards the low point in SW Scholls Ferry Road (at the creek crossing near SW Vandermost Road) and eventually be conveyed to the new River Terrace Pump Station. The River Terrace Pump Station will be located within the urban growth boundary along the creeks south of SW Scholls Ferry Road and west of SW Roy Rogers Road. The River Terrace Pump Station is anticipated to be in operation by the end of 2015, and all flows from this proposed pump station will be directed to the intersection of Scholls Ferry Road and 175th Avenue to connect to the 21-inch Scholls Ferry Road Sanitary Sewer Extension and ultimately to the Durham Wastewater Treatment Plant.

Major sewer lines will be extended within future collector road right-of-ways, as well as in SW Tile Flat Road and SW Scholls Ferry Road west of SW 175th Avenue. In addition, the low lying creek will have sanitary sewers on each side to convey waste water to the low point in SW Scholls Ferry Road.

A planning-level cost estimate to construct these facilities is approximately $12.3 million (including soft costs such as engineering and contingency but excluding the cost of the planned River Terrace Pump Station).28 The conceptual sewer system plan for the full Concept Plan area is shown in 13. Sewer line alignments are conceptual and subject to further design and engineering. Sewer lines outside of Community Plan area are also conceptual and shown only for context and to inform future planning in the area.

Stormwater Conceptual storm water management planning was conducted during scenarios phase of the Concept Plan. The work identifiedr: (1) A preference by the City of Beaverton and Clean Water Services (CWS) for an approach that uses Regional Stormwater Facilities (RSFs); (2) Recognition that there are challenges to implementing RSFs, and flexibility is needed to apply site-scale storm water management instead of, or in combination with, RSFs; and (3) Changing water quality regulations merit further planning for South Cooper Mountain, including the creation of a Storm Water Management Plan for the

27

Details of the cost estimates and planned water system are available in the Water System Concept Plan – Summary Findings and Planning Level Cost Estimates memorandum prepared by David Evans and Associates, Inc., June 11, 2014.

28

Details of the cost estimates and planned sewer system are available in the Sanitary Sewer Concept Plan – Summary Findings and Planning Level Cost Estimates memorandum prepared by David Evans and Associates, Inc., June 11, 2014.

South Cooper Mountain Community Plan November 26, 2014

Page 32

Community Plan area. The description below summarizes elements of the work that was prepared for the Concept Plan.29 The preferred approach for implementing Overarching Principles 3 (sustainability), 4 (funding plan), and 7 (natural resources) is to plan for large scale dry detention ponds, termed Regional Stormwater Facilities (RSFs) by CWS, in order to manage peak runoff rates to avoid downstream impacts. This approach is preferred because it is consistent with planning in other new areas added to the Urban Growth Boundary; it provides planned, comprehensive flow control in a cost-effective manner; and, it provides the highest level of certainty of meeting the flow management guidelines being established by CWS. In addition, RSFs will meet water quality requirements (capture and treatment of stormwater pollutants) as well as preserving the stream health of the receiving channel by avoiding hydrographic modification.

It should be noted that RSFs require a high level of coordinated implementation. Options should be available so that there is some flexibility as how to design and construct facilities to serve individual properties prior to regional facilities being available.

29

For the scenario level evaluation, please see Stormwater and Water Quality Scenario Summary, David Evans and Associates, December 19, 2014.

South Cooper Mountain Community Plan November 26, 2014

Page 33

Figure 15: Conceptual Future Water System for SCM Concept Plan Area

South Cooper Mountain Community Plan November 26, 2014

Page 34

Figure 16: Conceptual Future Sanitary Sewer System for SCM Concept Plan Area

South Cooper Mountain Community Plan November 26, 2014

Page 35

In the scenarios phase of the Concept Plan, RSFs were tentatively sized and located based on estimates of impervious area upland of the facilities. The sizing tool was the Western Washington Hydrologic Model, which matches flow-duration curves for a range of storms pre- and postdevelopment. CWS is in the process of updating its conveyance and detention standards based on a similar approach. Thus the work prepared during the Concept Plan was an approximation of that anticipated standard of care. Fine tuning of the location, upland area, and final facility size (including buffer and access areas) will be required as future planning and development occurs.

Additional site-specific reviews of opportunities for Low Impact Development Approaches (LIDA) are encouraged as part of development, which may reduce the size of downstream detention facilities. This would be a joint decision of CWS and the City of Beaverton and would need to be decided prior to the commitment for any particular facility.

No matter what specific storm water management facilities are planned, it is essential that the detention ponds and conveyance work are planned and designed in combination with other elements of the Community Plan, including: protection and enhancement of natural resource areas, provision of parks and open spaces, and management of stormwater at the site and street scale.

Infrastructure Policies 1. Urban development shall not be allowed until urban services, including water and sewer, are available to the subject property.

2. The City shall work with service providers and property owners to extend urban services in a coordinated and efficient manner.

3. The City of Beaverton will coordinate closely with the City of Tigard on the final location and timing of the River Terrace Pump Station.

4. The City shall use the South Cooper Mountain Infrastructure Funding Plan as the basis of financing decisions for public facilities and services in the SCM Community Plan area.

5. The City shall develop memorandums of understanding with service providers to implement the South Cooper Mountain Infrastructure Funding Plan.

6. The City shall work with Clean Water Services to develop a Stormwater Management Plan for the SCM Community Plan area. In the interim, the City will work with Clean Water Services and developers to apply existing storm water management regulations.

7. In identifying specific alignments for new water and sewer infrastructure, impacts to natural resources shall be avoided or minimized to the extent possible.

South Cooper Mountain Community Plan November 26, 2014

Page 36

APPENDIX A: PROJECT COMMITTEES AND TEAM South Cooper Mountain Technical Advisory Committee Susan Shanks, City of Tigard

Tom Mills, TriMet

Dyami Valentine, Washington County Department of Land Use and Transportation

Carrie Pak, Clean Water Services (CWS)

Kevin Hanway, City of Hillsboro Water Department; Tyler Wubbena (alternate), City of Hillsboro Water Department

Aisha Willits, Tualatin Hills Parks and Recreation District (THPRD) Richard Hoffman, Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue (TVF&R)

Jeannine Rustad, City of Hillsboro Planning Department; Daniel Rutzick (alternate), City of Hillsboro Planning Department

Mark Knudsen, Tualatin Valley Water District (TVWD); Stu David (alternate), TVWD

Anne Debbaut, Department of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD)

Dick Steinbrugge, Beaverton School District (BSD); David Etchart (alternate), BSD

Tim O’Brien, Metro

Adam Stewart, Hillsboro School District (HSD); Loren Rogers (alternate), HSD

Lidwien Rahman, Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT)

Finance Task Force John O’Neill

Aisha Willits

Martin Moore

David Winship

Dan Grimberg

Jabra Khasho

David Waffle

Dyami Valentine

Toby LaFrance

Matt Wellner

Andy Braun Guests: Wally Remmers, Tom Brian, Kenny Asher, Susan Shanks

South Cooper Mountain Community Plan November 26, 2014

Appendix A

APPENDIX A: PROJECT COMMITTEES AND TEAM City of Beaverton South Cooper Mountain Planning Team Valerie Sutton, Senior Planner, Project Manager Steve Sparks, Principal Planner Leigh Crabtree, Associate Planner Cassera Phipps, Assistant Planner Juston Manville, GIS Manager Sheila Martin, Administrative Assistant

City of Beaverton Core Project Team Jabra Khasho

David Winship

Cindy Dolezel

Andrew Barrett

Peter Arellano

Mark Boguslawski

Jim Duggan

Eric Oathes

Lani Parr

Geoff Spalding

Jason Wachs

Alma Flores

Jeff Salvon

Patrick O'Claire

Andrea Nelson

Dave Waffle

Kenneth Rencher

Bill LaMarche

Luke Pelz

Todd Juhasz

Wendy Prather

Megan Cohen

Brion Barnett

Randy Ealy

South Cooper Mountain Community Plan November 26, 2014

Appendix A

APPENDIX A: PROJECT COMMITTEES AND TEAM Consultant Team Angelo Planning Group

ECONorthwest

Joe Dills, Angelo Planning Group, Project Manager

Nick Popenuk, ECONorthwest, Funding Plan Manager

Becky Hewitt, Angelo Planning Group, Planner and Assistant Project Manager

Lisa Wall, ECONorthwest, Analyst Anne Fifield, ECONorthwest, Market Analyst

Cathy Corliss, Angelo Planning Group, Principal

Fregonese Associates Matt Hastie, Angelo Planning Group, Finance Task Force Facilitator Andrew Parish, Angelo Planning Group, Planner

Glen Bolen, Fregonese Associates, Planner Max Bolen, Fregonese Associates, Scenario Analyst

JLA Public Involvement David Evans and Associates Claudia Sterling, David Evans and Associates, Storm Water Engineer Ethan Rosenthal, David Evans and Associates, Ecologist

Eryn Deeming Kehe, JLA Public Involvement, Public Involvement Advisor Kalin Schmoldt, JLA Public Involvement, Public Involvement Manager

Walker Macy Paul Fendt, David Evans and Associates, Storm Water Engineer

Ken Pirie, Walker Macy, Urban Designer Mike Zilis, Walker Macy, Urban Designer

Steve Harrison, David Evans and Associates, Engineer Sara Gilbert, David Evans and Associates, GIS Specialist

Nathan Kappen, Walker Macy, Urban Designer Saumya Kini, Walker Macy, Urban Designer

DKS Associates Carl Springer, DKS Associates, Transportation Planner Kevin Chewuk, DKS Associates, Transportation Planner

South Cooper Mountain Community Plan November 26, 2014

Appendix A

VICINITY MAP

Legend Subject Site Buffer Subject Site Selection Washington County Taxlots

SCM BLACKBIRD FARMS

SCM BLACKBIRD FARMS - CPA2020-0008/CU2020-0008/CU2020-0009/ CPA2020-0008/CU2020-0008/CU2020-0009/DR2020-0136/DR2020DR2020-0136/DR2020-0137/DR2020-0138/DR2021-0044/LD2020-0014/LD202 0137/DR2020-0138/DR2021-0044/LD2020-0014/LD2020-0015/PD2020 0-0015/PD2020-0007/TP2020-0009/TP2020-0010/ZMA2020-0008

-0007/TP2020-0009/TP2020-0010/ZMA2020-0008

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Planning Division

The information supplied in this application represents the best data available at the time of publication.

City of Beaverton GIS makes no claims, representations, or warranties as to its accuracy or completeness.

06/02/2021

Taxlot No: 2S106B00200 2S106B000200 2S106B00203 2S106B00204 2S106B000203 2S106B00500 2S106B000204 2S106B00600 2S106B000500 2S106B01100

Application # See Notice

Otak, Inc. 808 SW Third Avenue, Ste. 800 Portland, OR 97204 503. 287. 6825 www.otak.com

LOT 1 - PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT LOT 1 - PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS

LOT 2 - PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT LOT 2 - PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS STAMP

LOT 3 - PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT LOT 3 - PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS

LOT 4 - PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT LOT 4 - PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS

TRACT B PARK A

CONSULTANT

LOT 5 - PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT LOT 5 - PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT BOUNDARY

LOT 2

LOT 1

LOT 6 - PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT BUILDING 1B

LOT 6 - PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS

BUILDING 2B

PARK, MULTI-USE TRAIL OR STORM WATER POND

STREET A

4/14/2021 - LAND USE PLANS ( NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION)

STREET B

LOT 3

BUILDING 3B

BUILDING 4A

BUILDING 4B

LOT 4

BUILDING 3A

OPEN SPACE TRACT

BUILDING 1C

5A

TRACT C FUTURE PARK

Plotted: Apr 14, 2021 - 10:36am Jeff.Bornsheuer

POND

LOT 5

BUILDING 5B

MAIN STREET

STREET C

L:\Project\19600\19615\CADD\ACAD\Dwg\C19615C150.dwg Layout Name: C1.05

STREET

BUILDING

A

AY AINSIDE W T N U O M W S

BLDG 6A

LOT 6

POND

BUILDING 6B

LOT LIMITS

BUILDING 2A

1A

18043 SW SCHOLLS FERRY ROAD BEAVERTON, OREGON

DING BUIL

SOUTH COOPER MTN. BLACKBIRD FARMS

COMMUNITY MULTI-USE TRAIL

TITLE #

DATE

DESCRIPTION

REVISIONS

DATUM KN CJB DRAWN BY

KDC CHECKED BY

LAND USE STATUS

2021-5-5

04/14/2021 DATE

19615 PROJECT NUMBER

SCHOLLS FERRY ROAD 0

90

180

C1.05 © 2020 OTAK, INC.

SCALE IN FEET

If this drawing is not 22" x 34", it has been reduced/enlarged. Scale accordingly.

VICINITY MAP

Legend Subject Site Buffer Subject Site Selection Washington County Taxlots

SCHOLLS HEIGHTS PUD NORTHEAST PHASE MODIFICATIONS CU2021-0006/LD2021-0004

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Planning Division

The information supplied in this application represents the best data available at the time of publication.

City of Beaverton GIS makes no claims, representations, or warranties as to its accuracy or completeness.

06/22/2021

Taxlot No: 2S2010003200 2S2010003300 2S2010003301 2S2010003400

Application # See Notice

CITY OF BEAVERTON Community Development Department Planning Division 12725 SW Millikan Way PO Box 4755 Beaverton, OR 97076 Tel: (503) 526-2420 Fax: (503) 526-2550 www.beavertonoregon.gov

Hearing Date: Project Name: Case File No.: Summary of Application :

August 4, 2021

PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE

Hearing Body: Planning Commission

Scholls Heights PUD Northeast Phase Modifications CU2021-0006 / LD2021-0004 The applicant, West Hills Land Development, requests approval of a Modification of a Decision of a Planned Unit Development (CU2017-0010) and a Modification of a Decision of a Preliminary Subdivision (LD2017-0009). Staff notes previous modifications to CU2017-0010 were approved under CU20190012. Previous modifications to LD2017-0009 were approved under LD20190032. The applicant proposes to split the Northeast Phase of the project into two separate phases with minor lot dimension modifications. The request also involves a reduction to rear yard setbacks for specific lots within and outside of the Northeast Phase. Minor grading changes to roadways and lots.

Modifications to conditions of approval related to the applicant’s requested phasing and site mods.

Project Location:

The site is located at the northeast corner of the intersection of SW Tile Flat Road and SW Scholls Ferry Road. The Scholls Heights PUD encompasses the following Tax Lots 3200, 3300, 3301, 3400, 3700, 3800, 3900, 4000, 4100, 4200, 4201, 4300, 4400, 4500, 4600, 4700, and 4800 on Washington County Tax Assessor’s Map 2S20100.

Zoning & NAC:

Urban High Density (R1), Urban Medium Density (R2), Urban Medium Density (R4), Urban Standard Density (R5), Urban Standard Density (R7)/ Neighbors Southwest NAC

Applicable Approval Criteria:

Development Code Section 40.03.1 Facilities Review, Section 40.15.15.6.C Planned Unit Development, Section 40.45.15.5.C. Preliminary Subdivision, and 50.95 Modification of a Decision.

Hearing Time and Place:

City Council Chambers, First Floor, Beaverton Building, 12725 SW Millikan Way, beginning at 6:30 p.m.

Note: Public Hearings are held remotely and can be viewed at the following link: https://www.beavertonoregon.gov/291/Agendas-Minutes.

Staff Contact:

Jana Fox, Current Planning Manager 503-523-8530 / jfox@beavertonoregon.gov

How to Participate:

Given the current COVID-19 crisis the City of Beaverton strongly encourages submitting written public testimony via email to the project

planners. However, visitor comments and public hearing testimony can be provided in the following ways: • In writing via email to the project planner jfox@beavertonoregon.gov or mailboxcddplanning@beavertonoregon.gov.

• In writing via mail to project planner to PO Box 4755, Beaverton, OR 97076 • In person on a video link. The Planning Commission Meeting can be viewed from the Beaverton Building Council Chambers, and in-person public hearing testimony may be provided on a computer set up in the Beaverton Building.

• Join Zoom webinar conference via phone or computer. Meeting ID and password, as well as the meeting link, can be found at https://www.beavertonoregon.gov/291/Agendas-Minutes.

NOTE: The City of Beaverton has declared a State of Emergency due to COVID-19 and the Community Development Division is closed to the public until further notice. The Community Development Department is evaluating temporary changes to processes and procedures to respond appropriately to the COVID-19 State of Emergency, and is committed to ensuring that the land use review process continues to fulfill the requirements of state and local law while protecting the health and wellbeing of the community.

Pursuant to Section 50.83 of the Beaverton Development Code, written comments or exhibits submitted prior to the hearing to be submitted by staff at the hearing must be received by the City Recorder no later than 4:30 p.m. on the day of the scheduled hearing. Mailed written comments to the Commission should be sent to the attention of Jana Fox, Planning Division, PO Box 4755, Beaverton, OR 97076. To be made a part of the staff report, correspondence needs to be received by July 23, 2021. All written testimony provided prior to the meeting will be provided to Planning Commission prior to their decision. Please reference the Case File Number and Project Name in your written comments. Comments may also be provided via email to jfox@beavertonoregon.gov.

A copy of all documents and evidence submitted by or on behalf of the applicant, and applicable review criteria, are available for inspection. Please contact the project planner for more information or to view documents electronically. A copy of the staff report will be available for inspection at no cost at least seven (7) calendar days before the hearing. A copy of any or all materials will be provided at a reasonable cost.

A copy of the staff report may also be viewed online at: www.beavertonoregon.gov/DevelopmentProjects Staff strongly encourages you to participate in the public process by reviewing documents online and viewing the public meeting at https://www.beavertonoregon.gov/291/Agendas-Minutes. If you do not have the technology to view documents, watch, or participate in the meeting, please contact the project planner for additional support.

The Planning Commission shall conduct hearings in accordance with adopted rules of procedure and shall make a decision on the development application after the hearing closes. Failure to raise an issue in a hearing, by testifying in person or by letter, or failure to provide statements or evidence with sufficient specificity to afford the decision making authority an opportunity to respond to such issue, precludes appeal to the Land Use Board of Appeals on the issue.

Facilities Review Committee Meeting Day: Wednesday, July 14, 2021 The Facilities Review Committee is not a decision making body, but advises the Director and Planning Commission on a project’s conformity to the technical criteria specified in Section 40.03 of the Beaverton Development Code. The Director will include the Committee’s recommendation in the staff report to the decision making authority. The Facilities Review Committee meeting is open to the public, but is not intended for public testimony.

Accessibility information: This information can be made available in large print or audio tape upon request. Assistive listening devices, sign language interpreters, or qualified bilingual interpreters can be made available at any public meeting or program with 72 hours advance notice. To request these services, contact Jana Fox by calling 711 503-523-8539 or email jfox@beavertonoregon.gov.