Thursday, October 25, 2012 twitter.com/@msureporter
facebook.com /msureporter
www.themsureporter.com
Minnesota State University, Mankato
THURSDAY
H 42 ⢠L 28
FRIDAY
H 45 ⢠L 24
MSU College of Business honored by Princeton Review MSU one of consulting companyâs âBest 296 Business schoolsâ
William Cahyadi ⢠msu reporter
William Cahyadi ⢠msu reporter Minnesota State University, Mankatoâs College of Business was honored once again by The Princeton Review, and academic consulting company based in Framingham, Massachusets. SAM WILMES
staff writer
The Minnesota State University, Mankato Master of Business Administration has been named one of the best in the nation by The Princeton Reviewâs 2013 business school guidebook. This is the seventh consecutive year the program has received the honor. The New York-based education services company is famous for conducting rankings based on school surveys,
publishing a yearly âBest 296 Business schools.â The list is not a traditional ranking business schools are not ranked 1 to 296, but in eleven lists of the top 10 business schools in different categories. Director of MSUâs MBA program Marilyn Fox is very pleased with the honor. âWeâre committed to delivering a high profile program,â Fox said. âWhen
MBA Program / page 2
What the marriage amendment means for Minnesota
TIM FAKLIS
staff writer
Vote yes or vote no? What does it really mean? Election Day is fast approaching, and some people still may be wondering what each selection really means. There have been a multitude of students patrolling the Centennial Student Union, campaigning for your vote. College students have all the resources that they need to be as well informed, but a vote like this can be tricky. What are the stipulations for each option? What does the amendment even pertain too? In May 2011, the Min-
nesota Senate passed a bill that would place a proposed amendment to the state constitution on the ballot that would ban the marriage of same-sex couples. The vote was 37â27, with all Republicans, as well as one Democrat voting for the amendment. The Minnesota House of Representatives passed an identical bill on May 21 of the same year, 70â62, with two Democrats and all but four Republicans voting for the amendment. The proposed amendment reads as follows: âOnly a union of one man and one woman shall be valid or
recognized as a marriage in Minnesota.â It must also be noted that civil unions, which provide benefits of marriage without the ceremony and celebration in itself, are not a part of this ballot, and wonât affect that aspect of the gay rights movement. If an individual were to vote âyes,â they would be supporting the proposed amendment, as it reads. If one was to vote âno,â it wouldnât legalize gay marriage, but at the same time, it would keep it from being banned. Chuck Darrell, a Minne-
Amendment / page 8
The Reporterâs 2012 ELECTION GUIDE Starts on page 5