VIEWER
Mounds View
http://mvviewer.org Friday, June 1, 2012
Volume 59
2011-2012
Issue 12
<editor@mvviewer.org>
INSIDE
The Truth of Photoshop
Your Report Card Staff at Mounds View retire
photo by Allison Hare
Teachers reconsider what should be in a grade Webster defines the word “grade” as “a mark indicating a degree of accomplishment in school. But who or what defines what “accomplishment” means?
Languages of Mounds View
Viewer’s Allstar team
Online
k
Reconstuction of Valentine Park
Story by John Ke and Max Wang Is accomplishment based on pure effort, mastery of material, or a combination? And should improvement count for something, even if the student doesn’t meet a goal? Principal Julie Wikelius created a Grading Task Force last fall to address these questions. This group examined Mounds View’s grading practices in the classroom, in departments, and in the school as a whole. Ultimately, this work could lead to changes in how teachers evaluate students, but those involved with the task force say it is too soon to tell. According to Associate Principal Doug Bullinger, there were around 15 teachers and administrators charged with two specific goals: determine the current “reality of grading practices” and establish what a grade really means. While these issues may seem selfexplanatory, the task force went through a detailed process, examining several articles from the November issue of Educational Leadership, which included one from the incoming Mounds View Principal, Jeff Erickson. The articles emphasized different points, such as consistent and transparent grading systems, the benefits of retakes, and even the removal of grades altogether, instead focusing on narrative assessments. All the articles emphasized increasing student achievement, and finding out the true meaning of a grade. Of the issues discussed in the articles, the most familiar would be grade curving
The Task Force Created a Vision with Five Points: 1. Grading practices will be able to measure success equitably. 2. The grading system will be accepted and understood by parents, teachers, students and administration. 3. There will be consistency in grading within departments. 4. There will be a clear understanding of what a grade means at MVHS. 5. There will be support for teachers to develop a manageable grading system. versus retakes. Authors emphasized that grade curving inhibited student growth, since the practice does not help students learn what they missed, whereas retakes allow students to improve. Sarah Schuler, 10, agreed, saying that “in honors classes, you’re surrounded by a lot of really smart people. When the tests are curved, it’s really only one or two points difference. Retakes seem like a great option because then you have many chances to do your best.”
Matt Wilson, 12, disagreed with the policy of retakes, saying that they were just “excuses for students to not study the first time [taking a test].” Grade curving, on the other hand, did a better job of showing a student’s knowledge. “They can also show whether the test material was just too difficult,” said Wilson. Other issues include the purpose and relevance of extra credit, how a grading scale should work, and whether homework assignments should even be required. “Those ideas are being gathered and will be shared out with staff so that we can continue the conversation into next year,” said Bullinger. “If any changes in our grading practices are to take place, those changes will be teacher-led.” Currently, Mounds View has no standardized grading policy. Teachers are subject to few restrictions when creating their own grading criteria. This has resulted in a wide variety of grading practices.
Grading continues on Features, p. 5