Thursday, 16 November 2017 http://today.thefinancialexpress.com.bd/views-reviews/advance-ruling-by-nbr-needs-to-be-well-defined1510755911
Advance Ruling by NBR needs to be well-defined M S Siddiqui | November 16, 2017 00:00:00
Customs officials and traders often have differences of opinion regarding the treatment of goods for Customs purposes - determination of value, classification of goods, and determination of rules of origin etc. Such disputes arise mainly due to lack of legislation and legal guidelines, lack of technical expertise, ineffective management controls, and poorly defined compliance requirements. These obstacles are compounded by complex or inadequately publicised guidelines and poorly designed declaration processing systems and practices, which coupled with unfettered discretion among customs officials facilitates questionable and corrupt practices that foster mutual distrust. This is an acute p roblem in most developing countries. Wrong valuation and classification decisions may constitute a non -tariff barrier to trade.
WTO tried to address the issue through guideline of Advance ruling or biding ruling incorporated in standard provision 9.9 of Th e International Convention on the Simplification and Harmonisation of Customs Procedures (Revised Kyoto Convention). Article 3 of the Trade Facilitation agreement (TFA) has provision of advance ruling and Bangladesh gave its accent to TFA.
The proposed WTO text on advance rulings stipulates the following requirements: (1) the authority must publish the information that should be provided in a request for a ruling; (2) the issuing authority must publish the deadline by which it will issue advance rulings an d the length of time rulings will be valid; (3) rulings must be binding for a "reasonable" period of time unless facts or circumstances supporting the original rulings change; (4) if a ruling is modified or revoked, the issuing authority must notify the ap plicant promptly in writing explaining the basis for its decision in writing; (5) if an applicant requests, the issuing authority must provide an administrative review of a ruling or decision to revoke or modify a ruling; (6) the issuing authority must try to make available information on advance rulings that it