Clarification by Motley Magazine in light of UCC Societies’ guild response The following are excerpts from the UCC Societies’ Guild response to the two articles published in Motley Thursday 16th February 2012 regarding contact: “I would like to point out that only once during this investigation was the Guild Executive contacted for any purpose and that was at the print deadline” “Had we been asked at any point during the month while the article was being published for assistance we would have been more than happy to sit down with the writers and aid them in ensuring that their articles were factually accurate.”
Motley magazine went into the Societies Guild Office on Tuesday the 31st of January, we received a copy of the Guild accounts for the year 2010, and we requested a copy of the guild accounts and a copy of expenses for 2010/2011. We were told these were not available yet as they had to be passed by Joint Academic Board at their next meeting. We went in two weeks later and requested the documents again. We were told that they would call us back on the issue. No call was received. A third representative went into the office and they were informed again that the documents were not available. The articles took a long time to piece together and we only finished late on Tuesday the 14th of February.
“They claimed that we were contacted for a response and that we declined. This is misleading in the extreme, in that while it is true that we were contacted, we were contacted mere hours before the piece went to print.”
At 11.41am on Wedensday the 15th of February, I sent the two articles via Facebook to the Guild President and the Guild Vice-President. (They were sent via Facebook, as I was led to believe by a status update that they had both gone on a trip to Scotland and it would the fastest mode of contact, the status turned out to be a “frape”.)