A Strange Drawing Found In Sinai Could Undermine Our Entire Idea Of Judaism

SUBSCRIBE NOW FOR FULL ACCESS TO HAARETZ.COM

SUBSCRIBE

A Strange Drawing Found in Sinai Could Undermine Our Entire Idea of Judaism Is that a 3,000-year-old picture of god, his penis and his wife depicted by early Jews at Kuntillet Ajrud?

Save

Zen Read

News coverage you can trust ONLY $1 FOR THE FIRST MONTH WHEN YOU BUY AN ANNUAL SUBSCRIPTION SUBSCRIBE

Depiction of god and his wife? Found at Kuntillet Ajrud

Listen to this article now 11:35

Nir Hasson Follow Apr 4, 2018

Powered by Trinity Audio

More than four decades after its excavation wound down, a small hill in the Sinai Desert continues to bedevil archaeologists. The extraordinary discoveries made at Kuntillet Ajrud, an otherwise nondescript slope in the northern Sinai, seem to undermine one of the foundations of Judaism as we know it.

Then, it seems, "the Lord our God” wasn't “one God.” He may have even had a wife, going by the completely unique "portrait" of the Jewish deity that archaeologists found at the site, which may well be the only existing depiction of YHWH. Kuntillet Ajrud got its name, meaning “the isolated hill of the water sources," from wells at the foot of the hill. It is a remote spot in the heart of the desert, far from any town or or trade route. But for a short time around 3,000 years ago, it served as a small way station.

- Advertisment -

___

Dozens of drawings and inscriptions, resembling nothing whatever found anywhere else in our region, survived from that period, which seems to have lasted no longer than two or three decades. Egypt gained the artifacts with the peace treaty with Israel 25 years ago, but the release of the report on the excavation six years ago and a book about the site two years ago have kept the argument over the exceptional findings from the hill in Sinai alive.

Breaking news and analyses delivered to your inbox Email *

Sign Up Please enter a valid email address

Kuntillet Ajrud

The hill lies 50 kilometers south of Kadesh Barnea and 15 kilometers west of the ancient Darb el-Ghazza route, which led from Gaza to the Read Sea's Gulf of Eilat. Its unique qualities were first noticed in 1870 by the British explorer Edward Palmer who discovered a fragment of a clay jar, a pithos, marked with the Hebrew letter aleph.

Later, in 1902, a Czech orientalist and explorer, Alois Musil, was attacked by local Bedouins who claimed that he was defiling a holy site. Exploration would only resume in 1975, by the Tel Aviv University archaeologist Ze’ev Meshel, as part of a collaboration between the university and the Israel Exploration Society.

- Advertisment -

___

Kuntillet Ajrud.

The excavation showed that Kuntillat Ajrud was what's called a "single-layer site," meaning, it had been occupied for just one period, which the excavators dated to the late ninth century or early eighth century B.C.E. Meshel estimated that it had been occupied very briefy, 25 years at most. Structure-wise, the excavators only found two fairly simple, unimpressive structures. The wonder lay in the drawings and inscriptions.

Ancient Hebrew writing on the rim of a bowl found at Kuntillet Ajrud, dating to about 3,000 years ago

Clay from Jerusalem At first the archaeologists thought that the place was a military fortress. Other fortresses from the First Temple period had been found in the Negev. But no evidence that there had been a military presence was found, and in the third excavation season, Meshel decided that the structures weren't that sort.

Nor would Kuntillet Ajrud have been suitable as an inn for travelers: it was too small and was off the beaten track. Nor did it seem to match any of the criteria of a trade station.

The first hint at the true character of Kuntillet Ajrud was the discovery of pottery fragments inscribed with ancient Hebrew letters: quf, quf resh, aleph and yud.

Analysis of the clay from which the pithos (pottery jars) was intriguing. The pots were made of hawar motza, clay only found by Jerusalem. In other words, the jars had been made in area of Ancient Hebrew writing found at

Jerusalem, which was certainly far away.

Kuntillet Ajrud

Among the inscriptions were a blessing and religious texts. That and the origin of the clay suggested to Meshel that the residents were priests and Levites, who were supported by tithes collected in the Temple in Jerusalem.

Breaking news and the best of Haaretz straight to your inbox Email *

Sign Up Please enter a valid email address

In line with the spirit of this interpretation, he also interpreted the letters on the dishes: quf as standing for kodesh (holy), quf-resh as the first two letters in the word korban (sacrifice), and aleph for a korban asham (guilt offering).

The letter yud, Meshel suggests, may represent a vessel that had been used to continued tithes, though he himself casts doubt on that theory: “In First Temple times, they used Egyptian numbers,” he points out

Animal images found at Kuntillet Ajrud

he points out.

Another inscription found there argues that the hill had been peopled by a literate elite and even hints at the presence of a school. One vessel contains the Hebrew alphabet twice — one in the crisp, competent handwriting of a well-trained scribe and another in what researchers suspect was the hesitant handwriting of a student.

If all this is true, what was a small group of priests and Levites doing in the middle of the desert?

When King Yoash conquered Judah Meshel thinks the people dwelling at the site were providing an essential service: writing blessings. But from who, for who? The story gets even more complicated when one examines the site through the lens of geopolitics.

At the time the hill was occupied, the kingdom of Israel existed in the north, ruled from Samaria. The kingdom of Judah existed in the south and had its capital in Jerusalem.

Depiction of god and his wife? Found at Kuntillet Ajrud

However, the names and inscriptions found at Kuntillat Ajrud seem to be Israelite, not Judahite. It seems to have been an Israelite site — far, far to the south of Israel and even south of the Judah border.

Reconstruction of what may be the image of King Yoash, possibly the only known contemporary portrait of a Judahite king. Found at Kuntillet Ajrud

Why would one kingdom maintain a religious site at the far end of another kingdom?

Meshel thinks the Israelite presence in or beyond the Judean kingdom, and the fact that Jerusalem (the capital of Judah) provisioned this way station of the rival kingdom, indicates that at the time the kingdom of Israel was, or was turning into, a regional power.

Judah was a vassal state subject to the more powerful northern kingdom, he thinks.

As for why Judahite Jerusalem would provision this Israelitemanned hilltop in the middle of nowhere, Meshel suspects it all comes down to Kuntillat Ajrud having been founded by none other than King Yoash of Israel

than King Yoash of Israel.

“The bible says that war broke out between Amatzia, king of Judah, and Yoash, king of Israel,” he says. Thus the Israelite king Yoash gained control of Judah.

It would have been convenient for Yoash to provision Kuntillat Ajrud from the Temple in Judah. Why would he have sent up north to bring supplies for it from Israel, Meshel asks rhetorically.

If indeed Meshel is right and King Yoash founded the site, he may be the figure drawn on plaster at the entrance of the building.

The drawing, possibly of the king, was restored by Prof. Pirhiya Bar based on similar drawings from the ancient east, in which the royal figure holds a lotus flower. It is a reasonable possibility that the figure depicted at Kuntillet Ajrud was a ruler or king, and if so, then it is the only contemporary visual description we have of a king from biblical times.

“I told myself look at the luck I had, finding the only drawing of a king from the First Temple period,” says Meshel.

A picture of God, and is that his tail Kuntillet Ajrud also brought images of animals, humans and what seems to be gods.

The one causing the controversy shows a man and a women, drawn naively, with crowned heads and holding hands. The man has either a tail or a large penis, and above him the blessing “Yahweh and his Asherah” is written.

Could the couple on the pithos be a rendering of God and his wife Asherah, the only one ever found?

Dr. Yigal Bin Nun, a researcher and author of “A Brief History of YHWH.” has no doubt. “If you want to step away from reality then you can say this or that, but if you look at it as it is you can’t ignore the truth,” he says.

Among the detractors are Prof. Tallay Ornan, who has studied the images at the site, and Prof. Shmuel Ahituv, an acclaimed ancient inscriptions researcher. Both contributed to a book on the topic together with Meshel and Esther Eshel, published last year.

They think these figures show the minor Egyptian deity Bes, not YHWH, the Jewish god.

“Bes is a dwarf who was the deity of witches," Ahituv says, adding that in his view, the picture shown wouldn't befit a major divinity.

Kuntillet Ajrud

Defending the picture as that of YHWH, Ben Nun an Israelite religious site on the border of Judah, under the political auspices of Assyria, would be unlikely to hail Bes, or any Egyptian god or symbol. Egypt was considered hostile. "The Bes explanation is completely illogical," Ben Nun says.

Furthermore, it's hard to make sense of the writing “YHWH and his Asherah” without suspecting that this god, at least according to the people on this hill, was married.

God of the south and god of the north Other phrases found at the site also challenge the known pantheon of Israelite faith. “Yahweh of Teman and his Asherah” and “Yahweh of Samaria and his Asherah,” for example, were also found inscribed at the site.

These are doubly outrageous. If God is one, then how can there be god for the north (Shomron) and for the south (Yemen, still called Teman in Hebrew)?

To make matters worse, does the word “Asherah,” formulated as “his Asherah”, hint that the gods of Israel had a wife? If so, where has she gone?

For Meshel, the site’s main researcher, the issue remains unresolved.

He and Ben Nun suspect the site brings insight to the beliefs of the people living here 3,000 years ago. They did not worship a single al-powerful deity: they were devoted to a pantheon of gods.

It has also long been known that households with Jewish hallmarks, certainly in the First Temple era and later too, also had images of other gods, a.k.a, figurines.

If anything the discoveries at Kuntillet Ajrud indicate that in the late ninth century B.C.E. or the early eighth, the idea of a single deity had not yet consolidated, suggests Meshel. "In this religious reality YHWH is local, for the city, the village, for Shomron and for Teman (Yemen)."

Ashera the tree?

The sheer fact that Kuntillet Ajrud was so far-flung is what enabled it to survive, Meshel further claims - albeit not for long.

Come the seventh century B.C.E., Josiah King of Judah spearheaded a profound religious reformation, that included centralizing ritual sacrifice in Jerusalem and destroying competing sites.

By that time, Kuntillet Ajrud was long since abandoned. Meshel suspects the kingdom simply forgot about it.

Ahituv rejects this whole analysis and thinks that Ashera referred to a tree. Or maybe a thing or place. But not an independent female divinity.

“If you look at the Bible you can see that there is no sacrifice for Ashera - but rather the ashera is chopped down ahead of war," he says. "It may be a tree but it was not an independent being."

Regarding the varying names of Jehovah, Ahituv says these are different manifestations of the same god, “its like there are different manifestations of the Holy Mary in different places and everyone knows it’s the same Mary.”

Meshel does not agree: “If you read the phrase as is, clearly the meaning is that she is his partner.”

“The Bible reads: Ashera pesel (Ashera statue) — the statue had to represent someone. We can’t just say it was a log,” Ben Nun bolsters the point. Some also believe the early Jews worshipped trees.

This argument is bound to continue even though access to the actual findings is impossible. As part of the deal with Egypt, all archaeological findings were returned to Cairo in 1993. They have not been shown to the public since then. Meshel fears Kuntillet Ajrud will be forgotten again

Ajrud will be forgotten again.

You Might Also Like

Why so many young Israelis adore this racist politician

Secret NATO client of Israeli spy planes revealed

Ken Burns’ brilliant ‘The U.S. and the Holocaust’ has only one problem

Comments

Israel's Labor party has been revived. Just not by its current leader

A Jewish 'golden age' ends in Spain and Portugal | Opinion

Monumental ancient structure in central Israel isn’t a synagogue after all

Sponsored

Sponsored

Nikkei Asia // China Communist Party officials 'offered' to quit top ranks: Xinhua

Nikkei Asia // Nikkei Stock Index 300 to remove Hitachi Metals from constituents

Sponsored

Sponsored

https://thesup ermommy.co m/ // [Photos] The Oldest Stars Who Are Still Living In 2022

Life Tech Advi ser // Malaysia: New "Lung Cleaning" Device is Going Viral

Sponsored

Sponsored

GadgetReview er.org // Here Are 27 Of The Coolest Gifts For Men In 2021

PodoCare // Here's why people over 45 are snapping up this bunion corrector

Name Enter the commenter display name

Get a nickname

Comment

SUBSCRIBERS JOIN THE CONVERSATION FASTER

Automatic approval of subscriber comments.

From $1 for the first month

By adding a comment, I agree to this site’s Terms of use

SUBSCRIBE Already signed up? LOG IN

Newest first

Sort comment by

11

Manuel Gold 09:57 24.09.2019 0

0

There are yet other explanations that go beyond what Meshel proposed. When I visited my daughter in Jerusalem in September 1995, we went right to the Israel Museum to see these Kuntillat Ajrud inscriptions. Alas, there was nothin there. I had heard about these finds from Ze’ev Meshel himself at a lecture he gave at NYU in the early 1980s. When I asked an Israeli archaeologist where they were, he told me that they had been returned to Egypt after the peace treaty with Israel. I noted that there was not even a replica at the Museum. They are probably stored in crates deep inside vast storage warehouses, like in Indiana Jones. It occurred to me that even the Israel Museum was too embarrassed to keep replicas of this find. When Meshel gave his presentation at NYU he said that although he was not a religious man, he was embarrassed by his discovery. I said to him, ‘’why be embarrassed when an entire chapter in the Hebrew Bible, 2Kings chapter 23, was devoted to the many, many idolatrous objects that King Josiah took out from the Temple in Jerusalem and destroyed, including Asherah.’’ (King Josiah’s Reformation, c.622 BCE, at the time of prophet Jeremiah.) The Temple had gradually added different pagan deities to please the demands of the people, and to keep them from visiting local shrines. At that time there were purist Yahwists, and also those who added the worship of other deities. The site was a place where locals and passing travelers could make offerings to the Temple in Jerusalem.

Hence the letters ‘‘aleph’’ and ‘’yod’’ on some jars. ‘’Aleph’’ jars held offerings to the goddess Asherah, while ‘’yod’’ jars

j

g

g

,

y

j

contained offerings to Yahweh. In later Second Temple Times, letters on temple jars indicated content, ‘’men’’ for ma’aser, ‘’tav’’ for terumah. The scripts that appear appear to have been written by children could also have been by adults, who were using irregular writing tools or inks. The images at this site, so close to Egypt, were borrowed by the ancient artists from the Egyptian god Bes who has many different uses, including protector of households. So, these valuable discoveries show the struggles of those who advocated the purist worship of Yahweh, [and those who were adding other deities. It appears that after Josiah’s Reformation, there were no longer any local shrines, and Yahwism became more normative.

Report

10

Shlomo 23:28 13.06.2018 0

0

1. My reading of other sources suggests that drueing th 9-8 century BC Judea/Israel was ruled by King Solomon (Shlomo), based on newly discovered scripts documenting selling tall trees by the king of Sidon (Lebanon) to King Shlomo (for building he temple, as described in the old testament in detail), while the division between Israel and Judea occurred after Shlomo's death, and not to Yoash and Amazia, but rather to Yerovaam (Israel) and Rehavaam (Judea). 2. Ashara is a Goddess associated with agriculture.

It is mentioned in the old testament many times, as an unwanted supplement to be eradicated (which is why chopping it was a "good thing"). However, many Israelites at the time did worship (also) Ashera and Baal (the god of cattle, which is perhaps why the cows are drawn there as well). 3. The drawing in question also reminds of the ancient Egyptian's God (YHWH?) and his children, Osiris and Isis.

According to their mythology, God created the world (known at the time) by masturbation (as he did not have a wife), which perhaps is hinted by the penis in that drawing. 4. A side effect of all of this is the existence of a female Goddess, Read more

9

Uri Geller 21:29 08.06.2018 1

0

Art inspired by Goyim Heathens in the area. Plain and simple.

Report

8

Kal 17:14 08.04.2018 1

2

This is truly fascinating Report

7

Moshe ben Avraham 01:54 07.04.2018 2

1

Does anyone know who wrote the bible and who published it? Was it a corporation; what I mean is, is there limited liability?

Report

6

Darth Zaider 19:24 05.04.2018 3

1

I do not not see a lot of controversy here. Before the idea of Yahweh as the sovereign , the only one supreme God became firmly implanted among the population at the time there were very likely existing different views among the people of what Lord Yahweh was supposed to be like.

Report

5

David Wight 02:02 04.04.2018 0

0

The Torah does not lie. Yahweh is our God eternal. This article may describe a historical find but will never be relevant. Mere conjecture.

Report

John Watkins. (New

04:52

Zealand.)

09.04.2018

1

David Wight

1

I have no doubt that the Lord God Eternal exists, but Yahweh, (Jehovah,) may not be his actual name.

Remember, there are four names of God in the Old Testament, (Torah.)

Reply

Report

4

Moshe ben Avraham 00:23 04.04.2018 0

2

Look at the woman in the upper right. What is she sitting on?

Is it a shopping cart? Does it have wheels? Look at the turn in the cow's neck. I think there are legitimate reasons to question the age of this "art."

Report

Tzila 05:33 06.04.2018 1

Moshe ben Avraham

0

Reply

Report

Search

LOG IN

Moshe ben

01:46

Avraham

07.04.2018

0

Moshe ben Avraham

1

Ah Ha! That explains everything.

Reply

3

Report

brk 14:53 03.04.2018 2

1 Report

2

Smadar 00:34 03.04.2018 0

0

It's obvious that there are Egyptian influences with this group of people and that indeed it is known that there were people who worshipped other gods at the time. Apparently only 40% of the Jews exiled from Egypt with Moses. So it's possible that this was another sect just as other sects lived in the West Bank near Masada.

Report

More comments

In the News In the News Haaretz - Israel election Nablus ghost town Israel - Lebanon Gantz - Turkey Syri

One in Six American

Why Half a Million

Broker for Israeli Arms

Jews Say U.S. Should Be

Israeli Citizens Can't

to Myanmar Arrested in

a Christian Nation, Pew

Vote in Israel's

Thailand for Drug

Survey Finds

Upcoming Elections

Dealing, Money Laundering

Netanyahu Shifts to War

Israel's Fateful

The Fellowship: Fast

Mode: Voter Phone

Elections: Here's How to

response to the Ukraine

Numbers Distributed

Keep Up to Date

crisis

Without Consent

Paid by IFCJ

FAQ | Contact us | Terms and conditions | Privacy policy | Cancellation of digital subscriptions | Management |

Load more

Editorial | Newsletters | Accessibility | Advertise on Haaretz.com | About Haaretz Haaretz.com, the online English edition of Haaretz Newspaper in Israel, gives you breaking news, analyses and opinions about Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World. © Haaretz Daily Newspaper Ltd. All Rights Reserved

SUBSCRIBE NOW