MSU 2025 Legislative Session Report by Morgan State University

2025 LEGISLATIVE SESSION REPORT

A REPORT FROM THE OFFICE OF THE VICE PRESIDENT FOR STATE AND FEDERAL RELATIONS & CHIEF OF STAFF

A MESSAGE FROM PRESIDENT DAVID KWABENA

WILSON

Dear Morgan Community,

As Morgan State University boldly advances into its 158th year, we remain steadfast in our role as Maryland’s Preeminent Public Urban Research University and a major economic engine for both Baltimore and the state of Maryland. Morgan continues to lead in groundbreaking research, workforce development, and innovation elements vital to sustaining growth in a rapidly evolving society.

I am pleased to share an overview of the recently concluded 2025 Maryland legislative session. Despite fiscal constraints facing the state this year, Morgan achieved strong outcomes. The final budget hearing for the University was a success, and I am proud to report that Morgan received full fundingin the FY2026 Capital Budget for two critical initiatives:

• $337 million for the construction of a state-of-the-art science building

• $87 million for major electrical power infrastructure upgrades

These capital investments will support the development of modern classrooms, laboratories, and research facilities that are essential to advancing our academic and research missions. They also ensure that our growing campus has the energy infrastructure necessary for uninterrupted operations. We are deeply grateful to Governor Wes Moore his visionary leadership and his administration’s transformative support of Morgan’s future.

With regard to the FY2026 Operating Budget, Morgan like many institutions across the state incurred a permanent reduction of approximately $12 million in base appropriations. This adjustment reflects the broader economic challenges facing both state and federal governments, including a multi-billion-dollar structural deficit in the Maryland state budget. While such reductions pose real challenges, I want to reassure our community that throughout my presidency, we have consistently avoided operating budget deficits. With careful planning, fiscal stewardship, and collective resolve, I am confident that we will navigate this period successfully.

As a leading anchor institution in Baltimore and a champion of social mobility, Morgan remains deeply committed to advancing equity, expanding access to higher education, and preparing the next generation of global leaders. We look forward to continued collaboration with our government partners and community stakeholders as we lay the groundwork for the 2026 legislative session.

Thank you for your continued support and commitment to Morgan’s mission.

Warm regards,

President Morgan State University

SeeexcerptbelowfromPage2oftheMSUFY2026OperatingBudgetTestimony.

MOORE-MILLER ADMINISTRATION 2024 STATE PLAN: LEAVE NO ONE BEHIND

The Moore-Miller Administration’s 2024 State Plan was developed to lay out an implementation roadmap of the Administration’s mission to “Leave No One Behind” in Maryland, centered on the following 10 priorities:

Leave No One Behind by …

1. Ending child poverty in the State of Maryland.

2. Setting Maryland’s Students Up for Success.

3. Creating an Equitable, Robust and Competitive Economy.

4. Connecting Marylanders to Jobs.

5. Creating Safer Communities.

6. Making the State of Maryland a Desirable and Affordable Home for All Residents.

7. Advancing Infrastructure to Better Connect All Marylanders to Opportunities and Each Other.

8. Ensuring World-Class Health Systems for All Marylanders.

9. Making Maryland a Leader in Clean Energy and the Greenest State in the Country.

10. Making Maryland a State of Service.

TRANSFORMATION MORGAN 2030: LEADING THE FUTURE

Our Strategic Plan, “Transformation Morgan 2030: Leading the Future,” reflects our continuous pursuit of excellence and a renewed commitment to fulfilling our vital mission Our plan is firmly rooted in the realization of Morgan State University’s successful attainment of Carnegie’s R1, “very high” research classification by the year 2030, cementing our status as a leading, nationally recognized research institution. Our plan outlines six interconnected strategic goals that give shape to, and provide a framework for, the management of needed organizational change and preparation of the University to serve and complete at the highest attainable level. Accomplishments and strides under each of the six strategic goals are highlighted below.

GOAL 1

GOAL 2

GOAL 3

GOAL 4

GOAL 5

GOAL 6

Enhance Student Success and Wellbeing

Provide students with a comprehensive educational and transformative experience that actualizes their full potential and empowers them to emerge as confident and competent and global citizens and dynamic leaders in their selected careers and communities.

Implement Faculty Ascendency and Staff Development Initiatives

The University will implement a broad range of human resource development initiatives for the benefit of faculty and staff.

Elevate Morgan’s Status to R1 Very High Doctoral Research University

Over the next ten years, Morgan will emerge as an R1 doctoral research university fully engaged in basic and applied research and creative interdisciplinary inquiries undergirded and sustained through increased research grants and contracts.

Expand and Improve a Campus-Wide Infrastructure to Support Operational Excellence and Increase Overall Institutional Capacity

Morgan will advance new construction, capital improvement, deferred maintenance, and campus safety projects in keeping with the University’s evolving master plan.

Serve as the Premiere Anchor Institution for Baltimore City and Beyond

Morgan will expand and deepen its role as a recognized anchor institution with broad social and economic impact.

Accelerate Global Education Initiatives and Expand the University’s International Footprint International Footrpint International Footprint

Morgan will enhance its study abroad program and promote global awareness and intercultural competencies through its diverse curricular and co-curricular programs and activities.

➢ See full text here of the FISCAL YEAR 2026 OPERATING BUDGET

Morgan State University’s 2025 legislative testimonies may be found at the following links, each preceded by arrows:

➢ FISCAL YEAR 2026 OPERATING BUDGET TESTIMONY

➢ Live Testimony of 2/20/25 before the Capital Budget Subcommittee [Note: Live testimony begins at 7:33; Ends at 47:00.]

➢ Live Testimony of 2/26/25 before the Education and Economic Development Subcommittee [Note: Live testimony begins at 9:02; Ends at 44:50.]

➢ FISCAL YEAR 2026 CAPITAL BUDGET TESTIMONY

➢ Capital Budget Analysis

➢ Live Testimony of 3/10/25 before the Capital Budget Subcommittee [Note: Live testimony begins at 50:21; Ends at 1:05:28 ]

➢ Live Testimony of 3/11/25 before the Capital Budget Subcommittee [Note: Live testimony begins at 50:22; Ends at 59:39 ]

Additional information:

➢ Effect of the 2025 Legislative Program on the Financial Condition of the State

➢ House Bills Introduced on January 8, 2025

➢ MSU Economic Impact Report

FINAL STATUS OF LEGISLATIVE BILLS OF SPECIAL INTEREST TO MORGAN STATE UNIVERSITY

ACADEMIC & STUDENT AFFAIRS

Interstate Teacher Mobility Compact

MSU Position: Favorable Status: Did not pass

Synopsis: Repealing certain provisions of law relating to Interstate Agreement on Qualifications of Educational Personnel; providing that certain provisions of law regarding the issuance of an initial teaching certificate do not apply to certain teachers; entering into the Interstate Teacher Mobility Compact for the purpose of authorizing regulated teachers who hold multistate licenses to teach in each member state; establishing requirements for multistate licensure; providing a certain contingency requirement; etc.

Morgan State University is the Preeminent Public Urban Research University in Maryland, known for its excellence in teaching, intensive research, effective public service and community engagement. Morgan prepares diverse and competitive graduates for success in a global interdependent society.

The establishment of common standards across states for certification of K-12 teachers will have beneficial effects. The bill removes barriers to interstate mobility and could alleviate the differential levels of teacher shortage across states. High quality standards of teacher accreditation that are common across states might serve to reduce disparities in the learning experiences of children.

We appreciate the opportunity to work with the State in reaching a solution to support our students as we continue to grow the future and lead the world.

➢ HB 118

Collection – Parental Status

Status: Did not pass

Synopsis: Requiring the Maryland Higher Education Commission to collect certain data regarding the parental status of students from each public institution of higher education in the State using questions developed by the Commission and the institutions; requiring public institutions of higher education to collect and report certain demographic data from students; and requiring the Commission to report to certain committees of the General Assembly by September 1, 2026, and each September 1 thereafter, a report summarizing the data collect.

Institutes of Higher Education - Mandatory Disclosures For New and Prospective Students (Informed Enrollment Act)

MSU Position: Unfavorable

Status: Did not pass

Synopsis: Requiring each institution of higher education in the State that admits first-time undergraduate students, by July 1, 2026, to prominently display on its publicly accessible prospective student website a link to the U.S. Department of Education College Scorecard

➢ HB 298 MHEC – Demographic Data

➢ HB 611 / SB 713

website; and requiring the Maryland Higher Education Commission to make certain data available to institutions of higher education in the State under certain circumstances.

Highlighted are concerns regarding the proposed bill to require Maryland's institutions of higher learning ("IHEs") to prominently display of a link to the Department of Education College Scoreboard website and to make certain data available to institutions in the State under certain circumstances. The primary challenges with this are multifaceted.

With the former proposal, the bill does not take into account that while the College Scoreboard provides a nationwide metric for assessing student outcomes generally, it does not take into account that each state, including the State of Maryland, maintains academic program-level data that is not comparable across systems as each state makes a determination on how to calculate mean wages differently.

For Morgan, enactment of this bill would also likely result in the University's need to hire additional personnel involved in alumni engagement to track this data. These new employees would entail a significant added expense to the University at a time when our operating budget is being reduced by over $12 million annually. Moreover, these new employees, along with incumbent employees, would require substantial training and be tasked with additional responsibilities to remain in compliance with a mandate such as the one proposed in this bill. The new demands will only further thestrain onour already financially burdened administrative resources.

➢ HB 852

MSU Position: Informational Status: Did not pass

Synopsis: Requiring the State Board of Education, county boards of education, and institutions of higher education in the State to update certain drug addiction and prevention education programs to include information on the mitigating effects of naloxone or other opioid overdose-reversing medication, authorized possession for a student, a member of the school's staff, or any lawfully present individual at the school or a school-sponsored event or activity, and immunity from liability.

The nationwide opioid crisis impacts does not discriminate against age, race or economic status. Its far-reaching impact continues to claim lives from overdoses. Staying informed with updated information on interventions and treatment options offers numerous benefits, to include improved

decision-making, and increased awareness, knowledge and understanding. Morgan, through its Counseling Center, is actively involved in research and participates in studies to gain knowledge about reversing medications for opioid overdose. Plans are underway to develop programming on prevention education and provide resources specifically addresses the risk of opioid-related emergencies, including overdose, in their emergency operations plans (EOPs) by including a Threat- and Hazard-SpecificAnnex for drug overdose. For example, the University’s Division of Student Affairs attended a Naloxone/Narcan training by the Bureau of Behavioral Health of Baltimore Department of Health. Individuals learned about opioids, recognizing, responding, and preventing an overdose, and how to administer intranasal Naloxone. Participants receive a completion certificate and a kit containing the medication to possibly save a life. After training, the Counseling Center will develop programming on prevention education and provide resources for the campus community.

This bill aligns with the University’s goal to promote education on certain drug addiction and prevention educationprogramsto includeinformationonthe mitigatingeffectsofopioidoverdosereversing medication, authorized possession for a student, a member of the school’s staff, or any lawfully present individual at the school or a school-sponsored event or activity, and immunity from liability.

MSU Position: Favorable with proposed amendments

Status: Did not pass

Synopsis: Requiring the State Lottery and Gaming Control Commission to adopt regulations to reduce or mitigate effects of problem gambling; requiring the regulations to establish a voluntary exclusion list; requiring the Commission to provide contact information of individuals that request to be placed on the voluntary exclusion list to the Maryland Center for Excellence on Problem Gambling; prohibiting an individual under 21 Years of age from participating in fantasy competitions; etc.

Morgan proposes amendment of the title of this bill to read as follows:

Strengthening Data Access, Research Funding, and University Involvement in Gambling Policy

These amendments would enhance the bill’s impact on responsible gaming research, data access, and policy development. These amendments would also ensure that the State of Maryland adopts a research-driven approach to understanding and mitigating the effects of sports wagering, particularly among college students and vulnerable populations. The proposed amendments focus on four key areas:

➢ HB 465

Gaming – Problem Gambling and College Athlete Protections

• Data Access and Standardization – Sports wagering operators must provide anonymized gambling data at regular intervals (daily, weekly, monthly, and annually) to support research on betting behaviors, self-exclusion trends, and problem gambling indicators. The Maryland Lottery and Gaming Control Commission, in consultation with Morgan State’s Center for Data Analytics and Sports Gaming Research (DASGR), will establish data formatting guidelines to ensure usability.

• Dedicated Research Funding – $2 million annually from state gaming revenues will support DASGR’s research, including hiring faculty, building secure data infrastructure, and producing reports on gambling trends and policy impacts.

• University Representation in Policy Discussions – A Gambling Research & Policy Advisory Council, including representatives from Morgan State University, Bowie State University, the University of Maryland School of Medicine, and state regulators, will review gambling trends and propose policy adjustments.

• Enforcement and Accountability – Strict penalties for non-compliance will be enforced, including fines for sports wagering operators failing to provide required data and independent audits conducted by the Maryland Lottery and Gaming Control Commission.

These amendments will position Maryland as a leader in responsible gambling regulation, leveraging university expertise to inform policy and protect at-risk populations.

Status: Passed

Synopsis: Requiring certain nonpublic institutions of higher education to submit a certain letter of intent regarding intended new graduate level programs to the Maryland Higher Education commission in a certain manner and every 6 months; repealing a provision of law that required the Commission to circulate certain letters of intent; repealing a certain provision of law that limited which institutions of higher education could propose or implement certain academic programs for certain graduate level programs under certain circumstances; etc.

➢ SB 9 / HB 479

MHEC – Academic Academic Program Approval – Revision

College Preparatory Programs and College Admissions Applications –Fees – Prohibition

MSU Position: Unfavorable Status: Did not pass

Synopsis: Prohibiting a county board from charging fees to certain students related to enrollment in or completion of the International Baccalaureate Diploma Program or a comparable program consisting of Advanced Placement courses specified by the College Board; and prohibiting public institutions of higher education from charging a graduate of an approved public high school in the State any fees associated with certain college admissions applications.

Our university charges a $35 application fee, and waives tuition for eligible applicants. We process approximately 17,000 in-state resident applications yearly. This proposed legislation, if passed, would result in a loss of approximately $500,000 in revenue yearly, thereby increasing our deficit at a time when our budget is being reduced by over $12 million annually. Diverting focus from academic functions to complex administrative procedures to comply with this legislation will only further the strain on our already financially burdened administrative departments.

➢ SB 82

Public Senior Higher Education Institutions – Pregnant and Parenting Students –Plan Requirements (Pregnant and Parenting Student Support Act

MSU Position: Favorable Status: Passed

Synopsis: Requiring certain public senior higher education institutions to adopt a plan regarding pregnant and parenting students to include referral to on-campus or off-campus services to assist regarding the availability of or eligibility for certain government assistance programs and any other programs, scholarships, or subsidies that may be available for pregnant and parenting students; and requiring each public senior higher education institution to post the plan on the institution's website on or before August 1, 2026.

Over the decades, Morgan State University has made student success a top priority, to include health and well-being of the campus community. For example, in our 2021-23 strategic plan, our number one (1) goal is to “Enhance Student Success and Well-Being.” Along with our student success component, Morgan considers students holistically which include physical and mental well-being. With that said, we provide for the well-being of students through the University Health Center, University Counseling Center, Office of Retention and Student Success, and Disabilities Office. In demonstration of support and recognition of the needs of population of pregnant and parenting students, our University currently provides lactation room accommodations for nursing mothers in one of our newest campus facilities.

Pregnant and parenting students are considered to be marginalized due to the challenges they may face with social stigmas, and in balancing class schedules and childcare. To this extent, Senate Bill 511 embodies values, critical to addressing systemic barriers that disproportionately impact these marginalized students. It is in alignment with the University's commitment to equitable access to resources and advocacy for policies that support pregnant and parenting student populations.

Higher Education – Scholarships for Correctional Officers

MSU Position: Favorable Status: Did not pass

Synopsis: Altering the eligibility criteria for the Maryland Police Officers and Probation Agents Scholarship Program to include correctional officers.

This proposed legislation holds significant implications for Maryland police officers, probation agents and correctional officers, as well as those students enrolled in institutions of higher education in the State of Maryland exploring careers in those areas. Since correctional officers are vital to the correctional system's safety, security, and rehabilitation, providing them with the means to further their education promotes their professional growth and career progression. Inclusion of correctional officers in this scholarship program demonstrates a broader commitment to supporting all law enforcement personnel, and in satisfying the growing need for skilled professionals in this field. It encourages educational growth and retention of correctional officers, aiding in keeping experienced staff amid high turnover rates. Investing in the future of correctional officers will improve the caliber of our correctional facilities, the training and experience of those working there, and the growth of a stronger and more efficient criminal justice system in Maryland. Moreover, integrating correctional officers into academic programs encourages interdisciplinary collaboration among students pursuing criminal justice, social work, psychology, and related fields. Such collaboration may lead to the development and implementation of rehabilitative models within correctional institutions, shifting the focus from punitive measures to restorative justice approaches. This paradigm shift is essential for addressing systemic issues within the criminal justice system and promoting equitable treatment of incarcerated individuals.

Many higher education institutions, to include HBCUs and urban universities, have a longstanding tradition of community engagement and empowerment, which are what our Universitystandsfirmlyuponandembraces.Graduatesbenefittingfrom thescholarshipprogram will likely return to their communities, equipped with the knowledge and skills to effect positive change within the correctional system. This reinvestment enhances public safety and contributes to the social and economic development of the communities from which these students originate.

Institutes of Higher Education – Dually Enrolled Students – Alterations

MSU Position: Favorable Status: Did not pass

Synopsis: Altering the definition of "dually enrolled student" to include a nonpublic secondary school student and a home school student to be eligible to apply for the PartTime Grant Program and the Early College Access Grant.

The bill ensures parity of access to all students regardless of parental choice of secondary education. Eligibility for state support for post-secondary education should be based on a demonstration of readiness for post-secondary education.

➢ SB 879 / HB725

➢ HB 009

Public Safety – Food System Resiliency Council –Definitions and Reports

MSU Position: Favorable Status: Passed

This bill for this legislation states that it “alters existing responsibilities of the Food System Resiliency Council and repeals outdated one-time reporting requirements, including a previously submitted one-time strategic plan. It requires the council to develop equity and sustainability policy recommendations to increase the long-term resiliency of the food system that (1) address and eliminate food options and food scarcity that exist in “healthy food priority areas” (rather than food deserts, as specified under current law); (2) reduce “wasted food,” as defined under the bill (rather than the current statutory reference to food waste); and (3) address the production and procurement of food (previously required as part of the one-time strategic plan). The bill also requires the council to include in its annual report appropriate policy and legislative changes.”

Morgan State University makes student success as top priority, to include health and well-being of thecampus community. Inour 2021-2030strategicplan,ournumberonegoal is“Enhance Student Success and Well-Being”. Along with our student component, Morgan considers students holistically which include both physical and mental well-being. The inequities relative to our students having access to healthy food options have far reaching impact on overall health.

This legislative embodies values critical in addressing systemic barriers that disproportionately impact marginalized students and is in alignment with our commitment to equitable access to resources for policies that support our students and the Morgan community.

Criminal Law – Firearm Crimes – Convertible Pistols

MSU Position: Favorable

Status: Did not pass

Synopsis: Prohibiting a person from manufacturing, selling, offering for sale, purchasing, receiving, or transferring a certain convertible pistol; and defining “convertible pistol” as a semiautomatic pistol that can be converted into a machine gun by the attachment of a switch/autosear.

It is noted that the majority of the witnesses who provided testimony, representing various jurisdictions including law enforcement, were in favor of this bill. In-personal testimony was provided by MSU. Mass shootings have become too common and we must do everything possible to stop these attacks on our schools and communities. As a clarion call to direct national attention to the increasing incidents of gun violence on United States colleges and university campuses, the Center on Urban Violence and Crime Reduction at Morgan State University hosted its inaugural symposium to reduce violence series.

This bill is crucial to maintaining public safety because it closes a dangerous loophole in firearms regulations. Convertible pistols, which are semi-automatic handguns that can be easily converted into fully automatic machine guns by simply attaching a switch or auto-sear, pose a serious threat to public safety and law enforcement. By prohibiting their production, sale and transfer, the bill ensures that these deadly weapons cannot easily reach the market, thereby reducing the likelihood that criminals or other bad actors will misuse them. There is an immediate and evident risk that needstobeaddressedtoprevent damagebecauseasemi-automaticpistolcanbe easily transformed into a machine gun.

This law also encourages efforts to curb the proliferation of weapons that are especially hazardous in public spaces because of their high rate of rapid fire. Machine guns are already subject to strict federal regulations. This bill seeks to reinforce those safeguards by ensuring that dangerous alterations, like installing a switch or auto-sear, are not allowed to continue unchecked. This bill is a proactive step to maintain control over firearm modifications by ensuring that those who try to circumvent existing regulations by manufacturing or acquiring convertible pistols will be held accountable. By putting these crucial measures into place, we may help prevent mass shootings and other violent incidents which may arise from the inappropriate use of such easily converted firearms.

RESEARCH, ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

Internet Gaming – Authorization and Implementation

MSU Position: Informational / Amend

Status: Did not pass

This bill for this legislation proposed “authorization of the State Lottery and Gaming Control Commission to issue certain licenses to qualified applicants to conduct or participate in certain Internet gaming operations in the State; requiring the Commission to regulate internet gaming and the conduct of Internet gaming in the State; requiring an Internet gaming licensee to require individuals to provide proof of the registration in order to participate Internet gaming; submitting the Act to a referendum, et al.”

While Morgan does not endorse the proliferation of gambling in the state, we recognize the importance of mitigation its potential social and economic consequences. In this regard, we submitted a proposed an amendment to the bill, establishing a detailed mechanism for addressing problem gambling through research and education. The proposed amendment would allow Morgan’s researchers to access the essential data to conduct independent studies that inform policymakers, regulators and stakeholders about the effects of gambling expansion. This research would be instrumental in development data-driven strategies to address problem gambling and to ensure that responsible gaming practices are upheld across Maryland.

Furthermore, the amendment includes provisions for dedicated funding to support educational initiatives on responsible gaming. These resources would allow for the development of programs that equip individuals, particularly vulnerable populations, with the knowledge needed to make informed decisions about gaming behaviors.

By proactively investing in research and education, Maryland can lead the way in promoting responsible gambling policies while safeguarding its residents. This amendment ensures that Maryland adopts a balanced and responsible approach to gaming legislation.

HB 211 / SB 166

LABOR

AND EMPLOYMENT

MSU Position: Not Favorable

Status: Did not pass

Synopsis: Providing collective bargaining rights to certain graduate assistants at a system institution, Morgan State University, or St. Mary’s College of Maryland; defining “graduate assistant” as a graduate student at a system institution, Morgan State University, or St. Mary’s College of Maryland who is a teaching, administrative, or research assistant, or in a comparable position, a fellow, or a postdoctoral intern; and establishing a separate collective bargaining unit for the graduate assistants

MorganStateUniversityutilizesseveralentities, includingitsrepresentativebodycalledtheUniversity Council, to provide for a participatory system of governance in order to provide the University community an opportunity for involvement, communication, and accountability in all major decisions. The University Council, which has 37 members (27 faculty, 7 staff, 2 undergraduate students, 1 graduate student) serves as the University’s official governance structure involving the administration, faculty, professional administrative staff, classified employees, graduate students, and the undergraduate student body in the ongoing operation of the University. In particular, three faculty members come from each of the nine academic colleges and schools at the University. For academic collegesandschoolswithgraduateprograms,atleast one of the three representatives shall be a member of the graduate faculty. Two members of the council are from the University's classified employees. In terms of responsibility, the University Council serves as an advisory body to the president of the University, reviews all proposed policies, and ultimately gives the University’s president feedback on such policies.

The president of Morgan takes this feedback very seriously and rarely, if ever, has he in his fifteen years as president advanced any significant policy to the Morgan State University Board of Regents for action without reaching consensus with the Council. The University Council may also, on its own initiative, make recommendations to him for his and the Board of Regent's consideration with respect to any matter of university-wide significance and impact.

In essence, the University Council serves a valued role in providing all members of the University’s community a part in shared governance. It has been the president of Morgan State University’s experience in higher ed institutions with collective bargaining within its academic ranks, that it has led to slower progress and hindered implementation of initiatives which effectively address the concerns of multiple stakeholders, as already accomplished by the University Council.

Further, a collective bargaining environment can create an extremely adversarial relationship between graduate assistants, and postdoctoral associates, creating the possibility that collective bargaining agreements and the nature of the relationship may prioritize union interests over collaborative solutions, thereby impacting curricular development and alignment with market needs, and resource allocation when resources are very limited, leading to a tense learning environment for students. This legislation would likely lead to the promulgation of union rules for graduate assistants and postdoctoral associates which restrict the autonomy they currently enjoy through course design, pedagogy, and assessment. Similarly, the immense amount of time that the collective bargaining process requires would surely impact their commitment to these aspects of their academic lives.

Enactment of this bill would likely also result in the University’s need to hire a significant number of additional personnel to manage relations with additional bargaining units. These new employees wouldentailasignificantaddedexpensetotheUniversityatatimewhenouroperating budget is being reduced by over $12 million. Moreover, these new employees, along with incumbent employees, would require substantial training and be tasked with additional responsibilities to remain in compliance with labor relations laws. Diverting focus from core academic functions to complex administrative procedures to comply with union and collective bargaining obligations will only further the strain on already financially burdened administrative departments.

Morgan State University remains firmly committed to the success of all graduate assistants and postdoctoral associates. However, a collective bargaining environment for all graduate assistants and postdoctoral associates will not lead to an enhancement of that success.

Status: Passed

Synopsis: Requiring the State Board of Trustees of the Maryland Teachers and State Employees Supplemental Retirement Plans to implement an automatic enrollment arrangement for State employees who are hired on or after January 1, 2026; authorizing certain employing institutions to automatically enroll employees into a certain supplemental retirement plan; requiring an eligible employer to deduct wages of an employee for contribution to a supplemental retirement plan in accordance with an automatic enrollment arrangement; etc.

➢ SB 270

➢ SB 693 / HB1033

State Retirement and Pension System – Reemployment Earnings Limitations – Maximum Average Final Compensation

Status: Passed

Synopsis: Clarifying that the maximum average final compensation that certain retirees of the State Retirement and Pension System is to be based on the minimum annual salary on the standard State pay scale as of January 1 of the preceding calendar year in order to be exempt from a certain reemployment earnings limitation; and adding an average final compensation reemployment exemption for the temporary suspension of a retirement allowance for disability retirees.

➢ SB 750 / HB 661

State Personnel – Collective Bargaining – Part-Time Faculty

MSU Position: Not favorable

Status: Did not pass

In particular, three faculty members come from each of the nine academic colleges and schools at theUniversity. Foracademiccollegesandschoolswithgraduateprograms,atleast one of the three representatives shall be a member of the graduate faculty. Two members of the council are from the University's classified employees. In terms of responsibility, the University Council serves as an advisory body to the president of the University, reviews all proposed policies, and ultimately gives the University’s president feedback on such policies.

the University Council may also, on its own initiative, make recommendations to him for his and the Board of Regent's consideration with respect to any matter of university-wide significance and impact.

Further, a collective bargaining environment can create an extremely adversarial relationship between faculty (including tenure-track faculty), academic deans and mid-level administrators to include associate deans, assistant deans, department chairpersons and co-chairpersons who may serve as administrators with faculty rank, academic program directors and coordinators, and research center directors who oversee research staff with faculty rank, creating the possibility that collective bargaining agreements and the nature of the relationship may prioritize union interests over collaborative solutions, thereby impacting curricular development and alignment with market needs, and resource allocation when resources are very limited, leading to a tense learning environment for students. This legislation would likely lead to the promulgation of union rules for faculty which restrict the autonomy they currently enjoy through course design, academic program development and proposals, pedagogy, research, service, and assessment. Similarly, the immense amount of time that the collective bargaining process requires wouldsurely impact their commitment to these aspects of their academic lives.

Enactmentof thisbillwouldlikelyalsoresultintheUniversity’sneed tohire asignificant number of additional personnel to manage relations with additional bargaining units. These new employeeswouldentailasignificantaddedexpensetotheUniversityatatimewhenouroperating budget is being reduced by over $12 million. Moreover, these new employees, along with incumbent employees, would require substantial training and be tasked with additional responsibilities to remain in compliance with labor relations laws. Diverting focus from core academic functions to complex administrative procedures to comply with union and collective bargaining obligations will only further the strain on already financially burdened administrative departments.

Morgan State University remains firmly committed to the success of all part-time and full-time faculty and administrators with the rank of faculty. However, a collective bargaining environment for all part-time faculty will not lead to an enhancement of that success.

➢ SB 862 / HB 1072

State Retirement and Pension System –Administrative Fees - Repeal

Status: Passed

Synopsis: Requiring the Board of Trustees for the State Retirement and Pension System to certify certain employer contribution rates each fiscal year; requiring the employer contribution rates to include recognition of certain administrative and operational expenses; repealing a requirement that certain administrative and operational expenses of the State Retirement and Pension System and the State Retirement Agency be funded by charging each participating employer an administrative fee for each system participant; etc.

IT & CYBERSECURITY

Authorization and Implementation

MSU Position: Informational / Amendment offered

Status: Did not pass

Synopsis: Authorizing the State Lottery and Gaming Control Commission to issue certain licenses to certain qualified applicants to conduct or participate in certain Internet gaming operations in the State; requiring the Commission to regulate Internet gaming and the conduct of Internet gaming in the State; requiring an Internet gaming licensee to require individuals to provide proof of the registration in order to participate in Internet gaming; submitting the Act to a referendum; etc.

➢ HB 17

Morgan proposed amendment to the title of this bill to read as follows:

Ensuring DataAccess, Research Funding and Responsible Gaming Measures in Maryland’s iGaming Expansion

The foregoing additional amendment to the outline and language of the bill was suggested:

SECTION 1. Legislative Intent and Purpose

Whereas the expansion of internet gaming in Maryland presents both economic opportunities and potential risks to consumers, particularly vulnerable individuals and communities, it is imperative that a robust research and data-sharing framework be established to inform responsible gaming policies, assess the socio-economic impact of online gambling, and ensure the state’s gaming ecosystem prioritizes transparency, fairness, and consumer protection.

To this end, Morgan State University’s Center for Data Analytics and Sports Gaming Research (DASGR) dedicated to studying the impact of gambling on communities, promoting responsible gaming, and informing state policy must be granted access to industry data and dedicated funding to support independent research and community outreach initiatives.

By incorporating this amendment, Maryland can establish itself as a national leader in responsible gaming policy while safeguarding the well-being of its residents.

SECTION 2. Data Sharing Mandate

(a) Any licensed internet gaming operator authorized under this legislation must submit anonymized, player-level data to Morgan State University’s researchers. In addition, the following access and reporting requirements shall apply:

• Daily Data Access: Operators shall ensure that real-time, anonymized player data is available through a secure, encrypted API connection to Morgan State researchers.

• Weekly Data Reports: Operators shall generate and submit weekly summary reports detailing key gaming activity metrics, including trends in deposits, withdrawals, selfexclusions, and high-risk gambling behavior.

• Monthly Comprehensive Submissions: A complete dataset, as detailed below, must be provided each month for independent analysis by the DASGR Center.

• Quarterly Trend Analysis Data: Operators must compile quarterly datasets that include longitudinal trends and behavioral analysis data for regulatory review and research.

• Annual Full Data Archive: A complete historical archive of the past year’s anonymized data must be provided to DASGR Center by January 31 of the following year

(b)Ad Hoc Data Requests

• Operators shall, at the request of Morgan State University’s Center for Data Analytics and Sports Gaming Research, provide specific ad hoc datasets for urgent research needs, policy analysis, or emerging trends.

• These requests must be fulfilled within 10 business days, unless an extension is formally approved by the Maryland State Lottery and Gaming Control Agency (MLGCA).

The required data shall include, but is not limited to:

1. User Demographics (age brackets, ZIP code distribution, income brackets where available)

2. Betting Behavior Trends (frequency, size, and types of wagers)

3. Deposit and Withdrawal Patterns

4. Self-Exclusion and Responsible Gaming Program Participation

5. Problem Gambling Indicators (e.g., frequency of declined transactions, multiple payment sources, excessive play duration)

6. Marketing and Promotional Strategies (Advertising data, bonus offers, etc.)

(b)All data shall be anonymized to protect user privacy and provided at no cost to Morgan State University’s Center for Data Analytics and Sports Gaming Research to support independent analysis.

(c)The Center shall use this data to:

• Identify trends in problem gambling and develop intervention strategies.

• Assess disparities in gaming-related harm among different demographic groups.

• Evaluate the effectiveness of Maryland’s responsible gaming policies.

• Inform state regulators, legislators, and community organizations on best practices for gaming oversight.

(d)Data Access and Compliance Mechanisms

1. Secure Transmission & Storage

o Operators must provide data via a secure, encrypted API or file transfer system designated by Morgan’s DASGR Center.

o Data must be structured and consistent across all licensed operators to allow comparability and analysis.

2. Audit and Compliance Verification

o Operators must retain complete historical records and provide access upon regulatory request.

o DASGR Center shall have the authority to conduct audits to verify data accuracy and completeness.

o Failure to comply shall result in penalties starting at $50,000 per week of noncompliance, escalating with continued violations.

o False certification shall constitute fraudulent reporting, subject to criminal and civil penalties.

SECTION 3. Research and Public Policy Funding

(a) To ensure the effective study of internet gaming and its societal impact, the Maryland State Lottery and Gaming Control Agency shall allocate $2 M of annual tax revenue generated from internet gaming to Morgan State University’s Center for Data Analytics and Sports Gaming Research.

(b) These funds shall be used for:

1. Statewide Research Expansion: Conducting annual reports on the socio-economic and health (including mental health) impact of online gaming in Maryland.

2. Community Outreach & Education: Developing public awareness campaigns on responsible gaming and risk mitigation strategies.

3. Problem Gambling Prevention Initiatives: Creating early intervention programs targeting at-risk communities.

4. Legislative & Regulatory Support: Providing data-driven recommendations to policymakers on effective gambling regulations.

SECTION 4. Reporting and Legislative Oversight

(a) Morgan State University’s Center for Data Analytics and Sports Gaming Research shall submit an annual report to the Maryland General Assembly and the Maryland State Lottery and Gaming Control Agency detailing:

• Key findings from industry data analysis.

• Trends in problem gambling behavior.

• Effectiveness of responsible gaming initiatives.

• Recommendations for policy and regulatory improvements.

(b) The Maryland General Assembly shall conduct an annual oversight hearing to review the findings and evaluate whether additional measures are needed to ensure Maryland’s internet gaming framework upholds consumer protection and responsible gaming principles.

SECTION 5. Effective Date

This amendment shall take effect immediately upon passage of the bill.

Justification for the Amendment

• Data Access for Research: This provision ensures that policymakers have the necessary insights to mitigate the risks associated with internet gaming.

• Funding for Responsible Gaming Initiatives: A dedicated funding stream will allow the state to proactively address gambling-related harm and prevent future crises.

• Legislative Oversight & Transparency: Annual reports and hearings will ensure continuous monitoring and adaptation of policies based on real-world data.

MSU Position: Informational Status: Did not pass

Synopsis: Transferring the Cyber Maryland Program from the Maryland Technology Development Corporation to the Maryland Department of Labor; altering the duties of the Program; requiring the Program to issue competitive grants and contracts to enhance cybersecurity workforce development, including cybersecurity for operational technology beginning in fiscal year 2026; requiring the Program in conjunction with other agencies to report on certain Program activities to the Governor and the General Assembly by December 1, 2026; etc.

This legislation will provide essential funding for future cyber workforce development from K-12, higher education, and beyond. Of particular note is the requirement that unused balances from specific programs and funds be transferred to the Program at the close of the fiscal year.

MSU Position: Informational / Amendment offered Status: Did not pass

Synopsis: Authorizing the State Lottery and Gaming Control Commission to issue certain licenses to certain qualified applicants to conduct or participate in certain internet gaming operations in the State; requiring the Commission to regulate Internet gaming and the conduct of Internet gaming in the State; requiring an Internet gaming licensee to require individuals to provide proof of the registration in order to participate in Internet gaming; etc.

➢ HB 1468 / SB 867

Cyber Maryland Program – Revisions

➢ SB 340

Internet Gaming - Authorization and Implementation

Morgan proposed amendment of the title of this bill to read as follows:

Ensuring Data Access, Research Funding, and Responsible Gaming Measure in Maryland’s iGaming Expansion

Justification for the amendment:

• Data Access for Research: This provision ensures that policymakers have the necessary insights to mitigate the risks associated with internet gaming.

• Funding for Responsible Gaming Initiatives: A dedicated funding stream will allow the state to proactively address gambling-related harm and prevent future crises.

• Legislative Oversight & Transparency: Annual reports and hearings will ensure continuous monitoring and adaptation of policies based on real-world data.

PURCHASING & PROCUREMENT

➢ HB 819 / SB 653 / Chapter 737

Employee Stock Ownership Plan Preference - Pilot

Status: Passed

Synopsis: Authorizing the Maryland Stadium Authority, Morgan State University, St. Mary’s College of Maryland, and Baltimore City Community College to establish a certain preference program for certain procurements; authorizing the establishment of certain evaluation factor for certain proposals by an entity that utilizes certain employee stock ownership plans; requiring contractors to provide certain information to a unit regarding the use of an employee stock ownership plan; etc.

This bill allows certain entities to use an “evaluation factor” during the procurement process of up to 10% for companies that have had employee stock ownership plans, subject to the approval of the Board of Public Works and under specified circumstances.

State Government – Forms – Reporting Requirement

Status: Passed

Synopsis: Repealing a requirement that certain departments or units of State government annually submit a report on the management of forms to the Department of General Services.

➢ SB 260

➢ SB 439

Higher Education – High Impact Economic Development

Activities - Alterations

Status: Passed

Synopsis: Altering the definition of "high impact economic development activity" to exclude cost savings related to the reduction in the number of University System of Maryland or Morgan State University employees; requiring the Board of Regents of the University System of Maryland and the Board of Regents of Morgan State University to report certain information relating to high impact economic development activities; making a high impact economic development activity subject to State procurement law; etc

R13M00 - Morgan State University

2025 Joint Chairmen’s Report

The 2025 Joint Chairmen’s Report (JCR) requested that MSU prepare three reports. Electronic copies of the full JCR responses can be found on the DLS Library website.

• East North Avenue Development Report: The committees requested a report from MSU about the development of East North Avenue and its position as an anchor institution. At the time of the writing of this analysis, the report has not been submitted.

• Instructional Faculty Workload Report: A report was submitted providing MSU’s faculty workload. MSU’s tenure and tenure-track faculty taught 92% of expected course units, and full-time instructional faculty taught 90% of expected course units.

• Report on Student Cohort Data: The budget committees requested that MSU provide data for in-state students from fiscal 2019 through 2024, including recruitment efforts, the number enrolled by high school, and racial/ethnic and gender demographics. MSU provided the analyst with an extensive report detailing the institution’s recruitment efforts and the demographics of its student body but has yet to submit the report to the DLS Library at the writing of this analysis.

Morgan Across Maryland

Morgan State University draws students from across the state from the Allegheny Mountains in Western Maryland to the Chesapeake Bay on the Eastern Shore.

Our largest numbers of Maryland students, 760, hail from Legislative District 45 represented by Senator Cory V. McCray and Delegates Jaqueline T. Addison, Stephanie Smith, and Caylin Young. The map represents 8,524 students enrolled from fall 2023-through spring 2025.

Senators and Delegates

OFFICE OF STATE AND FEDERAL RELATIONS

Don-Terry Veal, Ph.D.

Vice President of State and Federal Relations & Chief of Staff

443-885-3035

don-terry.veal@morgan.edu

Senator Joan Carter Conway

Director

443-885-3950

joan.carterconway@morgan.edu

Michelle Cypress

Staff Assistant

443-885-3938

michelle.cypress@morgan.edu

Lesley A. Robinson

Executive Assistant to the Vice President of State and Federal Relations & Chief of Staff

443-885-3035

lesley.robinson@morgan.edu